UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF
REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-05986
T. Rowe Price Index Trust, Inc. |
|
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) |
100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 |
|
(Address of principal executive offices) |
David Oestreicher |
100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 |
|
(Name and address of agent for service) |
Registrants telephone number, including area
code: (410) 345-2000
Date of fiscal year end: December 31
Date of reporting period: June 30, 2017
Item 1. Report to Shareholders
![]() |
Extended Equity Market Index Fund
|
June 30, 2017 |
The views and opinions in this report were current as of June 30, 2017. They are not guarantees of performance or investment results and should not be taken as investment advice. Investment decisions reflect a variety of factors, and the managers reserve the right to change their views about individual stocks, sectors, and the markets at any time. As a result, the views expressed should not be relied upon as a forecast of the funds future investment intent. The report is certified under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires mutual funds and other public companies to affirm that, to the best of their knowledge, the information in their financial reports is fairly and accurately stated in all material respects.
REPORTS ON THE WEB
Sign up for our Email Program, and you can begin to receive updated fund reports and prospectuses online rather than through the mail. Log in to your account at troweprice.com for more information.
Managers Letter
Fellow Shareholders
Signs of stronger economic growth and a rebound in corporate earnings lifted stock markets worldwide in the first half of 2017. In the U.S., stocks surged as earnings rebounded after several quarters of declining profits and investors continued to pin their hopes on business-friendly policies under President Donald Trump. The improving global backdrop outweighed concerns about rising U.S. interest rates, geopolitical tensions in a few countries, and the Trump administrations ability to deliver on its agenda. The major U.S. stock market benchmarks rose to record levels in June. In this supportive environment, the Equity Index 500 Fund, Total Equity Market Index Fund, and Extended Equity Market Index Fund each recorded positive results for the period ended June 30, 2017.
MARKET ENVIRONMENT
U.S. stocks continued to surge in the first six months of the year. Strong corporate earnings growth in the first quarter helped to push the profits for S&P 500-listed companies higher, a welcome turnaround after five quarters of earnings declines that began in 2015. U.S. stocks continued their ascent into the second quarter, as the S&P 500 rose to record highs by June. The market generally shrugged off lackluster first-quarter economic growth, two interest rate increases from the Federal Reserve, President Trumps domestic political controversies, and Republicans failed attempts to repeal the Affordable Care Act. Growth stocks outpaced value across the capitalization spectrum. Mid- and small-cap stocks lagged large-caps.
In the large-cap universe, as measured by the S&P 500 Index, most sectors produced positive returns. Information technology shares fared best in the last six months, though their performance in June weakened due to concerns about valuations. Health care stocks also did very well, with biotechnology shares spiking late in the period because of reduced concerns about new drug pricing regulations. Consumer discretionary stocks outperformed the S&P 500 by a smaller margin, whereas industrials and business services and materials stocks performed in line with the broad market. Financial stocks underperformed during the six-month period, despite strength in June following news that major banks passed the Feds stress tests, which will allow them to return capital to shareholders. Energy stocks fell sharply and oil prices declined, as increased U.S. production offset the effects of an OPEC production cut that took effect at the beginning of 2017. An extension of the existing production cut until March 2018 disappointed investors looking for a larger reduction. Telecommunication services shares also declined.
SUMMARY OF INVESTMENT STRATEGIES
T. Rowe Prices Equity Market Index Funds are designed for investors who want to harness the potential for long-term capital appreciation from broad exposure to large-cap stocks (Equity Index 500 Fund), small- and mid-cap stocks (Extended Equity Market Index Fund), or the entire U.S. stock market (Total Equity Market Index Fund). These funds could serve as core holdings in an investors portfolio, as they offer attributes that many investors will find appealing.
● | They are well diversified,
which can reduce the potentially negative impact of a given stock on the
entire portfolio. The Equity Index 500 Fund invests in all S&P 500
Index stocks, while the Total Equity Market Index Fund and the Extended
Equity Market Index Fund owned 1,403 and 1,620 holdings, respectively, as
of June 30, 2017. (Diversification cannot assure a profit or protect
against loss in a declining market.) |
● | They tend to closely track
their benchmarks. The Equity Index 500 Fund uses a full replication
strategy so that the weightings of our holdings match those of the S&P
500 Index. The Total Equity Market Index Fund and the Extended Equity
Market Index Fund use a sampling strategy to approximate the sector
allocations, price-to-earnings ratio, and other attributes of their
benchmarks. We occasionally invest in securities such as futures and
exchange-traded funds so that the index funds can accommodate cash flows
and remain fully invested. |
● | They offer instant, broad
exposure to different sectors of the stock market, and each funds sector
allocations are consistent with its benchmarks sector breakdown. As such,
changes in the funds sector diversification and other overall
characteristics reflect changes in the composition of the indexes, rather
than strategic shifts that are typical of an actively managed fund. Since
the funds are designed to track their respective indexes, they do not have
the flexibility to shift assets toward stocks or sectors that are rising
or away from those that are declining. |
● | Their expenses are generally low, which allows investors to retain more of their returns. |
Equity Index 500
Fund
The Equity Index 500 Fund returned
9.19% in the six months ended June 30, 2017, versus 9.34% for the S&P 500
Index. (Performance will vary for the I Class shares, reflecting their different
fee structure.) Fund performance tends to
slightly lag that of the broader index due to operating and management expenses.
The majority of the names in the index recorded positive results for the
six-month period. Information technology, health care, and consumer
discretionary led. Energy and telecommunication services were the only two
sectors to post losses.
Information technology was lifted by increasing levels of consumer and business confidence as well as strong earnings from large technology companies. Visa and Google parent Alphabet were standout performers. (Please refer to the funds portfolio of investments for a complete list of holdings and the amount each represents in the portfolio.)
Gains in the financials sector were strongest in the insurance industry, which is not as sensitive to interest rates as traditional banks. Marsh & McLennan and Willis Towers Watson were strong. During the period, two interest rate increases were announced by the Federal Reserve.
Telecommunication services lagged in the period. Fierce competition, a challenging regulatory environment, as well as a higher interest rate environment hurt the sector. Verizon Communications and AT&T performed poorly.
S&P Dow Jones Indices authorized several additions to and deletions from the composition of the S&P 500 Index during the period. Please see The Evolving S&P 500 Index table on page 13 for a complete list of index changes.
Total Equity Market Index
Fund
The Total Equity Market Index Fund
returned 8.99% for the six months ended June 30, 2017, versus 8.97% for its
benchmark, the S&P Total Market Index.
Fund performance tends to slightly lag that of the benchmark because of the funds operating and management expenses; however, the funds sample of stocks slightly outperformed the index in our reporting period. The S&P Total Market Index represents the entire U.S. stock market. It combines the S&P 500 and S&P Completion Indexes, offering broad exposure to large-, mid-, small-, and micro-cap companies. Stocks in the S&P 500 represent over 75% of the S&P Total Market Indexs overall market value.
As with the S&P 500, the largest holdings of the S&P Total Market Index have the greatest influence on the funds performance. In addition, the sector percentage weightings of the two benchmarks are similar, although the S&P Total Market Index provides modestly greater exposure to financials than the S&P 500 and less exposure to consumer staples. The performance of the S&P Total Market Index was generally in line with the S&P 500.
Extended Equity Market Index
Fund
The Extended Equity Market Index Fund
returned 7.40% for the six months ended June 30, 2017, generally in line with
its benchmark, the S&P Completion Index. Fund performance tends to slightly
lag that of the benchmark because of the funds operating and management
expenses; however, the funds sample of stocks slightly outperformed the index
in our reporting period. The S&P Completion Index, a subset of the S&P
Total Market Index, excludes all S&P 500 stocks. The index covers more than
3,400 companies and provides exposure to mid-, small-, and micro-cap
companies.
During the reporting period, the fund held derivatives as a cash management tool, not to enhance investment outcomes.
Health care, information technology, consumer discretionary, and materials were the leading sectors. Energy and consumer staples were the biggest laggards. The health care sector was a notable area of strength in the first half of 2017. While health care reform and drug pricing remained key areas of discussion, there have been few concrete policy changes. Gains in information technology were driven by a rotation into growth stocks and Internet stocks. Energy stocks lagged due to continued low energy prices and oversupply.
Some of the funds holdings that performed well included medical device company Medtronic, open source software company Red Hat, and cigarette maker Philip Morris International. Marathon Oil and grocer Kroger did not perform well. (Please refer to the funds portfolio of investments for a complete list of holdings and the amount each represents in the portfolio.)
OUTLOOK
The outlook for the U.S. stock market is guardedly optimistic. The combination of U.S. policy instability and elevated valuations lends itself to heightened volatility and muted returns in the near term. The first half of the year saw U.S. stocks trade at record levels, partly based on fiscal policies promised by President Trump, and any setback regarding their passage could dampen the markets performance. Risks for the U.S. and global economic picture include monetary policy missteps and volatile energy prices, which remain vulnerable to a longer-term imbalance between supply and demand. U.S. economic growth is likely to remain steady, but on course to remain around 2%. In addition, we expect interest rates to continue to rise but not on a preset course.
Thank you for investing with T. Rowe Price.
Respectfully submitted,
Ken D. Uematsu
Chairman of the Investment Advisory Committee, Equity Index
500 Fund, Extended Equity Market Index Fund, and Total Equity Market Index
Fund
July 20, 2017
The committee chairman has day-to-day responsibility for managing the portfolios and works with committee members in developing and executing the funds investment programs.
RISKS OF INVESTING
As with all stock mutual funds, the funds share prices can fall because of weakness in the stock market, a particular industry, or specific holdings. Stock markets can decline for many reasons, including adverse political or economic developments, changes in investor psychology, or heavy institutional selling. The prospects for an industry or company may deteriorate because of a variety of factors, including disappointing earnings or changes in the competitive environment.
GLOSSARY
Investment-weighted median market capitalization: The investment-weighted midpoint market capitalization (shares outstanding multiplied by current price) representing a typical security in a portfolio. An investment-weighted median represents the breakpoint where 50% of the values are above and 50% of the values are below based on portfolio weight.
Price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio: A valuation measure calculated by dividing the price of a stock by its reported earnings per share. The ratio is a measure of how much investors are willing to pay for the companys earnings.
Projected earnings growth rate (IBES): A companys expected earnings per share growth rate for a given time period based on the forecast from the Institutional Brokers Estimate System, which is commonly referred to as IBES.
S&P 500 Index: An unmanaged index that tracks the stocks of 500 primarily large-cap U.S. companies.
S&P Completion Index: Tracks the performance of the U.S. stocks not included in the S&P 500, which are primarily small- and mid-capitalization stocks. The index includes approximately 3,300 stocks.
S&P Total Market Index: Tracks the performance of a broad spectrum of small-, mid-, and large-capitalization U.S. stocks. Because the largest stocks in the index carry the most weight, large-capitalization stocks make up a substantial majority of the S&P Total Market Indexs value. The index includes approximately 3,800 stocks.
Performance and Expenses
Growth of $10,000 |
This chart shows the value of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the fund over the past 10 fiscal year periods or since inception (for funds lacking 10-year records). The result is compared with benchmarks, which may include a broad-based market index and a peer group average or index. Market indexes do not include expenses, which are deducted from fund returns as well as mutual fund averages and indexes.
Growth of $10,000 |
This chart shows the value of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the fund over the past 10 fiscal year periods or since inception (for funds lacking 10-year records). The result is compared with benchmarks, which may include a broad-based market index and a peer group average or index. Market indexes do not include expenses, which are deducted from fund returns as well as mutual fund averages and indexes.
Growth of $10,000 |
This chart shows the value of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the fund over the past 10 fiscal year periods or since inception (for funds lacking 10-year records). The result is compared with benchmarks, which may include a broad-based market index and a peer group average or index. Market indexes do not include expenses, which are deducted from fund returns as well as mutual fund averages and indexes.
Fund Expense Example |
As a mutual fund shareholder, you may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees, and other fund expenses. The following example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the most recent six-month period and held for the entire period.
Please note that the Equity Index 500 Fund has two share classes: The original share class (Investor Class) charges no distribution and service (12b-1) fee, and I Class shares are also available to institutionally oriented clients and impose no 12b-1 or administrative fee payment. Each share class is presented separately in the table.
Actual Expenses
The first line of the following table (Actual) provides
information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the
information on this line, together with your account balance, to estimate the
expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by
$1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then
multiply the result by the number on the first line under the heading Expenses
Paid During Period to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during
this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison
Purposes
The information on the second
line of the table (Hypothetical) is based on hypothetical account values and
expenses derived from the funds actual expense ratio and an assumed 5% per year
rate of return before expenses (not the funds actual return). You may compare
the ongoing costs of investing in the fund with other funds by contrasting this
5% hypothetical example and the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the
shareholder reports of the other funds. The hypothetical account values and
expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or
expenses you paid for the period.
Note: T. Rowe Price charges an account service fee that is not included in the accompanying table. The account service fee is charged on a quarterly basis, usually during the last week of a calendar quarter, and applies to accounts with balances below $10,000 on the day of the assessment. The fee is charged to accounts that fall below $10,000 for any reason, including market fluctuations, redemptions, or exchanges. When an account with less than $10,000 is closed either through redemption or exchange, the fee is charged and deducted from the proceeds. The fee applies to IRAs but not to retirement plans directly registered with T. Rowe Price Services or accounts maintained by intermediaries through NSCC® Networking. If you are subject to the fee, keep it in mind when you are estimating the ongoing expenses of investing in the fund and when comparing the expenses of this fund with other funds.
You should also be aware that the expenses shown in the table highlight only your ongoing costs and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. To the extent a fund charges transaction costs, however, the total cost of owning that fund is higher.
Unaudited
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Unaudited
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Unaudited
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Unaudited
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Unaudited
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Unaudited
Notes to Financial Statements |
T. Rowe Price Index Trust, Inc. (the corporation), is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). The Extended Equity Market Index Fund (the fund) is a diversified, open-end management investment company established by the corporation. The fund seeks to track the performance of a benchmark index that measures the investment return of small- and mid-capitalization U.S. stocks.
NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Preparation The fund is an investment company and follows accounting and reporting guidance in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 (ASC 946). The accompanying financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), including, but not limited to, ASC 946. GAAP requires the use of estimates made by management. Management believes that estimates and valuations are appropriate; however, actual results may differ from those estimates, and the valuations reflected in the accompanying financial statements may differ from the value ultimately realized upon sale or maturity.
Investment Transactions, Investment Income, and Distributions Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis. Premiums and discounts on debt securities are amortized for financial reporting purposes. Dividends received from mutual fund investments are reflected as dividend income; capital gain distributions are reflected as realized gain/loss. Dividend income and capital gain distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income tax-related interest and penalties, if incurred, would be recorded as income tax expense. Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Realized gains and losses are reported on the identified cost basis. Distributions from REITs are initially recorded as dividend income and, to the extent such represent a return of capital or capital gain for tax purposes, are reclassified when such information becomes available. Income distributions are declared and paid annually. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. A capital gain distribution may also be declared and paid by the fund annually.
Redemption Fees A 0.5% fee is assessed on redemptions of fund shares held for 90 days or less to deter short-term trading and to protect the interests of long-term shareholders. Redemption fees are withheld from proceeds that shareholders receive from the sale or exchange of fund shares. The fees are paid to the fund and are recorded as an increase to paid-in capital. The fees may cause the redemption price per share to differ from the net asset value per share.
New Accounting Guidance In October 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a new rule, Investment Company Reporting Modernization, which, among other provisions, amends Regulation S-X to require standardized, enhanced disclosures, particularly related to derivatives, in investment company financial statements. Compliance with the guidance is effective for financial statements related to periods ending on or after August 1, 2017; adoption will have no effect on the funds net assets or results of operations.
NOTE 2 - VALUATION
The funds financial instruments are valued and its net asset value (NAV) per share is computed at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), normally 4 p.m. ET, each day the NYSE is open for business. However, the NAV per share may be calculated at a time other than the normal close of the NYSE if trading on the NYSE is restricted, if the NYSE closes earlier, or as may be permitted by the SEC.
Fair Value The funds financial instruments are reported at fair value, which GAAP defines as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The T. Rowe Price Valuation Committee (the Valuation Committee) is an internal committee that has been delegated certain responsibilities by the funds Board of Directors (the Board) to ensure that financial instruments are appropriately priced at fair value in accordance with GAAP and the 1940 Act. Subject to oversight by the Board, the Valuation Committee develops and oversees pricing-related policies and procedures and approves all fair value determinations. Specifically, the Valuation Committee establishes procedures to value securities; determines pricing techniques, sources, and persons eligible to effect fair value pricing actions; oversees the selection, services, and performance of pricing vendors; oversees valuation-related business continuity practices; and provides guidance on internal controls and valuation-related matters. The Valuation Committee reports to the Board and has representation from legal, portfolio management and trading, operations, risk management, and the funds treasurer.
Various valuation techniques and inputs are used to determine the fair value of financial instruments. GAAP establishes the following fair value hierarchy that categorizes the inputs used to measure fair value:
Level 1 quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical financial instruments that the fund can access at the reporting date
Level 2 inputs other than Level 1 quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly (including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar financial instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar financial instruments in inactive markets, interest rates and yield curves, implied volatilities, and credit spreads)
Level 3 unobservable inputs
Observable inputs are developed using market data, such as publicly available information about actual events or transactions, and reflect the assumptions that market participants would use to price the financial instrument. Unobservable inputs are those for which market data are not available and are developed using the best information available about the assumptions that market participants would use to price the financial instrument. GAAP requires valuation techniques to maximize the use of relevant observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. When multiple inputs are used to derive fair value, the financial instrument is assigned to the level within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest-level input that is significant to the fair value of the financial instrument. Input levels are not necessarily an indication of the risk or liquidity associated with financial instruments at that level but rather the degree of judgment used in determining those values.
Valuation Techniques Equity securities listed or regularly traded on a securities exchange or in the over-the-counter (OTC) market are valued at the last quoted sale price or, for certain markets, the official closing price at the time the valuations are made. OTC Bulletin Board securities are valued at the mean of the closing bid and asked prices. A security that is listed or traded on more than one exchange is valued at the quotation on the exchange determined to be the primary market for such security. Listed securities not traded on a particular day are valued at the mean of the closing bid and asked prices. Actively traded equity securities listed on a domestic exchange generally are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. OTC Bulletin Board securities, certain preferred securities, and equity securities traded in inactive markets generally are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Debt securities generally are traded in the OTC market. Debt securities with remaining maturities of less than one year at the time of acquisition generally use amortized cost in local currency to approximate fair value. However, if amortized cost is deemed not to reflect fair value or the fund holds a significant amount of such securities with remaining maturities of more than 60 days, the securities are valued at prices furnished by dealers who make markets in such securities or by an independent pricing service. Generally, debt securities are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Investments in mutual funds are valued at the mutual funds closing NAV per share on the day of valuation and are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Financial futures contracts are valued at closing settlement prices and are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Assets and liabilities other than financial instruments, including short-term receivables and payables, are carried at cost, or estimated realizable value, if less, which approximates fair value.
Thinly traded financial instruments and those for which the above valuation procedures are inappropriate or are deemed not to reflect fair value are stated at fair value as determined in good faith by the Valuation Committee. The objective of any fair value pricing determination is to arrive at a price that could reasonably be expected from a current sale. Financial instruments fair valued by the Valuation Committee are primarily private placements, restricted securities, warrants, rights, and other securities that are not publicly traded.
Subject to oversight by the Board, the Valuation Committee regularly makes good faith judgments to establish and adjust the fair valuations of certain securities as events occur and circumstances warrant. For instance, in determining the fair value of an equity investment with limited market activity, such as a private placement or a thinly traded public company stock, the Valuation Committee considers a variety of factors, which may include, but are not limited to, the issuers business prospects, its financial standing and performance, recent investment transactions in the issuer, new rounds of financing, negotiated transactions of significant size between other investors in the company, relevant market valuations of peer companies, strategic events affecting the company, market liquidity for the issuer, and general economic conditions and events. In consultation with the investment and pricing teams, the Valuation Committee will determine an appropriate valuation technique based on available information, which may include both observable and unobservable inputs. The Valuation Committee typically will afford greatest weight to actual prices in arms length transactions, to the extent they represent orderly transactions between market participants, transaction information can be reliably obtained, and prices are deemed representative of fair value. However, the Valuation Committee may also consider other valuation methods such as market-based valuation multiples; a discount or premium from market value of a similar, freely traded security of the same issuer; or some combination. Fair value determinations are reviewed on a regular basis and updated as information becomes available, including actual purchase and sale transactions of the issue. Because any fair value determination involves a significant amount of judgment, there is a degree of subjectivity inherent in such pricing decisions, and fair value prices determined by the Valuation Committee could differ from those of other market participants. Depending on the relative significance of unobservable inputs, including the valuation technique(s) used, fair valued securities may be categorized in Level 2 or 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Valuation Inputs The following table summarizes the funds financial instruments, based on the inputs used to determine their fair values on June 30, 2017:
There were no material transfers between Levels 1 and 2 during the six months ended June 30, 2017.
Following is a reconciliation of the funds Level 3 holdings for the six months ended June 30, 2017. Gain (loss) reflects both realized and change in unrealized gain/loss on Level 3 holdings during the period, if any, and is included on the accompanying Statement of Operations. The change in unrealized gain/loss on Level 3 instruments held at June 30, 2017, totaled $(215,000) for the six months ended June 30, 2017. Transfers into and out of Level 3 are reflected at the value of the financial instrument at the beginning of the period. During the six months, transfers into Level 3 resulted from a lack of observable market data for the security.
NOTE 3 - DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
During the six months ended June 20, 2017, the fund invested in derivative instruments. As defined by GAAP, a derivative is a financial instrument whose value is derived from an underlying security price, foreign exchange rate, interest rate, index of prices or rates, or other variable; it requires little or no initial investment and permits or requires net settlement. The fund invests in derivatives only if the expected risks and rewards are consistent with its investment objectives, policies, and overall risk profile, as described in its prospectus and Statement of Additional Information. The fund may use derivatives for a variety of purposes, such as seeking to hedge against declines in principal value, increase yield, invest in an asset with greater efficiency and at a lower cost than is possible through direct investment, or to adjust credit exposure. The risks associated with the use of derivatives are different from, and potentially much greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in the instruments on which the derivatives are based. The fund at all times maintains sufficient cash reserves, liquid assets, or other SEC-permitted asset types to cover its settlement obligations under open derivative contracts.
The fund values its derivatives at fair value and recognizes changes in fair value currently in its results of operations. Accordingly, the fund does not follow hedge accounting, even for derivatives employed as economic hedges. Generally, the fund accounts for its derivatives on a gross basis. It does not offset the fair value of derivative liabilities against the fair value of derivative assets on its financial statements, nor does it offset the fair value of derivative instruments against the right to reclaim or obligation to return collateral. As of June 30, 2017, the fund held equity futures with cumulative unrealized loss of $54,000; the value reflected on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities is the related unsettled variation margin.
Additionally, during the six months ended June 30, 2017, the fund recognized $915,000 of realized gain on Futures and a $267,000 change in unrealized gain/loss on Futures related to its investments in equity derivatives; such amounts are included on the accompanying Statement of Operations.
Counterparty Risk and Collateral The fund invests in exchange-traded or centrally cleared derivative contracts, such as futures, exchange-traded options, and centrally cleared swaps. Counterparty risk on such derivatives is minimal because the clearinghouse provides protection against counterparty defaults. For futures and centrally cleared swaps, the fund is required to deposit collateral in an amount specified by the clearinghouse and the clearing firm (margin requirement), and the margin requirement must be maintained over the life of the contract. Each clearinghouse and clearing firm, in its sole discretion, may adjust the margin requirements applicable to the fund.
Collateral may be in the form of cash or debt securities issued by the U.S. government or related agencies. Cash posted by the fund is reflected as cash deposits in the accompanying financial statements and generally is restricted from withdrawal by the fund; securities posted by the fund are so noted in the accompanying Portfolio of Investments; both remain in the funds assets. As of June 30, 2017, securities valued at $1,243,000 had been posted by the fund for exchange-traded and/or centrally cleared derivatives.
Futures Contracts The fund is subject to equity price risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives and uses futures contracts to help manage such risk. The fund may enter into futures contracts as an efficient means of maintaining liquidity while being invested in the market, to facilitate trading, or to reduce transaction costs. A futures contract provides for the future sale by one party and purchase by another of a specified amount of a specific underlying financial instrument at an agreed-upon price, date, time, and place. The fund currently invests only in exchange-traded futures, which generally are standardized as to maturity date, underlying financial instrument, and other contract terms. Payments are made or received by the fund each day to settle daily fluctuations in the value of the contract (variation margin), which reflect changes in the value of the underlying financial instrument. Variation margin is recorded as unrealized gain or loss until the contract is closed. The value of a futures contract included in net assets is the amount of unsettled variation margin; net variation margin receivable is reflected as an asset, and net variation margin payable is reflected as a liability on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Risks related to the use of futures contracts include possible illiquidity of the futures markets, contract prices that can be highly volatile and imperfectly correlated to movements in hedged security values, and potential losses in excess of the funds initial investment. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the volume of the funds activity in futures, based on underlying notional amounts, was generally between 2% and 6% of net assets.
NOTE 4 - OTHER INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS
Consistent with its investment objective, the fund engages in the following practices to manage exposure to certain risks and/or to enhance performance. The investment objective, policies, program, and risk factors of the fund are described more fully in the funds prospectus and Statement of Additional Information.
Securities Lending The fund may lend its securities to approved brokers to earn additional income. Its securities lending activities are administered by a lending agent in accordance with a securities lending agreement. Security loans generally do not have stated maturity dates, and the fund may recall a security at any time. The fund receives collateral in the form of cash or U.S. government securities, valued at 102% to 105% of the value of the securities on loan. Collateral is maintained over the life of the loan in an amount not less than the value of loaned securities; any additional collateral required due to changes in security values is delivered to the fund the next business day. Cash collateral is invested by the lending agent(s) in accordance with investment guidelines approved by fund management. Additionally, the lending agent indemnifies the fund against losses resulting from borrower default. Although risk is mitigated by the collateral and indemnification, the fund could experience a delay in recovering its securities and a possible loss of income or value if the borrower fails to return the securities, collateral investments decline in value, and the lending agent fails to perform. Securities lending revenue consists of earnings on invested collateral and borrowing fees, net of any rebates to the borrower, compensation to the lending agent, and other administrative costs. In accordance with GAAP, investments made with cash collateral are reflected in the accompanying financial statements, but collateral received in the form of securities is not. At June 30, 2017, the value of loaned securities was $114,381,000; the value of cash collateral and related investments was $117,567,000.
Other Purchases and sales of portfolio securities other than short-term securities aggregated $71,042,000 and $76,363,000, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2017.
NOTE 5 - FEDERAL INCOME TAXES
No provision for federal income taxes is required since the fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code and distribute to shareholders all of its taxable income and gains. Distributions determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations may differ in amount or character from net investment income and realized gains for financial reporting purposes. Financial reporting records are adjusted for permanent book/tax differences to reflect tax character but are not adjusted for temporary differences. The amount and character of tax-basis distributions and composition of net assets are finalized at fiscal year-end; accordingly, tax-basis balances have not been determined as of the date of this report.
At June 30, 2017, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was $641,752,000. Net unrealized gain aggregated $294,303,000 at period-end, of which $322,786,000 related to appreciated investments and $28,483,000 related to depreciated investments.
NOTE 6 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The fund is managed by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Price Associates), a wholly owned subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (Price Group). The investment management and administrative agreement between the fund and Price Associates provides for an all-inclusive annual fee equal to 0.35% of the funds average daily net assets. The fee is computed daily and paid monthly. The all-inclusive fee covers investment management, shareholder servicing, transfer agency, accounting, and custody services provided to the fund, as well as fund directors fees and expenses. Interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, and other non-recurring expenses permitted by the investment management agreement are paid directly by the fund.
Additionally, the fund is one of several mutual funds in which certain college savings plans managed by Price Associates may invest. As approved by the funds Board of Directors, shareholder servicing costs associated with each college savings plan are allocated to the fund in proportion to the average daily value of its shares owned by the college savings plan. Shareholder servicing costs allocated to the fund are borne by Price Associates, pursuant to the funds all-inclusive fee agreement. At June 30, 2017, approximately 1% of the outstanding shares of the fund were held by college savings plans.
The fund may invest in the T. Rowe Price Government Reserve Fund, the T. Rowe Price Treasury Reserve Fund, or the T. Rowe Price Short-Term Fund (collectively, the Price Reserve Funds), open-end management investment companies managed by Price Associates and considered affiliates of the fund. The Price Reserve Funds are offered as short-term investment options to mutual funds, trusts, and other accounts managed by Price Associates or its affiliates and are not available for direct purchase by members of the public. The Price Reserve Funds pay no investment management fees.
The fund may participate in securities purchase and sale transactions with other funds or accounts advised by Price Associates (cross trades), in accordance with procedures adopted by the funds Board and Securities and Exchange Commission rules, which require, among other things, that such purchase and sale cross trades be effected at the independent current market price of the security. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the fund had no purchases or sales cross trades with other funds or accounts advised by Price Associates.
Information on Proxy Voting Policies, Procedures, and Records |
A description of the policies and procedures used by T. Rowe Price funds and portfolios to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available in each funds Statement of Additional Information. You may request this document by calling 1-800-225-5132 or by accessing the SECs website, sec.gov.
The description of our proxy voting policies and procedures is also available on our corporate website. To access it, please visit the following Web page:
https://www3.troweprice.com/usis/corporate/en/utility/policies.html
Scroll down to the section near the bottom of the page that says, Proxy Voting Policies. Click on the Proxy Voting Policies link in the shaded box.
Each funds most recent annual proxy voting record is available on our website and through the SECs website. To access it through T. Rowe Price, visit the website location shown above, and scroll down to the section near the bottom of the page that says, Proxy Voting Records. Click on the Proxy Voting Records link in the shaded box.
How to Obtain Quarterly Portfolio Holdings |
The fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The funds Form N-Q is available electronically on the SECs website (sec.gov); hard copies may be reviewed and copied at the SECs Public Reference Room, 100 F St. N.E., Washington, DC 20549. For more information on the Public Reference Room, call 1-800-SEC-0330.
Approval of Investment Management Agreement |
Each year, the funds Board of Directors (Board) considers the continuation of the investment management agreement (Advisory Contract) between the fund and its investment advisor, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Advisor). In that regard, at an in-person meeting held on March 67, 2017 (Meeting), the Board, including a majority of the funds independent directors, approved the continuation of the funds Advisory Contract. At the Meeting, the Board considered the factors and reached the conclusions described below relating to the selection of the Advisor and the approval of the Advisory Contract. The independent directors were assisted in their evaluation of the Advisory Contract by independent legal counsel from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately.
In providing information to the Board, the Advisor was guided by a detailed set of requests for information submitted by independent legal counsel on behalf of the independent directors. In considering and approving the Advisory Contract, the Board considered the information it believed was relevant, including, but not limited to, the information discussed below. The Board considered not only the specific information presented in connection with the Meeting but also the knowledge gained over time through interaction with the Advisor about various topics. The Board meets regularly and, at each of its meetings, covers an extensive agenda of topics and materials and considers factors that are relevant to its annual consideration of the renewal of the T. Rowe Price funds advisory contracts, including performance and the services and support provided to the funds and their shareholders.
Services Provided by the Advisor
The Board considered the
nature, quality, and extent of the services provided to the fund by the Advisor.
These services included, but were not limited to, directing the funds
investments in accordance with its investment program and the overall management
of the funds portfolio, as well as a variety of related activities such as
financial, investment operations, and administrative services; compliance;
maintaining the funds records and registrations; and shareholder
communications. The Board also reviewed the background and experience of the
Advisors senior management team and investment personnel involved in the
management of the fund, as well as the Advisors compliance record. The Board
concluded that it was satisfied with the nature, quality, and extent of the
services provided by the Advisor.
Investment Performance of the Fund
The Board took into
account discussions with the Advisor and reports that it receives throughout the
year relating to fund performance. In connection with the Meeting, the Board
reviewed the funds net annualized total returns for the 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, and
10-year periods as of September 30, 2016, and compared these returns with the
performance of a peer group of funds with similar investment programs and a wide
variety of other previously agreed-upon comparable performance measures and
market data, including those supplied by Broadridge, which is an independent
provider of mutual fund data.
On the basis of this evaluation and the Boards ongoing review of investment results, and factoring in the relative market conditions during certain of the performance periods, the Board concluded that the funds performance was satisfactory.
Costs, Benefits, Profits, and Economies
of
Scale
The Board reviewed detailed information regarding the revenues received
by the Advisor under the Advisory Contract and other benefits that the Advisor
(and its affiliates) may have realized from its relationship with the fund,
including any research received under soft dollar agreements and
commission-sharing arrangements with broker-dealers. The Board considered that
the Advisor may receive some benefit from soft-dollar arrangements pursuant to
which research is received from broker-dealers that execute the funds portfolio
transactions. The Board received information on the estimated costs incurred and
profits realized by the Advisor from managing the T. Rowe Price funds. The Board
also reviewed estimates of the profits realized from managing the fund in
particular, and the Board concluded that the Advisors profits were reasonable
in light of the services provided to the fund.
The Board also considered whether the fund benefits under the fee levels set forth in the Advisory Contract from any economies of scale realized by the Advisor. Under the Advisory Contract, the fund pays the Advisor a single fee, or all-inclusive management fee, which is based on the funds average daily net assets. The all-inclusive management fee includes investment management services and provides for the Advisor to pay all of the funds ordinary, recurring operating expenses except for interest, taxes, portfolio transaction fees, and any nonrecurring extraordinary expenses that may arise. The Board concluded that, based on the profitability data it reviewed and consistent with this all-inclusive management fee structure, the Advisory Contract provided for a reasonable sharing of any benefits from economies of scale with the fund.
Fees and Expenses
The Board was provided with information regarding industry
trends in management fees and expenses. Among other things, the Board reviewed
data for peer groups that were compiled by Broadridge, which compared: (i)
contractual management fees, total expenses, actual management fees, and
non-management expenses of the fund with a group of competitor funds selected by
Broadridge (Expense Group) and (ii) total expenses, actual management fees, and
non-management expenses of the fund with a broader set of funds within the
Lipper investment classification (Expense Universe). The Board considered the
funds contractual management fee rate, actual management fee rate (which
reflects the management fees actually received from the fund by the Advisor
after paying the funds operating expenses, as well as any applicable waivers,
reductions, or reimbursements), operating expenses, and total expenses (which
reflects the net total expense ratio of the fund after any waivers, reductions,
or reimbursements) in comparison with the information for the Broadridge peer
groups. Broadridge generally constructed the peer groups by seeking the most
comparable funds based on similar investment classifications and objectives, expense structure, asset size, and
operating components and attributes and ranked funds into quintiles, with the
first quintile representing the funds with the lowest relative expenses and the
fifth quintile representing the funds with the highest relative expenses. The
information provided to the Board indicated that the funds contractual
management fee ranked in the fifth quintile (Expense Group), the funds actual
management fee rate ranked in the fifth quintile (Expense Group and Expense
Universe), and the funds total expenses ranked in the second and third
quintiles (Expense Group) and second and fourth quintiles (Expense
Universe).
The Board also reviewed the fee schedules for institutional accounts and private accounts with similar mandates that are advised or subadvised by the Advisor and its affiliates. Management provided the Board with information about the Advisors responsibilities and services provided to subadvisory and other institutional account clients, including information about how the requirements and economics of the institutional business are fundamentally different from those of the mutual fund business. The Board considered information showing that the Advisors mutual fund business is generally more complex from a business and compliance perspective than its institutional account business and considered various relevant factors, such as the broader scope of operations and oversight, more extensive shareholder communication infrastructure, greater asset flows, heightened business risks, and differences in applicable laws and regulations associated with the Advisors proprietary mutual fund business. In assessing the reasonableness of the funds management fee rate, the Board considered the differences in the nature of the services required for the Advisor to manage its mutual fund business versus managing a discrete pool of assets as a subadvisor to another institutions mutual fund or for an institutional account and that the Advisor generally performs significant additional services and assumes greater risk in managing the fund and other T. Rowe Price funds than it does for institutional account clients.
On the basis of the information provided and the factors considered, the Board concluded that the fees paid by the fund under the Advisory Contract are reasonable.
Approval of the Advisory Contract
As noted, the Board
approved the continuation of the Advisory Contract. No single factor was
considered in isolation or to be determinative to the decision. Rather, the
Board concluded, in light of a weighting and balancing of all factors
considered, that it was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders
for the Board to approve the continuation of the Advisory Contract (including
the fees to be charged for services thereunder).
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
A code of ethics, as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR, applicable to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions is filed as an exhibit to the registrants annual Form N-CSR. No substantive amendments were approved or waivers were granted to this code of ethics during the registrants most recent fiscal half-year.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Disclosure required in registrants annual Form N-CSR.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Disclosure required in registrants annual Form N-CSR.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable.
Item 6. Investments.
(a) Not applicable. The complete schedule of investments is included in Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not applicable.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the registrants disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of this filing and have concluded that the registrants disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of that date, in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported timely.
(b) The registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer are aware of no change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants second fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits.
(a)(1) The registrants code of ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is filed with the registrants annual Form N-CSR.
(2) Separate certifications by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, are attached.
(3) Written solicitation to repurchase securities issued by closed-end companies: not applicable.
(b) A certification by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, is attached.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
T. Rowe Price Index Trust, Inc.
By | /s/ Edward C. Bernard | |||||
Edward C. Bernard | ||||||
Principal Executive Officer | ||||||
Date | August 17, 2017 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By | /s/ Edward C. Bernard | |||||
Edward C. Bernard | ||||||
Principal Executive Officer | ||||||
Date | August 17, 2017 | |||||
By | /s/ Catherine D. Mathews | |||||
Catherine D. Mathews | ||||||
Principal Financial Officer | ||||||
Date | August 17, 2017 |
Item 12(a)(2).
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Edward C. Bernard, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund; | |||
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; | |||
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; | |||
4. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have: | |||
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |||
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |||
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and | |||
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and | |||
5. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |||
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and | |||
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: August 17, 2017 | /s/ Edward C. Bernard |
Edward C. Bernard | |
Principal Executive Officer |
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Catherine D. Mathews, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund; | |||
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; | |||
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; | |||
4. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have: | |||
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |||
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |||
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and | |||
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and | |||
5. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |||
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and | |||
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: August 17, 2017 | /s/ Catherine D. Mathews |
Catherine D. Mathews | |
Principal Financial Officer |
Item 12(b).
CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 | ||
Name of Issuer: T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund | ||
In connection with the Report on Form N-CSR for the above named Issuer, the undersigned hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that: | ||
1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; | |
2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer. |
Date: August 17, 2017 | /s/ Edward C. Bernard |
Edward C. Bernard | |
Principal Executive Officer | |
Date: August 17, 2017 | /s/ Catherine D. Mathews |
Catherine D. Mathews | |
Principal Financial Officer |
7!E
M96YU;0 I%4VQI8V54>7!E $EM9R &8F]U;F1S3V)J8P $
M !28W0Q ! !4;W @;&]N9P 3&5F=&QO;F<
M $)T;VUL;VYG "AP !29VAT;&]N9P A@ #=7)L5$585
M $ !N=6QL5$585 $ !- KTEMZCXOU+*/8U>/@W^<>5[/V/G^/Y-IT7W47+,IN&UNB8DB
MADR\XV"&C 3'E=1$BMA#TTM$4U&!^H!T3W;(YLWZ>KTEMZCXOU+*/8U>/@W^
M<>5[/V/G^/Y-IT7W47+,IN&UNB8DBADR\XV"&C 3'E=1$BMA#TTM$4U&!^H!
MT3W;(YLWZ>KTEMZCXOU+*/8U>/@W^<>5[/V/G^/Y-IT7W47+,IN%-NB8DBAD
MR\XV"&B(3'E=1$BMA#TTM$4U&!^H"]$]VR#=FX6,A:6TLE0R8S H-T3W;,Y'MU_"C].LSV=([O_U_5.@:!H&@A_L6?!G]&K'=)[-1KJ
MY/DN!2G'K[HSK+*UL&!E2,O%&ZM!AL9DW_XX')3CYQUEC^U
'VI<=&@^GZTR:"T>W7\*/TZD]ECN__TO5.@:!H&@A_L&?!
MG]&K'=)[-(]9L0Q8-)!F,B+EP,F$S&T$,'!A4/Y8K A_6'75RHU@7M@$W5T6
M=@[?'L*+\29:\29'D*5N* @ET"U?B,3I0FKQ/Y[DQAO*+>SLWW M5E9N;Z;.
M13
S4:
MZN3Y -\-K,KR.0N,5@'YGN KR^MVG;3%P%S\F&7+V+J\^17O2TPIZO!K+;!S
M+>X&6USF[NXN[+.V/:-A=LE##1,W'J+B:G"%-7Y)(DGY?BJ#0=@S+LDKN2_O
MEY&]"+7N+$V*K8;AD6PV]TFTYQE._&7)REXX*BJH*#T&CM.X
JII$FH #U!NA[MD [-\92=I;0R%%(#%RR1EM
M2(27!&P2R7 3*:A %LXBY26E-",EPS*;G5;HB((87,/.=PEI"I4HQL7WGW5F[FS(
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MX$(8XX*04,F4+ F',#&\T@$$9E^80
M$B+WNNKE+K%KVKV<&8]4JRN_5G=LN]FSD"MHNB8TB="V3-J,\BF$+**>I)+]
MO;\EP9Y-I0OMOLF;7( ./NXM;ZW;-W;2&0A