Concentrations and Litigation	12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2024
Concentrations and Litigation [Abstract]
CONCENTRATIONS AND LITIGATION	NOTE 13 – CONCENTRATIONS AND LITIGATION *Market Concentration* All the Company’s revenue-generating operations are conducted in the PRC. Accordingly, the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations may be influenced by the political, economic and legal environments in the PRC, and by the general state of the PRC’s economy. The Company’s operations in the PRC are subject to specific considerations and significant risks not typically associated with companies in North America and Western Europe. These include risks associated with, among other things, the political, economic and legal environment and foreign currency exchange. The Company’s results may be adversely affected by, among other things, changes in governmental policies with respect to laws and regulations, anti-inflationary measures, currency conversion and remittance abroad, and rates and methods of taxation. *Vendor and Customer Concentration* There was no vendor that the Company purchased over 10% of its raw materials during the year ended June 30, 2024. There were six vendors that the Company purchased over 10% of its raw materials with an aggregate amount of $71,040,024, or 12.2%, 12.0%, 12.0%, 11.8%, 11.7% and 11.6%, respectively, for fertilizer manufacturing during the year ended June 30, 2023. There was no customer that account for over 10% of the Company’s manufactured fertilizer sales for the year ended June 30, 2024. Six customers accounted for an aggregate amount of $71,690,103, or 10.7%, 10.4%, 10.4%, 10.4%, 10.3%, and 10.2%, respectively, of the Company’s manufactured fertilizer sales for the year ended June 30, 2023. *Litigation* On June 5, 2020, an individual filed suit pro se (as in, representing oneself without an attorney) in the Southern District of Florida federal court alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act. The Company believes the action is without merit and vigorously opposed it. The Company moved to dismiss the litigation and for attorney’s fees from the plaintiff. On November 2, 2020, the case was transferred to the United States District Court for The Southern District Of New York. On March 31, 2021, the Southern District of New York federal court presiding over the case dismissed all claims against the Company, its executives, and its independent directors. The dismissal was without prejudice and the plaintiff can appeal or amend within 30 days, or by October 29, 2021. The plaintiff amended the complaint on Oct 30, 2021. On August 30, 2022, the Southern District of New York federal court presiding over the case issued an order granting motions to dismiss all claims in the amended complaint against the Company, its executives, and its independent directors. On September 6, 2022, the plaintiff filed a notice of civil appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. On December 11, 2023, the Second Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision. On or about April 19, 2024, the Plaintiff filed an appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States. The Company does not believe a response to Plaintiff’s appeal is necessary. On May 28, 2024, an individual commenced a lawsuit in Texas state court against the Company and its co-CEO, Mr. Zhibiao Pan. The individual alleges that the Company used funds he stored in cryptocurrency wallets operated by entities related to Mr. Pan to purchase cryptocurrency mining sites. The Company plans to dismiss the lawsuit. The Company has engaged counsel and negotiated an extension to enable investigation of this matter, and will be responding to the lawsuit in December 2024. There are no other actions, suits, proceedings, inquiries or investigations before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our companies or our subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.

Concentrations and Litigation

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2024

Concentrations and Litigation [Abstract]

NOTE 13 – CONCENTRATIONS AND LITIGATION

Market Concentration

All the Company’s revenue-generating operations are conducted in the PRC. Accordingly, the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations may be influenced by the political, economic and legal environments in the PRC, and by the general state of the PRC’s economy.

The Company’s operations in the PRC are subject to specific considerations and significant risks not typically associated with companies in North America and Western Europe. These include risks associated with, among other things, the political, economic and legal environment and foreign currency exchange. The Company’s results may be adversely affected by, among other things, changes in governmental policies with respect to laws and regulations, anti-inflationary measures, currency conversion and remittance abroad, and rates and methods of taxation.

Vendor and Customer Concentration

There was no vendor that the Company purchased over 10% of its raw materials during the year ended June 30, 2024.

There were six vendors that the Company purchased over 10% of its raw materials with an aggregate amount of $71,040,024, or 12.2%, 12.0%, 12.0%, 11.8%, 11.7% and 11.6%, respectively, for fertilizer manufacturing during the year ended June 30, 2023.

There was no customer that account for over 10% of the Company’s manufactured fertilizer sales for the year ended June 30, 2024.

Six customers accounted for an aggregate amount of $71,690,103, or 10.7%, 10.4%, 10.4%, 10.4%, 10.3%, and 10.2%, respectively, of the Company’s manufactured fertilizer sales for the year ended June 30, 2023.

Litigation

On June 5, 2020, an individual filed suit pro se (as in, representing oneself without an attorney) in the Southern District of Florida federal court alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act. The Company believes the action is without merit and vigorously opposed it. The Company moved to dismiss the litigation and for attorney’s fees from the plaintiff. On November 2, 2020, the case was transferred to the United States District Court for The Southern District Of New York. On March 31, 2021, the Southern District of New York federal court presiding over the case dismissed all claims against the Company, its executives, and its independent directors. The dismissal was without prejudice and the plaintiff can appeal or amend within 30 days, or by October 29, 2021. The plaintiff amended the complaint on Oct 30, 2021. On August 30, 2022, the Southern District of New York federal court presiding over the case issued an order granting motions to dismiss all claims in the amended complaint against the Company, its executives, and its independent directors. On September 6, 2022, the plaintiff filed a notice of civil appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. On December 11, 2023, the Second Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision. On or about April 19, 2024, the Plaintiff filed an appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States. The Company does not believe a response to Plaintiff’s appeal is necessary.

On May 28, 2024, an individual commenced a lawsuit in Texas state court against the Company and its co-CEO, Mr. Zhibiao Pan. The individual alleges that the Company used funds he stored in cryptocurrency wallets operated by entities related to Mr. Pan to purchase cryptocurrency mining sites. The Company plans to dismiss the lawsuit. The Company has engaged counsel and negotiated an extension to enable investigation of this matter, and will be responding to the lawsuit in December 2024.

There are no other actions, suits, proceedings, inquiries or investigations before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our companies or our subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.