XML 26 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Jul. 02, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required to be recorded at fair value, we consider the principal or most advantageous market in which we would transact and consider assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions, and risk of nonperformance. Generally accepted accounting principles prescribe a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1: quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2: inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; or
Level 3: unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Money market funds, time deposits and corporate notes/bonds are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued based on quoted market prices in active markets.
Certificates of deposit, commercial paper and certain U.S. government agency securities are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. These instruments are valued based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or based on other observable inputs consisting of market yields, reported trades and broker/dealer quotes.
The principal market in which we execute our foreign currency contracts is the institutional market in an over-the-counter environment with a relatively high level of price transparency. The market participants usually are large financial institutions. Our foreign currency contracts’ valuation inputs are based on quoted prices and quoted pricing intervals from public data sources and do not involve management judgment. These contracts are typically classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The fair value of our contingent consideration arrangements are determined based on our evaluation as to the probability and amount of any earn-out that will be achieved based on expected future performances by the acquired entities. These arrangements are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Our significant financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of July 2, 2016 and September 30, 2015 were as follows:
 
July 2, 2016
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
 
(in thousands)
Financial assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents
$
72,829

 
$

 
$

 
$
72,829

Marketable securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Certificates of deposit

 
680

 

 
680

Commercial paper

 
9,930

 

 
9,930

Corporate notes/bonds
31,590

 

 

 
31,590

U.S. government agency securities

 
2,406

 

 
2,406

Forward contracts

 
1,739

 

 
1,739

 
$
104,419

 
$
14,755

 
$

 
$
119,174

Financial liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent consideration related to acquisitions
$

 
$

 
$
19,497

 
$
19,497

Forward contracts

 
6,150

 

 
6,150

 
$

 
$
6,150

 
$
19,497

 
$
25,647

 
September 30, 2015
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
 
(in thousands)
Financial assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents
$
91,216

 
$

 
$

 
$
91,216

Forward contracts

 
507

 

 
507

 
$
91,216

 
$
507

 
$

 
$
91,723

Financial liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent consideration related to acquisitions
$

 
$

 
$
13,000

 
$
13,000

Forward contracts

 
46

 

 
46

 
$

 
$
46

 
$
13,000

 
$
13,046


Changes in the fair value of Level 3 contingent consideration liability associated with our acquisitions of ThingWorx, ColdLight and Kepware were as follows:
 
Contingent Consideration
 
(in thousands)
 
ThingWorx
 
ColdLight
 
Kepware
 
Total
Balance, October 1, 2015
$
9,000

 
$
4,000

 
$

 
$
13,000

Addition to contingent consideration

 

 
16,900

 
16,900

Change in present value of contingent consideration

 
1,000

 
97

 
1,097

Payment of contingent consideration
(9,000
)
 
(2,500
)
 
 
 
(11,500
)
Balance, July 2, 2016
$

 
$
2,500

 
$
16,997

 
$
19,497


 Of the total, $11.8 million of the contingent consideration liabilities is included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities, with the remaining $7.7 million in other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of July 2, 2016.