XML 60 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
CONCENTRATIONS AND LITIGIATION
12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Concentration and Litigation [Abstract]  
Concentration And Litigation [Text Block]

NOTE 15 –CONCENTRATIONS AND LITIGIATION

 

Market Concentration

 

All of the Company's revenue-generating operations are conducted in the PRC. Accordingly, the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations may be influenced by the political, economic and legal environments in the PRC, and by the general state of the PRC's economy.

 

The Company's operations in the PRC are subject to specific considerations and significant risks not typically associated with companies in North America and Western Europe. These include risks associated with, among other things , the political, economic and legal environments and foreign currency exchange. The Company's results may be adversely affected by, among other things, changes in governmental policies with respect to laws and regulations, anti-inflationary measures, currency conversion and remittance abroad, and rates and methods of taxation.

 

Vendor and Customer Concentration

 

There was two vendors from which the Company purchased 11.9% and 10.1% of its raw materials for the year ended June 30, 2012. Account payable to Beijing Baofengnian Agricultural Material Co. Ltd. was $216,842 and advance payment to Inner Mongolia Shuangying Chemical Products Co. Ltd. was $1,389,368.

 

One vendor accounted for approximately 11.5% of the Company’s total purchases for the year ended June 30, 2011. Advance payment to Inner Mongolia Shuangying Chemical Products Co. Ltd. was $900,070.as of June 30, 2011.

 

One vendor accounted for approximately 12.4% of the Company’s total purchases of raw materials for the year ended June 30, 2010. There were no accounts payable to this vendor as of June 30, 2010.

 

One customer, Sinoagri Holding Company Limited, accounted for $31,509,757, or 14.5% of the Company’s sales for the year ended June 30, 2012. One customer, Sinoagri Holding Company Limited, accounted for $31,599,412, or 17.6% of the Company’s sales for the year ended June 30, 2011. There was no customers which accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s sales for the years ended June 30, 2010.

 

Litigation

 

On October 15, 2010, a class action lawsuit was filed against the Company and certain of its current and former officers in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada (the "Nevada Federal Court") on behalf of purchasers of the Company’s common stock between November 12, 2009 and September 1, 2010.  On April 27, 2011, the court appointed the lead plaintiff and lead plaintiff’s counsel. On June 13, 2011, lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint, which adds several additional defendants and expands the class period to include purchasers who purchased our common stock between May 12, 2009 and January 4, 2011. The amended complaint alleges that the Company and certain of its current and former officers and directors violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by making material misstatements and omissions in the Company’s financial statements, securities offering documents, and related disclosures during the class period..  The plaintiffs claim that such allegedly misleading financial statements inflated the price of the Company’s common stock and seek monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial. Defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint on October 7, 2011. Defendants’ motions are fully briefed and the Nevada Federal Court has scheduled oral argument for October 2, 2012.

 

On September 5, 2012, the Company received a letter from the staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission notifying it that the staff had completed its investigation of the Company and that it did not intend to recommend any enforcement action against the Company.