Commitments and Contingencies	9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2020
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	10. Commitments and Contingencies. Loan Commitment. On October 11, 2019, we acquired shares of stock in Selio Medical Limited (“Selio”) representing an ownership interest of approximately 19.5%, as well as an option to purchase all ordinary shares of Selio throughout a 45 day period commencing from the date Selio receives FDA 510(k) approval of a medical device it is currently developing, and an option to purchase all remaining shares of Selio on the third anniversary date of the agreement if we elect to purchase all ordinary shares. We have also made a loan of $250,000 to Selio and committed to provide additional loans of up to €2 million at a rate of 5% per annum. Additional loans made to Selio pursuant to our loan agreement, together with the initial advance and all other amounts owed to us by Selio, would be securitized by Selio’s assets. Litigation. In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in various proceedings, legal actions and claims. These proceedings, actions and claims may involve product liability, intellectual property, contract disputes, employment, governmental inquiries or other matters, including those more fully described below. The outcomes of these matters will generally not be known for prolonged periods of time. In certain proceedings, the claimants may seek damages as well as other compensatory and equitable relief that could result in the payment of significant claims and settlements and/or the imposition of injunctions or other equitable relief. For legal matters for which our management had sufficient information to reasonably estimate our future obligations, a liability representing management’s best estimate of the probable loss, or the minimum of the range of probable losses when a best estimate within the range is not known, is recorded. The estimates are based on consultation with legal counsel, previous settlement experience and settlement strategies. If actual outcomes are less favorable than those estimated by management, additional expense may be incurred, which could unfavorably affect our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The ultimate cost to us with respect to product liability claims could be materially different than the amount of the current estimates and accruals and could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Securities Litigation On December 3, 2019, the Bucks County Employees Retirement Fund filed a complaint against Merit, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, individually and on behalf of all purchasers of our common stock between February 26, 2019 and October 30, 2019. On February 24, 2020, the court appointed the City of Atlanta Police Pension Fund, the Atlanta Firefighters’ Pension Fund, and the Employees’ Retirement System of the City of Baton Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge as Lead Plaintiffs. This action is now captioned In re Merit Medical Systems, Inc. Securities Litigation (Master File No. 8:19-cv-02326-DOC-ADS). On June 30, 2020, Lead Plaintiffs filed a consolidated class action complaint for violations of federal securities laws against Merit, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, individually and on behalf of all purchasers of our common stock between February 26, 2019 and October 30, 2019. The consolidated class action complaint alleges that defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and seeks unspecified damages, costs and attorneys’ fees, and equitable relief. We intend to vigorously defend against the lawsuit and have filed a motion to dismiss the action. We have not recorded an expense related to this matter because any potential loss is not currently probable or reasonably estimable. Additionally, we cannot presently estimate the range of loss, if any, that may result from the matter. It is possible that the ultimate resolution of the foregoing matter, or other similar matters, if resolved in a manner unfavorable to us, may be materially adverse to our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Department of Justice Investigation In October 2016, we received a subpoena from the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) seeking information related to its investigation of certain of our marketing and promotional practices. We responded to the subpoena, as well as additional related requests, and on October 13, 2020, we entered into agreements with the DOJ and others to fully resolve the DOJ’s investigation. We denied the DOJ’s allegations, but determined that avoiding protracted litigation and its associated costs would enable us to focus on our mission of being the most customer-focused company in healthcare. Legal expenses we incurred in responding to the DOJ investigation for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2020 were approximately $1.4 million and $4.6 million, respectively. Legal costs for these matters, such as outside counsel fees and expenses, are charged to expense in the period incurred.

Commitments and Contingencies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2020

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

10. Commitments and Contingencies.

Loan Commitment. On October 11, 2019, we acquired shares of stock in Selio Medical Limited (“Selio”) representing an ownership interest of approximately 19.5%, as well as an option to purchase all ordinary shares of Selio throughout a 45 day period commencing from the date Selio receives FDA 510(k) approval of a medical device it is currently developing, and an option to purchase all remaining shares of Selio on the third anniversary date of the agreement if we elect to purchase all ordinary shares. We have also made a loan of $250,000 to Selio and committed to provide additional loans of up to €2 million at a rate of 5% per annum. Additional loans made to Selio pursuant to our loan agreement, together with the initial advance and all other amounts owed to us by Selio, would be securitized by Selio’s assets.

Litigation. In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in various proceedings, legal actions and claims. These proceedings, actions and claims may involve product liability, intellectual property, contract disputes, employment, governmental inquiries or other matters, including those more fully described below. The outcomes of these matters will generally not be known for prolonged periods of time. In certain proceedings, the claimants may seek damages as well as other compensatory and equitable relief that could result in the payment of significant claims and settlements and/or the imposition of injunctions or other equitable relief. For legal matters for which our management had sufficient information to reasonably estimate our future obligations, a liability representing management’s best estimate of the probable loss, or the minimum of the range of probable losses when a best estimate within the range is not known, is recorded. The estimates are based on consultation with legal counsel, previous settlement experience and settlement strategies. If actual outcomes are less favorable than those estimated by management, additional expense may be incurred, which could unfavorably affect our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The ultimate cost to us with respect to product liability claims could be materially different than the amount of the current estimates and accruals and could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Securities Litigation

On December 3, 2019, the Bucks County Employees Retirement Fund filed a complaint against Merit, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, individually and on behalf of all purchasers of our common stock between February 26, 2019 and October 30, 2019. On February 24, 2020, the court appointed the City of Atlanta Police Pension Fund, the Atlanta Firefighters’ Pension Fund, and the Employees’ Retirement System of the City of Baton Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge as Lead Plaintiffs. This action is now captioned In re Merit Medical Systems, Inc. Securities Litigation (Master File No. 8:19-cv-02326-DOC-ADS). On June 30, 2020, Lead Plaintiffs filed a consolidated class action complaint for violations of federal securities laws against Merit, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, individually and on behalf of all purchasers of our common stock between February 26, 2019 and October 30, 2019. The consolidated class action complaint alleges that defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and seeks unspecified damages, costs and attorneys’ fees, and equitable relief. We intend to vigorously defend against the lawsuit and have filed a motion to dismiss the action. We have not recorded an expense related to this matter because any potential loss is not currently probable or reasonably estimable. Additionally, we cannot presently estimate the range of loss, if any, that may result from the matter. It is possible that the ultimate resolution of the foregoing matter, or other similar matters, if resolved in a manner unfavorable to us, may be materially adverse to our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Department of Justice Investigation

In October 2016, we received a subpoena from the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) seeking information related to its investigation of certain of our marketing and promotional practices. We responded to the subpoena, as well as additional related requests, and on October 13, 2020, we entered into agreements with the DOJ and others to fully resolve the DOJ’s investigation. We denied the DOJ’s allegations, but determined that avoiding protracted litigation and its associated costs would enable us to focus on our mission of being the most customer-focused company in healthcare. Legal expenses we incurred in responding to the DOJ investigation for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2020 were approximately $1.4 million and $4.6 million, respectively.

Legal costs for these matters, such as outside counsel fees and expenses, are charged to expense in the period incurred.