XML 65 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2013
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill and Intangible Assets. The carrying amount of goodwill increased approximately $381,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 due to an adjustment related to a previous acquisition (see Note 5).

Other intangible assets at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, consisted of the following (in thousands):

 
September 30, 2013
 
Gross Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net Carrying
Amount
Patents
$
8,906

 
$
(2,298
)
 
$
6,608

Distribution agreements
5,176

 
(1,660
)
 
3,516

License agreements
2,733

 
(1,156
)
 
1,577

Trademarks
7,255

 
(1,719
)
 
5,536

Covenants not to compete
1,029

 
(339
)
 
690

Customer lists
20,204

 
(10,213
)
 
9,991

Royalty agreements
267

 
(267
)
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
$
45,570

 
$
(17,652
)
 
$
27,918


 
December 31, 2012
 
Gross Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net Carrying
Amount
Patents
$
7,843

 
$
(2,045
)
 
$
5,798

Distribution agreements
5,176

 
(1,301
)
 
3,875

License agreements
2,733

 
(861
)
 
1,872

Trademarks
7,311

 
(1,362
)
 
5,949

Covenants not to compete
1,035

 
(160
)
 
875

Customer lists
20,468

 
(8,038
)
 
12,430

Royalty agreements
267

 
(267
)
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
$
44,833

 
$
(14,034
)
 
$
30,799



Aggregate amortization expense was approximately $3.4 million and $10.4 million for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2013, respectively, and approximately $1.9 million and $5.7 million for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012, respectively.

Estimated amortization expense for intangible assets for the next five years consisted of the following as of September 30, 2013 (in thousands):

Year Ending December 31
 
Remaining 2013
$
3,363

2014
12,684

2015
12,140

2016
11,515

2017
11,150



We evaluate long-lived assets, including amortizing intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. We perform the impairment analysis at the asset group for which the lowest level of identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities. We compared the carrying value of the amortizing intangible assets acquired in our Ostial acquisition in January 2012 (see Note 5) to the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the asset group and determined that the carrying amount was not recoverable. We then determined the fair value of the amortizing assets related to the Ostial acquisition based on estimated future cash flows discounted back to their present value using a discount rate that reflects the risk profiles of the underlying activities. Some of the factors that influenced our estimated cash flows were slower than anticipated sales growth in the products acquired from our Ostial acquisition and uncertainty about future sales growth. The excess of the carrying value compared to the fair value was recognized as an intangible asset impairment charge. During the three months ended September 30, 2013, we recorded an impairment charge of approximately $8.1 million, which was offset by approximately $3.8 million of fair value reductions to the contingent consideration liability.