CONCENTRATIONS AND LITIGIATION	3 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2012
Concentration and Litigation [Abstract]
Concentration And Litigation [Text Block]	NOTE 15 -CONCENTRATIONS AND LITIGIATION *Market Concentration* All of the Company's revenue-generating operations are conducted in the PRC. Accordingly, the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations may be influenced by the political, economic and legal environments in the PRC, and by the general state of the PRC's economy. The Company's operations in the PRC are subject to specific considerations and significant risks not typically associated with companies in North America and Western Europe. These include risks associated with, among other things , the political, economic and legal environments and foreign currency exchange. The Company's results may be adversely affected by, among other things, changes in governmental policies with respect to laws and regulations, anti-inflationary measures, currency conversion and remittance abroad, and rates and methods of taxation. *Vendor and Customer Concentration* There were two vendors from which the Company purchased more than 10% of its raw materials for the fertilizer products for the three months ended September 30, 2012. There was no vendor from which the Company purchased more than 10% of its raw materials for the fertilizer products for the three months ended September 30, 2011. There was no customer that accounted over 10% of the total sales of fertilizer products as of three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. *Litigation* On October 15, 2010, a class action lawsuit was filed against the Company and certain of its current and former officers in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada (the "Nevada Federal Court") on behalf of purchasers of the Company’s common stock between November 12, 2009 and September 1, 2010. On April 27, 2011, the court appointed the lead plaintiff and lead plaintiff’s counsel. On June 13, 2011, lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint, which adds several additional defendants and expands the class period to include purchasers who purchased our common stock between May 12, 2009 and January 4, 2011. The amended complaint alleges that the Company and certain of its current and former officers and directors violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by making material misstatements and omissions in the Company’s financial statements, securities offering documents, and related disclosures during the class period.. The plaintiffs claim that such allegedly misleading financial statements inflated the price of the Company’s common stock and seek monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial. Defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint on October 7, 2011. Defendant’s motions were argued on October 2, 2012. On November 2, 2012, the Nevada Federal Court issued a decision dismissing the claims for violation of sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 as to all defendants and dismissing certain individual defendants from the complaint and allowing the claims for violations of section 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to continue with respect to the Company and certain of the individual defendants.

CONCENTRATIONS AND LITIGIATION

3 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2012

Concentration and Litigation [Abstract]

Concentration And Litigation [Text Block]

NOTE 15 -CONCENTRATIONS AND LITIGIATION

Market Concentration

All of the Company's revenue-generating operations are conducted in the PRC. Accordingly, the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations may be influenced by the political, economic and legal environments in the PRC, and by the general state of the PRC's economy.

The Company's operations in the PRC are subject to specific considerations and significant risks not typically associated with companies in North America and Western Europe. These include risks associated with, among other things , the political, economic and legal environments and foreign currency exchange. The Company's results may be adversely affected by, among other things, changes in governmental policies with respect to laws and regulations, anti-inflationary measures, currency conversion and remittance abroad, and rates and methods of taxation.

Vendor and Customer Concentration

There were two vendors from which the Company purchased more than 10% of its raw materials for the fertilizer products for the three months ended September 30, 2012.

There was no vendor from which the Company purchased more than 10% of its raw materials for the fertilizer products for the three months ended September 30, 2011.

There was no customer that accounted over 10% of the total sales of fertilizer products as of three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

Litigation

On October 15, 2010, a class action lawsuit was filed against the Company and certain of its current and former officers in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada (the "Nevada Federal Court") on behalf of purchasers of the Company’s common stock between November 12, 2009 and September 1, 2010. On April 27, 2011, the court appointed the lead plaintiff and lead plaintiff’s counsel. On June 13, 2011, lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint, which adds several additional defendants and expands the class period to include purchasers who purchased our common stock between May 12, 2009 and January 4, 2011. The amended complaint alleges that the Company and certain of its current and former officers and directors violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by making material misstatements and omissions in the Company’s financial statements, securities offering documents, and related disclosures during the class period.. The plaintiffs claim that such allegedly misleading financial statements inflated the price of the Company’s common stock and seek monetary damages in an amount to be determined at trial. Defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint on October 7, 2011. Defendant’s motions were argued on October 2, 2012. On November 2, 2012, the Nevada Federal Court issued a decision dismissing the claims for violation of sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 as to all defendants and dismissing certain individual defendants from the complaint and allowing the claims for violations of section 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to continue with respect to the Company and certain of the individual defendants.