XML 36 R21.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
Concentrations and Litigation
12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2020
Risks and Uncertainties [Abstract]  
CONCENTRATIONS AND LITIGATION

NOTE 15 – CONCENTRATIONS AND LITIGATION


Market Concentration


All the Company’s revenue-generating operations are conducted in the PRC. Accordingly, the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations may be influenced by the political, economic and legal environments in the PRC, and by the general state of the PRC’s economy.


The Company’s operations in the PRC are subject to specific considerations and significant risks not typically associated with companies in North America and Western Europe. These include risks associated with, among other things, the political, economic and legal environment and foreign currency exchange. The Company’s results may be adversely affected by, among other things, changes in governmental policies with respect to laws and regulations, anti-inflationary measures, currency conversion and remittance abroad, and rates and methods of taxation.


Vendor and Customer Concentration


There was no vendor that the Company purchased over 10% of its raw materials for fertilizer manufacturing during the year ended June 30, 2020.


There were two vendors from which the Company purchased 10.8% and 10.6%, respectively, of its raw materials for fertilizer manufacturing during the year ended June 30, 2019. Total purchases from these two vendors amounted to $51,459,699 as June 30, 2019


Two customers accounted for an aggregate amount of $42,091,565, or 10.5% and 10.4%, respectively, of the Company’s manufactured fertilizer sales for the year ended June 30, 2020. 


Two customers accounted for an aggregate amount of $35,303,527, or 7.4% and 7.3%, respectively, of the Company’s manufactured fertilizer sales for the year ended June 30, 2019.


Litigation


On June 5, 2020, an individual filed suit pro se (as in, representing oneself without an attorney) in the Southern District of Florida federal court alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act. The Company believes the action is without merit and vigorously opposed it. The company has moved to dismiss the litigation and for attorney’s fees from the plaintiff. The motions are pending.