Concentrations and Litigation	6 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2023
Concentrations and Litigation [Abstract]
CONCENTRATIONS AND LITIGATION	NOTE 13 – CONCENTRATIONS AND LITIGATION *Market Concentration* The majority of the Company’s revenue-generating operations are conducted in the PRC. Accordingly, the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations may be influenced by the political, economic and legal environments in the PRC, and by the general state of the PRC’s economy. The Company’s operations in the PRC are subject to specific considerations and significant risks not typically associated with companies in North America and Western Europe. These include risks associated with, among other things, the political, economic and legal environment and foreign currency exchange. The Company’s results may be adversely affected by, among other things, changes in governmental policies with respect to laws and regulations, anti-inflationary measures, currency conversion and remittance abroad, and rates and methods of taxation. *Vendor and Customer Concentration* None of the vendors accounted over 10% of the Company’s purchase of raw materials and supplies for the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022. No customer accounted for over 10% of the Company’s sales for the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022. *Litigation* On June 5, 2020, an individual filed suit pro se (as in, representing oneself without an attorney) in the Southern District of Florida federal court alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act. The Company believes the action is without merit and vigorously opposed it. The company moved to dismiss the litigation and for attorney’s fees from the plaintiff. On November 2, 2020, the case was transferred to the United States District Court for The Southern District Of New York. On December 31, 2021, the Southern District of New York federal court presiding over the case dismissed all claims against the company, its executives, and its independent directors. The dismissal was without prejudice and the plaintiff can appeal or amend within 30 days, or by October 29, 2021. The plaintiff amended the complaint on Oct 30, 2021. On August 30, 2022, the Southern District of New York federal court presiding over the case issued an order granting motions to dismiss all claims in the amended complaint against the Company, its executives, and its independent directors. On September 6, 2022, the plaintiff filed a notice of civil appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. The appeal has now been fully briefed and the Company expects a decision to issue sometime in the coming year. There are no other actions, suits, proceedings, inquiries or investigations before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our companies or our subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.

Concentrations and Litigation

6 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2023

Concentrations and Litigation [Abstract]

NOTE 13 – CONCENTRATIONS AND LITIGATION

Market Concentration

The majority of the Company’s revenue-generating operations are conducted in the PRC. Accordingly, the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations may be influenced by the political, economic and legal environments in the PRC, and by the general state of the PRC’s economy.

The Company’s operations in the PRC are subject to specific considerations and significant risks not typically associated with companies in North America and Western Europe. These include risks associated with, among other things, the political, economic and legal environment and foreign currency exchange. The Company’s results may be adversely affected by, among other things, changes in governmental policies with respect to laws and regulations, anti-inflationary measures, currency conversion and remittance abroad, and rates and methods of taxation.

Vendor and Customer Concentration

None of the vendors accounted over 10% of the Company’s purchase of raw materials and supplies for the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.

No customer accounted for over 10% of the Company’s sales for the six months ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.

Litigation

On June 5, 2020, an individual filed suit pro se (as in, representing oneself without an attorney) in the Southern District of Florida federal court alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act. The Company believes the action is without merit and vigorously opposed it. The company moved to dismiss the litigation and for attorney’s fees from the plaintiff. On November 2, 2020, the case was transferred to the United States District Court for The Southern District Of New York. On December 31, 2021, the Southern District of New York federal court presiding over the case dismissed all claims against the company, its executives, and its independent directors. The dismissal was without prejudice and the plaintiff can appeal or amend within 30 days, or by October 29, 2021. The plaintiff amended the complaint on Oct 30, 2021. On August 30, 2022, the Southern District of New York federal court presiding over the case issued an order granting motions to dismiss all claims in the amended complaint against the Company, its executives, and its independent directors. On September 6, 2022, the plaintiff filed a notice of civil appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. The appeal has now been fully briefed and the Company expects a decision to issue sometime in the coming year.

There are no other actions, suits, proceedings, inquiries or investigations before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our companies or our subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.