UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
April 20, 2015 (March 23, 2015)
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
Caesars Entertainment Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 001-10410 | 62-1411755 | ||
(State of Incorporation) | (Commission File Number) |
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
One Caesars Palace Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89109
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(702) 407-6000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
¨ | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
¨ | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure.
On April 20, 2015, Caesars Entertainment Corporation (CEC) and Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc., a majority owned subsidiary of CEC (CEOC), announced that while they have been engaged in confidential discussions with certain beneficial holders (the Ad Hoc Committee Bank Lenders) of first lien debt (the First Lien Debt) incurred by CEOC pursuant to that certain Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the Credit Agreement), dated as of July 25, 2014, by and among CEC, CEOC, the lenders party thereto and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent, CEC, CEOC and the Ad Hoc Committee Bank Lenders have not been able to reach an agreement regarding the Restructuring (as defined in the Third Amended and Restated Restructuring Support and Forbearance Agreement (the Bond RSA) among CEC, CEOC, LeverageSource III (H Holdings), LeverageSource V, L.P. and certain holders of claims in respect of CEOCs 11.25% senior secured notes due 2017, CEOCs 8.5% senior secured notes due 2020 and CEOCs 9% senior secured notes due 2020 (the First Lien Bonds)). In connection with the discussions, CEC and CEOC provided certain confidential information to the Ad Hoc Committee Bank Lenders pursuant to non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) between CEC, CEOC and the Ad Hoc Committee Bank Lenders. The NDAs have now expired pursuant to their terms. CEC is making the disclosures herein in accordance with the terms of the NDAs. All capitalized terms used, but not defined herein, shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Bond RSA, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K dated January 14, 2015 filed by CEC with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
On March 23, 2015, a meeting (the Meeting) occurred among CEC, CEOC and the Ad Hoc Committee Bank Lenders, together with their respective legal and financial advisors. CEC and CEOC provided the information included in Exhibit 99.1 hereto (the Discussion Materials) to the Ad Hoc Committee Bank Lenders and their advisors at the Meeting.
On March 28, 2015, after multiple rounds of negotiations at and after the Meeting, CEC, CEOC and the Ad Hoc Committee Bank Lenders believed they reached an agreement in principle regarding certain terms of a restructuring as follows (the Specified Terms):
1. | The Rent for the Lease and the CPLV Lease will be fixed for the first seven years of the Term. |
2. | The Percentage Rent for the Lease and the CPLV Lease will in no event be less than zero. The Base Rent for the Lease and the CPLV Lease during any of the Renewal Terms will not be less than Base Rent then payable during the year immediately preceding the commencement of such Renewal Term. |
3. | CEC will provide to holders of the First Lien Debt (the Bank Lenders) a guarantee of collection (the Future CEC Guarantee) for (1) the New First Lien OpCo Debt and New Second Lien OpCo Debt to be received by the Bank Lenders in a restructuring, and (2) the CPLV Mezzanine Debt, if any, to be received by the Bank Lenders in a restructuring so long as such Future CEC Guarantee for the CPLV Mezzanine Debt is permitted by the structure of the REIT, and, if CEC shall be unable to provide the Future CEC Guarantee for the CPLV Mezzanine Debt to the Bank Lenders, CEC and the Ad Hoc Committee Bank Lenders shall mutually agree upon an economic solution in lieu thereof. |
4. | The existing collection guarantee provided by CEC with respect to the amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement (the CEC Credit Agreement Guarantee) will be amended (the CEC Credit Agreement Guarantee Amendment) to (1) prevent CECs sponsors and CECs sponsors affiliates from voting on amendments to the CEC Credit Agreement Guarantee, (2) clarify that the prior guarantee provided by CEC, dated as of January 28, 2008 (as amended and restated on June 10, 2009), with respect to the amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement that was replaced by the CEC Credit Agreement Guarantee will be restored if any (x) guarantee that CEC provided to creditors of CEOC (other than the Bank Lenders) is restored, comes into existence or is otherwise reinstated or (y) new guarantee is issued by CEC, and (3) eliminate in its entirety the references to or immediately available funds in the relevant paragraphs of the CEC Credit Agreement Guarantee so as to clarify that payments due must be made in full in cash. |
5. | CEC will pay $125 million (the Upfront Payment) to the Bank Lenders, on a pro rata basis, in connection with (a) the CEC Credit Agreement Guarantee Amendment, (b) termination of the CEC Credit Agreement Guarantee on the effective date of a restructuring and (c) forbearance by the Bank Lenders from the exercise of certain rights and remedies against CEC arising from certain specified transactions. |
6. | On the effective date of a restructuring, CEC will pay the Bank Lenders a total amount of interest on the First Lien Debt equal to the sum of (x) 80% of the non-default contract rate of interest on the First Lien Debt for 2015, plus (y) an increase in a percentage of total contract rate of interest on the First Lien Debt equivalent to 25 bps per quarter for the period of October 1, 2015 through and including the effective date of a restructuring, to a maximum of the non-default contract rate of interest on the First Lien Debt otherwise due under the Credit Agreement, less (1) any monthly adequate protection payments made by CEOC to the Bank Lenders pursuant to the final cash collateral order entered in CEOCs chapter 11 cases that are not recharacterized or otherwise disallowed and (2) the Upfront Payment. |
7. | CECs termination rights in a restructuring support agreement to be entered into by and among CEC, CEOC, LeverageSource III (H Holdings), LeverageSource V, L.P. and the Ad Hoc Committee Bank Lenders (the Bank RSA) will (1) in certain circumstances be subject to waiver by a requisite percentage of the Bank Lenders that execute the Bank RSA, and (2) not be applicable where directors of CEC constituted a majority of the board of directors of CEOC for the purposes of voting to approve any such action. |
8. | The CEC Guaranty (as defined in the MLSA) will not terminate if the Manager is terminated for cause, subject to binding arbitration. |
9. | The definitive documentation for the CPLV Mezzanine Debt will contain only terms and conditions that are reasonable and customary for issuances of this type. |
10. | Each Ad Hoc Committee Bank Lender who signs the Bank RSA and holds First Lien Bonds will receive its pro rata share of the RSA Forbearance Fees. |
An abbreviated bullet points summary of the Specified Terms was sent by counsel to the Ad Hoc Committee Bank Lenders to CECs counsel. The Specified Terms described above remained subject to negotiation and execution by CEC, CEOC and the Ad Hoc Committee Bank Lenders of definitive documentation (including term sheets) that reflected the Specified Terms.
Since March 28, 2015, CEC, CEOC and the Ad Hoc Committee Bank Lenders have engaged in negotiations to reach agreement on a Bank RSA (including term sheets that would be attached thereto) and other definitive documentation that reflect the Specified Terms and other material terms of a restructuring. Notwithstanding such negotiations, CEC, CEOC and the Ad Hoc Committee Bank Lenders have been unable to reach an agreement on certain significant issues relating to the Bank RSA and such other definitive documentation. These significant issues include, among others, (i) the circumstances under which the exercise of remedies would be deemed to have been exhausted under the Future CEC Guarantee, (ii) the collateral to secure the obligations under the Future CEC Guarantee, (iii) the terms of the covenant package (including the types of covenants and terms thereof) under the Future CEC Guarantee, the New First Lien OpCo Debt and New Second Lien OpCo Debt, and (iv) when CEC would start paying 80% of the non-default contract rate of interest to the Bank Lenders on the First Lien Debt.
Accordingly, as of April 20, 2015, CEC has ceased discussions with the Ad Hoc Committee Bank Lenders.
Any financial projections or forecasts included in the Discussion Materials (the projections) were not prepared with a view toward public disclosure or compliance with the published guidelines of the Securities and Exchange Commission or the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants regarding projections or forecasts. The projections do not purport to present CEC and CEOCs financial condition in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. CEC and CEOCs
independent accountants have not examined, compiled or otherwise applied procedures to the projections and, accordingly, do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance with respect to the projections. The inclusion of the projections herein should not be regarded as an indication that CEC, CEOC or their affiliates or representatives consider the projections to be a reliable prediction of future events, and the projections should not be relied upon as such. Neither CEC, CEOC nor any of their affiliates or representatives has made or makes any representation to any person regarding the ultimate outcome of CEOCs restructuring compared to the projections, and none of them undertakes any obligation to publicly update the projections to reflect circumstances existing after the date when the projections were made or to reflect the occurrence of future events, even in the event that any or all of the assumptions underlying the projections are shown to be in error.
The information set forth in this Item 7.01 of this Current Report on Form 8-K is being furnished pursuant to Item 7.01 of Form 8-K and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any of CECs filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and regardless of any general incorporation language in such filings, except to the extent expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing. The filing of this Item 7.01 of this Current Report on Form 8-K shall not be deemed an admission as to the materiality of any information herein that is required to be disclosed solely by reason of Regulation FD.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements and information included in the Discussion Materials may constitute forward-looking statements intended to qualify for the safe harbor from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements contain words such as may, will, project, might, expect, believe, anticipate, intend, could, would, estimate, continue, pursue, or the negative or other variations thereof or comparable terminology. In particular, they include statements relating to future actions, new projects, strategies, future performance, the outcomes of contingencies, a potential restructuring of CEOCs debt and future financial results of CEC and CEOC. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and projections about future events. Readers are cautioned that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance or results and involve risks and uncertainties that cannot be predicted or quantified, and, consequently, the actual performance of CEC and CEOC may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, factors described from time to time in CEC and CEOCs reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (including the sections entitled Risk Factors and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained therein).
Item 9.01 | Financial Statements and Exhibits. |
(d) Exhibits. The following exhibit is being furnished herewith:
Exhibit |
Description | |
99.1 | Discussion Materials provided in connection with discussions with the Ad Hoc Committee Bank Lenders at the Meeting. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION | ||||||
Date: April 20, 2015 | By: | /s/ SCOTT E. WIEGAND | ||||
Name: | Scott E. Wiegand | |||||
Title: | Senior Vice President, Deputy General | |||||
Counsel and Corporate Secretary |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit |
Description | |
99.1 | Discussion Materials provided in connection with discussions with the Ad Hoc Committee Bank Lenders at the Meeting. |
Exhibit 99.1
Open Issues Review | AWP / ACP - Privileged & Confidential |
($ in millions)
|
||||||
CEC proposal | Bank counter | Difference | ||||
Post-Petition Interest |
- $300 million - $75 million upfront |
- Full contract interest but no default interest - 8.1% or $437/annum |
- $137 / year - $33mm upfront | |||
- 3 months interest paid up front ($108mm)
|
||||||
Additional cash payment |
- N/A | - Additional cash payment of $294mm as a make-whole - Payable on effective date
|
- $294 million | |||
Milestones | - Push out milestones by 3 months | - Accepted | - Discuss |
Page 1
Interest |
AWP / ACP - Privileged & Confidential | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disclosure | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Filing Date | Statement | Confirm. | Drop Dead | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current Bid / Ask | Jan-15 | Feb-15 | Mar-15 | Apr-15 | May-15 | Jun-15 | Jul-15 | Aug-15 | Sep-15 | Oct-15 | Nov-15 | Dec-15 | Jan-16 | Feb-16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current Offer ($300) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Received |
| $ | 300 | $ | 300 | $ | 300 | $ | 300 | $ | 300 | $ | 300 | $ | 300 | $ | 300 | $ | 300 | $ | 300 | $ | 300 | $ | 300 | $ | 300 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effective Annual Interest |
| 65.4 | % | 34.3 | % | 22.5 | % | 16.9 | % | 13.4 | % | 11.2 | % | 9.6 | % | 8.3 | % | 7.4 | % | 6.7 | % | 6.1 | % | 5.6 | % | 5.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bank Ask (Contract Rate) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Received |
| $ | 37 | $ | 71 | $ | 108 | $ | 144 | $ | 181 | $ | 217 | $ | 254 | $ | 291 | $ | 327 | $ | 364 | $ | 400 | $ | 437 | $ | 467 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effective Annual Interest |
| 8.1 | % | 8.1 | % | 8.1 | % | 8.1 | % | 8.1 | % | 8.1 | % | 8.1 | % | 8.1 | % | 8.1 | % | 8.1 | % | 8.1 | % | 8.1 | % | 8.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Difference |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Received |
| $ | 263 | $ | 229 | $ | 192 | $ | 156 | $ | 119 | $ | 83 | $ | 46 | $ | 9 | ($ | 27 | ) | ($ | 64 | ) | ($ | 100 | ) | ($ | 137 | ) | ($ | 167 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effective Annual Interest |
| 57.3 | % | 26.3 | % | 14.4 | % | 8.8 | % | 5.3 | % | 3.1 | % | 1.5 | % | 0.3 | % | (0.7 | %) | (1.4 | %) | (2.0 | %) | (2.5 | %) | (2.9 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current offer as % of Bank Ask |
809 | % | 425 | % | 279 | % | 209 | % | 166 | % | 139 | % | 118 | % | 103 | % | 92 | % | 82 | % | 75 | % | 69 | % | 64 | % |
Page 2
$294 Ask Implies 85c Trading Price For PropCo 1L | AWP / ACP - Privileged & Confidential |
($ in millions)
PropCo 1L (to banks): |
$ | 1,961 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total PropCo 1L Debt |
$ | 2,392 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PropCo 1L Leverage
|
5.0x | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Price |
100.0 | 99.0 | 98.0 | 97.0 | 96.0 | 95.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ MTM |
| ($ | 20 | ) | ($ | 39 | ) | ($ | 59 | ) | ($ | 78 | ) | ($ | 98 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
% of Bank Recovery |
| (0.4 | %) | (0.7 | %) | (1.1 | %) | (1.5 | %) | (1.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Implied Leverage |
5.0x | 5.0x | 4.9x | 4.9x | 4.8x | 4.8x | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Implied YTM (1)
|
5.0 | % | 5.2 | % | 5.5 | % | 5.7 | % | 5.9 | % | 6.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Additional bank cash payment ask |
$ | 294 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Implied trading price of PropCo 1L |
85.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Implied EBITDA multiple |
4.3x | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Implied YTM (1) |
8.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GLPI Cap Structure | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate | Book | Leverage | Price | Market | Leverage | CY | YTM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
$700mm RCF |
L+150 | 258 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Term Loan A |
L+150 | 300 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total Senior Debt |
L+150 | $ | 558 | 1.3x | N/A | $ | 558 | 1.3x | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Nov 2023 Senior Unsecured |
5.375 | % | 500 | 104.3 | 521 | 5.16 | % | 4.77 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Nov 2020 Senior Unsecured |
4.875 | % | 1,000 | 104.1 | 1,041 | 4.68 | % | 4.06 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Nov 2018 Senior Unsecured |
4.375 | % | 550 | 103.0 | 567 | 4.25 | % | 3.48 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total Debt |
4.863 | % | $ | 2,608 | 6.2x | 103.0 | $ | 2,686 | 6.4x | 4.72 | % | 4.08 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
GLPI LTM EBITDA |
$ | 423 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Yield GLPI bonds |
4.08 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PropCo 1L Interest |
L+350 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Implied PropCo trading price(1) |
104.1 |
GLPIs debt trades above par, even without a guarantee on its lease and with 1.2x greater leverage
|
(1) | Assuming 1.5% LIBOR swap rate, 5 year maturity |
Page 3
Documentation Points | AWP / ACP - Privileged & Confidential |
Accepted
|
Lease
- Agree that CEOC credit can be made available for the Lease and CEOC can be added as a guarantor of the Lease.
- Generally agree the standard for Landlord having approval rights over alterations will be similar to Penn.
- Agree the list of permitted assignments by Tenant should be definitive.
- Agree to pay rent into a lockbox if required by Landlords lender.
- Open to listing specific provisions of the Lease that would be subject to alternative dispute resolution.
CPLV Mezz
- Agree that the Borrower will be an SPE with independent directors.
- Agree to a more straightforward default interest rate formula (3-5% above the coupon rate would be customary).
- Agree to a customary nonrecourse carveout guaranty and environmental indemnity. Presumably guarantor would be the REITs master limited partnership.
- Agree to provide a UCC policy and we agree to hard cash management with respect to interest due under the mezz loan.
- Agree to general reps, warranties and covenants (including negative covenants) that are consistent with the CPLV Market Debt.
- Agree to the lender flexibility relating to assignments/ participations/ syndications so long as the documents also provide customary borrower protections.
- Agree to a prohibition on subordinated debt/preferred equity by Mezz Borrower, so long as such prohibition does not apply to corporate/ parent-level debt.
RSA
- Can agree to consultation rights (but not consent) on operational issues, subject to materiality thresholds for new employment contracts, agreements with affiliates, etc.
- We can work with Banks to set a threshold for effectiveness of the RSA that accounts for the size of their group.
- If we are otherwise resolved, we would be able to agree to an MAE as long as its scope is properly defined.
Open(1)
|
- Amending RSA/Term Sheet: Must be able to amend deal without Banks consent to get Non-1Ls on board so long as changes dont affect the Banks (or 1L Bonds) economics. Same standard as in Bond RSA.
- CEC Termination Rights: CEC must have the same ability as the Banks do to terminate the RSA in certain circumstances.
- Guaranty/MLSA: CECs guaranty must be tied to CECs management of the properties.
- Rent issues: Fixed/variable.
- CPLV Market Debt: The market, not the CPLV Mezz Lenders, will determine terms of the CPLV Market Debt, but terms must fit within economic contraints (interest cap, $2.0bn)
(1) | The open items do not include all of the open issues with regards to documentation, but highlight the substantive business level issues only. |
Page 5