N-CSRS 1 srexf.htm T. ROWE PRICE EQUITY INDEX 500 FUND T. Rowe Price Equity Index 500 Fund - June 30, 2007


Item 1: Report to Shareholders

T. Rowe Price Annual Report
 Equity Index 500 Fund June 30, 2007 

The views and opinions in this report were current as of June 30, 2007. They are not guarantees of performance or investment results and should not be taken as investment advice. Investment decisions reflect a variety of factors, and the managers reserve the right to change their views about individual stocks, sectors, and the markets at any time. As a result, the views expressed should not be relied upon as a forecast of the fund’s future investment intent. The report is certified under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires mutual funds and other public companies to affirm that, to the best of their knowledge, the information in their financial reports is fairly and accurately stated in all material respects.

REPORTS ON THE WEB

Sign up for our E-mail Program, and you can begin to receive updated fund reports and prospectuses online rather than through the mail. Log in to your account at troweprice.com for more information.

Manager’s Letter

Fellow Shareholders

In the first six months of 2007, the U.S. stock market cooked up another solid rally, maintaining its momentum after four straight years of positive performance. The recipe for success involved many of the same ingredients as in recent years—better-than-expected earnings growth, a liberal number of mergers and acquisitions, and a dash of economic resilience. The result was some savory stock market gains as the broad market indexes advanced by approximately 7% to 9%.

HIGHLIGHTS

• Better-than-expected earnings, mergers and acquisitions, and the resilient economy lifted U.S. equities in the first half of 2007.

• The Equity Market Index Funds generally tracked their unmanaged benchmarks; two of the funds adopted S&P benchmarks as of April 1, 2007.

• Using full replication and sampling strategies, we keep the compositions and other attributes of each fund similar to those of its benchmark.

• Economic and market fundamentals in the near term seem likely to remain favorable, but we will not attempt to determine which stocks or sectors are likely to perform best. Our main task is to replicate the structure and performance of broad market indexes, providing shareholders diversified exposure to U.S. equities.

MARKET ENVIRONMENT

Economic conditions continued to moderate in the first half of 2007. After growing by 3.3% in 2006, the U.S. economy grew at a meager 0.7% annualized rate in the first quarter of 2007 as further weakness in the housing market had an adverse impact on consumer spending. However, economic data improved in the second quarter, led by persistent strength in the labor market. Inflation, on the other hand, remained above the Federal Reserve’s comfort level, in part because of an increase in energy and commodity prices during the period. While the Fed kept the fed funds target rate at 5.25% throughout the first half of the year, investors reassessed their expectations for a Fed rate cut, pushing it out from the second half of 2007 to early 2008.

Reflecting the moderating economic environment, corporate profit growth also eased during the period, bringing an end to the record streak of double-digit earnings growth the S&P 500 had delivered every quarter since mid-2002. Despite the slowdown, however, earnings continued to exceed market expectations, which provided a positive backdrop for stocks. In addition, mergers and acquisitions were on pace to outstrip last year’s record amount as private-equity firms continued to pursue leveraged buyouts.

As measured by the S&P 500 Index, large-cap stocks returned 6.96% in the first half of 2007, while the Dow Jones Wilshire 4500 Completion Index, a broad measure of small- and mid-cap stock performance, returned 9.39%. Growth stocks outperformed value across all market capitalizations, reversing a trend that began several years ago.


T. Rowe Price’s Equity Market Index Funds are designed for investors who want to harness the potential for long-term capital appreciation from broad exposure to large-cap stocks (Equity Index 500 Fund), small- and mid-cap stocks (Extended Equity Market Index Fund), or the entire U.S. stock market (Total Equity Market Index Fund). These funds could serve as core holdings in an investor’s portfolio, as they offer attributes that many investors will find appealing.

• They are well diversified, which can reduce the potentially negative impact of a given stock on the entire portfolio. The Equity Index 500 Fund invests in all S&P 500 Index stocks, while the Total Equity Market Index Fund and the Extended Equity Market Index Fund invested in approximately 1,740 and 2,060 stocks, respectively, as of June 30.

• They tend to closely track their benchmarks. The Equity Index 500 Fund uses a full replication strategy so that the weightings of our holdings match those of the S&P 500 Index. The Total Equity Market Index Fund and the Extended Equity Market Index Fund use a sampling strategy to approximate the sector allocations, price/earnings ratio, and other attributes of their benchmarks. We occasionally invest in securities such as futures and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) so that the index funds can accommodate cash flows and remain fully invested.

• They offer instant, broad exposure to different sectors of the stock market, and each fund’s sector allocations are consistent with its benchmark’s sector breakdown. As such, changes in the funds’ sector diversification and other overall characteristics reflect changes in the composition of the indexes, rather than strategic shifts that are typical of an actively managed fund.

• Their expenses are generally very low, which enables investors to retain more of their returns.

EQUITY INDEX 500 FUND

Your fund returned 6.78% for the first six months of 2007 and 20.18% for the 12-month period ended June 30, 2007. As the accompanying table shows, the fund closely tracked the performance of its benchmark, the S&P 500 Stock Index, in both periods. Fund performance tends to lag that of the benchmark due to annual operating and management expenses.


Nine of the 10 major sectors in the S&P 500 advanced in the last six months. The top-performing sector was energy, which benefited from a 16% increase in the price of oil. Rising gasoline prices also supported energy stocks as refining profit margins expanded. Four of the fund’s top 10 performance contributors came from this sector, led by the portfolio’s largest holding, oil and gas producer ExxonMobil. Other top contributors included oilfield services provider Schlumberger, oil and gas producer Chevron, and oil refiner Valero Energy. (Please refer to the fund’s portfolio of investments for a complete listing of holdings and the amount each represents in the portfolio.)

The materials and telecommunication services sectors, which are relatively small segments of the index, also generated strong results. Metals and mining stocks were the best performers in the materials sector, thanks to merger deals and speculation and a firming of some commodity prices. The leading contributors were aluminum producer Alcoa and copper producer Freeport McMoRan Copper & Gold. In the telecom sector, takeover activity and speculation also contributed to our performance. For example, wireless provider Alltel rose after agreeing to be acquired by a pair of private-equity firms. Telecom giant AT&T was the fund’s second-best contributor as earnings exceeded expectations thanks to strength in its wireless business.


The industrials and business services sector enjoyed double-digit gains for the six-month period. Machinery manufacturers led the advance in this sector. Heavy machinery maker Caterpillar posted robust profit growth as strong construction and mining demand overseas helped overcome weak demand in the U.S. Also, GE continued to shed lower-growth businesses and redeploy capital into faster-growing areas, and this strategy began to pay off in the form of better earnings.

Information technology stocks performed better than the broad stock market for the past six months. Computer and peripherals makers and semiconductor manufacturers fared best. Apple continued to benefit from the explosive growth of the iPod and another potential blockbuster in the iPhone. Intel recovered from a rough 2006 by regaining market share from rival Advanced Micro Devices. Search engine firm Google and chipmaker Texas Instruments were also among the top contributors in the technology sector.

Financials, the largest sector weighting in the fund and index, was the only sector to decline during the period. Rising interest rates and the debacle in the subprime mortgage market combined to push financial stocks modestly lower. Some of the largest detractors in the portfolio came from the financials sector—financial services titans Citigroup and Bank of America, commercial banks Wachovia and U.S. Bancorp, and capital markets firm Merrill Lynch.

Standard & Poor’s authorized 19 changes to the composition of the S&P 500 Index in the first half of 2007. Many of the stocks that left the index were acquired by other companies or taken private in leveraged buyout deals. Please see the table on page 11 for a complete list of index changes thus far in 2007.



TOTAL EQUITY MARKET INDEX FUND

Your fund returned 7.45% for the first six months of 2007 and 20.07% for the 12-month period ended June 30, 2007. As the accompanying table shows, the fund closely tracked the Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Composite Index and its new benchmark (effective April 1, 2007), the S&P Total Market Index, in both periods. Fund performance often trails that of the benchmark due to annual operating and management expenses.


One major reason for the benchmark change is that Standard & Poor’s has more restrictive inclusion requirements. As a result, many very small and illiquid securities in the Dow Jones Wilshire index are not included in the S&P index. These securities are very difficult to trade and make it more difficult to replicate the structure and performance of the Dow Jones Wilshire index. Another important reason for the change is that the Dow Jones Wilshire index holds publicly traded partnerships (PTPs). These holdings can create an unacceptable tax risk for a mutual fund and its shareholders, including potential liability for state taxes in the multiple states in which the PTPs invest. The S&P Total Market Index does not include PTPs.


In general, what is true about the performance of the S&P 500 Index is also true about the performance of the Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Composite Index. The Wilshire 5000 index, which represents the entire U.S. stock market, includes all S&P 500 companies. In fact, the S&P 500 represents 75% of the Wilshire 5000’s total market value. The largest components of the Wilshire index—as with the S&P 500—have the greatest influence on performance. In addition, the percentage weightings of the major sectors are somewhat similar.


In the last six months, nine of the major market sectors gained ground, led by materials and energy, which benefited from rising energy and commodity prices. Telecommunication services, industrials and business services, and information technology all produced double-digit gains for the six months. Health care and consumer stocks posted more modest gains, while financials was the only sector to decline.

EXTENDED EQUITY MARKET INDEX FUND

Your fund returned 8.80% for the first six months of 2007 and 19.27% for the 12-month period ended June 30, 2007. As the accompanying table shows, the fund closely tracked the Dow Jones Wilshire 4500 Completion Index and its new benchmark (effective April 1, 2007), the S&P Completion Index, in the last six months. For the 12-month period ended June 30, the fund lagged the Dow Jones Wilshire index but did better than its new benchmark. Fund performance often trails that of the benchmark due to annual operating and management expenses.


One major reason for the benchmark change is that Standard & Poor’s has more restrictive inclusion requirements. As a result, many very small and illiquid securities in the Dow Jones Wilshire index are not included in the S&P index. These securities are very difficult to trade and make it more difficult to replicate the structure and performance of the Dow Jones Wilshire index. Another important reason for the change is that the Dow Jones Wilshire index holds publicly traded partnerships (PTPs). These holdings can create an unacceptable tax risk for a mutual fund and its shareholders, including potential liability for state taxes in the multiple states in which the PTPs invest. The S&P Completion Index does not include PTPs.

All but one sector in the small- and mid-cap universe advanced in the first half of 2007. The leading sectors were materials and energy, both of which generated returns of more than 20%. Stubbornly high gasoline prices, which led to higher refining profit margins, and other rising energy costs provided a lift to energy stocks. In the materials sector, metals and mining stocks were the best contributors, thanks to merger deals and speculation and a firming of some commodity prices. Chemicals companies, especially those whose fortunes are closely tied to high or rising commodity prices, also enjoyed solid results.


The industrials and business services sector delivered strong returns for the six-month period. Machinery manufacturers were the top performers amid worldwide demand for heavy equipment and machinery. Aerospace and defense stocks also fared well during a time of increased military spending.

The telecommunication services and information technology sectors rounded out the list of sectors with double-digit gains during the period. Wireless companies led the advance in the telecom sector as new technologies stoked demand. In the technology sector, electronic equipment, IT services, software, and Internet-related companies did well.


Financials, by far the largest sector weighting in the fund and in our old and new benchmarks, was the only sector to decline during the period. Higher interest rates and problems in the subprime mortgage market weighed on financial stocks during the period. Real estate investment trusts (REITs) also slid during this period, suffering a meaningful correction after years of robust returns. The health care sector gained ground but lagged the broader stock market.

OUTLOOK

The U.S. economy seems to be getting a second wind following a year-long slowdown, and global economic growth is likely to remain favorable in the near term. This should be supportive of corporate earnings growth and, in turn, the stock market. Equities could also continue to benefit from vigorous merger and leveraged buyout activity, but rising interest rates and energy cost inflation could keep the economy and the equity market in check.

In any event, as bullish and bearish forces manifest themselves in the form of daily market volatility, we will not attempt to determine which stocks or sectors are likely to perform best. Our main task is to replicate the structure and performance of our S&P indexes to provide you with broad exposure to large-cap stocks, small- and mid-cap stocks, and the entire U.S. stock market.

Respectfully submitted,


E. Frederick Bair
Chairman of the Investment Advisory Committee, Equity Index 500 Fund
and Extended Equity Market Index Fund
Co-chairman of the Investment Advisory Committee, Total Equity Market
Index Fund


Ken D. Uematsu
Co-chairman of the Investment Advisory Committee, Total Equity Market
Index Fund

July 26, 2007

The committee chairmen have day-to-day responsibility for managing the portfolios and work with committee members in developing and executing the funds’ investment program.

RISKS OF INVESTING

As with all stock mutual funds, the fund’s share price can fall because of weakness in the stock market, a particular industry, or specific holdings. Stock markets can decline for many reasons, including adverse political or economic developments, changes in investor psychology, or heavy institutional selling. The prospects for an industry or company may deteriorate because of a variety of factors, including disappointing earnings or changes in the competitive environment.

GLOSSARY

Dow Jones Wilshire 4500 Completion Index: Tracks the performance of all stocks in the Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Composite Index, excluding those in the S&P 500 Stock Index.

Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Composite Index: Tracks the performance of the most active stocks in the broad U.S. market.

Fed funds target rate: An overnight lending rate set by the Federal Reserve and used by banks to meet reserve requirements. Banks also use the fed funds rate as a benchmark for their prime lending rates.

S&P 500 Stock Index: Tracks the stocks of 500 mostly large U.S. companies.

S&P Completion Index: A subindex of the S&P Total Market Index that excludes all companies in the S&P 500 Index.

S&P Total Market Index: A broad measure of the U.S. stock market that includes all common stocks listed on major U.S. stock exchanges. The index excludes certain securities, such as limited partnerships, closed-end funds, OTC bulletin board issues, and ETFs.

















Performance and Expenses



GROWTH OF $10,000 

This chart shows the value of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the fund over the past 10 fiscal year periods or since inception (for funds lacking 10-year records). The result is compared with benchmarks, which may include a broad-based market index and a peer group average or index. Market indexes do not include expenses, which are deducted from fund returns as well as mutual fund averages and indexes.





AVERAGE ANNUAL COMPOUND TOTAL RETURN 

This table shows how the fund would have performed each year if its actual (or cumulative) returns for the periods shown had been earned at a constant rate





GROWTH OF $10,000 

This chart shows the value of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the fund over the past 10 fiscal year periods or since inception (for funds lacking 10-year records). The result is compared with benchmarks, which may include a broad-based market index and a peer group average or index. Market indexes do not include expenses, which are deducted from fund returns as well as mutual fund averages and indexes.





AVERAGE ANNUAL COMPOUND TOTAL RETURN 

This table shows how the fund would have performed each year if its actual (or cumulative) returns for the periods shown had been earned at a constant rate.





GROWTH OF $10,000 

This chart shows the value of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the fund over the past 10 fiscal year periods or since inception (for funds lacking 10-year records). The result is compared with benchmarks, which may include a broad-based market index and a peer group average or index. Market indexes do not include expenses, which are deducted from fund returns as well as mutual fund averages and indexes.





AVERAGE ANNUAL COMPOUND TOTAL RETURN 

This table shows how the fund would have performed each year if its actual (or cumulative) returns for the periods shown had been earned at a constant rate.









FUND EXPENSE EXAMPLE 

As a mutual fund shareholder, you may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees, and other fund expenses. The following example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the most recent six-month period and held for the entire period.

Actual Expenses
The first line of the following table (“Actual”) provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with your account balance, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The information on the second line of the table (“Hypothetical”) is based on hypothetical account values and expenses derived from the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed 5% per year rate of return before expenses (not the fund’s actual return). You may compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund with other funds by contrasting this 5% hypothetical example and the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.

Note: T. Rowe Price charges an account maintenance fee that is not included in the accompanying table. The account maintenance fee is charged on a quarterly basis, usually during the last week of a calendar quarter, and applies to accounts with balances below $10,000 on the day of the assessment. The fee is charged to accounts that fall below $10,000 for any reason, including market fluctuations, redemptions, or exchanges. When an account with less than $10,000 is closed either through redemption or exchange, the fee is charged and deducted from the proceeds. The fee applies to IRA accounts but not to retirement plans directly registered with T. Rowe Price Services or accounts maintained by intermediaries through NSCC® Networking. If you are subject to the fee, keep it in mind when you are estimating the ongoing expenses of investing in the fund and when comparing the expenses of this fund with other funds.

You should also be aware that the expenses shown in the table highlight only your ongoing costs and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. To the extent a fund charges transaction costs, however, the total cost of owning that fund is higher.









Unaudited


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



Unaudited




























The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



Unaudited


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



Unaudited


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



Unaudited


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



Unaudited

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

T. Rowe Price Index Trust, Inc. (the trust), is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). The Equity Index 500 Fund (the fund), a diversified, open-end management investment company, is one portfolio established by the trust. The fund commenced operations on March 30, 1990. The fund seeks to match the performance of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index®.

The accompanying financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require the use of estimates made by fund management. Fund management believes that estimates and security valuations are appropriate; however, actual results may differ from those estimates, and the security valuations reflected in the financial statements may differ from the value the fund ultimately realizes upon sale of the securities.

Valuation The fund values its investments and computes its net asset value per share at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), normally 4 p.m. ET, each day that the NYSE is open for business. Equity securities listed or regularly traded on a securities exchange or in the over-the-counter (OTC) market are valued at the last quoted sale price at the time the valuations are made, except for OTC Bulletin Board securities, which are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices. A security that is listed or traded on more than one exchange is valued at the quotation on the exchange determined to be the primary market for such security. Listed securities not traded on a particular day are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices. Debt securities with original maturities of less than one year are valued at amortized cost in local currency, which approximates fair value when combined with accrued interest.

Investments in mutual funds are valued at the mutual fund’s closing net asset value per share on the day of valuation. Financial futures contracts are valued at closing settlement prices.

Other investments, including restricted securities, and those for which the above valuation procedures are inappropriate or are deemed not to reflect fair value are stated at fair value as determined in good faith by the T. Rowe Price Valuation Committee, established by the fund’s Board of Trustees.

Credits The fund earns credits on temporarily uninvested cash balances at the custodian that reduce the fund’s custody charges. Custody expense in the accompanying financial statements is presented before reduction for credits, which are reflected as expenses paid indirectly.

Redemption Fees A 0.5% fee is assessed on redemptions of fund shares held for 90 days or less to deter short-term trading and to protect the interests of long-term shareholders. Redemption fees are withheld from proceeds that shareholders receive from the sale or exchange of fund shares. The fees are paid to the fund, and are recorded as an increase to paid-in capital. The fees may cause the redemption price per share to differ from the net asset value per share.

Investment Transactions, Investment Income, and Distributions Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis. Premiums and discounts on debt securities are amortized for financial reporting purposes. Dividends received from mutual fund investments are reflected as dividend income; capital gain distributions are reflected as realized gain/loss. Dividend income and capital gain distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Any income tax-related interest and penalties would be classified as income tax expense. Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Realized gains and losses are reported on the identified cost basis. Payments (“variation margin”) made or received to settle the daily fluctuations in the value of futures contracts are recorded as unrealized gains or losses until the contracts are closed. Unsettled variation margin on futures contracts is reflected as other assets or liabilities, and unrealized gains and losses on futures contracts are reflected as the change in net unrealized gain or loss in the accompanying financial statements. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income distributions are declared and paid on a quarterly basis. Capital gain distributions, if any, are declared and paid by the fund, typically on an annual basis.

New Accounting Pronouncements Effective June 29, 2007, the fund adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, a clarification of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 establishes financial accounting and disclosure requirements for recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken on an income tax return. The adoption of FIN 48 had no impact on the fund’s net assets or results of operations.

In September 2006, the FASB released the Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157 (“FAS 157”), Fair Value Measurements. FAS 157 clarifies the definition of fair value and establishes the framework for measuring fair value, as well as proper disclosure of this methodology in the financial statements. It will be effective for the fund’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2008. Management is evaluating the effects of FAS 157; however, it is not expected to have a material impact on the fund’s net assets or results of operations.

NOTE 2 - INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS

Consistent with its investment objective, the fund engages in the following practices to manage exposure to certain risks or to enhance performance. The investment objective, policies, program, and risk factors of the fund are described more fully in the fund’s prospectus and Statement of Additional Information.

Futures Contracts During the six months ended June 30, 2007, the fund was a party to futures contracts, which provide for the future sale by one party and purchase by another of a specified amount of a specific financial instrument at an agreed upon price, date, time, and place. Risks arise from possible illiquidity of the futures market and from movements in security values.

Securities Lending The fund lends its securities to approved brokers to earn additional income. It receives as collateral cash and U.S. government securities valued at 102% to 105% of the value of the securities on loan. Cash collateral is invested in a money market pooled trust managed by the fund’s lending agent in accordance with investment guidelines approved by fund management. Collateral is maintained over the life of the loan in an amount not less than the value of loaned securities, as determined at the close of fund business each day; any additional collateral required due to changes in security values is delivered to the fund the next business day. Although risk is mitigated by the collateral, the fund could experience a delay in recovering its securities and a possible loss of income or value if the borrower fails to return the securities. Securities lending revenue recognized by the fund consists of earnings on invested collateral and borrowing fees, net of any rebates to the borrower and compensation to the lending agent. At June 30, 2007, the value of loaned securities was $648,026,000; aggregate collateral consisted of $594,580,000 in the money market pooled trust and U.S. government securities valued at $72,806,000.

Other Purchases and sales of portfolio securities, other than short-term securities, aggregated $1,037,673,000 and $135,278,000, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2007.

NOTE 3 - FEDERAL INCOME TAXES

No provision for federal income taxes is required since the fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code and distribute to shareholders all of its taxable income and gains. Federal income tax regulations differ from generally accepted accounting principles; therefore, distributions determined in accordance with tax regulations may differ in amount or character from net investment income and realized gains for financial reporting purposes. Financial reporting records are adjusted for permanent book/tax differences to reflect tax character. Financial records are not adjusted for temporary differences. The amount and character of tax-basis distributions and composition of net assets are finalized at fiscal year-end; accordingly, tax-basis balances have not been determined as of June 30, 2007.

For tax purposes, the fund has elected to treat net capital losses realized between November 1 and December 31 of each year as occurring on the first day of the following tax year; consequently, $10,590,000 of realized losses recognized for financial reporting purposes in the year ended December 31, 2006, were recognized for tax purposes on January 1, 2007. Further, the fund intends to retain realized gains to the extent of available capital loss carryforwards. As of December 31, 2006, the fund had $196,975,000 of unused capital loss carryforwards, of which $48,781,000 expire in 2009, $115,599,000 expire in 2010, $3,380,000 expire in 2011, $15,884,000 expire in 2013, and $13,331,000 expire in 2014.

At June 30, 2007, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was $7,511,333,000. Net unrealized gain aggregated $2,363,154,000 at period-end, of which $2,573,788,000 related to appreciated investments and $210,634,000 related to depreciated investments.

NOTE 4 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The fund is managed by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (the manager or Price Associates), a wholly owned subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. The investment management agreement between the fund and the manager provides for an annual investment management fee equal to 0.15% of the fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is computed daily and paid monthly.

The fund is also subject to a contractual expense limitation through April 30, 2008. During the limitation period, the manager is required to waive its management fee and reimburse the fund for any expenses, excluding interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, and extraordinary expenses, that would otherwise cause the fund’s ratio of annualized total expenses to average net assets (expense ratio) to exceed its expense limitation of 0.35% . The fund is required to repay the manager for expenses previously reimbursed and management fees waived to the extent the fund’s net assets have grown or expenses have declined sufficiently to allow repayment without causing the fund’s expense ratio to exceed its expense limitation. However, no repayment will be made more than three years after the date of any reimbursement or waiver or later than April 30, 2010. Pursuant to this agreement, management fees in the amount of $148,000 were waived during the six months ended June 30, 2007. Including these amounts, management fees waived by the fund in the amount of $2,997,000 remain subject to repayment at June 30, 2007.

In addition, the fund has entered into service agreements with Price Associates and two wholly owned subsidiaries of Price Associates (collectively, Price). Price Associates computes the daily share price and provides certain other administrative services to the fund. T. Rowe Price Services, Inc., provides shareholder and administrative services in its capacity as the fund’s transfer and dividend disbursing agent. T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., provides subaccounting and recordkeeping services for certain retirement accounts invested in the fund. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, expenses incurred pursuant to these service agreements were $77,000 for Price Associates, $1,216,000 for T. Rowe Price Services, Inc., and $1,339,000 for T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc. The total amount payable at period-end pursuant to these service agreements is reflected as Due to Affiliates in the accompanying financial statements.

Additionally, the fund is one of several mutual funds in which certain college savings plans managed by Price Associates may invest. As approved by the fund’s Board of Trustees, shareholder servicing costs associated with each college savings plan are borne by the fund in proportion to the average daily value of its shares owned by the college savings plan. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, the fund was charged $863,000 for shareholder servicing costs related to the college savings plans, of which $759,000 was for services provided by Price. The amount payable at period-end pursuant to this agreement is reflected as Due to Affiliates in the accompanying financial statements. At June 30, 2007, approximately 8% of the outstanding shares of the fund were held by college savings plans.

The fund is also one of several mutual funds sponsored by Price Associates (underlying Price funds) in which the T. Rowe Price Retirement Funds (Retirement Funds) may invest. The Retirement Funds do not invest in the underlying Price funds for the purpose of exercising management or control.

Pursuant to a special servicing agreement, expenses associated with the operation of the Retirement Funds are borne by each underlying Price fund to the extent of estimated savings to it and in proportion to the average daily value of its shares owned by the Retirement Funds. Expenses allocated under this agreement are reflected as shareholder servicing expense in the accompanying financial statements. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, the fund was allocated $4,337,000 of Retirement Funds’ expenses, of which $3,420,000 related to services provided by Price. The amount payable at period-end pursuant to this agreement is reflected as Due to Affiliates in the accompanying financial statements. At June 30, 2007, approximately 49% of the outstanding shares of the fund were held by the Retirement Funds.

Consistent with its investment objective, the fund may invest in T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. Additionally, the fund may invest in the T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Fund and the T. Rowe Price Government Reserve Investment Fund (collectively, the T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Funds), open-end management investment companies managed by Price Associates and affiliates of the fund. The T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Funds are offered as cash management options to mutual funds, trusts, and other accounts managed by Price Associates and/or its affiliates, and are not available for direct purchase by members of the public. The T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Funds pay no investment management fees. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, dividend income from the T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Funds totaled $4,354,000, and the value of shares of the T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Funds held at June 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006, was $177,382,000 and $119,548,000, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, dividend income from T. Rowe Price Group totaled $58,000, and the value of shares of T. Rowe Price Group held at June 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006, was $9,187,000 and $7,001,000, respectively.

INFORMATION ON PROXY VOTING POLICIES, PROCEDURES, AND RECORDS 

A description of the policies and procedures used by T. Rowe Price funds and portfolios to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available in each fund’s Statement of Additional Information, which you may request by calling 1-800-225-5132 or by accessing the SEC’s Web site, www.sec.gov. The description of our proxy voting policies and procedures is also available on our Web site, www.troweprice.com. To access it, click on the words “Company Info” at the top of our homepage for individual investors. Then, in the window that appears, click on the “Proxy Voting Policy” navigation button in the top left corner.

Each fund’s most recent annual proxy voting record is available on our Web site and through the SEC’s Web site. To access it through our Web site, follow the directions above, then click on the words “Proxy Voting Record” at the bottom of the Proxy Voting Policy page.

HOW TO OBTAIN QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS 

The fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q is available electronically on the SEC’s Web site (www.sec.gov); hard copies may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room, 450 Fifth St. N.W., Washington, DC 20549. For more information on the Public Reference Room, call 1-800-SEC-0330.

APPROVAL OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 

On March 7, 2007, the fund’s Board of Directors (Board) unanimously approved the investment advisory contract (Contract) between the fund and its investment manager, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Manager). The Board considered a variety of factors in connection with its review of the Contract, also taking into account information provided by the Manager during the course of the year, as discussed below:

Services Provided by the Manager
The Board considered the nature, quality, and extent of the services provided to the fund by the Manager. These services included, but were not limited to, management of the fund’s portfolio and a variety of related activities, as well as financial and administrative services, reporting, and communications. The Board also reviewed the background and experience of the Manager’s senior management team and investment personnel involved in the management of the fund. The Board concluded that it was satisfied with the nature, quality, and extent of the services provided by the Manager.

Investment Performance of the Fund
The Board reviewed the fund’s average annual total return over the 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year periods as well as the fund’s year-by-year returns and compared these returns with previously agreed upon comparable performance measures and market data, including those supplied by Lipper and Morningstar, which are independent providers of mutual fund data. On the basis of this evaluation and the Board’s ongoing review of investment results, the Board concluded that the fund’s performance was satisfactory.

Costs, Benefits, Profits, and Economies of Scale
The Board reviewed detailed information regarding the revenues received by the Manager under the Contract and other benefits that the Manager (and its affiliates) may have realized from its relationship with the fund, including research received under “soft dollar” agreements. The Board noted that soft dollars were not used to pay for third-party, non-broker research. The Board also received information on the estimated costs incurred and profits realized by the Manager and its affiliates from advising T. Rowe Price mutual funds, as well as estimates of the gross profits realized from managing the fund in particular. The Board concluded that the Manager’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the fund. The Board also considered whether the fund or other funds benefit under the fee levels set forth in the Contract from any economies of scale realized by the Manager. The Board concluded that, based on the profitability data it reviewed, the Contract provided for a reasonable sharing of benefits from any economies of scale with the fund’s investors.

Fees
The Board reviewed the fund’s management fee rate, operating expenses, and total expense ratio and compared them with fees and expenses of other comparable funds based on information and data supplied by Lipper. The information provided to the Board indicated that the fund’s management fee rate was at or below the median for comparable funds. The information also indicated that the fund’s expense ratio was generally above the median for certain groups of comparable funds but below the median for other groups of comparable funds. The Board also reviewed the fee schedules for comparable privately managed accounts of the Manager and its affiliates. Management informed the Board that the Manager’s responsibilities for privately managed accounts are more limited than its responsibilities for the fund and other T. Rowe Price mutual funds that it or its affiliates advise. On the basis of the information provided, the Board concluded that the fees paid by the fund under the Contract were reasonable.

Approval of the Contract
As noted, the Board approved the continuation of the Contract. No single factor was considered in isolation or to be determinative to the decision. Rather, the Board concluded, in light of a weighting and balancing of all factors considered, that it was in the best interests of the fund to approve the continuation of the Contract, including the fees to be charged for services thereunder.

Item 2. Code of Ethics.

A code of ethics, as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR, applicable to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions is filed as an exhibit to the registrant’s annual Form N-CSR. No substantive amendments were approved or waivers were granted to this code of ethics during the registrant’s most recent fiscal half-year.

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.

Disclosure required in registrant’s annual Form N-CSR.

Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

Disclosure required in registrant’s annual Form N-CSR.

Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.

Not applicable.

Item 6. Schedule of Investments.

Not applicable. The complete schedule of investments is included in Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.

Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable.

Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable.

Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.

Not applicable.

Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

Not applicable.

Item 11. Controls and Procedures.

(a) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of this filing and have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of that date, in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported timely.

(b) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer are aware of no change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s second fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 12. Exhibits.

(a)(1) The registrant’s code of ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is filed with the registrant’s annual Form N-CSR.

    (2) Separate certifications by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, are attached.

    (3) Written solicitation to repurchase securities issued by closed-end companies: not applicable.

(b) A certification by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, is attached.

                                                                                  
  SIGNATURES
 
  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment 
Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the 
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. 
 
T. Rowe Price Index Trust, Inc. 
 
 
By  /s/ Edward C. Bernard 
  Edward C. Bernard 
  Principal Executive Officer 
 
Date  August 17, 2007 
 
 
 
  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment 
Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of 
the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. 
 
 
By  /s/ Edward C. Bernard 
  Edward C. Bernard 
  Principal Executive Officer 
 
Date  August 17, 2007 
 
 
 
By  /s/ Joseph A. Carrier 
  Joseph A. Carrier 
  Principal Financial Officer 
 
Date  August 17, 2007