N-CSR 1 arxmx.htm T. ROWE PRICE EXTENDED EQUITY MARKET INDEX FUND T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund - December 31, 2008


UNITED STATES 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
Washington, D.C. 20549 
 
FORM N-CSR 
 
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED 
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES 
 
 
 
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-5986 
 
T. Rowe Price Index Trust, Inc. 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) 
 
100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 

(Address of principal executive offices) 
 
David Oestreicher 
 100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 

 (Name and address of agent for service) 
 
 
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (410) 345-2000 
 
 
Date of fiscal year end: December 31 
 
 
Date of reporting period: December 31, 2008 




Item 1: Report to Shareholders

T. Rowe Price Annual Report
 Extended Equity Market Index Fund December 31, 2008 

The views and opinions in this report were current as of December 31, 2008. They are not guarantees of performance or investment results and should not be taken as investment advice. Investment decisions reflect a variety of factors, and the managers reserve the right to change their views about individual stocks, sectors, and the markets at any time. As a result, the views expressed should not be relied upon as a forecast of the fund’s future investment intent. The report is certified under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires mutual funds and other public companies to affirm that, to the best of their knowledge, the information in their financial reports is fairly and accurately stated in all material respects.

REPORTS ON THE WEB

Sign up for our E-mail Program, and you can begin to receive updated fund reports and prospectuses online rather than through the mail. Log in to your account at troweprice.com for more information.

Managers’ Letter

Fellow Shareholders

Philosopher George Santayana opined that “those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” The U.S. stock market made history in 2008, but it was the kind of history that investors would prefer not to remember or repeat. A flood of downbeat news—including a global economic downturn, a worsening credit crisis, and an implosion in the financial system—led to a relentless decline in the equity market, resulting in the largest calendar year loss for U.S. stocks in more than 70 years.

HIGHLIGHTS

• U.S. equities suffered profound losses caused by a rapid deterioration in the credit markets and a deepening global downturn.

• The Equity Market Index Funds’ results generally tracked their unmanaged benchmarks.

• Pressures on the U.S. economy mounted, as several major financial institutions collapsed, the housing market continued to deteriorate, and consumer confidence plummeted.

• Our replication and sampling strategies are designed to keep the compositions of the funds similar to those of the benchmarks.

MARKET ENVIRONMENT

The primary factor to the stock market’s nose-dive in 2008 was an increasingly weak economic environment. According to the National Bureau of Economic Research, a recession in the U.S. economy began in December 2007, and economic conditions continued to deteriorate in 2008. About 2.6 million U.S. jobs were lost during the year, the largest drop in absolute numbers since 1945 and the biggest percentage decline since 1982. The housing market continued to sink, resulting in a wave of mortgage delinquencies and foreclosures. Consumers curtailed their spending as record-high gas prices in the first half of the year and economic uncertainty later in the year squeezed household budgets.

The economic slowdown was exacerbated by a liquidity crisis in the credit markets that escalated as the year progressed. The fallout from the subprime mortgage meltdown in 2007 and the persistent downturn in the housing sector caused banks and other financial companies to write off hundreds of billions of dollars in losses from mortgages and mortgage-backed investments. The losses forced many financial institutions to tighten their lending standards and raise capital to rebuild their impaired balance sheets. As a result, the credit markets seized up, making life difficult for companies that rely on the debt markets to fund their growth or run their businesses.






By September, the combination of mortgage write-downs, deteriorating balance sheets, and a lack of liquidity became too much for the financial sector to bear. The watershed event was the bankruptcy filing of the venerable investment firm Lehman Brothers, which set off a chain reaction of bailouts and takeovers in the financial sector. Notable examples included the government takeover of mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the bailout of insurer American International Group, and the fire-sale acquisitions of brokerage firm Merrill Lynch and commercial bank Wachovia by, respectively, Bank of America and Wells Fargo. (Please refer to each fund’s portfolio of investments for a complete listing of holdings and the amount each represents in the portfolio.)

As the degree of instability in the financial system grew increasingly severe, the federal government moved quickly to prevent a collapse through a series of extraordinary measures that included providing emergency funding to banks in exchange for equity stakes, purchasing underperforming assets, and expanding guarantees for bank deposits. The Federal Reserve also did its part to shore up the flagging economy, providing additional liquidity and shifting to a near-zero interest rate policy. The Fed lowered its federal funds rate target to a historically low range of 0.00% to 0.25% in December—uncharted territory for U.S. monetary policy.


Taken together, these detrimental factors put significant downward pressure on the U.S. stock market in 2008. Stocks kicked off the year with their worst quarterly performance since 2002, culminating in the near-bankruptcy of “canary in a coal mine” investment bank Bear Stearns. However, after a buyer emerged for the embattled Wall Street firm, the stock market enjoyed a rally through April and May—that is, until the financial sector reported another series of larger-than-expected losses in June, which sent stocks down sharply. The equity market downturn accelerated in the last few months of the year as the financial sector crumbled and the recession deepened.

For the year, the major stock indexes lost more than a third of their value across all market capitalizations. The S&P 500, a broad measure of large-cap stock performance, returned -37.00% in 2008, while the S&P Completion Index, a barometer of small- and mid-cap issues, returned -38.94%. Value stocks, which underperformed in 2007, held up better than growth shares in 2008.

SUMMARY OF INVESTMENT STRATEGIES

T. Rowe Price’s Equity Market Index Funds are designed for investors who want to harness the potential for long-term capital appreciation from broad exposure to large-cap stocks (Equity Index 500 Fund), small- and mid-cap stocks (Extended Equity Market Index Fund), or the entire U.S. stock market (Total Equity Market Index Fund). These funds could serve as core holdings in an investor’s portfolio because they offer attributes that many investors will find appealing.

• They are well diversified, which can reduce the potentially negative impact of a given stock on the entire portfolio. The Equity Index 500 Fund invests in all S&P 500 Index stocks, while the Total Equity Market Index Fund and the Extended Equity Market Index Fund invested in approximately 1,589 and 1,900 stocks, respectively, as of December 31, 2008.

• They tend to closely track their benchmarks. The Equity Index 500 Fund uses a full replication strategy so that the weightings of our holdings match those of the S&P 500 Index. The Total Equity Market Index Fund and the Extended Equity Market Index Fund use a sampling strategy to approximate the sector allocations, price/earnings ratio, and other attributes of their benchmarks. We invest in securities such as futures and occasionally in exchange-traded funds (ETFs) so that the index funds can accommodate cash flows and remain fully invested.

• They offer instant, broad exposure to different sectors of the stock market, and each fund’s sector allocations are consistent with its benchmark’s sector breakdown. As such, changes in the funds’ sector diversification and other overall characteristics reflect changes in the composition of the indexes, rather than strategic shifts that are typical of an actively managed fund.

• Their expenses are generally very low, which enables investors to retain more of their returns.

Equity Index 500 Fund
As shown in the accompanying table, your fund returned -37.06% in 2008, with much of the decline occurring in the last six months, when the fund returned -28.46%. Both the 6- and 12-month returns were in line with the performance of its benchmark, the S&P 500 Stock Index. Fund performance tends to slightly lag that of the benchmark due to annual operating and management expenses.


Every sector in the S&P 500 posted double-digit declines in 2008. The financials sector of the index suffered the biggest losses, falling by more than 55%. Three of the four largest detractors came from this sector—Bank of America, which struggled with the acquisitions of Merrill Lynch and troubled mortgage lender Countrywide Financial; Citigroup, which reported nearly $60 billion in losses and write-downs during the year; and American International Group, which received a sizable government bailout in the wake of substantial losses and management turnover. Even the largest performance detractor in the portfolio, industrial conglomerate General Electric, fell largely because of weakness in its finance arm, GE Capital. On the positive side, however, tax preparer H&R Block and commercial bank Wells Fargo were among the handful of stocks in the index that advanced for the year.

Information technology stocks, the largest sector weighting in the index, also suffered sharp declines amid reduced consumer and corporate spending on technology. The biggest detractors in the index were bellwethers of the technology industry, including software maker Microsoft, consumer electronics company Apple, online advertising and search firm Google, networking equipment maker Cisco Systems, and semiconductor manufacturer Intel.

The only two sectors in the S&P 500 to gain ground during the first half of the year—energy and materials—were the worst performers over the last six months. In general, this parabolic rise and fall reflected a similar pattern in commodity prices, which rose sharply early in the year and then subsequently collapsed as the global economic downturn tempered demand for commodities. In the energy sector, oil field services provider Schlumberger and energy producer ConocoPhillips were the weakest contributors, while copper producer Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold and agricultural products maker Monsanto had the biggest negative impact in the materials sector.


The consumer staples sector was the only segment in the S&P 500 to decline by less than 20% in 2008. The companies in this sector tend to hold up well in an economic downturn because they provide “necessities”—goods and services that consumers typically buy regardless of economic conditions. The portfolio’s top contributor was discount retailer Wal-Mart, which benefited from a dramatic consumer shift toward lower-cost shopping destinations as the economy contracted. Other top contributors in the consumer staples sector included beer company Anheuser-Busch and gum and candy maker Wrigley, both of which were acquired during the year.

The health care and utilities sectors, which are also considered defensive segments of the market, held up better than the index as a whole. Biotechnology stocks were the best performers in the health care sector, led by a trio of stocks that produced double-digit gains for the year—Amgen, which reported favorable results for its new osteoporosis medication; Gilead Sciences, which gained market share for its industry-leading HIV drug; and Celgene, which generated robust sales from its anemia drug. In the utilities sector, the top contributor was electric utility Southern Co., which benefited from its operations in regulated markets that provide more stable pricing.

Standard & Poor’s authorized 37 changes to the composition of the S&P 500 Index in 2008, most of which occurred in the last six months. Please see the table on page 15 for a complete list of index changes.

Total Equity Market Index Fund


Your fund returned -37.16% in 2008, slightly ahead of the performance of its benchmark, the S&P Total Market Index (see the accompanying table). The bulk of the fund’s decline occurred in the final six months of the year, when it returned -29.26%. Fund performance often trails that of the benchmark slightly due to annual operating and management expenses.

In general, what was true about the performance of the S&P 500 Index was also true about the performance of the S&P Total Market Index. The Total Market Index, which represents the entire U.S. stock market, includes all S&P 500 companies. The S&P 500 represents approximately 75% of the Total Market Index’s overall market value. The largest components of the Total Market Index—as with the S&P 500—have the greatest influence on performance. In addition, the percentage weightings of the major sectors are somewhat similar.


Mirroring the S&P 500, the financials and information technology sectors of the Total Market Index had the biggest negative performance impact in 2008 as the credit crisis weighed on financial stocks and the slowing economy hurt technology shares. Energy and materials stocks also stumbled, particularly in the second half of the year as commodity prices cratered. Consumer staples and health care, which are considered to be the most defensive sectors of the market, held up the best.

Extended Equity Market Index Fund
Your fund returned -38.50% in 2008, slightly ahead of the performance of its benchmark, the S&P Completion Index (see the accompanying table). Virtually all of the fund’s decline occurred in the last six months of the year, when the fund returned -33.49%. Fund performance typically (but not always) trails that of the benchmark slightly due to annual operating and management expenses.


Every sector in the S&P Completion Index fell by more than 20% in 2008. Energy and materials stocks, which were the top performers in the first six months, finished the year as the worst-performing sectors in the index as plummeting commodity prices led to depressed profit margins. Other areas of weakness included consumer discretionary, which fell sharply amid a significant downturn in retail sales, and telecommunication services, which faced an increasingly challenging competitive environment.

The three most defensive sectors in the index— utilities, health care, and consumer staples—posted the smallest declines. Surprisingly, the financials sector of the S&P Completion Index also held up reasonably well despite the damaging impact of the credit crisis. Many smaller banks and financial companies had less exposure to the subprime mortgages and distressed securities that produced substantial losses for many larger financial firms.


OUTLOOK

The stock market will likely continue to face a challenging environment in the first half of 2009. Despite the federal government’s efforts to restore confidence in the financial system, it will take some time before these measures have a meaningful effect on the economy and credit markets. While many observers expect the U.S. economy to be on the road to recovery by the end of 2009, there are many potential pitfalls along the way that could derail or delay this recovery.

This uncertain outlook does not change our mandate—replicating the structure and performance of the S&P indexes to provide you with broad exposure to large-cap stocks, small- and mid-cap equities, and the entire U.S. stock market.

Respectfully submitted,


E. Frederick Bair


Ken D. Uematsu
Cochairmen of the Investment Advisory Committee, Equity Market Index Funds

January 16, 2009

The committee chairmen have day-to-day responsibility for managing the portfolios and work with committee members in developing and executing the funds’ investment program.


RISKS OF INVESTING

As with all stock mutual funds, the funds’ share price can fall because of weakness in the stock market, a particular industry, or specific holdings. Stock markets can decline for many reasons, including adverse political or economic developments, changes in investor psychology, or heavy institutional selling. The prospects for an industry or company may deteriorate because of a variety of factors, including disappointing earnings or changes in the competitive environment.

GLOSSARY

Dow Jones Wilshire 4500 Completion Index: Tracks the performance of all stocks in the Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Composite Index, excluding those in the S&P 500 Stock Index.

Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Composite Index: Tracks the performance of the most active stocks in the broad U.S. market.

Fed funds target rate: An overnight lending rate set by the Federal Reserve and used by banks to meet reserve requirements. Banks also use the fed funds rate as a benchmark for their prime lending rates.

S&P 500 Stock Index: Tracks the stocks of 500 mostly large U.S. companies.

S&P Completion Index: Tracks the performance of the U.S. stocks not included in the S&P 500, which are primarily small- and mid-capitalization stocks. The index includes approximately 4,000 stocks.

S&P Total Market Index: Tracks the performance of a broad spectrum of small-, mid-, and large-capitalization U.S. stocks. Because the largest stocks in the index carry the most weight, large-capitalization stocks make up a substantial majority of the S&P Total Market’s value. The index includes approximately 4,500 stocks. “Standard & Poor’s®”, “S&P®”, “S&P 500®”, “Standard & Poor’s 500”, “500”, “S&P Completion Index”, “S&P Total Market Index”, and “S&P TMI” are marks/trademarks of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., and have been licensed for use by T. Rowe Price. The Product is not sponsored, endorsed, sold, or promoted by Standard & Poor’s, and Standard & Poor’s makes no representation regarding the advisability of investing in the Product.


















Performance and Expenses

GROWTH OF $10,000 

This chart shows the value of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the fund over the past 10 fiscal year periods or since inception (for funds lacking 10-year records). The result is compared with benchmarks, which may include a broad-based market index and a peer group average or index. Market indexes do not include expenses, which are deducted from fund returns as well as mutual fund averages and indexes.





AVERAGE ANNUAL COMPOUND TOTAL RETURN 

This table shows how the fund would have performed each year if its actual (or cumulative) returns for the periods shown had been earned at a constant rate.




GROWTH OF $10,000 

This chart shows the value of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the fund over the past 10 fiscal year periods or since inception (for funds lacking 10-year records). The result is compared with benchmarks, which may include a broad-based market index and a peer group average or index. Market indexes do not include expenses, which are deducted from fund returns as well as mutual fund averages and indexes.





AVERAGE ANNUAL COMPOUND TOTAL RETURN 

This table shows how the fund would have performed each year if its actual (or cumulative) returns for the periods shown had been earned at a constant rate.




GROWTH OF $10,000 

This chart shows the value of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the fund over the past 10 fiscal year periods or since inception (for funds lacking 10-year records). The result is compared with benchmarks, which may include a broad-based market index and a peer group average or index. Market indexes do not include expenses, which are deducted from fund returns as well as mutual fund averages and indexes.





AVERAGE ANNUAL COMPOUND TOTAL RETURN 

This table shows how the fund would have performed each year if its actual (or cumulative) returns for the periods shown had been earned at a constant rate.








FUND EXPENSE EXAMPLE 

As a mutual fund shareholder, you may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees, and other fund expenses. The following example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the most recent six-month period and held for the entire period.

Actual Expenses
The first line of the following table (“Actual”) provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with your account balance, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The information on the second line of the table (“Hypothetical”) is based on hypothetical account values and expenses derived from the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed 5% per year rate of return before expenses (not the fund’s actual return). You may compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund with other funds by contrasting this 5% hypothetical example and the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.

Note: T. Rowe Price charges an account maintenance fee that is not included in the accompanying table. The account maintenance fee is charged on a quarterly basis, usually during the last week of a calendar quarter, and applies to accounts with balances below $10,000 on the day of the assessment. The fee is charged to accounts that fall below $10,000 for any reason, including market fluctuations, redemptions, or exchanges. When an account with less than $10,000 is closed either through redemption or exchange, the fee is charged and deducted from the proceeds. The fee applies to IRA accounts but not to retirement plans directly registered with T. Rowe Price Services or accounts maintained by intermediaries through NSCC® Networking. If you are subject to the fee, keep it in mind when you are estimating the on-going expenses of investing in the fund and when comparing the expenses of this fund with other funds.

You should also be aware that the expenses shown in the table highlight only your ongoing costs and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. To the extent a fund charges transaction costs, however, the total cost of owning that fund is higher.








The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.










































































The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

T. Rowe Price Index Trust, Inc. (the trust), is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). The Extended Equity Market Index Fund (the fund), a diversified, open-end management investment company, is one portfolio established by the trust. The fund commenced operations on January 30, 1998. The fund seeks to match the performance of the U.S. stocks not included in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index®, as represented by the Dow Jones Wilshire 4500 Completion Index.

NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Preparation The accompanying financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require the use of estimates made by fund management. Fund management believes that estimates and security valuations are appropriate; however, actual results may differ from those estimates, and the security valuations reflected in the financial statements may differ from the value the fund ultimately realizes upon sale of the securities.

Investment Transactions, Investment Income, and Distributions Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis. Premiums and discounts on debt securities are amortized for financial reporting purposes. Dividends received from mutual fund investments are reflected as dividend income; capital gain distributions are reflected as realized gain/loss. Dividend income and capital gain distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income tax-related interest and penalties, if incurred, would be recorded as income tax expense. Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Realized gains and losses are reported on the identified cost basis. Payments (“variation margin”) made or received to settle the daily fluctuations in the value of futures contracts are recorded as unrealized gains or losses until the contracts are closed. Unsettled variation margin on futures contracts is reflected as other assets or liabilities, and unrealized gains and losses on futures contracts are reflected as the change in net unrealized gain or loss in the accompanying financial statements. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income distributions are declared and paid on an annual basis. Capital gain distributions, if any, are declared and paid by the fund, typically on an annual basis.

Redemption Fees A 0.5% fee is assessed on redemptions of fund shares held for 90 days or less to deter short-term trading and to protect the interests of long-term shareholders. Redemption fees are withheld from proceeds that shareholders receive from the sale or exchange of fund shares. The fees are paid to the fund, and are recorded as an increase to paid-in capital. The fees may cause the redemption price per share to differ from the net asset value per share.

New Accounting Pronouncements On January 1, 2008, the fund adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), Fair Value Measurements. FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes the framework for measuring fair value, and expands the disclosures of fair value measurements in the financial statements. Adoption of FAS 157 did not have a material impact on the fund’s net assets or results of operations.

In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (FAS 161), Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. FAS 161 requires enhanced disclosures about derivative and hedging activities, including how such activities are accounted for and their effect on financial position, performance and cash flows. Management is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of FAS 161 will have on the fund’s financial statements and related disclosures.

NOTE 2 - VALUATION

The fund’s investments are reported at fair value as defined under FAS 157. The fund values its investments and computes its net asset value per share at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), normally 4 p.m. ET, each day that the NYSE is open for business.

Valuation Methods Equity securities listed or regularly traded on a securities exchange or in the over-the-counter (OTC) market are valued at the last quoted sale price at the time the valuations are made, except for OTC Bulletin Board securities, which are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices. A security that is listed or traded on more than one exchange is valued at the quotation on the exchange determined to be the primary market for such security. Listed securities not traded on a particular day are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices. Debt securities with remaining maturities of less than one year at the time of acquisition generally use amortized cost in local currency to approximate fair value. However, if amortized cost is deemed not to reflect fair value or the fund holds a significant amount of such securities with remaining maturities of more than 60 days, the securities are valued at prices furnished by dealers who make markets in such securities or by an independent pricing service.

Investments in mutual funds are valued at the mutual fund’s closing net asset value per share on the day of valuation. Financial futures contracts are valued at closing settlement prices.

Other investments, including restricted securities, and those for which the above valuation procedures are inappropriate or are deemed not to reflect fair value are stated at fair value as determined in good faith by the T. Rowe Price Valuation Committee, established by the fund’s Board of Directors.

Valuation Inputs Various inputs are used to determine the value of the fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:

Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical securities

Level 2 – observable inputs other than Level 1 quoted prices (including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk)

Level 3 – unobservable inputs

Observable inputs are those based on market data obtained from sources independent of the fund, and unobservable inputs reflect the fund’s own assumptions based on the best information available. The input levels are not necessarily an indication of the risk or liquidity associated with investments at that level. The following table summarizes the fund’s investments, based on the inputs used to determine their values on December 31, 2008:

NOTE 3 - INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS

Consistent with its investment objective, the fund engages in the following practices to manage exposure to certain risks or to enhance performance. The investment objective, policies, program, and risk factors of the fund are described more fully in the fund’s prospectus and Statement of Additional Information.

Futures Contracts During the year ended December 31, 2008, the fund was a party to futures contracts, which provide for the future sale by one party and purchase by another of a specified amount of a specific financial instrument at an agreed upon price, date, time, and place. Risks arise from possible illiquidity of the futures market and from movements in security values.

Securities Lending The fund lends its securities to approved brokers to earn additional income. It receives as collateral cash and U.S. government securities valued at 102% to 105% of the value of the securities on loan. Cash collateral is invested by the fund’s lending agent(s) in accordance with investment guidelines approved by fund management. Although risk is mitigated by the collateral, the fund could experience a delay in recovering its securities and a possible loss of income or value if the borrower fails to return the securities or if collateral investments decline in value. Securities lending revenue recognized by the fund consists of earnings on invested collateral and borrowing fees, net of any rebates to the borrower and compensation to the lending agent. At December 31, 2008, there were no securities on loan.

Other Purchases and sales of portfolio securities, other than short-term securities, aggregated $64,629,000 and $64,178,000, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2008.

NOTE 4 - FEDERAL INCOME TAXES

No provision for federal income taxes is required since the fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code and distribute to shareholders all of its taxable income and gains. Distributions are determined in accordance with Federal income tax regulations, which differ from generally accepted accounting principles, and, therefore, may differ significantly in amount or character from net investment income and realized gains for financial reporting purposes. Financial reporting records are adjusted for permanent book/tax differences to reflect tax character but are not adjusted for temporary differences.

Reclassifications to paid-in capital relate primarily to a tax practice that treats a portion of the proceeds from each redemption of capital shares as a distribution of taxable net investment income and/or realized capital gain. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the following reclassifications, which had no impact on results of operations or net assets, were recorded to reflect tax character:



Distributions during the years ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were characterized for tax purposes as follows:



At December 31, 2008, the tax-basis cost of investments and components of net assets were as follows:



The difference between book-basis and tax-basis net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable to the realization of unrealized gains/losses on certain open derivative contracts for tax purposes. The fund intends to retain realized gains to the extent of available capital loss carryforwards. As of December 31, 2008, all unused capital loss carryforwards expire in fiscal 2016. Pursuant to federal income tax regulations applicable to investment companies, recognition of capital losses on certain transactions is deferred until the subsequent tax year. Consequently, realized losses reflected in the accompanying financial statements include net capital losses realized between November 1 and the fund’s fiscal year-end that have not been recognized for tax purposes (Post-October loss deferrals).

NOTE 5 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The fund is managed by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (the manager or Price Associates), a wholly owned subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. The investment management and administrative agreement between the fund and the manager provides for an all-inclusive annual fee equal to 0.40% of the fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is computed daily and paid monthly. The agreement provides that investment management, shareholder servicing, transfer agency, accounting, custody services, and directors’ fees and expenses are provided to the fund, and interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, and extraordinary expenses are paid directly by the fund.

Additionally, the fund is one of several mutual funds in which certain college savings plans managed by Price Associates may invest. As approved by the fund’s Board of Directors, shareholder servicing costs associated with each college savings plan are allocated to the fund in proportion to the average daily value of its shares owned by the college savings plan. Shareholder servicing costs allocated to the fund are borne by Price Associates, pursuant to the fund’s all-inclusive fee agreement. At December 31, 2008, approximately 2% of the outstanding shares of the fund were held by college savings plans.

The fund may invest in the T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Fund and the T. Rowe Price Government Reserve Investment Fund (collectively, the T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Funds), open-end management investment companies managed by Price Associates and considered affiliates of the fund. The T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Funds are offered as cash management options to mutual funds, trusts, and other accounts managed by Price Associates and/or its affiliates and are not available for direct purchase by members of the public. The T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Funds pay no investment management fees.


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

To the Board of Directors of T. Rowe Price Index Trust, Inc. and Shareholders of T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund

In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Index Fund (one of the portfolios comprising T. Rowe Price Index Trust, Inc., hereafter referred to as the “Fund”) at December 31, 2008, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as “financial statements”) are the responsibility of the Fund’s management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities at December 31, 2008 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers and confirmation of the underlying fund by correspondence with the transfer agent, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
February 12, 2009


TAX INFORMATION (UNAUDITED) FOR THE TAX YEAR ENDED 12/31/08

We are providing this information as required by the Internal Revenue Code. The amounts shown may differ from those elsewhere in this report because of differences between tax and financial reporting requirements.

The fund’s distributions to shareholders included:

• $406,000 from short-term capital gains,

• $4,578,000 from long-term capital gains, subject to the 15% rate gains category.

For taxable non-corporate shareholders, $2,155,000 of the fund’s income represents qualified dividend income subject to the 15% rate category.

For corporate shareholders, $2,098,000 of the fund’s income qualifies for the dividends-received deduction.

INFORMATION ON PROXY VOTING POLICIES, PROCEDURES, AND RECORDS 

A description of the policies and procedures used by T. Rowe Price funds and portfolios to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available in each fund’s Statement of Additional Information, which you may request by calling 1-800-225-5132 or by accessing the SEC’s Web site, www.sec.gov. The description of our proxy voting policies and procedures is also available on our Web site, www.troweprice.com. To access it, click on the words “Our Company” at the top of our corporate homepage. Then, when the next page appears, click on the words “Proxy Voting Policies” on the left side of the page.

Each fund’s most recent annual proxy voting record is available on our Web site and through the SEC’s Web site. To access it through our Web site, follow the directions above, then click on the words “Proxy Voting Records” on the right side of the Proxy Voting Policies page.

HOW TO OBTAIN QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS 

The fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q is available electronically on the SEC’s Web site (www.sec.gov); hard copies may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room, 450 Fifth St. N.W., Washington, DC 20549. For more information on the Public Reference Room, call 1-800-SEC-0330.

ABOUT THE FUNDS DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS 

Your fund is governed by a Board of Directors (Board) that meets regularly to review a wide variety of matters affecting the fund, including performance, investment programs, compliance matters, advisory fees and expenses, service providers, and other business affairs. The Board elects the fund’s officers, who are listed in the final table. At least 75% of Board members are independent of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (T. Rowe Price), and T. Rowe Price International, Inc. (T. Rowe Price International); “inside” or “interested” directors are employees or officers of T. Rowe Price. The business address of each director and officer is 100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202. The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the directors and is available without charge by calling a T. Rowe Price representative at 1-800-225-5132.

Independent Directors   
 
Name   
(Year of Birth)  Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years and Directorships of 
Year Elected*  Other Public Companies 
 
Jeremiah E. Casey  Director, National Life Insurance (2001 to 2005); Director, The Rouse 
(1940)  Company, real estate developers (1990 to 2004) 
2005   
 
Anthony W. Deering  Chairman, Exeter Capital, LLC, a private investment firm (2004 to 
(1945)  present); Director, Under Armour (8/08 to present); Director, Vornado 
2001  Real Estate Investment Trust (3/04 to present); Director, Mercantile 
  Bankshares (2002 to 2007); Member, Advisory Board, Deutsche 
  Bank North America (2004 to present); Director, Chairman of the 
  Board, and Chief Executive Officer, The Rouse Company, real estate 
  developers (1997 to 2004) 
 
Donald W. Dick, Jr.  Principal, EuroCapital Advisors, LLC, an acquisition and management 
(1943)  advisory firm (10/95 to present); Chairman, The Haven Group, a cus- 
1994  tom manufacturer of modular homes (1/04 to present) 
 
David K. Fagin  Chairman and President, Nye Corporation (6/88 to present); Director, 
(1938)  Golden Star Resources Ltd. (5/92 to present); Director, Pacific Rim 
1994  Mining Corp. (2/02 to present); Director, B.C. Corporation (3/08 to 
  present); Chairman, Canyon Resources Corp. (8/07 to 3/08); Director, 
  Atna Resources Ltd. (3/08 to present) 
 
Karen N. Horn  Director, Eli Lilly and Company (1987 to present); Director, Simon 
(1943)  Property Group (2004 to present); Director, Federal National Mortgage 
2003  Association (9/06 to present); Director, Norfolk Southern (2/08 to pres- 
  ent); Director, Georgia Pacific (5/04 to 12/05); Managing Director and 
  President, Global Private Client Services, Marsh Inc. (1999 to 2003) 

Theo C. Rodgers  President, A&R Development Corporation (1977 to present) 
(1941)   
2005   
 
John G. Schreiber  Owner/President, Centaur Capital Partners, Inc., a real estate invest- 
(1946)  ment company (1991 to present); Partner, Blackstone Real Estate 
2001  Advisors, L.P. (10/92 to present) 
 
*Each independent director oversees 126 T. Rowe Price portfolios (except for Mr. Fagin, who oversees 125 T.Rowe 
Price portfolios) and serves until retirement, resignation, or election of a successor. 

Inside Directors   
 
Name   
(Year of Birth)   
Year Elected*   
[Number of T. Rowe Price  Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years and Directorships of 
Portfolios Overseen]  Other Public Companies 
 
Edward C. Bernard  Director and Vice President, T. Rowe Price; Vice Chairman of the Board, 
(1956)  Director, and Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Chairman of 
2006  the Board, Director, and President, T. Rowe Price Investment Services, 
[126]  Inc.; Chairman of the Board and Director, T. Rowe Price Global Asset 
  Management Limited, T. Rowe Price Global Investment Services 
  Limited, T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price 
  Savings Bank, and T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.; Director, T. Rowe Price 
  International, Inc.; Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board, 
  Director, and President, T. Rowe Price Trust Company; Chairman of the 
  Board, all funds 
 
Brian C. Rogers, CFA, CIC  Chief Investment Officer, Director, and Vice President, T. Rowe Price; 
(1955)  Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer, Director, and Vice 
2006  President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Vice President, T. Rowe Price 
[71]  Trust Company 
 
*Each inside director serves until retirement, resignation, or election of a successor. 

Officers   
 
Name (Year of Birth)   
Title and Fund(s) Served  Principal Occupation(s) 
 
E. Frederick Bair, CFA, CPA (1969)  Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price 
President, Index Trust  Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company 
 
Wendy R. Diffenbaugh (1954)  Vice President, T. Rowe Price 
Vice President, Index Trust   
 
Roger L. Fiery III, CPA (1959)  Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price 
Vice President, Index Trust  Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price International, Inc., 
  and T. Rowe Price Trust Company 
 
John R. Gilner (1961)  Chief Compliance Officer and Vice President, 
Chief Compliance Officer, Index Trust  T. Rowe Price; Vice President, T. Rowe Price 
  Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Investment 
  Services, Inc. 
 
Gregory S. Golczewski (1966)  Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price 
Vice President, Index Trust  Trust Company 
 
Gregory K. Hinkle, CPA (1958)  Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price 
Treasurer, Index Trust  Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price Investment Services, 
  Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company; formerly 
  Partner, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (to 2007) 
 
Patricia B. Lippert (1953)  Assistant Vice President, T. Rowe Price and 
Secretary, Index Trust  T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc. 
 
Sudhir Nanda, Ph.D., CFA (1959)  Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price 
Vice President, Index Trust  Group, Inc. 
 
David Oestreicher (1967)  Director and Vice President, T. Rowe Price 
Vice President, Index Trust  Investment Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Trust 
  Company, and T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.; Vice 
  President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Global 
  Asset Management Limited, T. Rowe Price Global 
  Investment Services Limited, T. Rowe Price 
  Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price International, Inc., and 
  T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc. 
 
Ken D. Uematsu, CFA (1969)  Assistant Vice President, T. Rowe Price 
Executive Vice President, Index Trust   

Julie L. Waples (1970)  Vice President, T. Rowe Price 
Vice President, Index Trust   
 
Paul W. Wojcik, CFA (1970)  Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price 
Vice President, Index Trust  Group, Inc. 
 
Unless otherwise noted, officers have been employees of T. Rowe Price or T. Rowe Price International for at  
least five years.   

Item 2. Code of Ethics.

The registrant has adopted a code of ethics, as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR, applicable to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. A copy of this code of ethics is filed as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR. No substantive amendments were approved or waivers were granted to this code of ethics during the period covered by this report.

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.

The registrant’s Board of Directors/Trustees has determined that Ms. Karen N. Horn qualifies as an audit committee financial expert, as defined in Item 3 of Form N-CSR. Ms. Horn is considered independent for purposes of Item 3 of Form N-CSR.

Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

(a) – (d) Aggregate fees billed to the registrant for the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the registrant’s principal accountant were as follows:


Audit fees include amounts related to the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements and services normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings. Audit-related fees include amounts reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrant’s financial statements and specifically include the issuance of a report on internal controls and, if applicable, agreed-upon procedures related to fund acquisitions. Tax fees include amounts related to services for tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice. The nature of these services specifically includes the review of distribution calculations and the preparation of Federal, state, and excise tax returns. All other fees include the registrant’s pro-rata share of amounts for agreed-upon procedures in conjunction with service contract approvals by the registrant’s Board of Directors/Trustees.

(e)(1) The registrant’s audit committee has adopted a policy whereby audit and non-audit services performed by the registrant’s principal accountant for the registrant, its investment adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant require pre-approval in advance at regularly scheduled audit committee meetings. If such a service is required between regularly scheduled audit committee meetings, pre-approval may be authorized by one audit committee member with ratification at the next scheduled audit committee meeting. Waiver of pre-approval for audit or non-audit services requiring fees of a de minimis amount is not permitted.

    (2) No services included in (b) – (d) above were approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

(f) Less than 50 percent of the hours expended on the principal accountant’s engagement to audit the registrant’s financial statements for the most recent fiscal year were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees.

(g) The aggregate fees billed for the most recent fiscal year and the preceding fiscal year by the registrant’s principal accountant for non-audit services rendered to the registrant, its investment adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant were $1,922,000 and $1,486,000, respectively.

(h) All non-audit services rendered in (g) above were pre-approved by the registrant’s audit committee. Accordingly, these services were considered by the registrant’s audit committee in maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.

Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.

Not applicable.

Item 6. Investments.

(a) Not applicable. The complete schedule of investments is included in Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.

(b) Not applicable.

Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable.

Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable.

Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.

Not applicable.

Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

Not applicable.

Item 11. Controls and Procedures.

(a) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of this filing and have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of that date, in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported timely.

(b) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer are aware of no change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s second fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 12. Exhibits.

(a)(1) The registrant’s code of ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is attached.

    (2) Separate certifications by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, are attached.

    (3) Written solicitation to repurchase securities issued by closed-end companies: not applicable.

(b) A certification by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, is attached.

                                                                              
SIGNATURES
 
  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment 
Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the 
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. 
 
T. Rowe Price Index Trust, Inc. 
 
 
 
By  /s/ Edward C. Bernard 
  Edward C. Bernard 
  Principal Executive Officer 
 
Date  February 19, 2009 
 
 
 
  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment 
Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of 
the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. 
 
 
By  /s/ Edward C. Bernard 
  Edward C. Bernard 
  Principal Executive Officer 
 
Date  February 19, 2009 
 
 
 
By  /s/ Gregory K. Hinkle 
  Gregory K. Hinkle 
  Principal Financial Officer 
 
Date  February 19, 2009