N-CSR 1 form.htm Money Market Obligations Trust - N-CSR


                                 UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

                                   FORM N-CSR
   CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES




                                    811-5950

                      (Investment Company Act File Number)


                         Money Market Obligations Trust
        _______________________________________________________________

               (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)



                           Federated Investors Funds
                              5800 Corporate Drive
                      Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15237-7000


                                 (412) 288-1900
                        (Registrant's Telephone Number)


                           John W. McGonigle, Esquire
                           Federated Investors Tower
                              1001 Liberty Avenue
                      Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-3779
                    (Name and Address of Agent for Service)
               (Notices should be sent to the Agent for Service)






                       Date of Fiscal Year End:  7/31/06


              Date of Reporting Period:  Fiscal year ended 7/31/06








ITEM 1.     REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Money Market Obligations Trust



ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT

July 31, 2006

Institutional Capital Shares

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
SHAREHOLDER EXPENSE EXAMPLE
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS SUMMARY TABLES
PORTFOLIOS OF INVESTMENTS
STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND TRUST OFFICERS
EVALUATION AND APPROVAL OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
VOTING PROXIES ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

Not FDIC Insured * May Lose Value * No Bank Guarantee

Federated Investors 50 Years of Growth & Innovation

Financial Highlights

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

            
Year Ended
   
Net Asset Value,
Beginning of Period

   
Net
Investment
Income

   
Net Realized
and Unrealized
Gain (Loss) on
Investments


   
Total From
Investment
Operations

Government Obligations Fund









July 31, 2005 3
$1.00 0.014 -- 0.014
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.041 -- 0.041
Municipal Obligations Fund









July 31, 2002
$1.00 0.017 -- 0.017
July 31, 2003
$1.00 0.011 -- 0.011
July 31, 2004
$1.00 0.008 (0.000 ) 5 0.008
July 31, 2005
$1.00 0.017 0.000 5 0.017
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.029 (0.000 ) 5 0.029
Prime Cash Obligations Fund









July 31, 2002
$1.00 0.022 -- 0.022
July 31, 2003
$1.00 0.012 -- 0.012
July 31, 2004
$1.00 0.009 -- 0.009
July 31, 2005
$1.00 0.021 -- 0.021
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.042 -- 0.042

1 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

2 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and net investment income ratios shown.

3 Reflects operations for the period from January 18, 2005 (start of performance) to July 31, 2005.

4 Computed on an annualized basis.

5 Represents less than $0.001.

6 During the period, the Fund was reimbursed by the shareholder services provider, which had an impact of 0.02% on the total return. (See Notes to Financial Statements, Note 5.)

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

          Ratios to Average Net Assets
   
Distributions
From Net
Investment
Income

   
Net Asset Value,
End of Period

   
Total Return 1
   
Net
Expenses


   
Net
Investment
Income


   
Expense Waiver/
Reimbursement 2


   
Net Assets,
End of Period
(000 omitted)

















(0.014) $1.00 1.38% 0.31% 4 2.92% 4 0.24% 4 $ 298,625
(0.041) $1.00 4.19% 0.31% 4.17% 0.20% $ 377,414
















(0.017) $1.00 1.67% 0.30% 1.63% 0.28% $ 196,824
(0.011) $1.00 1.13% 0.30% 1.08% 0.27% $ 416,036
(0.008) $1.00 0.82% 0.30% 0.82% 0.27% $ 265,345
(0.017) $1.00 1.71% 0.28% 1.94% 0.28% $1,061,717
(0.029) $1.00 2.90% 0.28% 2.83% 0.24% $ 882,006
















(0.022) $1.00 2.22% 0.30% 2.07% 0.26% $ 894,934
(0.012) $1.00 1.25% 0.30% 1.26% 0.26% $ 690,099
(0.009) $1.00 0.87% 0.30% 0.86% 0.26% $ 634,504
(0.021) $1.00 2.16% 0.28% 2.12% 0.26% $ 709,195
(0.042) $1.00 4.28% 6 0.26% 4.21% 0.24% $ 987,698

Financial Highlights

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

               
Year Ended
   
Net Asset Value,
Beginning of Period

   
Net
Investment
Income

   
Net Realized
and Unrealized
Gain on
Investments



Total From
Investment
Operations

   

Distributions
From Net
Investment
Income

Prime Management Obligations Fund











July 31, 2005 3
$1.00 0.015 -- 0.015 (0.015)
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.042 -- 0.042 (0.042)
Prime Value Obligations Fund











July 31, 2002
$1.00 0.022 -- 0.022 (0.022)
July 31, 2003
$1.00 0.013 -- 0.013 (0.013)
July 31, 2004
$1.00 0.009 -- 0.009 (0.009)
July 31, 2005
$1.00 0.022 -- 0.022 (0.022)
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.042 -- 0.042 (0.042)
Treasury Obligations Fund











July 31, 2002
$1.00 0.019 0.001 0.020 (0.019)
July 31, 2003
$1.00 0.012 0.000 5 0.012 (0.012)
July 31, 2004
$1.00 0.008 -- 0.008 (0.008)
July 31, 2005
$1.00 0.020 -- 0.020 (0.020)
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.040 -- 0.040 (0.040)

1 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

2 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and net investment income ratios shown.

3 Reflects operations for the period from January 18, 2005 (start of performance) to July 31, 2005.

4 Computed on an annualized basis.

5 Represents less than $0.001.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

             Ratios to Average Net Assets
   
Distributions
From Net
Realized
Gain on
Investments

   
Total
Distributions

   
Net Asset Value,
End of Period

   
Total Return 1
   
Net
Expenses


   
Net
Investment
Income


   
Expense Waiver/
Reimbursement 2


   
Net Assets,
End of Period
(000 omitted)



















-- (0.015) $1.00 1.47% 0.23% 4 3.00% 4 0.35% 4 $ 817,205
-- (0.042) $1.00 4.28% 0.26% 4.18% 0.27% $ 734,060


















-- (0.022) $1.00 2.26% 0.29% 2.29% 0.27% $ 506,382
-- (0.013) $1.00 1.29% 0.29% 1.29% 0.27% $ 387,288
-- (0.009) $1.00 0.90% 0.29% 0.90% 0.27% $ 883,749
-- (0.022) $1.00 2.20% 0.27% 2.19% 0.27% $1,169,349
-- (0.042) $1.00 4.29% 0.27% 4.28% 0.22% $ 1,427,494


















(0.001) (0.020) $1.00 2.06% 0.30% 1.85% 0.24% $ 577,516
(0.000) 5 (0.012) $1.00 1.17% 0.30% 1.23% 0.24% $ 623,407
-- (0.008) $1.00 0.76% 0.30% 0.75% 0.24% $ 871,735
-- (0.020) $1.00 2.02% 0.30% 1.99% 0.24% $ 622,744
-- (0.040) $1.00 4.09% 0.30% 4.07% 0.20% $ 1,037,466

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of a Fund, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees; to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees and/or shareholder services fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you to understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Funds and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from February 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006.

ACTUAL EXPENSES

The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES

The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Funds' actual expense ratios and assumed rates of return of 5% per year before expenses, which are not the Funds' actual returns. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are required to be provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Funds with other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.


   
Beginning
Account Value
2/1/2006

   
Ending
Account Value
7/31/2006

   
Expenses Paid
During Period 1

Actual:






Government Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,022.90

$1.55
Municipal Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,015.90

$1.40
Prime Cash Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,023.40

$1.35
Prime Management Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,023.40

$1.30
Prime Value Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,023.40

$1.35
Treasury Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,022.50

$1.55
Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return before expenses):






Government Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,023.26

$1.56
Municipal Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,023.41

$1.40
Prime Cash Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,023.46

$1.35
Prime Management Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,023.51

$1.30
Prime Value Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,023.46

$1.35
Treasury Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,023.26

$1.56

1 Expenses are equal to the Funds' Institutional Capital Shares annualized net expense ratios, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The annualized net expense ratios are as follows:

Government Obligations Fund
   
0.31%
Municipal Obligations Fund

0.28%
Prime Cash Obligations Fund

0.27%
Prime Management Obligations Fund

0.26%
Prime Value Obligations Fund

0.27%
Treasury Obligations Fund

0.31%

Government Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:





   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Repurchase Agreements

77.3%
U.S. Government Agency Securities

22.6%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

0.1%
   TOTAL

100.0%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:



   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

63.4%
4
8-30 Days

20.0%

31-90 Days

8.9%

91-180 Days

3.0%

181 Days or more

4.6%

Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

0.1%

   TOTAL

100.0%

1 See the Fund's Prospectus for a description of the principal types of securities in which the Fund invests.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

4 Overnight securities comprised 56.6% of the Fund's portfolio.

Government Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES--22.6%
$ 325,000,000 1 Federal Home Loan Bank System Floating Rate Notes, 5.039% - 5.340%, 8/2/2006 - 10/4/2006
$ 324,920,662
220,435,000 Federal Home Loan Bank System Notes, 2.625% - 6.500%, 8/11/2006 - 6/21/2007
220,255,625
299,500,000 2 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Discount Notes, 4.190% - 5.005%, 9/29/2006 - 5/1/2007
291,983,768
537,000,000 1 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Floating Rate Notes, 5.010% - 5.350%, 8/7/2006 - 9/27/2006
536,820,385
320,500,000 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Notes, 2.375% - 5.500%, 8/11/2006 - 7/9/2007
319,382,322
185,000,000 1 Federal National Mortgage Association Floating Rate Notes, 5.330%, 9/28/2006
184,861,287
84,500,000 Federal National Mortgage Association Notes, 3.875% - 4.840%, 5/15/2007 - 6/22/2007
83,715,703
436,580,500 1 Housing and Urban Development Floating Rate Notes, 5.708%, 8/1/2006


436,580,500
   TOTAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES


2,398,520,252
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--77.3%
195,000,000 3 Interest in $500,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.3225%, dated 7/27/2006, under which Banc of America Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 7/25/2036 for $507,096,667 on 10/31/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $512,990,020.
195,000,000
413,000,000 3 Interest in $900,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.28%, dated 7/11/2006, under which Banc of America Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/15/2036 for $903,960,000 on 8/10/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $926,698,636.
413,000,000
319,343,000 Interest in $3,200,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Bank of America N.A. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/1/2035 for $3,200,470,222 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $3,264,000,000.
319,343,000
319,420,000 Interest in $1,350,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Barclays Capital, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 2/22/2013 for $1,350,198,375 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,377,000,216.
319,420,000
350,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.30%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Barclays Capital, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 12/16/2015 for $350,051,528 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $357,000,824.
350,000,000
629,000,000 Interest in $2,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Bear Stearns & Co., Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 12/16/2040 for $2,000,293,889 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $2,060,002,709.
629,000,000
81,250,000 Interest in $2,323,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006, under which BNP Paribas Securities Corp. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2036 for $2,323,338,771 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $2,369,460,967.
81,250,000
600,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 11/23/2035 for $600,088,167 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $612,000,361.
600,000,000
450,000,000 Interest in $900,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Countrywide Securities Corp. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/1/2036 for $900,132,250 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $923,148,491.
450,000,000
400,000,000 3 Interest in $900,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.28%, dated 7/14/2006, under which Credit Suisse First Boston LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/16/2043 for $903,036,000 on 8/9/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $927,003,994.
400,000,000
497,165,000 Interest in $2,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Credit Suisse First Boston LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 12/16/2045 for $2,000,293,889 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $2,060,005,868.
497,165,000
172,000,000 3 Interest in $750,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.31%, dated 6/20/2006, under which Credit Suisse First Boston LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/16/2043 for $757,522,500 on 8/28/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $772,503,322.
172,000,000
722,000,000 3 Interest in $1,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.28%, dated 7/5/2006, under which Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 11/15/2046 for $1,004,986,667 on 8/8/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,023,758,060.
722,000,000
804,420,000 Interest in $1,700,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/1/2036 for $1,700,249,806 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,747,724,257.
804,420,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--continued
$ 20,000,000 3 Interest in $375,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.31%, dated 6/20/2006, under which Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/1/2036 for $378,982,500 on 8/31/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $385,895,608.
$ 20,000,000
25,000,000 3 Interest in $50,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.31%, dated 7/5/2006, under which Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein will repurchase a U.S. Government Agency security maturing on 5/15/2033 for $50,206,500 on 8/2/2006. The market value of the underlying security at the end of the period was $51,860,327.
25,000,000
150,000,000 Interest in $300,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.27%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Goldman Sachs & Co. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/30/2023 for $300,043,917 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $306,045,400.
150,000,000
500,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.30%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/25/2036 for $500,073,611 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $515,003,511.
500,000,000
500,000,000 Interest in $1,500,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which HSBC Securities (USA), Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities and a U.S. Treasury security with various maturities to 8/1/2036 for $1,500,220,417 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,531,931,063.
500,000,000
168,000,000 Interest in $238,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.10%, dated 7/31/2006, under which J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 10/31/2006 for $238,033,717 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $242,764,447.
168,000,000
300,000,000 Interest in $2,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Morgan Stanley & Co. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 7/15/2013 for $2,000,291,667 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $2,045,228,487.
300,000,000
25,000,000 Interest in $100,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.20%, dated 7/31/2006, under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 4/1/2036 for $100,014,444 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $102,000,893.
25,000,000
250,000,000 3 Interest in $750,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.31%, dated 6/21/2006, under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 7/25/2036 for $757,522,500 on 8/28/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $777,061,107.
250,000,000
300,000,000 Interest in $500,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.30%, dated 7/31/2006, under which WAMU Capital Corp. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 7/20/2036 for $500,073,611 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $510,035,110.


300,000,000
   TOTAL REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS


8,190,598,000
   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--99.9%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 4



10,589,118,252
   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--0.1%


5,668,166
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
10,594,786,418

1 Floating rate note with current rate and next reset date shown.

2 Discount rate at the time of purchase.

3 Although the repurchase date is more than seven days after the date of purchase, the Fund has the right to terminate the repurchase agreement at any time with seven-days' notice.

4 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Municipal Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:


   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Variable Rate Instruments

96.9
%
Municipal Bonds/Notes

8.3
%
Commercial Paper

2.4
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(7.6
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

At July 31, 2006, the fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:

   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 days

97.7
%
8-30 days

0.7
%
31-90 days

2.9
%
91-180 days

2.9
%
181 days or more

3.4
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(7.6
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

1 See the Fund's Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information for a description of these investments.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

Municipal Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--107.6% 1,2
Alabama--1.7%
$ 4,500,000 Alabama HFA MFH, (Series 2002A: Sterling Pointe Apartments) Weekly VRDNs (Oxford Pointe LP)/(Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
$ 4,500,000
8,020,000 Alabama HFA MFH, (Series 2003A) Weekly VRDNs (Lakeshore Crossing Apartments Ltd.)/(Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
8,020,000
4,230,000 Alabama HFA MFH, (Series 2004A: Phoenix Apartments) Weekly VRDNs (Phoenix Arts LLC)/(Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.800%, 8/3/2006
4,230,000
1,615,000 Calhoun County, AL Economic Development Council Weekly VRDNs (Fabarc Steel Co.)/(Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.870%, 8/2/2006
1,615,000
17,000,000 Decatur, AL IDB, (Series 2003-A) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Steel Decatur LLC)/(Nucor Corp. GTD), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
17,000,000
3,725,000 East Central, AL Solid Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 2003: Three Corners) Weekly VRDNs (Waste Management, Inc.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
3,725,000
27,400,000 Health Care Authority for Baptist Health, AL, (Series 2006-A2) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.630%, 8/2/2006
27,400,000
8,000,000 Jefferson County, AL Sewer System, (Series 2003 B-4-Warrants) Weekly VRDNs (XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
8,000,000
4,175,000 Mobile, AL Solid Waste Authority, (Series 2003: Chastang) Weekly VRDNs (Waste Management, Inc.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
4,175,000
6,600,000 Tuscaloosa County, AL IDA, (1995 Series A) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.730%, 8/2/2006


6,600,000

   TOTAL


85,265,000

Alaska--0.9%
1,410,000 3,4 Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority, (MT-129) Weekly VRDNs (Delong Mountain Transportation System)/ (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
1,410,000
3,750,000 3,4 Alaska International Airports System, MERLOTS (Series 1999I) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
3,750,000
9,500,000 3,4 Alaska State Housing Finance Corp., PUTTERs (Series 1398) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
9,500,000
24,500,000 Valdez, AK Marine Terminal, (Series 1994A), 3.68% TOBs (Phillips Transportation Alaska, Inc.)/(ConocoPhillips GTD), Optional Tender 6/1/2007
24,500,000
6,015,000 Valdez, AK Marine Terminal, (Series 1994B), 3.68% TOBs (Phillips Transportation Alaska, Inc.)/(ConocoPhillips GTD), Optional Tender 6/1/2007


6,015,000

   TOTAL


45,175,000

Arizona--0.1%
1,500,000 Coconino County, AZ Pollution Control Corp., (Series 1998) Daily VRDNs (Arizona Public Service Co.)/(KBC Bank N.V. LOC), 3.710%, 8/1/2006
1,500,000
1,000,000 Tucson, AZ IDA, MFH Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (Quality Apartment Living LLC)/(FNMA LOC), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
1,000,000
650,000 Yavapai, AZ IDA, (Series 1997B) Weekly VRDNs (Yavapai Regional Medical Center)/(FSA INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.640%, 8/3/2006


650,000

   TOTAL


3,150,000

Arkansas--1.6%
1,000,000 Arkadelphia, AR, IDRBs Bonds (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (Siplast, Inc.)/(Danske Bank A/S LOC), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
1,000,000
5,130,000 Arkansas Development Finance Authority, (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Paco Steel & Engineering Corp.)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
5,130,000
16,800,000 Blytheville, AR, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
16,800,000
34,400,000 Blytheville, AR, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.760%, 8/2/2006
34,400,000
8,000,000 Crossett, AR, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Bemis Co., Inc.), 3.950%, 8/3/2006
8,000,000
7,500,000 Osceola, AR, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2006) Weekly VRDNs (Plum Point Energy Associates LLC)/(Credit Suisse, Zurich LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
7,500,000
7,100,000 Siloam Springs, AR, IDRB (Series 1994) Weekly VRDNs (La-Z Boy Chair Co.)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006


7,100,000

   TOTAL


79,930,000

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
California--5.1%
$ 1,700,000 California PCFA, (Series 1995A) Weekly VRDNs (Athens Disposal Co., Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
$ 1,700,000
2,325,000 California PCFA, (Series 1995A) Weekly VRDNs (Contra Costa Waste Service, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
2,325,000
1,245,000 California PCFA, (Series 1997A) Weekly VRDNs (West Valley MRF LLC)/(Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
1,245,000
1,400,000 California PCFA, (Series 1997B) Weekly VRDNs (Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
1,400,000
910,000 California PCFA, (Series 1998A) Weekly VRDNs (Santa Clara Valley Industries LLC)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
910,000
2,400,000 California PCFA, (Series 1999A) Weekly VRDNs (Atlas Disposal Industries LLC)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
2,400,000
2,145,000 California PCFA, (Series 1999A) Weekly VRDNs (BLT Enterprises of Sacramento, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
2,145,000
4,140,000 California PCFA, (Series 1999A) Weekly VRDNs (Blue Line Transfer, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
4,140,000
1,880,000 California PCFA, (Series 1999B) Weekly VRDNs (GreenWaste Recovery, Inc.)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
1,880,000
4,705,000 California PCFA, (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
4,705,000
4,475,000 California PCFA, (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (Sunset Waste Paper, Inc.)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
4,475,000
1,700,000 California PCFA, (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (West Valley MRF LLC)/(Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
1,700,000
1,550,000 California PCFA, (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Bos Farms)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
1,550,000
3,400,000 California PCFA, (Series 2001A) Weekly VRDNs (Athens Services)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
3,400,000
5,000,000 California PCFA, (Series 2001A) Weekly VRDNs (Western Sky Dairy)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
2,705,000 California PCFA, (Series 2001A: GreenTeam of San Jose) Weekly VRDNs (Waste Connections of California, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
2,705,000
2,000,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Bidart Dairy II LLC)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
4,295,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (MarBorg Industries)/(CALSTRS (California State Teachers' Retirement System) LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
4,295,000
9,900,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
9,900,000
3,365,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (California Waste Solutions, Inc.)/(CALSTRS (California State Teachers' Retirement System) LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
3,365,000
4,000,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (Norcal Waste Systems, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
4,000,000
2,600,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (SANCO Services LP)/(Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
2,600,000
4,615,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (South Lake Refuse Co. LLC)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
4,615,000
2,825,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (Sunset Waste Paper, Inc.)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
2,825,000
2,900,000 California PCFA, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (Agrifab, Inc. / Vintage Dairy)/(CALSTRS (California State Teachers' Retirement System) LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
2,900,000
4,400,000 California PCFA, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (B & B Dairy, LLC)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
4,400,000
2,000,000 California PCFA, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (C.A. and E.J. Vanderham Family Trust)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
2,510,000 California PCFA, (Series 2003A) Weekly VRDNs (Mill Valley Refuse Service, Inc.)/(CALSTRS (California State Teachers' Retirement System) LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
2,510,000
4,000,000 California PCFA, (Series 2003A) Weekly VRDNs (Norcal Waste Systems, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
4,000,000
5,035,000 California PCFA, (Series 2003A) Weekly VRDNs (Placer County Eastern Regional Sanitary Landfill, Inc.)/(CALSTRS (California State Teachers' Retirement System) LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
5,035,000
9,000,000 3,4 California PCFA, (Series 2004 F11J) Weekly VRDNs (Waste Management, Inc.)/(Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. SWP), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
9,000,000
2,000,000 California PCFA, (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (A & M Farms)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
2,780,000 California PCFA, (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Ag Resources III, LLC)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
2,780,000
3,965,000 California PCFA, (Series 2004A) Weekly VRDNs (Burrtec Waste Group, Inc.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
3,965,000
5,570,000 California PCFA, (Series 2004A) Weekly VRDNs (MarBorg Industries)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
5,570,000
7,280,000 California PCFA, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (BLT Enterprises of Fremont, LLC)/(Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
7,280,000
4,905,000 California PCFA, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (Napa Recycling & Waste Services LLC)/(Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
4,905,000
3,170,000 California PCFA, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (Sunset Waste Paper, Inc.)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
3,170,000
11,200,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Athens Services)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
11,200,000
9,215,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Burrtec Waste & Recycling Services LLC)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
9,215,000
12,300,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Burrtec Waste Group, Inc.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
12,300,000
3,920,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (CR&R, Inc.)/(Bank of the West, San Francisco, CA LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
3,920,000
4,225,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Evergreen Oil, Inc.)/(Bank of the West, San Francisco, CA LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
4,225,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
California--continued
$ 3,075,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (GreenWaste Recovery, Inc.)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
$ 3,075,000
3,235,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (MarBorg Industries)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
3,235,000
4,115,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Marin Sanitary Service)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
4,115,000
1,345,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Pena's Disposal, Inc.)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
1,345,000
2,240,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006B) Weekly VRDNs (Desert Properties LLC)/(Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
2,240,000
7,000,000 3,4 California State, Veterans Bonds ROCs (Series 438CE) Weekly VRDNs (Citibank NA, New York LIQ)/(Citibank NA, New York LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
7,000,000
2,500,000 3,4 California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (PT-2001) Weekly VRDNs (Vista Montana Apartments)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
2,500,000
2,515,000 California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Series 1996-H) Weekly VRDNs (Levecke LLC)/(Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.770%, 8/2/2006
2,515,000
25,000,000 California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Series 2004M) Weekly VRDNs (Kaiser Permanente), 3.580%, 8/2/2006
25,000,000
5,000,000 California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Series 2006) Weekly VRDNs (Gateway Circle LLC)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
11,500,000 3,4 GS Pool Trust Series 2006-24TP Weekly VRDNs (IXIS Financial Products Inc. INS)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
11,500,000
435,000 Los Angeles County, CA IDA, (Series 1991) Weekly VRDNs (Caitec Garment Processing. Inc.)/(Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.770%, 8/2/2006
435,000
9,200,000 Santa Clara County, CA Housing Authority, (Series 2005B: Timberwood Apartments) Weekly VRDNs (MP Timberwood Associates)/ (Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006


9,200,000

   TOTAL


252,815,000

Colorado--2.2%
59,975,000 3,4 Denver Urban Renewal Authority, Stapleton Tax Increment Revenue (Series 2004 FR/RI-F7J) Weekly VRDNs (Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. SWP), 3.750%, 8/2/2006
59,975,000
5,500,000 3,4 Denver, CO City & County Airport Authority, (PT-782) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
5,500,000
29,500,000 Denver, CO City & County Airport Authority, (Series 2004A) Weekly VRDNs (CDC IXIS Financial Guaranty N.A. INS)/(Bayerische Landesbank (Guaranteed) LIQ), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
29,500,000
14,660,000 3,4 Denver, CO City & County Airport Authority, Merlot (Series 1997E) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006


14,660,000

   TOTAL


109,635,000

Connecticut--0.5%
1,700,000 Connecticut Development Authority Health Care Revenue, (Series 1993A) Weekly VRDNs (Corporation for Independent Living)/(Dexia Credit Local LOC), 3.610%, 8/2/2006
1,700,000
700,000 Connecticut Development Authority Health Care Revenue, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Corporation for Independent Living)/(Dexia Credit Local LOC), 3.610%, 8/2/2006
700,000
1,575,000 Connecticut State, Second Lien Special Tax Obligation Refunding Bonds, Transportation Infrastructure Purposes (2003 Series 1) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(WestLB AG (Guaranteed) LIQ), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
1,575,000
3,000,000 New Britain, CT, 5.00% BANs, 4/5/2007
3,027,034
10,000,000 New Haven, CT, 4.50% BANs, 2/15/2007
10,036,705
9,000,000 North Haven, CT, 5.00% BANs, 1/23/2007


9,056,399

   TOTAL


26,095,138

District of Columbia--0.9%
31,000,000 3,4 District of Columbia HFA, (Series 2005 BNY5) Weekly VRDNs (Trinity Plus Funding Co. LLC)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
31,000,000
9,644,000 3,4 District of Columbia HFA, (Series 2005 BNY6) Weekly VRDNs (Trinity Plus Funding Co. LLC)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
9,644,000
4,100,000 District of Columbia, Enterprise Zone Revenue Bonds (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (NJA Hotel LLC)/(Bank of Scotland, Edinburgh LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006


4,100,000

   TOTAL


44,744,000

Florida--2.8%
9,000,000 Alachua County, FL, IDRB's (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Florida Rock Industries, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
9,000,000
9,345,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Florida-AMT)/(Series 2005-17) Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.760%, 8/3/2006
9,345,000
2,700,000 Coconut Creek, FL, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Elite Aluminum Corp.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
2,700,000
6,500,000 Greater Orlando, FL Aviation Authority Weekly VRDNs (Cessna Aircraft Co.)/(Textron Inc. GTD), 4.740%, 8/2/2006
6,500,000
7,835,000 3,4 Hillsborough County, FL Aviation Authority, (MT-126), 3.50% TOBs (Tampa International Airport)/(AMBAC INS)/(Svenska Handelsbanken, Stockholm LIQ), Optional Tender 2/8/2007
7,835,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Florida--continued
$ 11,280,000 3,4 Hillsborough County, FL Port District, MT-101, 3.53% TOBs (Tampa, FL Port Authority)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen (Guaranteed) LIQ), Optional Tender 2/15/2007
$ 11,280,000
190,000 Miami, FL Health Facilities Authority, Health Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Mercy Hospital, FL)/ (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
190,000
5,325,000 3,4 Miami-Dade County, FL Aviation, (PT-2713) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
5,325,000
8,700,000 3,4 Miami-Dade County, FL Aviation, (Rocs Series 525) Weekly VRDNs (XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/(Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
8,700,000
7,615,000 3,4 Miami-Dade County, FL HFA, (PT-1349) Weekly VRDNs (Hidden Grove Apartments)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
7,615,000
70,585,000 St. Lucie County, FL Solid Waste Disposal, (Series 2003) Daily VRDNs (Florida Power & Light Co.), 3.740%, 8/1/2006


70,585,000

   TOTAL


139,075,000

Georgia--0.8%
3,500,000 3,4 Atlanta, GA Airport General Revenue, PA 926R Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
3,500,000
6,150,000 Crisp County, GA Solid Waste Management Authority, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 4.080%, 8/3/2006
6,150,000
800,000 Fayette County, GA, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Gardner Denver Machinery, Inc.)/(National City Bank of the Midwest LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
800,000
23,650,000 3,4 Georgia State, PUTTERs (Series 493) Weekly VRDNs (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
23,650,000
3,500,000 Kennesaw, GA Development Authority, (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Lakeside Vista Apartments)/(FNMA LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
3,500,000
2,600,000 Tattnall County, GA IDA, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Rotary Corp.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006


2,600,000

   TOTAL


40,200,000

Hawaii--0.0%
185,000 3,4 Hawaii Finance and Development Corp., MERLOTS (Series 2001 A15) Weekly VRDNs (FNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006


185,000

Illinois--6.1%
3,500,000 Aurora City, IL, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Cleveland Hardware & Forging Co.)/(Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 3.830%, 8/3/2006
3,500,000
38,300,000 Chicago, IL Midway Airport, (Series 1998A) Daily VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/1/2006
38,300,000
47,550,000 Chicago, IL Midway Airport, (Series 1998B) Daily VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/1/2006
47,550,000
8,050,000 3,4 Chicago, IL O'Hare International Airport, (PA-1198) Weekly VRDNs (XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
8,050,000
1,065,000 3,4 Chicago, IL O'Hare International Airport, (PT-1993) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
1,065,000
7,000,000 3,4 Chicago, IL O'Hare International Airport, (PT-756) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
7,000,000
9,995,000 3,4 Chicago, IL O'Hare International Airport, PT-685, 3.50% TOBs (AMBAC INS)/(Svenska Handelsbanken, Stockholm LIQ), Optional Tender 2/8/2007
9,995,000
5,200,000 3,4 Chicago, IL O'Hare International Airport, ROCS (Series 239) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
5,200,000
1,340,000 Chicago, IL, (Series 1999 IDRB) Weekly VRDNs (Ade, Inc.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
1,340,000
25,000,000 Chicago, IL, (Series 2005D) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
25,000,000
10,500,000 Chicago, IL, Chicago Midway Airport Special Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 1998), 3.72% TOBs (Signature Flight Support Corp.)/(Bayerische Landesbank (GTD) LOC), Optional Tender 12/1/2006
10,500,000
12,490,000 3,4 Chicago, IL, PUTTERs (Series 1277) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
12,490,000
515,000 Galva, IL, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (John H. Best & Sons, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
515,000
3,400,000 Harvey, IL Multifamily Revenue, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Bethlehem Village)/(Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago LOC), 3.780%, 8/3/2006
3,400,000
2,190,000 Huntley, IL Industrial Development Revenue, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Colony, Inc.)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/2/2006
2,190,000
10,000,000 Illinois Development Finance Authority IDB, (Series 1994) Weekly VRDNs (St. Ignatius College Prep.)/(Northern Trust Co., Chicago, IL LOC), 3.660%, 8/2/2006
10,000,000
1,400,000 Illinois Development Finance Authority IDB, (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Evapco, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
1,400,000
5,225,000 Illinois Development Finance Authority IDB, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Lakeview Partners I LP)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.780%, 8/3/2006
5,225,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Illinois--continued
$ 2,940,000 Illinois Development Finance Authority IDB, (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (Processing Technologies, Inc.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
$ 2,940,000
3,110,000 Illinois Development Finance Authority, (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Mangel BG Investments LLC)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.760%, 8/2/2006
3,110,000
4,000,000 Illinois Finance Authority, (Series 2006) Weekly VRDNs (Reliable Materials Lyons LLC)/(Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
4,000,000
3,830,000 Illinois Health Facilities Authority, (Series 1997B) Weekly VRDNs (Advocate Health Care Network)/(Bank of America N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Northern Trust Co., Chicago, IL LIQs), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
3,830,000
28,020,000 Illinois Health Facilities Authority, (Series 2001C) Weekly VRDNs (Edward Hospital Obligated Group)/(FSA INS)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
28,020,000
28,500,000 Illinois Health Facilities Authority, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (Herman M. Finch University)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
28,500,000
40,000,000 Illinois State Weekly VRDNs (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.700%, 8/2/2006


40,000,000

   TOTAL


303,120,000

Indiana--5.1%
17,540,000 Bartholomew Consolidated School Corp., IN, 4.25% TANs, 12/29/2006
17,599,291
250,000 Clarksville, IN, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Metal Sales Manufacturing Corp.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.880%, 8/3/2006
250,000
2,338,000 Franklin, IN, Lakeview I Apartments (Series 1994) Weekly VRDNs (Pedcor Investments LP)/(Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
2,338,000
1,080,000 Huntington, IN, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (DK Enterprises LLC)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
1,080,000
8,700,000 Indiana Development Finance Authority, (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Indianapolis Museum of Art, Inc.)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
8,700,000
3,000,000 Indiana Development Finance Authority, (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Indianapolis Museum of Art, Inc.)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
3,000,000
17,410,000 Indiana Health & Educational Facility Financing Authority, (Series 2005B) Weekly VRDNs (Parkview Health System Obligated Group)/ (AMBAC INS)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006
17,410,000
3,200,000 Indiana Port Commission, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Kosmos Cement Co.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/2/2006
3,200,000
1,250,000 3,4 Indiana State HFA, MERLOTS (Series 2000-PPP) Weekly VRDNs (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
1,250,000
18,000,000 Indianapolis, IN Local Public Improvement Bond Bank, (Series 2005G-3) Weekly VRDNs (Indianapolis, IN Waterworks Department)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
18,000,000
5,135,000 3,4 Indianapolis, IN Local Public Improvement Bond Bank, PT-731 Weekly VRDNs (Indianapolis, IN Airport Authority)/(FSA INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
5,135,000
3,400,000 Indianapolis, IN, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Chip Ganassi Racing Teams)/(National City Bank, Pennsylvania LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
3,400,000
7,100,000 Indianapolis, IN, (Series 2004A) Weekly VRDNs (Nora Commons LP)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
7,100,000
5,000,000 Jasper County, IN EDA, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (T & M LP)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
4,300,000 Jasper County, IN EDA, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (T & M LP)/(Rabobank Nederland, Utrecht LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
4,300,000
6,500,000 Jasper County, IN EDA, (Series 2006) Weekly VRDNs (T & M LP)/(Rabobank Nederland, Utrecht LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
6,500,000
7,245,000 3,4 Jeffersonville, IN, (PT-1309) Weekly VRDNs (Armstrong Farms Apartments)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
7,245,000
1,450,000 Kendallville, IN, (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Rivnut Real Estate, Ltd.)/(National City Bank, Ohio LOC), 3.820%, 8/3/2006
1,450,000
9,000,000 Muncie, IN Community Schools, 4.25% TANs, 12/29/2006
9,025,187
32,600,000 Richmond, IN Hospital Authority, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (Reid Hospital & Health Care Services, Inc.)/(FSA INS)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006
32,600,000
170,000 Richmond, IN, (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (Holland Colors Americas, Inc.)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 4.030%, 8/3/2006
170,000
4,571,000 Southwest Allen County, IN Metropolitan School District, 4.00% TANs, 12/29/2006
4,579,158
7,700,000 Whiting, IN Environmental Facilities Revenue, (Series 2002) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
7,700,000
8,000,000 Whiting, IN Environmental Facilities Revenue, (Series 2002B) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
8,000,000
15,000,000 Whiting, IN Environmental Facilities Revenue, (Series 2002C) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
15,000,000
15,800,000 Whiting, IN Environmental Facilities Revenue, (Series 2003) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
15,800,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Indiana--continued
$ 47,700,000 Whiting, IN Environmental Facilities Revenue, (Series 2005) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
$ 47,700,000
2,200,000 Whitley County, IN, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Undersea Sensor Systems, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006


2,200,000

   TOTAL


255,731,636

Iowa--0.9%
12,085,000 Iowa Finance Authority, (Series 2005 A-2) Weekly VRDNs (Iowa Health System)/(FGIC INS)/(Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006
12,085,000
34,130,000 Iowa Finance Authority, (Series 2005 A-3) Weekly VRDNs (Iowa Health System)/(FGIC INS)/(Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006


34,130,000

   TOTAL


46,215,000

Kansas--0.7%
13,405,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Kansas-AMT)/(Series 2005-13) Weekly VRDNs (Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS)/ (GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
13,405,000
20,000,000 Olathe, KS, (Series A), 4.50% BANs, 6/1/2007
20,125,849
3,240,000 3,4 Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, MERLOTS (Series 2001 A-35) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006


3,240,000

   TOTAL


36,770,849

Kentucky--0.2%
4,900,000 Graves County, KY, (Series 1988) Weekly VRDNs (Seaboard Farms)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
4,900,000
740,000 Jefferson County, KY, (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Derby Industries, Inc.)/(Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 4.030%, 8/3/2006
740,000
2,292,000 Kenton County, KY, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Packaging Un-limited of Northern Kentucky, Inc.)/(National City Bank, Kentucky LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
2,292,000
1,685,000 Paris, KY Weekly VRDNs (Monessen Holdings LLC)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.790%, 8/3/2006


1,685,000

   TOTAL


9,617,000

Louisiana--1.2%
4,000,000 3,4 ABN AMRO MuniTOPS Certificates Trust (Louisiana Non-AMT)/(Series 2002-17) Weekly VRDNs (Louisiana State Gas & Fuels)/(AMBAC INS)/ (ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
4,000,000
6,604,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Louisiana-AMT)/(Series 2005-11) Weekly VRDNs (Louisiana HFA)/(GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
6,604,000
11,825,000 3,4 East Baton Rouge, LA Mortgage Finance Authority, (Series 2006 FR/RI-P2U) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.750%, 8/2/2006
11,825,000
5,000,000 Lake Charles, LA Harbor & Terminal District, (Series 1995A) Weekly VRDNs (Polycom-Huntsman, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
10,100,000 Lake Charles, LA Harbor & Terminal District, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (ConocoPhillips)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
10,100,000
9,000,000 Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
9,000,000
11,600,000 Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, (Series 2005) Daily VRDNs (Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.), 3.770%, 8/1/2006


11,600,000

   TOTAL


58,129,000

Maine--0.3%
2,025,000 Biddeford, ME Weekly VRDNs (DK Associates & Volk Packaging)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
2,025,000
8,315,000 Maine Finance Authority, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (The Jackson Laboratory)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
8,315,000
4,005,000 3,4 Maine State Housing Authority, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A108), 3.40% TOBs (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006


4,005,000

   TOTAL


14,345,000

Maryland--0.7%
2,495,000 3,4 Maryland Community Development Administration - Housing Revenue, (PA-629R) Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
2,495,000
4,330,000 3,4 Maryland Community Development Administration - Residential Revenue, (Series 2004 FR/RI-L59J) Weekly VRDNs (Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.780%, 8/2/2006
4,330,000
5,850,000 Maryland IDFA, (Series 1999), 3.72% TOBs (Signature Flight Support Corp.)/(Bayerische Landesbank (GTD) LOC), Optional Tender 12/1/2006
5,850,000
5,850,000 Maryland State Community Development Administration, (Series 1990B) Weekly VRDNs (Cherry Hill Apartment Ltd.)/(Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.710%, 8/2/2006
5,850,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Maryland--continued
$ 4,000,000 Maryland State Economic Development Corp., (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Hunter Douglas Northeast, Inc.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/2/2006
$ 4,000,000
6,925,000 Maryland State Economic Development Corp., (Series 2006) Weekly VRDNs (Santa Barbara Court LLC)/(Mercantile Safe Deposit & Trust Co., Baltimore LOC), 3.740%, 8/4/2006
6,925,000
750,000 Maryland State Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Holton-Arms School, Inc.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
750,000
5,730,000 3,4 Northeast MD Waste Disposal Authority, (PT-766) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen (GTD) LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006


5,730,000

   TOTAL


35,930,000

Massachusetts--1.6%
12,400,000 Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Consolidated Loan (Series 2006B) Daily VRDNs (Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.660%, 8/1/2006
12,400,000
18,720,000 3,4 Commonwealth of Massachusetts, PUTTERs (Series 443) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC, FSA INS) and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQs), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
18,720,000
7,000,000 Everett, MA, 4.00% BANs, 9/8/2006
7,006,928
7,500,000 3,4 Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority General Transportation System, MERLOTS (Series 2000H) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/ (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
7,500,000
10,000,000 Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Series 2004), 3.62% CP (Nantucket Electric Co.)/(Massachusetts Electric Co. GTD), Mandatory Tender 8/11/2006
10,000,000
4,500,000 Massachusetts IFA, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Parker-Hannifin Corp.)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
4,500,000
19,610,000 3,4 Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, Class A Certificates (Series 2002-208) Daily VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Bear Stearns Cos., Inc. LIQ), 3.650%, 8/1/2006


19,610,000

   TOTAL


79,736,928

Michigan--2.8%
6,000,000 3,4 Grand Rapids & Kent County, MI Joint Building Authority, (Series 2001-JPMC7) Weekly VRDNs (Kent County, MI)/(J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/2/2006
6,000,000
13,650,000 Kent Hospital Finance Authority, MI, (Series 1998B) Weekly VRDNs (Spectrum Health)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006
13,650,000
7,300,000 Michigan Higher Education Student Loan Authority, (Series X11-B) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(KBC Bank N.V. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
7,300,000
2,935,000 Michigan State Housing Development Authority, (2002 Series A) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
2,935,000
401,000 Michigan State Strategic Fund, (Series A) Weekly VRDNs (Teal Run Apartments)/(Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
401,000
25,000,000 Michigan State, (2006 Series A), 4.50% TRANs, 9/29/2006
25,048,756
68,660,000 3,4 Michigan State, GO Notes (Series 2005 FR/RI-P5) Weekly VRDNs (Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
68,660,000
12,680,000 3,4 Wayne County, MI Airport Authority, (ROCs Series 353) Weekly VRDNs (Detroit, MI Metropolitan Wayne County Airport)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
12,680,000
4,300,000 3,4 Wayne County, MI Airport Authority, GS Trust (Series 2006-32) Weekly VRDNs (Detroit, MI Metropolitan Wayne County Airport)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006


4,300,000

   TOTAL


140,974,756

Minnesota--1.8%
24,815,000 3,4 Becker, MN, (Series 2005 FR/RI-FP13) Weekly VRDNs (Northern States Power Co., MN)/(Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. SWP), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
24,815,000
17,970,000 3,4 Becker, MN, (Series 2006 FR/RI-FP1) Weekly VRDNs (Northern States Power Co., MN)/(Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. SWP), 3.970%, 8/3/2006
17,970,000
2,600,000 Coon Rapids, MN, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Assurance Mfg. Co., Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
2,600,000
6,440,000 3,4 Dakota County & Washington County MN Housing & Redevelopment Authority, MERLOTS (Series J) Weekly VRDNs (United States Treasury COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
6,440,000
3,865,000 Dakota County, MN Community Development Agency, (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (View Pointe Apartments)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/4/2006
3,865,000
1,225,000 Minneapolis, MN IDA, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Viking Materials, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
1,225,000
3,140,000 3,4 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN Metropolitan Airports Commission, (MT-117) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
3,140,000
5,220,000 3,4 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN Metropolitan Airports Commission, PT-735 Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(BNP Paribas SA LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
5,220,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Minnesota--continued
$ 8,975,000 3,4 Minnesota Public Facilities Authority, (PT-1175) Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
$ 8,975,000
1,700,000 Northfield, MN, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (Summerfield Investments LLC)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.750%, 8/4/2006
1,700,000
6,690,000 Ramsey County, MN Housing and Redevelopment Authority, (Series 2003 A) Weekly VRDNs (Gateway Apartments LP)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/4/2006
6,690,000
1,390,000 Savage, MN, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Fabcon, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
1,390,000
445,000 Springfield, MN, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Ochs Brick Co.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.940%, 8/3/2006
445,000
2,250,000 White Bear Lake, MN, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Taylor Corp.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
2,250,000
3,300,000 White Bear Lake, MN, (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Pinehurst Investments LLC)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.750%, 8/4/2006


3,300,000

   TOTAL


90,025,000

Mississippi--1.2%
10,000,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Mississippi-AMT)/(Series 2005-16) Weekly VRDNs (Mississippi Home Corp.)/(GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
2,250,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (Series 1999) VRDNs (Polks Meat Products, Inc.)/(Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.800%, 8/3/2006
2,250,000
2,420,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (TT&W Farm Products, Inc.)/(Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
2,420,000
3,495,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Silver Creek Gin Co.)/(Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
3,495,000
3,185,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Mill Creek Gin, Inc.)/(Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
3,185,000
1,400,000 3,4 Mississippi Home Corp., (PT-1446) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
1,400,000
7,500,000 Mississippi Home Corp., (Series 2004-6) Weekly VRDNs (Windsor Park Partners LP)/(FNMA LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
7,500,000
4,635,000 3,4 Mississippi Home Corp., MERLOTS (Series 2001 A8) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
4,635,000
1,890,000 3,4 Mississippi Home Corp., MERLOTS (Series YYY) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
1,890,000
6,160,000 3,4 Mississippi Home Corp., Roaring Forks (Series 2001-14) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
6,160,000
9,790,000 Mississippi Regional Housing Authority No. II, (Series 1998), 4.05% TOBs (Bradford Park Apartments)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), Mandatory Tender 10/1/2006
9,790,000
6,500,000 Mississippi Regional Housing Authority No. II, (Series 2000), 4.15% TOBs (Terrace Park Apartments)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), Mandatory Tender 5/1/2007


6,500,000

   TOTAL


59,225,000

Missouri--4.8%
31,430,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Missouri-AMT)/(Series 2005-14) Weekly VRDNs (Missouri State Housing Development Commission)/(GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
31,430,000
3,505,000 Kansas City, MO IDA, (Series 2004B) Weekly VRDNs (The Bishop Spencer Place, Inc.)/(Commerce Bank, N.A., Kansas City LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
3,505,000
47,300,000 Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Senior Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
47,300,000
20,000,000 Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Senior Series 2005B) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.700%, 8/3/2006
20,000,000
7,750,000 Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Senior Series 2005E) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
7,750,000
29,100,000 Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
29,100,000
15,000,000 Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Series 2006B) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
15,000,000
6,600,000 Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Series 2006C) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
6,600,000
6,250,000 Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Series 2006E) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
6,250,000
21,000,000 Missouri State HEFA, (Series 2005A) Daily VRDNs (St. Louis University)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.670%, 8/1/2006
21,000,000
30,435,000 Missouri State HEFA, (Series 2005C-4) Weekly VRDNs (SSM Healthcare)/(FSA INS)/(Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006
30,435,000
3,160,000 3,4 Missouri State Housing Development Commission, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A81) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
3,160,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Missouri--continued
$ 1,825,000 3,4 Missouri State Housing Development Commission, MERLOTS (Series 2001 A28) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
$ 1,825,000
16,000,000 Southwest City, MO IDA, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (Simmons Foods, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
16,000,000
1,000,000 St. Louis, MO IDA, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Cee Kay Supply)/(Commerce Bank, N.A., Kansas City LOC), 3.830%, 7/20/2006


1,000,000

   TOTAL


240,355,000

Montana--0.3%
6,900,000 3,4 Montana State Board of Housing, (Series 2004 FR/RI-L6) Weekly VRDNs (Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.780%, 8/2/2006
6,900,000
3,545,000 3,4 Montana State Board of Housing, MERLOTS (Series 2002 A19) Weekly VRDNs (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
3,545,000
4,105,000 3,4 Montana State Board of Housing, Variable Certificates (Series 2002L) Weekly VRDNs (Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006


4,105,000

   TOTAL


14,550,000

Multi State--6.7%
33,061,143 3,4 ABN AMRO Chicago Corp. 1997-1 LeaseTOPS Trust Weekly VRDNs (LaSalle Bank, N.A. LIQ)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.910%, 8/3/2006
33,061,143
21,302,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (AMT MultiState)/(Series 1999-3) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
21,302,000
49,771,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (AMT Multistate)/(Series 2002-09) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC, FGIC, FSA, MBIA Insurance Corp. INS) and State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQs), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
49,771,000
11,820,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Multistate-AMT)/(Series 2005-1) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
11,820,000
23,410,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Multistate-AMT)/(Series 2005-18) Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
23,410,000
6,799,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Multistate-AMT)/(Series 2005-19) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
6,799,000
31,050,000 3,4 GS Pool Trust (Series 2006-19TP) Weekly VRDNs (IXIS Financial Products Inc. INS)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
31,050,000
19,000,000 3,4 GS Pool Trust (Series 2006-35TP) Weekly VRDNs (IXIS Financial Products Inc. INS)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
19,000,000
6,200,000 3,4 GS Pool Trust (Series 2006-46TP) Weekly VRDNs (IXIS Financial Products Inc. INS)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
6,200,000
42,060,000 3,4 Reset Option Certificates Trust II-R (Series 8000JD) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC, FGIC, FSA, MBIA Insurance Corp. INS) and Citigroup, Inc. LIQs), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
42,060,000
55,860,000 3,4 Reset Option Certificates Trust II-R (Series 8001JJ) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC, FGIC, FSA, MBIA Insurance Corp. INS) and Citigroup, Inc. LIQs), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
55,860,000
6,140,000 3,4 Reset Option Certificates Trust II-R (Series 8002FA) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC, FGIC, FSA, MBIA Insurance Corp. INS) and Citigroup, Inc. LIQs), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
6,140,000
25,860,000 3,4 Reset Option Certificates Trust II-R (Series 8005MN) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC, FGIC, FSA, MBIA Insurance Corp. INS) and Citigroup, Inc. LIQs), 3.740%, 8/3/2006


25,860,000

   TOTAL


332,333,143

Nebraska--0.5%
3,150,000 Douglas County, NE, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (American Laboratories, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
3,150,000
1,200,000 Douglas County, NE, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Majors Plastics, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
1,200,000
7,730,000 Nebraska Investment Finance Authority, (Series 2001 E) Weekly VRDNs (Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
7,730,000
3,726,000 Nebraska Investment Finance Authority, (Series 2001 F) Weekly VRDNs (Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
3,726,000
2,000,000 Nebraska Investment Finance Authority, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (Tuls Properties LLC)/(Rabobank Nederland, Utrecht LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
5,200,000 Stanton County, NE, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.730%, 8/2/2006


5,200,000

   TOTAL


23,006,000

Nevada--4.9%
22,300,000 Clark County, NV Airport System, (Series 1993A) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Dexia Credit Local and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQs), 3.630%, 8/2/2006
22,300,000
12,500,000 Clark County, NV Industrial Development Revenue Board, (Series 2003A) Weekly VRDNs (Southwest Gas Corp.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
12,500,000
7,140,000 Clark County, NV, (Series 1997A), 3.72% TOBs (Signature Flight Support Corp.)/(Bayerische Landesbank (GTD) LOC), Optional Tender 12/1/2006
7,140,000
7,535,000 Clark County, NV, (Series 1998), 3.72% TOBs (Signature Flight Support Corp.)/(Bayerische Landesbank (GTD) LOC), Optional Tender 12/1/2006
7,535,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Nevada--continued
$ 90,000,000 Clark County, NV, Passenger Facility Charge Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2005 A-1) Weekly VRDNs (Las Vegas-McCarran International Airport)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Bayerische Landesbank (GTD) LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
$ 90,000,000
69,200,000 Clark County, NV, Passenger Facility Charge Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A-2) Weekly VRDNs (Las Vegas-McCarran International Airport)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
69,200,000
23,100,000 3,4 Nevada State, (Series 2006 SGB 64) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Societe Generale, Paris LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
23,100,000
13,000,000 3,4 Washoe County, NV Water Facilities Revenue, (Series 2004 FR/RI-F9J) Weekly VRDNs (Sierra Pacific Power Co.)/(Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. SWP), 3.800%, 8/2/2006


13,000,000

   TOTAL


244,775,000

New Hampshire--0.7%
892,000 New Hampshire Business Finance Authority, (Series A) Weekly VRDNs (Upper Valley Press)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.780%, 8/2/2006
892,000
30,000,000 New Hampshire Business Finance Authority, PCR Bonds (1990 Series A), 3.72% CP (New England Power Co.), Mandatory Tender 10/11/2006
30,000,000
1,530,000 New Hampshire Higher Educational & Health Facilities Authority, (Series 2001A) Weekly VRDNs (Dartmouth-Hitchcock Obligated Group)/ (FSA INS)/(Chase Bank USA, N.A. and Dexia Credit Local LIQs), 3.630%, 8/3/2006
1,530,000
1,175,000 3,4 New Hampshire State HFA, MERLOTS (Series 2001 A-51) Weekly VRDNs (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
1,175,000
870,000 3,4 New Hampshire State HFA, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A82) Weekly VRDNs (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006


870,000

   TOTAL


34,467,000

New Jersey--2.2%
12,689,700 Barnegat Township, NJ Board of Education, 4.50% BANs, 7/6/2007
12,763,361
4,600,000 Kearny, NJ Board of Education, 4.50% BANs, 8/2/2007
4,624,334
9,852,414 Maple Shade Township, NJ, 4.125% BANs, 1/10/2007
9,860,576
1,900,000 New Jersey EDA, (Series 1998A) Weekly VRDNs (Jewish Home at Rockleigh)/(Allied Irish Banks PLC LOC), 3.660%, 8/4/2006
1,900,000
4,000,000 New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Series 2002) Daily VRDNs (RWJ Health Care Corp. at Hamilton)/(Commerce Bank N.A., Cherry Hill, NJ LOC), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
4,000,000
12,505,000 3,4 New Jersey State Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Class A Certificates (Series 3011) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Bear Stearns & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
12,505,000
4,026,250 North Plainfield, NJ, 4.50% BANs, 6/25/2007
4,048,889
4,393,712 Sea Girt, NJ, 4.50% BANs, 5/24/2007
4,417,722
2,245,000 South Amboy, NJ, 4.00% BANs, 8/2/2006
2,245,005
5,738,550 South Plainfield, NJ, 4.00% BANs, 9/27/2006
5,746,808
8,875,000 Trenton, NJ, 4.50% BANs, 12/15/2006
8,908,862
21,554,000 Trenton, NJ, 4.50% BANs, 5/18/2007
21,676,102
2,875,000 Washington Township (Morris County), NJ, 4.50% BANs, 7/27/2007
2,891,078
3,257,100 Willingboro Township, NJ, 4.00% BANs, 8/4/2006
3,257,122
8,792,100 Willingboro Township, NJ, 4.375% BANs, 8/3/2007
8,829,642
2,967,000 Willingboro Township, NJ, 4.65% BANs, 7/19/2007


2,984,883

   TOTAL


110,659,384

New Mexico--1.7%
1,690,000 Albuquerque, NM, (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (Rose's Southwest Papers, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
1,690,000
4,485,000 Albuquerque, NM, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (El Encanto, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
4,485,000
17,576,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (New Mexico-AMT)/(Series 2005-15) Weekly VRDNs (New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority)/(GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
17,576,000
2,850,000 Los Lunas Village, NM, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Wall Colmonoy Corp.)/(LaSalle Bank Midwest, N.A. LOC), 3.810%, 8/2/2006
2,850,000
53,806,983 New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority, (Series 2006), 4.53% TOBs (Trinity Plus Funding Co. LLC), Mandatory Tender 7/1/2007
53,806,983
1,120,000 3,4 New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority, MERLOTS (Series 2001 A9) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
1,120,000
2,770,000 3,4 New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority, MERLOTS 2001 A66, 3.40% TOBs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006
2,770,000
1,210,000 3,4 New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority, MERLOTS (Series 2000-A18), 3.40% TOBs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006


1,210,000

   TOTAL


85,507,983

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
New York--2.8%
$ 21,560,000 New York City, NY Transitional Finance Authority, New York City Recovery Bonds (2003 Series 3-G) Weekly VRDNs (Bank of New York LIQ), 3.600%, 8/2/2006
$ 21,560,000
6,800,000 New York State HFA, (2000 Series A: 300 East 39th Street) Weekly VRDNs (39th Street Associates LLC)/(FNMA LOC), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
6,800,000
2,800,000 New York State HFA, (Series 2005A: 1 East 35th Street Apartments) Weekly VRDNs (35th Street Associates LP)/(Commerce Bank N.A., Cherry Hill, NJ LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
2,800,000
4,000,000 New York State HFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Clinton Green North LLC)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
4,000,000
3,500,000 New York State HFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Clinton Green South LLC)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
3,500,000
17,000,000 New York State HFA, (Series 2006A: 250 East 60th Street Apartments) Weekly VRDNs (250 East 60th Street Associates LP)/(Commerce Bank N.A., Cherry Hill, NJ LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
17,000,000
2,300,000 New York State HFA, (Series 2006A: 385 Third Avenue Apartments) Weekly VRDNs (385 Third Avenue Associates LP)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
2,300,000
10,000,000 New York State HFA, (Series 2006A: Related-East 21st Street Housing) Weekly VRDNs (321 East 21st Street Associates LLC)/ (Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
10,000,000
18,820,000 3,4 TSASC, Inc. NY, Tobacco Settlement Asset Backed Bonds (PA-1356) Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
18,820,000
34,335,000 Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, NY, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.600%, 8/2/2006
34,335,000
19,680,000 3,4 Westchester County, NY IDA, (MT-257) Weekly VRDNs (Ardsley Housing Associates LLC)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006


19,680,000

   TOTAL


140,795,000

North Carolina--4.7%
6,600,000 Cabarrus County, NC Industrial Facilities and Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (S & D Coffee, Inc.)/ (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
6,600,000
2,840,000 3,4 Charlotte, NC Airport, (PT-719) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(BNP Paribas SA LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
2,840,000
2,000,000 Hertford County, NC Industrial Facilities & Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.760%, 8/2/2006
2,000,000
17,500,000 Hertford County, NC Industrial Facilities & Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Series 2000B) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
17,500,000
395,000 Johnson County, NC Industrial Facilities & Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Walthom Group)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.760%, 8/4/2006
395,000
3,200,000 Mecklenberg County, NC Industrial Facilities & PCFA Industrial Development, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Ehren-Haus Industries, Inc.)/ (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.760%, 8/3/2006
3,200,000
6,700,000 Montgomery County, NC Industrial Facilities and Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Series 2000) Daily VRDNs (Republic Services, Inc.)/ (SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.740%, 8/1/2006
6,700,000
615,000 North Carolina Capital Facilities Finance Agency, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Goodwill Community Foundation)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.630%, 8/3/2006
615,000
7,000,000 North Carolina Capital Facilities Finance Agency, (Series 2004) Daily VRDNs (Republic Services, Inc.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.740%, 8/1/2006
7,000,000
54,855,000 North Carolina Education Assistance Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Series 20005-A1) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
54,855,000
11,250,000 North Carolina Education Assistance Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A-2) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Branch Banking & Trust Co., Winston-Salem LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
11,250,000
21,445,000 North Carolina Education Assistance Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A-3) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
21,445,000
1,150,000 3,4 North Carolina HFA, MERLOTS (Series 2000 A37) Weekly VRDNs (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
1,150,000
3,700,000 3,4 North Carolina HFA, MERLOTS (Series B12) Weekly VRDNs (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
3,700,000
13,800,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Series 2001B) Weekly VRDNs (Moses H. Cone Memorial), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
13,800,000
16,840,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina)/(AMBAC INS)/ (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006
16,840,000
9,000,000 Raleigh & Durham, NC Airport Authority, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Raleigh-Durham Airport)/(XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/ (SunTrust Bank LIQ), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
9,000,000
12,600,000 Raleigh & Durham, NC Airport Authority, (Series 2006B) Weekly VRDNs (Raleigh-Durham Airport)/(XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/ (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
12,600,000
9,000,000 Raleigh & Durham, NC Airport Authority, (Series 2006C) Weekly VRDNs (Raleigh-Durham Airport)/(XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/ (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.710%, 8/2/2006
9,000,000
22,000,000 Raleigh & Durham, NC Airport Authority, (Series 2006D) Weekly VRDNs (Raleigh-Durham Airport)/(XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/ (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
22,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
North Carolina--continued
$ 11,100,000 Raleigh & Durham, NC Airport Authority, (Series 2006E) Weekly VRDNs (Raleigh-Durham Airport)/(XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/ (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
$ 11,100,000
35,000 Sampson County, NC Industrial Facilities and Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (DuBose Strapping, Inc.)/ (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.810%, 8/3/2006
35,000
1,300,000 Wilson County, NC PCA, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Quality Truck Bodies & Repair, Inc.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.760%, 8/3/2006


1,300,000

   TOTAL


234,925,000

Ohio--3.5%
2,150,000 Ashland, OH, 5.00% BANs, 5/24/2007
2,170,998
5,805,000 3,4 Cuyahoga County, OH, (PT-1966) Weekly VRDNs (Antioch Towers Apartments)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
5,805,000
2,000,000 Dublin, OH, IDRBs (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Witco Corp.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
1,916,000 Euclid, OH, 4.50% BANs, 5/31/2007
1,925,941
10,485,000 Hamilton County, OH, (Series 2001A) Weekly VRDNs (MLB Hilltop Health Facilities, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
10,485,000
15,000,000 Hamilton County, OH, (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Stratford Heights)/(Bank of New York and Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania LOCs), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
15,000,000
3,950,000 Hamilton, OH MFH, (Series 2003A: Knollwood Crossing II Apartments) Weekly VRDNs (Pedcor Investments-2003-LIX LP)/(Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
3,950,000
185,000 Madison County, OH, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (Madison County Hospital, Inc.)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
185,000
3,550,000 Mason, OH, 4.75% BANs, 5/24/2007
3,578,291
6,250,000 Medina County, OH, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Mack Industries, Inc.)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.780%, 8/3/2006
6,250,000
43,500,000 Ohio HFA, (Series 2005D) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
43,500,000
50,000,000 Ohio HFA, (Series I) Weekly VRDNs (Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
50,000,000
15,000,000 Ohio HFA, (Series J) Weekly VRDNs (State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
15,000,000
1,505,000 3,4 Ohio HFA, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A78) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
1,505,000
3,075,000 3,4 Ohio HFA, Variable Rate Certificates (Series 2001-I) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.760%, 8/3/2006
3,075,000
2,250,000 Ohio State Water Development Authority, (Series 1999-A) Weekly VRDNs (Ohio Edison Co.), 3.830%, 8/2/2006
2,250,000
7,000,000 Ohio State, Solid Waste Revenue Bonds (Series 1998) Daily VRDNs (BP Exploration & Oil, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.690%, 8/1/2006
7,000,000
2,870,000 Paulding County, OH, (Series B), 4.50% BANs, 2/14/2007


2,884,379

   TOTAL


176,564,609

Oklahoma--2.0%
5,650,000 Broken Arrow, OK EDA Weekly VRDNs (Blue Bell Creameries)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.880%, 8/3/2006
5,650,000
17,646,873 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Oklahoma AMT)/(Series 2004-3) Weekly VRDNs (Oklahoma HFA)/(GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
17,646,873
7,500,000 Oklahoma Development Finance Authority, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (ConocoPhillips Co.)/(ConocoPhillips GTD), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
7,500,000
6,000,000 Oklahoma Development Finance Authority, (Series 2003), 3.45% TOBs (ConocoPhillips Co.)/(ConocoPhillips GTD), Optional Tender 12/1/2006
6,000,000
33,000,000 Oklahoma Student Loan Authority, (Series 1997A) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
33,000,000
32,000,000 Oklahoma Student Loan Authority, (Series 2006A-1) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.730%, 8/2/2006


32,000,000

   TOTAL


101,796,873

Oregon--0.4%
10,000,000 Port of Morrow, OR, (Series 2001A) Weekly VRDNs (Threemile Canyon Farms LLC)/(Rabobank Nederland, Utrecht LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
10,000,000 Port of Morrow, OR, (Series 2001C) Weekly VRDNs (Threemile Canyon Farms LLC)/(Rabobank Nederland, Utrecht LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006


10,000,000

   TOTAL


20,000,000

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Pennsylvania--5.4%
$ 1,000,000 Chester County, PA IDA, (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc.)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.780%, 8/3/2006
$ 1,000,000
1,162,000 Northampton County, PA IDA, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Ultra-Poly Corp.)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
1,162,000
10,000,000 Pennsylvania EDFA, Wastewater Treatment Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2004A) Weekly VRDNs (Sunoco, Inc.), 3.785%, 8/2/2006
10,000,000
2,500,000 Pennsylvania EDFA, Wastewater Treatment Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2004B) Weekly VRDNs (Sunoco, Inc.), 3.850%, 8/2/2006
2,500,000
30,700,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Assistance Agency, (Series 1997A) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
30,700,000
24,500,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Assistance Agency, (Series 2003 A-1) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
24,500,000
10,000,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Assistance Agency, (Series 2003 A-2) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
10,000,000
16,100,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Assistance Agency, Series 2002 A) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Bayerische Landesbank (Guaranteed), Lloyds TSB Bank PLC, London, State Street Bank and Trust Co. and WestLB AG (Guaranteed) LIQs), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
16,100,000
25,000,000 Philadelphia, PA Airport System, (Series 2005B) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
25,000,000
76,485,000 Philadelphia, PA Airport System, (Series 2005C) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
76,485,000
14,000,000 Philadelphia, PA Gas Works, (Sixth Series 1998 General Ordinance) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Bank of Nova Scotia, Toronto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQs), 3.620%, 8/3/2006
14,000,000
15,500,000 Philadelphia, PA Hospitals & Higher Education Facilities Authority, (Series 2005A) Daily VRDNs (Children's Hospital of Philadelphia)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.660%, 8/1/2006
15,500,000
19,100,000 Southcentral PA, General Authority, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (Wellspan Health Obligated Group)/(AMBAC INS)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006
19,100,000
21,615,000 Southcentral PA, General Authority, (Series 2005B) Weekly VRDNs (Wellspan Health Obligated Group)/(AMBAC INS)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006


21,615,000

   TOTAL


267,662,000

Puerto Rico--0.3%
14,975,000 3,4 Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (PT-3189), 3.15% TOBs (AMBAC, CDC IXIS Financial Guaranty N.A. INS) and Dexia Credit Local LIQs), Optional Tender 10/12/2006


14,975,000

Rhode Island--0.1%
3,555,000 Rhode Island Industrial Facilities Corp., (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Interplex Industries, Inc.)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.780%, 8/3/2006
3,555,000
1,960,000 Warwick, RI Housing Authority, (Series 2001) Daily VRDNs (Trafalgar East Apartments)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/1/2006


1,960,000

   TOTAL


5,515,000

South Carolina--3.1%
29,650,000 Berkeley County, SC Exempt Facility Industrial Development, (Series 1997) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
29,650,000
22,280,000 Berkeley County, SC Exempt Facility Industrial Development, (Series 1998) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.)/(BP Amoco Corp. GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
22,280,000
21,800,000 Berkeley County, SC IDB Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
21,800,000
18,800,000 Berkeley County, SC IDB, (Series 1996A) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
18,800,000
5,600,000 Berkeley County, SC IDB, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
5,600,000
21,000,000 Berkeley County, SC IDB, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
21,000,000
10,000,000 3,4 Medical University of South Carolina Hospital Authority, AUSTIN (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
1,830,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA Weekly VRDNs (Boozer Lumber Co.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.920%, 8/4/2006
1,830,000
1,450,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA Weekly VRDNs (Lorraine Linens)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.810%, 8/4/2006
1,450,000
150,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA, (Series 1990) Weekly VRDNs (NMFO Associates)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.970%, 8/2/2006
150,000
150,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA, (Series 1990) Weekly VRDNs (Old Claussen's Bakery)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.970%, 8/2/2006
150,000
150,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA, (Series 1990) Weekly VRDNs (Rice Street Association)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.970%, 8/2/2006
150,000
2,300,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA, (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (PVC Container Corp. Project)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
2,300,000
700,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Carolina Cotton Works, Inc.)/(Branch Banking & Trust Co., Winston-Salem LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
700,000
6,000,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (Oconee Memorial Hospital, Inc.)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS)/(RBC Centura Bank LIQ), 3.700%, 8/3/2006
6,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
South Carolina--continued
$ 2,085,000 3,4 South Carolina State Housing Finance & Development Authority, ROCs (Series 398) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
$ 2,085,000
10,300,000 3,4 South Carolina State Ports Authority, Floater Certificates (Series 2006-1390X) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006


10,300,000

   TOTAL


154,245,000

South Dakota--0.1%
4,000,000 South Dakota Housing Development Authority, (2003 Series F) Weekly VRDNs (Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen (GTD) LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006


4,000,000

Tennessee--0.6%
4,850,000 Dickson, TN Health and Educational Facilities Board, Autumn Park Apartments (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Tennessee Partners XII LP)/ (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.800%, 8/3/2006
4,850,000
1,500,000 Dover, TN IDB, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Nashville Wire Products Manufacturing Co.)/(Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 3.910%, 8/3/2006
1,500,000
1,950,000 Hamilton County, TN IDB Weekly VRDNs (Pavestone Co.)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.880%, 8/3/2006
1,950,000
3,000,000 Jackson, TN IDB, Solid Waste Facility Bonds (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Florida Steel Corp.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
3,000,000
9,400,000 Shelby County, TN Health Education & Housing Facilities Board, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (FSP-Wyndridge III LLC)/(FHLMC LOC), 3.700%, 8/3/2006
9,400,000
200,000 South Pittsburg, TN IDB, (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (Lodge Manufacturing Co.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
200,000
845,000 Tullahoma, TN IDB, (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Rock-Tenn Converting Co.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
845,000
7,000,000 Wilson County, TN Health and Educational Facilities Board, Forest View Apartments (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (Forest View LP)/ (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006


7,000,000

   TOTAL


28,745,000

Texas--15.7%
8,830,000 3,4 Alliance Airport Authority Inc., TX, GS Trust (Series 2006-2G) Weekly VRDNs (FedEx Corp.)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. GTD)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
8,830,000
14,800,000 3,4 Austin, TX Housing Finance Corp., (PT-1348) Weekly VRDNs (Blunn Creek Apartments)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
14,800,000
4,965,000 3,4 Bexar County, TX Housing Finance Corp., PT-2596 Weekly VRDNs (Rosemont Apartments)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(WestLB AG (Guaranteed) LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
4,965,000
2,000,000 Brazos River Authority, TX, (Series 2001 D-1) Weekly VRDNs (TXU Energy Co. LLC)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
2,000,000
14,700,000 Brazos River Authority, TX, (Series 2001 D-2) Weekly VRDNs (TXU Energy Co. LLC)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
14,700,000
35,500,000 Brazos River Authority, TX, (Series 2001A) Weekly VRDNs (TXU Energy Co. LLC)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
35,500,000
26,500,000 Calhoun County, TX Navigation District Environmental Facilities, (Series 2006) Weekly VRDNs (Formosa Plastic Corp.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
26,500,000
930,000 College Station, TX, 6.375% Bonds (CDC IXIS Financial Guaranty N.A. INS), 2/15/2007
942,314
805,000 College Station, TX, 6.375% Bonds (CDC IXIS Financial Guaranty N.A. INS), 2/15/2007
815,659
5,340,000 Colorado County, TX IDC, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Great Southern Wood, Inc.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.780%, 8/2/2006
5,340,000
2,100,000 Dalhart, TX Economic Development Corp., (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (DARE Investments)/(Rabobank Nederland, Utrecht LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
2,100,000
2,950,000 Dalhart, TX Economic Development Corp., (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (Northside Farms LLC)/(Rabobank Nederland, Utrecht LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
2,950,000
14,575,000 3,4 Dallas, TX Housing Finance Corp., PT-2599 Weekly VRDNs (Southern Oaks Housing)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(WestLB AG (Guaranteed) LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
14,575,000
9,000,000 3,4 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX International Airport, (PA-1061) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
9,000,000
2,870,000 3,4 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX International Airport, MERLOTS (Series 2002-A13) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
2,870,000
3,915,000 3,4 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX International Airport, PT-738 Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
3,915,000
4,995,000 3,4 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX International Airport, PUTTERs (Series 354) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
4,995,000
7,150,000 3,4 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX International Airport, PUTTERs (Series 350) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
7,150,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Texas--continued
$ 3,000,000 3,4 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX International Airport, ROCs (Series 268) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
$ 3,000,000
21,370,000 3,4 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX International Airport, Roaring Forks (Series 2003-4) Weekly VRDNs (FSA, MBIA Insurance Corp. INS) and Bank of New York LIQs), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
21,370,000
9,400,000 DeSoto, TX Housing Finance Corp., (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Hickory Manor Senior Apartments)/(FHLMC LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
9,400,000
7,500,000 East Texas Housing Finance Corp., (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (The Park at Shiloh Apartments)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
7,500,000
3,350,000 Gulf Coast, TX IDA, (Series 1999) Daily VRDNs (CITGO Petroleum Corp.)/(BNP Paribas SA LOC), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
3,350,000
25,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX IDA, (Series 2001) Daily VRDNs (CITGO Petroleum Corp.)/(Bank of New York LOC), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
25,000,000
18,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX IDA, Marine Terminal Revenue Bonds (Series 1993) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
18,000,000
35,900,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
35,900,000
6,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 1993) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
6,000,000
23,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 1994) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
23,000,000
25,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 1996) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
25,000,000
24,900,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 1997) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
24,900,000
13,500,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 1998) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
13,500,000
20,800,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 2001) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
20,800,000
21,500,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 2002) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
21,500,000
25,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 2003) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
25,000,000
24,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 2004) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
24,000,000
19,600,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 2005) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
19,600,000
6,300,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
6,300,000
7,800,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
7,800,000
7,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Air Products LP)/ (Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. GTD), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
7,000,000
12,500,000 Harris County, TX HFDC, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (Baylor College of Medicine)/(AMBAC INS)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006
12,500,000
32,000,000 Harris County, TX HFDC, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital)/(FGIC INS)/(Citibank NA, New York and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQs), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
32,000,000
5,600,000 Harris County, TX HFDC, (Series 2006) Daily VRDNs (Texas Medical Center)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.660%, 8/1/2006
5,600,000
2,000,000 Harris County, TX Housing Finance Corp., Park at Kirkstall Apartments (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Harris Park Partners LP)/ (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
9,570,000 3,4 Houston, TX Airport System, (MERLOTS Series 2001-B4) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
9,570,000
45,200,000 Houston, TX Airport System, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
45,200,000
6,930,000 3,4 Houston, TX Airport System, Floater Certificates (Series 2006-1382X) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
6,930,000
15,000,000 Houston, TX, (Series F), 3.70% CP, Mandatory Tender 8/17/2006
15,000,000
3,500,000 Lower Neches Valley Authority, TX, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (Onyx Environmental Services LLC)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
3,500,000
5,000,000 North Texas Tollway Authority, Variable Rate Revenue Bonds (Series 2005C) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
5,000,000
15,000,000 Port Arthur Navigation District, TX IDC, (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
15,000,000
4,995,000 3,4 Port of Houston, TX, Roaring Forks (Series 2005-24) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
4,995,000
2,845,000 Saginaw, TX IDA, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Glad Investing Partners Ltd.)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.880%, 8/3/2006
2,845,000
10,120,000 3,4 San Antonio, TX Electric & Gas System, MERLOTS (Series 2002-A53), 3.385% TOBs (FSA INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 1/24/2007
10,120,000
7,000,000 3,4 San Antonio, TX Independent School District, (PT-1184) Weekly VRDNs (Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
7,000,000
10,000,000 3,4 Texas State Department of Housing & Community Affairs, (PA-1308) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Texas--continued
$ 3,000,000 3,4 Texas State Department of Housing & Community Affairs, (PT-2507) Weekly VRDNs (Ironwood Ranch Townhomes LP)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
$ 3,000,000
4,200,000 3,4 Texas State Department of Housing & Community Affairs, (Series 2005 FR/RI-L2) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.750%, 8/2/2006
4,200,000
19,985,000 Texas State Department of Housing & Community Affairs, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
19,985,000
13,400,000 Texas State Department of Housing & Community Affairs, Addison Park Apartments (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Arlington Partners LP)/ (Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
13,400,000
3,150,000 3,4 Texas State Department of Housing & Community Affairs, MERLOTS (Series 2003-A8) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
3,150,000
38,000,000 Texas State, (Series 2005), 4.50% TRANs, 8/31/2006
38,037,595
4,000,000 Waco, TX Industrial Development Corp., (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Chad A. Grief 1998 Irrevocable Trust)/(Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 3.910%, 8/3/2006
4,000,000
3,850,000 Waxahachie, TX IDA, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Rock-Tenn Converting Co.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.690%, 8/2/2006


3,850,000

   TOTAL


786,750,568

Utah--0.1%
4,000,000 West Jordan, UT, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Penco Products, Inc.)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006


4,000,000

Vermont--0.2%
5,295,000 3,4 Vermont HFA, (Series 2004 FR/RI-L76) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.750%, 8/2/2006
5,295,000
3,500,000 3,4 Vermont HFA, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A49), 3.40% TOBs (FSA INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006
3,500,000
2,730,000 3,4 Vermont HFA, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A91), 3.40% TOBs (FSA INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006


2,730,000

   TOTAL


11,525,000

Virginia--1.2%
34,300,000 Halifax, VA IDA, MMMs, PCR (Series 1992), 3.80% CP (Virginia Electric & Power Co.), Mandatory Tender 8/1/2006
34,300,000
5,000,000 3,4 Harrisonburg, VA Redevelopment & Housing Authority, (PT-485), 2.98% TOBs (Rolling Brook Village Apartments)/ (FHLMC GTD)/(FHLMC LIQ), Optional Tender 9/7/2006
5,000,000
6,500,000 3,4 Virginia Port Authority, MERLOTS (Series 1997M) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
6,500,000
12,000,000 Virginia State Housing Development Authority, (Subseries D-STEM-II), 3.80% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 11/14/2006


12,000,000

   TOTAL


57,800,000

Washington--3.3%
6,985,000 3,4 Chelan County, WA Public Utility District No. 1, (MERLOTS Series 2001-B1) Weekly VRDNs (Chelan Hydro Consolidated System)/ (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
6,985,000
4,300,000 Energy Northwest, WA, Electric Revenue Bonds (Series 2003-E: Project No. 3) Weekly VRDNs (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/2/2006
4,300,000
5,183,500 3,4 Energy Northwest, WA, Piper Certificates (Series 2002C) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
5,183,500
24,000,000 Issaquah Community Properties, WA, (Series 2001B) Weekly VRDNs (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
24,000,000
9,000,000 Pierce County, WA Economic Development Corp., (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Simpson-Tacoma Kraft Co.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
9,000,000
4,555,000 Port of Pasco, WA Economic Development Corp., (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (Douglas Fruit Co., Inc.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
4,555,000
4,995,000 3,4 Port of Seattle, WA, (PT-720) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(BNP Paribas SA LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
4,995,000
8,425,000 Port of Seattle, WA, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (Fortis Bank SA/NV LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
8,425,000
7,610,000 3,4 Port of Seattle, WA, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A53) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
7,610,000
3,950,000 3,4 Port of Seattle, WA, MERLOTS (Series 2002-B4) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
3,950,000
5,020,000 3,4 Port of Seattle, WA, MERLOTS (Series 2006-C1) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
5,020,000
4,450,000 3,4 Port of Seattle, WA, PT-728 Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(BNP Paribas SA LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
4,450,000
4,320,000 3,4 Port of Seattle, WA, PT-850, 3.13% TOBs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), Optional Tender 8/17/2006
4,320,000
2,420,000 Seattle, WA Housing Authority, (Series 2002: New Holly Project Phase III) Weekly VRDNs (Desdemona LP)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
2,420,000
11,550,000 Seattle, WA Housing Authority, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (High Point North LP)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
11,550,000
11,720,000 3,4 Spokane, WA Public Facilities District, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A111), 3.40% TOBs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006
11,720,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Washington--continued
$ 5,500,000 Washington State EDFA, (Series 2001C) Weekly VRDNs (Waste Management, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
$ 5,500,000
1,000,000 Washington State EDFA, (Series 2001L) Weekly VRDNs (Darigold, Inc./WestFarm Foods)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
1,000,000
5,200,000 Washington State EDFA, (Series 2004B) Weekly VRDNs (Cedar Grove Composting, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
5,200,000
5,000,000 Washington State EDFA, (Series 2005B) Weekly VRDNs (Harold LeMay Enterprises, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
5,000,000
5,350,000 Washington State Housing Finance Commission, (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (Alderwood Court Associates LP)/(FNMA LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
5,350,000
26,146,000 3,4 Washington State, Floater Certificates (Series 2004-1161) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.600%, 8/3/2006


26,146,000

   TOTAL


166,679,500

West Virginia--1.1%
1,045,000 Berkeley County, WV County Commission, (Series 1994) Weekly VRDNs (Brentwood Industries, Inc.)/(General Electric Capital Corp. LOC), 3.760%, 8/2/2006
1,045,000
10,000,000 Grant County, WV County Commission, PCRB (Series 1994), 3.72% CP (Virginia Electric & Power Co.), Mandatory Tender 10/11/2006
10,000,000
4,000,000 Grant County, WV County Commission, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 1996), 3.65% CP (Virginia Electric & Power Co.), Mandatory Tender 8/14/2006
4,000,000
15,800,000 Marion County, WV County Commission, (Series 1990 A) Weekly VRDNs (American Bituminous Power Partners LP)/(Deutsche Bank AG LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
15,800,000
3,300,000 Marion County, WV County Commission, (Series 1990 B) Weekly VRDNs (American Bituminous Power Partners LP)/(Deutsche Bank AG LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
3,300,000
3,760,000 Ritchie County, WV, IDRB (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (Simonton Building Products, Inc.)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.780%, 8/3/2006
3,760,000
15,800,000 West Virginia Public Energy Authority, (1989 Series A), 3.70% CP (Morgantown Energy Associates)/(Dexia Credit Local LOC), Mandatory Tender 8/4/2006


15,800,000

   TOTAL


53,705,000

Wisconsin--2.0%
9,500,000 Brokaw, WI, Sewage and Solid Waste Revenue Bonds (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Wausau Paper Mills Co.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.890%, 8/3/2006
9,500,000
4,000,000 Combined Locks, WI, Development Revenue Bonds, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Appleton Papers)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.890%, 8/3/2006
4,000,000
800,000 Grand Chute, WI, (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (Pacon Corp.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
800,000
2,075,000 Hartford, WI, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Advance Bag, Inc.)/(Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee LOC), 3.830%, 8/3/2006
2,075,000
2,300,000 Milwaukee, WI, (Series 1997), 3.72% TOBs (Signature Flight Support Corp.)/(Bayerische Landesbank (GTD) LOC), Optional Tender 12/1/2006
2,300,000
4,085,000 3,4 Wisconsin Housing & EDA, (PT-3456) Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
4,085,000
17,435,000 Wisconsin Housing & EDA, (Series 2004E) Weekly VRDNs (Lloyds TSB Bank PLC, London LIQ), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
17,435,000
30,000,000 Wisconsin Housing & EDA, (Series A) Weekly VRDNs (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
30,000,000
5,000,000 Wisconsin Housing & EDA, Home Ownership Revenue Bonds (Series 2002E) Weekly VRDNs (Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago LIQ), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
5,000,000
17,450,000 Wisconsin Housing & EDA, Home Ownership Revenue Bonds (Series 2005C) Weekly VRDNs (Lloyds TSB Bank PLC, London LIQ), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
17,450,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Wisconsin--continued
$ 4,100,000 Wisconsin Housing & EDA, Home Ownership Revenue Bonds (Series 2005C) Weekly VRDNs (Lloyds TSB Bank PLC, London LIQ), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
$ 4,100,000
2,865,000 3,4 Wisconsin Housing & EDA, ROCs (Series 397) Weekly VRDNs (Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006


2,865,000

   TOTAL


99,610,000

   TOTAL MUNICIPAL INVESTMENTS--107.6%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 5



5,371,036,367

   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--(7.6)%


(377,494,671
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
4,993,541,696

Securities that are subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) represent 70.0% of the portfolio as calculated based on total market value (percentage is unaudited).

1 The Fund may only invest in securities rated in one of the two highest short-term rating categories by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSROs) or unrated securities of comparable quality. An NRSRO's two highest rating categories are determined without regard for sub-categories and gradations. For example, securities rated SP-1+, SP-1, or SP-2 by Standard & Poor's, MIG-1 or MIG-2 by Moody's Investors Service, or F-1+, F-1, or F-2 by Fitch Ratings, are all considered rated in one of the two highest short-term rating categories. Securities rated in the highest short-term rating category (and unrated securities of comparable quality) are identified as First Tier securities. Securities rated in the second highest short-term rating category (and unrated securities of comparable quality) are identified as Second Tier securities. The Fund follows applicable regulations in determining whether a security is rated and whether a security rated by multiple NRSROs in different rating categories should be identified as a First or Second Tier security. At July 31, 2006, the portfolio securities were rated as follows:

Tier Rating Based on Total Market Value (unaudited)

First Tier
   
Second Tier
97.7%

2.3%

2 Current rate and next reset date shown for Variable Rate Demand Notes.

3 Denotes a restricted security that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) is subject to a contractual restriction on public sales. At July 31, 2006, these restricted securities amounted to $1,417,048,516, which represented 28.4% of total net assets.

4 Denotes a restricted security that may be resold without restriction to "qualified institutional buyers" as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and that the Fund has determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Fund's Board of Trustees. At July 31, 2006, these liquid restricted securities amounted to $1,417,048,516, which represented 28.4% of total net assets.

5 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

AMBAC --American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation
AMT --Alternative Minimum Tax
BANs --Bond Anticipation Notes
COL --Collateralized
CP --Commercial Paper
EDA --Economic Development Authority
EDFA --Economic Development Financing Authority
FGIC --Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FHLMC --Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
FNMA --Federal National Mortgage Association
FSA --Financial Security Assurance
GNMA --Government National Mortgage Association
GO --General Obligation
GTD --Guaranteed
HEFA --Health and Education Facilities Authority
HFA --Housing Finance Authority
HFDC --Health Facility Development Corporation
IDA --Industrial Development Authority
IDB --Industrial Development Bond
IDC --Industrial Development Corporation
IDFA --Industrial Development Finance Authority
IDRB(s) --Industrial Development Revenue Bond(s)
IFA --Industrial Finance Authority
INS --Insured
LIQ --Liquidity Agreement
LOCs --Letter(s) of Credit
MERLOTS --Municipal Exempt Receipts -- Liquidity Optional Tender Series
MFH --Multi-Family Housing
MMMs --Money Market Municipals
PCA --Pollution Control Authority
PCFA --Pollution Control Finance Authority
PCR --Pollution Control Revenue
PCRB --Pollution Control Revenue Board
PUTTERs --Puttable Tax Exempt Receipts
ROCs --Reset Option Certificates
SWP --Swap Agreement
TANs --Tax Anticipation Notes
TOBs --Tender Option Bonds
TRANs --Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes
VRDNs --Variable Rate Demand Notes

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Prime Cash Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:

Security Type
   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Variable Rate Demand Instruments

52.3%
Commercial Paper & Notes

36.6%
Bank Instruments

9.5%
Repurchase Agreements- Cash

1.4%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

0.2%
   TOTAL

100.0%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:



   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

35.0%
4
8-30 Days

36.2%

31-90 Days

21.0%

91-180 Days

0.8%

181 Days or more

6.8%

Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

0.2%

   TOTAL

100.0%

1 Commercial paper and notes include any fixed-rate security that is not a bank instrument. A variable rate instrument is any security which has an interest rate that resets periodically. See the Fund's Prospectus for a description of the principal types of securities in which the Fund invests.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

4 Overnight securities comprised 1.4% of the Fund's portfolio.

Prime Cash Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES--1.2%
Finance - Automotive--0.4%
$ 14,885,373 Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2006-1, Class A1, 4.872%, 3/15/2007
$ 14,885,373
3,358,853 1,2 DaimlerChrysler Auto Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.791%, 3/8/2007
3,358,853
1,294,473 USAA Auto Owner Trust 2005-4, Class A1, 4.400%, 12/15/2006
1,294,473
5,644,182 World Omni Automobile Receivables Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.854%, 3/15/2007


5,644,182
   TOTAL


25,182,881
Finance - Equipment--0.8%
27,430,465 CIT Equipment Collateral 2006-VT1, Class A1, 4.989%, 3/20/2007
27,430,465
5,248,121 CNH Equipment Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.989%, 4/5/2007
5,248,122
26,912,334 John Deere Owner Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 5.364%, 7/13/2007


26,912,334
   TOTAL


59,590,921
   TOTAL ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES


84,773,802
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT--9.5%
Banking--9.5%
15,000,000 Barclays Bank PLC, 4.752%, 10/17/2006
15,000,077
40,000,000 Calyon, Paris, 4.750% - 5.260%, 10/26/2006 - 4/11/2007
40,000,000
65,000,000 Citizens Bank N.A., 5.160% - 5.270%, 8/10/2006 - 9/12/2006
65,001,045
70,000,000 Citizens Bank of Massachusetts, 5.330%, 8/10/2006
70,000,000
35,000,000 Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, 5.220%, 8/28/2006
35,000,000
195,000,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 4.775% - 5.200%, 10/27/2006 - 3/29/2007
195,000,000
25,000,000 DePfa Bank PLC, 5.260%, 4/9/2007
25,000,000
13,000,000 Deutsche Bank AG, 4.500%, 10/13/2006
13,000,000
25,000,000 Dexia Bank, Belgium, 4.305%, 9/29/2006
24,980,510
10,000,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.260%, 4/11/2007
10,000,000
80,500,000 Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, Edinburgh, 4.397% - 4.755%, 10/4/2006 - 10/27/2006
80,499,809
20,000,000 Societe Generale, Paris, 4.760%, 10/27/2006
20,000,000
50,000,000 Toronto Dominion Bank, 5.160% - 5.600%, 9/5/2006 - 6/18/2007
50,000,000
50,000,000 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 5.310%, 8/10/2006


50,000,000
   TOTAL CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT


693,481,441
COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS--9.6%
Banking--0.5%
40,000,000 IXIS Financial Products Inc., 5.412%, 8/1/2006


40,000,000
Brokerage--9.1%
301,000,000 Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., 5.412%, 8/1/2006
301,000,000
300,000,000 Goldman Sachs & Co., 5.382% - 5.412%, 8/1/2006
300,000,000
59,000,000 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.442%, 8/1/2006


59,000,000
   TOTAL


660,000,000
   TOTAL COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS


700,000,000
COMMERCIAL PAPER--20.6% 3
Banking--7.6%
25,000,000 Bank of America Corp., 5.280%, 8/8/2006
24,974,333
75,000,000 1,2 Blue Spice LLC, (Deutsche Bank AG SWP), 5.330% - 5.350%, 9/20/2006 - 9/22/2006
74,436,667
35,000,000 Danske Corp., Inc., (Danske Bank A/S, GTD), 4.984%, 4/10/2007
33,778,920
41,000,000 1,2 Fountain Square Commercial Funding Corp., 5.000%, 9/5/2006
40,800,694
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
COMMERCIAL PAPER--continued 3
Banking--continued
$ 35,000,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.180%, 9/8/2006
$ 34,808,628
10,000,000 1,2 KBC Financial Products International Ltd., (KBC Bank NV GTD), 4.970%, 8/9/2006
9,988,956
100,000,000 1,2 Long Lane Master Trust IV, (Bank of America N.A. SWP), 5.280% - 5.360%, 8/7/2006 - 8/21/2006
99,807,111
235,000,000 1,2 Picaros Funding LLC, (KBC Bank NV GTD), 4.970% - 5.400%, 8/10/2006 - 2/13/2007


232,857,165
   TOTAL


551,452,474
Finance - Automotive--4.7%
171,000,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust, A1+/P1 Series, 5.070% - 5.280%, 8/8/2006 - 9/15/2006
170,574,791
175,000,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust, A1/P1 Series, 5.210% - 5.410%, 8/4/2006 - 10/16/2006


174,070,181
   TOTAL


344,644,972
Finance - Retail--4.9%
21,000,000 1,2 Chariot Funding LLC, 5.150%, 9/5/2006
20,894,854
50,000,000 1,2 Compass Securitization LLC, 5.245%, 9/15/2006
49,672,188
64,012,000 1,2 Jupiter Securitization Company LLC, 5.300%, 8/9/2006
63,936,608
100,000,000 1,2 Paradigm Funding LLC, 5.300%, 8/15/2006
99,792,722
121,966,000 1,2 Yorktown Capital LLC, 5.360%, 8/21/2006


121,602,812
   TOTAL


355,899,184
Finance - Securities--3.4%
66,000,000 1,2 Grampian Funding LLC, 5.220% - 5.370%, 9/18/2006 - 10/25/2006
65,197,490
87,000,000 1,2 KLIO II Funding Ltd., 5.230% - 5.370%, 8/22/2006 - 9/8/2006
86,664,639
97,000,000 1,2 Perry Global Funding LLC Series A, 5.180% - 5.390%, 8/9/2006 - 10/10/2006


96,694,069
   TOTAL


248,556,198
   TOTAL COMMERCIAL PAPER


1,500,552,828
CORPORATE BONDS--0.2%
Insurance--0.2%
15,000,000 AEGON NV, 8.000%, 8/15/2006


15,012,843
CORPORATE NOTES--3.8%
Finance - Securities--3.8%
106,000,000 1,2 K2 (USA) LLC, (K2 Corp. GTD), 4.800% - 5.000%, 12/6/2006 - 3/12/2007
105,998,016
172,000,000 1,2 Sigma Finance, Inc., (Sigma Finance Corp. GTD), 4.150% - 5.750%, 8/1/2006 -7/25/2007


172,000,000
   TOTAL CORPORATE NOTES


277,998,016
LOAN PARTICIPATION--0.4%
Electrical Equipment--0.4%
32,000,000 Mt. Vernon Phenol Plant Partnership, (General Electric Co. GTD), 5.390%, 5/21/2007


32,000,000
NOTES - VARIABLE--52.3% 4
Banking--27.8%
4,120,000 1700 Financial Group, Inc., Series 2002, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
4,120,000
3,955,000 4 C's LLC, (Series 1998), (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
3,955,000
4,495,000 AW Mobile LLC, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/4/2006
4,495,000
3,533,000 Aaron Oil Co., Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,533,000
3,835,000 Acton Realty Investors LLP, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,835,000
1,875,000 Alabama State IDA, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
1,875,000
2,000,000 Albuquerque, NM, Series 1997 El Canto, Inc., (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 5.490%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
1,095,000 Alder Creek Properties LLC, (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
1,095,000
2,940,000 American Custom Yachts, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,940,000
8,200,000 American Health Centers, Inc., Series 2004, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
8,200,000
7,775,000 Anchor Holdings LLC, Series 2000, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
7,775,000
3,155,000 B & H Holdings LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,155,000
2,865,000 BMW Investments, Inc., (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
2,865,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 4
Banking--continued
$ 8,915,000 Badger Mining Corp., (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
$ 8,915,000
3,899,000 Baldwin County Sewer Service LLC, Series 2003, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,899,000
274,000,000 Bank of America N.A., 5.373%, 8/1/2006
273,996,424
25,000,000 1,2 Bank of New York Co., Inc., 5.458%, 8/28/2006
25,000,000
59,000,000 Barclays Bank PLC, 5.289% - 5.343%, 8/7/2006 - 8/28/2006
58,993,058
8,315,000 Barton Healthcare LLC, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.340%, 8/2/2006
8,315,000
24,995,000 Battle Creek, MI Downtown Development Authority, Series 2004, (INS by Ambac Financial Group, Inc.), 5.340%, 8/2/2006
24,995,000
7,690,000 Bessemer, AL IDB, Series 2003, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
7,690,000
865,000 Biddle Road Corp., Series 2004, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
865,000
1,870,000 Birmingham Fastener and Supply, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
1,870,000
925,000 Bond Holdings LP, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/4/2006
925,000
3,125,000 Boyd-Plott LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,125,000
5,180,000 Briarwood LP, (Series 1999), (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
5,180,000
5,890,000 Brownsburg Christian Church, Inc., (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
5,890,000
705,000 Brumfield Properties, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
705,000
6,310,000 California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.440%, 8/1/2006
6,310,000
2,305,000 Capital Container Properties LLC, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
2,305,000
35,106,000 Capital One Funding Corp., (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
35,106,000
208,000 Capital One Funding Corp., (Series 1993-A), (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
208,000
1,663,000 Capital One Funding Corp., Series 1996-C, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
1,663,000
4,800,000 Capital One Funding Corp., Series 2001-C, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
4,800,000
1,955,000 Charles River LLC, (Harris, N.A. LOC), 5.520%, 8/3/2006
1,955,000
9,100,000 Charlotte Christian School, Series 1999, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/2/2006
9,100,000
3,350,000 Cleveland Country Club, Inc., Series 2001, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,350,000
4,100,000 Cleveland, TN IDB, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/2/2006
4,100,000
6,600,000 Coilplus-Alabama, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
6,600,000
14,490,000 Cook County, IL, Series 2002 A, 5.420%, 8/2/2006
14,490,000
27,120,000 Covington, KY Industrial Building Revenue Bond, Series 2005-A, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
27,120,000
110,000,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 5.280% - 5.470%, 9/12/2006 - 9/29/2006
110,000,000
4,500,000 DBH Properties LLC, Series 2004, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
4,500,000
5,570,000 DLR Investments, Inc., Series 2005, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.470%, 8/3/2006
5,570,000
170,000,000 1,2 DePfa Bank PLC, 5.369%, 9/15/2006
170,000,000
4,020,000 Duncan Machinery Movers Inc., (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
4,020,000
1,855,000 Elliott Aviation, Inc., (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
1,855,000
4,810,000 Elmira Downtown Arena LLC, (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
4,810,000
875,000 Elsinore Properties LP, (Series 1998), (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
875,000
2,800,000 Equity Development Corp., Series 2002, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,800,000
6,900,000 Erwin Marine Sales, Inc., Series 2000, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
6,900,000
4,000,000 Excel Mining Systems, Inc., Series 2001, (Australia & New Zealand Banking Group, Melbourne LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
4,000,000
451,000 First Baptist Church of West Monroe, LA, Series 2003, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
451,000
1,875,000 Frank Nelson Building of Birmingham LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
1,875,000
785,000 Fredericksburg, VA IDA, (SunTrust Bank LOC), 5.420%, 8/2/2006
785,000
5,645,000 Freeport, IL, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
5,645,000
2,010,000 Galasso Materials LLC and Galasso Holdings LLC, (Series 1998), (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
2,010,000
2,100,000 Galliano Marine Service, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
2,100,000
3,700,000 Georgia Ports Authority, Colonel's Island Terminal Project (Series 1996-A), Revenue Bonds, (SunTrust Bank LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
3,700,000
21,500,000 Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc., (Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc. GTD), 5.305%, 8/9/2006
21,500,000
79,000,000 Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc., (Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, Edinburgh GTD), 5.317%, 8/14/2006
79,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 4
Banking--continued
$ 3,860,000 Grigsby Properties LLC, Series 2002, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
$ 3,860,000
1,485,000 Guilford Capital LLC, Series 2002 - C, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
1,485,000
2,170,000 Guilford Capital LLC, Series 2002 - F, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
2,170,000
153,000,000 1,2 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.259% - 5.315%, 8/9/2006 - 8/21/2006
153,000,000
171,000,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.396% - 5.530%, 8/1/2006 - 9/25/2006
171,000,000
14,600,000 Hamilton Station Park and Ride, Series 2005, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
14,600,000
8,055,000 Hanna Steel Corp., (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
8,055,000
8,400,000 Home City Ice Co. & H.C. Transport, Series 2000, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
8,400,000
4,440,000 Hugh W. Underwood/Underwood Properties, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006
4,440,000
5,335,000 Hugh W. Underwood, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006
5,335,000
3,085,000 IPC Industries, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
3,085,000
1,050,000 IT Spring Wire LLC, Series 1997, (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
1,050,000
6,750,000 Ilsco Corp., (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
6,750,000
15,000,000 Interlock Realty Co., (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
15,000,000
32,500,000 J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., 5.316%, 8/2/2006
32,500,000
3,685,000 Jemmack Funding Group LLC, Series 2002, (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
3,685,000
8,755,000 Jet-Pep, Inc., Series 2003, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
8,755,000
3,865,000 Kansas Development Finance Authority, DLR Deer Creek Project, (FHLB of Topeka LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
3,865,000
2,200,000 Kentucky Derby Hosiery Co., Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,200,000
950,000 Kit Carson County, CO, Midwest Farms Project, (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 5.340%, 8/3/2006
950,000
2,700,000 LCO Ventures LLC, (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 5.370%, 8/3/2006
2,700,000
2,690,000 Life Church Birmingham, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,690,000
5,000,000 1,2 Los Angeles, CA, MERLOT Series 2000 A (H&H Theatre), (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/2/2006
5,000,000
2,425,000 Mayer Properties LLP, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/4/2006
2,425,000
1,785,000 McCullough Snappy Service Oil Co., Inc., (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/4/2006
1,785,000
7,900,000 Medical Arts Capital LLC, Series 2001, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
7,900,000
895,000 Michigan State Housing Development Authority, Series 1999B, Lexington Place Apartments, (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006
895,000
2,695,000 Mike Patton Real Estate II LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,695,000
3,300,000 Mile Bluff Clinic Building Partnership, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
3,300,000
1,460,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
1,460,000
1,275,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., Mississippi College Project, Series 2001B, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
1,275,000
2,835,000 Montgomery, AL IDB, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
2,835,000
2,565,000 New Jersey EDA, Phoenix Realty Partners, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/2/2006
2,565,000
4,155,000 O.K.I. Supply Co., (Series 1998), (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
4,155,000
14,000,000 Ogden City Redevelopment Agency, Series 2005 C-1, (Bank of New York Co., Inc. LOC), 5.540%, 8/1/2006
14,000,000
2,355,000 P.C.I. Paper Conversions, Inc., Series 2000, (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
2,355,000
3,885,000 PW Holdings LLC, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
3,885,000
2,000,000 Parker Towing Co., Inc., Series 2001, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
6,365,000 R & J Investment Co., (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
6,365,000
7,480,000 Racetrac Capital LLC, Series 2000, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006
7,480,000
55,000,000 Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal, 5.375%, 8/10/2006
55,000,000
779,000 Sandridge Food Corp., (National City Bank, Ohio LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
779,000
3,110,000 Seeber USA LLP, Series 2000, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/2/2006
3,110,000
2,520,000 Sherman-Dixie Concrete Industries, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,520,000
5,140,000 Sioux-Preme Packing Co., (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
5,140,000
4,790,000 Southeast Christian Church of Jefferson County, KY Inc., Series 2003, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
4,790,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 4
Banking--continued
$ 4,075,000 Springhill Medical Complex, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
$ 4,075,000
7,190,000 Stow-Glen Properties LLC, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
7,190,000
60,000,000 Svenska Handelsbanken, Stockholm, 5.318%, 8/21/2006
59,998,368
2,335,000 TIL Holdings LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,335,000
2,110,000 TTL Realty LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,110,000
1,740,000 Tarrant Hydraulics Services LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
1,740,000
30,000,000 1,2 Union Hamilton Special Purpose Funding LLC, Series 2005-1 Tranche #1, (Wachovia Corp. GTD), 5.490%, 9/28/2006
30,000,000
3,055,000 University Church of Christ, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/4/2006
3,055,000
2,595,000 University Ltd. Properties LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,595,000
2,055,000 VLF LLC, The Village of Lovejoy, Fountain Project, (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
2,055,000
560,000 Vista Grande Villa, (LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
560,000
3,510,000 Watson's St. Louis Property LLC, Series 2001, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
3,510,000
4,315,000 Weaver Rentals LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
4,315,000
6,400,000 Wellbrook Finance LLC, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006
6,400,000
85,000,000 Wells Fargo & Co., 5.396%, 8/2/2006
85,000,000
15,000,000 West Memphis IDRB, S-B Power Tool Project, Series 2000 A, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.320%, 8/3/2006
15,000,000
50,000,000 Westpac Banking Corp. Ltd., Sydney, 5.340%, 9/11/2006
50,000,000
108,000,000 1,2 Westpac Banking Corp. Ltd., Sydney, 5.339%, 8/16/2006
108,000,000
1,145,000 White's Ferry Road Church of Christ, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
1,145,000
4,190,000 Wildcat Management Co., Inc., (Series 1999), (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006


4,190,000
   TOTAL


2,022,271,850
Brokerage--7.6%
35,000,000 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.307% - 5.386%, 8/1/2006 - 8/7/2006
35,000,000
40,000,000 1,2 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.389%, 8/15/2006
40,001,508
40,000,000 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.394%, 8/4/2006
40,000,000
165,000,000 1,2 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.599%, 8/11/2006
165,000,000
272,000,000 Morgan Stanley, 5.366% - 5.468%, 8/1/2006 - 8/28/2006


272,001,466
   TOTAL


552,002,974
Finance - Commercial--3.5%
6,600,000 Decoster, Series 2003-A, (General Electric Capital Corp. LOC), 5.380%, 8/3/2006
6,600,000
50,000,000 General Electric Capital Corp., 5.360%, 8/30/2006
50,000,000
193,500,000 1,2 General Electric Capital Corp., 5.469%, 8/17/2006
193,500,000
7,750,000 Oberthur Gaming Technologies Corp., Series 2002-A, (General Electric Capital Corp. LOC), 5.380%, 8/3/2006


7,750,000
   TOTAL


257,850,000
Finance - Retail--3.1%
85,000,000 1,2 Compass Securitization LLC, 5.289% - 5.311%, 8/7/2006 - 10/12/2006
84,992,856
144,000,000 1,2 Paradigm Funding LLC, 5.297% - 5.345%, 8/7/2006 - 8/25/2006


144,000,000
   TOTAL


228,992,856
Finance - Securities--4.2%
15,500,000 1,2 Beta Finance, Inc., 5.189%, 8/22/2006
15,501,114
119,000,000 1,2 K2 (USA) LLC, (K2 Corp. GTD), 5.300% - 5.445%, 8/10/2006 - 10/25/2006
118,989,530
170,000,000 1,2 Sigma Finance, Inc., (Sigma Finance Corp. GTD), 5.311% - 5.500%, 8/1/2006 - 10/20/2006


169,999,472
   TOTAL


304,490,116
Government Agency--0.1%
3,860,000 Community Hearth and Home Ltd., Series 2002, (FHLBank of Cincinnati LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
3,860,000
935,000 Direct One Funding Corp., Series 2000 (Sexton Properties), (FNMA LOC), 5.320%, 8/3/2006


935,000
   TOTAL


4,795,000
Principal
Amount
or Shares

   

   

Value
NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 4
Insurance--4.8%
$ 25,000,000 Genworth Life Insurance Co., 5.321%, 9/1/2006
$ 25,000,000
25,000,000 Hartford Life Insurance Co., 5.319% - 5.401%, 8/1/2006 - 9/1/2006
25,000,000
50,000,000 1,2 MBIA Global Funding LLC, 5.317%, 8/14/2006
50,000,000
45,000,000 MetLife Insurance Co. of Connecticut, 5.279% - 5.590%, 8/21/2006 - 9/28/2006
45,000,000
45,000,000 Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 5.270% - 5.648%, 8/1/2006 - 10/2/2006
45,000,000
54,000,000 Monumental Life Insurance Co., 5.367% - 5.680%, 8/1/2006 - 8/14/2006
54,000,000
70,000,000 New York Life Insurance Co., 4.920% - 5.290%, 8/30/2006 - 9/1/2006
70,000,000
12,000,000 1,2 Pacific Life Global Funding, 5.384%, 8/4/2006
12,000,142
25,000,000 Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Co., 5.620%, 10/2/2006


25,000,000
   TOTAL


351,000,142
Municipal--1.2%
84,000,000 Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund Finance Corp., 5.377%, 8/15/2006


84,000,000
   TOTAL NOTES - VARIABLE


3,805,402,938
MUTUAL FUNDS--0.8%
Asset Management--0.8%
25,000,000 Columbia Money Market Reserves
25,000,000
30,088,937 DWS Money Market Trust


30,088,937
   TOTAL MUTUAL FUNDS


55,088,937
REPURCHASE AGREEMENT--1.4%
104,499,000 Interest in $3,200,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Bank of America N.A. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/1/2035 for $3,200,470,222 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $3,264,000,000.


104,499,000
   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--99.8%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 5



7,268,809,805
   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--0.2%


15,433,271
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
7,284,243,076

1 Denotes a restricted security that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) is subject to a contractual restriction on public sales. At July 31, 2006, these restricted securities amounted to $2,828,687,466, which represented 38.8% of total net assets.

2 Denotes a restricted security that may be resold without restriction to "qualified institutional buyers" as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and that the Fund has determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Fund's Board of Trustees. At July 31, 2006, these liquid restricted securities amounted to $2,828,687,466, which represented 38.8% of total net assets.

3 Discount at the time of the purchase, or the coupon for interest bearing issues.

4 Floating rate note with current rate and next reset date shown.

5 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

EDA --Economic Development Authority
FHLB --Federal Home Loan Bank
FNMA --Federal National Mortgage Association
GTD --Guaranteed
IDA --Industrial Development Authority
IDB --Industrial Development Bond
IDRB --Industrial Development Revenue Bond
INS --Insured
LOC --Letter of Credit
MERLOTS --Municipal Exempt Receipts- Liquidity Optional Tender Series
SWP --Swap Agreement

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Prime Management Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:

Security Type


   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Commercial Paper & Notes

44.3%
Variable Rate Instruments

37.3%
Bank Instruments

9.4%
Repurchase Agreements

8.7%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

0.3%
   TOTAL

100.0%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:



   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

50.9%
4
8-30 Days

30.7%

31-90 Days

10.2%

91-180 Days

2.6%

181 Days or more

5.3%

Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

0.3%

   TOTAL

100.0%

1 Commercial paper and notes include any fixed-rate security that is not a bank instrument. A variable rate instrument is any security which has an interest rate that resets periodically. See the Fund's Prospectus for a description of the principal types of securities in which the Fund invests.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

4 Overnight securities comprised 37.5% of the Fund's portfolio.

Prime Management Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES--0.6%
Finance - Automotive--0.1%
$ 3,358,853 1,2 DaimlerChrysler Auto Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.791%, 3/8/2007
$ 3,358,853
1,975,464 World Omni Automobile Receivables Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.854%, 3/15/2007


1,975,464
   TOTAL


5,334,317
Finance - Equipment--0.5%
6,583,312 CIT Equipment Collateral 2006-VT1, Class A1, 4.989%, 3/20/2007
6,583,312
11,245,974 CNH Equipment Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.989%, 4/5/2007


11,245,974
   TOTAL


17,829,286
   TOTAL ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES


23,163,603
BANKERS ACCEPTANCE--0.5%
Banking--0.5%
18,000,000 Wachovia Bank N.A., 5.450%, 12/20/2006


17,615,775
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT--8.9%
Banking--8.9%
15,000,000 Barclays Bank PLC, 4.752%, 10/17/2006
15,000,077
29,000,000 Calyon, Paris, 4.750% - 5.310%, 10/17/2006 - 4/19/2007
29,000,000
18,000,000 Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, 5.220%, 8/28/2006
18,000,000
44,200,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 4.775% - 5.250%, 10/27/2006 - 3/29/2007
44,200,000
25,000,000 DePfa Bank PLC, 5.260%, 4/9/2007
25,000,000
20,000,000 Deutsche Bank AG, 4.500%, 10/13/2006
20,000,000
10,000,000 Dexia Bank, Belgium, 4.305%, 9/29/2006
9,992,204
20,000,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.355%, 5/15/2007
20,000,000
48,000,000 Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH, 5.190%, 8/1/2006
48,000,000
21,500,000 Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, Edinburgh, 4.397% - 4.755%, 10/4/2006 - 10/27/2006
21,499,964
10,000,000 Societe Generale, Paris, 4.785%, 10/27/2006
10,000,117
11,000,000 Toronto Dominion Bank, 5.600%, 6/18/2007
11,000,000
48,000,000 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 4.840% - 5.310%, 8/10/2006 - 1/30/2007
47,999,229
12,000,000 Wilmington Trust Co., 5.125%, 8/2/2006


12,000,000
   TOTAL CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT


331,691,591
COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS--20.7%
Banking--9.9%
25,000,000 BNP Paribas Securities Corp., 5.423%, 8/1/2006
25,000,000
110,000,000 Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, 5.413%, 8/1/2006
110,000,000
100,000,000 Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., 5.443%, 8/1/2006
100,000,000
75,000,000 Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., 5.438%, 8/1/2006
75,000,000
20,000,000 IXIS Financial Products Inc., 5.413%, 8/1/2006
20,000,000
40,000,000 J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., 5.413%, 8/1/2006


40,000,000
   TOTAL


370,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS--continued
Brokerage--10.8%
$ 72,000,000 Bear Stearns & Co., Inc., 5.433%, 8/1/2006
$ 72,000,000
115,000,000 Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., 5.413%, 8/1/2006
115,000,000
145,000,000 Goldman Sachs & Co., 5.383% - 5.413%, 8/1/2006
145,000,000
10,000,000 Lehman Brothers, Inc., 5.463%, 8/1/2006
10,000,000
50,000,000 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.443%, 8/1/2006
50,000,000
15,000,000 Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., 5.413%, 8/1/2006


15,000,000
   TOTAL


407,000,000
   TOTAL COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS


777,000,000
COMMERCIAL PAPER--19.1% 3
Banking--5.8%
20,000,000 Danske Corp., Inc., (GTD by Danske Bank A/S), 4.984%, 4/10/2007
19,302,240
28,000,000 1,2 Fountain Square Commercial Funding Corp., 5.300%, 8/22/2006
27,913,433
45,000,000 1,2 KBC Financial Products International Ltd., (GTD by KBC Bank NV), 4.960% - 5.100%, 8/4/2006 - 11/20/2006
44,668,256
44,991,000 1,2 Long Lane Master Trust IV, (Bank of America N.A. SWP), 5.360%, 8/21/2006
44,857,027
83,000,000 1,2 Picaros Funding LLC, (GTD by KBC Bank NV), 4.970% - 5.400%, 8/10/2006 - 10/11/2006


82,616,490
   TOTAL


219,357,446
Finance - Automotive--1.7%
45,000,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust, A1+/P1 Series, 5.260% - 5.280%, 8/8/2006 - 8/15/2006
44,928,328
18,000,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust, A1/P1 Series, 5.140% - 5.210%, 8/15/2006 - 9/15/2006


17,905,343
   TOTAL


62,833,671
Finance - Commercial--0.7%
27,000,000 CIT Group, Inc., 5.000% - 5.110%, 8/9/2006 - 11/15/2006


26,709,978
Finance - Retail--5.2%
11,000,000 1,2 Chariot Funding LLC, 5.150%, 9/5/2006
10,944,924
32,820,000 1,2 Compass Securitization LLC, 5.300%, 9/15/2006
32,602,568
41,500,000 Countrywide Financial Corp., 5.300%, 8/7/2006 - 8/8/2006
41,461,796
10,000,000 1,2 PREFCO-Preferred Receivables Funding Company LLC, 5.170%, 8/10/2006
9,987,075
100,000,000 1,2 Paradigm Funding LLC, 5.330%, 8/15/2006


99,792,722
   TOTAL


194,789,085
Finance - Securities--5.7%
25,000,000 1,2,4 Georgetown Funding Co. LLC, 5.390%, 8/30/2006
24,891,451
53,000,000 1,2 Grampian Funding LLC, 4.900% - 5.370%, 8/7/2006 - 10/25/2006
52,537,927
120,000,000 1,2 KLIO II Funding Ltd., 5.340% - 5.360%, 8/18/2006 - 8/21/2006
119,663,192
15,000,000 1,2 Perry Global Funding LLC Series A, 5.390%, 10/4/2006


14,856,267
   TOTAL


211,948,837
   TOTAL COMMERCIAL PAPER


715,639,017
CORPORATE BOND--0.1%
Banking--0.1%
5,500,000 PNC Funding Corp., 5.750%, 8/1/2006


5,500,000
CORPORATE NOTES--3.2%
Finance - Retail--0.7%
26,000,000 Countrywide Financial Corp., 5.210% - 5.380%, 8/3/2006 - 9/13/2006


26,000,894
Finance - Securities--2.5%
26,000,000 1,2 Beta Finance, Inc., 4.160%, 3/15/2007
26,000,000
14,050,000 1,2 K2 (USA) LLC, (GTD by K2 Corp.), 5.000%, 3/12/2007
14,050,000
53,000,000 1,2 Sigma Finance, Inc., (GTD by Sigma Finance Corp.), 4.150% - 5.750%, 8/8/2006 -4/30/2007


53,000,000
   TOTAL


93,050,000
   TOTAL CORPORATE NOTES


119,050,894
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
LOAN PARTICIPATION--0.6%
Miscellaneous--0.6%
$ 22,000,000 Cargill, Inc., 5.350%, 8/9/2006

$
22,000,000
NOTES - VARIABLE--37.3% 5
Banking--22.7%
2,900,000 AlaTrade Foods LLC, Series 4, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,900,000
961,000 American Health Care Centers, Inc., (Series 1998), (FirstMerit Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
961,000
35,000,000 1,2 Australia & New Zealand Banking Group, Melbourne, 5.400%, 8/23/2006
35,000,000
1,920,000 BD Toy LLC, Series 2003, (Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006
1,920,000
62,000,000 1,2 BNP Paribas SA, 5.143% - 5.363%, 8/21/2006 - 8/28/2006
62,000,000
626,000 Baldwin County Sewer Service LLC, Series 2003, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
626,000
7,916,000 Baldwin County Sewer Service LLC, Series 2005, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
7,916,000
20,000,000 1,2 Bank of Ireland, 5.350%, 8/21/2006
20,000,000
12,000,000 Barclays Bank PLC, 5.343%, 8/28/2006
11,998,754
1,950,000 Battle Creek, MI Downtown Development Authority, Series 2004, (Insured by AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.), 5.340%, 8/2/2006
1,950,000
5,960,000 Biddle Road Corp., Series 2004, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
5,960,000
925,000 Bond Holdings LP, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/4/2006
925,000
3,940,000 CAH Holdings, Inc., Series 2003, (First Commercial Bank, Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
3,940,000
8,000,000 CV 40-Stone Oak Ltd., Series 2005, (Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
8,000,000
4,500,000 Castleton United Methodist Church, Inc., Series 2006a, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
4,500,000
45,000,000 1,2 Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Sydney, 5.370%, 8/24/2006
45,000,000
70,000,000 Credit Agricole S.A., 5.480%, 10/23/2006
70,000,000
22,500,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 5.280% - 5.476%, 9/12/2006 - 10/16/2006
22,500,000
2,425,000 Dale G. Mithum, M.D. FACS, Series 2003, (Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006
2,425,000
1,500,000 DeKalb County, GA Housing Authority, Series 2004-T Highlands, (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 5.570%, 8/3/2006
1,500,000
4,000,000 1,2 DePfa Bank PLC, 5.369%, 9/15/2006
3,999,985
10,000,000 Development Authority of Gordon County, GA, Series 2005, Faus Group Inc., (RBC Centura Bank LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
490,000 Drury Inns, Inc., (First Commercial Bank, Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
490,000
8,285,000 Fiore Capital LLC, Series 2005-A, (Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
8,285,000
5,000,000 First Family Church, Series 2005, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.370%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
905,000 Franklin County, PA IDA, Series 2001B Precast Systems, LLC, (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
905,000
35,400,000 Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc., (Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc. LOC), 5.305% - 5.360%, 8/9/2006 - 8/28/2006
35,400,000
1,230,000 Grote Family LP, (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
1,230,000
18,000,000 1,2 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.315%, 8/9/2006
18,000,000
3,000,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.530%, 9/25/2006
3,000,641
9,555,000 HP Huntsville LLC, Series 2003, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
9,555,000
4,715,000 Hamilton Farm Bureau Cooperative, Inc., (Series 1999), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.510%, 8/3/2006
4,715,000
5,915,000 Headquarters Partnership Ltd., Series 2001, (National Australia Bank Ltd., Melbourne LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
5,915,000
13,000,000 ICS-Remington LLC, (First Commercial Bank, Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.470%, 8/3/2006
13,000,000
20,000,000 Interlock Realty Co., (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
20,000,000
9,650,000 Lake Mary Bay LP, Series 2005, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
9,650,000
1,665,000 Lee County, FL IDA, Bonita Community Health Center, Series 1999B, (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.400%, 8/4/2006
1,665,000
5,450,000 MOBR-04 LLC, Series 2004, (Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006
5,450,000
4,405,000 Magdim C-Stores, Inc./Lynhurst Storage LLC, Series 2005, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
4,405,000
3,000,000 Marital Trust No. 2, Vernon W. Van Aker, Grantor, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,000,000
14,500,000 Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee, 5.510%, 10/3/2006
14,500,467
245,000 McCullough Oil Bond Issue LLC, Series 2003, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
245,000
136,000,000 1,2 National Australia Bank Ltd., Melbourne, 5.306%, 8/7/2006
136,000,000
10,500,000 Nautical Transport LLC, Series 2005, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
10,500,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 5
Banking--continued
$ 4,350,000 Ohmart/Vega Corp., Series 2003, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
$ 4,350,000
3,000,000 Overland Park Professional Center LLC, Series 2004, (Comerica Bank LOC), 5.490%, 8/3/2006
3,000,000
3,225,000 Pizitz Properties LLC, Series 2003, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,225,000
4,000,000 Prevea Clinic, Inc., Series 2004-A, (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
4,000,000
3,500,000 Pro-Cell LLC, Series 2004, (Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006
3,500,000
5,975,000 Provena Foods, Inc., (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.410%, 8/3/2006
5,975,000
5,450,000 Roman Catholic Bishop of San Jose, CA, Series 2005, (Allied Irish Banks PLC LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
5,450,000
45,000,000 1,2 Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal, 5.316%, 8/1/2006
45,000,000
5,000,000 Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal, 5.520%, 10/12/2006
5,000,853
10,000,000 Salvation Army, Series 2004-A, (Bank of New York LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
410,000 Sandridge Food Corp., (National City Bank, Ohio LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
410,000
20,000,000 1,2 Societe Generale, Paris, 5.316%, 8/2/2006
20,000,000
900,000 Spiller LLC, Series 2003, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
900,000
65,000,000 Svenska Handelsbanken, Stockholm, 5.286% - 5.318%, 8/3/2006 - 8/21/2006
64,997,946
910,000 Wellborn Forest Products, Inc., (Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006
910,000
36,000,000 1,2 Westpac Banking Corp. Ltd., Sydney, 5.338%, 8/16/2006
36,000,000
3,090,000 William Morris Realty Huntsville LLC, Series 2004, (Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006


3,090,000
   TOTAL


850,741,646
Brokerage--5.9%
20,000,000 1,2 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.388%, 8/15/2006
20,000,754
6,000,000 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.598%, 9/29/2006
6,004,446
30,000,000 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.182% - 5.348%, 8/15/2006 - 8/28/2006
30,000,000
165,000,000 Morgan Stanley, 5.366% - 5.468%, 8/1/2006 - 8/25/2006


165,001,070
   TOTAL


221,006,270
Finance - Retail--2.6%
35,000,000 1,2 Compass Securitization LLC, 5.300% - 5.323%, 8/10/2006 - 10/12/2006
34,995,871
43,000,000 1,2 Paradigm Funding LLC, 5.296% - 5.345%, 8/7/2006 - 8/25/2006
43,000,000
20,000,000 1,2 SLM Corp., 5.355%, 8/14/2006


20,000,000
   TOTAL


97,995,871
Finance - Securities--1.5%
40,000,000 1,2 K2 (USA) LLC, (GTD by K2 Corp.), 5.325% - 5.445%, 8/10/2006 - 10/25/2006
39,991,504
15,000,000 1,2 Sigma Finance, Inc., (GTD by Sigma Finance Corp.), 5.311%, 8/1/2006


15,000,000
   TOTAL


54,991,504
Insurance--3.6%
10,000,000 Genworth Life Insurance Co., 5.256%, 8/9/2006
10,000,000
10,000,000 Hartford Life Global Funding Trust, 5.348%, 8/15/2006
10,000,000
10,000,000 Hartford Life Insurance Co., 5.400%, 9/1/2006
10,000,000
20,000,000 1,2 MBIA Global Funding LLC, 5.316%, 8/14/2006
20,000,000
15,000,000 MetLife Insurance Co. of Connecticut, 5.328% - 5.590%, 9/1/2006 - 9/28/2006
15,000,000
20,000,000 Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 5.270%, 8/1/2006
20,000,000
50,000,000 New York Life Insurance Co., 4.920% - 5.290%, 8/30/2006 - 9/1/2006


50,000,000
   TOTAL


135,000,000
Municipal--1.0%
37,000,000 Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund Finance Corp., 5.377%, 8/15/2006


37,000,000
Pharmaceuticals & Health Care--0.0%
500,000 1,2 Eli Lilly Services, Inc., (GTD by Eli Lilly & Co.), 5.316%, 8/1/2006


500,019
   TOTAL NOTES - VARIABLE


1,397,235,310
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--8.7%
$ 286,527,000 Interest in $3,200,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Bank of America N.A. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/1/2035 for $3,200,470,222 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $3,264,000,000.
$ 286,527,000
20,000,000 Interest in $238,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.10%, dated 7/31/2006 under which J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 10/31/2006 for $238,033,717 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $242,764,447.
20,000,000
20,000,000 Interest in $100,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.20%, dated 7/31/2006 under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 4/1/2036 for $100,014,444 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $102,000,893.


20,000,000
   TOTAL REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS


326,527,000
   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--99.7%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 6



3,735,423,190
   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--0.3%


11,926,237
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
3,747,349,427

1 Denotes a restricted security that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) is subject to a contractual restriction on public sales. At July 31, 2006, these restricted securities amounted to $1,276,228,318, which represented 34.1% of total net assets.

2 Denotes a restricted security that may be resold without restriction to "qualified institutional buyers" as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and that the Fund has determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Fund's Board of Trustees. At July 31, 2006, these liquid restricted securities amounted to $1,276,228,318, which represented 34.1% of total net assets.

3 Discount rate at the time of purchase, or the coupon for interest-bearing issues.

4 Reflects potential extension period.

5 Floating rate note with current rate and next reset date shown.

6 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

GTD --Guaranteed
IDA --Industrial Development Authority
LOC --Letters of Credit
SWP --Swap Agreement

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Prime Value Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:

Security Type


   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Commercial Paper & Notes

47.3
%
Variable Rate Instruments

42.2
%
Bank Instruments

8.6
%
Repurchase Agreements

3.9
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(2.0
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:



   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

51.5
% 4
8-30 Days

22.7
%
31-90 Days

16.7
%
91-180 Days

5.4
%
181 Days or more

5.7
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(2.0
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

1 Commercial paper and notes include any fixed-rate security that is not a bank instrument. A variable rate instrument is any security which has an interest rate that resets periodically. See the Fund's Prospectus for a description of the principal types of securities in which the Fund invests.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statements of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

4 Overnight securities comprised 34.0% of the Fund's portfolio.

Prime Value Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES--1.7%
Finance - Automotive--1.3%
$ 10,076,558 1,2 DaimlerChrysler Auto Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.791%, 3/8/2007
$ 10,076,558
73,500,000 GS Auto Loan Trust 2006-1, Class A1, 5.514%, 8/15/2007
73,500,000
32,397,518 HSBC Automotive Trust 2006-1, Class A1, 5.276%, 6/18/2007
32,397,518
1,294,473 USAA Auto Owner Trust 2005-4, Class A1, 4.400%, 12/15/2006
1,294,473
5,644,182 World Omni Automobile Receivables Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.855%, 3/15/2007


5,644,182
   TOTAL


122,912,731
Finance - Equipment--0.4%
10,972,186 CIT Equipment Collateral 2006-VT1, Class A1, 4.990%, 3/20/2007
10,972,186
29,989,266 CNH Equipment Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.989%, 4/5/2007


29,989,266
   TOTAL


40,961,452
   TOTAL ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES


163,874,183
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT--7.6%
Banking--7.6%
5,000,000 Barclays Bank PLC, 4.752%, 10/17/2006
5,000,026
181,000,000 Calyon, Paris, 4.750% - 5.310%, 10/17/2006 - 4/19/2007
181,000,000
55,000,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 4.920% - 5.200%, 2/5/2007 - 3/29/2007
55,000,000
200,000,000 Deutsche Bank AG, 4.405% - 4.765%, 10/4/2006 - 10/27/2006
200,000,851
14,000,000 Dexia Bank, Belgium, 4.305%, 9/29/2006
13,989,086
40,000,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.260%, 4/11/2007
40,000,000
128,000,000 Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, Edinburgh, 4.410% - 4.800%, 10/4/2006 - 1/29/2007
128,000,000
39,000,000 Toronto Dominion Bank, 5.600%, 6/18/2007
39,000,000
91,250,000 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 4.840%, 1/30/2007


91,241,207
   TOTAL CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT


753,231,170
COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS--24.1%
Banking--13.8%
25,000,000 BNP Paribas Securities Corp., 5.423%, 8/1/2006
25,000,000
344,000,000 Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, 5.413%, 8/1/2006
344,000,000
175,000,000 Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., 5.443%, 8/1/2006
175,000,000
75,000,000 Fortis Bank SA/NV, 5.363%, 8/1/2006
75,000,000
295,000,000 Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., 5.438%, 8/1/2006
295,000,000
250,000,000 HSBC Securities (USA), Inc., 5.413%, 8/1/2006
250,000,000
185,000,000 J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., 5.413%, 8/1/2006
185,000,000
14,000,000 WAMU Capital Corp., 5.513%, 8/1/2006


14,000,000
   TOTAL


1,363,000,000
Brokerage--10.3%
25,000,000 Bear Stearns & Cos., Inc., 5.433%, 8/1/2006
25,000,000
255,000,000 Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., 5.413%, 8/1/2006
255,000,000
353,000,000 Goldman Sachs & Co., 5.383% - 5.413%, 8/1/2006
353,000,000
189,631,000 Lehman Brothers, Inc., 5.413% - 5.463%, 8/1/2006
189,631,000
195,500,000 Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., 5.413%, 8/1/2006


195,500,000
   TOTAL


1,018,131,000
   TOTAL COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS


2,381,131,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
COMMERCIAL PAPER --17.2% 3
Aerospace/Auto--1.2%
$ 53,900,000 1,2 Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp., (Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Support Agreement), 5.340% - 5.360%, 8/7/2006
$ 53,851,896
67,100,000 1,2 Volkswagen of America, Inc., (GTD by Volkswagen AG), 5.340% - 5.350%, 8/3/2006


67,080,066
   TOTAL


120,931,962
Banking--2.7%
20,000,000 Danske Corp., Inc., (GTD by Danske Bank A/S), 4.984%, 4/10/2007
19,302,240
66,000,000 1,2 KBC Financial Products International Ltd., (GTD by KBC Bank N.V.), 4.970% - 5.100%, 8/9/2006 - 11/20/2006
65,400,767
60,000,000 Landesbank Baden-Wuerttemberg, 5.350%, 9/19/2006
59,563,083
125,000,000 1,2 Picaros Funding LLC, (GTD by KBC Bank N.V.), 4.970% - 5.400%, 8/10/2006 - 10/11/2006


124,139,125
   TOTAL


268,405,215
Consumer Products--0.5%
54,400,000 1,2 Fortune Brands, Inc., 5.225% - 5.450%, 8/8/2006 - 9/6/2006


54,276,304
Finance - Automotive--4.2%
105,700,000 DaimlerChrysler North America Holding Corp., 5.240% - 5.450%, 8/7/2006 - 8/21/2006
105,543,416
151,000,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust, (A1+/P1 Series), 4.280% - 5.260%, 8/8/2006 - 8/15/2006
150,768,557
158,000,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust, (A1/P1 Series), 5.210% - 5.250%, 8/4/2006 - 9/15/2006


157,595,927
   TOTAL


413,907,900
Finance - Commercial--1.2%
124,000,000 CIT Group, Inc., 5.050% - 5.370%, 10/16/2006 - 11/15/2006


122,385,500
Finance - Retail--1.1%
20,000,000 1,2 Amsterdam Funding Corp., 5.380%, 10/4/2006
19,808,711
21,000,000 1,2 Chariot Funding LLC, 5.150%, 9/5/2006
20,894,854
65,000,000 1,2 Compass Securitization LLC, 5.245% - 5.280%, 8/16/2006 - 9/15/2006


64,791,656
   TOTAL


105,495,221
Finance - Securities--2.3%
22,000,000 1,2 Galaxy Funding Inc., 5.040%, 8/4/2006
21,990,760
100,000,000 1,2,4 Georgetown Funding Co. LLC, 5.419%, 9/19/2006
99,565,806
108,000,000 1,2 Grampian Funding LLC, 5.040% - 5.370%, 8/7/2006 - 10/25/2006


106,808,238
   TOTAL


228,364,804
Food & Beverage--1.0%
25,000,000 1,2 General Mills, Inc., 5.350%, 8/8/2006
24,973,993
40,300,000 1,2 H.J. Heinz Finance Co., (H.J. Heinz Co. LOC), 5.350% - 5.420%, 8/1/2006 - 8/15/2006
40,250,467
37,500,000 1,2 Sara Lee Corp., 5.370%, 8/3/2006


37,488,813
   TOTAL


102,713,273
Homebuilding--0.8%
76,100,000 Centex Corp., 5.370%, 8/7/2006 - 8/8/2006


76,028,833
Insurance--1.0%
100,000,000 1,2 Aspen Funding Corp., 5.330%, 9/20/2006


99,259,722
Machinery, Equipment, Auto--0.6%
55,200,000 John Deere Capital Corp., (Deere & Co. Support Agreement), 5.310%, 8/10/2006


55,126,722
Oil & Oil Finance--0.6%
54,300,000 1,2 ConocoPhillips, (GTD by ConocoPhillips Co.), 5.400%, 8/1/2006


54,300,000
   TOTAL COMMERCIAL PAPER


1,701,195,456
CORPORATE BONDS--0.1%
Finance - Retail--0.1%
12,970,000 Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 5.500%, 8/1/2006


12,970,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
CORPORATE NOTES--2.7%
Banking--0.1%
$ 12,675,000 Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH, 2.750%, 10/16/2006

$
12,616,330
Finance - Retail--0.1%
5,000,000 Countrywide Financial Corp., 5.210%, 11/3/2006


5,000,174
Finance - Securities--2.5%
90,000,000 1,2 K2 (USA) LLC, (GTD by K2 Corp.), 4.800% - 5.000%, 12/6/2006 - 3/12/2007
89,998,979
157,000,000 1,2 Sigma Finance, Inc., (GTD by Sigma Finance Corp.), 4.340% - 5.750%, 10/3/2006 - 7/25/2007


157,000,000
   TOTAL


246,998,979
   TOTAL CORPORATE NOTES


264,615,483
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES--0.2%
Government Agency--0.2%
25,000,000 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 5.410%, 6/18/2007


25,000,000
LOAN PARTICIPATION--1.3%
Chemicals--0.5%
50,000,000 DuPont Teijin Films U.K. Ltd., (GTD by Du Pont (E.I.) de Nemours & Co.), 5.430%, 8/31/2006


50,000,000
Electrical Equipment--0.3%
28,000,000 Mt. Vernon Phenol Plant Partnership, (GTD by General Electric Co.), 5.390%, 5/21/2007


28,000,000
Miscellaneous--0.5%
51,000,000 Cargill, Inc., 5.350%, 8/9/2006


51,000,000
   TOTAL LOAN PARTICIPATION


129,000,000
NOTES - VARIABLE --42.2% 5
Banking--23.3%
1,467,000 1901 4th Ave. Parking LLC, (Series 2004), (First Commercial Bank, Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.520%, 8/3/2006
1,467,000
2,065,000 AC, Inc., (Series 2002), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,065,000
80,000 Alabama State IDA, (Wellborn Cabinet, Inc.), Tax Revenue Bonds, (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
80,000
1,650,000 Avondale Commerce Park, Phase III LLP, Phase III, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
1,650,000
4,530,000 Baramax LLC, (Series 2002), (Commerce Bank N.A., Cherry Hill, NJ LOC), 5.600%, 8/2/2006
4,530,000
100,000,000 Barclays Bank PLC, 5.289% - 5.343%, 8/7/2006 - 8/28/2006
99,987,984
4,000,000 Bardstown City, KY, (RJ Tower Project), (Series 1995), (Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
4,000,000
3,505,000 BBF LLC, Series 2002, (First Commercial Bank, Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.380%, 8/3/2006
3,505,000
6,930,000 Bethesda Country Club, Inc., (Series 1997), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.490%, 8/1/2006
6,930,000
735,000 Bissett, William K. and Sheryl B., Multi-Option Adjustable Rate Notes, (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
735,000
5,550,000 Blue Family Holdings LLC, (First Commercial Bank, Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.380%, 8/3/2006
5,550,000
42,000,000 1,2 BNP Paribas SA, 5.144%, 8/21/2006
42,000,000
1,510,000 Broadway Investments, Inc., (Series 1999), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
1,510,000
8,415,000 Callaway Gardens Resort, Inc., (Columbus Bank and Trust Co., GA LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
8,415,000
1,325,000 Campbell Enterprises, (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.650%, 8/3/2006
1,325,000
734,000 Capital One Funding Corp., (Series 1996-C), (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
734,000
2,542,000 CC Properties LLC, (Series 2002 A), Ronald & Phyllis Coleman, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,542,000
3,251,000 CC Properties LLC, (Series 2002 B), Thomas & Carolyn Coleman, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,251,000
6,085,000 Centra State Medical Arts Building LLC, (Commerce Bank N.A., Cherry Hill, NJ LOC), 5.550%, 8/2/2006
6,085,000
4,785,000 Century Drive Associates, (Series 2001), (Commerce Bank N.A., Cherry Hill, NJ LOC), 5.550%, 8/2/2006
4,785,000
3,555,000 Charapp Family Ltd., (Series 2000), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
3,555,000
4,035,000 Christian Life Assembly of the Assemblies of God, (Series 2003), (Fulton Bank LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
4,035,000
4,340,000 Clark-Holder Clinic, PA, (Columbus Bank and Trust Co., GA LOC), 5.570%, 8/3/2006
4,340,000
4,730,000 Columbus, GA Development Authority, Woodmont Properties, LLC, (Series 2000), (Columbus Bank and Trust Co., GA LOC), 5.440%, 8/3/2006
4,730,000
3,315,000 Commerce Towers LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,315,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
NOTES - VARIABLE --continued 5
Banking--continued
$ 6,250,000 Commercial Contractors, Inc., (Series 1998), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.490%, 8/1/2006
$ 6,250,000
1,060,000 Continental Downtown Properties, (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
1,060,000
6,550,000 Continental Downtown Properties, (Series 2000), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
6,550,000
62,000,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 5.477%, 10/16/2006
62,000,000
6,025,000 Cruiser Properties LLC, (Series 1999), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.650%, 8/3/2006
6,025,000
8,075,000 Cullman Shopping Center, Inc., (Series 2002), (First Commercial Bank, Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
8,075,000
165,000,000 1,2 DePfa Bank PLC, 5.369%, 9/15/2006
165,000,000
4,845,000 Dellridge Care Center LP, (Series 1997), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.490%, 8/1/2006
4,845,000
1,560,000 Die-Matic Corp., (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.650%, 8/3/2006
1,560,000
7,345,000 Drury Inns, Inc., (First Commercial Bank, Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
7,345,000
2,685,000 Engle Printing & Publishing, (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
2,685,000
3,465,000 Engle Printing & Publishing, (Series 2003), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
3,465,000
3,120,000 First Baptist Church of Mt. Olive, (Series 2003), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,120,000
2,713,000 First Baptist Church of West Monroe, LA, (Series 2003), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,713,000
8,230,000 Fountainhead Enterprises LLC, (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
8,230,000
2,778,000 Frank Parsons Paper Co., Inc., (Series 1999), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
2,778,000
3,110,000 Gannett Fleming, Inc., (Series 2001), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
3,110,000
1,719,000 Gateway Foods, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
1,719,000
5,625,000 Georgia Crown Distributing Co., (Columbus Bank and Trust Co., GA LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
5,625,000
1,135,000 Gerald T. Thom, Trustee U.A.D., March 27, 1997, (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.510%, 8/3/2006
1,135,000
6,510,000 Green Clinic Management Co. LLC, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
6,510,000
21,000,000 Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc., (GTD by Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc.), 5.305%, 8/9/2006
21,000,000
5,990,000 G&R Investments of Bay County LLC, (Series 2004), (Columbus Bank and Trust Co., GA LOC), 5.520%, 8/3/2006
5,990,000
1,691,000 Grossman Realty LLC, (Series 5), (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.370%, 8/3/2006
1,691,000
920,000 Guilford Capital LLC, (Series 2002 - D), (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
920,000
3,130,000 Guilford Capital LLC, (Series 2002 - E), (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
3,130,000
825,000 Hamilton Farm Bureau Cooperative, Inc., (Series 1999), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.510%, 8/3/2006
825,000
12,200,000 Harris County, GA Development Authority, (Columbus Bank and Trust Co., GA LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
12,200,000
4,310,000 Hazlet Manor Associates, (Series 1998), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.490%, 8/1/2006
4,310,000
157,000,000 1,2 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.259% - 5.315%, 8/9/2006 - 8/21/2006
157,000,000
150,000,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.396% - 5.530%, 8/1/2006 - 9/25/2006
150,000,000
17,990,000 HD Greenville LLC, (Series 2004), (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
17,990,000
2,250,000 HFS Holdings LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,250,000
7,945,000 HP Huntsville LLC, (Series 2003), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
7,945,000
665,000 Ilsco Corp., (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
665,000
3,595,000 Indian Hills Country Club, (Series 2000), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,595,000
5,750,000 Jack W. Kidd, (Series 2003), (First Commercial Bank, Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.520%, 8/3/2006
5,750,000
40,500,000 J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., 5.316%, 8/2/2006
40,500,000
6,916,290 Katie Realty LLC, (Series 2000), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.450%, 8/4/2006
6,916,290
1,510,000 Kent Capital LLC, (Series 1999), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
1,510,000
3,540,000 K & K Management Co., (Series 2000), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
3,540,000
3,350,000 Lake Sherwood Senior Living Center LLC, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.470%, 8/3/2006
3,350,000
8,400,000 Maryland IDFA, Avalon Pharmaceutical, Inc., (Series 2003), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
8,400,000
1,995,000 Maryland IDFA, Gen-Vec, Inc. Facility (Series 1999), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
1,995,000
20,320,000 Maryland State Economic Development Corp., Human Genome (Series 1997), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.490%, 8/1/2006
20,320,000
16,000,000 Maryland State Economic Development Corp., (Series 2001A), Human Genome Sciences, (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.490%, 8/1/2006
16,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
NOTES - VARIABLE --continued 5
Banking--continued
$ 3,140,000 McClatchy-Avondale Corp., (Series1999), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.490%, 8/1/2006
$ 3,140,000
11,035,000 McCullough Oil Bond Issue LLC, (Series 2003), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
11,035,000
10,350,000 Mike Bowden, (Columbus Bank and Trust Co., GA LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
10,350,000
4,055,000 Miller, James & Deborah, (Series 1997), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.490%, 8/1/2006
4,055,000
184,000,000 1 MONET Trust, (Series 2000-1 Class A-2A), (Dresdner Bank AG, Frankfurt SWP), 5.560%, 9/28/2006
184,000,000
135,000,000 1 MONET Trust, (Series 2000-1 Class A-2B), (Dresdner Bank AG, Frankfurt SWP), 5.560%, 9/28/2006
135,000,000
9,490,000 Mountain Christian Church, (Series 2003), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
9,490,000
85,000,000 1,2 National Australia Bank Ltd., Melbourne, 5.307%, 8/7/2006
85,000,000
3,455,000 Neron Real Estate LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,455,000
3,214,000 Oceana County Freezer Storage, Inc., (Series 1998), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.510%, 8/3/2006
3,214,000
910,000 Oceana County Freezer Storage, Inc., (Series 1999), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.510%, 8/3/2006
910,000
4,365,000 Old South Country Club, Inc., (Series 1999), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.490%, 8/1/2006
4,365,000
17,085,000 Omni, HC, Inc., (Columbus Bank and Trust Co., GA LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
17,085,000
2,482,500 Orange Beach Marina, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,482,500
3,200,000 Palmetto Net, Inc., (National Bank of South Carolina LOC), 5.535%, 8/3/2006
3,200,000
5,225,000 Pelham Retail Group LLC, (First Commercial Bank, Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
5,225,000
7,720,000 Prospects Aggregates, Inc., (Series 2004), (Fulton Bank LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
7,720,000
8,750,000 River Road Marietta LP, (Series 2006), (Fulton Bank LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
8,750,000
3,140,000 Riverchase Office Road LLC, (First Commercial Bank, Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
3,140,000
1,175,000 R.M.D.H. Properties LLC, (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
1,175,000
2,060,000 Roby Co. Ltd. Partnership, (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
2,060,000
145,000,000 1,2 Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal, 5.316%, 8/1/2006
145,000,000
55,000,000 Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal, 5.375%, 8/10/2006
55,000,000
18,350,000 Schuster Enterprises, Inc., (Columbus Bank and Trust Co., GA LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
18,350,000
14,000,000 Sea Island Co., (Columbus Bank and Trust Co., GA LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
14,000,000
7,535,000 Smith Land Improvement Corp., (Series 1999), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.490%, 8/1/2006
7,535,000
30,000,000 1,2 Societe Generale, Paris, 5.316%, 8/2/2006
30,000,000
4,675,000 Southeastern Partners Realty I, II, III, (Series 2003), (Bank of North Georgia LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
4,675,000
3,115,000 Southwest Atlanta E.O.C., Inc., (Series 2002), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.470%, 8/3/2006
3,115,000
7,110,000 Spectra Gases, Inc., (Commerce Bank N.A., Cherry Hill, NJ LOC), 5.550%, 8/2/2006
7,110,000
6,720,000 Spencer Cos., Inc., (Series 2001), (First Commercial Bank, Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
6,720,000
3,200,000 Stone Creek LLC, (Columbus Bank and Trust Co., GA LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
3,200,000
25,000,000 Svenska Handelsbanken, Stockholm, 5.318%, 8/21/2006
24,999,320
5,530,000 Tanya K. Nitterhouse, (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
5,530,000
10,140,000 Team Rahal, Inc., (Series 2002), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.450%, 8/4/2006
10,140,000
9,390,000 Test Associates, (Series 2002), (Fulton Bank LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
9,390,000
1,070,000 TLC Realty LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
1,070,000
2,935,000 TNT Co., (Series 1998), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.510%, 8/3/2006
2,935,000
4,670,000 Town Development, Inc., (Series 2000), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
4,670,000
10,000,000 1,2 Union Hamilton Special Purpose Funding LLC, (Series 2005-1), Tranche #1, (GTD by Wachovia Corp.), 5.424%, 9/21/2006
10,000,000
12,360,000 Village of Bartlett, IL, Bartlett Quarry Redevelopment Project (Series 2000), (LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.490%, 8/2/2006
12,360,000
2,015,000 Vulcan, Inc., (Series 2002), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,015,000
10,695,000 WCN Properties, Inc., (Series 2), (Fulton Bank LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
10,695,000
87,000,000 Wells Fargo & Co., 5.396%, 8/2/2006
87,000,000
6,570,000 West Shore Country Club, (Series 2000), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
6,570,000
100,000,000 Westpac Banking Corp. Ltd., Sydney, 5.340%, 9/11/2006
100,000,000
136,500,000 1,2 Westpac Banking Corp. Ltd., Sydney, 5.339%, 8/16/2006
136,500,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
NOTES - VARIABLE --continued 5
Banking--continued
$ 13,805,000 William Hill Manor, Inc., (Series 1998), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.490%, 8/1/2006
$ 13,805,000
6,790,000 Wilsbach Distributors, Inc., (Series 1999), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.500%, 8/2/2006
6,790,000
4,550,000 WMMT Properties LP, (Series 2003), (FirstMerit Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
4,550,000
8,160,000 Yonkers, NY IDA, JME Associates, LLC (Series 2006), (Commerce Bank N.A., Cherry Hill, NJ LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
8,160,000
8,375,000 York County, PA IDA, (Series 2003-B), 5.410%, 8/3/2006
8,375,000
15,300,000 Yorktown Building Holding Co. LLC, (Columbus Bank and Trust Co., GA LOC), 5.470%, 8/3/2006


15,300,000
   TOTAL


2,309,125,094
Brokerage--6.5%
70,000,000 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.307% - 5.386%, 8/1/2006 - 8/7/2006
70,000,000
28,000,000 1,2 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.389%, 8/15/2006
28,001,056
181,500,000 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.185% - 5.394%, 8/4/2006 - 8/28/2006
181,500,000
85,500,000 1,2 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.599%, 8/11/2006
85,500,000
279,000,000 Morgan Stanley, 5.366% - 5.468%, 8/1/2006 - 8/28/2006


279,000,000
   TOTAL


644,001,056
Finance - Commercial--1.5%
50,000,000 General Electric Capital Corp., 5.360%, 8/30/2006
50,000,000
97,500,000 1,2 General Electric Capital Corp., 5.469% - 5.470%, 8/9/2006 - 8/17/2006


97,500,000
   TOTAL


147,500,000
Finance - Retail--3.4%
43,000,000 AFS Insurance Premium Receivables Trust, (Series 1994-A), 5.925%, 8/15/2006
43,000,000
53,000,000 1,2 Compass Securitization LLC, 5.289% - 5.300%, 8/7/2006 - 8/10/2006
52,996,068
158,000,000 1,2 Paradigm Funding LLC, 5.297% - 5.345%, 8/7/2006 - 8/25/2006
158,000,000
80,000,000 1,2 SLM Corp., 5.356%, 8/14/2006


80,000,000
   TOTAL


333,996,068
Finance - Securities--3.9%
54,000,000 1,2 Beta Finance, Inc., 5.379%, 8/15/2006
54,010,937
119,000,000 1,2 K2 (USA) LLC, (GTD by K2 Corp.), 5.300% - 5.445%, 8/10/2006 - 10/25/2006
118,967,387
216,000,000 1,2 Sigma Finance, Inc., (GTD by Sigma Finance Corp.), 5.311% - 5.410%, 8/1/2006 - 9/26/2006


215,997,093
   TOTAL


388,975,417
Insurance--2.6%
45,000,000 Genworth Life Insurance Co., 5.256%, 8/9/2006
45,000,000
15,000,000 Hartford Life Insurance Co., 5.319%, 8/1/2006
15,000,000
65,000,000 MetLife Insurance Co. of Connecticut, 5.328% - 5.590%, 9/1/2006 - 9/28/2006
65,000,000
25,000,000 Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 5.648%, 10/2/2006
25,000,000
50,000,000 New York Life Insurance Co., 4.92% - 5.29%, 8/30/2006 - 9/1/2006
50,000,000
35,000,000 1,2 Pacific Life Global Funding, 5.384%, 8/4/2006
35,000,415
20,000,000 Protective Life Secured Trust 2004-B, 5.580%, 10/13/2006


20,012,478
   TOTAL


255,012,893
Municipal--1.0%
98,000,000 Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund Finance Corp., 5.379%, 8/15/2006


98,000,000
   TOTAL NOTES - VARIABLE


4,176,610,528
TIME DEPOSIT--1.0%
Banking--1.0%
95,000,000 WestLB AG, 5.313%, 8/1/2006


95,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--3.9%
$ 294,504,000 Interest in $3,200,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Bank of America N.A. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/1/2035 for $3,200,470,222 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $3,264,000,000.
$ 294,504,000
20,000,000 Interest in $238,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.10%, dated 7/31/2006, under which J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 10/31/2006 for $238,033,717 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $242,764,447.
20,000,000
75,000,000 Interest in $850,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. will repurchase a U.S. Treasury security maturing on 1/15/2011 for $850,123,958 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying security at the end of the period was $868,259,653.


75,000,000
   TOTAL REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS


389,504,000
   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--102.0%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 6



10,092,131,820
   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET --(2.0)%


(200,438,617)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
9,891,693,203

1 Denotes a restricted security that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) is subject to a contractual restriction on public sales. At July 31, 2006, these restricted securities amounted to $3,227,429,671, which represented 32.6% of total net assets.

2 Denotes a restricted security that may be resold without restriction to "qualified institutional buyers" as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and that the Fund has determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Fund's Board of Trustees. At July 31, 2006, these liquid restricted securities amounted to $2,908,429,671, which represented 29.4% of total net assets.

3 Discount rate at time of purchase, or the coupon for interest-bearing issues.

4 Reflects potential extension period.

5 Floating rate note with current rate and next reset date shown.

6 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

GTD --Guaranteed
IDA --Industrial Development Authority
IDFA --Industrial Development Finance Authority
LOC --Letter of Credit
SWP --Swap Agreement

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Treasury Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:





   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Repurchase Agreements

97.7
%
U.S. Treasury Securities

2.6
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(0.3
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:



   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

96.1
%
8-30 Days

0.0
%
31-90 Days

0.0
%
91-180 Days

3.4
%
181 Days or more

0.8
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(0.3
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

1 See the Fund's Prospectus for a description of the principal types of securities in which the Fund invests.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

Treasury Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

U.S. TREASURY--2.6%
U.S. Treasury Notes--2.6%
$ 86,500,000 United States Treasury Notes, 2.500%, 10/31/2006
$ 86,144,653
167,000,000 United States Treasury Notes, 2.875%, 11/30/2006
166,126,823
104,750,000 United States Treasury Notes, 3.125%, 1/31/2007


104,004,038

   TOTAL U.S. TREASURY


356,275,514

REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--97.7%
350,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Abbey National Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2036 for $350,051,042 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was 357,000,148.
350,000,000
1,711,246,000 Interest in $2,323,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which BNP Paribas Securities Corp. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2036 for $2,323,338,771 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $2,369,460,967.
1,711,246,000
1,000,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Barclays Capital, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 7/31/2011 for $1,000,145,833 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,020,000,675.
1,000,000,000
1,167,000,000 Interest in $1,500,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.26%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Bear Stearns & Co., Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 5/15/2016 for $1,500,219,167 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,557,996,728.
1,167,000,000
100,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which CIBC World Markets Corp. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2023 for $100,014,583 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $102,105,371.
100,000,000
1,000,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.24%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Credit Suisse First Boston Corp. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2031 for $1,000,145,556 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,020,002,584.
1,000,000,000
95,000,000 Interest in $100,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.15%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2021 for $100,014,306 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $102,000,718.
95,000,000
1,000,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2023 for $1,000,145,833 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,020,000,065.
1,000,000,000
1,850,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Fortis Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2031 for $1,850,269,792 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,887,000,309.
1,850,000,000
1,000,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which HSBC Securities (USA), Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 7/31/2008 for $1,000,145,833 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,020,001,854.
1,000,000,000
1,017,000,000 Interest in $1,350,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2036 for $1,350,196,875 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,377,001,350.
1,017,000,000
1,200,000,000 Interest in $2,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 7/15/2013 for $2,000,291,667 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $2,045,228,487.
1,200,000,000
267,000,000 Interest in $850,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. will repurchase a U.S. Treasury security maturing on 1/15/2011 for $850,123,958 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying security at the end of the period was $868,259,653.
267,000,000
95,000,000 Interest in $100,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.15%, dated 7/31/2006 under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase a U.S. Treasury security maturing on 12/15/2010 for $100,014,306 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying security at the end of the period was $102,001,058.
95,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--continued
$ 224,000,000 1 Interest in $244,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.20%, dated 6/1/2006 under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2015 for $250,344,000 on 11/29/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $251,133,204.
$ 224,000,000
1,565,000,000 Interest in $1,850,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 5/15/2021 for $1,850,269,792 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,887,004,311.


1,565,000,000

   TOTAL REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS


13,641,246,000

   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--100.3%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 2



13,997,521,514

   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--(0.3)%


(36,782,254
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
13,960,739,260

1 Although the repurchase date is more than seven days after the date of purchase, the Fund has the right to terminate the repurchase agreement at any time with seven-days' notice.

2 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statements of Assets And Liabilities

July 31, 2006


   

Government
Obligations Fund

   

Municipal
Obligations Fund


   


Prime Cash
Obligations Fund


Assets:
Investments in repurchase agreements
$ 8,190,598,000 $ -- $ 104,499,000
Investments in securities


2,398,520,252


5,371,036,367



7,164,310,805

Total investments in securities, at amortized cost and value
10,589,118,252 5,371,036,367 7,268,809,805
Cash
1,152,064 593,731 --
Income receivable
29,296,807 30,352,747 39,189,270
Receivable for shares sold


434,539


4,205,130



1,362,878

   TOTAL ASSETS


10,620,001,662


5,406,187,975



7,309,361,953

Liabilities:
Payable for investments purchased
3,640,000 410,329,900 --
Payable for shares redeemed
1,855,386 261,376 --
Payable to bank
-- -- 9,662,489
Payable for Directors'/Trustees' fees
-- 132 --
Payable for distribution services fee (Note 5)
24,536 -- --
Payable for shareholder services fee (Note 5)
744,613 217,291 469,445
Payable for account administration fee (Note 5)
23,878 -- --
Income distribution payable
18,611,370 1,530,520 14,792,485
Accrued expenses


315,461


307,060



194,458

   TOTAL LIABILITIES


25,215,244


412,646,279



25,118,877

   TOTAL NET ASSETS

$
10,594,786,418

$
4,993,541,696


$
7,284,243,076

Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 10,594,680,018 $ 4,993,675,960 $ 7,284,269,345
Accumulated net realized loss on investments
-- (129,669 ) --
Undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income


106,400


(4,595
)


(26,269
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS

$
10,594,786,418

$
4,993,541,696


$
7,284,243,076

Net Assets:
Institutional Shares
$ 6,619,951,532 $ 3,490,983,401 $ 4,363,937,759
Institutional Service Shares
3,493,161,012 620,552,403 1,932,607,070
Institutional Capital Shares
377,413,712 882,005,892 987,698,247
Trust Shares


104,260,162


--



--

   TOTAL NET ASSETS

$
10,594,786,418

$
4,993,541,696


$
7,284,243,076

Shares Outstanding, No Par Value, Unlimited Shares Authorized:
Institutional Shares
6,619,627,926 3,491,030,472 4,363,681,734
Institutional Service Shares
3,493,377,141 620,601,148 1,932,865,670
Institutional Capital Shares
377,428,905 882,044,339 987,741,698
Trust Shares


104,246,054


--



--

Net Asset Value, Offering Price, and Redemption Proceeds Per Share:
Institutional Shares


$1.00


$1.00



$1.00

Institutional Service Shares


$1.00


$1.00



$1.00

Institutional Capital Shares


$1.00


$1.00



$1.00

Trust Shares


$1.00


--



--

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statements of Assets And Liabilities

July 31, 2006


   

Prime Management
Obligations Fund

   

Prime Value
Obligations Fund


   


Treasury
Obligations Fund


Assets:
Investments in repurchase agreements
$ 326,527,000 $ 389,504,000 $ 13,641,246,000
Investments in securities


3,408,896,190


9,702,627,820



356,275,514

Total investments in securities, at amortized cost and value
3,735,423,190 10,092,131,820 13,997,521,514
Cash
290,762 -- 242,422
Income receivable
13,124,458 42,952,177 5,266,493
Receivable for shares sold


622,955


1,708,867



217,838

   TOTAL ASSETS


3,749,461,365


10,136,792,864



14,003,248,267

Liabilities:
Payable for investments purchased
-- 228,000,000 --
Payable for shares redeemed
92,065 1,335,800 1,785,394
Payable to bank
-- 343,311 --
Payable for portfolio accounting fees
31,792 -- --
Payable for Directors'/Trustees' fees
74 8,014 --
Payable for transfer and dividend agent fees and expenses
72,902 -- --
Payable for distribution services fee (Note 5)
-- -- 170,074
Payable for shareholder services fee (Note 5)
277,834 500,673 1,337,834
Income distribution payable
1,554,499 14,526,247 38,686,356
Accrued expenses


82,772


385,616



529,349

   TOTAL LIABILITIES


2,111,938


245,099,661



42,509,007

   TOTAL NET ASSETS

$
3,747,349,427

$
9,891,693,203


$
13,960,739,260

Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 3,747,328,535 $ 9,891,767,488 $ 13,960,798,380
Undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income


20,892


(74,285
)


(59,120
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS

$
3,747,349,427

$
9,891,693,203


$
13,960,739,260

Net Assets:
Institutional Shares
$ 1,986,137,907 $ 6,708,462,674 $ 6,419,380,349
Institutional Service Shares
1,027,151,335 1,755,736,515 5,712,345,718
Institutional Capital Shares
734,060,185 1,427,494,014 1,037,466,444
Trust Shares


--


--



791,546,749

   TOTAL NET ASSETS

$
3,747,349,427

$
9,891,693,203


$
13,960,739,260

Shares Outstanding, No Par Value, Unlimited Shares Authorized:
Institutional Shares
1,986,091,725 6,708,448,811 6,419,232,189
Institutional Service Shares
1,027,156,738 1,755,819,937 5,712,590,837
Institutional Capital Shares
734,080,072 1,427,498,740 1,037,325,793
Trust Shares


--


--



791,649,561

Net Asset Value, Offering Price, and Redemption Proceeds Per Share:
Institutional Shares


$1.00


$1.00



$1.00

Institutional Service Shares


$1.00


$1.00



$1.00

Institutional Capital Shares


$1.00


$1.00



$1.00

Trust Shares


--


--



$1.00

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statements of Operations

Year Ended July 31, 2006


   

Government
Obligations Fund


   

Municipal
Obligations Fund


   

Prime Cash
Obligations Fund


Investment Income:
Interest

$
425,161,282


$
158,813,381


$
409,264,710

Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
19,209,033 10,060,761 18,572,277
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
7,647,497 4,005,330 7,394,467
Account administration fee--Institutional Service Shares
25,154 15,512 31,220
Account administration fee--Trust Shares
189,455 -- --
Custodian fees
396,154 201,306 402,607
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
315,523 374,694 171,627
Directors'/Trustees' fees
62,670 35,031 74,542
Auditing fees
16,737 16,736 16,736
Legal fees
10,597 23,088 10,678
Portfolio accounting fees
200,336 184,126 188,406
Distribution services fee--Trust Shares (Note 5)
189,455 -- --
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Shares (Note 5)
11,368,980 -- --
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Service Shares (Note 5)
7,668,093 1,514,647 4,202,692
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Capital Shares (Note 5)
740,865 2,178,142 1,829,443
Share registration costs
192,918 291,821 135,462
Printing and postage
37,394 31,176 36,015
Insurance premiums
58,809 34,818 61,633
Miscellaneous


49,528



18,239



57,547

   TOTAL EXPENSES


48,379,198



18,985,427



33,185,352

Waivers (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
(8,189,143 ) (5,812,657 ) (9,636,338 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(328,855 ) (172,180 ) (318,429 )
Waiver of shareholder services fee--Institutional Shares
(11,368,980 ) -- --
Waiver of shareholder services fee--Institutional Capital Shares
(384,687 ) (1,166,074 ) (950,309 )
Reimbursement of shareholder services fee- Institutional Capital Shares


--



--



(188,804
)
   TOTAL WAIVERS


(20,271,665
)


(7,150,911
)


(11,093,880
)
Net expenses


28,107,533



11,834,516



22,091,472

Net investment income


397,053,749



146,978,865



387,173,238

Net realized loss on investments


--



(101,081
)


--

Change in net assets resulting from operations

$
397,053,749


$
146,877,784


$
387,173,238

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statements of Operations

Year Ended July 31, 2006


   

Prime Management
Obligations Fund


   

Prime Value
Obligations Fund


   

Treasury
Obligations Fund


Investment Income:
Interest

$
156,468,804


$
490,592,807


$
566,111,764

Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
7,047,225 21,797,830 26,078,224
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
2,805,780 8,677,639 10,382,153
Account administration fee--Institutional Service Shares
-- 147 55,780
Account administration fee--Institutional Capital Shares
-- 380 --
Account administration fee--Trust Shares
-- -- 1,625,445
Custodian fees
202,344 505,305 523,265
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
610,443 210,474 158,065
Directors'/Trustees' fees
29,070 84,519 101,670
Auditing fees
19,431 16,735 16,736
Legal fees
3,164 11,021 11,496
Portfolio accounting fees
190,979 188,382 200,344
Distribution services fee--Trust Shares (Note 5)
-- -- 1,628,506
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Shares (Note 5)
3,214,009 -- 11,459,465
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Service Shares (Note 5)
2,369,550 3,627,295 13,400,562
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Capital Shares (Note 5)
1,774,294 2,688,268 1,614,992
Share registration costs
140,211 271,380 247,005
Printing and postage
8,075 15,713 19,883
Insurance premiums
29,865 58,244 77,674
Miscellaneous


6,494



28,684



54,725

   TOTAL EXPENSES


18,450,934



38,182,016



67,655,990

Waivers (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
(5,340,791 ) (12,433,605 ) (10,708,341 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(120,787 ) (372,666 ) (446,349 )
Waiver of shareholder services fee--Institutional Shares
(3,214,009 ) -- (11,459,465 )
Waiver of shareholder services fee--Institutional Capital Shares


(947,009
)


(1,338,508
)


(835,249
)
   TOTAL WAIVERS


(9,622,596
)


(14,144,779
)


(23,449,404
)
Net expenses


8,828,338



24,037,237



44,206,586

Net investment income

$
147,640,466


$
466,555,570


$
521,905,178

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statements of Changes In Net Assets

    Government Obligations Fund
    Municipal Obligations Fund
Year Ended July 31
   

2006

   

2005

   

2006

   

2005

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income
$ 397,053,749 $ 172,438,416 $ 146,978,865 $ 64,788,270
Net realized gain (loss) on investments


--



--



(101,081
)


20,299

   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS


397,053,749



172,438,416



146,877,784



64,808,569

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income
Institutional Shares
(256,450,437 ) (114,471,130 ) (101,730,945 ) (47,775,366 )
Institutional Service Shares
(122,791,609 ) (55,404,715 ) (16,628,052 ) (7,591,909 )
Institutional Capital Shares
(14,901,586 ) (1,950,254 ) (28,618,336 ) (9,430,661 )
Trust Shares


(2,835,807
)


(624,264
)


--



--

   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS


(396,979,439
)


(172,450,363
)


(146,977,333
)


(64,797,936
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
121,622,215,277 87,120,054,501 52,382,943,955 38,273,423,295
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
214,926,107 89,911,597 121,331,427 48,697,843
Cost of shares redeemed


(120,077,728,527
)


(86,572,564,132
)


(52,255,060,210
)


(36,351,113,204
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


1,759,412,857



637,401,966



249,215,172



1,971,007,934

Change in net assets


1,759,487,167



637,390,019



249,115,623



1,971,018,567

Net Assets:
Beginning of period


8,835,299,251



8,197,909,232



4,744,426,073



2,773,407,506

End of period

$
10,594,786,418


$
8,835,299,251


$
4,993,541,696


$
4,744,426,073

Undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income

$
106,400


$
32,090


$
(4,595
)

$
(6,127
)

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statements of Changes In Net Assets

    Prime Cash Obligations Fund
    Prime Management Obligations Fund
Year Ended July 31
   

2006

   

2005

   

2006

   

2005 1

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income

$
387,173,238


$
179,236,149


$
147,640,466


$
42,769,974

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income
Institutional Shares
(282,500,044 ) (132,849,543 ) (74,352,557 ) (30,528,332 )
Institutional Service Shares
(67,668,841 ) (33,866,842 ) (38,571,323 ) (5,972,619 )
Institutional Capital Shares


(37,023,256
)


(12,479,601
)


(34,589,344
)


(6,375,373
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS


(387,192,141
)


(179,195,986
)


(147,513,224
)


(42,876,324
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
85,644,582,220 78,137,296,623 26,136,821,666 18,299,194,935
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
210,361,380 84,355,486 132,777,852 35,438,738
Cost of shares redeemed


(86,734,626,374
)


(81,322,811,194
)


(26,790,546,302
)


(14,066,358,354
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


(879,682,774
)


(3,101,159,085
)


(520,946,784
)


4,268,275,319

Change in net assets


(879,701,677
)


(3,101,118,922
)


(520,819,542
)


4,268,168,969

Net Assets:
Beginning of period


8,163,944,753



11,265,063,675



4,268,168,969



--

End of period

$
7,284,243,076


$
8,163,944,753


$
3,747,349,427


$
4,268,168,969

Undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income

$
(26,269
)

$
(7,366
)

$
20,892


$
(106,350
)

1 For the period from August 11, 2004 (date of initial public investment) to July 31, 2005.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statements of Changes In Net Assets

    Prime Value Obligations Fund
    Treasury Obligations Fund
Year Ended July 31
   

2006

   

2005

   

2006

   

2005

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income

$
466,555,570


$
188,758,788


$
521,905,178


$
242,236,047

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income
Institutional Shares
(349,204,081 ) (140,584,009 ) (257,475,405 ) (128,528,475 )
Institutional Service Shares
(59,625,600 ) (26,266,545 ) (208,686,308 ) (92,576,050 )
Institutional Capital Shares
(57,788,318 ) (21,863,896 ) (31,673,738 ) (13,288,865 )
Trust Shares


--



--



(24,128,847
)


(7,840,255
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS


(466,617,999
)


(188,714,450
)


(521,964,298
)


(242,233,645
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
121,377,436,367 90,434,961,145 73,461,176,690 62,185,884,386
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
316,717,960 125,247,801 165,943,475 78,502,143
Cost of shares redeemed


(120,034,108,003
)


(94,278,755,673
)


(71,716,471,589
)


(62,117,771,017
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


1,660,046,324



(3,718,546,727
)


1,910,648,576



146,615,512

Change in net assets


1,659,983,895



(3,718,502,389
)


1,910,589,456



146,617,914

Net Assets:
Beginning of period


8,231,709,308



11,950,211,697



12,050,149,804



11,903,531,890

End of period

$
9,891,693,203


$
8,231,709,308


$
13,960,739,260


$
12,050,149,804

Distributions in excess of net investment income

$
(74,285
)

$
(11,856
)

$
(59,120
)

$
--

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

July 31, 2006

1. ORGANIZATION

Money Market Obligations Trust (the "Trust") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust consists of 41 portfolios. The financial statements of the following portfolios (individually referred to as the "Fund" or collectively as the "Funds") are presented herein:

Portfolio Name
   
Diversification
   
Classes of Shares
   
Investment Objective
Government Obligations Fund

diversified

Institutional Shares
Institutional Service Shares
Institutional Capital Shares
Trust Shares

To provide current income consistent with stability of principal.
Municipal Obligations Fund

diversified

Institutional Shares
Institutional Service Shares
Institutional Capital Shares

To provide current income exempt from all federal regular income tax
consistent with stability of principal.
Prime Cash Obligations Fund

diversified

Institutional Shares
Institutional Service Shares
Institutional Capital Shares

To provide current income consistent with stability of principal and liquidity.
Prime Management Obligations Fund

diversified

Institutional Shares
Institutional Service Shares
Institutional Capital Shares

To provide current income consistent with stability of principal.
Prime Value Obligations Fund

diversified

Institutional Shares
Institutional Service Shares
Institutional Capital Shares

To provide current income consistent with stability of principal and liquidity.
Treasury Obligations Fund

diversified

Institutional Shares
Institutional Service Shares
Institutional Capital Shares
Trust Shares

To provide current income consistent with stability of principal.

Effective January 18, 2005, Government Obligations Fund began offering Institutional Capital Shares.

Effective August 11, 2004, Prime Management Obligations Fund began offering Institutional Shares.

Effective January 18, 2005, Prime Management Obligations Fund began offering Institutional Service Shares and Institutional Capital Shares.

The financial statements of the other portfolios are presented separately. The assets of each portfolio are segregated and a shareholder's interest is limited to the portfolio in which shares are held. All shares of the Funds have equal rights with respect to voting, except on class specific matters. The financial highlights of the Institutional Shares, Institutional Service Shares and the Trust Shares are presented separately. Interest income from the investments of Municipal Obligations Fund may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax for individuals and corporations and state and local taxes.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Funds in the preparation of their financial statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America.

Investment Valuation

The Funds use the amortized cost method to value their portfolio securities in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act. Investments in other open-end regulated investment companies are valued at net asset value.

Repurchase Agreements

It is the policy of the Funds to require the other party to a repurchase agreement to transfer to the Funds' custodian or sub-custodian eligible securities or cash with a market value (after transaction costs) at least equal to the repurchase price to be paid under the repurchase agreement. The eligible securities are transferred to accounts with the custodian or sub-custodian in which the Funds hold a "securities entitlement" and exercise "control" as those terms are defined in the Uniform Commercial Code. The Funds have established procedures for monitoring the market value of the transferred securities and requiring the transfer of additional eligible securities if necessary to equal at least the repurchase price. These procedures also allow the other party to require securities to be transferred from the account to the extent that their market value exceeds the repurchase price or in exchange for other eligible securities of equivalent market value.

With respect to agreements to repurchase U.S. government securities and cash items, the Funds treat the repurchase agreement as an investment in the underlying securities and not as an obligation of the other party to the repurchase agreement. Other repurchase agreements are treated as obligations of the other party secured by the underlying securities. Nevertheless, the insolvency of the other party or other failure to repurchase the securities may delay the disposition of the underlying securities or cause the Funds to receive less than the full repurchase price. Under the terms of the repurchase agreement, any amounts received by the Funds in excess of the repurchase price and related transaction costs must be remitted to the other party.

The Funds may enter into repurchase agreements in which eligible securities are transferred into joint trading accounts maintained by the custodian or sub-custodian for investment companies and other clients advised by the Funds' adviser and its affiliates. The Funds will participate on a pro rata basis with the other investment companies and clients in its share of the securities transferred under such repurchase agreements and in its share of proceeds from any repurchase or other disposition of such securities.

Investment Income, Gains and Losses, Expenses, and Distributions

Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income are declared daily and paid monthly. Investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and certain fund-level expenses are allocated to each class based on relative average daily net assets, except that each class bears certain expenses unique to the class such as distribution and shareholder services fees. Dividends are declared separately for each class. No class has preferential dividend rights; differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses.

Premium and Discount Amortization

All premiums and discounts are amortized/accreted.

Federal Taxes

It is each Fund's policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of their income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary.

On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released FASB Interpretation No. 48 "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken in the course of preparing the fund's tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are "more-likely-than-not" of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax benefits of positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax expense in the current year. Adoption of FIN 48 is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the effective date. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FIN 48 and its impact in the financial statements has not yet been determined.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

The Funds may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Funds record when-issued securities on the trade date and maintain security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Restricted Securities

Restricted securities are securities that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) are subject to contractual restrictions on public sales. In some cases, when a security cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, the issuer of the restricted security has agreed to register such securities for resale, at the issuer's expense, either upon demand by the Funds or in connection with another registered offering of the securities. Many such restricted securities may be resold in the secondary market in transactions exempt from registration. Restricted securities may be determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Funds' Board of Trustees. The Funds will not incur any registration costs upon such resales. Restricted securities are valued at amortized cost in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

Other

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST

The following tables summarize share activity:

    Government Obligations Fund
Year Ended July 31
   
2006
   
2005
Institutional Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
102,883,407,350 $ 102,883,407,350 68,840,529,646 $ 68,840,529,646
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
137,243,183 137,243,183 59,531,634 59,531,634
Shares redeemed

(102,122,900,107
)


(102,122,900,107
)

(68,312,442,051
)


(68,312,442,051
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

897,750,426


$
897,750,426


587,619,229


$
587,619,229

Year Ended July 31
   
2006
   
2005
Institutional Service Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
17,728,529,559 $ 17,728,529,559 17,692,054,657 $ 17,692,054,657
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
62,429,858 62,429,858 28,370,500 28,370,492
Shares redeemed

(17,057,295,017
)


(17,057,295,017
)

(17,997,158,534
)


(17,997,158,534
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SERVICE SHARE TRANSACTIONS

733,664,400


$
733,664,400


(276,733,377
)

$
(276,733,385
)

   
Year Ended
7/31/2006

   
Period Ended
7/31/2005 1

Institutional Capital Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
571,379,890 $ 571,379,890 397,007,718 $ 397,007,718
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
14,800,977 14,800,977 1,953,531 1,953,531
Shares redeemed

(507,373,473
)


(507,373,473
)

(100,339,738
)


(100,339,738
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

78,807,394


$
78,807,394


298,621,511


$
298,621,511

Year Ended July 31
   
2006
   
2005
Trust Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
438,898,478 $ 438,898,478 190,462,480 $ 190,462,480
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
452,089 452,089 55,940 55,940
Shares redeemed

(390,159,930
)


(390,159,930
)

(162,623,809
)


(162,623,809
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM TRUST SHARE TRANSACTIONS

49,190,637


$
49,190,637


27,894,611


$
27,894,611

   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

1,759,412,857



1,759,412,857


637,401,974



637,401,966

    Municipal Obligations Fund
Year Ended July 31
   
2006
   
2005
Institutional Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
45,999,768,480 $ 45,999,768,480 32,377,793,944 $ 32,377,793,944
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
81,476,882 81,476,882 34,837,487 34,837,487
Shares redeemed

(45,631,011,465
)


(45,631,011,465
)

(31,516,352,148
)


(31,516,352,148
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

450,233,897


$
450,233,897


896,279,283


$
896,279,283

Year Ended July 31
   
2006
   
2005
Institutional Service Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
1,884,342,195 $ 1,884,342,195 2,119,536,078 $ 2,119,536,078
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
13,961,548 13,961,548 6,196,601 6,196,601
Shares redeemed

(1,919,661,907
)


(1,919,661,907
)

(1,847,370,660
)


(1,847,370,660
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SERVICE SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(21,358,164
)

$
(21,358,164
)

278,362,019


$
278,362,019

Year Ended July 31
   
2006
   
2005
Institutional Capital Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
4,498,833,280 $ 4,498,833,280 3,776,093,273 $ 3,776,093,273
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
25,892,997 25,892,997 7,663,755 7,663,755
Shares redeemed

(4,704,386,838
)


(4,704,386,838
)

(2,987,390,396
)


(2,987,390,396
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(179,660,561
)

$
(179,660,561
)

796,366,632


$
796,366,632

   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

249,215,172


$
249,215,172


1,971,007,934


$
1,971,007,934

    Prime Cash Obligations Fund
Year Ended July 31
   
2006
   
2005
Institutional Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
70,536,994,017 $ 70,536,994,017 63,323,840,572 $ 63,323,840,572
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
161,355,050 161,355,050 65,451,824 65,451,824
Shares redeemed

(72,008,871,373
)


(72,008,871,373
)

(66,320,572,743
)


(66,320,572,743
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(1,310,522,306
)

$
(1,310,522,306
)

(2,931,280,347
)

$
(2,931,280,347
)
Year Ended July 31
   
2006
   
2005
Institutional Service Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
10,566,795,860 $ 10,566,795,860 11,309,022,977 $ 11,309,022,977
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
18,223,345 18,223,345 9,050,906 9,050,906
Shares redeemed

(10,432,734,748
)


(10,432,734,748
)

(11,562,653,146
)


(11,562,653,146
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SERVICE SHARE TRANSACTIONS

152,284,457


$
152,284,457


(244,579,263
)

$
(244,579,263
)
Year Ended July 31
   
2006
   
2005
Institutional Capital Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
4,540,792,343 $ 4,540,792,343 3,504,433,074 $ 3,504,433,074
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
30,782,985 30,782,985 9,852,756 9,852,756
Shares redeemed

(4,293,020,253
)


(4,293,020,253
)

(3,439,585,305
)


(3,439,585,305
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

278,555,075


$
278,555,075


74,700,525


$
74,700,525

   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(879,682,774
)

$
(879,682,774
)

(3,101,159,085
)

$
(3,101,159,085
)
    Prime Management Obligations Fund

   
Year Ended
7/31/2006

   
Period Ended
7/31/2005 2

Institutional Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
22,720,652,458 $ 22,720,652,458 15,711,474,555 $ 15,711,474,555
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
60,837,635 60,837,635 23,392,394 23,392,394
Shares redeemed

(23,433,559,021
)


(23,433,559,021
)

(13,096,706,296
)


(13,096,706,296
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(652,068,928
)

$
(652,068,928
)

2,638,160,653


$
2,638,160,653


   
Year Ended
7/31/2006

   
Period Ended
7/31/2005 1

Institutional Service Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
1,122,765,191 $ 1,122,765,191 1,110,524,614 $ 1,110,524,614
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
37,377,237 37,377,237 5,702,788 5,702,788
Shares redeemed

(945,873,165
)


(945,873,165
)

(303,339,927
)


(303,339,927
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SERVICE SHARE TRANSACTIONS

214,269,263


$
214,269,263


812,887,475


$
812,887,475


   
Year Ended
7/31/2006

   
Period Ended
7/31/2005 1

Institutional Capital Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
2,293,404,017 $ 2,293,404,017 1,477,195,766 $ 1,477,195,766
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
34,562,980 34,562,980 6,343,556 6,343,556
Shares redeemed

(2,411,114,116
)


(2,411,114,116
)

(666,312,131
)


(666,312,131
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(83,147,119
)

$
(83,147,119
)

817,227,191


$
817,227,191

   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(520,946,784
)

$
(520,946,784
)

4,268,275,319


$
4,268,275,319

    Prime Value Obligations Fund
Year Ended July 31
   
2006
   
2005
Institutional Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
103,692,917,824 $ 103,692,917,824 78,613,332,108 $ 78,613,332,108
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
246,934,132 246,934,132 95,726,452 95,726,452
Shares redeemed

(103,030,683,708
)


(103,030,683,708
)

(82,412,070,061
)


(82,412,070,061
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

909,168,248


$
909,168,248


(3,703,011,501
)

$
(3,703,011,501
)
Year Ended July 31
   
2006
   
2005
Institutional Service Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
6,825,236,442 $ 6,825,236,442 5,432,893,340 $ 5,432,893,340
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
46,250,432 46,250,432 19,368,337 19,368,337
Shares redeemed

(6,378,794,460
)


(6,378,794,460
)

(5,753,378,607
)


(5,753,378,607
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SERVICE SHARE TRANSACTIONS

492,692,414


$
492,692,414


(301,116,930
)

$
(301,116,930
)
Year Ended July 31
   
2006
   
2005
Institutional Capital Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
10,859,282,101 $ 10,859,282,101 6,388,735,697 $ 6,388,735,697
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
23,533,396 23,533,396 10,153,012 10,153,012
Shares redeemed

(10,624,629,835
)


(10,624,629,835
)

(6,113,307,005
)


(6,113,307,005
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

258,185,662


$
258,185,662


285,581,704


$
285,581,704

   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

1,660,046,324


$
1,660,046,324


(3,718,546,727
)

$
(3,718,546,727
)
    Treasury Obligations Fund
Year Ended July 31
   
2006
   
2005
Institutional Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
44,165,575,744 $ 44,165,575,744 33,844,927,635 $ 33,844,927,635
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
122,359,876 122,359,876 59,642,933 59,642,933
Shares redeemed

(43,601,649,250
)


(43,601,649,250
)

(33,729,830,302
)


(33,729,830,302
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

686,286,370


$
686,286,370


174,740,266


$
174,740,266

Year Ended July 31
   
2006
   
2005
Institutional Service Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
22,364,859,502 $ 22,364,859,502 20,751,297,064 $ 20,751,297,064
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
38,022,724 38,022,724 16,731,340 16,731,340
Shares redeemed

(21,936,217,537
)


(21,936,217,537
)

(20,487,277,725
)


(20,487,277,725
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SERVICE SHARE TRANSACTIONS

466,664,689


$
466,664,689


280,750,679


$
280,750,679

Year Ended July 31
   
2006
   
2005
Institutional Capital Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
5,366,080,952 $ 5,366,080,952 5,303,145,483 $ 5,303,145,483
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
3,868,188 3,868,188 1,116,708 1,116,708
Shares redeemed

(4,955,300,921
)


(4,955,300,921
)

(5,553,358,330
)


(5,553,358,330
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

414,648,219


$
414,648,219


(249,096,139
)

$
(249,096,139
)
Year Ended July 31
   
2006
   
2005
Trust Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
1,564,660,492 $ 1,564,660,492 2,286,514,204 $ 2,286,514,204
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
1,692,687 1,692,687 1,011,162 1,011,162
Shares redeemed

(1,223,303,881
)


(1,223,303,881
)

(2,347,304,660
)


(2,347,304,660
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM TRUST SHARE TRANSACTIONS

343,049,298


$
343,049,298


(59,779,294
)

$
(59,779,294
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

1,910,648,576


$
1,910,648,576


146,615,512


$
146,615,512

1 For period from January 18, 2005 (start of performance) to July 31, 2005.

2 For period from August 11, 2004 (start of performance) to July 31, 2005.

4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

The tax character of distributions reported on the Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended July 31, 2006 and 2005 was as follows:

    2006
    2005

   
Tax-Exempt Income
   
Ordinary Income 1
   
Tax-Exempt Income
   
Ordinary Income 1
Government Obligations Fund

--

$396,979,439

--

$172,450,363
Municipal Obligations Fund

$146,977,333

--

$64,797,936

--
Prime Cash Obligation Fund

--

$387,192,141

--

$179,195,986
Prime Management Obligations Fund

--

$147,513,224

--

$ 42,876,324
Prime Value Obligations Fund

--

$466,617,999

--

$188,714,450
Treasury Obligations Fund

--

$521,964,298

--

$242,233,645

1 For tax purposes short-term capital gain distributions are considered as ordinary income distributions.

As of July 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Fund
   
Undistributed
Tax-Exempt Income

   
Undistributed
Ordinary Income

   
Dividend
Payable

   
Capital Loss
Carryforward


   
Current year
post October
loss deferral

Government Obligations Fund

--

$ 18,717,772

$(18,611,370)

--


--
Municipal Obligations Fund

$1,525,925

--

$ (1,530,520)

$(15,340
)

$(114,328)
Prime Cash Obligations Fund

--

$14,766,216

$(14,792,485)

--


--
Prime Management Obligations Fund

--

$ 1,575,391

$ (1,554,499)

--


--
Prime Value Obligations Fund

--

$14,451,963

$(14,526,248)

--


--
Treasury Obligations Fund

--

$ 38,627,237

$(38,686,356)

--


--

At July 31, 2006, the Municipal Obligations Fund had capital loss carryforwards of $15,340 which will reduce the Fund's taxable income arising from future net realized gain on investments, if any, to the extent permitted by the Code and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income tax. Pursuant to the Code, such capital loss carryforward will expire in 2013.

The Municipal Obligations Fund used capital loss carryforwards of $13,247 to offset taxable capital gains realized during the year ended July 31, 2006.

Under current tax regulations, capital losses realized after October 31 may be deferred and treated as occurring on the first day of the following fiscal year. As of July 31, 2006, for federal income tax purposes, post October losses of $114,328 were deferred to August 1, 2006 for Municipal Obligations Fund.

5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

Federated Investment Management Company, the Funds' investment adviser (the "Adviser"), receives for its services an annual investment adviser fee equal to 0.20% of each Funds' average daily net assets.

The Adviser may voluntarily choose to waive and/or reimburse any portion of its fee. The Adviser can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver and/or reimbursement at any time at its sole discretion.

For the year ended July 31, 2006, the Adviser voluntarily waived the following fees:

Fund
   
Adviser Fee Waiver
Government Obligations Fund

$ 8,189,143
Municipal Obligations Fund

$ 5,812,657
Prime Cash Obligations Fund

$ 9,636,338
Prime Management Obligations Fund

$ 5,340,791
Prime Value Obligations Fund

$12,433,605
Treasury Obligations Fund

$10,708,341

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Funds with administrative personnel and services. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average aggregate daily net assets of certain Federated funds as specified below:

Maximum
Administrative Fee

   
Average Aggregate Daily Net Assets
of the Federated Funds

0.150%

on the first $5 billion
0.125%

on the next $5 billion
0.100%

on the next $10 billion
0.075%

on assets in excess of $20 billion

The administrative fee received during any fiscal year shall be at least $150,000 per portfolio and $40,000 per each additional class of Shares. FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FAS can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the net fee paid to FAS was 0.076% of average aggregate daily net assets of each Fund.

Distribution Services Fee

Government Obligations Fund and Treasury Obligations Fund have adopted a Distribution Plan (the "Plan") pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act. Under the terms of the Plan, the Funds will compensate Federated Securities Corp. (FSC), the principal distributor, from the daily net assets of their Trust Shares to finance activities intended to result in the sale of these shares. The Plan provides that the Government Obligations Fund and Treasury Obligations Fund may incur distribution expenses of 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Fund's Trust Shares, annually, to compensate FSC. FSC may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FSC can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. Rather than paying financial intermediaries directly, the Funds may pay fees to FSC and FSC will use the fees to compensate financial intermediaries.

For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSC retained $9,487 of fees paid by Treasury Obligations Fund, and did not retain any fees paid by the Government Obligations Fund.

Shareholder Services Fee

The Funds may pay fees (Service Fees) up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Funds' Institutional Shares, Institutional Service Shares and Institutional Capital Shares to financial intermediaries or to Federated Shareholder Services Company (FSSC) for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. FSSC or these financial intermediaries may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of their fee. In addition, FSSC may voluntarily reimburse the Fund for shareholder services fees. This voluntary waiver and/or reimbursement can be modified or terminated at any time.

For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC voluntarily waived the following fees:

Fund
   
Shareholder
Services
Fee Waiver

Government Obligations Fund

$11,753,667
Municipal Obligations Fund

$ 1,166,074
Prime Cash Obligations Fund

$ 950,309
Prime Management Obligations Fund

$ 4,161,018
Prime Value Obligations Fund

$ 1,338,508
Treasury Obligations Fund

$12,294,714

For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC received the following fees paid by the Funds:

Fund
   
Shareholder
Services Fees
Received

Government Obligations Fund

$15,466
Prime Cash Obligations Fund

$24,081
Prime Value Obligations Fund

$33,676
Treasury Obligations Fund

$ 27,914

For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC did not receive any fees paid by Municipal Obligations Fund and Prime Management Obligations Fund. For the year ended July 31, 2006, Institutional Shares for Municipal Obligations Fund, Prime Cash Obligations Fund, and Prime Value Obligations Fund did not incur a shareholder services fee.

Commencing on August 1, 2005, and continuing through May 3, 2006, FSSC reimbursed daily a portion of the shareholder services fee of Prime Cash Obligations Fund's Institutional Capital Shares. This reimbursement resulted from an administrative delay in the implementation of contractual terms of shareholder service fee agreements. This reimbursement amounted to $188,804 for the year ended July 31, 2006.

General

Certain of the Officers and Trustees of the Funds are Officers and Directors or Trustees of the above companies.

Interfund Transactions

During the year ended July 31, 2006, the Funds engaged in purchase and sale transactions with funds that have a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment advisers), common Directors/Trustees, and/or common Officers. These purchase and sale transactions complied with Rule 17a-7 under the Act. Interfund transactions were as follows:

Fund
   
Purchases
   
Sales
Municipal Obligations Fund

$7,698,355,000

$12,397,527,000

6. CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

A substantial part of the portfolios of Prime Cash Obligations Fund and Prime Value Obligations Fund may be comprised of obligations of banks. As a result, these funds may be more susceptible to any economic, business, political or other developments which generally affect these entities.

7. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning in October 2003, Federated Investors, Inc. and various subsidiaries thereof (including the advisers and distributor for various investment companies, collectively, "Federated"), along with various investment companies sponsored by Federated ("Funds") were named as defendants in several class action lawsuits now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuits were purportedly filed on behalf of people who purchased, owned and/or redeemed shares of Federated-sponsored mutual funds during specified periods beginning November 1, 1998. The suits are generally similar in alleging that Federated engaged in illegal and improper trading practices including market timing and late trading in concert with certain institutional traders, which allegedly caused financial injury to the mutual fund shareholders. These lawsuits began to be filed shortly after Federated's first public announcement that it had received requests for information on shareholder trading activities in the Funds from the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), the Office of the New York State Attorney General ("NYAG"), and other authorities. In that regard, on November 28, 2005, Federated announced that it had reached final settlements with the SEC and the NYAG with respect to those matters. As Federated previously reported in 2004, it has already paid approximately $8.0 million to certain funds as determined by an independent consultant. As part of these settlements, Federated agreed to pay for the benefit of fund shareholders additional disgorgement and a civil money penalty in the aggregate amount of an additional $72 million. Federated and various Funds have also been named as defendants in several additional lawsuits, the majority of which are now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging, among other things, excessive advisory and Rule 12b-1 fees. The Board of the Funds has retained the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro LLP to represent the Funds in these lawsuits. Federated and the Funds, and their respective counsel, are reviewing the allegations and intend to defend this litigation. Additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations may be filed in the future. The potential impact of these lawsuits, all of which seek unquantified damages, attorneys' fees and expenses, and future potential similar suits is uncertain. Although we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Funds, there can be no assurance that these suits, the ongoing adverse publicity and/or other developments resulting from the regulatory investigations will not result in increased Fund redemptions, reduced sales of Fund shares, or other adverse consequences for the Funds.

8. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

At July 31, 2006, 100.0% of the distributions from net investment income for the Municipal Obligations Fund are exempt from federal income tax, other than the federal AMT.

For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2006, 99.12% and 100.0% of dividends paid by the Prime Management Obligations Fund and Treasury Obligations Fund, respectively, are interest-related dividends, as provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.

9. CHANGE IN INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM (UNAUDITED)

On August 18, 2006, the Funds' Trustees, upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, and completion of the audit for July 31, 2006, appointed KPMG LLP (KPMG) as the Funds' independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2007. The Funds' previous independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP (D&T) declined to stand for re-election. The previous reports issued by D&T on the Funds' financial statements for the fiscal years ended July 31, 2005 and July 31, 2006, contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During the Funds' fiscal years ended July 31, 2005 and July 31, 2006: (i) there were no disagreements with D&T on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of D&T, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with the reports on the financial statements for such years; and (ii) there were no reportable events of the kind described in Item 304(a) (1) (v) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

As indicted above, the Funds have appointed KPMG as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Funds' financial statements for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2007. During the Funds' fiscal years ended July 31, 2005 and July 31, 2006 and the interim period commencing August 1, 2006 and ending September 22, 2006, neither the Funds nor anyone on its behalf has consulted KPMG on items which: (i) concerned the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Funds' financial statements; or (ii) concerned the subject of a disagreement (as defined in paragraph (a) (1) (iv) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K) or reportable events (as described in paragraph (a) (1) (v) of said Item 304).

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONEY MARKET OBLIGATIONS TRUST AND SHAREHOLDERS OF GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS FUND, MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS FUND, PRIME CASH OBLIGATIONS FUND, PRIME MANAGEMENT OBLIGATIONS FUND, PRIME VALUE OBLIGATIONS FUND, AND TREASURY OBLIGATIONS FUND FOR THE INSTITUTIONAL CAPITAL SHARES:

We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the portfolios of investments, of Government Obligations Fund, Municipal Obligations Fund, Prime Cash Obligations Fund, Prime Management Obligations Fund, Prime Value Obligations Fund, and Treasury Obligations Fund (collectively the "Funds") (portfolios of the Money Market Obligations Trust) as of July 31, 2006, and the related statements of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds' management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Funds are not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of their internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of July 31, 2006, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, other auditing procedures were performed. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Funds as of July 31, 2006, the results of their operations, the changes in their net assets, and their financial highlights for the respective stated periods, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
September 22, 2006

Board of Trustees and Trust Officers

The Board is responsible for managing the Trust's business affairs and for exercising all the Trust's powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Board member and the senior officers of the Funds. Where required, the tables separately list Board members who are "interested persons" of the Fund (i.e., "Interested" Board members) and those who are not (i.e., "Independent" Board members). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is Federated Investors Tower, 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA. As of December 31, 2005, the Trust comprised 41 portfolios, and the Federated Fund Complex consisted of 43 investment companies (comprising 136 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Board member oversees all portfolios in the Federated Fund Complex and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund's Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trust Trustees and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
John F. Donahue*
Birth Date: July 28, 1924
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex's Executive Committee.

Previous Positions
: Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex; Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Chairman and Director, Federated Investment Counseling.



J. Christopher Donahue*
Birth Date: April 11, 1949
PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 1989
Principal Occupations : Principal Executive Officer and President of the Federated Fund Complex; Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company; Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman, Passport Research, Ltd. (Investment advisory subsidiary of Federated); Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director, Federated Services Company.

Previous Positions
: President, Federated Investment Counseling; President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd.



Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D.*
Birth Date: October 11, 1932
3471 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1111
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Medical Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Downtown; Hematologist, Oncologist and Internist, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Other Directorships Held
: Member, National Board of Trustees, Leukemia Society of America.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, University of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.



* Family relationships and reasons for "interested" status: John F. Donahue is the father of J. Christopher Donahue; both are "interested" due to the positions they hold with Federated Investors, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D. is "interested" because his son-in-law is employed by the Fund's principal underwriter, Federated Securities Corp.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
Thomas G. Bigley
Birth Date: February 3, 1934
15 Old Timber Trail
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: November 1994
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Member of Executive Committee, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh.

Previous Position
: Senior Partner, Ernst & Young LLP.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
John T. Conroy, Jr.
Birth Date: June 23, 1937
Investment Properties Corporation
3838 North Tamiami Trail
Suite 402
Naples, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman of the Board, Investment Properties Corporation; Partner or Trustee in private real estate ventures in Southwest Florida.

Previous Positions
: President, Investment Properties Corporation; Senior Vice President, John R. Wood and Associates, Inc., Realtors; President, Naples Property Management, Inc. and Northgate Village Development Corporation.



Nicholas P. Constantakis
Birth Date: September 3, 1939
175 Woodshire Drive
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Michael Baker Corporation (engineering and energy services worldwide).

Previous Position
: Partner, Andersen Worldwide SC.



John F. Cunningham
Birth Date: March 5, 1943
353 El Brillo Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Director, WinsorTech.

Other Directorships Held
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cunningham & Co., Inc. (strategic business consulting); Trustee Associate, Boston College.

Previous Positions
: Director, Redgate Communications and EMC Corporation (computer storage systems); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Computer Consoles, Inc.; President and Chief Operating Officer, Wang Laboratories; Director, First National Bank of Boston; Director, Apollo Computer, Inc.



Peter E. Madden
Birth Date: March 16, 1942
One Royal Palm Way
100 Royal Palm Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Board of Overseers, Babson College.

Previous Positions
: Representative, Commonwealth of Massachusetts General Court; President, State Street Bank and Trust Company and State Street Corporation (retired); Director, VISA USA and VISA International; Chairman and Director, Massachusetts Bankers Association; Director, Depository Trust Corporation; Director, The Boston Stock Exchange.



Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.
Birth Date: April 10, 1945
80 South Road
Westhampton Beach, NY
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Management Consultant.

Previous Positions
: Chief Executive Officer, PBTC International Bank; Partner, Arthur Young & Company (now Ernst & Young LLP); Chief Financial Officer of Retail Banking Sector, Chase Manhattan Bank; Senior Vice President, HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank); Vice President, Citibank; Assistant Professor of Banking and Finance, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University; Executive Vice President, DVC Group, Inc.



John E. Murray, Jr., J.D., S.J.D.
Birth Date: December 20, 1932
Chancellor, Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1995
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee, and Chairman of the Board of Directors or Trustees, of the Federated Fund Complex; Chancellor and Law Professor, Duquesne University; Partner, Murray, Hogue & Lannis.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Michael Baker Corp. (engineering, construction, operations and technical services).

Previous Positions
: President, Duquesne University; Dean and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Dean and Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law.



Marjorie P. Smuts
Birth Date: June 21, 1935
4905 Bayard Street
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Public Relations/Marketing Consultant/Conference Coordinator.

Previous Positions
: National Spokesperson, Aluminum Company of America; television producer; President, Marj Palmer Assoc.; Owner, Scandia Bord.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
John S. Walsh
Birth Date: November 28, 1957
2604 William Drive
Valparaiso, IN
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer of construction temporary heaters); President and Director, Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers Products, Inc.

Previous Position
: Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc.



James F. Will
Birth Date: October 12, 1938
Saint Vincent College
Latrobe, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 2006
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chancellor and President, Saint Vincent College.

Other Directorships Held
: Alleghany Corporation.

Previous Positions
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Armco, Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer, Cyclops Industries; President and Chief Operating Officer, Kaiser Steel Corporation.



OFFICERS




Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
John W. McGonigle
Birth Date: October 26, 1938
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND SECRETARY
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Federated Investment Counseling; Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Services Company and Federated Securities Corp.



Richard A. Novak
Birth Date: December 25, 1963
TREASURER
Began serving: January 2006
Principal Occupations : Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Federated Fund Complex; Senior Vice President, Federated Administrative Services; Financial and Operations Principal for Federated Securities Corp., Edgewood Services, Inc. and Southpointe Distribution Services, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Vice President, Finance of Federated Services Company; Controller of Federated Investors, Inc.; held various financial management positions within The Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh; Auditor, Arthur Andersen & Co.



Richard B. Fisher
Birth Date: May 17, 1923
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Vice Chairman or Vice President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman, Federated Securities Corp.

Previous Positions
: President and Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Executive Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc. and Director and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Securities Corp.



Brian P. Bouda
Birth Date: February 28, 1947
CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER
Began serving: August 2004
Principal Occupations : Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of Federated Investors, Inc.; and Chief Compliance Officer of its subsidiaries. Mr. Bouda joined Federated in 1999 and is a member of the American Bar Association and the State Bar Association of Wisconsin.



Deborah A. Cunningham
Birth Date: September 15, 1959
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Deborah A. Cunningham was named Chief Investment Officer of money market products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1981 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1997. Ms. Cunningham is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.S.B.A. in Finance from Robert Morris College.






Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
Mary Jo Ochson
Birth Date: September 12, 1953
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Mary Jo Ochson was named Chief Investment Officer of tax-exempt fixed income products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1982 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Pittsburgh.



Susan R. Hill
Birth Date: June 20, 1963
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Susan R. Hill has been Government Obligations Fund's and Treasury Obligation Fund's Portfolio Manager since July 1993. She is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Hill joined Federated in 1990 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 2003 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 2005. Ms. Hill was a Portfolio Manager from 1994 until 2003, and served as Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1997 until 2004 and an Assistant Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1994 until 1997. Ms. Hill is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received an M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University.



Jeff A. Kozemchak
Birth Date: January 15, 1960
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Jeff A. Kozemchak is Vice President of the Trust. Mr. Kozemchak joined Federated in 1987 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 1996 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1999. He was a Portfolio Manager until 1996 and a Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Kozemchak is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received his M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University in 1987.



Paige M. Wilhelm
Birth Date: May 28, 1962
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: August 2006
Principal Occupations : Paige M. Wilhelm is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Wilhelm joined Federated in 1985 and has been a Senior Vice President and a Senior Portfolio Manager. She is responsible for portfolio management and research in the fixed-income area concentrating on taxable money market instruments. Previous associations include Senior Credit Analyst, Federated Investors; Performance Analysis Supervisor; Performance Analyst, Federated Investment Counseling. Ms. Wilhelm is a member of the CFA Society of Pittsburgh and received her B.S. from Indiana University and her M.B.A. from Duquesne University.



Evaluation and Approval of Advisory Contract

GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS FUND (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was above the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS FUND (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was above the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

PRIME CASH OBLIGATIONS FUND (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was above the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

PRIME MANAGEMENT OBLIGATIONS FUND (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was above the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

PRIME VALUE OBLIGATIONS FUND (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was above the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

TREASURY OBLIGATIONS FUND (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was above the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that the Funds use to determine how to vote proxies, if any, relating to securities held in the Funds' portfolios is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. Report on "Form N-PX" of how the Funds voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Federated's website. Go to FederatedInvestors.com, select "Products," select the "Prospectuses and Regulatory Reports" link, then select a Fund to access the link to Form N-PX. This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

The Funds file with the SEC a complete schedule of their portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on "Form N-Q." These filings are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.) You may also access this information from the "Products" section of Federated website at FederatedInvestors.com by clicking on "Portfolio Holdings" and selecting the name of a Fund, or by selecting the name of a Fund and clicking on "Portfolio Holdings." You must register on the website the first time you wish to access this information.

Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board, or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal. Although money market funds seek to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share, there is no assurance that they will be able to do so.

This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the Fund's prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses, and other information.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Money Market Obligations Trust
Federated Investors Funds
5800 Corporate Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15237-7000
Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.

Federated Securities Corp., Distributor

Cusip 608919809
Cusip 608919841
Cusip 60934N633
Cusip 60934N591
Cusip 60934N567
Cusip 60934N823

25717 (9/06)

Federated is a registered mark of Federated Investors, Inc. 2006 (c)Federated Investors, Inc.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Money Market Obligations Trust

ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT

July 31, 2006

Institutional Shares
Institutional Service Shares

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
SHAREHOLDER EXPENSE EXAMPLE
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS SUMMARY TABLES
PORTFOLIOS OF INVESTMENTS
STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND TRUST OFFICERS
EVALUATION AND APPROVAL OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
VOTING PROXIES ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

Not FDIC Insured * May Lose Value * No Bank Guarantee

Federated Investors 50 Years of Growth & Innovation

Financial Highlights - Institutional Shares

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended
   
Net Asset Value,
Beginning
of Period

   
Net
Investment
Income

   
Net Realized
and Unrealized
Gain (Loss) on
Investments

   
Total From
Investment
Operations

   
Government Obligations Fund









July 31, 2002
$1.00 0.022 -- 0.022
July 31, 2003
$1.00 0.013 -- 0.013
July 31, 2004
$1.00 0.009 -- 0.009
July 31, 2005
$1.00 0.022 -- 0.022
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.042 -- 0.042
Government Obligations Tax-Managed Fund









July 31, 2002
$1.00 0.021 0.001 0.022
July 31, 2003
$1.00 0.013 -- 0.013
July 31, 2004
$1.00 0.009 -- 0.009
July 31, 2005
$1.00 0.022 -- 0.022
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.041 -- 0.041
Municipal Obligations Fund









July 31, 2002
$1.00 0.018 -- 0.018
July 31, 2003
$1.00 0.012 -- 0.012
July 31, 2004
$1.00 0.009 (0.000 ) 3 0.009
July 31, 2005
$1.00 0.018 0.000 3 0.018
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.030 (0.000 ) 3 0.030

1 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

2 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and net investment income ratios shown.

3 Represents less than $0.001.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Ratios to Average Net Assets
Distributions
From Net
Investment
Income

   
Distributions From
Net Realized Gain
on Investments

   
Total
Distributions

   
Net Asset Value,
End of Period

   
Total
Return

1
Net
Expenses

   
Net
Investment
Income

   
Expense Waiver/
Reimbursement

2
Net Assets,
End of Period
(000 Omitted)










   







(0.022) -- (0.022) $1.00 2.23% 0.20% 2.19% 0.34% $7,380,640
(0.013) -- (0.013) $1.00 1.30% 0.20% 1.30% 0.34% $6,166,411
(0.009) -- (0.009) $1.00 0.92% 0.20% 0.91% 0.34% $5,134,296
(0.022) -- (0.022) $1.00 2.20% 0.20% 2.17% 0.34% $5,721,965
(0.042) -- (0.042) $1.00 4.30% 0.20% 4.22% 0.28% $6,619,952

















(0.021) (0.001) (0.022) $1.00 2.22% 0.20% 2.16% 0.34% $1,798,217
(0.013) -- (0.013) $1.00 1.26% 0.20% 1.25% 0.34% $1,521,953
(0.009) -- (0.009) $1.00 0.89% 0.20% 0.88% 0.35% $1,159,503
(0.022) -- (0.022) $1.00 2.17% 0.20% 2.15% 0.34% $1,206,111
(0.041) -- (0.041) $1.00 4.21% 0.20% 4.15% 0.29% $1,556,092

















(0.018) -- (0.018) $1.00 1.79% 0.18% 1.68% 0.13% $856,839
(0.012) -- (0.012) $1.00 1.25% 0.18% 1.19% 0.12% $1,570,532
(0.009) -- (0.009) $1.00 0.94% 0.18% 0.94% 0.12% $2,144,468
(0.018) -- (0.018) $1.00 1.82% 0.18% 1.85% 0.13% $3,040,759
(0.030) -- (0.030) $1.00 3.01% 0.18% 2.99% 0.12% $3,490,983

Financial Highlights - Institutional Shares

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended
   
Net Asset Value,
Beginning of Period

   
Net
Investment
Income

   
Net Realized
and Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on Investments


Prime Cash Obligations Fund







July 31, 2002
$1.00 0.023 --
July 31, 2003
$1.00 0.014 --
July 31, 2004
$1.00 0.010 --
July 31, 2005
$1.00 0.022 --
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.043 --
Prime Management Obligations Fund







July 31, 2005 3
$1.00 0.024 --
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.043 --
Prime Obligations Fund







July 31, 2002
$1.00 0.023 --
July 31, 2003
$1.00 0.014 (0.000 ) 5
July 31, 2004
$1.00 0.010 0.000 5
July 31, 2005
$1.00 0.022 0.000 5
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.042 0.000 5

1 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

2 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and net investment income ratios shown.

3 Reflects operations for the period from August 11, 2004 (date of initial public investment) to July 31, 2005.

4 Computed on an annualized basis.

5 Represents less than $0.001.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Ratios to Average Net Assets
Total From
Investment
Operations

   
Distributions
From Net
Investment
Income

   
Net Asset Value,
End of Period

   
Total
Return

1
Net
Expenses

   
Net
Investment
Income

   
Expense Waiver/
Reimbursement

2
Net Assets,
End of Period
(000 Omitted)
















0.023 (0.023) $1.00 2.34% 0.18% 2.25% 0.11% $8,219,465
0.014 (0.014) $1.00 1.37% 0.18% 1.34% 0.11% $9,986,839
0.010 (0.010) $1.00 0.99% 0.18% 0.98% 0.11% $8,605,478
0.022 (0.022) $1.00 2.26% 0.18% 2.15% 0.11% $5,674,270
0.043 (0.043) $1.00 4.36% 0.18% 4.21% 0.11% $4,363,938















0.024 (0.024) $1.00 2.39% 0.13% 4 2.82% 4 0.45% 4 $2,638,079
0.043 (0.043) $1.00 4.38% 0.16% 4.26% 0.34% $1,986,138















0.023 (0.023) $1.00 2.32% 0.20% 2.21% 0.34% $20,707,206
0.014 (0.014) $1.00 1.36% 0.20% 1.34% 0.34% $20,110,135
0.010 (0.010) $1.00 0.97% 0.20% 0.96% 0.34% $16,519,436
0.022 (0.022) $1.00 2.24% 0.20% 2.19% 0.34% $15,600,659
0.042 (0.042) $1.00 4.33% 0.20% 4.24% 0.28% $15,151,070

Financial Highlights - Institutional Shares

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended
   
Net Asset Value,
Beginning of Period

   
Net
Investment
Income

   
Net Realized
and Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on Investments

   
Total From
Investment
Operations

Prime Value Obligations Fund








July 31, 2002
$1.00 0.024 -- 0.024
July 31, 2003
$1.00 0.014 -- 0.014
July 31, 2004
$1.00 0.010 -- 0.010
July 31, 2005
$1.00 0.023 -- 0.023
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.043 -- 0.043
Tax-Free Obligations Fund








July 31, 2002
$1.00 0.016 0.000 3 0.016
July 31, 2003
$1.00 0.011 (0.000 ) 3 0.011
July 31, 2004
$1.00 0.008 0.000 3 0.008
July 31, 2005
$1.00 0.017 (0.000 ) 3 0.017
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.029 (0.000 ) 3 0.029
Treasury Obligations Fund








July 31, 2002
$1.00 0.020 0.001 0.021
July 31, 2003
$1.00 0.013 0.000 3 0.013
July 31, 2004
$1.00 0.009 -- 0.009
July 31, 2005
$1.00 0.021 -- 0.021
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.041 -- 0.041

1 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

2 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and net investment income ratios shown.

3 Represents less than $0.001.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Ratios to Average Net Assets
Distributions
From Net
Investment
Income

   
Distributions From
Net Realized Gain
on Investments

   
Total
Distributions

   
Net Asset Value,
End of Period

   
Total
Return

1
Net
Expenses

   
Net
Investment
Income

   
Expense Waiver/
Reimbursement

2
Net Assets,
End of Period
(000 Omitted)


















(0.024) -- (0.024) $1.00 2.39% 0.17% 2.28% 0.12% $7,967,856
(0.014) -- (0.014) $1.00 1.41% 0.17% 1.38% 0.12% $10,410,998
(0.010) -- (0.010) $1.00 1.03% 0.17% 1.02% 0.12% $9,502,207
(0.023) -- (0.023) $1.00 2.30% 0.17% 2.17% 0.12% $5,799,231
(0.043) -- (0.043) $1.00 4.40% 0.17% 4.32% 0.12% $6,708,463

















(0.016) -- (0.016) $1.00 1.65% 0.20% 1.59% 0.34% $5,265,275
(0.011) -- (0.011) $1.00 1.14% 0.20% 1.12% 0.34% $6,143,476
(0.008) -- (0.008) $1.00 0.85% 0.20% 0.85% 0.34% $6,249,045
(0.017) -- (0.017) $1.00 1.75% 0.20% 1.78% 0.34% $8,460,989
(0.029) -- (0.029) $1.00 2.91% 0.20% 2.82% 0.29% $5,941,736

















(0.020) (0.001 ) (0.021) $1.00 2.17% 0.20% 2.04% 0.34% $7,484,039
(0.013) (0.000 ) 3 (0.013) $1.00 1.27% 0.20% 1.25% 0.34% $5,085,604
(0.009) -- (0.009) $1.00 0.86% 0.20% 0.85% 0.34% $5,558,392
(0.021) -- (0.021) $1.00 2.12% 0.20% 2.12% 0.34% $5,733,139
(0.041) -- (0.041) $1.00 4.20% 0.20% 4.14% 0.27% $6,419,380

Financial Highlights - Institutional Service Shares

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended
   
Net Asset Value,
Beginning of Period

   
Net
Investment
Income

   
Net Realized
and Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on Investments

   
Total From
Investment
Operations

   
Distributions
From Net
Investment
Income

Government Obligations Fund










July 31, 2002
$1.00 0.020 -- 0.020 (0.020)
July 31, 2003
$1.00 0.010 -- 0.010 (0.010)
July 31, 2004
$1.00 0.007 -- 0.007 (0.007)
July 31, 2005
$1.00 0.019 -- 0.019 (0.019)
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.040 -- 0.040 (0.040)
Government Obligations Tax-Managed Fund










July 31, 2002
$1.00 0.018 0.001 0.019 (0.018)
July 31, 2003
$1.00 0.010 -- 0.010 (0.010)
July 31, 2004
$1.00 0.006 -- 0.006 (0.006)
July 31, 2005
$1.00 0.019 -- 0.019 (0.019)
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.039 -- 0.039 (0.039)
Municipal Obligations Fund










July 31, 2002
$1.00 0.015 -- 0.015 (0.015)
July 31, 2003
$1.00 0.010 -- 0.010 (0.010)
July 31, 2004
$1.00 0.007 (0.000 ) 3 0.007 (0.007)
July 31, 2005
$1.00 0.016 0.000 3 0.016 (0.016)
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.027 (0.000 ) 3 0.027 (0.027)

1 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

2 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and net investment income ratios shown.

3 Represents less than $0.001.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements


Ratios to Average Net Assets

   
Distributions From
Net Realized Gain
on Investments

   
Total
Distributions

   
Net Asset Value,
End of Period

   
Total
Return

1
Net
Expenses

   
Net
Investment
Income

   
Expense Waiver/
Reimbursement

2
Net Assets,
End of Period
(000 Omitted)

















-- (0.020) $1.00 1.97% 0.45% 1.92% 0.09% $3,820,479
-- (0.010) $1.00 1.05% 0.45% 1.05% 0.09% $3,621,295
-- (0.007) $1.00 0.67% 0.45% 0.66% 0.09% $3,036,452
-- (0.019) $1.00 1.95% 0.45% 1.91% 0.09% $2,759,651
-- (0.040) $1.00 4.04% 0.45% 3.99% 0.09% $3,493,161
















(0.001) (0.019) $1.00 1.97% 0.45% 1.88% 0.09% $2,260,128
-- (0.010) $1.00 1.01% 0.45% 1.00% 0.09% $1,996,288
-- (0.006) $1.00 0.64% 0.45% 0.63% 0.10% $1,756,992
-- (0.019) $1.00 1.92% 0.45% 1.90% 0.09% $1,797,876
-- (0.039) $1.00 3.96% 0.45% 3.90% 0.10% $2,010,881
















-- (0.015) $1.00 1.53% 0.43% 1.54% 0.13% $258,515
-- (0.010) $1.00 1.00% 0.43% 1.00% 0.12% $302,262
-- (0.007) $1.00 0.69% 0.43% 0.69% 0.12% $363,595
-- (0.016) $1.00 1.57% 0.43% 1.63% 0.13% $641,950
-- (0.027) $1.00 2.75% 0.43% 2.72% 0.12% $620,552

Financial Highlights - Institutional Service Shares

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended
   
Net Asset Value,
Beginning of Period

   
Net
Investment
Income

   
Net Realized
and Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on Investments

   
Prime Cash Obligations Fund







July 31, 2002
$1.00 0.021 --
July 31, 2003
$1.00 0.011 --
July 31, 2004
$1.00 0.007 --
July 31, 2005
$1.00 0.020 --
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.040 --
Prime Management Obligations Fund







July 31, 2005 3
$1.00 0.014 --
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.040 --
Prime Obligations Fund







July 31, 2002
$1.00 0.020 --
July 31, 2003
$1.00 0.011 (0.000 ) 5
July 31, 2004
$1.00 0.007 0.000 5
July 31, 2005
$1.00 0.020 0.000 5
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.040 0.000 5

1 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

2 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and net investment income ratios shown.

3 Reflects operations for the period from January 18, 2005 (date of initial public investment) to July 31, 2005.

4 Computed on an annualized basis.

5 Represents less than $0.001.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Ratios to Average Net Assets
Total From
Investment
Operations

   
Distributions
From Net
Investment
Income

   
Net Asset Value,
End of Period

   
Total
Return

1
Net
Expenses

   
Net
Investment
Income

   
Expense Waiver/
Reimbursement

2
Net Assets,
End of Period
(000 Omitted)








   





   

0.021 (0.021) $1.00 2.08% 0.43% 1.97% 0.11% $2,092,235
0.011 (0.011) $1.00 1.12% 0.43% 1.11% 0.11% $1,960,635
0.007 (0.007) $1.00 0.74% 0.43% 0.73% 0.11% $2,025,081
0.020 (0.020) $1.00 2.00% 0.43% 1.94% 0.11% $1,780,479
0.040 (0.040) $1.00 4.10% 0.43% 3.98% 0.11% $1,932,607















0.014 (0.014) $1.00 1.40% 0.38% 4 2.87% 4 0.20% 4 $812,886
0.040 (0.040) $1.00 4.13% 0.41% 4.07% 0.16% $1,027,151















0.020 (0.020) $1.00 2.06% 0.45% 2.06% 0.09% $6,020,704
0.011 (0.011) $1.00 1.11% 0.45% 1.11% 0.09% $4,789,142
0.007 (0.007) $1.00 0.72% 0.45% 0.71% 0.09% $4,824,570
0.020 (0.020) $1.00 1.99% 0.45% 1.96% 0.09% $5,727,774
0.040 (0.040) $1.00 4.07% 0.45% 4.02% 0.09% $5,827,992

Financial Highlights - Institutional Service Shares

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended
   
Net Asset Value,
Beginning of Period

   
Net
Investment
Income

   
Net Realized
and Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on Investments

   
Total From
Investment
Operations

Prime Value Obligations Fund








July 31, 2002
$1.00 0.021 -- 0.021
July 31, 2003
$1.00 0.012 -- 0.012
July 31, 2004
$1.00 0.008 -- 0.008
July 31, 2005
$1.00 0.020 -- 0.020
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.041 -- 0.041
Tax-Free Obligations Fund








July 31, 2002
$1.00 0.014 0.000 3 0.014
July 31, 2003
$1.00 0.009 (0.000 ) 3 0.009
July 31, 2004
$1.00 0.006 0.000 3 0.006
July 31, 2005
$1.00 0.015 (0.000 ) 3 0.015
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.026 (0.000 ) 3 0.026
Treasury Obligations Fund








July 31, 2002
$1.00 0.018 0.001 0.019
July 31, 2003
$1.00 0.010 0.000 3 0.010
July 31, 2004
$1.00 0.006 -- 0.006
July 31, 2005
$1.00 0.019 -- 0.019
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.039 -- 0.039

1 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

2 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and net investment income ratios shown.

3 Represents less than $0.001.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Ratios to Average Net Assets
Distributions
From Net
Investment
Income

   
Distributions From
Net Realized Gain
on Investments

   
Total
Distributions

   
Net Asset Value,
End of Period

   
Total
Return

1
Net
Expenses

   
Net
Investment
Income

   
Expense Waiver/
Reimbursement

2
Net Assets,
End of Period
(000 Omitted)


















(0.021) -- (0.021) $1.00 2.13% 0.42% 2.12% 0.12% $966,996
(0.012) -- (0.012) $1.00 1.16% 0.42% 1.15% 0.12% $1,369,542
(0.008) -- (0.008) $1.00 0.77% 0.42% 0.77% 0.12% $1,564,255
(0.020) -- (0.020) $1.00 2.05% 0.42% 1.98% 0.12% $1,263,130
(0.041) -- (0.041) $1.00 4.14% 0.42% 4.11% 0.12% $1,755,737

















(0.014) -- (0.014) $1.00 1.40% 0.45% 1.37% 0.09% $2,076,385
(0.009) -- (0.009) $1.00 0.89% 0.45% 0.88% 0.09% $2,054,523
(0.006) -- (0.006) $1.00 0.60% 0.45% 0.60% 0.09% $1,787,740
(0.015) -- (0.015) $1.00 1.50% 0.45% 1.53% 0.09% $2,073,222
(0.026) -- (0.026) $1.00 2.65% 0.45% 2.61% 0.09% $2,066,260

















(0.018) (0.001) (0.019) $1.00 1.91% 0.45% 1.83% 0.09% $5,519,235
(0.010) (0.000) 3 (0.010) $1.00 1.02% 0.45% 0.95% 0.09% $5,770,025
(0.006) -- (0.006) $1.00 0.61% 0.45% 0.60% 0.09% $4,965,031
(0.019) -- (0.019) $1.00 1.87% 0.45% 1.85% 0.09% $5,245,762
(0.039) -- (0.039) $1.00 3.94% 0.45% 3.87% 0.09% $5,712,346

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of a Fund, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees; to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees and/or shareholder services fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you to understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Funds and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from February 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006.

ACTUAL EXPENSES

The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES

The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Funds' actual expense ratios and assumed rates of return of 5% per year before expenses, which are not the Funds' actual returns. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are required to be provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Funds with other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.

INSTITUTIONAL SHARES


   
Beginning
Account Value
2/1/2006

   
Ending
Account Value
7/31/2006

   
Expenses Paid
During Period 1

Actual:
   

   

   

Government Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,023.50

$1.00
Government Obligations Tax-Managed Fund

$1,000

$1,023.10

$1.00
Municipal Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,016.40

$0.90
Prime Cash Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,023.80

$0.90
Prime Management Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,023.90

$0.80
Prime Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,023.70

$1.00
Prime Value Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,023.90

$0.85
Tax-Free Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,015.90

$1.00
Treasury Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,023.00

$1.00
Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return before expenses):






Government Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,023.80

$1.00
Government Obligations Tax-Managed Fund

$1,000

$1,023.80

$1.00
Municipal Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,023.90

$0.90
Prime Cash Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,023.90

$0.90
Prime Management Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,024.00

$0.80
Prime Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,023.80

$1.00
Prime Value Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,023.95

$0.85
Tax-Free Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,023.80

$1.00
Treasury Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,023.80

$1.00

1 Expenses are equal to the Funds' Institutional Shares annualized net expense ratios multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The annualized net expense ratios are as follows:

Government Obligations Fund
   
0.20%
Government Obligations Tax-Managed Fund

0.20%
Municipal Obligations Fund

0.18%
Prime Cash Obligations Fund

0.18%
Prime Management Obligations Fund

0.16%
Prime Obligations Fund

0.20%
Prime Value Obligations Fund

0.17%
Tax-Free Obligations Fund

0.20%
Treasury Obligations Fund

0.20%

INSTITUTIONAL SERVICE SHARES


   
Beginning
Account Value
2/1/2006

   
Ending
Account Value
7/31/2006

   
Expenses Paid
During Period 2

Actual:
   

   

   

Government Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,022.20

$2.26
Government Obligations Tax-Managed Fund

$1,000

$1,021.80

$2.26
Municipal Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,015.10

$2.15
Prime Cash Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,022.50

$2.16
Prime Management Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,022.70

$2.06
Prime Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,022.40

$2.26
Prime Value Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,022.70

$2.11
Tax-Free Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,014.60

$2.25
Treasury Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,021.70

$2.26
Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return before expenses):






Government Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,022.56

$2.26
Government Obligations Tax-Managed Fund

$1,000

$1,022.56

$2.26
Municipal Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,022.66

$2.16
Prime Cash Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,022.66

$2.16
Prime Management Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,022.76

$2.06
Prime Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,022.56

$2.26
Prime Value Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,022.71

$2.11
Tax-Free Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,022.56

$2.26
Treasury Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,022.56

$2.26

2 Expenses are equal to the Funds' Institutional Service Shares annualized net expense ratios multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The annualized net expense ratios are as follows:

Government Obligations Fund
   
0.45%
Government Obligations Tax-Managed Fund

0.45%
Municipal Obligations Fund

0.43%
Prime Cash Obligations Fund

0.43%
Prime Management Obligations Fund

0.41%
Prime Obligations Fund

0.45%
Prime Value Obligations Fund

0.42%
Tax-Free Obligations Fund

0.45%
Treasury Obligations Fund

0.45%

Government Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:





   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Repurchase Agreements

77.3%
U.S. Government Agency Securities

22.6%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

0.1%
   TOTAL

100.0%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:



   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

63.4%
4
8-30 Days

20.0%

31-90 Days

8.9%

91-180 Days

3.0%

181 Days or more

4.6%

Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

0.1%

   TOTAL

100.0%

1 See the Fund's Prospectus for a description of the principal types of securities in which the Fund invests.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

4 Overnight securities comprised 56.6% of the Fund's portfolio.

Government Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES--22.6%
$ 325,000,000 1 Federal Home Loan Bank System Floating Rate Notes, 5.039% - 5.340%, 8/2/2006 - 10/4/2006
$ 324,920,662
220,435,000 Federal Home Loan Bank System Notes, 2.625% - 6.500%, 8/11/2006 - 6/21/2007
220,255,625
299,500,000 2 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Discount Notes, 4.190% - 5.005%, 9/29/2006 - 5/1/2007
291,983,768
537,000,000 1 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Floating Rate Notes, 5.010% - 5.350%, 8/7/2006 - 9/27/2006
536,820,385
320,500,000 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Notes, 2.375% - 5.500%, 8/11/2006 - 7/9/2007
319,382,322
185,000,000 1 Federal National Mortgage Association Floating Rate Notes, 5.330%, 9/28/2006
184,861,287
84,500,000 Federal National Mortgage Association Notes, 3.875% - 4.840%, 5/15/2007 - 6/22/2007
83,715,703
436,580,500 1 Housing and Urban Development Floating Rate Notes, 5.708%, 8/1/2006


436,580,500
   TOTAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES


2,398,520,252
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--77.3%
195,000,000 3 Interest in $500,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.3225%, dated 7/27/2006, under which Banc of America Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 7/25/2036 for $507,096,667 on 10/31/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $512,990,020.
195,000,000
413,000,000 3 Interest in $900,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.28%, dated 7/11/2006, under which Banc of America Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/15/2036 for $903,960,000 on 8/10/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $926,698,636.
413,000,000
319,343,000 Interest in $3,200,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Bank of America N.A. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/1/2035 for $3,200,470,222 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $3,264,000,000.
319,343,000
319,420,000 Interest in $1,350,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Barclays Capital, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 2/22/2013 for $1,350,198,375 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,377,000,216.
319,420,000
350,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.30%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Barclays Capital, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 12/16/2015 for $350,051,528 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $357,000,824.
350,000,000
629,000,000 Interest in $2,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Bear Stearns & Co., Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 12/16/2040 for $2,000,293,889 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $2,060,002,709.
629,000,000
81,250,000 Interest in $2,323,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006, under which BNP Paribas Securities Corp. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2036 for $2,323,338,771 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $2,369,460,967.
81,250,000
600,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 11/23/2035 for $600,088,167 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $612,000,361.
600,000,000
450,000,000 Interest in $900,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Countrywide Securities Corp. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/1/2036 for $900,132,250 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $923,148,491.
450,000,000
400,000,000 3 Interest in $900,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.28%, dated 7/14/2006, under which Credit Suisse First Boston LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/16/2043 for $903,036,000 on 8/9/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $927,003,994.
400,000,000
497,165,000 Interest in $2,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Credit Suisse First Boston LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 12/16/2045 for $2,000,293,889 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $2,060,005,868.
497,165,000
172,000,000 3 Interest in $750,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.31%, dated 6/20/2006, under which Credit Suisse First Boston LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/16/2043 for $757,522,500 on 8/28/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $772,503,322.
172,000,000
722,000,000 3 Interest in $1,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.28%, dated 7/5/2006, under which Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 11/15/2046 for $1,004,986,667 on 8/8/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,023,758,060.
722,000,000
804,420,000 Interest in $1,700,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/1/2036 for $1,700,249,806 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,747,724,257.
804,420,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--continued
$ 20,000,000 3 Interest in $375,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.31%, dated 6/20/2006, under which Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/1/2036 for $378,982,500 on 8/31/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $385,895,608.
$ 20,000,000
25,000,000 3 Interest in $50,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.31%, dated 7/5/2006, under which Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein will repurchase a U.S. Government Agency security maturing on 5/15/2033 for $50,206,500 on 8/2/2006. The market value of the underlying security at the end of the period was $51,860,327.
25,000,000
150,000,000 Interest in $300,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.27%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Goldman Sachs & Co. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/30/2023 for $300,043,917 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $306,045,400.
150,000,000
500,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.30%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/25/2036 for $500,073,611 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $515,003,511.
500,000,000
500,000,000 Interest in $1,500,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which HSBC Securities (USA), Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities and a U.S. Treasury security with various maturities to 8/1/2036 for $1,500,220,417 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,531,931,063.
500,000,000
168,000,000 Interest in $238,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.10%, dated 7/31/2006, under which J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 10/31/2006 for $238,033,717 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $242,764,447.
168,000,000
300,000,000 Interest in $2,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Morgan Stanley & Co. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 7/15/2013 for $2,000,291,667 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $2,045,228,487.
300,000,000
25,000,000 Interest in $100,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.20%, dated 7/31/2006, under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 4/1/2036 for $100,014,444 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $102,000,893.
25,000,000
250,000,000 3 Interest in $750,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.31%, dated 6/21/2006, under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 7/25/2036 for $757,522,500 on 8/28/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $777,061,107.
250,000,000
300,000,000 Interest in $500,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.30%, dated 7/31/2006, under which WAMU Capital Corp. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 7/20/2036 for $500,073,611 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $510,035,110.


300,000,000
   TOTAL REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS


8,190,598,000
   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--99.9%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 4



10,589,118,252
   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--0.1%


5,668,166
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
10,594,786,418

1 Floating rate note with current rate and next reset date shown.

2 Discount rate at the time of purchase.

3 Although the repurchase date is more than seven days after the date of purchase, the Fund has the right to terminate the repurchase agreement at any time with seven-days' notice.

4 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Government Obligations Tax-Managed Fund
Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:





   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

U.S. Government Agency Securities

100.1
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(0.1
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:



   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

19.8
%
8-30 Days

49.9
%
31-90 Days

24.7
%
91-180 Days

1.8
%
181 Days or more

3.9
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(0.1
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

1 See the Fund's Prospectus for a description of the principal types of securities in which the Fund invests.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

Government Obligations Tax-Managed Fund
Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

GOVERNMENT AGENCIES--100.1%
$ 265,000,000 1 Federal Farm Credit System Discount Notes, 5.100% - 5.150%, 8/2/2006 - 8/10/2006
$ 264,876,601
809,315,000 2 Federal Farm Credit System Floating Rate Notes, 5.206% - 5.376%, 8/1/2006 - 10/13/2006
809,219,267
11,085,000 Federal Farm Credit System Notes, 2.375% - 3.750%, 10/2/2006 - 10/20/2006
11,043,576
1,933,000,000 1 Federal Home Loan Bank System Discount Notes, 4.935% - 5.309%, 8/1/2006 - 10/18/2006
1,927,092,025
220,000,000 2 Federal Home Loan Bank System Floating Rate Notes, 5.039% - 5.380%, 8/2/2006 - 10/10/2006
219,942,016
337,950,000 Federal Home Loan Bank System Notes, 2.375% - 7.625%, 8/15/2006 - 7/13/2007


336,995,725

   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--100.1%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 3



3,569,169,210

   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--(0.1)%


(2,196,433
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
3,566,972,777

1 Discount rate at time of purchase.

2 Floating rate note with current rate and next reset date shown.

3 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Municipal Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:


   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Variable Rate Instruments

96.9
%
Municipal Bonds/Notes

8.3
%
Commercial Paper

2.4
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(7.6
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

At July 31, 2006, the fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:

   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 days

97.7
%
8-30 days

0.7
%
31-90 days

2.9
%
91-180 days

2.9
%
181 days or more

3.4
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(7.6
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

1 See the Fund's Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information for a description of these investments.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

Municipal Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--107.6% 1,2
Alabama--1.7%
$ 4,500,000 Alabama HFA MFH, (Series 2002A: Sterling Pointe Apartments) Weekly VRDNs (Oxford Pointe LP)/(Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
$ 4,500,000
8,020,000 Alabama HFA MFH, (Series 2003A) Weekly VRDNs (Lakeshore Crossing Apartments Ltd.)/(Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
8,020,000
4,230,000 Alabama HFA MFH, (Series 2004A: Phoenix Apartments) Weekly VRDNs (Phoenix Arts LLC)/(Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.800%, 8/3/2006
4,230,000
1,615,000 Calhoun County, AL Economic Development Council Weekly VRDNs (Fabarc Steel Co.)/(Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.870%, 8/2/2006
1,615,000
17,000,000 Decatur, AL IDB, (Series 2003-A) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Steel Decatur LLC)/(Nucor Corp. GTD), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
17,000,000
3,725,000 East Central, AL Solid Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 2003: Three Corners) Weekly VRDNs (Waste Management, Inc.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
3,725,000
27,400,000 Health Care Authority for Baptist Health, AL, (Series 2006-A2) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.630%, 8/2/2006
27,400,000
8,000,000 Jefferson County, AL Sewer System, (Series 2003 B-4-Warrants) Weekly VRDNs (XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
8,000,000
4,175,000 Mobile, AL Solid Waste Authority, (Series 2003: Chastang) Weekly VRDNs (Waste Management, Inc.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
4,175,000
6,600,000 Tuscaloosa County, AL IDA, (1995 Series A) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.730%, 8/2/2006


6,600,000

   TOTAL


85,265,000

Alaska--0.9%
1,410,000 3,4 Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority, (MT-129) Weekly VRDNs (Delong Mountain Transportation System)/ (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
1,410,000
3,750,000 3,4 Alaska International Airports System, MERLOTS (Series 1999I) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
3,750,000
9,500,000 3,4 Alaska State Housing Finance Corp., PUTTERs (Series 1398) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
9,500,000
24,500,000 Valdez, AK Marine Terminal, (Series 1994A), 3.68% TOBs (Phillips Transportation Alaska, Inc.)/(ConocoPhillips GTD), Optional Tender 6/1/2007
24,500,000
6,015,000 Valdez, AK Marine Terminal, (Series 1994B), 3.68% TOBs (Phillips Transportation Alaska, Inc.)/(ConocoPhillips GTD), Optional Tender 6/1/2007


6,015,000

   TOTAL


45,175,000

Arizona--0.1%
1,500,000 Coconino County, AZ Pollution Control Corp., (Series 1998) Daily VRDNs (Arizona Public Service Co.)/(KBC Bank N.V. LOC), 3.710%, 8/1/2006
1,500,000
1,000,000 Tucson, AZ IDA, MFH Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (Quality Apartment Living LLC)/(FNMA LOC), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
1,000,000
650,000 Yavapai, AZ IDA, (Series 1997B) Weekly VRDNs (Yavapai Regional Medical Center)/(FSA INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.640%, 8/3/2006


650,000

   TOTAL


3,150,000

Arkansas--1.6%
1,000,000 Arkadelphia, AR, IDRBs Bonds (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (Siplast, Inc.)/(Danske Bank A/S LOC), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
1,000,000
5,130,000 Arkansas Development Finance Authority, (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Paco Steel & Engineering Corp.)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
5,130,000
16,800,000 Blytheville, AR, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
16,800,000
34,400,000 Blytheville, AR, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.760%, 8/2/2006
34,400,000
8,000,000 Crossett, AR, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Bemis Co., Inc.), 3.950%, 8/3/2006
8,000,000
7,500,000 Osceola, AR, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2006) Weekly VRDNs (Plum Point Energy Associates LLC)/(Credit Suisse, Zurich LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
7,500,000
7,100,000 Siloam Springs, AR, IDRB (Series 1994) Weekly VRDNs (La-Z Boy Chair Co.)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006


7,100,000

   TOTAL


79,930,000

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
California--5.1%
$ 1,700,000 California PCFA, (Series 1995A) Weekly VRDNs (Athens Disposal Co., Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
$ 1,700,000
2,325,000 California PCFA, (Series 1995A) Weekly VRDNs (Contra Costa Waste Service, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
2,325,000
1,245,000 California PCFA, (Series 1997A) Weekly VRDNs (West Valley MRF LLC)/(Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
1,245,000
1,400,000 California PCFA, (Series 1997B) Weekly VRDNs (Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
1,400,000
910,000 California PCFA, (Series 1998A) Weekly VRDNs (Santa Clara Valley Industries LLC)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
910,000
2,400,000 California PCFA, (Series 1999A) Weekly VRDNs (Atlas Disposal Industries LLC)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
2,400,000
2,145,000 California PCFA, (Series 1999A) Weekly VRDNs (BLT Enterprises of Sacramento, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
2,145,000
4,140,000 California PCFA, (Series 1999A) Weekly VRDNs (Blue Line Transfer, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
4,140,000
1,880,000 California PCFA, (Series 1999B) Weekly VRDNs (GreenWaste Recovery, Inc.)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
1,880,000
4,705,000 California PCFA, (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
4,705,000
4,475,000 California PCFA, (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (Sunset Waste Paper, Inc.)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
4,475,000
1,700,000 California PCFA, (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (West Valley MRF LLC)/(Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
1,700,000
1,550,000 California PCFA, (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Bos Farms)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
1,550,000
3,400,000 California PCFA, (Series 2001A) Weekly VRDNs (Athens Services)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
3,400,000
5,000,000 California PCFA, (Series 2001A) Weekly VRDNs (Western Sky Dairy)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
2,705,000 California PCFA, (Series 2001A: GreenTeam of San Jose) Weekly VRDNs (Waste Connections of California, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
2,705,000
2,000,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Bidart Dairy II LLC)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
4,295,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (MarBorg Industries)/(CALSTRS (California State Teachers' Retirement System) LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
4,295,000
9,900,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
9,900,000
3,365,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (California Waste Solutions, Inc.)/(CALSTRS (California State Teachers' Retirement System) LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
3,365,000
4,000,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (Norcal Waste Systems, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
4,000,000
2,600,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (SANCO Services LP)/(Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
2,600,000
4,615,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (South Lake Refuse Co. LLC)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
4,615,000
2,825,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (Sunset Waste Paper, Inc.)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
2,825,000
2,900,000 California PCFA, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (Agrifab, Inc. / Vintage Dairy)/(CALSTRS (California State Teachers' Retirement System) LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
2,900,000
4,400,000 California PCFA, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (B & B Dairy, LLC)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
4,400,000
2,000,000 California PCFA, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (C.A. and E.J. Vanderham Family Trust)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
2,510,000 California PCFA, (Series 2003A) Weekly VRDNs (Mill Valley Refuse Service, Inc.)/(CALSTRS (California State Teachers' Retirement System) LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
2,510,000
4,000,000 California PCFA, (Series 2003A) Weekly VRDNs (Norcal Waste Systems, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
4,000,000
5,035,000 California PCFA, (Series 2003A) Weekly VRDNs (Placer County Eastern Regional Sanitary Landfill, Inc.)/(CALSTRS (California State Teachers' Retirement System) LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
5,035,000
9,000,000 3,4 California PCFA, (Series 2004 F11J) Weekly VRDNs (Waste Management, Inc.)/(Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. SWP), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
9,000,000
2,000,000 California PCFA, (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (A & M Farms)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
2,780,000 California PCFA, (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Ag Resources III, LLC)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
2,780,000
3,965,000 California PCFA, (Series 2004A) Weekly VRDNs (Burrtec Waste Group, Inc.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
3,965,000
5,570,000 California PCFA, (Series 2004A) Weekly VRDNs (MarBorg Industries)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
5,570,000
7,280,000 California PCFA, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (BLT Enterprises of Fremont, LLC)/(Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
7,280,000
4,905,000 California PCFA, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (Napa Recycling & Waste Services LLC)/(Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
4,905,000
3,170,000 California PCFA, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (Sunset Waste Paper, Inc.)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
3,170,000
11,200,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Athens Services)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
11,200,000
9,215,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Burrtec Waste & Recycling Services LLC)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
9,215,000
12,300,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Burrtec Waste Group, Inc.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
12,300,000
3,920,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (CR&R, Inc.)/(Bank of the West, San Francisco, CA LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
3,920,000
4,225,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Evergreen Oil, Inc.)/(Bank of the West, San Francisco, CA LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
4,225,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
California--continued
$ 3,075,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (GreenWaste Recovery, Inc.)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
$ 3,075,000
3,235,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (MarBorg Industries)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
3,235,000
4,115,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Marin Sanitary Service)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
4,115,000
1,345,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Pena's Disposal, Inc.)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
1,345,000
2,240,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006B) Weekly VRDNs (Desert Properties LLC)/(Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
2,240,000
7,000,000 3,4 California State, Veterans Bonds ROCs (Series 438CE) Weekly VRDNs (Citibank NA, New York LIQ)/(Citibank NA, New York LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
7,000,000
2,500,000 3,4 California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (PT-2001) Weekly VRDNs (Vista Montana Apartments)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
2,500,000
2,515,000 California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Series 1996-H) Weekly VRDNs (Levecke LLC)/(Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.770%, 8/2/2006
2,515,000
25,000,000 California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Series 2004M) Weekly VRDNs (Kaiser Permanente), 3.580%, 8/2/2006
25,000,000
5,000,000 California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Series 2006) Weekly VRDNs (Gateway Circle LLC)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
11,500,000 3,4 GS Pool Trust Series 2006-24TP Weekly VRDNs (IXIS Financial Products Inc. INS)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
11,500,000
435,000 Los Angeles County, CA IDA, (Series 1991) Weekly VRDNs (Caitec Garment Processing. Inc.)/(Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.770%, 8/2/2006
435,000
9,200,000 Santa Clara County, CA Housing Authority, (Series 2005B: Timberwood Apartments) Weekly VRDNs (MP Timberwood Associates)/ (Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006


9,200,000

   TOTAL


252,815,000

Colorado--2.2%
59,975,000 3,4 Denver Urban Renewal Authority, Stapleton Tax Increment Revenue (Series 2004 FR/RI-F7J) Weekly VRDNs (Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. SWP), 3.750%, 8/2/2006
59,975,000
5,500,000 3,4 Denver, CO City & County Airport Authority, (PT-782) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
5,500,000
29,500,000 Denver, CO City & County Airport Authority, (Series 2004A) Weekly VRDNs (CDC IXIS Financial Guaranty N.A. INS)/(Bayerische Landesbank (Guaranteed) LIQ), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
29,500,000
14,660,000 3,4 Denver, CO City & County Airport Authority, Merlot (Series 1997E) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006


14,660,000

   TOTAL


109,635,000

Connecticut--0.5%
1,700,000 Connecticut Development Authority Health Care Revenue, (Series 1993A) Weekly VRDNs (Corporation for Independent Living)/(Dexia Credit Local LOC), 3.610%, 8/2/2006
1,700,000
700,000 Connecticut Development Authority Health Care Revenue, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Corporation for Independent Living)/(Dexia Credit Local LOC), 3.610%, 8/2/2006
700,000
1,575,000 Connecticut State, Second Lien Special Tax Obligation Refunding Bonds, Transportation Infrastructure Purposes (2003 Series 1) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(WestLB AG (Guaranteed) LIQ), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
1,575,000
3,000,000 New Britain, CT, 5.00% BANs, 4/5/2007
3,027,034
10,000,000 New Haven, CT, 4.50% BANs, 2/15/2007
10,036,705
9,000,000 North Haven, CT, 5.00% BANs, 1/23/2007


9,056,399

   TOTAL


26,095,138

District of Columbia--0.9%
31,000,000 3,4 District of Columbia HFA, (Series 2005 BNY5) Weekly VRDNs (Trinity Plus Funding Co. LLC)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
31,000,000
9,644,000 3,4 District of Columbia HFA, (Series 2005 BNY6) Weekly VRDNs (Trinity Plus Funding Co. LLC)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
9,644,000
4,100,000 District of Columbia, Enterprise Zone Revenue Bonds (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (NJA Hotel LLC)/(Bank of Scotland, Edinburgh LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006


4,100,000

   TOTAL


44,744,000

Florida--2.8%
9,000,000 Alachua County, FL, IDRB's (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Florida Rock Industries, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
9,000,000
9,345,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Florida-AMT)/(Series 2005-17) Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.760%, 8/3/2006
9,345,000
2,700,000 Coconut Creek, FL, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Elite Aluminum Corp.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
2,700,000
6,500,000 Greater Orlando, FL Aviation Authority Weekly VRDNs (Cessna Aircraft Co.)/(Textron Inc. GTD), 4.740%, 8/2/2006
6,500,000
7,835,000 3,4 Hillsborough County, FL Aviation Authority, (MT-126), 3.50% TOBs (Tampa International Airport)/(AMBAC INS)/(Svenska Handelsbanken, Stockholm LIQ), Optional Tender 2/8/2007
7,835,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Florida--continued
$ 11,280,000 3,4 Hillsborough County, FL Port District, MT-101, 3.53% TOBs (Tampa, FL Port Authority)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen (Guaranteed) LIQ), Optional Tender 2/15/2007
$ 11,280,000
190,000 Miami, FL Health Facilities Authority, Health Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Mercy Hospital, FL)/ (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
190,000
5,325,000 3,4 Miami-Dade County, FL Aviation, (PT-2713) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
5,325,000
8,700,000 3,4 Miami-Dade County, FL Aviation, (Rocs Series 525) Weekly VRDNs (XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/(Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
8,700,000
7,615,000 3,4 Miami-Dade County, FL HFA, (PT-1349) Weekly VRDNs (Hidden Grove Apartments)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
7,615,000
70,585,000 St. Lucie County, FL Solid Waste Disposal, (Series 2003) Daily VRDNs (Florida Power & Light Co.), 3.740%, 8/1/2006


70,585,000

   TOTAL


139,075,000

Georgia--0.8%
3,500,000 3,4 Atlanta, GA Airport General Revenue, PA 926R Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
3,500,000
6,150,000 Crisp County, GA Solid Waste Management Authority, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 4.080%, 8/3/2006
6,150,000
800,000 Fayette County, GA, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Gardner Denver Machinery, Inc.)/(National City Bank of the Midwest LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
800,000
23,650,000 3,4 Georgia State, PUTTERs (Series 493) Weekly VRDNs (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
23,650,000
3,500,000 Kennesaw, GA Development Authority, (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Lakeside Vista Apartments)/(FNMA LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
3,500,000
2,600,000 Tattnall County, GA IDA, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Rotary Corp.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006


2,600,000

   TOTAL


40,200,000

Hawaii--0.0%
185,000 3,4 Hawaii Finance and Development Corp., MERLOTS (Series 2001 A15) Weekly VRDNs (FNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006


185,000

Illinois--6.1%
3,500,000 Aurora City, IL, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Cleveland Hardware & Forging Co.)/(Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 3.830%, 8/3/2006
3,500,000
38,300,000 Chicago, IL Midway Airport, (Series 1998A) Daily VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/1/2006
38,300,000
47,550,000 Chicago, IL Midway Airport, (Series 1998B) Daily VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/1/2006
47,550,000
8,050,000 3,4 Chicago, IL O'Hare International Airport, (PA-1198) Weekly VRDNs (XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
8,050,000
1,065,000 3,4 Chicago, IL O'Hare International Airport, (PT-1993) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
1,065,000
7,000,000 3,4 Chicago, IL O'Hare International Airport, (PT-756) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
7,000,000
9,995,000 3,4 Chicago, IL O'Hare International Airport, PT-685, 3.50% TOBs (AMBAC INS)/(Svenska Handelsbanken, Stockholm LIQ), Optional Tender 2/8/2007
9,995,000
5,200,000 3,4 Chicago, IL O'Hare International Airport, ROCS (Series 239) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
5,200,000
1,340,000 Chicago, IL, (Series 1999 IDRB) Weekly VRDNs (Ade, Inc.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
1,340,000
25,000,000 Chicago, IL, (Series 2005D) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
25,000,000
10,500,000 Chicago, IL, Chicago Midway Airport Special Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 1998), 3.72% TOBs (Signature Flight Support Corp.)/(Bayerische Landesbank (GTD) LOC), Optional Tender 12/1/2006
10,500,000
12,490,000 3,4 Chicago, IL, PUTTERs (Series 1277) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
12,490,000
515,000 Galva, IL, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (John H. Best & Sons, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
515,000
3,400,000 Harvey, IL Multifamily Revenue, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Bethlehem Village)/(Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago LOC), 3.780%, 8/3/2006
3,400,000
2,190,000 Huntley, IL Industrial Development Revenue, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Colony, Inc.)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/2/2006
2,190,000
10,000,000 Illinois Development Finance Authority IDB, (Series 1994) Weekly VRDNs (St. Ignatius College Prep.)/(Northern Trust Co., Chicago, IL LOC), 3.660%, 8/2/2006
10,000,000
1,400,000 Illinois Development Finance Authority IDB, (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Evapco, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
1,400,000
5,225,000 Illinois Development Finance Authority IDB, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Lakeview Partners I LP)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.780%, 8/3/2006
5,225,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Illinois--continued
$ 2,940,000 Illinois Development Finance Authority IDB, (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (Processing Technologies, Inc.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
$ 2,940,000
3,110,000 Illinois Development Finance Authority, (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Mangel BG Investments LLC)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.760%, 8/2/2006
3,110,000
4,000,000 Illinois Finance Authority, (Series 2006) Weekly VRDNs (Reliable Materials Lyons LLC)/(Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
4,000,000
3,830,000 Illinois Health Facilities Authority, (Series 1997B) Weekly VRDNs (Advocate Health Care Network)/(Bank of America N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Northern Trust Co., Chicago, IL LIQs), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
3,830,000
28,020,000 Illinois Health Facilities Authority, (Series 2001C) Weekly VRDNs (Edward Hospital Obligated Group)/(FSA INS)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
28,020,000
28,500,000 Illinois Health Facilities Authority, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (Herman M. Finch University)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
28,500,000
40,000,000 Illinois State Weekly VRDNs (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.700%, 8/2/2006


40,000,000

   TOTAL


303,120,000

Indiana--5.1%
17,540,000 Bartholomew Consolidated School Corp., IN, 4.25% TANs, 12/29/2006
17,599,291
250,000 Clarksville, IN, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Metal Sales Manufacturing Corp.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.880%, 8/3/2006
250,000
2,338,000 Franklin, IN, Lakeview I Apartments (Series 1994) Weekly VRDNs (Pedcor Investments LP)/(Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
2,338,000
1,080,000 Huntington, IN, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (DK Enterprises LLC)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
1,080,000
8,700,000 Indiana Development Finance Authority, (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Indianapolis Museum of Art, Inc.)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
8,700,000
3,000,000 Indiana Development Finance Authority, (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Indianapolis Museum of Art, Inc.)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
3,000,000
17,410,000 Indiana Health & Educational Facility Financing Authority, (Series 2005B) Weekly VRDNs (Parkview Health System Obligated Group)/ (AMBAC INS)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006
17,410,000
3,200,000 Indiana Port Commission, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Kosmos Cement Co.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/2/2006
3,200,000
1,250,000 3,4 Indiana State HFA, MERLOTS (Series 2000-PPP) Weekly VRDNs (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
1,250,000
18,000,000 Indianapolis, IN Local Public Improvement Bond Bank, (Series 2005G-3) Weekly VRDNs (Indianapolis, IN Waterworks Department)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
18,000,000
5,135,000 3,4 Indianapolis, IN Local Public Improvement Bond Bank, PT-731 Weekly VRDNs (Indianapolis, IN Airport Authority)/(FSA INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
5,135,000
3,400,000 Indianapolis, IN, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Chip Ganassi Racing Teams)/(National City Bank, Pennsylvania LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
3,400,000
7,100,000 Indianapolis, IN, (Series 2004A) Weekly VRDNs (Nora Commons LP)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
7,100,000
5,000,000 Jasper County, IN EDA, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (T & M LP)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
4,300,000 Jasper County, IN EDA, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (T & M LP)/(Rabobank Nederland, Utrecht LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
4,300,000
6,500,000 Jasper County, IN EDA, (Series 2006) Weekly VRDNs (T & M LP)/(Rabobank Nederland, Utrecht LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
6,500,000
7,245,000 3,4 Jeffersonville, IN, (PT-1309) Weekly VRDNs (Armstrong Farms Apartments)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
7,245,000
1,450,000 Kendallville, IN, (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Rivnut Real Estate, Ltd.)/(National City Bank, Ohio LOC), 3.820%, 8/3/2006
1,450,000
9,000,000 Muncie, IN Community Schools, 4.25% TANs, 12/29/2006
9,025,187
32,600,000 Richmond, IN Hospital Authority, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (Reid Hospital & Health Care Services, Inc.)/(FSA INS)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006
32,600,000
170,000 Richmond, IN, (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (Holland Colors Americas, Inc.)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 4.030%, 8/3/2006
170,000
4,571,000 Southwest Allen County, IN Metropolitan School District, 4.00% TANs, 12/29/2006
4,579,158
7,700,000 Whiting, IN Environmental Facilities Revenue, (Series 2002) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
7,700,000
8,000,000 Whiting, IN Environmental Facilities Revenue, (Series 2002B) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
8,000,000
15,000,000 Whiting, IN Environmental Facilities Revenue, (Series 2002C) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
15,000,000
15,800,000 Whiting, IN Environmental Facilities Revenue, (Series 2003) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
15,800,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Indiana--continued
$ 47,700,000 Whiting, IN Environmental Facilities Revenue, (Series 2005) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
$ 47,700,000
2,200,000 Whitley County, IN, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Undersea Sensor Systems, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006


2,200,000

   TOTAL


255,731,636

Iowa--0.9%
12,085,000 Iowa Finance Authority, (Series 2005 A-2) Weekly VRDNs (Iowa Health System)/(FGIC INS)/(Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006
12,085,000
34,130,000 Iowa Finance Authority, (Series 2005 A-3) Weekly VRDNs (Iowa Health System)/(FGIC INS)/(Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006


34,130,000

   TOTAL


46,215,000

Kansas--0.7%
13,405,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Kansas-AMT)/(Series 2005-13) Weekly VRDNs (Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS)/ (GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
13,405,000
20,000,000 Olathe, KS, (Series A), 4.50% BANs, 6/1/2007
20,125,849
3,240,000 3,4 Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, MERLOTS (Series 2001 A-35) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006


3,240,000

   TOTAL


36,770,849

Kentucky--0.2%
4,900,000 Graves County, KY, (Series 1988) Weekly VRDNs (Seaboard Farms)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
4,900,000
740,000 Jefferson County, KY, (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Derby Industries, Inc.)/(Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 4.030%, 8/3/2006
740,000
2,292,000 Kenton County, KY, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Packaging Un-limited of Northern Kentucky, Inc.)/(National City Bank, Kentucky LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
2,292,000
1,685,000 Paris, KY Weekly VRDNs (Monessen Holdings LLC)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.790%, 8/3/2006


1,685,000

   TOTAL


9,617,000

Louisiana--1.2%
4,000,000 3,4 ABN AMRO MuniTOPS Certificates Trust (Louisiana Non-AMT)/(Series 2002-17) Weekly VRDNs (Louisiana State Gas & Fuels)/(AMBAC INS)/ (ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
4,000,000
6,604,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Louisiana-AMT)/(Series 2005-11) Weekly VRDNs (Louisiana HFA)/(GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
6,604,000
11,825,000 3,4 East Baton Rouge, LA Mortgage Finance Authority, (Series 2006 FR/RI-P2U) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.750%, 8/2/2006
11,825,000
5,000,000 Lake Charles, LA Harbor & Terminal District, (Series 1995A) Weekly VRDNs (Polycom-Huntsman, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
10,100,000 Lake Charles, LA Harbor & Terminal District, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (ConocoPhillips)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
10,100,000
9,000,000 Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
9,000,000
11,600,000 Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, (Series 2005) Daily VRDNs (Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.), 3.770%, 8/1/2006


11,600,000

   TOTAL


58,129,000

Maine--0.3%
2,025,000 Biddeford, ME Weekly VRDNs (DK Associates & Volk Packaging)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
2,025,000
8,315,000 Maine Finance Authority, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (The Jackson Laboratory)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
8,315,000
4,005,000 3,4 Maine State Housing Authority, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A108), 3.40% TOBs (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006


4,005,000

   TOTAL


14,345,000

Maryland--0.7%
2,495,000 3,4 Maryland Community Development Administration - Housing Revenue, (PA-629R) Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
2,495,000
4,330,000 3,4 Maryland Community Development Administration - Residential Revenue, (Series 2004 FR/RI-L59J) Weekly VRDNs (Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.780%, 8/2/2006
4,330,000
5,850,000 Maryland IDFA, (Series 1999), 3.72% TOBs (Signature Flight Support Corp.)/(Bayerische Landesbank (GTD) LOC), Optional Tender 12/1/2006
5,850,000
5,850,000 Maryland State Community Development Administration, (Series 1990B) Weekly VRDNs (Cherry Hill Apartment Ltd.)/(Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.710%, 8/2/2006
5,850,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Maryland--continued
$ 4,000,000 Maryland State Economic Development Corp., (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Hunter Douglas Northeast, Inc.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/2/2006
$ 4,000,000
6,925,000 Maryland State Economic Development Corp., (Series 2006) Weekly VRDNs (Santa Barbara Court LLC)/(Mercantile Safe Deposit & Trust Co., Baltimore LOC), 3.740%, 8/4/2006
6,925,000
750,000 Maryland State Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Holton-Arms School, Inc.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
750,000
5,730,000 3,4 Northeast MD Waste Disposal Authority, (PT-766) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen (GTD) LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006


5,730,000

   TOTAL


35,930,000

Massachusetts--1.6%
12,400,000 Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Consolidated Loan (Series 2006B) Daily VRDNs (Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.660%, 8/1/2006
12,400,000
18,720,000 3,4 Commonwealth of Massachusetts, PUTTERs (Series 443) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC, FSA INS) and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQs), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
18,720,000
7,000,000 Everett, MA, 4.00% BANs, 9/8/2006
7,006,928
7,500,000 3,4 Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority General Transportation System, MERLOTS (Series 2000H) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/ (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
7,500,000
10,000,000 Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Series 2004), 3.62% CP (Nantucket Electric Co.)/(Massachusetts Electric Co. GTD), Mandatory Tender 8/11/2006
10,000,000
4,500,000 Massachusetts IFA, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Parker-Hannifin Corp.)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
4,500,000
19,610,000 3,4 Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, Class A Certificates (Series 2002-208) Daily VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Bear Stearns Cos., Inc. LIQ), 3.650%, 8/1/2006


19,610,000

   TOTAL


79,736,928

Michigan--2.8%
6,000,000 3,4 Grand Rapids & Kent County, MI Joint Building Authority, (Series 2001-JPMC7) Weekly VRDNs (Kent County, MI)/(J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/2/2006
6,000,000
13,650,000 Kent Hospital Finance Authority, MI, (Series 1998B) Weekly VRDNs (Spectrum Health)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006
13,650,000
7,300,000 Michigan Higher Education Student Loan Authority, (Series X11-B) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(KBC Bank N.V. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
7,300,000
2,935,000 Michigan State Housing Development Authority, (2002 Series A) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
2,935,000
401,000 Michigan State Strategic Fund, (Series A) Weekly VRDNs (Teal Run Apartments)/(Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
401,000
25,000,000 Michigan State, (2006 Series A), 4.50% TRANs, 9/29/2006
25,048,756
68,660,000 3,4 Michigan State, GO Notes (Series 2005 FR/RI-P5) Weekly VRDNs (Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
68,660,000
12,680,000 3,4 Wayne County, MI Airport Authority, (ROCs Series 353) Weekly VRDNs (Detroit, MI Metropolitan Wayne County Airport)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
12,680,000
4,300,000 3,4 Wayne County, MI Airport Authority, GS Trust (Series 2006-32) Weekly VRDNs (Detroit, MI Metropolitan Wayne County Airport)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006


4,300,000

   TOTAL


140,974,756

Minnesota--1.8%
24,815,000 3,4 Becker, MN, (Series 2005 FR/RI-FP13) Weekly VRDNs (Northern States Power Co., MN)/(Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. SWP), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
24,815,000
17,970,000 3,4 Becker, MN, (Series 2006 FR/RI-FP1) Weekly VRDNs (Northern States Power Co., MN)/(Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. SWP), 3.970%, 8/3/2006
17,970,000
2,600,000 Coon Rapids, MN, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Assurance Mfg. Co., Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
2,600,000
6,440,000 3,4 Dakota County & Washington County MN Housing & Redevelopment Authority, MERLOTS (Series J) Weekly VRDNs (United States Treasury COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
6,440,000
3,865,000 Dakota County, MN Community Development Agency, (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (View Pointe Apartments)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/4/2006
3,865,000
1,225,000 Minneapolis, MN IDA, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Viking Materials, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
1,225,000
3,140,000 3,4 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN Metropolitan Airports Commission, (MT-117) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
3,140,000
5,220,000 3,4 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN Metropolitan Airports Commission, PT-735 Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(BNP Paribas SA LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
5,220,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Minnesota--continued
$ 8,975,000 3,4 Minnesota Public Facilities Authority, (PT-1175) Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
$ 8,975,000
1,700,000 Northfield, MN, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (Summerfield Investments LLC)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.750%, 8/4/2006
1,700,000
6,690,000 Ramsey County, MN Housing and Redevelopment Authority, (Series 2003 A) Weekly VRDNs (Gateway Apartments LP)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/4/2006
6,690,000
1,390,000 Savage, MN, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Fabcon, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
1,390,000
445,000 Springfield, MN, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Ochs Brick Co.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.940%, 8/3/2006
445,000
2,250,000 White Bear Lake, MN, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Taylor Corp.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
2,250,000
3,300,000 White Bear Lake, MN, (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Pinehurst Investments LLC)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.750%, 8/4/2006


3,300,000

   TOTAL


90,025,000

Mississippi--1.2%
10,000,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Mississippi-AMT)/(Series 2005-16) Weekly VRDNs (Mississippi Home Corp.)/(GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
2,250,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (Series 1999) VRDNs (Polks Meat Products, Inc.)/(Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.800%, 8/3/2006
2,250,000
2,420,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (TT&W Farm Products, Inc.)/(Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
2,420,000
3,495,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Silver Creek Gin Co.)/(Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
3,495,000
3,185,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Mill Creek Gin, Inc.)/(Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
3,185,000
1,400,000 3,4 Mississippi Home Corp., (PT-1446) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
1,400,000
7,500,000 Mississippi Home Corp., (Series 2004-6) Weekly VRDNs (Windsor Park Partners LP)/(FNMA LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
7,500,000
4,635,000 3,4 Mississippi Home Corp., MERLOTS (Series 2001 A8) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
4,635,000
1,890,000 3,4 Mississippi Home Corp., MERLOTS (Series YYY) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
1,890,000
6,160,000 3,4 Mississippi Home Corp., Roaring Forks (Series 2001-14) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
6,160,000
9,790,000 Mississippi Regional Housing Authority No. II, (Series 1998), 4.05% TOBs (Bradford Park Apartments)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), Mandatory Tender 10/1/2006
9,790,000
6,500,000 Mississippi Regional Housing Authority No. II, (Series 2000), 4.15% TOBs (Terrace Park Apartments)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), Mandatory Tender 5/1/2007


6,500,000

   TOTAL


59,225,000

Missouri--4.8%
31,430,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Missouri-AMT)/(Series 2005-14) Weekly VRDNs (Missouri State Housing Development Commission)/(GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
31,430,000
3,505,000 Kansas City, MO IDA, (Series 2004B) Weekly VRDNs (The Bishop Spencer Place, Inc.)/(Commerce Bank, N.A., Kansas City LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
3,505,000
47,300,000 Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Senior Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
47,300,000
20,000,000 Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Senior Series 2005B) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.700%, 8/3/2006
20,000,000
7,750,000 Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Senior Series 2005E) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
7,750,000
29,100,000 Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
29,100,000
15,000,000 Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Series 2006B) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
15,000,000
6,600,000 Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Series 2006C) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
6,600,000
6,250,000 Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Series 2006E) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
6,250,000
21,000,000 Missouri State HEFA, (Series 2005A) Daily VRDNs (St. Louis University)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.670%, 8/1/2006
21,000,000
30,435,000 Missouri State HEFA, (Series 2005C-4) Weekly VRDNs (SSM Healthcare)/(FSA INS)/(Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006
30,435,000
3,160,000 3,4 Missouri State Housing Development Commission, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A81) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
3,160,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Missouri--continued
$ 1,825,000 3,4 Missouri State Housing Development Commission, MERLOTS (Series 2001 A28) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
$ 1,825,000
16,000,000 Southwest City, MO IDA, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (Simmons Foods, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
16,000,000
1,000,000 St. Louis, MO IDA, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Cee Kay Supply)/(Commerce Bank, N.A., Kansas City LOC), 3.830%, 7/20/2006


1,000,000

   TOTAL


240,355,000

Montana--0.3%
6,900,000 3,4 Montana State Board of Housing, (Series 2004 FR/RI-L6) Weekly VRDNs (Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.780%, 8/2/2006
6,900,000
3,545,000 3,4 Montana State Board of Housing, MERLOTS (Series 2002 A19) Weekly VRDNs (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
3,545,000
4,105,000 3,4 Montana State Board of Housing, Variable Certificates (Series 2002L) Weekly VRDNs (Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006


4,105,000

   TOTAL


14,550,000

Multi State--6.7%
33,061,143 3,4 ABN AMRO Chicago Corp. 1997-1 LeaseTOPS Trust Weekly VRDNs (LaSalle Bank, N.A. LIQ)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.910%, 8/3/2006
33,061,143
21,302,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (AMT MultiState)/(Series 1999-3) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
21,302,000
49,771,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (AMT Multistate)/(Series 2002-09) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC, FGIC, FSA, MBIA Insurance Corp. INS) and State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQs), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
49,771,000
11,820,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Multistate-AMT)/(Series 2005-1) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
11,820,000
23,410,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Multistate-AMT)/(Series 2005-18) Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
23,410,000
6,799,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Multistate-AMT)/(Series 2005-19) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
6,799,000
31,050,000 3,4 GS Pool Trust (Series 2006-19TP) Weekly VRDNs (IXIS Financial Products Inc. INS)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
31,050,000
19,000,000 3,4 GS Pool Trust (Series 2006-35TP) Weekly VRDNs (IXIS Financial Products Inc. INS)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
19,000,000
6,200,000 3,4 GS Pool Trust (Series 2006-46TP) Weekly VRDNs (IXIS Financial Products Inc. INS)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
6,200,000
42,060,000 3,4 Reset Option Certificates Trust II-R (Series 8000JD) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC, FGIC, FSA, MBIA Insurance Corp. INS) and Citigroup, Inc. LIQs), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
42,060,000
55,860,000 3,4 Reset Option Certificates Trust II-R (Series 8001JJ) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC, FGIC, FSA, MBIA Insurance Corp. INS) and Citigroup, Inc. LIQs), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
55,860,000
6,140,000 3,4 Reset Option Certificates Trust II-R (Series 8002FA) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC, FGIC, FSA, MBIA Insurance Corp. INS) and Citigroup, Inc. LIQs), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
6,140,000
25,860,000 3,4 Reset Option Certificates Trust II-R (Series 8005MN) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC, FGIC, FSA, MBIA Insurance Corp. INS) and Citigroup, Inc. LIQs), 3.740%, 8/3/2006


25,860,000

   TOTAL


332,333,143

Nebraska--0.5%
3,150,000 Douglas County, NE, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (American Laboratories, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
3,150,000
1,200,000 Douglas County, NE, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Majors Plastics, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
1,200,000
7,730,000 Nebraska Investment Finance Authority, (Series 2001 E) Weekly VRDNs (Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
7,730,000
3,726,000 Nebraska Investment Finance Authority, (Series 2001 F) Weekly VRDNs (Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
3,726,000
2,000,000 Nebraska Investment Finance Authority, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (Tuls Properties LLC)/(Rabobank Nederland, Utrecht LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
5,200,000 Stanton County, NE, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.730%, 8/2/2006


5,200,000

   TOTAL


23,006,000

Nevada--4.9%
22,300,000 Clark County, NV Airport System, (Series 1993A) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Dexia Credit Local and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQs), 3.630%, 8/2/2006
22,300,000
12,500,000 Clark County, NV Industrial Development Revenue Board, (Series 2003A) Weekly VRDNs (Southwest Gas Corp.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
12,500,000
7,140,000 Clark County, NV, (Series 1997A), 3.72% TOBs (Signature Flight Support Corp.)/(Bayerische Landesbank (GTD) LOC), Optional Tender 12/1/2006
7,140,000
7,535,000 Clark County, NV, (Series 1998), 3.72% TOBs (Signature Flight Support Corp.)/(Bayerische Landesbank (GTD) LOC), Optional Tender 12/1/2006
7,535,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Nevada--continued
$ 90,000,000 Clark County, NV, Passenger Facility Charge Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2005 A-1) Weekly VRDNs (Las Vegas-McCarran International Airport)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Bayerische Landesbank (GTD) LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
$ 90,000,000
69,200,000 Clark County, NV, Passenger Facility Charge Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A-2) Weekly VRDNs (Las Vegas-McCarran International Airport)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
69,200,000
23,100,000 3,4 Nevada State, (Series 2006 SGB 64) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Societe Generale, Paris LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
23,100,000
13,000,000 3,4 Washoe County, NV Water Facilities Revenue, (Series 2004 FR/RI-F9J) Weekly VRDNs (Sierra Pacific Power Co.)/(Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. SWP), 3.800%, 8/2/2006


13,000,000

   TOTAL


244,775,000

New Hampshire--0.7%
892,000 New Hampshire Business Finance Authority, (Series A) Weekly VRDNs (Upper Valley Press)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.780%, 8/2/2006
892,000
30,000,000 New Hampshire Business Finance Authority, PCR Bonds (1990 Series A), 3.72% CP (New England Power Co.), Mandatory Tender 10/11/2006
30,000,000
1,530,000 New Hampshire Higher Educational & Health Facilities Authority, (Series 2001A) Weekly VRDNs (Dartmouth-Hitchcock Obligated Group)/ (FSA INS)/(Chase Bank USA, N.A. and Dexia Credit Local LIQs), 3.630%, 8/3/2006
1,530,000
1,175,000 3,4 New Hampshire State HFA, MERLOTS (Series 2001 A-51) Weekly VRDNs (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
1,175,000
870,000 3,4 New Hampshire State HFA, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A82) Weekly VRDNs (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006


870,000

   TOTAL


34,467,000

New Jersey--2.2%
12,689,700 Barnegat Township, NJ Board of Education, 4.50% BANs, 7/6/2007
12,763,361
4,600,000 Kearny, NJ Board of Education, 4.50% BANs, 8/2/2007
4,624,334
9,852,414 Maple Shade Township, NJ, 4.125% BANs, 1/10/2007
9,860,576
1,900,000 New Jersey EDA, (Series 1998A) Weekly VRDNs (Jewish Home at Rockleigh)/(Allied Irish Banks PLC LOC), 3.660%, 8/4/2006
1,900,000
4,000,000 New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Series 2002) Daily VRDNs (RWJ Health Care Corp. at Hamilton)/(Commerce Bank N.A., Cherry Hill, NJ LOC), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
4,000,000
12,505,000 3,4 New Jersey State Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Class A Certificates (Series 3011) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Bear Stearns & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
12,505,000
4,026,250 North Plainfield, NJ, 4.50% BANs, 6/25/2007
4,048,889
4,393,712 Sea Girt, NJ, 4.50% BANs, 5/24/2007
4,417,722
2,245,000 South Amboy, NJ, 4.00% BANs, 8/2/2006
2,245,005
5,738,550 South Plainfield, NJ, 4.00% BANs, 9/27/2006
5,746,808
8,875,000 Trenton, NJ, 4.50% BANs, 12/15/2006
8,908,862
21,554,000 Trenton, NJ, 4.50% BANs, 5/18/2007
21,676,102
2,875,000 Washington Township (Morris County), NJ, 4.50% BANs, 7/27/2007
2,891,078
3,257,100 Willingboro Township, NJ, 4.00% BANs, 8/4/2006
3,257,122
8,792,100 Willingboro Township, NJ, 4.375% BANs, 8/3/2007
8,829,642
2,967,000 Willingboro Township, NJ, 4.65% BANs, 7/19/2007


2,984,883

   TOTAL


110,659,384

New Mexico--1.7%
1,690,000 Albuquerque, NM, (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (Rose's Southwest Papers, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
1,690,000
4,485,000 Albuquerque, NM, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (El Encanto, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
4,485,000
17,576,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (New Mexico-AMT)/(Series 2005-15) Weekly VRDNs (New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority)/(GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
17,576,000
2,850,000 Los Lunas Village, NM, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Wall Colmonoy Corp.)/(LaSalle Bank Midwest, N.A. LOC), 3.810%, 8/2/2006
2,850,000
53,806,983 New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority, (Series 2006), 4.53% TOBs (Trinity Plus Funding Co. LLC), Mandatory Tender 7/1/2007
53,806,983
1,120,000 3,4 New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority, MERLOTS (Series 2001 A9) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
1,120,000
2,770,000 3,4 New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority, MERLOTS 2001 A66, 3.40% TOBs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006
2,770,000
1,210,000 3,4 New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority, MERLOTS (Series 2000-A18), 3.40% TOBs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006


1,210,000

   TOTAL


85,507,983

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
New York--2.8%
$ 21,560,000 New York City, NY Transitional Finance Authority, New York City Recovery Bonds (2003 Series 3-G) Weekly VRDNs (Bank of New York LIQ), 3.600%, 8/2/2006
$ 21,560,000
6,800,000 New York State HFA, (2000 Series A: 300 East 39th Street) Weekly VRDNs (39th Street Associates LLC)/(FNMA LOC), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
6,800,000
2,800,000 New York State HFA, (Series 2005A: 1 East 35th Street Apartments) Weekly VRDNs (35th Street Associates LP)/(Commerce Bank N.A., Cherry Hill, NJ LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
2,800,000
4,000,000 New York State HFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Clinton Green North LLC)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
4,000,000
3,500,000 New York State HFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Clinton Green South LLC)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
3,500,000
17,000,000 New York State HFA, (Series 2006A: 250 East 60th Street Apartments) Weekly VRDNs (250 East 60th Street Associates LP)/(Commerce Bank N.A., Cherry Hill, NJ LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
17,000,000
2,300,000 New York State HFA, (Series 2006A: 385 Third Avenue Apartments) Weekly VRDNs (385 Third Avenue Associates LP)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
2,300,000
10,000,000 New York State HFA, (Series 2006A: Related-East 21st Street Housing) Weekly VRDNs (321 East 21st Street Associates LLC)/ (Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
10,000,000
18,820,000 3,4 TSASC, Inc. NY, Tobacco Settlement Asset Backed Bonds (PA-1356) Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
18,820,000
34,335,000 Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, NY, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.600%, 8/2/2006
34,335,000
19,680,000 3,4 Westchester County, NY IDA, (MT-257) Weekly VRDNs (Ardsley Housing Associates LLC)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006


19,680,000

   TOTAL


140,795,000

North Carolina--4.7%
6,600,000 Cabarrus County, NC Industrial Facilities and Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (S & D Coffee, Inc.)/ (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
6,600,000
2,840,000 3,4 Charlotte, NC Airport, (PT-719) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(BNP Paribas SA LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
2,840,000
2,000,000 Hertford County, NC Industrial Facilities & Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.760%, 8/2/2006
2,000,000
17,500,000 Hertford County, NC Industrial Facilities & Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Series 2000B) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
17,500,000
395,000 Johnson County, NC Industrial Facilities & Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Walthom Group)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.760%, 8/4/2006
395,000
3,200,000 Mecklenberg County, NC Industrial Facilities & PCFA Industrial Development, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Ehren-Haus Industries, Inc.)/ (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.760%, 8/3/2006
3,200,000
6,700,000 Montgomery County, NC Industrial Facilities and Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Series 2000) Daily VRDNs (Republic Services, Inc.)/ (SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.740%, 8/1/2006
6,700,000
615,000 North Carolina Capital Facilities Finance Agency, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Goodwill Community Foundation)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.630%, 8/3/2006
615,000
7,000,000 North Carolina Capital Facilities Finance Agency, (Series 2004) Daily VRDNs (Republic Services, Inc.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.740%, 8/1/2006
7,000,000
54,855,000 North Carolina Education Assistance Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Series 20005-A1) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
54,855,000
11,250,000 North Carolina Education Assistance Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A-2) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Branch Banking & Trust Co., Winston-Salem LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
11,250,000
21,445,000 North Carolina Education Assistance Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A-3) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
21,445,000
1,150,000 3,4 North Carolina HFA, MERLOTS (Series 2000 A37) Weekly VRDNs (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
1,150,000
3,700,000 3,4 North Carolina HFA, MERLOTS (Series B12) Weekly VRDNs (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
3,700,000
13,800,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Series 2001B) Weekly VRDNs (Moses H. Cone Memorial), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
13,800,000
16,840,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina)/(AMBAC INS)/ (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006
16,840,000
9,000,000 Raleigh & Durham, NC Airport Authority, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Raleigh-Durham Airport)/(XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/ (SunTrust Bank LIQ), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
9,000,000
12,600,000 Raleigh & Durham, NC Airport Authority, (Series 2006B) Weekly VRDNs (Raleigh-Durham Airport)/(XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/ (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
12,600,000
9,000,000 Raleigh & Durham, NC Airport Authority, (Series 2006C) Weekly VRDNs (Raleigh-Durham Airport)/(XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/ (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.710%, 8/2/2006
9,000,000
22,000,000 Raleigh & Durham, NC Airport Authority, (Series 2006D) Weekly VRDNs (Raleigh-Durham Airport)/(XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/ (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
22,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
North Carolina--continued
$ 11,100,000 Raleigh & Durham, NC Airport Authority, (Series 2006E) Weekly VRDNs (Raleigh-Durham Airport)/(XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/ (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
$ 11,100,000
35,000 Sampson County, NC Industrial Facilities and Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (DuBose Strapping, Inc.)/ (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.810%, 8/3/2006
35,000
1,300,000 Wilson County, NC PCA, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Quality Truck Bodies & Repair, Inc.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.760%, 8/3/2006


1,300,000

   TOTAL


234,925,000

Ohio--3.5%
2,150,000 Ashland, OH, 5.00% BANs, 5/24/2007
2,170,998
5,805,000 3,4 Cuyahoga County, OH, (PT-1966) Weekly VRDNs (Antioch Towers Apartments)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
5,805,000
2,000,000 Dublin, OH, IDRBs (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Witco Corp.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
1,916,000 Euclid, OH, 4.50% BANs, 5/31/2007
1,925,941
10,485,000 Hamilton County, OH, (Series 2001A) Weekly VRDNs (MLB Hilltop Health Facilities, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
10,485,000
15,000,000 Hamilton County, OH, (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Stratford Heights)/(Bank of New York and Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania LOCs), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
15,000,000
3,950,000 Hamilton, OH MFH, (Series 2003A: Knollwood Crossing II Apartments) Weekly VRDNs (Pedcor Investments-2003-LIX LP)/(Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
3,950,000
185,000 Madison County, OH, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (Madison County Hospital, Inc.)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
185,000
3,550,000 Mason, OH, 4.75% BANs, 5/24/2007
3,578,291
6,250,000 Medina County, OH, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Mack Industries, Inc.)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.780%, 8/3/2006
6,250,000
43,500,000 Ohio HFA, (Series 2005D) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
43,500,000
50,000,000 Ohio HFA, (Series I) Weekly VRDNs (Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
50,000,000
15,000,000 Ohio HFA, (Series J) Weekly VRDNs (State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
15,000,000
1,505,000 3,4 Ohio HFA, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A78) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
1,505,000
3,075,000 3,4 Ohio HFA, Variable Rate Certificates (Series 2001-I) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.760%, 8/3/2006
3,075,000
2,250,000 Ohio State Water Development Authority, (Series 1999-A) Weekly VRDNs (Ohio Edison Co.), 3.830%, 8/2/2006
2,250,000
7,000,000 Ohio State, Solid Waste Revenue Bonds (Series 1998) Daily VRDNs (BP Exploration & Oil, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.690%, 8/1/2006
7,000,000
2,870,000 Paulding County, OH, (Series B), 4.50% BANs, 2/14/2007


2,884,379

   TOTAL


176,564,609

Oklahoma--2.0%
5,650,000 Broken Arrow, OK EDA Weekly VRDNs (Blue Bell Creameries)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.880%, 8/3/2006
5,650,000
17,646,873 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Oklahoma AMT)/(Series 2004-3) Weekly VRDNs (Oklahoma HFA)/(GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
17,646,873
7,500,000 Oklahoma Development Finance Authority, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (ConocoPhillips Co.)/(ConocoPhillips GTD), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
7,500,000
6,000,000 Oklahoma Development Finance Authority, (Series 2003), 3.45% TOBs (ConocoPhillips Co.)/(ConocoPhillips GTD), Optional Tender 12/1/2006
6,000,000
33,000,000 Oklahoma Student Loan Authority, (Series 1997A) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
33,000,000
32,000,000 Oklahoma Student Loan Authority, (Series 2006A-1) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.730%, 8/2/2006


32,000,000

   TOTAL


101,796,873

Oregon--0.4%
10,000,000 Port of Morrow, OR, (Series 2001A) Weekly VRDNs (Threemile Canyon Farms LLC)/(Rabobank Nederland, Utrecht LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
10,000,000 Port of Morrow, OR, (Series 2001C) Weekly VRDNs (Threemile Canyon Farms LLC)/(Rabobank Nederland, Utrecht LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006


10,000,000

   TOTAL


20,000,000

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Pennsylvania--5.4%
$ 1,000,000 Chester County, PA IDA, (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc.)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.780%, 8/3/2006
$ 1,000,000
1,162,000 Northampton County, PA IDA, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Ultra-Poly Corp.)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
1,162,000
10,000,000 Pennsylvania EDFA, Wastewater Treatment Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2004A) Weekly VRDNs (Sunoco, Inc.), 3.785%, 8/2/2006
10,000,000
2,500,000 Pennsylvania EDFA, Wastewater Treatment Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2004B) Weekly VRDNs (Sunoco, Inc.), 3.850%, 8/2/2006
2,500,000
30,700,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Assistance Agency, (Series 1997A) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
30,700,000
24,500,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Assistance Agency, (Series 2003 A-1) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
24,500,000
10,000,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Assistance Agency, (Series 2003 A-2) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
10,000,000
16,100,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Assistance Agency, Series 2002 A) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Bayerische Landesbank (Guaranteed), Lloyds TSB Bank PLC, London, State Street Bank and Trust Co. and WestLB AG (Guaranteed) LIQs), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
16,100,000
25,000,000 Philadelphia, PA Airport System, (Series 2005B) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
25,000,000
76,485,000 Philadelphia, PA Airport System, (Series 2005C) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
76,485,000
14,000,000 Philadelphia, PA Gas Works, (Sixth Series 1998 General Ordinance) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Bank of Nova Scotia, Toronto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQs), 3.620%, 8/3/2006
14,000,000
15,500,000 Philadelphia, PA Hospitals & Higher Education Facilities Authority, (Series 2005A) Daily VRDNs (Children's Hospital of Philadelphia)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.660%, 8/1/2006
15,500,000
19,100,000 Southcentral PA, General Authority, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (Wellspan Health Obligated Group)/(AMBAC INS)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006
19,100,000
21,615,000 Southcentral PA, General Authority, (Series 2005B) Weekly VRDNs (Wellspan Health Obligated Group)/(AMBAC INS)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006


21,615,000

   TOTAL


267,662,000

Puerto Rico--0.3%
14,975,000 3,4 Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (PT-3189), 3.15% TOBs (AMBAC, CDC IXIS Financial Guaranty N.A. INS) and Dexia Credit Local LIQs), Optional Tender 10/12/2006


14,975,000

Rhode Island--0.1%
3,555,000 Rhode Island Industrial Facilities Corp., (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Interplex Industries, Inc.)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.780%, 8/3/2006
3,555,000
1,960,000 Warwick, RI Housing Authority, (Series 2001) Daily VRDNs (Trafalgar East Apartments)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/1/2006


1,960,000

   TOTAL


5,515,000

South Carolina--3.1%
29,650,000 Berkeley County, SC Exempt Facility Industrial Development, (Series 1997) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
29,650,000
22,280,000 Berkeley County, SC Exempt Facility Industrial Development, (Series 1998) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.)/(BP Amoco Corp. GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
22,280,000
21,800,000 Berkeley County, SC IDB Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
21,800,000
18,800,000 Berkeley County, SC IDB, (Series 1996A) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
18,800,000
5,600,000 Berkeley County, SC IDB, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
5,600,000
21,000,000 Berkeley County, SC IDB, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
21,000,000
10,000,000 3,4 Medical University of South Carolina Hospital Authority, AUSTIN (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
1,830,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA Weekly VRDNs (Boozer Lumber Co.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.920%, 8/4/2006
1,830,000
1,450,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA Weekly VRDNs (Lorraine Linens)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.810%, 8/4/2006
1,450,000
150,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA, (Series 1990) Weekly VRDNs (NMFO Associates)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.970%, 8/2/2006
150,000
150,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA, (Series 1990) Weekly VRDNs (Old Claussen's Bakery)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.970%, 8/2/2006
150,000
150,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA, (Series 1990) Weekly VRDNs (Rice Street Association)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.970%, 8/2/2006
150,000
2,300,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA, (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (PVC Container Corp. Project)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
2,300,000
700,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Carolina Cotton Works, Inc.)/(Branch Banking & Trust Co., Winston-Salem LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
700,000
6,000,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (Oconee Memorial Hospital, Inc.)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS)/(RBC Centura Bank LIQ), 3.700%, 8/3/2006
6,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
South Carolina--continued
$ 2,085,000 3,4 South Carolina State Housing Finance & Development Authority, ROCs (Series 398) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
$ 2,085,000
10,300,000 3,4 South Carolina State Ports Authority, Floater Certificates (Series 2006-1390X) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006


10,300,000

   TOTAL


154,245,000

South Dakota--0.1%
4,000,000 South Dakota Housing Development Authority, (2003 Series F) Weekly VRDNs (Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen (GTD) LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006


4,000,000

Tennessee--0.6%
4,850,000 Dickson, TN Health and Educational Facilities Board, Autumn Park Apartments (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Tennessee Partners XII LP)/ (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.800%, 8/3/2006
4,850,000
1,500,000 Dover, TN IDB, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Nashville Wire Products Manufacturing Co.)/(Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 3.910%, 8/3/2006
1,500,000
1,950,000 Hamilton County, TN IDB Weekly VRDNs (Pavestone Co.)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.880%, 8/3/2006
1,950,000
3,000,000 Jackson, TN IDB, Solid Waste Facility Bonds (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Florida Steel Corp.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
3,000,000
9,400,000 Shelby County, TN Health Education & Housing Facilities Board, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (FSP-Wyndridge III LLC)/(FHLMC LOC), 3.700%, 8/3/2006
9,400,000
200,000 South Pittsburg, TN IDB, (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (Lodge Manufacturing Co.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
200,000
845,000 Tullahoma, TN IDB, (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Rock-Tenn Converting Co.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
845,000
7,000,000 Wilson County, TN Health and Educational Facilities Board, Forest View Apartments (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (Forest View LP)/ (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006


7,000,000

   TOTAL


28,745,000

Texas--15.7%
8,830,000 3,4 Alliance Airport Authority Inc., TX, GS Trust (Series 2006-2G) Weekly VRDNs (FedEx Corp.)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. GTD)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
8,830,000
14,800,000 3,4 Austin, TX Housing Finance Corp., (PT-1348) Weekly VRDNs (Blunn Creek Apartments)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
14,800,000
4,965,000 3,4 Bexar County, TX Housing Finance Corp., PT-2596 Weekly VRDNs (Rosemont Apartments)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(WestLB AG (Guaranteed) LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
4,965,000
2,000,000 Brazos River Authority, TX, (Series 2001 D-1) Weekly VRDNs (TXU Energy Co. LLC)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
2,000,000
14,700,000 Brazos River Authority, TX, (Series 2001 D-2) Weekly VRDNs (TXU Energy Co. LLC)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
14,700,000
35,500,000 Brazos River Authority, TX, (Series 2001A) Weekly VRDNs (TXU Energy Co. LLC)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
35,500,000
26,500,000 Calhoun County, TX Navigation District Environmental Facilities, (Series 2006) Weekly VRDNs (Formosa Plastic Corp.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
26,500,000
930,000 College Station, TX, 6.375% Bonds (CDC IXIS Financial Guaranty N.A. INS), 2/15/2007
942,314
805,000 College Station, TX, 6.375% Bonds (CDC IXIS Financial Guaranty N.A. INS), 2/15/2007
815,659
5,340,000 Colorado County, TX IDC, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Great Southern Wood, Inc.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.780%, 8/2/2006
5,340,000
2,100,000 Dalhart, TX Economic Development Corp., (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (DARE Investments)/(Rabobank Nederland, Utrecht LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
2,100,000
2,950,000 Dalhart, TX Economic Development Corp., (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (Northside Farms LLC)/(Rabobank Nederland, Utrecht LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
2,950,000
14,575,000 3,4 Dallas, TX Housing Finance Corp., PT-2599 Weekly VRDNs (Southern Oaks Housing)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(WestLB AG (Guaranteed) LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
14,575,000
9,000,000 3,4 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX International Airport, (PA-1061) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
9,000,000
2,870,000 3,4 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX International Airport, MERLOTS (Series 2002-A13) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
2,870,000
3,915,000 3,4 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX International Airport, PT-738 Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
3,915,000
4,995,000 3,4 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX International Airport, PUTTERs (Series 354) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
4,995,000
7,150,000 3,4 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX International Airport, PUTTERs (Series 350) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
7,150,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Texas--continued
$ 3,000,000 3,4 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX International Airport, ROCs (Series 268) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
$ 3,000,000
21,370,000 3,4 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX International Airport, Roaring Forks (Series 2003-4) Weekly VRDNs (FSA, MBIA Insurance Corp. INS) and Bank of New York LIQs), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
21,370,000
9,400,000 DeSoto, TX Housing Finance Corp., (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Hickory Manor Senior Apartments)/(FHLMC LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
9,400,000
7,500,000 East Texas Housing Finance Corp., (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (The Park at Shiloh Apartments)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
7,500,000
3,350,000 Gulf Coast, TX IDA, (Series 1999) Daily VRDNs (CITGO Petroleum Corp.)/(BNP Paribas SA LOC), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
3,350,000
25,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX IDA, (Series 2001) Daily VRDNs (CITGO Petroleum Corp.)/(Bank of New York LOC), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
25,000,000
18,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX IDA, Marine Terminal Revenue Bonds (Series 1993) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
18,000,000
35,900,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
35,900,000
6,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 1993) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
6,000,000
23,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 1994) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
23,000,000
25,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 1996) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
25,000,000
24,900,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 1997) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
24,900,000
13,500,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 1998) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
13,500,000
20,800,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 2001) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
20,800,000
21,500,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 2002) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
21,500,000
25,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 2003) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
25,000,000
24,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 2004) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
24,000,000
19,600,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 2005) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
19,600,000
6,300,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
6,300,000
7,800,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
7,800,000
7,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Air Products LP)/ (Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. GTD), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
7,000,000
12,500,000 Harris County, TX HFDC, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (Baylor College of Medicine)/(AMBAC INS)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006
12,500,000
32,000,000 Harris County, TX HFDC, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital)/(FGIC INS)/(Citibank NA, New York and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQs), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
32,000,000
5,600,000 Harris County, TX HFDC, (Series 2006) Daily VRDNs (Texas Medical Center)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.660%, 8/1/2006
5,600,000
2,000,000 Harris County, TX Housing Finance Corp., Park at Kirkstall Apartments (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Harris Park Partners LP)/ (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
9,570,000 3,4 Houston, TX Airport System, (MERLOTS Series 2001-B4) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
9,570,000
45,200,000 Houston, TX Airport System, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
45,200,000
6,930,000 3,4 Houston, TX Airport System, Floater Certificates (Series 2006-1382X) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
6,930,000
15,000,000 Houston, TX, (Series F), 3.70% CP, Mandatory Tender 8/17/2006
15,000,000
3,500,000 Lower Neches Valley Authority, TX, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (Onyx Environmental Services LLC)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
3,500,000
5,000,000 North Texas Tollway Authority, Variable Rate Revenue Bonds (Series 2005C) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
5,000,000
15,000,000 Port Arthur Navigation District, TX IDC, (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
15,000,000
4,995,000 3,4 Port of Houston, TX, Roaring Forks (Series 2005-24) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
4,995,000
2,845,000 Saginaw, TX IDA, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Glad Investing Partners Ltd.)/(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.880%, 8/3/2006
2,845,000
10,120,000 3,4 San Antonio, TX Electric & Gas System, MERLOTS (Series 2002-A53), 3.385% TOBs (FSA INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 1/24/2007
10,120,000
7,000,000 3,4 San Antonio, TX Independent School District, (PT-1184) Weekly VRDNs (Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
7,000,000
10,000,000 3,4 Texas State Department of Housing & Community Affairs, (PA-1308) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Texas--continued
$ 3,000,000 3,4 Texas State Department of Housing & Community Affairs, (PT-2507) Weekly VRDNs (Ironwood Ranch Townhomes LP)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
$ 3,000,000
4,200,000 3,4 Texas State Department of Housing & Community Affairs, (Series 2005 FR/RI-L2) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.750%, 8/2/2006
4,200,000
19,985,000 Texas State Department of Housing & Community Affairs, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
19,985,000
13,400,000 Texas State Department of Housing & Community Affairs, Addison Park Apartments (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Arlington Partners LP)/ (Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
13,400,000
3,150,000 3,4 Texas State Department of Housing & Community Affairs, MERLOTS (Series 2003-A8) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
3,150,000
38,000,000 Texas State, (Series 2005), 4.50% TRANs, 8/31/2006
38,037,595
4,000,000 Waco, TX Industrial Development Corp., (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Chad A. Grief 1998 Irrevocable Trust)/(Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 3.910%, 8/3/2006
4,000,000
3,850,000 Waxahachie, TX IDA, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Rock-Tenn Converting Co.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.690%, 8/2/2006


3,850,000

   TOTAL


786,750,568

Utah--0.1%
4,000,000 West Jordan, UT, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Penco Products, Inc.)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006


4,000,000

Vermont--0.2%
5,295,000 3,4 Vermont HFA, (Series 2004 FR/RI-L76) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.750%, 8/2/2006
5,295,000
3,500,000 3,4 Vermont HFA, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A49), 3.40% TOBs (FSA INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006
3,500,000
2,730,000 3,4 Vermont HFA, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A91), 3.40% TOBs (FSA INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006


2,730,000

   TOTAL


11,525,000

Virginia--1.2%
34,300,000 Halifax, VA IDA, MMMs, PCR (Series 1992), 3.80% CP (Virginia Electric & Power Co.), Mandatory Tender 8/1/2006
34,300,000
5,000,000 3,4 Harrisonburg, VA Redevelopment & Housing Authority, (PT-485), 2.98% TOBs (Rolling Brook Village Apartments)/ (FHLMC GTD)/(FHLMC LIQ), Optional Tender 9/7/2006
5,000,000
6,500,000 3,4 Virginia Port Authority, MERLOTS (Series 1997M) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
6,500,000
12,000,000 Virginia State Housing Development Authority, (Subseries D-STEM-II), 3.80% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 11/14/2006


12,000,000

   TOTAL


57,800,000

Washington--3.3%
6,985,000 3,4 Chelan County, WA Public Utility District No. 1, (MERLOTS Series 2001-B1) Weekly VRDNs (Chelan Hydro Consolidated System)/ (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
6,985,000
4,300,000 Energy Northwest, WA, Electric Revenue Bonds (Series 2003-E: Project No. 3) Weekly VRDNs (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/2/2006
4,300,000
5,183,500 3,4 Energy Northwest, WA, Piper Certificates (Series 2002C) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
5,183,500
24,000,000 Issaquah Community Properties, WA, (Series 2001B) Weekly VRDNs (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
24,000,000
9,000,000 Pierce County, WA Economic Development Corp., (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Simpson-Tacoma Kraft Co.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
9,000,000
4,555,000 Port of Pasco, WA Economic Development Corp., (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (Douglas Fruit Co., Inc.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
4,555,000
4,995,000 3,4 Port of Seattle, WA, (PT-720) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(BNP Paribas SA LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
4,995,000
8,425,000 Port of Seattle, WA, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (Fortis Bank SA/NV LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
8,425,000
7,610,000 3,4 Port of Seattle, WA, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A53) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
7,610,000
3,950,000 3,4 Port of Seattle, WA, MERLOTS (Series 2002-B4) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
3,950,000
5,020,000 3,4 Port of Seattle, WA, MERLOTS (Series 2006-C1) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
5,020,000
4,450,000 3,4 Port of Seattle, WA, PT-728 Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(BNP Paribas SA LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
4,450,000
4,320,000 3,4 Port of Seattle, WA, PT-850, 3.13% TOBs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), Optional Tender 8/17/2006
4,320,000
2,420,000 Seattle, WA Housing Authority, (Series 2002: New Holly Project Phase III) Weekly VRDNs (Desdemona LP)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
2,420,000
11,550,000 Seattle, WA Housing Authority, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (High Point North LP)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
11,550,000
11,720,000 3,4 Spokane, WA Public Facilities District, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A111), 3.40% TOBs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006
11,720,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Washington--continued
$ 5,500,000 Washington State EDFA, (Series 2001C) Weekly VRDNs (Waste Management, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
$ 5,500,000
1,000,000 Washington State EDFA, (Series 2001L) Weekly VRDNs (Darigold, Inc./WestFarm Foods)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
1,000,000
5,200,000 Washington State EDFA, (Series 2004B) Weekly VRDNs (Cedar Grove Composting, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
5,200,000
5,000,000 Washington State EDFA, (Series 2005B) Weekly VRDNs (Harold LeMay Enterprises, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
5,000,000
5,350,000 Washington State Housing Finance Commission, (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (Alderwood Court Associates LP)/(FNMA LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
5,350,000
26,146,000 3,4 Washington State, Floater Certificates (Series 2004-1161) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.600%, 8/3/2006


26,146,000

   TOTAL


166,679,500

West Virginia--1.1%
1,045,000 Berkeley County, WV County Commission, (Series 1994) Weekly VRDNs (Brentwood Industries, Inc.)/(General Electric Capital Corp. LOC), 3.760%, 8/2/2006
1,045,000
10,000,000 Grant County, WV County Commission, PCRB (Series 1994), 3.72% CP (Virginia Electric & Power Co.), Mandatory Tender 10/11/2006
10,000,000
4,000,000 Grant County, WV County Commission, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 1996), 3.65% CP (Virginia Electric & Power Co.), Mandatory Tender 8/14/2006
4,000,000
15,800,000 Marion County, WV County Commission, (Series 1990 A) Weekly VRDNs (American Bituminous Power Partners LP)/(Deutsche Bank AG LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
15,800,000
3,300,000 Marion County, WV County Commission, (Series 1990 B) Weekly VRDNs (American Bituminous Power Partners LP)/(Deutsche Bank AG LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
3,300,000
3,760,000 Ritchie County, WV, IDRB (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (Simonton Building Products, Inc.)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.780%, 8/3/2006
3,760,000
15,800,000 West Virginia Public Energy Authority, (1989 Series A), 3.70% CP (Morgantown Energy Associates)/(Dexia Credit Local LOC), Mandatory Tender 8/4/2006


15,800,000

   TOTAL


53,705,000

Wisconsin--2.0%
9,500,000 Brokaw, WI, Sewage and Solid Waste Revenue Bonds (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Wausau Paper Mills Co.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.890%, 8/3/2006
9,500,000
4,000,000 Combined Locks, WI, Development Revenue Bonds, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Appleton Papers)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.890%, 8/3/2006
4,000,000
800,000 Grand Chute, WI, (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (Pacon Corp.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
800,000
2,075,000 Hartford, WI, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Advance Bag, Inc.)/(Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee LOC), 3.830%, 8/3/2006
2,075,000
2,300,000 Milwaukee, WI, (Series 1997), 3.72% TOBs (Signature Flight Support Corp.)/(Bayerische Landesbank (GTD) LOC), Optional Tender 12/1/2006
2,300,000
4,085,000 3,4 Wisconsin Housing & EDA, (PT-3456) Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
4,085,000
17,435,000 Wisconsin Housing & EDA, (Series 2004E) Weekly VRDNs (Lloyds TSB Bank PLC, London LIQ), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
17,435,000
30,000,000 Wisconsin Housing & EDA, (Series A) Weekly VRDNs (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
30,000,000
5,000,000 Wisconsin Housing & EDA, Home Ownership Revenue Bonds (Series 2002E) Weekly VRDNs (Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago LIQ), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
5,000,000
17,450,000 Wisconsin Housing & EDA, Home Ownership Revenue Bonds (Series 2005C) Weekly VRDNs (Lloyds TSB Bank PLC, London LIQ), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
17,450,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Wisconsin--continued
$ 4,100,000 Wisconsin Housing & EDA, Home Ownership Revenue Bonds (Series 2005C) Weekly VRDNs (Lloyds TSB Bank PLC, London LIQ), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
$ 4,100,000
2,865,000 3,4 Wisconsin Housing & EDA, ROCs (Series 397) Weekly VRDNs (Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006


2,865,000

   TOTAL


99,610,000

   TOTAL MUNICIPAL INVESTMENTS--107.6%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 5



5,371,036,367

   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--(7.6)%


(377,494,671
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
4,993,541,696

Securities that are subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) represent 70.0% of the portfolio as calculated based on total market value (percentage is unaudited).

1 The Fund may only invest in securities rated in one of the two highest short-term rating categories by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSROs) or unrated securities of comparable quality. An NRSRO's two highest rating categories are determined without regard for sub-categories and gradations. For example, securities rated SP-1+, SP-1 or SP-2 by Standard & Poor's, MIG-1 or MIG-2 by Moody's Investors Service, or F-1+, F-1 or F-2 by Fitch Ratings, are all considered rated in one of the two highest short-term rating categories. Securities rated in the highest short-term rating category (and unrated securities of comparable quality) are identified as First Tier securities. Securities rated in the second highest short-term rating category (and unrated securities of comparable quality) are identified as Second Tier securities. The Fund follows applicable regulations in determining whether a security is rated and whether a security rated by multiple NRSROs in different rating categories should be identified as a First or Second Tier security. At July 31, 2006, the portfolio securities were rated as follows:

Tier Rating Based on Total Market Value (unaudited)

First Tier
   
Second Tier
97.7%

2.3%

2 Current rate and next reset date shown for Variable Rate Demand Notes.

3 Denotes a restricted security that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) is subject to a contractual restriction on public sales. At July 31, 2006, these restricted securities amounted to $1,417,048,516, which represented 28.4% of total net assets.

4 Denotes a restricted security that may be resold without restriction to "qualified institutional buyers" as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and that the Fund has determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Fund's Board of Trustees. At July 31, 2006, these liquid restricted securities amounted to $1,417,048,516, which represented 28.4% of total net assets.

5 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

AMBAC --American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation
AMT --Alternative Minimum Tax
BANs --Bond Anticipation Notes
COL --Collateralized
CP --Commercial Paper
EDA --Economic Development Authority
EDFA --Economic Development Financing Authority
FGIC --Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FHLMC --Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
FNMA --Federal National Mortgage Association
FSA --Financial Security Assurance
GNMA --Government National Mortgage Association
GO --General Obligation
GTD --Guaranteed
HEFA --Health and Education Facilities Authority
HFA --Housing Finance Authority
HFDC --Health Facility Development Corporation
IDA --Industrial Development Authority
IDB --Industrial Development Bond
IDC --Industrial Development Corporation
IDFA --Industrial Development Finance Authority
IDRB(s) --Industrial Development Revenue Bond(s)
IFA --Industrial Finance Authority
INS --Insured
LIQ --Liquidity Agreement
LOCs --Letter(s) of Credit
MERLOTS --Municipal Exempt Receipts -- Liquidity Optional Tender Series
MFH --Multi-Family Housing
MMMs --Money Market Municipals
PCA --Pollution Control Authority
PCFA --Pollution Control Finance Authority
PCR --Pollution Control Revenue
PCRB --Pollution Control Revenue Board
PUTTERs --Puttable Tax Exempt Receipts
ROCs --Reset Option Certificates
SWP --Swap Agreement
TANs --Tax Anticipation Notes
TOBs --Tender Option Bonds
TRANs --Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes
VRDNs --Variable Rate Demand Notes

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Prime Cash Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:

Security Type
   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Variable Rate Demand Instruments

52.3%
Commercial Paper & Notes

36.6%
Bank Instruments

9.5%
Repurchase Agreements- Cash

1.4%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

0.2%
   TOTAL

100.0%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:



   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

35.0%
4
8-30 Days

36.2%

31-90 Days

21.0%

91-180 Days

0.8%

181 Days or more

6.8%

Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

0.2%

   TOTAL

100.0%

1 Commercial paper and notes include any fixed-rate security that is not a bank instrument. A variable rate instrument is any security which has an interest rate that resets periodically. See the Fund's Prospectus for a description of the principal types of securities in which the Fund invests.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

4 Overnight securities comprised 1.4% of the Fund's portfolio.

Prime Cash Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES--1.2%
Finance - Automotive--0.4%
$ 14,885,373 Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2006-1, Class A1, 4.872%, 3/15/2007
$ 14,885,373
3,358,853 1,2 DaimlerChrysler Auto Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.791%, 3/8/2007
3,358,853
1,294,473 USAA Auto Owner Trust 2005-4, Class A1, 4.400%, 12/15/2006
1,294,473
5,644,182 World Omni Automobile Receivables Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.854%, 3/15/2007


5,644,182
   TOTAL


25,182,881
Finance - Equipment--0.8%
27,430,465 CIT Equipment Collateral 2006-VT1, Class A1, 4.989%, 3/20/2007
27,430,465
5,248,121 CNH Equipment Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.989%, 4/5/2007
5,248,122
26,912,334 John Deere Owner Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 5.364%, 7/13/2007


26,912,334
   TOTAL


59,590,921
   TOTAL ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES


84,773,802
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT--9.5%
Banking--9.5%
15,000,000 Barclays Bank PLC, 4.752%, 10/17/2006
15,000,077
40,000,000 Calyon, Paris, 4.750% - 5.260%, 10/26/2006 - 4/11/2007
40,000,000
65,000,000 Citizens Bank N.A., 5.160% - 5.270%, 8/10/2006 - 9/12/2006
65,001,045
70,000,000 Citizens Bank of Massachusetts, 5.330%, 8/10/2006
70,000,000
35,000,000 Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, 5.220%, 8/28/2006
35,000,000
195,000,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 4.775% - 5.200%, 10/27/2006 - 3/29/2007
195,000,000
25,000,000 DePfa Bank PLC, 5.260%, 4/9/2007
25,000,000
13,000,000 Deutsche Bank AG, 4.500%, 10/13/2006
13,000,000
25,000,000 Dexia Bank, Belgium, 4.305%, 9/29/2006
24,980,510
10,000,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.260%, 4/11/2007
10,000,000
80,500,000 Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, Edinburgh, 4.397% - 4.755%, 10/4/2006 - 10/27/2006
80,499,809
20,000,000 Societe Generale, Paris, 4.760%, 10/27/2006
20,000,000
50,000,000 Toronto Dominion Bank, 5.160% - 5.600%, 9/5/2006 - 6/18/2007
50,000,000
50,000,000 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 5.310%, 8/10/2006


50,000,000
   TOTAL CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT


693,481,441
COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS--9.6%
Banking--0.5%
40,000,000 IXIS Financial Products Inc., 5.412%, 8/1/2006


40,000,000
Brokerage--9.1%
301,000,000 Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., 5.412%, 8/1/2006
301,000,000
300,000,000 Goldman Sachs & Co., 5.382% - 5.412%, 8/1/2006
300,000,000
59,000,000 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.442%, 8/1/2006


59,000,000
   TOTAL


660,000,000
   TOTAL COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS


700,000,000
COMMERCIAL PAPER--20.6% 3
Banking--7.6%
25,000,000 Bank of America Corp., 5.280%, 8/8/2006
24,974,333
75,000,000 1,2 Blue Spice LLC, (Deutsche Bank AG SWP), 5.330% - 5.350%, 9/20/2006 - 9/22/2006
74,436,667
35,000,000 Danske Corp., Inc., (Danske Bank A/S, GTD), 4.984%, 4/10/2007
33,778,920
41,000,000 1,2 Fountain Square Commercial Funding Corp., 5.000%, 9/5/2006
40,800,694
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
COMMERCIAL PAPER--continued 3
Banking--continued
$ 35,000,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.180%, 9/8/2006
$ 34,808,628
10,000,000 1,2 KBC Financial Products International Ltd., (KBC Bank NV GTD), 4.970%, 8/9/2006
9,988,956
100,000,000 1,2 Long Lane Master Trust IV, (Bank of America N.A. SWP), 5.280% - 5.360%, 8/7/2006 - 8/21/2006
99,807,111
235,000,000 1,2 Picaros Funding LLC, (KBC Bank NV GTD), 4.970% - 5.400%, 8/10/2006 - 2/13/2007


232,857,165
   TOTAL


551,452,474
Finance - Automotive--4.7%
171,000,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust, A1+/P1 Series, 5.070% - 5.280%, 8/8/2006 - 9/15/2006
170,574,791
175,000,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust, A1/P1 Series, 5.210% - 5.410%, 8/4/2006 - 10/16/2006


174,070,181
   TOTAL


344,644,972
Finance - Retail--4.9%
21,000,000 1,2 Chariot Funding LLC, 5.150%, 9/5/2006
20,894,854
50,000,000 1,2 Compass Securitization LLC, 5.245%, 9/15/2006
49,672,188
64,012,000 1,2 Jupiter Securitization Company LLC, 5.300%, 8/9/2006
63,936,608
100,000,000 1,2 Paradigm Funding LLC, 5.300%, 8/15/2006
99,792,722
121,966,000 1,2 Yorktown Capital LLC, 5.360%, 8/21/2006


121,602,812
   TOTAL


355,899,184
Finance - Securities--3.4%
66,000,000 1,2 Grampian Funding LLC, 5.220% - 5.370%, 9/18/2006 - 10/25/2006
65,197,490
87,000,000 1,2 KLIO II Funding Ltd., 5.230% - 5.370%, 8/22/2006 - 9/8/2006
86,664,639
97,000,000 1,2 Perry Global Funding LLC Series A, 5.180% - 5.390%, 8/9/2006 - 10/10/2006


96,694,069
   TOTAL


248,556,198
   TOTAL COMMERCIAL PAPER


1,500,552,828
CORPORATE BONDS--0.2%
Insurance--0.2%
15,000,000 AEGON NV, 8.000%, 8/15/2006


15,012,843
CORPORATE NOTES--3.8%
Finance - Securities--3.8%
106,000,000 1,2 K2 (USA) LLC, (K2 Corp. GTD), 4.800% - 5.000%, 12/6/2006 - 3/12/2007
105,998,016
172,000,000 1,2 Sigma Finance, Inc., (Sigma Finance Corp. GTD), 4.150% - 5.750%, 8/1/2006 -7/25/2007


172,000,000
   TOTAL CORPORATE NOTES


277,998,016
LOAN PARTICIPATION--0.4%
Electrical Equipment--0.4%
32,000,000 Mt. Vernon Phenol Plant Partnership, (General Electric Co. GTD), 5.390%, 5/21/2007


32,000,000
NOTES - VARIABLE--52.3% 4
Banking--27.8%
4,120,000 1700 Financial Group, Inc., Series 2002, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
4,120,000
3,955,000 4 C's LLC, (Series 1998), (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
3,955,000
4,495,000 AW Mobile LLC, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/4/2006
4,495,000
3,533,000 Aaron Oil Co., Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,533,000
3,835,000 Acton Realty Investors LLP, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,835,000
1,875,000 Alabama State IDA, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
1,875,000
2,000,000 Albuquerque, NM, Series 1997 El Canto, Inc., (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 5.490%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
1,095,000 Alder Creek Properties LLC, (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
1,095,000
2,940,000 American Custom Yachts, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,940,000
8,200,000 American Health Centers, Inc., Series 2004, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
8,200,000
7,775,000 Anchor Holdings LLC, Series 2000, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
7,775,000
3,155,000 B & H Holdings LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,155,000
2,865,000 BMW Investments, Inc., (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
2,865,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 4
Banking--continued
$ 8,915,000 Badger Mining Corp., (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
$ 8,915,000
3,899,000 Baldwin County Sewer Service LLC, Series 2003, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,899,000
274,000,000 Bank of America N.A., 5.373%, 8/1/2006
273,996,424
25,000,000 1,2 Bank of New York Co., Inc., 5.458%, 8/28/2006
25,000,000
59,000,000 Barclays Bank PLC, 5.289% - 5.343%, 8/7/2006 - 8/28/2006
58,993,058
8,315,000 Barton Healthcare LLC, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.340%, 8/2/2006
8,315,000
24,995,000 Battle Creek, MI Downtown Development Authority, Series 2004, (INS by Ambac Financial Group, Inc.), 5.340%, 8/2/2006
24,995,000
7,690,000 Bessemer, AL IDB, Series 2003, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
7,690,000
865,000 Biddle Road Corp., Series 2004, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
865,000
1,870,000 Birmingham Fastener and Supply, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
1,870,000
925,000 Bond Holdings LP, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/4/2006
925,000
3,125,000 Boyd-Plott LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,125,000
5,180,000 Briarwood LP, (Series 1999), (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
5,180,000
5,890,000 Brownsburg Christian Church, Inc., (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
5,890,000
705,000 Brumfield Properties, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
705,000
6,310,000 California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.440%, 8/1/2006
6,310,000
2,305,000 Capital Container Properties LLC, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
2,305,000
35,106,000 Capital One Funding Corp., (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
35,106,000
208,000 Capital One Funding Corp., (Series 1993-A), (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
208,000
1,663,000 Capital One Funding Corp., Series 1996-C, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
1,663,000
4,800,000 Capital One Funding Corp., Series 2001-C, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
4,800,000
1,955,000 Charles River LLC, (Harris, N.A. LOC), 5.520%, 8/3/2006
1,955,000
9,100,000 Charlotte Christian School, Series 1999, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/2/2006
9,100,000
3,350,000 Cleveland Country Club, Inc., Series 2001, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,350,000
4,100,000 Cleveland, TN IDB, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/2/2006
4,100,000
6,600,000 Coilplus-Alabama, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
6,600,000
14,490,000 Cook County, IL, Series 2002 A, 5.420%, 8/2/2006
14,490,000
27,120,000 Covington, KY Industrial Building Revenue Bond, Series 2005-A, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
27,120,000
110,000,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 5.280% - 5.470%, 9/12/2006 - 9/29/2006
110,000,000
4,500,000 DBH Properties LLC, Series 2004, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
4,500,000
5,570,000 DLR Investments, Inc., Series 2005, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.470%, 8/3/2006
5,570,000
170,000,000 1,2 DePfa Bank PLC, 5.369%, 9/15/2006
170,000,000
4,020,000 Duncan Machinery Movers Inc., (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
4,020,000
1,855,000 Elliott Aviation, Inc., (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
1,855,000
4,810,000 Elmira Downtown Arena LLC, (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
4,810,000
875,000 Elsinore Properties LP, (Series 1998), (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
875,000
2,800,000 Equity Development Corp., Series 2002, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,800,000
6,900,000 Erwin Marine Sales, Inc., Series 2000, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
6,900,000
4,000,000 Excel Mining Systems, Inc., Series 2001, (Australia & New Zealand Banking Group, Melbourne LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
4,000,000
451,000 First Baptist Church of West Monroe, LA, Series 2003, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
451,000
1,875,000 Frank Nelson Building of Birmingham LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
1,875,000
785,000 Fredericksburg, VA IDA, (SunTrust Bank LOC), 5.420%, 8/2/2006
785,000
5,645,000 Freeport, IL, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
5,645,000
2,010,000 Galasso Materials LLC and Galasso Holdings LLC, (Series 1998), (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
2,010,000
2,100,000 Galliano Marine Service, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
2,100,000
3,700,000 Georgia Ports Authority, Colonel's Island Terminal Project (Series 1996-A), Revenue Bonds, (SunTrust Bank LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
3,700,000
21,500,000 Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc., (Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc. GTD), 5.305%, 8/9/2006
21,500,000
79,000,000 Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc., (Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, Edinburgh GTD), 5.317%, 8/14/2006
79,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 4
Banking--continued
$ 3,860,000 Grigsby Properties LLC, Series 2002, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
$ 3,860,000
1,485,000 Guilford Capital LLC, Series 2002 - C, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
1,485,000
2,170,000 Guilford Capital LLC, Series 2002 - F, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
2,170,000
153,000,000 1,2 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.259% - 5.315%, 8/9/2006 - 8/21/2006
153,000,000
171,000,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.396% - 5.530%, 8/1/2006 - 9/25/2006
171,000,000
14,600,000 Hamilton Station Park and Ride, Series 2005, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
14,600,000
8,055,000 Hanna Steel Corp., (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
8,055,000
8,400,000 Home City Ice Co. & H.C. Transport, Series 2000, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
8,400,000
4,440,000 Hugh W. Underwood/Underwood Properties, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006
4,440,000
5,335,000 Hugh W. Underwood, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006
5,335,000
3,085,000 IPC Industries, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
3,085,000
1,050,000 IT Spring Wire LLC, Series 1997, (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
1,050,000
6,750,000 Ilsco Corp., (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
6,750,000
15,000,000 Interlock Realty Co., (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
15,000,000
32,500,000 J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., 5.316%, 8/2/2006
32,500,000
3,685,000 Jemmack Funding Group LLC, Series 2002, (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
3,685,000
8,755,000 Jet-Pep, Inc., Series 2003, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
8,755,000
3,865,000 Kansas Development Finance Authority, DLR Deer Creek Project, (FHLB of Topeka LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
3,865,000
2,200,000 Kentucky Derby Hosiery Co., Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,200,000
950,000 Kit Carson County, CO, Midwest Farms Project, (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 5.340%, 8/3/2006
950,000
2,700,000 LCO Ventures LLC, (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 5.370%, 8/3/2006
2,700,000
2,690,000 Life Church Birmingham, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,690,000
5,000,000 1,2 Los Angeles, CA, MERLOT Series 2000 A (H&H Theatre), (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/2/2006
5,000,000
2,425,000 Mayer Properties LLP, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/4/2006
2,425,000
1,785,000 McCullough Snappy Service Oil Co., Inc., (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/4/2006
1,785,000
7,900,000 Medical Arts Capital LLC, Series 2001, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
7,900,000
895,000 Michigan State Housing Development Authority, Series 1999B, Lexington Place Apartments, (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006
895,000
2,695,000 Mike Patton Real Estate II LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,695,000
3,300,000 Mile Bluff Clinic Building Partnership, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
3,300,000
1,460,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
1,460,000
1,275,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., Mississippi College Project, Series 2001B, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
1,275,000
2,835,000 Montgomery, AL IDB, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
2,835,000
2,565,000 New Jersey EDA, Phoenix Realty Partners, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/2/2006
2,565,000
4,155,000 O.K.I. Supply Co., (Series 1998), (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
4,155,000
14,000,000 Ogden City Redevelopment Agency, Series 2005 C-1, (Bank of New York Co., Inc. LOC), 5.540%, 8/1/2006
14,000,000
2,355,000 P.C.I. Paper Conversions, Inc., Series 2000, (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
2,355,000
3,885,000 PW Holdings LLC, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
3,885,000
2,000,000 Parker Towing Co., Inc., Series 2001, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
6,365,000 R & J Investment Co., (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
6,365,000
7,480,000 Racetrac Capital LLC, Series 2000, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006
7,480,000
55,000,000 Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal, 5.375%, 8/10/2006
55,000,000
779,000 Sandridge Food Corp., (National City Bank, Ohio LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
779,000
3,110,000 Seeber USA LLP, Series 2000, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/2/2006
3,110,000
2,520,000 Sherman-Dixie Concrete Industries, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,520,000
5,140,000 Sioux-Preme Packing Co., (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
5,140,000
4,790,000 Southeast Christian Church of Jefferson County, KY Inc., Series 2003, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
4,790,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 4
Banking--continued
$ 4,075,000 Springhill Medical Complex, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
$ 4,075,000
7,190,000 Stow-Glen Properties LLC, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
7,190,000
60,000,000 Svenska Handelsbanken, Stockholm, 5.318%, 8/21/2006
59,998,368
2,335,000 TIL Holdings LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,335,000
2,110,000 TTL Realty LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,110,000
1,740,000 Tarrant Hydraulics Services LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
1,740,000
30,000,000 1,2 Union Hamilton Special Purpose Funding LLC, Series 2005-1 Tranche #1, (Wachovia Corp. GTD), 5.490%, 9/28/2006
30,000,000
3,055,000 University Church of Christ, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/4/2006
3,055,000
2,595,000 University Ltd. Properties LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,595,000
2,055,000 VLF LLC, The Village of Lovejoy, Fountain Project, (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
2,055,000
560,000 Vista Grande Villa, (LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
560,000
3,510,000 Watson's St. Louis Property LLC, Series 2001, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
3,510,000
4,315,000 Weaver Rentals LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
4,315,000
6,400,000 Wellbrook Finance LLC, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006
6,400,000
85,000,000 Wells Fargo & Co., 5.396%, 8/2/2006
85,000,000
15,000,000 West Memphis IDRB, S-B Power Tool Project, Series 2000 A, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.320%, 8/3/2006
15,000,000
50,000,000 Westpac Banking Corp. Ltd., Sydney, 5.340%, 9/11/2006
50,000,000
108,000,000 1,2 Westpac Banking Corp. Ltd., Sydney, 5.339%, 8/16/2006
108,000,000
1,145,000 White's Ferry Road Church of Christ, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
1,145,000
4,190,000 Wildcat Management Co., Inc., (Series 1999), (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006


4,190,000
   TOTAL


2,022,271,850
Brokerage--7.6%
35,000,000 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.307% - 5.386%, 8/1/2006 - 8/7/2006
35,000,000
40,000,000 1,2 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.389%, 8/15/2006
40,001,508
40,000,000 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.394%, 8/4/2006
40,000,000
165,000,000 1,2 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.599%, 8/11/2006
165,000,000
272,000,000 Morgan Stanley, 5.366% - 5.468%, 8/1/2006 - 8/28/2006


272,001,466
   TOTAL


552,002,974
Finance - Commercial--3.5%
6,600,000 Decoster, Series 2003-A, (General Electric Capital Corp. LOC), 5.380%, 8/3/2006
6,600,000
50,000,000 General Electric Capital Corp., 5.360%, 8/30/2006
50,000,000
193,500,000 1,2 General Electric Capital Corp., 5.469%, 8/17/2006
193,500,000
7,750,000 Oberthur Gaming Technologies Corp., Series 2002-A, (General Electric Capital Corp. LOC), 5.380%, 8/3/2006


7,750,000
   TOTAL


257,850,000
Finance - Retail--3.1%
85,000,000 1,2 Compass Securitization LLC, 5.289% - 5.311%, 8/7/2006 - 10/12/2006
84,992,856
144,000,000 1,2 Paradigm Funding LLC, 5.297% - 5.345%, 8/7/2006 - 8/25/2006


144,000,000
   TOTAL


228,992,856
Finance - Securities--4.2%
15,500,000 1,2 Beta Finance, Inc., 5.189%, 8/22/2006
15,501,114
119,000,000 1,2 K2 (USA) LLC, (K2 Corp. GTD), 5.300% - 5.445%, 8/10/2006 - 10/25/2006
118,989,530
170,000,000 1,2 Sigma Finance, Inc., (Sigma Finance Corp. GTD), 5.311% - 5.500%, 8/1/2006 - 10/20/2006


169,999,472
   TOTAL


304,490,116
Government Agency--0.1%
3,860,000 Community Hearth and Home Ltd., Series 2002, (FHLBank of Cincinnati LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
3,860,000
935,000 Direct One Funding Corp., Series 2000 (Sexton Properties), (FNMA LOC), 5.320%, 8/3/2006


935,000
   TOTAL


4,795,000
Principal
Amount
or Shares

   

   

Value
NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 4
Insurance--4.8%
$ 25,000,000 Genworth Life Insurance Co., 5.321%, 9/1/2006
$ 25,000,000
25,000,000 Hartford Life Insurance Co., 5.319% - 5.401%, 8/1/2006 - 9/1/2006
25,000,000
50,000,000 1,2 MBIA Global Funding LLC, 5.317%, 8/14/2006
50,000,000
45,000,000 MetLife Insurance Co. of Connecticut, 5.279% - 5.590%, 8/21/2006 - 9/28/2006
45,000,000
45,000,000 Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 5.270% - 5.648%, 8/1/2006 - 10/2/2006
45,000,000
54,000,000 Monumental Life Insurance Co., 5.367% - 5.680%, 8/1/2006 - 8/14/2006
54,000,000
70,000,000 New York Life Insurance Co., 4.920% - 5.290%, 8/30/2006 - 9/1/2006
70,000,000
12,000,000 1,2 Pacific Life Global Funding, 5.384%, 8/4/2006
12,000,142
25,000,000 Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Co., 5.620%, 10/2/2006


25,000,000
   TOTAL


351,000,142
Municipal--1.2%
84,000,000 Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund Finance Corp., 5.377%, 8/15/2006


84,000,000
   TOTAL NOTES - VARIABLE


3,805,402,938
MUTUAL FUNDS--0.8%
Asset Management--0.8%
25,000,000 Columbia Money Market Reserves
25,000,000
30,088,937 DWS Money Market Trust


30,088,937
   TOTAL MUTUAL FUNDS


55,088,937
REPURCHASE AGREEMENT--1.4%
104,499,000 Interest in $3,200,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Bank of America N.A. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/1/2035 for $3,200,470,222 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $3,264,000,000.


104,499,000
   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--99.8%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 5



7,268,809,805
   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--0.2%


15,433,271
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
7,284,243,076

1 Denotes a restricted security that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) is subject to a contractual restriction on public sales. At July 31, 2006, these restricted securities amounted to $2,828,687,466, which represented 38.8% of total net assets.

2 Denotes a restricted security that may be resold without restriction to "qualified institutional buyers" as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and that the Fund has determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Fund's Board of Trustees. At July 31, 2006, these liquid restricted securities amounted to $2,828,687,466, which represented 38.8% of total net assets.

3 Discount at the time of the purchase, or the coupon for interest bearing issues.

4 Floating rate note with current rate and next reset date shown.

5 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

EDA --Economic Development Authority
FHLB --Federal Home Loan Bank
FNMA --Federal National Mortgage Association
GTD --Guaranteed
IDA --Industrial Development Authority
IDB --Industrial Development Bond
IDRB --Industrial Development Revenue Bond
INS --Insured
LOC --Letter of Credit
MERLOTS --Municipal Exempt Receipts- Liquidity Optional Tender Series
SWP --Swap Agreement

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Prime Management Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:

Security Type


   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Commercial Paper & Notes

44.3%
Variable Rate Instruments

37.3%
Bank Instruments

9.4%
Repurchase Agreements

8.7%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

0.3%
   TOTAL

100.0%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:



   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

50.9%
4
8-30 Days

30.7%

31-90 Days

10.2%

91-180 Days

2.6%

181 Days or more

5.3%

Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

0.3%

   TOTAL

100.0%

1 Commercial paper and notes include any fixed-rate security that is not a bank instrument. A variable rate instrument is any security which has an interest rate that resets periodically. See the Fund's Prospectus for a description of the principal types of securities in which the Fund invests.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

4 Overnight securities comprised 37.5% of the Fund's portfolio.

Prime Management Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES--0.6%
Finance - Automotive--0.1%
$ 3,358,853 1,2 DaimlerChrysler Auto Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.791%, 3/8/2007
$ 3,358,853
1,975,464 World Omni Automobile Receivables Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.854%, 3/15/2007


1,975,464
   TOTAL


5,334,317
Finance - Equipment--0.5%
6,583,312 CIT Equipment Collateral 2006-VT1, Class A1, 4.989%, 3/20/2007
6,583,312
11,245,974 CNH Equipment Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.989%, 4/5/2007


11,245,974
   TOTAL


17,829,286
   TOTAL ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES


23,163,603
BANKERS ACCEPTANCE--0.5%
Banking--0.5%
18,000,000 Wachovia Bank N.A., 5.450%, 12/20/2006


17,615,775
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT--8.9%
Banking--8.9%
15,000,000 Barclays Bank PLC, 4.752%, 10/17/2006
15,000,077
29,000,000 Calyon, Paris, 4.750% - 5.310%, 10/17/2006 - 4/19/2007
29,000,000
18,000,000 Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, 5.220%, 8/28/2006
18,000,000
44,200,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 4.775% - 5.250%, 10/27/2006 - 3/29/2007
44,200,000
25,000,000 DePfa Bank PLC, 5.260%, 4/9/2007
25,000,000
20,000,000 Deutsche Bank AG, 4.500%, 10/13/2006
20,000,000
10,000,000 Dexia Bank, Belgium, 4.305%, 9/29/2006
9,992,204
20,000,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.355%, 5/15/2007
20,000,000
48,000,000 Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH, 5.190%, 8/1/2006
48,000,000
21,500,000 Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, Edinburgh, 4.397% - 4.755%, 10/4/2006 - 10/27/2006
21,499,964
10,000,000 Societe Generale, Paris, 4.785%, 10/27/2006
10,000,117
11,000,000 Toronto Dominion Bank, 5.600%, 6/18/2007
11,000,000
48,000,000 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 4.840% - 5.310%, 8/10/2006 - 1/30/2007
47,999,229
12,000,000 Wilmington Trust Co., 5.125%, 8/2/2006


12,000,000
   TOTAL CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT


331,691,591
COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS--20.7%
Banking--9.9%
25,000,000 BNP Paribas Securities Corp., 5.423%, 8/1/2006
25,000,000
110,000,000 Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, 5.413%, 8/1/2006
110,000,000
100,000,000 Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., 5.443%, 8/1/2006
100,000,000
75,000,000 Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., 5.438%, 8/1/2006
75,000,000
20,000,000 IXIS Financial Products Inc., 5.413%, 8/1/2006
20,000,000
40,000,000 J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., 5.413%, 8/1/2006


40,000,000
   TOTAL


370,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS--continued
Brokerage--10.8%
$ 72,000,000 Bear Stearns & Co., Inc., 5.433%, 8/1/2006
$ 72,000,000
115,000,000 Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., 5.413%, 8/1/2006
115,000,000
145,000,000 Goldman Sachs & Co., 5.383% - 5.413%, 8/1/2006
145,000,000
10,000,000 Lehman Brothers, Inc., 5.463%, 8/1/2006
10,000,000
50,000,000 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.443%, 8/1/2006
50,000,000
15,000,000 Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., 5.413%, 8/1/2006


15,000,000
   TOTAL


407,000,000
   TOTAL COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS


777,000,000
COMMERCIAL PAPER--19.1% 3
Banking--5.8%
20,000,000 Danske Corp., Inc., (GTD by Danske Bank A/S), 4.984%, 4/10/2007
19,302,240
28,000,000 1,2 Fountain Square Commercial Funding Corp., 5.300%, 8/22/2006
27,913,433
45,000,000 1,2 KBC Financial Products International Ltd., (GTD by KBC Bank NV), 4.960% - 5.100%, 8/4/2006 - 11/20/2006
44,668,256
44,991,000 1,2 Long Lane Master Trust IV, (Bank of America N.A. SWP), 5.360%, 8/21/2006
44,857,027
83,000,000 1,2 Picaros Funding LLC, (GTD by KBC Bank NV), 4.970% - 5.400%, 8/10/2006 - 10/11/2006


82,616,490
   TOTAL


219,357,446
Finance - Automotive--1.7%
45,000,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust, A1+/P1 Series, 5.260% - 5.280%, 8/8/2006 - 8/15/2006
44,928,328
18,000,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust, A1/P1 Series, 5.140% - 5.210%, 8/15/2006 - 9/15/2006


17,905,343
   TOTAL


62,833,671
Finance - Commercial--0.7%
27,000,000 CIT Group, Inc., 5.000% - 5.110%, 8/9/2006 - 11/15/2006


26,709,978
Finance - Retail--5.2%
11,000,000 1,2 Chariot Funding LLC, 5.150%, 9/5/2006
10,944,924
32,820,000 1,2 Compass Securitization LLC, 5.300%, 9/15/2006
32,602,568
41,500,000 Countrywide Financial Corp., 5.300%, 8/7/2006 - 8/8/2006
41,461,796
10,000,000 1,2 PREFCO-Preferred Receivables Funding Company LLC, 5.170%, 8/10/2006
9,987,075
100,000,000 1,2 Paradigm Funding LLC, 5.330%, 8/15/2006


99,792,722
   TOTAL


194,789,085
Finance - Securities--5.7%
25,000,000 1,2,4 Georgetown Funding Co. LLC, 5.390%, 8/30/2006
24,891,451
53,000,000 1,2 Grampian Funding LLC, 4.900% - 5.370%, 8/7/2006 - 10/25/2006
52,537,927
120,000,000 1,2 KLIO II Funding Ltd., 5.340% - 5.360%, 8/18/2006 - 8/21/2006
119,663,192
15,000,000 1,2 Perry Global Funding LLC Series A, 5.390%, 10/4/2006


14,856,267
   TOTAL


211,948,837
   TOTAL COMMERCIAL PAPER


715,639,017
CORPORATE BOND--0.1%
Banking--0.1%
5,500,000 PNC Funding Corp., 5.750%, 8/1/2006


5,500,000
CORPORATE NOTES--3.2%
Finance - Retail--0.7%
26,000,000 Countrywide Financial Corp., 5.210% - 5.380%, 8/3/2006 - 9/13/2006


26,000,894
Finance - Securities--2.5%
26,000,000 1,2 Beta Finance, Inc., 4.160%, 3/15/2007
26,000,000
14,050,000 1,2 K2 (USA) LLC, (GTD by K2 Corp.), 5.000%, 3/12/2007
14,050,000
53,000,000 1,2 Sigma Finance, Inc., (GTD by Sigma Finance Corp.), 4.150% - 5.750%, 8/8/2006 -4/30/2007


53,000,000
   TOTAL


93,050,000
   TOTAL CORPORATE NOTES


119,050,894
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
LOAN PARTICIPATION--0.6%
Miscellaneous--0.6%
$ 22,000,000 Cargill, Inc., 5.350%, 8/9/2006

$
22,000,000
NOTES - VARIABLE--37.3% 5
Banking--22.7%
2,900,000 AlaTrade Foods LLC, Series 4, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,900,000
961,000 American Health Care Centers, Inc., (Series 1998), (FirstMerit Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
961,000
35,000,000 1,2 Australia & New Zealand Banking Group, Melbourne, 5.400%, 8/23/2006
35,000,000
1,920,000 BD Toy LLC, Series 2003, (Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006
1,920,000
62,000,000 1,2 BNP Paribas SA, 5.143% - 5.363%, 8/21/2006 - 8/28/2006
62,000,000
626,000 Baldwin County Sewer Service LLC, Series 2003, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
626,000
7,916,000 Baldwin County Sewer Service LLC, Series 2005, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
7,916,000
20,000,000 1,2 Bank of Ireland, 5.350%, 8/21/2006
20,000,000
12,000,000 Barclays Bank PLC, 5.343%, 8/28/2006
11,998,754
1,950,000 Battle Creek, MI Downtown Development Authority, Series 2004, (Insured by AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.), 5.340%, 8/2/2006
1,950,000
5,960,000 Biddle Road Corp., Series 2004, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
5,960,000
925,000 Bond Holdings LP, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/4/2006
925,000
3,940,000 CAH Holdings, Inc., Series 2003, (First Commercial Bank, Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
3,940,000
8,000,000 CV 40-Stone Oak Ltd., Series 2005, (Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
8,000,000
4,500,000 Castleton United Methodist Church, Inc., Series 2006a, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
4,500,000
45,000,000 1,2 Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Sydney, 5.370%, 8/24/2006
45,000,000
70,000,000 Credit Agricole S.A., 5.480%, 10/23/2006
70,000,000
22,500,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 5.280% - 5.476%, 9/12/2006 - 10/16/2006
22,500,000
2,425,000 Dale G. Mithum, M.D. FACS, Series 2003, (Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006
2,425,000
1,500,000 DeKalb County, GA Housing Authority, Series 2004-T Highlands, (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 5.570%, 8/3/2006
1,500,000
4,000,000 1,2 DePfa Bank PLC, 5.369%, 9/15/2006
3,999,985
10,000,000 Development Authority of Gordon County, GA, Series 2005, Faus Group Inc., (RBC Centura Bank LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
490,000 Drury Inns, Inc., (First Commercial Bank, Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
490,000
8,285,000 Fiore Capital LLC, Series 2005-A, (Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
8,285,000
5,000,000 First Family Church, Series 2005, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.370%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
905,000 Franklin County, PA IDA, Series 2001B Precast Systems, LLC, (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
905,000
35,400,000 Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc., (Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc. LOC), 5.305% - 5.360%, 8/9/2006 - 8/28/2006
35,400,000
1,230,000 Grote Family LP, (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
1,230,000
18,000,000 1,2 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.315%, 8/9/2006
18,000,000
3,000,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.530%, 9/25/2006
3,000,641
9,555,000 HP Huntsville LLC, Series 2003, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
9,555,000
4,715,000 Hamilton Farm Bureau Cooperative, Inc., (Series 1999), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.510%, 8/3/2006
4,715,000
5,915,000 Headquarters Partnership Ltd., Series 2001, (National Australia Bank Ltd., Melbourne LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
5,915,000
13,000,000 ICS-Remington LLC, (First Commercial Bank, Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.470%, 8/3/2006
13,000,000
20,000,000 Interlock Realty Co., (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
20,000,000
9,650,000 Lake Mary Bay LP, Series 2005, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
9,650,000
1,665,000 Lee County, FL IDA, Bonita Community Health Center, Series 1999B, (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.400%, 8/4/2006
1,665,000
5,450,000 MOBR-04 LLC, Series 2004, (Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006
5,450,000
4,405,000 Magdim C-Stores, Inc./Lynhurst Storage LLC, Series 2005, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
4,405,000
3,000,000 Marital Trust No. 2, Vernon W. Van Aker, Grantor, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,000,000
14,500,000 Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee, 5.510%, 10/3/2006
14,500,467
245,000 McCullough Oil Bond Issue LLC, Series 2003, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
245,000
136,000,000 1,2 National Australia Bank Ltd., Melbourne, 5.306%, 8/7/2006
136,000,000
10,500,000 Nautical Transport LLC, Series 2005, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
10,500,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 5
Banking--continued
$ 4,350,000 Ohmart/Vega Corp., Series 2003, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
$ 4,350,000
3,000,000 Overland Park Professional Center LLC, Series 2004, (Comerica Bank LOC), 5.490%, 8/3/2006
3,000,000
3,225,000 Pizitz Properties LLC, Series 2003, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,225,000
4,000,000 Prevea Clinic, Inc., Series 2004-A, (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
4,000,000
3,500,000 Pro-Cell LLC, Series 2004, (Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006
3,500,000
5,975,000 Provena Foods, Inc., (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.410%, 8/3/2006
5,975,000
5,450,000 Roman Catholic Bishop of San Jose, CA, Series 2005, (Allied Irish Banks PLC LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
5,450,000
45,000,000 1,2 Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal, 5.316%, 8/1/2006
45,000,000
5,000,000 Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal, 5.520%, 10/12/2006
5,000,853
10,000,000 Salvation Army, Series 2004-A, (Bank of New York LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
410,000 Sandridge Food Corp., (National City Bank, Ohio LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
410,000
20,000,000 1,2 Societe Generale, Paris, 5.316%, 8/2/2006
20,000,000
900,000 Spiller LLC, Series 2003, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
900,000
65,000,000 Svenska Handelsbanken, Stockholm, 5.286% - 5.318%, 8/3/2006 - 8/21/2006
64,997,946
910,000 Wellborn Forest Products, Inc., (Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006
910,000
36,000,000 1,2 Westpac Banking Corp. Ltd., Sydney, 5.338%, 8/16/2006
36,000,000
3,090,000 William Morris Realty Huntsville LLC, Series 2004, (Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006


3,090,000
   TOTAL


850,741,646
Brokerage--5.9%
20,000,000 1,2 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.388%, 8/15/2006
20,000,754
6,000,000 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.598%, 9/29/2006
6,004,446
30,000,000 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.182% - 5.348%, 8/15/2006 - 8/28/2006
30,000,000
165,000,000 Morgan Stanley, 5.366% - 5.468%, 8/1/2006 - 8/25/2006


165,001,070
   TOTAL


221,006,270
Finance - Retail--2.6%
35,000,000 1,2 Compass Securitization LLC, 5.300% - 5.323%, 8/10/2006 - 10/12/2006
34,995,871
43,000,000 1,2 Paradigm Funding LLC, 5.296% - 5.345%, 8/7/2006 - 8/25/2006
43,000,000
20,000,000 1,2 SLM Corp., 5.355%, 8/14/2006


20,000,000
   TOTAL


97,995,871
Finance - Securities--1.5%
40,000,000 1,2 K2 (USA) LLC, (GTD by K2 Corp.), 5.325% - 5.445%, 8/10/2006 - 10/25/2006
39,991,504
15,000,000 1,2 Sigma Finance, Inc., (GTD by Sigma Finance Corp.), 5.311%, 8/1/2006


15,000,000
   TOTAL


54,991,504
Insurance--3.6%
10,000,000 Genworth Life Insurance Co., 5.256%, 8/9/2006
10,000,000
10,000,000 Hartford Life Global Funding Trust, 5.348%, 8/15/2006
10,000,000
10,000,000 Hartford Life Insurance Co., 5.400%, 9/1/2006
10,000,000
20,000,000 1,2 MBIA Global Funding LLC, 5.316%, 8/14/2006
20,000,000
15,000,000 MetLife Insurance Co. of Connecticut, 5.328% - 5.590%, 9/1/2006 - 9/28/2006
15,000,000
20,000,000 Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 5.270%, 8/1/2006
20,000,000
50,000,000 New York Life Insurance Co., 4.920% - 5.290%, 8/30/2006 - 9/1/2006


50,000,000
   TOTAL


135,000,000
Municipal--1.0%
37,000,000 Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund Finance Corp., 5.377%, 8/15/2006


37,000,000
Pharmaceuticals & Health Care--0.0%
500,000 1,2 Eli Lilly Services, Inc., (GTD by Eli Lilly & Co.), 5.316%, 8/1/2006


500,019
   TOTAL NOTES - VARIABLE


1,397,235,310
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--8.7%
$ 286,527,000 Interest in $3,200,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Bank of America N.A. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/1/2035 for $3,200,470,222 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $3,264,000,000.
$ 286,527,000
20,000,000 Interest in $238,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.10%, dated 7/31/2006 under which J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 10/31/2006 for $238,033,717 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $242,764,447.
20,000,000
20,000,000 Interest in $100,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.20%, dated 7/31/2006 under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 4/1/2036 for $100,014,444 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $102,000,893.


20,000,000
   TOTAL REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS


326,527,000
   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--99.7%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 6



3,735,423,190
   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--0.3%


11,926,237
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
3,747,349,427

1 Denotes a restricted security that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) is subject to a contractual restriction on public sales. At July 31, 2006, these restricted securities amounted to $1,276,228,318, which represented 34.1% of total net assets.

2 Denotes a restricted security that may be resold without restriction to "qualified institutional buyers" as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and that the Fund has determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Fund's Board of Trustees. At July 31, 2006, these liquid restricted securities amounted to $1,276,228,318, which represented 34.1% of total net assets.

3 Discount rate at the time of purchase, or the coupon for interest-bearing issues.

4 Reflects potential extension period.

5 Floating rate note with current rate and next reset date shown.

6 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

GTD --Guaranteed
IDA --Industrial Development Authority
LOC --Letters of Credit
SWP --Swap Agreement

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Prime Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:

Security Type


   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Variable Rate Demand Instruments

41.5
%
Commercial Paper & Notes

37.7
%
Bank Instruments

18.9
%
Repurchase Agreements

2.9
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(1.0
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:



   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

42.2
% 4
8-30 Days

33.2
%
31-90 Days

18.8
%
91-180 Days

1.8
%
181 Days or more

5.0
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(1.0
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

1 Commercial paper and notes include any fixed-rate security that is not a bank instrument. A variable rate demand instrument is any security which has an interest rate that resets periodically. See the Fund's Prospectus for descriptions of commercial paper, repurchase agreements and bank instruments.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

4 Overnight securities comprised 28.1% of the Fund's portfolio.

Prime Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES--0.8%
Finance - Automotive--0.3%
$ 21,264,819 Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2006-1, Class A1, 4.872%, 3/15/2007
$ 21,264,819
12,479,638 CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2006-1, Class A1, 5.180%, 5/15/2007
12,479,638
9,740,673 1,2 DaimlerChrysler Auto Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.791%, 3/8/2007
9,740,673
7,490,611 Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust 2005-6, Class A-1, 4.511%, 12/18/2006
7,490,611
2,226,494 USAA Auto Owner Trust 2005-4, Class A1, 4.400%, 12/15/2006
2,226,494
11,288,364 World Omni Automobile Receivables Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.854%, 3/15/2007


11,288,364

   TOTAL


64,490,599

Finance - Equipment--0.5%
17,006,888 CIT Equipment Collateral 2006-VT1, Class A1, 4.989%, 3/20/2007
17,006,888
41,235,240 CNH Equipment Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.989%, 4/5/2007
41,235,240
4,392,380 1,2 GE Equipment Small Ticket LLC Series 2005-2, Class A1, 4.556%, 12/22/2006
4,392,380
32,480,403 John Deere Owner Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 5.364%, 7/13/2007


32,480,403

   TOTAL


95,114,911

   TOTAL ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES


159,605,510

CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT--10.9%
Banking--10.9%
35,000,000 Barclays Bank PLC, 4.752%, 10/17/2006
35,000,181
245,000,000 Calyon, Paris, 4.750% - 5.355%, 10/17/2006 - 4/30/2007
245,001,791
105,000,000 Citizens Bank N.A., 5.160% - 5.270%, 8/10/2006 - 9/12/2006
105,001,514
235,000,000 Citizens Bank of Massachusetts, 5.330% - 5.430%, 8/10/2006 - 9/29/2006
235,000,000
189,000,000 Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, 5.220% - 5.500%, 8/28/2006 - 10/31/2006
189,000,000
219,000,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 4.920% - 5.250%, 11/20/2006 - 3/29/2007
219,000,000
49,200,000 DePfa Bank PLC, 5.260%, 4/9/2007
49,200,000
250,000,000 Deutsche Bank AG, 4.500% - 4.765%, 10/13/2006 - 10/27/2006
250,000,000
40,000,000 Dexia Bank, Belgium, 4.305%, 9/29/2006
39,968,817
19,250,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.260%, 4/11/2007
19,250,000
100,000,000 Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee, 5.250%, 9/11/2006
100,000,000
289,000,000 Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, Edinburgh, 4.397% - 4.850%, 10/4/2006 - 1/30/2007
288,999,290
95,000,000 Societe Generale, Paris, 4.760% - 4.785%, 10/27/2006
95,000,875
153,000,000 Toronto Dominion Bank, 5.295% - 5.600%, 4/13/2007 - 6/18/2007
153,000,000
280,000,000 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 5.300% - 5.310%, 8/7/2006 - 8/10/2006


280,000,000

   TOTAL CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT


2,303,422,468

COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS--12.4%
Banking--4.5%
856,000,000 Fortis Bank SA/NV, 5.362%, 8/1/2006
856,000,000
80,000,000 IXIS Financial Products Inc., 5.412%, 8/1/2006


80,000,000

   TOTAL


936,000,000

Brokerage--7.9%
703,000,000 Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., 5.362% - 5.412%, 8/1/2006
703,000,000
740,000,000 Goldman Sachs & Co., 5.270% - 5.412%, 8/1/2006
740,000,000
230,000,000 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.442%, 8/1/2006


230,000,000

   TOTAL


1,673,000,000

   TOTAL COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS


2,609,000,000

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

COMMERCIAL PAPER--20.8% 3
Banking--5.0%
$ 222,000,000 Bank of America Corp., 5.330% - 5.385%, 9/21/2006 - 10/4/2006
$ 220,070,903
33,110,000 Benedictine Health System-St. Mary's Duluth Clinic Health System Obligated Group, 5.400%, 10/11/2006
32,757,379
1,265,000 Benedictine Living Communities, Inc., 5.400%, 10/11/2006
1,251,528
100,000,000 1,2 Fountain Square Commercial Funding Corp., 5.390%, 10/2/2006 - 10/3/2006
99,064,236
90,000,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.180%, 9/8/2006
89,507,900
106,270,000 1,2 Long Lane Master Trust IV, (Bank of America N.A. SWP), 5.280%, 8/7/2006
106,176,482
15,235,000 Los Angeles County, CA Metropolitan Transportation Authority, (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 5.330%, 8/9/2006
15,235,000
505,027,000 1,2 Picaros Funding LLC, (GTD by KBC Bank N.V.), 4.970% - 5.400%, 8/8/2006 - 10/11/2006


502,413,575

   TOTAL


1,066,477,003

Finance - Automotive--5.3%
83,382,000 DaimlerChrysler Revolving Auto Conduit LLC, A1+/P1 Series, 5.280%, 8/4/2006
83,345,312
51,442,000 DaimlerChrysler Revolving Auto Conduit LLC, A1/P1 Series, 5.140% - 5.150%, 8/18/2006 - 9/14/2006
51,146,103
666,000,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust, A1+/P1 Series, 4.970% - 5.400%, 8/7/2006 - 11/13/2006
662,378,022
325,000,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust, A1/P1 Series, 5.140% - 5.360%, 8/11/2006 - 9/15/2006


324,052,989

   TOTAL


1,120,922,426

Finance - Commercial--1.3%
130,000,000 CIT Group, Inc., 5.000% - 5.110%, 8/9/2006 - 11/14/2006
128,780,458
40,000,000 1,2 Edison Asset Securitization LLC, 5.380%, 10/5/2006
39,611,444
100,000,000 General Electric Capital Corp., 5.230%, 8/8/2006


99,898,306

   TOTAL


268,290,208

Finance - Retail--4.2%
20,000,000 1,2 Amsterdam Funding Corp., 5.380%, 10/4/2006
19,808,711
75,431,000 1,2 Chariot Funding LLC, 5.150% - 5.280%, 8/10/2006 - 9/5/2006
75,164,442
198,855,000 1,2 Compass Securitization LLC, 5.245% - 5.330%, 8/16/2006 - 9/15/2006
197,794,469
51,205,000 1,2 Jupiter Securitization Company LLC, 5.280%, 8/3/2006
51,189,980
50,000,000 1,2 PREFCO-Preferred Receivables Funding Company LLC, 5.170%, 8/10/2006
49,935,375
232,564,000 1,2 Paradigm Funding LLC, 5.230% - 5.330%, 8/7/2006 - 8/15/2006
232,203,675
252,229,000 1,2 Sheffield Receivables Corp., 5.280% - 5.300%, 8/9/2006 - 8/11/2006


251,906,103

   TOTAL


878,002,755

Finance - Securities--4.5%
35,000,000 1,2 Galaxy Funding Inc., 5.040%, 8/4/2006
34,985,300
269,000,000 1,2 Georgetown Funding Co. LLC, 5.419% - 5.449%, 9/19/2006 - 9/20/2006
267,816,641
250,000,000 1,2 Grampian Funding LLC, 5.220% - 5.370%, 9/18/2006 - 10/25/2006
247,259,146
197,844,000 1,2 KLIO II Funding Ltd., 5.230% - 5.370%, 8/18/2006 - 9/8/2006
197,110,642
179,000,000 1,2 Perry Global Funding LLC Series A, 5.180% - 5.380%, 8/9/2006 - 10/10/2006
177,862,951
35,000,000 1,2 Scaldis Capital LLC, 5.230%, 9/13/2006


34,781,357

   TOTAL


959,816,037

Insurance--0.5%
100,000,000 1,2 Aspen Funding Corp., 5.350%, 9/22/2006


99,227,222

   TOTAL COMMERCIAL PAPER


4,392,735,651

CORPORATE BONDS--0.3%
Finance - Commercial--0.1%
20,000,000 CIT Group, Inc., 5.202%, 8/18/2006


20,000,573

Finance - Retail--0.2%
46,325,000 SLM Corp., 5.529%, 9/15/2006


46,335,844

   TOTAL CORPORATE BONDS


66,336,417

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

CORPORATE NOTES--2.3%
Finance - Securities--2.3%
$ 185,000,000 1,2 K2 (USA) LLC, (GTD by K2 Corp.), 5.000%, 3/9/2007 - 3/12/2007
$ 185,000,000
303,000,000 1,2 Sigma Finance, Inc., (GTD by Sigma Finance Corp.), 4.150% - 5.750%, 8/8/2006 - 7/25/2007


303,000,000

   TOTAL CORPORATE NOTES


488,000,000

GOVERNMENT AGENCIES--0.2%
Government Agency--0.2%
39,000,000 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 5.410%, 6/18/2007


39,000,000

LOAN PARTICIPATION--0.3%
Electrical Equipment--0.3%
55,500,000 Mt. Vernon Phenol Plant Partnership, (GTD by General Electric Co.), 5.390%, 5/21/2007


55,500,000

NOTES - VARIABLE--41.5% 4
Banking--18.5%
4,945,000 4 C's LLC, (Series 1998), (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
4,945,000
1,620,000 Advanced Labelworx, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
1,620,000
4,915,000 AlaTrade Foods LLC, Series 2003, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
4,915,000
1,245,000 Alabama State IDA, (SERIES 1994) Miltope Project, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.470%, 8/3/2006
1,245,000
3,800,000 Alabama State IDA, (Wellborn Cabinet, Inc.), Tax Revenue Bonds, (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
3,800,000
1,075,000 Alabama State IDA, Standard Furniture Project (Series 1995), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
1,075,000
2,050,000 Aliceville, AL IDB, Buchanan Hardwood Flooring Co. (Series 1999), (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.470%, 8/3/2006
2,050,000
33,640,000 American Health Care Centers, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
33,640,000
7,150,000 American Xtal Technology, Inc., Xtal Project (Series 1998), (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006
7,150,000
12,000,000 Association of American Medical Colleges, (GTD by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., INS AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.), 5.490%, 8/2/2006
12,000,000
4,125,000 Atlantic Tool and Die Co., (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
4,125,000
7,640,000 B.R. Williams Trucking, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
7,640,000
230,000,000 1,2 BNP Paribas SA, 5.144% - 5.364%, 8/21/2006 - 8/28/2006
230,000,000
5,635,000 Baldwin County Sewer Service LLC, Series 2002, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
5,635,000
602,000,000 Bank of America N.A., 5.373%, 8/1/2006
601,992,144
63,000,000 1,2 Bank of Ireland, 5.350%, 8/21/2006
63,000,000
73,000,000 1,2 Bank of New York Co., Inc., 5.458%, 8/28/2006
73,000,000
225,000,000 Barclays Bank PLC, 5.289% - 5.343%, 8/7/2006 - 8/28/2006
224,972,557
16,275,000 Biddle Road Corp., Series 2004, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
16,275,000
6,995,000 Bing Steel Management, Inc., Series 2000, (Comerica Bank LOC), 5.498%, 8/2/2006
6,995,000
3,260,000 Bing Steel Management, Inc., Series 2002, (Comerica Bank LOC), 5.498%, 8/2/2006
3,260,000
4,910,000 Bond Holdings LP, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/4/2006
4,910,000
1,205,000 Brookshire Grocery Co., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
1,205,000
5,970,000 Brumfield Properties, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
5,970,000
13,001,000 Capital One Funding Corp., (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
13,001,000
3,107,000 Capital One Funding Corp., (Series 1998-C), (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
3,107,000
17,658,000 Capital One Funding Corp., (Series 1999-A), (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
17,658,000
1,414,000 Capital One Funding Corp., (Series 1999-B), (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
1,414,000
1,089,000 Capital One Funding Corp., Series 1994-D, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
1,089,000
2,882,000 Capital One Funding Corp., Series 1995-B, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
2,882,000
1,297,000 Capital One Funding Corp., Series 1995-F, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
1,297,000
3,112,000 Capital One Funding Corp., Series 1996-H, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
3,112,000
7,294,000 Capital One Funding Corp., Series 2001-B, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
7,294,000
10,575,000 Church at Brook Hills, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
10,575,000
6,350,000 Cincinnati Bible College and Seminary, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
6,350,000
3,760,000 Clinton County, NY IDA, Bombardier Project (Series 1998-B), (HSBC Bank USA LOC), 5.650%, 8/3/2006
3,760,000
3,805,000 Colonie, NY IDA, Mechanical Technology, Inc. Project (Series 1998 A), (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
3,805,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 4
Banking--continued
$ 795,000 Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Development Disabilities Resource Center (Series 1998-C1), (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
$ 795,000
1,420,000 Columbia County, GA Development Authority, Series 1993, (SunTrust Banks, Inc. LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
1,420,000
10,800,000 Community Centre Group of Cos., (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
10,800,000
8,580,000 Consolidated Publishing Co., Inc., (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.550%, 8/4/2006
8,580,000
33,810,000 Cook County, IL, Series 2002 A, 5.420%, 8/2/2006
33,810,000
5,765,000 Crane Plastics Siding LLC, Series 2000, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
5,765,000
146,500,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 5.280% - 5.486%, 9/12/2006 - 10/24/2006
146,500,619
12,600,000 Decatur, AL IDB, Bailey-PVS Oxides Project (Series 1998), (SunTrust Bank LOC), 5.470%, 8/3/2006
12,600,000
15,000,000 Development Authority of Gordon County, GA, Series 2005, Faus Group Inc., (RBC Centura Bank LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
15,000,000
2,570,000 Double H Plastics, Inc., (Series 1998), (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/2/2006
2,570,000
6,110,000 Elsinore Properties LP, (Series 1998), (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
6,110,000
3,200,000 Fairpoint Regional Utility System, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,200,000
43,000,000 First Tennessee Bank, N.A., 5.210%, 8/25/2006
43,000,099
1,000,000 G.M.H. Enterprises, Inc., (Series 1995), (National City Bank, Ohio LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
1,000,000
13,405,000 Galasso Materials LLC and Galasso Holdings LLC, (Series 1998), (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
13,405,000
2,930,000 Gesmundo & Associates, Inc., Series A, (National City Bank of the Midwest LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
2,930,000
36,800,000 Greene County Development Authority, Reynolds Lodge, LLC Series 2000 A, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.420%, 8/2/2006
36,800,000
13,850,000 Greene County Development Authority, Reynolds Lodge, LLC Series 2000B, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
13,850,000
36,000,000 Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc., (GTD by Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc.), 5.305%, 8/9/2006
36,000,000
5,615,000 H & P Holdings LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
5,615,000
8,860,000 H.C. Equities LP, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
8,860,000
399,000,000 1,2 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.259% - 5.315%, 8/9/2006 - 8/21/2006
399,001,584
369,700,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.396% - 5.530%, 8/1/2006 - 9/25/2006
369,702,523
5,550,000 HFS Holdings LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
5,550,000
8,210,000 Healthcare Network Properties LLC, (Series A), (National City Bank of the Midwest LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
8,210,000
10,350,000 Hillcrest Investments LLC, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/2/2006
10,350,000
3,235,000 Historical Preservation Authority of Birmingham, (Series 1993), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.520%, 8/3/2006
3,235,000
85,000,000 J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., 5.316%, 8/2/2006
85,000,000
3,725,000 J.P. Plymouth Properties LLC, (Series 1999), (LaSalle Bank Midwest, N.A. LOC), 5.590%,8/2/2006
3,725,000
15,000,000 Kansas City, MO Tax Increment Financing Commission, President Hotel, (INS MBIA Insurance Corp.), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
15,000,000
3,130,000 Kings Creek Country Club, Inc., (Series 1997), (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/2/2006
3,130,000
1,800,000 L.H. Kroh, Inc., (Series 1998), (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/2/2006
1,800,000
4,740,000 Lee County, FL IDA, Bonita Community Health Center, Series 1999B, (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.400%, 8/4/2006
4,740,000
5,165,000 1,2 Los Angeles, CA, MERLOTs Series 2000 A (H&H Theatre), (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/2/2006
5,165,000
11,250,000 Louisiana Agricultural Finance Authority, Lacassive Syrup Mill, Series 2004, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
11,250,000
4,785,000 M & C Holdings LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
4,785,000
460,000 Madison, WI Community Development Authority, Series 1997-B Hamilton Point Apts., (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
460,000
12,045,000 Maryland State Economic Development Corp., Human Genome Sciences Series 1999B, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.480%, 8/1/2006
12,045,000
17,440,000 Massachusetts State Development Finance Agency, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
17,440,000
4,610,000 McCullough Snappy Service Oil Co., Inc., (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/4/2006
4,610,000
75,000,000 Mercantile Safe Deposit & Trust Co., Baltimore, 5.305% - 5.329%, 8/10/2006 - 8/15/2006
74,995,400
1,841,000 Midwest Funding Corp., Series 1992-B, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
1,841,000
8,710,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.470%, 8/3/2006
8,710,000
4,200,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., Howard Industries, Inc. Series 1997, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
4,200,000
10,000,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., Kohler Project, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 4
Banking--continued
$ 17,000,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., Series 1994 Georgia Gulf, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/2/2006
$ 17,000,000
10,790,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., VC Regional Assembly & Manufacturing LLC., (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/2/2006
10,790,000
110,000,000 1,2 National Australia Bank Ltd., Melbourne, 5.307%, 8/7/2006
110,000,000
5,975,000 North American Gulf Terminals, Inc., Series 2002, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.390%, 8/3/2006
5,975,000
11,920,000 North Oaks Partnership, (Series 1998), (LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
11,920,000
81,800,000 Novant Health, Inc., Series 1997, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/2/2006
81,800,000
10,150,000 Ohio Waste Development Authority Solid Waste, Bailey-PVS Oxides, LLC (Series 1998), (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
10,150,000
5,000,000 Olive Baptist Church, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
11,000,000 Park Street Properties I LLC, University of Wisconsin - Madison Projects, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
11,000,000
4,385,000 Parkview Professional Center, Series 2005, (Comerica Bank LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
4,385,000
6,650,000 Physicians Real Estate LLP, (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 5.450%, 8/2/2006
6,650,000
14,500,000 Pitney Roads Partners LLC, Series 2003 - A, (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 5.380%, 8/3/2006
14,500,000
1,185,000 Quality Synthetic Rubber Co., Series 2000, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
1,185,000
5,850,000 Reiser Group Sonic Management Co., Inc., Series 2002, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
5,850,000
9,255,000 Rollins College, Series 1998, (SunTrust Bank LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
9,255,000
108,000,000 1,2 Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal, 5.316%, 8/1/2006
108,000,000
60,000,000 Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal, 5.520%, 10/12/2006
60,010,241
19,000,000 Salvation Army, Series 2004-A, (Bank of New York LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
19,000,000
3,590,000 Savannah, GA Housing Authority, (SunTrust Bank LOC), 5.420%, 8/2/2006
3,590,000
2,771,000 Sawmill Creek Lodge Co., (Series 1996), (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
2,771,000
14,390,000 Seeber USA LLP, Series 2000, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/2/2006
14,390,000
50,000,000 1,2 Societe Generale, Paris, 5.316%, 8/2/2006
50,000,000
11,375,000 Spira Millenium LLC, Series 2001, (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
11,375,000
55,225,000 Spitzer Group, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
55,225,000
3,180,000 Springfield Ltd. Partnership, (UBS AG LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
3,180,000
1,165,000 St. Paul, MN Port Authority, Bix Fruit Co. (Series 1998-B), (Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee LOC), 5.640%, 8/3/2006
1,165,000
1,950,000 St. Paul, MN Port Authority, National Checking Co. Project (Series 1998-B), (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.540%, 8/3/2006
1,950,000
13,280,000 Suffolk County, NY IDA, (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 5.420%, 8/2/2006
13,280,000
6,050,000 Trinity Baptist Church, Series 2002-A, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
6,050,000
75,000,000 1,2 Union Hamilton Special Purpose Funding LLC, Series 2005-1 Tranche #1, (GTD by Wachovia Corp.), 5.424% - 5.490%, 9/21/2006 - 9/28/2006
75,000,000
9,300,000 Victor H. Hanson/ Elizabeth F. Hanson, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
9,300,000
1,200,000 Village Green Finance Co. LLC, (Series 1997), (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/2/2006
1,200,000
2,512,000 Vista Funding Corp., Series 1995-D, (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.390%, 8/3/2006
2,512,000
1,245,000 Vista Funding Corp., Series 1998-B, (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
1,245,000
195,250,000 Wells Fargo & Co., 5.396%, 8/2/2006
195,250,066
10,575,000 Western Reserve Masonic Community, Inc., (GTD by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
10,575,000
25,000,000 Westpac Banking Corp. Ltd., Sydney, 5.340%, 9/11/2006
25,000,000
10,195,000 Whetstone Care Center LLC, Series 1998, (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
10,195,000
4,780,000 William Morris Realty Montgomery LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
4,780,000
34,345,000 World Wildlife Fund, Inc., Series 2000 B, (INS by AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.), 5.490%, 8/3/2006


34,345,000

   TOTAL


3,895,168,233

Brokerage--7.8%
117,000,000 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.307% - 5.386%, 8/1/2006 - 8/7/2006
117,000,000
50,000,000 1,2 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.389%, 8/15/2006
50,001,885
110,000,000 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Promissory Note, 5.375%, 8/8/2006
110,000,000
374,000,000 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.349% - 5.394%, 8/4/2006 - 8/24/2006
374,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 4
Brokerage--continued
$ 240,000,000 1,2 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.599%, 8/11/2006
$ 240,000,334
752,300,000 Morgan Stanley, 5.363% - 5.468%, 8/1/2006 - 8/28/2006


752,302,345

   TOTAL


1,643,304,564

Electrical Equipment--0.3%
2,600,000 Alabama State IDA, General Electric Project, (General Electric Co. LOC), 5.310%, 8/3/2006
2,600,000
58,656,672 Northwest Airlines, Inc., (GTD by General Electric Co.), 5.330%, 8/7/2006


58,656,672

   TOTAL


61,256,672

Finance - Commercial--2.3%
50,000,000 1,2 Fairway Finance Co. LLC, 5.328%, 8/21/2006
49,999,745
436,100,000 1,2 General Electric Capital Corp., 5.469% - 5.470%, 8/9/2006 - 8/17/2006


436,100,000

   TOTAL


486,099,745

Finance - Retail--4.0%
14,000,000 American Express Credit Corp., 5.459%, 8/15/2006
14,006,142
368,500,000 1,2 Compass Securitization LLC, 5.300% - 5.324%, 8/7/2006 - 10/12/2006
368,472,518
286,500,000 1,2 Paradigm Funding LLC, 5.297% - 5.345%, 8/7/2006 - 8/25/2006
286,500,000
180,000,000 1,2 SLM Corp., 5.356%, 8/14/2006


180,000,000

   TOTAL


848,978,660

Finance - Securities--2.9%
122,500,000 1,2 Beta Finance, Inc., 5.189% - 5.379%, 8/15/2006 - 8/22/2006
122,522,655
23,000,000 1,2 K2 (USA) LLC, (GTD by K2 Corp.), 5.325%, 8/10/2006
23,000,793
474,000,000 1,2 Sigma Finance, Inc., (GTD by Sigma Finance Corp.), 5.309% - 5.355%, 8/1/2006 - 8/24/2006


473,994,899

   TOTAL


619,518,347

Government Agency--0.3%
7,945,000 Direct One Funding Corp., (FNMA LOC), 5.320%, 8/3/2006
7,945,000
46,455,000 Direct One Funding Corp., Series 2000 (Sexton Properties), (FNMA LOC), 5.320%, 8/3/2006
46,455,000
5,350,000 Grand Pointe II Ltd. Partnership, Series 1999 Globe Apartments, (FHLB of Indianapolis LOC), 5.340%, 8/3/2006


5,350,000

   TOTAL


59,750,000

Insurance--3.8%
20,000,000 Albuquerque, NM, Series 2000 A, (INS MBIA Insurance Corp.), 5.320%, 8/2/2006
20,000,000
54,000,000 Genworth Life Insurance Co., 5.321%, 9/1/2006
54,000,000
50,000,000 Hartford Life Insurance Co., 5.319% - 5.401%, 8/1/2006 - 9/1/2006
50,000,000
100,000,000 1,2 MBIA Global Funding LLC, 5.317%, 8/14/2006
100,000,000
66,000,000 MetLife Insurance Co. of Connecticut, 5.279% - 5.590%, 8/21/2006 - 9/28/2006
66,000,000
105,000,000 Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 5.270% - 5.648%, 8/1/2006 - 10/2/2006
105,000,000
152,000,000 Monumental Life Insurance Co., 5.367% - 5.609%, 7/31/2006 - 10/2/2006
152,000,000
90,000,000 New York Life Insurance Co., 4.920% - 5.290%, 8/30/2006 - 9/1/2006
90,000,000
30,000,000 Protective Life Secured Trust 2004-B, 5.580%, 10/13/2006
30,018,718
125,000,000 Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Co., 5.620%, 10/2/2006


125,000,000

   TOTAL


792,018,718

Municipal--1.0%
205,500,000 Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund Finance Corp., 5.377%, 8/15/2006


205,500,000

Pharmaceuticals & Health Care--0.6%
128,000,000 1,2 Eli Lilly Services, Inc., (GTD by Eli Lilly & Co.), 5.316%, 8/1/2006


128,000,000

   TOTAL NOTES - VARIABLE


8,739,594,939

Principal
Amount
or Shares

   

   

Value

TIME DEPOSITS--8.0%
Banking--8.0%
$ 400,000,000 Bank of Montreal, 5.300%, 8/1/2006
$ 400,000,000
190,000,000 Chase Bank USA, N.A., 5.313%, 8/1/2006
190,000,000
140,000,000 Deutsche Bank AG, 5.313%, 8/1/2006
140,000,000
250,000,000 Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee, 5.213%, 8/1/2006
250,000,000
200,000,000 Societe Generale, Paris, 5.293%, 8/1/2006
200,000,000
500,000,000 SunTrust Bank, 5.300%, 8/1/2006


500,000,000

   TOTAL TIME DEPOSITS


1,680,000,000

MUTUAL FUNDS--0.6%
Asset Management--0.6%
65,000,000 AIM Short-Term Investments Co. Liquid Assets Portfolio
65,000,000
50,000,000 Columbia Money Market Reserves
50,000,000
20,059,291 DWS Money Market Trust


20,059,291

   TOTAL MUTUAL FUNDS


135,059,291

REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--2.9%
$ 228,302,000 Interest in $3,200,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Bank of America N.A. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/1/2035 for $3,200,470,222 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $3,264,000,000.
228,302,000
150,000,000 Interest in $300,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.27%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Goldman Sachs & Co. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/30/2023 for $300,043,917 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $306,045,400.
150,000,000
30,000,000 Interest in $238,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.10%, dated 7/31/2006 under which J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 10/31/2006 for $238,033,717 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $242,764,447.
30,000,000
150,000,000 Interest in $850,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. will repurchase a U.S. Treasury security maturing on 1/15/2011 for $850,123,958 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying security at the end of the period was $868,259,653.
150,000,000
55,000,000 Interest in $100,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.20%, dated 7/31/2006 under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase a U.S. Government Agency Security and Refunding Bonds with various maturities to 4/1/2036 for $100,014,444 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $102,000,893.


55,000,000

   TOTAL REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS


613,302,000

   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--101.0%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 5



21,281,556,276

   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--(1.0)%


(211,105,080
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
21,070,451,196

1 Denotes a restricted security that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) is subject to a contractual restriction on public sales. At July 31, 2006, these restricted securities amounted to $6,758,204,217, which represented 32.1% of total net assets.

2 Denotes a restricted security that may be resold without restriction to "qualified institutional buyers" as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and that the Fund has determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Fund's Board of Trustees. At July 31, 2006, these liquid restricted securities amounted to $6,758,204,217, which represented 32.1% of total net assets.

3 Discount rate at the time of purchase.

4 Floating rate note with current rate and next reset date shown.

5 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

AMBAC --American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation
FHLB --Federal Home Loan Bank
FNMA --Federal National Mortgage Association
GTD --Guaranteed
IDA --Industrial Development Authority
IDB --Industrial Development Bond
INS --Insured
LOC --Letter of Credit
MERLOTS --Municipal Exempt Receipts - Liquidity Optional Tender Series
SWP --Swap Agreement

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Prime Value Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:

Security Type
   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Commercial Paper & Notes

47.3
%
Variable Rate Instruments

42.2
%
Bank Instruments

8.6
%
Repurchase Agreements

3.9
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(2.0
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:



   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

51.5
% 4
8-30 Days

22.7
%
31-90 Days

16.7
%
91-180 Days

5.4
%
181 Days or more

5.7
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(2.0
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

1 Commercial paper and notes include any fixed-rate security that is not a bank instrument. A variable rate instrument is any security which has an interest rate that resets periodically. See the Fund's Prospectus for a description of the principal types of securities in which the Fund invests.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statements of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

4 Overnight securities comprised 34.0% of the Fund's portfolio.

Prime Value Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES--1.7%
Finance - Automotive--1.3%
$ 10,076,558 1,2 DaimlerChrysler Auto Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.791%, 3/8/2007
$ 10,076,558
73,500,000 GS Auto Loan Trust 2006-1, Class A1, 5.514%, 8/15/2007
73,500,000
32,397,518 HSBC Automotive Trust 2006-1, Class A1, 5.276%, 6/18/2007
32,397,518
1,294,473 USAA Auto Owner Trust 2005-4, Class A1, 4.400%, 12/15/2006
1,294,473
5,644,182 World Omni Automobile Receivables Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.855%, 3/15/2007


5,644,182
   TOTAL


122,912,731
Finance - Equipment--0.4%
10,972,186 CIT Equipment Collateral 2006-VT1, Class A1, 4.990%, 3/20/2007
10,972,186
29,989,266 CNH Equipment Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.989%, 4/5/2007


29,989,266
   TOTAL


40,961,452
   TOTAL ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES


163,874,183
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT--7.6%
Banking--7.6%
5,000,000 Barclays Bank PLC, 4.752%, 10/17/2006
5,000,026
181,000,000 Calyon, Paris, 4.750% - 5.310%, 10/17/2006 - 4/19/2007
181,000,000
55,000,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 4.920% - 5.200%, 2/5/2007 - 3/29/2007
55,000,000
200,000,000 Deutsche Bank AG, 4.405% - 4.765%, 10/4/2006 - 10/27/2006
200,000,851
14,000,000 Dexia Bank, Belgium, 4.305%, 9/29/2006
13,989,086
40,000,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.260%, 4/11/2007
40,000,000
128,000,000 Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, Edinburgh, 4.410% - 4.800%, 10/4/2006 - 1/29/2007
128,000,000
39,000,000 Toronto Dominion Bank, 5.600%, 6/18/2007
39,000,000
91,250,000 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 4.840%, 1/30/2007


91,241,207
   TOTAL CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT


753,231,170
COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS--24.1%
Banking--13.8%
25,000,000 BNP Paribas Securities Corp., 5.423%, 8/1/2006
25,000,000
344,000,000 Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, 5.413%, 8/1/2006
344,000,000
175,000,000 Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., 5.443%, 8/1/2006
175,000,000
75,000,000 Fortis Bank SA/NV, 5.363%, 8/1/2006
75,000,000
295,000,000 Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., 5.438%, 8/1/2006
295,000,000
250,000,000 HSBC Securities (USA), Inc., 5.413%, 8/1/2006
250,000,000
185,000,000 J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., 5.413%, 8/1/2006
185,000,000
14,000,000 WAMU Capital Corp., 5.513%, 8/1/2006


14,000,000
   TOTAL


1,363,000,000
Brokerage--10.3%
25,000,000 Bear Stearns & Cos., Inc., 5.433%, 8/1/2006
25,000,000
255,000,000 Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., 5.413%, 8/1/2006
255,000,000
353,000,000 Goldman Sachs & Co., 5.383% - 5.413%, 8/1/2006
353,000,000
189,631,000 Lehman Brothers, Inc., 5.413% - 5.463%, 8/1/2006
189,631,000
195,500,000 Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., 5.413%, 8/1/2006


195,500,000
   TOTAL


1,018,131,000
   TOTAL COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS


2,381,131,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
COMMERCIAL PAPER --17.2% 3
Aerospace/Auto--1.2%
$ 53,900,000 1,2 Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp., (Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Support Agreement), 5.340% - 5.360%, 8/7/2006
$ 53,851,896
67,100,000 1,2 Volkswagen of America, Inc., (GTD by Volkswagen AG), 5.340% - 5.350%, 8/3/2006


67,080,066
   TOTAL


120,931,962
Banking--2.7%
20,000,000 Danske Corp., Inc., (GTD by Danske Bank A/S), 4.984%, 4/10/2007
19,302,240
66,000,000 1,2 KBC Financial Products International Ltd., (GTD by KBC Bank N.V.), 4.970% - 5.100%, 8/9/2006 - 11/20/2006
65,400,767
60,000,000 Landesbank Baden-Wuerttemberg, 5.350%, 9/19/2006
59,563,083
125,000,000 1,2 Picaros Funding LLC, (GTD by KBC Bank N.V.), 4.970% - 5.400%, 8/10/2006 - 10/11/2006


124,139,125
   TOTAL


268,405,215
Consumer Products--0.5%
54,400,000 1,2 Fortune Brands, Inc., 5.225% - 5.450%, 8/8/2006 - 9/6/2006


54,276,304
Finance - Automotive--4.2%
105,700,000 DaimlerChrysler North America Holding Corp., 5.240% - 5.450%, 8/7/2006 - 8/21/2006
105,543,416
151,000,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust, (A1+/P1 Series), 4.280% - 5.260%, 8/8/2006 - 8/15/2006
150,768,557
158,000,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust, (A1/P1 Series), 5.210% - 5.250%, 8/4/2006 - 9/15/2006


157,595,927
   TOTAL


413,907,900
Finance - Commercial--1.2%
124,000,000 CIT Group, Inc., 5.050% - 5.370%, 10/16/2006 - 11/15/2006


122,385,500
Finance - Retail--1.1%
20,000,000 1,2 Amsterdam Funding Corp., 5.380%, 10/4/2006
19,808,711
21,000,000 1,2 Chariot Funding LLC, 5.150%, 9/5/2006
20,894,854
65,000,000 1,2 Compass Securitization LLC, 5.245% - 5.280%, 8/16/2006 - 9/15/2006


64,791,656
   TOTAL


105,495,221
Finance - Securities--2.3%
22,000,000 1,2 Galaxy Funding Inc., 5.040%, 8/4/2006
21,990,760
100,000,000 1,2,4 Georgetown Funding Co. LLC, 5.419%, 9/19/2006
99,565,806
108,000,000 1,2 Grampian Funding LLC, 5.040% - 5.370%, 8/7/2006 - 10/25/2006


106,808,238
   TOTAL


228,364,804
Food & Beverage--1.0%
25,000,000 1,2 General Mills, Inc., 5.350%, 8/8/2006
24,973,993
40,300,000 1,2 H.J. Heinz Finance Co., (H.J. Heinz Co. LOC), 5.350% - 5.420%, 8/1/2006 - 8/15/2006
40,250,467
37,500,000 1,2 Sara Lee Corp., 5.370%, 8/3/2006


37,488,813
   TOTAL


102,713,273
Homebuilding--0.8%
76,100,000 Centex Corp., 5.370%, 8/7/2006 - 8/8/2006


76,028,833
Insurance--1.0%
100,000,000 1,2 Aspen Funding Corp., 5.330%, 9/20/2006


99,259,722
Machinery, Equipment, Auto--0.6%
55,200,000 John Deere Capital Corp., (Deere & Co. Support Agreement), 5.310%, 8/10/2006


55,126,722
Oil & Oil Finance--0.6%
54,300,000 1,2 ConocoPhillips, (GTD by ConocoPhillips Co.), 5.400%, 8/1/2006


54,300,000
   TOTAL COMMERCIAL PAPER


1,701,195,456
CORPORATE BONDS--0.1%
Finance - Retail--0.1%
12,970,000 Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 5.500%, 8/1/2006


12,970,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
CORPORATE NOTES--2.7%
Banking--0.1%
$ 12,675,000 Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH, 2.750%, 10/16/2006

$
12,616,330
Finance - Retail--0.1%
5,000,000 Countrywide Financial Corp., 5.210%, 11/3/2006


5,000,174
Finance - Securities--2.5%
90,000,000 1,2 K2 (USA) LLC, (GTD by K2 Corp.), 4.800% - 5.000%, 12/6/2006 - 3/12/2007
89,998,979
157,000,000 1,2 Sigma Finance, Inc., (GTD by Sigma Finance Corp.), 4.340% - 5.750%, 10/3/2006 - 7/25/2007


157,000,000
   TOTAL


246,998,979
   TOTAL CORPORATE NOTES


264,615,483
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES--0.2%
Government Agency--0.2%
25,000,000 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 5.410%, 6/18/2007


25,000,000
LOAN PARTICIPATION--1.3%
Chemicals--0.5%
50,000,000 DuPont Teijin Films U.K. Ltd., (GTD by Du Pont (E.I.) de Nemours & Co.), 5.430%, 8/31/2006


50,000,000
Electrical Equipment--0.3%
28,000,000 Mt. Vernon Phenol Plant Partnership, (GTD by General Electric Co.), 5.390%, 5/21/2007


28,000,000
Miscellaneous--0.5%
51,000,000 Cargill, Inc., 5.350%, 8/9/2006


51,000,000
   TOTAL LOAN PARTICIPATION


129,000,000
NOTES - VARIABLE --42.2% 5
Banking--23.3%
1,467,000 1901 4th Ave. Parking LLC, (Series 2004), (First Commercial Bank, Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.520%, 8/3/2006
1,467,000
2,065,000 AC, Inc., (Series 2002), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,065,000
80,000 Alabama State IDA, (Wellborn Cabinet, Inc.), Tax Revenue Bonds, (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
80,000
1,650,000 Avondale Commerce Park, Phase III LLP, Phase III, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
1,650,000
4,530,000 Baramax LLC, (Series 2002), (Commerce Bank N.A., Cherry Hill, NJ LOC), 5.600%, 8/2/2006
4,530,000
100,000,000 Barclays Bank PLC, 5.289% - 5.343%, 8/7/2006 - 8/28/2006
99,987,984
4,000,000 Bardstown City, KY, (RJ Tower Project), (Series 1995), (Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
4,000,000
3,505,000 BBF LLC, Series 2002, (First Commercial Bank, Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.380%, 8/3/2006
3,505,000
6,930,000 Bethesda Country Club, Inc., (Series 1997), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.490%, 8/1/2006
6,930,000
735,000 Bissett, William K. and Sheryl B., Multi-Option Adjustable Rate Notes, (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
735,000
5,550,000 Blue Family Holdings LLC, (First Commercial Bank, Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.380%, 8/3/2006
5,550,000
42,000,000 1,2 BNP Paribas SA, 5.144%, 8/21/2006
42,000,000
1,510,000 Broadway Investments, Inc., (Series 1999), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
1,510,000
8,415,000 Callaway Gardens Resort, Inc., (Columbus Bank and Trust Co., GA LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
8,415,000
1,325,000 Campbell Enterprises, (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.650%, 8/3/2006
1,325,000
734,000 Capital One Funding Corp., (Series 1996-C), (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
734,000
2,542,000 CC Properties LLC, (Series 2002 A), Ronald & Phyllis Coleman, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,542,000
3,251,000 CC Properties LLC, (Series 2002 B), Thomas & Carolyn Coleman, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,251,000
6,085,000 Centra State Medical Arts Building LLC, (Commerce Bank N.A., Cherry Hill, NJ LOC), 5.550%, 8/2/2006
6,085,000
4,785,000 Century Drive Associates, (Series 2001), (Commerce Bank N.A., Cherry Hill, NJ LOC), 5.550%, 8/2/2006
4,785,000
3,555,000 Charapp Family Ltd., (Series 2000), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
3,555,000
4,035,000 Christian Life Assembly of the Assemblies of God, (Series 2003), (Fulton Bank LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
4,035,000
4,340,000 Clark-Holder Clinic, PA, (Columbus Bank and Trust Co., GA LOC), 5.570%, 8/3/2006
4,340,000
4,730,000 Columbus, GA Development Authority, Woodmont Properties, LLC, (Series 2000), (Columbus Bank and Trust Co., GA LOC), 5.440%, 8/3/2006
4,730,000
3,315,000 Commerce Towers LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,315,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
NOTES - VARIABLE --continued 5
Banking--continued
$ 6,250,000 Commercial Contractors, Inc., (Series 1998), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.490%, 8/1/2006
$ 6,250,000
1,060,000 Continental Downtown Properties, (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
1,060,000
6,550,000 Continental Downtown Properties, (Series 2000), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
6,550,000
62,000,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 5.477%, 10/16/2006
62,000,000
6,025,000 Cruiser Properties LLC, (Series 1999), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.650%, 8/3/2006
6,025,000
8,075,000 Cullman Shopping Center, Inc., (Series 2002), (First Commercial Bank, Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
8,075,000
165,000,000 1,2 DePfa Bank PLC, 5.369%, 9/15/2006
165,000,000
4,845,000 Dellridge Care Center LP, (Series 1997), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.490%, 8/1/2006
4,845,000
1,560,000 Die-Matic Corp., (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.650%, 8/3/2006
1,560,000
7,345,000 Drury Inns, Inc., (First Commercial Bank, Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
7,345,000
2,685,000 Engle Printing & Publishing, (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
2,685,000
3,465,000 Engle Printing & Publishing, (Series 2003), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
3,465,000
3,120,000 First Baptist Church of Mt. Olive, (Series 2003), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,120,000
2,713,000 First Baptist Church of West Monroe, LA, (Series 2003), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,713,000
8,230,000 Fountainhead Enterprises LLC, (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
8,230,000
2,778,000 Frank Parsons Paper Co., Inc., (Series 1999), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
2,778,000
3,110,000 Gannett Fleming, Inc., (Series 2001), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
3,110,000
1,719,000 Gateway Foods, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
1,719,000
5,625,000 Georgia Crown Distributing Co., (Columbus Bank and Trust Co., GA LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
5,625,000
1,135,000 Gerald T. Thom, Trustee U.A.D., March 27, 1997, (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.510%, 8/3/2006
1,135,000
6,510,000 Green Clinic Management Co. LLC, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
6,510,000
21,000,000 Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc., (GTD by Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc.), 5.305%, 8/9/2006
21,000,000
5,990,000 G&R Investments of Bay County LLC, (Series 2004), (Columbus Bank and Trust Co., GA LOC), 5.520%, 8/3/2006
5,990,000
1,691,000 Grossman Realty LLC, (Series 5), (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.370%, 8/3/2006
1,691,000
920,000 Guilford Capital LLC, (Series 2002 - D), (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
920,000
3,130,000 Guilford Capital LLC, (Series 2002 - E), (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
3,130,000
825,000 Hamilton Farm Bureau Cooperative, Inc., (Series 1999), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.510%, 8/3/2006
825,000
12,200,000 Harris County, GA Development Authority, (Columbus Bank and Trust Co., GA LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
12,200,000
4,310,000 Hazlet Manor Associates, (Series 1998), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.490%, 8/1/2006
4,310,000
157,000,000 1,2 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.259% - 5.315%, 8/9/2006 - 8/21/2006
157,000,000
150,000,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.396% - 5.530%, 8/1/2006 - 9/25/2006
150,000,000
17,990,000 HD Greenville LLC, (Series 2004), (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
17,990,000
2,250,000 HFS Holdings LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,250,000
7,945,000 HP Huntsville LLC, (Series 2003), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
7,945,000
665,000 Ilsco Corp., (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
665,000
3,595,000 Indian Hills Country Club, (Series 2000), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,595,000
5,750,000 Jack W. Kidd, (Series 2003), (First Commercial Bank, Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.520%, 8/3/2006
5,750,000
40,500,000 J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., 5.316%, 8/2/2006
40,500,000
6,916,290 Katie Realty LLC, (Series 2000), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.450%, 8/4/2006
6,916,290
1,510,000 Kent Capital LLC, (Series 1999), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
1,510,000
3,540,000 K & K Management Co., (Series 2000), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
3,540,000
3,350,000 Lake Sherwood Senior Living Center LLC, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.470%, 8/3/2006
3,350,000
8,400,000 Maryland IDFA, Avalon Pharmaceutical, Inc., (Series 2003), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
8,400,000
1,995,000 Maryland IDFA, Gen-Vec, Inc. Facility (Series 1999), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
1,995,000
20,320,000 Maryland State Economic Development Corp., Human Genome (Series 1997), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.490%, 8/1/2006
20,320,000
16,000,000 Maryland State Economic Development Corp., (Series 2001A), Human Genome Sciences, (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.490%, 8/1/2006
16,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
NOTES - VARIABLE --continued 5
Banking--continued
$ 3,140,000 McClatchy-Avondale Corp., (Series1999), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.490%, 8/1/2006
$ 3,140,000
11,035,000 McCullough Oil Bond Issue LLC, (Series 2003), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
11,035,000
10,350,000 Mike Bowden, (Columbus Bank and Trust Co., GA LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
10,350,000
4,055,000 Miller, James & Deborah, (Series 1997), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.490%, 8/1/2006
4,055,000
184,000,000 1 MONET Trust, (Series 2000-1 Class A-2A), (Dresdner Bank AG, Frankfurt SWP), 5.560%, 9/28/2006
184,000,000
135,000,000 1 MONET Trust, (Series 2000-1 Class A-2B), (Dresdner Bank AG, Frankfurt SWP), 5.560%, 9/28/2006
135,000,000
9,490,000 Mountain Christian Church, (Series 2003), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
9,490,000
85,000,000 1,2 National Australia Bank Ltd., Melbourne, 5.307%, 8/7/2006
85,000,000
3,455,000 Neron Real Estate LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,455,000
3,214,000 Oceana County Freezer Storage, Inc., (Series 1998), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.510%, 8/3/2006
3,214,000
910,000 Oceana County Freezer Storage, Inc., (Series 1999), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.510%, 8/3/2006
910,000
4,365,000 Old South Country Club, Inc., (Series 1999), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.490%, 8/1/2006
4,365,000
17,085,000 Omni, HC, Inc., (Columbus Bank and Trust Co., GA LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
17,085,000
2,482,500 Orange Beach Marina, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,482,500
3,200,000 Palmetto Net, Inc., (National Bank of South Carolina LOC), 5.535%, 8/3/2006
3,200,000
5,225,000 Pelham Retail Group LLC, (First Commercial Bank, Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
5,225,000
7,720,000 Prospects Aggregates, Inc., (Series 2004), (Fulton Bank LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
7,720,000
8,750,000 River Road Marietta LP, (Series 2006), (Fulton Bank LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
8,750,000
3,140,000 Riverchase Office Road LLC, (First Commercial Bank, Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
3,140,000
1,175,000 R.M.D.H. Properties LLC, (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
1,175,000
2,060,000 Roby Co. Ltd. Partnership, (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
2,060,000
145,000,000 1,2 Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal, 5.316%, 8/1/2006
145,000,000
55,000,000 Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal, 5.375%, 8/10/2006
55,000,000
18,350,000 Schuster Enterprises, Inc., (Columbus Bank and Trust Co., GA LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
18,350,000
14,000,000 Sea Island Co., (Columbus Bank and Trust Co., GA LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
14,000,000
7,535,000 Smith Land Improvement Corp., (Series 1999), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.490%, 8/1/2006
7,535,000
30,000,000 1,2 Societe Generale, Paris, 5.316%, 8/2/2006
30,000,000
4,675,000 Southeastern Partners Realty I, II, III, (Series 2003), (Bank of North Georgia LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
4,675,000
3,115,000 Southwest Atlanta E.O.C., Inc., (Series 2002), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.470%, 8/3/2006
3,115,000
7,110,000 Spectra Gases, Inc., (Commerce Bank N.A., Cherry Hill, NJ LOC), 5.550%, 8/2/2006
7,110,000
6,720,000 Spencer Cos., Inc., (Series 2001), (First Commercial Bank, Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
6,720,000
3,200,000 Stone Creek LLC, (Columbus Bank and Trust Co., GA LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
3,200,000
25,000,000 Svenska Handelsbanken, Stockholm, 5.318%, 8/21/2006
24,999,320
5,530,000 Tanya K. Nitterhouse, (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
5,530,000
10,140,000 Team Rahal, Inc., (Series 2002), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.450%, 8/4/2006
10,140,000
9,390,000 Test Associates, (Series 2002), (Fulton Bank LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
9,390,000
1,070,000 TLC Realty LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
1,070,000
2,935,000 TNT Co., (Series 1998), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.510%, 8/3/2006
2,935,000
4,670,000 Town Development, Inc., (Series 2000), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
4,670,000
10,000,000 1,2 Union Hamilton Special Purpose Funding LLC, (Series 2005-1), Tranche #1, (GTD by Wachovia Corp.), 5.424%, 9/21/2006
10,000,000
12,360,000 Village of Bartlett, IL, Bartlett Quarry Redevelopment Project (Series 2000), (LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.490%, 8/2/2006
12,360,000
2,015,000 Vulcan, Inc., (Series 2002), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
2,015,000
10,695,000 WCN Properties, Inc., (Series 2), (Fulton Bank LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
10,695,000
87,000,000 Wells Fargo & Co., 5.396%, 8/2/2006
87,000,000
6,570,000 West Shore Country Club, (Series 2000), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
6,570,000
100,000,000 Westpac Banking Corp. Ltd., Sydney, 5.340%, 9/11/2006
100,000,000
136,500,000 1,2 Westpac Banking Corp. Ltd., Sydney, 5.339%, 8/16/2006
136,500,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
NOTES - VARIABLE --continued 5
Banking--continued
$ 13,805,000 William Hill Manor, Inc., (Series 1998), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.490%, 8/1/2006
$ 13,805,000
6,790,000 Wilsbach Distributors, Inc., (Series 1999), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.500%, 8/2/2006
6,790,000
4,550,000 WMMT Properties LP, (Series 2003), (FirstMerit Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
4,550,000
8,160,000 Yonkers, NY IDA, JME Associates, LLC (Series 2006), (Commerce Bank N.A., Cherry Hill, NJ LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
8,160,000
8,375,000 York County, PA IDA, (Series 2003-B), 5.410%, 8/3/2006
8,375,000
15,300,000 Yorktown Building Holding Co. LLC, (Columbus Bank and Trust Co., GA LOC), 5.470%, 8/3/2006


15,300,000
   TOTAL


2,309,125,094
Brokerage--6.5%
70,000,000 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.307% - 5.386%, 8/1/2006 - 8/7/2006
70,000,000
28,000,000 1,2 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.389%, 8/15/2006
28,001,056
181,500,000 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.185% - 5.394%, 8/4/2006 - 8/28/2006
181,500,000
85,500,000 1,2 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.599%, 8/11/2006
85,500,000
279,000,000 Morgan Stanley, 5.366% - 5.468%, 8/1/2006 - 8/28/2006


279,000,000
   TOTAL


644,001,056
Finance - Commercial--1.5%
50,000,000 General Electric Capital Corp., 5.360%, 8/30/2006
50,000,000
97,500,000 1,2 General Electric Capital Corp., 5.469% - 5.470%, 8/9/2006 - 8/17/2006


97,500,000
   TOTAL


147,500,000
Finance - Retail--3.4%
43,000,000 AFS Insurance Premium Receivables Trust, (Series 1994-A), 5.925%, 8/15/2006
43,000,000
53,000,000 1,2 Compass Securitization LLC, 5.289% - 5.300%, 8/7/2006 - 8/10/2006
52,996,068
158,000,000 1,2 Paradigm Funding LLC, 5.297% - 5.345%, 8/7/2006 - 8/25/2006
158,000,000
80,000,000 1,2 SLM Corp., 5.356%, 8/14/2006


80,000,000
   TOTAL


333,996,068
Finance - Securities--3.9%
54,000,000 1,2 Beta Finance, Inc., 5.379%, 8/15/2006
54,010,937
119,000,000 1,2 K2 (USA) LLC, (GTD by K2 Corp.), 5.300% - 5.445%, 8/10/2006 - 10/25/2006
118,967,387
216,000,000 1,2 Sigma Finance, Inc., (GTD by Sigma Finance Corp.), 5.311% - 5.410%, 8/1/2006 - 9/26/2006


215,997,093
   TOTAL


388,975,417
Insurance--2.6%
45,000,000 Genworth Life Insurance Co., 5.256%, 8/9/2006
45,000,000
15,000,000 Hartford Life Insurance Co., 5.319%, 8/1/2006
15,000,000
65,000,000 MetLife Insurance Co. of Connecticut, 5.328% - 5.590%, 9/1/2006 - 9/28/2006
65,000,000
25,000,000 Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 5.648%, 10/2/2006
25,000,000
50,000,000 New York Life Insurance Co., 5.290% - 5.331%, 8/30/2006 - 9/1/2006
50,000,000
35,000,000 1,2 Pacific Life Global Funding, 5.384%, 8/4/2006
35,000,415
20,000,000 Protective Life Secured Trust 2004-B, 5.580%, 10/13/2006


20,012,478
   TOTAL


255,012,893
Municipal--1.0%
98,000,000 Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund Finance Corp., 5.379%, 8/15/2006


98,000,000
   TOTAL NOTES - VARIABLE


4,176,610,528
TIME DEPOSIT--1.0%
Banking--1.0%
95,000,000 WestLB AG, 5.313%, 8/1/2006


95,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--3.9%
$ 294,504,000 Interest in $3,200,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Bank of America N.A. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/1/2035 for $3,200,470,222 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $3,264,000,000.
$ 294,504,000
20,000,000 Interest in $238,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.10%, dated 7/31/2006, under which J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 10/31/2006 for $238,033,717 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $242,764,447.
20,000,000
75,000,000 Interest in $850,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. will repurchase a U.S. Treasury security maturing on 1/15/2011 for $850,123,958 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying security at the end of the period was $868,259,653.


75,000,000
   TOTAL REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS


389,504,000
   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--102.0%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 6



10,092,131,820
   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET --(2.0)%


(200,438,617)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
9,891,693,203

1 Denotes a restricted security that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) is subject to a contractual restriction on public sales. At July 31, 2006, these restricted securities amounted to $3,227,429,671, which represented 32.6% of total net assets.

2 Denotes a restricted security that may be resold without restriction to "qualified institutional buyers" as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and that the Fund has determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Fund's Board of Trustees. At July 31, 2006, these liquid restricted securities amounted to $2,908,429,671, which represented 29.4% of total net assets.

3 Discount rate at time of purchase, or the coupon for interest-bearing issues.

4 Reflects potential extension period.

5 Floating rate note with current rate and next reset date shown.

6 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

GTD --Guaranteed
IDA --Industrial Development Authority
IDFA --Industrial Development Finance Authority
LOC --Letter of Credit
SWP --Swap Agreement

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Tax-Free Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:





   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Variable Rate Demand Instruments

89.1
%
Municipal Notes

13.1
%
Commercial Paper

0.7
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(2.9
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity schedule 3 was as follows:

Securities with an
Effective Maturity of:



   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

89.2
%
8-30 Days

0.9
%
31-90 Days

5.0
%
91-180 Days

3.5
%
181 Days or more

4.3
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(2.9
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

1 See the Fund's Prospectus for a description of these investments.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

Tax-Free Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--102.9% 1,2
Alabama--4.1%
$ 9,860,000 3,4 ABN AMRO MuniTOPS Certificates Trust (Alabama Non-AMT), (Series 2005-5), Weekly VRDNs (Baldwin County, AL Board of Education)/(AMBAC INS)/(ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
$ 9,860,000
7,000,000 3,4 Alabama State Public School & College Authority, (PA-918R), Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
7,000,000
500,000 3,4 Alabama State Public School & College Authority, PUTTERs (Series 124), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
500,000
9,500,000 Birmingham, AL, Medical Clinic Board, (Series 1991), Weekly VRDNs (University of Alabama Health System)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
9,500,000
11,835,000 Birmingham, AL, Tax Increment Financing District I, Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.660%, 8/4/2006
11,835,000
12,985,000 Chelsea Park, AL, Cooperative District, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
12,985,000
2,000,000 Daphne, AL, Special Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Series 1998-A), Weekly VRDNs (Presbyterian Retirement Corp.)/(AMBAC INS)/(Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LIQ), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
25,000,000 Jefferson County, AL, Sewer System, Warrants (Series 2003 B-3), Weekly VRDNs (XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
25,000,000
2,050,000 Jefferson County, AL, Sewer System, Warrants (Series 2003 B-4), Weekly VRDNs (XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
2,050,000
52,600,000 Jefferson County, AL, Sewer System, Warrants (Series 2003B-7), Weekly VRDNs (XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/(Lloyds TSB Bank PLC, London LIQ), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
52,600,000
9,175,000 3,4 Jefferson County, AL, Sewer System, Floater Certificates (Series 2000-352), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
9,175,000
49,400,000 Jefferson County, AL, Sewer System, Warrants (Series 2002 C-2), Weekly VRDNs (XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
49,400,000
43,700,000 Jefferson County, AL, Sewer System, Warrants (Series 2002 C-4), Weekly VRDNs (XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/(Bank of Nova Scotia, Toronto LIQ), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
43,700,000
34,300,000 Jefferson County, AL, Sewer System, Warrants (Series 2002C-6), Weekly VRDNs (XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/(Societe Generale, Paris LIQ), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
34,300,000
360,000 Magnolia Ridge Improvement District, AL, (Series 2002), Weekly VRDNs (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.760%, 8/4/2006
360,000
6,295,000 Marshall County, AL, Special Obligation School Refunding Warrant (Series 1994), Weekly VRDNs (Marshall County, AL Board of Education)/(Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
6,295,000
5,500,000 Mobile, AL, IDB, PCR (Series 1993B), Weekly VRDNs (Alabama Power Co.), 3.580%, 8/3/2006
5,500,000
20,300,000 Mobile, AL, Special Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Series 2006-B), Weekly VRDNs (Infirmary Health System, Inc.)/(Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.660%, 8/2/2006
20,300,000
2,600,000 Mobile, AL Spring Hill College Educational Building Authority, (Series 2004B), Weekly VRDNs (Spring Hill College, AL)/(Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.660%, 8/2/2006
2,600,000
2,500,000 3,4 Mobile, AL, Class A Certificates (Series 2002-197), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Bear Stearns Cos., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
2,500,000
3,300,000 Port City Medical Clinic Board of Mobile, AL, (Series 1998B), Weekly VRDNs (Infirmary Health System, Inc.)/(AMBAC INS)/(Bank of Nova Scotia, Toronto and KBC Bank N.V. LIQs), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
3,300,000
17,930,000 Southeast Alabama Gas District, (Series 2003B), Weekly VRDNs (XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
17,930,000
2,798,000 Tuscaloosa County, AL, Automotive Corridor IDA, (Series 2002), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/3/2006


2,798,000

   TOTAL


331,488,000

Alaska--1.9%
4,630,000 3,4 Alaska International Airports System, (PT-1397), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
4,630,000
8,585,000 3,4 Alaska State Housing Finance Corp., (PT-2770), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
8,585,000
25,800,000 3,4 Alaska State Housing Finance Corp., MERLOTS (Series 1999D), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
25,800,000
13,800,000 North Slope Borough, AK, (Series B), Bonds (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 6/30/2007
13,348,119
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Alaska--continued
$ 1,700,000 Valdez, AK, Marine Terminal, (Series 2001), Daily VRDNs (BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.660%, 8/1/2006
$ 1,700,000
94,340,000 Valdez, AK Marine Terminal, (Series 2003B), Daily VRDNs (BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.660%, 8/1/2006


94,340,000

   TOTAL


148,403,119

Arizona--1.5%
1,500,000 Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Weekly VRDNs (University Physicians, Inc.)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.810%, 8/3/2006
1,500,000
4,315,000 Arizona Health Facilities Authority, (Series 2002), Weekly VRDNs (Royal Oaks Life Care Community)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
4,315,000
32,670,000 Arizona Health Facilities Authority, (Series 2005A), Weekly VRDNs (Banner Health)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.630%, 8/2/2006
32,670,000
2,780,000 Glendale, AZ, IDA, Weekly VRDNs (Friendship Retirement Corp.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
2,780,000
3,695,000 Maricopa County, AZ, IDA, (Series 2000A), Weekly VRDNs (Gran Victoria Housing LLC)/(FNMA LOC), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
3,695,000
35,000,000 3,4 Maricopa County, AZ, IDA, PUTTERs (Series 420), Weekly VRDNs (Catholic Healthcare West)/(J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. LIQ)/ (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.700%, 8/4/2006
35,000,000
4,675,000 3,4 Phoenix, AZ, Civic Improvement Corp., MACON (Series 2005L), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
4,675,000
10,000,000 Phoenix, AZ, Civic Improvement Corp., Senior Lien Wastewater System (Series 2004A), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
10,000,000
6,750,000 Phoenix, AZ, IDA, (Series 2000), Weekly VRDNs (Copper Palms Apartments)/(FHLMC LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
6,750,000
2,000,000 Phoenix, AZ IDA, (Series 2002), Weekly VRDNs (Jewell McFarland Lewis Fresh Start Women's Resource Center)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.630%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
5,635,000 Pima County, AZ, IDA, (Series 2002A), Weekly VRDNs (La Posada at Park Centre, Inc.)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
5,635,000
1,500,000 Sierra Vista, AZ, IDA, (Series 2001A), Weekly VRDNs (Mountain Steppes Properties LLC)/(FNMA LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
1,500,000
2,500,000 Tucson, AZ, IDA, (Series 1989), Weekly VRDNs (Lincoln Garden Tucson LP)/(FHLMC LOC), 3.670%, 8/1/2006
2,500,000
2,745,000 Tucson, AZ, IDA, MFH Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A), Weekly VRDNs (Quality Apartment Living LLC)/(FNMA LOC), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
2,745,000
3,000,000 Yavapai, AZ, IDA, (Series 1997B), Weekly VRDNs (Yavapai Regional Medical Center)/(FSA INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.640%, 8/3/2006


3,000,000

   TOTAL


118,765,000

Arkansas--0.3%
21,555,000 Fayetteville, AR, Public Facilities Board, (Series 2002), Weekly VRDNs (Butterfield Trail Village)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/3/2006


21,555,000

California--0.2%
16,900,000 California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Series 2003D), Weekly VRDNs (Kaiser Permanente), 3.620%, 8/2/2006


16,900,000

Colorado--1.7%
9,500,000 Colorado Educational & Cultural Facilities Authority, (Series 2004A), Weekly VRDNs (Fuller Theological Seminary)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
9,500,000
2,805,000 Colorado Health Facilities Authority, (Series 1998C-1), Weekly VRDNs (Developmental Disabilities Center)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.830%, 8/3/2006
2,805,000
700,000 Denver (City & County), CO, 3.65% TOBs (Blake Street Compendium)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), Optional Tender 12/15/2006
700,000
100,000,000 3,4 Denver Urban Renewal Authority, Stapleton Tax Increment Revenue (Series 2004 FR/RI-F7J), Weekly VRDNs (Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. SWP), 3.750%, 8/2/2006
100,000,000
7,215,000 3,4 Denver, CO, City & County Airport Authority, (PT-1324), Weekly VRDNs (XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
7,215,000
2,800,000 Holland Creek Metropolitan District, CO, (Series 2001), Weekly VRDNs (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.570%, 8/3/2006
2,800,000
7,495,000 3,4 Park Creek Metropolitan District, CO, (PT-1871), Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
7,495,000
6,600,000 Traer Creek Metropolitan District, CO, (Series 2004), Weekly VRDNs (BNP Paribas SA LOC), 3.650%, 8/2/2006


6,600,000

   TOTAL


137,115,000

Connecticut--0.1%
7,000,000 3,4 Connecticut State HFA, Variable Rate Certificates (Series 1998S), Weekly VRDNs (Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006


7,000,000

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Delaware--1.1%
$ 48,925,000 Delaware EDA, (Series 1985A), Weekly VRDNs (Hospital Billing & Collection Service Ltd.)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
$ 48,925,000
25,735,000 Delaware EDA, (Series 1985B), Weekly VRDNs (Hospital Billing & Collection Service Ltd.)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
25,735,000
13,250,000 Sussex County, DE, First Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Series 2006C), Weekly VRDNs (Cadbury at Lewes)/(Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006


13,250,000

   TOTAL


87,910,000

District of Columbia--0.5%
3,560,000 District of Columbia, (Series 1999), Weekly VRDNs (Association of American Medical Colleges)/(AMBAC INS)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.760%, 8/3/2006
3,560,000
5,280,000 District of Columbia, (Series 1999), Weekly VRDNs (Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Washington)/(Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.690%, 8/4/2006
5,280,000
4,500,000 District of Columbia, (Series 2000), Weekly VRDNs (Public Welfare Foundation, Inc.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
4,500,000
11,410,000 District of Columbia, (Series 2001C), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(FGIC Securities Purchase, Inc. LIQ), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
11,410,000
1,820,000 District of Columbia, (Series 2001D), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(FGIC Securities Purchase, Inc. LIQ), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
1,820,000
1,700,000 District of Columbia, (Series 2006), Weekly VRDNs (Washington Center for Internships & Academic Seminars)/(Branch Banking & Trust Co., Winston-Salem LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
1,700,000
6,680,000 3,4 District of Columbia, Ball Park Revenue PUTTERs (Series 1325), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
6,680,000
3,575,000 District of Columbia, Revenue Bonds (Series 1997B), Weekly VRDNs (Association of American Medical Colleges)/(AMBAC INS)/ (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/3/2006


3,575,000

   TOTAL


38,525,000

Florida--5.7%
300,000 Brevard County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Series 2003), Daily VRDNs (Health First, Inc.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.690%, 8/1/2006
300,000
5,800,000 Broward County, FL, HFA, (Series 1997), Weekly VRDNs (Jacaranda Village Apartments)/(HSBC Bank USA LOC), 3.660%, 8/2/2006
5,800,000
16,000,000 Dade County, FL, IDA, (Series 1993), Daily VRDNs (Florida Power & Light Co.), 3.690%, 8/1/2006
16,000,000
5,365,000 Davie, FL, (Series 2003), Weekly VRDNs (United Jewish Community of Broward County, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.630%, 8/3/2006
5,365,000
5,250,000 3,4 Escambia County, FL, Utilities Authority, (PT-2003), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
5,250,000
7,130,000 Eustis Health Facilities Authority, FL, (Series 1992), Weekly VRDNs (Florida Hospital/Waterman, Inc.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
7,130,000
8,200,000 Florida HFA, (1985 Series YY), Weekly VRDNs (Monterey Meadows Apartments, FL)/(FNMA LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
8,200,000
9,400,000 Florida Higher Educational Facilities Financing Authority, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (Flagler College, Inc.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
9,400,000
10,100,000 3,4 Florida State Board of Education Capital Outlay, (Series 2000 SGA-102), Daily VRDNs (Florida State)/(Societe Generale, Paris LIQ), 3.700%, 8/1/2006
10,100,000
16,990,000 3,4 Florida State Board of Education Lottery, ROCs (Series 542), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
16,990,000
7,000,000 3,4 Florida State Department of Environmental Protection, Floater Certificates (Series 2001-722), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/ (Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
7,000,000
35,490,000 3,4 Florida State, MERLOTS (Series 2005-A22), 3.35% TOBs (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/15/2006
35,490,000
295,000 Gulf Breeze, FL, (Series 1985E), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
295,000
3,000,000 Highlands County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Series 1996A), Weekly VRDNs (Adventist Health System)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
3,000,000
8,500,000 Highlands County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Series 2003B), Weekly VRDNs (Adventist Health System/ Sunbelt Obligated Group)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
8,500,000
2,000,000 Highlands County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, Adventist Health System/Sunbelt A/R Program (Series 2004 AR-2), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Bank of Nova Scotia, Toronto LIQ), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
13,500,000 Highlands County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series 2003B), Weekly VRDNs (Adventist Health System/ Sunbelt Obligated Group)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
13,500,000
1,725,000 3,4 Highlands County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, ROCs (Series 577CE), Weekly VRDNs (Adventist Health System/ Sunbelt Obligated Group)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ)/(Citibank N.A., New York LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
1,725,000
3,000,000 Hillsborough County, FL IDA, (Series 2006), Weekly VRDNs (Carrollwood Day School)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
3,000,000
10,600,000 JEA, FL, Electric System, Subordinate Revenue Bonds (2001 Series B), Daily VRDNs (Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/1/2006
10,600,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Florida--continued
$ 4,785,000 Jacksonville, FL, EDC, (Series 2003), Weekly VRDNs (YMCA of Florida's First Coast)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.630%, 8/3/2006
$ 4,785,000
15,600,000 Jacksonville, FL, EDC, (Series 2003A), Weekly VRDNs (Florida Proton Therapy Institute)/(Fortis Bank SA/NV and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOCs), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
15,600,000
2,430,000 Jacksonville, FL, HFDC, Weekly VRDNs (River Garden Project)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
2,430,000
10,010,000 Manatee County, FL, PCR Refunding Bonds (Series 1994), Daily VRDNs (Florida Power & Light Co.), 3.680%, 8/1/2006
10,010,000
48,200,000 Martin County, FL, PCRB, (Series 2000), Daily VRDNs (Florida Power & Light Co.), 3.660%, 8/1/2006
48,200,000
7,600,000 Miami, FL Health Facilities Authority, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (Miami Jewish Home and Hospital for the Aged, Inc.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
7,600,000
1,500,000 Miami-Dade County, FL, IDA, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (Palmer Trinity Private School)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
1,500,000
9,740,000 3,4 Miami-Dade County, FL, Solid Waste System, (PT-2701), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
9,740,000
113,430,000 Miami-Dade County, FL, Water & Sewer Authority, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
113,430,000
5,000,000 Orange County, FL, IDA, (Series 2000), Weekly VRDNs (Central Florida Kidney Centers, Inc.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
5,000,000
10,250,000 Orange County, FL, IDA, (Series 2002), Weekly VRDNs (Catholic Diocese of Orlando)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
10,250,000
4,405,000 Palm Beach County, FL, (Series 2003), Weekly VRDNs (Benjamin Private School, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.630%, 8/3/2006
4,405,000
8,900,000 Palm Beach County, FL, (Series 2003), Weekly VRDNs (Morse Obligated Group)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
8,900,000
410,000 Palm Beach County, FL, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (Maltz Jupiter Theatre, Inc.)/(Bank of New York LOC), 3.700%, 8/3/2006
410,000
5,000,000 Pasco County, FL, School Board, Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen LIQ), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
2,000,000 Sarasota County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Series 2005A), Weekly VRDNs (Sarasota-Manatee Jewish Housing Council, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
3,950,000 St. Petersburg, FL, HFA, Weekly VRDNs (Florida Blood Services, Inc.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/4/2006
3,950,000
2,495,000 3,4 Tampa Bay, FL, Water Utility System, (PA-576), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
2,495,000
7,240,000 Tampa, FL, (Series 2001), Weekly VRDNs (Academy of the Holy Names, Inc.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
7,240,000
8,505,000 Volusia County, FL Education Facility Authority, (Series 2001), Weekly VRDNs (Bethune-Cookman College, Inc.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
8,505,000
5,900,000 Washington County, FL, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Series 2003A), Weekly VRDNs (SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
5,900,000
5,900,000 West Orange, FL, Healthcare District, (Series 1999B), Weekly VRDNs (SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.650%, 8/3/2006


5,900,000

   TOTAL


452,895,000

Georgia--2.6%
2,795,000 Athens-Clarke County, GA, IDA, (Series 2001), Weekly VRDNs (UGA Real Estate Foundation, Inc.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
2,795,000
10,200,000 Burke County, GA, Development Authority, PCR (Series 1992), Daily VRDNs (Georgia Power Co.), 3.660%, 7/31/2006
10,200,000
4,282,000 Burke County, GA, Development Authority, PCRBs (Series 1994A: Vogtle), Weekly VRDNs (Oglethorpe Power Corp.)/(FGIC INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.660%, 8/2/2006
4,282,000
9,675,000 Cobb County, GA, IDA, (Series 1997), Weekly VRDNs (Wyndham Gardens)/(ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
9,675,000
3,635,000 Cobb-Marietta, GA, Coliseum & Exhibit Hall Authority, (Series 1996A), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(SunTrust Bank LIQ), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
3,635,000
4,900,000 Columbus, GA, Hospital Authority, (Series 2000), Weekly VRDNs (St. Francis Hospital, Inc., GA)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
4,900,000
5,000,000 De Kalb Private Hospital Authority, GA, (Series 1994B), Weekly VRDNs (Egleston Children's Hospital at Emory University, Inc.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
5,000,000
1,175,000 DeKalb County, GA, Development Authority, Weekly VRDNs (Lifesouth Community Blood Centers, Inc.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
1,175,000
10,675,000 3,4 DeKalb County, GA, Water & Sewer, Solar Eclipse (Series 2006-0074), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
10,675,000
6,900,000 Floyd County, GA, Development Authority, (Series 2002), Weekly VRDNs (Darlington School)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
6,900,000
1,280,000 Fulton County, GA, Development Authority, (Series 1998), Weekly VRDNs (Morehouse School of Medicine)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
1,280,000
500,000 Fulton County, GA, Development Authority, (Series 2001), Weekly VRDNs (The Lovett School)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
500,000
6,000,000 Fulton County, GA, Development Authority, (Series 2001), Weekly VRDNs (Trinity School, Inc.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
6,000,000
2,200,000 Fulton County, GA, IDA, Weekly VRDNs (Automatic Data Processing, Inc.), 3.700%, 8/15/2006
2,200,000
11,400,000 Gainesville, GA, Redevelopment Authority, (Series 1999), Weekly VRDNs (Brenau University, Inc.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
11,400,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Georgia--continued
$ 8,505,362 Georgia Municipal Association, Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
$ 8,505,362
5,600,000 Georgia State Municipal Gas Authority, (Series A), Weekly VRDNs (Bayerische Landesbank (GTD), J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen (GTD) and Wachovia Bank N.A. LOCs), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
5,600,000
9,500,000 Georgia State Municipal Gas Authority, (Series A), Weekly VRDNs (Bayerische Landesbank (GTD), J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen (GTD) and Wachovia Bank N.A. LOCs), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
9,500,000
21,000,000 Georgia State Municipal Gas Authority, (Series B), Weekly VRDNs (Bayerische Landesbank (GTD), Credit Suisse, Zurich, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wachovia Bank N.A. LOCs), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
21,000,000
33,425,000 Georgia State Municipal Gas Authority, (Series C), Weekly VRDNs (Bank of America N.A., Bayerische Landesbank (GTD), J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wachovia Bank N.A. LOCs), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
33,425,000
1,600,000 Georgia State Municipal Gas Authority, (Series C), Weekly VRDNs (Bank of America N.A., Bayerische Landesbank (GTD), J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen (GTD) and Wachovia Bank N.A. LOCs), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
1,600,000
22,000,000 3,4 Georgia State, Floater Certificates (Series 2011-647), Weekly VRDNs (Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
22,000,000
17,260,000 3,4 Georgia State, PUTTERs (Series 128), Weekly VRDNs (J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
17,260,000
6,040,000 Monroe County, GA, Development Authority, (Series 1999B), Daily VRDNs (Oglethorpe Power Corp. Scherer Project)/(AMBAC INS)/ (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/1/2006
6,040,000
2,960,000 3,4 Rockdale County, GA, Water & Sewer, (PUTTERs Series 1342), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006


2,960,000

   TOTAL


208,507,362

Hawaii--1.2%
7,995,000 3,4 Hawaii State Department of Budget & Finance, GS Trust (Series 2006-4G), Weekly VRDNs (Hawaii Pacific Health)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. GTD)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. LIQ), 3.700%, 8/3/2006
7,995,000
14,960,000 3,4 Hawaii State Department of Budget & Finance, PUTTERs (Series 834), Weekly VRDNs (Hawaii Pacific Health)/(J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. LIQ)/ (J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. LOC), 3.700%, 8/3/2006
14,960,000
58,325,000 3,4 Hawaii State Department of Budget & Finance, PUTTERs (Series 835), Weekly VRDNs (Hawaii Pacific Health)/(J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. LIQ)/ (J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. LOC), 3.700%, 8/3/2006
58,325,000
10,000,000 3,4 Hawaii State, ROCs (Series 6062), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
4,465,000 3,4 Honolulu, HI, City & County, ROCs (Series 4043), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Citigroup Global Markets Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006


4,465,000

   TOTAL


95,745,000

Illinois--10.1%
11,000,000 3,4 ABN AMRO MuniTOPS Certificates Trust (Multistate Non-AMT)/(Series 1998-14), Weekly VRDNs (Cook County, IL)/(FGIC INS)/ (ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LIQ), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
11,000,000
14,705,000 3,4 ABN AMRO MuniTOPS Certificates Trust (Multistate Non-AMT)/(Series 2001-13), Weekly VRDNs (Illinois State)/(FGIC INS)/ (ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LIQ), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
14,705,000
14,285,000 3,4 ABN AMRO MuniTOPS Certificates Trust (Multistate Non-AMT)/(Series 2001-31), Weekly VRDNs (Chicago, IL)/(FGIC INS)/ (ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
14,285,000
4,320,000 Channahon, IL, (Series 2003A), Weekly VRDNs (Morris Hospital)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
4,320,000
5,785,000 Channahon, IL, (Series 2003C), Weekly VRDNs (Morris Hospital)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
5,785,000
6,210,000 Channahon, IL, (Series 2003D), Weekly VRDNs (Morris Hospital)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
6,210,000
6,170,000 3,4 Chicago, IL, Board of Education, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A64), 3.35% TOBs (FGIC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006
6,170,000
20,800,000 Chicago, IL, Board of Education, (Series 2004C-1), Daily VRDNs (FSA INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.670%, 8/1/2006
20,800,000
6,195,000 3,4 Chicago, IL, Board of Education, MERLOTS (Series 2001 A47), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
6,195,000
15,625,000 3,4 Chicago, IL, Board of Education, MERLOTS (Series 1997E), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
15,625,000
20,000,000 3,4 Chicago, IL, Board of Education, Variable Rate Certificates (Series 1996BB), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
20,000,000
6,000,000 Chicago, IL, O'Hare International Airport, (Series 2005D), Weekly VRDNs (CDC IXIS Financial Guaranty N.A. INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
6,000,000
20,575,000 3,4 Chicago, IL, O'Hare International Airport, ROCs (Series 6059), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
20,575,000
5,290,000 3,4 Chicago, IL, Public Building Commission, ROCs (Series 3000), Weekly VRDNs (Chicago, IL Transit Authority)/(AMBAC INS)/ (Citigroup Global Markets Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
5,290,000
6,835,000 3,4 Chicago, IL, (PT-3112), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
6,835,000
66,575,000 Chicago, IL, (Series 2003 B-1), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
66,575,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Illinois--continued
$ 9,500,000 Chicago, IL, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (Joseph Kellman Community Center)/(Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
$ 9,500,000
7,815,000 3,4 Chicago, IL, MERLOTS (Series 2002 A-44), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
7,815,000
20,000,000 3,4 Chicago, IL, MERLOTS (Series 1997 V), Weekly VRDNs (Chicago, IL Water Revenue)/(FGIC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
20,000,000
4,640,000 3,4 Chicago, IL, MERLOTS (Series 2000 WWW), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
4,640,000
6,680,000 3,4 Chicago, IL, MERLOTS (Series 2001 A33), 3.35% TOBs (AMBAC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006
6,680,000
12,485,000 3,4 Chicago, IL, PUTTERs (Series 1277), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
12,485,000
24,995,000 3,4 Chicago, IL, Variable Rate Certificates (Series 1998M), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
24,995,000
30,000,000 Cook County, IL, (Series 2002 B), Weekly VRDNs (Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen (GTD) LIQ), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
30,000,000
4,000,000 Cook County, IL, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (Catholic Theological Union)/(Harris, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/2/2006
4,000,000
21,900,000 Cook County, IL, Capital Improvement Bonds (Series 2004E), Weekly VRDNs (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.700%, 8/3/2006
21,900,000
1,685,000 Crestwood Village, IL, 135th and Cicero Redevelopment (Series 2004), Weekly VRDNs (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
1,685,000
2,790,000 3,4 DuPage & Cook Counties, IL Community United School District No. 205, ROCs (Series 1073), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Citigroup, Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
2,790,000
11,905,000 Freeport, IL, (Series 2001), Weekly VRDNs (Freeport Regional Health Care Foundation)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.810%, 8/3/2006
11,905,000
3,900,000 Galesburg, IL, (Series 1996), Weekly VRDNs (Knox College)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
3,900,000
2,715,000 Hazel Crest, IL, Retirement Center, (Series 1992A), Weekly VRDNs (Waterford Estates)/(DePfa Bank PLC LOC), 3.690%, 8/4/2006
2,715,000
6,875,000 Hazel Crest, IL, Retirement Center, (Series 1992A), Weekly VRDNs (Waterford Estates)/(DePfa Bank PLC LOC), 3.690%, 8/4/2006
6,875,000
6,660,000 Hopedale Village, IL, (Series 1998), Weekly VRDNs (Hopedale Medical Foundation)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
6,660,000
2,400,000 Illinois Development Finance Authority IDB, Weekly VRDNs (Burpee Museum of Natural History)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.830%, 8/3/2006
2,400,000
1,620,000 Illinois Development Finance Authority IDB, (Series 1997), Weekly VRDNs (Ada S. McKInley Community Services, Inc.)/(Harris, N.A. LOC), 3.830%, 8/3/2006
1,620,000
20,000,000 Illinois Development Finance Authority PCR, Daily VRDNs (Diamond Star Motors Corp.)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.700%, 8/1/2006
20,000,000
2,500,000 Illinois Development Finance Authority, (Series 2002), Weekly VRDNs (St. Ignatius College Prep.)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/2/2006
2,500,000
1,000,000 Illinois Development Finance Authority, (Series A), Weekly VRDNs (McCormick Theological Seminary)/(Northern Trust Co., Chicago, IL LOC), 3.660%, 8/2/2006
1,000,000
10,000,000 Illinois Finance Authority, (Series 2006), Weekly VRDNs (Saint Xavier University)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
69,170,000 Illinois Health Facilities Authority, (Series 1997B), Weekly VRDNs (Advocate Health Care Network)/(Bank of America N.A., J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Northern Trust Co., Chicago, IL LIQs), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
69,170,000
60,000,000 Illinois Health Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series 1985B), Weekly VRDNs (OSF Health Care Systems)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
60,000,000
4,500,000 Illinois Health Facilities Authority, Revolving Fund Pooled Financing Program (Series 1985F), Weekly VRDNs (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
4,500,000
10,420,000 3,4 Illinois State Toll Highway Authority, (PT-3477), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
10,420,000
34,445,000 3,4 Illinois State Toll Highway Authority, (PT-3479), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
34,445,000
11,165,000 3,4 Illinois State Toll Highway Authority, PUTTERs (Series 1354), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
11,165,000
22,000,000 3,4 Illinois State Toll Highway Authority, PUTTERs (Series 1355), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
22,000,000
62,200,000 Illinois State, Weekly VRDNs (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
62,200,000
11,915,000 Lombard, IL, (Series 2000: Clover Creek Apartments), Weekly VRDNs (TVO Clover Creek LLC)/(FNMA LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
11,915,000
6,295,000 3,4 Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, IL, GS Trust (Series 2006-28Z), Weekly VRDNs (McCormick Place)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
6,295,000
8,245,000 3,4 Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, IL, MERLOTS (Series 2000VVV), Weekly VRDNs (McCormick Place)/(FGIC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
8,245,000
2,660,000 3,4 Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, IL, PUTTERS (Series 269), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
2,660,000
4,900,000 3,4 Regional Transportation Authority, IL, (Series 2001-A73), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
4,900,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Illinois--continued
$ 11,700,000 3,4 Regional Transportation Authority, IL, MERLOT (Series 2001-A69), 3.35% TOBs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006
$ 11,700,000
10,765,000 3,4 Regional Transportation Authority, IL, MERLOTS (Series 2002-A23), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
10,765,000
9,890,000 3,4 Regional Transportation Authority, IL, MERLOTS (Series 2002-A24), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
9,890,000
3,755,000 3,4 Regional Transportation Authority, IL, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A86), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
3,755,000
9,125,000 3,4 University of Illinois, (PT-2739), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
9,125,000
6,245,000 3,4 University of Illinois, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A88), 3.35% TOBs (AMBAC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006


6,245,000

   TOTAL


805,830,000

Indiana--3.8%
18,615,000 3,4 ABN AMRO MuniTOPS Certificates Trust (Indiana Non-AMT)/(Series 2002-7), Weekly VRDNs (Indianapolis, IN Local Public Improvement Bond Bank)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
18,615,000
4,150,000 Anderson, IN, (Series 2000), Weekly VRDNs (United Faith Housing Corp.)/(National City Bank, Ohio LOC), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
4,150,000
8,450,000 3,4 Brownsburg, IN School Building Corp., (PT-2650), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
8,450,000
9,785,000 Frankfort, IN EDA, (Series 2004), Weekly VRDNs (Wesley Manor, Inc.)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
9,785,000
7,665,000 Franklin, IN, (Series 1999), Weekly VRDNs (Franklin United Methodist Home, Inc.)/(Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
7,665,000
12,105,000 3,4 Indiana Bond Bank, MERLOTS (Series 2001 - A119), 3.35% TOBs (Indiana State Revolving Fund Program)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006
12,105,000
8,445,000 Indiana Development Finance Authority, (Series 2003), Weekly VRDNs (Heritage Christian Schools, Inc.)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
8,445,000
6,000,000 Indiana Health & Educational Facility Financing Authority, (Series 2006), Weekly VRDNs (Marian College, Inc.)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
6,000,000
72,825,000 Indiana Health & Educational Facility Financing Authority, (Series 2006A), Weekly VRDNs (Sisters of St. Francis Health Services, Inc.)/ (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.630%, 8/2/2006
72,825,000
470,000 Indiana Health Facility Financing Authority, Weekly VRDNs (Crossroads Rehabilitation Center)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.980%, 8/3/2006
470,000
2,415,000 Indiana Health Facility Financing Authority, (Series 2001B), Weekly VRDNs (Bethesda Living Center)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
2,415,000
7,815,000 Indiana Health Facility Financing Authority, (Series 2003), Weekly VRDNs (Dunn Memorial Hospital Board of Trustees)/(Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
7,815,000
13,370,000 Indiana Health Facility Financing Authority, (Series 2003), Weekly VRDNs (Major Hospital Board of Trustees)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
13,370,000
10,100,000 Indiana Health Facility Financing Authority, (Series 2004), Weekly VRDNs (Riverview Hospital)/(National City Bank, Indiana LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
10,100,000
5,230,000 3,4 Indiana Transportation Finance Authority, ROCs (Series 2045), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Citigroup Global Markets Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
5,230,000
17,000,000 Indianapolis, IN, Local Public Improvement Bond Bank, (Series 2005G-3), Weekly VRDNs (Indianapolis, IN Waterworks Department)/ (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
17,000,000
36,470,000 3,4 Indianapolis, IN, Local Public Improvement Bond Bank, Class A Certificates (Series 2002-193), Daily VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (Bear Stearns Cos., Inc. LIQ), 3.650%, 8/1/2006
36,470,000
7,220,000 Indianapolis, IN, (Series 2000), Marquette Manor Project, Weekly VRDNs (Retirement Living, Inc.)/(Allied Irish Banks PLC LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
7,220,000
2,385,000 Indianapolis, IN, EDRB (Series 2001), Weekly VRDNs (Indianapolis Electrical Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee)/ (National City Bank, Ohio LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
2,385,000
8,000,000 Lawrence, IN, EDR Board, (Series 2002), Weekly VRDNs (Westminster Village North, Inc.)/(Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
8,000,000
1,680,000 Linton, IN, (Series 1999), Weekly VRDNs (Franklin-Glenburn Home, Inc.)/(Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 3.820%, 8/3/2006
1,680,000
1,875,000 St. Joseph County, IN, (Series 1998), Weekly VRDNs (South Bend Heritage Foundation, Inc.)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/2/2006
1,875,000
24,200,000 Tipton, IN, (Series 2006A), Weekly VRDNs (Tipton County Memorial Hospital)/(Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
24,200,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Indiana--continued
$ 4,000,000 Vigo County, IN, EDA, (Series 2001), Weekly VRDNs (Sisters of Providence of Saint Mary's of the Woods)/(Allied Irish Banks PLC LOC), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
$ 4,000,000
6,580,000 3,4 Warren Township MSD, IN, MERLOTS (Series 2001 A-52), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
6,580,000
7,100,000 Winona Lake, IN, EDRB, (Series 2006), Weekly VRDNs (Grace Village Retirement Community)/(Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006


7,100,000

   TOTAL


303,950,000

Kansas--0.1%
10,195,000 Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, KS, (Series 1993), Weekly VRDNs (Wood View Apartments)/(FHLMC LOC), 3.670%, 8/3/2006


10,195,000

Kentucky--0.4%
8,200,000 Jefferson County, KY, MFH, (Series 2002: Camden Meadows Apartments), Weekly VRDNs (Camden Operating, LP)/(FNMA LOC), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
8,200,000
7,500,000 Jefferson County, KY, (Series 1997), Weekly VRDNs (Kosmos Cement Co. Partnership)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
7,500,000
14,060,000 Jefferson County, KY, (Series 2002A), Weekly VRDNs (ULH, Inc.-University of Louisville)/(Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
14,060,000
3,820,000 Kentucky EDFA, (Series 1999C), Daily VRDNs (Baptist Healthcare System)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(National City Bank, Ohio LIQ), 3.660%, 8/1/2006


3,820,000

   TOTAL


33,580,000

Louisiana--0.9%
12,490,000 3,4 ABN AMRO MuniTOPS Certificates Trust (Louisiana Non-AMT), (Series 2002-17), Weekly VRDNs (Louisiana State Gas & Fuels)/ (AMBAC INS)/(ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
12,490,000
22,000,000 3,4 Jefferson Parish, LA, Hospital Service District No. 1, PUTTERs (Series 522), Weekly VRDNs (J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. LIQ)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.700%, 8/3/2006
22,000,000
8,000,000 Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities Community Development Authority, (Series 2001), Weekly VRDNs (Jewish Federation of Greater New Orleans)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
8,000,000
4,000,000 Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities Community Development Authority, (Series 2004), Weekly VRDNs (The Academy of the Sacred Heart of New Orleans)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
4,000,000
3,350,000 Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities Community Development Authority, (Series 2004), Weekly VRDNs (The Christ Episcopal Church in Covington)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
3,350,000
4,000,000 Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities Community Development Authority, (Series 2004A), Weekly VRDNs (Provident Group-NSU Properties LLC)/(Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
4,000,000
5,125,000 3,4 Louisiana State Gas & Fuels, PUTTERs (Series 1347T), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
5,125,000
8,000,000 Louisiana State Offshore Terminal Authority, Refunding Revenue Bonds Weekly VRDNs (Loop LLC)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
8,000,000
6,275,000 3,4 Louisiana State, (MT-190), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006


6,275,000

   TOTAL


73,240,000

Maine--0.1%
5,000,000 Lewiston, ME, 4.75% BANs, 7/6/2007


5,042,491

Maryland--3.5%
19,400,000 3,4 ABN AMRO MuniTOPS Certificates Trust (Maryland Non-AMT), (Series 2003-19), 3.80% TOBs (Baltimore, MD)/(FGIC INS)/(ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LIQ), Optional Tender 1/18/2007
19,400,000
6,220,000 Baltimore County, MD, Weekly VRDNs (Calvert Hall College)/(Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.690%, 8/4/2006
6,220,000
3,090,000 Baltimore County, MD, (Series 1999), Weekly VRDNs (Calvert Hall College)/(Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.690%, 8/4/2006
3,090,000
6,450,000 Baltimore County, MD, (Series 2004), Weekly VRDNs (Quail Ridge Apartments)/(FNMA LOC), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
6,450,000
4,440,000 Calvert County, MD, EDA, (Series 2001), Weekly VRDNs (Asbury-Solomons, Inc.)/(KBC Bank N.V. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
4,440,000
9,290,000 Carroll County, MD, (Series 1999B), Weekly VRDNs (Fairhaven, Inc./Copper Ridge, Inc.)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS)/ (Branch Banking & Trust Co., Winston-Salem LIQ), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
9,290,000
9,000,000 Frederick County, MD, (1997 Issue), Weekly VRDNs (Homewood at Frederick MD, Inc. Facility)/(Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.660%, 8/1/2006
9,000,000
4,765,000 Howard County, MD, (Series 1995), Weekly VRDNs (Bluffs at Clarys Forest Apartments)/(Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.660%, 8/1/2006
4,765,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Maryland--continued
$ 1,650,000 Howard County, MD, (Series 1999), Weekly VRDNs (Howard Development LP Facility)/(Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.740%, 8/4/2006
$ 1,650,000
4,470,000 Howard County, MD, (Series 2002-A), Weekly VRDNs (Columbia Vantage House Corp.)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
4,470,000
58,000,000 Maryland Community Development Administration - Residential Revenue, (2006 Series C), 3.375% BANs, 3/7/2007
58,000,000
3,000,000 Maryland IDFA, (Series 2002A), Weekly VRDNs (National Aquarium in Baltimore, Inc.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.630%, 8/2/2006
3,000,000
3,720,000 Maryland State Economic Development Corp., (1997 Issue), Weekly VRDNs (Jenkins Memorial Nursing Home, Inc. Facility)/(Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.590%, 8/1/2006
3,720,000
5,200,000 Maryland State Economic Development Corp., (Series 2003), Weekly VRDNs (YMCA of Central Maryland, Inc.)/(Branch Banking & Trust Co., Winston-Salem LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
5,200,000
5,400,000 Maryland State Economic Development Corp., (Series 2003), Maryland Science Center, Weekly VRDNs (Maryland Academy of Sciences)/ (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.630%, 8/3/2006
5,400,000
3,000,000 Maryland State Economic Development Corp., (Series 2006A), Weekly VRDNs (Constellation Energy Group)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
3,000,000
1,890,000 Maryland State Economic Development Corp., (Series 2006A), Weekly VRDNs (eMerge, Inc.)/(Mercantile Safe Deposit & Trust Co., Baltimore LOC), 3.670%, 8/4/2006
1,890,000
2,185,000 Maryland State Economic Development Corp., (Series 2006B), Weekly VRDNs (eMerge, Inc.)/(Mercantile Safe Deposit & Trust Co., Baltimore LOC), 3.670%, 8/4/2006
2,185,000
5,325,000 Maryland State Economic Development Corp., (Series A), Weekly VRDNs (The ASSOCIATED: Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.630%, 8/3/2006
5,325,000
1,675,000 Maryland State Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority, Weekly VRDNs (Capitol College)/(Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.610%, 8/1/2006
1,675,000
7,800,000 Maryland State Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Series 1994), Weekly VRDNs (University Physicians, Inc.)/ (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
7,800,000
1,250,000 Maryland State Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Series 1998), Weekly VRDNs (Woodbourne Foundation, Inc.)/ (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.610%, 8/1/2006
1,250,000
5,420,000 Maryland State Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Series 1999), Weekly VRDNs (Boys' Latin School)/(Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.690%, 8/4/2006
5,420,000
2,800,000 Maryland State Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Series 1999), Weekly VRDNs (Landon School)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.630%, 8/2/2006
2,800,000
5,765,000 Maryland State Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Series 2001C), Weekly VRDNs (Collington Episcopal Life Care Community, Inc.)/ (LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
5,765,000
7,015,000 Maryland State Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Series 2003B), Weekly VRDNs (Adventist HealthCare, Inc.)/ (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.690%, 8/4/2006
7,015,000
6,640,000 Maryland State Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Series 2004), Weekly VRDNs (Annapolis Life Care, Inc.)/(Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania LOC), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
6,640,000
7,945,000 Maryland State Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Series 1997), Weekly VRDNs (Augsburg Lutheran Home of MD, Inc.)/ (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.610%, 8/2/2006
7,945,000
3,700,000 Maryland State IDFA, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (Baltimore International College, Inc.)/(Branch Banking & Trust Co., Winston-Salem LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
3,700,000
7,875,000 Maryland State IDFA, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (McDonogh School, Inc.)/(Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.690%, 8/4/2006
7,875,000
9,145,000 Montgomery County, MD EDA, (Series 2002), Weekly VRDNs (Institute for Genomic Research, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.630%, 8/3/2006
9,145,000
914,000 Montgomery County, MD Housing Opportunities Commission, (Series 1998 Issue I), Weekly VRDNs (Byron House, Inc. Facility)/ (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.660%, 8/1/2006
914,000
35,000,000 Montgomery County, MD, (Series 2002), 3.60% CP, Mandatory Tender 8/10/2006
35,000,000
12,700,000 Montgomery County, MD, Consolidated Public Improvement BANs (2006 Series B), Daily VRDNs (Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.680%, 8/1/2006
12,700,000
2,235,000 Prince Georges County, MD, (1997 Issue), Weekly VRDNs (Mona Branch Avenue Ltd. Partnership)/(Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.710%, 8/1/2006
2,235,000
3,365,000 Washington County, MD, (Series 2000), Weekly VRDNs (YMCA of Hagerstown, Inc.)/(Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.690%, 8/4/2006


3,365,000

   TOTAL


277,739,000

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Massachusetts--1.2%
$ 3,724,836 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Massachusetts Non-AMT), (Series 1997-2), Weekly VRDNs (Massachusetts State Lottery Commission)/(AMBAC INS)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
$ 3,724,836
10,866,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Massachusetts Non-AMT) (Series 2000-2), 3.30% TOBs (Massachusetts Turnpike Authority)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), Optional Tender 8/3/2006
10,866,000
14,500,000 Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Consolidated Loan (Series 2006B), Daily VRDNs (Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.660%, 8/1/2006
14,500,000
6,800,000 Massachusetts HEFA, (Series 2003), Weekly VRDNs (Emmanuel College)/(Allied Irish Banks PLC and State Street Bank and Trust Co. LOCs), 3.610%, 8/3/2006
6,800,000
15,170,000 Massachusetts HEFA, (Series 2004F), Weekly VRDNs (Winchester Hospital)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
15,170,000
2,450,000 3,4 Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co., Floater Certificates (Series 2001-674), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
2,450,000
19,355,000 Massachusetts State Development Finance Agency, (Series 2002), Weekly VRDNs (Gordon College)/(Citizens Bank of Massachusetts LOC), 3.700%, 8/3/2006
19,355,000
1,627,500 3,4 Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, Floater Certificates (Series 2000-335), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
1,627,500
23,250,000 3,4 Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, Class A Certificates (Series 2002-208), Daily VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Bear Stearns Cos., Inc. LIQ), 3.650%, 8/1/2006


23,250,000

   TOTAL


97,743,336

Michigan--4.0%
10,000,000 3,4 ABN AMRO MuniTOPS Certificates Trust (Michigan Non-AMT) (Series 2005-2), 3.80% TOBs (Chippewa Valley, MI Schools)/(FSA INS)/ (ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LIQ), Optional Tender 1/18/2007
10,000,000
2,665,000 3,4 Allen Park, MI, Public School District, ROCs (Series 4007), Weekly VRDNs (Michigan State GTD)/(Citigroup Global Markets Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
2,665,000
4,815,000 3,4 Detroit, MI, City School District, (PT-1844), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
4,815,000
14,380,000 3,4 Detroit, MI, City School District, MERLOTS (Series 2000 A8), 3.35% TOBs (FGIC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006
14,380,000
1,490,000 3,4 Detroit, MI, City School District, ROCs (Series 4004), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Citigroup Global Markets Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
1,490,000
24,195,000 3,4 Detroit, MI, City School District, Solar Eclipse Certificates (Series 2006-0001), 3.55% TOBs (FSA INS)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 3/8/2007
24,195,000
3,620,000 3,4 Detroit, MI, City School District, Variable Certificates (Series 2002H), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
3,620,000
14,125,000 3,4 Detroit, MI, Sewage Disposal System, MERLOTS (Series 2000-I), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
14,125,000
4,260,000 3,4 Detroit, MI, Sewage Disposal System, Variable Certificates (Series 2002G), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
4,260,000
10,000,000 3,4 Detroit, MI, Water Supply System, MERLOTS (Series 2000 D), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
10,000,000
2,620,000 3,4 Forest Hills, MI, Public School, (PT-1762), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
2,620,000
8,360,000 3,4 Grand Rapids & Kent County, MI Joint Building Authority, (Series 2001-JP MC7), Weekly VRDNs (Kent County, MI)/(J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/2/2006
8,360,000
9,245,000 Grand Rapids, MI, Economic Development Corp., (Series 2000), Weekly VRDNs (Holland Home Obligated Group)/(Fifth Third Bank, Michigan LOC), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
9,245,000
13,000,000 Kalamazoo, MI, Hospital Finance Authority, (Series 2006), Weekly VRDNs (Bronson Methodist Hospital)/(FSA INS)/(National City Bank of the Midwest LIQ), 3.630%, 8/2/2006
13,000,000
8,995,000 3,4 Kent County, MI, (Series 1998-118), Weekly VRDNs (Kent County International Airport)/(Kent County, MI GTD)/(Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
8,995,000
6,000,000 Kentwood, MI, Public Economic Development Corp., Weekly VRDNs (Holland Home Obligated Group)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
6,000,000
125,000 Michigan Higher Education Facilities Authority, (Series 1997), Weekly VRDNs (Davenport College of Business)/(Fifth Third Bank, Michigan LOC), 3.700%, 8/3/2006
125,000
1,250,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, (Series 1999 A), Weekly VRDNs (Covenant Retirement Communities, Inc.)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
1,250,000
24,200,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, (Series 2000E), Weekly VRDNs (Trinity Healthcare Credit Group)/(AMBAC INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
24,200,000
1,200,000 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, (Series C), Weekly VRDNs (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
1,200,000
18,150,000 3,4 Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, MERLOTS (Series 1997A), Weekly VRDNs (Detroit Medical Center Obligated Group)/(AMBAC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
18,150,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Michigan--continued
$ 1,700,000 Michigan State Housing Development Authority, (Series 2002A), Weekly VRDNs (Ponds Taylor Limited Dividend Housing Association LLC)/ (FNMA LOC), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
$ 1,700,000
40,000,000 Michigan State, (2006 Series A), 4.50% TRANs, 9/29/2006
40,078,009
4,370,000 3,4 Michigan State, (PT-2021), Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
4,370,000
90,000,000 3,4 Michigan State, GO Notes (Series 2005 FR/RI-P5), Weekly VRDNs (Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
90,000,000
2,915,000 3,4 Wyandotte, MI, City School District, (PT-1790), Weekly VRDNs (Michigan State GTD)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006


2,915,000

   TOTAL


321,758,009

Minnesota--2.2%
13,000,000 3,4 ABN AMRO MuniTOPS Certificates Trust (Minnesota Non-AMT), (Series 2000-8), Weekly VRDNs (Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN Metropolitan Airports Commission)/(FGIC INS)/(ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LIQ), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
13,000,000
46,185,000 3,4 Becker, MN, (Series 2005 FR/RI-FP12), Weekly VRDNs (Northern States Power Co., MN)/(Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. SWP), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
46,185,000
4,965,000 3,4 Becker, MN, (Series 2005 FR/RI-FP13), Weekly VRDNs (Northern States Power Co., MN)/(Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. SWP), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
4,965,000
29,950,000 3,4 Becker, MN, (Series 2006 FR/RI-FP1), Weekly VRDNs (Northern States Power Co., MN)/(Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. SWP), 3.970%, 8/3/2006
29,950,000
6,400,000 Center City, MN, (Series 2000), Weekly VRDNs (Hazelden Foundation)/(Allied Irish Banks PLC LOC), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
6,400,000
1,550,000 Cohasset, MN, (Series 2000), Weekly VRDNs (Minnesota Power, Inc.)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
1,550,000
2,000,000 Hopkins, MN, ISD No. 270, 3.75% TRANs (Minnesota State GTD), 8/7/2006
2,000,180
10,000,000 Minneapolis, MN, Housing Development Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 1988), Weekly VRDNs (Symphony Place)/(FHLMC LOC), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
5,000,000 3,4 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN Metropolitan Airports Commission, SGA 127 (Series 2001), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Societe Generale, Paris LIQ), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
5,000,000
2,000,000 3,4 Minnesota Public Facilities Authority, (PT-1175), Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
9,000,000 Minnesota State Higher Education Facility Authority, (Series Five-C), Weekly VRDNs (University of St. Thomas)/(Allied Irish Banks PLC LOC), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
9,000,000
3,500,000 Minnesota State Higher Education Facility Authority, (Series Five-L), Weekly VRDNs (University of St. Thomas)/(Allied Irish Banks PLC LOC), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
3,500,000
10,000 Minnesota State Higher Education Facility Authority, (Series Five-S), Weekly VRDNs (William Mitchell College of Law)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
10,000
5,995,000 3,4 Minnesota State, (PT-399), Weekly VRDNs (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
5,995,000
14,810,000 3,4 Minnesota State, (PT-400), Weekly VRDNs (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
14,810,000
3,500,000 3,4 Minnesota State, Floater Certificates (Series 2001-719), Weekly VRDNs (Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
3,500,000
4,560,000 Plymouth, MN, (Series 2003), Weekly VRDNs (Parkside Apartments)/(FNMA LOC), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
4,560,000
5,000,000 3,4 Rochester, MN, Health Care Facility Authority, (Series 1998-177), Weekly VRDNs (Mayo Foundation)/(Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
4,100,000 St. Paul, MN, Port Authority, (Series 1991), Weekly VRDNs (West Gate Office)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
4,100,000
2,250,000 St. Paul, MN Port Authority, District Heating Revenue Bonds (Series 2003-4 H), Weekly VRDNs (Dexia Credit Local LOC), 3.660%, 8/2/2006
2,250,000
555,000 University of Minnesota, (Series 1999A), Weekly VRDNs, 3.640%, 8/2/2006
555,000
3,165,000 3,4 University of Minnesota, Floater Certificates (Series 2001-648), Weekly VRDNs (Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006


3,165,000

   TOTAL


177,495,180

Mississippi--0.4%
20,000,000 Jackson County, MS, Port Facility Daily VRDNs (Chevron U.S.A., Inc.)/(Chevron Corp. GTD), 3.680%, 8/1/2006
20,000,000
3,600,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (Series 2002), Weekly VRDNs (Mississippi State University Foundation, Inc.)/(Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
3,600,000
8,840,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (Series A), Weekly VRDNs (Mississippi College)/(Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 3.760%, 8/3/2006


8,840,000

   TOTAL


32,440,000

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Missouri--4.4%
$ 4,390,000 Kansas City, MO, IDA, (Series 2001A), Weekly VRDNs (Bethesda Living Center)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
$ 4,390,000
65,015,000 Kansas City, MO, IDA, (Series 2005A), Weekly VRDNs (Kansas City, MO)/(AMBAC INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
65,015,000
47,185,000 Kansas City, MO, IDA, (Series 2005B), Weekly VRDNs (Kansas City, MO)/(AMBAC INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
47,185,000
140,870,000 Kansas City, MO, IDA, (Series 2005C), Weekly VRDNs (Kansas City, MO)/(AMBAC INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
140,870,000
25,000,000 Kansas City, MO, IDA, (Series 2006 E), Weekly VRDNs (Kansas City, MO)/(AMBAC INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
25,000,000
25,500,000 Kansas City, MO, IDA, (Series 2006B), Weekly VRDNs (Kansas City, MO)/(AMBAC INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
25,500,000
1,380,000 Missouri State HEFA, (Series 2005A), Daily VRDNs (St. Louis University)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.670%, 8/1/2006
1,380,000
44,725,000 3,4 St. Louis, MO, SPEARs (DB-161), Weekly VRDNs (Lambert-St. Louis International Airport)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (Deutsche Bank AG LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006


44,725,000

   TOTAL


354,065,000

Multi State--3.7%
67,532,896 3,4 ABN AMRO Chicago Corp. 1997-1 LeaseTOPS Trust, Weekly VRDNs (LaSalle Bank, N.A. LIQ)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.910%, 8/3/2006
67,532,896
3,485,000 Dallas County, AL, Housing Development Corp., (Series 1999: Jim Manor Garden Homes), Weekly VRDNs (Dallas County, AL)/ (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.760%, 8/4/2006
3,485,000
60,220,000 3,4 ROCs Trust II-R (Series 8000JD), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC, FGIC, FSA, MBIA Insurance Corp. INS) and Citigroup, Inc. LIQs), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
60,220,000
85,935,000 3,4 ROCs Trust II-R (Series 8001JJ), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC, FGIC, FSA, MBIA Insurance Corp. INS) and Citigroup, Inc. LIQs), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
85,935,000
9,980,000 3,4 ROCs Trust II-R (Series 8002FA), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC, FGIC, FSA, MBIA Insurance Corp. INS) and Citigroup, Inc. LIQs), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
9,980,000
36,945,000 3,4 ROCs Trust II-R (Series 8005MN), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC, FGIC, FSA, MBIA Insurance Corp. INS) and Citigroup, Inc. LIQs), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
36,945,000
30,105,000 3,4 TICs/TOCs MuniMae Trust (Series 2002-1M), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Bayerische Landesbank (GTD) LIQ), 3.700%, 8/3/2006


30,105,000

   TOTAL


294,202,896

Nebraska--0.2%
2,050,000 3,4 Nebraska Public Power District, ROCs (Series 9000), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Citigroup, Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
2,050,000
12,000,000 Scotts Bluff County, NE, Hospital Authority No.1, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (Regional West Medical Center)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS)/ (Key Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006


12,000,000

   TOTAL


14,050,000

Nevada--1.1%
17,900,000 Clark County, NV, Airport System, (Series 1993A), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Dexia Credit Local and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQs), 3.630%, 8/2/2006
17,900,000
21,350,000 3,4 Clark County, NV, School District, (Series 2006-1356), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
21,350,000
20,000,000 3,4 Clark County, NV, PUTTERs (Series 1353), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
20,000,000
18,735,000 3,4 Las Vegas Valley, NV, Water District, MERLOTS (Series 2003 B-10), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
18,735,000
9,300,000 3,4 Truckee Meadows, NV, Water Authority, ROCs (Series 6078), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Citigroup, Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006


9,300,000

   TOTAL


87,285,000

New Hampshire--0.3%
17,000,000 New Hampshire HEFA, (Series 2002B), Weekly VRDNs (Catholic Medical Center)/(Citizens Bank of Massachusetts LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
17,000,000
9,725,000 New Hampshire Higher Educational & Health Facilities Authority, (Series 1997B), Weekly VRDNs (RiverWoods at Exeter)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.650%, 8/2/2006


9,725,000

   TOTAL


26,725,000

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
New Jersey--2.0%
$ 11,860,000 3,4 Delaware River Port Authority Revenue, PUTTERS (Series 144), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
$ 11,860,000
11,000,000 East Brunswick Township, NJ, 4.50% BANs, 5/11/2007
11,065,757
13,915,600 Hammonton, NJ, 4.125% BANs, 1/11/2007
13,927,133
12,565,000 Lakewood Township, NJ, 4.50% BANs, 3/2/2007
12,615,074
8,691,000 Montclair Township, NJ, 4.50% BANs, 3/15/2007
8,742,964
18,000,000 Montclair Township, NJ, Temporary School Notes, 4.50% BANs, 3/15/2007
18,107,623
10,606,000 New Brunswick, NJ, 4.50% BANs, 7/10/2007
10,669,263
8,085,000 3,4 New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, Floater Certificates (Series 2001-833), Weekly VRDNs (Hunterdon Medical Center)/ (AMBAC INS)/(Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
8,085,000
13,000,000 3,4 New Jersey State Transportation Trust Fund Authority, (Series 5012-BBT), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Branch Banking & Trust Co., Winston-Salem LIQ), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
13,000,000
20,140,000 3,4 New Jersey State Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Class A Certificates (Series 268), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Bear Stearns Cos., Inc. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
20,140,000
5,295,000 3,4 New Jersey State Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Floater Certificates (Series 1998-54), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
5,295,000
21,485,000 3,4 New Jersey State Transportation Trust Fund Authority, PUTTERS (Series 241), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
21,485,000
10,428,250 Red Bank, NJ, 4.50% BANs, 7/31/2007


10,498,536

   TOTAL


165,491,350

New York--6.3%
19,000,000 Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY, (Series 2004 A-2), Weekly VRDNs (MTA Transportation Revenue)/(CDC IXIS Financial Guaranty N.A. INS)/ (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.600%, 8/3/2006
19,000,000
115,500,000 Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY, (Series 2005A), Weekly VRDNs (MTA Dedicated Tax Fund)/(XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/ (Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
115,500,000
21,100,000 3,4 Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NY, MERLOTS (Series 1997C), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
21,100,000
67,800,000 New York City, NY, IDA, Liberty Revenue Bonds (Series 2004 A), Weekly VRDNs (One Bryant Park LLC)/(Bayerische Landesbank (GTD) INV)/ (Bank of America N.A. and Citibank NA, New York LOCs), 3.630%, 8/2/2006
67,800,000
18,400,000 New York City, NY, IDA, Liberty Revenue Bonds (Series 2004 B), Daily VRDNs (One Bryant Park LLC)/(Bayerische Landesbank (GTD) INV)/ (Bank of America N.A. and Citibank NA, New York LOCs), 3.700%, 8/1/2006
18,400,000
20,000,000 New York City, NY, Municipal Water Finance Authority, (Series 5), 3.65% CP, Mandatory Tender 8/17/2006
20,000,000
52,730,000 New York City, NY, (1996 Series J-3), Weekly VRDNs (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
52,730,000
30,000,000 3,4 New York City, NY, ROCs (Series 251), Weekly VRDNs (Citigroup Global Markets Holdings, Inc. GTD)/(Citigroup Global Markets Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.700%, 8/3/2006
30,000,000
20,255,000 3,4 New York City, NY, Floater Certificates (Series 2004-1065), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
20,255,000
3,670,000 3,4 New York State Environmental Facilities Corp. State Clean Water and Drinking Water, Floater Certificates (Series 2001-658), Weekly VRDNs (Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
3,670,000
12,500,000 New York State HFA, Service Contract Revenue Bonds (2003 Series G), Weekly VRDNs (WestLB AG (GTD) LOC), 3.630%, 8/2/2006
12,500,000
10,275,000 New York State Local Government Assistance Corp., (Series 2003A-4V), Subordinate Lien Refunding Bonds, Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(WestLB AG (GTD) LIQ), 3.600%, 8/2/2006
10,275,000
10,410,000 3,4 New York State Thruway Authority, ROCs (Series 562), Weekly VRDNs (New York State Personal Income Tax Revenue Bond Fund)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
10,410,000
37,745,999 Niagara Wheatfield, NY Central School District, 4.50% BANs, 2/15/2007
37,980,448
7,595,930 Poughkeepsie City, NY, (Series 2006A), 4.50% BANs, 7/19/2007
7,643,838
10,000,000 3,4 TSASC, Inc. NY, Tobacco Settlement Asset Backed Bonds (PA-1389), Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
19,140,000 3,4 TSASC, Inc. NY, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds (PA-1355), Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
19,140,000
27,220,000 3,4 Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, NY, PUTTERs (Series 304), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006


27,220,000

   TOTAL


503,624,286

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
North Carolina--0.4%
$ 3,870,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Series 2001), Weekly VRDNs (Rutherford Hospital, Inc.)/(Branch Banking & Trust Co., Winston-Salem LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
$ 3,870,000
1,000,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Series 2001A), Weekly VRDNs (Moses H. Cone Memorial), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
1,000,000
5,000,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Series 2006C-1), Weekly VRDNs (University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina)/ (AMBAC INS)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.660%, 8/2/2006
5,000,000
22,470,000 North Carolina State, Public Improvement Bonds (Series 2002G), Weekly VRDNs (Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen (GTD) LIQ), 3.600%, 8/2/2006


22,470,000

   TOTAL


32,340,000

Ohio--6.1%
8,500,000 3,4 ABN AMRO MuniTOPS Certificates Trust (Ohio Non-AMT) (Series 2004-14), Weekly VRDNs (Columbus, OH City School District)/ (FSA INS)/(ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
8,500,000
1,310,000 Akron, Bath & Copley, OH, Joint Township, Weekly VRDNs (Visiting Nurses)/(National City Bank, Ohio LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
1,310,000
7,135,000 Akron, Bath & Copley, OH, Joint Township, (Series 2002), Weekly VRDNs (Sumner on Ridgewood, Inc.)/(KBC Bank N.V. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
7,135,000
9,835,000 Akron, Bath & Copley, OH, Joint Township, (Series 2004B), Weekly VRDNs (Summa Health System)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
9,835,000
15,880,000 Ashland County, OH, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (Brethren Care, Inc.)/(FirstMerit Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
15,880,000
5,115,000 Butler County Hospital, (Series 2002), Weekly VRDNs (Middletown Regional Hospital)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
5,115,000
3,500,000 Butler County, OH, (Series C), 4.00% BANs, 9/21/2006
3,505,129
5,060,000 Butler County, OH, 4.50% BANs, 9/21/2006
5,067,031
3,835,000 3,4 Cincinnati City School District, OH, PUTTERs (Series 315), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
3,835,000
9,715,000 Clark County, OH, (Series 1999), Weekly VRDNs (Ohio Masonic Home)/(AMBAC INS)/(Harris, N.A. LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
9,715,000
8,870,000 Clark County, OH, (Series 2001), Weekly VRDNs (Ohio Masonic Home)/(AMBAC INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
8,870,000
10,165,000 Clark County, OH, (Series 2002), Weekly VRDNs (Ohio Masonic Home)/(AMBAC INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
10,165,000
4,015,000 3,4 Cleveland, OH, Waterworks, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A24), 3.35% TOBs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006
4,015,000
7,150,000 Cleveland-Cuyahoga County, OH, Port Authority, (Series 2004), Weekly VRDNs (Playhouse Square Foundation)/(Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
7,150,000
4,005,000 Cuyahoga County, OH, Hospital Authority, (Series 1998-II), Weekly VRDNs (W.O. Walker Center, Inc.)/(AMBAC INS)/(Key Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
4,005,000
14,400,000 Cuyahoga County, OH, Hospital Authority, (Series 2000), Weekly VRDNs (The Sisters of Charity of St. Augustine Health System, Inc.)/ (National City Bank, Ohio LOC), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
14,400,000
5,000,000 Cuyahoga County, OH, IDA, (Series A-1 Remarketing), Weekly VRDNs (University School)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
4,000,000 Cuyahoga County, OH, (Series 2002), Weekly VRDNs (The Health Museum of Cleveland)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
4,000,000
4,775,000 Cuyahoga, OH, Community College District, (Series 2002B), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Key Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
4,775,000
11,000,000 Dublin, OH, City School District, 3.39% BANs, 11/16/2006
11,007,481
1,250,000 Dublin, OH, Industrial Development Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 1997), Weekly VRDNs (Witco Corp.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
1,250,000
7,485,000 3,4 Erie County, OH, Hospital Facilities, (MT-253), Weekly VRDNs (Firelands Regional Medical Center)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
7,485,000
3,000,000 Franklin County, OH, Health Care Facilities, (Series 1999 A), Weekly VRDNs (National Church Residences)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
3,000,000
7,250,000 Franklin County, OH, Health Care Facilities, (Series 2004), Weekly VRDNs (Creekside at the Village)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
7,250,000
6,230,000 Franklin County, OH, Health Care Facilities, (Series 2004), Weekly VRDNs (Willow Brook Christian Communities)/(Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
6,230,000
10,000,000 Franklin County, OH, Health Care Facilities, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (First Community Village)/(KBC Bank N.V. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
10,540,000 Franklin County, OH, Health Care Facilities, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (Traditions Healthcare Obligated Group)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
10,540,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Ohio--continued
$ 8,000,000 Franklin County, OH, Health Care Facilities, (Series 2006A), Weekly VRDNs (Ohio Presbyterian Retirement Services)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS)/(National City Bank, Ohio LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
$ 8,000,000
3,200,000 Franklin County, OH, Health Care Facilities, (Series 2006B), Weekly VRDNs (Ohio Presbyterian Retirement Services)/(National City Bank, Ohio LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
3,200,000
6,465,000 Franklin County, OH, Health Care Facilities, Refunding & Improvement Revs (Series 2002 B), Weekly VRDNs (Ohio Presbyterian Retirement Services)/(National City Bank, Ohio LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
6,465,000
4,500,000 Franklin County, OH, IDA Weekly VRDNs (Heekin Can, Inc.)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
4,500,000
45,500,000 Franklin County, OH, Revenue, (Series 2000F), Weekly VRDNs (Trinity Healthcare Credit Group), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
45,500,000
5,950,000 Geauga County, OH, (Series 2001), Weekly VRDNs (Montefiore Housing Corp.)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
5,950,000
6,295,000 Greene County, OH Hospital Facilities Revenue Authority, (Series 1999A), Weekly VRDNs (Med Health System)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
6,295,000
3,380,000 Hamilton County, OH Hospital Facilities Authority, (Series 1999A), Weekly VRDNs (Drake Center, Inc.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
3,380,000
3,860,000 Hamilton County, OH, (Series 2000A), Weekly VRDNs (Deaconess Long Term Care, Inc.)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/2/2006
3,860,000
30,800,000 Hamilton County, OH, (Series 2004), Weekly VRDNs (Block 3 Project)/(Bank of New York and Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania LOCs), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
30,800,000
10,000,000 Hamilton County, OH, (Series 2004), Weekly VRDNs (Stratford Heights)/(Bank of New York and Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania LOCs), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
4,500,000 Hilliard, OH, School District, 4.50% BANs, 6/14/2007
4,532,047
6,445,000 Knox County, OH, (Series 2004), Weekly VRDNs (Knox Community Hospital)/(National City Bank, Ohio LOC), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
6,445,000
12,500,000 Lake County, OH, Weekly VRDNs (Lake County, OH Hospital System, Inc.)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
12,500,000
4,680,000 Lima, OH, 4.50% BANs, 5/3/2007
4,705,457
6,730,000 Lorain County, OH, EDA, Weekly VRDNs (Lake Ridge Academy)/(National City Bank, Ohio LOC), 3.880%, 8/3/2006
6,730,000
4,590,000 Louisville, OH, (Series 1999A), Weekly VRDNs (St. Joseph Care Center)/(FirstMerit Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.860%, 8/3/2006
4,590,000
5,000,000 Louisville, OH, (Series 1999B), Weekly VRDNs (St. Joseph Care Center)/(FirstMerit Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.860%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
7,400,000 Lucas County, OH, IDA, Weekly VRDNs (Kroger Co.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
7,400,000
11,500,000 Lucas County, OH, Weekly VRDNs (Lutheran Homes Society)/(Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
11,500,000
8,610,000 Madison County, OH, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (Madison County Hospital, Inc.)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
8,610,000
1,180,000 Marion County, OH, Health Care Facilities, Weekly VRDNs (Marion Area Counseling Center, Inc.)/(Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 3.840%, 8/3/2006
1,180,000
2,450,000 Middletown, OH, Weekly VRDNs (Bishop Fenwick High School)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
2,450,000
6,495,000 3,4 Middletown, OH, (MT-239), Weekly VRDNs (Middletown Regional Hospital)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
6,495,000
225,000 Ohio State Higher Educational Facilities Commission, Weekly VRDNs (Notre Dame College)/(National City Bank, Ohio LOC), 3.820%, 8/3/2006
225,000
3,620,000 Ohio State Higher Educational Facilities Commission, (Series A), Weekly VRDNs (John Carroll University, OH)/(Allied Irish Banks PLC LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
3,620,000
5,695,000 3,4 Ohio State Turnpike Commission, Floater Certificates 1998-71, Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
5,695,000
3,375,000 Ohio State University, (Series 1999 B2), Weekly VRDNs, 3.640%, 8/2/2006
3,375,000
30,000,000 Ohio State Water Development Authority Pollution Control Facilities, (Series 2005B), Weekly VRDNs (FirstEnergy Corp.)/(Barclays Bank PLC LOC), 3.660%, 8/2/2006
30,000,000
8,425,000 Pike County, OH, Health Care Facilities, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (Bristol Village Homes)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
8,425,000
5,000,000 Port of Greater Cincinnati, OH Development Authority, (Series 2003A), Weekly VRDNs (National Underground Railroad Freedom Center, Inc.)/ (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and U.S. Bank, N.A. LOCs), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
5,000,000
4,755,000 Ross County, OH, Weekly VRDNs (Adena Health System)/(Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 3.810%, 8/3/2006
4,755,000
7,585,000 Seneca County, OH, Health Care Facilities, Revenue Refunding and Improvement Bonds (Series 2003), Weekly VRDNs (Good Shepherd Home)/(Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 3.700%, 8/3/2006
7,585,000
2,055,000 Summit County, OH, (Series 1996), Weekly VRDNs (United Disability Services, Inc.)/(FirstMerit Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.880%, 8/3/2006
2,055,000
5,335,000 Summit County, OH, (Series 2002), Weekly VRDNs (The Western Reserve Academy)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
5,335,000
3,770,000 Village of Holland, OH, (Series 2001), Weekly VRDNs (Anne Grady Corp.)/(Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
3,770,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Ohio--continued
$ 895,000 Wayne County, OH, Health Care Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 1995), Weekly VRDNs (D & M Realty)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
$ 895,000
6,880,000 Wooster, OH, Health Care Facilities Revenue Bonds (Series 2003), Weekly VRDNs (West View Manor)/(Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006


6,880,000

   TOTAL


486,742,145

Oklahoma--0.7%
2,400,000 Oklahoma Development Finance Authority, (Series 2001), Weekly VRDNs (Oklahoma Centennial Fund, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
2,400,000
7,075,000 Oklahoma Industries Authority, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (Oklahoma Christian University)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
7,075,000
23,100,000 Oklahoma Industries Authority, (Series 2006), Weekly VRDNs (Oklahoma Christian University)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
23,100,000
7,100,000 Oklahoma State Industries Authority, (Series 2002), Weekly VRDNs (American Cancer Society, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
7,100,000
7,885,000 Payne County, OK EDA, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (OSUF Phase III Student Housing LLC)/(AMBAC INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
7,885,000
4,805,000 Tulsa County, OK Industrial Authority, (Series 2002A), Daily VRDNs (Montereau in Warren Woods)/(BNP Paribas SA LOC), 3.660%, 8/1/2006
4,805,000
3,000,000 3,4 Tulsa, OK International Airport, Variable Rate Certificates (Series 1997B-2), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.790%, 8/3/2006


3,000,000

   TOTAL


55,365,000

Oregon--0.1%
6,500,000 Portland, OR, EDR Board, (Series 2003-A), Weekly VRDNs (Broadway Housing LLC)/(AMBAC INS)/(Key Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
6,500,000
3,575,000 3,4 Portland, OR, Sewer System, PUTTERs (Series 1343), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006


3,575,000

   TOTAL


10,075,000

Pennsylvania--5.1%
6,000,000 3,4 ABN AMRO MuniTOPS Certificates Trust (Pennsylvania Non-AMT), (Series 2003-24), Weekly VRDNs (Philadelphia, PA School District)/(FSA INS)/(ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
6,000,000
16,340,000 Adams County, PA, IDA, (Series 2002), Weekly VRDNs (Wellspan Properties, Inc.)/(AMBAC INS)/(Allied Irish Banks PLC LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
16,340,000
910,000 Allegheny County, PA, HDA, (Series 1990 D), Weekly VRDNs (Presbyterian University Hospital)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
910,000
10,005,000 Allegheny County, PA, HDA, (Series 2005B), Weekly VRDNs (Children's Institute of Pittsburgh)/(Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
10,005,000
2,810,000 Allegheny County, PA, IDA, (Series 1992), Weekly VRDNs (Eleven Parkway Center Associates)/(National City Bank, Pennsylvania LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
2,810,000
9,000,000 Allegheny County, PA, IDA, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh)/(Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania LOC), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
9,000,000
555,000 Allegheny County, PA, IDA, (Series B of 1997), Weekly VRDNs (Jewish Community Center)/(National City Bank, Pennsylvania LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
555,000
6,200,000 Allegheny County, PA, IDA, (Series B), Weekly VRDNs (Zoological Society of Pittsburgh)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
6,200,000
5,000,000 Allegheny County, PA, IDA, (Series of 2002), Weekly VRDNs (Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh)/(Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania LOC), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
6,300,000 Beaver County, PA, IDA, (Series 2006-A), Daily VRDNs (FirstEnergy Corp.)/(Barclays Bank PLC LOC), 3.660%, 8/1/2006
6,300,000
3,900,000 Bermudian Springs, PA, School District, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal LIQ), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
3,900,000
10,115,000 Butler County, PA, IDA, (Series 2000A), Weekly VRDNs (Concordia Lutheran Ministries)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
10,115,000
1,350,000 Butler County, PA, IDA, (Series A of 2004), Weekly VRDNs (Concordia Lutheran Ministries)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
1,350,000
8,400,000 Clearfield County, PA, IDA, (Series 2002), Weekly VRDNs (Dubois Area Catholic School)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
8,400,000
5,000,000 3,4 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, (Series 2001-JP-MC5), Weekly VRDNs (J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/2/2006
5,000,000
4,535,500 3,4 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Floater Certificates (Series 2001-696), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
4,535,500
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Pennsylvania--continued
$ 6,000,000 Cumberland County, PA, Municipal Authority, (Series 1993), Weekly VRDNs (Presbyterian Homes, Inc.)/(KBC Bank N.V. LOC), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
$ 6,000,000
3,380,000 Dallastown Area School District, PA, (Series 1998), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(BNP Paribas SA LIQ), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
3,380,000
7,500,000 Dallastown Area School District, PA, (Series 2006), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(BNP Paribas SA LIQ), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
7,500,000
7,680,000 Dauphin County, PA, General Authority, (Education and Health Loan Program, Series 1997), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
7,680,000
6,800,000 Dauphin County, PA, IDA, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (WITF, Inc.)/(Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania LOC), 3.670%, 8/4/2006
6,800,000
4,300,000 Delaware County, PA, Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds (Series of 1996), Weekly VRDNs (Crozer-Chester Medical Center)/(KBC Bank N.V. LOC), 3.660%, 8/2/2006
4,300,000
14,000,000 3,4 Delaware Valley, PA, Regional Finance Authority, (Series 5005 BBT), 3.45% TOBs (AMBAC INS)/(Branch Banking & Trust Co., Winston-Salem LIQ), Optional Tender 1/9/2007
14,000,000
4,555,000 3,4 Delaware Valley, PA, Regional Finance Authority, Variable Rate Certificates (Series 2002E), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.700%, 8/3/2006
4,555,000
7,735,000 Derry Township, PA, Industrial and Commercial Development Authority, Arena Project (Series 200A), Weekly VRDNs (PNC Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
7,735,000
13,500,000 Doylestown Hospital Authority, PA, (Series 1998 B), Weekly VRDNs (Doylestown Hospital, PA)/(AMBAC INS)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
13,500,000
2,000,000 Doylestown Hospital Authority, PA, (Series 1998C), Weekly VRDNs (Doylestown Hospital, PA)/(AMBAC INS)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.810%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
1,900,000 East Hempfield Township, PA, IDA, (Series of 1997), Weekly VRDNs (Mennonite Home)/(Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.750%, 8/2/2006
1,900,000
11,965,000 Erie County, PA, Hospital Authority, Weekly VRDNs (St. Vincent Health System)/(Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.760%, 8/3/2006
11,965,000
6,500,000 Horizon Hospital System Authority, PA, (Series 2002), Weekly VRDNs (St. Paul Homes)/(Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
6,500,000
10,415,000 Huntingdon County, PA, General Authority, (Series A), Weekly VRDNs (Juniata College)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
10,415,000
2,864,000 Lawrence County, PA, IDA, (Series 2003), Weekly VRDNs (Villa Maria Retirement Center)/(Allied Irish Banks PLC LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
2,864,000
5,495,000 Lebanon County, PA, Health Facilities Authority, (Series 1999), Weekly VRDNs (United Church of Christ Homes, Inc.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
5,495,000
10,150,000 Montgomery County, PA, IDA, PCR (2002 Series A), Weekly VRDNs (Exelon Generation Co. LLC)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/2/2006
10,150,000
3,780,000 Moon, PA, IDA, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (YMCA of Greater Pittsburgh)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
3,780,000
900,000 Pennsylvania EDFA, (Series 1996 E), Weekly VRDNs (Adelphoi, Inc.)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
900,000
7,900,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority, (Series 2001 H5), Weekly VRDNs (Keystone College)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
7,900,000
7,100,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority, (Series H1), Weekly VRDNs (Beaver College, PA)/(Allied Irish Banks PLC LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
7,100,000
2,100,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority, (Series I-4), Weekly VRDNs (Messiah College)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
2,100,000
8,100,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority, (Series J1), Weekly VRDNs (Juniata College)/(Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
8,100,000
6,960,000 3,4 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority, ROCs (Series 1018), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Citigroup Global Markets Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
6,960,000
6,150,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds (Series E4), Weekly VRDNs (Washington & Jefferson College)/ (National City Bank, Pennsylvania LOC), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
6,150,000
1,000,000 Pennsylvania State University, (Series 2002), Weekly VRDNs (Toronto Dominion Bank LIQ), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
1,000,000
11,000,000 Philadelphia, PA, Gas Works, (Sixth Series 1998 General Ordinance), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Bank of Nova Scotia, Toronto, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQs), 3.620%, 8/3/2006
11,000,000
3,370,000 Philadelphia, PA, Hospitals & Higher Education Facilities Authority, (Series 2004), Weekly VRDNs (Philadelphia Protestant Home)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.630%, 8/3/2006
3,370,000
72,000,000 Philadelphia, PA, School District, 4.50% TRANs (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 6/29/2007
72,454,043
42,000,000 Philadelphia, PA, (Series A of 2006-2007), 4.50% TRANs, 6/29/2007
42,269,152
9,000,000 Southcentral PA, General Authority, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (Hanover Lutheran Retirement Village, Inc.)/(Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.690%, 8/4/2006


9,000,000

   TOTAL


405,242,695

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Puerto Rico--0.4%
$ 34,945,000 3,4 Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (PT-3189), 3.15% TOBs (AMBAC, CDC IXIS Financial Guaranty N.A. INS) and Dexia Credit Local LIQs), Optional Tender 10/12/2006

$
34,945,000

South Carolina--0.5%
5,896,000 3,4 Berkeley County, SC, School District, Floater Certificates (Series 2001-656), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
5,896,000
5,000,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA, (Series 2002), Weekly VRDNs (Carolina Piedmont Foundation, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
4,000,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA, (Series 2006), Weekly VRDNs (Carolina Community Care, Inc.)/(National Bank of South Carolina LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
4,000,000
20,235,000 3,4 South Carolina Transportation Infrastructure Bank, (Series 2006-1359), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
20,235,000
6,640,000 3,4 South Carolina Transportation Infrastructure Bank, (Series IXIS 2005-20), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Caisse des Depots et Consignations (CDC) LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006


6,640,000

   TOTAL


41,771,000

Tennessee--1.8%
13,071,000 3,4 ABN AMRO MuniTOPS Certificates Trust (Multistate Non-AMT), (Series 1999-1), Weekly VRDNs (Metropolitan Government Nashville & Davidson County, TN)/(FGIC INS)/(ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
13,071,000
6,600,000 Chattanooga, TN, HEFA, Weekly VRDNs (Sisken Hospital)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.760%, 8/3/2006
6,600,000
4,100,000 Chattanooga, TN, IDB, (Series 1997), Weekly VRDNs (YMCA)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
4,100,000
17,350,000 3,4 Elizabethton, TN, Health & Educational Facilities Board, MERLOTS (Series 2000 GG), 3.35% TOBs (Mountain States Health Alliance)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006
17,350,000
6,000,000 Knox County, TN, Health Education & Housing Facilities Board, (Series 2000), Weekly VRDNs (Episcopal School of Knoxville)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
6,000,000
9,795,000 Knox County, TN, Health Education & Housing Facilities Board, (Series 2000), Weekly VRDNs (Johnson Bible College)/(Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 3.760%, 8/3/2006
9,795,000
8,450,000 Memphis, TN, Center City Revenue Finance Corp., (Series 1996A), Weekly VRDNs (South Bluffs)/(National Bank of Commerce, Memphis, TN LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
8,450,000
500,000 Metropolitan Government Nashville & Davidson County, TN HEFA, (Series 1996), Weekly VRDNs (Dede Wallace Center)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
500,000
6,300,000 Metropolitan Government Nashville & Davidson County, TN HEFA, (Series 1997), Weekly VRDNs (Belmont University)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
6,300,000
7,625,000 Metropolitan Government Nashville & Davidson County, TN IDB, (Series 2003), Weekly VRDNs (David Lipscomb University)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
7,625,000
295,000 Montgomery County, TN, Public Building Authority, Pooled Financing Revenue Bonds (Series 1996), Weekly VRDNs (Montgomery County Loan)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.630%, 8/3/2006
295,000
4,200,000 Sevier County, TN, Public Building Authority, (Series II-B-2), Weekly VRDNs (Citizens Gas Utility District of Scott & Morgan Counties)/(AMBAC INS)/ (KBC Bank N.V. LIQ), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
4,200,000
2,520,000 Sevier County, TN, Public Building Authority, (Series II-G-3), Weekly VRDNs (Maryville, TN)/(AMBAC INS)/(KBC Bank N.V. LIQ), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
2,520,000
7,430,000 Sevier County, TN, Public Building Authority, Local Government Public Improvement Bonds, (Series II-G-1), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(KBC Bank N.V. LIQ), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
7,430,000
21,435,000 Shelby County, TN, Health Education & Housing Facilities Board, (Series 2003C), Weekly VRDNs (Village at Germantown, Inc.)/(BNP Paribas SA LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
21,435,000
510,000 Washington County, TN IDB, (Series 1996), Weekly VRDNs (Springbrook Properties)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
510,000
24,000,000 Wilson County, TN Sports Authority, (Series 1999), Weekly VRDNs (Mercantile Safe Deposit & Trust Co., Baltimore LOC), 3.670%, 8/3/2006


24,000,000

   TOTAL


140,181,000

Texas--14.4%
20,996,000 3,4 ABN AMRO MuniTOPS Certificates Trust (Multistate Non-AMT), (Series 1998-19), Weekly VRDNs (Dallas, TX Waterworks & Sewer System)/(FSA INS)/ (ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LIQ), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
20,996,000
5,500,000 3,4 ABN AMRO MuniTOPS Certificates Trust (Multistate Non-AMT), (Series 2002-16), Weekly VRDNs (Leander, TX ISD)/(Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD)/(ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LIQ), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
5,500,000
16,745,000 3,4 ABN AMRO MuniTOPS Certificates Trust (Multistate Non-AMT) (Series 2004-5), Weekly VRDNs (Lake Travis, TX ISD)/(Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD)/(ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LIQ), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
16,745,000
24,470,000 3,4 ABN AMRO MuniTOPS Certificates Trust (Texas Non-AMT) (Series 2005-8), Weekly VRDNs (North Texas Tollway Authority)/(FSA INS)/ (ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LIQ), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
24,470,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Texas--continued
$ 10,890,000 3,4 Aldine, TX, ISD, (Series 1997), SGB-30, Weekly VRDNs (Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD)/(Societe Generale, Paris LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
$ 10,890,000
8,880,000 3,4 Arlington, TX, PUTTERs (Series 760), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
8,880,000
6,115,000 3,4 Austin, TX, Electric Utility System, ROCs (Series 6080), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Citigroup, Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
6,115,000
13,710,000 3,4 Austin, TX, Electric Utility System, (Series 2002-744D), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
13,710,000
6,415,000 3,4 Austin, TX Water and Wastewater System, MERLOTS (Series 2001 A-63), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
6,415,000
10,000,000 3,4 Austin, TX, MERLOTS (Series 2000-A26), 3.35% TOBs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006
10,000,000
14,235,000 3,4 Bastrop, TX, ISD, (PT-2775), Weekly VRDNs (Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
14,235,000
3,500,000 Bexar County, TX, Housing Finance Corp., (Series 2005A), Weekly VRDNs (Summit Hills Apartments)/(FHLMC LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
3,500,000
13,815,000 3,4 Bexar County, TX, Clippers (Series 2001-3), 3.45% TOBs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), Optional Tender 9/7/2006
13,815,000
10,000,000 Crawford, TX, Education Facilities Corp., (Series 2004A), Weekly VRDNs (Central Houston Parking LLC)/(BNP Paribas SA LOC), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
11,850,000 3,4 Cypress-Fairbanks, TX, ISD, (PT-2858), Weekly VRDNs (Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
11,850,000
8,180,000 3,4 Frisco, TX, (PT-2737), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
8,180,000
8,570,000 3,4 Frisco, TX, (PT-2789), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
8,570,000
400,000 Grapevine, TX, IDC, (Series 1993), Weekly VRDNs (Southern Air Transport, Inc.)/(Bank of Montreal LOC), 3.700%, 8/3/2006
400,000
13,415,000 3,4 Grapevine-Colleyville, TX, ISD, (PT-2766), Weekly VRDNs (Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
13,415,000
4,800,000 Harris County, TX, HFDC, (Series 2000), Weekly VRDNs (St. Dominic Village)/(J.P Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
4,800,000
56,000,000 Harris County, TX, HFDC, (Series 2005A), Weekly VRDNs (St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital)/(FGIC INS)/(Citibank N.A., New York and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQs), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
56,000,000
182,200,000 Harris County, TX, HFDC, (Series 2006A), Daily VRDNs (Methodist Hospital, Harris County, TX), 3.680%, 8/1/2006
182,200,000
28,185,000 3,4 Harris County, TX, ROCs (Series 4056), Weekly VRDNs (Citigroup Global Markets Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
28,185,000
12,000,000 3,4 Houston, TX, Airport System, MERLOTS (Series 2000-A25), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
12,000,000
10,525,000 3,4 Houston, TX, Combined Utility System, (PT-2670), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
10,525,000
10,220,000 Houston, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp., (Series 2000A), Weekly VRDNs (Houston Student Housing LLC)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
10,220,000
4,905,000 Houston, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp., (Series 2003A), Tierwester Oaks and Richfield Manor, Weekly VRDNs (Houston Student Housing LLC)/(Bank of New York LOC), 3.550%, 8/1/2006
4,905,000
19,435,000 3,4 Houston, TX, ISD, Floater Certificates (Series 1998-133), Weekly VRDNs (Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD)/ (Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
19,435,000
7,925,000 3,4 Houston, TX, Water & Sewer System, MERLOTS (Series 2002-A-16), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
7,925,000
11,080,000 Kendall County, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., (Series 2002-A), Weekly VRDNs (Morningside Ministries Foundation, Inc.)/ (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
11,080,000
2,825,000 Kendall County, TX, Health Facilities Development Corp., (Series 2002-B), Weekly VRDNs (Morningside Ministries Foundation, Inc.)/ (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
2,825,000
9,120,000 3,4 Laredo, TX, ISD, (PT-2673), Weekly VRDNs (Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
9,120,000
11,840,000 3,4 McAllen, TX, ISD, (PT-3082), Weekly VRDNs (Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
11,840,000
8,560,000 3,4 McKinney, TX, ISD, (PT-1180), Weekly VRDNs (Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
8,560,000
4,750,000 3,4 North East, TX, ISD, PUTTERs (Series 390), Weekly VRDNs (Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
4,750,000
870,000 North Richland Hills, TX, IDC, Weekly VRDNs (Tecnol, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
870,000
7,345,000 3,4 North Texas Municipal Water District, (ROCs 6074), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
7,345,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Texas--continued
$ 7,775,000 3,4 North Texas Municipal Water District, Floater Certificates, (Series 2006-1375), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
$ 7,775,000
7,780,000 3,4 North Texas Municipal Water District, Floater Certificates (Series 2006-1376), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
7,780,000
136,000,000 North Texas Tollway Authority, Variable Rate Revenue Bonds (Series 2005C), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
136,000,000
7,290,000 Richmond, TX, Higher Education Finance Corp., (Series 2003-A), Weekly VRDNs (Bayou Student Housing LLC - University of Houston)/(AMBAC INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
7,290,000
5,400,000 3,4 San Antonio, TX, Electric & Gas System, MERLOTS (Series 2002-A12), Weekly VRDNs (United States Treasury COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
5,400,000
5,850,000 3,4 San Antonio, TX, Electric & Gas System, MERLOTS (Series 2001 A10), Weekly VRDNs (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
5,850,000
81,305,000 3,4 San Antonio, TX, Electric & Gas System, MERLOTS (Series 2002-A53), 3.385% TOBs (FSA INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 1/24/2007
81,305,000
11,100,000 3,4 San Antonio, TX, Electric & Gas System, Municipal Securities Trust Receipts (Series 1997 SG 101), Weekly VRDNs (Societe Generale, Paris LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
11,100,000
4,650,000 3,4 San Antonio, TX, Electric & Gas System, PUTTERS (Series 771), Weekly VRDNs (J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
4,650,000
7,935,000 3,4 San Antonio, TX, ISD, (PT-1184), Weekly VRDNs (Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
7,935,000
3,680,000 3,4 San Antonio, TX, ROCs (Series 6003), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
3,680,000
11,510,000 3,4 Tarrant County, TX, Housing Finance Corp., (PT-482), Weekly VRDNs (Bear Creek Apartments)/(FHLMC GTD)/(FHLMC LIQ), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
11,510,000
6,805,000 3,4 Texas State Transportation Commission, (PT-3483), Weekly VRDNs (Texas State)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
6,805,000
8,130,000 3,4 Texas State University System, (PT-3473), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
8,130,000
249,380,000 Texas State, (Series 2005), 4.50% TRANs, 8/31/2006
249,653,336
6,000,000 3,4 Texas Turnpike Authority, ROCs (Series 188), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006


6,000,000

   TOTAL


1,161,134,336

Utah--1.6%
13,950,000 Central Utah Water Conservancy District, (Series 1998F), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen (GTD) LIQ), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
13,950,000
35,400,000 Central Utah Water Conservancy District, (Series 2004B), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen (GTD) LIQ), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
35,400,000
21,700,000 Murray City, UT, (Series 2003A), Weekly VRDNs (IHC Health Services, Inc.), 3.620%, 8/3/2006
21,700,000
28,050,000 Murray City, Utah Hospital Revenue, (Series 2005A), Daily VRDNs (IHC Health Services, Inc.)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/1/2006
28,050,000
30,000,000 Murray City, Utah Hospital Revenue, (Series 2005C), Weekly VRDNs (IHC Health Services, Inc.)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.650%, 8/3/2006


30,000,000

   TOTAL


129,100,000

Virginia--1.2%
10,500,000 3,4 ABN AMRO MuniTOPS Certificates Trust (Virginia Non-AMT), (Series 1998-21), Weekly VRDNs (Norfolk, VA Water Revenue)/(FSA INS)/ (ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LIQ), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
10,500,000
4,010,000 Albemarle County, VA, IDA, (Series 1999), Weekly VRDNs (Region Ten Community Services Board, Inc.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
4,010,000
6,500,000 Alexandria, VA, IDA, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (American Statistical Association)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
6,500,000
9,500,000 Alexandria, VA, IDA, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (Institute for Defense Analyses)/(AMBAC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
9,500,000
475,000 Alexandria, VA, IDA, (Series 2006), Weekly VRDNs (Institute for Defense Analyses)/(AMBAC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
475,000
5,605,000 Fairfax County, VA, EDA, (Series 2001), Weekly VRDNs (The Langley School)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.630%, 8/2/2006
5,605,000
1,700,000 Fairfax County, VA, IDA, (Series 2005C-1), Weekly VRDNs (Inova Health System), 3.600%, 8/2/2006
1,700,000
2,500,000 Hampton, VA, Redevelopment & Housing Authority, (Series 1998), Weekly VRDNs (Township Apartments)/(FNMA LOC), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
2,500,000
3,155,000 Henrico County, VA, EDA, (Series 2001), Weekly VRDNs (Instructive Visiting Nurse Association)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
3,155,000
2,570,000 Henrico County, VA, EDA, (Series 2003B), Weekly VRDNs (Westminster-Canterbury of Richmond)/(Branch Banking & Trust Co. of Virginia LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
2,570,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Virginia--continued
$ 16,800,000 3,4 Henrico County, VA, IDA, MERLOTS (Series 1997C), Weekly VRDNs (Bon Secours Health System)/(FSA INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
$ 16,800,000
15,150,000 James City County, VA, IDA, (Series 2002), Weekly VRDNs (CMCP Williamsburg LLC)/(FNMA LOC), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
15,150,000
9,000,000 Roanoke, VA, IDA, (Series 2005-C-1), Daily VRDNs (Carilion Health System Obligated Group)/(FSA INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/1/2006
9,000,000
6,500,000 Spotsylvania County, VA, IDA, (Series 1993), Weekly VRDNs (Carlisle Corp. Project)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
6,500,000
1,220,000 3,4 Virginia State Public Building Authority, Floater Certificates, (Series 1998-131), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006


1,220,000

   TOTAL


95,185,000

Washington--2.5%
4,000,000 3,4 ABN AMRO MuniTOPS Certificates Trust (Multistate Non-AMT), (Series 1998-16), Weekly VRDNs (Port of Seattle, WA)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LIQ), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
4,000,000
11,957,000 3,4 ABN AMRO MuniTOPS Certificates Trust (Multistate Non-AMT), (Series 1999-12), Weekly VRDNs (Washington State)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LIQ), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
11,957,000
8,680,000 3,4 ABN AMRO MuniTOPS Certificates Trust (Multistate Non-AMT), (Series 2002-36), Weekly VRDNs (Tacoma, WA Regional Water Supply System)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LIQ), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
8,680,000
4,170,000 3,4 Clark County, WA, Public Utilities District No. 001, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A122), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
4,170,000
8,075,000 3,4 Clark County, WA, School District No. 119 Battleground, (PT-2786) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
8,075,000
8,500,000 3,4 Energy Northwest, WA, (PT-778), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen (GTD) LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
8,500,000
5,190,000 3,4 Energy Northwest, WA, (PT-1392), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
5,190,000
10,790,000 3,4 Energy Northwest, WA, ROCs (Series 4524), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Citigroup Global Markets Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
10,790,000
13,700,000 3,4 King County, WA, MERLOTS (Series 2000 E), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
13,700,000
11,825,000 King County, WA, Sewer Revenue (Series 2001A), Weekly VRDNs (Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen (GTD) LOC), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
11,825,000
20,785,000 3,4 Seattle, WA, Municipal Light & Power, MERLOTS (Series 2001 A56), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
20,785,000
5,280,000 3,4 Seattle, WA, Water System, ROCs (Series 4006), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Citigroup Global Markets Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
5,280,000
7,420,000 3,4 Snohomish County, WA, Public Utility District, ROCs (Series 6055), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
7,420,000
3,455,000 3,4 Spokane, WA, School District No. 081, ROCs (Series 4000), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Citigroup Global Markets Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
3,455,000
5,000,000 3,4 Washington Health Care Facilities Authority, ROCs (Series 510CE), Weekly VRDNs (Overlake Hospital Medical Center)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ)/(Citibank N.A., New York LOC), 3.700%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
7,695,000 Washington State EDFA, (Series 2005A), Weekly VRDNs (Northwest Center)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
7,695,000
6,380,000 Washington State Housing Finance Commission, (Series 2005 B), Weekly VRDNs (Forest Ridge School of the Sacred Heart)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
6,380,000
11,700,000 3,4 Washington State, (Series 5016-BBT), Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Branch Banking & Trust Co., Winston-Salem LIQ), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
11,700,000
34,860,000 3,4 Washington State, Class A Certificates (Series 2002-205), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Bear Stearns Cos., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
34,860,000
2,040,000 3,4 Washington State, MERLOTS (Series 2002-A14), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
2,040,000
5,170,000 3,4 Washington State, Piper Certificates (Series 2002G), Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
5,170,000
3,765,000 3,4 Washington State, Piper Variable Certificates (Series 2002B), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.690%, 8/3/2006


3,765,000

   TOTAL


200,437,000

West Virginia--0.1%
5,965,000 Cabell County Commission, WV, (Series 1995), Weekly VRDNs (Foster Foundation)/(Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 3.840%, 8/3/2006
5,965,000
1,300,000 3,4 West Virginia University, MERLOTS (Series 2002-A-15), Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006


1,300,000

   TOTAL


7,265,000

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Wisconsin--2.4%
$ 17,375,000 3,4 ABN AMRO MuniTOPS Certificates Trust (Wisconsin Non-AMT), (Series 2005-25), Weekly VRDNs (Central Brown County, WI Water Authority)/(AMBAC INS)/(ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LIQ), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
$ 17,375,000
4,900,000 Chippewa Falls WI, Unified School District, 4.00% TRANs, 9/29/2006
4,906,760
22,000,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Wisconsin Non-AMT), (Series 2004-4), Weekly VRDNs (Wisconsin State)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
22,000,000
4,685,000 Eau Claire, WI, Area School District, 4.00% TRANs, 8/25/2006
4,687,855
5,400,000 Germantown, WI, School District, 3.75% TRANs, 8/25/2006
5,402,664
26,000,000 Kenosha, WI, United School District No. 1, 3.75% TRANs, 9/26/2006
26,030,597
10,000,000 Mequon-Thiensville, WI, School District, 4.00% TRANs, 9/8/2006
10,010,521
1,850,000 Middleton-Cross Plains, WI, Area School District, 4.00% BANs, 12/1/2006
1,850,000
5,000,000 Milton, WI, School District, 3.75% TRANs, 9/20/2006
5,005,121
4,980,000 Milwaukee, WI, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Goodwill Industries of Southeastern Wisconsin and Metropolitan Chicago, Inc.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.630%, 8/2/2006
4,980,000
5,100,000 Plymouth, WI, Joint School District, 4.00% TRANs, 11/1/2006
5,109,720
5,000,000 Stevens Point, WI, Area Public School District, 4.25% TRANs, 10/16/2006
5,010,733
3,150,000 Sun Prairie, WI, Area School District, 4.10% TRANs, 10/25/2006
3,157,107
7,000,000 3,4 University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics Authority, MERLOTS (Series 2000RR), Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
7,000,000
2,340,000 Wisconsin State HEFA, (Series 2000), Weekly VRDNs (Grace Lutheran Foundation, Inc.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.630%, 8/2/2006
2,340,000
6,500,000 Wisconsin State HEFA, (Series 2003B), Weekly VRDNs (Franciscan Sisters of Christian Charity HealthCare Ministry, Inc.)/(Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee LOC), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
6,500,000
1,750,000 Wisconsin State HEFA, (Series 2005), Weekly VRDNs (Hospicecare Holdings, Inc.)/(Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee LOC), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
1,750,000
21,590,000 3,4 Wisconsin State HEFA, MERLOTS (Series 1997 B), Weekly VRDNs (Sinai Samaritan Medical Center, Inc.)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/ (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
21,590,000
39,735,000 3,4 Wisconsin State, Floater Certificates (Series 2004-1166), Weekly VRDNs (Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006


39,735,000

   TOTAL


194,441,078

   TOTAL MUNICIPAL INVESTMENTS--102.9%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 5



8,243,489,283

   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--(2.9)%


(235,494,010
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
8,007,995,273

At July 31, 2006, the Fund holds no securities that are subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (percentage is unaudited).

1 The Fund primarily invests in securities rated in the highest short-term rating categories by one or more nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSROs) or unrated securities of comparable quality. An NRSRO's highest rating categories are determined without regard for sub-categories and gradations. For example, securities rated SP-1+ or SP-1 by Standard & Poor's, MIG-1 or VMIG-1 by Moody's Investors Service, or F-1+ or F-1 by Fitch Ratings are all considered rated in highest short-term rating categories. Securities rated in the highest short-term rating category (and unrated securities of comparable quality) are identified as First Tier securities. The Fund follows applicable regulations in determining whether a security is rated by multiple NRSROs in different rating categories should be identified as a First Tier security. At July 31, 2006, the portfolio securities were rated as follows:

Tier Rating Based on Total Market Value (unaudited)

First Tier
   
Second Tier
100.0%

0.0%

2 Current rate and next reset date shown for Variable Rate Demand Notes.

3 Denotes a restricted security that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) is subject to a contractual restriction on public sales. At July 31, 2006, these restricted securities amounted to $2,982,201,732, which represented 37.2% of total net assets.

4 Denotes a restricted security that may be resold without restriction to "qualified institutional buyers" as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and that the Fund has determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Fund's Board of Trustees. At July 31, 2006, these liquid restricted securities amounted to $2,982,201,732, which represented 37.2% of total net assets.

5 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

AMBAC --American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation
AMT --Alternative Minimum Tax
BANs --Bond Anticipation Notes
COL --Collateralized
CP --Commercial Paper
EDA --Economic Development Authority
EDC --Economic Development Commission
EDFA --Economic Development Financing Authority
EDR --Economic Development Revenue
EDRB --Economic Development Revenue Bonds
FGIC --Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FHLMC --Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
FNMA --Federal National Mortgage Association
FSA --Financial Security Association
GO --General Obligation
GTD --Guaranteed
HDA --Hospital Development Authority
HEFA --Health and Education Facilities Authority
HFA --Housing Finance Authority
HFDC --Health Facility Development Corporation
IDA --Industrial Development Authority
IDB --Industrial Development Bond
IDC --Industrial Development Corporation
IDFA --Industrial Development Finance Authority
INS --Insured
INV --Investment Agreement
ISD --Independent School District
LIQ(s) --Liquidity Agreement(s)
LOC(s) --Letter(s) of Credit
MERLOTS --Municipal Exempt Receipts -- Liquidity Optional Tender Series
MFH --Multi Family Housing
PCR --Pollution Control Revenue
PCRB(s) --Pollution Control Revenue Bond(s)
PUTTERs --Puttable Tax-Exempt Receipts
ROCs --Reset Option Certificates
SPEARs --Short Puttable Exempt Adjustable Receipts
SWP --Swap Agreement
TICs --Trust Inverse Certificates
TOBs --Tender Option Bonds
TOCs --Tender Option Certificates
TOPS --Trust Obligation Participation Securities
TRANs --Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes
VRDNs --Variable Rate Demand Notes

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Treasury Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:





   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Repurchase Agreements

97.7
%
U.S. Treasury Securities

2.6
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(0.3
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:



   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

96.1
%
8-30 Days

0.0
%
31-90 Days

0.0
%
91-180 Days

3.4
%
181 Days or more

0.8
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(0.3
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

1 See the Fund's Prospectus for a description of the principal types of securities in which the Fund invests.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

Treasury Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

U.S. TREASURY--2.6%
U.S. Treasury Notes--2.6%
$ 86,500,000 United States Treasury Notes, 2.500%, 10/31/2006
$ 86,144,653
167,000,000 United States Treasury Notes, 2.875%, 11/30/2006
166,126,823
104,750,000 United States Treasury Notes, 3.125%, 1/31/2007


104,004,038

   TOTAL U.S. TREASURY


356,275,514

REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--97.7%
350,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Abbey National Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2036 for $350,051,042 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was 357,000,148.
350,000,000
1,711,246,000 Interest in $2,323,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which BNP Paribas Securities Corp. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2036 for $2,323,338,771 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $2,369,460,967.
1,711,246,000
1,000,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Barclays Capital, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 7/31/2011 for $1,000,145,833 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,020,000,675.
1,000,000,000
1,167,000,000 Interest in $1,500,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.26%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Bear Stearns & Co., Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 5/15/2016 for $1,500,219,167 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,557,996,728.
1,167,000,000
100,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which CIBC World Markets Corp. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2023 for $100,014,583 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $102,105,371.
100,000,000
1,000,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.24%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Credit Suisse First Boston Corp. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2031 for $1,000,145,556 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,020,002,584.
1,000,000,000
95,000,000 Interest in $100,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.15%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2021 for $100,014,306 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $102,000,718.
95,000,000
1,000,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2023 for $1,000,145,833 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,020,000,065.
1,000,000,000
1,850,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Fortis Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2031 for $1,850,269,792 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,887,000,309.
1,850,000,000
1,000,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which HSBC Securities (USA), Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 7/31/2008 for $1,000,145,833 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,020,001,854.
1,000,000,000
1,017,000,000 Interest in $1,350,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2036 for $1,350,196,875 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,377,001,350.
1,017,000,000
1,200,000,000 Interest in $2,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 7/15/2013 for $2,000,291,667 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $2,045,228,487.
1,200,000,000
267,000,000 Interest in $850,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. will repurchase a U.S. Treasury security maturing on 1/15/2011 for $850,123,958 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying security at the end of the period was $868,259,653.
267,000,000
95,000,000 Interest in $100,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.15%, dated 7/31/2006 under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase a U.S. Treasury security maturing on 12/15/2010 for $100,014,306 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying security at the end of the period was $102,001,058.
95,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--continued
$ 224,000,000 1 Interest in $244,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.20%, dated 6/1/2006 under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2015 for $250,344,000 on 11/29/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $251,133,204.
$ 224,000,000
1,565,000,000 Interest in $1,850,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 5/15/2021 for $1,850,269,792 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,887,004,311.


1,565,000,000

   TOTAL REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS


13,641,246,000

   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--100.3%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 2



13,997,521,514

   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--(0.3)%


(36,782,254
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
13,960,739,260

1 Although the repurchase date is more than seven days after the date of purchase, the Fund has the right to terminate the repurchase agreement at any time with seven-days' notice.

2 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statements of Assets And Liabilities

July 31, 2006


   

Government
Obligations
Fund

   

Government
Obligations
Tax-Managed
Fund

   


Municipal
Obligations
Fund


Assets:
Investments in repurchase agreements
$ 8,190,598,000 $ -- $ --
Investments in securities


2,398,520,252


3,569,169,210


5,371,036,367

Total investments in securities, at amortized cost and value
10,589,118,252 3,569,169,210 5,371,036,367
Cash
1,152,064 1,201,979 593,731
Income receivable
29,296,807 8,082,155 30,352,747
Receivable for shares sold


434,539


124,059


4,205,130

   TOTAL ASSETS


10,620,001,662


3,578,577,403


5,406,187,975

Liabilities:
Payable for investments purchased
3,640,000 -- 410,329,900
Payable for shares redeemed
1,855,386 125,488 261,376
Payable for Directors'/Trustees' fees
-- -- 132
Payable for distribution services fee (Note 5)
24,536 -- --
Payable for shareholder services fee (Note 5)
744,613 422,924 217,291
Payable for account administration fee
23,878 162 --
Income distribution payable
18,611,370 10,929,348 1,530,520
Accrued expenses


315,461


126,704


307,060

   TOTAL LIABILITIES


25,215,244


11,604,626


412,646,279

   TOTAL NET ASSETS

$
10,594,786,418

$
3,566,972,777

$
4,993,541,696

Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 10,594,680,018 $ 3,566,945,907 $ 4,993,675,960
Accumulated net realized loss on investments
-- -- (129,669)
Undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income


106,400


26,870


(4,595)

   TOTAL NET ASSETS

$
10,594,786,418


3,566,972,777


4,993,541,696

Net Assets:
Institutional Shares
$ 6,619,951,532 $ 1,556,092,071 $ 3,490,983,401
Institutional Service Shares
3,493,161,012 2,010,880,706 620,552,403
Institutional Capital Shares
377,413,712 -- 882,005,892
Trust Shares


104,260,162


--


--

   TOTAL NET ASSETS

$
10,594,786,418

$
3,566,972,777

$
4,993,541,696

Shares Outstanding, No Par Value, Unlimited Shares Authorized:
Institutional Shares
6,619,627,926 1,556,128,746 3,491,030,472
Institutional Service Shares
3,493,377,141 2,010,807,784 620,601,148
Institutional Capital Shares
377,428,905 -- 882,044,339
Trust Shares


104,246,054


--


--

Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds Per Share:
Institutional Shares


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00

Institutional Service Shares


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00

Institutional Capital Shares


$1.00


--


$1.00

Trust Shares


$1.00


--


--

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statements of Assets And Liabilities

July 31, 2006


   

Prime Cash
Obligations
Fund

   

Prime
Management
Obligations
Fund

   


Prime
Obligations
Fund


Assets:
Investments in repurchase agreements
$ 104,499,000 $ 326,527,000 $ 613,302,000
Investments in securities


7,164,310,805


3,408,896,190


20,668,254,276

Total investments in securities, at amortized cost and value
7,268,809,805 3,735,423,190 21,281,556,276
Cash
-- 290,762 --
Income receivable
39,189,270 13,124,458 91,284,630
Receivable for shares sold


1,362,878


622,955


4,244,361

   TOTAL ASSETS


7,309,361,953


3,749,461,365


21,377,085,267

Liabilities:
Payable for investments purchased
-- -- 250,000,000
Payable for shares redeemed
-- 92,065 1,794,999
Payable to bank
9,662,489 -- 1,071,520
Payable for Directors'/Trustees' fees
-- 74 --
Payable for account administration fee
-- 31,792 5,592
Payable for transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
23,579 72,902 97,324
Payable for distribution services fee (Note 5)
-- -- 18,578
Payable for shareholder services fee (Note 5)
469,445 277,834 1,236,856
Income distribution payable
14,792,485 1,554,499 52,052,978
Accrued expenses


170,879


82,772


356,224

   TOTAL LIABILITIES


25,118,877


2,111,938


306,634,071

   TOTAL NET ASSETS

$
7,284,243,076


3,747,349,427


21,070,451,196

Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 7,284,269,345 3,747,328,535 21,070,483,315
Undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income


(26,269)


20,892


(32,119)

   TOTAL NET ASSETS

$
7,284,243,076


3,747,349,427


21,070,451,196

Net Assets:
Institutional Shares
$ 4,363,937,759 1,986,137,907 15,151,070,495
Institutional Service Shares
1,932,607,070 1,027,151,335 5,827,991,920
Institutional Capital Shares
987,698,247 734,060,185 --
Trust Shares


--


--


91,388,781

   TOTAL NET ASSETS

$
7,284,243,076


3,747,349,427


21,070,451,196

Shares Outstanding, No Par Value, Unlimited Shares Authorized:
Institutional Shares
4,363,681,734 1,986,091,725 15,150,737,987
Institutional Service Shares
1,932,865,670 1,027,156,738 5,828,357,684
Institutional Capital Shares
987,741,698 734,080,072 --
Trust Shares


--


--


91,387,156

Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds Per Share:
Institutional Shares


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00

Institutional Service Shares


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00

Institutional Capital Shares


$1.00


$1.00


--

Trust Shares


--


--


$1.00

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statements of Assets And Liabilities

July 31, 2006


   

Prime Value
Obligations Fund

   

Tax-Free
Obligations Fund

   

Treasury
Obligations Fund


Assets:
Investments in repurchase agreements
$ 389,504,000 $ -- $ 13,641,246,000
Investments in securities


9,702,627,820


8,243,489,283


356,275,514

Total investments in securities, at amortized cost and value
10,092,131,820 8,243,489,283 13,997,521,514
Cash
-- -- 242,422
Income receivable
42,952,177 53,164,176 5,266,493
Receivable for shares sold


1,708,867


476,728


217,838

   TOTAL ASSETS


10,136,792,864


8,297,130,187


14,003,248,267

Liabilities:
Payable for investments purchased
228,000,000 270,304,812 --
Payable for shares redeemed
1,335,800 1,713,813 1,785,394
Payable to bank
343,311 5,512,652 --
Payable for account administration fee
202 -- 118,125
Payable for Directors'/Trustees' fees
8,014 6,704 --
Payable for distribution services fee (Note 5)
-- -- 170,074
Payable for shareholder services fee (Note 5)
500,673 441,229 1,337,834
Income distribution payable
14,526,247 10,956,910 38,686,356
Accrued expenses


385,414


198,794


411,224

   TOTAL LIABILITIES


245,099,661


289,134,914


42,509,007

   TOTAL NET ASSETS

$
9,891,693,203

$
8,007,995,273

$
13,960,739,260

Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 9,891,767,488 $ 8,008,408,527 $ 13,960,798,380
Accumulated net realized loss on investments
-- (402,669) --
Distributions in excess of net investment income


(74,285)


(10,585)


(59,120)

   TOTAL NET ASSETS

$
9,891,693,203

$
8,007,995,273

$
13,960,739,260

Net Assets:
Institutional Shares
$ 6,708,462,674 $ 5,941,735,606 $ 6,419,380,349
Institutional Service Shares
1,755,736,515 2,066,259,667 5,712,345,718
Institutional Capital Shares
1,427,494,014 -- 1,037,466,444
Trust Shares


--


--


791,546,749

   TOTAL NET ASSETS

$
9,891,693,203

$
8,007,995,273

$
13,960,739,260

Shares Outstanding, No Par Value, Unlimited Shares Authorized:
Institutional Shares
6,708,448,811 5,942,398,081 6,419,232,189
Institutional Service Shares
1,755,819,937 2,066,029,929 5,712,590,837
Institutional Capital Shares
1,427,498,740 -- 1,037,325,793
Trust Shares


--


--


791,649,561

Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds per Share:
Institutional Shares


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00

Institutional Service Shares


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00

Institutional Capital Shares


$1.00


--


$1.00

Trust Shares


--


--


$1.00

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statements of Operations

Year Ended July 31, 2006


   
Government
Obligations Fund


   

Government
Obligations
Tax-Managed
Fund


   

Municipal
Obligations Fund


Investment Income:
Interest
$
425,161,282


$
145,036,916


$
158,813,381

Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
19,209,033 6,657,578 10,060,761
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
7,647,497 2,650,495 4,005,330
Account administration fee - Institutional Service Shares
25,154 30,232 15,512
Account administration fee - Trust Shares
189,455 -- --
Custodian fees
396,154 139,112 201,306
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
315,523 59,345 374,694
Directors'/Trustees' fees
62,670 23,720 35,031
Auditing fees
16,737 16,735 16,736
Legal fees
10,597 7,899 23,088
Portfolio accounting fees
200,336 176,392 184,126
Distribution services fee--Trust Shares (Note 5)
189,455 -- --
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Shares (Note 5)
11,368,980 2,517,226 --
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Service Shares (Note 5)
7,668,093 4,903,799 1,514,647
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Capital Shares (Note 5)
740,865 -- 2,178,142
Share registration costs
192,918 72,371 291,821
Printing and postage
37,394 18,459 31,176
Insurance premiums
58,809 25,035 34,818
Miscellaneous

49,528



27,406



18,239

   TOTAL EXPENSES

48,379,198



17,325,804



18,985,427

Waivers (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
(8,189,143 ) (2,940,111 ) (5,812,657 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(328,855 ) (113,957 ) (172,180 )
Waiver of shareholder services fee--Institutional Shares
(11,368,980 ) (2,517,226 ) --
Waiver of shareholder services fee--Institutional Capital Shares

(384,687
)


--



(1,166,074
)
   TOTAL WAIVERS

(20,271,665
)


(5,571,294
)


(7,150,911
)
Net expenses

28,107,533



11,754,510



11,834,516

Net investment income
$
397,053,749


$
133,282,406


$
146,978,865

Net realized loss on investments

--



--



(101,081
)
Change in net assets resulting from operations
$
397,053,749


$
133,282,406


$
146,877,784

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statements of Operations

Year Ended July 31, 2006


   

Prime Cash
Obligations Fund


   

Prime
Management
Obligations Fund


   

Prime
Obligations
Fund


Investment Income:
Interest

$
409,264,710


$
156,468,804


$
962,143,991

Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
18,572,277 7,047,225 43,223,840
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
7,394,467 2,805,780 17,208,606
Account administration fee-Institutional Service Shares
31,220 -- 42,355
Account administration fee-Trust Shares
-- -- 112,749
Custodian fees
402,607 202,344 945,118
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
171,627 610,443 288,861
Directors'/Trustees' fees
74,542 29,070 156,835
Auditing fees
16,736 19,431 16,735
Legal fees
10,678 3,164 15,843
Portfolio accounting fees
188,406 190,979 188,342
Distribution services fee--Trust Shares (Note 5)
-- -- 113,101
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Shares (Note 5)
-- 3,214,009 30,505,395
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Service Shares (Note 5)
4,202,692 2,369,550 13,485,527
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Capital Shares (Note 5)
1,829,443 1,774,294 --
Share registration costs
135,462 140,211 185,177
Printing and postage
36,015 8,075 49,673
Insurance premiums
61,633 29,865 120,310
Miscellaneous


57,547



6,494



85,055

   TOTAL EXPENSES


33,185,352



18,450,934



106,743,522

Waivers (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
(9,636,338 ) (5,340,791 ) (17,467,455 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(318,429 ) (120,787 ) (740,323 )
Waiver of shareholder services fee--Institutional Shares
-- (3,214,009 ) (30,505,395 )
Waiver of shareholder services fee--Institutional Capital Shares
(950,309 ) (947,009 ) --
Reimbursement of shareholder services fee-Institutional Capital Shares


(188,804
)


--



--

   TOTAL WAIVERS


(11,093,880
)


(9,622,596)



(48,713,173
)
Net expenses


22,091,472



8,828,338



58,030,349

Net investment income

$
387,173,238


$
147,640,466


$
904,113,642

Net realized gain on investments


--



--



19,446

Change in net assets resulting from operations

$
387,173,238


$
147,640,466


$
904,133,088

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statements of Operations

Year Ended July 31, 2006


   

Prime Value
Obligations Fund


   

Tax-Free
Obligations Fund


   

Treasury
Obligations
Fund


Investment Income:
Interest

$
490,592,807


$
291,305,025


$
566,111,764

Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
21,797,830 19,200,527 26,078,224
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
8,677,639 7,645,170 10,382,153
Account administration fee--Institutional Service Shares
147 5,118 55,780
Account administration fee--Institutional Capital Shares
380 -- --
Account administration fee--Trust Shares
-- -- 1,625,445
Custodian fees
505,305 360,193 523,265
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses--Institutional Shares
153,617 158,904 75,252
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses--Institutional Service Shares
29,401 45,127 65,397
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses--Institutional Capital Shares
27,456 -- 9,502
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses-- Trust Shares
-- -- 7,914
Directors'/Trustees' fees
84,519 75,307 101,670
Auditing fees
16,735 16,735 16,736
Legal fees
11,021 28,225 11,496
Portfolio accounting fees
188,382 172,125 200,344
Distribution services fee--Trust Shares (Note 5)
-- -- 1,628,506
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Shares (Note 5)
-- 14,769,698 11,459,465
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Service Shares (Note 5)
3,627,295 5,170,233 13,400,562
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Capital Shares (Note 5)
2,688,268 -- 1,614,992
Share registration costs
271,380 98,540 247,005
Printing and postage
15,713 9,112 19,883
Insurance premiums
58,244 68,404 77,674
Miscellaneous


28,684



48,817



54,725

   TOTAL EXPENSES


38,182,016



47,872,235



67,655,990

Waivers and Reimbursement (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
(12,433,605 ) (7,925,939 ) (10,708,341 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(372,666 ) (329,769 ) (446,349 )
Waiver of shareholder services fee--Institutional Shares
-- (14,769,698 ) (11,459,465 )
Waiver of shareholder services fee--Institutional Capital Shares
(1,338,508 ) -- (835,249 )
Reimbursement of investment adviser fee


--



(156,047
)


--

   TOTAL WAIVERS AND REIMBURSEMENT


(14,144,779
)


(23,181,453
)


(23,449,404
)
Net expenses


24,037,237



24,690,782



44,206,586

Net investment income

$
466,555,570


$
266,614,243


$
521,905,178

Net realized loss on investments


--



(145,553
)


--

Change in net assets resulting from operations
$

466,555,570


$
266,468,690


$
521,905,178

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statements of Changes in Net Assets

   
Government
Obligations Fund


   
Government Obligations
Tax-Managed Fund


Year Ended July 31
   

2006

   

2005

   

2006

   

2005

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income

$
397,053,749


$
172,438,416


$
133,282,406


$
57,198,420

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income
Institutional Shares
(256,450,437 ) (114,471,130 ) (56,310,426 ) (24,544,085 )
Institutional Service Shares
(122,791,609 ) (55,404,715 ) (76,961,103 ) (32,638,685 )
Institutional Capital Shares
(14,901,586 ) (1,950,254 ) -- --
Trust Shares


(2,835,807
)


(624,264
)


--



--

   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS


(396,979,439
)


(172,450,363
)


(133,271,529
)


(57,182,770
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
121,622,215,277 87,120,054,501 11,799,039,407 8,879,726,436
Proceeds from shares issued in connection with tax-free transfer of assets from Trust for Government Cash Reserves
-- -- 84,754,065 --
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
214,926,107 89,911,597 31,940,046 16,250,172
Cost of shares redeemed


(120,077,728,527
)


(86,572,564,132
)


(11,352,758,580
)


(8,808,500,655
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


1,759,412,857



637,401,966



562,974,938



87,475,953

Change in net assets


1,759,487,167



637,390,019



562,985,815



87,491,603

Net Assets:
Beginning of period


8,835,299,251



8,197,909,232



3,003,986,962



2,916,495,359

End of period
$

10,594,786,418


$
8,835,299,251


$
3,566,972,777


$
3,003,986,962

Undistributed net investment income
$

106,400


$
32,090


$
26,870


$
15,993

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statements of Changes in Net Assets

   
Municipal
Obligations Fund


   
Prime Cash
Obligations Fund


Year Ended July 31
   

2006

   

2005

   

2006

   

2005

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income
$ 146,978,865 $ 64,788,270 $ 387,173,238 $ 179,236,149
Net realized gain (loss) on investments


(101,081
)


20,299



--



--

   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS


146,877,784



64,808,569



387,173,238



179,236,149

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income
Institutional Shares
(101,730,945 ) (47,775,366) ) (282,500,044 ) (132,849,543 )
Institutional Service Shares
(16,628,052 ) (7,591,909 ) (67,668,841 ) (33,866,842 )
Institutional Capital Shares


(28,618,336
)


(9,430,661
)


(37,023,256
)


(12,479,601
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS


(146,977,333
)


(64,797,936
)


(387,192,141
)


(179,195,986
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
52,382,943,955 38,273,423,295 85,644,582,220 78,137,296,623
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
121,331,427 48,697,843 210,361,380 84,355,486
Cost of shares redeemed


(52,255,060,210
)


(36,351,113,204
)


(86,734,626,374
)


(81,322,811,194
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


249,215,172



1,971,007,934



(879,682,774
)


(3,101,159,085
)
Change in net assets


249,115,623



1,971,018,567



(879,701,677
)


(3,101,118,922
)
Net Assets:
Beginning of period


4,744,426,073



2,773,407,506



8,163,944,753



11,265,063,675

End of period
$

4,993,541,696


$
4,744,426,073


$
7,284,243,076


$
8,163,944,753

Undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income
$

(4,595
)

$
(6,127
)

$
(26,269
)

$
(7,366
)

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statements of Changes in Net Assets

   
Prime Management
Obligations Fund


   
Prime Obligations Fund

Year Ended July 31
   

2006

   

2005 1

   

2006

   

2005

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income
$ 147,640,466 $ 42,769,974 $ 904,113,642 $ 403,067,223
Net realized gain on investments


--



--



19,446



6,988

   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS


147,640,466



42,769,974



904,133,088



403,074,211

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income
Institutional Shares
(74,352,557 ) (30,528,332 ) (684,227,011 ) (310,331,174 )
Institutional Service Shares
(38,571,323 ) (5,972,619 ) (218,509,885 ) (91,678,641 )
Institutional Capital Shares
(34,589,344 ) (6,375,373 ) -- --
Trust Shares


--



--



(1,780,728
)


(559,108
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS


(147,513,224
)


(42,876,324
)


(904,517,624
)


(402,568,923
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
26,136,821,666 18,299,194,935 239,640,314,040 195,969,796,916
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
132,777,852 35,438,738 372,405,232 158,142,824
Cost of shares redeemed


(26,790,546,302
)


(14,066,358,354
)


(240,296,751,011
)


(196,153,055,301
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


(520,946,784
)


4,268,275,319



(284,031,739
)


(25,115,561
)
Change in net assets


(520,819,542
)


4,268,168,969



(284,416,275
)


(24,610,273
)
Net Assets:
Beginning of period


4,268,168,969



--



21,354,867,471



21,379,477,744

End of period
$

3,747,349,427


$
4,268,168,969


$
21,070,451,196


$
21,354,867,471

Undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income
$

20,892


$
(106,350
)

$
(32,119
)

$
371,863

1 For the period from August 11, 2004 (date of initial public investment) to July 31, 2005.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statements of Changes in Net Assets

   
Prime Value
Obligations Fund


   
Tax-Free
Obligations Fund


Year Ended July 31
   

2006

   

2005

   

2006

   

2005

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income
$ 466,555,570 $ 188,758,788 $ 266,614,243 $ 186,692,570
Net realized gain (loss) on investments


--



--



(145,553
)


(132,476
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS


466,555,570



188,758,788



266,468,690



186,560,094

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income
Institutional Shares
(349,204,081 ) (140,584,009 ) (212,476,508 ) (156,586,021 )
Institutional Service Shares
(59,625,600 ) (26,266,545 ) (54,150,504 ) (30,112,482 )
Institutional Capital Shares


(57,788,318
)


(21,863,896
)


--



--

   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS


(466,617,999
)


(188,714,450
)


(266,627,012
)


(186,698,503
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
121,377,436,367 90,434,961,145 65,224,290,640 74,250,206,501
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
316,717,960 125,247,801 129,111,119 91,514,510
Cost of shares redeemed


(120,034,108,003
)


(94,278,755,673
)


(67,879,459,172
)


(71,844,156,948
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


1,660,046,324



(3,718,546,727
)


(2,526,057,413
)


2,497,564,063

Change in net assets


1,659,983,895



(3,718,502,389
)


(2,526,215,735
)


2,497,425,654

Net Assets:
Beginning of period


8,231,709,308



11,950,211,697



10,534,211,008



8,036,785,354

End of period
$

9,891,693,203


$
8,231,709,308


$
8,007,995,273


$
10,534,211,008

Undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income
$

(74,285
)

$
(11,856
)

$
(10,585
)

$
2,184

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statements of Changes in Net Assets

   
Treasury Obligations Fund

Year Ended July 31
   

2006

   

2005

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income

$
521,905,178


$
242,236,047

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income
Institutional Shares
(257,475,405 ) (128,528,475 )
Institutional Service Shares
(208,686,308 ) (92,576,050 )
Institutional Capital Shares
(31,673,738 ) (13,288,865 )
Trust Shares


(24,128,847
)


(7,840,255
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS


(521,964,298
)


(242,233,645
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
73,461,176,690 62,185,884,386
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
165,943,475 78,502,143
Cost of shares redeemed


(71,716,471,589
)


(62,117,771,017
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


1,910,648,576



146,615,512

Change in net assets


1,910,589,456



146,617,914

Net Assets:
Beginning of period


12,050,149,804



11,903,531,890

End of period

$
13,960,739,260


$
12,050,149,804

Distributions in excess of net investment income

$
(59,120
)

$
--

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

July 31, 2006

1. ORGANIZATION

Money Market Obligations Trust (the "Trust") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust consists of 41 portfolios. The financial statements of the following portfolios (individually referred to as the "Fund" or collectively as the "Funds") are presented herein:

Portfolio Name
   
Diversification
   
Classes of Shares
   
Investment Objective
Government Obligations Fund

diversified

Institutional Shares
Institutional Service Shares
Institutional Capital Shares
Trust Shares

To provide current income consistent with stability
of principal.
Government Obligations Tax-Managed Fund

diversified

Institutional Shares
Institutional Service Shares

To provide current income consistent with stability
of principal and liquidity.
Municipal Obligations Fund

diversified

Institutional Shares
Institutional Service Shares
Institutional Capital Shares

To provide current income exempt from all federal
regular income tax consistent with stability of principal.
Prime Cash Obligations Fund

diversified

Institutional Shares
Institutional Service Shares
Institutional Capital Shares

To provide current income consistent with stability
of principal and liquidity.
Prime Management Obligations Fund

diversified

Institutional Shares
Institutional Service Shares
Institutional Capital Shares

To provide current income consistent with
stability of principal.
Prime Obligations Fund

diversified

Institutional Shares
Institutional Service Shares
Trust Shares

To provide current income consistent with
stability of principal.
Prime Value Obligations Fund

diversified

Institutional Shares
Institutional Service Shares
Institutional Capital Shares

To provide current income consistent with
stability of principal and liquidity.
Tax-Free Obligations Fund

diversified

Institutional Shares
Institutional Service Shares

To provide dividend income exempt from federal
regular income tax consistent with stability of principal.
Treasury Obligations Fund

diversified

Institutional Shares
Institutional Service Shares
Institutional Capital Shares
Trust Shares

To provide current income consistent with
stability of principal.

Effective January 18, 2005, Government Obligations Fund began offering Institutional Capital Shares.

Effective August 11, 2004, Prime Management Obligations Fund began offering Institutional Shares.

Effective January 18, 2005, Prime Management Obligations Fund began offering Institutional Service Shares and Institutional Capital Shares.

The financial statements of the other portfolios are presented separately. The assets of each portfolio are segregated and a shareholder's interest is limited to the portfolio in which shares are held. All shares of the Funds have equal rights with respect to voting, except on class specific matters. The financial highlights of the Institutional Capital Shares and the Trust Shares are presented separately. Interest income from the investments of Municipal Obligations Fund and Tax-Free Obligations Fund may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax for individuals and corporations and state and local taxes.

On December 9, 2005, Government Obligations Tax-Managed Fund received assets from the Trust for Government Cash Reserves as a result of a tax-free reorganization, as follows:

Institutional Shares of Government
Obligations Tax-Managed Fund Issued

   
Trust for Government
Cash Reserves
Net Assets Received

   
Net Assets
of Government
Obligations
Tax-Managed Fund
Prior to Combination

   
Net Assets of Trust for
Government
Cash Reserves
Immediately
Prior to Combination

   
Net Assets
of Government
Obligations
Tax-Managed Fund
Immediately After
Combination

84,754,065

$84,754,065

$3,211,157,913

$84,754,065

$3,295,911,978

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Funds in the preparation of their financial statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America.

Investment Valuation

The Funds use the amortized cost method to value their portfolio securities in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act. Investments in other open-end regulated investment companies are valued at net asset value.

Repurchase Agreements

It is the policy of the Funds to require the other party to a repurchase agreement to transfer to the Funds' custodian or sub-custodian eligible securities or cash with a market value (after transaction costs) at least equal to the repurchase price to be paid under the repurchase agreement. The eligible securities are transferred to accounts with the custodian or sub-custodian in which the Funds hold a "securities entitlement" and exercises "control" as those terms are defined in the Uniform Commercial Code. The Funds have established procedures for monitoring the market value of the transferred securities and requiring the transfer of additional eligible securities if necessary to equal at least the repurchase price. These procedures also allow the other party to require securities to be transferred from the account to the extent that their market value exceeds the repurchase price or in exchange for other eligible securities of equivalent market value.

With respect to agreements to repurchase U.S. government securities and cash items, the Funds treat the repurchase agreement as an investment in the underlying securities and not as an obligation of the other party to the repurchase agreement. Other repurchase agreements are treated as obligations of the other party secured by the underlying securities. Nevertheless, the insolvency of the other party or other failure to repurchase the securities may delay the disposition of the underlying securities or cause the Funds to receive less than the full repurchase price. Under the terms of the repurchase agreement, any amounts received by the Funds in excess of the repurchase price and related transaction costs must be remitted to the other party.

The Funds may enter into repurchase agreements in which eligible securities are transferred into joint trading accounts maintained by the custodian or sub-custodian for investment companies and other clients advised by the Funds' adviser and its affiliates. The Funds will participate on a pro rata basis with the other investment companies and clients in its share of the securities transferred under such repurchase agreements and in its share of proceeds from any repurchase or other disposition of such securities.

The Tax-Free Obligations Fund may enter into reverse repurchase agreements with institutions that the Fund's investment adviser has determined are creditworthy. Under a reverse repurchase agreement, the Fund sells securities and agrees to repurchase them at a mutually agreed upon date and price. Reverse repurchase agreements involve the risk that the market value of the securities purchased with the proceeds from the sale of securities received by the Fund may decline below the price of the securities the Fund is obligated to repurchase. Reverse repurchase agreements also involve credit risk with the counterparty to the extent that the value of securities subject to repurchase exceed the Fund's liability under the reverse repurchase agreement. Securities subject to repurchase under reverse repurchase agreements, if any, are designated as such in the Portfolio of Investments.

At July 31, 2006, the Tax-Free Obligations Fund did not have any reverse repurchase agreements outstanding.

Investment Income, Gains and Losses, Expenses and Distributions

Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income are declared daily and paid monthly. Investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and certain fund-level expenses are allocated to each class based on relative average daily net assets, except that each class bears certain expenses unique to the class such as account administration, distribution and shareholder services fees. Dividends are declared separately for each class. No class has preferential dividend rights; differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses.

Premium and Discount Amortization

All premiums and discounts are amortized/accreted.

Federal Taxes

It is each Fund's policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of their income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary.

On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released FASB Interpretation No. 48 "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken in the course of preparing the funds' tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are "more-likely-than-not" of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax benefits of positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax expense in the current year. Adoption of FIN 48 is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the effective date. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FIN 48 and its impact in the financial statements has not yet been determined.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

The Funds may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Funds record when-issued securities on the trade date and maintain security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Restricted Securities

Restricted securities are securities that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933;or (b) are subject to contractual restrictions on public sales. In some cases, when a security cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, the issuer of the restricted security has agreed to register such securities for resale, at the issuer's expense, either upon demand by the Funds or in connection with another registered offering of the securities. Many such restricted securities may be resold in the secondary market in transactions exempt from registration. Restricted securities may be determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Funds' Board of Trustees. The Funds will not incur any registration costs upon such resales. Restricted securities are valued at amortized cost in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act.

Additional information on restricted securities held by Prime Value Obligations Fund, excluding securities purchased under Rule 144A that have been deemed liquid by the Trustees, held at July 31, 2006, is as follows:

Security
   
Acquisition Date
   
Acquisition Cost
MONET Trust, (Series 2000-1 Class A-2A), (Dresdner Bank AG, Frankfurt SWP), 5.560%, 9/28/2006

6/1/2005

$184,000,000
MONET Trust, (Series 2000-1 Class A-2B), (Dresdner Bank AG, Frankfurt SWP), 5.560%, 9/28/2006

6/1/2005

$135,000,000

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

Other

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST

The following tables summarize share activity:

Government Obligations Fund


Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005


Institutional Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount


Shares sold
102,883,407,350 $ 102,883,407,350 68,840,529,646 $ 68,840,529,646
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
137,243,183 137,243,183 59,531,634 59,531,634
Shares redeemed

(102,122,900,107
)


(102,122,900,107
)

(68,312,442,051
)


(68,312,442,051
)

   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

897,750,426


$
897,750,426


587,619,229


$
587,619,229


Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

Institutional Service Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
17,728,529,559 $ 17,728,529,559 17,692,054,657 $ 17,692,054,657
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
62,429,858 62,429,858 28,370,500 28,370,492
Shares redeemed

(17,057,295,017
)


(17,057,295,017
)

(17,997,158,534
)


(17,997,158,534
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SERVICE SHARE TRANSACTIONS

733,664,400


$
733,664,400


(276,733,377
)

$
(276,733,385
)

   
Year Ended
7/31/2006


   
Period Ended
7/31/2005 1


Institutional Capital Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
571,379,890 $ 571,379,890 397,007,718 $ 397,007,718
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
14,800,977 14,800,977 1,953,531 1,953,531
Shares redeemed

(507,373,473
)


(507,373,473
)

(100,339,738
)


(100,339,738
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

78,807,394


$
78,807,394


298,621,511


$
298,621,511

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005
Trust Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
438,898,478 $ 438,898,478 190,462,480 $ 190,462,480
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
452,089 452,089 55,940 55,940
Shares redeemed

(390,159,930
)


(390,159,930
)

(162,623,809
)


(162,623,809
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM TRUST SHARE TRANSACTIONS

49,190,637


$
49,190,637


27,894,611


$
27,894,611

   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

1,759,412,857


$
1,759,412,857


637,401,974


$
637,401,966

Government Obligations Tax-Managed Fund
Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

Institutional Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
6,325,739,769 $ 6,325,749,146 4,281,102,291 $ 4,281,102,291
Shares issued in connection with tax-free merger of assets from the Trust for Government Cash Reserves
84,754,065 84,754,065 -- --
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
16,260,309 16,260,309 6,541,528 6,541,528
Shares redeemed

(6,076,755,268
)


(6,076,755,268
)

(4,241,037,779
)


(4,241,037,779
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

349,998,875


$
350,008,252


46,606,040


$
46,606,040

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005
Institutional Service Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
5,473,290,261 $ 5,473,290,261 4,598,624,145 $ 4,598,624,145
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
15,679,737 15,679,737 9,708,644 9,708,644
Shares redeemed

(5,276,003,312
)


(5,276,003,312
)

(4,567,462,876
)


(4,567,462,876
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SERVICE SHARE TRANSACTIONS

212,966,686


$
212,966,686


40,869,913


$
40,869,913

   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

562,965,561


$
562,974,938


87,475,953


$
87,475,953

Municipal Obligations Fund
Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005
Institutional Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
45,999,768,480 $ 45,999,768,480 32,377,793,944 $ 32,377,793,944
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
81,476,882 81,476,882 34,837,487 34,837,487
Shares redeemed

(45,631,011,465
)


(45,631,011,465
)

(31,516,352,148
)


(31,516,352,148
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

450,233,897


$
450,233,897


896,279,283


$
896,279,283

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005
Institutional Service Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
1,884,342,195 $ 1,884,342,195 2,119,536,078 $ 2,119,536,078
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
13,961,548 13,961,548 6,196,601 6,196,601
Shares redeemed

(1,919,661,907
)


(1,919,661,907
)

(1,847,370,660
)


(1,847,370,660
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SERVICE SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(21,358,164
)

$
(21,358,164
)

278,362,019


$
278,362,019

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005
Institutional Capital Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
4,498,833,280 $ 4,498,833,280 3,776,093,273 $ 3,776,093,273
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
25,892,997 25,892,997 7,663,755 7,663,755
Shares redeemed

(4,704,386,838
)


(4,704,386,838
)

(2,987,390,396
)


(2,987,390,396
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(179,660,561
)

$
(179,660,561
)

796,366,632


$
796,366,632

   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

249,215,172


$
249,215,172


1,971,007,934


$
1,971,007,934

Prime Cash Obligations Fund
Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005
Institutional Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
70,536,994,017 $ 70,536,994,017 63,323,840,572 $ 63,323,840,572
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
161,355,050 161,355,050 65,451,824 65,451,824
Shares redeemed

(72,008,871,373
)


(72,008,871,373
)

(66,320,572,743
)


(66,320,572,743
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(1,310,522,306
)

$
(1,310,522,306
)

(2,931,280,347
)

$
(2,931,280,347
)
Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005
Institutional Service Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
10,566,795,860 $ 10,566,795,860 11,309,022,977 $ 11,309,022,977
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
18,223,345 18,223,345 9,050,906 9,050,906
Shares redeemed

(10,432,734,748
)


(10,432,734,748
)

(11,562,653,146
)


(11,562,653,146
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SERVICE SHARE TRANSACTIONS

152,284,457


$
152,284,457


(244,579,263
)

$
(244,579,263
)
Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005
Institutional Capital Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
4,540,792,343 $ 4,540,792,343 3,504,433,074 $ 3,504,433,074
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
30,782,985 30,782,985 9,852,756 9,852,756
Shares redeemed

(4,293,020,253
)


(4,293,020,253
)

(3,439,585,305
)


(3,439,585,305
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

278,555,075


$
278,555,075


74,700,525


$
74,700,525

   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(879,682,774
)

$
(879,682,774
)

(3,101,159,085
)

$
(3,101,159,085
)
Prime Management Obligations Fund

   
Year Ended
7/31/2006


   
Period Ended
7/31/2005 2

Institutional Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
22,720,652,458 $ 22,720,652,458 15,711,474,555 $ 15,711,474,555
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
60,837,635 60,837,635 23,392,394 23,392,394
Shares redeemed

(23,433,559,021
)


(23,433,559,021
)

(13,096,706,296
)


(13,096,706,296
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(652,068,928
)

$
(652,068,928
)

2,638,160,653


$
2,638,160,653


   
Year Ended
7/31/2006


   
Period Ended
7/31/2005 1

Institutional Service Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
1,122,765,191 $ 1,122,765,191 1,110,524,614 $ 1,110,524,614
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
37,377,237 37,377,237 5,702,788 5,702,788
Shares redeemed

(945,873,165
)


(945,873,165
)

(303,339,927
)


(303,339,927
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SERVICE SHARE TRANSACTIONS

214,269,263


$
214,269,263


812,887,475


$
812,887,475


   
Year Ended
7/31/2006


   
Period Ended
7/31/2005 1

Institutional Capital Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
2,293,404,017 $ 2,293,404,017 1,477,195,766 $ 1,477,195,766
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
34,562,980 34,562,980 6,343,556 6,343,556
Shares redeemed

(2,411,114,116
)


(2,411,114,116
)

(666,312,131
)


(666,312,131
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(83,147,119
)

$
(83,147,119
)

817,227,191


$
817,227,191

   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(520,946,784
)

$
(520,946,784
)

4,268,275,319


$
4,268,275,319

Prime Obligations Fund
Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005
Institutional Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
195,830,365,206 $ 195,830,365,206 152,484,780,713 $ 152,484,780,713
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
302,881,875 302,881,875 129,187,873 129,187,873
Shares redeemed

(196,582,948,973
)


(196,582,948,973
)

(153,533,043,698
)


(153,533,043,698
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(449,701,892
)

$
(449,701,892
)

(919,075,112
)

$
(919,075,112
)
Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005
Institutional Service Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
43,532,917,577 $ 43,532,917,577 43,291,731,228 $ 43,291,731,228
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
68,834,830 68,834,830 28,658,863 28,658,806
Shares redeemed

(43,501,036,269
)


(43,501,036,269
)

(42,417,391,466
)


(42,417,391,466
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SERVICE SHARE TRANSACTIONS

100,716,138


$
100,716,138


902,998,625


$
902,998,568

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005
Trust Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
277,031,257 $ 277,031,257 193,284,975 $ 193,284,975
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
688,527 688,527 296,145 296,145
Shares redeemed

(212,765,769
)


(212,765,769
)

(202,620,137
)


(202,620,137
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM TRUST SHARE TRANSACTIONS

64,954,015


$
64,954,015


(9,039,017
)

$
(9,039,017
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(284,031,739
)

$
(284,031,739
)

(25,115,504
)

$
(25,115,561
)
Prime Value Obligations Fund
Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005
Institutional Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
103,692,917,824 $ 103,692,917,824 78,613,332,108 $ 78,613,332,108
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
246,934,132 246,934,132 95,726,452 95,726,452
Shares redeemed

(103,030,683,708
)


(103,030,683,708
)

(82,412,070,061
)


(82,412,070,061
)

   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

909,168,248


$
909,168,248


(3,703,011,501
)

$
(3,703,011,501
)

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005
Institutional Service Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
6,825,236,442 $ 6,825,236,442 5,432,893,340 $ 5,432,893,340
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
46,250,432 46,250,432 19,368,337 19,368,337
Shares redeemed

(6,378,794,460
)


(6,378,794,460
)

(5,753,378,607
)


(5,753,378,607
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SERVICE SHARE TRANSACTIONS

492,692,414


$
492,692,414


(301,116,930
)

$
(301,116,930
)
Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005
Institutional Capital Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
10,859,282,101 $ 10,859,282,101 6,388,735,697 $ 6,388,735,697
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
23,533,396 23,533,396 10,153,012 10,153,012
Shares redeemed

(10,624,629,835
)


(10,624,629,835
)

(6,113,307,005
)


(6,113,307,005
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

258,185,662


$
258,185,662


285,581,704


$
285,581,704

   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

1,660,046,324


$
1,660,046,324


(3,718,546,727
)

$
(3,718,546,727
)
Tax-Free Obligations Fund
Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005
Institutional Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
56,791,571,131 $ 56,791,571,131 66,345,418,587 $ 66,345,418,587
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
116,153,616 116,153,616 84,387,890 84,387,783
Shares redeemed

(59,426,864,922
)


(59,426,864,922
)

(64,217,452,935
)


(64,217,452,935
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(2,519,140,175
)

$
(2,519,140,175
)

2,212,353,542


$
2,212,353,435

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005
Institutional Service Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
8,432,719,509 $ 8,432,719,509 7,904,787,914 $ 7,904,787,914
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
12,957,574 12,957,503 7,126,727 7,126,727
Shares redeemed

(8,452,594,250
)


(8,452,594,250
)

(7,626,704,013
)


(7,626,704,013
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SERVICE SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(6,917,167
)

$
(6,917,238
)

285,210,628


$
285,210,628

   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(2,526,057,342
)

$
(2,526,057,413
)

2,497,564,170


$
2,497,564,063

Treasury Obligations Fund
Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005
Institutional Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
44,165,575,744 $ 44,165,575,744 33,844,927,635 $ 33,844,927,635
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
122,359,876 122,359,876 59,642,933 59,642,933
Shares redeemed

(43,601,649,250
)


(43,601,649,250
)

(33,729,830,302
)


(33,729,830,302
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

686,286,370


$
686,286,370


174,740,266


$
174,740,266

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005
Institutional Service Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
22,364,859,502 $ 22,364,859,502 20,751,297,064 $ 20,751,297,064
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
38,022,724 38,022,724 16,731,340 16,731,340
Shares redeemed

(21,936,217,537
)


(21,936,217,537
)

(20,487,277,725
)


(20,487,277,725
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SERVICE SHARE TRANSACTIONS

466,664,689


$
466,664,689


280,750,679


$
280,750,679

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005
Institutional Capital Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
5,366,080,952 $ 5,366,080,952 5,303,145,483 $ 5,303,145,483
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
3,868,188 3,868,188 1,116,708 1,116,708
Shares redeemed

(4,955,300,921
)


(4,955,300,921
)

(5,553,358,330
)


(5,553,358,330
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

414,648,219


$
414,648,219


(249,096,139
)

$
(249,096,139
)
Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005
Trust Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
1,564,660,492 $ 1,564,660,492 2,286,514,204 $ 2,286,514,204
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
1,692,687 1,692,687 1,011,162 1,011,162
Shares redeemed

(1,223,303,881
)


(1,223,303,881
)

(2,347,304,660
)


(2,347,304,660
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM TRUST SHARE TRANSACTIONS

343,049,298


$
343,049,298


(59,779,294
)

$
(59,779,294
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

1,910,648,576


$
1,910,648,576


146,615,512


$
146,615,512

1 For period from January 18, 2005 (start of performance) to July 31, 2005.

2 For period from August 11, 2004 (start of performance) to July 31, 2005.

4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

The tax character of distributions as reported on the Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended July 31, 2006 and 2005 was as follows:

    2006
    2005


   
Tax-Exempt Income
   
Ordinary Income
1
Tax-Exempt Income
   
Ordinary Income
1
Government Obligations Fund

--

$396,979,439

--

$ 172,450,363

Government Obligations Tax-Managed Fund

--

$133,271,529

--

$ 57,182,770

Municipal Obligations Fund

$ 146,977,333

--

$ 64,797,936

--

Prime Cash Obligations Fund

--

$387,192,141

--

$ 179,195,986

Prime Management Obligations Fund

--

$147,513,224

--

$ 42,876,324

Prime Obligations Fund

--

$904,517,624

--

$402,568,923

Prime Value Obligations Fund

--

$466,617,999

--

$188,714,450

Tax-Free Obligations Fund

$266,627,012

--

$186,698,503

--

Treasury Obligations Fund

--

$521,964,298

--

$242,233,645

1 For tax purposes short-term capital gain distributions are considered ordinary income distributions.

As of July 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Fund
   
Undistributed
Tax-Exempt Income

   
Undistributed
Ordinary Income

   
Dividends Payable
   
Post-October
Losses

   
Capital Loss Carryforward
Government Obligations Fund

--

$ 18,717,772

$(18,611,370)

--

--
Government Obligations Tax-Managed Fund

--

$10,956,219

$(10,929,348)

--

--
Municipal Obligations Fund

$ 1,525,925

--

$ (1,530,520)

$ (114,328)

$ (15,340)
Prime Cash Obligations Fund

--

$ 14,766,216

$(14,792,485)

--

--
Prime Management Obligations Fund

--

$ 1,575,391

$ (1,554,499)

--

--
Prime Obligations Fund

--

$52,020,859

$ (52,052,978)

--

--
Prime Value Obligations Fund

--

$14,451,963

$(14,526,247)

--

--
Tax-Free Obligations Fund

$10,946,325

--

$(10,956,910)

$(186,839)

$(215,830)
Treasury Obligations Fund

--

$38,627,237

$(38,686,356)

--

--

At July 31, 2006, the following Funds had capital loss carryforwards, which will reduce each Fund's taxable income arising from future net realized gain on investments, if any, to the extent permitted by the Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders which would otherwise be necessary to relieve each Fund of any liability for federal income tax. Pursuant to the Code, such capital loss carryforwards will expire as follows:

Fund
   
Capital Loss
Carryforward
to Expire
in 2011

   
Capital Loss
Carryforward
to Expire
in 2013

   
Capital Loss
Carryforward
to Expire
in 2014

   
Total
Capital Loss
Carrryforward

Municipal Obligations Fund

--

$15,340

--

$ 15,340
Tax-Free Obligations Fund

$27,839

--

$187,991

$215,830

The following Funds used capital loss carryforwards to offset taxable capital gains realized during the year ended July 31, 2006:

Fund
   
Capital Loss
Carryforwards
Utilized

Municipal Obligations Fund

$13,247
Prime Obligations Fund

$19,446

Under current tax regulations, capital losses realized after October 31 may be deferred and treated as occurring on the first day of the following fiscal year. As of July 31, 2006, for federal income tax purposes, post-October losses as follows were deferred to August 1, 2006:

Fund
   
Post-October Losses
Municipal Obligations Fund

$114,328
Tax-Free Obligations Fund

$186,839

5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

Federated Investment Management Company, the Funds' investment adviser (the "Adviser"), receives for its services an annual investment adviser fee equal to 0.20% of each Fund's average daily net assets. The Adviser may voluntarily choose to waive and/or reimburse any portion of its fee. The Adviser can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver and/or reimbursement at any time at its sole discretion.

For the year ended July 31, 2006, the Adviser voluntarily waived the following fees:

Fund
   
Adviser Fee Waiver
Government Obligations Fund

$ 8,189,143
Government Obligations Tax-Managed Fund

$ 2,940,111
Municipal Obligations Fund

$ 5,812,657
Prime Cash Obligations Fund

$ 9,636,338
Prime Management Obligations Fund

$ 5,340,791
Prime Obligations Fund

$ 17,467,455
Prime Value Obligations Fund

$ 12,433,605
Tax-Free Obligations Fund

$ 7,925,939
Treasury Obligations Fund

$10,708,341

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Funds with administrative personnel and services. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average aggregate daily net assets of certain Federated funds as specified below:

Maximum
Administrative Fee



   
Average Aggregate Daily Net Assets
of the Federated Funds

0.150%

on the first $5 billion
0.125%

on the next $5 billion
0.100%

on the next $10 billion
0.075%

on assets in excess of $20 billion

The administrative fee received during any fiscal year shall be at least $150,000 per portfolio and $40,000 per each additional class of Shares. FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FAS can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion.

For the year ended July 31, 2006, the net fee paid to FAS was 0.076% of average aggregate daily net assets of each Fund.

Distribution Services Fee

Government Obligations Fund, Prime Obligations Fund, and Treasury Obligations Fund have adopted a Distribution Plan (the "Plan") pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act. Under the terms of the Plan, the Funds will compensate Federated Securities Corp. (FSC), the principal distributor, from the daily net assets of their Trust Shares to finance activities intended to result in the sale of their Trust shares. The Plan provides that the Government Obligations Fund, Prime Obligations Fund, and Treasury Obligations Fund may incur distribution expenses up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Fund's Trust Shares, annually, to compensate FSC. FSC may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FSC can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. When FSC receives fees, it may pay some or all of them to financial intermediaries whose customers purchase shares.

For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSC retained $225 of fees paid by the Prime Obligations Fund and $9,487 of fees paid by the Treasury Obligations Fund, and did not retain any fees paid by Government Obligations Fund.

Shareholder Services Fee

The Funds may pay fees (Service Fees) up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Funds' Institutional Shares, Institutional Service Shares and Institutional Capital Shares to financial intermediaries or to Federated Shareholder Services Company (FSSC) for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. FSSC or these financial intermediaries may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of their fee. In addition, FSSC may voluntarily reimburse the Funds for shareholder services fees. This voluntary waiver and/or reimbursement can be modified or terminated at any time.

For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC voluntarily waived the following fees:

Fund
   
Shareholder
Services
Fee Waiver

Government Obligations Fund

$11,753,667
Government Obligations Tax-Managed Fund

$ 2,517,226
Municipal Obligations Fund

$ 1,166,074
Prime Cash Obligations Fund

$ 950,309
Prime Management Obligations Fund

$ 4,161,018
Prime Obligations Fund

$30,505,395
Prime Value Obligations Fund

$ 1,338,508
Tax-Free Obligations Fund

$14,769,698
Treasury Obligations Fund

$12,294,714

For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC received the following fees paid by the Funds:

Fund
   
Shareholder
Services
Fees Received

Government Obligations Fund

$15,466
Government Obligations Tax-Managed Fund

$ 579
Prime Cash Obligations Fund

$24,081
Prime Obligations Fund

$32,334
Prime Value Obligations Fund

$ 33,676
Tax-Free Obligations Fund

$18,440
Treasury Obligations Fund

$ 27,914

For the year ended July 31, 2006, Institutional Shares for the Municipal Obligations Fund, Prime Cash Obligations Fund and Prime Value Obligations Fund did not incur a shareholder services fee. For the year ended July 31, 2006, Institutional Capital Shares for Prime Obligations Fund did not incur a shareholder services fee.

Commencing on August 15, 2005, and continuing through May 17, 2006, FSSC reimbursed daily a portion of the shareholder services fee of Prime Cash Obligations Fund - Institutional Capital Shares. This reimbursement resulted from an administrative delay in the implementation of contractual terms of shareholder service fee agreements. This reimbursement amounted to $188,804 for the year ended July 31, 2006.

General

Certain of the Officers and Trustees of the Funds are Officers and Directors or Trustees of the above companies.

Interfund Transactions

During the year ended July 31, 2006, the Funds engaged in purchase and sale transactions with funds that have a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment advisers), common Directors/Trustees, and/or common Officers. These purchase and sale transactions complied with Rule 17a-7 under the Act. Interfund transactions were as follows:

Fund
   
Purchases
   
Sales
Municipal Obligations Fund

$ 7,698,355,000

$12,397,527,000
Tax-Free Obligations Fund

$11,498,482,362

$ 8,035,474,500

6. CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

A substantial part of the portfolios of Prime Cash Obligations Fund, Prime Obligations Fund and Prime Value Obligations Fund may be comprised of obligations of banks. As a result, these Funds may be more susceptible to any economic, business, political or other developments which generally affect these entities.

7. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning in October 2003, Federated Investors, Inc. and various subsidiaries thereof (including the advisers and distributor for various investment companies, collectively, "Federated"), along with various investment companies sponsored by Federated ("Funds") were named as defendants in several class action lawsuits now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuits were purportedly filed on behalf of people who purchased, owned and/or redeemed shares of Federated-sponsored mutual funds during specified periods beginning November 1, 1998. The suits are generally similar in alleging that Federated engaged in illegal and improper trading practices including market timing and late trading in concert with certain institutional traders, which allegedly caused financial injury to the mutual fund shareholders. These lawsuits began to be filed shortly after Federated's first public announcement that it had received requests for information on shareholder trading activities in the Funds from the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), the Office of the New York State Attorney General ("NYAG"), and other authorities. In that regard, on November 28, 2005, Federated announced that it had reached final settlements with the SEC and the NYAG with respect to those matters. As Federated previously reported in 2004, it has already paid approximately $8.0 million to certain funds as determined by an independent consultant. As part of these settlements, Federated agreed to pay for the benefit of fund shareholders additional disgorgement and a civil money penalty in the aggregate amount of an additional $72 million. Federated and various Funds have also been named as defendants in several additional lawsuits, the majority of which are now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging, among other things, excessive advisory and Rule 12b-1 fees. The Board of the Funds has retained the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro LLP to represent the Funds in these lawsuits. Federated and the Funds, and their respective counsel, are reviewing the allegations and intend to defend this litigation. Additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations may be filed in the future. The potential impact of these lawsuits, all of which seek unquantified damages, attorneys' fees and expenses, and future potential similar suits is uncertain. Although we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Funds, there can be no assurance that these suits, the ongoing adverse publicity and/or other developments resulting from the regulatory investigations will not result in increased Fund redemptions, reduced sales of Fund shares, or other adverse consequences for the Funds.

8. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

At July 31, 2006, 100.0% of the distributions from net investment income for the Municipal Obligations Fund and the Tax-Free Obligations Fund is exempt from federal income tax, other than the federal AMT.

For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2006, 99.12%, 100.00%, and 100.00% of dividends paid by the Prime Management Obligations Fund, Prime Obligations Fund and Treasury Obligations Fund, respectively, are interest-related dividends, as provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.

9. CHANGE IN INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM (UNAUDITED)

On August 18, 2006, the Funds' Trustees, upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, and completion of the audit for July 31, 2006, appointed KPMG LLP (KPMG) as the Funds' independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007. The Fund's previous independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP (D&T), declined to stand for re-election. The previous reports issued by D&T on the Funds' financial statements for the fiscal years ended July 31, 2005 and July 31, 2006, contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During the Funds' fiscal years ended July 31, 2005 and July 31, 2006: (i) there were no disagreements with D&T on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of D&T, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with the reports on the financial statements for such years; and (ii) there were no reportable events of the kind described in Item 304(a) (1) (v) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

As indicted above, the Funds have appointed KPMG as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Fund's financial statements for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2007. During the Funds' fiscal years ended July 31, 2005 and July 31, 2006 and the interim period commencing August 1, 2006 and ending September 22, 2006, neither the Fund nor anyone on its behalf has consulted KPMG on items which: (i) concerned the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Funds' financial statements; or (ii) concerned the subject of a disagreement (as defined in paragraph (a) (1) (iv) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K) or reportable events (as described in paragraph (a) (1) (v) of said Item 304).

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONEY MARKET OBLIGATIONS TRUST AND SHAREHOLDERS OF GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS FUND, GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS TAX-MANAGED FUND, MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS FUND, PRIME CASH OBLIGATIONS FUND, PRIME OBLIGATIONS FUND, PRIME MANAGEMENT OBLIGATIONS FUND, PRIME VALUE OBLIGATIONS FUND, TAX-FREE OBLIGATIONS FUND, AND TREASURY OBLIGATIONS FUND FOR THE INSTITUTIONAL SHARES AND INSTITUTIONAL SERVICE SHARES:

We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the portfolios of investments, of Government Obligations Fund, Government Obligations Tax-Managed Fund, Municipal Obligations Fund, Prime Cash Obligations Fund, Prime Obligations Fund, Prime Management Obligations Fund, Prime Value Obligations Fund, Tax-Free Obligations Fund and Treasury Obligations Fund (collectively the "Funds") (portfolios of the Money Market Obligations Trust) as of July 31, 2006, and the related statements of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds' management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Funds are not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of their internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of July 31, 2006, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, other auditing procedures were performed. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Funds as of July 31, 2006, the results of their operations for the year then ended, and the changes in their net assets, and their financial highlights for the respective stated periods, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
September 22, 2006

Board of Trustees and Trust Officers

The Board is responsible for managing the Trust's business affairs and for exercising all the Trust's powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Board member and the senior officers of the Funds. Where required, the tables separately list Board members who are "interested persons" of the Fund ( i.e. , "Interested" Board members) and those who are not ( i.e. , "Independent" Board members). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is Federated Investors Tower, 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA. As of December 31, 2005, the Trust comprised 41 portfolios, and the Federated Fund Complex consisted of 43 investment companies (comprising 136 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Board member oversees all portfolios in the Federated Fund Complex and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund's Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trust Trustees and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
John F. Donahue*
Birth Date: July 28, 1924
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex's Executive Committee.

Previous Positions
: Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex; Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Chairman and Director, Federated Investment Counseling.



J. Christopher Donahue*
Birth Date: April 11, 1949
PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 1989
Principal Occupations : Principal Executive Officer and President of the Federated Fund Complex; Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company; Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman, Passport Research, Ltd. (Investment advisory subsidiary of Federated); Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director, Federated Services Company.

Previous Positions
: President, Federated Investment Counseling; President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd.



Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D.*
Birth Date: October 11, 1932
3471 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1111
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Medical Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Downtown; Hematologist, Oncologist and Internist, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Other Directorships Held
: Member, National Board of Trustees, Leukemia Society of America.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, University of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.



* Family relationships and reasons for "interested" status: John F. Donahue is the father of J. Christopher Donahue; both are "interested" due to the positions they hold with Federated Investors, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D. is "interested" because his son-in-law is employed by the Fund's principal underwriter, Federated Securities Corp.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
Thomas G. Bigley
Birth Date: February 3, 1934
15 Old Timber Trail
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: November 1994
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Member of Executive Committee, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh.

Previous Position
: Senior Partner, Ernst & Young LLP.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
John T. Conroy, Jr.
Birth Date: June 23, 1937
Investment Properties Corporation
3838 North Tamiami Trail
Suite 402
Naples, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman of the Board, Investment Properties Corporation; Partner or Trustee in private real estate ventures in Southwest Florida.

Previous Positions
: President, Investment Properties Corporation; Senior Vice President, John R. Wood and Associates, Inc., Realtors; President, Naples Property Management, Inc. and Northgate Village Development Corporation.



Nicholas P. Constantakis
Birth Date: September 3, 1939
175 Woodshire Drive
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Michael Baker Corporation (engineering and energy services worldwide).

Previous Position
: Partner, Andersen Worldwide SC.



John F. Cunningham
Birth Date: March 5, 1943
353 El Brillo Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Director, WinsorTech.

Other Directorships Held
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cunningham & Co., Inc. (strategic business consulting); Trustee Associate, Boston College.

Previous Positions
: Director, Redgate Communications and EMC Corporation (computer storage systems); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Computer Consoles, Inc.; President and Chief Operating Officer, Wang Laboratories; Director, First National Bank of Boston; Director, Apollo Computer, Inc.



Peter E. Madden
Birth Date: March 16, 1942
One Royal Palm Way
100 Royal Palm Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Board of Overseers, Babson College.

Previous Positions
: Representative, Commonwealth of Massachusetts General Court; President, State Street Bank and Trust Company and State Street Corporation (retired); Director, VISA USA and VISA International; Chairman and Director, Massachusetts Bankers Association; Director, Depository Trust Corporation; Director, The Boston Stock Exchange.



Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.
Birth Date: April 10, 1945
80 South Road
Westhampton Beach, NY
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Management Consultant.
Previous Positions
: Chief Executive Officer, PBTC International Bank; Partner, Arthur Young & Company (now Ernst & Young LLP); Chief Financial Officer of Retail Banking Sector, Chase Manhattan Bank; Senior Vice President, HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank); Vice President, Citibank; Assistant Professor of Banking and Finance, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University; Executive Vice President, DVC Group, Inc.



John E. Murray, Jr., J.D., S.J.D.
Birth Date: December 20, 1932
Chancellor, Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1995
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee, and Chairman of the Board of Directors or Trustees, of the Federated Fund Complex; Chancellor and Law Professor, Duquesne University; Partner, Murray, Hogue & Lannis.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Michael Baker Corp. (engineering, construction, operations and technical services).

Previous Positions
: President, Duquesne University; Dean and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Dean and Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law.



Marjorie P. Smuts
Birth Date: June 21, 1935
4905 Bayard Street
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Public Relations/Marketing Consultant/Conference Coordinator.

Previous Positions
: National Spokesperson, Aluminum Company of America; television producer; President, Marj Palmer Assoc.; Owner, Scandia Bord.



John S. Walsh
Birth Date: November 28, 1957
2604 William Drive
Valparaiso, IN
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer of construction temporary heaters); President and Director, Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers Products, Inc.

Previous Position
: Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
James F. Will
Birth Date: October 12, 1938
Saint Vincent College
Latrobe, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 2006
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chancellor and President, Saint Vincent College.

Other Directorships Held
: Alleghany Corporation.

Previous Positions
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Armco, Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer, Cyclops Industries; President and Chief Operating Officer, Kaiser Steel Corporation.



OFFICERS




Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
John W. McGonigle
Birth Date: October 26, 1938
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND SECRETARY
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Federated Investment Counseling; Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Services Company and Federated Securities Corp.



Richard A. Novak
Birth Date: December 25, 1963
TREASURER
Began serving: January 2006
Principal Occupations : Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Federated Fund Complex; Senior Vice President, Federated Administrative Services; Financial and Operations Principal for Federated Securities Corp., Edgewood Services, Inc. and Southpointe Distribution Services, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Vice President, Finance of Federated Services Company; Controller of Federated Investors, Inc.; held various financial management positions within The Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh; Auditor, Arthur Andersen & Co.



Richard B. Fisher
Birth Date: May 17, 1923
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Vice Chairman or Vice President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman, Federated Securities Corp.

Previous Positions
: President and Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Executive Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc. and Director and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Securities Corp.



Brian P. Bouda
Birth Date: February 28, 1947
CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER
Began serving: August 2004
Principal Occupations : Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of Federated Investors, Inc.; and Chief Compliance Officer of its subsidiaries. Mr. Bouda joined Federated in 1999 and is a member of the American Bar Association and the State Bar Association of Wisconsin.



Deborah A. Cunningham
Birth Date: September 15, 1959
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Deborah A. Cunningham was named Chief Investment Officer of money market products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1981 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1997. Ms. Cunningham is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.S.B.A. in Finance from Robert Morris College.



Mary Jo Ochson
Birth Date: September 12, 1953
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Mary Jo Ochson was named Chief Investment Officer of tax-exempt, fixed-income products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1982 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Pittsburgh.



Susan R. Hill
Birth Date: June 20, 1963
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Susan R. Hill is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Hill joined Federated in 1990 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 2003 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 2005. Ms. Hill was a Portfolio Manager from 1994 until 2003, and served as Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1997 until 2004 and an Assistant Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1994 until 1997. Ms. Hill is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received an M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University.



Jeff A. Kozemchak
Birth Date: January 15, 1960
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Jeff A. Kozemchak is Vice President of the Trust. Mr. Kozemchak joined Federated in 1987 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 1996 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1999. He was a Portfolio Manager until 1996 and a Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Kozemchak is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received his M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University in 1987.



Paige M. Wilhelm
Birth Date: May 28, 1962
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: August 2006
Principal Occupations : Paige M. Wilhelm is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Wilhelm joined Federated in 1985 and has been a Senior Vice President and a Senior Portfolio Manager. She is responsible for portfolio management and research in the fixed income area concentrating on taxable money market instruments. Previous associations include Senior Credit Analyst, Federated Investors; Performance Analysis Supervisor; Performance Analyst, Federated Investment Counseling. Ms. Wilhelm is a member of the CFA Society of Pittsburgh and received her B.S. from Indiana University and her M.B.A. from Duquesne University.



Evaluation and Approval of Advisory Contract

GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS FUND (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was above the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS TAX-MANAGED FUND (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was above the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS FUND (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was above the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

PRIME CASH OBLIGATIONS FUND (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant n determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was above the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

PRIME MANAGEMENT OBLIGATIONS FUND (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was above the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

PRIME OBLIGATIONS FUND (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was above the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

PRIME VALUE OBLIGATIONS FUND (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was above the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

TAX-FREE OBLIGATIONS FUND (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

The Fund's performance fell below the median of the relevant peer group during the year ending December 31, 2005. The Board discussed the Fund's performance with the Adviser and recognized the efforts being undertaken by the Adviser. The Board will continue to monitor these efforts and the performance of the Fund.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

TREASURY OBLIGATIONS FUND (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was above the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that the Funds use to determine how to vote proxies, if any, relating to securities held in the Funds' portfolios is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Funds voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Federated's website. Go to FederatedInvestors.com, select "Products," select the "Prospectuses and Regulatory Reports" link, then select a Fund to access the link to Form N-PX. This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

The Funds file with the SEC a complete schedule of their portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on "Form N-Q." These filings are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.) You may also access this information from the "Products" section of Federated's website at FederatedInvestors.com by clicking on "Portfolio Holdings" and selecting the name of a Fund, or by selecting the name of a Fund and clicking on "Portfolio Holdings." You must register on the website the first time you wish to access this information.

Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board, or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal. Although money market funds seek to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share, there is no assurance that they will be able to do so.

This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the funds' prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses, and other information.

Cusip 60934N104    Cusip 60934N625    Cusip 60934N401
Cusip 60934N807 Cusip 60934N617 Cusip 60934N880
Cusip 60934N856 Cusip 60934N203 Cusip 60934N500
Cusip 60934N849 Cusip 60934N708 Cusip 60934N872
Cusip 60934N658 Cusip 60934N583 Cusip 608919833
Cusip 60934N641 Cusip 60934N575 Cusip 60934N112

25716 (9/06)

Federated is a registered mark of Federated Investors, Inc. 2006 (c)Federated Investors, Inc.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Money Market Obligations Trust



ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT

July 31, 2006

Trust Shares

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
SHAREHOLDER EXPENSE EXAMPLE
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS SUMMARY TABLES
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND TRUST OFFICERS
EVALUATION AND APPROVAL OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
VOTING PROXIES ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

Not FDIC Insured * May Lose Value * No Bank Guarantee

Federated Investors 50 Years of Growth & Innovation

Financial Highlights

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

                  
Year Ended
   
Net Asset Value,
Beginning of Period

   
Net
Investment
Income

   
Net Realize
and Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on Investments


   
Total From
Investment
Operations

   
Distributions
From Net
Investment
Income

   
Distributions
From Net
Realized Gain
on Investments


Government Obligations Fund














July 31, 2003 3
$1.00 0.003 -- 0.003 (0.003) --
July 31, 2004
$1.00 0.004 -- 0.004 (0.004) --
July 31, 2005
$1.00 0.017 -- 0.017 (0.017) --
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.037 -- 0.037 (0.037) --
Prime Obligations Fund














July 31, 2003 3
$1.00 0.003 (0.000 ) 5 0.003 (0.003) --
July 31, 2004
$1.00 0.005 0.000 5 0.005 (0.005) --
July 31, 2005
$1.00 0.017 0.000 5 0.017 (0.017) --
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.038 0.000 5 0.038 (0.038) --
Treasury Obligations Fund












July 31, 2003 3
$1.00 0.003 0.000 5 0.003 (0.003) (0.000 ) 5
July 31, 2004
$1.00 0.004 -- 0.004 (0.004) --
July 31, 2005
$1.00 0.016 -- 0.016 (0.016) --
July 31, 2006
$1.00 0.036 -- 0.036 (0.036) --

1 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

2 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and net investment income ratios shown.

3 Reflects operations for the period from February 19, 2003 (start of performance) to July 31, 2003.

4 Computed on an annualized basis.

5 Represents less than $0.001.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

         
Ratios to Average Net Assets

   
Total
Distributions

   
Net Asset Value,
End of Period

   
Total
Return 1

   
Net
Expenses


   
Net
Investment
Income


   
Expense Waiver/
Reimbursement

2
   
Net Assets,
End of Period
(000 Omitted)

















(0.003) $1.00 0.25% 0.70% 4 0.55% 4 0.09% 4 $29,085
(0.004) $1.00 0.41% 0.70% 0.41% 0.09% $27,162
(0.017) $1.00 1.69% 0.70% 1.84% 0.09% $55,057
(0.037) $1.00 3.78% 0.70% 3.77% 0.09% $104,260
















(0.003) $1.00 0.29% 0.70% 4 0.54% 4 0.09% 4 $11,159
(0.005) $1.00 0.46% 0.70% 0.47% 0.09% $35,472
(0.017) $1.00 1.73% 0.70% 1.67% 0.09% $26,434
(0.038) $1.00 3.82% 0.70% 3.94% 0.09% $91,389
















(0.003) $1.00 0.25% 0.70% 4 0.43% 4 0.09% 4 $173,447
(0.004) $1.00 0.36% 0.70% 0.37% 0.09% $508,374
(0.016) $1.00 1.61% 0.70% 1.65% 0.09% $448,505
(0.036) $1.00 3.68% 0.70% 3.70% 0.09% $791,547

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of a Fund, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees; to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees/or shareholder services fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Funds and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from February 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006.

ACTUAL EXPENSES

The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES

The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Funds' actual expense ratios and assumed rates of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Funds' actual return. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are required to be provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Funds with other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.


   
Beginning
Account Value
2/1/2006

   
Ending
Account Value
7/31/2006

   
Expenses Paid
During Period 1

Actual:






Government Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,020.90

$3.51
Prime Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,021.10

$3.51
Treasury Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,020.50

$3.51
Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return before expenses):






Government Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,021.32

$3.51
Prime Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,021.32

$3.51
Treasury Obligations Fund

$1,000

$1,021.32

$3.51

1 Expenses are equal to the Funds' Trust Shares annualized net expense ratios, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The annualized net expense ratios are as follows:

Government Obligations Fund
   
0.70%
Prime Obligations Fund

0.70%
Treasury Obligations Fund

0.70%

Government Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:




   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Repurchase Agreements

77.3%
U.S. Government Agency Securities

22.6%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

0.1%
   TOTAL

100.0%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:



   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

63.4%
4
8-30 Days

20.0%

31-90 Days

8.9%

91-180 Days

3.0%

181 Days or more

4.6%

Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

0.1%

   TOTAL

100.0%

1 See the Fund's Prospectus for a description of the principal types of securities in which the Fund invests.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

4 Overnight securities comprised 56.6% of the Fund's portfolio.

Government Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES--22.6%
$ 325,000,000 1 Federal Home Loan Bank System Floating Rate Notes, 5.039% - 5.340%, 8/2/2006 - 10/4/2006
$ 324,920,662
220,435,000 Federal Home Loan Bank System Notes, 2.625% - 6.500%, 8/11/2006 - 6/21/2007
220,255,625
299,500,000 2 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Discount Notes, 4.190% - 5.005%, 9/29/2006 - 5/1/2007
291,983,768
537,000,000 1 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Floating Rate Notes, 5.010% - 5.350%, 8/7/2006 - 9/27/2006
536,820,385
320,500,000 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Notes, 2.375% - 5.500%, 8/11/2006 - 7/9/2007
319,382,322
185,000,000 1 Federal National Mortgage Association Floating Rate Notes, 5.330%, 9/28/2006
184,861,287
84,500,000 Federal National Mortgage Association Notes, 3.875% - 4.840%, 5/15/2007 - 6/22/2007
83,715,703
436,580,500 1 Housing and Urban Development Floating Rate Notes, 5.708%, 8/1/2006


436,580,500
   TOTAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES


2,398,520,252
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--77.3%
195,000,000 3 Interest in $500,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.3225%, dated 7/27/2006, under which Banc of America Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 7/25/2036 for $507,096,667 on 10/31/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $512,990,020.
195,000,000
413,000,000 3 Interest in $900,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.28%, dated 7/11/2006, under which Banc of America Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/15/2036 for $903,960,000 on 8/10/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $926,698,636.
413,000,000
319,343,000 Interest in $3,200,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Bank of America N.A. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/1/2035 for $3,200,470,222 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $3,264,000,000.
319,343,000
319,420,000 Interest in $1,350,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Barclays Capital, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 2/22/2013 for $1,350,198,375 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,377,000,216.
319,420,000
350,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.30%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Barclays Capital, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 12/16/2015 for $350,051,528 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $357,000,824.
350,000,000
629,000,000 Interest in $2,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Bear Stearns & Co., Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 12/16/2040 for $2,000,293,889 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $2,060,002,709.
629,000,000
81,250,000 Interest in $2,323,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006, under which BNP Paribas Securities Corp. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2036 for $2,323,338,771 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $2,369,460,967.
81,250,000
600,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 11/23/2035 for $600,088,167 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $612,000,361.
600,000,000
450,000,000 Interest in $900,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Countrywide Securities Corp. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/1/2036 for $900,132,250 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $923,148,491.
450,000,000
400,000,000 3 Interest in $900,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.28%, dated 7/14/2006, under which Credit Suisse First Boston LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/16/2043 for $903,036,000 on 8/9/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $927,003,994.
400,000,000
497,165,000 Interest in $2,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Credit Suisse First Boston LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 12/16/2045 for $2,000,293,889 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $2,060,005,868.
497,165,000
172,000,000 3 Interest in $750,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.31%, dated 6/20/2006, under which Credit Suisse First Boston LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/16/2043 for $757,522,500 on 8/28/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $772,503,322.
172,000,000
722,000,000 3 Interest in $1,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.28%, dated 7/5/2006, under which Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 11/15/2046 for $1,004,986,667 on 8/8/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,023,758,060.
722,000,000
804,420,000 Interest in $1,700,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/1/2036 for $1,700,249,806 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,747,724,257.
804,420,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--continued
$ 20,000,000 3 Interest in $375,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.31%, dated 6/20/2006, under which Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/1/2036 for $378,982,500 on 8/31/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $385,895,608.
$ 20,000,000
25,000,000 3 Interest in $50,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.31%, dated 7/5/2006, under which Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein will repurchase a U.S. Government Agency security maturing on 5/15/2033 for $50,206,500 on 8/2/2006. The market value of the underlying security at the end of the period was $51,860,327.
25,000,000
150,000,000 Interest in $300,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.27%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Goldman Sachs & Co. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/30/2023 for $300,043,917 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $306,045,400.
150,000,000
500,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.30%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/25/2036 for $500,073,611 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $515,003,511.
500,000,000
500,000,000 Interest in $1,500,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which HSBC Securities (USA), Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities and a U.S. Treasury security with various maturities to 8/1/2036 for $1,500,220,417 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,531,931,063.
500,000,000
168,000,000 Interest in $238,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.10%, dated 7/31/2006, under which J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 10/31/2006 for $238,033,717 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $242,764,447.
168,000,000
300,000,000 Interest in $2,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Morgan Stanley & Co. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 7/15/2013 for $2,000,291,667 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $2,045,228,487.
300,000,000
25,000,000 Interest in $100,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.20%, dated 7/31/2006, under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 4/1/2036 for $100,014,444 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $102,000,893.
25,000,000
250,000,000 3 Interest in $750,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.31%, dated 6/21/2006, under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 7/25/2036 for $757,522,500 on 8/28/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $777,061,107.
250,000,000
300,000,000 Interest in $500,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.30%, dated 7/31/2006, under which WAMU Capital Corp. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 7/20/2036 for $500,073,611 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $510,035,110.


300,000,000
   TOTAL REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS


8,190,598,000
   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--99.9%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 4



10,589,118,252
   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--0.1%


5,668,166
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
10,594,786,418

1 Floating rate note with current rate and next reset date shown.

2 Discount rate at the time of purchase.

3 Although the repurchase date is more than seven days after the date of purchase, the Fund has the right to terminate the repurchase agreement at any time with seven-days' notice.

4 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Prime Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:

Security Type


   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Variable Rate Demand Instruments

41.5
%
Commercial Paper & Notes

37.7
%
Bank Instruments

18.9
%
Repurchase Agreements

2.9
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(1.0
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:



   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

42.2
% 4
8-30 Days

33.2
%
31-90 Days

18.8
%
91-180 Days

1.8
%
181 Days or more

5.0
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(1.0
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

1 Commercial paper and notes include any fixed-rate security that is not a bank instrument. A variable rate demand instrument is any security which has an interest rate that resets periodically. See the Fund's Prospectus for descriptions of commercial paper, repurchase agreements and bank instruments.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

4 Overnight securities comprised 28.1% of the Fund's portfolio.

Prime Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES--0.8%
Finance - Automotive--0.3%
$ 21,264,819 Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2006-1, Class A1, 4.872%, 3/15/2007
$ 21,264,819
12,479,638 CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2006-1, Class A1, 5.180%, 5/15/2007
12,479,638
9,740,673 1,2 DaimlerChrysler Auto Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.791%, 3/8/2007
9,740,673
7,490,611 Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust 2005-6, Class A-1, 4.511%, 12/18/2006
7,490,611
2,226,494 USAA Auto Owner Trust 2005-4, Class A1, 4.400%, 12/15/2006
2,226,494
11,288,364 World Omni Automobile Receivables Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.854%, 3/15/2007


11,288,364

   TOTAL


64,490,599

Finance - Equipment--0.5%
17,006,888 CIT Equipment Collateral 2006-VT1, Class A1, 4.989%, 3/20/2007
17,006,888
41,235,240 CNH Equipment Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.989%, 4/5/2007
41,235,240
4,392,380 1,2 GE Equipment Small Ticket LLC Series 2005-2, Class A1, 4.556%, 12/22/2006
4,392,380
32,480,403 John Deere Owner Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 5.364%, 7/13/2007


32,480,403

   TOTAL


95,114,911

   TOTAL ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES


159,605,510

CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT--10.9%
Banking--10.9%
35,000,000 Barclays Bank PLC, 4.752%, 10/17/2006
35,000,181
245,000,000 Calyon, Paris, 4.750% - 5.355%, 10/17/2006 - 4/30/2007
245,001,791
105,000,000 Citizens Bank N.A., 5.160% - 5.270%, 8/10/2006 - 9/12/2006
105,001,514
235,000,000 Citizens Bank of Massachusetts, 5.330% - 5.430%, 8/10/2006 - 9/29/2006
235,000,000
189,000,000 Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, 5.220% - 5.500%, 8/28/2006 - 10/31/2006
189,000,000
219,000,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 4.920% - 5.250%, 11/20/2006 - 3/29/2007
219,000,000
49,200,000 DePfa Bank PLC, 5.260%, 4/9/2007
49,200,000
250,000,000 Deutsche Bank AG, 4.500% - 4.765%, 10/13/2006 - 10/27/2006
250,000,000
40,000,000 Dexia Bank, Belgium, 4.305%, 9/29/2006
39,968,817
19,250,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.260%, 4/11/2007
19,250,000
100,000,000 Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee, 5.250%, 9/11/2006
100,000,000
289,000,000 Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, Edinburgh, 4.397% - 4.850%, 10/4/2006 - 1/30/2007
288,999,290
95,000,000 Societe Generale, Paris, 4.760% - 4.785%, 10/27/2006
95,000,875
153,000,000 Toronto Dominion Bank, 5.295% - 5.600%, 4/13/2007 - 6/18/2007
153,000,000
280,000,000 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 5.300% - 5.310%, 8/7/2006 - 8/10/2006


280,000,000

   TOTAL CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT


2,303,422,468

COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS--12.4%
Banking--4.5%
856,000,000 Fortis Bank SA/NV, 5.362%, 8/1/2006
856,000,000
80,000,000 IXIS Financial Products Inc., 5.412%, 8/1/2006


80,000,000

   TOTAL


936,000,000

Brokerage--7.9%
703,000,000 Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., 5.362% - 5.412%, 8/1/2006
703,000,000
740,000,000 Goldman Sachs & Co., 5.270% - 5.412%, 8/1/2006
740,000,000
230,000,000 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.442%, 8/1/2006


230,000,000

   TOTAL


1,673,000,000

   TOTAL COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS


2,609,000,000

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

COMMERCIAL PAPER--20.8% 3
Banking--5.0%
$ 222,000,000 Bank of America Corp., 5.330% - 5.385%, 9/21/2006 - 10/4/2006
$ 220,070,903
33,110,000 Benedictine Health System-St. Mary's Duluth Clinic Health System Obligated Group, 5.400%, 10/11/2006
32,757,379
1,265,000 Benedictine Living Communities, Inc., 5.400%, 10/11/2006
1,251,528
100,000,000 1,2 Fountain Square Commercial Funding Corp., 5.390%, 10/2/2006 - 10/3/2006
99,064,236
90,000,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.180%, 9/8/2006
89,507,900
106,270,000 1,2 Long Lane Master Trust IV, (Bank of America N.A. SWP), 5.280%, 8/7/2006
106,176,482
15,235,000 Los Angeles County, CA Metropolitan Transportation Authority, (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 5.330%, 8/9/2006
15,235,000
505,027,000 1,2 Picaros Funding LLC, (GTD by KBC Bank N.V.), 4.970% - 5.400%, 8/8/2006 - 10/11/2006


502,413,575

   TOTAL


1,066,477,003

Finance - Automotive--5.3%
83,382,000 DaimlerChrysler Revolving Auto Conduit LLC, A1+/P1 Series, 5.280%, 8/4/2006
83,345,312
51,442,000 DaimlerChrysler Revolving Auto Conduit LLC, A1/P1 Series, 5.140% - 5.150%, 8/18/2006 - 9/14/2006
51,146,103
666,000,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust, A1+/P1 Series, 4.970% - 5.400%, 8/7/2006 - 11/13/2006
662,378,022
325,000,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust, A1/P1 Series, 5.140% - 5.360%, 8/11/2006 - 9/15/2006


324,052,989

   TOTAL


1,120,922,426

Finance - Commercial--1.3%
130,000,000 CIT Group, Inc., 5.000% - 5.110%, 8/9/2006 - 11/14/2006
128,780,458
40,000,000 1,2 Edison Asset Securitization LLC, 5.380%, 10/5/2006
39,611,444
100,000,000 General Electric Capital Corp., 5.230%, 8/8/2006


99,898,306

   TOTAL


268,290,208

Finance - Retail--4.2%
20,000,000 1,2 Amsterdam Funding Corp., 5.380%, 10/4/2006
19,808,711
75,431,000 1,2 Chariot Funding LLC, 5.150% - 5.280%, 8/10/2006 - 9/5/2006
75,164,442
198,855,000 1,2 Compass Securitization LLC, 5.245% - 5.330%, 8/16/2006 - 9/15/2006
197,794,469
51,205,000 1,2 Jupiter Securitization Company LLC, 5.280%, 8/3/2006
51,189,980
50,000,000 1,2 PREFCO-Preferred Receivables Funding Company LLC, 5.170%, 8/10/2006
49,935,375
232,564,000 1,2 Paradigm Funding LLC, 5.230% - 5.330%, 8/7/2006 - 8/15/2006
232,203,675
252,229,000 1,2 Sheffield Receivables Corp., 5.280% - 5.300%, 8/9/2006 - 8/11/2006


251,906,103

   TOTAL


878,002,755

Finance - Securities--4.5%
35,000,000 1,2 Galaxy Funding Inc., 5.040%, 8/4/2006
34,985,300
269,000,000 1,2 Georgetown Funding Co. LLC, 5.419% - 5.449%, 9/19/2006 - 9/20/2006
267,816,641
250,000,000 1,2 Grampian Funding LLC, 5.220% - 5.370%, 9/18/2006 - 10/25/2006
247,259,146
197,844,000 1,2 KLIO II Funding Ltd., 5.230% - 5.370%, 8/18/2006 - 9/8/2006
197,110,642
179,000,000 1,2 Perry Global Funding LLC Series A, 5.180% - 5.380%, 8/9/2006 - 10/10/2006
177,862,951
35,000,000 1,2 Scaldis Capital LLC, 5.230%, 9/13/2006


34,781,357

   TOTAL


959,816,037

Insurance--0.5%
100,000,000 1,2 Aspen Funding Corp., 5.350%, 9/22/2006


99,227,222

   TOTAL COMMERCIAL PAPER


4,392,735,651

CORPORATE BONDS--0.3%
Finance - Commercial--0.1%
20,000,000 CIT Group, Inc., 5.202%, 8/18/2006


20,000,573

Finance - Retail--0.2%
46,325,000 SLM Corp., 5.529%, 9/15/2006


46,335,844

   TOTAL CORPORATE BONDS


66,336,417

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

CORPORATE NOTES--2.3%
Finance - Securities--2.3%
$ 185,000,000 1,2 K2 (USA) LLC, (GTD by K2 Corp.), 5.000%, 3/9/2007 - 3/12/2007
$ 185,000,000
303,000,000 1,2 Sigma Finance, Inc., (GTD by Sigma Finance Corp.), 4.150% - 5.750%, 8/8/2006 - 7/25/2007


303,000,000

   TOTAL CORPORATE NOTES


488,000,000

GOVERNMENT AGENCIES--0.2%
Government Agency--0.2%
39,000,000 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 5.410%, 6/18/2007


39,000,000

LOAN PARTICIPATION--0.3%
Electrical Equipment--0.3%
55,500,000 Mt. Vernon Phenol Plant Partnership, (GTD by General Electric Co.), 5.390%, 5/21/2007


55,500,000

NOTES - VARIABLE--41.5% 4
Banking--18.5%
4,945,000 4 C's LLC, (Series 1998), (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
4,945,000
1,620,000 Advanced Labelworx, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
1,620,000
4,915,000 AlaTrade Foods LLC, Series 2003, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
4,915,000
1,245,000 Alabama State IDA, (SERIES 1994) Miltope Project, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.470%, 8/3/2006
1,245,000
3,800,000 Alabama State IDA, (Wellborn Cabinet, Inc.), Tax Revenue Bonds, (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
3,800,000
1,075,000 Alabama State IDA, Standard Furniture Project (Series 1995), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
1,075,000
2,050,000 Aliceville, AL IDB, Buchanan Hardwood Flooring Co. (Series 1999), (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.470%, 8/3/2006
2,050,000
33,640,000 American Health Care Centers, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
33,640,000
7,150,000 American Xtal Technology, Inc., Xtal Project (Series 1998), (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006
7,150,000
12,000,000 Association of American Medical Colleges, (GTD by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., INS AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.), 5.490%, 8/2/2006
12,000,000
4,125,000 Atlantic Tool and Die Co., (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
4,125,000
7,640,000 B.R. Williams Trucking, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
7,640,000
230,000,000 1,2 BNP Paribas SA, 5.144% - 5.364%, 8/21/2006 - 8/28/2006
230,000,000
5,635,000 Baldwin County Sewer Service LLC, Series 2002, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
5,635,000
602,000,000 Bank of America N.A., 5.373%, 8/1/2006
601,992,144
63,000,000 1,2 Bank of Ireland, 5.350%, 8/21/2006
63,000,000
73,000,000 1,2 Bank of New York Co., Inc., 5.458%, 8/28/2006
73,000,000
225,000,000 Barclays Bank PLC, 5.289% - 5.343%, 8/7/2006 - 8/28/2006
224,972,557
16,275,000 Biddle Road Corp., Series 2004, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
16,275,000
6,995,000 Bing Steel Management, Inc., Series 2000, (Comerica Bank LOC), 5.498%, 8/2/2006
6,995,000
3,260,000 Bing Steel Management, Inc., Series 2002, (Comerica Bank LOC), 5.498%, 8/2/2006
3,260,000
4,910,000 Bond Holdings LP, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/4/2006
4,910,000
1,205,000 Brookshire Grocery Co., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
1,205,000
5,970,000 Brumfield Properties, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
5,970,000
13,001,000 Capital One Funding Corp., (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
13,001,000
3,107,000 Capital One Funding Corp., (Series 1998-C), (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
3,107,000
17,658,000 Capital One Funding Corp., (Series 1999-A), (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
17,658,000
1,414,000 Capital One Funding Corp., (Series 1999-B), (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
1,414,000
1,089,000 Capital One Funding Corp., Series 1994-D, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
1,089,000
2,882,000 Capital One Funding Corp., Series 1995-B, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
2,882,000
1,297,000 Capital One Funding Corp., Series 1995-F, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
1,297,000
3,112,000 Capital One Funding Corp., Series 1996-H, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
3,112,000
7,294,000 Capital One Funding Corp., Series 2001-B, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
7,294,000
10,575,000 Church at Brook Hills, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
10,575,000
6,350,000 Cincinnati Bible College and Seminary, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
6,350,000
3,760,000 Clinton County, NY IDA, Bombardier Project (Series 1998-B), (HSBC Bank USA LOC), 5.650%, 8/3/2006
3,760,000
3,805,000 Colonie, NY IDA, Mechanical Technology, Inc. Project (Series 1998 A), (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
3,805,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 4
Banking--continued
$ 795,000 Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Development Disabilities Resource Center (Series 1998-C1), (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
$ 795,000
1,420,000 Columbia County, GA Development Authority, Series 1993, (SunTrust Banks, Inc. LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
1,420,000
10,800,000 Community Centre Group of Cos., (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
10,800,000
8,580,000 Consolidated Publishing Co., Inc., (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.550%, 8/4/2006
8,580,000
33,810,000 Cook County, IL, Series 2002 A, 5.420%, 8/2/2006
33,810,000
5,765,000 Crane Plastics Siding LLC, Series 2000, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
5,765,000
146,500,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 5.280% - 5.486%, 9/12/2006 - 10/24/2006
146,500,619
12,600,000 Decatur, AL IDB, Bailey-PVS Oxides Project (Series 1998), (SunTrust Bank LOC), 5.470%, 8/3/2006
12,600,000
15,000,000 Development Authority of Gordon County, GA, Series 2005, Faus Group Inc., (RBC Centura Bank LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
15,000,000
2,570,000 Double H Plastics, Inc., (Series 1998), (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/2/2006
2,570,000
6,110,000 Elsinore Properties LP, (Series 1998), (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
6,110,000
3,200,000 Fairpoint Regional Utility System, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,200,000
43,000,000 First Tennessee Bank, N.A., 5.210%, 8/25/2006
43,000,099
1,000,000 G.M.H. Enterprises, Inc., (Series 1995), (National City Bank, Ohio LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
1,000,000
13,405,000 Galasso Materials LLC and Galasso Holdings LLC, (Series 1998), (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
13,405,000
2,930,000 Gesmundo & Associates, Inc., Series A, (National City Bank of the Midwest LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
2,930,000
36,800,000 Greene County Development Authority, Reynolds Lodge, LLC Series 2000 A, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.420%, 8/2/2006
36,800,000
13,850,000 Greene County Development Authority, Reynolds Lodge, LLC Series 2000B, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
13,850,000
36,000,000 Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc., (GTD by Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc.), 5.305%, 8/9/2006
36,000,000
5,615,000 H & P Holdings LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
5,615,000
8,860,000 H.C. Equities LP, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
8,860,000
399,000,000 1,2 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.259% - 5.315%, 8/9/2006 - 8/21/2006
399,001,584
369,700,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.396% - 5.530%, 8/1/2006 - 9/25/2006
369,702,523
5,550,000 HFS Holdings LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
5,550,000
8,210,000 Healthcare Network Properties LLC, (Series A), (National City Bank of the Midwest LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
8,210,000
10,350,000 Hillcrest Investments LLC, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/2/2006
10,350,000
3,235,000 Historical Preservation Authority of Birmingham, (Series 1993), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.520%, 8/3/2006
3,235,000
85,000,000 J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., 5.316%, 8/2/2006
85,000,000
3,725,000 J.P. Plymouth Properties LLC, (Series 1999), (LaSalle Bank Midwest, N.A. LOC), 5.590%,8/2/2006
3,725,000
15,000,000 Kansas City, MO Tax Increment Financing Commission, President Hotel, (INS MBIA Insurance Corp.), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
15,000,000
3,130,000 Kings Creek Country Club, Inc., (Series 1997), (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/2/2006
3,130,000
1,800,000 L.H. Kroh, Inc., (Series 1998), (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/2/2006
1,800,000
4,740,000 Lee County, FL IDA, Bonita Community Health Center, Series 1999B, (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.400%, 8/4/2006
4,740,000
5,165,000 1,2 Los Angeles, CA, MERLOTs Series 2000 A (H&H Theatre), (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/2/2006
5,165,000
11,250,000 Louisiana Agricultural Finance Authority, Lacassive Syrup Mill, Series 2004, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
11,250,000
4,785,000 M & C Holdings LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
4,785,000
460,000 Madison, WI Community Development Authority, Series 1997-B Hamilton Point Apts., (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
460,000
12,045,000 Maryland State Economic Development Corp., Human Genome Sciences Series 1999B, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.480%, 8/1/2006
12,045,000
17,440,000 Massachusetts State Development Finance Agency, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
17,440,000
4,610,000 McCullough Snappy Service Oil Co., Inc., (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/4/2006
4,610,000
75,000,000 Mercantile Safe Deposit & Trust Co., Baltimore, 5.305% - 5.329%, 8/10/2006 - 8/15/2006
74,995,400
1,841,000 Midwest Funding Corp., Series 1992-B, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
1,841,000
8,710,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.470%, 8/3/2006
8,710,000
4,200,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., Howard Industries, Inc. Series 1997, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
4,200,000
10,000,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., Kohler Project, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 4
Banking--continued
$ 17,000,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., Series 1994 Georgia Gulf, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/2/2006
$ 17,000,000
10,790,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., VC Regional Assembly & Manufacturing LLC., (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/2/2006
10,790,000
110,000,000 1,2 National Australia Bank Ltd., Melbourne, 5.307%, 8/7/2006
110,000,000
5,975,000 North American Gulf Terminals, Inc., Series 2002, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.390%, 8/3/2006
5,975,000
11,920,000 North Oaks Partnership, (Series 1998), (LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
11,920,000
81,800,000 Novant Health, Inc., Series 1997, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/2/2006
81,800,000
10,150,000 Ohio Waste Development Authority Solid Waste, Bailey-PVS Oxides, LLC (Series 1998), (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
10,150,000
5,000,000 Olive Baptist Church, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
11,000,000 Park Street Properties I LLC, University of Wisconsin - Madison Projects, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
11,000,000
4,385,000 Parkview Professional Center, Series 2005, (Comerica Bank LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
4,385,000
6,650,000 Physicians Real Estate LLP, (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 5.450%, 8/2/2006
6,650,000
14,500,000 Pitney Roads Partners LLC, Series 2003 - A, (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 5.380%, 8/3/2006
14,500,000
1,185,000 Quality Synthetic Rubber Co., Series 2000, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
1,185,000
5,850,000 Reiser Group Sonic Management Co., Inc., Series 2002, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
5,850,000
9,255,000 Rollins College, Series 1998, (SunTrust Bank LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
9,255,000
108,000,000 1,2 Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal, 5.316%, 8/1/2006
108,000,000
60,000,000 Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal, 5.520%, 10/12/2006
60,010,241
19,000,000 Salvation Army, Series 2004-A, (Bank of New York LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
19,000,000
3,590,000 Savannah, GA Housing Authority, (SunTrust Bank LOC), 5.420%, 8/2/2006
3,590,000
2,771,000 Sawmill Creek Lodge Co., (Series 1996), (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
2,771,000
14,390,000 Seeber USA LLP, Series 2000, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/2/2006
14,390,000
50,000,000 1,2 Societe Generale, Paris, 5.316%, 8/2/2006
50,000,000
11,375,000 Spira Millenium LLC, Series 2001, (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
11,375,000
55,225,000 Spitzer Group, (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
55,225,000
3,180,000 Springfield Ltd. Partnership, (UBS AG LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
3,180,000
1,165,000 St. Paul, MN Port Authority, Bix Fruit Co. (Series 1998-B), (Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee LOC), 5.640%, 8/3/2006
1,165,000
1,950,000 St. Paul, MN Port Authority, National Checking Co. Project (Series 1998-B), (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.540%, 8/3/2006
1,950,000
13,280,000 Suffolk County, NY IDA, (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 5.420%, 8/2/2006
13,280,000
6,050,000 Trinity Baptist Church, Series 2002-A, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
6,050,000
75,000,000 1,2 Union Hamilton Special Purpose Funding LLC, Series 2005-1 Tranche #1, (GTD by Wachovia Corp.), 5.424% - 5.490%, 9/21/2006 - 9/28/2006
75,000,000
9,300,000 Victor H. Hanson/ Elizabeth F. Hanson, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
9,300,000
1,200,000 Village Green Finance Co. LLC, (Series 1997), (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/2/2006
1,200,000
2,512,000 Vista Funding Corp., Series 1995-D, (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.390%, 8/3/2006
2,512,000
1,245,000 Vista Funding Corp., Series 1998-B, (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
1,245,000
195,250,000 Wells Fargo & Co., 5.396%, 8/2/2006
195,250,066
10,575,000 Western Reserve Masonic Community, Inc., (GTD by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
10,575,000
25,000,000 Westpac Banking Corp. Ltd., Sydney, 5.340%, 9/11/2006
25,000,000
10,195,000 Whetstone Care Center LLC, Series 1998, (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
10,195,000
4,780,000 William Morris Realty Montgomery LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
4,780,000
34,345,000 World Wildlife Fund, Inc., Series 2000 B, (INS by AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.), 5.490%, 8/3/2006


34,345,000

   TOTAL


3,895,168,233

Brokerage--7.8%
117,000,000 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.307% - 5.386%, 8/1/2006 - 8/7/2006
117,000,000
50,000,000 1,2 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.389%, 8/15/2006
50,001,885
110,000,000 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Promissory Note, 5.375%, 8/8/2006
110,000,000
374,000,000 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.349% - 5.394%, 8/4/2006 - 8/24/2006
374,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 4
Brokerage--continued
$ 240,000,000 1,2 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.599%, 8/11/2006
$ 240,000,334
752,300,000 Morgan Stanley, 5.363% - 5.468%, 8/1/2006 - 8/28/2006


752,302,345

   TOTAL


1,643,304,564

Electrical Equipment--0.3%
2,600,000 Alabama State IDA, General Electric Project, (General Electric Co. LOC), 5.310%, 8/3/2006
2,600,000
58,656,672 Northwest Airlines, Inc., (GTD by General Electric Co.), 5.330%, 8/7/2006


58,656,672

   TOTAL


61,256,672

Finance - Commercial--2.3%
50,000,000 1,2 Fairway Finance Co. LLC, 5.328%, 8/21/2006
49,999,745
436,100,000 1,2 General Electric Capital Corp., 5.469% - 5.470%, 8/9/2006 - 8/17/2006


436,100,000

   TOTAL


486,099,745

Finance - Retail--4.0%
14,000,000 American Express Credit Corp., 5.459%, 8/15/2006
14,006,142
368,500,000 1,2 Compass Securitization LLC, 5.300% - 5.324%, 8/7/2006 - 10/12/2006
368,472,518
286,500,000 1,2 Paradigm Funding LLC, 5.297% - 5.345%, 8/7/2006 - 8/25/2006
286,500,000
180,000,000 1,2 SLM Corp., 5.356%, 8/14/2006


180,000,000

   TOTAL


848,978,660

Finance - Securities--2.9%
122,500,000 1,2 Beta Finance, Inc., 5.189% - 5.379%, 8/15/2006 - 8/22/2006
122,522,655
23,000,000 1,2 K2 (USA) LLC, (GTD by K2 Corp.), 5.325%, 8/10/2006
23,000,793
474,000,000 1,2 Sigma Finance, Inc., (GTD by Sigma Finance Corp.), 5.309% - 5.355%, 8/1/2006 - 8/24/2006


473,994,899

   TOTAL


619,518,347

Government Agency--0.3%
7,945,000 Direct One Funding Corp., (FNMA LOC), 5.320%, 8/3/2006
7,945,000
46,455,000 Direct One Funding Corp., Series 2000 (Sexton Properties), (FNMA LOC), 5.320%, 8/3/2006
46,455,000
5,350,000 Grand Pointe II Ltd. Partnership, Series 1999 Globe Apartments, (FHLB of Indianapolis LOC), 5.340%, 8/3/2006


5,350,000

   TOTAL


59,750,000

Insurance--3.8%
20,000,000 Albuquerque, NM, Series 2000 A, (INS MBIA Insurance Corp.), 5.320%, 8/2/2006
20,000,000
54,000,000 Genworth Life Insurance Co., 5.321%, 9/1/2006
54,000,000
50,000,000 Hartford Life Insurance Co., 5.319% - 5.401%, 8/1/2006 - 9/1/2006
50,000,000
100,000,000 1,2 MBIA Global Funding LLC, 5.317%, 8/14/2006
100,000,000
66,000,000 MetLife Insurance Co. of Connecticut, 5.279% - 5.590%, 8/21/2006 - 9/28/2006
66,000,000
105,000,000 Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 5.270% - 5.648%, 8/1/2006 - 10/2/2006
105,000,000
152,000,000 Monumental Life Insurance Co., 5.367% - 5.609%, 7/31/2006 - 10/2/2006
152,000,000
90,000,000 New York Life Insurance Co., 4.920% - 5.290%, 8/30/2006 - 9/1/2006
90,000,000
30,000,000 Protective Life Secured Trust 2004-B, 5.580%, 10/13/2006
30,018,718
125,000,000 Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Co., 5.620%, 10/2/2006


125,000,000

   TOTAL


792,018,718

Municipal--1.0%
205,500,000 Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund Finance Corp., 5.377%, 8/15/2006


205,500,000

Pharmaceuticals & Health Care--0.6%
128,000,000 1,2 Eli Lilly Services, Inc., (GTD by Eli Lilly & Co.), 5.316%, 8/1/2006


128,000,000

   TOTAL NOTES - VARIABLE


8,739,594,939

Principal
Amount
or Shares

   

   

Value

TIME DEPOSITS--8.0%
Banking--8.0%
$ 400,000,000 Bank of Montreal, 5.300%, 8/1/2006
$ 400,000,000
190,000,000 Chase Bank USA, N.A., 5.313%, 8/1/2006
190,000,000
140,000,000 Deutsche Bank AG, 5.313%, 8/1/2006
140,000,000
250,000,000 Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee, 5.213%, 8/1/2006
250,000,000
200,000,000 Societe Generale, Paris, 5.293%, 8/1/2006
200,000,000
500,000,000 SunTrust Bank, 5.300%, 8/1/2006


500,000,000

   TOTAL TIME DEPOSITS


1,680,000,000

MUTUAL FUNDS--0.6%
Asset Management--0.6%
65,000,000 AIM Short-Term Investments Co. Liquid Assets Portfolio
65,000,000
50,000,000 Columbia Money Market Reserves
50,000,000
20,059,291 DWS Money Market Trust


20,059,291

   TOTAL MUTUAL FUNDS


135,059,291

REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--2.9%
$ 228,302,000 Interest in $3,200,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Bank of America N.A. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/1/2035 for $3,200,470,222 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $3,264,000,000.
228,302,000
150,000,000 Interest in $300,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.27%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Goldman Sachs & Co. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/30/2023 for $300,043,917 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $306,045,400.
150,000,000
30,000,000 Interest in $238,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.10%, dated 7/31/2006 under which J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 10/31/2006 for $238,033,717 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $242,764,447.
30,000,000
150,000,000 Interest in $850,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. will repurchase a U.S. Treasury security maturing on 1/15/2011 for $850,123,958 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying security at the end of the period was $868,259,653.
150,000,000
55,000,000 Interest in $100,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.20%, dated 7/31/2006 under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase a U.S. Government Agency Security and Refunding Bonds with various maturities to 4/1/2036 for $100,014,444 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $102,000,893.


55,000,000

   TOTAL REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS


613,302,000

   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--101.0%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 5



21,281,556,276

   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--(1.0)%


(211,105,080
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
21,070,451,196

1 Denotes a restricted security that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) is subject to a contractual restriction on public sales. At July 31, 2006, these restricted securities amounted to $6,758,204,217, which represented 32.1% of total net assets.

2 Denotes a restricted security that may be resold without restriction to "qualified institutional buyers" as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and that the Fund has determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Fund's Board of Trustees. At July 31, 2006, these liquid restricted securities amounted to $6,758,204,217, which represented 32.1% of total net assets.

3 Discount rate at the time of purchase.

4 Floating rate note with current rate and next reset date shown.

5 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

AMBAC --American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation
FHLB --Federal Home Loan Bank
FNMA --Federal National Mortgage Association
GTD --Guaranteed
IDA --Industrial Development Authority
IDB --Industrial Development Bond
INS --Insured
LOC --Letter of Credit
MERLOTS --Municipal Exempt Receipts - Liquidity Optional Tender Series
SWP --Swap Agreement

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Treasury Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:





   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Repurchase Agreements

97.7
%
U.S. Treasury Securities

2.6
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(0.3
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:



   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

96.1
%
8-30 Days

0.0
%
31-90 Days

0.0
%
91-180 Days

3.4
%
181 Days or more

0.8
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(0.3
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

1 See the Fund's Prospectus for a description of the principal types of securities in which the Fund invests.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

Treasury Obligations Fund
Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

U.S. TREASURY--2.6%
U.S. Treasury Notes--2.6%
$ 86,500,000 United States Treasury Notes, 2.500%, 10/31/2006
$ 86,144,653
167,000,000 United States Treasury Notes, 2.875%, 11/30/2006
166,126,823
104,750,000 United States Treasury Notes, 3.125%, 1/31/2007


104,004,038

   TOTAL U.S. TREASURY


356,275,514

REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--97.7%
350,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Abbey National Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2036 for $350,051,042 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was 357,000,148.
350,000,000
1,711,246,000 Interest in $2,323,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which BNP Paribas Securities Corp. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2036 for $2,323,338,771 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $2,369,460,967.
1,711,246,000
1,000,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Barclays Capital, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 7/31/2011 for $1,000,145,833 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,020,000,675.
1,000,000,000
1,167,000,000 Interest in $1,500,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.26%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Bear Stearns & Co., Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 5/15/2016 for $1,500,219,167 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,557,996,728.
1,167,000,000
100,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which CIBC World Markets Corp. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2023 for $100,014,583 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $102,105,371.
100,000,000
1,000,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.24%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Credit Suisse First Boston Corp. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2031 for $1,000,145,556 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,020,002,584.
1,000,000,000
95,000,000 Interest in $100,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.15%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2021 for $100,014,306 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $102,000,718.
95,000,000
1,000,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2023 for $1,000,145,833 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,020,000,065.
1,000,000,000
1,850,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Fortis Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2031 for $1,850,269,792 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,887,000,309.
1,850,000,000
1,000,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which HSBC Securities (USA), Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 7/31/2008 for $1,000,145,833 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,020,001,854.
1,000,000,000
1,017,000,000 Interest in $1,350,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2036 for $1,350,196,875 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,377,001,350.
1,017,000,000
1,200,000,000 Interest in $2,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 7/15/2013 for $2,000,291,667 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $2,045,228,487.
1,200,000,000
267,000,000 Interest in $850,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. will repurchase a U.S. Treasury security maturing on 1/15/2011 for $850,123,958 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying security at the end of the period was $868,259,653.
267,000,000
95,000,000 Interest in $100,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.15%, dated 7/31/2006 under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase a U.S. Treasury security maturing on 12/15/2010 for $100,014,306 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying security at the end of the period was $102,001,058.
95,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--continued
$ 224,000,000 1 Interest in $244,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.20%, dated 6/1/2006 under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2015 for $250,344,000 on 11/29/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $251,133,204.
$ 224,000,000
1,565,000,000 Interest in $1,850,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 5/15/2021 for $1,850,269,792 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,887,004,311.


1,565,000,000

   TOTAL REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS


13,641,246,000

   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--100.3%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 2



13,997,521,514

   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--(0.3)%


(36,782,254
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
13,960,739,260

1 Although the repurchase date is more than seven days after the date of purchase, the Fund has the right to terminate the repurchase agreement at any time with seven-days' notice.

2 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statements of Assets And Liabilities

July 31, 2006


   

Government
Obligations
Fund

   

Prime
Obligations
Fund


   

Treasury
Obligations
Fund


Assets:
Investments in repurchase agreements
$ 8,190,598,000 $ 613,302,000 $ 13,641,246,000
Investments in securities


2,398,520,252


20,668,254,276



356,275,514

Total investments in securities, at amortized cost and value
$ 10,589,118,252 $ 21,281,556,276 $ 13,997,521,514
Cash
1,152,064 -- 242,422
Income receivable
29,296,807 91,284,630 5,266,493
Receivable for shares sold


434,539


4,244,361



217,838

   TOTAL ASSETS


10,620,001,662


21,377,085,267



14,003,248,267

Liabilities:
Payable for investments purchased
$ 3,640,000 $ 250,000,000 $ --
Payable for shares redeemed
1,855,386 1,794,999 1,785,394
Payable to bank
-- 1,071,520 --
Payable for account administration fee
23,878 5,592 118,125
Payable for distribution services fee (Note 5)
24,536 18,578 170,074
Payable for shareholder services fee (Note 5)
744,613 1,236,856 1,337,834
Income distribution payable
18,611,370 52,052,978 38,686,356
Accrued expenses


315,461


453,548



411,224

   TOTAL LIABILITIES


25,215,244


306,634,071



42,509,007

   TOTAL NET ASSETS

$
10,594,786,418

$
21,070,451,196


$
13,960,739,260

Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 10,594,680,018 $ 21,070,483,315 $ 13,960,798,380
Undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income


106,400


(32,119
)


(59,120
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS

$
10,594,786,418

$
21,070,451,196


$
13,960,739,260

Net Assets:
Institutional Shares
$ 6,619,951,532 $ 15,151,070,495 $ 6,419,380,349
Institutional Service Shares
3,493,161,012 5,827,991,920 5,712,345,718
Institutional Capital Shares
377,413,712 -- 1,037,466,444
Trust Shares


104,260,162


91,388,781



791,546,749

   TOTAL NET ASSETS

$
10,594,786,418

$
21,070,451,196


$
13,960,739,260

Shares Outstanding, No Par Value, Unlimited Shares Authorized:
Institutional Shares
$ 6,619,627,926 $ 15,150,737,987 $ 6,419,232,189
Institutional Service Shares
3,493,377,141 5,828,357,684 5,712,590,837
Institutional Capital Shares
377,428,905 -- 1,037,325,793
Trust Shares


104,246,054


91,387,156



791,649,561

Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds Per Share:
Institutional Shares


$1.00


$1.00



$1.00

Institutional Service Shares


$1.00


$1.00



$1.00

Institutional Capital Shares


$1.00


--



$1.00

Trust Shares


$1.00


$1.00



$1.00

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statements of Operations

Year Ended July 31, 2006


   

Government
Obligations
Fund


   

Prime
Obligations
Fund


   

Treasury
Obligations
Fund


Investment Income:
Interest

$
425,161,282


$
962,143,991


$
566,111,764

Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
19,209,033 43,223,840 26,078,224
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
7,647,497 17,208,606 10,382,153
Account administration fee--Institutional Service Shares
25,154 42,355 55,780
Account administration fee--Trust Shares
189,455 112,749 1,625,445
Custodian fees
396,154 945,118 523,265
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
315,523 288,861 158,065
Directors'/Trustees' fees
62,670 156,835 101,670
Auditing fees
16,737 16,735 16,736
Legal fees
10,597 15,843 11,496
Portfolio accounting fees
200,336 188,342 200,344
Distribution services fee--Trust Shares (Note 5)
189,455 113,101 1,628,506
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Shares (Note 5)
11,368,980 30,505,395 11,459,465
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Service Shares (Note 5)
7,668,093 13,485,527 13,400,562
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Capital Shares (Note 5)
740,865 -- 1,614,992
Share registration costs
192,918 185,177 247,005
Printing and postage
37,394 49,673 19,883
Insurance premiums
58,809 120,310 77,674
Miscellaneous


49,528



85,055



54,725

   TOTAL EXPENSES


48,379,198



106,743,522



67,655,990

Waivers (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
(8,189,143 ) (17,467,455 ) (10,708,341 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(328,855 ) (740,323 ) (446,349 )
Waiver of shareholder services fee--Institutional Shares
(11,368,980 ) (30,505,395 ) (11,459,465 )
Waiver of shareholder services fee--Institutional Capital Shares


(384,687
)


--



(835,249
)
   TOTAL WAIVERS


(20,271,665
)


(48,713,173
)


(23,449,404
)
Net expenses


28,107,533



58,030,349



44,206,586

Net investment income

$
397,053,749


$
904,113,642


$
521,905,178

Net realized gain on investments


--



19,446



--

Change in net assets resulting from operations

$
397,053,749


$
904,133,088


$
521,905,178

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statements of Changes in Net Assets

    Government Obligations Fund
   
Prime Obligations Fund

Year Ended July 31
   

2006

   

2005

   

2006

   

2005

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income
$ 397,053,749 $ 172,438,416 $ 904,113,642 $ 403,067,223
Net realized gain on investments


--



--



19,446



6,988

   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS


397,053,749



172,438,416



904,133,088



403,074,211

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income
Institutional Shares
(256,450,437 ) (114,471,130 ) (684,227,011 ) (310,331,174 )
Institutional Service Shares
(122,791,609 ) (55,404,715 ) (218,509,885 ) (91,678,641 )
Institutional Capital Shares
(14,901,586 ) (1,950,254 ) -- --
Trust Shares


(2,835,807
)


(624,264
)


(1,780,728
)


(559,108
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS


(396,979,439
)


(172,450,363
)


(904,517,624
)


(402,568,923
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
121,622,215,277 87,120,054,501 239,640,314,040 195,969,796,916
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
214,926,107 89,911,597 372,405,232 158,142,824
Cost of shares redeemed


(120,077,728,527
)


(86,572,564,132
)


(240,296,751,011
)


(196,153,055,301
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


1,759,412,857



637,401,966



(284,031,739
)


(25,115,561
)
Change in net assets


1,759,487,167



637,390,019



(284,416,275
)


(24,610,273
)
Net Assets:
Beginning of period


8,835,299,251



8,197,909,232



21,354,867,471



21,379,477,744

End of period
$

10,594,786,418


$
8,835,299,251


$
21,070,451,196


$
21,354,867,471

Undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income
$

106,400


$
32,090


$
(32,119
)

$
371,863

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statements of Changes in Net Assets - continued

    Treasury Obligations Fund
Year Ended July 31
   

2006

   

2005

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income

$
521,905,178


$
242,236,047

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income
Institutional Shares
(257,475,405 ) (128,528,475 )
Institutional Service Shares
(208,686,308 ) (92,576,050 )
Institutional Capital Shares
(31,673,738 ) (13,288,865 )
Trust Shares


(24,128,847
)


(7,840,255
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS


(521,964,298
)


(242,233,645
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
73,461,176,690 62,185,884,386
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
165,943,475 78,502,143
Cost of shares redeemed


(71,716,471,589
)


(62,117,771,017
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


1,910,648,576



146,615,512

Change in net assets


1,910,589,456



146,617,914

Net Assets:
Beginning of period


12,050,149,804



11,903,531,890

End of period
$

13,960,739,260


$
12,050,149,804

Distributions in excess of net investment income
$

(59,120
)

$
--

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

July 31, 2006

1. ORGANIZATION

Money Market Obligations Trust (the "Trust") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), as an open-end, management investment company. The Trust consists of 41 portfolios. The financial statements of the following portfolios (individually referred to as the "Fund" or collectively as the "Funds") are presented herein:

Portfolio Name
   
Diversification
   
Class of Shares
   
Investment Objective
Government Obligations Fund

diversified

Institutional Shares
Institutional Service Shares
Institutional Capital Shares
Trust Shares

To provide current income consistent with stability of principal.
Prime Obligations Fund

diversified

Institutional Shares
Institutional Service Shares
Trust Shares

To provide current income consistent with stability of principal.
Treasury Obligations Fund

diversified

Institutional Shares
Institutional Service Shares
Institutional Capital Shares
Trust Shares

To provide current income consistent with stability of principal.

The financial statements of the other portfolios are presented separately. The assets of each portfolio are segregated and a shareholder's interest is limited to the portfolio in which shares are held. All shares of each Fund have equal rights with respect to voting, except on class-specific matters. The financial highlights of the Institutional Shares, Institutional Service Shares and Institutional Capital Shares are presented separately.

Effective January 18, 2005, Government Obligations Fund began offering Institutional Capital Shares.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Funds in the preparation of their financial statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America.

Investment Valuation

The Funds use the amortized cost method to value their portfolio securities in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act. Investments in other open-end regulated investment companies are valued at net asset value.

Repurchase Agreements

It is the policy of the Funds to require the other party to a repurchase agreement to transfer to the Fund's custodian or sub-custodian eligible securities or cash with a market value (after transaction costs) at least equal to the repurchase price to be paid under the repurchase agreement. The eligible securities are transferred to accounts with the custodian or sub-custodian in which the Funds hold a "securities entitlement" and exercises "control," as those terms are defined in the Uniform Commercial Code. The Funds have established procedures for monitoring the market value of the transferred securities and requiring the transfer of additional eligible securities if necessary to equal at least the repurchase price. These procedures also allow the other party to require securities to be transferred from the account to the extent that their market value exceeds the repurchase price or in exchange for other eligible securities of equivalent market value.

With respect to agreements to repurchase U.S. government securities and cash items, the Funds treat the repurchase agreement as an investment in the underlying securities and not as an obligation of the other party to the repurchase agreement. Other repurchase agreements are treated as obligations of the other party secured by the underlying securities. Nevertheless, the insolvency of the other party or other failure to repurchase the securities may delay the disposition of the underlying securities or cause the Funds to receive less than the full repurchase price. Under the terms of the repurchase agreement, any amounts received by the Funds in excess of the repurchase price and related transaction costs must be remitted to the other party.

The Funds may enter into repurchase agreements in which eligible securities are transferred into joint trading accounts maintained by the custodian or sub-custodian for investment companies and other clients advised by the Funds' adviser and its affiliates. The Funds will participate on a pro rata basis with the other investment companies and clients in its share of the securities transferred under such repurchase agreements and in its share of proceeds from any repurchase or other disposition of such securities.

Investment Income, Gains and Losses, Expenses and Distributions

Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income are declared daily and paid monthly. Investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and certain fund-level expenses are allocated to each class based on relative average daily net assets, except that each class bears certain expenses unique to the class such as account administration, distribution and shareholder services fees. Dividends are declared separately for each class. No class has preferential dividend rights; differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses.

Premium and Discount Amortization

All premiums and discounts are amortized/accreted.

Federal Taxes

It is each Fund's policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of their income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary.

On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released FASB Interpretation No. 48 "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken in the course of preparing the funds' tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are "more-likely-than-not" of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax benefits of positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax expense in the current year. Adoption of FIN 48 is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the effective date. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FIN 48 and its impact in the financial statements has not yet been determined.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

The Funds may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Funds record when-issued securities on the trade date and maintain security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Restricted Securities

Restricted securities are securities that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) are subject to contractual restrictions on public sales. In some cases, when a security cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, the issuer of the restricted security has agreed to register such securities for resale, at the issuer's expense, either upon demand by the Funds or in connection with another registered offering of the securities. Many such restricted securities may be resold in the secondary market in transactions exempt from registration. Restricted securities may be determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Funds' Board of Trustees. The Funds will not incur any registration costs upon such resales. Restricted securities are valued at amortized cost in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

Other

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST

The following tables summarize share activity:

    Government Obligations Fund
Year Ended July 31
   
2006

2005

Institutional Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount


Shares sold
102,883,407,350 $ 102,883,407,350 68,840,529,646 $ 68,840,529,646
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
137,243,183 137,243,183 59,531,634 59,531,634
Shares redeemed

(102,122,900,107
)


(102,122,900,107
)

(68,312,442,051
)


(68,312,442,051
)

   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

897,750,426


$
897,750,426


587,619,229


$
587,619,229


Year Ended July 31
   
2006

2005
Institutional Service Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
17,728,529,559 $ 17,728,529,559 17,692,054,657 $ 17,692,054,657
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
62,429,858 62,429,858 28,370,500 28,370,492
Shares redeemed

(17,057,295,017
)


(17,057,295,017
)

(17,997,158,534
)


(17,997,158,534
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SERVICE SHARE TRANSACTIONS

733,664,400


$
733,664,400


(276,733,377
)

$
(276,733,385
)
Government Obligations Fund--continued
Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005 1

Institutional Capital Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
571,379,890 $ 571,379,890 397,007,718 $ 397,007,718
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
14,800,977 14,800,977 1,953,531 1,953,531
Shares redeemed

(507,373,473
)


(507,373,473
)

(100,339,738
)


(100,339,738
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

78,807,394


$
78,807,394


298,621,511


$
298,621,511

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

Trust Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
438,898,478 $ 438,898,478 190,462,480 $ 190,462,480
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
452,089 452,089 55,940 55,940
Shares redeemed

(390,159,930
)


(390,159,930
)

(162,623,809
)


(162,623,809
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM TRUST SHARE TRANSACTIONS

49,190,637



49,190,637


27,894,611



27,894,611

   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

1,759,412,857


$
1,759,412,857


637,401,974


$
637,401,966

Prime Obligations Fund

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

Institutional Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
195,830,365,206 $ 195,830,365,206 152,484,780,713 $ 152,484,780,713
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
302,881,875 302,881,875 129,187,873 129,187,873
Shares redeemed

(196,582,948,973
)


(196,582,948,973
)

(153,533,043,698
)


(153,533,043,698
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(449,701,892
)

$
(449,701,892
)

(919,075,112
)

$
(919,075,112
)
Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

Institutional Service Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
43,532,917,577 $ 43,532,917,577 43,291,731,228 $ 43,291,731,228
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
68,834,830 68,834,830 28,658,863 28,658,806
Shares redeemed

(43,501,036,269
)


(43,501,036,269
)

(42,417,391,466
)


(42,417,391,466
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SERVICE SHARE TRANSACTIONS

100,716,138


$
100,716,138


902,998,625


$
902,998,568

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

Trust Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
277,031,257 $ 277,031,257 193,284,975 $ 193,284,975
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
688,527 688,527 296,145 296,145
Shares redeemed

(212,765,769
)


(212,765,769
)

(202,620,137
)


(202,620,137
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM TRUST SHARE TRANSACTIONS

64,954,015


$
64,954,015


(9,039,017
)

$
(9,039,017
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(284,031,739
)

$
(284,031,739
)

(25,115,504
)

$
(25,115,561
)
Treasury Obligations Fund

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

Institutional Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
44,165,575,744 $ 44,165,575,744 33,844,927,635 $ 33,844,927,635
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
122,359,876 122,359,876 59,642,933 59,642,933
Shares redeemed

(43,601,649,250
)


(43,601,649,250
)

(33,729,830,302
)


(33,729,830,302
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

686,286,370


$
686,286,370


174,740,266


$
174,740,266

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

Institutional Service Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
22,364,859,502 $ 22,364,859,502 20,751,297,064 $ 20,751,297,064
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
38,022,724 38,022,724 16,731,340 16,731,340
Shares redeemed

(21,936,217,537
)


(21,936,217,537
)

(20,487,277,725
)


(20,487,277,725
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SERVICE SHARE TRANSACTIONS

466,664,689


$
466,664,689


280,750,679


$
280,750,679

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

Institutional Capital Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
5,366,080,952 $ 5,366,080,952 5,303,145,483 $ 5,303,145,483
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
3,868,188 3,868,188 1,116,708 1,116,708
Shares redeemed

(4,955,300,921
)


(4,955,300,921
)

(5,553,358,330
)


(5,553,358,330
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

414,648,219


$
414,648,219


(249,096,139
)

$
(249,096,139
)
Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

Trust Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
1,564,660,492 $ 1,564,660,492 2,286,514,204 $ 2,286,514,204
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
1,692,687 1,692,687 1,011,162 1,011,162
Shares redeemed

(1,223,303,881
)


(1,223,303,881
)

(2,347,304,660
)


(2,347,304,660
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM TRUST SHARE TRANSACTIONS

343,049,298


$
343,049,298


(59,779,294
)

$
(59,779,294
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

1,910,648,576


$
1,910,648,576


146,615,512


$
146,615,512

1 For period from January 18, 2005 (start of performance) to July 31, 2005.

4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

The tax character of distributions as reported on the Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended July 31, 2006 and 2005 was as follows:

    2006
    2005

   
Ordinary Income 1
   
Ordinary Income 1
Government Obligations Fund

$396,979,439

$172,450,363
Prime Obligations Fund

$904,517,624

$402,568,923
Treasury Obligations Fund

$521,964,298

$242,233,645

1 For tax purposes short-term capital gain distributions are considered ordinary income distributions.

As of July 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Fund
   
Undistributed
Ordinary Income

   
Dividend Payable

   
Capital Loss
Carryforward

Government Obligations Fund

$ 18,717,770

$(18,611,370
)

$--
Prime Obligations Fund

$52,020,859

$ (52,052,978
)

$--
Treasury Obligations Fund

$ 38,627,236

$(38,686,356
)

$--

Prime Obligations Fund used capital loss carryforwards of $19,446 to offset taxable capital gains realized during the year ended July 31, 2006.

5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

Federated Investment Management Company, the Funds' investment adviser (the "Adviser") receives for its services an annual investment adviser fee equal to the percentage of each Funds' average daily net assets as follows:

Fund
   
Investment Adviser
Fee Percentage

Government Obligations Fund

0.20%
Prime Obligations Fund

0.20%
Treasury Obligations Fund

0.20%

The Adviser may voluntarily choose to waive and /or reimburse any portion of its fee. The Adviser can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver and/or reimbursement at any time at its sole discretion.

For the year ended July 31, 2006, the Adviser voluntarily waived the following fees:

Fund
   
Adviser Fee Waiver
Government Obligations Fund

$ 8,189,143
Prime Obligations Fund

$ 17,467,455
Treasury Obligations Fund

$10,708,341

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Funds with administrative personnel and services. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average aggregate daily net assets of certain Federated funds as specified below:

Maximum
Administrative Fee



   
Average Aggregate Daily Net Assets
of the Federated Funds

0.150%

on the first $5 billion
0.125%

on the next $5 billion
0.100%

on the next $10 billion
0.075%

on assets in excess of $20 billion

The administrative fee received during any fiscal year shall be at least $150,000 per portfolio and $40,000 per each additional class of Shares. FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FAS can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion.

For the year ended July 31, 2006, the net fee paid to FAS was 0.076% of average aggregate daily net assets of each Fund.

Distribution Services Fee

Government Obligations Fund, Prime Obligations Fund and Treasury Obligations Fund have adopted a Distribution Plan (the "Plan") pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act. Under the terms of the Plan, the Funds will compensate Federated Securities Corp. (FSC), the principal distributor, from the daily net assets of the Trust Shares to finance activities intended to result in the sale of the Trust shares. The Plan provides that the Government Obligations Fund, Prime Obligations Fund and Treasury Obligations Fund may incur distribution expenses up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Funds' Trust Shares, annually, to compensate FSC. FSC may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FSC can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. When FSC receives fees, it may pay some or all of them to financial intermediaries whose customers purchase shares.

For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSC retained $225 of fees paid by the Prime Obligations Fund and $9,487 of fees paid by the Treasury Obligations Fund, and did not receive any fees paid by Government Obligations Fund.

Shareholder Services Fee

The Funds may pay fees (Service Fees) up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Funds' Institutional Shares, Institutional Service Shares and Institutional Capital Shares to financial intermediaries or to FSSC, for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. FSSC or these financial intermediaries may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of their fee. In addition, FSSC may voluntarily reimburse the Funds for shareholder services fees. This voluntary waiver and/or reimbursement can be modified or terminated at any time.

For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC voluntarily waived the following fees:

Fund
   
Shareholder Services
Fee Waiver

Government Obligations Fund

$11,753,667
Prime Obligations Fund

$30,505,395
Treasury Obligations Fund

$12,294,714

For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC received the following fees paid by the Funds:

Fund
   
Shareholder Services
Fees Received

Government Obligations Fund

$15,466
Prime Obligations Fund

$32,334
Treasury Obligations Fund

$ 27,914

For the year ended July 31, 2006, Institutional Capital Shares for Prime Obligations Fund did not incur a shareholder services fee.

General

Certain of the Officers and Trustees of the Funds are Officers and Directors or Trustees of the above companies.

6. CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

A substantial part of Prime Obligations Fund's portfolio may be comprised of obligations of banks. As a result, Prime Obligations Fund may be more susceptible to any economic, business, political or other developments which generally affect these entities.

7. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning in October 2003, Federated Investors, Inc. and various subsidiaries thereof (including the advisers and distributor for various investment companies, collectively, "Federated"), along with various investment companies sponsored by Federated ("Funds") were named as defendants in several class action lawsuits now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuits were purportedly filed on behalf of people who purchased, owned and/or redeemed shares of Federated-sponsored mutual funds during specified periods beginning November 1, 1998. The suits are generally similar in alleging that Federated engaged in illegal and improper trading practices including market timing and late trading in concert with certain institutional traders, which allegedly caused financial injury to the mutual fund shareholders. These lawsuits began to be filed shortly after Federated's first public announcement that it had received requests for information on shareholder trading activities in the Funds from the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), the Office of the New York State Attorney General ("NYAG"), and other authorities. In that regard, on November 28, 2005, Federated announced that it had reached final settlements with the SEC and the NYAG with respect to those matters. As Federated previously reported in 2004, it has already paid approximately $8.0 million to certain funds as determined by an independent consultant. As part of these settlements, Federated agreed to pay for the benefit of fund shareholders additional disgorgement and a civil money penalty in the aggregate amount of an additional $72 million. Federated and various Funds have also been named as defendants in several additional lawsuits, the majority of which are now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging, among other things, excessive advisory and Rule 12b-1 fees. The Board of the Funds has retained the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro LLP to represent the Funds in these lawsuits. Federated and the Funds, and their respective counsel, are reviewing the allegations and intend to defend this litigation. Additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations may be filed in the future. The potential impact of these lawsuits, all of which seek unquantified damages, attorneys' fees and expenses, and future potential similar suits is uncertain. Although we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Funds, there can be no assurance that these suits, the ongoing adverse publicity and/or other developments resulting from the regulatory investigations will not result in increased Fund redemptions, reduced sales of Fund shares, or other adverse consequences for the Funds.

8. CHANGE IN INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM (UNAUDITED)

On August 18, 2006, the Funds' Trustees , upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee and completion of the audit for July 31, 2006, appointed KPMG LLP (KPMG) as the Funds' independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007. The Funds' previous independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP (D&T) declined to stand for re-election. The reports issued by D&T on the Funds' financial statements for the fiscal years ended 2005, and 2006, contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During the Funds' fiscal years ended 2005, and 2006: (i) there were no disagreements with D&T on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of D&T, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its reports on the financial statements for such years; and (ii) there were no reportable events of the kind described in Item 304(a) (1) (v) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

As indicated above, the Funds have appointed KPMG as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Funds' financial statements for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2007. During the Funds' fiscal years ended July 31, 2005, and July 31, 2006, and the interim period commencing August 1, 2006 and ending September 22, 2006, neither the Funds nor anyone on their behalf has consulted KPMG on items which: (i) concerned the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Funds' financial statements; or (ii) concerned the subject of a disagreement (as defined in paragraph (a) (1) (iv) of Item 304 of Regulations S-K) or reportable events (as described in paragraph (a) (1) (v) of said Item 304).

9. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2006, 100% of dividends paid by the Prime Obligations Fund and Treasury Obligations Fund are interest-related dividends, as provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONEY MARKET OBLIGATIONS TRUST AND SHAREHOLDERS OF GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS FUND, PRIME OBLIGATIONS FUND AND TREASURY OBLIGATIONS FUND OF THE TRUST SHARES:

We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the portfolios of investments, of Government Obligations Fund, Prime Obligations Fund and Treasury Obligations Fund (collectively the "Funds") (portfolios of Money Market Obligations Trust) as of July 31, 2006, and the related statements of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the periods then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights of the Trust Shares are the responsibility of the Funds' management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Funds are not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Funds' internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of July 31, 2006, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, other auditing procedures were performed. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Funds as of July 31, 2006, the results of their operations for the year then ended, the changes in their net assets, and their financial highlights for the respective stated periods, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
September 22, 2006

Board of Trustees and Trust Officers

The Board is responsible for managing the Trust's business affairs and for exercising all the Trust's powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Board member and the senior officers of the Funds. Where required, the tables separately list Board members who are "interested persons" of the Funds (i.e., "Interested" Board members) and those who are not (i.e., "Independent" Board members). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is Federated Investors Tower, 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA. As of December 31, 2005, the Trust comprised 41 portfolios, and the Federated Fund Complex consisted of 43 investment companies (comprising 136 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Board member oversees all portfolios in the Federated Fund Complex and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund's Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trust Trustees and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
John F. Donahue*
Birth Date: July 28, 1924
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex's Executive Committee.
Previous Positions
: Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex; Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Chairman and Director, Federated Investment Counseling.



J. Christopher Donahue*
Birth Date: April 11, 1949
PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 1989
Principal Occupations : Principal Executive Officer and President of the Federated Fund Complex; Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company; Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman, Federated Equity Management Company of Pennsylvania and Passport Research, Ltd. (Investment advisory subsidiary of Federated) Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director, Federated Services Company.

Previous Positions
: President, Federated Investment Counseling; President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd.



Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D.*
Birth Date: October 11, 1932
3471 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1111
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Medical Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Downtown; Hematologist, Oncologist and Internist, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Other Directorships Held
: Member, National Board of Trustees, Leukemia Society of America.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, University of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.



* Family relationships and reasons for "interested" status: John F. Donahue is the father of J. Christopher Donahue; both are "interested" due to the positions they hold with Federated Investors, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D. is "interested" because his son-in-law is employed by the Fund's principal underwriter, Federated Securities Corp.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
Thomas G. Bigley
Birth Date: February 3, 1934
15 Old Timber Trail
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: November 1994
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Member of Executive Committee, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh.

Previous Position
: Senior Partner, Ernst & Young LLP.



John T. Conroy, Jr.
Birth Date: June 23, 1937
Investment Properties Corporation
3838 North Tamiami Trail
Suite 402
Naples, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman of the Board, Investment Properties Corporation; Partner or Trustee in private real estate ventures in Southwest Florida.

Previous Positions
: President, Investment Properties Corporation; Senior Vice President, John R. Wood and Associates, Inc., Realtors; President, Naples Property Management, Inc. and Northgate Village Development Corporation.



Nicholas P. Constantakis
Birth Date: September 3, 1939
175 Woodshire Drive
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Michael Baker Corporation (engineering and energy services worldwide).

Previous Position
: Partner, Andersen Worldwide SC.



John F. Cunningham
Birth Date: March 5, 1943
353 El Brillo Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Director, WinsorTech.

Other Directorships Held
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cunningham & Co., Inc. (strategic business consulting); Trustee Associate, Boston College.

Previous Positions
: Director, Redgate Communications and EMC Corporation (computer storage systems); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Computer Consoles, Inc.; President and Chief Operating Officer, Wang Laboratories; Director, First National Bank of Boston; Director, Apollo Computer, Inc.



Peter E. Madden
Birth Date: March 16, 1942
One Royal Palm Way
100 Royal Palm Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Board of Overseers, Babson College.

Previous Positions
: Representative, Commonwealth of Massachusetts General Court; President, State Street Bank and Trust Company and State Street Corporation (retired); Director, VISA USA and VISA International; Chairman and Director, Massachusetts Bankers Association; Director, Depository Trust Corporation; Director, The Boston Stock Exchange.



Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.
Birth Date: April 10, 1945
80 South Road
Westhampton Beach, NY
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Management Consultant.
Previous Positions
: Chief Executive Officer, PBTC International Bank; Partner, Arthur Young & Company (now Ernst & Young LLP); Chief Financial Officer of Retail Banking Sector, Chase Manhattan Bank; Senior Vice President, HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank); Vice President, Citibank; Assistant Professor of Banking and Finance, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University; Executive Vice President, DVC Group, Inc.



John E. Murray, Jr., J.D., S.J.D.
Birth Date: December 20, 1932
Chancellor, Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1995
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee, and Chairman of the Board of Directors or Trustees, of the Federated Fund Complex; Chancellor and Law Professor, Duquesne University; Partner, Murray, Hogue & Lannis.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Michael Baker Corp. (engineering, construction, operations and technical services).

Previous Positions
: President, Duquesne University; Dean and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Dean and Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
Marjorie P. Smuts
Birth Date: June 21, 1935
4905 Bayard Street
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Public Relations/Marketing Consultant/Conference Coordinator.

Previous Positions
: National Spokesperson, Aluminum Company of America; television producer; President, Marj Palmer Assoc.; Owner, Scandia Bord.



John S. Walsh
Birth Date: November 28, 1957
2604 William Drive
Valparaiso, IN
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer of construction temporary heaters); President and Director, Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers Products, Inc.

Previous Position
: Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc.



James F. Will
Birth Date: October 12, 1938
Saint Vincent College
Latrobe, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 2006
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chancellor and President, Saint Vincent College.

Other Directorships Held
: Alleghany Corporation.

Previous Positions
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Armco, Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer, Cyclops Industries; President and Chief Operating Officer, Kaiser Steel Corporation.



OFFICERS




Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
John W. McGonigle
Birth Date: October 26, 1938
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND SECRETARY
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Federated Investment Counseling; Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Services Company and Federated Securities Corp.



Richard A. Novak
Birth Date: December 25, 1963 TREASURER
Began serving: January 2006
Principal Occupations : Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Federated Fund Complex; Senior Vice President, Federated Administrative Services; Financial and Operations Principal for Federated Securities Corp., Edgewood Services, Inc. and Southpointe Distribution Services, Inc.
Previous Positions
: Vice President, Finance of Federated Services Company; Controller of Federated Investors, Inc.; held various financial management positions within The Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh; Auditor, Arthur Andersen & Co.



Richard B. Fisher
Birth Date: May 17, 1923
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Vice Chairman or Vice President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman, Federated Securities Corp.

Previous Positions
: President and Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Executive Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc. and Director and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Securities Corp.



Brian P. Bouda
Birth Date: February 28, 1947
CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER
Began serving: August 2004
Principal Occupations : Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of Federated Investors, Inc.; and Chief Compliance Officer of its subsidiaries. Mr. Bouda joined Federated in 1999 and is a member of the American Bar Association and the State Bar Association of Wisconsin.






Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
Deborah A. Cunningham
Birth Date: September 15, 1959
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Deborah A. Cunningham has been Prime Obligations Fund's Portfolio Manager since July 1991. Ms. Cunningham was named Chief Investment Officer of money market products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1981 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1997. Ms. Cunningham is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.S.B.A. in Finance from Robert Morris College.



Mary Jo Ochson
Birth Date: September 12, 1953
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Mary Jo Ochson was named Chief Investment Officer of tax-exempt, fixed-income products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1982 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Pittsburgh.



Susan R. Hill
Birth Date: June 20, 1963
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Susan R. Hill has been Government Obligations Fund's and Treasury Obligations Fund's Portfolio Manager since July 1993. Ms. Hill is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Hill joined Federated in 1990 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 2003 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 2005. Ms. Hill was a Portfolio Manager from 1994 until 2003, and served as Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1997 until 2004 and an Assistant Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1994 until 1997. Ms. Hill is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received an M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University.



Jeff A. Kozemchak
Birth Date: January 15, 1960
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Jeff A. Kozemchak is Vice President of the Trust. Mr. Kozemchak joined Federated in 1987 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 1996 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1999. He was a Portfolio Manager until 1996 and a Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Kozemchak is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received his M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University in 1987.



Paige M. Wilhelm
Birth Date: May 28, 1962
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: August 2006
Principal Occupations : Paige M. Wilhelm is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Wilhelm joined Federated in 1985 and has been a Senior Vice President and a Senior Portfolio Manager. She is responsible for portfolio management and research in the fixed-income area concentrating on taxable money market instruments. Previous associations include Senior Credit Analyst, Federated Investors; Performance Analysis Supervisor; Performance Analyst, Federated Investment Counseling. Ms. Wilhelm is a member of the CFA Society of Pittsburgh and received her B.S. from Indiana University and her M.B.A. from Duquesne University.



Evaluation and Approval of Advisory Contract

GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS FUND (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was above the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

PRIME OBLIGATIONS FUND (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was above the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

TREASURY OBLIGATIONS FUND (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was above the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that the Funds use to determine how to vote proxies, if any, relating to securities held in the Funds' portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Funds voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Federated's website. Go to FederatedInvestors.com, select "Products," select the "Prospectuses and Regulatory Reports" link, then select the Funds to access the link to Form N-PX. This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

The Funds file with the SEC a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on "Form N-Q." These filings are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.) You may also access this information from the "Products" section of Federated's website at FederatedInvestors.com by clicking on "Portfolio Holdings" and selecting the name of a Fund, or by selecting the name of a Fund and clicking on "Portfolio Holdings." You must register on the website the first time you wish to access this information.

Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board, or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal. Although money market funds seek to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share, there is no assurance that they will be able to do so.

This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the Trust's prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses, and other information.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Money Market Obligations Trust
Federated Investors Funds
5800 Corporate Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15237-7000
Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.

Federated Securities Corp., Distributor

Cusip 60934N153
Cusip 60934N146
Cusip 60934N120

28717 (9/06)

Federated is a registered mark of Federated Investors, Inc. 2006 (c)Federated Investors, Inc.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager


Federated Capital Reserves Fund
Federated Government Reserves Fund
Federated Municipal Trust

Portfolios of Money Market Obligations Trust


ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT

July 31, 2006

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
SHAREHOLDER EXPENSE EXAMPLE
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS SUMMARY TABLES
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND TRUST OFFICERS
EVALUATION AND APPROVAL OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
VOTING PROXIES ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

Not FDIC Insured * May Lose Value * No Bank Guarantee

Federated Investors 50 Years of Growth & Innovation

Financial Highlights-Federated Capital Reserves Fund

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)


   
Year Ended
7/31/2006


   
Period
Ended
7/31/2005

1
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$1.00 $1.00
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.035 0.009
Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.035
)

(0.009
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$1.00


$1.00

Total Return 2

3.51
%

0.90
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:






Net expenses

1.00
%

1.00
% 3
Net investment income

3.47
%

2.26
% 3
Expense waiver/reimbursement 4

0.33
%

0.35
% 3
Supplemental Data:






Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$8,165,254


$7,429,461

1 Reflects operations for the period February 25, 2005 (commencement of operations) to July 31, 2005.

2 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

3 Computed on an annualized basis.

4 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Financial Highlights-Federated Government Reserves Fund

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)


   
Year Ended
7/31/2006


   
Period
Ended
7/31/2005

1
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$1.00 $1.00
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.034 0.009
Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.034
)

(0.009
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$1.00


$1.00

Total Return 2

3.46
%

0.87
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:






Net expenses

1.00
%

1.00
% 3
Net investment income

3.43
%

2.23
% 3
Expense waiver/reimbursement 4

0.30
%

0.31
% 3
Supplemental Data:






Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$7,623,531


$6,250,822

1 Reflects operations for the period February 25, 2005 (commencement of operations) to July 31, 2005.

2 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

3 Computed on an annualized basis.

4 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Financial Highlights-Federated Municipal Trust

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)


   
Year Ended
7/31/2006


   
Period
Ended
7/31/2005

1
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$1.00 $1.00
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.022 0.007
Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.022
)

(0.007
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$1.00


$1.00

Total Return 2

2.20
%

0.67
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:






Net expenses

1.00
%

1.00
% 3
Net investment income

2.17
%

1.63
% 3
Expense waiver/reimbursement 4

0.39
%

0.51
% 3
Supplemental Data:






Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$403,322


$442,515

1 Reflects operations for the period February 25, 2005 (commencement of operations) to July 31, 2005.

2 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

3 Computed on an annualized basis.

4 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of a Fund, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees; to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees and/or shareholder services fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you to understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in a Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from February 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006.

ACTUAL EXPENSES

The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES

The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on a Fund's actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund's actual return. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are required to be provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in a Fund with other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.


   
Beginning
Account Value
2/1/2006

   
Ending
Account Value
7/31/2006

   
Expenses Paid
During Period 1

Actual:






Federated Capital Reserves Fund

$1,000

$1,019.60

$5.01
Federated Government Reserves Fund

$1,000

$1,019.40

$5.01
Federated Municipal Trust

$1,000

$1,012.40

$4.99
Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return before expenses):






Federated Capital Reserves Fund

$1,000

$1,019.84

$5.01
Federated Government Reserves Fund

$1,000

$1,019.84

$5.01
Federated Municipal Trust

$1,000

$1,019.84

$5.01

1 Expenses are equal to each Fund's annualized net expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).

The annualized net expense ratios are as follows:

Federated Capital Reserves Fund
   
1.00%
Federated Government Reserves Fund

1.00%
Federated Municipal Trust

1.00%

Federated Capital Reserves Fund
Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:

Security Type
   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Commercial Paper & Notes

50.4
%
Variable Rate Instruments

35.2
%
Bank Instruments

9.5
%
Repurchase Agreements

5.5
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(0.6
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:

   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

44.4
% 4
8-30 Days

34.5
%
31-90 Days

15.4
%
91-180 Days

1.7
%
181 Days or more

4.6
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(0.6
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

1 Commercial Paper and Notes includes any fixed-rate security that is not a bank instrument. A variable rate instrument is any security which has an interest rate that resets periodically. See the Fund's Prospectus for descriptions of commercial paper, repurchase agreements and bank instruments.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

4 Overnight securities comprised 31.7% of the Fund's portfolio.

Federated Capital Reserves Fund
Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES--0.8%
Finance - Automotive--0.5%
$ 11,855,656 CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2006-1, Class A1, 5.180%, 5/15/2007
$ 11,855,656
6,213,877 1,2 DaimlerChrysler Auto Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.791%, 3/8/2007
6,213,877
374,531 Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust 2005-6, Class A-1, 4.512%, 12/18/2006
374,531
20,767,639 HSBC Automotive Trust 2006-1, Class A1, 5.276%, 6/18/2007
20,767,639
4,233,137 World Omni Automobile Receivables Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.855%, 3/15/2007


4,233,137

   TOTAL


43,444,840

Finance - Equipment--0.3%
8,777,749 CIT Equipment Collateral 2006-VT1, Class A1, 4.990%, 3/20/2007
8,777,749
14,994,633 CNH Equipment Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.989%, 4/5/2007


14,994,633

   TOTAL


23,772,382

   TOTAL ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES


67,217,222

BANKERS ACCEPTANCE--0.5%
Banking--0.5%
39,000,000 Wachovia Bank N.A., 5.599%, 12/20/2006


38,167,513

   TOTAL BANKERS ACCEPTANCE


38,167,513

CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT--9.0%
Banking--9.0%
15,000,000 Barclays Bank PLC, 4.712%, 10/17/2006
15,000,077
51,000,000 Calyon, Paris, 4.712% - 5.279%, 10/26/2006 - 4/30/2007
51,001,111
50,000,000 Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, 5.220%, 8/28/2006
50,000,000
170,000,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 4.737% - 5.246%, 10/27/2006 - 3/29/2007
170,000,000
106,000,000 Deutsche Bank AG, 4.352% - 4.450%, 10/4/2006 - 10/13/2006
106,000,519
55,000,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.192% - 5.284%, 4/11/2007 - 5/15/2007
55,000,000
70,000,000 Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH, 5.140% - 5.190%, 8/1/2006 - 8/2/2006
70,000,000
84,000,000 Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, Edinburgh, 4.712%, 10/27/2006
84,000,980
35,000,000 Toronto Dominion Bank, 5.226% - 5.522%, 4/13/2007 - 6/18/2007
35,000,000
100,000,000 Washington Mutual Bank, 5.310%, 8/3/2006


100,000,000

   TOTAL CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT


736,002,687

COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS--20.3%
Banking--7.4%
180,000,000 Barclays Capital, Inc., 5.403%, 8/1/2006
180,000,000
175,000,000 BNP Paribas Securities Corp., 5.423%, 8/1/2006
175,000,000
100,000,000 Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, 5.413%, 8/1/2006
100,000,000
150,000,000 HSBC Securities (USA), Inc., 5.413%, 8/1/2006


150,000,000

   TOTAL


605,000,000

Brokerage--12.9%
150,000,000 Bear Stearns Cos., Inc., 5.433%, 8/1/2006
150,000,000
285,000,000 Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., 5.363% - 5.413%, 8/1/2006
285,000,000
300,000,000 Goldman Sachs & Co., 5.413%, 8/1/2006
300,000,000
75,000,000 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.443%, 8/1/2006
75,000,000
245,000,000 Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., 5.413%, 8/1/2006


245,000,000

   TOTAL


1,055,000,000

   TOTAL COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS


1,660,000,000

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

COMMERCIAL PAPER--25.2% 3
Aerospace/Auto-1.6%
$ 81,756,000 1,2 Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp., (Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Support Agreement), 5.365% - 5.384%, 8/4/2006 - 8/11/2006
$ 81,687,664
51,300,000 1,2 Volkswagen of America, Inc., (GTD by Volkswagen AG), 5.346% - 5.367%, 8/3/2006


51,284,759

   TOTAL


132,972,423

Banking--5.9%
100,000,000 Bank of America Corp., 5.296%, 8/8/2006
99,897,333
16,000,000 Danske Corp., Inc., (GTD by Danske Bank A/S), 5.185%, 4/10/2007
15,441,792
65,000,000 1,2 KBC Financial Products International Ltd., (GTD by KBC Bank N.V.), 5.041% - 5.053%, 8/4/2006 - 8/9/2006
64,952,400
35,000,000 Landesbank Baden-Wuerttemberg, 5.422%, 9/19/2006
34,745,132
100,000,000 1,2 Long Lane Master Trust IV, (Bank of America N.A. Swap Agreement), 5.386%,8/21/2006
99,702,222
165,000,000 1,2 Picaros Funding LLC, (GTD by KBC Bank N.V.), 5.053% - 5.476%, 8/10/2006 - 10/11/2006


163,783,675

   TOTAL


478,522,554

Consumer Products--0.7%
60,400,000 1,2 Fortune Brands, Inc., 5.272% - 5.541%, 8/8/2006 - 10/3/2006


60,229,815

Finance - Automotive--5.4%
81,300,000 DaimlerChrysler North America Holding Corp., 5.310% - 5.477%, 8/4/2006 - 8/21/2006
81,200,177
25,000,000 DaimlerChrysler Revolving Auto Conduit LLC, A1/P1 Series, 5.228%, 9/14/2006
24,842,639
115,000,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust, A1/P1 Series, 5.133% - 5.345%, 8/4/2006 - 9/15/2006
114,685,088
220,500,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust, A1+/P1 Series, 5.142% - 5.318%, 8/8/2006 - 11/13/2006


219,567,556

   TOTAL


440,295,460

Finance - Commercial--1.8%
99,796,000 CIT Group, Inc., 5.179% - 5.442%, 10/16/2006 - 11/15/2006
98,628,520
50,000,000 1,2 Edison Asset Securitization LLC, 5.453%, 10/5/2006


49,514,306

   TOTAL


148,142,826

Finance - Retail--3.5%
100,000,000 1,2 Compass Securitization LLC, 5.325%, 8/16/2006
99,780,000
120,000,000 Countrywide Financial Corp., 5.320% - 5.323%, 8/1/2006 - 8/7/2006
119,938,167
50,000,000 1,2 Paradigm Funding LLC, 5.304%, 8/7/2006
49,956,000
20,000,000 1,2 PREFCO-Preferred Receivables Funding Company LLC, 5.214%, 8/10/2006


19,974,150

   TOTAL


289,648,317

Finance - Securities--4.0%
43,000,000 1,2 Galaxy Funding Inc., 5.107% - 5.453%, 8/4/2006 - 10/4/2006
42,616,162
99,000,000 1,2 Georgetown Funding Co. LLC, 5.419%, 9/19/2006
98,570,148
7,000,000 1,2 Grampian Funding LLC, 5.109%, 8/7/2006
6,994,120
115,000,000 1,2 KLIO II Funding Ltd., 5.376% - 5.397%, 8/22/2006 - 8/25/2006
114,622,596
50,000,000 1,2 Perry Global Funding LLC Series A, 5.459%, 10/10/2006
49,476,944
15,000,000 1,2 Scaldis Capital LLC, 5.301%, 9/13/2006


14,906,296

   TOTAL


327,186,266

Food & Beverage--1.1%
10,100,000 1,2 General Mills, Inc., 5.350%, 8/7/2006
10,091,011
41,900,000 1,2 H.J. Heinz Finance Co., (H.J. Heinz Co. LOC), 5.364% - 5.442%, 8/1/2006 - 8/15/2006
41,862,795
34,000,000 1,2 Sara Lee Corp., 5.372%, 8/3/2006


33,989,857

   TOTAL


85,943,663

Homebuilding--0.4%
30,600,000 Centex Corp., 5.386% - 5.389%, 8/7/2006 - 8/8/2006


30,570,376

Machinery, Equipment, Auto--0.5%
40,000,000 John Deere Capital Corp., (Deere & Co. Support Agreement), 5.327% - 5.334%,8/3/2006 - 8/8/2006


39,969,811

Oil & Oil Finance--0.3%
21,100,000 1,2 ConocoPhillips, (GTD by ConocoPhillips Co.), 5.401%, 8/1/2006


21,100,000

   TOTAL COMMERCIAL PAPER


2,054,581,511

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

CORPORATE BOND--0.6%
Finance - Retail--0.6%
$ 50,000,000 SLM Corp., 5.529%, 9/15/2006

$
50,011,704

   TOTAL CORPORATE BOND


50,011,704

CORPORATE NOTES--2.9%
Finance - Retail--0.5%
42,000,000 Countrywide Financial Corp., 5.380%, 9/13/2006


42,001,386

Finance - Securities--2.4%
81,000,000 1,2 K2 (USA) LLC, (GTD by K2 Corp.), 4.934% - 4.935%, 3/9/2007 - 3/12/2007
81,000,000
115,000,000 1,2 Sigma Finance, Inc., (GTD by Sigma Finance Corp.), 4.830% - 5.750%,1/26/2007 - 7/25/2007


115,000,000

   TOTAL


196,000,000

   TOTAL CORPORATE NOTES


238,001,386

LOAN PARTICIPATION--0.6%
Miscellaneous--0.6%
47,000,000 Cargill, Inc., 5.350% - 5.390%, 8/9/2006 - 8/21/2006


47,000,000

   TOTAL LOAN PARTICIPATION


47,000,000

NOTES - VARIABLE--35.2% 4
Banking--18.5%
100,000,000 1,2 Australia & New Zealand Banking Group, Melbourne, 5.400%, 8/23/2006
100,000,000
40,000,000 1,2 Bank of Ireland, 5.350%, 8/21/2006
40,000,000
30,000,000 Barclays Bank PLC, 5.343%, 8/28/2006
29,996,886
195,000,000 1,2 BNP Paribas SA, 5.178% - 5.364%, 8/21/2006 - 8/28/2006
195,000,000
3,400,000 Brevard County, FL IDRB, Designer Choice Cabinetry, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
3,400,000
Banking--continued
4,650,000 Capital Markets Access Co. LC, Series 2005 E, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, ALLOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
4,650,000
100,000,000 1,2 Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Sydney, 5.370%, 8/24/2006
100,000,000
155,000,000 Credit Agricole S.A., 5.470%, 8/23/2006
155,000,000
55,000,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 5.280% - 5.470%, 9/12/2006 - 9/29/2006
55,000,000
2,350,000 Flintrock Farms, Series 2006, (Fulton Bank LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
2,350,000
199,000,000 Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc., (GTD by Royal Bank of Scotland), 5.294% - 5.360%, 8/7/2006 - 8/30/2006
199,000,000
1,800,000 Grossman Realty LLC, Series 5, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.370%, 8/3/2006
1,800,000
1,750,000 Hamilton Farm Bureau Cooperative, Inc., (Series 1999), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.510%, 8/3/2006
1,750,000
62,000,000 1,2 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.315%, 8/9/2006
62,000,000
55,000,000 Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH, 5.229%, 8/1/2006
55,016,979
25,000,000 Mercantile Safe Deposit & Trust Co., Baltimore, 5.309%, 8/11/2006
24,993,656
73,000,000 1,2 National Australia Bank Ltd., Melbourne, 5.307%, 8/7/2006
73,000,000
3,080,000 Oceana County Freezer Storage, Inc., Series 1999, (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.510%, 8/3/2006
3,080,000
4,630,000 Roby Co. Ltd. Partnership, (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%,8/3/2006
4,630,000
135,000,000 1,2 Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal, 5.316%, 8/1/2006
135,000,000
25,000,000 Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal, 5.520%, 10/12/2006
25,004,267
50,000,000 1,2 Societe Generale, Paris, 5.316%, 8/2/2006
50,000,000
50,000,000 Svenska Handelsbanken, Stockholm, 5.286%, 8/3/2006
49,998,282
2,590,000 Tipton, IN, Tipton County Memorial Hospital Project, Series 2006B, (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
2,590,000
35,000,000 1,2 Union Hamilton Special Purpose Funding LLC, Series 2005-1 Tranche #1, (GTD by Wachovia Corp.), 5.490%, 9/28/2006
35,000,000
250,000 Wells Fargo & Co., 5.396%, 8/2/2006
250,000
100,000,000 1,2 Westpac Banking Corp. Ltd., Sydney, 5.339%, 8/16/2006
100,000,000
3,840,000 Yonkers, NY IDA, Salgra Realty, LLC Series 2006, (Commerce Bank N.A., Cherry Hill, NJ LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006


3,840,000

   TOTAL


1,512,350,070

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

NOTES - VARIABLE--0.6%
Brokerage--6.5%
$ 80,000,000 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.307% - 5.386%, 8/1/2006 - 8/7/2006
$ 80,000,000
5,000,000 1,2 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.389, 8/15/2006
5,000,000
293,000,000 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.185% - 5.349%, 8/15/2006 - 8/29/2006
293,000,000
150,450,000 Morgan Stanley, 5.410%, 8/1/2006


150,451,599

   TOTAL


528,451,599

Finance - Commercial--0.7%
53,500,000 General Electric Capital Corp., 5.459% - 5.526%, 9/18/2006 - 10/2/2006


53,500,578

Finance - Retail--3.6%
97,500,000 1,2 Compass Securitization LLC, 5.289% - 5.324%, 8/7/2006 - 8/18/2006
97,492,713
107,000,000 1,2 Paradigm Funding LLC, 5.297% - 5.345%, 8/7/2006 - 8/25/2006
107,000,000
90,000,000 1,2 SLM Corp., 5.356%, 8/14/2006


90,000,000

   TOTAL


294,492,713

Finance - Securities--2.5%
9,000,000 1,2 Beta Finance, Inc., 5.189%, 8/22/2006
9,000,647
50,000,000 1,2 K2 (USA) LLC, (GTD by K2 Corp.), 5.445%, 10/25/2006
49,985,265
144,000,000 1,2 Sigma Finance, Inc., (GTD by Sigma Finance Corp.), 5.324% - 5.355%, 8/15/2006 - 8/24/2006


143,997,866

   TOTAL


202,983,778

Insurance--2.4%
31,000,000 Genworth Life Insurance Co., 5.256% - 5.321%, 8/9/2006 - 9/1/2006
31,000,000
23,600,000 Hartford Life Global Funding Trust, 5.349%, 8/15/2006
23,600,000
25,000,000 1,2 MBIA Global Funding LLC, 5.317%, 8/14/2006
25,000,000
40,000,000 MetLife Insurance Co. of Connecticut, 5.328% - 5.590%, 9/1/2006 - 9/28/2006
40,000,000
30,000,000 New York Life Insurance Co., 5.290%, 8/30/2006
30,000,000
50,000,000 Protective Life Secured Trust 2004-B, 5.580%, 10/13/2006


50,031,196

   TOTAL


199,631,196

Municipal-1.0%
80,000,000 Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund Finance Corp., 5.379%, 8/15/2006


80,000,000

   TOTAL NOTES - VARIABLE


2,871,409,934

REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--5.5%
154,000,000 Interest in $291,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.250%, dated 7/31/2006 under which BNP Paribas Securities Corp. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 1/15/2011 for $154,022,458 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $296,820,001.
154,000,000
300,000,000 Interest in $1,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.290%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Countrywide Securities Corp. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/1/2036 for $300,044,083 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,023,890,091.


300,000,000

   TOTAL REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS


454,000,000

   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--100.6%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 5



8,216,391,957

   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--(0.6)%


(51,138,218
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
8,165,253,739

1 Denotes a security that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) is subject to contractual restriction on public sales. At July 31, 2006, these restricted securities amounted to $2,794,785,288, which represented 34.2% of total net assets.

2 Denotes a restricted security that may be resold without restriction to "qualified institutional buyers" as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and that the Fund has determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Fund's Board of Trustees. At July 31, 2006, these liquid restricted securities amounted to $2,794,785,288, which represented 34.2% of total net assets.

3 Each issue shows the rate of discount at the time of purchase for discount issues, or the coupon for interest-bearing issues.

4 Floating rate note with current rate and next reset date shown.

5 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

IDA --Industrial Development Authority
IDRB --Industrial Development Revenue Bond
GTD --Guaranteed
LOC --Letter of Credit

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Federated Government Reserves Fund
Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:


   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Repurchase Agreements

76.6
%
U.S. Government Agency Securities

23.3
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

0.1
%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:

   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

67.2
%
8-30 Days

8.9
%
31-90 Days

14.8
%
91-180 Days

4.2
%
181 Days or more

4.8
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

0.1
%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

1 See the Fund's Prospectus for a description of the principal types of securities in which the Fund invests.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

Federated Government Reserves Fund
Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006


Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES--23.3%
$ 35,000,000 1 Federal Farm Credit System Floating Rate Note, 5.216%, 8/1/2006
$ 34,991,472
255,000,000 1 Federal Home Loan Bank System Floating Rate Notes, 5.039% - 5.340%, 8/2/2006 -10/5/2006
254,946,095
226,245,000 Federal Home Loan Bank System Notes, 2.100% - 5.500%, 8/15/2006 - 6/21/2007
225,933,631
212,500,000 2 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Discount Notes, 4.000% - 5.005%, 8/22/2006 -4/17/2007
207,903,995
567,000,000 1 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Floating Rate Notes, 5.010% - 5.350%, 8/7/2006 -9/27/2006
566,845,701
198,398,000 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Notes, 2.375% - 5.500%, 8/11/2006 - 7/9/2007
197,910,778
24,367,000 2 Federal National Mortgage Association Discount Notes, 5.070%, 9/1/2006
24,260,618
123,000,000 1 Federal National Mortgage Association Floating Rate Notes, 5.330%, 9/28/2006
122,907,774
144,000,000 Federal National Mortgage Association Notes, 3.000% - 5.070%, 9/1/2006 - 6/22/2007


142,822,652
   TOTAL U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES


1,778,522,716
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--76.6%
50,000,000 3 Repurchase agreement 5.280%, dated 7/11/2006 under which Banc of America Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 04/25/2032 for $50,220,000 on 8/10/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $51,658,620.
50,000,000
250,000,000 3 Repurchase agreement 5.323%, dated 7/27/2006 under which Banc of America Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 07/25/2035 for $253,548,333 on 10/31/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $257,688,566.
250,000,000
1,500,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.290%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Bank of America N.A. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 05/1/2036 for $1,500,220,417 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,530,000,001.
1,500,000,000
1,500,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.290%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Barclays Capital, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 10/6/2015 for $1,500,220,417 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,530,000,762.
1,500,000,000
137,000,000 Interest in $291,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.250%, dated 7/31/2006 under which BNP Paribas Securities Corp. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 1/15/2011 for $137,019,979 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $296,820,001.
137,000,000
1,100,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.290%, dated 7/31/2006 under which BNP Paribas Securities Corp. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 11/1/2038 for $1,100,161,639 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,128,571,781.
1,100,000,000
700,000,000 Interest in $1,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.290%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Countrywide Securities Corp. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/1/2036 for $700,102,861 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,023,890,091.
700,000,000
500,000,000 3 Repurchase agreement 5.280%, dated 7/14/2006 under which CS First Boston Corp. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/15/2036 for $501,906,667 on 8/9/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $510,004,099.
500,000,000
100,000,000 3 Repurchase agreement 5.310%, dated 6/20/2006 under which Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/1/2035 for $101,062,000 on 8/31/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $102,888,292.


100,000,000
  
   TOTAL REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS


5,837,000,000
  
   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--99.9%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 4



7,615,522,716
  
   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES--NET--0.1%


8,008,658
  
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
7,623,531,374

1 Discount rate at the time of purchase.

2 Floating rate note with current rate and next reset date shown.

3 Although the repurchase date is more than seven days after the date of purchase, the fund has the right to terminate the repurchase agreement at any time with seven-days' notice.

4 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Federated Municipal Trust
Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:


   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Variable Rate Demand Instruments

86.2
%
Municipal Notes

11.8
%
Commercial Paper

1.5
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

0.5
%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity schedule 3 was as follows:

Securities with an
Effective Maturity of:

   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

87.0
%
8-30 Days

0.7
%
31-90 Days

2.4
%
91-180 Days

3.8
%
181 Days or more

5.6
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

0.5
%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

1 See the Fund's Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information for a description of these investments.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

Federated Municipal Trust
Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--99.5% 1,2
Alabama--3.1%
$ 600,000 Alabama HFA MFH, (Series 2003A) Weekly VRDNs (Lakeshore Crossing Apartments Ltd.)/(Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
$ 600,000
100,000 Alabama HFA MFH, (Series 2004A: Phoenix Apartments) Weekly VRDNs (Phoenix Arts LLC)/(Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.800%, 8/3/2006
100,000
4,675,000 Alabama State IDA, (Series 1994) Weekly VRDNs (Homeland Vinyl Products, Inc.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
4,675,000
5,000,000 Chatom, AL IDB, (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Alabama Electric Co-op, Inc.)/ (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
1,200,000 North Sumter, AL Solid Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 2003: Emelle) Weekly VRDNs (Waste Management, Inc.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
1,200,000
725,000 St. Clair County, AL IDB, (Series 1993) Weekly VRDNs (Ebsco Industries, Inc.)/ (National Australia Bank Ltd., Melbourne LOC), 3.760%, 8/3/2006


725,000
   TOTAL


12,300,000
Arkansas --0.4%
500,000 Arkansas Development Finance Authority, (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Paco Steel & Engineering Corp.)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
500,000
1,000,000 Osceola, AR, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2006) Weekly VRDNs (Plum Point Energy Associates LLC)/(Credit Suisse, Zurich LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006


1,000,000
   TOTAL


1,500,000
California--8.6%
3,300,000 Alameda County, CA IDA, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (Convergent Laser Technologies)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
3,300,000
3,500,000 California PCFA, (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (West Valley MRF LLC)/ (Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
3,500,000
6,815,000 California PCFA, (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Brawley Beef, LLC)/(Rabobank Nederland, Utrecht LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
6,815,000
4,000,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Bidart Dairy II LLC)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
4,000,000
2,940,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (T & W Farms)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
2,940,000
3,580,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (Mission Trail Waste Systems, Inc.)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
3,580,000
435,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (SANCO Services LP)/(Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
435,000
3,600,000 California PCFA, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (B & B Dairy, LLC)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
3,600,000
3,800,000 California PCFA, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (George Borba & Son Dairy)/ (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
3,800,000
255,000 California PCFA, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (Napa Recycling & Waste Services LLC)/(Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.720%,8/2/2006
255,000
2,375,000 3,4 California State, Veterans Bonds ROCs (Series 438CE) Weekly VRDNs (Citibank N.A., New York LIQ)/(Citibank N.A., New York LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006


2,375,000
   TOTAL


34,600,000
Delaware--0.4%
1,450,000 3,4 Delaware State Housing Authority, (ROCs 359) Weekly VRDNs (Financial Security Assurance, Inc. INS)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006


1,450,000
District of Columbia--2.1%
5,000,000 3,4 District of Columbia HFA, (Series 2005 BNY5) Weekly VRDNs (Trinity Plus Funding Co. LLC)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
2,585,000 3,4 District of Columbia HFA, (Series 2005 BNY6) Weekly VRDNs (Trinity Plus Funding Co. LLC)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
2,585,000
900,000 District of Columbia, Enterprise Zone Revenue Bonds (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (NJA Hotel LLC)/(Bank of Scotland, Edinburgh LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006


900,000
   TOTAL


8,485,000
Florida--0.7%
3,000,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Florida-AMT) Series 2005-17 Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.760%, 8/3/2006


3,000,000
Georgia--7.4%
2,100,000 DeKalb County, GA Development Authority, (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Rock-Tenn Converting Co.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
2,100,000
16,790,000 DeKalb County, GA MFHA, (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Signature Station Apartments)/(Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
16,790,000
7,200,000 Fayette County, GA, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Gardner Denver Machinery, Inc.)/(National City Bank of the Midwest LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
7,200,000
1,800,000 Fulton County, GA IDA, (Series 1989) Weekly VRDNs (STO Corp.)/(Dresdner Bank AG, Frankfurt LOC), 3.900%, 8/3/2006
1,800,000
2,150,000 Savannah, GA EDA, (Series 1995A) Weekly VRDNs (Home Depot, Inc.), 3.690%, 8/2/2006


2,150,000
   TOTAL


30,040,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Idaho--0.8%
$ 3,425,000 Minidoka County, ID IDC, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Nature's Best Produce, Inc.)/(BNP Paribas SA LOC), 3.790%, 8/3/2006

$
3,425,000
Illinois--8.0%
6,000,000 Aurora, Kane, DuPage, Will and Kendall Counties, IL, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Yeomans Chicago Corp.)/(Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 3.780%, 8/3/2006
6,000,000
4,200,000 3,4 Chicago, IL O'Hare International Airport, PUTTERs (Series 1364Z) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
4,200,000
7,245,000 3,4 Chicago, IL O'Hare International Airport, PUTTERs (Series 844Z) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
7,245,000
1,420,000 3,4 Chicago, IL SFM MACON (Series 1999N) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
1,420,000
4,250,000 Illinois Development Finance Authority IDB Weekly VRDNs (R. A. Zweig, Inc.)/ (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
4,250,000
190,000 Illinois Development Finance Authority, (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Mangel BG Investments LLC)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.760%, 8/2/2006
190,000
5,100,000 Illinois Finance Authority, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (Plano Molding Co.)/(Harris, N.A. LOC), 3.760%, 8/3/2006
5,100,000
3,690,000 Libertyville, IL Industrial Revenue, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (Fabrication Technologies, Inc.)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/3/2006


3,690,000
   TOTAL


32,095,000
Indiana--3.3%
377,000 Crawfordsville, IN EDA, (Series 1995: Shady Knoll III Apartments) Weekly VRDNs (Pedcor Investments-1994-XXII LP)/(Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis LOC), 3.800%, 8/3/2006
377,000
2,300,000 Indiana Port Commission, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Kosmos Cement Co.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/2/2006
2,300,000
5,680,000 3,4 Indiana State HFA, PUTTERs (Series 1204) Weekly VRDNs (J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
5,680,000
3,120,000 3,4 Indianapolis, IN Local Public Improvement Bond Bank, MACON (Series 2005P) Weekly VRDNs (Indianapolis, IN Airport Authority)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
3,120,000
1,850,000 Whiting, IN Environmental Facilities Revenue, (Series 2003) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006


1,850,000
   TOTAL


13,327,000
Kansas--0.6%
2,451,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Kansas-AMT) Series 2005-13 Weekly VRDNs (Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS)/(GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006


2,451,000
Kentucky--3.6%
4,600,000 Graves County, KY, (Series 1988) Weekly VRDNs (Seaboard Farms)/ (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
4,600,000
2,700,000 Henderson, KY IDRB, Series 1998 Weekly VRDNs (Vincent Industrial Plastics, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.760%, 8/3/2006
2,700,000
265,000 Kenton County, KY, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Packaging Un-limited of Northern Kentucky, Inc.)/(National City Bank, Kentucky LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
265,000
6,725,000 Kentucky Housing Corp., (Conduit Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Clarksdale Rental I LP)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
6,725,000
275,000 Paris, KY Weekly VRDNs (Monessen Holdings LLC)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.790%, 8/3/2006


275,000
   TOTAL


14,565,000
Maine--1.5%
175,000 Biddeford, ME Weekly VRDNs (DK Associates & Volk Packaging)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
175,000
1,350,000 Biddeford, ME, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Volk Packaging)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
1,350,000
1,845,000 Maine Finance Authority, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (Brunswick Publishing)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
1,845,000
2,600,000 3,4 Maine State Housing Authority, PUTTERs (Series 1414) Weekly VRDNs (J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006


2,600,000
   TOTAL


5,970,000
Maryland--1.9%
7,730,000 3,4 Northeast MD Waste Disposal Authority, (PT-766) Weekly VRDNs (Ambac Financial Group, Inc. INS)/(Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen (GTD) LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006


7,730,000
Massachusetts--1.3%
2,725,000 Everett, MA, 4.00% BANs, 9/8/2006
2,727,697
2,495,000 Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Series 2004), 3.620% CP (Nantucket Electric Co.)/(Massachusetts Electric Co. GTD), Mandatory Tender 8/11/2006


2,495,000
   TOTAL


5,222,697
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Michigan--0.5%
$ 2,000,000 3,4 Wayne County, MI Airport Authority, GS Trust (Series 2006-32) Weekly VRDNs (Detroit, MI Metropolitan Wayne County Airport)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006

$
2,000,000
Minnesota--1.4%
5,000,000 3,4 Becker, MN, (Series 2005 FR/RI-FP13) Weekly VRDNs (Northern States Power Co., MN)/(Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. SWP), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
475,000 Hennepin County, MN Housing and Redevelopment Authority Weekly VRDNs (Stone Arch Apartments)/(FNMA LOC), 3.700%, 8/3/2006


475,000
   TOTAL


5,475,000
Mississippi--3.9%
150,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (Series 1999) VRDNs (Polks Meat Products, Inc.)/(Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.800%, 8/3/2006
150,000
3,850,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Corinthian, Inc.)/(Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
3,850,000
2,800,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Silver Creek Gin Co.)/(Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
2,800,000
7,800,000 Mississippi Regional Housing Authority No. II, (Series 2000), 4.10% TOBs (Laurel Park Apartments)/(First Tennessee Bank, N.A. LOC), Mandatory Tender 6/1/2007
7,800,000
1,000,000 Mississippi Regional Housing Authority No. II, (Series 2000), 4.15% TOBs (Terrace Park Apartments)/(Wachovia Bank, N.A. LOC), Mandatory Tender 5/1/2007


1,000,000
   TOTAL


15,600,000
Missouri--1.2%
5,000,000 Southwest City, MO IDA, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (Simmons Foods, Inc.)/ (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006


5,000,000
Multi State--1.7%
1,855,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Multistate-AMT) Series 2005-1 Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
1,855,000
2,000,000 3,4 GS Pool Trust Series 2006-19TP Weekly VRDNs (IXIS Financial Products, Inc. INS)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
2,000,000 3,4 GS Pool Trust Series 2006-35TP Weekly VRDNs (IXIS Financial Products, Inc. INS)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
1,000,000 3,4 GS Pool Trust Series 2006-46TP Weekly VRDNs (IXIS Financial Products, Inc. INS)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006


1,000,000
   TOTAL


6,855,000
Nebraska--1.5%
5,600,000 3,4 Nebraska Investment Finance Authority, PUTTERs (Series 1352) Weekly VRDNs (J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
5,600,000
500,000 Stanton County, NE, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.730%, 8/2/2006


500,000
   TOTAL


6,100,000
Nevada--1.3%
3,420,000 3,4 Clark County, NV Airport System, (PT-2806) Weekly VRDNs (Ambac Financial Group, Inc. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
3,420,000
2,000,000 Clark County, NV, Passenger Facility Charge Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A-2) Weekly VRDNs (Las Vegas-McCarran International Airport)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006


2,000,000
   TOTAL


5,420,000
New Jersey--6.1%
1,602,000 Edgewater, NJ, 4.75% BANs, 6/28/2007
1,612,474
3,100,000 Hoboken, NJ, 4.00% BANs, 9/15/2006
3,101,493
2,400,000 Mount Ephraim, NJ Board of Education, 4.25% GANs, 10/11/2006
2,404,883
4,492,500 Mount Holly Township, NJ, 4.50% BANs, 11/27/2006
4,506,816
1,500,000 Pleasantville, NJ, 4.25% BANs, 9/29/2006
1,502,585
4,000,000 Trenton, NJ, 4.50% BANs, 12/15/2006
4,015,262
2,460,500 Wildwood, NJ, 4.625% BANs, 5/11/2007
2,472,877
4,949,500 Wildwood, NJ, 4.75% BANs, 5/11/2007


4,973,605
   TOTAL


24,589,995
New Mexico--1.1%
4,600,000 New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority, (Series 2006), 4.53% TOBs (Trinity Plus Funding Co. LLC), Mandatory Tender 7/1/2007


4,600,000
North Carolina--2.2%
3,335,000 3,4 Charlotte, NC Airport, (PT-719) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(BNP Paribas SA LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
3,335,000
5,500,000 Hertford County, NC Industrial Facilities & PCFA (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.760%, 8/2/2006


5,500,000
   TOTAL


8,835,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
North Dakota--0.7%
$ 2,800,000 Richland County, ND Solid Waste Disposal, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006

$
2,800,000
Ohio--0.6%
1,500,000 Ohio HFA, (Series 2005D) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(FHLB of Cincinnati LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
1,500,000
1,000,000 Ohio State Water Development Authority, (Series 1999-A) Weekly VRDNs (Ohio Edison Co.), 3.830%, 8/3/2006


1,000,000
   TOTAL


2,500,000
Oklahoma--1.6%
350,000 Broken Arrow, OK EDA Weekly VRDNs (Blue Bell Creameries)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.880%, 8/3/2006
350,000
3,400,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Oklahoma AMT) Series 2004-3 Weekly VRDNs (Oklahoma HFA)/(GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
3,400,000
1,500,000 Oklahoma Development Finance Authority, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (ConocoPhillips Co.)/(ConocoPhillips GTD), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
1,500,000
1,000,000 Oklahoma Student Loan Authority, (Series 2006A-1) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.730%, 8/2/2006


1,000,000
   TOTAL


6,250,000
Pennsylvania--4.4%
270,000 Northampton County, PA IDA, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Ultra-Poly Corp.)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
270,000
3,500,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Assistance Agency, (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (Financial Security Assurance, Inc. INS)/(Bayerische Landesbank (GTD), Lloyds TSB Bank PLC, London, State Street Bank and Trust Co. and WestLB AG (GTD) LIQs), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
3,500,000
14,000,000 Philadelphia, PA Airport System, (Series 2005C) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/2/2006


14,000,000
   TOTAL


17,770,000
South Carolina--3.7%
3,120,000 Berkeley County, SC Exempt Facility Industrial Development, (Series 1998) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.)/(BP Amoco Corp. GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
3,120,000
5,200,000 Berkeley County, SC IDB, (Series 1996A) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
5,200,000
1,400,000 South Carolina Jobs- EDA, (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (PVC Container Corp. Project)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
1,400,000
5,320,000 3,4 South Carolina State Housing Finance & Development Authority, PUTTERs (Series 1388) Weekly VRDNs (Ambac Financial Group, Inc. INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006


5,320,000
   TOTAL


15,040,000
Tennessee-- 1.6%
150,000 Dickson, TN Health and Educational Facilities Board, Autumn Park Apartments (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Tennessee Partners XII LP)/ (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.800%, 8/3/2006
150,000
3,500,000 Jackson, TN Health Educational & Housing Facilities Board Multifamily Revenue, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Park Ridge Apartments)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
3,500,000
550,000 Knox County, TN IDB, (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (Health Ventures, Inc.)/ (SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
550,000
1,675,000 Tullahoma, TN IDB, (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Rock-Tenn Converting Co.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
1,675,000
445,000 Wilson County, TN Health and Educational Facilities Board, Forest View Apartments (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (Forest View LP)/(Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006


445,000
   TOTAL


6,320,000
Texas--9.7%
2,660,000 3,4 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX International Airport, (MT-132) Weekly VRDNs (Financial Security Assurance, Inc. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
2,660,000
1,730,000 3,4 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX International Airport, (PT-2830) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
1,730,000
6,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 1994) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
6,000,000
200,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
200,000
5,500,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Air Products LP)/(Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. GTD), 3.74%, 8/2/2006
5,500,000
12,500,000 Harris County, TX Housing Finance Corp., Park at Kirkstall Apartments (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Harris Park Partners LP)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
12,500,000
270,000 Houston, TX Housing Finance Corp., (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (Fairlake Cove Apartments)/(Citibank N.A., New York LOC), 3.760%, 8/2/2006
270,000
5,920,000 3,4 San Antonio, TX Convention Center Hotel Finance Corp., ROCs (Series 363) Weekly VRDNs (Hotel Investments LP)/(Ambac Financial Group, Inc. INS)/ (Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
5,920,000
3,905,000 3,4 San Antonio, TX Electric & Gas System, MERLOTS (Series 2002-A53), 3.385% TOBs (Financial Security Assurance, Inc. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 1/24/2007
3,905,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Texas--continued
$ 600,000 Texas State Department of Housing & Community Affairs, Addison Park Apartments (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Arlington Partners LP)/(Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006

$
600,000
   TOTAL


39,285,000
Virginia--1.6%
3,500,000 Halifax, VA IDA, MMMs, PCR (Series 1992), 3.80% CP (Virginia Electric & Power Co.), Mandatory Tender 8/1/2006
3,500,000
3,000,000 Virginia State Housing Development Authority, (Subseries D-STEM-II), 3.80% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 11/14/2006


3,000,000
   TOTAL


6,500,000
Washington--8.1%
6,140,000 3,4 Chelan County, WA Public Utility District No. 1, (MERLOTS Series 2001-B1) Weekly VRDNs (Chelan Hydro Consolidated System)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
6,140,000
850,000 Port of Bellingham, WA IDC (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (FPE Renewables LLC)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
850,000
1,300,000 Seattle, WA Housing Authority, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (High Point North LP)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
1,300,000
6,825,00 Washington State EDFA, (Series 2000H) Weekly VRDNs (Waste Management, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
6,825,000
7,375,000 Washington State EDFA, (Series 2001E) Weekly VRDNs (Darigold, Inc./ WestFarm Foods)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
7,375,000
5,500,000 Washington State Housing Finance Commission, (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Heatherstone Apartments, LP)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
5,500,000
4,825,000 Washington State Housing Finance Commission, (Series 1996: Larkin Apartments) Weekly VRDNs (Hamilton Place Apartments, LP)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/3/2006


4,825,000
   TOTAL


32,815,000
West Virginia--0.6%
2,300,000 Marion County, WV County Commission, (Series 1990 B) Weekly VRDNs (American Bituminous Power Partners LP)/(Deutsche Bank AG LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006


2,300,000
Wisconsin--2.3%
200,000 Grand Chute, WI, (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (Pacon Corp.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
200,000
1,000,000 Wausau, WI IDA, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Apogee Enterprises, Inc.)/ (Bank of New York LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
1,000,000
8,000,000 3,4 Wisconsin Housing & EDA, (PT-3456) Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006


8,000,000
   TOTAL


9,200,000
   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--99.5%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 5



401,415,692
   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--0.5%


1,906,708
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
403,322,400

Securities that are subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) represent 90.7% of the portfolio as calculated based upon total market value (percentage is unaudited).

1 The Fund may only invest in securities rated in one of the two highest short-term rating categories by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSROs) or unrated securities of comparable quality. An NRSRO's two highest rating categories are determined without regard for sub-categories and gradations. For example, securities rated SP-1+, SP-1 or SP-2 by Standard & Poor's, MIG-1 or MIG-2 by Moody's Investors Service, or F-1+, F-1 or F-2 by Fitch Ratings, are all considered rated in one of the two highest short-term rating categories.

Securities rated in the highest short-term rating category (and unrated securities of comparable quality) are identified as First Tier securities. Securities rated in the second highest short-term rating category (and unrated securities of comparable quality) are identified as Second Tier securities. The Fund follows applicable regulations in determining whether a security is rated and whether a security rated by multiple NRSROs in different rating categories should be identified as a First or Second Tier security.

At July 31, 2006, the portfolio securities were rated as follows:

Tier Rating Percentages Based on Total Market Value

First Tier
   
Second Tier
95.9%

4.1%

2 Current rate and next reset date shown on variable rate demand notes.

3 Denotes a security that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) is subject to contractual restriction on public sales. At July 31, 2006, these restricted securities amounted to $112,141,000, which represented 27.8% of total net assets.

4 Denotes a restricted security that may be resold without restriction to "qualified institutional buyers" as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and that the Fund has determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Fund's Board of Trustees. At July 31, 2006, these liquid restricted securities amounted to $112,141,000 which represented 27.8% of total net assets.

5 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

AMT --Alternative Minimum Tax
BANs --Bond Anticipation Notes
COL --Collateralized
CP --Commercial Paper
EDA --Economic Development Authority
EDFA --Economic Development Finance Authority
FHLB --Federal Home Loan Bank
FNMA --Federal National Mortgage Association
GANs --Grant Anticipation Notes
GTD --Guaranteed
HFA --Housing Finance Authority
IDA --Industrial Development Authority
IDB --Industrial Development Bond
IDC --Industrial Development Corporation
IDRB --Industrial Development Revenue Bond
INS --Insured
LIQ(s) --Liquidity Agreement(s)
LOC --Letter of Credit
MERLOTS --Municipal Exempt Receipts -- Liquidity Optional Tender Series
MFH --Multi-Family Housing
MFHA --Multi-Family Housing Authority
MMMs --Money Market Municipals
PCFA --Pollution Control Finance Authority
PCR --Pollution Control Revenue
PUTTERs --Puttable Tax-Exempt Receipts
ROCs --Reset Option Certificates
SFM --Single Family Mortgage
SWP --Swap Agreement
TOBs --Tender Option Bonds
VRDNs --Variable Rate Demand Notes

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities-
Federated Capital Reserves Fund

July 31, 2006

Assets:
      
Total investments in securities, at amortized cost and value
$ 8,216,391,957
Cash
1,451,603
Income receivable





28,470,816
   TOTAL ASSETS





8,246,314,376
Liabilities:
Payable for investments purchased
$ 75,000,000
Payable for distribution services fee (Note 5)
3,114,815
Payable for shareholder services fee (Note 5)
1,725,910
Accrued expenses


1,219,912



   TOTAL LIABILITIES





81,060,637
Net assets for 8,165,242,282 shares outstanding




$
8,165,253,739
Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 8,165,242,282
Undistributed net investment income





11,457
TOTAL NET ASSETS




$
8,165,253,739
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds per Share:
$8,165,253,739 ÷ 8,165,242,282 shares outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$1.00

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities-
Federated Government Reserves Fund

July 31, 2006

Assets:
      
Investments in repurchase agreements
$ 5,837,000,000
Investments in securities


1,778,522,716



Total investments in securities, at amortized cost and value
$ 7,615,522,716
Income receivable





14,320,625
   TOTAL ASSETS





7,629,843,341
Liabilities:
Payable to bank
649,961
Payable for distribution services fee (Note 5)
2,896,364
Payable for shareholder services fee (Note 5)
1,602,893
Payable for transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
622,671
Payable for printing and postage fees and expenses
362,189
Accrued expenses


177,889



   TOTAL LIABILITIES





6,311,967
Net assets for 7,623,441,054 shares outstanding




$
7,623,531,374
Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 7,623,441,054
Undistributed net investment income





90,320
   TOTAL NET ASSETS




$
7,623,531,374
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds per Share:
$7,623,531,374 ÷ 7,623,441,054 shares outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$1.00

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities-
Federated Municipal Trust

July 31, 2006

Assets:
      
Total investments in securities, at amortized cost and value
$ 401,415,692
Cash
156,638
Income receivable





2,118,425

   TOTAL ASSETS





403,690,755

Liabilities:
Payable for distribution services fee (Note 5)
$ 157,069
Payable for shareholder services fee (Note 5)
86,801
Payable for transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
69,191
Payable for portfolio accounting fees
20,833
Payable for auditing fees
11,895
Payable for share registration costs
10,602
Accrued expenses


11,964




   TOTAL LIABILITIES





368,355

Net assets for 403,311,619 shares outstanding




$
403,322,400

Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 403,311,619
Accumulated net realized loss on investments
(2,358 )
Undistributed net investment income





13,139

   TOTAL NET ASSETS




$
403,322,400

Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds per Share:
$403,322,400 ÷ 403,311,619 shares outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$1.00

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Operations-
Federated Capital Reserves Fund

Year Ended July 31, 2006

Investment Income:
         
Interest









$
362,121,777
Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
$ 24,289,019
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
6,446,582
Custodian fees
206,069
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
7,942,988
Directors'/Trustees' fees
69,278
Auditing fees
10,789
Legal fees
5,315
Portfolio accounting fees
193,470
Distribution services fee (Note 5)
44,529,808
Shareholder services fee (Note 5)
20,240,822
Share registration costs
3,320,765
Printing and postage
646,404
Insurance premiums
563
Miscellaneous






830




   TOTAL EXPENSES






107,902,702




Waivers (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
$ (18,169,154)
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(277,137)
Waiver of distribution services fee


(8,096,329)








   TOTAL WAIVERS






(26,542,620)




Net expenses










81,360,082
Net investment income









$
280,761,695

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Operations-
Federated Government Reserves Fund

Year Ended July 31, 2006

Investment Income:
         
Interest









$
304,210,825
Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
$ 20,555,678
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
5,455,638
Custodian fees
188,290
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
6,766,973
Directors'/Trustees' fees
57,800
Auditing fees
10,790
Legal fees
4,774
Portfolio accounting fees
194,310
Distribution services fee (Note 5)
37,685,409
Shareholder services fee (Note 5)
17,129,731
Share registration costs
257,024
Printing and postage
935,794
Insurance premiums
342
Miscellaneous






5,972




   TOTAL EXPENSES






89,248,525




Waivers (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
$ (13,307,468 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(234,496 )
Waiver of distribution services fee


(6,851,892
)







   TOTAL WAIVERS






(20,393,856
)



Net expenses










68,854,669
Net investment income









$
235,356,156

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Operations-
Federated Municipal Trust

Year Ended July 31, 2006

Investment Income:
         
Interest









$
13,515,425

Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
$ 1,278,635
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
339,386
Custodian fees
13,457
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
459,078
Directors'/Trustees' fees
5,419
Auditing fees
10,790
Legal fees
1,564
Portfolio accounting fees
130,926
Distribution services fee (Note 5)
2,344,162
Shareholder services fee (Note 5)
1,065,528
Share registration costs
271,241
Printing and postage
27,779
Insurance premiums
161
Miscellaneous






152





   TOTAL EXPENSES






5,948,278





Waivers (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
$ (1,224,456 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(14,613 )
Waiver of distribution services fee


(426,211
)








   TOTAL WAIVERS






(1,665,280
)




Net expenses










4,282,998

Net investment income










9,232,427

Net realized loss on investments










(2,358
)
Change in net assets resulting from operations









$
9,230,069

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Changes in Net Assets-
Federated Capital Reserves Fund


   

Year Ended
7/31/2006


   

Period
Ended
7/31/2005

1
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income

$
280,761,695


$
40,018,058

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income


(280,844,957
)


(39,923,339
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
3,871,114,316 8,283,897,365
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
280,844,907 39,897,967
Cost of shares redeemed


(3,416,083,200
)


(894,429,073
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


735,876,023



7,429,366,259

Change in net assets


735,792,761



7,429,460,978

Net Assets:
Beginning of period


7,429,460,978



--

End of period (including undistributed net investment income of $11,457 and $94,719, respectively)

$
8,165,253,739


$
7,429,460,978

1 For the period from February 25, 2005 (commencement of operations) to July 31, 2005.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Changes in Net Assets-
Federated Government Reserves Fund


   

Year Ended
7/31/2006


   

Period
Ended
7/31/2005

1
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income

$
235,356,156


$
29,203,016

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income


(235,433,046
)


(29,035,806
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
7,178,814,440 9,261,068,939
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
235,432,403 29,011,414
Cost of shares redeemed


(6,041,460,584
)


(3,039,425,558
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


1,372,786,259



6,250,654,795

Change in net assets


1,372,709,369



6,250,822,005

Net Assets:
Beginning of period


6,250,822,005



--

End of period (including undistributed net investment income of $90,320 and $167,210, respectively)

$
7,623,531,374


$
6,250,822,005

1 For the period from February 25, 2005 (commencement of operations) to July 31, 2005.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Changes in Net Assets-
Federated Municipal Trust


   

Year Ended
7/31/2006


   

Period
Ended
7/31/2005

1
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income
$ 9,232,427 $ 1,579,978
Net realized loss on investments


(2,358
)


--

   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS


9,230,069



1,579,978

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income


(9,226,852
)


(1,572,414
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
515,662,998 569,474,133
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
9,226,843 1,556,745
Cost of shares redeemed


(564,085,623
)


(128,523,477
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


(39,195,782
)


442,507,401

Change in net assets


(39,192,565
)


442,514,965

Net Assets:
Beginning of period


442,514,965



--

End of period (including undistributed net investment income of $13,139 and $7,564, respectively)

$
403,322,400


$
442,514,965

1 For the period from February 25, 2005 (commencement of operations) to July 31, 2005.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

July 31, 2006

1. ORGANIZATION

Money Market Obligations Trust (the "Trust") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), as an open-end, management investment company. The Trust consists of 41 portfolios. The financial statements of the following portfolios (individually referred to as the "Fund" or collectively as the "Funds") are presented herein:

Portfolio Name
   
Diversification
   
Investment Objective
Federated Capital Reserves Fund

diversified

To provide current income consistent
with stability of principal and liquidity.
Federated Government Reserves Fund

diversified

To provide current income consistent
with stability of principal and liquidity.
Federated Municipal Trust

diversified

To provide current income exempt from
federal regular income tax consistent with
stability of principal.

The financial statements of the other portfolios are presented separately. The assets of each portfolio are segregated and a shareholder's interest is limited to the portfolio in which shares are held. Interest income from the investments of Federated Municipal Trust may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax for individuals and corporations and state and local taxes.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Funds in the preparation of their financial statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America.

Investment Valuation

The Funds use the amortized cost method to value their portfolio securities in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act.

Repurchase Agreements

It is the policy of the Federated Capital Reserves Fund and Federated Government Reserves Fund to require the other party to a repurchase agreement to transfer to the Funds' custodian or sub-custodian eligible securities or cash with a market value (after transaction costs) at least equal to the repurchase price to be paid under the repurchase agreement. The eligible securities are transferred to accounts with the custodian or sub-custodian in which the Funds hold a "securities entitlement" and exercises "control" as those terms are defined in the Uniform Commercial Code. The Funds have established procedures for monitoring the market value of the transferred securities and requiring the transfer of additional eligible securities if necessary to equal at least the repurchase price. These procedures also allow the other party to require securities to be transferred from the account to the extent that their market value exceeds the repurchase price or in exchange for other eligible securities of equivalent market value.

With respect to agreements to repurchase U.S. government securities and cash items, the Funds treat the repurchase agreement as an investment in the underlying securities and not as an obligation of the other party to the repurchase agreement. Other repurchase agreements are treated as obligations of the other party secured by the underlying securities. Nevertheless, the insolvency of the other party or other failure to repurchase the securities may delay the disposition of the underlying securities or cause the Funds to receive less than the full repurchase price. Under the terms of the repurchase agreement, any amounts received by the Funds in excess of the repurchase price and related transaction costs must be remitted to the other party.

The Funds may enter into repurchase agreements in which eligible securities are transferred into joint trading accounts maintained by the custodian or sub-custodian for investment companies and other clients advised by the Funds' adviser and its affiliates. The Funds will participate on a pro rata basis with the other investment companies and clients in the Funds' share of the securities transferred under such repurchase agreements and in the Funds' share of proceeds from any repurchase or other disposition of such securities.

Investment Income, Expenses and Distributions

Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income are declared daily and paid monthly.

Premium and Discount Amortization

All premiums and discounts are amortized/accreted.

Federal Taxes

It is each Fund's policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of their income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary.

On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released FASB Interpretation No. 48 "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken in the course of preparing each fund's tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are "more-likely-than-not" of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax benefits of positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax expense in the current year. Adoption of FIN 48 is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the effective date. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FIN 48 and its impact in the financial statements has not yet been determined.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

The Funds may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Funds record when-issued securities on the trade date and maintain security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Restricted Securities

Restricted securities are securities that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) are subject to contractual restrictions on public sales. In some cases, when a security cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, the issuer of the restricted security has agreed to register such securities for resale, at the issuer's expense, either upon demand by the Funds or in connection with another registered offering of the securities. Many such restricted securities may be resold in the secondary market in transactions exempt from registration. Restricted securities may be determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Funds' Board of Trustees. The Funds will not incur any registration costs upon such resales. Restricted securities are valued at amortized cost in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

Other

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST

The following tables summarize share activity:

Federated Capital Reserves Fund







   
Year Ended
7/31/2006


   
Period Ended
7/31/2005

1
Shares sold
3,871,114,316 8,283,897,365
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
280,844,907 39,897,967
Shares redeemed

(3,416,083,200
)

(894,429,073
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

735,876,023


7,429,366,259

Federated Government Reserves Fund








Year Ended
7/31/2006



Period Ended
7/31/2005

1
Shares sold
7,178,814,440 9,261,068,939
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
235,432,403 29,011,414
Shares redeemed

(6,041,460,584
)

(3,039,425,558
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

1,372,786,259


6,250,654,795

Federated Municipal Trust








Year Ended
7/31/2006



Period Ended
7/31/2005

1
Shares sold
515,662,998 569,474,133
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
9,226,843 1,556,745
Shares redeemed

(564,085,623
)

(128,523,477
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(39,195,782
)

442,507,401

1 For the period from February 25, 2005 (commencement of operations) to July 31, 2005.

4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

The tax character of distributions as reported on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the year ended July 31, 2006 and the period ended July 31, 2005, was as follows:


   
Tax-Exempt Income
   
Ordinary Income
Fund

2006
   
2005
   
2006
   
2005
Federated Capital Reserves Fund

$ --

$ --

$280,844,957

$39,923,339
Federated Government Reserves Fund

$ --

$ --

$235,433,046

$29,035,806
Federated Municipal Trust

$9,226,852

$1,572,414

$ --

$ --

As of July 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Fund
   
Undistributed
Tax-Exempt Income

   
Undistributed
Ordinary Income

Federated Capital Reserves Fund

$ --

$11,457
Federated Government Reserves Fund

$ --

$90,320
Federated Municipal Trust

$13,139

$ --

Under current tax regulations, capital losses on securities transactions realized after October 31 may be deferred and treated as occurring on the first day of the following fiscal year. As of July 31, 2006, for federal income tax purposes, post October losses of $2,358 were deferred to August 1, 2006 for Federated Municipal Trust.

5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

Federated Investment Management Company, the Funds' investment adviser (the "Adviser"), receives for its services an annual investment adviser fee equal to 0.30% of each Fund's average daily net assets. The Adviser may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. The Adviser can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the Adviser voluntarily waived a portion of its fee as follows:

Fund
   
Amount Waived
Federated Capital Reserves Fund

$18,169,154
Federated Government Reserves Fund

$ 13,307,468
Federated Municipal Trust

$ 1,224,456

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Funds with administrative personnel and services. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average aggregate daily net assets of certain Federated funds as specified below:

Maximum
Administrative Fee

   
Average Aggregate Daily Net Assets
of the Federated Funds

0.150%

on the first $5 billion
0.125%

on the next $5 billion
0.100%

on the next $10 billion
0.075%

on assets in excess of $20 billion

The administrative fee received during any fiscal year shall be at least $150,000 per portfolio and $40,000 per each additional class of Shares. FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FAS can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the net fee paid to FAS was 0.076% of the average aggregate daily net assets of each Fund.

Distribution Services Fee

Each Fund has adopted a Distribution Plan (the "Plan") pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act. Under the terms of the Plan, each Fund will compensate Federated Securities Corp. (FSC), from the daily net assets of each Fund's shares to finance activities intended to result in the sale of these shares. The Plan provides that each Fund may incur distribution expenses of 0.55% of average daily net assets, annually, to compensate FSC. FSC may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FSC can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSC waived a portion if its fee as follows:

Fund
   
Amount Waived
Federated Capital Reserves Fund

$8,096,329
Federated Government Reserves Fund

$6,851,892
Federated Municipal Trust

$ 426,211

When FSC receives fees, it may pay some or all of them to financial intermediaries whose customers purchase shares. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSC did not receive any fees paid by the Funds.

Shareholder Services Fee

Each Fund may pay fees (Service Fees) up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of each Fund's Shares to financial intermediaries or to Federated Shareholder Services Company (FSSC) for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. FSSC or these financial intermediaries may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of their fee. In addition, FSSC may voluntarily reimburse the Funds for shareholder services fees. This voluntary waiver and/or reimbursement can be modified or terminated at any time. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC received $636 of fees paid by Federated Municipal Trust and did not receive any fees paid by Federated Capital Reserves Fund and Federated Government Reserves Fund.

General

Certain of the Officers and Trustees of the Trust are Officers and Directors or Trustees of the above companies.

Interfund Transactions

During the year ended July 31, 2006, Federated Municipal Trust engaged in purchase and sale transactions with funds that have a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment advisers), common Directors/Trustees, and/or common Officers. These purchase and sale transactions complied with Rule 17a-7 under the Act and amounted to $451,817,000 and $655,715,000, respectively.

6. CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

A substantial part of the Federated Capital Reserves Fund's portfolio may be comprised of obligations of banks. As a result, this Fund may be more susceptible to any economic, business, political or other developments which generally affect these entities.

7. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning in October 2003, Federated Investors, Inc. and various subsidiaries thereof (including the advisers and distributor for various investment companies, collectively, "Federated"), along with various investment companies sponsored by Federated ("Funds") were named as defendants in several class action lawsuits now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuits were purportedly filed on behalf of people who purchased, owned and/or redeemed shares of Federated-sponsored mutual funds during specified periods beginning November 1, 1998. The suits are generally similar in alleging that Federated engaged in illegal and improper trading practices including market timing and late trading in concert with certain institutional traders, which allegedly caused financial injury to the mutual fund shareholders. These lawsuits began to be filed shortly after Federated's first public announcement that it had received requests for information on shareholder trading activities in the Funds from the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), the Office of the New York State Attorney General ("NYAG"), and other authorities. In that regard, on November 28, 2005, Federated announced that it had reached final settlements with the SEC and the NYAG with respect to those matters. As Federated previously reported in 2004, it has already paid approximately $8.0 million to certain funds as determined by an independent consultant. As part of these settlements, Federated agreed to pay for the benefit of fund shareholders additional disgorgement and a civil money penalty in the aggregate amount of an additional $72 million. Federated and various Funds have also been named as defendants in several additional lawsuits, the majority of which are now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging, among other things, excessive advisory and Rule 12b-1 fees. The Board of the Funds has retained the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro LLP to represent the Funds in these lawsuits. Federated and the Funds, and their respective counsel, are reviewing the allegations and intend to defend this litigation. Additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations may be filed in the future. The potential impact of these lawsuits, all of which seek unquantified damages, attorney's fees and expenses, and future potential similar suits is uncertain. Although we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Funds, there can be no assurance that these suits, the ongoing adverse publicity and/or other developments resulting from the regulatory investigations will not result in increased Fund redemptions, reduced sales of Fund shares, or other adverse consequences for the Funds.

8. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

At July 31, 2006, 100% of the distributions from net investment income of Federated Municipal Trust is exempt from federal income tax, other than the federal AMT.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONEY MARKET OBLIGATIONS TRUST AND SHAREHOLDERS OF FEDERATED CAPITAL RESERVES FUND, FEDERATED GOVERNMENT RESERVES FUND, AND FEDERATED MUNICIPAL TRUST:

We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities of Federated Capital Reserves Fund, Federated Government Reserves Fund, and Federated Municipal Trust (the "Funds") (three of the portfolios constituting Money Market Obligations Trust), including the portfolios of investments, as of July 31, 2006, and the related statements of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets and the financial highlights for the year then ended and for the period from February 25, 2005 (commencement of operations) to July 31, 2005. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds' management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Funds' internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Funds' internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of July 31, 2006, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers or by other appropriate auditing procedures where replies from brokers were not received. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Federated Capital Reserves Fund, Federated Government Reserves Fund, and Federated Municipal Trust, three portfolios of Money Market Obligations Trust, at July 31, 2006, the results of their operations for the year then ended, the changes in their net assets and the financial highlights for the year then ended and for the period from February 25, 2005 (commencement of operations) to July 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
September 12, 2006

Board of Trustees and Trust Officers

The Board is responsible for managing the Trust's business affairs and for exercising all the Trust's powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Board member and the senior officers of the Funds. Where required, the tables separately list Board members who are "interested persons" of the Fund (i.e., "Interested" Board members) and those who are not (i.e., "Independent" Board members). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is Federated Investors Tower, 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA. As of December 31, 2005, the Trust comprised 41 portfolios, and the Federated Fund Complex consisted of 43 investment companies (comprising 136 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Board member oversees all portfolios in the Federated Fund Complex and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund's Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trust Trustees and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
John F. Donahue*
Birth Date: July 28, 1924
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex's Executive Committee.

Previous Positions
: Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex; Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Chairman and Director, Federated Investment Counseling.



J. Christopher Donahue*
Birth Date: April 11, 1949
PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 1989
Principal Occupations : Principal Executive Officer and President of the Federated Fund Complex; Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company; Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman, Passport Research, Ltd. (Investment advisory subsidiary of Federated); Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director, Federated Services Company.

Previous Positions
: President, Federated Investment Counseling; President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd.



Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D.*
Birth Date: October 11, 1932
3471 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1111
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Medical Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Downtown; Hematologist, Oncologist and Internist, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Other Directorships Held
: Member, National Board of Trustees, Leukemia Society of America.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, University of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.



* Family relationships and reasons for "interested" status: John F. Donahue is the father of J. Christopher Donahue; both are "interested" due to the positions they hold with Federated Investors, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D. is "interested" because his son-in-law is employed by the Fund's principal underwriter, Federated Securities Corp.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
Thomas G. Bigley
Birth Date: February 3, 1934
15 Old Timber Trail
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: November 1994
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Member of Executive Committee, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh.

Previous Position
: Senior Partner, Ernst & Young LLP.



John T. Conroy, Jr.
Birth Date: June 23, 1937
Investment Properties Corporation
3838 North Tamiami Trail
Suite 402
Naples, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman of the Board, Investment Properties Corporation; Partner or Trustee in private real estate ventures in Southwest Florida.

Previous Positions
: President, Investment Properties Corporation; Senior Vice President, John R. Wood and Associates, Inc., Realtors; President, Naples Property Management, Inc. and Northgate Village Development Corporation.



Nicholas P. Constantakis
Birth Date: September 3, 1939
175 Woodshire Drive
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Michael Baker Corporation (engineering and energy services worldwide).

Previous Position
: Partner, Andersen Worldwide SC.



John F. Cunningham
Birth Date: March 5, 1943
353 El Brillo Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Director, WinsorTech.

Other Directorships Held
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cunningham & Co., Inc. (strategic business consulting); Trustee Associate, Boston College.

Previous Positions
: Director, Redgate Communications and EMC Corporation (computer storage systems); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Computer Consoles, Inc.; President and Chief Operating Officer, Wang Laboratories; Director, First National Bank of Boston; Director, Apollo Computer, Inc.



Peter E. Madden
Birth Date: March 16, 1942
One Royal Palm Way
100 Royal Palm Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Board of Overseers, Babson College.

Previous Positions
: Representative, Commonwealth of Massachusetts General Court; President, State Street Bank and Trust Company and State Street Corporation (retired); Director, VISA USA and VISA International; Chairman and Director, Massachusetts Bankers Association; Director, Depository Trust Corporation; Director, The Boston Stock Exchange.



Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.
Birth Date: April 10, 1945
80 South Road
Westhampton Beach, NY
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Management Consultant.

Previous Positions
: Chief Executive Officer, PBTC International Bank; Partner, Arthur Young & Company (now Ernst & Young LLP); Chief Financial Officer of Retail Banking Sector, Chase Manhattan Bank; Senior Vice President, HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank); Vice President, Citibank; Assistant Professor of Banking and Finance, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University; Executive Vice President, DVC Group, Inc.



John E. Murray, Jr., J.D., S.J.D.
Birth Date: December 20, 1932
Chancellor, Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1995
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee, and Chairman of the Board of Directors or Trustees, of the Federated Fund Complex; Chancellor and Law Professor, Duquesne University; Partner, Murray, Hogue & Lannis.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Michael Baker Corp. (engineering, construction, operations and technical services).

Previous Positions
: President, Duquesne University; Dean and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Dean and Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law.



Marjorie P. Smuts
Birth Date: June 21, 1935
4905 Bayard Street
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Public Relations/Marketing Consultant/Conference Coordinator.

Previous Positions
: National Spokesperson, Aluminum Company of America; television producer; President, Marj Palmer Assoc.; Owner, Scandia Bord.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
John S. Walsh
Birth Date: November 28, 1957
2604 William Drive
Valparaiso, IN
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer of construction temporary heaters); President and Director, Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers Products, Inc.

Previous Position
: Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc.



James F. Will
Birth Date: October 12, 1938
Saint Vincent College
Latrobe, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 2006
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chancellor and President, Saint Vincent College.

Other Directorships Held
: Alleghany Corporation.

Previous Positions
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Armco, Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer, Cyclops Industries; President and Chief Operating Officer, Kaiser Steel Corporation.



OFFICERS




Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
John W. McGonigle
Birth Date: October 26, 1938
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND SECRETARY
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Federated Investment Counseling; Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Services Company and Federated Securities Corp.



Richard A. Novak
Birth Date: December 25, 1963
TREASURER
Began serving: January 2006
Principal Occupations : Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Federated Fund Complex; Senior Vice President, Federated Administrative Services; Financial and Operations Principal for Federated Securities Corp., Edgewood Services, Inc. and Southpointe Distribution Services, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Controller of Federated Investors, Inc.; Vice President, Finance of Federated Services Company; held various financial management positions within The Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh; Auditor, Arthur Andersen & Co.



Richard B. Fisher
Birth Date: May 17, 1923
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Vice Chairman or Vice President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman, Federated Securities Corp.

Previous Positions
: President and Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Executive Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc. and Director and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Securities Corp.



Brian P. Bouda
Birth Date: February 28, 1947
CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER
Began serving: August 2004
Principal Occupations : Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of Federated Investors, Inc.; and Chief Compliance Officer of its subsidiaries. Mr. Bouda joined Federated in 1999 and is a member of the American Bar Association and the State Bar Association of Wisconsin.



Deborah A. Cunningham
Birth Date: September 15, 1959
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Deborah A. Cunningham was named Chief Investment Officer of money market products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1981 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1997. Ms. Cunningham is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.S.B.A. in Finance from Robert Morris College.



Mary Jo Ochson
Birth Date: September 12, 1953
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Mary Jo Ochson was named Chief Investment Officer of tax-exempt, fixed-income products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1982 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Pittsburgh.






Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
Susan R. Hill
Birth Date: June 20, 1963
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Susan R. Hill has been the Government Fund's Portfolio Manager since inception. Susan R. Hill is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Hill joined Federated in 1990 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 2003 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 2005. Ms. Hill was a Portfolio Manager from 1994 until 2003, and served as Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1997 until 2004 and an Assistant Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1994 until 1997. Ms. Hill is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received an M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University.



Jeff A. Kozemchak
Birth Date: January 15, 1960
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Jeff A. Kozemchak is Vice President of the Trust. Mr. Kozemchak joined Federated in 1987 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 1996 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1999. He was a Portfolio Manager until 1996 and a Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Kozemchak is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received his M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University in 1987.



Paige M. Wilhelm
Birth Date: May 28, 1962
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: August 2006
Principal Occupations : Paige M. Wilhelm is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Wilhelm joined Federated in 1985 and has been a Senior Vice President and a Senior Portfolio Manager. She is responsible for portfolio management and research in the fixed-income area concentrating on taxable money market instruments. Previous associations include Senior Credit Analyst, Federated Investors; Performance Analysis Supervisor; Performance Analyst, Federated Investment Counseling. Ms. Wilhelm is a member of the CFA Society of Pittsburgh and received her B.S. from Indiana University and her M.B.A. from Duquesne University.



Evaluation and Approval of Advisory Contract

FEDERATED CAPITAL RESERVES FUND (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. Because the Fund did not yet have a meaningful operating history. The Board's decision to approve the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment primarily on whether to authorize the continued offering of this new investment vehicle, as originally proposed by, and based on information previously provided by, the Federated organization, and based on Federated's recommendation to go forward with the Fund.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

The Board also considered the anticipated compensation and benefits to be received by the Adviser. This includes fees to be received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services that may be received by the Adviser from brokers that execute fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in working with Federated on matters relating to other Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. The Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services to be provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's anticipated investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund will compete. In this regard, the Senior Officer also reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds (e.g., institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the fees charged by other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

It was recognized that the factors mentioned above relating to such matters as any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund, are essentially impossible to apply before the Fund has experienced any meaningful operating history. Nevertheless, in connection with the Board's governance of other Federated funds, it should be noted that the Board regularly receives financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derives from its relationships with the other Federated funds. These reports cover not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discuss any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades, as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waive fees and/or reimburse expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors, and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. As noted, not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to the Fund, nor does the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that are relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that, based upon the information previously requested and supplied, Federated's proposal to establish and manage the Fund, and its past performance and actions in providing services to other mutual funds, provide a satisfactory basis to support the business decision to continue the existing arrangements.

FEDERATED GOVERNMENT RESERVES FUND (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. Because the Fund did not yet have a meaningful operating history. The Board's decision to approve the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment primarily on whether to authorize the continued offering of this new investment vehicle, as originally proposed by, and based on information previously provided by, the Federated organization, and based on Federated's recommendation to go forward with the Fund.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

The Board also considered the anticipated compensation and benefits to be received by the Adviser. This includes fees to be received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services that may be received by the Adviser from brokers that execute fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in working with Federated on matters relating to other Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. The Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services to be provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's anticipated investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund will compete. In this regard, the Senior Officer also reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds (e.g., institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the fees charged by other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

It was recognized that the factors mentioned above relating to such matters as any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund, are essentially impossible to apply before the Fund has experienced any meaningful operating history. Nevertheless, in connection with the Board's governance of other Federated funds, it should be noted that the Board regularly receives financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derives from its relationships with the other Federated funds. These reports cover not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discuss any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades, as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waive fees and/or reimburse expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors, and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. As noted, not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to the Fund, nor does the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that are relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that, based upon the information previously requested and supplied, Federated's proposal to establish and manage the Fund, and its past performance and actions in providing services to other mutual funds, provide a satisfactory basis to support the business decision to continue the existing arrangements.

FEDERATED MUNICIPAL TRUST (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. Because the Fund did not yet have a meaningful operating history. The Board's decision to approve the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment primarily on whether to authorize the continued offering of this new investment vehicle, as originally proposed by, and based on information previously provided by, the Federated organization, and based on Federated's recommendation to go forward with the Fund.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

The Board also considered the anticipated compensation and benefits to be received by the Adviser. This includes fees to be received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services that may be received by the Adviser from brokers that execute fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in working with Federated on matters relating to other Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. The Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services to be provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's anticipated investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund will compete. In this regard, the Senior Officer also reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds (e.g., institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the fees charged by other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

It was recognized that the factors mentioned above relating to such matters as any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund, are essentially impossible to apply before the Fund has experienced any meaningful operating history. Nevertheless, in connection with the Board's governance of other Federated funds, it should be noted that the Board regularly receives financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derives from its relationships with the other Federated funds. These reports cover not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discuss any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades, as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waive fees and/or reimburse expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors, and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. As noted, not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to the Fund, nor does the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that are relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that, based upon the information previously requested and supplied, Federated's proposal to establish and manage the Fund, and its past performance and actions in providing services to other mutual funds, provide a satisfactory basis to support the business decision to continue the existing arrangements.

Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies, if any, relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Federated's website. Go to FederatedInvestors.com, select "Products," select the "Prospectuses and Regulatory Reports" link, then select the Fund to access the link to Form N-PX. This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

The Fund files with the SEC a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on "Form N-Q." These filings are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.) You may also access this information from the "Products" section of Federated's website at FederatedInvestors.com by clicking on "Portfolio Holdings" and selecting the name of the Fund, or by selecting the name of the Fund and clicking on "Portfolio Holdings." You must register on the website the first time you wish to access this information.

Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board, or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal. Although money market funds seek to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share, there is no assurance that they will be able to do so.

This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the Fund's prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses, and other information.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Federated Capital Reserves FundFederated Government Reserves FundFederated Municipal Trust
Federated Investors Funds
5800 Corporate Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15237-7000
Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.

Federated Securities Corp., Distributor

Cusip 608919304
Cusip 608919205
Cusip 608919106

33542 (9/06)

Federated is a registered mark of Federated Investors, Inc. 2006 (c)Federated Investors, Inc.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Automated Cash Management Trust

A Portfolio of Money Market Obligations Trust



ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT

July 31, 2006

Institutional Service Shares
Cash II Shares

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
SHAREHOLDER EXPENSE EXAMPLE
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS SUMMARY TABLES
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND TRUST OFFICERS
EVALUATION AND APPROVAL OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
VOTING PROXIES ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

Not FDIC Insured * May Lose Value * No Bank Guarantee

Federated Investors 50 Years of Growth & Innovation

Financial Highlights-Institutional Service Shares

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005
1
   
2004

   
2003

   
2002

Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.038 0.018 0.005 0.009 0.019
Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.038
)

(0.018
)

(0.005
)

(0.009
)

(0.019
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$1.00


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00

Total Return 2

3.88
%

1.80
%

0.54
%

0.93
%

1.95
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:















Net expenses

0.64
%

0.64
%

0.64
%

0.64
%

0.64
%
Net investment income

3.85
%

1.77
%

0.54
%

0.94
%

1.94
%
Expense waiver/reimbursement 3

0.29
%

0.28
%

0.28
%

0.28
%

0.26
%
Supplemental Data:















Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$2,096,218

$1,683,914

$1,832,151

$1,763,112

$2,259,956

1 Beginning with the year ended July 31, 2005, the Fund was audited by Ernst & Young, LLP. The previous years were audited by another independent registered public accounting firm.

2 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

3 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Financial Highlights-Cash II Shares

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005
1
   
2004

   
2003

   
2002

Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.036 0.016 0.004 0.008 0.018
Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.036
)

(0.016
)

(0.004
)

(0.008
)

(0.018
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$1.00


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00

Total Return 2

3.71
%

1.63
%

0.37
%

0.76
%

1.77
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:















Net expenses

0.81
%

0.81
%

0.81
%

0.81
%

0.81
%
Net investment income

3.51
%

1.60
%

0.37
%

0.78
%

1.81
%
Expense waiver/reimbursement 3

0.37
%

0.36
%

0.36
%

0.36
%

0.34
%
Supplemental Data:















Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$441,444

$688,969

$585,275

$654,887

$1,131,739

1 Beginning with the year ended July 31, 2005, the Fund was audited by Ernst & Young, LLP. The previous years were audited by another independent registered public accounting firm.

2 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

3 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees; to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees and/or shareholder services fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you to understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from February 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006.

ACTUAL EXPENSES

The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES

The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund's actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund's actual return. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are required to be provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund with other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.


   
Beginning
Account Value
2/1/2006

   
Ending
Account Value
7/31/2006

   
Expenses Paid
During Period 1

Actual:






Institutional Service Shares

$1,000

$1,021.50

$3.21
Cash II Shares

$1,000

$1,020.60

$4.06
Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return before expenses):






Institutional Service Shares

$1,000

$1,021.62

$3.21
Cash II Shares

$1,000

$1,020.78

$4.06

1 Expenses are equal to the Fund's annualized net expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The annualized net expense ratios are as follows:

Institutional Service Shares
   
0.64%
Cash II Shares

0.81%

Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:

Security Type
   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Commercial Paper & Notes

44.6
%
Variable Rate Demand Instruments

36.9
%
Bank Instruments

11.5
%
Repurchase Agreements

7.1
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(0.1
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:

   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

42.7
% 4
8-30 Days

34.0
%
31-90 Days

16.9
%
91-180 Days

1.8
%
181 Days or more

4.7
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(0.1
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

1 Commercial paper and notes includes any fixed-rate security that is not a bank instrument. A variable rate instrument is any security which has an interest rate that resets periodically. See the Fund's Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information for a description of the principal types of securities in which the Fund invests.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

4 Overnight securities comprised 28.9% of the Fund's portfolio.

Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES--1.0%
Finance - Automotive--0.5%
$ 12,460,584 HSBC Automotive Trust 2006-1, Class A1, 5.2756%, 6/18/2007

$
12,460,584

Finance - Equipment--0.5%
8,229,139 CIT Equipment Collateral 2006-VT1, Class A1, 4.989%, 3/20/2007
8,229,139
3,748,658 CNH Equipment Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.989%, 4/5/2007


3,748,658

   TOTAL


11,977,797

   TOTAL ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES


24,438,381

BANKERS ACCEPTANCE--0.4%
Banking--0.4%
12,000,000 Wachovia Bank N.A., 5.450%, 12/22/2006


11,740,217

CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT--8.9%
Banking--8.9%
31,000,000 Calyon, Paris, 4.750% - 5.310%, 10/17/2006 - 4/19/2007
31,000,000
5,000,000 Citizens Bank N.A., 5.270%, 9/12/2006
5,000,115
45,000,000 Citizens Bank of Massachusetts, 5.330% - 5.430%, 8/10/2006 - 9/29/2006
45,000,000
15,000,000 Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, 5.220%, 8/28/2006
15,000,000
27,000,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 4.920% - 5.250%, 11/20/2006 - 3/29/2007
27,000,000
10,000,000 DePfa Bank PLC, 5.260%, 4/9/2007
10,000,000
15,000,000 Deutsche Bank AG, 4.500%, 10/13/2006
15,000,000
15,000,000 Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, Edinburgh, 4.397%, 10/4/2006
14,999,936
30,000,000 Societe Generale, Paris, 4.760%, 10/27/2006
30,000,000
8,000,000 Toronto Dominion Bank, 5.600%, 6/18/2007
8,000,000
25,000,000 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 5.310%, 8/10/2006


25,000,000

   TOTAL CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT


226,000,051

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS--12.2%
Banking--5.9%
$ 50,000,000 Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., 5.442%, 8/1/2006
$ 50,000,000
50,000,000 Fortis Bank SA/NV, 5.362%, 8/1/2006
50,000,000
50,000,000 IXIS Financial Products Inc., 5.412%, 8/1/2006


50,000,000

   TOTAL


150,000,000

Brokerage--6.3%
75,000,000 Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., 5.412%, 8/1/2006
75,000,000
35,000,000 Goldman Sachs & Co., 5.382% - 5.413%, 8/1/2006
35,000,000
50,000,000 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.442%, 8/1/2006


50,000,000

   TOTAL


160,000,000

   TOTAL COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS


310,000,000

COMMERCIAL PAPER--26.1% 1
Banking--8.4%
40,000,000 Bank of America Corp., 5.280% - 5.385%, 8/8/2006 - 10/4/2006
39,830,733
5,000,000 2,3 Blue Spice LLC, (Deutsche Bank AG SWP), 5.350%, 9/22/2006
4,961,361
2,000,000 Danske Corp., Inc., (Danske Bank A/S, GTD), 4.984%, 4/10/2007
1,930,224
20,356,000 2,3 Fountain Square Commercial Funding Corp., 5.000% - 5.300%, 8/22/2006 - 9/5/2006
20,275,372
10,000,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.180%, 9/8/2006
9,945,322
20,000,000 2,3 KBC Financial Products International Ltd., (KBC Bank N.V., GTD), 4.960% - 4.970%, 8/4/2006 - 8/9/2006
19,984,822
40,000,000 2,3 Long Lane Master Trust IV, (Bank of America N.A. SWP), 5.290%, 8/7/2006
39,964,733
17,945,000 Los Angeles County, CA Metropolitan Transportation Authority, (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 5.330%, 8/9/2006
17,945,000
25,000,000 Louis Dreyfus Corp., (Barclays Bank PLC LOC), 5.365%, 8/23/2006
24,918,035
34,000,000 2,3 Picaros Funding LLC, (KBC Bank N.V., GTD), 4.970% - 5.400%, 8/10/2006 - 10/11/2006


33,794,377

   TOTAL


213,549,979

Finance - Automotive--4.2%
68,000,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust, (Series A1+/P1), 5.070% - 5.270%, 8/8/2006 - 11/13/2006
67,707,211
40,300,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust, (Series A1/P1), 5.210% - 5.410%, 8/4/2006 - 10/16/2006


40,121,743

   TOTAL


107,828,954

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

COMMERICIAL PAPER--continued 1
Finance - Commercial--1.6%
$ 40,500,000 CIT Group, Inc., 5.020% - 5.310%, 8/11/2006 - 10/18/2006

$
40,164,458

Finance - Retail--6.3%
20,000,000 2,3 Amsterdam Funding Corp., 5.280%, 8/10/2006
19,973,600
40,000,000 2,3 Compass Securitization LLC, 5.245% - 5.280%, 8/16/2006 - 9/15/2006
39,846,656
40,000,000 2,3 Paradigm Funding LLC, 5.280%, 8/7/2006
39,964,800
50,000,000 2,3 Sheffield Receivables Corp., 5.280% - 5.300%, 8/9/2006 - 8/11/2006
49,938,344
10,000,000 2,3 Tulip Funding Corp., 5.110%, 10/24/2006


9,880,767

   TOTAL


159,604,167

Finance - Securities--5.6%
66,000,000 2,3,4 Georgetown Funding Co. LLC, 5.390% - 5.420%, 9/19/2006 - 9/20/2006
65,709,588
5,500,000 2,3 Grampian Funding LLC, 5.050%, 8/30/2006
5,477,626
48,791,000 2,3 KLIO II Funding Ltd., 5.230% - 5.370%, 8/22/2006 - 9/8/2006
48,596,078
3,000,000 2,3 Perry Global Funding LLC (Series A), 5.390%, 10/4/2006
2,971,253
20,000,000 2,3 Sigma Finance, Inc., (Sigma Finance Corp., GTD), 5.040%, 8/2/2006


19,997,200

   TOTAL


142,751,745

   TOTAL COMMERCIAL PAPER


663,899,303

CORPORATE NOTES --2.3%
Finance - Securities--2.3%
17,500,000 2,3 K2 (USA) LLC, (K2 Corp., GTD), 5.000%, 3/12/2007
17,500,000
40,500,000 2,3 Sigma Finance, Inc., (Sigma Finance Corp., GTD), 4.830% - 5.750%, 1/26/2007 - 7/25/2007


40,500,000

   TOTAL CORPORATE NOTES


58,000,000

GOVERNMENT AGENCIES--0.6%
Government Agency--0.6%
15,000,000 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 5.410%, 6/18/2007


15,000,000

LOAN PARTICIPATION--2.0%
Chemicals--2.0%
50,000,000 DuPont Teijin Films U.K. Ltd., (Du Pont (E.I.) de Nemours & Co., GTD), 5.430%, 8/31/2006


50,000,000

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

NOTES - VARIABLE--36.9% 5
Banking--13.1%
$ 4,775,000 AGE, Inc., (Series 2000), (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
$ 4,775,000
400,000 Alabama Paper Products LLC, (Series 2003), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
400,000
4,460,000 American Concrete Pumping LLC, (Series 2004), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
4,460,000
4,100,000 Arkansas Development Finance Authority, (Series 1999A), (BNP Paribas SA LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
4,100,000
2,000,000 Arkansas Development Finance Authority, (Series 1999B), (BNP Paribas SA LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
1,000,000 Arkansas Development Finance Authority, (Series 1999C), (BNP Paribas SA LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
1,000,000
1,000,000 Arkansas Development Finance Authority, (Series 1999D), (BNP Paribas SA LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
1,000,000
1,225,000 Arkansas Development Finance Authority, (Series 2000A), (BNP Paribas SA LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
1,225,000
2,050,000 Arkansas Development Finance Authority, (Series 2000B), (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
2,050,000
40,000,000 2,3 BNP Paribas SA, 5.364%, 8/28/2006
40,000,000
7,000,000 Bank of America N.A., 5.373%, 8/1/2006
6,999,909
5,280,000 CNOS Building LLC, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
5,280,000
638,000 Capital One Funding Corp., (Series 1999-B), (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
638,000
10,000,000 Credit Agricole S.A., 5.481%, 10/23/2006
10,000,000
35,000,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 5.280% - 5.470%, 9/12/2006 - 9/29/2006
35,000,000
30,000,000 2,3 DePfa Bank PLC, 3.369%, 9/15/2006
30,000,000
7,625,000 E & J Investments LLC, Bradner Village Health Care, (Series 1999), (LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
7,625,000
7,355,000 Elsinore Properties LP, (Series 1998), (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
7,355,000
5,760,000 Grand Chute, WI, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
5,760,000
39,000,000 2,3 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.259% - 5.315%, 8/9/2006 - 8/21/2006
39,000,000
1,920,000 HYCO Alabama LLC, (Series 2000), (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.520%, 8/3/2006
1,920,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 5
Banking--continued
$ 7,590,000 Infirmary Health Systems, Inc., (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
$ 7,590,000
10,500,000 J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., 5.316%, 8/2/2006
10,500,000
2,400,000 K-O-I Warehouse, Inc.; Hamlet Auto Parts, Inc.; Kentucky Motor Services, Inc.; Mad River Auto Parts, Inc.; Ezzel Parts Exchange, Inc., (Series 1998), (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
2,400,000
6,000,000 Kansas City, MO IDA, West Edge Project, (Series 2006), (Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee LOC), 5.418%, 8/2/2006
6,000,000
5,000,000 2,3 Los Angeles, CA, MERLOTS (Series 2000 A) (H&H Theatre), (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/2/2006
5,000,000
5,000,000 Louisiana Agricultural Finance Authority, Lacassive Syrup Mill, (Series 2004), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
6,000,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., Howard Industries, Inc., (Series 1999), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
6,000,000
1,400,000 Racetrac Capital LLC, (Series 2000), (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006
1,400,000
6,910,000 Rollins College, (Series 1998), (SunTrust Bank LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
6,910,000
3,151,000 Sandridge Food Corp., (National City Bank, Ohio LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
3,151,000
3,900,000 South Pittsburg, TN IDB, Lodge Manufacturing Co. Project, (Series 1999), (SunTrust Bank LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
3,900,000
10,000,000 Svenska Handelsbanken, Stockholm, 5.286%, 8/3/2006
9,999,656
10,000,000 2,3 Union Hamilton Special Purpose Funding LLC, (Series 2005-1) Tranche #1, (Wachovia Corp., GTD), 5.424%, 9/21/2006
10,000,000
20,000,000 Wells Fargo & Co., 5.396%, 8/2/2006
20,000,000
20,000,000 2,3 Westpac Banking Corp. Ltd., Sydney, 5.339%, 8/16/2006
20,000,000
4,600,000 White Hydraulics, Inc., (Series 1999), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006


4,600,000

   TOTAL


333,038,565

Brokerage--11.1%
45,290,000 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.307% - 5.386%, 8/1/2006 - 8/7/2006
45,290,000
29,500,000 2,3 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.389%, 8/15/2006
29,502,918
10,000,000 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Promissory Note, 5.375%, 8/8/2006
10,000,000
41,000,000 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.185% - 5.394%, 8/4/2006 - 8/29/2006
41,000,000
35,000,000 2,3 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.599%, 8/11/2006
35,000,000
120,000,000 Morgan Stanley, 5.363% - 5.468%, 8/1/2006 - 8/28/2006


120,000,000

   TOTAL


280,792,918

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 5
Electrical Equipment--0.7%
$ 17,300,240 Northwest Airlines, Inc., (General Electric Co., GTD), 5.330%, 8/7/2006

$
17,300,240

Finance - Commercial--1.3%
32,400,000 2,3 General Electric Capital Corp., 5.469% - 5.470%, 8/9/2006 - 8/17/2006


32,400,000

Finance - Retail--3.3%
49,000,000 2,3 Compass Securitization LLC, 5.300% - 5.324%, 8/10/2006 - 8/18/2006
48,993,745
34,000,000 2,3 Paradigm Funding LLC, 5.297% - 5.345%, 8/7/2006 - 8/25/2006


34,000,000

   TOTAL


82,993,745

Finance - Securities--2.0%
4,000,000 2,3 Beta Finance, Inc., 5.189%, 8/22/2006
4,000,287
33,000,000 2,3 K2 (USA) LLC, (K2 Corp., GTD), 5.300% - 5.445%, 8/10/2006 - 10/25/2006
32,994,915
14,000,000 2,3 Sigma Finance, Inc., (Sigma Finance Corp., GTD), 5.311% - 5.329%, 8/1/2006 - 8/15/2006


13,999,954

   TOTAL


50,995,156

Government Agency--0.7%
780,000 Alabama HFA MFH, Turtle Lake Project (Series 2000-B), (FNMA LOC), 5.470%, 8/3/2006
780,000
7,000,000 Direct One Funding Corp., (FNMA LOC), 5.320%, 8/3/2006
7,000,000
3,650,000 Kentucky EDFA, Henderson County Health Care Corp., (FHLB of Cincinnati LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
3,650,000
3,180,000 Lexington Fayette, KY, (Series 2001), (FHLB of Cincinnati LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
3,180,000
4,000,000 Louisiana PFA, Emberwood Apt. Complex, (Series 2003B), (FNMA LOC), 5.460%, 8/3/2006


4,000,000

   TOTAL


18,610,000

Insurance--2.9%
15,000,000 Genworth Life Insurance Co., 5.256% - 5.321%, 8/9/2006 - 9/1/2006
15,000,000
5,000,000 Hartford Life Global Funding Trust, 5.349%, 8/15/2006
5,000,000
53,000,000 Monumental Life Insurance Co., 5.367% - 5.520%, 8/1/2006 - 8/14/2006


53,000,000

   TOTAL


73,000,000

Municipal--1.4%
37,000,000 Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund Finance Corp., 5.379%, 8/15/2006


37,000,000

Pharmaceuticals & Health Care--0.4%
10,000,000 2,3 Eli Lilly Services, Inc., (Eli Lilly & Co., GTD), 5.316%, 8/1/2006


10,000,000

   TOTAL NOTES - VARIABLE


936,130,624

Shares or Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

MUTUAL FUND--0.4%
Asset Management--0.4%
10,000,000 AIM Short-Term Investments Co. Liquid Assets Portfolio

$
10,000,000

TIME DEPOSIT--2.2% 1
Banking--2.2%
$ 55,000,000 Toronto Dominion Bank, 5.313%, 8/1/2006


55,000,000

REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--7.1%
154,464,000 Interest in $3,200,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Bank of America N.A. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/1/2035 for $3,200,470,222 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $3,264,000,000.
154,464,000
25,000,000 Interest in $850,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. will repurchase a U.S. Treasury security maturing on 1/15/2011 for $850,123,958 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying security at the end of the period was $868,259,653.


25,000,000

   TOTAL REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS


179,464,000

   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--100.1%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 6



2,539,672,576

   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--(0.1)%


(2,011,211
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
2,537,661,365

1 Discount rate at time of purchase, or the coupon for interest bearing issues.

2 Denotes a restricted security that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) is subject to a contractual restriction on public sales. At July 31, 2006, these restricted securities amounted to $864,228,396, which represented 34.1% of total net assets.

3 Denotes a restricted security that may be resold without restriction to "qualified institutional buyers" as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and that the Fund has determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Fund's Board of Trustees. At July 31, 2006, these liquid restricted securities amounted to $864,228,396, which represented 34.1% of total net assets.

4 Reflects potential extension period.

5 Floating rate note with current rate and next reset date shown.

6 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

EDFA --Economic Development Financing Authority
FHLB --Federal Home Loan Bank
FNMA --Federal National Mortgage Association
GTD --Guaranteed
HFA --Housing Finance Authority
IDB --Industrial Development Bond
LOC --Letter of Credit
MERLOTS --Municipal Exempt Receipts - Liquidity Optional Tender Series
MFH --Multifamily Housing
PFA --Public Facility Authority
SWP --Swap Agreement

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

July 31, 2006

Assets:
      
Total investments in securities, at amortized cost and value
$ 2,539,672,576
Income receivable
8,952,723
Receivable for shares sold





2,760,208

   TOTAL ASSETS





2,551,385,507

Liabilities:
Payable for investments purchased
$ 9,000,000
Payable for shares redeemed
2,287,764
Income distribution payable
779,947
Payable to bank
634,197
Payable for distribution services fee (Note 5)
59,978
Payable for shareholder services fee (Note 5)
545,846
Accrued expenses


416,410




   TOTAL LIABILITIES





13,724,142

Net assets for 2,537,637,990 shares outstanding




$
2,537,661,365

Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 2,537,648,866
Undistributed net investment income





12,499

   TOTAL NET ASSETS




$
2,537,661,365

Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds Per Share:
Institutional Service Shares:
$2,096,217,647 ÷ 2,096,171,675 shares outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$1.00

Cash II Shares:
$441,443,718 ÷ 441,466,315 shares outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$1.00

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Operations

Year Ended July 31, 2006

Investment Income:
         
Interest









$
110,838,929
Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
$ 12,447,882
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
1,982,374
Account administration fee--Cash II Shares
964
Custodian fees
132,624
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
2,073,817
Directors'/Trustees' fees
21,096
Auditing fees
16,436
Legal fees
7,803
Portfolio accounting fees
176,350
Distribution services fee--Cash II Shares (Note 5)
1,575,795
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Service Shares (Note 5)
4,637,319
Shareholder services fee--Cash II Shares (Note 5)
1,574,225
Share registration costs
56,962
Printing and postage
45,031
Insurance premiums
19,639
Miscellaneous






14,705




   TOTAL EXPENSES






24,783,022




Waivers (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
$ (6,905,609 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(85,317 )
Waiver of distribution services fee--Cash II Shares
(548,095 )
Waiver of shareholder services fee--Institutional Service Shares


(84,209
)







   TOTAL WAIVERS






(7,623,230
)



Net expenses










17,159,792
Net investment income









$
93,679,137

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

Year Ended July 31
   

2006

   

2005

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income

$
93,679,137


$
41,463,408

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income
Institutional Service Shares
(71,511,526 ) (31,145,047 )
Cash II Shares


(22,161,563
)


(10,396,625
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS


(93,673,089
)


(41,541,672
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
11,104,344,302 11,958,688,286
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
87,985,468 36,381,160
Cost of shares redeemed


(11,027,557,189
)


(12,039,534,627
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


164,772,581



(44,465,181
)
Change in net assets


164,778,629



(44,543,445
)
Net Assets:
Beginning of period


2,372,882,736



2,417,426,181

End of period (including undistributed net investment income of $12,499 and $6,451, respectively)

$
2,537,661,365


$
2,372,882,736

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

July 31, 2006

1. ORGANIZATION

Money Market Obligations Trust (the "Trust") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust consists of 41 portfolios. The financial statements included herein are only those of Automated Cash Management Trust (the "Fund"). The financial statements of the other portfolios are presented separately. The assets of each portfolio are segregated and a shareholder's interest is limited to the portfolio in which shares are held. The Fund offers two classes of shares: Institutional Service Shares and Cash II Shares. All shares of the Fund have equal rights with respect to voting, except on class-specific matters. The investment objective of the Fund is to provide stability of principal and current income consistent with stability of principal.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America.

Investment Valuation

The Fund uses the amortized cost method to value its portfolio securities in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act.

Repurchase Agreements

It is the policy of the Fund to require the other party to a repurchase agreement to transfer to the Fund's custodian or sub-custodian eligible securities or cash with a market value (after transaction costs) at least equal to the repurchase price to be paid under the repurchase agreement. The eligible securities are transferred to accounts with the custodian or sub-custodian in which the Fund holds a "securities entitlement" and exercises "control" as those terms are defined in the Uniform Commercial Code. The Fund has established procedures for monitoring the market value of the transferred securities and requiring the transfer of additional eligible securities if necessary to equal at least the repurchase price. These procedures also allow the other party to require securities to be transferred from the account to the extent that their market value exceeds the repurchase price or in exchange for other eligible securities of equivalent market value.

With respect to agreements to repurchase U.S. government securities and cash items, the Fund treats the repurchase agreement as an investment in the underlying securities and not as an obligation of the other party to the repurchase agreement. Other repurchase agreements are treated as obligations of the other party secured by the underlying securities. Nevertheless, the insolvency of the other party or other failure to repurchase the securities may delay the disposition of the underlying securities or cause the Fund to receive less than the full repurchase price. Under the terms of the repurchase agreement, any amounts received by the Fund in excess of the repurchase price and related transaction costs must be remitted to the other party.

The Fund may enter into repurchase agreements in which eligible securities are transferred into joint trading accounts maintained by the custodian or sub-custodian for investment companies and other clients advised by the Fund's adviser and its affiliates. The Fund will participate on a pro rata basis with the other investment companies and clients in its share of the securities transferred under such repurchase agreements and in its share of proceeds from any repurchase or other disposition of such securities.

Investment Income, Expenses and Distributions

Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income are declared daily and paid monthly. Non-cash dividends included in dividend income, if any, are recorded at fair value. Investment income and certain fund-level expenses are allocated to each class based on relative average daily net assets, except that each class bears certain expenses unique to that class such as distribution and shareholder services fees. Dividends are declared separately for each class. No class has preferential dividend rights; differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses.

Premium and Discount Amortization

All premiums and discounts are amortized/accreted.

Federal Taxes

It is the Fund's policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary.

On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released FASB Interpretation No. 48 "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken in the course of preparing the fund's tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are "more-likely-than-not" of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax benefits of positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax expense in the current year. Adoption of FIN 48 is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the effective date. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FIN 48 and its impact in the financial statements has not yet been determined.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

The Fund may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Fund records when-issued securities on the trade date and maintains security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Restricted Securities

Restricted securities are securities that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) are subject to contractual restrictions on public sales. In some cases, when a security cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, the issuer of the restricted security has agreed to register such securities for resale, at the issuer's expense, either upon demand by the Fund or in connection with another registered offering of the securities. Many such restricted securities may be resold in the secondary market in transactions exempt from registration. Restricted securities may be determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Fund's Board of Trustees. The Fund will not incur any registration costs upon such resales. Restricted securities are valued at amortized cost in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

Other

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST

The following tables summarize share activity:

Year Ended July 31

2006

2005
Institutional Service Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
5,590,438,446 $ 5,590,438,446 4,805,936,524 $ 4,805,936,524
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
67,854,660 67,854,660 27,840,375 27,840,375
Shares redeemed

(5,246,019,245
)


(5,246,019,245
)

(4,981,955,983
)


(4,981,955,983
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SERVICE SHARE TRANSACTIONS


412,273,861


$
412,273,861


(148,179,084
)

$
(148,179,084
)
Year Ended July 31

2006

2005
Cash II Shares:

Shares



Amount


Shares



Amount

Shares sold
5,513,905,856 $ 5,513,905,856 7,152,751,762 $ 7,152,751,762
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
20,130,808 20,130,808 8,540,785 8,540,785
Shares redeemed

(5,781,537,944
)


(5,781,537,944
)

(7,057,578,644
)


(7,057,578,644
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM CASH II SHARE TRANSACTIONS


(247,501,280
)

$
(247,501,280
)

103,713,903


$
103,713,903

   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

164,772,581


$
164,772,581


(44,465,181
)

$
(44,465,181
)

4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

The tax character of distributions as reported on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended July 31, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:


   
2006
   
2005
Ordinary income 1

$93,673,089

$41,541,672

1 For tax purposes short-term capital gain distributions are considered ordinary income distributions.

As of July 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed ordinary income
   
$
792,446

Dividend payable--current year end
   
$
(779,947
)

5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

Federated Investment Management Company, the Fund's investment adviser (the "Adviser"), receives for its services an annual investment adviser fee equal to 0.50% of the Fund's average daily net assets. The Adviser may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. The Adviser can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the Adviser voluntarily waived $6,905,609 of its fee.

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Fund with administrative personnel and services. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average aggregate daily net assets of certain Federated funds as specified below:

Maximum
Administrative Fee

   
Average Aggregate Daily Net Assets
of the Federated Funds

0.150%

on the first $5 billion
0.125%

on the next $5 billion
0.100%

on the next $10 billion
0.075%

on assets in excess of $20 billion

The administrative fee received during any fiscal year shall be at least $150,000 per portfolio and $40,000 per each additional class of Shares. FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FAS can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the net fee paid to FAS was 0.076% of average aggregate daily net assets of the Fund.

Distribution Services Fee

The Fund has adopted a Distribution Plan (the "Plan") pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act. Under the terms of the Plan, the Fund will compensate Federated Securities Corp. (FSC), the principal distributor, from the daily net assets of the Fund's Cash II Shares to finance activities intended to result in the sale of these Shares. The Plan provides that the Fund may incur distribution expenses of 0.25% of average daily net assets, annually, to compensate FSC. FSC may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FSC can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSC voluntarily waived $548,095 of its fee. Rather than paying financial intermediaries directly, the Fund may pay fees to FSC and FSC will use the fees to compensate financial intermediaries. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSC retained $90,332 of fees paid by the Fund.

Shareholder Services Fee

The Fund may pay fees (Service Fees) up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Fund's Institutional Service Shares and Cash II Shares to financial intermediaries or to Federated Shareholder Services Company (FSSC) for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. FSSC or these financial intermediaries may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of their fee. In addition, FSSC may voluntarily reimburse the Fund for shareholder services fees. This voluntary waiver and/or reimbursement can be modified or terminated at any time. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC voluntarily waived $84,209 of its fee. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC did not receive any fees paid by the Fund.

General

Certain of the Officers and Trustees of the Fund are Officers and Directors or Trustees of the above companies.

6. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning in October 2003, Federated Investors, Inc. and various subsidiaries thereof (including the advisers and distributor for various investment companies, collectively, "Federated"), along with various investment companies sponsored by Federated ("Funds") were named as defendants in several class action lawsuits now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuits were purportedly filed on behalf of people who purchased, owned and/or redeemed shares of Federated-sponsored mutual funds during specified periods beginning November 1, 1998. The suits are generally similar in alleging that Federated engaged in illegal and improper trading practices including market timing and late trading in concert with certain institutional traders, which allegedly caused financial injury to the mutual fund shareholders. These lawsuits began to be filed shortly after Federated's first public announcement that it had received requests for information on shareholder trading activities in the Funds from the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), the Office of the New York State Attorney General ("NYAG"), and other authorities. In that regard, on November 28, 2005, Federated announced that it had reached final settlements with the SEC and the NYAG with respect to those matters. As Federated previously reported in 2004, it has already paid approximately $8.0 million to certain funds as determined by an independent consultant. As part of these settlements, Federated agreed to pay for the benefit of fund shareholders additional disgorgement and a civil money penalty in the aggregate amount of an additional $72 million. Federated and various Funds have also been named as defendants in several additional lawsuits, the majority of which are now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging, among other things, excessive advisory and Rule 12b-1 fees. The Board of the Funds has retained the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro LLP to represent the Funds in these lawsuits. Federated and the Funds, and their respective counsel, are reviewing the allegations and intend to defend this litigation. Additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations may be filed in the future. The potential impact of these lawsuits, all of which seek unquantified damages, attorneys' fees and expenses, and future potential similar suits is uncertain. Although we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Funds, there can be no assurance that these suits, the ongoing adverse publicity and/or other developments resulting from the regulatory investigations will not result in increased Fund redemptions, reduced sales of Fund shares, or other adverse consequences for the Funds.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONEY MARKET OBLIGATIONS TRUST AND SHAREHOLDERS OF AUTOMATED CASH MANAGEMENT TRUST:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Automated Cash Management Trust (the "Fund") (one of the portfolios constituting Money Market Obligations Trust), including the portfolio of investments, as of July 31, 2006, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statement of changes in net assets and the financial highlights for each of the two years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. The financial highlights for each of the three years in the period ended July 31, 2004 were audited by another independent registered public accounting firm whose report, dated September 17, 2004, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial highlights.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of July 31, 2006, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Automated Cash Management Trust, a portfolio of the Money Market Obligations Trust, at July 31, 2006, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets and the financial highlights for each of the two years in the period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
September 12, 2006

Board of Trustees and Trust Officers

The Board is responsible for managing the Trust's business affairs and for exercising all the Trust's powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Board member and the senior officers of the Fund. Where required, the tables separately list Board members who are "interested persons" of the Fund (i.e., "Interested" Board members) and those who are not (i.e., "Independent" Board members). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is Federated Investors Tower, 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA. As of December 31, 2005, the Trust comprised 41 portfolios, and the Federated Fund Complex consisted of 43 investment companies (comprising 136 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Board member oversees all portfolios in the Federated Fund Complex and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund's Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trust Trustees and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John F. Donahue*
Birth Date: July 28, 1924
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex's Executive Committee.

Previous Positions
: Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex; Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Chairman and Director, Federated Investment Counseling.



J. Christopher Donahue*
Birth Date: April 11, 1949
PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1999
Principal Occupations : Principal Executive Officer and President of the Federated Fund Complex; Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company; Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman, Federated Equity Management Company of Pennsylvania and Passport Research, Ltd. (Investment advisory subsidiary of Federated); Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director, Federated Services Company.

Previous Positions
: President, Federated Investment Counseling; President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D.*
Birth Date: October 11, 1932
3471 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1111
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Medical Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Downtown; Hematologist, Oncologist and Internist, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Other Directorships
Held : Member, National Board of Trustees, Leukemia Society of America.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, University of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.



* Family relationships and reasons for "interested" status: John F. Donahue is the father of J. Christopher Donahue; both are "interested" due to the positions they hold with Federated Investors, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D. is "interested" because his son-in-law is employed by the Fund's principal underwriter, Federated Securities Corp.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Thomas G. Bigley
Birth Date: February 3, 1934
15 Old Timber Trail
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: November 1994
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Member of Executive Committee, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh.

Previous Position
: Senior Partner, Ernst & Young LLP.



John T. Conroy, Jr.
Birth Date: June 23, 1937
Investment Properties Corporation
3838 North Tamiami Trail
Suite 402
Naples, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman of the Board, Investment Properties Corporation; Partner or Trustee in private real estate ventures in Southwest Florida.

Previous Positions
: President, Investment Properties Corporation; Senior Vice President, John R. Wood and Associates, Inc., Realtors; President, Naples Property Management, Inc. and Northgate Village Development Corporation.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Nicholas P. Constantakis
Birth Date: September 3, 1939
175 Woodshire Drive
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Michael Baker Corporation (engineering and energy services worldwide).

Previous Position
: Partner, Andersen Worldwide SC.



John F. Cunningham
Birth Date: March 5, 1943
353 El Brillo Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Director, WinsorTech.

Other Directorships Held
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cunningham & Co., Inc. (strategic business consulting); Trustee Associate, Boston College.

Previous Positions
: Director, Redgate Communications and EMC Corporation (computer storage systems); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Computer Consoles, Inc.; President and Chief Operating Officer, Wang Laboratories; Director, First National Bank of Boston; Director, Apollo Computer, Inc.



Peter E. Madden
Birth Date: March 16, 1942
One Royal Palm Way
100 Royal Palm Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Board of Overseers, Babson College.

Previous Positions
: Representative, Commonwealth of Massachusetts General Court; President, State Street Bank and Trust Company and State Street Corporation (retired); Director, VISA USA and VISA International; Chairman and Director, Massachusetts Bankers Association; Director, Depository Trust Corporation; Director, The Boston Stock Exchange.



Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.
Birth Date: April 10, 1945
80 South Road
Westhampton Beach, NY
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Management Consultant.

Previous Positions
: Chief Executive Officer, PBTC International Bank; Partner, Arthur Young & Company (now Ernst & Young LLP); Chief Financial Officer of Retail Banking Sector, Chase Manhattan Bank; Senior Vice President, HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank); Vice President, Citibank; Assistant Professor of Banking and Finance, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University; Executive Vice President DVC Group, Inc.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John E. Murray, Jr., J.D., S.J.D.
Birth Date: December 20, 1932
Chancellor, Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1995
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee, and Chairman of the Board of Directors or Trustees, of the Federated Fund Complex; Chancellor and Law Professor, Duquesne University; Partner, Murray, Hogue & Lannis.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Michael Baker Corp. (engineering, construction, operations and technical services).

Previous Positions
: President, Duquesne University; Dean and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Dean and Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law.



Marjorie P. Smuts
Birth Date: June 21, 1935
4905 Bayard Street
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Public Relations/Marketing Consultant/Conference Coordinator.

Previous Positions
: National Spokesperson, Aluminum Company of America; television producer; President, Marj Palmer Assoc.; Owner, Scandia Bord.



John S. Walsh
Birth Date: November 28, 1957
2604 William Drive
Valparaiso, IN
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer of construction temporary heaters); President and Director, Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers Products, Inc.

Previous Position
: Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc.



James F. Will
Birth Date: October 12, 1938
Saint Vincent College
Latrobe, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 2006
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chancellor and President, Saint Vincent College.

Other Directorships Held
: Alleghany Corporation.

Previous Positions
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Armco, Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer, Cyclops Industries; President and Chief Operating Officer, Kaiser Steel Corporation.



OFFICERS




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) and Previous Position(s)
John W. McGonigle
Birth Date: October 26, 1938
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND SECRETARY
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Federated Investment Counseling; Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Services Company and Federated Securities Corp.



Richard A. Novak
Birth Date: December 25, 1963
TREASURER
Began serving: January 2006
Principal Occupations : Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Federated Fund Complex; Senior Vice President, Federated Administrative Services; Financial and Operations Principal for Federated Securities Corp., Edgewood Services, Inc. and Southpointe Distribution Services, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Vice President, Finance of Federated Services Company ; Controller of Federated Investors, Inc.; held various financial management positions within The Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh; Auditor, Arthur Andersen & Co .



Richard B. Fisher
Birth Date: May 17, 1923
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Vice Chairman or Vice President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman, Federated Securities Corp.

Previous Positions
: President and Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Executive Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc. and Director and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Securities Corp.



Brian P. Bouda
Birth Date: February 28, 1947
CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER AND
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: August 2004
Principal Occupations : Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of Federated Investors, Inc.; and Chief Compliance Officer of its subsidiaries. Mr. Bouda joined Federated in 1999 and is a member of the American Bar Association and the State Bar Association of Wisconsin.



Deborah A. Cunningham
Birth Date: September 15, 1959
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations: Deborah A. Cunningham was named Chief Investment Officer of money market products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1981 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1997. Ms. Cunningham is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.S.B.A. in Finance from Robert Morris College.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) and Previous Position(s)
Mary Jo Ochson
Birth Date: September 12, 1953
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
AND VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: November 1998
Principal Occupations : Mary Jo Ochson was named Chief Investment Officer of tax-exempt, fixed-income products in 2004 and is a Vice President of the Trust. She joined Federated in 1982 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Pittsburgh.



Susan R. Hill
Birth Date: June 20, 1963
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Susan R. Hill is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Hill joined Federated in 1990 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 2003 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 2005. Ms. Hill was a Portfolio Manager from 1994 until 2003, and served as Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1997 until 2004 and an Assistant Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1994 until 1997. Ms. Hill is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received an M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University.



Jeff A. Kozemchak
Birth Date: January 15, 1960
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Jeff A. Kozemchak is Vice President of the Trust. Mr. Kozemchak joined Federated in 1987 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 1996 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1999. He was a Portfolio Manager until 1996 and a Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Kozemchak is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received his M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University in 1987.



Paige M. Wilhelm
Birth Date: May 28, 1962
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: August 2006
Principal Occupations : Paige M. Wilhelm is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Wilhelm joined Federated in 1985 and has been a Senior Vice President and a Senior Portfolio Manager. She is responsible for portfolio management and research in the fixed-income area concentrating on taxable money market instruments. Previous associations include Senior Credit Analyst, Federated Investors; Performance Analysis Supervisor; Performance Analyst, Federated Investment Counseling. Ms. Wilhelm is a member of the CFA Society of Pittsburgh and received her B.S. from Indiana University and her M.B.A. from Duquesne University.



Evaluation and Approval of Advisory Contract

AUTOMATED CASH MANAGEMENT TRUST (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was below the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements was above the median of the relevant peer group.

At the Senior Officer's recommendation, the Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser. After discussion regarding peer group classification, the Board was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

Voting Proxies of Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies, if any, relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Federated's website. Go to FederatedInvestors.com, select "Products," select the "Prospectuses and Regulatory Reports" link, then select the Fund to access the link to Form N-PX. This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

The Fund files with the SEC a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on "Form N-Q." These filings are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.) You may also access this information from the "Products" section of the Federated Investors website at FederatedInvestors.com by clicking on "Portfolio Holdings" and selecting the name of the Fund, or by selecting the name of the Fund and clicking on "Portfolio Holdings." You must register on the website the first time you wish to access this information.

Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board, or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal. Although money market funds seek to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share, there is no assurance that they will be able to do so.

This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the Fund's prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses, and other information.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Automated Cash Management Trust
Federated Investors Funds
5800 Corporate Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15237-7000
Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.

Federated Securities Corp., Distributor

Cusip 60934N831
Cusip 60934N864

25698 (9/06)

Federated is a registered mark of Federated Investors, Inc. 2006 (c)Federated Investors, Inc.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Automated Government Money Trust

A Portfolio of Money Market Obligations Trust



ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT

July 31, 2006

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
SHAREHOLDER EXPENSE EXAMPLE
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS SUMMARY TABLES
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND TRUST OFFICERS
EVALUATION AND APPROVAL OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
VOTING PROXIES ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

Not FDIC Insured * May Lose Value * No Bank Guarantee

Federated Investors 50 Years of Growth & Innovation

Financial Highlights

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended July 31,
   
2006

   
2005

   
2004

   
2003

   
2002

Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.037 0.017 0.005 0.008 0.018
Net realized gain on investments

--


--


0.000
1

0.001


0.001

   TOTAL FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS

0.037


0.017


0.005


0.009


0.019

Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income
(0.037 ) (0.017 ) (0.005 ) (0.008 ) (0.018 )
Distributions from net realized gain on investments

--


--


(0.000
) 1

(0.001
)

(0.001
)
   TOTAL DISTRIBUTIONS

(0.037
)

(0.017
)

(0.005
)

(0.009
)

(0.019
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$1.00


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00

Total Return 2

3.78
%

1.72
%

0.47
%

0.90
%

1.81
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:















Net expenses

0.59
%

0.59
%

0.59
%

0.59
%

0.59
%
Net investment income

3.62
%

1.68
%

0.45
%

0.85
%

1.75
%
Expense waiver/reimbursement 3

0.28
%

0.30
%

0.30
%

0.29
%

0.27
%
Supplemental Data:















Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$530,728


$800,984


$856,598


$1,093,524


$1,329,998

1 Represents less than $0.001.

2 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

3 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees; to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees and/or shareholder services fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you to understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from February 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006.

ACTUAL EXPENSES

The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES

The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund's actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund's actual return. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are required to be provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund with other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.


   
Beginning
Account Value
2/1/2006

   
Ending
Account Value
7/31/2006

   
Expenses Paid
During Period

1
Actual

$1,000

$1,020.90

$2.96

Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return before expenses)

$1,000

$1,021.87

$2.96

1 Expenses are equal to the Fund's annualized net expense ratio of 0.59%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).

Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:





   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Repurchase Agreements

95.9
%
U.S. Treasury Securities

4.2
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(0.1
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:



   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

94.8
%
8-30 Days

0.0
%
31-90 Days

0.0
%
91-180 Days

4.1
%
181 Days or more

1.2
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(0.1
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

1 See the Fund's Prospectus for a description of the principal types of securities in which the Fund invests.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

U.S. TREASURY--4.2%
U.S. Treasury Notes--4.2%
$ 5,500,000 United States Treasury Notes, 2.500%, 10/31/2006
$ 5,477,406
10,250,000 United States Treasury Notes, 2.875%, 11/30/2006
10,196,372
6,500,000 United States Treasury Notes, 3.125%, 1/31/2007


6,453,740

   TOTAL U.S. TREASURY


22,127,518

REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--95.9%
88,241,000 Interest in $2,323,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006, under which BNP Paribas Securities Corp. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2036 for $2,323,338,771 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $2,369,460,967.
88,241,000
105,000,000 Interest in $1,500,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.26%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Bear Stearns & Co., Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 5/15/2016 for $1,500,219,167 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,557,996,728.
105,000,000
5,000,000 Interest in $100,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.15%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2021 for $100,014,306 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $102,000,718.
5,000,000
105,000,000 Interest in $1,350,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006, under which J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2036 for $1,350,196,875 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,377,001,350.
105,000,000
105,000,000 Interest in $850,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. will repurchase a U.S. Treasury security maturing on 1/15/2011 for $850,123,958 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying security at the end of the period was $868,259,653.
105,000,000
5,000,000 Interest in $100,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.15%, dated 7/31/2006, under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase a U.S. Treasury security maturing on 12/15/2010 for $100,014,306 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying security at the end of the period was $102,001,058.
5,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--continued
$ 6,000,000 1 Interest in $244,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.20%, dated 6/1/2006, under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2015 for $250,344,000 on 11/29/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $251,133,204.
$ 6,000,000
90,000,000 Interest in $1,850,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006, under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 5/15/2021 for $1,850,269,792 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,887,004,311.


90,000,000

   TOTAL REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS


509,241,000

   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--100.1%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 2



531,368,518

   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--(0.1)%


(640,505
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
530,728,013

1 Although the repurchase date is more than seven days after the date of purchase, the Fund has the right to terminate the repurchase agreement at any time with seven-days' notice.

2 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

July 31, 2006

Assets:
      
Investments in repurchase agreements
$ 509,241,000
Investments in securities


22,127,518




Total investments in securities, at amortized cost and value
$ 531,368,518
Cash
105,329
Income receivable
210,611
Receivable for shares sold





187,215

   TOTAL ASSETS





531,871,673

Liabilities:
Payable for shares redeemed
13,133
Income distribution payable
924,894
Payable for Directors'/Trustees' fees
541
Payable for transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
69,912
Payable for shareholder services fee (Note 5)
104,275
Accrued expenses


30,905




   TOTAL LIABILITIES





1,143,660

Net assets for 530,732,392 shares outstanding




$
530,728,013

Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 530,730,403
Distributions in excess of net investment income





(2,390
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS




$
530,728,013

Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds Per Share:
$530,728,013 ÷ 530,732,392 shares outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$1.00

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Operations

Year Ended July 31, 2006

Investment Income:
         
Interest









$
28,216,644
Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
$ 3,344,961
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
532,784
Account administration fee
4,177
Custodian fees
39,661
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
304,880
Directors'/Trustees' fees
6,756
Auditing fees
16,436
Legal fees
6,986
Portfolio accounting fees
104,861
Shareholder services fee (Note 5)
1,363,612
Share registration costs
38,405
Printing and postage
18,188
Insurance premiums
11,577
Miscellaneous






17,983




   TOTAL EXPENSES






5,811,267




Waivers (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
$ (1,790,994 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(23,012 )
Waiver of shareholder services fee


(17,574
)







   TOTAL WAIVERS






(1,831,580
)



Net expenses










3,979,687
Net investment income









$
24,236,957

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

Year Ended July 31
   

2006

   

2005

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income

$
24,236,957


$
13,908,921

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income


(24,245,137
)


(13,909,324
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
3,518,350,577 4,492,706,349
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
13,859,150 8,185,540
Cost of shares redeemed


(3,802,457,095
)


(4,556,505,939
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


(270,247,368
)


(55,614,050
)
Change in net assets


(270,255,548
)


(55,614,453
)
Net Assets:
Beginning of period


800,983,561



856,598,014

End of period (including undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income of $(2,390) and $5,790, respectively)

$
530,728,013


$
800,983,561

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

July 31, 2006

1. ORGANIZATION

Money Market Obligations Trust (the "Trust") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust consists of 41 portfolios. The financial statements included herein are only those of Automated Government Money Trust (the "Fund"), a diversified portfolio. The financial statements of the other portfolios are presented separately. The assets of each portfolio are segregated and a shareholder's interest is limited to the portfolio in which shares are held. The primary investment objective of the Fund is stability of principal and current income consistent with stability of principal.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America.

Investment Valuation

The Fund uses the amortized cost method to value its portfolio securities in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act.

Repurchase Agreements

It is the policy of the Fund to require the other party to a repurchase agreement to transfer to the Fund's custodian or sub-custodian eligible securities or cash with a market value (after transaction costs) at least equal to the repurchase price to be paid under the repurchase agreement. The eligible securities are transferred to accounts with the custodian or sub-custodian in which the Fund holds a "securities entitlement" and exercises "control" as those terms are defined in the Uniform Commercial Code. The Fund has established procedures for monitoring the market value of the transferred securities and requiring the transfer of additional eligible securities if necessary to equal at least the repurchase price. These procedures also allow the other party to require securities to be transferred from the account to the extent that their market value exceeds the repurchase price or in exchange for other eligible securities of equivalent market value.

With respect to agreements to repurchase U.S. government securities and cash items, the Fund treats the repurchase agreement as an investment in the underlying securities and not as an obligation of the other party to the repurchase agreement. Other repurchase agreements are treated as obligations of the other party secured by the underlying securities. Nevertheless, the insolvency of the other party or other failure to repurchase the securities may delay the disposition of the underlying securities or cause the Fund to receive less than the full repurchase price. Under the terms of the repurchase agreement, any amounts received by the Fund in excess of the repurchase price and related transaction costs must be remitted to the other party.

The Fund may enter into repurchase agreements in which eligible securities are transferred into joint trading accounts maintained by the custodian or sub-custodian for investment companies and other clients advised by the Fund's adviser and its affiliates. The Fund will participate on a pro rata basis with the other investment companies and clients in its share of the securities transferred under such repurchase agreements and in its share of proceeds from any repurchase or other disposition of such securities.

Investment Income, Expenses and Distributions

Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income are declared daily and paid monthly.

Premium and Discount Amortization

All premiums and discounts are amortized/accreted for financial statement purposes.

Federal Taxes

It is the Fund's policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary.

On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released FASB Interpretation No. 48 "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken in the course of preparing the fund's tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are "more-likely-than-not" of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax benefits of positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax expense in the current year. Adoption of FIN 48 is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the effective date. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FIN 48 and its impact in the financial statements has not yet been determined.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

The Fund may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Fund records when-issued securities on the trade date and maintains security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

Other

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST

The following table summarizes share activity:

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

Shares sold
3,518,350,577 4,492,706,349
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
13,859,150 8,185,540
Shares redeemed

(3,802,457,095
)

(4,556,505,939
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(270,247,368
)

(55,614,050
)

4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

The tax character of distributions as reported on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended July 31, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:


   
2006
   
2005
Ordinary income 1

$24,245,137

$13,909,324

1 For tax purposes short-term capital gain distributions are considered ordinary income distributions.

As of July 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed ordinary income
   
$
922,504

Dividend payable
   
$
(924,894
)

5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

Federated Investment Management Company, the Fund's investment adviser (the "Adviser"), receives for its services an annual investment adviser fee equal to 0.50% of the Fund's average daily net assets. The Adviser may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. The Adviser can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the Adviser voluntarily waived $1,790,994 of its fee.

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Fund with administrative personnel and services. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average aggregate daily net assets of certain Federated funds as specified below:

Maximum
Administrative Fee



   
Average Aggregate Daily Net Assets
of the Federated Funds

0.150%

on the first $5 billion
0.125%

on the next $5 billion
0.100%

on the next $10 billion
0.075%

on assets in excess of $20 billion

The administrative fee received during any fiscal year shall be at least $150,000 per portfolio and $40,000 per each additional class of Shares. FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FAS can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the net fee paid to FAS was 0.076% of average aggregate daily net assets of the Fund.

Shareholder Services Fee

The Fund may pay fees (Service Fees) up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Fund's Shares to financial intermediaries or to Federated Shareholder Services Company (FSSC) for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. FSSC or these financial intermediaries may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of their fee. In addition, FSSC may voluntarily reimburse the Fund for shareholder services fees. This voluntary waiver and/or reimbursement can be modified or terminated at any time. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC voluntarily waived $17,574 of its shareholder services fees. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC did not receive any fees paid by the Fund.

General

Certain of the Officers and Trustees of the Fund are Officers and Directors or Trustees of the above companies.

6. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning in October 2003, Federated Investors, Inc. and various subsidiaries thereof (including the advisers and distributor for various investment companies, collectively, "Federated"), along with various investment companies sponsored by Federated ("Funds") were named as defendants in several class action lawsuits now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuits were purportedly filed on behalf of people who purchased, owned and/or redeemed shares of Federated-sponsored mutual funds during specified periods beginning November 1, 1998. The suits are generally similar in alleging that Federated engaged in illegal and improper trading practices including market timing and late trading in concert with certain institutional traders, which allegedly caused financial injury to the mutual fund shareholders. These lawsuits began to be filed shortly after Federated's first public announcement that it had received requests for information on shareholder trading activities in the Funds from the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), the Office of the New York State Attorney General ("NYAG"), and other authorities. In that regard, on November 28, 2005, Federated announced that it had reached final settlements with the SEC and the NYAG with respect to those matters. As Federated previously reported in 2004, it has already paid approximately $8.0 million to certain funds as determined by an independent consultant. As part of these settlements, Federated agreed to pay for the benefit of fund shareholders additional disgorgement and a civil money penalty in the aggregate amount of an additional $72 million. Federated and various Funds have also been named as defendants in several additional lawsuits, the majority of which are now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging, among other things, excessive advisory and Rule 12b-1 fees. The Board of the Funds has retained the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro LLP to represent the Funds in these lawsuits. Federated and the Funds, and their respective counsel, are reviewing the allegations and intend to defend this litigation. Additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations may be filed in the future. The potential impact of these lawsuits, all of which seek unquantified damages, attorneys' fees and expenses, and future potential similar suits is uncertain. Although we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Funds, there can be no assurance that these suits, the ongoing adverse publicity and/or other developments resulting from the regulatory investigations will not result in increased Fund redemptions, reduced sales of Fund shares, or other adverse consequences for the Funds.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONEY MARKET OBLIGATIONS TRUST AND SHAREHOLDERS OF AUTOMATED GOVERNMENT MONEY TRUST:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Automated Government Money Trust (the "Fund") (one of the portfolios constituting Money Market Obligations Trust), including the portfolio of investments, as of July 31, 2006, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statement of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of July 31, 2006, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Automated Government Money Trust, a portfolio of Money Market Obligations Trust, at July 31, 2006, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
September 12, 2006

Board of Trustees and Trust Officers

The Board is responsible for managing the Trust's business affairs and for exercising all the Trust's powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Board member and the senior officers of the Funds. Where required, the tables separately list Board members who are "interested persons" of the Fund ( i.e. , "Interested" Board members) and those who are not ( i.e. , "Independent" Board members). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is Federated Investors Tower, 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA. As of December 31, 2005, the Trust comprised 41 portfolios, and the Federated Fund Complex consisted of 43 investment companies (comprising 136 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Board member oversees all portfolios in the Federated Fund Complex and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund's Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trust Trustees and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John F. Donahue*
Birth Date: July 28, 1924
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex's Executive Committee.

Previous Positions
: Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex; Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Chairman and Director, Federated Investment Counseling.



J. Christopher Donahue*
Birth Date: April 11, 1949
PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 1989
Principal Occupations : Principal Executive Officer and President of the Federated Fund Complex; Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company; Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman, Passport Research, Ltd. (Investment advisory subsidiary of Federated); Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director, Federated Services Company.

Previous Positions
: President, Federated Investment Counseling; President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D.*
Birth Date: October 11, 1932
3471 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1111
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Medical Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Downtown; Hematologist, Oncologist and Internist, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Other Directorships Held
: Member, National Board of Trustees, Leukemia Society of America.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, University of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.



* Family relationships and reasons for "interested" status: John F. Donahue is the father of J. Christopher Donahue; both are "interested" due to the positions they hold with Federated Investors, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D. is "interested" because his son-in-law is employed by the Fund's principal underwriter, Federated Securities Corp.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Thomas G. Bigley
Birth Date: February 3, 1934
15 Old Timber Trail
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: November 1994
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Member of Executive Committee, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh.

Previous Position
: Senior Partner, Ernst & Young LLP.



John T. Conroy, Jr.
Birth Date: June 23, 1937
Investment Properties Corporation
3838 North Tamiami Trail
Suite 402
Naples, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman of the Board, Investment Properties Corporation; Partner or Trustee in private real estate ventures in Southwest Florida.

Previous Positions
: President, Investment Properties Corporation; Senior Vice President, John R. Wood and Associates, Inc., Realtors; President, Naples Property Management, Inc. and Northgate Village Development Corporation.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Nicholas P. Constantakis
Birth Date: September 3, 1939
175 Woodshire Drive
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Michael Baker Corporation (engineering and energy services worldwide).

Previous Position
: Partner, Andersen Worldwide SC.



John F. Cunningham
Birth Date: March 5, 1943
353 El Brillo Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Director, WinsorTech.

Other Directorships Held
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cunningham & Co., Inc. (strategic business consulting); Trustee Associate, Boston College.

Previous Positions
: Director, Redgate Communications and EMC Corporation (computer storage systems); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Computer Consoles, Inc.; President and Chief Operating Officer, Wang Laboratories; Director, First National Bank of Boston; Director, Apollo Computer, Inc.



Peter E. Madden
Birth Date: March 16, 1942
One Royal Palm Way
100 Royal Palm Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Board of Overseers, Babson College.

Previous Positions
: Representative, Commonwealth of Massachusetts General Court; President, State Street Bank and Trust Company and State Street Corporation (retired); Director, VISA USA and VISA International; Chairman and Director, Massachusetts Bankers Association; Director, Depository Trust Corporation; Director, The Boston Stock Exchange.



Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.
Birth Date: April 10, 1945
80 South Road
Westhampton Beach, NY
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Management Consultant.

Previous Positions
: Chief Executive Officer, PBTC International Bank; Partner, Arthur Young & Company (now Ernst & Young LLP); Chief Financial Officer of Retail Banking Sector, Chase Manhattan Bank; Senior Vice President, HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank); Vice President, Citibank; Assistant Professor of Banking and Finance, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University; Executive Vice President, DVC Group, Inc.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John E. Murray, Jr., J.D., S.J.D.
Birth Date: December 20, 1932
Chancellor, Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1995
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee, and Chairman of the Board of Directors or Trustees, of the Federated Fund Complex; Chancellor and Law Professor, Duquesne University; Partner, Murray, Hogue & Lannis.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Michael Baker Corp. (engineering, construction, operations and technical services).

Previous Positions
: President, Duquesne University; Dean and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Dean and Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law.



Marjorie P. Smuts
Birth Date: June 21, 1935
4905 Bayard Street
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Public Relations/Marketing Consultant/Conference Coordinator.

Previous Positions
: National Spokesperson, Aluminum Company of America; television producer; President, Marj Palmer Assoc.; Owner, Scandia Bord.



John S. Walsh
Birth Date: November 28, 1957
2604 William Drive
Valparaiso, IN
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer of construction temporary heaters); President and Director, Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers Products, Inc.

Previous Position
: Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc.



James F. Will
Birth Date: October 12, 1938
Saint Vincent College
Latrobe, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 2006
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chancellor and President, Saint Vincent College.

Other Directorships Held
: Alleghany Corporation.

Previous Positions
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Armco, Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer, Cyclops Industries; President and Chief Operating Officer, Kaiser Steel Corporation.



OFFICERS




Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
John W. McGonigle
Birth Date: October 26, 1938
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND SECRETARY
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Federated Investment Counseling; Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Services Company and Federated Securities Corp.



Richard A. Novak
Birth Date: December 25, 1963
TREASURER
Began serving: January 2006
Principal Occupations : Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Federated Fund Complex; Senior Vice President, Federated Administrative Services; Financial and Operations Principal for Federated Securities Corp., Edgewood Services, Inc. and Southpointe Distribution Services, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Vice President, Finance of Federated Services Company; Controller of Federated Investors, Inc.; held various financial management positions within The Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh; Auditor, Arthur Andersen & Co.



Richard B. Fisher
Birth Date: May 17, 1923
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Vice Chairman or Vice President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman, Federated Securities Corp.

Previous Positions
: President and Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Executive Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc. and Director and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Securities Corp.



Brian P. Bouda
Birth Date: February 28, 1947
CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER
Began serving: August 2004
Principal Occupations : Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of Federated Investors, Inc.; and Chief Compliance Officer of its subsidiaries. Mr. Bouda joined Federated in 1999 and is a member of the American Bar Association and the State Bar Association of Wisconsin.



Deborah A. Cunningham
Birth Date: September 15, 1959
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Deborah A. Cunningham was named Chief Investment Officer of money market products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1981 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1997. Ms. Cunningham is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.S.B.A. in Finance from Robert Morris College.



Mary Jo Ochson
Birth Date: September 12, 1953
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Mary Jo Ochson was named Chief Investment Officer of tax-exempt, fixed-income products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1982 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Pittsburgh.






Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
Susan R. Hill
Birth Date: June 20, 1963
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Susan R. Hill has been the Fund's Portfolio Manager since July 1993. Susan R. Hill is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Hill joined Federated in 1990 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 2003 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 2005. Ms. Hill was a Portfolio Manager from 1994 until 2003, and served as Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1997 until 2004 and an Assistant Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1994 until 1997. Ms. Hill is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received an M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University.



Jeff A. Kozemchak
Birth Date: January 15, 1960
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Jeff A. Kozemchak is Vice President of the Trust. Mr. Kozemchak joined Federated in 1987 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 1996 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1999. He was a Portfolio Manager until 1996 and a Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Kozemchak is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received his M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University in 1987.



Paige M. Wilhelm
Birth Date: May 28, 1962
VICE PRESIDENT
Began Serving: August 2006
Paige M. Wilhelm is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Wilhelm joined Federated in 1985 and has been a Senior Vice President and a Senior Portfolio Manager. She is responsible for portfolio management and research in the fixed income area concentrating on taxable money market instruments. Previous associations include Senior Credit Analyst, Federated Investors; Performance Analysis Supervisor; Performance Analyst, Federated Investment Counseling. Ms. Wilhelm is a member of the CFA Society of Pittsburgh and received her B.S. from Indiana University and her M.B.A. from Duquesne University.



Evaluation and Approval of Advisory Contract

Automated Government Money Trust (the "Fund")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was below the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements was above the median of the relevant peer group.

At the Senior Officer's recommendation, the Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser. After discussion regarding peer group classification, the Board was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies, if any, relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Federated's website. Go to FederatedInvestors.com, select "Products," select the "Prospectuses and Regulatory Reports" link, then select the Fund to access the link to Form N-PX. This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

The Fund files with the SEC a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on "Form N-Q." These filings are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.) You may also access this information from the "Products" section of the Federated Investors website at FederatedInvestors.com by clicking on "Portfolio Holdings" and selecting the name of the Fund, or by selecting the name of the Fund and clicking on "Portfolio Holdings." You must register on the website the first time you wish to access this information.

Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board, or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal. Although money market funds seek to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share, there is no assurance that they will be able to do so.

This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the Fund's prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses, and other information.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Automated Government Money Trust
Federated Investors Funds
5800 Corporate Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15237-7000
Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.

Federated Securities Corp., Distributor

Cusip 60934N815

28845 (9/06)

Federated is a registered mark of Federated Investors, Inc. 2006 (c)Federated Investors, Inc.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Federated Government Reserves Fund

A Portfolio of Money Market Obligations Trust



ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT

July 31, 2006

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
SHAREHOLDER EXPENSE EXAMPLE
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS SUMMARY TABLES
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND TRUST OFFICERS
EVALUATION AND APPROVAL OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
VOTING PROXIES ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

Not FDIC Insured * May Lose Value * No Bank Guarantee

Federated Investors 50 Years of Growth & Innovation

Financial Highlights

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)


   
Year Ended
7/31/2006


   
Period
Ended
7/31/2005

1
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$1.00 $1.00
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.034 0.009
Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.034
)

(0.009
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$1.00


$1.00

Total Return 2

3.46
%

0.87
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:






Net expenses

1.00
%

1.00
% 3
Net investment income

3.43
%

2.23
% 3
Expense waiver/reimbursement 4

0.30
%

0.31
% 3
Supplemental Data:






Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$7,623,531


$6,250,822

1 Reflects operations for the period February 25, 2005 (commencement of operations) to July 31, 2005.

2 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

3 Computed on an annualized basis.

4 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees; to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees and/or shareholder services fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you to understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from February 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006.

ACTUAL EXPENSES

The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES

The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund's actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund's actual return. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are required to be provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund with other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.


   
Beginning
Account Value
2/1/2006

   
Ending
Account Value
7/31/2006

   
Expenses Paid
During Period 1

Actual

$1,000

$1,019.40

$5.01
Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return before expenses)

$1,000

$1,019.84

$5.01

1 Expenses are equal to the Fund's annualized net expense ratio of 1.00%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).

Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:


   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Repurchase Agreements

76.6%
U.S. Government Agency Securities

23.3%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

0.1%
   TOTAL

100.0%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:

   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

67.2%
8-30 Days

8.9%
31-90 Days

14.8%
91-180 Days

4.2%
181 Days or more

4.8%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

0.1%
   TOTAL
100.0%

1 See the Fund's Prospectus for a description of the principal types of securities in which the Fund invests.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES--23.3%
$ 35,000,000 1 Federal Farm Credit System Floating Rate Note, 5.216%, 8/1/2006
$ 34,991,472
255,000,000 1 Federal Home Loan Bank System Floating Rate Notes, 5.039% - 5.340%, 8/2/2006 -10/5/2006
254,946,095
226,245,000 Federal Home Loan Bank System Notes, 2.100% - 5.500%, 8/15/2006 - 6/21/2007
225,933,631
212,500,000 2 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Discount Notes, 4.000% - 5.005%, 8/22/2006 - 4/17/2007
207,903,995
567,000,000 1 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Floating Rate Notes, 5.010% - 5.350%, 8/7/2006 - 9/27/2006
566,845,701
198,398,000 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Notes, 2.375% - 5.500%,
8/11/2006 -7/9/2007
197,910,778
24,367,000 2 Federal National Mortgage Association Discount Notes, 5.070%, 9/1/2006
24,260,618
123,000,000 1 Federal National Mortgage Association Floating Rate Notes, 5.330%, 9/28/2006
122,907,774
144,000,000 Federal National Mortgage Association Notes, 3.000% - 5.070%,
9/1/2006 - 6/22/2007


142,822,652
   TOTAL U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES


1,778,522,716
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--76.6%
50,000,000 3 Repurchase agreement 5.280%, dated 7/11/2006 under which Banc of America Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 4/25/2032 for $50,220,000 on 8/10/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $51,658,620.
50,000,000
250,000,000 3 Repurchase agreement 5.323%, dated 7/27/2006 under which Banc of America Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 7/25/2035 for $253,548,333 on 10/31/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $257,688,566.
250,000,000
1,500,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.290%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Bank of America N.A. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 5/1/2036 for $1,500,220,417 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,530,000,001.
1,500,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--continued
$ 1,500,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.290%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Barclays Capital, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 10/6/2015 for $1,500,220,417 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,530,000,762.
$ 1,500,000,000
137,000,000 Interest in $291,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.250%, dated 7/31/2006 under which BNP Paribas Securities Corp. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 1/15/2011 for $137,019,979 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $296,820,001.
137,000,000
1,100,000,000 Repurchase agreement 5.290%, dated 7/31/2006 under which BNP Paribas Securities Corp. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 11/1/2038 for $1,100,161,639 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,128,571,781.
1,100,000,000
700,000,000 Interest in $1,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.290%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Countrywide Securities Corp. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/1/2036 for $700,102,861 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,023,890,091.
700,000,000
500,000,000 3 Repurchase agreement 5.280%, dated 7/14/2006 under which CS First Boston Corp. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/15/2036 for $501,906,667 on 8/9/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $510,004,099.
500,000,000
100,000,000 3 Repurchase agreement 5.310%, dated 6/20/2006 under which Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/1/2035 for $101,062,000 on 8/31/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $102,888,292.

100,000,000
   TOTAL REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS

5,837,000,000
   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--99.9%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 4


7,615,522,716
   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--0.1%

8,008,658
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%
$
7,623,531,374

1 Discount rate at the time of purchase.

2 Floating rate note with current rate and next reset date shown.

3 Although the repurchase date is more than seven days after the date of purchase, the Fund has the right to terminate the repurchase agreement at any time with seven-days' notice.

4 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

July 31, 2006

Assets:
      
Investments in repurchase agreements
$ 5,837,000,000
Investments in securities


1,778,522,716



Total investments in securities, at amortized cost and value
$ 7,615,522,716
Income receivable





14,320,625
   TOTAL ASSETS





7,629,843,341
Liabilities:
Payable to bank
649,961
Payable for distribution services fee (Note 5)
2,896,364
Payable for shareholder services fee (Note 5)
1,602,893
Payable for transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
622,671
Payable for printing and postage fees and expenses
362,189
Accrued expenses


177,889



   TOTAL LIABILITIES





6,311,967
Net assets for 7,623,441,054 shares outstanding




$
7,623,531,374
Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 7,623,441,054
Undistributed net investment income





90,320
   TOTAL NET ASSETS




$
7,623,531,374
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds per Share:
$7,623,531,374 ÷ 7,623,441,054 shares outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$1.00

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Operations

Year Ended July 31, 2006

Investment Income:
         
Interest









$
304,210,825
Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
$ 20,555,678
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
5,455,638
Custodian fees
188,290
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
6,766,973
Directors'/Trustees' fees
57,800
Auditing fees
10,790
Legal fees
4,774
Portfolio accounting fees
194,310
Distribution services fee (Note 5)
37,685,409
Shareholder services fee (Note 5)
17,129,731
Share registration costs
257,024
Printing and postage
935,794
Insurance premiums
342
Miscellaneous






5,972




   TOTAL EXPENSES






89,248,525




Waivers (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
$ (13,307,468 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(234,496 )
Waiver of distribution services fee


(6,851,892
)







   TOTAL WAIVERS






(20,393,856
)



Net expenses










68,854,669
Net investment income









$
235,356,156

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Changes in Net Assets


   
   
Year Ended
7/31/2006


   

Period
Ended
7/31/2005

1
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income

$
235,356,156


$
29,203,016

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income


(235,433,046
)


(29,035,806
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
7,178,814,440 9,261,068,939
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
235,432,403 29,011,414
Cost of shares redeemed


(6,041,460,584
)


(3,039,425,558
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


1,372,786,259



6,250,654,795

Change in net assets


1,372,709,369



6,250,822,005

Net Assets:
Beginning of period


6,250,822,005



--

End of period (including undistributed net investment income of $90,320 and $167,210, respectively)

$
7,623,531,374


$
6,250,822,005

1 For the period from February 25, 2005 (commencement of operations) to July 31, 2005.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

July 31, 2006

1. ORGANIZATION

Money Market Obligations Trust (the "Trust") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), as an open-end, management investment company. The Trust consists of 41 portfolios. The financial statements included herein are only those of Federated Government Reserves Fund (the "Fund"). The financial statements of the other portfolios are presented separately. The assets of each portfolio are segregated and a shareholder's interest is limited to the portfolio in which shares are held. The investment objective of the Fund is to provide current income consistent with stability of principal and liquidity.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America.

Investment Valuation

The Fund uses the amortized cost method to value its portfolio securities in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act.

Repurchase Agreements

It is the policy of the Fund to require the other party to a repurchase agreement to transfer to the Fund's custodian or sub-custodian eligible securities or cash with a market value (after transaction costs) at least equal to the repurchase price to be paid under the repurchase agreement. The eligible securities are transferred to accounts with the custodian or sub-custodian in which the Fund holds a "securities entitlement" and exercises "control" as those terms are defined in the Uniform Commercial Code. The Fund has established procedures for monitoring the market value of the transferred securities and requiring the transfer of additional eligible securities if necessary to equal at least the repurchase price. These procedures also allow the other party to require securities to be transferred from the account to the extent that their market value exceeds the repurchase price or in exchange for other eligible securities of equivalent market value.

With respect to agreements to repurchase U.S. government securities and cash items, the Fund treats the repurchase agreement as an investment in the underlying securities and not as an obligation of the other party to the repurchase agreement. Other repurchase agreements are treated as obligations of the other party secured by the underlying securities. Nevertheless, the insolvency of the other party or other failure to repurchase the securities may delay the disposition of the underlying securities or cause the Fund to receive less than the full repurchase price. Under the terms of the repurchase agreement, any amounts received by the Fund in excess of the repurchase price and related transaction costs must be remitted to the other party.

The Fund may enter into repurchase agreements in which eligible securities are transferred into joint trading accounts maintained by the custodian or sub-custodian for investment companies and other clients advised by the Fund's adviser and its affiliates. The Fund will participate on a pro rata basis with the other investment companies and clients in its share of the securities transferred under such repurchase agreements and in its share of proceeds from any repurchase or other disposition of such securities.

Investment Income, Expenses and Distributions

Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income are declared daily and paid monthly.

Premium and Discount Amortization

All premiums and discounts are amortized/accreted.

Federal Taxes

It is the Fund's policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary.

On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released FASB Interpretation No. 48 "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken in the course of preparing the fund's tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are "more-likely-than-not" of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax benefits of positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax expense in the current year. Adoption of FIN 48 is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the effective date. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FIN 48 and its impact in the financial statements has not yet been determined.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

The Fund may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Fund records when-issued securities on the trade date and maintains security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

Other

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST

The following table summarizes share activity:


   
Year Ended
7/31/2006


   
Period
Ended
7/31/2005 1


Shares sold
7,178,814,440 9,261,068,939
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
235,432,403 29,011,414
Shares redeemed

(6,041,460,584
)

(3,039,425,558
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

1,372,786,259


6,250,654,795

1 For the period from February 25, 2005 (commencement of operations) to July 31, 2005.

4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

The tax character of distributions as reported on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the year ended July 31, 2006 and the period ended July 31, 2005, was as follows:


   
2006
   
2005
Ordinary income

$235,433,046

$29,035,806

As of July 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:


   
2006
Undistributed ordinary income

$90,320

5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

Federated Investment Management Company, the Fund's investment adviser (the "Adviser") receives for its services an annual investment adviser fee equal to 0.30% of the Fund's average daily net assets. The Adviser may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. The Adviser can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the Adviser voluntarily waived $13,307,468 of its fee.

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Fund with administrative personnel and services. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average aggregate daily net assets of certain Federated funds as specified below:

Maximum
Administrative Fee

   
Average Aggregate Daily Net Assets
of the Federated Funds

0.150%

on the first $5 billion
0.125%

on the next $5 billion
0.100%

on the next $10 billion
0.075%

on assets in excess of $20 billion

The administrative fee received during any fiscal year shall be at least $150,000 per portfolio and $40,000 per each additional class of Shares. FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FAS can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the net fee paid to FAS was 0.076% of average aggregate daily net assets of the Fund.

Distribution Services Fee

The Fund has adopted a Distribution Plan (the "Plan") pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act. Under the terms of the Plan, the Fund will compensate Federated Securities Corp. (FSC) from the daily net assets of the Fund's shares to finance activities intended to result in the sale of these shares. The Plan provides that the Fund may incur distribution expenses of 0.55% of average daily net assets, annually, to compensate FSC. FSC may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FSC can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSC voluntarily waived $6,851,892 of its fee. When FSC receives fees, it may pay some or all of them to financial intermediaries whose customers purchase shares. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSC did not receive any fees paid by the Fund.

Shareholder Services Fee

The Fund may pay fees (Service Fees) up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Fund's Shares to financial intermediaries or to Federated Shareholder Services Company (FSSC) for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. FSSC or these financial intermediaries may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of their fee. In addition, FSSC may voluntarily reimburse the Fund for shareholder services fees. This voluntary waiver and/or reimbursement can be modified or terminated at any time. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC did not receive any fees paid by the Fund.

General

Certain of the Officers and Trustees of the Fund are Officers and Directors or Trustees of the above companies.

6. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning in October 2003, Federated Investors, Inc. and various subsidiaries thereof (including the advisers and distributor for various investment companies, collectively, "Federated"), along with various investment companies sponsored by Federated ("Funds") were named as defendants in several class action lawsuits now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuits were purportedly filed on behalf of people who purchased, owned and/or redeemed shares of Federated-sponsored mutual funds during specified periods beginning November 1, 1998. The suits are generally similar in alleging that Federated engaged in illegal and improper trading practices including market timing and late trading in concert with certain institutional traders, which allegedly caused financial injury to the mutual fund shareholders. These lawsuits began to be filed shortly after Federated's first public announcement that it had received requests for information on shareholder trading activities in the Funds from the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), the Office of the New York State Attorney General ("NYAG"), and other authorities. In that regard, on November 28, 2005, Federated announced that it had reached final settlements with the SEC and the NYAG with respect to those matters. As Federated previously reported in 2004, it has already paid approximately $8.0 million to certain funds as determined by an independent consultant. As part of these settlements, Federated agreed to pay for the benefit of fund shareholders additional disgorgement and a civil money penalty in the aggregate amount of an additional $72 million. Federated and various Funds have also been named as defendants in several additional lawsuits, the majority of which are now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging, among other things, excessive advisory and Rule 12b-1 fees. The Board of the Funds has retained the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro LLP to represent the Funds in these lawsuits. Federated and the Funds, and their respective counsel, are reviewing the allegations and intend to defend this litigation. Additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations may be filed in the future. The potential impact of these lawsuits, all of which seek unquantified damages, attorney's fees and expenses, and future potential similar suits is uncertain. Although we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Funds, there can be no assurance that these suits, the ongoing adverse publicity and/or other developments resulting from the regulatory investigations will not result in increased Fund redemptions, reduced sales of Fund shares, or other adverse consequences for the Funds.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONEY MARKET OBLIGATIONS TRUST AND SHAREHOLDERS OF FEDERATED GOVERNMENT RESERVES FUND:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Federated Government Reserves Fund (the "Fund") (one of the portfolios constituting Money Market Obligations Trust), including the portfolio of investments, as of July 31, 2006, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statement of changes in net assets and the financial highlights for the year then ended and for the period from February 25, 2005 (commencement of operations) to July 31, 2005. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of July 31, 2006, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Federated Government Reserves Fund, a portfolio of Money Market Obligations Trust, at July 31, 2006, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets and the financial highlights for the year then ended and for the period from February 25, 2005 (commencement of operations) to July 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
September 12, 2006

Board of Trustees and Trust Officers

The Board is responsible for managing the Trust's business affairs and for exercising all the Trust's powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Board member and the senior officers of the Fund. Where required, the tables separately list Board members who are "interested persons" of the Fund (i.e., "Interested" Board members) and those who are not (i.e., "Independent" Board members). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is Federated Investors Tower, 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA. As of December 31, 2005, the Trust comprised 41 portfolios, and the Federated Fund Complex consisted of 43 investment companies (comprising 136 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Board member oversees all portfolios in the Federated Fund Complex and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund's Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trust Trustees and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John F. Donahue*
Birth Date: July 28, 1924
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex's Executive Committee.

Previous Positions
: Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex; Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Chairman and Director, Federated Investment Counseling.



J. Christopher Donahue*
Birth Date: April 11, 1949
PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 1989
Principal Occupations : Principal Executive Officer and President of the Federated Fund Complex; Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company; Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman, Passport Research, Ltd. (Investment advisory subsidiary of Federated) Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director, Federated Services Company.

Previous Positions
: President, Federated Investment Counseling; President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D.*
Birth Date: October 11, 1932
3471 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1111
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Medical Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Downtown; Hematologist, Oncologist and Internist, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Other Directorships Held
: Member, National Board of Trustees, Leukemia Society of America.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, University of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.



* Family relationships and reasons for "interested" status: John F. Donahue is the father of J. Christopher Donahue; both are "interested" due to the positions they hold with Federated Investors, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D. is "interested" because his son-in-law is employed by the Fund's principal underwriter, Federated Securities Corp.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Thomas G. Bigley
Birth Date: February 3, 1934
15 Old Timber Trail
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: November 1994
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Member of Executive Committee, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh.

Previous Position
: Senior Partner, Ernst & Young LLP.



John T. Conroy, Jr.
Birth Date: June 23, 1937
Investment Properties Corporation
3838 North Tamiami Trail
Suite 402
Naples, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman of the Board, Investment Properties Corporation; Partner or Trustee in private real estate ventures in Southwest Florida.

Previous Positions
: President, Investment Properties Corporation; Senior Vice President, John R. Wood and Associates, Inc., Realtors; President, Naples Property Management, Inc. and Northgate Village Development Corporation.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Nicholas P. Constantakis
Birth Date: September 3, 1939
175 Woodshire Drive
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Michael Baker Corporation (engineering and energy services worldwide).

Previous Position
: Partner, Andersen Worldwide SC.



John F. Cunningham
Birth Date: March 5, 1943
353 El Brillo Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Director, WinsorTech.

Other Directorships Held
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cunningham & Co., Inc. (strategic business consulting); Trustee Associate, Boston College.

Previous Positions
: Director, Redgate Communications and EMC Corporation (computer storage systems); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Computer Consoles, Inc.; President and Chief Operating Officer, Wang Laboratories; Director, First National Bank of Boston; Director, Apollo Computer, Inc.



Peter E. Madden
Birth Date: March 16, 1942
One Royal Palm Way
100 Royal Palm Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Board of Overseers, Babson College.

Previous Positions
: Representative, Commonwealth of Massachusetts General Court; President, State Street Bank and Trust Company and State Street Corporation (retired); Director, VISA USA and VISA International; Chairman and Director, Massachusetts Bankers Association; Director, Depository Trust Corporation; Director, The Boston Stock Exchange.



Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.
Birth Date: April 10, 1945
80 South Road
Westhampton Beach, NY
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Management Consultant.
Previous Positions
: Chief Executive Officer, PBTC International Bank; Partner, Arthur Young & Company (now Ernst & Young LLP); Chief Financial Officer of Retail Banking Sector, Chase Manhattan Bank; Senior Vice President, HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank); Vice President, Citibank; Assistant Professor of Banking and Finance, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University Executive Vice President, DVC Group, Inc.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John E. Murray, Jr., J.D., S.J.D.
Birth Date: December 20, 1932
Chancellor, Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1995
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee, and Chairman of the Board of Directors or Trustees, of the Federated Fund Complex; Chancellor and Law Professor, Duquesne University; Partner, Murray, Hogue & Lannis.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Michael Baker Corp. (engineering, construction, operations and technical services).

Previous Positions
: President, Duquesne University; Dean and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Dean and Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law.



Marjorie P. Smuts
Birth Date: June 21, 1935
4905 Bayard Street
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Public Relations/Marketing Consultant/Conference Coordinator.

Previous Positions
: National Spokesperson, Aluminum Company of America; television producer; President, Marj Palmer Assoc.; Owner, Scandia Bord.



John S. Walsh
Birth Date: November 28, 1957
2604 William Drive
Valparaiso, IN
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer of construction temporary heaters); President and Director, Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers Products, Inc.

Previous Position
: Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc.



James F. Will
Birth Date: October 12, 1938
Saint Vincent College
Latrobe, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 2006
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chancellor and President, Saint Vincent College.
Other Directorships Held
: Allegheny Corporation.

Previous Positions
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Armco, Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer, Cyclops Industries; President and Chief Operating Officer, Kaiser Steel Corporation.



OFFICERS




Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
John W. McGonigle
Birth Date: October 26, 1938
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND SECRETARY
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Federated Investment Counseling; Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Services Company and Federated Securities Corp.



Richard A. Novak
Birth Date: December 25, 1963
TREASURER
Began serving: January 2006
Principal Occupations : Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Federated Fund Complex; Senior Vice President, Federated Administrative Services Financial and Operations Principal for Federated Securities Corp., Edgewood Services, Inc. and Southpointe Distribution Services, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Controller of Federated Investors, Inc. Vice President, Finance of Federated Services Company; held various financial management positions within The Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh; Auditor, Arthur Andersen & Co.



Richard B. Fisher
Birth Date: May 17, 1923
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Vice Chairman or Vice President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman, Federated Securities Corp.

Previous Positions
: President and Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Executive Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc. and Director and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Securities Corp.



Brian P. Bouda
Birth Date: February 28, 1947
CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER
Began serving: August 2004
Principal Occupations : Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of Federated Investors, Inc.; and Chief Compliance Officer of its subsidiaries. Mr. Bouda joined Federated in 1999 and is a member of the American Bar Association and the State Bar Association of Wisconsin.






Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
Deborah A. Cunningham
Birth Date: September 15, 1959
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Deborah A. Cunningham was named Chief Investment Officer of money market products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1981 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1997. Ms. Cunningham is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.S.B.A. in Finance from Robert Morris College.



Mary Jo Ochson
Birth Date: September 12, 1953
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Mary Jo Ochson was named Chief Investment Officer of tax-exempt, fixed-income products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1982 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Pittsburgh.



Susan R. Hill
Birth Date: June 20, 1963
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Susan R. Hill has been the Fund's Portfolio Manager since December 2004. Susan R. Hill is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Hill joined Federated in 1990 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 2003 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 2005. Ms. Hill was a Portfolio Manager from 1994 until 2003, and served as Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1997 until 2004 and an Assistant Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1994 until 1997. Ms. Hill is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received an M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University.



Jeff A. Kozemchak
Birth Date: January 15, 1960
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Jeff A. Kozemchak is Vice President of the Trust. Mr. Kozemchak joined Federated in 1987 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 1996 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1999. He was a Portfolio Manager until 1996 and a Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Kozemchak is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received his M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University in 1987.



Paige M. Wilhelm
Birth Date: May 28, 1962
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: August 2006
Paige M. Wilhelm is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Wilhelm joined Federated in 1985 and has been a Senior Vice President and a Senior Portfolio Manager. She is responsible for portfolio management and research in the fixed-income area concentrating on taxable money market instruments. Previous associations include Senior Credit Analyst, Federated Investors; Performance Analysis Supervisor; Performance Analyst, Federated Investment Counseling. Ms. Wilhelm is a member of the CFA Society of Pittsburgh and received her B.S. from Indiana University and her M.B.A. from Duquesne University.



Evaluation and Approval of Advisory Contract

FEDERATED GOVERNMENT RESERVES FUND (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. Because the Fund did not yet have a meaningful operating history. The Board's decision to approve the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment primarily on whether to authorize the continued offering of this new investment vehicle, as originally proposed by, and based on information previously provided by, the Federated organization, and based on Federated's recommendation to go forward with the Fund.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

The Board also considered the anticipated compensation and benefits to be received by the Adviser. This includes fees to be received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services that may be received by the Adviser from brokers that execute fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in working with Federated on matters relating to other Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. The Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services to be provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's anticipated investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund will compete. In this regard, the Senior Officer also reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds (e.g., institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the fees charged by other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

It was recognized that the factors mentioned above relating to such matters as any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund, are essentially impossible to apply before the Fund has experienced any meaningful operating history. Nevertheless, in connection with the Board's governance of other Federated funds, it should be noted that the Board regularly receives financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derives from its relationships with the other Federated funds. These reports cover not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discuss any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades, as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waive fees and/or reimburse expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors, and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. As noted, not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to the Fund, nor does the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that are relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that, based upon the information previously requested and supplied, Federated's proposal to establish and manage the Fund, and its past performance and actions in providing services to other mutual funds, provide a satisfactory basis to support the business decision to continue the existing arrangements.

Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies, if any, relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Federated's website. Go to FederatedInvestors.com, select "Products," select the "Prospectuses and Regulatory Reports" link, then select the Fund to access the link to Form N-PX. This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

The Fund files with the SEC a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on "Form N-Q." These filings are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.) You may also access this information from the "Products" section of the Federated Investors website at FederatedInvestors.com by clicking on "Portfolio Holdings" and selecting the name of the Fund, or by selecting the name of the Fund and clicking on "Portfolio Holdings." You must register on the website the first time you wish to access this information.

Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board, or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal. Although money market funds seek to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share, there is no assurance that they will be able to do so.

This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the Fund's prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses, and other information.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Federated Government Reserves Fund
Federated Investors Funds
5800 Corporate Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15237-7000
Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.

Federated Securities Corp., Distributor

Cusip 608918205

33543 (9/06)

Federated is a registered mark of Federated Investors, Inc. 2006 (c)Federated Investors, Inc.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Federated Master Trust

A Portfolio of Money Market Obligations Trust



ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT

July 31, 2006

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
SHAREHOLDER EXPENSE EXAMPLE
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS SUMMARY TABLES
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND TRUST OFFICERS
EVALUATION AND APPROVAL OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
VOTING PROXIES ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

Not FDIC Insured * May Lose Value * No Bank Guarantee

Federated Investors 50 Years of Growth & Innovation

Financial Highlights

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended July 31
   
2006
   
   
2005
1
   
2004

   
2003

   
2002

Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income

0.040


0.020


0.007


0.011


0.022

Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.040
)

(0.020
)

(0.007
)

(0.011
)

(0.022
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$1.00


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00

Total Return 2

4.05
%

1.97
%

0.71
%

1.12
%

2.23
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:















Net expenses

0.48
%

0.47
%

0.46
%

0.46
%

0.46
%
Net investment income

3.97
%

1.91
%

0.71
%

1.15
%

2.27
%
Supplemental Data:















Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$189,392


$114,763


$148,324


$180,849


$289,339

1 Beginning with the year ended July 31, 2005, the Fund was audited by Ernst & Young LLP. The previous years were audited by another independent registered public accounting firm.

2 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees; to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees and/or shareholder services fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you to understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from February 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006.

ACTUAL EXPENSES

The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES

The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund's actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund's actual return. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are required to be provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund with other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.


   
Beginning
Account Value
2/1/2006

   
Ending
Account Value
7/31/2006

   
Expenses Paid
During Period 1

Actual

$1,000

$1,022.30

$2.46
Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return before expenses)

$1,000

$1,022.36

$2.46

1 Expenses are equal to the Fund's annualized net expense ratio of 0.49%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).

Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:


   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Variable Rate Demand Instruments

39.2
%
Commercial Paper & Notes

33.1
%
Bank Instruments

22.5
%
Repurchase Agreements

6.8
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(1.6
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

At July 31, 2006, the fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:


   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

43.1
% 4
8-30 Days

31.0
%
31-90 Days

20.8
%
91-180 Days

2.1
%
181 Days and more

4.6
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(1.6
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

1 Commercial paper and notes includes any fixed-rate security that is not a bank instrument. A variable rate demand instrument is any security which has an interest rate that resets periodically. See the Fund's Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information for descriptions of commercial paper, repurchase agreements and bank instruments.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

4 Overnight securities comprised 26.3% of the Fund's portfolio.

Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES--1.0%
Finance - Automotive--1.0%
$ 623,982 CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2006-1, Class A1, 5.180%, 5/15/2007
$ 623,982
1,000,000 GS Auto Loan Trust 2006-1, Class A1, 5.514%, 8/15/2007
1,000,000
282,209 World Omni Automobile Receivables Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.855%, 3/15/2007


282,209

   TOTAL ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES


1,906,191

CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT--8.9%
Banking--8.9%
1,000,000 Calyon, Paris, 5.355%, 4/30/2007
1,000,036
1,500,000 Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, 5.220%, 8/28/2006
1,500,000
1,000,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 4.920%, 2/5/2007
1,000,000
2,500,000 Deutsche Bank AG, 4.405% - 4.500%, 10/4/2006 - 10/13/2006
2,500,013
1,000,000 Dexia Bank, Belgium, 4.305%, 9/29/2006
999,220
750,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.260%, 4/11/2007
750,000
2,000,000 Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH, 5.190%, 8/1/2006
2,000,000
2,000,000 Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, Edinburgh, 4.755%, 10/27/2006
2,000,023
5,000,000 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 5.310%, 8/10/2006


5,000,000

   TOTAL CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT


16,749,292

COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS--10.0%
Banking--2.6%
5,000,000 Fortis Bank SA/NV, 5.363%, 8/1/2006


5,000,000

Brokerage--7.4%
6,000,000 Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., 5.413%, 8/1/2006
6,000,000
5,000,000 Goldman Sachs & Co., 5.413%, 8/1/2006
5,000,000
3,000,000 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.443%, 8/1/2006


3,000,000

   TOTAL


14,000,000

   TOTAL COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS


19,000,000

COMMERCIAL PAPER--33.5% 1
Banking--11.0%
2,000,000 Bank of America Corp., 5.330%, 9/21/2006
1,984,898
1,000,000 2,3 Blue Spice LLC, (Deutsche Bank AG SWP), 5.350%, 9/22/2006
992,272
2,000,000 Danske Corp., Inc., (Danske Bank A/S GTD), 4.984%, 4/10/2007
1,930,224
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
COMMERCIAL PAPER--continued 1
Banking--continued
$ 2,000,000 2,3 KBC Financial Products International Ltd., (KBC Bank N.V. GTD), 5.100%, 11/20/2006
$ 1,968,550
7,000,000 2,3 Long Lane Master Trust IV, (Bank of America N.A. SWP), 5.280% - 5.290%, 8/7/2006
6,993,832
7,000,000 2,3 Picaros Funding LLC, (KBC Bank N.V. GTD), 5.340% - 5.400%, 8/16/2006 - 10/11/2006


6,959,150

   TOTAL


20,828,926

Finance - Automotive--6.8%
8,000,000 DaimlerChrysler Revolving Auto Conduit LLC, (A1+/P1 Series), 5.280%, 8/9/2006
7,990,613
4,000,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust, (A1+/P1 Series), 5.210%, 9/15/2006
3,973,950
1,000,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust, (A1/P1 Series), 5.410%, 10/16/2006


988,579

   TOTAL


12,953,142

Finance - Commercial--3.2%
6,000,000 CIT Group, Inc., 5.000% - 5.370%, 8/9/2006 - 11/15/2006


5,947,827

Finance - Retail--6.4%
2,000,000 2,3 Compass Securitization LLC, 5.245%, 9/15/2006
1,986,888
8,000,000 2,3 Paradigm Funding LLC, 5.280%, 8/7/2006
7,992,960
2,214,000 2,3 Tulip Funding Corp., 5.110%, 10/24/2006


2,187,602

   TOTAL


12,167,450

Finance - Securities--6.1%
4,000,000 2,3,4 Georgetown Funding Co. LLC, 5.419%, 9/19/2006
3,982,632
1,000,000 2,3 KLIO II Funding Ltd., 5.360%, 9/8/2006
994,342
6,000,000 2,3 Perry Global Funding LLC (Series A), 5.180% - 5.390%, 8/9/2006 - 10/4/2006
5,976,231
500,000 2,3 Sigma Finance, Inc., (Sigma Finance Corp. GTD), 5.040%, 8/2/2006


499,930

   TOTAL


11,453,135

   TOTAL COMMERCIAL PAPER


63,350,480

CORPORATE NOTES--1.7%
Finance - Securities--1.7%
1,750,000 2,3 K2 (USA) LLC, (K2 Corp. GTD), 5.000%, 3/9/2007 - 3/12/2007
1,750,000
1,500,000 2,3 Sigma Finance, Inc., (Sigma Finance Corp. GTD), 4.830% - 5.750%, 1/30/2007 - 7/25/2007


1,500,000

   TOTAL CORPORATE NOTES


3,250,000

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES--0.5%
Government Agency--0.5%
$ 1,000,000 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 5.410%, 6/18/2007

$
1,000,000

NOTES - VARIABLE--39.2% 5
Banking--14.4%
2,000,000 2,3 Bank of Ireland, 5.350%, 8/21/2006
2,000,000
2,000,000 2,3 Bank of New York Co., Inc., 5.458%, 8/28/2006
2,000,000
965,000 Covered Bridge Development Co. LLC, (Series 2004), (Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 5.550%, 8/3/2006
965,000
4,500,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 5.280% - 5.477%, 9/12/2006 - 10/16/2006
4,500,000
470,000 Dave White Chevrolet, Inc., (Series 1996), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
470,000
4,000,000 Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc., (Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc. LOC), 5.360%, 8/28/2006
4,000,000
500,000 Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc., (Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc. GTD), 5.305%, 8/9/2006
500,000
3,000,000 2,3 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.259% - 5.315%, 8/9/2006 - 8/21/2006
3,000,000
3,000,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.530%, 9/25/2006
3,000,000
2,000,000 2,3 Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal, 5.316%, 8/1/2006
2,000,000
1,500,000 Wells Fargo & Co., 5.396%, 8/2/2006
1,500,000
2,500,000 2,3 Westpac Banking Corp. Ltd., Sydney, 5.339%, 8/16/2006
2,500,000
245,000 White Brothers Properties, (Series 1996), (Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
245,000
480,000 Wildcat Management Co., Inc., (Series 1999), (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006


480,000

   TOTAL


27,160,000

Brokerage--6.6%
2,000,000 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.307%, 8/7/2006
2,000,000
2,000,000 2,3 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.389%, 8/15/2006
2,000,075
2,000,000 2,3 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.599%, 8/11/2006
2,000,000
2,500,000 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.,5.402%, 8/3/2006
2,500,000
4,000,000 Morgan Stanley, 5.373% - 5.410%, 8/1/2006


4,000,000

   TOTAL


12,500,075

Finance - Retail--0.5%
1,000,000 2,3 Paradigm Funding LLC, 5.297%, 8/7/2006


1,000,000

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 5
Finance - Securities--2.1%
$ 1,000,000 2,3 Beta Finance, Inc., 5.189%, 8/22/2006
$ 1,000,072
3,000,000 2,3 Sigma Finance, Inc., (Sigma Finance Corp. GTD), 5.329%, 8/15/2006


2,999,966

   TOTAL


4,000,038

Government Agency--5.2%
9,890,000 Direct One Funding Corp., (Series 2000), (Sexton Properties), (FNMA LOC), 5.320%, 8/3/2006


9,890,000

Insurance--6.9%
5,000,000 2,3 MBIA Global Funding LLC, 5.317%, 8/14/2006
5,000,000
2,000,000 MetLife Insurance Co. of Connecticut, 5.328%, 9/1/2006
2,000,000
5,000,000 Monumental Life Insurance Co., 5.680%, 8/1/2006
5,000,000
1,000,000 2,3 Pacific Life Global Funding, 5.384%, 8/4/2006


1,000,012

   TOTAL


13,000,012

Municipal--0.9%
1,700,000 Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund Finance Corp., 5.377%, 8/15/2006


1,700,000

Pharmaceuticals and Health Care--2.6%
5,000,000 2,3 Eli Lilly Services, Inc., (Eli Lilly & Co. GTD), 5.316%, 8/1/2006


5,000,000

   TOTAL NOTES - VARIABLE


74,250,125

REPURCHASE AGREEMENT--6.8%
12,895,000 Interest in $3,200,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.290%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Bank of America N.A., will repurchase U.S. government agency securities with various maturities to 6/1/2035 for $3,200,470,222 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $3,264,000,000.


12,895,000

   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--101.6%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 6



192,401,088

   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--(1.6)%


(3,009,430
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
189,391,658

1 Discount rate at time of purchase for discount issues, or the coupon for interest bearing issues.

2 Denotes a restricted security that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) is subject to a contractual restriction on public sales. At July 31, 2006, these restricted securities amounted to $75,284,514, which represented 39.8% of total net assets.

3 Denotes a restricted security that may be resold without restriction to "qualified institutional buyers" as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and that the Fund has determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Fund's Board of Trustees. At July 31, 2006, these liquid restricted securities amounted to $75,284,514, which represented 39.8% of total net assets.

4 Reflects potential extension period.

5 Floating rate note with current rate and next reset date shown.

6 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

FNMA --Federal National Mortgage Association
GTD --Guaranteed
LOC --Letter of Credit
SWP --Swap Agreement

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

July 31, 2006

Assets:
      
Total investments in securities, at amortized cost and value
$ 192,401,088
Cash
395,349
Income receivable
616,693
Receivable for shares sold





68,545

   TOTAL ASSETS





193,481,675

Liabilities:
Payable for investments purchased
$ 3,500,000
Payable for shares redeemed
124,473
Income distribution payable
428,109
Accrued expenses


37,435




   TOTAL LIABILITIES





4,090,017

Net assets for 189,382,558 shares outstanding




$
189,391,658

Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 189,392,123
Distributions in excess of net investment income





(465
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS




$
189,391,658

Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds Per Share:
$189,391,658 ÷ 189,382,558 shares outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$1.00

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Operations

Year Ended July 31, 2006

Investment Income:
         
Interest









$
8,257,009
Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
$ 741,814
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
150,000
Custodian fees
21,810
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
97,123
Directors'/Trustees' fees
1,163
Auditing fees
16,542
Legal fees
6,624
Portfolio accounting fees
52,940
Shareholder services fee (Note 5)
347,405
Share registration costs
60,558
Printing and postage
17,942
Insurance premiums
8,103
Miscellaneous






925




   TOTAL EXPENSES






1,522,949




Waivers (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
$ (271,967 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(8,685 )
Waiver of shareholder services fee


(347,405
)







   TOTAL WAIVERS






(628,057
)



Net expenses










894,892
Net investment income









$
7,362,117

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

Year Ended July 31
   

2006

   

2005

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income

$
7,362,117


$
2,487,188

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income


(7,362,217
)


(2,488,950
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
539,637,801 397,334,161
Proceeds from shares issued in connection with the tax-free transfer of assets from Money Market Trust
55,892,115 --
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
3,238,608 775,148
Cost of shares redeemed


(524,139,366
)


(431,669,368
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


74,629,158



(33,560,059
)
Change in net assets


74,629,058



(33,561,821
)
Net Assets:
Beginning of period


114,762,600



148,324,421

End of period (including distributions in excess of net investment income of $(465) and $(365), respectively)

$
189,391,658


$
114,762,600

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

July 31, 2006

1. ORGANIZATION

Money Market Obligations Trust (the "Trust") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust consists of 41 portfolios. The financial statements included herein are only those of Federated Master Trust (the "Fund"), a diversified portfolio. The financial statements of the other portfolios are presented separately. The assets of each portfolio are segregated and a shareholder's interest is limited to the portfolio in which shares are held. The primary investment objective of the Fund is current income consistent with stability of principal.

On August 8, 2005, the Fund received assets from Money Market Trust as the result of a tax-free reorganization, as follows:


   
Shares of
Federated
Master
Trust Issued

   
Money Market
Trust Net
Assets Received

   
Net Assets
of Federated
Master Trust
Prior to
Combination

   
Net Assets of
Money Market
Trust Immediately
Prior to
Combination

   
Net Assets
of Federated
Master Trust
Immediately After
Combination

Total

55,882,550

$55,892,115

$140,329,381

$55,892,115

$196,221,496

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America.

Investment Valuation

The Fund uses the amortized cost method to value its portfolio securities in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act.

Repurchase Agreements

It is the policy of the Fund to require the other party to a repurchase agreement to transfer to the Fund's custodian or sub-custodian eligible securities or cash with a market value (after transaction costs) at least equal to the repurchase price to be paid under the repurchase agreement. The eligible securities are transferred to accounts with the custodian or sub-custodian in which the Fund holds a "securities entitlement" and exercises "control" as those terms are defined in the Uniform Commercial Code. The Fund has established procedures for monitoring the market value of the transferred securities and requiring the transfer of additional eligible securities if necessary to equal at least the repurchase price. These procedures also allow the other party to require securities to be transferred from the account to the extent that their market value exceeds the repurchase price or in exchange for other eligible securities of equivalent market value.

With respect to agreements to repurchase U.S. government securities and cash items, the Fund treats the repurchase agreement as an investment in the underlying securities and not as an obligation of the other party to the repurchase agreement. Other repurchase agreements are treated as obligations of the other party secured by the underlying securities. Nevertheless, the insolvency of the other party or other failure to repurchase the securities may delay the disposition of the underlying securities or cause the Fund to receive less than the full repurchase price. Under the terms of the repurchase agreement, any amounts received by the Fund in excess of the repurchase price and related transaction costs must be remitted to the other party.

The Fund may enter into repurchase agreements in which eligible securities are transferred into joint trading accounts maintained by the custodian or sub-custodian for investment companies and other clients advised by the Fund's adviser and its affiliates. The Fund will participate on a pro rata basis with the other investment companies and clients in its share of the securities transferred under such repurchase agreements and in its share of proceeds from any repurchase or other disposition of such securities.

Investment Income, Expenses and Distributions

Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income are declared daily and paid monthly.

Premium and Discount Amortization

All premiums and discounts are amortized/accreted.

Federal Taxes

It is the Fund's policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary.

On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released FASB Interpretation No. 48 "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken in the course of preparing the fund's tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are "more-likely-than-not" of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax benefits of positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax expense in the current year. Adoption of FIN 48 is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the effective date. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FIN 48 and its impact in the financial statements has not yet been determined.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

The Fund may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Fund records when-issued securities on the trade date and maintains security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Restricted Securities

Restricted securities are securities that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) are subject to contractual restrictions on public sales. In some cases, when a security cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, the issuer of the restricted security has agreed to register such securities for resale, at the issuer's expense, either upon demand by the Fund or in connection with another registered offering of the securities. Many such restricted securities may be resold in the secondary market in transactions exempt from registration. Restricted securities may be determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Fund's Board of Trustees. The Fund will not incur any registration costs upon such resales. Restricted securities are valued at amortized cost in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

Other

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions, if any, are recorded on an identified cost basis.

3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST

The following table summarizes share activity:

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

Shares sold
539,637,801 397,334,161
Shares issued in connection with the tax-free transfer of assets from Money Market Trust
55,882,550 --
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
3,238,608 775,148
Shares redeemed

(524,139,366
)

(431,669,368
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

74,619,593


(33,560,059
)

4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

The tax character of distributions as reported on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended July 31, 2006 and 2005, was as follows:


   
2006
   
2005
Ordinary income 1

$7,362,217

$2,488,950

1 For tax purposes short-term capital gain distributions are considered ordinary income distributions.

As of July 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed ordinary income
   
$
427,644

Dividend payable--current year end
   

(428,109
)

5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

Federated Investment Management Company, the Fund's investment adviser (the "Adviser"), receives for its services an annual investment adviser fee equal to 0.40% of the Fund's average daily net assets. The Adviser will waive, to the extent of its adviser fee, the amount, if any, by which the Fund's aggregate annual operating expenses (excluding interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, expenses of registering or qualifying the Fund and its shares under federal and state laws and regulations, expenses of withholding taxes, and extraordinary expenses) exceed 0.45% of average daily net assets of the Fund. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the Adviser waived $271,967 of its fee.

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Fund with administrative personnel and services. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average aggregate daily net assets of certain Federated funds as specified below:

Maximum
Administrative Fee

   
Average Aggregate Daily Net Assets
of the Federated Funds

0.150%

on the first $5 billion
0.125%

on the next $5 billion
0.100%

on the next $10 billion
0.075%

on assets in excess of $20 billion

The administrative fee received during any fiscal year shall be at least $150,000 per portfolio and $40,000 per each additional class of Shares. FAS may choose to waive any portion of its fee. FAS can modify or terminate this waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the net fee paid to FAS was 0.076% of average aggregate daily net assets of the Fund.

Shareholder Services Fee

The Fund may pay fees (Service Fees) up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Fund's Shares to financial intermediaries or to Federated Shareholder Services Company (FSSC) for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. FSSC or these financial intermediaries may choose to waive any portion of their fee. In addition, FSSC may reimburse the Fund for shareholder services fees. This waiver and/or reimbursement can be modified or terminated at any time. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC waived $347,405 of its fee. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC did not receive any fees paid by the Fund.

General

Certain of the Officers and Trustees of the Fund are Officers and Directors or Trustees of the above companies.

6. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning in October 2003, Federated Investors, Inc. and various subsidiaries thereof (including the advisers and distributor for various investment companies, collectively, "Federated"), along with various investment companies sponsored by Federated ("Funds") were named as defendants in several class action lawsuits now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuits were purportedly filed on behalf of people who purchased, owned and/or redeemed shares of Federated-sponsored mutual funds during specified periods beginning November 1, 1998. The suits are generally similar in alleging that Federated engaged in illegal and improper trading practices including market timing and late trading in concert with certain institutional traders, which allegedly caused financial injury to the mutual fund shareholders. These lawsuits began to be filed shortly after Federated's first public announcement that it had received requests for information on shareholder trading activities in the Funds from the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), the Office of the New York State Attorney General ("NYAG"), and other authorities. In that regard, on November 28, 2005, Federated announced that it had reached final settlements with the SEC and the NYAG with respect to those matters. As Federated previously reported in 2004, it has already paid approximately $8.0 million to certain funds as determined by an independent consultant. As part of these settlements, Federated agreed to pay for the benefit of fund shareholders additional disgorgement and a civil money penalty in the aggregate amount of an additional $72 million. Federated and various Funds have also been named as defendants in several additional lawsuits, the majority of which are now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging, among other things, excessive advisory and Rule 12b-1 fees. The Board of the Funds has retained the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro LLP to represent the Funds in these lawsuits. Federated and the Funds, and their respective counsel, are reviewing the allegations and intend to defend this litigation. Additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations may be filed in the future. The potential impact of these lawsuits, all of which seek unquantified damages, attorneys' fees and expenses, and future potential similar suits is uncertain. Although we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Funds, there can be no assurance that these suits, the ongoing adverse publicity and/or other developments resulting from the regulatory investigations will not result in increased Fund redemptions, reduced sales of Fund shares, or other adverse consequences for the Funds.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONEY MARKET OBLIGATIONS TRUST AND SHAREHOLDERS OF FEDERATED MASTER TRUST:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Federated Master Trust (the "Fund") (one of the portfolios constituting Money Market Obligations Trust), including the portfolio of investments, as of July 31, 2006, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statement of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the two years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. The financial highlights for each of the three years in the period ended July 31, 2004 were audited by another independent registered public accounting firm whose report, dated September 17, 2004, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial highlights.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of July 31, 2006, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers or by other appropriate auditing procedures where replies from brokers were not received. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Federated Master Trust, a portfolio of the Money Market Obligations Trust, at July 31, 2006, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets and the financial highlights for each of the two years in the period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
September 12, 2006

Board of Trustees and Trust Officers

The Board is responsible for managing the Trust's business affairs and for exercising all the Trust's powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Board member and the senior officers of the Fund. Where required, the tables separately list Board members who are "interested persons" of the Fund (i.e., "Interested" Board members) and those who are not (i.e., "Independent" Board members). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is Federated Investors Tower, 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA. As of December 31, 2005, the Trust comprised 41 portfolios, and the Federated Fund Complex consisted of 43 investment companies (comprising 136 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Board member oversees all portfolios in the Federated Fund Complex and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund's Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trust Trustees and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John F. Donahue*
Birth Date: July 28, 1924
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex's Executive Committee.

Previous Positions
: Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex; Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Chairman and Director, Federated Investment Counseling.



J. Christopher Donahue*
Birth Date: April 11, 1949
PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 1989
Principal Occupations : Principal Executive Officer and President of the Federated Fund Complex; Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company; Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman, Federated Equity Management Company of Pennsylvania and Passport Research, Ltd. (Investment advisory subsidiary of Federated); Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director, Federated Services Company.

Previous Positions
: President, Federated Investment Counseling; President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D.*
Birth Date: October 11, 1932
3471 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1111
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Medical Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Downtown; Hematologist, Oncologist and Internist, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Other Directorships Held
: Member, National Board of Trustees, Leukemia Society of America.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, University of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.



* Family relationships and reasons for "interested" status: John F. Donahue is the father of J. Christopher Donahue; both are "interested" due to the positions they hold with Federated Investors, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D. is "interested" because his son-in-law is employed by the Fund's principal underwriter, Federated Securities Corp.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Thomas G. Bigley
Birth Date: February 3, 1934
15 Old Timber Trail
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: November 1994
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Member of Executive Committee, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh.

Previous Position
: Senior Partner, Ernst & Young LLP.



John T. Conroy, Jr.
Birth Date: June 23, 1937
Investment Properties Corporation
3838 North Tamiami Trail
Suite 402
Naples, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman of the Board, Investment Properties Corporation; Partner or Trustee in private real estate ventures in Southwest Florida.

Previous Positions
: President, Investment Properties Corporation; Senior Vice President, John R. Wood and Associates, Inc., Realtors; President, Naples Property Management, Inc. and Northgate Village Development Corporation.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Nicholas P. Constantakis
Birth Date: September 3, 1939
175 Woodshire Drive
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Michael Baker Corporation (engineering and energy services worldwide).

Previous Position
: Partner, Andersen Worldwide SC.



John F. Cunningham
Birth Date: March 5, 1943
353 El Brillo Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Director, WinsorTech.

Other Directorships Held
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cunningham & Co., Inc. (strategic business consulting); Trustee Associate, Boston College.

Previous Positions
: Director, Redgate Communications and EMC Corporation (computer storage systems); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Computer Consoles, Inc.; President and Chief Operating Officer, Wang Laboratories; Director, First National Bank of Boston; Director, Apollo Computer, Inc.



Peter E. Madden
Birth Date: March 16, 1942
One Royal Palm Way
100 Royal Palm Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Board of Overseers, Babson College.

Previous Positions
: Representative, Commonwealth of Massachusetts General Court; President, State Street Bank and Trust Company and State Street Corporation (retired); Director, VISA USA and VISA International; Chairman and Director, Massachusetts Bankers Association; Director, Depository Trust Corporation; Director, The Boston Stock Exchange.



Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.
Birth Date: April 10, 1945
80 South Road
Westhampton Beach, NY
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Management Consultant.

Previous Positions
: Chief Executive Officer, PBTC International Bank; Partner, Arthur Young & Company (now Ernst & Young LLP); Chief Financial Officer of Retail Banking Sector, Chase Manhattan Bank; Senior Vice President, HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank); Vice President, Citibank; Assistant Professor of Banking and Finance, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University; Executive Vice President, DVC Group, Inc.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John E. Murray, Jr., J.D., S.J.D.
Birth Date: December 20, 1932
Chancellor, Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1995
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee, and Chairman of the Board of Directors or Trustees, of the Federated Fund Complex; Chancellor and Law Professor, Duquesne University; Partner, Murray, Hogue & Lannis.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Michael Baker Corp. (engineering, construction, operations and technical services).

Previous Positions
: President, Duquesne University; Dean and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Dean and Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law.



Marjorie P. Smuts
Birth Date: June 21, 1935
4905 Bayard Street
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Public Relations/Marketing Consultant/ Conference Coordinator.

Previous Positions
: National Spokesperson, Aluminum Company of America; television producer; President, Marj Palmer Assoc.; Owner, Scandia Bord.



John S. Walsh
Birth Date: November 28, 1957
2604 William Drive
Valparaiso, IN
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer of construction temporary heaters); President and Director, Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers Products, Inc.

Previous Position
: Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc.



James F. Will
Birth Date: October 12, 1938
Saint Vincent College
Latrobe, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 2006
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chancellor and President, Saint Vincent College.

Other Directorships Held
: Alleghany Corporation.

Previous Positions
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Armco, Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer, Cyclops Industries; President and Chief Operating Officer, Kaiser Steel Corporation.



OFFICERS




Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
John W. McGonigle
Birth Date: October 26, 1938
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND SECRETARY
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Federated Investment Counseling; Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Services Company and Federated Securities Corp.



Richard A. Novak
Birth Date: December 25, 1963 TREASURER
Began serving: January 2006
Principal Occupations : Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Federated Fund Complex; Senior Vice President, Federated Administrative Services; Financial and Operations Principal for Federated Securities Corp., Edgewood Services, Inc. and Southpointe Distribution Services, Inc.
Previous Positions
: Vice President, Finance of Federated Services Company; Controller of Federated Investors, Inc.; held various financial management positions within The Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh; Auditor, Arthur Andersen & Co.



Richard B. Fisher
Birth Date: May 17, 1923
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Vice Chairman or Vice President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman, Federated Securities Corp.

Previous Positions
: President and Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Executive Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc. and Director and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Securities Corp.



Brian P. Bouda
Birth Date: February 28, 1947
CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER
Began serving: August 2004
Principal Occupations : Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of Federated Investors, Inc.; and Chief Compliance Officer of its subsidiaries. Mr. Bouda joined Federated in 1999 and is a member of the American Bar Association and the State Bar Association of Wisconsin.



Deborah A. Cunningham
Birth Date: September 15, 1959
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Deborah A. Cunningham was named Chief Investment Officer of money market products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1981 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1997. Ms. Cunningham is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.S.B.A. in Finance from Robert Morris College.






Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
Mary Jo Ochson
Birth Date: September 12, 1953
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Mary Jo Ochson was named Chief Investment Officer of tax-exempt, fixed-income products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1982 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Pittsburgh.



Susan R. Hill
Birth Date: June 20, 1963
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Susan R. Hill is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Hill joined Federated in 1990 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 2003 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 2005. Ms. Hill was a Portfolio Manager from 1994 until 2003, and served as Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1997 until 2004 and an Assistant Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1994 until 1997. Ms. Hill is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received an M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University.



Jeff A. Kozemchak
Birth Date: January 15, 1960
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Jeff A. Kozemchak is Vice President of the Trust. Mr. Kozemchak joined Federated in 1987 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 1996 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1999. He was a Portfolio Manager until 1996 and a Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Kozemchak is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received his M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University in 1987.



Paige M. Wilhelm
Birth Date: May 28, 1962
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: August 2006
Principal Occupations : Paige M. Wilhelm is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Wilhelm joined Federated in 1985 and has been a Senior Vice President and a Senior Portfolio Manager. She is responsible for portfolio management and research in the fixed-income area concentrating on taxable money market instruments. Previous associations include Senior Credit Analyst, Federated Investors; Performance Analysis Supervisor; Performance Analyst, Federated Investment Counseling. Ms. Wilhelm is a member of the CFA Society of Pittsburgh and received her B.S. from Indiana University and her M.B.A. from Duquesne University.



Evaluation and Approval of Advisory Contract

FEDERATED MASTER TRUST (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

The Fund's performance fell below the median of the relevant peer group during the year ending December 31, 2005. The Board discussed the Fund's performance with the Adviser and recognized the efforts being undertaken by the Adviser. The Board will continue to monitor these efforts and the performance of the Fund.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was above the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies, if any, relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Federated's website. Go to FederatedInvestors.com, select "Products," select the "Prospectuses and Regulatory Reports" link, then select the Fund to access the link to Form N-PX. This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

The Fund files with the SEC a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on "Form N-Q." These filings are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.) You may also access this information from the "Products" section of Federated's website at FederatedInvestors.com by clicking on "Portfolio Holdings" and selecting the name of the Fund, or by selecting the name of the Fund and clicking on "Portfolio Holdings." You must register on the website the first time you wish to access this information.

Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board, or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal. Although money market funds seek to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share, there is no assurance that they will be able to do so.

This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the Fund's prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses, and other information.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Federated Master Trust
Federated Investors Funds
5800 Corporate Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15237-7000
Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.

Federated Securities Corp., Distributor

Cusip 60934N740

28846 (9/06)

Federated is a registered mark of Federated Investors, Inc. 2006 (c)Federated Investors, Inc.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Federated Short-Term U.S. Government Trust

A Portfolio of Money Market Obligations Trust



ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT

July 31, 2006

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
SHAREHOLDER EXPENSE EXAMPLE
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS SUMMARY TABLES
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND TRUST OFFICERS
EVALUATION AND APPROVAL OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
VOTING PROXIES ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

Not FDIC Insured * May Lose Value * No Bank Guarantee

Federated Investors 50 Years of Growth & Innovation

Financial Highlights

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

   
2004

   
2003

   
2002

Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.039 0.019 0.006 0.010 0.020
Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.039
)

(0.019
)

(0.006
)

(0.010
)

(0.020
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$1.00


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00

Total Return 1

4.01
%

1.93
%

0.65
%

1.04
%

1.97
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:















Net expenses

0.46
%

0.46
%

0.46
%

0.46
%

0.46
%
Net investment income

3.96
%

1.91
%

0.64
%

1.03
%

1.95
%
Expense waiver/reimbursement 2

0.31
%

0.45
%

0.40
%

0.38
%

0.36
%
Supplemental Data:















Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$204,909

$110,588

$128,039

$220,547

$212,948

1 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

2 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees; to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees and/or shareholder services fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you to understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from February 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006.

ACTUAL EXPENSES

The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES

The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund's actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund's actual return. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are required to be provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund with other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.


   
Beginning
Account Value
2/1/2006

   
Ending
Account Value
7/31/2006

   
Expenses Paid
During Period 1

Actual

$1,000

$1,022.10

$2.31
Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return before expenses)

$1,000

$1,022.51

$2.31

1 Expenses are equal to the Fund's annualized net expense ratio of 0.46%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).

Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:


   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Repurchase Agreements

80.5
%
U.S. Government Agency Securities

19.6
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(0.1
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity schedule 3 was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:

   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

58.8
%
8-30 Days

17.5
%
31-90 Days

11.3
%
91-180 Days

7.5
%
181 Days or more

5.0
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(0.1
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

1 See the Fund's Prospectus for a description of the principal types of securities in which the Fund invests.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

GOVERNMENT AGENCIES--19.6%
$ 4,500,000 1 Federal Home Loan Bank System Floating Rate Notes, 5.039% - 5.340%, 8/2/2006 - 10/4/2006
$ 4,499,050
5,410,000 Federal Home Loan Bank System Notes, 2.375% - 5.500%, 8/11/2006 - 6/21/2007
5,405,909
6,150,000 2 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Discount Notes, 4.190% - 5.005%, 9/29/2006 - 5/1/2007
6,007,173
9,500,000 1 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Floating Rate Notes, 5.010% - 5.350%, 8/7/2006 - 9/27/2006
9,496,743
7,282,000 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Notes, 2.700% - 5.500%, 8/11/2006 - 7/9/2007
7,262,814
5,000,000 1 Federal National Mortgage Association Floating Rate Notes, 5.330%, 9/28/2006
4,996,251
2,500,000 Federal National Mortgage Association Notes, 3.875% - 4.840%, 5/15/2007 - 6/22/2007


2,475,779

   TOTAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES


40,143,719

REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--80.5%
12,000,000 3 Interest in $500,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.3225%, dated 7/27/2006 under which Banc of America LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 7/25/2036 for $507,096,667 on 10/31/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $512,990,020.
12,000,000
4,000,000 3 Interest in $900,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.28%, dated 7/11/2006 under which Banc of America Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/25/2036 for $903,960,000 on 8/10/2006. The repurchase value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $926,698,636.
4,000,000
9,068,000 Interest in $2,323,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which BNP Paribas Securities Corp. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2036 for $2,323,338,771 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $2,369,460,967.
9,068,000
12,000,000 3 Interest in $900,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.28%, dated 7/14/2006 under which Credit Suisse First Boston Corp. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/16/2043 for $903,036,000 on 8/9/2006. The repurchase value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $927,003,994.
12,000,000
5,000,000 3 Interest in $750,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.31%, dated 6/20/2006 under which Credit Suisse First Boston Corp. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/16/2043 for $757,522,500 on 8/28/2006. The repurchase value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $772,503,322.
5,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--continued
$ 7,000,000 3 Interest in $1,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.28%, dated 7/5/2006 under which Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 11/15/2046 for $1,004,986,667 on 8/8/2006. The repurchase value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,023,758,060.
$ 7,000,000
5,000,000 3 Interest in $375,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.31%, dated 6/20/2006 under which Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/1/2036 for $378,982,500 on 8/31/2006. The repurchase value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $385,895,608.
5,000,000
24,000,000 Interest in $1,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.30%, dated 7/31/2006 under which ING Financial Markets LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 7/25/2036 for $1,000,147,222 on 8/1/2006. The repurchase value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,030,003,431.
24,000,000
41,000,000 Interest in $1,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006 under which J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. will repurchase a U.S. Treasury Security and U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/15/2041 for $1,000,146,944 on 8/1/2006. The repurchase value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,022,651,313.
41,000,000
4,000,000 3 Interest in $750,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.31%, dated 6/21/2006 under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 7/25/2036 for $757,522,500 on 8/28/2006. The repurchase value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $777,061,107.
4,000,000
42,000,000 Interest in $500,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.30%, dated 7/31/2006 under which WAMU Capital Corp. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 7/20/2036 for $500,073,611 on 8/1/2006. The repurchase value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $510,035,110.


42,000,000

   TOTAL REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS


165,068,000

   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--100.1%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 4



205,211,719

   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--(0.1)%


(302,376
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
204,909,343

1 Floating rate note with current rate and next reset date shown.

2 Discount rate at time of purchase.

3 Although the repurchase date is more than seven days after the date of purchase, the fund has the right to terminate the repurchase agreement at any time with seven-days' notice.

4 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

July 31, 2006

Assets:
      
Investments in repurchase agreements
$ 165,068,000
Investments in securities


40,143,719




Total investments in securities, at amortized cost and value
$ 205,211,719
Income receivable
470,781
Receivable for shares sold





135,325

   TOTAL ASSETS





205,817,825

Liabilities:
Payable for shares redeemed
253,621
Income distribution payable
593,158
Payable to bank
21
Payable for transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
38,662
Accrued expenses


23,020




   TOTAL LIABILITIES





908,482

Net assets for 204,898,311 shares outstanding




$
204,909,343

Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 204,909,513
Distributions in excess of net investment income





(170
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS




$
204,909,343

Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds per Share:
$204,909,343 ÷ 204,898,311 shares outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$1.00

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Operations

Year Ended July 31, 2006

Investment Income:
         
Interest









$
9,001,965
Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
$ 814,186
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
162,052
Custodian fees
23,347
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
55,115
Directors'/Trustees' fees
1,121
Auditing fees
16,436
Legal fees
6,567
Portfolio accounting fees
56,547
Shareholder services fee (Note 5)
373,561
Share registration costs
39,822
Printing and postage
7,420
Insurance premiums
8,271
Miscellaneous






687




   TOTAL EXPENSES






1,565,132




Waivers (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
$ (238,398 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(6,949 )
Waiver of shareholder services fee


(373,561
)







   TOTAL WAIVERS






(618,908
)



Net expenses










946,224
Net investment income









$
8,055,741

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

Year Ended July 31
   

2006

   

2005

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income

$
8,055,741


$
2,435,157

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income


(8,056,155
)


(2,434,832
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
629,496,212 343,625,826
Proceeds from shares issued in connection with the tax-free transfer of assets from Trust for Short-Term U.S. Government Securities
65,132,145 --
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
2,305,750 981,168
Cost of shares redeemed


(602,612,124
)


(362,058,240
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


94,321,983



(17,451,246
)
Change in net assets


94,321,569



(17,450,921
)
Net Assets:
Beginning of period


110,587,774



128,038,695

End of period (including undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income of $(170) and $244, respectively)

$
204,909,343


$
110,587,774

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

July 31, 2006

1. ORGANIZATION

Money Market Obligations Trust (the "Trust") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust consists of 41 portfolios. The financial statements included herein are only those of Federated Short-Term U.S. Government Trust (the "Fund"). The financial statements of the other portfolios are presented separately. The assets of each portfolio are segregated and a shareholder's interest is limited to the portfolio in which shares are held. The primary investment objective of the Fund is to provide high income consistent with stability of principal and liquidity.

On August 8, 2005, the Fund received assets from Trust for Short-Term U.S. Government Securities as the result of a tax-free reorganization as follows:

Shares of
Federated
Short-Term
U.S. Government
Trust Issued

   
Trust for
Short-Term
U.S. Government
Securities
Net Assets
Received

   
Net Assets
of Federated
Short-Term
U.S. Government
Trust Prior to
Combination

   
Net Assets
of Trust for
Short-Term
U.S. Government
Securities
Immediately
Prior to
Combination

   
Net Assets
of Federated
Short-Term
U.S. Government
Trust Immediately
After
Combination

65,120,943

$65,132,145

$146,308,953

$65,132,145

$211,441,098

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America.

Investment Valuation

The Fund uses the amortized cost method to value its portfolio securities in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act.

Repurchase Agreements

It is the policy of the Fund to require the other party to a repurchase agreement to transfer to the Fund's custodian or sub-custodian eligible securities or cash with a market value (after transaction costs) at least equal to the repurchase price to be paid under the repurchase agreement. The eligible securities are transferred to accounts with the custodian or sub-custodian in which the Fund holds a "securities entitlement" and exercises "control" as those terms are defined in the Uniform Commercial Code. The Fund has established procedures for monitoring the market value of the transferred securities and requiring the transfer of additional eligible securities if necessary to equal at least the repurchase price. These procedures also allow the other party to require securities to be transferred from the account to the extent that their market value exceeds the repurchase price or in exchange for other eligible securities of equivalent market value.

With respect to agreements to repurchase U.S. government securities and cash items, the Fund treats the repurchase agreement as an investment in the underlying securities and not as an obligation of the other party to the repurchase agreement. Other repurchase agreements are treated as obligations of the other party secured by the underlying securities. Nevertheless, the insolvency of the other party or other failure to repurchase the securities may delay the disposition of the underlying securities or cause the Fund to receive less than the full repurchase price. Under the terms of the repurchase agreement, any amounts received by the Fund in excess of the repurchase price and related transaction costs must be remitted to the other party.

The Fund may enter into repurchase agreements in which eligible securities are transferred into joint trading accounts maintained by the custodian or sub-custodian for investment companies and other clients advised by the Adviser and its affiliates. The Fund will participate on a pro rata basis with the other investment companies and clients in its share of the securities transferred under such repurchase agreements and in its share of proceeds from any repurchase or other disposition of such securities.

Investment Income, Expenses and Distributions

Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income are declared daily and paid monthly.

Premium and Discount Amortization

All premiums and discounts are amortized/accreted.

Federal Taxes

It is the Fund's policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary.

On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released FASB Interpretation No. 48 "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken in the course of preparing the fund's tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are "more-likely-than-not" of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax benefits of positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax expense in the current year. Adoption of FIN 48 is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the effective date. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FIN 48 and its impact in the financial statements has not yet been determined.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

The Fund may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Fund records when-issued securities on the trade date and maintains security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

Other

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST

The following table summarizes share activity:

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

Shares sold
629,496,212 343,625,826
Shares issued in connection with the tax-free transfer of assets from Trust for Short-Term U.S. Government Securities
65,120,943 --
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
2,305,750 981,168
Shares redeemed

(602,612,124
)

(362,058,240
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

94,310,781


(17,451,246
)

4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

The tax character of distributions as reported on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended July 31, 2006 and 2005, was as follows:


   
2006
   
2005
Ordinary income 1

$8,056,155

$2,434,832

1 For tax purposes short-term capital gain distributions are considered ordinary income distributions.

As of July 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed ordinary income
   
$
592,988

Dividend payable
   
$
(593,158
)

5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

Federated Investment Management Company, the Fund's investment adviser (the "Adviser"), receives for its services an annual investment adviser fee equal to 0.40% of the Fund's average daily net assets. The Adviser may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. The Adviser can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the Adviser voluntarily waived $238,398.

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Fund with administrative personnel and services. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average aggregate daily net assets of certain Federated funds as specified below:

Maximum
Administrative Fee

   
Average Aggregate Daily Net Assets
of the Federated Funds

0.150%

on the first $5 billion
0.125%

on the next $5 billion
0.100%

on the next $10 billion
0.075%

on assets in excess of $20 billion

The administrative fee received during any fiscal year shall be at least $150,000 per portfolio and $40,000 per each additional class of Shares. FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FAS can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the net fee paid to FAS was 0.076% of average aggregate daily net assets of the Fund.

Shareholder Services Fee

The Fund may pay fees (Service Fees) up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Fund's Shares to financial intermediaries or to FSSC, for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. FSSC or these financial intermediaries may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of their fee. In addition, FSSC may voluntarily reimburse the Fund for shareholder services fee. This voluntary waiver and/or reimbursement can be modified or terminated at any time. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC voluntarily waived $373,561 of its fee. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC did not retain any fees paid by the Fund.

General

Certain of the Officers and Trustees of the Fund are Officers and Directors or Trustees of the above companies.

6. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning in October 2003, Federated Investors, Inc. and various subsidiaries thereof (including the advisers and distributor for various investment companies, collectively, "Federated"), along with various investment companies sponsored by Federated ("Funds") were named as defendants in several class action lawsuits now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuits were purportedly filed on behalf of people who purchased, owned and/or redeemed shares of Federated-sponsored mutual funds during specified periods beginning November 1, 1998. The suits are generally similar in alleging that Federated engaged in illegal and improper trading practices including market timing and late trading in concert with certain institutional traders, which allegedly caused financial injury to the mutual fund shareholders. These lawsuits began to be filed shortly after Federated's first public announcement that it had received requests for information on shareholder trading activities in the Funds from the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), the Office of the New York State Attorney General ("NYAG"), and other authorities. In that regard, on November 28, 2005, Federated announced that it had reached final settlements with the SEC and the NYAG with respect to those matters. As Federated previously reported in 2004, it has already paid approximately $8.0 million to certain funds as determined by an independent consultant. As part of these settlements, Federated agreed to pay for the benefit of fund shareholders additional disgorgement and a civil money penalty in the aggregate amount of an additional $72 million. Federated and various Funds have also been named as defendants in several additional lawsuits, the majority of which are now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging, among other things, excessive advisory and Rule 12b-1 fees. The Board of the Funds has retained the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro LLP to represent the Funds in these lawsuits. Federated and the Funds, and their respective counsel, are reviewing the allegations and intend to defend this litigation. Additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations may be filed in the future. The potential impact of these lawsuits, all of which seek unquantified damages, attorneys' fees and expenses, and future potential similar suits is uncertain. Although we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Funds, there can be no assurance that these suits, the ongoing adverse publicity and/or other developments resulting from the regulatory investigations will not result in increased Fund redemptions, reduced sales of Fund shares, or other adverse consequences for the Funds.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONEY MARKET OBLIGATIONS TRUST AND SHAREHOLDERS OF FEDERATED SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT TRUST:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Federated Short-Term U.S. Government Trust (the "Fund") (one of the portfolios constituting Money Market Obligations Trust), including the portfolio of investments, as of July 31, 2006, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statement of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of July 31, 2006, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Federated Short-Term U.S. Government Trust, a portfolio of the Money Market Obligations Trust, at July 31, 2006, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
September 12, 2006

Board of Trustees and Trust Officers

The Board is responsible for managing the Trust's business affairs and for exercising all the Trust's powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Board member and the senior officers of the Fund. Where required, the tables separately list Board members who are "interested persons" of the Fund (i.e., "Interested" Board members) and those who are not (i.e., "Independent" Board members). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is Federated Investors Tower, 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA. As of December 31, 2005, the Trust comprised 41 portfolios, and the Federated Fund Complex consisted of 43 investment companies (comprising 136 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Board member oversees all portfolios in the Federated Fund Complex and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund's Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trust Trustees and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John F. Donahue*
Birth Date: July 28, 1924
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
   Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex's Executive Committee.

Previous Positions
: Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex; Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Chairman and Director, Federated Investment Counseling.



J. Christopher Donahue*
Birth Date: April 11, 1949
PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1999
   Principal Occupations : Principal Executive Officer and President of the Federated Fund Complex; Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company; Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman, Federated Equity Management Company of Pennsylvania and Passport Research, Ltd. (Investment advisory subsidiary of Federated); Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director, Federated Services Company.

Previous Positions
: President, Federated Investment Counseling; President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D.*
Birth Date: October 11, 1932
3471 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1111
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
   Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Medical Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Downtown; Hematologist, Oncologist and Internist, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Other Directorships
Held : Member, National Board of Trustees, Leukemia Society of America.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, University of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.



* Family relationships and reasons for "interested" status: John F. Donahue is the father of J. Christopher Donahue; both are "interested" due to the positions they hold with Federated Investors, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D. is "interested" because his son-in-law is employed by the Fund's principal underwriter, Federated Securities Corp.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Thomas G. Bigley
Birth Date: February 3, 1934
15 Old Timber Trail
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: November 1994
   Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Member of Executive Committee, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh.

Previous Position
: Senior Partner, Ernst & Young LLP.



John T. Conroy, Jr.
Birth Date: June 23, 1937
Investment Properties Corporation
3838 North Tamiami Trail
Suite 402
Naples, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
   Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman of the Board, Investment Properties Corporation; Partner or Trustee in private real estate ventures in Southwest Florida.

Previous Positions
: President, Investment Properties Corporation; Senior Vice President, John R. Wood and Associates, Inc., Realtors; President, Naples Property Management, Inc. and Northgate Village Development Corporation.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Nicholas P. Constantakis
Birth Date: September 3, 1939
175 Woodshire Drive
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1999
   Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Michael Baker Corporation (engineering and energy services worldwide).

Previous Position
: Partner, Andersen Worldwide SC.



John F. Cunningham
Birth Date: March 5, 1943
353 El Brillo Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
   Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Director, WinsorTech.

Other Directorships Held
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cunningham & Co., Inc. (strategic business consulting); Trustee Associate, Boston College.

Previous Positions
: Director, Redgate Communications and EMC Corporation (computer storage systems); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Computer Consoles, Inc.; President and Chief Operating Officer, Wang Laboratories; Director, First National Bank of Boston; Director, Apollo Computer, Inc.



Peter E. Madden
Birth Date: March 16, 1942
One Royal Palm Way
100 Royal Palm Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
   Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Board of Overseers, Babson College.

Previous Positions
: Representative, Commonwealth of Massachusetts General Court; President, State Street Bank and Trust Company and State Street Corporation (retired); Director, VISA USA and VISA International; Chairman and Director, Massachusetts Bankers Association; Director, Depository Trust Corporation; Director, The Boston Stock Exchange.



Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.
Birth Date: April 10, 1945
80 South Road
Westhampton Beach, NY
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
   Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Management Consultant.

Previous Positions
: Chief Executive Officer, PBTC International Bank; Partner, Arthur Young & Company (now Ernst & Young LLP); Chief Financial Officer of Retail Banking Sector, Chase Manhattan Bank; Senior Vice President, HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank); Vice President, Citibank; Assistant Professor of Banking and Finance, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University; Executive Vice President DVC Group, Inc.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John E. Murray, Jr., J.D., S.J.D.
Birth Date: December 20, 1932
Chancellor, Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1995
   Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee, and Chairman of the Board of Directors or Trustees, of the Federated Fund Complex; Chancellor and Law Professor, Duquesne University; Partner, Murray, Hogue & Lannis.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Michael Baker Corp. (engineering, construction, operations and technical services).

Previous Positions
: President, Duquesne University; Dean and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Dean and Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law.



Marjorie P. Smuts
Birth Date: June 21, 1935
4905 Bayard Street
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
   Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Public Relations/Marketing Consultant/ Conference Coordinator.

Previous Positions
: National Spokesperson, Aluminum Company of America; television producer; President, Marj Palmer Assoc.; Owner, Scandia Bord.



John S. Walsh
Birth Date: November 28, 1957
2604 William Drive
Valparaiso, IN
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
   Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer of construction temporary heaters); President and Director, Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers Products, Inc.

Previous Position
: Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc.



James F. Will
Birth Date: October 12, 1938
Saint Vincent College
Latrobe, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 2006
   Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chancellor and President, Saint Vincent College.

Other Directorships Held
: Alleghany Corporation.

Previous Positions
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Armco, Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer, Cyclops Industries; President and Chief Operating Officer, Kaiser Steel Corporation.



OFFICERS




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) and Previous Position(s)
John W. McGonigle
Birth Date: October 26, 1938
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND SECRETARY
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Federated Investment Counseling; Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Services Company and Federated Securities Corp.



Richard A. Novak
Birth Date: December 25, 1963
TREASURER
Began serving: January 2006
Principal Occupations : Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Federated Fund Complex; Senior Vice President, Federated Administrative Services; Financial and Operations Principal for Federated Securities Corp., Edgewood Services, Inc. and Southpointe Distribution Services, Inc.; Senior Vice President and Controller of Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Vice President, Finance of Federated Services Company; held various financial management positions within The Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh; Auditor, Arthur Andersen & Co.



Richard B. Fisher
Birth Date: May 17, 1923
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Vice Chairman or Vice President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman, Federated Securities Corp.

Previous Positions
: President and Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Executive Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc. and Director and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Securities Corp.



Brian P. Bouda
Birth Date: February 28, 1947
CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER
Began serving: August 2004
Principal Occupations : Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of Federated Investors, Inc.; and Chief Compliance Officer of its subsidiaries. Mr. Bouda joined Federated in 1999 and is a member of the American Bar Association and the State Bar Association of Wisconsin.



Deborah A. Cunningham
Birth Date: September 15, 1959
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Deborah A. Cunningham was named Chief Investment Officer of money market products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1981 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1997. Ms. Cunningham is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.S.B.A. in Finance from Robert Morris College.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) and Previous Position(s)
Mary Jo Ochson
Birth Date: September 12, 1953
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: November 1998
Principal Occupations : Mary Jo Ochson was named Chief Investment Officer of tax-exempt, fixed-income products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1982 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Pittsburgh.



Susan R. Hill
Birth Date: June 20, 1963
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Susan R. Hill has been the Fund's Portfolio Manager since January 1994. She is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Hill joined Federated in 1990 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 2003 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 2005. Ms. Hill was a Portfolio Manager from 1994 until 2003, and served as Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1997 until 2004 and an Assistant Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1994 until 1997. Ms. Hill is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received an M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University.



Jeff A. Kozemchak
Birth Date: January 15, 1960
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Jeff A. Kozemchak is Vice President of the Trust. Mr. Kozemchak joined Federated in 1987 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 1996 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1999. He was a Portfolio Manager until 1996 and a Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Kozemchak is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received his M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University in 1987.



Paige M. Wilhelm
Birth Date: May 28, 1962
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: August 2006
Principal Occupations : Paige M. Wilhelm is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Wilhelm joined Federated in 1985 and has been a Senior Vice President and a Senior Portfolio Manager. She is responsible for portfolio management and research in the fixed income area concentrating on taxable money market instruments. Previous associations include Senior Credit Analyst, Federated Investors; Performance Analysis Supervisor; Performance Analyst, Federated Investment Counseling. Ms. Wilhelm is a member of the CFA Society of Pittsburgh and received her B.S. from Indiana University and her M.B.A. from Duquesne University.



** Officers do not receive any compensation from the Fund.

Evaluation and Approval of Advisory Contract

FEDERATED SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT TRUST (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds (e.g., institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

The Fund's performance fell below the median of the relevant peer group during the year ending December 31, 2005. The Board discussed the Fund's performance with the Adviser and recognized the efforts being undertaken by the Adviser. The Board will continue to monitor these efforts and the performance of the Fund.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was above the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies, if any, relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Federated's website. Go to FederatedInvestors.com, select "Products," select the "Prospectuses and Regulatory Reports" link, then select the Fund to access the link to Form N-PX. This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

The Fund files with the SEC a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on "Form N-Q." These filings are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.) You may also access this information from the "Products" section of Federated's website at FederatedInvestors.com by clicking on "Portfolio Holdings" and selecting the name of the Fund, or by selecting the name of the Fund and clicking on "Portfolio Holdings." You must register on the website the first time you wish to access this information.

Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board, or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal. Although money market funds seek to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share, there is no assurance that they will be able to do so.

This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the Fund's prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses, and other information.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Federated Short-Term U.S. Government Trust
Federated Investors Funds
5800 Corporate Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15237-7000
Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.

Federated Securities Corp., Distributor

Cusip 60934N765

28726 (9/06)

Federated is a registered mark of Federated Investors, Inc. 2006 (c)Federated Investors, Inc.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Government Obligations Tax-Managed Fund

A Portfolio of Money Market Obligations Trust



ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT

July 31, 2006

Institutional Shares

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
SHAREHOLDER EXPENSE EXAMPLE
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS SUMMARY TABLES
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND TRUST OFFICERS
EVALUATION AND APPROVAL OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
VOTING PROXIES ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

Not FDIC Insured * May Lose Value * No Bank Guarantee

Federated Investors 50 Years of Growth & Innovation

Financial Highlights

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

   
2004

   
2003

   
2002

Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.041 0.022 0.009 0.013 0.021
Net realized and unrealized gain on investments

--


--


--


--


0.001

   TOTAL FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS

0.041


0.022


0.009


0.013


0.022

Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income
(0.041 ) (0.022 ) (0.009 ) (0.013 ) (0.021 )
Distributions from net realized gain on investments

--


--


--


--


(0.001
)
   TOTAL DISTRIBUTIONS

(0.041
)

(0.022
)

(0.009
)

(0.013
)

(0.022
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$1.00


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00

Total Return 1

4.21
%

2.17
%

0.89
%

1.26
%

2.22
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:















Net expenses

0.20
%

0.20
%

0.20
%

0.20
%

0.20
%
Net investment income

4.15
%

2.15
%

0.88
%

1.25
%

2.16
%
Expense waiver/reimbursement 2

0.29
%

0.34
%

0.35
%

0.34
%

0.34
%
Supplemental Data:















Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$1,556,092


$1,206,111


$1,159,503


$1,521,953


$1,798,217

1 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

2 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees; to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees and/or shareholder services fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you to understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from February 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006.

ACTUAL EXPENSES

The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES

The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund's actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund's actual return. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are required to be provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund with other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.


   
Beginning
Account Value
2/1/2006

   
Ending
Account Value
7/31/2006

   
Expenses Paid
During Period 1

Actual

$1,000

$1,023.10

$1.00
Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return before expenses)

$1,000

$1,023.80

$1.00

1 Expenses are equal to the Fund's Institutional Shares annualized net expense ratio of 0.20%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).

Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:


   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

U.S. Government Agency Securities

100.1
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(0.1
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:

   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

19.8
%
8-30 Days

49.9
%
31-90 Days

24.7
%
91-180 Days

1.8
%
181 Days or more

3.9
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(0.1
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

1 See the Fund's Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information for a description of the principal types of securities in which the Fund invests.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

GOVERNMENT AGENCIES--100.1%
$ 265,000,000 1 Federal Farm Credit System Discount Notes, 5.100% - 5.150%, 8/2/2006 - 8/10/2006
$ 264,876,601
809,315,000 2 Federal Farm Credit System Floating Rate Notes, 5.206% - 5.376%, 8/1/2006 - 10/13/2006
809,219,267
11,085,000 Federal Farm Credit System Notes, 2.375% - 3.750%, 10/2/2006 - 10/20/2006
11,043,576
1,933,000,000 1 Federal Home Loan Bank System Discount Notes, 4.935% - 5.309%, 8/1/2006 - 10/18/2006
1,927,092,025
220,000,000 2 Federal Home Loan Bank System Floating Rate Notes, 5.039% - 5.380%, 8/2/2006 - 10/10/2006
219,942,016
337,950,000 Federal Home Loan Bank System Notes, 2.375% - 7.625%, 8/15/2006 - 7/13/2007


336,995,725

   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--100.1%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 3



3,569,169,210

   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--(0.1)%


(2,196,433
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
3,566,972,777

1 Discount rate at time of purchase.

2 Floating rate note with current rate and next reset date shown.

3 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

July 31, 2006

Assets:
      
Total investments in securities, at amortized cost and value
$ 3,569,169,210
Cash
1,201,979
Income receivable
8,082,155
Receivable for shares sold





124,059
   TOTAL ASSETS





3,578,577,403
Liabilities:
Payable for shares redeemed
$ 125,488
Payable for shareholder services fee (Note 5)
422,924
Payable for account administration fee (Note 5)
162
Income distribution payable
10,929,348
Accrued expenses


126,704



   TOTAL LIABILITIES





11,604,626
Net assets for 3,566,936,530 shares outstanding




$
3,566,972,777
Net Assets Consist of:
Paid in capital
$ 3,566,945,907
Undistributed net investment income





26,870
   TOTAL NET ASSETS




$
3,566,972,777
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds Per Share
Institutional Shares:
$1,556,092,071 ÷ 1,556,128,746 shares outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$1.00
Institutional Service Shares:
$2,010,880,706 ÷ 2,010,807,784 shares outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$1.00

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Operations

Year Ended July 31, 2006

Investment Income:
         
Interest









$
145,036,916
Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
$ 6,657,578
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
2,650,495
Account administration fee--Institutional Service Shares
30,232
Custodian fees
139,112
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
59,345
Directors'/Trustees' fees
23,720
Auditing fees
16,735
Legal fees
7,899
Portfolio accounting fees
176,392
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Shares (Note 5)
2,517,226
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Service Shares (Note 5)
4,903,799
Share registration costs
72,371
Printing and postage
18,459
Insurance premiums
25,035
Miscellaneous






27,406




   TOTAL EXPENSES






17,325,804




Waivers (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
$ (2,940,111 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(113,957 )
Waiver of shareholder services fee--Institutional Shares


(2,517,226
)







   TOTAL WAIVERS






(5,571,294
)



Net expenses










11,754,510
Net investment income









$
133,282,406

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

Year Ended July 31
   

2006

   

2005

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income

$
133,282,406


$
57,198,420

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income
Institutional Shares
(56,310,426 ) (24,544,085 )
Institutional Service Shares


(76,961,103
)


(32,638,685
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS


(133,271,529
)


(57,182,770
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
11,799,039,407 8,879,726,436
Proceeds from shares issued in connection with tax-free merger of assets from the Trust for Government Cash Reserves
84,754,065 --
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
31,940,046 16,250,172
Cost of shares redeemed


(11,352,758,580
)


(8,808,500,655
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


562,974,938



87,475,953

Change in net assets


562,985,815



87,491,603

Net Assets:
Beginning of period


3,003,986,962



2,916,495,359

End of period (including undistributed net investment income of $26,870 and $15,993, respectively)

$
3,566,972,777


$
3,003,986,962

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

July 31, 2006

1. ORGANIZATION

Money Market Obligations Trust (the "Trust") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust consists of 41 portfolios. The financial statements included herein are only those of Government Obligations Tax-Managed Fund (the "Fund") a diversified portfolio. The financial statements of the other portfolios are presented separately. The assets of each portfolio are segregated and a shareholder's interest is limited to the portfolio in which shares are held. The Fund offers two classes of shares: Institutional Shares and Institutional Service Shares. All shares of the Fund have equal rights with respect to voting, except on class specific matters. The financial highlights of the Institutional Service Shares are presented separately. The investment objective of the Fund is to provide current income consistent with stability of principal and liquidity.

On December 9, 2005, Government Obligations Tax-Managed Fund received assets from Trust for Government Cash Reserves as a result of a tax-free reorganization, as follows:


   
Shares of
the Fund
Issued

   
Trust for
Government
Cash
Reserves
Net Assets
Received

   
Net Assets
of the Fund
Prior to
Combination

   
Net Assets
of Trust for
Government
Cash Reserves
Immediately
Prior to
Combination

   
Net Assets
of the Fund
Immediately
After
Combination

Trust for Government Cash Reserves

84,754,065

$84,754,065

$3,211,157,913

$84,754,065

$3,295,911,978

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America.

Investment Valuation

The Fund uses the amortized cost method to value its portfolio securities in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act.

Repurchase Agreements

It is the policy of the Fund to require the other party to a repurchase agreement to transfer to the Fund's custodian or sub-custodian eligible securities or cash with a market value (after transaction costs) at least equal to the repurchase price to be paid under the repurchase agreement. The eligible securities are transferred to accounts with the custodian or sub-custodian in which the Fund holds a "securities entitlement" and exercises "control" as those terms are defined in the Uniform Commercial Code. The Fund has established procedures for monitoring the market value of the transferred securities and requiring the transfer of additional eligible securities if necessary to equal at least the repurchase price. These procedures also allow the other party to require securities to be transferred from the account to the extent that their market value exceeds the repurchase price or in exchange for other eligible securities of equivalent market value.

With respect to agreements to repurchase U.S. government securities and cash items, the Fund treats the repurchase agreement as an investment in the underlying securities and not as an obligation of the other party to the repurchase agreement. Other repurchase agreements are treated as obligations of the other party secured by the underlying securities. Nevertheless, the insolvency of the other party or other failure to repurchase the securities may delay the disposition of the underlying securities or cause the Fund to receive less than the full repurchase price. Under the terms of the repurchase agreement, any amounts received by the Fund in excess of the repurchase price and related transaction costs must be remitted to the other party.

The Fund may enter into repurchase agreements in which eligible securities are transferred into joint trading accounts maintained by the custodian or sub-custodian for investment companies and other clients advised by the Adviser and its affiliates. The Fund will participate on a pro rata basis with the other investment companies and clients in its share of the securities transferred under such repurchase agreements and in its share of proceeds from any repurchase or other disposition of such securities.

Investment Income, Expenses and Distributions

Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income are declared daily and paid monthly. Investment income and certain fund-level expenses are allocated to each class based on relative average daily net assets, except that each class bears certain expenses unique to that class such as account administration and shareholder service fees. Dividends are declared separately for each class. No class has preferential dividend rights; differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses.

Premium and Discount Amortization

All premiums and discounts are amortized/accreted.

Federal Taxes

It is the Fund's policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary.

On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released FASB Interpretation No. 48 "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken in the course of preparing the fund's tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are "more-likely-than-not" of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax benefits of positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax expense in the current year. Adoption of FIN 48 is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the effective date. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FIN 48 and its impact in the financial statements has not yet been determined.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

The Fund may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Fund records when-issued securities on the trade date and maintains security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

Other

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST

The following tables summarize share activity:

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

Institutional Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
6,325,739,769 $ 6,325,749,146 4,281,102,291 $ 4,281,102,291
Shares issued in connection with tax-free transfer of assets from Trust for Government Cash Reserves
84,754,065 84,754,065 -- --
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
16,260,309 16,260,309 6,541,528 6,541,528
Shares redeemed

(6,076,755,268
)


(6,076,755,268
)

(4,241,037,779
)


(4,241,037,779
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING
FROM INSTITUTIONAL
SHARE TRANSACTIONS


349,998,875


$
350,008,252


46,606,040


$
46,606,040

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

Institutional Service Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
5,473,290,261 $ 5,473,290,261 4,598,624,145 $ 4,598,624,145
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
15,679,737 15,679,737 9,708,644 9,708,644
Shares redeemed

(5,276,003,312
)


(5,276,003,312
)

(4,567,462,876
)


(4,567,462,876
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING
FROM INSTITUTIONAL SERVICE
SHARE TRANSACTIONS


212,966,686


$
212,966,686


40,869,913


$
40,869,913

   NET CHANGE RESULTING
FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


562,965,561


$
562,974,938


87,475,953


$
87,475,953

4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

The tax character of distributions as reported on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended July 31, 2006 and 2005, was as follows:


   
2006
   
2005
Ordinary income 1

$133,271,529

$57,182,770

1 For tax purposes short-term capital gain distributions are considered ordinary income distributions.

As of July 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed ordinary income
   
$10,956,219

Dividend payable

$(10,929,348
)

5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

Federated Investment Management Company, the Fund's investment adviser (the "Adviser"), receives for its services an annual investment adviser fee equal to 0.20% of the Fund's average daily net assets. The Adviser may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. The Adviser can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the Adviser voluntarily waived $2,940,111 of its fee.

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Fund with administrative personnel and services. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average aggregate daily net assets of certain Federated funds as specified below:

Maximum
Administrative Fee

   
Average Aggregate Daily Net Assets
of the Federated Funds

0.150%

on the first $5 billion
0.125%

on the next $5 billion
0.100%

on the next $10 billion
0.075%

on assets in excess of $20 billion

The administrative fee received during any fiscal year shall be at least $150,000 per portfolio and $40,000 per each additional class of Shares. FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FAS can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the net fee paid to FAS was 0.076% of average aggregate daily net assets of the Fund.

Shareholder Services Fee

The Fund may pay fees (Service Fees) up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Fund's Institutional Shares and Institutional Service Shares to financial intermediaries or to Federated Shareholder Services Company (FSSC), for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. FSSC or these financial intermediaries may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of their fee. In addition, FSSC may voluntarily reimburse the Fund for shareholder services fees. This voluntary waiver and/or reimbursement can be modified or terminated at any time. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC voluntarily waived $2,517,226 of its fee. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the FSSC received $579 of fees paid by the Fund.

General

Certain of the Officers and Trustees of the Fund are Officers and Directors or Trustees of the above companies.

6. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning in October 2003, Federated Investors, Inc. and various subsidiaries thereof (including the advisers and distributor for various investment companies, collectively, "Federated"), along with various investment companies sponsored by Federated ("Funds") were named as defendants in several class action lawsuits now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuits were purportedly filed on behalf of people who purchased, owned and/or redeemed shares of Federated-sponsored mutual funds during specified periods beginning November 1, 1998. The suits are generally similar in alleging that Federated engaged in illegal and improper trading practices including market timing and late trading in concert with certain institutional traders, which allegedly caused financial injury to the mutual fund shareholders. These lawsuits began to be filed shortly after Federated's first public announcement that it had received requests for information on shareholder trading activities in the Funds from the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), the Office of the New York State Attorney General ("NYAG"), and other authorities. In that regard, on November 28, 2005, Federated announced that it had reached final settlements with the SEC and the NYAG with respect to those matters. As Federated previously reported in 2004, it has already paid approximately $8.0 million to certain funds as determined by an independent consultant. As part of these settlements, Federated agreed to pay for the benefit of fund shareholders additional disgorgement and a civil money penalty in the aggregate amount of an additional $72 million. Federated and various Funds have also been named as defendants in several additional lawsuits, the majority of which are now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging, among other things, excessive advisory and Rule 12b-1 fees. The Board of the Funds has retained the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro LLP to represent the Funds in these lawsuits. Federated and the Funds, and their respective counsel, are reviewing the allegations and intend to defend this litigation. Additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations may be filed in the future. The potential impact of these lawsuits, all of which seek unquantified damages, attorneys' fees and expenses, and future potential similar suits is uncertain. Although we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Funds, there can be no assurance that these suits, the ongoing adverse publicity and/or other developments resulting from the regulatory investigations will not result in increased Fund redemptions, reduced sales of Fund shares, or other adverse consequences for the Funds.

7. CHANGE IN INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM (UNAUDITED)

On August 18, 2006, the Fund's Trustees, upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, and completion of the audit for July 31, 2006, appointed KPMG LLP (KPMG) as the Fund's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007. The Fund's previous independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP (D&T) declined to stand for re-election. The reports issued by D&T on the Fund's financial statements for the fiscal years ended July 31, 2005 and July 31, 2006, contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During the Fund's fiscal years ended July 31, 2005 and July 31, 2006: (i) there were no disagreements with D&T on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of D&T, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with the reports on the financial statements for such years; and (ii) there were no reportable events of the kind described in Item 304(a) (1) (v) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

As indicted above, the Fund has appointed KPMG as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Fund's financial statements for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2007. During the Fund's fiscal years ended July 31, 2005 and July 31, 2006 and the interim period commencing August 1, 2006 and ending September 22, 2006, neither the Fund nor anyone on its behalf has consulted KPMG on items which: (i) concerned the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Fund's financial statements; or (ii) concerned the subject of a disagreement (as defined in paragraph (a) (1) (iv) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K) or reportable events (as described in paragraph (a) (1) (v) of said Item 304).

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONEY MARKET OBLIGATIONS TRUST AND SHAREHOLDERS OF GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS TAX-MANAGED FUND FOR THE INSTITUTIONAL SHARES:

We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the portfolios of investments, of Government Obligations Tax-Managed Fund (the "Fund") (a portfolio of the Money Market Obligations Trust) as of July 31, 2006, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statement of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of July 31, 2006, by correspondence with the custodian. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of July 31, 2006, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets, and its financial highlights for the respective stated periods, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
September 22, 2006

Board of Trustees and Trust Officers

The Board is responsible for managing the Trust's business affairs and for exercising all the Trust's powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Board member and the senior officers of the Funds. Where required, the tables separately list Board members who are "interested persons" of the Fund (i.e., "Interested" Board members) and those who are not (i.e., "Independent" Board members). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is Federated Investors Tower, 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA. As of December 31, 2005, the Trust comprised 41 portfolios, and the Federated Fund Complex consisted of 43 investment companies (comprising 136 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Board member oversees all portfolios in the Federated Fund Complex and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund's Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trust Trustees and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John F. Donahue*
Birth Date: July 28, 1924
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex's Executive Committee.

Previous Positions
: Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex; Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Chairman and Director, Federated Investment Counseling.



J. Christopher Donahue*
Birth Date: April 11, 1949
PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 1989
Principal Occupations : Principal Executive Officer and President of the Federated Fund Complex; Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company; Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman, Passport Research, Ltd. (Investment advisory subsidiary of Federated); Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director, Federated Services Company.

Previous Positions
: President, Federated Investment Counseling; President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D.*
Birth Date: October 11, 1932
3471 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1111
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Medical Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Downtown; Hematologist, Oncologist and Internist, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Other Directorships Held
: Member, National Board of Trustees, Leukemia Society of America.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, University of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.



* Family relationships and reasons for "interested" status: John F. Donahue is the father of J. Christopher Donahue; both are "interested" due to the positions they hold with Federated Investors, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D. is "interested" because his son-in-law is employed by the Fund's principal underwriter, Federated Securities Corp.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Thomas G. Bigley
Birth Date: February 3, 1934
15 Old Timber Trail
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: November 1994
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Member of Executive Committee, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh.

Previous Position
: Senior Partner, Ernst & Young LLP.



John T. Conroy, Jr.
Birth Date: June 23, 1937
Investment Properties Corporation
3838 North Tamiami Trail
Suite 402
Naples, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman of the Board, Investment Properties Corporation; Partner or Trustee in private real estate ventures in Southwest Florida.

Previous Positions
: President, Investment Properties Corporation; Senior Vice President, John R. Wood and Associates, Inc., Realtors; President, Naples Property Management, Inc. and Northgate Village Development Corporation.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Nicholas P. Constantakis
Birth Date: September 3, 1939
175 Woodshire Drive
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Michael Baker Corporation (engineering and energy services worldwide).

Previous Position
: Partner, Andersen Worldwide SC.



John F. Cunningham
Birth Date: March 5, 1943
353 El Brillo Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Director, WinsorTech.

Other Directorships Held
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cunningham & Co., Inc. (strategic business consulting); Trustee Associate, Boston College.

Previous Positions
: Director, Redgate Communications and EMC Corporation (computer storage systems); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Computer Consoles, Inc.; President and Chief Operating Officer, Wang Laboratories; Director, First National Bank of Boston; Director, Apollo Computer, Inc.



Peter E. Madden
Birth Date: March 16, 1942
One Royal Palm Way
100 Royal Palm Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Board of Overseers, Babson College.

Previous Positions
: Representative, Commonwealth of Massachusetts General Court; President, State Street Bank and Trust Company and State Street Corporation (retired); Director, VISA USA and VISA International; Chairman and Director, Massachusetts Bankers Association; Director, Depository Trust Corporation; Director, The Boston Stock Exchange.



Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.
Birth Date: April 10, 1945
80 South Road
Westhampton Beach, NY
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Management Consultant.

Previous Positions
: Chief Executive Officer, PBTC International Bank; Partner, Arthur Young & Company (now Ernst & Young LLP); Chief Financial Officer of Retail Banking Sector, Chase Manhattan Bank; Senior Vice President, HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank); Vice President, Citibank; Assistant Professor of Banking and Finance, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University; Executive Vice President, DVC Group, Inc.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John E. Murray, Jr., J.D., S.J.D.
Birth Date: December 20, 1932
Chancellor, Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1995
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee, and Chairman of the Board of Directors or Trustees, of the Federated Fund Complex; Chancellor and Law Professor, Duquesne University; Partner, Murray, Hogue & Lannis.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Michael Baker Corp. (engineering, construction, operations and technical services).

Previous Positions
: President, Duquesne University; Dean and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Dean and Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law.



Marjorie P. Smuts
Birth Date: June 21, 1935
4905 Bayard Street
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Public Relations/Marketing Consultant/Conference Coordinator.

Previous Positions
: National Spokesperson, Aluminum Company of America; television producer; President, Marj Palmer Assoc.; Owner, Scandia Bord.



John S. Walsh
Birth Date: November 28, 1957
2604 William Drive
Valparaiso, IN
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer of construction temporary heaters); President and Director, Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers Products, Inc.

Previous Position
: Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc.



James F. Will
Birth Date: October 12, 1938
Saint Vincent College
Latrobe, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 2006
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chancellor and President, Saint Vincent College.

Other Directorships Held
: Alleghany Corporation.

Previous Positions
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Armco, Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer, Cyclops Industries; President and Chief Operating Officer, Kaiser Steel Corporation.



OFFICERS




Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
John W. McGonigle
Birth Date: October 26, 1938
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND SECRETARY
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Federated Investment Counseling; Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Services Company and Federated Securities Corp.



Richard A. Novak
Birth Date: December 25, 1963
TREASURER
Began serving: January 2006
Principal Occupations : Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Federated Fund Complex; Senior Vice President, Federated Administrative Services; Financial and Operations Principal for Federated Securities Corp., Edgewood Services, Inc. and Southpointe Distribution Services, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Vice President, Finance of Federated Services Company; Controller of Federated Investors, Inc.; held various financial management positions within The Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh; Auditor, Arthur Andersen & Co.



Richard B. Fisher
Birth Date: May 17, 1923
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Vice Chairman or Vice President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman, Federated Securities Corp.

Previous Positions
: President and Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Executive Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc. and Director and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Securities Corp.



Brian P. Bouda
Birth Date: February 28, 1947
CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER
Began serving: August 2004
Principal Occupations : Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of Federated Investors, Inc.; and Chief Compliance Officer of its subsidiaries. Mr. Bouda joined Federated in 1999 and is a member of the American Bar Association and the State Bar Association of Wisconsin.



Deborah A. Cunningham
Birth Date: September 15, 1959
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Deborah A. Cunningham was named Chief Investment Officer of money market products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1981 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1997. Ms. Cunningham is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.S.B.A. in Finance from Robert Morris College.



Mary Jo Ochson
Birth Date: September 12, 1953
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Mary Jo Ochson was named Chief Investment Officer of tax-exempt, fixed-income products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1982 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Pittsburgh.






Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
Susan R. Hill
Birth Date: June 20, 1963
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Susan R. Hill has been the Fund's Portfolio Manager since January 1994. She is Vice President of the Trust. Susan R. Hill is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Hill joined Federated in 1990 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 2003 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 2005. Ms. Hill was a Portfolio Manager from 1994 until 2003, and served as Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1997 until 2004 and an Assistant Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1994 until 1997. Ms. Hill is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received an M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University.



Jeff A. Kozemchak
Birth Date: January 15, 1960
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Jeff A. Kozemchak is Vice President of the Trust. Mr. Kozemchak joined Federated in 1987 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 1996 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1999. He was a Portfolio Manager until 1996 and a Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Kozemchak is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received his M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University in 1987.



Paige M. Wilhelm
Birth Date: May 28, 1962
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: August 2006
Paige M. Wilhelm is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Wilhelm joined Federated in 1985 and has been a Senior Vice President and a Senior Portfolio Manager. She is responsible for portfolio management and research in the fixed-income area concentrating on taxable money market instruments. Previous associations include Senior Credit Analyst, Federated Investors; Performance Analysis Supervisor; Performance Analyst, Federated Investment Counseling. Ms. Wilhelm is a member of the CFA Society of Pittsburgh and received her B.S. from Indiana University and her M.B.A. from Duquesne University.



Evaluation and Approval of Advisory Contract

GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS TAX-MANAGED FUND (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was above the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies, if any, relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Federated's website. Go to FederatedInvestors.com, select "Products," select the "Prospectuses and Regulatory Reports" link, then select the Fund to access the link to Form N-PX. This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

The Fund files with the SEC a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on "Form N-Q." These filings are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.) You may also access this information from the "Products" section of Federated's website at FederatedInvestors.com by clicking on "Portfolio Holdings" and selecting the name of the Fund, or by selecting the name of the Fund and clicking on "Portfolio Holdings." You must register on the website the first time you wish to access this information.

Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board, or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal. Although money market funds seek to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share, there is no assurance that they will be able to do so.

This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the Fund's prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses, and other information.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Government Obligations Tax-Managed Fund
Federated Investors Funds
5800 Corporate Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15237-7000
Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.

Federated Securities Corp., Distributor

Cusip 60934N856

Federated is a registered mark of Federated Investors, Inc. 2006 (c)Federated Investors, Inc.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Liberty U.S. Government Money Market Trust

Established 1980

A Portfolio of Money Market Obligations Trust


27TH ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT

July 31, 2006

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
SHAREHOLDER EXPENSE EXAMPLE
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS SUMMARY TABLES
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND TRUST OFFICERS
EVALUATION AND APPROVAL OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
VOTING PROXIES ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

Not FDIC Insured * May Lose Value * No Bank Guarantee

Financial Highlights-Class A Shares

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

   
2004

   
2003

   
2002

Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.035 0.015 0.002 0.006 0.015
Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.035
)

(0.015
)

(0.002
)

(0.006
)

(0.015
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$1.00


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00

Total Return 1

3.53
%

1.47
%

0.19
%

0.57
%

1.47
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:















Net expenses

0.93
%

0.92
%

0.92
%

0.93
%

0.96
%
Net investment income

3.47
%

1.42
%

0.20
%

0.58
%

1.46
%
Expense waiver/reimbursement 2

0.29
%

0.22
%

0.28
%

0.19
%

0.15
%
Supplemental Data:















Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$258,486


$270,162


$323,777


$443,485


$532,987

1 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

2 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Financial Highlights-Class B Shares

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

   
2004

   
2003

   
2002

Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.026 0.006 0.0001 0.001 0.006
Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.026
)

(0.006
)

(0.0001
)

(0.001
)

(0.006
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$1.00


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00

Total Return 1

2.61
%

0.62
%

0.01
%

0.05
%

0.57
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:















Net expenses

1.83
%

1.75
%

1.10
%

1.46
%

1.86
%
Net investment income

2.51
%

0.52
%

0.02
%

0.05
%

0.53
%
Expense waiver/reimbursement 2

0.14
%

0.14
%

0.85
%

0.41
%

--

Supplemental Data:















Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$41,481


$54,502


$101,443


$122,807


$153,901

1 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

2 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Financial Highlights-Class C Shares

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

    Year Ended    Period
Ended


7/31/2006


7/31/2005
1
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$1.00 $1.00
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.026 0.003
Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.026
)

(0.003
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$1.00


$1.00

Total Return 2

2.61
%

0.33
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:






Net expenses

1.82
%

1.82
% 3
Net investment income

2.73
%

1.46
% 3
Expense waiver/reimbursement 4

0.14
%

0.00
% 3,5
Supplemental Data:






Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$3,699


$1,285

1 Reflects operations for the period from May 2, 2005 (date of initial public investment) to July 31, 2005.

2 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

3 Computed on an annualized basis.

4 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.

5 Represents less than 0.01%.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Financial Highlights-Class F Shares

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

    Year Ended    Period
Ended


7/31/2006


7/31/2005
1
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$1.00 $1.00
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.035 0.006
Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.035
)

(0.006
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$1.00


$1.00

Total Return 2

3.53
%

0.56
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:






Net expenses

0.94
%

0.92
% 3
Net investment income

3.46
%

3.57
% 3
Expense waiver/reimbursement 4

0.28
%

0.15
% 3
Supplemental Data:






Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$184


$5

1 Reflects operations for the period from May 2, 2005 (date of initial public investment) to July 31, 2005.

2 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

3 Computed on an annualized basis.

4 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on redemptions; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees and/or shareholder services fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you to understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from February 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006.

ACTUAL EXPENSES

The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES

The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund's actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund's actual return. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are required to be provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund with other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as sales charges (loads) on redemptions. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher.


   
Beginning
Account Value
2/1/2006

   
Ending
Account Value
7/31/2006

   
Expenses Paid
During Period 1

Actual:






Class A Shares

$1,000

$1,019.70

$4.61
Class B Shares

$1,000

$1,015.20

$9.09
Class C Shares

$1,000

$1,015.20

$9.09
Class F Shares

$1,000

$1,019.70

$4.61
Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return before expenses):






Class A Shares

$1,000

$1,020.23

$4.61
Class B Shares

$1,000

$1,015.77

$9.10
Class C Shares

$1,000

$1,015.77

$9.10
Class F Shares

$1,000

$1,020.23

$4.61

1 Expenses are equal to the Fund's annualized net expense ratios, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The annualized net expense ratios are as follows:

Class A Shares
   
0.92%
Class B Shares

1.82%
Class C Shares

1.82%
Class F Shares

0.92%

Portfolio of Investments Summary Table

At July 31, 2006, the fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:


   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Repurchase Agreements

77.9%
U.S. Government Agency Securities

22.1%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

0.0%
   TOTAL

100.0%

At July 31, 2006, the fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:


   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 days

52.9
% 4
8-30 days

20.9
%
31-90 days

16.8
%
91-180 days

4.4
%
181 Days and more

5.0
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

0.0
%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

1 See the Fund's Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information for a more complete description of the principal types of securities in which the fund invests.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market funds.

4 Overnight securities comprised 49.9% of the Fund's portfolio.

Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES--22.1%
$ 12,000,000 1 Federal Home Loan Bank System Floating Rate Notes, 5.039% - 5.340%, 8/2/2006 - 10/04/2006
$ 11,997,102
8,475,000 Federal Home Loan Bank System Notes, 2.625% - 5.500%,
8/11/2006 - 6/21/2007
8,467,250
10,090,000 2 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Discount Notes, 4.190% - 5.005%, 9/29/2006 - 5/1/2007
9,836,906
19,000,000 1 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Floating Rate Notes, 5.010% - 5.350%, 8/7/2006 - 9/27/2006
18,993,739
9,250,000 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Notes, 2.375% - 5.500%,
8/11/2006 - 7/9/2007
9,227,862
5,000,000 1 Federal National Mortgage Association Floating Rate Note,
5.330%, 9/28/2006
4,996,251
3,500,000 Federal National Mortgage Association Notes, 3.875% - 4.840%,
5/15/2007 - 6/22/2007


3,467,028
   TOTAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES


66,986,138
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--77.9%
10,000,000 3 Interest in $500,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.3225%, dated 7/27/2006, under which Banc of America Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 7/25/2036 for $507,096,667 on 10/31/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $512,990,020.
10,000,000
5,000,000 3 Interest in $900,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.28%, dated 7/11/2006, under which Banc of America Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/25/2036 for $903,960,000 on 8/10/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $926,698,636.
5,000,000
15,754,000 Interest in $2,323,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006, under which BNP Paribas Securities Corp. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2036 for $2,323,338,771 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $2,369,460,967.
15,754,000
15,000,000 3 Interest in $900,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.28%, dated 7/14/2006, under which Credit Suisse First Boston LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/16/2043 for $903,036,000 on 8/9/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $927,003,994.
15,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--continued
$ 11,000,000 3 Interest in $750,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.31%, dated 6/20/2006, under which Credit Suisse First Boston LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/16/2043 for $757,522,500 on 8/28/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $772,503,322.
$ 11,000,000
5,000,000 3 Interest in $1,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.28%, dated 7/5/2006, under which Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 11/15/2046 for $1,004,986,667 on 8/8/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,023,758,060.
5,000,000
19,000,000 3 Interest in $375,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.31%, dated 6/20/2006, under which Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 8/1/2036 for $378,982,500 on 8/31/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $385,895,608.
19,000,000
15,000,000 Interest in $1,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.30%, dated 7/31/2006, under which ING Financial Markets LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 7/25/2036 for $1,000,147,222 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,030,003,431.
15,000,000
60,000,000 Interest in $1,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006, under which J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities and a U.S. Treasury security with various maturities to 8/15/2041 for $1,000,146,944 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,022,651,313.
60,000,000
20,000,000 3 Interest in $750,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.31%, dated 6/21/2006, under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 7/25/2036 for $757,522,500 on 8/28/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $777,061,107.
20,000,000
61,000,000 Interest in $500,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.30%, dated 7/31/2006, under which WAMU Capital Corp. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 7/20/2036 for $500,073,611 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $510,035,110.


61,000,000
   TOTAL REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS


236,754,000
   TOTAL INVESTMENTS-100.0%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 4



303,740,138
   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--0.0%


110,110
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
303,850,248

1 Floating rate note with current rate and next reset date shown.

2 Discount rate at time of purchase.

3 Although the repurchase date is more than seven days after the date of purchase, the fund has the right to terminate the repurchase agreement at any time with seven-days' notice.

4 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

July 31, 2006

Assets:
      
Investments in repurchase agreements
$ 236,754,000
Investments in securities


66,986,138



Total investments in securities, at amortized cost and value
$ 303,740,138
Cash
740
Income receivable
914,642
Receivable for shares sold





307,068
   TOTAL ASSETS





304,962,588
Liabilities:
Payable for shares redeemed
520,618
Income distribution payable
63,226
Payable for Directors'/Trustees' fees
202
Payable for transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
285,882
Payable for distribution services fee (Note 5)
28,299
Payable for shareholder services fee (Note 5)
169,614
Accrued expenses


44,499



   TOTAL LIABILITIES





1,112,340
Net assets for 303,904,504 shares outstanding




$
303,850,248
Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 303,849,575
Undistributed net investment income





673
   TOTAL NET ASSETS




$
303,850,248

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

July 31, 2006

Net Asset Value and Offering Price per Share
Class A Shares:
$258,485,931 ÷ 258,543,524 shares outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$1.00
Class B Shares:
$41,480,680 ÷ 41,478,398 shares outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$1.00
Class C Shares:
$3,699,350 ÷ 3,698,307 shares outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$1.00
Class F Shares:
$184,287 ÷ 184,275 shares outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$1.00
Redemption Proceeds per Share:
Class A Shares





$1.00
Class B Shares (94.50/100 of $1.00) 1





$0.95
Class C Shares (99.00/100 of $1.00) 1





$0.99
Class F Shares (99.00/100 of $1.00) 1





$0.99

1 Under certain limited conditions, a "Contingent Deferred Sales Charge" of up to 5.50% for Class B Shares and up to 1.00% for Class C Shares and Class F Shares may be imposed. See "Sales Charge When You Redeem" in the Prospectus.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Operations

Year Ended July 31, 2006

Investment Income:
         
Interest









$
13,621,984

Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
$ 1,553,053
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
270,000
Custodian fees
12,730
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
852,741
Directors'/Trustees' fees
3,052
Auditing fees
17,441
Legal fees
7,031
Portfolio accounting fees
119,264
Distribution services fee--Class B Shares (Note 5)
339,978
Distribution services fee--Class C Shares (Note 5)
17,152
Shareholder services fee--Class A Shares (Note 5)
653,972
Shareholder services fee--Class B Shares (Note 5)
113,326
Shareholder services fee--Class C Shares (Note 5)
5,564
Shareholder services fee--Class F Shares (Note 5)
524
Share registration costs
102,145
Printing and postage
59,644
Insurance premiums
8,961
Miscellaneous






3,793





   TOTAL EXPENSES






4,140,371





Waivers and Reimbursements (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
$ (413,108 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(34,598 )
Waiver of shareholder services fee--Class A Shares
(296,404 )
Waiver of shareholder services fee--Class F Shares
(241 )
Reimbursement of shareholder services fee--Class A Shares
(94,788 )
Reimbursement of shareholder services fee--Class F Shares


(70
)








   TOTAL WAIVERS AND REIMBURSEMENTS






(839,209
)




Net expenses










3,301,162

Net investment income










$10,320,822

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

Year Ended July 31
   

2006

   

2005

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income

$
10,320,822


$
4,516,459

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income
Class A Shares
(9,112,576 ) (4,176,051 )
Class B Shares
(1,139,170 ) (382,107 )
Class C Shares
(61,406 ) (1,620 )
Class F Shares


(7,376
)


(5
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS


(10,320,528
)


(4,559,783
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
173,752,700 144,879,200
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
9,602,595 4,223,068
Cost of shares redeemed


(205,460,043
)


(248,324,583
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


(22,104,748
)


(99,222,315
)
Change in net assets


(22,104,454
)


(99,265,639
)
Net Assets:
Beginning of period


325,954,702



425,220,341

End of period (including undistributed net investment income of $673 and $379, respectively)

$
303,850,248


$
325,954,702

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

July 31, 2006

1. ORGANIZATION

Money Market Obligations Trust (the "Trust") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust consists of 41 portfolios. The financial statements included herein are only those of Liberty U.S. Government Money Market Trust (the "Fund"). The financial statements of the other portfolios are presented separately. The assets of each portfolio are segregated and a shareholder's interest is limited to the portfolio in which shares are held. The Fund offers four classes of shares: Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class C Shares and Class F Shares. All shares of the Fund have equal rights with respect to voting, except on class-specific matters. The investment objective of the Fund is stability of principal and current income consistent with stability of principal.

Effective May 2, 2005, the Fund began offering Class C Shares and Class F Shares.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America.

Investment Valuation

The Fund uses the amortized cost method to value its portfolio securities in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act.

Repurchase Agreements

It is the policy of the Fund to require the other party to a repurchase agreement to transfer to the Fund's custodian or sub-custodian eligible securities or cash with a market value (after transaction costs) at least equal to the repurchase price to be paid under the repurchase agreement. The eligible securities are transferred to accounts with the custodian or sub-custodian in which the Fund holds a "securities entitlement" and exercises "control" as those terms are defined in the Uniform Commercial Code. The Fund has established procedures for monitoring the market value of the transferred securities and requiring the transfer of additional eligible securities if necessary to equal at least the repurchase price. These procedures also allow the other party to require securities to be transferred from the account to the extent that their market value exceeds the repurchase price or in exchange for other eligible securities of equivalent market value.

With respect to agreements to repurchase U.S. government securities and cash items, the Fund treats the repurchase agreement as an investment in the underlying securities and not as an obligation of the other party to the repurchase agreement. Other repurchase agreements are treated as obligations of the other party secured by the underlying securities. Nevertheless, the insolvency of the other party or other failure to repurchase the securities may delay the disposition of the underlying securities or cause the Fund to receive less than the full repurchase price. Under the terms of the repurchase agreement, any amounts received by the Fund in excess of the repurchase price and related transaction costs must be remitted to the other party.

The Fund may enter into repurchase agreements in which eligible securities are transferred into joint trading accounts maintained by the custodian or sub-custodian for investment companies and other clients advised by the Fund's adviser and its affiliates. The Fund will participate on a pro rata basis with the other investment companies and clients in its share of the securities transferred under such repurchase agreements and in its share of proceeds from any repurchase or other disposition of such securities.

Investment Income, Expenses and Distributions

Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income are declared daily and paid monthly. Non-cash dividends included in dividend income, if any, are recorded at fair value. Investment income, and certain fund-level expenses are allocated to each class based on relative average daily net assets, except that each class bears certain expenses unique to that class such as distribution and shareholder services fees. Dividends are declared separately for each class. No class has preferential dividend rights; differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses.

Premium and Discount Amortization

All premiums and discounts are amortized/accreted.

Federal Taxes

It is the Fund's policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary.

On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released FASB Interpretation No. 48 "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken in the course of preparing the fund's tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are "more-likely-than-not" of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax benefits of positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax expense in the current year. Adoption of FIN 48 is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the effective date. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FIN 48 and its impact in the financial statements has not yet been determined.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

The Fund may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Fund records when-issued securities on the trade date and maintains security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

Other

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST

The following tables summarize share activity:

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

Class A Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
141,280,203 $ 141,280,203 119,290,037 $ 119,290,037
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared


8,570,155



8,570,155



3,906,658



3,906,658

Shares redeemed

(161,526,269
)


(161,526,269
)

(176,777,400
)


(176,777,400
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM CLASS A SHARE TRANSACTIONS



(11,675,911
)



$

(11,675,911
)



(53,580,705
)



$

(53,580,705
)
Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

Class B Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
22,819,772 $ 22,819,772 24,157,819 $ 24,157,819
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared


972,422




972,422



314,951




314,951

Shares redeemed

(36,813,796
)


(36,813,796
)

(71,404,197
)


(71,404,197
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM CLASS B SHARE TRANSACTIONS



(13,021,602
)



$

(13,021,602
)



(46,931,427
)



$

(46,931,427
)
Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005 1

Class C Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
8,972,578 $ 8,972,578 1,426,282 $ 1,426,282
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared


53,236




53,236



1,455



1,455

Shares redeemed

(6,612,258
)


(6,612,258
)

(142,986
)


(142,986
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM CLASS C SHARE TRANSACTIONS



2,413,556




$

2,413,556





1,284,751





$

1,284,751


Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005 1

Class F Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
680,147 $ 680,147 5,062 $ 5,062
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared


6,782




6,782



4




4

Shares redeemed

(507,720
)


(507,720
)

--





   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM CLASS F SHARE TRANSACTIONS



179,209





$

179,209





5,066





$

5,066


   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS



(22,104,748
)



$

(22,104,748
)



(99,222,315
)



$

(99,222,315
)

1 For the period from May 2, 2005 (date of initial public investment) to July 31, 2005.

4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

The tax character of distributions as reported on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended July 31, 2006 and 2005 was as follows:


   
2006
   
2005
Ordinary income 1

$10,320,528

$4,559,783

1 For tax purposes short-term capital gain distributions are considered ordinary income distributions.

As of July 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed ordinary income
   
$
63,899

Dividend payable
   
$
(63,226
)

5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

Federated Investment Management Company, the Fund's investment adviser (the "Adviser"), receives for its services an annual investment adviser fee based on the average daily net assets of the Fund as follows: 0.500% on the first $500 million; 0.475% on the second $500 million; 0.450% on the third $500 million; 0.425% on the fourth $500 million; and 0.400% over $2 billion. The Adviser may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. The Adviser can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the Adviser voluntarily waived $413,108 of its fee.

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Fund with administrative personnel and services. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average aggregate daily net assets of certain Federated funds as specified below:

Maximum
Administrative Fee

   
Average Aggregate Daily Net Assets
of the Federated Funds

0.150%

on the first $5 billion
0.125%

on the next $5 billion
0.100%

on the next $10 billion
0.075%

on assets in excess of $20 billion

The administrative fee received during any fiscal year shall be at least $150,000 per portfolio and $40,000 per each additional class of Shares. FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FAS can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the net fee paid to FAS was 0.076% of average daily net assets of the Fund.

Distribution Services Fee

The Fund has adopted a Distribution Plan (the "Plan") pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act. Under the terms of the Plan, the Fund will compensate Federated Securities Corp. (FSC), the principal distributor, from the daily net assets of the Fund's Class B Shares and Class C Shares to finance activities intended to result in the sale of these shares. The Plan provides that the Fund may incur distribution expenses according to the following schedule annually, to compensate FSC:

Share Class Name
   
Percentage of Average Daily
Net Assets of Class

Class B Shares

0.75%
Class C Shares

0.75%

FSC may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FSC can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. When FSC receives fees, it may pay some or all of them to financial intemediaries whose customers purchase shares. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSC retained $12,533 of fees paid by the Fund.

Shareholder Services Fee

The Fund may pay fees (Service Fees) up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Fund's Class A Shares, Class B Shares, Class C Shares and Class F Shares to financial intermediaries or to Federated Shareholder Services Company (FSSC), for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. FSSC or these financial intermediaries may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of their fee. In addition, FSSC may voluntarily reimburse the Fund for shareholder services fees. This voluntary waiver and/or reimbursement can be modified or terminated at any time. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC voluntarily waived $296,645 of its fee and voluntarily reimbursed $94,858 of shareholder services fees. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC received $101,437 of fees paid by the Fund.

General

Certain of the Officers and Trustees of the Fund are Officers and Directors or Trustees of the above companies.

6. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning in October 2003, Federated Investors, Inc. and various subsidiaries thereof (including the advisers and distributor for various investment companies, collectively, "Federated"), along with various investment companies sponsored by Federated ("Funds") were named as defendants in several class action lawsuits now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuits were purportedly filed on behalf of people who purchased, owned and/or redeemed shares of Federated-sponsored mutual funds during specified periods beginning November 1, 1998. The suits are generally similar in alleging that Federated engaged in illegal and improper trading practices including market timing and late trading in concert with certain institutional traders, which allegedly caused financial injury to the mutual fund shareholders. These lawsuits began to be filed shortly after Federated's first public announcement that it had received requests for information on shareholder trading activities in the Funds from the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), the Office of the New York State Attorney General ("NYAG"), and other authorities. In that regard, on November 28, 2005, Federated announced that it had reached final settlements with the SEC and the NYAG with respect to those matters. As Federated previously reported in 2004, it has already paid approximately $8.0 million to certain funds as determined by an independent consultant. As part of these settlements, Federated agreed to pay for the benefit of fund shareholders additional disgorgement and a civil money penalty in the aggregate amount of an additional $72 million. Federated and various Funds have also been named as defendants in several additional lawsuits, the majority of which are now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging, among other things, excessive advisory and Rule 12b-1 fees. The Board of the Funds has retained the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro LLP to represent the Funds in these lawsuits. Federated and the Funds, and their respective counsel, are reviewing the allegations and intend to defend this litigation. Additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations may be filed in the future. The potential impact of these lawsuits, all of which seek unquantified damages, attorneys' fees and expenses, and future potential similar suits is uncertain. Although we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Funds, there can be no assurance that these suits, the ongoing adverse publicity and/or other developments resulting from the regulatory investigations will not result in increased Fund redemptions, reduced sales of Fund shares, or other adverse consequences for the Funds.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONEY MARKET OBLIGATIONS TRUST AND
SHAREHOLDERS OF LIBERTY U.S. GOVERNMENT MONEY MARKET TRUST:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Liberty U.S. Government Money Market Trust (the "Fund") (one of the portfolios constituting Money Market Obligations Trust), including the portfolio of investments, as of July 31, 2006, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statement of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of July 31, 2006, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Liberty U.S. Government Money Market Trust, a portfolio of Money Market Obligations Trust, at July 31, 2006, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
September 12, 2006

Board of Trustees and Trust Officers

The Board is responsible for managing the Trust's business affairs and for exercising all the Trust's powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Board member and the senior officers of the Trust. Where required, the tables separately list Board members who are "interested persons" of the Trust (i.e., "Interested" Board members) and those who are not (i.e., "Independent" Board members). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is Federated Investors Tower, 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA. As of December 31, 2005, the Trust comprised 41 portfolios, and the Federated Fund Complex consisted of 43 investment companies (comprising 136 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Board member oversees all portfolios in the Federated Fund Complex and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund's Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trust Trustees and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John F. Donahue*
Birth Date: July 28, 1924
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex's Executive Committee.

Previous Positions
: Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex; Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Chairman and Director, Federated Investment Counseling.



J. Christopher Donahue*
Birth Date: April 11, 1949
PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 1989
Principal Occupations : Principal Executive Officer and President of the Federated Fund Complex; Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company; Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman, Federated Equity Management Company of Pennsylvania and Passport Research, Ltd. (Investment advisory subsidiary of Federated) Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director, Federated Services Company.

Previous Positions
: President, Federated Investment Counseling; President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D.*
Birth Date: October 11, 1932
3471 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1111
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Medical Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Downtown; Hematologist, Oncologist and Internist, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Other Directorships Held
: Member, National Board of Trustees, Leukemia Society of America.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, University of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.



* Family relationships and reasons for "interested" status: John F. Donahue is the father of J. Christopher Donahue; both are "interested" due to the positions they hold with Federated Investors, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D. is "interested" because his son-in-law is employed by the Fund's principal underwriter, Federated Securities Corp.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Thomas G. Bigley
Birth Date: February 3, 1934
15 Old Timber Trail
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: November 1994
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Member of Executive Committee, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh.

Previous Position
: Senior Partner, Ernst & Young LLP.



John T. Conroy, Jr.
Birth Date: June 23, 1937
Investment Properties Corporation
3838 North Tamiami Trail
Suite 402
Naples, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman of the Board, Investment Properties Corporation; Partner or Trustee in private real estate ventures in Southwest Florida.

Previous Positions
: President, Investment Properties Corporation; Senior Vice President, John R. Wood and Associates, Inc., Realtors; President, Naples Property Management, Inc. and Northgate Village Development Corporation.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Nicholas P. Constantakis
Birth Date: September 3, 1939
175 Woodshire Drive
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Michael Baker Corporation (engineering and energy services worldwide).

Previous Position
: Partner, Andersen Worldwide SC.



John F. Cunningham
Birth Date: March 5, 1943
353 El Brillo Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Director, WinsorTech.

Other Directorships Held
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cunningham & Co., Inc. (strategic business consulting); Trustee Associate, Boston College.

Previous Positions
: Director, Redgate Communications and EMC Corporation (computer storage systems); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Computer Consoles, Inc.; President and Chief Operating Officer, Wang Laboratories; Director, First National Bank of Boston; Director, Apollo Computer, Inc.



Peter E. Madden
Birth Date: March 16, 1942
One Royal Palm Way
100 Royal Palm Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Board of Overseers, Babson College.

Previous Positions
: Representative, Commonwealth of Massachusetts General Court; President, State Street Bank and Trust Company and State Street Corporation (retired); Director, VISA USA and VISA International; Chairman and Director, Massachusetts Bankers Association; Director, Depository Trust Corporation; Director, The Boston Stock Exchange.



Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.
Birth Date: April 10, 1945
80 South Road
Westhampton Beach, NY
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Management Consultant.

Previous Positions
: Chief Executive Officer, PBTC International Bank; Partner, Arthur Young & Company (now Ernst & Young LLP); Chief Financial Officer of Retail Banking Sector, Chase Manhattan Bank; Senior Vice President, HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank); Vice President, Citibank; Assistant Professor of Banking and Finance, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University; Executive Vice President, DVC Group, Inc.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John E. Murray, Jr., J.D., S.J.D.
Birth Date: December 20, 1932
Chancellor, Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1995
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee, and Chairman of the Board of Directors or Trustees, of the Federated Fund Complex; Chancellor and Law Professor, Duquesne University; Partner, Murray, Hogue & Lannis.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Michael Baker Corp. (engineering, construction, operations and technical services).

Previous Positions
: President, Duquesne University; Dean and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Dean and Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law.



Marjorie P. Smuts
Birth Date: June 21, 1935
4905 Bayard Street
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Public Relations/Marketing Consultant/Conference Coordinator.

Previous Positions
: National Spokesperson, Aluminum Company of America; television producer; President, Marj Palmer Assoc.; Owner, Scandia Bord.



John S. Walsh
Birth Date: November 28, 1957
2604 William Drive
Valparaiso, IN
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer of construction temporary heaters); President and Director, Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers Products, Inc.

Previous Position
: Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc.



James F. Will
Birth Date: October 12, 1938
Saint Vincent College
Latrobe, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 2006
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chancellor and President, Saint Vincent College.

Other Directorships Held
: Allegheny Corporation.

Previous Positions
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Armco, Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer, Cyclops Industries; President and Chief Operating Officer, Kaiser Steel Corporation.



OFFICERS




Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
John W. McGonigle
Birth Date: October 26, 1938
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND SECRETARY
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Federated Investment Counseling; Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Services Company and Federated Securities Corp.



Richard A. Novak
Birth Date: December 25, 1963 TREASURER
Began serving: January 2006
Principal Occupations : Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Federated Fund Complex; Senior Vice President, Federated Administrative Services Financial and Operations Principal for Federated Securities Corp., Edgewood Services, Inc. and Southpointe Distribution Services, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Vice President, Finance of Federated Services Company; Controller of Federated Investors, Inc.; held various financial management positions within The Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh; Auditor, Arthur Andersen & Co.



Richard B. Fisher
Birth Date: May 17, 1923
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Vice Chairman or Vice President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman, Federated Securities Corp.

Previous Positions
: President and Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Executive Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc. and Director and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Securities Corp.



Brian P. Bouda
Birth Date: February 28, 1947
CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER
Began serving: August 2004
Principal Occupations : Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of Federated Investors, Inc.; and Chief Compliance Officer of its subsidiaries. Mr. Bouda joined Federated in 1999 and is a member of the American Bar Association and the State Bar Association of Wisconsin.






Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
Deborah A. Cunningham
Birth Date: September 15, 1959
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations: Deborah A. Cunningham has been the Fund's Portfolio Manager since January 1994. Ms. Cunningham was named Chief Investment Officer of money market products in 2004 and is a Vice President of the Trust. She joined Federated in 1981 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1997. Ms. Cunningham is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.S.B.A. in Finance from Robert Morris College.



Mary Jo Ochson
Birth Date: September 12, 1953
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations: Mary Jo Ochson was named Chief Investment Officer of tax-exempt, fixed-income products in 2004 and is a Vice President of the Trust. She joined Federated in 1982 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Pittsburgh.



Susan R. Hill
Birth Date: June 20, 1963
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations: Susan R. Hill has been the Fund's Portfolio Manager since January 1994. She is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Hill joined Federated in 1990 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 2003 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 2005. Ms. Hill was a Portfolio Manager from 1994 until 2003, and served as Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1997 until 2004 and an Assistant Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1994 until 1997. Ms. Hill is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received an M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University.



Jeff A. Kozemchak
Birth Date: January 15, 1960
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations: Jeff A. Kozemchak is Vice President of the Trust. Mr. Kozemchak joined Federated in 1987 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 1996 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1999. He was a Portfolio Manager until 1996 and a Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Kozemchak is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received his M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University in 1987.



Paige M. Wilhelm
Birth Date: May 28, 1962
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: August 2006
Principal Occupations: Paige M. Wilhelm is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Wilhelm joined Federated in 1985 and has been a Senior Vice President and a Senior Portfolio Manager. She is responsible for portfolio management and research in the fixed-income area concentrating on taxable money market instruments. Previous associations include Senior Credit Analyst, Federated Investors; Performance Analysis Supervisor; Performance Analyst, Federated Investment Counseling. Ms. Wilhelm is a member of the CFA Society of Pittsburgh and received her B.S. from Indiana University and her M.B.A. from Duquesne University.



Evaluation and Approval of Advisory Contract

LIBERTY U.S. GOVERNMENT MONEY MARKET TRUST (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds (e.g., institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was above the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of additional breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was above the median of the relevant peer group

At the Senior Officer's recommendation, the Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and the Adviser noted the higher costs of services offered to shareholders and other expenses associated with the fund. The Board was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies, if any, relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Federated's website. Go to FederatedInvestors.com, select "Products," select the "Prospectuses and Regulatory Reports" link, then select the Fund to access the link to Form N-PX. This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

The Fund files with the SEC a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on "Form N-Q." These filings are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.) You may also access this information from the "Products" section of the Federated Investors website at FederatedInvestors.com by clicking on "Portfolio Holdings" and selecting the name of the Fund, or by selecting the name of the Fund and clicking on "Portfolio Holdings." You must register on the website the first time you wish to access this information.

Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board, or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal. Although money market funds seek to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share, there is no assurance that they will be able to do so.

This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the Fund's prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses, and other information.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Liberty U.S. Government Money Market Trust
Federated Investors Funds
5800 Corporate Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15237-7000
Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.

Federated Securities Corp., Distributor

Cusip 60934N732
Cusip 60934N724
Cusip 60934N817
Cusip 60934N791

8042603 (9/06)

Federated is a registered mark of Federated Investors, Inc. 2006 (c)Federated Investors, Inc.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Liquid Cash Trust

A Portfolio of Money Market Obligations Trust



ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT

July 31, 2006

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
SHAREHOLDER EXPENSE EXAMPLE
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS SUMMARY TABLES
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND TRUST OFFICERS
EVALUATION AND APPROVAL OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
VOTING PROXIES ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

Not FDIC Insured * May Lose Value * No Bank Guarantee

Federated Investors 50 Years of Growth & Innovation

Financial Highlights

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended July 31,
   
2006

   
2005
1
   
2004

   
2003

   
2002

Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income

0.043


0.022


0.009


0.012


0.020

Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.043
)

(0.022
)

(0.009
)

(0.012
)

(0.020
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$1.00


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00

Total Return 2

4.33
%

2.27
%

0.91
%

1.25
%

2.04
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:















Net expenses

0.18
%

0.17
%

0.16
%

0.16
%

0.16
%
Net investment income

4.32
%

2.28
%

0.90
%

1.24
%

2.13
%
Expense waiver/reimbursement 3

0.30
%

0.30
%

0.30
%

0.30
%

0.30
%
Supplemental Data:















Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$86,721


$81,537


$93,831


$228,140


$242,443

1 Beginning with the year ended July 31, 2005, the Fund was audited by Ernst & Young, LLP. The previous years were audited by another independent registered public accounting firm.

2 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

3 This voluntary expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees; to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees and/or shareholder services fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you to understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from February 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006.

ACTUAL EXPENSES

The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES

The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund's actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund's actual return. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are required to be provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund with other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.


   
Beginning
Account Value
2/1/2006

   
Ending
Account Value
7/31/2006

   
Expenses Paid
During Period 1

Actual

$1,000

$1,023.70

$0.90
Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return before expenses)

$1,000

$1,023.90

$0.90

1 Expenses are equal to the Fund's annualized net expense ratio of 0.18%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).

Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:


   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Repurchase Agreements

100.1
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(0.1
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:


Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

100.1
%
8-30 Days

0.0
%
31-90 Days

0.0
%
91-180 Days

0.0
%
181 Days or more

0.0
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(0.1
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

1 See the Fund's Prospectus for a description of principal types of securities in which the Fund invests.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--100.1%
$ 6,848,000 Interest in $2,323,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.250%, dated 7/31/2006 under which BNP Paribas Securities Corp. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2036 for $2,323,338,771 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $2,369,460,967.
$ 6,848,000
16,000,000 Interest in $2,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.290%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Credit Suisse First Boston Corp. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 12/16/2045 for $2,000,293,889 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $2,060,005,868.
16,000,000
16,000,000 Interest in $1,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.300%, dated 7/31/2006 under which ING Financial Markets LLC will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 7/25/2036 for $1,000,147,222 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,030,003,431.
16,000,000
16,000,000 Interest in $1,000,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.290%, dated 7/31/2006 under which J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency and U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 8/15/2041 for $1,000,146,944 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,022,651,313.
16,000,000
16,000,000 Interest in $700,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.290%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Merrill Lynch Government Securities will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 7/25/2036 for $700,102,861 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $721,000,666.
16,000,000
16,000,000 Interest in $500,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.290%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 3/1/2036 for $500,073,472 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $512,301,208.


16,000,000

   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--100.1%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 1



86,848,000

   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--(0.1)%


(127,250
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS --100%

$
86,720,750

1 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

July 31, 2006

Assets:
      
Total investments in repurchase agreements, at amortized cost and value
$ 86,848,000
Cash
9,119
Income receivable
12,759
Receivable for shares sold






18,757

   TOTAL ASSETS






86,888,635

Liabilities:
Income distribution payable
$ 150,579
Payable for Directors'/Trustees' fees
47
Payable for portfolio accounting fees
8,025
Payable for transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
6,181
Accrued expenses


3,053





   TOTAL LIABILITIES






167,885

Net assets for 86,721,371 shares outstanding





$
86,720,750

Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 86,721,371
Distributions in excess of net investment income






(621
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS





$
86,720,750

Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds per Share:
$86,720,750 ÷ 86,721,371 shares outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized






$1.00

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Operations

Year Ended July 31, 2006

Investment Income:
         
Interest









$
4,347,008
Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
$ 386,423
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
150,000
Custodian fees
16,224
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
18,318
Directors'/Trustees' fees
1,112
Auditing fees
16,580
Legal fees
6,637
Portfolio accounting fees
45,572
Share registration costs
25,410
Printing and postage
7,665
Insurance premiums
7,647
Miscellaneous






6,379




   TOTAL EXPENSES






687,967




Waivers and Reimbursement (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
$ (386,423 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(24,033 )
Reimbursement of other operating expenses


(107,256
)







   TOTAL WAIVERS AND REIMBURSEMENT






(517,712
)



Net expenses










170,255
Net investment income









$
4,176,753

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

Year Ended July 31
   

2006

   

2005

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income

$
4,176,753


$
2,768,042

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income


(4,176,738
)


(2,768,649
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
916,539,897 1,324,347,791
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
2,988,698 2,112,380
Cost of shares redeemed


(914,345,021
)


(1,338,753,097
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


5,183,574



(12,292,926
)
Change in net assets


5,183,589



(12,293,533
)
Net Assets:
Beginning of period


81,537,161



93,830,694

End of period (including distributions in excess of net investment income of $(621) and $(636), respectively)

$
86,720,750


$
81,537,161

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

July 31, 2006

1. ORGANIZATION

Money Market Obligations Trust (the "Trust") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust consists of 41 portfolios. The financial statements included herein are only those of Liquid Cash Trust (the "Fund"). The financial statements of the other portfolios are presented separately. The assets of each portfolio are segregated and a shareholder's interest is limited to the portfolio in which shares are held. The investment objective of the Fund is stability of principal and current income consistent with stability of principal.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America.

Investment Valuation

The Fund uses the amortized cost method to value its portfolio securities in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act.

Repurchase Agreements

It is the policy of the Fund to require the other party to a repurchase agreement to transfer to the Fund's custodian or sub-custodian eligible securities or cash with a market value (after transaction costs) at least equal to the repurchase price to be paid under the repurchase agreement. The eligible securities are transferred to accounts with the custodian or sub-custodian in which the Fund holds a "securities entitlement" and exercises "control" as those terms are defined in the Uniform Commercial Code. The Fund has established procedures for monitoring the market value of the transferred securities and requiring the transfer of additional eligible securities if necessary to equal at least the repurchase price. These procedures also allow the other party to require securities to be transferred from the account to the extent that their market value exceeds the repurchase price or in exchange for other eligible securities of equivalent market value.

With respect to agreements to repurchase U.S. government securities and cash items, the Fund treats the repurchase agreement as an investment in the underlying securities and not as an obligation of the other party to the repurchase agreement. Other repurchase agreements are treated as obligations of the other party secured by the underlying securities. Nevertheless, the insolvency of the other party or other failure to repurchase the securities may delay the disposition of the underlying securities or cause the Fund to receive less than the full repurchase price. Under the terms of the repurchase agreement, any amounts received by the Fund in excess of the repurchase price and related transaction costs must be remitted to the other party.

The Fund may enter into repurchase agreements in which eligible securities are transferred into joint trading accounts maintained by the custodian or sub custodian for investment companies and other clients advised by the Fund's adviser and its affiliates. The Fund will participate on a pro rata basis with the other investment companies and clients in its share of the securities transferred under such repurchase agreements and in its share of proceeds from any repurchase or other disposition of such securities.

Investment Income, Expenses and Distributions

Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income are declared daily and paid monthly.

Premium and Discount Amortization

All premiums and discounts are amortized/accreted.

Federal Taxes

It is the Fund's policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary.

On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released FASB Interpretation No. 48 "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken in the course of preparing the fund's tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are "more-likely-than-not" of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax benefits of positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax expense in the current year. Adoption of FIN 48 is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the effective date. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FIN 48 and its impact in the financial statements has not yet been determined.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

The Fund may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Fund records when-issued securities on the trade date and maintains security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

Other

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST

The following table summarizes share activity:

Year Ended July 31
   
2006
   
2005

Shares sold
916,539,897 1,324,347,791
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
2,988,698 2,112,380
Shares redeemed

(914,345,021
)
(1,338,753,097
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

5,183,574

(12,292,926
)

4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

The tax character of distributions as reported on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended July 31, 2006 and 2005, was as follows:


   
2006
   
2005
Ordinary income 1

$4,176,738

$2,768,649

1 For tax purposes short-term capital gain distributions are considered ordinary income distributions.

As of July 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed ordinary income
   
$
149,958

Dividend Payable

$
(150,579
)

5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

Federated Investment Management Company, the Fund's investment adviser (the "Adviser"), receives for its services an annual investment adviser fee equal to 0.40% of the Fund's average daily net assets. The Adviser will waive to the extent of its adviser fee, the amount, if any, by which the Fund's aggregate annual operating expenses, (excluding interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, expenses of registering and qualifying the Fund and its shares under federal and state laws and regulations, and extraordinary expenses) exceed 0.45% of the average daily net assets of the Fund. In addition, the Adviser may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee and/or reimburse certain operating expenses of the Fund. The Adviser can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver and/or reimbursement at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the Adviser waived $386,423 of its fee and reimbursed $107,256 of other operating expenses.

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Fund with administrative personnel and services. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average aggregate daily net assets of certain Federated funds as specified below:

Maximum
Administrative Fee

   
Average Aggregate Daily Net Assets
of the Federated Funds

0.150%

on the first $5 billion
0.125%

on the next $5 billion
0.100%

on the next $10 billion
0.075%

on assets in excess of $20 billion

The administrative fee received during any fiscal year shall be at least $150,000 per portfolio and $40,000 per each additional class of Shares. FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FAS can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the net fee paid to FAS was 0.130% of average aggregate daily net assets of the Fund.

Shareholder Services Fee

The Fund may pay fees (Service Fees) up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Fund's Shares to financial intermediaries or to Federated Shareholder Services Company (FSSC) for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. FSSC or these financial intermediaries may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of their fee. In addition, FSSC may voluntarily reimburse the Fund for shareholder services fees. This voluntary waiver and/or reimbursement can be modified or terminated at any time. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the Fund's Shares did not incur a shareholder services fee.

General

Certain of the Officers and Trustees of the Fund are Officers and Directors or Trustees of the above companies.

6. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning in October 2003, Federated Investors, Inc. and various subsidiaries thereof (including the advisers and distributor for various investment companies, collectively, "Federated"), along with various investment companies sponsored by Federated ("Funds") were named as defendants in several class action lawsuits now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuits were purportedly filed on behalf of people who purchased, owned and/or redeemed shares of Federated-sponsored mutual funds during specified periods beginning November 1, 1998. The suits are generally similar in alleging that Federated engaged in illegal and improper trading practices including market timing and late trading in concert with certain institutional traders, which allegedly caused financial injury to the mutual fund shareholders. These lawsuits began to be filed shortly after Federated's first public announcement that it had received requests for information on shareholder trading activities in the Funds from the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), the Office of the New York State Attorney General ("NYAG"), and other authorities. In that regard, on November 28, 2005, Federated announced that it had reached final settlements with the SEC and the NYAG with respect to those matters. As Federated previously reported in 2004, it has already paid approximately $8.0 million to certain funds as determined by an independent consultant. As part of these settlements, Federated agreed to pay for the benefit of fund shareholders additional disgorgement and a civil money penalty in the aggregate amount of an additional $72 million. Federated and various Funds have also been named as defendants in several additional lawsuits, the majority of which are now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging, among other things, excessive advisory and Rule 12b-1 fees. The Board of the Funds has retained the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro LLP to represent the Funds in these lawsuits. Federated and the Funds, and their respective counsel, are reviewing the allegations and intend to defend this litigation. Additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations may be filed in the future. The potential impact of these lawsuits, all of which seek unquantified damages, attorneys' fees and expenses, and future potential similar suits is uncertain. Although we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Funds, there can be no assurance that these suits, the ongoing adverse publicity and/or other developments resulting from the regulatory investigations will not result in increased Fund redemptions, reduced sales of Fund shares, or other adverse consequences for the Funds.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONEY MARKET OBLIGATIONS TRUST AND SHAREHOLDERS OF LIQUID CASH TRUST:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Liquid Cash Trust (the "Fund") (one of the portfolios constituting Money Market Obligations Trust), including the portfolio of investments, as of July 31, 2006, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statement of changes in net assets and the financial highlights for each of the two years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. The financial highlights for each of the three years in the period ended July 31, 2004 were audited by another independent registered public accounting firm whose report, dated September 17, 2004, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial highlights.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of July 31, 2006, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Liquid Cash Trust, a portfolio of the Money Market Obligations Trust, at July 31, 2006, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets and the financial highlights for each of the two years in the period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
September 12, 2006

Board of Trustees and Trust Officers

The Board is responsible for managing the Trust's business affairs and for exercising all the Trust's powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Board member and the senior officers of the Fund. Where required, the tables separately list Board members who are "interested persons" of the Fund (i.e., "Interested" Board members) and those who are not (i.e., "Independent" Board members). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is Federated Investors Tower, 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA. As of December 31, 2005, the Trust comprised 41 portfolios, and the Federated Fund Complex consisted of 43 investment companies (comprising 136 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Board member oversees all portfolios in the Federated Fund Complex and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund's Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trust Trustees and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John F. Donahue*
Birth Date: July 28, 1924
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex's Executive Committee.

Previous Positions
: Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex; Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Chairman and Director, Federated Investment Counseling.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

J. Christopher Donahue*
Birth Date: April 11, 1949
PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1999
Principal Occupations : Principal Executive Officer and President of the Federated Fund Complex; Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company; Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman, Federated Equity Management Company of Pennsylvania and Passport Research, Ltd. Investment advisory subsidiary of Federated) Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director, Federated Services Company.
Previous Positions
: President, Federated Investment Counseling; President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd.



Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D.*
Birth Date: October 11, 1932
3471 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1111
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Medical Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Downtown; Hematologist, Oncologist and Internist, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Other Directorships
Held : Member, National Board of Trustees, Leukemia Society of America.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, University of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.



* Family relationships and reasons for "interested" status: John F. Donahue is the father of J. Christopher Donahue; both are "interested" due to the positions they hold with Federated Investors, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D. is "interested" because his son-in-law is employed by the Fund's principal underwriter, Federated Securities Corp.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Thomas G. Bigley
Birth Date: February 3, 1934
15 Old Timber Trail
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: November 1994
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Member of Executive Committee, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh.

Previous Position
: Senior Partner, Ernst & Young LLP.



John T. Conroy, Jr.
Birth Date: June 23, 1937
Investment Properties Corporation
3838 North Tamiami Trail
Suite 402
Naples, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman of the Board, Investment Properties Corporation; Partner or Trustee in private real estate ventures in Southwest Florida.

Previous Positions
: President, Investment Properties Corporation; Senior Vice President, John R. Wood and Associates, Inc., Realtors; President, Naples Property Management, Inc. and Northgate Village Development Corporation.



Nicholas P. Constantakis
Birth Date: September 3, 1939
175 Woodshire Drive
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Michael Baker Corporation (engineering and energy services worldwide).

Previous Position
: Partner, Andersen Worldwide SC.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John F. Cunningham
Birth Date: March 5, 1943
353 El Brillo Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Director, WinsorTech.

Other Directorships Held
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cunningham & Co., Inc. (strategic business consulting); Trustee Associate, Boston College.

Previous Positions
: Director, Redgate Communications and EMC Corporation (computer storage systems); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Computer Consoles, Inc.; President and Chief Operating Officer, Wang Laboratories; Director, First National Bank of Boston; Director, Apollo Computer, Inc.



Peter E. Madden
Birth Date: March 16, 1942
One Royal Palm Way
100 Royal Palm Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Board of Overseers, Babson College.

Previous Positions
: Representative, Commonwealth of Massachusetts General Court; President, State Street Bank and Trust Company and State Street Corporation (retired); Director, VISA USA and VISA International; Chairman and Director, Massachusetts Bankers Association; Director, Depository Trust Corporation; Director, The Boston Stock Exchange.



Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.
Birth Date: April 10, 1945
80 South Road
Westhampton Beach, NY
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Management Consultant.

Previous Positions
: Chief Executive Officer, PBTC International Bank; Partner, Arthur Young & Company (now Ernst & Young LLP); Chief Financial Officer of Retail Banking Sector, Chase Manhattan Bank; Senior Vice President, HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank); Vice President, Citibank; Assistant Professor of Banking and Finance, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University; Executive Vice President DVC Group, Inc.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John E. Murray, Jr., J.D., S.J.D.
Birth Date: December 20, 1932
Chancellor, Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1995
Principal Occupations: Director or Trustee, and Chairman of the Board of Directors or Trustees, of the Federated Fund Complex; Chancellor and Law Professor, Duquesne University; Partner, Murray, Hogue & Lannis.

Other Directorships Held:
Director, Michael Baker Corp. (engineering, construction, operations and technical services).

Previous Positions:
President, Duquesne University; Dean and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Dean and Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law.



Marjorie P. Smuts
Birth Date: June 21, 1935
4905 Bayard Street
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Public Relations/Marketing Consultant/Conference Coordinator.

Previous Positions
: National Spokesperson, Aluminum Company of America; television producer; President, Marj Palmer Assoc.; Owner, Scandia Bord.



John S. Walsh
Birth Date: November 28, 1957
2604 William Drive
Valparaiso, IN
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer of construction temporary heaters); President and Director, Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers Products, Inc.

Previous Position
: Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc.



James F. Will
Birth Date: October 12, 1938
Saint Vincent College
Latrobe, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 2006
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chancellor and President, Saint Vincent College.

Other Directorships Held
: Allegheny Corporation.

Previous Positions : Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Armco, Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer, Cyclops Industries; President and Chief Operating Officer, Kaiser Steel Corporation.



OFFICERS




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) and Previous Position(s)
John W. McGonigle
Birth Date: October 26, 1938
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND SECRETARY
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.
Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Federated Investment Counseling; Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Services Company and Federated Securities Corp.



Richard A. Novak
Birth Date: December 25, 1963 TREASURER
Began serving: January 2006
Principal Occupations : Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Federated Fund Complex; Senior Vice President, Federated Administrative Services Financial and Operations Principal for Federated Securities Corp., Edgewood Services, Inc. and Southpointe Distribution Services, Inc.
Previous Positions
: Vice President, Finance of Federated Services Company Controller of Federated Investors, Inc.; held various financial management positions within The Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh; Auditor, Arthur Andersen & Co.



Richard B. Fisher
Birth Date: May 17, 1923
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Vice Chairman or Vice President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman, Federated Securities Corp.

Previous Positions
: President and Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Executive Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc. and Director and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Securities Corp.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) and Previous Position(s)
Brian P. Bouda
Birth Date: February 28, 1947
CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER
Began serving: August 2004
Principal Occupations : Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of Federated Investors, Inc.; and Chief Compliance Officer of its subsidiaries. Mr. Bouda joined Federated in 1999 and is a member of the American Bar Association and the State Bar Association of Wisconsin.



Deborah A. Cunningham
Birth Date: September 15, 1959
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Deborah A. Cunningham was named Chief Investment Officer of money market products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1981 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1997. Ms. Cunningham is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.S.B.A. in Finance from Robert Morris College.



Mary Jo Ochson
Birth Date: September 12, 1953
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: November 1998
Principal Occupations : Mary Jo Ochson was named Chief Investment Officer of tax-exempt fixed-income products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1982 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Pittsburgh.



Susan R. Hill
Birth Date: June 20, 1963
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: MAY 2004
Principal Occupations : Susan R. Hill has been the Fund's Portfolio Manager since January 1994. She is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Hill joined Federated in 1990 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 2003 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 2005. Ms. Hill was a Portfolio Manager from 1994 until 2003, and served as Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1997 until 2004 and an Assistant Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1994 until 1997. Ms. Hill is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received an M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) and Previous Position(s)
Jeff A. Kozemchak
Birth Date: January 15, 1960
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Jeff A. Kozemchak is Vice President of the Trust. Mr. Kozemchak joined Federated in 1987 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 1996 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1999. He was a Portfolio Manager until 1996 and a Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Kozemchak is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received his M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University in 1987.



Paige M. Wilhelm
Birth Date: May 28, 1962
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: August 2006
Principal Occupations : Paige M. Wilhelm is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Wilhelm joined Federated in 1985 and has been a Senior Vice President and a Senior Portfolio Manager. She is responsible for portfolio management and research in the fixed-income area concentrating on taxable money market instruments. Previous associations include Senior Credit Analyst, Federated Investors; Performance Analysis Supervisor; Performance Analyst, Federated Investment Counseling. Ms. Wilhelm is a member of the CFA Society of Pittsburgh and received her B.S. from Indiana University and her M.B.A. from Duquesne University.



**Officers do not receive any compensation from the Fund.

Evaluation and Approval of Advisory Contract

LIQUID CASH TRUST (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was above the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies, if any, relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Federated's website. Go to FederatedInvestors.com, select "Products," select the "Prospectuses and Regulatory Reports" link, then select the Fund to access the link to Form N-PX. This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

The Fund files with the SEC a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on "Form N-Q." These filings are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.) You may also access this information from the "Products" section of the Federated's website at FederatedInvestors.com by clicking on "Portfolio Holdings" and selecting the name of the Fund, or by selecting the name of the Fund and clicking on "Portfolio Holdings." You must register on the website the first time you wish to access this information.

Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board, or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal. Although money market funds seek to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share, there is no assurance that they will be able to do so.

This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the Fund's prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses, and other information.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Liquid Cash Trust
Federated Investors Funds
5800 Corporate Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15237-7000
Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.

Federated Securities Corp., Distributor

Cusip 60934N757

28729 (9/06)

Federated is a registered mark of Federated Investors, Inc. 2006 (c)Federated Investors, Inc.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Money Market Management

A Portfolio of Money Market Obligations Trust



ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT

July 31, 2006

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
SHAREHOLDER EXPENSE EXAMPLE
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS SUMMARY TABLES
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND TRUST OFFICERS
EVALUATION AND APPROVAL OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
VOTING PROXIES ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

Not FDIC Insured * May Lose Value * No Bank Guarantee

Federated Investors 50 Years of Growth & Innovation

Financial Highlights

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

   
2004

   
2003

   
2002

Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.032 0.012 0.001 0.004 0.014
Net realized and unrealized gain on investments

0.000
1

0.000
1

0.000
1

0.000
1

0.000
1
   TOTAL FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS

0.032


0.012


0.001


0.004


0.014

Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.032
)

(0.012
)

(0.001
)

(0.004
)

(0.014
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$1.00


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00

Total Return 2

3.29
%

1.22
%

0.06
%

0.44
%

1.42
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:















Net expenses

1.22
%

1.22
%

1.13
%

1.22
%

1.20
%
Net investment income

3.22
%

1.19
%

0.06
%

0.45
%

1.42
%
Expense waiver/reimbursement 3

0.56
%

0.37
%

0.33
%

0.10
%

0.10
%
Supplemental Data:















Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$36,597


$41,519


$49,683


$57,210


$68,035

1 Represents less than $0.001.

2 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

3 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees; to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees and/or shareholder services fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you to understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from February 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006.

ACTUAL EXPENSES

The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES

The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund's actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund's actual return. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are required to be provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund with other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.


   
Beginning
Account Value
2/1/2006

   
Ending
Account Value
7/31/2006

   
Expenses Paid
During Period

1
Actual

$1,000

$1,018.50

$6.11

Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return before expenses)

$1,000

$1,018.74

$6.11

1 Expenses are equal to the Fund's annualized net expense ratio of 1.22%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).

Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:

Security Type


   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Variable Rate Demand Instruments

48.1
%
Commercial Paper & Notes

37.4
%
Bank Instruments

8.9
%
Repurchase Agreements

6.4
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(0.8
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:



   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

43.6
% 4
8-30 Days

33.1
%
31-90 Days

11.8
%
91-180 Days

11.6
%
181 Days or more

0.7
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(0.8
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

1 Commercial Paper and Notes includes any fixed-rate security that is not a bank instrument. A variable rate demand instrument is any security which has an interest rate that resets periodically. See the Fund's Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information for descriptions of commercial paper, repurchase agreements and bank instruments.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

4 Overnight securities comprised 6.4% of the Fund's portfolio.

Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

ASSET-BACKED SECURITY--1.4%
Finance - Automotive--1.4%
$ 500,000 GS Auto Loan Trust 2006-1, Class A1, 5.514%, 8/15/2007

$
500,000

BANKERS ACCEPTANCE--2.0%
Banking--2.0%
732,996 Huntington National Bank, Columbus, OH, 4.850%, 8/28/2006


730,330

CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT--6.9%
Banking--6.9%
1,800,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 5.250%, 11/20/2006
1,800,000
500,000 Deutsche Bank AG, 4.405%, 10/4/2006
500,004
250,000 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 4.840%, 1/30/2007


249,976

   TOTAL CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT


2,549,980

COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS--13.6%
Banking--2.7%
1,000,000 Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., 5.437%, 8/1/2006


1,000,000

Brokerage--10.9%
1,000,000 Bear Stearns & Co., Inc., 5.432%, 8/1/2006
1,000,000
1,000,000 Goldman Sachs & Co., 5.382%, 8/1/2006
1,000,000
1,000,000 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.442%, 8/1/2006
1,000,000
1,000,000 Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., 5.412%, 8/1/2006


1,000,000

   TOTAL


4,000,000

   TOTAL COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS


5,000,000

COMMERCIAL PAPER--21.0% 1
Banking--2.7%
1,000,000 2,3 Picaros Funding LLC, (KBC Bank NV GTD), 5.400%, 10/11/2006


989,350

Consumer Products--0.8%
300,000 2,3 Fortune Brands, Inc., 5.240%, 8/9/2006


299,651

Finance - Automotive--3.5%
300,000 DaimlerChrysler North America Holding Corp., 5.250%, 8/14/2006
299,431
1,000,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust (Series A1+/P1), 5.110%, 11/13/2006


985,238

   TOTAL


1,284,669

Finance - Commercial--2.7%
1,000,000 CIT Group, Inc., 5.050%, 10/16/2006


989,339

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

COMMERCIAL PAPER--continued 1
Finance - Retail--5.8%
$ 600,000 2,3 Compass Securitization LLC, 5.245%, 9/15/2006
$ 596,066
500,000 Countrywide Financial Corp., 5.300%, 8/7/2006
499,558
1,000,000 2,3 Paradigm Funding LLC, 5.330%, 8/15/2006


997,927

   TOTAL


2,093,551

Finance - Securities--3.9%
1,449,000 2,3 Grampian Funding LLC, 5.050% - 5.370%, 8/30/2006 - 10/25/2006


1,434,494

Food & Beverage--0.8%
300,000 2,3 Sara Lee Corp., 5.370%, 8/3/2006


299,911

Oil & Oil Finance--0.8%
300,000 2,3 ConocoPhillips, (ConocoPhillips Co. GTD), 5.400%, 8/1/2006


300,000

   TOTAL COMMERCIAL PAPER


7,690,965

CORPORATE BOND--1.4%
Banking--1.4%
500,000 PNC Funding Corp., 5.750%, 8/1/2006


500,000

NOTES - VARIABLE--48.1% 4
Banking--32.3%
2,000,000 Allied Irish Banks PLC, 5.355%, 8/14/2006
2,000,136
1,000,000 2,3 BNP Paribas SA, 5.363%, 8/28/2006
1,000,000
1,750,000 2,3 Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Sydney, 5.370%, 8/24/2006
1,750,000
1,500,000 2,3 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.259% - 5.315%, 8/9/2006 - 8/21/2006
1,500,000
1,000,000 Kansas City, MO Tax Increment Financing Commission, President Hotel, (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS), 5.450%, 8/10/2006
1,000,000
1,000,000 2 MONET Trust (Series 2000-1) Class A-2A, (Dresdner Bank AG, Frankfurt SWP), 5.560%, 9/28/2006
1,000,000
400,000 2,3 Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, Edinburgh, 5.217%, 8/24/2006
399,979
1,000,000 Salvation Army (Series 2004-A), (Bank of New York LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
1,000,000
2,155,000 Stratford Properties LP (Series 1998), (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 5.490%, 8/8/2006


2,155,000

   TOTAL


11,805,115

Brokerage--3.4%
500,000 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.386%, 8/1/2006
500,000
750,000 Morgan Stanley, 5.362% - 5.640%, 8/4/2006 -- 10/12/2006


750,127

   TOTAL


1,250,127

Finance -- Retail--4.1%
1,000,000 AFS Insurance Premium Receivables Trust (Series 1994-A), 5.924%, 8/15/2006
1,000,000
500,000 2,3 Paradigm Funding LLC, 5.345%, 8/25/2006


500,000

   TOTAL


1,500,000

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 4
Finance -- Securities--2.7%
$ 1,000,000 2,3 Beta Finance, Inc., 5.189%, 8/22/2006

$
1,000,072

Municipal--0.8%
300,000 Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund Finance Corp., 5.377%, 8/15/2006


300,000

Pharmaceuticals & Health Care--4.8%
1,750,000 2,3 Eli Lilly Services, Inc., (Eli Lilly & Co. GTD), 5.372%, 9/1/2006


1,750,000

   TOTAL NOTES -- VARIABLE


17,605,314

REPURCHASE AGREEMENT--6.4%
2,331,000 Interest in $3,200,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.290%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Bank of America N.A. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/01/2035 for $3,200,470,222 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $3,264,000,000.

$
2,331,000

   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--100.8%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 5



36,907,589

   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--(0.8)%


(310,326
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
36,597,263

1 Discount rate at the time of purchase, or the coupon for interest bearing issues.

2 Denotes a restricted security that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) is subject to a contractual restriction on public sales. At July 31, 2006, these restricted securities amounted to $13,817,450, which represented 37.8% of total net assets.

3 Denotes a restricted security that may be resold without restriction to "qualified institutional buyers" as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and that the Fund has determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Fund's Board of Trustees (the "Trustees"). At July 31, 2006, these liquid restricted securities amounted to $12,817,450, which represented 35.0% of total net assets.

4 Floating rate notes with current rate and next reset date shown.

5 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

GTD --Guaranteed
LOC --Letter of Credit
INS --Insured
SWP --Swap Agreement

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

July 31, 2006

Assets:
      
Total investments in securities, at amortized cost and value
$ 36,907,589
Cash
230
Income receivable
128,552
Receivable for shares sold





151,889

   TOTAL ASSETS





37,188,260

Liabilities:
Payable for investments purchased
$ 500,000
Payable for shares redeemed
16,886
Payable for transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
31,760
Payable for shareholder services fee (Note 5)
22,308
Income distribution payable
3,215
Accrued expenses


16,828




   TOTAL LIABILITIES





590,997

Net assets for 36,676,513 shares outstanding




$
36,597,263

Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 36,676,239
Accumulated net realized loss of investments
(78,849 )
Distributions in excess of net investment income





(127
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS




$
36,597,263

Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds Per Share:
$36,597,263 ÷ 36,676,513 shares outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$1.00

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Operations

Year Ended July 31, 2006

Investment Income:
         
Interest









$
1,759,658
Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
$ 197,792
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
150,000
Custodian fees
31,126
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
102,631
Directors'/Trustees' fees
598
Auditing fees
16,562
Legal fees
6,598
Portfolio accounting fees
45,392
Shareholder services fee (Note 5)
97,878
Share registration costs
29,369
Printing and postage
18,783
Insurance premiums
7,366
Miscellaneous






709




   TOTAL EXPENSES






704,804




Waivers (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
$ (171,580 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(24,603 )
Waiver of shareholder services fee


(24,153
)







   TOTAL WAIVERS






(220,336
)



Net expenses










484,468
Net investment income










1,275,190
Net realized gain on investments










989
Change in net assets resulting from operations









$
1,276,179

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

Year Ended July 31
   

2006

   

2005

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income
$ 1,275,190 $ 537,307
Net realized gain on investments


989



1,362

   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS


1,276,179



538,669

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income


(1,275,219
)


(537,510
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
24,922,842 27,687,662
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
1,235,330 515,974
Cost of shares redeemed


(31,081,279
)


(36,368,813
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


(4,923,107
)


(8,165,177
)
Change in net assets


(4,922,147
)


(8,164,018
)
Net Assets:
Beginning of period


41,519,410



49,683,428

End of period (including distributions in excess of net investment income of $(127) and $(98), respectively)

$
36,597,263


$
41,519,410

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

July 31, 2006

1. ORGANIZATION

Money Market Obligations Trust (the "Trust") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust consists of 41 portfolios. The financial statements included herein are only those of Money Market Management (the "Fund"), a diversified portfolio. The financial statements of the other portfolios are presented separately. The assets of each portfolio are segregated and a shareholder's interest is limited to the portfolio in which shares are held. The investment objective of the Fund is to provide current income consistent with stability of principal.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America.

Investment Valuation

The Fund uses the amortized cost method to value its portfolio securities in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act.

Repurchase Agreements

It is the policy of the Fund to require the other party to a repurchase agreement to transfer to the Fund's custodian or sub-custodian eligible securities or cash with a market value (after transaction costs) at least equal to the repurchase price to be paid under the repurchase agreement. The eligible securities are transferred to accounts with the custodian or sub-custodian in which the Fund holds a "securities entitlement" and exercises "control" as those terms are defined in the Uniform Commercial Code. The Fund has established procedures for monitoring the market value of the transferred securities and requiring the transfer of additional eligible securities if necessary to equal at least the repurchase price. These procedures also allow the other party to require securities to be transferred from the account to the extent that their market value exceeds the repurchase price or in exchange for other eligible securities of equivalent market value.

With respect to agreements to repurchase U.S. government securities and cash items, the Fund treats the repurchase agreement as an investment in the underlying securities and not as an obligation of the other party to the repurchase agreement. Other repurchase agreements are treated as obligations of the other party secured by the underlying securities. Nevertheless, the insolvency of the other party or other failure to repurchase the securities may delay the disposition of the underlying securities or cause the Fund to receive less than the full repurchase price. Under the terms of the repurchase agreement, any amounts received by the Fund in excess of the repurchase price and related transaction costs must be remitted to the other party.

The Fund may enter into repurchase agreements in which eligible securities are transferred into joint trading accounts maintained by the custodian or sub-custodian for investment companies and other clients advised by the Fund's adviser and its affiliates. The Fund will participate on a pro rata basis with the other investment companies and clients in its share of the securities transferred under such repurchase agreements and in its share of proceeds from any repurchase or other disposition of such securities.

Investment Income, Expenses and Distributions

Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income are declared daily and paid monthly.

Premium and Discount Amortization

All premiums and discounts are amortized/accreted.

Federal Taxes

It is the Fund's policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary.

On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released FASB Interpretation No. 48 "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken in the course of preparing the fund's tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are "more-likely-than-not" of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax benefits of positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax expense in the current year. Adoption of FIN 48 is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the effective date. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FIN 48 and its impact in the financial statements has not yet been determined.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

The Fund may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Fund records when-issued securities on the trade date and maintains security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Restricted Securities

Restricted securities are securities that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) are subject to contractual restrictions on public sales. In some cases, when a security cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, the issuer of the restricted security has agreed to register such securities for resale, at the issuer's expense, either upon demand by the Fund or in connection with another registered offering of the securities. Many such restricted securities may be resold in the secondary market in transactions exempt from registration. Restricted securities may be determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Trustees. The Fund will not incur any registration costs upon such resales. Restricted securities are valued at amortized cost in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act.

Additional information on restricted securities, excluding securities purchased under Rule 144A that have been deemed liquid by the Trustees, held at July 31, 2006, is as follows:

Security
   
Acquisition
Date

   
Acquisition
Cost

MONET Trust (Series 2000-1), Class A-2A, (Dresdner Bank AG, Frankfurt Swap Agreement), 5.560%, 9/28/2006

6/1/2005

$1,000,000

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

Other

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST

The following table summarizes share activity:

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

Shares sold
24,922,842 27,687,662
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
1,235,330 515,974
Shares redeemed

(31,081,279
)

(36,368,813
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(4,923,107
)

(8,165,177
)

4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

The tax character of distributions as reported on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended July 31, 2006 and 2005, was as follows:


   
2006
   
2005
Ordinary income 1

$1,275,219

$537,510

1 For tax purposes short-term capital gain distributions are considered ordinary income distributions.

As of July 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed ordinary income
   
$
3,089

Dividend payable

$
(3,215
)
Capital loss carryforward

$
(78,850
)

At July 31, 2006, the Fund had a capital loss carryforward of $78,850 which will reduce the Fund's taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investments, if any, to the extent permitted by the Code and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income tax. Pursuant to the Code, such capital loss carryforward will expire in 2008.

The Fund used capital loss carryforwards of $989 to offset taxable capital gains realized during the year ended July 31, 2006.

5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

Federated Investment Management Company, the Fund's investment adviser (the "Adviser"), receives for its services an annual investment adviser fee based on the average daily net assets of the Fund as follows: 0.500% on the first $500 million; 0.475% on the next $500 million; 0.450% on the next $500 million; 0.425% on the next $500 million and 0.400% thereafter. The Adviser may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. The Adviser can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the Adviser voluntarily waived $171,580 of its fee.

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Fund with administrative personnel and services. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average aggregate daily net assets of certain Federated funds as specified below:

Maximum
Administrative Fee



   
Average Aggregate Daily Net Assets
of the Federated Funds

0.150%

On the first $5 billion
0.125%

On the next $5 billion
0.100%

On the next $10 billion
0.075%

On assets in excess of $20 billion

The administrative fee received during any fiscal year shall be at least $150,000 per portfolio and $40,000 per each additional class of Shares. FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FAS can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the net fee paid to FAS was 0.317% of average daily net assets of the Fund.

Shareholder Services Fee

The Fund may pay fees (Service Fees) up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Fund's Shares to financial intermediaries or to Federated Shareholder Services Company (FSSC) for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. FSSC or these financial intermediaries may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of their fee. In addition, FSSC may voluntarily reimburse the Fund for shareholder services fees. This voluntary waiver and/or reimbursement can be modified or terminated at any time. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the FSSC voluntarily waived $24,153 of its fee. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC received $39,569 of fees paid by the Fund.

General

Certain of the Officers and Trustees of the Fund are Officers and Directors or Trustees of the above companies.

6. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning in October 2003, Federated Investors, Inc. and various subsidiaries thereof (including the advisers and distributor for various investment companies, collectively, "Federated"), along with various investment companies sponsored by Federated ("Funds") were named as defendants in several class action lawsuits now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuits were purportedly filed on behalf of people who purchased, owned and/or redeemed shares of Federated-sponsored mutual funds during specified periods beginning November 1, 1998. The suits are generally similar in alleging that Federated engaged in illegal and improper trading practices including market timing and late trading in concert with certain institutional traders, which allegedly caused financial injury to the mutual fund shareholders. These lawsuits began to be filed shortly after Federated's first public announcement that it had received requests for information on shareholder trading activities in the Funds from the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), the Office of the New York State Attorney General ("NYAG"), and other authorities. In that regard, on November 28, 2005, Federated announced that it had reached final settlements with the SEC and the NYAG with respect to those matters. As Federated previously reported in 2004, it has already paid approximately $8.0 million to certain funds as determined by an independent consultant. As part of these settlements, Federated agreed to pay for the benefit of fund shareholders additional disgorgement and a civil money penalty in the aggregate amount of an additional $72 million. Federated and various Funds have also been named as defendants in several additional lawsuits, the majority of which are now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging, among other things, excessive advisory and Rule 12b-1 fees. The Board of the Funds has retained the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro LLP to represent the Funds in these lawsuits. Federated and the Funds, and their respective counsel, are reviewing the allegations and intend to defend this litigation. Additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations may be filed in the future. The potential impact of these lawsuits, all of which seek unquantified damages, attorneys' fees and expenses, and future potential similar suits is uncertain. Although we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Funds, there can be no assurance that these suits, the ongoing adverse publicity and/or other developments resulting from the regulatory investigations will not result in increased Fund redemptions, reduced sales of Fund shares, or other adverse consequences for the Funds.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONEY MARKET OBLIGATIONS TRUST AND SHAREHOLDERS OF MONEY MARKET MANAGEMENT:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Money Market Management (the "Fund") (one of the portfolios constituting Money Market Obligations Trust), including the portfolio of investments, as of July 31, 2006, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statement of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of July 31, 2006, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Money Market Management, a portfolio of the Money Market Obligations Trust, at July 31, 2006, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
September 12, 2006

Board of Trustees and Trust Officers

The Board is responsible for managing the Trust's business affairs and for exercising all the Trust's powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Board member and the senior officers of the Trust. Where required, the tables separately list Board members who are "interested persons" of the Trust ( i.e. , "Interested" Board members) and those who are not ( i.e. , "Independent" Board members). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is Federated Investors Tower, 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA. As of December 31, 2005, the Trust comprised 41 portfolios, and the Federated Fund Complex consisted of 43 investment companies (comprising 136 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Board member oversees all portfolios in the Federated Fund Complex and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund's Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trust Trustees and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John F. Donahue*
Birth Date: July 28, 1924
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex's Executive Committee.

Previous Positions
: Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex; Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Chairman and Director, Federated Investment Counseling.



J. Christopher Donahue*
Birth Date: April 11, 1949
PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 1989
Principal Occupations : Principal Executive Officer and President of the Federated Fund Complex; Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company; Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman, Federated Equity Management Company of Pennsylvania and Passport Research, Ltd. (Investment advisory subsidiary of Federated); Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director, Federated Services Company.

Previous Positions
: President, Federated Investment Counseling; President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D.*
Birth Date: October 11, 1932
3471 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1111
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Medical Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Downtown; Hematologist, Oncologist and Internist, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Other Directorships Held
: Member, National Board of Trustees, Leukemia Society of America.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, University of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.



* Family relationships and reasons for "interested" status: John F. Donahue is the father of J. Christopher Donahue; both are "interested" due to the positions they hold with Federated Investors, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D. is "interested" because his son-in-law is employed by the Fund's principal underwriter, Federated Securities Corp.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Thomas G. Bigley
Birth Date: February 3, 1934
15 Old Timber Trail
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: November 1994
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Member of Executive Committee, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh.

Previous Position
: Senior Partner, Ernst & Young LLP.



John T. Conroy, Jr.
Birth Date: June 23, 1937
Investment Properties Corporation
3838 North Tamiami Trail
Suite 402
Naples, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman of the Board, Investment Properties Corporation; Partner or Trustee in private real estate ventures in Southwest Florida.

Previous Positions
: President, Investment Properties Corporation; Senior Vice President, John R. Wood and Associates, Inc., Realtors; President, Naples Property Management, Inc. and Northgate Village Development Corporation.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Nicholas P. Constantakis
Birth Date: September 3, 1939
175 Woodshire Drive
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Michael Baker Corporation (engineering and energy services worldwide).

Previous Position
: Partner, Andersen Worldwide SC.



John F. Cunningham
Birth Date: March 5, 1943
353 El Brillo Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Director, WinsorTech.

Other Directorships Held
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cunningham & Co., Inc. (strategic business consulting); Trustee Associate, Boston College.

Previous Positions
: Director, Redgate Communications and EMC Corporation (computer storage systems); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Computer Consoles, Inc.; President and Chief Operating Officer, Wang Laboratories; Director, First National Bank of Boston; Director, Apollo Computer, Inc.



Peter E. Madden
Birth Date: March 16, 1942
One Royal Palm Way
100 Royal Palm Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Board of Overseers, Babson College.

Previous Positions
: Representative, Commonwealth of Massachusetts General Court; President, State Street Bank and Trust Company and State Street Corporation (retired); Director, VISA USA and VISA International; Chairman and Director, Massachusetts Bankers Association; Director, Depository Trust Corporation; Director, The Boston Stock Exchange.



Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.
Birth Date: April 10, 1945
80 South Road
Westhampton Beach, NY
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Management Consultant.

Previous Positions
: Chief Executive Officer, PBTC International Bank; Partner, Arthur Young & Company (now Ernst & Young LLP); Chief Financial Officer of Retail Banking Sector, Chase Manhattan Bank; Senior Vice President, HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank); Vice President, Citibank; Assistant Professor of Banking and Finance, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University; Executive Vice President, DVC Group, Inc.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John E. Murray, Jr., J.D., S.J.D.
Birth Date: December 20, 1932
Chancellor, Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1995
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee, and Chairman of the Board of Directors or Trustees, of the Federated Fund Complex; Chancellor and Law Professor, Duquesne University; Partner, Murray, Hogue & Lannis.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Michael Baker Corp. (engineering, construction, operations and technical services).

Previous Positions
: President, Duquesne University; Dean and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Dean and Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law.



Marjorie P. Smuts
Birth Date: June 21, 1935
4905 Bayard Street
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Public Relations/Marketing Consultant/Conference Coordinator.

Previous Positions
: National Spokesperson, Aluminum Company of America; television producer; President, Marj Palmer Assoc.; Owner, Scandia Bord.



John S. Walsh
Birth Date: November 28, 1957
2604 William Drive
Valparaiso, IN
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer of construction temporary heaters); President and Director, Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers Products, Inc.

Previous Position
: Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc.



James F. Will
Birth Date: October 12, 1938
Saint Vincent College
Latrobe, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 2006
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chancellor and President, Saint Vincent College.

Other Directorships Held
: Alleghany Corporation.

Previous Positions
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Armco, Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer, Cyclops Industries; President and Chief Operating Officer, Kaiser Steel Corporation.



OFFICERS




Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
John W. McGonigle
Birth Date: October 26, 1938
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND SECRETARY
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Federated Investment Counseling; Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Services Company and Federated Securities Corp.



Richard A. Novak
Birth Date: December 25, 1963
TREASURER
Began serving: January 2006
Principal Occupations : Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Federated Fund Complex; Senior Vice President, Federated Administrative Services; Financial and Operations Principal for Federated Securities Corp., Edgewood Services, Inc. and Southpointe Distribution Services, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Vice President, Finance of Federated Services Company; Controller of Federated Investors, Inc.; held various financial management positions within The Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh; Auditor, Arthur Andersen & Co.



Richard B. Fisher
Birth Date: May 17, 1923
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Vice Chairman or Vice President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman, Federated Securities Corp.

Previous Positions
: President and Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Executive Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc. and Director and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Securities Corp.



Brian P. Bouda
Birth Date: February 28, 1947
CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER
Began serving: August 2004
Principal Occupations : Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of Federated Investors, Inc.; and Chief Compliance Officer of its subsidiaries. Mr. Bouda joined Federated in 1999 and is a member of the American Bar Association and the State Bar Association of Wisconsin.



Deborah A. Cunningham
Birth Date: September 15, 1959
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Deborah A. Cunningham has been the Fund's Portfolio Manager since July 1991. Ms. Cunningham was named Chief Investment Officer of money market products in 2004 and is a Vice President of the Trust. She joined Federated in 1981 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1997. Ms. Cunningham is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.S.B.A. in Finance from Robert Morris College.






Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
Mary Jo Ochson
Birth Date: September 12, 1953
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Mary Jo Ochson was named Chief Investment Officer of tax-exempt, fixed-income products in 2004 and is a Vice President of the Trust. She joined Federated in 1982 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Pittsburgh.



Susan R. Hill
Birth Date: June 20, 1963
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Susan R. Hill is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Hill joined Federated in 1990 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 2003 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 2005. Ms. Hill was a Portfolio Manager from 1994 until 2003, and served as Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1997 until 2004 and an Assistant Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1994 until 1997. Ms. Hill is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received an M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University.



Jeff A. Kozemchak
Birth Date: January 15, 1960
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Jeff A. Kozemchak is Vice President of the Trust. Mr. Kozemchak joined Federated in 1987 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 1996 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1999. He was a Portfolio Manager until 1996 and a Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Kozemchak is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received his M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University in 1987.



Paige M. Wilhelm
Birth Date: May 28, 1962
VICE PRESIDENT
Began Serving: August 2006
Principal Occupations : Paige M. Wilhelm has been the Fund's Portfolio Manager since April 1997. She is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Wilhelm joined Federated in 1985 and has been a Senior Vice President and a Senior Portfolio Manager. She is responsible for portfolio management and research in the fixed income area concentrating on taxable money market instruments. Previous associations include Senior Credit Analyst, Federated Investors; Performance Analysis Supervisor; Performance Analyst, Federated Investment Counseling. Ms. Wilhelm is a member of the CFA Society of Pittsburgh and received her B.S. from Indiana University and her M.B.A. from Duquesne University.



Evaluation and Approval of Advisory Contract

MONEY MARKET MANAGEMENT (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was above the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of additional breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies, if any, relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Federated's website. Go to FederatedInvestors.com, select "Products," select the "Prospectuses and Regulatory Reports" link, then select the Fund to access the link to Form N-PX. This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

The Fund files with the SEC a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on "Form N-Q." These filings are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.) You may also access this information from the "Products" section of the Federated Investors website at FederatedInvestors.com by clicking on "Portfolio Holdings" and selecting the name of the Fund, or by selecting the name of the Fund and clicking on "Portfolio Holdings." You must register on the website the first time you wish to access this information.

Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board, or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal. Although money market funds seek to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share, there is no assurance that they will be able to do so.

This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the Fund's prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses, and other information.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Money Market Management
Federated Investors Funds
5800 Corporate Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15237-7000
Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.

Federated Securities Corp., Distributor

Cusip 60934N211

28876 (9/06)

Federated is a registered mark of Federated Investors, Inc. 2006 (c)Federated Investors, Inc.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Municipal Obligations Fund

A Portfolio of Money Market Obligations Trust



ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT

July 31, 2006

Institutional Shares

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
SHAREHOLDER EXPENSE EXAMPLE
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS SUMMARY TABLES
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND TRUST OFFICERS
EVALUATION AND APPROVAL OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
VOTING PROXIES ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

Not FDIC Insured * May Lose Value * No Bank Guarantee

Federated Investors 50 Years of Growth & Innovation

Financial Highlights

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

   
2004

   
2003

   
2002

Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.030 0.018 0.009 0.012 0.018
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments

(0.000
) 1

0.000
1

(0.000
) 1

--


--

   TOTAL FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS

0.030


0.018


0.009


0.012


0.018

Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.030
)

(0.018
)

(0.009
)

(0.012
)

(0.018
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$1.00


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00

Total Return 2

3.01
%

1.82
%

0.94
%

1.25
%

1.79
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:















Net expenses

0.18
%

0.18
%

0.18
%

0.18
%

0.18
%
Net investment income

2.99
%

1.85
%

0.94
%

1.19
%

1.68
%
Expense waiver/reimbursement 3

0.12
%

0.13
%

0.12
%

0.12
%

0.13
%
Supplemental Data:















Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$3,490,983


$3,040,759


$2,144,468


$1,570,532


$856,839

1 Represents less than $0.001.

2 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

3 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown above.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees; to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees and/or shareholder services fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you to understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from February 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006.

ACTUAL EXPENSES

The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES

The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund's actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund's actual return. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are required to be provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund with other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.


   
Beginning
Account Value
2/1/2006

   
Ending
Account Value
7/31/2006

   
Expenses Paid
During Period 1

Actual

$1,000

$1,016.40

$0.90
Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return before expenses)

$1,000

$1,023.90

$0.90

1 Expenses are equal to the Fund's annualized net expense ratio of 0.18%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).

Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:


   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Variable Rate Instruments

96.9
%
Municipal Bonds/Notes

8.3
%
Commercial Paper

2.4
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(7.6
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

At July 31, 2006, the fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:

   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 days

97.7
%
8-30 days

0.7
%
31-90 days

2.9
%
91-180 days

2.9
%
181 days or more

3.4
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(7.6
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

1 See the Fund's Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information for a description of the principal types of securities in which the Fund invests.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--107.6% 1,2
Alabama--1.7%
$ 4,500,000 Alabama HFA MFH, (Series 2002A: Sterling Pointe Apartments) Weekly VRDNs (Oxford Pointe LP)/(Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
$ 4,500,000
8,020,000 Alabama HFA MFH, (Series 2003A) Weekly VRDNs (Lakeshore Crossing Apartments Ltd.)/(Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
8,020,000
4,230,000 Alabama HFA MFH, (Series 2004A: Phoenix Apartments) Weekly VRDNs (Phoenix Arts LLC)/(Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.800%, 8/3/2006
4,230,000
1,615,000 Calhoun County, AL Economic Development Council Weekly VRDNs (Fabarc Steel Co.)/(Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.870%, 8/2/2006
1,615,000
17,000,000 Decatur, AL IDB, (Series 2003-A) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Steel Decatur LLC)/(Nucor Corp. GTD), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
17,000,000
3,725,000 East Central, AL Solid Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 2003: Three Corners) Weekly VRDNs (Waste Management, Inc.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
3,725,000
27,400,000 Health Care Authority for Baptist Health, AL, (Series 2006-A2) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.630%, 8/2/2006
27,400,000
8,000,000 Jefferson County, AL Sewer System, (Series 2003 B-4-Warrants) Weekly VRDNs (XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
8,000,000
4,175,000 Mobile, AL Solid Waste Authority, (Series 2003: Chastang) Weekly VRDNs (Waste Management, Inc.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
4,175,000
6,600,000 Tuscaloosa County, AL IDA, (1995 Series A) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.730%, 8/2/2006


6,600,000

   TOTAL


85,265,000

Alaska--0.9%
1,410,000 3,4 Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority, (MT-129) Weekly VRDNs (Delong Mountain Transportation System)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
1,410,000
3,750,000 3,4 Alaska International Airports System, MERLOTS (Series 1999I) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
3,750,000
9,500,000 3,4 Alaska State Housing Finance Corp., PUTTERs (Series 1398) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
9,500,000
24,500,000 Valdez, AK Marine Terminal, (Series 1994A), 3.68% TOBs (Phillips Transportation Alaska, Inc.)/(ConocoPhillips GTD), Optional Tender 6/1/2007
24,500,000
6,015,000 Valdez, AK Marine Terminal, (Series 1994B), 3.68% TOBs (Phillips Transportation Alaska, Inc.)/(ConocoPhillips GTD), Optional Tender 6/1/2007


6,015,000

   TOTAL


45,175,000

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Arizona--0.1%
$ 1,500,000 Coconino County, AZ Pollution Control Corp., (Series 1998) Daily VRDNs (Arizona Public Service Co.)/(KBC Bank N.V. LOC), 3.710%, 8/1/2006
$ 1,500,000
1,000,000 Tucson, AZ IDA, MFH Revenue Bonds (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (Quality Apartment Living LLC)/(FNMA LOC), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
1,000,000
650,000 Yavapai, AZ IDA, (Series 1997B) Weekly VRDNs (Yavapai Regional Medical Center)/(FSA INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.640%, 8/3/2006


650,000

   TOTAL


3,150,000

Arkansas--1.6%
1,000,000 Arkadelphia, AR, IDRBs Bonds (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (Siplast, Inc.)/(Danske Bank A/S LOC), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
1,000,000
5,130,000 Arkansas Development Finance Authority, (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Paco Steel & Engineering Corp.)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
5,130,000
16,800,000 Blytheville, AR, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
16,800,000
34,400,000 Blytheville, AR, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.760%, 8/2/2006
34,400,000
8,000,000 Crossett, AR, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Bemis Co., Inc.), 3.950%, 8/3/2006
8,000,000
7,500,000 Osceola, AR, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2006) Weekly VRDNs (Plum Point Energy Associates LLC)/(Credit Suisse, Zurich LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
7,500,000
7,100,000 Siloam Springs, AR, IDRB (Series 1994) Weekly VRDNs (La-Z Boy Chair Co.)/ (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006


7,100,000

   TOTAL


79,930,000

California--5.1%
1,700,000 California PCFA, (Series 1995A) Weekly VRDNs (Athens Disposal Co., Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
1,700,000
2,325,000 California PCFA, (Series 1995A) Weekly VRDNs (Contra Costa Waste Service, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
2,325,000
1,245,000 California PCFA, (Series 1997A) Weekly VRDNs (West Valley MRF LLC)/ (Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
1,245,000
1,400,000 California PCFA, (Series 1997B) Weekly VRDNs (Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc.)/ (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
1,400,000
910,000 California PCFA, (Series 1998A) Weekly VRDNs (Santa Clara Valley Industries LLC)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
910,000
2,400,000 California PCFA, (Series 1999A) Weekly VRDNs (Atlas Disposal Industries LLC)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
2,400,000
2,145,000 California PCFA, (Series 1999A) Weekly VRDNs (BLT Enterprises of Sacramento, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
2,145,000
4,140,000 California PCFA, (Series 1999A) Weekly VRDNs (Blue Line Transfer, Inc.)/ (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
4,140,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
California--continued
$ 1,880,000 California PCFA, (Series 1999B) Weekly VRDNs (GreenWaste Recovery, Inc.)/ (Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
$ 1,880,000
4,705,000 California PCFA, (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc.)/ (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
4,705,000
4,475,000 California PCFA, (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (Sunset Waste Paper, Inc.)/ (Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
4,475,000
1,700,000 California PCFA, (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (West Valley MRF LLC)/ (Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
1,700,000
1,550,000 California PCFA, (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Bos Farms)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
1,550,000
3,400,000 California PCFA, (Series 2001A) Weekly VRDNs (Athens Services)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
3,400,000
5,000,000 California PCFA, (Series 2001A) Weekly VRDNs (Western Sky Dairy)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
2,705,000 California PCFA, (Series 2001A: GreenTeam of San Jose) Weekly VRDNs (Waste Connections of California, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
2,705,000
2,000,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Bidart Dairy II LLC)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
4,295,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (MarBorg Industries)/(CALSTRS (California State Teachers' Retirement System) LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
4,295,000
9,900,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
9,900,000
3,365,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (California Waste Solutions, Inc.)/(CALSTRS (California State Teachers' Retirement System) LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
3,365,000
4,000,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (Norcal Waste Systems, Inc.)/ (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
4,000,000
2,600,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (SANCO Services LP)/ (Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
2,600,000
4,615,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (South Lake Refuse Co. LLC)/ (Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
4,615,000
2,825,000 California PCFA, (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (Sunset Waste Paper, Inc.)/ (Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
2,825,000
2,900,000 California PCFA, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (Agrifab, Inc./Vintage Dairy)/(CALSTRS (California State Teachers' Retirement System) LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
2,900,000
4,400,000 California PCFA, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (B & B Dairy, LLC)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
4,400,000
2,000,000 California PCFA, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (C.A. and E.J. Vanderham Family Trust)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
California--continued
$ 2,510,000 California PCFA, (Series 2003A) Weekly VRDNs (Mill Valley Refuse Service, Inc.)/(CALSTRS (California State Teachers' Retirement System) LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
$ 2,510,000
4,000,000 California PCFA, (Series 2003A) Weekly VRDNs (Norcal Waste Systems, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
4,000,000
5,035,000 California PCFA, (Series 2003A) Weekly VRDNs (Placer County Eastern Regional Sanitary Landfill, Inc.)/(CALSTRS (California State Teachers' Retirement System) LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
5,035,000
9,000,000 3,4 California PCFA, (Series 2004 F11J) Weekly VRDNs (Waste Management, Inc.)/(Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. SWP), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
9,000,000
2,000,000 California PCFA, (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (A & M Farms)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
2,780,000 California PCFA, (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Ag Resources III, LLC)/ (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
2,780,000
3,965,000 California PCFA, (Series 2004A) Weekly VRDNs (Burrtec Waste Group, Inc.)/ (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
3,965,000
5,570,000 California PCFA, (Series 2004A) Weekly VRDNs (MarBorg Industries)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
5,570,000
7,280,000 California PCFA, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (BLT Enterprises of Fremont, LLC)/(Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
7,280,000
4,905,000 California PCFA, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (Napa Recycling & Waste Services LLC)/(Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
4,905,000
3,170,000 California PCFA, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (Sunset Waste Paper, Inc.)/ (Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
3,170,000
11,200,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Athens Services)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
11,200,000
9,215,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Burrtec Waste & Recycling Services LLC)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
9,215,000
12,300,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Burrtec Waste Group, Inc.)/ (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
12,300,000
3,920,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (CR&R, Inc.)/(Bank of the West, San Francisco, CA LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
3,920,000
4,225,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Evergreen Oil, Inc.)/ (Bank of the West, San Francisco, CA LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
4,225,000
3,075,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (GreenWaste Recovery, Inc.)/ (Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
3,075,000
3,235,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (MarBorg Industries)/ (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
3,235,000
4,115,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Marin Sanitary Service)/ (Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
4,115,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
California--continued
$ 1,345,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Pena's Disposal, Inc.)/ (Comerica Bank LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
$ 1,345,000
2,240,000 California PCFA, (Series 2006B) Weekly VRDNs (Desert Properties LLC)/ (Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
2,240,000
7,000,000 3,4 California State, Veterans Bonds ROCs (Series 438CE) Weekly VRDNs (Citibank NA, New York LIQ)/(Citibank NA, New York LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
7,000,000
2,500,000 3,4 California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (PT-2001) Weekly VRDNs (Vista Montana Apartments)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/ (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
2,500,000
2,515,000 California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Series 1996-H) Weekly VRDNs (Levecke LLC)/(Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.770%, 8/2/2006
2,515,000
25,000,000 California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Series 2004M) Weekly VRDNs (Kaiser Permanente), 3.580%, 8/2/2006
25,000,000
5,000,000 California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Series 2006) Weekly VRDNs (Gateway Circle LLC)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
11,500,000 3,4 GS Pool Trust Series 2006-24TP Weekly VRDNs (IXIS Financial Products Inc. INS)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
11,500,000
435,000 Los Angeles County, CA IDA, (Series 1991) Weekly VRDNs (Caitec Garment Processing. Inc.)/(Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.770%, 8/2/2006
435,000
9,200,000 Santa Clara County, CA Housing Authority, (Series 2005B: Timberwood Apartments) Weekly VRDNs (MP Timberwood Associates)/(Union Bank of California, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006


9,200,000

   TOTAL


252,815,000

Colorado--2.2%
59,975,000 3,4 Denver Urban Renewal Authority, Stapleton Tax Increment Revenue (Series 2004 FR/RI-F7J) Weekly VRDNs (Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. SWP), 3.750%, 8/2/2006
59,975,000
5,500,000 3,4 Denver, CO City & County Airport Authority, (PT-782) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
5,500,000
29,500,000 Denver, CO City & County Airport Authority, (Series 2004A) Weekly VRDNs (CDC IXIS Financial Guaranty N.A. INS)/(Bayerische Landesbank (Guaranteed) LIQ), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
29,500,000
14,660,000 3,4 Denver, CO City & County Airport Authority, Merlot (Series 1997E) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006


14,660,000

   TOTAL


109,635,000

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Connecticut--0.5%
$ 1,700,000 Connecticut Development Authority Health Care Revenue, (Series 1993A) Weekly VRDNs (Corporation for Independent Living)/(Dexia Credit Local LOC), 3.610%, 8/2/2006
$ 1,700,000
700,000 Connecticut Development Authority Health Care Revenue, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Corporation for Independent Living)/(Dexia Credit Local LOC), 3.610%, 8/2/2006
700,000
1,575,000 Connecticut State, Second Lien Special Tax Obligation Refunding Bonds, Transportation Infrastructure Purposes (2003 Series 1) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(WestLB AG (Guaranteed) LIQ), 3.670%, 8/2/2006
1,575,000
3,000,000 New Britain, CT, 5.00% BANs, 4/5/2007
3,027,034
10,000,000 New Haven, CT, 4.50% BANs, 2/15/2007
10,036,705
9,000,000 North Haven, CT, 5.00% BANs, 1/23/2007


9,056,399

   TOTAL


26,095,138

District of Columbia--0.9%
31,000,000 3,4 District of Columbia HFA, (Series 2005 BNY5) Weekly VRDNs (Trinity Plus Funding Co. LLC)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
31,000,000
9,644,000 3,4 District of Columbia HFA, (Series 2005 BNY6) Weekly VRDNs (Trinity Plus Funding Co. LLC)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
9,644,000
4,100,000 District of Columbia, Enterprise Zone Revenue Bonds (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (NJA Hotel LLC)/(Bank of Scotland, Edinburgh LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006


4,100,000

   TOTAL


44,744,000

Florida--2.8%
9,000,000 Alachua County, FL, IDRB's (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Florida Rock Industries, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
9,000,000
9,345,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Florida-AMT)/(Series 2005-17) Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.760%, 8/3/2006
9,345,000
2,700,000 Coconut Creek, FL, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Elite Aluminum Corp.)/ (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
2,700,000
6,500,000 Greater Orlando, FL Aviation Authority Weekly VRDNs (Cessna Aircraft Co.)/ (Textron Inc. GTD), 4.740%, 8/2/2006
6,500,000
7,835,000 3,4 Hillsborough County, FL Aviation Authority, (MT-126), 3.50% TOBs (Tampa International Airport)/(AMBAC INS)/(Svenska Handelsbanken, Stockholm LIQ), Optional Tender 2/8/2007
7,835,000
11,280,000 3,4 Hillsborough County, FL Port District, MT-101, 3.53% TOBs (Tampa, FL Port Authority)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen (Guaranteed) LIQ), Optional Tender 2/15/2007
11,280,000
190,000 Miami, FL Health Facilities Authority, Health Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Mercy Hospital, FL)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
190,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Florida--continued
$ 5,325,000 3,4 Miami-Dade County, FL Aviation, (PT-2713) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
$ 5,325,000
8,700,000 3,4 Miami-Dade County, FL Aviation, (Rocs Series 525) Weekly VRDNs (XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/(Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
8,700,000
7,615,000 3,4 Miami-Dade County, FL HFA, (PT-1349) Weekly VRDNs (Hidden Grove Apartments)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
7,615,000
70,585,000 St. Lucie County, FL Solid Waste Disposal, (Series 2003) Daily VRDNs (Florida Power & Light Co.), 3.740%, 8/1/2006


70,585,000

   TOTAL


139,075,000

Georgia--0.8%
3,500,000 3,4 Atlanta, GA Airport General Revenue, PA 926R Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
3,500,000
6,150,000 Crisp County, GA Solid Waste Management Authority, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 4.080%, 8/3/2006
6,150,000
800,000 Fayette County, GA, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Gardner Denver Machinery, Inc.)/(National City Bank of the Midwest LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
800,000
23,650,000 3,4 Georgia State, PUTTERs (Series 493) Weekly VRDNs (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
23,650,000
3,500,000 Kennesaw, GA Development Authority, (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Lakeside Vista Apartments)/(FNMA LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
3,500,000
2,600,000 Tattnall County, GA IDA, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Rotary Corp.)/ (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006


2,600,000

   TOTAL


40,200,000

Hawaii--0.0%
185,000 3,4 Hawaii Finance and Development Corp., MERLOTS (Series 2001 A15) Weekly VRDNs (FNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006


185,000

Illinois--6.1%
3,500,000 Aurora City, IL, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Cleveland Hardware & Forging Co.)/(Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 3.830%, 8/3/2006
3,500,000
38,300,000 Chicago, IL Midway Airport, (Series 1998A) Daily VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/1/2006
38,300,000
47,550,000 Chicago, IL Midway Airport, (Series 1998B) Daily VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/1/2006
47,550,000
8,050,000 3,4 Chicago, IL O'Hare International Airport, (PA-1198) Weekly VRDNs (XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
8,050,000
1,065,000 3,4 Chicago, IL O'Hare International Airport, (PT-1993) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
1,065,000
7,000,000 3,4 Chicago, IL O'Hare International Airport, (PT-756) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
7,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Illinois--continued
$ 9,995,000 3,4 Chicago, IL O'Hare International Airport, PT-685, 3.50% TOBs (AMBAC INS)/ (Svenska Handelsbanken, Stockholm LIQ), Optional Tender 2/8/2007
$ 9,995,000
5,200,000 3,4 Chicago, IL O'Hare International Airport, ROCS (Series 239) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
5,200,000
1,340,000 Chicago, IL, (Series 1999 IDRB) Weekly VRDNs (Ade, Inc.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
1,340,000
25,000,000 Chicago, IL, (Series 2005D) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
25,000,000
10,500,000 Chicago, IL, Chicago Midway Airport Special Facility Revenue Bonds (Series 1998), 3.72% TOBs (Signature Flight Support Corp.)/(Bayerische Landesbank (GTD) LOC), Optional Tender 12/1/2006
10,500,000
12,490,000 3,4 Chicago, IL, PUTTERs (Series 1277) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
12,490,000
515,000 Galva, IL, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (John H. Best & Sons, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
515,000
3,400,000 Harvey, IL Multifamily Revenue, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Bethlehem Village)/(Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago LOC), 3.780%, 8/3/2006
3,400,000
2,190,000 Huntley, IL Industrial Development Revenue, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Colony, Inc.)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/2/2006
2,190,000
10,000,000 Illinois Development Finance Authority IDB, (Series 1994) Weekly VRDNs (St. Ignatius College Prep.)/(Northern Trust Co., Chicago, IL LOC), 3.660%, 8/2/2006
10,000,000
1,400,000 Illinois Development Finance Authority IDB, (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Evapco, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
1,400,000
5,225,000 Illinois Development Finance Authority IDB, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Lakeview Partners I LP)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.780%, 8/3/2006
5,225,000
2,940,000 Illinois Development Finance Authority IDB, (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (Processing Technologies, Inc.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
2,940,000
3,110,000 Illinois Development Finance Authority, (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Mangel BG Investments LLC)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.760%, 8/2/2006
3,110,000
4,000,000 Illinois Finance Authority, (Series 2006) Weekly VRDNs (Reliable Materials Lyons LLC)/(Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
4,000,000
3,830,000 Illinois Health Facilities Authority, (Series 1997B) Weekly VRDNs (Advocate Health Care Network)/(Bank of America N.A., J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Northern Trust Co., Chicago, IL LIQs), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
3,830,000
28,020,000 Illinois Health Facilities Authority, (Series 2001C) Weekly VRDNs (Edward Hospital Obligated Group)/(FSA INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
28,020,000
28,500,000 Illinois Health Facilities Authority, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (Herman M. Finch University)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
28,500,000
40,000,000 Illinois State Weekly VRDNs (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.700%, 8/2/2006


40,000,000

   TOTAL


303,120,000

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Indiana--5.1%
$ 17,540,000 Bartholomew Consolidated School Corp., IN, 4.25% TANs, 12/29/2006
$ 17,599,291
250,000 Clarksville, IN, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Metal Sales Manufacturing Corp.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.880%, 8/3/2006
250,000
2,338,000 Franklin, IN, Lakeview I Apartments (Series 1994) Weekly VRDNs (Pedcor Investments LP)/(Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
2,338,000
1,080,000 Huntington, IN, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (DK Enterprises LLC)/ (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
1,080,000
8,700,000 Indiana Development Finance Authority, (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Indianapolis Museum of Art, Inc.)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
8,700,000
3,000,000 Indiana Development Finance Authority, (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Indianapolis Museum of Art, Inc.)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
3,000,000
17,410,000 Indiana Health & Educational Facility Financing Authority, (Series 2005B) Weekly VRDNs (Parkview Health System Obligated Group)/(AMBAC INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006
17,410,000
3,200,000 Indiana Port Commission, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Kosmos Cement Co.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/2/2006
3,200,000
1,250,000 3,4 Indiana State HFA, MERLOTS (Series 2000-PPP) Weekly VRDNs (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
1,250,000
18,000,000 Indianapolis, IN Local Public Improvement Bond Bank, (Series 2005G-3) Weekly VRDNs (Indianapolis, IN Waterworks Department)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.650%, 8/3/2006
18,000,000
5,135,000 3,4 Indianapolis, IN Local Public Improvement Bond Bank, PT-731 Weekly VRDNs (Indianapolis, IN Airport Authority)/(FSA INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
5,135,000
3,400,000 Indianapolis, IN, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Chip Ganassi Racing Teams)/(National City Bank, Pennsylvania LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
3,400,000
7,100,000 Indianapolis, IN, (Series 2004A) Weekly VRDNs (Nora Commons LP)/ (LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
7,100,000
5,000,000 Jasper County, IN EDA, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (T & M LP)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
4,300,000 Jasper County, IN EDA, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (T & M LP)/ (Rabobank Nederland, Utrecht LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
4,300,000
6,500,000 Jasper County, IN EDA, (Series 2006) Weekly VRDNs (T & M LP)/ (Rabobank Nederland, Utrecht LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
6,500,000
7,245,000 3,4 Jeffersonville, IN, (PT-1309) Weekly VRDNs (Armstrong Farms Apartments)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
7,245,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Indiana--continued
$ 1,450,000 Kendallville, IN, (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Rivnut Real Estate, Ltd.)/ (National City Bank, Ohio LOC), 3.820%, 8/3/2006
$ 1,450,000
9,000,000 Muncie, IN Community Schools, 4.25% TANs, 12/29/2006
9,025,187
32,600,000 Richmond, IN Hospital Authority, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (Reid Hospital & Health Care Services, Inc.)/(FSA INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006
32,600,000
170,000 Richmond, IN, (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (Holland Colors Americas, Inc.)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 4.030%, 8/3/2006
170,000
4,571,000 Southwest Allen County, IN Metropolitan School District, 4.00% TANs, 12/29/2006
4,579,158
7,700,000 Whiting, IN Environmental Facilities Revenue, (Series 2002) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
7,700,000
8,000,000 Whiting, IN Environmental Facilities Revenue, (Series 2002B) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
8,000,000
15,000,000 Whiting, IN Environmental Facilities Revenue, (Series 2002C) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
15,000,000
15,800,000 Whiting, IN Environmental Facilities Revenue, (Series 2003) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
15,800,000
47,700,000 Whiting, IN Environmental Facilities Revenue, (Series 2005) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
47,700,000
2,200,000 Whitley County, IN, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Undersea Sensor Systems, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006


2,200,000

   TOTAL


255,731,636

Iowa--0.9%
12,085,000 Iowa Finance Authority, (Series 2005 A-2) Weekly VRDNs (Iowa Health System)/(FGIC INS)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006
12,085,000
34,130,000 Iowa Finance Authority, (Series 2005 A-3) Weekly VRDNs (Iowa Health System)/(FGIC INS)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006


34,130,000

   TOTAL


46,215,000

Kansas--0.7%
13,405,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Kansas-AMT)/(Series 2005-13) Weekly VRDNs (Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS)/(GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
13,405,000
20,000,000 Olathe, KS, (Series A), 4.50% BANs, 6/1/2007
20,125,849
3,240,000 3,4 Sedgwick & Shawnee Counties, KS, MERLOTS (Series 2001 A-35) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006


3,240,000

   TOTAL


36,770,849

Kentucky--0.2%
4,900,000 Graves County, KY, (Series 1988) Weekly VRDNs (Seaboard Farms)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
4,900,000
740,000 Jefferson County, KY, (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Derby Industries, Inc.)/(Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 4.030%, 8/3/2006
740,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Kentucky--continued
$ 2,292,000 Kenton County, KY, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Packaging Un-limited of Northern Kentucky, Inc.)/(National City Bank, Kentucky LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
$ 2,292,000
1,685,000 Paris, KY Weekly VRDNs (Monessen Holdings LLC)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.790%, 8/3/2006


1,685,000

   TOTAL


9,617,000

Louisiana--1.2%
4,000,000 3,4 ABN AMRO MuniTOPS Certificates Trust (Louisiana Non-AMT)/ (Series 2002-17) Weekly VRDNs (Louisiana State Gas & Fuels)/ (AMBAC INS)/(ABN AMRO Bank NV, Amsterdam LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
4,000,000
6,604,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Louisiana-AMT)/(Series 2005-11) Weekly VRDNs (Louisiana HFA)/(GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
6,604,000
11,825,000 3,4 East Baton Rouge, LA Mortgage Finance Authority, (Series 2006 FR/RI-P2U) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.750%, 8/2/2006
11,825,000
5,000,000 Lake Charles, LA Harbor & Terminal District, (Series 1995A) Weekly VRDNs (Polycom-Huntsman, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
10,100,000 Lake Charles, LA Harbor & Terminal District, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (ConocoPhillips)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
10,100,000
9,000,000 Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
9,000,000
11,600,000 Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, (Series 2005) Daily VRDNs (Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.), 3.770%, 8/1/2006


11,600,000

   TOTAL


58,129,000

Maine--0.3%
2,025,000 Biddeford, ME Weekly VRDNs (DK Associates & Volk Packaging)/(Comerica Bank LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
2,025,000
8,315,000 Maine Finance Authority, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (The Jackson Laboratory)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
8,315,000
4,005,000 3,4 Maine State Housing Authority, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A108), 3.40% TOBs (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006


4,005,000

   TOTAL


14,345,000

Maryland--0.7%
2,495,000 3,4 Maryland Community Development Administration - Housing Revenue, (PA-629R) Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
2,495,000
4,330,000 3,4 Maryland Community Development Administration - Residential Revenue, (Series 2004 FR/RI-L59J) Weekly VRDNs (Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.780%, 8/2/2006
4,330,000
5,850,000 Maryland IDFA, (Series 1999), 3.72% TOBs (Signature Flight Support Corp.)/(Bayerische Landesbank (GTD) LOC), Optional Tender 12/1/2006
5,850,000
5,850,000 Maryland State Community Development Administration, (Series 1990B) Weekly VRDNs (Cherry Hill Apartment Ltd.)/(Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., Buffalo, NY LOC), 3.710%, 8/2/2006
5,850,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Maryland--continued
$ 4,000,000 Maryland State Economic Development Corp., (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Hunter Douglas Northeast, Inc.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/2/2006
$ 4,000,000
6,925,000 Maryland State Economic Development Corp., (Series 2006) Weekly VRDNs (Santa Barbara Court LLC)/(Mercantile Safe Deposit & Trust Co., Baltimore LOC), 3.740%, 8/4/2006
6,925,000
750,000 Maryland State Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Holton-Arms School, Inc.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
750,000
5,730,000 3,4 Northeast MD Waste Disposal Authority, (PT-766) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen (GTD) LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006


5,730,000

   TOTAL


35,930,000

Massachusetts--1.6%
12,400,000 Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Consolidated Loan (Series 2006B) Daily VRDNs (Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.660%, 8/1/2006
12,400,000
18,720,000 3,4 Commonwealth of Massachusetts, PUTTERs (Series 443) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC, FSA INS) and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQs), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
18,720,000
7,000,000 Everett, MA, 4.00% BANs, 9/8/2006
7,006,928
7,500,000 3,4 Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority General Transportation System, MERLOTS (Series 2000H) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
7,500,000
10,000,000 Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Series 2004), 3.62% CP (Nantucket Electric Co.)/(Massachusetts Electric Co. GTD), Mandatory Tender 8/11/2006
10,000,000
4,500,000 Massachusetts IFA, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Parker-Hannifin Corp.)/ (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
4,500,000
19,610,000 3,4 Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, Class A Certificates (Series 2002-208) Daily VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Bear Stearns Cos., Inc. LIQ), 3.650%, 8/1/2006


19,610,000

   TOTAL


79,736,928

Michigan--2.8%
6,000,000 3,4 Grand Rapids & Kent County, MI Joint Building Authority, (Series 2001-JPMC7) Weekly VRDNs (Kent County, MI)/(J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/2/2006
6,000,000
13,650,000 Kent Hospital Finance Authority, MI, (Series 1998B) Weekly VRDNs (Spectrum Health)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006
13,650,000
7,300,000 Michigan Higher Education Student Loan Authority, (Series X11-B) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(KBC Bank N.V. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
7,300,000
2,935,000 Michigan State Housing Development Authority, (2002 Series A) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
2,935,000
401,000 Michigan State Strategic Fund, (Series A) Weekly VRDNs (Teal Run Apartments)/(Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
401,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Michigan--continued
$ 25,000,000 Michigan State, (2006 Series A), 4.50% TRANs, 9/29/2006
$ 25,048,756
68,660,000 3,4 Michigan State, GO Notes (Series 2005 FR/RI-P5) Weekly VRDNs (Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
68,660,000
12,680,000 3,4 Wayne County, MI Airport Authority, (ROCs Series 353) Weekly VRDNs (Detroit, MI Metropolitan Wayne County Airport)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
12,680,000
4,300,000 3,4 Wayne County, MI Airport Authority, GS Trust (Series 2006-32) Weekly VRDNs (Detroit, MI Metropolitan Wayne County Airport)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006


4,300,000

   TOTAL


140,974,756

Minnesota--1.8%
24,815,000 3,4 Becker, MN, (Series 2005 FR/RI-FP13) Weekly VRDNs (Northern States Power Co., MN)/(Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. SWP), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
24,815,000
17,970,000 3,4 Becker, MN, (Series 2006 FR/RI-FP1) Weekly VRDNs (Northern States Power Co., MN)/(Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. SWP), 3.970%, 8/3/2006
17,970,000
2,600,000 Coon Rapids, MN, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Assurance Mfg. Co., Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
2,600,000
6,440,000 3,4 Dakota County & Washington County MN Housing & Redevelopment Authority, MERLOTS (Series J) Weekly VRDNs (United States Treasury COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
6,440,000
3,865,000 Dakota County, MN Community Development Agency, (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (View Pointe Apartments)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/4/2006
3,865,000
1,225,000 Minneapolis, MN IDA, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Viking Materials, Inc.)/ (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
1,225,000
3,140,000 3,4 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN Metropolitan Airports Commission, (MT-117) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
3,140,000
5,220,000 3,4 Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN Metropolitan Airports Commission, PT-735 Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(BNP Paribas SA LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
5,220,000
8,975,000 3,4 Minnesota Public Facilities Authority, (PT-1175) Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
8,975,000
1,700,000 Northfield, MN, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (Summerfield Investments LLC)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.750%, 8/4/2006
1,700,000
6,690,000 Ramsey County, MN Housing and Redevelopment Authority, (Series 2003 A) Weekly VRDNs (Gateway Apartments LP)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/4/2006
6,690,000
1,390,000 Savage, MN, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Fabcon, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
1,390,000
445,000 Springfield, MN, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Ochs Brick Co.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.940%, 8/3/2006
445,000
2,250,000 White Bear Lake, MN, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Taylor Corp.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
2,250,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Minnesota--continued
$ 3,300,000 White Bear Lake, MN, (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Pinehurst Investments LLC)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.750%, 8/4/2006

$
3,300,000

   TOTAL


90,025,000

Mississippi--1.2%
10,000,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Mississippi-AMT)/(Series 2005-16) Weekly VRDNs (Mississippi Home Corp.)/(GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
2,250,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (Series 1999) VRDNs (Polks Meat Products, Inc.)/(Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.800%, 8/3/2006
2,250,000
2,420,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (TT&W Farm Products, Inc.)/(Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
2,420,000
3,495,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Silver Creek Gin Co.)/(Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
3,495,000
3,185,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Mill Creek Gin, Inc.)/(Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
3,185,000
1,400,000 3,4 Mississippi Home Corp., (PT-1446) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/ (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
1,400,000
7,500,000 Mississippi Home Corp., (Series 2004-6) Weekly VRDNs (Windsor Park Partners LP)/(FNMA LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
7,500,000
4,635,000 3,4 Mississippi Home Corp., MERLOTS (Series 2001 A8) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
4,635,000
1,890,000 3,4 Mississippi Home Corp., MERLOTS (Series YYY) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
1,890,000
6,160,000 3,4 Mississippi Home Corp., Roaring Forks (Series 2001-14) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
6,160,000
9,790,000 Mississippi Regional Housing Authority No. II, (Series 1998), 4.05% TOBs (Bradford Park Apartments)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), Mandatory Tender 10/1/2006
9,790,000
6,500,000 Mississippi Regional Housing Authority No. II, (Series 2000), 4.15% TOBs (Terrace Park Apartments)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), Mandatory Tender 5/1/2007


6,500,000

   TOTAL


59,225,000

Missouri--4.8%
31,430,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Missouri-AMT)/(Series 2005-14) Weekly VRDNs (Missouri State Housing Development Commission)/ (GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
31,430,000
3,505,000 Kansas City, MO IDA, (Series 2004B) Weekly VRDNs (The Bishop Spencer Place, Inc.)/(Commerce Bank, N.A., Kansas City LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
3,505,000
47,300,000 Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Senior Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
47,300,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Missouri--continued
$ 20,000,000 Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Senior Series 2005B) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.700%, 8/3/2006
$ 20,000,000
7,750,000 Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Senior Series 2005E) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
7,750,000
29,100,000 Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
29,100,000
15,000,000 Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Series 2006B) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
15,000,000
6,600,000 Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Series 2006C) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
6,600,000
6,250,000 Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Series 2006E) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
6,250,000
21,000,000 Missouri State HEFA, (Series 2005A) Daily VRDNs (St. Louis University)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.670%, 8/1/2006
21,000,000
30,435,000 Missouri State HEFA, (Series 2005C-4) Weekly VRDNs (SSM Healthcare)/(FSA INS)/(Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006
30,435,000
3,160,000 3,4 Missouri State Housing Development Commission, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A81) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
3,160,000
1,825,000 3,4 Missouri State Housing Development Commission, MERLOTS (Series 2001 A28) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
1,825,000
16,000,000 Southwest City, MO IDA, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (Simmons Foods, Inc.)/ (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
16,000,000
1,000,000 St. Louis, MO IDA, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Cee Kay Supply)/ (Commerce Bank, N.A., Kansas City LOC), 3.830%, 7/20/2006


1,000,000

   TOTAL


240,355,000

Montana--0.3%
6,900,000 3,4 Montana State Board of Housing, (Series 2004 FR/RI-L6) Weekly VRDNs (Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.780%, 8/2/2006
6,900,000
3,545,000 3,4 Montana State Board of Housing, MERLOTS (Series 2002 A19) Weekly VRDNs (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
3,545,000
4,105,000 3,4 Montana State Board of Housing, Variable Certificates (Series 2002L) Weekly VRDNs (Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006


4,105,000

   TOTAL


14,550,000

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Multi State--6.7%
$ 33,061,143 3,4 ABN AMRO Chicago Corp. 1997-1 LeaseTOPS Trust Weekly VRDNs (LaSalle Bank, N.A. LIQ)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.910%, 8/3/2006
$ 33,061,143
21,302,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (AMT MultiState)/(Series 1999-3) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
21,302,000
49,771,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (AMT Multistate)/(Series 2002-09) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC, FGIC, FSA, MBIA Insurance Corp. INS) and State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQs), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
49,771,000
11,820,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Multistate-AMT)/(Series 2005-1) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
11,820,000
23,410,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Multistate-AMT)/(Series 2005-18) Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
23,410,000
6,799,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Multistate-AMT)/(Series 2005-19) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
6,799,000
31,050,000 3,4 GS Pool Trust (Series 2006-19TP) Weekly VRDNs (IXIS Financial Products Inc. INS)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
31,050,000
19,000,000 3,4 GS Pool Trust (Series 2006-35TP) Weekly VRDNs (IXIS Financial Products Inc. INS)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
19,000,000
6,200,000 3,4 GS Pool Trust (Series 2006-46TP) Weekly VRDNs (IXIS Financial Products Inc. INS)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. LIQ), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
6,200,000
42,060,000 3,4 Reset Option Certificates Trust II-R (Series 8000JD) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC, FGIC, FSA, MBIA Insurance Corp. INS) and Citigroup, Inc. LIQs), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
42,060,000
55,860,000 3,4 Reset Option Certificates Trust II-R (Series 8001JJ) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC, FGIC, FSA, MBIA Insurance Corp. INS) and Citigroup, Inc. LIQs), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
55,860,000
6,140,000 3,4 Reset Option Certificates Trust II-R (Series 8002FA) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC, FGIC, FSA, MBIA Insurance Corp. INS) and Citigroup, Inc. LIQs), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
6,140,000
25,860,000 3,4 Reset Option Certificates Trust II-R (Series 8005MN) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC, FGIC, FSA, MBIA Insurance Corp. INS) and Citigroup, Inc. LIQs), 3.740%, 8/3/2006


25,860,000

   TOTAL


332,333,143

Nebraska--0.5%
3,150,000 Douglas County, NE, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (American Laboratories, Inc.)/ (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
3,150,000
1,200,000 Douglas County, NE, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Majors Plastics, Inc.)/ (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
1,200,000
7,730,000 Nebraska Investment Finance Authority, (Series 2001 E) Weekly VRDNs (Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
7,730,000
3,726,000 Nebraska Investment Finance Authority, (Series 2001 F) Weekly VRDNs (Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
3,726,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Nebraska--continued
$ 2,000,000 Nebraska Investment Finance Authority, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (Tuls Properties LLC)/(Rabobank Nederland, Utrecht LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
$ 2,000,000
5,200,000 Stanton County, NE, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.730%, 8/2/2006


5,200,000

   TOTAL


23,006,000

Nevada--4.9%
22,300,000 Clark County, NV Airport System, (Series 1993A) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Dexia Credit Local and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQs), 3.630%, 8/2/2006
22,300,000
12,500,000 Clark County, NV Industrial Development Revenue Board, (Series 2003A) Weekly VRDNs (Southwest Gas Corp.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
12,500,000
7,140,000 Clark County, NV, (Series 1997A), 3.72% TOBs (Signature Flight Support Corp.)/(Bayerische Landesbank (GTD) LOC), Optional Tender 12/1/2006
7,140,000
7,535,000 Clark County, NV, (Series 1998), 3.72% TOBs (Signature Flight Support Corp.)/(Bayerische Landesbank (GTD) LOC), Optional Tender 12/1/2006
7,535,000
90,000,000 Clark County, NV, Passenger Facility Charge Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2005 A-1) Weekly VRDNs (Las Vegas-McCarran International Airport)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Bayerische Landesbank (GTD) LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
90,000,000
69,200,000 Clark County, NV, Passenger Facility Charge Refunding Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A-2) Weekly VRDNs (Las Vegas-McCarran International Airport)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
69,200,000
23,100,000 3,4 Nevada State, (Series 2006 SGB 64) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Societe Generale, Paris LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
23,100,000
13,000,000 3,4 Washoe County, NV Water Facilities Revenue, (Series 2004 FR/RI-F9J) Weekly VRDNs (Sierra Pacific Power Co.)/(Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. SWP), 3.800%, 8/2/2006


13,000,000

   TOTAL


244,775,000

New Hampshire--0.7%
892,000 New Hampshire Business Finance Authority, (Series A) Weekly VRDNs (Upper Valley Press)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.780%, 8/2/2006
892,000
30,000,000 New Hampshire Business Finance Authority, PCR Bonds (1990 Series A), 3.72% CP (New England Power Co.), Mandatory Tender 10/11/2006
30,000,000
1,530,000 New Hampshire Higher Educational & Health Facilities Authority, (Series 2001A) Weekly VRDNs (Dartmouth-Hitchcock Obligated Group)/ (FSA INS)/(Chase Bank USA, N.A. and Dexia Credit Local LIQs), 3.630%, 8/3/2006
1,530,000
1,175,000 3,4 New Hampshire State HFA, MERLOTS (Series 2001 A-51) Weekly VRDNs (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
1,175,000
870,000 3,4 New Hampshire State HFA, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A82) Weekly VRDNs (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006


870,000

   TOTAL


34,467,000

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
New Jersey--2.2%
$ 12,689,700 Barnegat Township, NJ Board of Education, 4.50% BANs, 7/6/2007
$ 12,763,361
4,600,000 Kearny, NJ Board of Education, 4.50% BANs, 8/2/2007
4,624,334
9,852,414 Maple Shade Township, NJ, 4.125% BANs, 1/10/2007
9,860,576
1,900,000 New Jersey EDA, (Series 1998A) Weekly VRDNs (Jewish Home at Rockleigh)/(Allied Irish Banks PLC LOC), 3.660%, 8/4/2006
1,900,000
4,000,000 New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, (Series 2002) Daily VRDNs (RWJ Health Care Corp. at Hamilton)/(Commerce Bank N.A., Cherry Hill, NJ LOC), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
4,000,000
12,505,000 3,4 New Jersey State Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Class A Certificates (Series 3011) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Bear Stearns & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
12,505,000
4,026,250 North Plainfield, NJ, 4.50% BANs, 6/25/2007
4,048,889
4,393,712 Sea Girt, NJ, 4.50% BANs, 5/24/2007
4,417,722
2,245,000 South Amboy, NJ, 4.00% BANs, 8/2/2006
2,245,005
5,738,550 South Plainfield, NJ, 4.00% BANs, 9/27/2006
5,746,808
8,875,000 Trenton, NJ, 4.50% BANs, 12/15/2006
8,908,862
21,554,000 Trenton, NJ, 4.50% BANs, 5/18/2007
21,676,102
2,875,000 Washington Township (Morris County), NJ, 4.50% BANs, 7/27/2007
2,891,078
3,257,100 Willingboro Township, NJ, 4.00% BANs, 8/4/2006
3,257,122
8,792,100 Willingboro Township, NJ, 4.375% BANs, 8/3/2007
8,829,642
2,967,000 Willingboro Township, NJ, 4.65% BANs, 7/19/2007


2,984,883

   TOTAL


110,659,384

New Mexico--1.7%
1,690,000 Albuquerque, NM, (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (Rose's Southwest Papers, Inc.)/ (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
1,690,000
4,485,000 Albuquerque, NM, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (El Encanto, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
4,485,000
17,576,000 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (New Mexico-AMT)/(Series 2005-15) Weekly VRDNs (New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority)/(GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
17,576,000
2,850,000 Los Lunas Village, NM, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Wall Colmonoy Corp.)/(LaSalle Bank Midwest, N.A. LOC), 3.810%, 8/2/2006
2,850,000
53,806,983 New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority, (Series 2006), 4.53% TOBs (Trinity Plus Funding Co. LLC), Mandatory Tender 7/1/2007
53,806,983
1,120,000 3,4 New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority, MERLOTS (Series 2001 A9) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
1,120,000
2,770,000 3,4 New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority, MERLOTS 2001 A66, 3.40% TOBs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006
2,770,000
1,210,000 3,4 New Mexico Mortgage Finance Authority, MERLOTS (Series 2000-A18), 3.40% TOBs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006


1,210,000

   TOTAL


85,507,983

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
New York--2.8%
$ 21,560,000 New York City, NY Transitional Finance Authority, New York City Recovery Bonds (2003 Series 3-G) Weekly VRDNs (Bank of New York LIQ), 3.600%, 8/2/2006
$ 21,560,000
6,800,000 New York State HFA, (2000 Series A: 300 East 39th Street) Weekly VRDNs (39th Street Associates LLC)/(FNMA LOC), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
6,800,000
2,800,000 New York State HFA, (Series 2005A: 1 East 35th Street Apartments) Weekly VRDNs (35th Street Associates LP)/(Commerce Bank N.A., Cherry Hill, NJ LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
2,800,000
4,000,000 New York State HFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Clinton Green North LLC)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
4,000,000
3,500,000 New York State HFA, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Clinton Green South LLC)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
3,500,000
17,000,000 New York State HFA, (Series 2006A: 250 East 60th Street Apartments) Weekly VRDNs (250 East 60th Street Associates LP)/(Commerce Bank N.A., Cherry Hill, NJ LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
17,000,000
2,300,000 New York State HFA, (Series 2006A: 385 Third Avenue Apartments) Weekly VRDNs (385 Third Avenue Associates LP)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
2,300,000
10,000,000 New York State HFA, (Series 2006A: Related-East 21st Street Housing) Weekly VRDNs (321 East 21st Street Associates LLC)/(Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
10,000,000
18,820,000 3,4 TSASC, Inc. NY, Tobacco Settlement Asset Backed Bonds (PA-1356) Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
18,820,000
34,335,000 Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, NY, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.600%, 8/2/2006
34,335,000
19,680,000 3,4 Westchester County, NY IDA, (MT-257) Weekly VRDNs (Ardsley Housing Associates LLC)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006


19,680,000

   TOTAL


140,795,000

North Carolina--4.7%
6,600,000 Cabarrus County, NC Industrial Facilities and Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (S & D Coffee, Inc.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
6,600,000
2,840,000 3,4 Charlotte, NC Airport, (PT-719) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(BNP Paribas SA LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
2,840,000
2,000,000 Hertford County, NC Industrial Facilities & Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.760%, 8/2/2006
2,000,000
17,500,000 Hertford County, NC Industrial Facilities & Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Series 2000B) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
17,500,000
395,000 Johnson County, NC Industrial Facilities & Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Walthom Group)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.760%, 8/4/2006
395,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
North Carolina--continued
$ 3,200,000 Mecklenberg County, NC Industrial Facilities & PCFA Industrial Development, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Ehren-Haus Industries, Inc.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.760%, 8/3/2006
$ 3,200,000
6,700,000 Montgomery County, NC Industrial Facilities and Pollution Control Financing Authority, (Series 2000) Daily VRDNs (Republic Services, Inc.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.740%, 8/1/2006
6,700,000
615,000 North Carolina Capital Facilities Finance Agency, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Goodwill Community Foundation)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.630%, 8/3/2006
615,000
7,000,000 North Carolina Capital Facilities Finance Agency, (Series 2004) Daily VRDNs (Republic Services, Inc.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.740%, 8/1/2006
7,000,000
54,855,000 North Carolina Education Assistance Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Series 20005-A1) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
54,855,000
11,250,000 North Carolina Education Assistance Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A-2) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Branch Banking & Trust Co., Winston-Salem LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
11,250,000
21,445,000 North Carolina Education Assistance Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds (Series 2005A-3) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
21,445,000
1,150,000 3,4 North Carolina HFA, MERLOTS (Series 2000 A37) Weekly VRDNs (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
1,150,000
3,700,000 3,4 North Carolina HFA, MERLOTS (Series B12) Weekly VRDNs (Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
3,700,000
13,800,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Series 2001B) Weekly VRDNs (Moses H. Cone Memorial), 3.640%, 8/3/2006
13,800,000
16,840,000 North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina)/(AMBAC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006
16,840,000
9,000,000 Raleigh & Durham, NC Airport Authority, (Series 2006A) Weekly VRDNs (Raleigh-Durham Airport)/(XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/(SunTrust Bank LIQ), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
9,000,000
12,600,000 Raleigh & Durham, NC Airport Authority, (Series 2006B) Weekly VRDNs (Raleigh-Durham Airport)/(XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
12,600,000
9,000,000 Raleigh & Durham, NC Airport Authority, (Series 2006C) Weekly VRDNs (Raleigh-Durham Airport)/(XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.710%, 8/2/2006
9,000,000
22,000,000 Raleigh & Durham, NC Airport Authority, (Series 2006D) Weekly VRDNs (Raleigh-Durham Airport)/(XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
22,000,000
11,100,000 Raleigh & Durham, NC Airport Authority, (Series 2006E) Weekly VRDNs (Raleigh-Durham Airport)/(XL Capital Assurance Inc. INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
11,100,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
North Carolina--continued
$ 35,000 Sampson County, NC Industrial Facilities and Pollution Control Financing Authorithy, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (DuBose Strapping, Inc.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.810%, 8/3/2006
$ 35,000
1,300,000 Wilson County, NC PCA, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Quality Truck Bodies & Repair, Inc.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.760%, 8/3/2006


1,300,000

   TOTAL


234,925,000

Ohio--3.5%
2,150,000 Ashland, OH, 5.00% BANs, 5/24/2007
2,170,998
5,805,000 3,4 Cuyahoga County, OH, (PT-1966) Weekly VRDNs (Antioch Towers Apartments)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
5,805,000
2,000,000 Dublin, OH, IDRBs (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Witco Corp.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
1,916,000 Euclid, OH, 4.50% BANs, 5/31/2007
1,925,941
10,485,000 Hamilton County, OH, (Series 2001A) Weekly VRDNs (MLB Hilltop Health Facilities, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
10,485,000
15,000,000 Hamilton County, OH, (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Stratford Heights)/(Bank of New York and Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania LOCs), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
15,000,000
3,950,000 Hamilton, OH MFH, (Series 2003A: Knollwood Crossing II Apartments) Weekly VRDNs (Pedcor Investments-2003-LIX LP)/(Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis LOC), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
3,950,000
185,000 Madison County, OH, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (Madison County Hospital, Inc.)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/3/2006
185,000
3,550,000 Mason, OH, 4.75% BANs, 5/24/2007
3,578,291
6,250,000 Medina County, OH, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Mack Industries, Inc.)/ (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.780%, 8/3/2006
6,250,000
43,500,000 Ohio HFA, (Series 2005D) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
43,500,000
50,000,000 Ohio HFA, (Series I) Weekly VRDNs (Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
50,000,000
15,000,000 Ohio HFA, (Series J) Weekly VRDNs (State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
15,000,000
1,505,000 3,4 Ohio HFA, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A78) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
1,505,000
3,075,000 3,4 Ohio HFA, Variable Rate Certificates (Series 2001-I) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.760%, 8/3/2006
3,075,000
2,250,000 Ohio State Water Development Authority, (Series 1999-A) Weekly VRDNs (Ohio Edison Co.), 3.830%, 8/2/2006
2,250,000
7,000,000 Ohio State, Solid Waste Revenue Bonds (Series 1998) Daily VRDNs (BP Exploration & Oil, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.690%, 8/1/2006
7,000,000
2,870,000 Paulding County, OH, (Series B), 4.50% BANs, 2/14/2007


2,884,379

   TOTAL


176,564,609

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Oklahoma--2.0%
$ 5,650,000 Broken Arrow, OK EDA Weekly VRDNs (Blue Bell Creameries)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.880%, 8/3/2006
$ 5,650,000
17,646,873 3,4 Clipper Tax-Exempt Certificates Trust (Oklahoma AMT)/(Series 2004-3) Weekly VRDNs (Oklahoma HFA)/(GNMA COL)/(State Street Bank and Trust Co. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
17,646,873
7,500,000 Oklahoma Development Finance Authority, (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (ConocoPhillips Co.)/(ConocoPhillips GTD), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
7,500,000
6,000,000 Oklahoma Development Finance Authority, (Series 2003), 3.45% TOBs (ConocoPhillips Co.)/(ConocoPhillips GTD), Optional Tender 12/1/2006
6,000,000
33,000,000 Oklahoma Student Loan Authority, (Series 1997A) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
33,000,000
32,000,000 Oklahoma Student Loan Authority, (Series 2006A-1) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.730%, 8/2/2006


32,000,000

   TOTAL


101,796,873

Oregon--0.4%
10,000,000 Port of Morrow, OR, (Series 2001A) Weekly VRDNs (Threemile Canyon Farms LLC)/(Rabobank Nederland, Utrecht LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
10,000,000 Port of Morrow, OR, (Series 2001C) Weekly VRDNs (Threemile Canyon Farms LLC)/(Rabobank Nederland, Utrecht LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006


10,000,000

   TOTAL


20,000,000

Pennsylvania--5.4%
1,000,000 Chester County, PA IDA, (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc.)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.780%, 8/3/2006
1,000,000
1,162,000 Northampton County, PA IDA, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Ultra-Poly Corp.)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
1,162,000
10,000,000 Pennsylvania EDFA, Wastewater Treatment Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2004A) Weekly VRDNs (Sunoco, Inc.), 3.785%, 8/2/2006
10,000,000
2,500,000 Pennsylvania EDFA, Wastewater Treatment Revenue Refunding Bonds (Series 2004B) Weekly VRDNs (Sunoco, Inc.), 3.850%, 8/2/2006
2,500,000
30,700,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Assistance Agency, (Series 1997A) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
30,700,000
24,500,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Assistance Agency, (Series 2003 A-1) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
24,500,000
10,000,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Assistance Agency, (Series 2003 A-2) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Dexia Credit Local LIQ), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
10,000,000
16,100,000 Pennsylvania State Higher Education Assistance Agency, Series 2002 A) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Bayerische Landesbank (Guaranteed), Lloyds TSB Bank PLC, London, State Street Bank and Trust Co. and WestLB AG (Guaranteed) LIQs), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
16,100,000
25,000,000 Philadelphia, PA Airport System, (Series 2005B) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.650%, 8/2/2006
25,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Pennsylvania--continued
$ 76,485,000 Philadelphia, PA Airport System, (Series 2005C) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
$ 76,485,000
14,000,000 Philadelphia, PA Gas Works, (Sixth Series 1998 General Ordinance) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Bank of Nova Scotia, Toronto, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQs), 3.620%, 8/3/2006
14,000,000
15,500,000 Philadelphia, PA Hospitals & Higher Education Facilities Authority, (Series 2005A) Daily VRDNs (Children's Hospital of Philadelphia)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.660%, 8/1/2006
15,500,000
19,100,000 Southcentral PA, General Authority, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (Wellspan Health Obligated Group)/(AMBAC INS)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006
19,100,000
21,615,000 Southcentral PA, General Authority, (Series 2005B) Weekly VRDNs (Wellspan Health Obligated Group)/(AMBAC INS)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006


21,615,000

   TOTAL


267,662,000

Puerto Rico--0.3%
14,975,000 3,4 Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, (PT-3189), 3.15% TOBs (AMBAC, CDC IXIS Financial Guaranty N.A. INS) and Dexia Credit Local LIQs), Optional Tender 10/12/2006


14,975,000

Rhode Island--0.1%
3,555,000 Rhode Island Industrial Facilities Corp., (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Interplex Industries, Inc.)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.780%, 8/3/2006
3,555,000
1,960,000 Warwick, RI Housing Authority, (Series 2001) Daily VRDNs (Trafalgar East Apartments)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/1/2006


1,960,000

   TOTAL


5,515,000

South Carolina--3.1%
29,650,000 Berkeley County, SC Exempt Facility Industrial Development, (Series 1997) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
29,650,000
22,280,000 Berkeley County, SC Exempt Facility Industrial Development, (Series 1998) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.)/(BP Amoco Corp. GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
22,280,000
21,800,000 Berkeley County, SC IDB Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
21,800,000
18,800,000 Berkeley County, SC IDB, (Series 1996A) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
18,800,000
5,600,000 Berkeley County, SC IDB, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
5,600,000
21,000,000 Berkeley County, SC IDB, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Nucor Corp.), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
21,000,000
10,000,000 3,4 Medical University of South Carolina Hospital Authority, AUSTIN (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
South Carolina--continued
$ 1,830,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA Weekly VRDNs (Boozer Lumber Co.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.920%, 8/4/2006
$ 1,830,000
1,450,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA Weekly VRDNs (Lorraine Linens)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.810%, 8/4/2006
1,450,000
150,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA, (Series 1990) Weekly VRDNs (NMFO Associates)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.970%, 8/2/2006
150,000
150,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA, (Series 1990) Weekly VRDNs (Old Claussen's Bakery)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.970%, 8/2/2006
150,000
150,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA, (Series 1990) Weekly VRDNs (Rice Street Association)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.970%, 8/2/2006
150,000
2,300,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA, (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (PVC Container Corp. Project)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
2,300,000
700,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Carolina Cotton Works, Inc.)/(Branch Banking & Trust Co., Winston-Salem LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
700,000
6,000,000 South Carolina Jobs-EDA, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (Oconee Memorial Hospital, Inc.)/(Radian Asset Assurance INS)/(RBC Centura Bank LIQ), 3.700%, 8/3/2006
6,000,000
2,085,000 3,4 South Carolina State Housing Finance & Development Authority, ROCs (Series 398) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Citibank NA, New York LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
2,085,000
10,300,000 3,4 South Carolina State Ports Authority, Floater Certificates (Series 2006-1390X) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006


10,300,000

   TOTAL


154,245,000

South Dakota--0.1%
4,000,000 South Dakota Housing Development Authority, (2003 Series F) Weekly VRDNs (Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen (GTD) LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006


4,000,000

Tennessee--0.6%
4,850,000 Dickson, TN Health and Educational Facilities Board, Autumn Park Apartments (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Tennessee Partners XII LP)/(Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 3.800%, 8/3/2006
4,850,000
1,500,000 Dover, TN IDB, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Nashville Wire Products Manufacturing Co.)/(Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 3.910%, 8/3/2006
1,500,000
1,950,000 Hamilton County, TN IDB Weekly VRDNs (Pavestone Co.)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.880%, 8/3/2006
1,950,000
3,000,000 Jackson, TN IDB, Solid Waste Facility Bonds (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Florida Steel Corp.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
3,000,000
9,400,000 Shelby County, TN Health Education & Housing Facilities Board, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (FSP-Wyndridge III LLC)/(FHLMC LOC), 3.700%, 8/3/2006
9,400,000
200,000 South Pittsburg, TN IDB, (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (Lodge Manufacturing Co.)/(SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
200,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Tennessee--continued
$ 845,000 Tullahoma, TN IDB, (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Rock-Tenn Converting Co.)/ (SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
$ 845,000
7,000,000 Wilson County, TN Health and Educational Facilities Board, Forest View Apartments (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (Forest View LP)/(Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006


7,000,000

   TOTAL


28,745,000

Texas--15.7%
8,830,000 3,4 Alliance Airport Authority Inc., TX, GS Trust (Series 2006-2G) Weekly VRDNs (FedEx Corp.)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. GTD)/(Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
8,830,000
14,800,000 3,4 Austin, TX Housing Finance Corp., (PT-1348) Weekly VRDNs (Blunn Creek Apartments)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
14,800,000
4,965,000 3,4 Bexar County, TX Housing Finance Corp., PT-2596 Weekly VRDNs (Rosemont Apartments)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(WestLB AG (Guaranteed) LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
4,965,000
2,000,000 Brazos River Authority, TX, (Series 2001 D-1) Weekly VRDNs (TXU Energy Co. LLC)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
2,000,000
14,700,000 Brazos River Authority, TX, (Series 2001 D-2) Weekly VRDNs (TXU Energy Co. LLC)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
14,700,000
35,500,000 Brazos River Authority, TX, (Series 2001A) Weekly VRDNs (TXU Energy Co. LLC)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
35,500,000
26,500,000 Calhoun County, TX Navigation District Environmental Facilities, (Series 2006) Weekly VRDNs (Formosa Plastic Corp.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
26,500,000
930,000 College Station, TX, 6.375% Bonds (CDC IXIS Financial Guaranty N.A. INS), 2/15/2007
942,314
805,000 College Station, TX, 6.375% Bonds (CDC IXIS Financial Guaranty N.A. INS), 2/15/2007
815,659
5,340,000 Colorado County, TX IDC, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Great Southern Wood, Inc.)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.780%, 8/2/2006
5,340,000
2,100,000 Dalhart, TX Economic Development Corp., (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (DARE Investments)/(Rabobank Nederland, Utrecht LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
2,100,000
2,950,000 Dalhart, TX Economic Development Corp., (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (Northside Farms LLC)/(Rabobank Nederland, Utrecht LOC), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
2,950,000
14,575,000 3,4 Dallas, TX Housing Finance Corp., PT-2599 Weekly VRDNs (Southern Oaks Housing)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(WestLB AG (Guaranteed) LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
14,575,000
9,000,000 3,4 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX International Airport, (PA-1061) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
9,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Texas--continued
$ 2,870,000 3,4 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX International Airport, MERLOTS (Series 2002-A13) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
$ 2,870,000
3,915,000 3,4 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX International Airport, PT-738 Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
3,915,000
4,995,000 3,4 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX International Airport, PUTTERs (Series 354) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
4,995,000
7,150,000 3,4 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX International Airport, PUTTERs (Series 350) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
7,150,000
3,000,000 3,4 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX International Airport, ROCs (Series 268) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006
3,000,000
21,370,000 3,4 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX International Airport, Roaring Forks (Series 2003-4) Weekly VRDNs (FSA, MBIA Insurance Corp. INS) and Bank of New York LIQs), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
21,370,000
9,400,000 DeSoto, TX Housing Finance Corp., (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Hickory Manor Senior Apartments)/(FHLMC LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
9,400,000
7,500,000 East Texas Housing Finance Corp., (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (The Park at Shiloh Apartments)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
7,500,000
3,350,000 Gulf Coast, TX IDA, (Series 1999) Daily VRDNs (CITGO Petroleum Corp.)/(BNP Paribas SA LOC), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
3,350,000
25,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX IDA, (Series 2001) Daily VRDNs (CITGO Petroleum Corp.)/(Bank of New York LOC), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
25,000,000
18,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX IDA, Marine Terminal Revenue Bonds (Series 1993) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
18,000,000
35,900,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
35,900,000
6,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 1993) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
6,000,000
23,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 1994) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
23,000,000
25,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 1996) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
25,000,000
24,900,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 1997) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
24,900,000
13,500,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 1998) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
13,500,000
20,800,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 2001) Daily VRDNs (BP Amoco Corp.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
20,800,000
21,500,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 2002) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
21,500,000
25,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 2003) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
25,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Texas--continued
$ 24,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 2004) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
$ 24,000,000
19,600,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 2005) Daily VRDNs (BP Products North America, Inc.)/(BP PLC GTD), 3.720%, 8/1/2006
19,600,000
6,300,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
6,300,000
7,800,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
7,800,000
7,000,000 Gulf Coast, TX Waste Disposal Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Air Products LP)/(Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. GTD), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
7,000,000
12,500,000 Harris County, TX HFDC, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (Baylor College of Medicine)/(AMBAC INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.620%, 8/2/2006
12,500,000
32,000,000 Harris County, TX HFDC, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital)/(FGIC INS)/(Citibank NA, New York and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQs), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
32,000,000
5,600,000 Harris County, TX HFDC, (Series 2006) Daily VRDNs (Texas Medical Center)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LIQ), 3.660%, 8/1/2006
5,600,000
2,000,000 Harris County, TX Housing Finance Corp., Park at Kirkstall Apartments (Series 2002) Weekly VRDNs (Harris Park Partners LP)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
2,000,000
9,570,000 3,4 Houston, TX Airport System, (MERLOTS Series 2001-B4) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
9,570,000
45,200,000 Houston, TX Airport System, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/ (Bank of America N.A. LIQ), 3.690%, 8/2/2006
45,200,000
6,930,000 3,4 Houston, TX Airport System, Floater Certificates (Series 2006-1382X) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
6,930,000
15,000,000 Houston, TX, (Series F), 3.70% CP, Mandatory Tender 8/17/2006
15,000,000
3,500,000 Lower Neches Valley Authority, TX, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (Onyx Environmental Services LLC)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
3,500,000
5,000,000 North Texas Tollway Authority, Variable Rate Revenue Bonds (Series 2005C) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.640%, 8/2/2006
5,000,000
15,000,000 Port Arthur Navigation District, TX IDC, (Series 2001) Weekly VRDNs (Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
15,000,000
4,995,000 3,4 Port of Houston, TX, Roaring Forks (Series 2005-24) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.790%, 8/3/2006
4,995,000
2,845,000 Saginaw, TX IDA, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Glad Investing Partners Ltd.)/(J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.880%, 8/3/2006
2,845,000
10,120,000 3,4 San Antonio, TX Electric & Gas System, MERLOTS (Series 2002-A53), 3.385% TOBs (FSA INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 1/24/2007
10,120,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Texas--continued
$ 7,000,000 3,4 San Antonio, TX Independent School District, (PT-1184) Weekly VRDNs (Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program GTD)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
$ 7,000,000
10,000,000 3,4 Texas State Department of Housing & Community Affairs, (PA-1308) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
3,000,000 3,4 Texas State Department of Housing & Community Affairs, (PT-2507) Weekly VRDNs (Ironwood Ranch Townhomes LP)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LOC), 3.770%, 8/3/2006
3,000,000
4,200,000 3,4 Texas State Department of Housing & Community Affairs, (Series 2005 FR/RI-L2) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.750%, 8/2/2006
4,200,000
19,985,000 Texas State Department of Housing & Community Affairs, (Series 2005A) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
19,985,000
13,400,000 Texas State Department of Housing & Community Affairs, Addison Park Apartments (Series 2004) Weekly VRDNs (Arlington Partners LP)/(Compass Bank, Birmingham LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
13,400,000
3,150,000 3,4 Texas State Department of Housing & Community Affairs, MERLOTS (Series 2003-A8) Weekly VRDNs (GNMA COL)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
3,150,000
38,000,000 Texas State, (Series 2005), 4.50% TRANs, 8/31/2006
38,037,595
4,000,000 Waco, TX Industrial Development Corp., (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Chad A. Grief 1998 Irrevocable Trust)/(Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 3.910%, 8/3/2006
4,000,000
3,850,000 Waxahachie, TX IDA, (Series 1998) Weekly VRDNs (Rock-Tenn Converting Co.)/ (SunTrust Bank LOC), 3.690%, 8/2/2006


3,850,000

   TOTAL


786,750,568

Utah--0.1%
4,000,000 West Jordan, UT, (Series 1999) Weekly VRDNs (Penco Products, Inc.)/ (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006


4,000,000

Vermont--0.2%
5,295,000 3,4 Vermont HFA, (Series 2004 FR/RI-L76) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/ (Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. LIQ), 3.750%, 8/2/2006
5,295,000
3,500,000 3,4 Vermont HFA, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A49), 3.40% TOBs (FSA INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006
3,500,000
2,730,000 3,4 Vermont HFA, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A91), 3.40% TOBs (FSA INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006


2,730,000

   TOTAL


11,525,000

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Virginia--1.2%
$ 34,300,000 Halifax, VA IDA, MMMs, PCR (Series 1992), 3.80% CP (Virginia Electric & Power Co.), Mandatory Tender 8/1/2006
$ 34,300,000
5,000,000 3,4 Harrisonburg, VA Redevelopment & Housing Authority, (PT-485), 2.98% TOBs (Rolling Brook Village Apartments)/(FHLMC GTD)/(FHLMC LIQ), Optional Tender 9/7/2006
5,000,000
6,500,000 3,4 Virginia Port Authority, MERLOTS (Series 1997M) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
6,500,000
12,000,000 Virginia State Housing Development Authority, (Subseries D-STEM-II), 3.80% TOBs, Mandatory Tender 11/14/2006


12,000,000

   TOTAL


57,800,000

Washington--3.3%
6,985,000 3,4 Chelan County, WA Public Utility District No. 1, (MERLOTS Series 2001-B1) Weekly VRDNs (Chelan Hydro Consolidated System)/(MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
6,985,000
4,300,000 Energy Northwest, WA, Electric Revenue Bonds (Series 2003-E: Project No. 3) Weekly VRDNs (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.660%, 8/2/2006
4,300,000
5,183,500 3,4 Energy Northwest, WA, Piper Certificates (Series 2002C) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Bank of New York LIQ), 3.690%, 8/3/2006
5,183,500
24,000,000 Issaquah Community Properties, WA, (Series 2001B) Weekly VRDNs (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.680%, 8/3/2006
24,000,000
9,000,000 Pierce County, WA Economic Development Corp., (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Simpson-Tacoma Kraft Co.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.850%, 8/3/2006
9,000,000
4,555,000 Port of Pasco, WA Economic Development Corp., (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (Douglas Fruit Co., Inc.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.750%, 8/3/2006
4,555,000
4,995,000 3,4 Port of Seattle, WA, (PT-720) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(BNP Paribas SA LIQ), 3.730%, 8/3/2006
4,995,000
8,425,000 Port of Seattle, WA, (Series 2005) Weekly VRDNs (Fortis Bank SA/NV LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
8,425,000
7,610,000 3,4 Port of Seattle, WA, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A53) Weekly VRDNs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
7,610,000
3,950,000 3,4 Port of Seattle, WA, MERLOTS (Series 2002-B4) Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
3,950,000
5,020,000 3,4 Port of Seattle, WA, MERLOTS (Series 2006-C1) Weekly VRDNs (FSA INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), 3.740%, 8/2/2006
5,020,000
4,450,000 3,4 Port of Seattle, WA, PT-728 Weekly VRDNs (FGIC INS)/(BNP Paribas SA LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
4,450,000
4,320,000 3,4 Port of Seattle, WA, PT-850, 3.13% TOBs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), Optional Tender 8/17/2006
4,320,000
2,420,000 Seattle, WA Housing Authority, (Series 2002: New Holly Project Phase III) Weekly VRDNs (Desdemona LP)/(Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
2,420,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Washington--continued
$ 11,550,000 Seattle, WA Housing Authority, (Series 2003) Weekly VRDNs (High Point North LP)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
$ 11,550,000
11,720,000 3,4 Spokane, WA Public Facilities District, MERLOTS (Series 2001-A111), 3.40% TOBs (MBIA Insurance Corp. INS)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LIQ), Optional Tender 11/9/2006
11,720,000
5,500,000 Washington State EDFA, (Series 2001C) Weekly VRDNs (Waste Management, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
5,500,000
1,000,000 Washington State EDFA, (Series 2001L) Weekly VRDNs (Darigold, Inc./WestFarm Foods)/(Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 3.740%, 8/3/2006
1,000,000
5,200,000 Washington State EDFA, (Series 2004B) Weekly VRDNs (Cedar Grove Composting, Inc.)/(Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
5,200,000
5,000,000 Washington State EDFA, (Series 2005B) Weekly VRDNs (Harold LeMay Enterprises, Inc.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
5,000,000
5,350,000 Washington State Housing Finance Commission, (Series 2002A) Weekly VRDNs (Alderwood Court Associates LP)/(FNMA LOC), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
5,350,000
26,146,000 3,4 Washington State, Floater Certificates (Series 2004-1161) Weekly VRDNs (AMBAC INS)/(Morgan Stanley LIQ), 3.600%, 8/3/2006


26,146,000

   TOTAL


166,679,500

West Virginia--1.1%
1,045,000 Berkeley County, WV County Commission, (Series 1994) Weekly VRDNs (Brentwood Industries, Inc.)/(General Electric Capital Corp. LOC), 3.760%, 8/2/2006
1,045,000
10,000,000 Grant County, WV County Commission, PCRB (Series 1994), 3.72% CP (Virginia Electric & Power Co.), Mandatory Tender 10/11/2006
10,000,000
4,000,000 Grant County, WV County Commission, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (Series 1996), 3.65% CP (Virginia Electric & Power Co.), Mandatory Tender 8/14/2006
4,000,000
15,800,000 Marion County, WV County Commission, (Series 1990 A) Weekly VRDNs (American Bituminous Power Partners LP)/(Deutsche Bank AG LOC), 3.700%, 8/2/2006
15,800,000
3,300,000 Marion County, WV County Commission, (Series 1990 B) Weekly VRDNs (American Bituminous Power Partners LP)/(Deutsche Bank AG LOC), 3.720%, 8/2/2006
3,300,000
3,760,000 Ritchie County, WV, IDRB (Series 1996) Weekly VRDNs (Simonton Building Products, Inc.)/(PNC Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.780%, 8/3/2006
3,760,000
15,800,000 West Virginia Public Energy Authority, (1989 Series A), 3.70% CP (Morgantown Energy Associates)/(Dexia Credit Local LOC), Mandatory Tender 8/4/2006


15,800,000

   TOTAL


53,705,000

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Wisconsin--2.0%
$ 9,500,000 Brokaw, WI, Sewage and Solid Waste Revenue Bonds (Series 1995) Weekly VRDNs (Wausau Paper Mills Co.)/(Bank of America N.A. LOC), 3.890%, 8/3/2006
$ 9,500,000
4,000,000 Combined Locks, WI, Development Revenue Bonds, (Series 1997) Weekly VRDNs (Appleton Papers)/(LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.890%, 8/3/2006
4,000,000
800,000 Grand Chute, WI, (Series 2000A) Weekly VRDNs (Pacon Corp.)/(U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 3.730%, 8/2/2006
800,000
2,075,000 Hartford, WI, (Series 2000) Weekly VRDNs (Advance Bag, Inc.)/(Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee LOC), 3.830%, 8/3/2006
2,075,000
2,300,000 Milwaukee, WI, (Series 1997), 3.72% TOBs (Signature Flight Support Corp.)/ (Bayerische Landesbank (GTD) LOC), Optional Tender 12/1/2006
2,300,000
4,085,000 3,4 Wisconsin Housing & EDA, (PT-3456) Weekly VRDNs (Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. LIQ), 3.710%, 8/3/2006
4,085,000
17,435,000 Wisconsin Housing & EDA, (Series 2004E) Weekly VRDNs (Lloyds TSB Bank PLC, London LIQ), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
17,435,000
30,000,000 Wisconsin Housing & EDA, (Series A) Weekly VRDNs (DePfa Bank PLC LIQ), 3.670%, 8/3/2006
30,000,000
5,000,000 Wisconsin Housing & EDA, Home Ownership Revenue Bonds (Series 2002E) Weekly VRDNs (Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago LIQ), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
5,000,000
17,450,000 Wisconsin Housing & EDA, Home Ownership Revenue Bonds (Series 2005C) Weekly VRDNs (Lloyds TSB Bank PLC, London LIQ), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
17,450,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

SHORT-TERM MUNICIPALS--continued 1,2
Wisconsin--continued
$ 4,100,000 Wisconsin Housing & EDA, Home Ownership Revenue Bonds (Series 2005C) Weekly VRDNs (Lloyds TSB Bank PLC, London LIQ), 3.680%, 8/2/2006
$ 4,100,000
2,865,000 3,4 Wisconsin Housing & EDA, ROCs (Series 397) Weekly VRDNs (Citibank N.A., New York LIQ), 3.720%, 8/3/2006


2,865,000

   TOTAL


99,610,000

   TOTAL MUNICIPAL INVESTMENTS--107.6%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 5



5,371,036,367

   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--(7.6)%


(377,494,671
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
4,993,541,696

Securities that are subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) represent 70.0% of the portfolio as calculated based on total market value (percentage is unaudited).

1 The Fund may only invest in securities rated in one of the two highest short-term rating categories by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSROs) or unrated securities of comparable quality. An NRSRO's two highest rating categories are determined without regard for sub-categories and gradations. For example, securities rated SP-1+, SP-1, or SP-2 by Standard & Poor's, MIG-1 or MIG-2 by Moody's Investors Service, or F-1+, F-1, or F-2 by Fitch IBCA, are all considered rated in one of the two highest short-term rating categories. Securities rated in the highest short-term rating category (and unrated securities of comparable quality) are identified as First Tier securities. Securities rated in the second highest short-term rating category (and unrated securities of comparable quality) are identified as Second Tier securities. The Fund follows applicable regulations in determining whether a security is rated and whether a security rated by multiple NRSROs in different rating categories should be identified as a First or Second Tier security. At July 31, 2006, the portfolio securities were rated as follows:

Tier Rating Based on Total Market Value (unaudited)

First Tier
   
Second Tier
97.7%

2.3%

2 Current rate and next reset date shown for Variable Rate Demand Notes.

3 Denotes a restricted security that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) is subject to a contractual restriction on public sales. At July 31, 2006, these restricted securities amounted to $1,417,048,516, which represented 28.4% of total net assets.

4 Denotes a restricted security that may be resold without restriction to "qualified institutional buyers" as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and that the Fund has determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Fund's Board of Trustees. At July 31, 2006, these liquid restricted securities amounted to $1,417,048,516, which represented 28.4% of total net assets.

5 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

AMBAC --American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation
AMT --Alternative Minimum Tax
BANs --Bond Anticipation Notes
COL --Collateralized
CP --Commercial Paper
EDA --Economic Development Authority
EDFA --Economic Development Financing Authority
FGIC --Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
FHLMC --Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
FNMA --Federal National Mortgage Association
FSA --Financial Security Assurance
GNMA --Government National Mortgage Association
GO --General Obligation
GTD --Guaranteed
HEFA --Health and Education Facilities Authority
HFA --Housing Finance Authority
HFDC --Health Facility Development Corporation
IDA --Industrial Development Authority
IDB --Industrial Development Bond
IDC --Industrial Development Corporation
IDFA --Industrial Development Finance Authority
IDRB(s) --Industrial Development Revenue Bond(s)
IFA --Industrial Finance Authority
INS --Insured
LIQ --Liquidity Agreement
LOCs --Letter(s) of Credit
MERLOTS --Municipal Exempt Receipts -- Liquidity Optional Tender Series
MFH --Multi-Family Housing
MMMs --Money Market Municipals
PCA --Pollution Control Authority
PCFA --Pollution Control Finance Authority
PCR --Pollution Control Revenue
PCRB --Pollution Control Revenue Board
PUTTERs --Puttable Tax Exempt Receipts
ROCs --Reset Option Certificates
SWP --Swap Agreement
TANs --Tax Anticipation Notes
TOBs --Tender Option Bonds
TRANs --Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes
VRDNs --Variable Rate Demand Notes

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

July 31, 2006

Assets:
      
Total investments in securities, at amortized cost and value
$ 5,371,036,367
Cash
593,731
Income receivable
30,352,747
Receivable for shares sold





4,205,130

   TOTAL ASSETS





5,406,187,975

Liabilities:
Payable for investments purchased
$ 410,329,900
Payable for shares redeemed
261,376
Payable for Directors'/Trustees fees
132
Payable for shareholder services fee (Note 5)
217,291
Income distribution payable
1,530,520
Accrued expenses


307,060




   TOTAL LIABILITIES





412,646,279

Net assets for 4,993,675,959 shares outstanding




$
4,993,541,696

Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 4,993,675,960
Accumulated net realized loss on investments
(129,669 )
Distributions in excess of net investment income





(4,595
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS




$
4,993,541,696

Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds Per Share
Institutional Shares:
$3,490,983,401 ÷ 3,491,030,472 shares outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$1.00

Institutional Service Shares:
$620,552,403 ÷ 620,601,148 shares outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$1.00

Institutional Capital Shares:
$882,005,892 ÷ 882,044,339 shares outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$1.00

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Operations

Year Ended July 31, 2006

Investment Income:
         
Interest









$
158,813,381

Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
$ 10,060,761
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
4,005,330
Account administration fee--Institutional Service Shares
15,512
Custodian fees
201,306
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
374,694
Directors'/Trustees' fees
35,031
Auditing fees
16,736
Legal fees
23,088
Portfolio accounting fees
184,126
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Service Shares (Note 5)
1,514,647
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Capital Shares (Note 5)
2,178,142
Share registration costs
291,821
Printing and postage
31,176
Insurance premiums
34,818
Miscellaneous






18,239





   TOTAL EXPENSES






18,985,427





Waivers (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
$ (5,812,657 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(172,180 )
Waiver of shareholder services fee--Institutional Capital Shares


(1,166,074
)








   TOTAL WAIVERS






(7,150,911
)




Net expenses










11,834,516

Net investment income










146,978,865

Net realized loss on investments










(101,081
)
Change in net assets resulting from operations









$
146,877,784

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

Year Ended July 31
   

2006

   

2005

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income
$ 146,978,865 $ 64,788,270
Net realized gain (loss) on investments


(101,081
)


20,299

   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS


146,877,784



64,808,569

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income
Institutional Shares
(101,730,945 ) (47,775,366 )
Institutional Service Shares
(16,628,052 ) (7,591,909 )
Institutional Capital Shares


(28,618,336
)


(9,430,661
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS


(146,977,333
)


(64,797,936
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
52,382,943,955 38,273,423,295
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
121,331,427 48,697,843
Cost of shares redeemed


(52,255,060,210
)


(36,351,113,204
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


249,215,172



1,971,007,934

Change in net assets


249,115,623



1,971,018,567

Net Assets:
Beginning of period


4,744,426,073



2,773,407,506

End of period (including distribution in excess of net investment income of ($4,595) and ($6,127), respectively)

$
4,993,541,696


$
4,744,426,073

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

July 31, 2006

1. ORGANIZATION

Money Market Obligations Trust (the "Trust") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust consists of 41 portfolios. The financial statements included herein are only those of Municipal Obligations Fund (the "Fund"), a diversified portfolio. The financial statements of the other portfolios are presented separately. The assets of each portfolio are segregated and a shareholder's interest is limited to the portfolio in which shares are held. The Fund offers three classes of shares: Institutional Shares, Institutional Service Shares and Institutional Capital Shares. The financial highlights of the Institutional Service Shares and Institutional Capital Shares are presented separately. All shares of the Fund have equal rights with respect to voting, except on class-specific matters. The investment objective of the Fund is to provide current income exempt from federal regular income tax consistent with stability of principal. Interest income from the Fund's investments may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax for individuals and corporations and state and local taxes.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America.

Investment Valuation

The Fund uses the amortized cost method to value its portfolio securities in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act.

Investment Income, Gains and Losses, Expenses and Distributions

Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income are declared daily and paid monthly. Investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and certain fund-level expenses are allocated to each class based on relative average daily net assets, except that each class bears certain expenses unique to the class such as shareholder services fees. Dividends are declared separately for each class. No class has preferential dividend rights; differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses.

Premium and Discount Amortization

All premiums and discounts are amortized/accreted.

Federal Taxes

It is the Fund's policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary.

On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released FASB Interpretation No. 48 "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken in the course of preparing the fund's tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are "more-likely-than-not" of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax benefits of positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax expense in the current year. Adoption of FIN 48 is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the effective date. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FIN 48 and its impact in the financial statements has not yet been determined.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

The Fund may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Fund records when-issued securities on the trade date and maintains security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Restricted Securities

Restricted securities are securities that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) are subject to contractual restrictions on public sales. In some cases, when a security cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, the issuer of the restricted security has agreed to register such securities for resale, at the issuer's expense, either upon demand by the Fund or in connection with another registered offering of the securities. Many such restricted securities may be resold in the secondary market in transactions exempt from registration. Restricted securities may be determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Fund's Board of Trustees. The Fund will not incur any registration costs upon such resales. Restricted securities are valued at amortized cost in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

Other

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST

The following tables summarize share activity:

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

Institutional Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
45,999,768,480 $ 45,999,768,480 32,377,793,944 $ 32,377,793,944
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared

81,476,882
81,476,882

34,837,487


34,837,487
Shares redeemed

(45,631,011,465
)


(45,631,011,465
)

(31,516,352,148
)


(31,516,352,148
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS


450,233,897




$
450,233,897




896,279,283




$

896,279,283

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

Institutional Service Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
1,884,342,195 $ 1,884,342,195 2,119,536,078 $ 2,119,536,078
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared

13,961,548

13,961,548

6,196,601



6,196,601
Shares redeemed

(1,919,661,907
)


(1,919,661,907
)

(1,847,370,660
)


(1,847,370,660
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SERVICE SHARE TRANSACTIONS


(21,358,164
)



$
(21,358,164
)


278,362,019




$

278,362,019

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

Institutional Capital Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
4,498,833,280 $ 4,498,833,280 3,776,093,273 $ 3,776,093,273
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared

25,892,997

25,892,997

7,663,755



7,663,755
Shares redeemed

(4,704,386,838
)


(4,704,386,838
)

(2,987,390,396
)


(2,987,390,396
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL CAPITAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS


(179,660,561
)



$
(179,660,561
)



796,366,632




$

796,366,632

   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


249,215,172




$
249,215,172



1,971,007,934




$
1,971,007,934

4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

The tax character of distributions reported on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended July 31, 2006 and 2005 was as follows:


   
2006
   
2005
Tax-exempt income

$146,977,333

$64,797,936

As of July 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed tax-exempt income
   
$
1,525,924

Capital loss carryforward
   
$
(15,340
)
Dividend payable - current year end
   
$
(1,530,520
)
Current year post October loss deferral
   
$
(114,328
)

At July 31, 2006, the Fund had a capital loss carryforward of $15,340, which will reduce the Fund's taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investments, if any, to the extent permitted by the Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income tax. Pursuant to the Code, such capital loss carryforward will expire in July 2013.

The Fund used capital loss carryforwards of $13,247 to offset taxable capital gains realized during the year ended July 31, 2006.

Under current tax regulations, capital losses realized after October 31 may be deferred and treated as occurring on the first day of the following fiscal year. As of July 31, 2006, for federal income tax purposes, post-October losses of $114,328 were deferred to August 1, 2006.

5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

Federated Investment Management Company, the Fund's investment adviser (the "Adviser"), receives for its services an annual investment adviser fee equal to 0.20% of the Fund's average daily net assets. The Adviser may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. The Adviser can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the Adviser voluntarily waived $5,812,657 of its fee.

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Fund with administrative personnel and services. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average aggregate daily net assets of certain Federated funds as specified below:

Maximum
Administrative Fee

   
Average Aggregate Daily Net Assets
of the Federated Funds

0.150%

on the first $5 billion
0.125%

on the next $5 billion
0.100%

on the next $10 billion
0.075%

on assets in excess of $20 billion

The administrative fee received during any fiscal year shall be at least $150,000 per portfolio and $40,000 per each additional class of Shares. FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FAS can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the net fee paid to FAS was 0.076% of average aggregate daily net assets of the Fund.

Shareholder Services Fee

The Fund may pay fees (Service Fees) up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Fund's Institutional Shares, Institutional Service Shares and Institutional Capital Shares to financial intermediaries or to Federated Shareholder Services Company (FSSC) for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. FSSC or these financial intermediaries may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of their fee. In addition, FSSC may voluntarily reimburse the Fund for shareholder services fees. This voluntary waiver and/or reimbursement can be modified or terminated at any time. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC voluntarily waived $1,166,074 of its fee. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC did not receive any fees paid by the Fund.

For the year ended July 31, 2006, the Fund's Institutional Shares did not incur a shareholder services fee.

General

Certain of the Officers and Trustees of the Fund are Officers and Directors or Trustees of the above companies.

Interfund Transactions

During the year ended July 31, 2006, the Fund engaged in purchase and sale transactions with funds that have a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment advisers), common Directors/Trustees, and/or common Officers. These purchase and sale transactions complied with Rule 17a-7 under the Act and amounted to $7,698,355,000 and $12,397,527,000, respectively.

6. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning in October 2003, Federated Investors, Inc. and various subsidiaries thereof (including the advisers and distributor for various investment companies, collectively, "Federated"), along with various investment companies sponsored by Federated ("Funds") were named as defendants in several class action lawsuits now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuits were purportedly filed on behalf of people who purchased, owned and/or redeemed shares of Federated-sponsored mutual funds during specified periods beginning November 1, 1998. The suits are generally similar in alleging that Federated engaged in illegal and improper trading practices including market timing and late trading in concert with certain institutional traders, which allegedly caused financial injury to the mutual fund shareholders. These lawsuits began to be filed shortly after Federated's first public announcement that it had received requests for information on shareholder trading activities in the Funds from the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), the Office of the New York State Attorney General ("NYAG"), and other authorities. In that regard, on November 28, 2005, Federated announced that it had reached final settlements with the SEC and the NYAG with respect to those matters. As Federated previously reported in 2004, it has already paid approximately $8.0 million to certain funds as determined by an independent consultant. As part of these settlements, Federated agreed to pay for the benefit of fund shareholders additional disgorgement and a civil money penalty in the aggregate amount of an additional $72 million. Federated and various Funds have also been named as defendants in several additional lawsuits, the majority of which are now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging, among other things, excessive advisory and Rule 12b-1 fees. The Board of the Funds has retained the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro LLP to represent the Funds in these lawsuits. Federated and the Funds, and their respective counsel, are reviewing the allegations and intend to defend this litigation. Additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations may be filed in the future. The potential impact of these lawsuits, all of which seek unquantified damages, attorneys' fees and expenses, and future potential similar suits is uncertain. Although we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Funds, there can be no assurance that these suits, the ongoing adverse publicity and/or other developments resulting from the regulatory investigations will not result in increased Fund redemptions, reduced sales of Fund shares, or other adverse consequences for the Funds.

7. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

At July 31, 2006, 100.00% of the distributions from net investment income for the Fund are exempt from federal income tax, other than the federal AMT.

8. CHANGE IN INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM (UNAUDITED)

On August 18, 2006, the Fund's Trustees, upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, and completion of the audit for July 31, 2006, appointed KPMG LLP (KPMG) as the Fund's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007. The Fund's previous independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP (D&T), declined to stand for re-election. The reports issued by D&T on the Fund's financial statements for the fiscal years ended July 31, 2005, and July 31, 2006, contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During the Fund's fiscal years ended July 31, 2005, and July 31, 2006: (i) there were no disagreements with D&T on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of D&T, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with the reports on the financial statements for such years; and (ii) there were no reportable events of the kind described in Item 304(a) (1) (v) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

As indicted above, the Fund has appointed KPMG as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Fund's financial statements for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2007. During the Fund's fiscal years ended July 31, 2005 and July 31, 2006 and the interim period commencing August 1, 2006 and ending September 22, 2006, neither the Fund nor anyone on its behalf has consulted KPMG on items which: (i) concerned the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Fund's financial statements; or (ii) concerned the subject of a disagreement (as defined in paragraph (a) (1) (iv) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K) or reportable events (as described in paragraph (a) (1) (v) of said Item 304).

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONEY MARKET OBLIGATIONS TRUST AND SHAREHOLDERS OF MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS FUND FOR THE INSTITUTIONAL SHARES:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments, of Municipal Obligations Fund (the "Fund") (a portfolio of the Money Market Obligations Trust) as of July 31, 2006, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of July 31, 2006, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of July 31, 2006, the results of its operations for the year then ended, and the changes in its net assets and its financial highlights for the respective stated periods, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
September 22, 2006

Board of Trustees and Trust Officers

The Board is responsible for managing the Trust's business affairs and for exercising all the Trust's powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Board member and the senior officers of the Funds. Where required, the tables separately list Board members who are "interested persons" of the Fund (i.e., "Interested" Board members) and those who are not (i.e., "Independent" Board members). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is Federated Investors Tower, 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA. As of December 31, 2005, the Trust comprised 41 portfolios, and the Federated Fund Complex consisted of 43 investment companies (comprising 136 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Board member oversees all portfolios in the Federated Fund Complex and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund's Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trust Trustees and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
John F. Donahue*
Birth Date: July 28, 1924
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex's Executive Committee.

Previous Positions
: Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex; Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Chairman and Director, Federated Investment Counseling.



J. Christopher Donahue*
Birth Date: April 11, 1949
PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 1989
Principal Occupations : Principal Executive Officer and President of the Federated Fund Complex; Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company; Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman, Passport Research, Ltd. (Investment advisory subsidiary of Federated); Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director, Federated Services Company.

Previous Positions
: President, Federated Investment Counseling; President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D.*
Birth Date: October 11, 1932
3471 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1111
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Medical Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Downtown; Hematologist, Oncologist and Internist, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Other Directorships Held
: Member, National Board of Trustees, Leukemia Society of America.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, University of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.



* Family relationships and reasons for "interested" status: John F. Donahue is the father of J. Christopher Donahue; both are "interested" due to the positions they hold with Federated Investors, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D. is "interested" because his son-in-law is employed by the Fund's principal underwriter, Federated Securities Corp.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
Thomas G. Bigley
Birth Date: February 3, 1934
15 Old Timber Trail
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: November 1994
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Member of Executive Committee, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh.

Previous Position
: Senior Partner, Ernst & Young LLP.



John T. Conroy, Jr.
Birth Date: June 23, 1937
Investment Properties Corporation
3838 North Tamiami Trail
Suite 402
Naples, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman of the Board, Investment Properties Corporation; Partner or Trustee in private real estate ventures in Southwest Florida.

Previous Positions
: President, Investment Properties Corporation; Senior Vice President, John R. Wood and Associates, Inc., Realtors; President, Naples Property Management, Inc. and Northgate Village Development Corporation.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
Nicholas P. Constantakis
Birth Date: September 3, 1939
175 Woodshire Drive
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Michael Baker Corporation (engineering and energy services worldwide).

Previous Position
: Partner, Andersen Worldwide SC.



John F. Cunningham
Birth Date: March 5, 1943
353 El Brillo Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Director, WinsorTech.

Other Directorships Held
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cunningham & Co., Inc. (strategic business consulting); Trustee Associate, Boston College.

Previous Positions
: Director, Redgate Communications and EMC Corporation (computer storage systems); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Computer Consoles, Inc.; President and Chief Operating Officer, Wang Laboratories; Director, First National Bank of Boston; Director, Apollo Computer, Inc.



Peter E. Madden
Birth Date: March 16, 1942
One Royal Palm Way
100 Royal Palm Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Board of Overseers, Babson College.

Previous Positions
: Representative, Commonwealth of Massachusetts General Court; President, State Street Bank and Trust Company and State Street Corporation (retired); Director, VISA USA and VISA International; Chairman and Director, Massachusetts Bankers Association; Director, Depository Trust Corporation; Director, The Boston Stock Exchange.



Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.
Birth Date: April 10, 1945
80 South Road
Westhampton Beach, NY
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Management Consultant.

Previous Positions
: Chief Executive Officer, PBTC International Bank; Partner, Arthur Young & Company (now Ernst & Young LLP); Chief Financial Officer of Retail Banking Sector, Chase Manhattan Bank; Senior Vice President, HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank); Vice President, Citibank; Assistant Professor of Banking and Finance, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University; Executive Vice President, DVC Group, Inc.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years, Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)
John E. Murray, Jr., J.D., S.J.D.
Birth Date: December 20, 1932
Chancellor, Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1995
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee, and Chairman of the Board of Directors or Trustees, of the Federated Fund Complex; Chancellor and Law Professor, Duquesne University; Partner, Murray, Hogue & Lannis.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Michael Baker Corp. (engineering, construction, operations and technical services).

Previous Positions
: President, Duquesne University; Dean and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Dean and Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law.



Marjorie P. Smuts
Birth Date: June 21, 1935
4905 Bayard Street
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Public Relations/Marketing Consultant/Conference Coordinator.

Previous Positions
: National Spokesperson, Aluminum Company of America; television producer; President, Marj Palmer Assoc.; Owner, Scandia Bord.



John S. Walsh
Birth Date: November 28, 1957
2604 William Drive
Valparaiso, IN
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer of construction temporary heaters); President and Director, Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers Products, Inc.

Previous Position
: Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc.



James F. Will
Birth Date: October 12, 1938
Saint Vincent College
Latrobe, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 2006
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chancellor and President, Saint Vincent College.

Other Directorships Held
: Alleghany Corporation.

Previous Positions
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Armco, Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer, Cyclops Industries; President and Chief Operating Officer, Kaiser Steel Corporation.



OFFICERS




Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
John W. McGonigle
Birth Date: October 26, 1938
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND SECRETARY
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Federated Investment Counseling; Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Services Company and Federated Securities Corp.



Richard A. Novak
Birth Date: December 25, 1963
TREASURER
Began serving: January 2006
Principal Occupations : Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Federated Fund Complex; Senior Vice President, Federated Administrative Services; Financial and Operations Principal for Federated Securities Corp., Edgewood Services, Inc. and Southpointe Distribution Services, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Vice President, Finance of Federated Services Company; Controller of Federated Investors, Inc.; held various financial management positions within The Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh; Auditor, Arthur Andersen & Co.



Richard B. Fisher
Birth Date: May 17, 1923
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Vice Chairman or Vice President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman, Federated Securities Corp.

Previous Positions
: President and Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Executive Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc. and Director and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Securities Corp.



Brian P. Bouda
Birth Date: February 28, 1947
CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER
Began serving: August 2004
Principal Occupations : Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of Federated Investors, Inc.; and Chief Compliance Officer of its subsidiaries. Mr. Bouda joined Federated in 1999 and is a member of the American Bar Association and the State Bar Association of Wisconsin.



Deborah A. Cunningham
Birth Date: September 15, 1959
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Deborah A. Cunningham was named Chief Investment Officer of money market products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1981 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1997. Ms. Cunningham is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.S.B.A. in Finance from Robert Morris College.






Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
Mary Jo Ochson
Birth Date: September 12, 1953
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Mary Jo Ochson has been the Fund's Portfolio Manager since November 1996. Ms. Ochson was named Chief Investment Officer of tax-exempt, fixed-income products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1982 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Pittsburgh.



Susan R. Hill
Birth Date: June 20, 1963
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Susan R. Hill is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Hill joined Federated in 1990 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 2003 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 2005. Ms. Hill was a Portfolio Manager from 1994 until 2003, and served as Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1997 until 2004 and an Assistant Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1994 until 1997. Ms. Hill is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received an M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University.



Jeff A. Kozemchak
Birth Date: January 15, 1960
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Jeff A. Kozemchak has been the Fund's Portfolio Manager since May 1997. Mr. Kozemchak is Vice President of the Trust. Mr. Kozemchak joined Federated in 1987 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 1996 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1999. He was a Portfolio Manager until 1996 and a Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Kozemchak is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received his M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University in 1987.



Paige M. Wilhelm
Birth Date: May 28, 1962
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: August 2006
Principal Occupations : Paige M. Wilhelm is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Wilhelm joined Federated in 1985 and has been a Senior Vice President and a Senior Portfolio Manager. She is responsible for portfolio management and research in the fixed income area concentrating on taxable money market instruments. Previous associations include Senior Credit Analyst, Federated Investors; Performance Analysis Supervisor; Performance Analyst, Federated Investment Counseling. Ms. Wilhelm is a member of the CFA Society of Pittsburgh and received her B.S. from Indiana University and her M.B.A. from Duquesne University.



Evaluation and Approval of Advisory Contract

MUNICIPAL OBLIGATIONS FUND (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds (e.g., institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was above the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies, if any, relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Federated's website. Go to FederatedInvestors.com, select "Products," select the "Prospectuses and Regulatory Reports" link, then select the Fund to access the link to Form N-PX. This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

The Fund files with the SEC a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on "Form N-Q." These filings are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.) You may also access this information from the "Products" section of Federated's website at FederatedInvestors.com by clicking on "Portfolio Holdings" and selecting the name of the Fund, or by selecting the name of the Fund and clicking on "Portfolio Holdings." You must register on the website the first time you wish to access this information.

Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board, or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal. Although money market funds seek to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share, there is no assurance that they will be able to do so.

This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the Fund's prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses, and other information.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Municipal Obligations Fund
Federated Investors Funds
5800 Corporate Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15237-7000
Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.

Federated Securities Corp., Distributor

Cusip 60934N658

33515 (9/06)

Federated is a registered mark of Federated Investors, Inc. 2006 (c)Federated Investors, Inc.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Prime Obligations Fund

A Portfolio of Money Market Obligations Trust



ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT

July 31, 2006

Institutional Shares

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
SHAREHOLDER EXPENSE EXAMPLE
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS SUMMARY TABLES
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND TRUST OFFICERS
EVALUATION AND APPROVAL OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
VOTING PROXIES ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

Not FDIC Insured * May Lose Value * No Bank Guarantee

Federated Investors 50 Years of Growth & Innovation

Financial Highlights

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended July 31
   
2006

   
2005

   
2004

   
2003

   
2002

Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period
$1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00
Income From Investment Operations:
Net investment income
0.042 0.022 0.010 0.014 0.023
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments

0.000
1

0.000
1

0.000
1

(0.000
) 1

--

   TOTAL FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS

0.042


0.022


0.010


0.014


0.023

Less Distributions:
Distributions from net investment income

(0.042
)

(0.022
)

(0.010
)

(0.014
)

(0.023
)
Net Asset Value, End of Period

$1.00


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00


$1.00

Total Return 2

4.33
%

2.24
%

0.97
%

1.36
%

2.32
%
Ratios to Average Net Assets:















Net expenses

0.20
%

0.20
%

0.20
%

0.20
%

0.20
%
Net investment income

4.24
%

2.19
%

0.96
%

1.34
%

2.21
%
Expense waiver/reimbursement 3

0.28
%

0.34
%

0.34
%

0.34
%

0.34
%
Supplemental Data:















Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

$15,151,070

$15,600,659

$16,519,436

$20,110,135

$20,707,206

1 Represents less than $0.001.

2 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

3 This expense decrease is reflected in both the net expense and the net investment income ratios shown.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees; to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees and/or shareholder services fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you to understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from February 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006.

ACTUAL EXPENSES

The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES

The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund's actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund's actual return. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are required to be provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund with other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.


   
Beginning
Account Value
2/1/2006

   
Ending
Account Value
7/31/2006

   
Expenses Paid
During Period 1

Actual

$1,000

$1,023.70

$1.00
Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return before expenses)

$1,000

$1,023.80

$1.00

1 Expenses are equal to the Fund's annualized net expense ratio of 0.20%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).

Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's portfolio composition 1 was as follows:

Security Type
   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

Variable Rate Demand Instruments

41.5
%
Commercial Paper & Notes

37.7
%
Bank Instruments

18.9
%
Repurchase Agreements

2.9
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(1.0
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

At July 31, 2006, the Fund's effective maturity 3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:

   
Percentage of
Total Net Assets

1-7 Days

42.2
% 4
8-30 Days

33.2
%
31-90 Days

18.8
%
91-180 Days

1.8
%
181 Days or more

5.0
%
Other Assets and Liabilities--Net 2

(1.0
)%
   TOTAL

100.0
%

1 Commercial paper and notes include any fixed-rate security that is not a bank instrument. A variable rate demand instrument is any security which has an interest rate that resets periodically. See the Fund's Prospectus for descriptions of commercial paper, repurchase agreements and bank instruments.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

4 Overnight securities comprised 28.1% of the Fund's portfolio.

Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES--0.8%
Finance - Automotive--0.3%
$ 21,264,819 Capital One Prime Auto Receivables Trust 2006-1, Class A1, 4.872%, 3/15/2007
$ 21,264,819
12,479,638 CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2006-1, Class A1, 5.180%, 5/15/2007
12,479,638
9,740,673 1,2 DaimlerChrysler Auto Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.791%, 3/8/2007
9,740,673
7,490,611 Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust 2005-6, Class A-1, 4.511%, 12/18/2006
7,490,611
2,226,494 USAA Auto Owner Trust 2005-4, Class A1, 4.400%, 12/15/2006
2,226,494
11,288,364 World Omni Automobile Receivables Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.854%, 3/15/2007


11,288,364

   TOTAL


64,490,599

Finance - Equipment--0.5%
17,006,888 CIT Equipment Collateral 2006-VT1, Class A1, 4.989%, 3/20/2007
17,006,888
41,235,240 CNH Equipment Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 4.989%, 4/5/2007
41,235,240
4,392,380 1,2 GE Equipment Small Ticket LLC Series 2005-2, Class A1, 4.556%, 12/22/2006
4,392,380
32,480,403 John Deere Owner Trust 2006-A, Class A1, 5.364%, 7/13/2007


32,480,403

   TOTAL


95,114,911

   TOTAL ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES


159,605,510

CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT--10.9%
Banking--10.9%
35,000,000 Barclays Bank PLC, 4.752%, 10/17/2006
35,000,181
245,000,000 Calyon, Paris, 4.750% - 5.355%, 10/17/2006 - 4/30/2007
245,001,791
105,000,000 Citizens Bank N.A., 5.160% - 5.270%, 8/10/2006 - 9/12/2006
105,001,514
235,000,000 Citizens Bank of Massachusetts, 5.330% - 5.430%, 8/10/2006 - 9/29/2006
235,000,000
189,000,000 Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, 5.220% - 5.500%, 8/28/2006 - 10/31/2006
189,000,000
219,000,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 4.920% - 5.250%, 11/20/2006 - 3/29/2007
219,000,000
49,200,000 DePfa Bank PLC, 5.260%, 4/9/2007
49,200,000
250,000,000 Deutsche Bank AG, 4.500% - 4.765%, 10/13/2006 - 10/27/2006
250,000,000
40,000,000 Dexia Bank, Belgium, 4.305%, 9/29/2006
39,968,817
19,250,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.260%, 4/11/2007
19,250,000
100,000,000 Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee, 5.250%, 9/11/2006
100,000,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT--continued
Banking--continued
$ 289,000,000 Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, Edinburgh, 4.397% - 4.850%, 10/4/2006 - 1/30/2007
$ 288,999,290
95,000,000 Societe Generale, Paris, 4.760% - 4.785%, 10/27/2006
95,000,875
153,000,000 Toronto Dominion Bank, 5.295% - 5.600%, 4/13/2007 - 6/18/2007
153,000,000
280,000,000 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 5.300% - 5.310%, 8/7/2006 - 8/10/2006


280,000,000

   TOTAL CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT


2,303,422,468

COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS--12.4%
Banking--4.5%
856,000,000 Fortis Bank SA/NV, 5.362%, 8/1/2006
856,000,000
80,000,000 IXIS Financial Products Inc., 5.412%, 8/1/2006


80,000,000

   TOTAL


936,000,000

Brokerage--7.9%
703,000,000 Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., 5.362% - 5.412%, 8/1/2006
703,000,000
740,000,000 Goldman Sachs & Co., 5.270% - 5.412%, 8/1/2006
740,000,000
230,000,000 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.442%, 8/1/2006


230,000,000

   TOTAL


1,673,000,000

   TOTAL COLLATERALIZED LOAN AGREEMENTS


2,609,000,000

COMMERCIAL PAPER--20.8% 3
Banking--5.0%
222,000,000 Bank of America Corp., 5.330% - 5.385%, 9/21/2006 - 10/4/2006
220,070,903
33,110,000 Benedictine Health System-St. Mary's Duluth Clinic Health System Obligated Group, 5.400%, 10/11/2006
32,757,379
1,265,000 Benedictine Living Communities, Inc., 5.400%, 10/11/2006
1,251,528
100,000,000 1,2 Fountain Square Commercial Funding Corp., 5.390%, 10/2/2006 - 10/3/2006
99,064,236
90,000,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.180%, 9/8/2006
89,507,900
106,270,000 1,2 Long Lane Master Trust IV, (Bank of America N.A. SWP), 5.280%, 8/7/2006
106,176,482
15,235,000 Los Angeles County, CA Metropolitan Transportation Authority, (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 5.330%, 8/9/2006
15,235,000
505,027,000 1,2 Picaros Funding LLC, (GTD by KBC Bank N.V.), 4.970% - 5.400%, 8/8/2006 - 10/11/2006


502,413,575

   TOTAL


1,066,477,003

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

COMMERCIAL PAPER--continued 3
Finance - Automotive--5.3%
$ 83,382,000 DaimlerChrysler Revolving Auto Conduit LLC, A1+/P1 Series, 5.280%, 8/4/2006
$ 83,345,312
51,442,000 DaimlerChrysler Revolving Auto Conduit LLC, A1/P1 Series, 5.140% - 5.150%, 8/18/2006 - 9/14/2006
51,146,103
666,000,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust, A1+/P1 Series, 4.970% - 5.400%, 8/7/2006 - 11/13/2006
662,378,022
325,000,000 FCAR Auto Loan Trust, A1/P1 Series, 5.140% - 5.360%, 8/11/2006 - 9/15/2006


324,052,989

   TOTAL


1,120,922,426

Finance - Commercial--1.3%
130,000,000 CIT Group, Inc., 5.000% - 5.110%, 8/9/2006 - 11/14/2006
128,780,458
40,000,000 1,2 Edison Asset Securitization LLC, 5.380%, 10/5/2006
39,611,444
100,000,000 General Electric Capital Corp., 5.230%, 8/8/2006


99,898,306

   TOTAL


268,290,208

Finance - Retail--4.2%
20,000,000 1,2 Amsterdam Funding Corp., 5.380%, 10/4/2006
19,808,711
75,431,000 1,2 Chariot Funding LLC, 5.150% - 5.280%, 8/10/2006 - 9/5/2006
75,164,442
198,855,000 1,2 Compass Securitization LLC, 5.245% - 5.330%, 8/16/2006 - 9/15/2006
197,794,469
51,205,000 1,2 Jupiter Securitization Company LLC, 5.280%, 8/3/2006
51,189,980
50,000,000 1,2 PREFCO-Preferred Receivables Funding Company LLC, 5.170%, 8/10/2006
49,935,375
232,564,000 1,2 Paradigm Funding LLC, 5.230% - 5.330%, 8/7/2006 - 8/15/2006
232,203,675
252,229,000 1,2 Sheffield Receivables Corp., 5.280% - 5.300%, 8/9/2006 - 8/11/2006


251,906,103

   TOTAL


878,002,755

Finance - Securities--4.5%
35,000,000 1,2 Galaxy Funding Inc., 5.040%, 8/4/2006
34,985,300
269,000,000 1,2 Georgetown Funding Co. LLC, 5.419% - 5.449%, 9/19/2006 - 9/20/2006
267,816,641
250,000,000 1,2 Grampian Funding LLC, 5.220% - 5.370%, 9/18/2006 - 10/25/2006
247,259,146
197,844,000 1,2 KLIO II Funding Ltd., 5.230% - 5.370%, 8/18/2006 - 9/8/2006
197,110,642
179,000,000 1,2 Perry Global Funding LLC Series A, 5.180% - 5.380%, 8/9/2006 - 10/10/2006
177,862,951
35,000,000 1,2 Scaldis Capital LLC, 5.230%, 9/13/2006


34,781,357

   TOTAL


959,816,037

Insurance--0.5%
100,000,000 1,2 Aspen Funding Corp., 5.350%, 9/22/2006


99,227,222

   TOTAL COMMERCIAL PAPER


4,392,735,651

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

CORPORATE BONDS--0.3%
Finance - Commercial--0.1%
$ 20,000,000 CIT Group, Inc., 5.202%, 8/18/2006

$
20,000,573

Finance - Retail--0.2%
46,325,000 SLM Corp., 5.529%, 9/15/2006


46,335,844

   TOTAL CORPORATE BONDS


66,336,417

CORPORATE NOTES--2.3%
Finance - Securities--2.3%
185,000,000 1,2 K2 (USA) LLC, (GTD by K2 Corp.), 5.000%, 3/9/2007 - 3/12/2007
185,000,000
303,000,000 1,2 Sigma Finance, Inc., (GTD by Sigma Finance Corp.), 4.150% - 5.750%, 8/8/2006 - 7/25/2007


303,000,000

   TOTAL CORPORATE NOTES


488,000,000

GOVERNMENT AGENCIES--0.2%
Government Agency--0.2%
39,000,000 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 5.410%, 6/18/2007


39,000,000

LOAN PARTICIPATION--0.3%
Electrical Equipment--0.3%
55,500,000 Mt. Vernon Phenol Plant Partnership, (GTD by General Electric Co.), 5.390%, 5/21/2007


55,500,000

NOTES - VARIABLE--41.5% 4
Banking--18.5%
4,945,000 4 C's LLC, (Series 1998), (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
4,945,000
1,620,000 Advanced Labelworx, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
1,620,000
4,915,000 AlaTrade Foods LLC, Series 2003, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
4,915,000
1,245,000 Alabama State IDA, (SERIES 1994) Miltope Project, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.470%, 8/3/2006
1,245,000
3,800,000 Alabama State IDA, (Wellborn Cabinet, Inc.), Tax Revenue Bonds, (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
3,800,000
1,075,000 Alabama State IDA, Standard Furniture Project (Series 1995), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
1,075,000
2,050,000 Aliceville, AL IDB, Buchanan Hardwood Flooring Co. (Series 1999), (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.470%, 8/3/2006
2,050,000
33,640,000 American Health Care Centers, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
33,640,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 4
Banking--continued
$ 7,150,000 American Xtal Technology, Inc., Xtal Project (Series 1998), (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.430%, 8/3/2006
$ 7,150,000
12,000,000 Association of American Medical Colleges, (GTD by J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., INS AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.), 5.490%, 8/2/2006
12,000,000
4,125,000 Atlantic Tool and Die Co., (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
4,125,000
7,640,000 B.R. Williams Trucking, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
7,640,000
230,000,000 1,2 BNP Paribas SA, 5.144% - 5.364%, 8/21/2006 - 8/28/2006
230,000,000
5,635,000 Baldwin County Sewer Service LLC, Series 2002, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
5,635,000
602,000,000 Bank of America N.A., 5.373%, 8/1/2006
601,992,144
63,000,000 1,2 Bank of Ireland, 5.350%, 8/21/2006
63,000,000
73,000,000 1,2 Bank of New York Co., Inc., 5.458%, 8/28/2006
73,000,000
225,000,000 Barclays Bank PLC, 5.289% - 5.343%, 8/7/2006 - 8/28/2006
224,972,557
16,275,000 Biddle Road Corp., Series 2004, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
16,275,000
6,995,000 Bing Steel Management, Inc., Series 2000, (Comerica Bank LOC), 5.498%, 8/2/2006
6,995,000
3,260,000 Bing Steel Management, Inc., Series 2002, (Comerica Bank LOC), 5.498%, 8/2/2006
3,260,000
4,910,000 Bond Holdings LP, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/4/2006
4,910,000
1,205,000 Brookshire Grocery Co., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
1,205,000
5,970,000 Brumfield Properties, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
5,970,000
13,001,000 Capital One Funding Corp., (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
13,001,000
3,107,000 Capital One Funding Corp., (Series 1998-C), (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
3,107,000
17,658,000 Capital One Funding Corp., (Series 1999-A), (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
17,658,000
1,414,000 Capital One Funding Corp., (Series 1999-B), (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
1,414,000
1,089,000 Capital One Funding Corp., Series 1994-D, (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
1,089,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 4
Banking--continued
$ 2,882,000 Capital One Funding Corp., Series 1995-B, (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
$ 2,882,000
1,297,000 Capital One Funding Corp., Series 1995-F, (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
1,297,000
3,112,000 Capital One Funding Corp., Series 1996-H, (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
3,112,000
7,294,000 Capital One Funding Corp., Series 2001-B, (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
7,294,000
10,575,000 Church at Brook Hills, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.500%, 8/4/2006
10,575,000
6,350,000 Cincinnati Bible College and Seminary, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
6,350,000
3,760,000 Clinton County, NY IDA, Bombardier Project (Series 1998-B), (HSBC Bank USA LOC), 5.650%, 8/3/2006
3,760,000
3,805,000 Colonie, NY IDA, Mechanical Technology, Inc. Project (Series 1998 A), (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
3,805,000
795,000 Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Development Disabilities Resource Center (Series 1998-C1), (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
795,000
1,420,000 Columbia County, GA Development Authority, Series 1993, (SunTrust Banks, Inc. LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
1,420,000
10,800,000 Community Centre Group of Cos., (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
10,800,000
8,580,000 Consolidated Publishing Co., Inc., (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.550%, 8/4/2006
8,580,000
33,810,000 Cook County, IL, Series 2002 A, 5.420%, 8/2/2006
33,810,000
5,765,000 Crane Plastics Siding LLC, Series 2000, (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
5,765,000
146,500,000 Credit Suisse, Zurich, 5.280% - 5.486%, 9/12/2006 - 10/24/2006
146,500,619
12,600,000 Decatur, AL IDB, Bailey-PVS Oxides Project (Series 1998), (SunTrust Bank LOC), 5.470%, 8/3/2006
12,600,000
15,000,000 Development Authority of Gordon County, GA, Series 2005, Faus Group Inc., (RBC Centura Bank LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
15,000,000
2,570,000 Double H Plastics, Inc., (Series 1998), (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/2/2006
2,570,000
6,110,000 Elsinore Properties LP, (Series 1998), (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
6,110,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 4
Banking--continued
$ 3,200,000 Fairpoint Regional Utility System, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
$ 3,200,000
43,000,000 First Tennessee Bank, N.A., 5.210%, 8/25/2006
43,000,099
1,000,000 G.M.H. Enterprises, Inc., (Series 1995), (National City Bank, Ohio LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
1,000,000
13,405,000 Galasso Materials LLC and Galasso Holdings LLC, (Series 1998), (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
13,405,000
2,930,000 Gesmundo & Associates, Inc., Series A, (National City Bank of the Midwest LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
2,930,000
36,800,000 Greene County Development Authority, Reynolds Lodge, LLC Series 2000 A, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.420%, 8/2/2006
36,800,000
13,850,000 Greene County Development Authority, Reynolds Lodge, LLC Series 2000B, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
13,850,000
36,000,000 Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc., (GTD by Greenwich Capital Holdings, Inc.), 5.305%, 8/9/2006
36,000,000
5,615,000 H & P Holdings LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
5,615,000
8,860,000 H.C. Equities LP, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
8,860,000
399,000,000 1,2 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.259% - 5.315%, 8/9/2006 - 8/21/2006
399,001,584
369,700,000 HBOS Treasury Services PLC, 5.396% - 5.530%, 8/1/2006 - 9/25/2006
369,702,523
5,550,000 HFS Holdings LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
5,550,000
8,210,000 Healthcare Network Properties LLC, (Series A), (National City Bank of the Midwest LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
8,210,000
10,350,000 Hillcrest Investments LLC, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/2/2006
10,350,000
3,235,000 Historical Preservation Authority of Birmingham, (Series 1993), (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.520%, 8/3/2006
3,235,000
85,000,000 J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., 5.316%, 8/2/2006
85,000,000
3,725,000 J.P. Plymouth Properties LLC, (Series 1999), (LaSalle Bank Midwest, N.A. LOC), 5.590%,8/2/2006
3,725,000
15,000,000 Kansas City, MO Tax Increment Financing Commission, President Hotel, (INS MBIA Insurance Corp.), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
15,000,000
3,130,000 Kings Creek Country Club, Inc., (Series 1997), (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/2/2006
3,130,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 4
Banking--continued
$ 1,800,000 L.H. Kroh, Inc., (Series 1998), (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/2/2006
$ 1,800,000
4,740,000 Lee County, FL IDA, Bonita Community Health Center, Series 1999B, (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.400%, 8/4/2006
4,740,000
5,165,000 1,2 Los Angeles, CA, MERLOTs Series 2000 A (H&H Theatre), (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/2/2006
5,165,000
11,250,000 Louisiana Agricultural Finance Authority, Lacassive Syrup Mill, Series 2004, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.450%, 8/3/2006
11,250,000
4,785,000 M & C Holdings LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
4,785,000
460,000 Madison, WI Community Development Authority, Series 1997-B Hamilton Point Apts., (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.600%, 8/3/2006
460,000
12,045,000 Maryland State Economic Development Corp., Human Genome Sciences Series 1999B, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.480%, 8/1/2006
12,045,000
17,440,000 Massachusetts State Development Finance Agency, (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
17,440,000
4,610,000 McCullough Snappy Service Oil Co., Inc., (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/4/2006
4,610,000
75,000,000 Mercantile Safe Deposit & Trust Co., Baltimore, 5.305% - 5.329%, 8/10/2006 - 8/15/2006
74,995,400
1,841,000 Midwest Funding Corp., Series 1992-B, (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
1,841,000
8,710,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.470%, 8/3/2006
8,710,000
4,200,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., Howard Industries, Inc. Series 1997, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
4,200,000
10,000,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., Kohler Project, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
10,000,000
17,000,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., Series 1994 Georgia Gulf, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/2/2006
17,000,000
10,790,000 Mississippi Business Finance Corp., VC Regional Assembly & Manufacturing LLC., (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/2/2006
10,790,000
110,000,000 1,2 National Australia Bank Ltd., Melbourne, 5.307%, 8/7/2006
110,000,000
5,975,000 North American Gulf Terminals, Inc., Series 2002, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.390%, 8/3/2006
5,975,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 4
Banking--continued
$ 11,920,000 North Oaks Partnership, (Series 1998), (LaSalle Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
$ 11,920,000
81,800,000 Novant Health, Inc., Series 1997, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.450%, 8/2/2006
81,800,000
10,150,000 Ohio Waste Development Authority Solid Waste, Bailey-PVS Oxides, LLC (Series 1998), (Key Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
10,150,000
5,000,000 Olive Baptist Church, Inc., (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
5,000,000
11,000,000 Park Street Properties I LLC, University of Wisconsin - Madison Projects, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
11,000,000
4,385,000 Parkview Professional Center, Series 2005, (Comerica Bank LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
4,385,000
6,650,000 Physicians Real Estate LLP, (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Minnesota LOC), 5.450%, 8/2/2006
6,650,000
14,500,000 Pitney Roads Partners LLC, Series 2003 - A, (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 5.380%, 8/3/2006
14,500,000
1,185,000 Quality Synthetic Rubber Co., Series 2000, (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
1,185,000
5,850,000 Reiser Group Sonic Management Co., Inc., Series 2002, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
5,850,000
9,255,000 Rollins College, Series 1998, (SunTrust Bank LOC), 5.370%, 8/2/2006
9,255,000
108,000,000 1,2 Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal, 5.316%, 8/1/2006
108,000,000
60,000,000 Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal, 5.520%, 10/12/2006
60,010,241
19,000,000 Salvation Army, Series 2004-A, (Bank of New York LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
19,000,000
3,590,000 Savannah, GA Housing Authority, (SunTrust Bank LOC), 5.420%, 8/2/2006
3,590,000
2,771,000 Sawmill Creek Lodge Co., (Series 1996), (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
2,771,000
14,390,000 Seeber USA LLP, Series 2000, (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/2/2006
14,390,000
50,000,000 1,2 Societe Generale, Paris, 5.316%, 8/2/2006
50,000,000
11,375,000 Spira Millenium LLC, Series 2001, (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
11,375,000
55,225,000 Spitzer Group, (J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
55,225,000
3,180,000 Springfield Ltd. Partnership, (UBS AG LOC), 5.350%, 8/3/2006
3,180,000
Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 4
Banking--continued
$ 1,165,000 St. Paul, MN Port Authority, Bix Fruit Co. (Series 1998-B), (Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee LOC), 5.640%, 8/3/2006
$ 1,165,000
1,950,000 St. Paul, MN Port Authority, National Checking Co. Project (Series 1998-B), (U.S. Bank, N.A. LOC), 5.540%, 8/3/2006
1,950,000
13,280,000 Suffolk County, NY IDA, (Bank of America N.A. LOC), 5.420%, 8/2/2006
13,280,000
6,050,000 Trinity Baptist Church, Series 2002-A, (Regions Bank, Alabama LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
6,050,000
75,000,000 1,2 Union Hamilton Special Purpose Funding LLC, Series 2005-1 Tranche #1, (GTD by Wachovia Corp.), 5.424% - 5.490%, 9/21/2006 - 9/28/2006
75,000,000
9,300,000 Victor H. Hanson/ Elizabeth F. Hanson, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
9,300,000
1,200,000 Village Green Finance Co. LLC, (Series 1997), (Wachovia Bank N.A. LOC), 5.350%, 8/2/2006
1,200,000
2,512,000 Vista Funding Corp., Series 1995-D, (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.390%, 8/3/2006
2,512,000
1,245,000 Vista Funding Corp., Series 1998-B, (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.400%, 8/3/2006
1,245,000
195,250,000 Wells Fargo & Co., 5.396%, 8/2/2006
195,250,066
10,575,000 Western Reserve Masonic Community, Inc., (GTD by J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
10,575,000
25,000,000 Westpac Banking Corp. Ltd., Sydney, 5.340%, 9/11/2006
25,000,000
10,195,000 Whetstone Care Center LLC, Series 1998, (Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati LOC), 5.500%, 8/3/2006
10,195,000
4,780,000 William Morris Realty Montgomery LLC, (Amsouth Bank N.A., Birmingham, AL LOC), 5.480%, 8/3/2006
4,780,000
34,345,000 World Wildlife Fund, Inc., Series 2000 B, (INS by AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.), 5.490%, 8/3/2006


34,345,000

   TOTAL


3,895,168,233

Brokerage--7.8%
117,000,000 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.307% - 5.386%, 8/1/2006 - 8/7/2006
117,000,000
50,000,000 1,2 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.389%, 8/15/2006
50,001,885
110,000,000 Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Promissory Note, 5.375%, 8/8/2006
110,000,000
374,000,000 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.349% - 5.394%, 8/4/2006 - 8/24/2006
374,000,000
240,000,000 1,2 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5.599%, 8/11/2006
240,000,334
752,300,000 Morgan Stanley, 5.363% - 5.468%, 8/1/2006 - 8/28/2006


752,302,345

   TOTAL


1,643,304,564

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 4
Electrical Equipment--0.3%
$ 2,600,000 Alabama State IDA, General Electric Project, (General Electric Co. LOC), 5.310%, 8/3/2006
$ 2,600,000
58,656,672 Northwest Airlines, Inc., (GTD by General Electric Co.), 5.330%, 8/7/2006


58,656,672

   TOTAL


61,256,672

Finance - Commercial--2.3%
50,000,000 1,2 Fairway Finance Co. LLC, 5.328%, 8/21/2006
49,999,745
436,100,000 1,2 General Electric Capital Corp., 5.469% - 5.470%, 8/9/2006 - 8/17/2006


436,100,000

   TOTAL


486,099,745

Finance - Retail--4.0%
14,000,000 American Express Credit Corp., 5.459%, 8/15/2006
14,006,142
368,500,000 1,2 Compass Securitization LLC, 5.300% - 5.324%, 8/7/2006 - 10/12/2006
368,472,518
286,500,000 1,2 Paradigm Funding LLC, 5.297% - 5.345%, 8/7/2006 - 8/25/2006
286,500,000
180,000,000 1,2 SLM Corp., 5.356%, 8/14/2006


180,000,000

   TOTAL


848,978,660

Finance - Securities--2.9%
122,500,000 1,2 Beta Finance, Inc., 5.189% - 5.379%, 8/15/2006 - 8/22/2006
122,522,655
23,000,000 1,2 K2 (USA) LLC, (GTD by K2 Corp.), 5.325%, 8/10/2006
23,000,793
474,000,000 1,2 Sigma Finance, Inc., (GTD by Sigma Finance Corp.), 5.309% - 5.355%, 8/1/2006 - 8/24/2006


473,994,899

   TOTAL


619,518,347

Government Agency--0.3%
7,945,000 Direct One Funding Corp., (FNMA LOC), 5.320%, 8/3/2006
7,945,000
46,455,000 Direct One Funding Corp., Series 2000 (Sexton Properties), (FNMA LOC), 5.320%, 8/3/2006
46,455,000
5,350,000 Grand Pointe II Ltd. Partnership, Series 1999 Globe Apartments, (FHLB of Indianapolis LOC), 5.340%, 8/3/2006


5,350,000

   TOTAL


59,750,000

Insurance--3.8%
20,000,000 Albuquerque, NM, Series 2000 A, (INS MBIA Insurance Corp.), 5.320%, 8/2/2006
20,000,000
54,000,000 Genworth Life Insurance Co., 5.321%, 9/1/2006
54,000,000
50,000,000 Hartford Life Insurance Co., 5.319% - 5.401%, 8/1/2006 - 9/1/2006
50,000,000
Principal
Amount
or Shares

   

   

Value

NOTES - VARIABLE--continued 4
Insurance--continued
$ 100,000,000 1,2 MBIA Global Funding LLC, 5.317%, 8/14/2006
$ 100,000,000
66,000,000 MetLife Insurance Co. of Connecticut, 5.279% - 5.590%, 8/21/2006 - 9/28/2006
66,000,000
105,000,000 Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 5.270% - 5.648%, 8/1/2006 - 10/2/2006
105,000,000
152,000,000 Monumental Life Insurance Co., 5.367% - 5.609%, 7/31/2006 - 10/2/2006
152,000,000
90,000,000 New York Life Insurance Co., 4.920% - 5.290%, 8/30/2006 - 9/1/2006
90,000,000
30,000,000 Protective Life Secured Trust 2004-B, 5.580%, 10/13/2006
30,018,718
125,000,000 Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Co., 5.620%, 10/2/2006


125,000,000

   TOTAL


792,018,718

Municipal--1.0%
205,500,000 Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund Finance Corp., 5.377%, 8/15/2006


205,500,000

Pharmaceuticals & Health Care--0.6%
128,000,000 1,2 Eli Lilly Services, Inc., (GTD by Eli Lilly & Co.), 5.316%, 8/1/2006


128,000,000

   TOTAL NOTES - VARIABLE


8,739,594,939

TIME DEPOSITS--8.0%
Banking--8.0%
400,000,000 Bank of Montreal, 5.300%, 8/1/2006
400,000,000
190,000,000 Chase Bank USA, N.A., 5.313%, 8/1/2006
190,000,000
140,000,000 Deutsche Bank AG, 5.313%, 8/1/2006
140,000,000
250,000,000 Marshall & Ilsley Bank, Milwaukee, 5.213%, 8/1/2006
250,000,000
200,000,000 Societe Generale, Paris, 5.293%, 8/1/2006
200,000,000
500,000,000 SunTrust Bank, 5.300%, 8/1/2006


500,000,000

   TOTAL TIME DEPOSITS


1,680,000,000

MUTUAL FUNDS--0.6%
Asset Management--0.6%
65,000,000 AIM Short-Term Investments Co. Liquid Assets Portfolio
65,000,000
50,000,000 Columbia Money Market Reserves
50,000,000
20,059,291 DWS Money Market Trust


20,059,291

   TOTAL MUTUAL FUNDS


135,059,291

Principal
Amount

   

   

Value

REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--2.9%
$ 228,302,000 Interest in $3,200,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.29%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Bank of America N.A. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/1/2035 for $3,200,470,222 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $3,264,000,000.
$ 228,302,000
150,000,000 Interest in $300,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.27%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Goldman Sachs & Co. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 6/30/2023 for $300,043,917 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $306,045,400.
150,000,000
30,000,000 Interest in $238,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.10%, dated 7/31/2006 under which J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Government Agency securities with various maturities to 10/31/2006 for $238,033,717 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $242,764,447.
30,000,000
150,000,000 Interest in $850,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006 under which Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. will repurchase a U.S. Treasury security maturing on 1/15/2011 for $850,123,958 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying security at the end of the period was $868,259,653.
150,000,000
55,000,000 Interest in $100,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.20%, dated 7/31/2006 under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase a U.S. Government Agency Security and Refunding Bonds with various maturities to 4/1/2036 for $100,014,444 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $102,000,893.


55,000,000

   TOTAL REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS


613,302,000

   TOTAL INVESTMENTS--101.0%
(AT AMORTIZED COST) 5



21,281,556,276

   OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - NET--(1.0)%


(211,105,080
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

$
21,070,451,196

1 Denotes a restricted security that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) is subject to a contractual restriction on public sales. At July 31, 2006, these restricted securities amounted to $6,758,204,217, which represented 32.1% of total net assets.

2 Denotes a restricted security that may be resold without restriction to "qualified institutional buyers" as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and that the Fund has determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Fund's Board of Trustees. At July 31, 2006, these liquid restricted securities amounted to $6,758,204,217, which represented 32.1% of total net assets.

3 Discount rate at the time of purchase.

4 Floating rate note with current rate and next reset date shown.

5 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

The following acronyms are used throughout this portfolio:

AMBAC --American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation
FHLB --Federal Home Loan Bank
FNMA --Federal National Mortgage Association
GTD --Guaranteed
IDA --Industrial Development Authority
IDB --Industrial Development Bond
INS --Insured
LOC --Letter of Credit
MERLOTS --Municipal Exempt Receipts - Liquidity Optional Tender Series
SWP --Swap Agreement

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

July 31, 2006

Assets:
      
Investments in securities, at amortized cost and value
$ 21,281,556,276
Income receivable
91,284,630
Receivable for shares sold





4,244,361

   TOTAL ASSETS





21,377,085,267

Liabilities:
Payable for investments purchased
$ 250,000,000
Payable for shares redeemed
1,794,999
Payable to bank
1,071,520
Payable for account administration fee
5,592
Payable for distribution services fee (Note 5)
18,578
Payable for shareholders services fee (Note 5)
1,236,856
Income distribution payable
52,052,978
Accrued expenses


453,548




   TOTAL LIABILITIES





306,634,071

Net assets for 21,070,482,827 shares outstanding




$
21,070,451,196

Net Assets Consist of:
Paid-in capital
$ 21,070,483,315
Distributions in excess of net investment income





(32,119
)
   TOTAL NET ASSETS




$
21,070,451,196

Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds Per Share
Institutional Shares:
$15,151,070,495 ÷ 15,150,737,987 shares outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$1.00

Institutional Service Shares:
$5,827,991,920 ÷ 5,828,357,684 shares outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$1.00

Trust Shares:
$91,388,781 ÷ 91,387,156 shares outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized





$1.00

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Operations

Year Ended July 31, 2006

Investment Income:
         
Interest









$
962,143,991
Expenses:
Investment adviser fee (Note 5)
$ 43,223,840
Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)
17,208,606
Account administration fee-Institutional Service Shares
42,355
Account administration fee-Trust Shares
112,749
Custodian fees
945,118
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses
288,861
Directors'/Trustees' fees
156,835
Auditing fees
16,735
Legal fees
15,843
Portfolio accounting fees
188,342
Distribution services fee--Trust Shares (Note 5)
113,101
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Shares (Note 5)
30,505,395
Shareholder services fee--Institutional Service Shares (Note 5)
13,485,527
Share registration costs
185,177
Printing and postage
49,673
Insurance premiums
120,310
Miscellaneous






85,055




   TOTAL EXPENSES






106,743,522




Waivers (Note 5):
Waiver of investment adviser fee
$ (17,467,455 )
Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee
(740,323 )
Waiver of shareholder services fee--Institutional Shares


(30,505,395
)







   TOTAL WAIVERS






(48,713,173
)



Net expenses










58,030,349
Net investment income









$
904,113,642
Net realized gain on investments










19,446
Change in net assets resulting from operations









$
904,133,088

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

Year Ended July 31
   

2006

   

2005

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets
Operations:
Net investment income
$ 904,113,642 $ 403,067,223
Net realized gain on investments


19,446



6,988

   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS


904,133,088



403,074,211

Distributions to Shareholders:
Distributions from net investment income
Institutional Shares
(684,227,011 ) (310,331,174 )
Institutional Service Shares
(218,509,885 ) (91,678,641 )
Trust Shares


(1,780,728
)


(559,108
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS


(904,517,624
)


(402,568,923
)
Share Transactions:
Proceeds from sale of shares
239,640,314,040 195,969,796,916
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
372,405,232 158,142,824
Cost of shares redeemed


(240,296,751,011
)


(196,153,055,301
)
   CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


(284,031,739
)


(25,115,561
)
Change in net assets


(284,416,275
)


(24,610,273
)
Net Assets:
Beginning of period


21,354,867,471



21,379,477,744

End of period (including undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income of $(32,119) and $371,863, respectively)

$
21,070,451,196


$
21,354,867,471

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

July 31, 2006

1. ORGANIZATION

Money Market Obligations Trust (the "Trust") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust consists of 41 diversified portfolios. The financial statements included herein are only those of Prime Obligations Fund (the "Fund"). The financial statements of the other portfolios are presented separately. The assets of each portfolio are segregated and a shareholder's interest is limited to the portfolio in which shares are held. The Fund offers three classes of shares: Institutional Shares, Institutional Service Shares, and Trust Shares. All shares of the Fund have equal rights with respect to voting, except on class-specific matters. The financial highlights of the Institutional Service Shares and Trust Shares are presented separately. The investment objective of the Fund is to provide current income consistent with stability of principal.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America.

Investment Valuation

The Fund uses the amortized cost method to value its portfolio securities in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act. Investments in other open-end regulated investment companies are valued at net asset value.

Repurchase Agreements

It is the policy of the Fund to require the other party to a repurchase agreement to transfer to the Fund's custodian or sub-custodian eligible securities or cash with a market value (after transaction costs) at least equal to the repurchase price to be paid under the repurchase agreement. The eligible securities are transferred to accounts with the custodian or sub-custodian in which the Fund holds a "securities entitlement" and exercises "control" as those terms are defined in the Uniform Commercial Code. The Fund has established procedures for monitoring the market value of the transferred securities and requiring the transfer of additional eligible securities if necessary to equal at least the repurchase price. These procedures also allow the other party to require securities to be transferred from the account to the extent that their market value exceeds the repurchase price or in exchange for other eligible securities of equivalent market value.

With respect to agreements to repurchase U.S. government securities and cash items, the Fund treat the repurchase agreement as an investment in the underlying securities and not as an obligation of the other party to the repurchase agreement. Other repurchase agreements are treated as obligations of the other party secured by the underlying securities. Nevertheless, the insolvency of the other party or other failure to repurchase the securities may delay the disposition of the underlying securities or cause the Fund to receive less than the full repurchase price. Under the terms of the repurchase agreement, any amounts received by the Fund in excess of the repurchase price and related transaction costs must be remitted to the other party.

The Fund may enter into repurchase agreements in which eligible securities are transferred into joint trading accounts maintained by the custodian or sub-custodian for investment companies and other clients advised by the Fund's adviser and its affiliates. The Fund will participate on a pro rata basis with the other investment companies and clients in its share of the securities transferred under such repurchase agreements and in its share of proceeds from any repurchase or other disposition of such securities.

Investment Income, Gains and Losses, Expenses and Distributions

Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income are declared daily and paid monthly. Investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and certain fund-level expenses are allocated to each class based on relative average daily net assets, except that each class bears certain expenses unique to the class such as distribution and shareholder services fees. Dividends are declared separately for each class. No class has preferential dividend rights; differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses.

Premium and Discount Amortization

All premiums and discounts are amortized/accreted.

Federal Taxes

It is Fund's policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary.

On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released FASB Interpretation No. 48 "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken in the course of preparing the fund's tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are "more-likely-than-not" of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax benefits of positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax expense in the current year. Adoption of FIN 48 is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the effective date. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FIN 48 and its impact in the financial statements has not yet been determined.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

The Fund may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Fund records when-issued securities on the trade date and maintain security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Restricted Securities

Restricted securities are securities that either: (a) cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, or being able to take advantage of an exemption from registration, under the Securities Act of 1933; or (b) are subject to contractual restrictions on public sales. In some cases, when a security cannot be offered for public sale without first being registered, the issuer of the restricted security has agreed to register such securities for resale, at the issuer's expense, either upon demand by the Fund or in connection with another registered offering of the securities. Many such restricted securities may be resold in the secondary market in transactions exempt from registration. Restricted securities may be determined to be liquid under criteria established by the Fund's Board of Trustees. The Fund will not incur any registration costs upon such resales. Restricted securities are valued at amortized cost in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

Other

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST

The following tables summarize share activity:

Year Ended July 31
   
2006
   
2005
Institutional Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
195,830,365,206 $ 195,830,365,206 152,484,780,713 $ 152,484,780,713
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared

302,881,875

302,881,875

129,187,873

129,187,873
Shares redeemed

(196,582,948,973
)


(196,582,948,973
)

(153,533,043,698
)


(153,533,043,698
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SHARE TRANSACTIONS

(449,701,892
)



$
(449,701,892
)


(919,075,112
)



$
(919,075,112
)
Year Ended July 31
   
2006
   
2005
Institutional Service Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
43,532,917,577 $ 43,532,917,577 43,291,731,228 $ 43,291,731,228
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared
68,834,830 68,834,830 28,658,863 28,658,806
Shares redeemed

(43,501,036,269
)


(43,501,036,269
)

(42,417,391,466
)


(42,417,391,466
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM INSTITUTIONAL SERVICE SHARE TRANSACTIONS

100,716,138



$
100,716,138



902,998,625




$
902,998,568

Year Ended July 31
   
2006
   
2005
Trust Shares:
   
Shares

   

Amount

   
Shares

   

Amount

Shares sold
277,031,257 $ 277,031,257 193,284,975 $ 193,284,975
Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared

688,527


688,527

296,145

296,145
Shares redeemed

(212,765,769
)


(212,765,769
)

(202,620,137
)


(202,620,137
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM TRUST SHARE TRANSACTIONS

64,954,015





$
64,954,015


(9,039,017
)



$
(9,039,017
)
   NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS


(284,031,739
)



$
(284,031,739
)


(25,115,504
)



$

(25,115,561
)

4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

The tax character of distributions as reported on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended July 31, 2006 and 2005, was as follows:


   
2006
   
2005
Ordinary income 1

$904,517,624

$402,568,923

1 For tax purposes short-term capital gain distributions are considered ordinary income distributions.

As of July 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed ordinary income
   
$
52,020,859

Dividend payable

$
(52,052,978
)

The Fund used capital loss carryforwards of $19,446 to offset taxable capital gains during the year ended July 31, 2006.

5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

Federated Investment Management Company, the Fund's investment adviser (the "Adviser"), receives for its services an annual investment adviser fee equal to 0.20% of the Fund's average daily net assets. The Adviser may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. The Adviser can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the Adviser voluntarily waived $17,467,455 of its fee.

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Fund with administrative personnel and services. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average aggregate daily net assets of certain Federated funds as specified below:

Maximum
Administrative Fee

   
Average Aggregate Daily Net Assets
of the Federated Funds

0.150%

on the first $5 billion
0.125%

on the next $5 billion
0.100%

on the next $10 billion
0.075%

on assets in excess of $20 billion

The administrative fee received during any fiscal year shall be at least $150,000 per portfolio and $40,000 per each additional class of Shares. FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FAS can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the net fee paid to FAS was 0.076% of average aggregate daily net assets of the Fund.

Distribution Services Fee

The Fund has adopted a Distribution Plan (the "Plan") pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act. Under the terms of the Plan, the Fund will compensate Federated Securities Corp. (FSC), the principal distributor, from the daily net assets of the Fund's Trust Shares to finance activities intended to result in the sale of these shares. The Plan provides that the Fund Trust Shares may incur distribution expenses of up to 0.25% of its average daily net assets, annually, to compensate FSC. FSC may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FSC can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. When FSC receives fees, it may pay some or all of them to financial intemediaries whose customers purchase shares. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSC retained $225 of fees paid by the Fund.

Shareholder Services Fee

The Fund may pay fees (Service Fees) up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Funds' Institutional Shares and Institutional Service Shares to financial intermediaries or to FSSC, for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. FSSC or these financial intermediaries may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of their fee. In addition, FSSC may voluntarily reimburse the Fund for shareholder services fees. This voluntary waiver and/or reimbursement can be modified or terminated at any time. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC voluntarily waived $30,505,395 of its fee. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC received $32,334 of fees paid by the Fund.

General

Certain of the Officers and Trustees of the Fund are Officers and Directors or Trustees of the above companies.

6. CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

A substantial part of the Fund's portfolio may be comprised of obligations of banks. As a result, the Fund may be more susceptible to any economic, business, political or other developments which generally affect these entities.

7. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning in October 2003, Federated Investors, Inc. and various subsidiaries thereof (including the advisers and distributor for various investment companies, collectively, "Federated"), along with various investment companies sponsored by Federated ("Funds") were named as defendants in several class action lawsuits now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuits were purportedly filed on behalf of people who purchased, owned and/or redeemed shares of Federated-sponsored mutual funds during specified periods beginning November 1, 1998. The suits are generally similar in alleging that Federated engaged in illegal and improper trading practices including market timing and late trading in concert with certain institutional traders, which allegedly caused financial injury to the mutual fund shareholders. These lawsuits began to be filed shortly after Federated's first public announcement that it had received requests for information on shareholder trading activities in the Funds from the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), the Office of the New York State Attorney General ("NYAG"), and other authorities. In that regard, on November 28, 2005, Federated announced that it had reached final settlements with the SEC and the NYAG with respect to those matters. As Federated previously reported in 2004, it has already paid approximately $8.0 million to certain funds as determined by an independent consultant. As part of these settlements, Federated agreed to pay for the benefit of fund shareholders additional disgorgement and a civil money penalty in the aggregate amount of an additional $72 million. Federated and various Funds have also been named as defendants in several additional lawsuits, the majority of which are now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging, among other things, excessive advisory and Rule 12b-1 fees. The Board of the Funds has retained the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro LLP to represent the Funds in these lawsuits. Federated and the Funds, and their respective counsel, are reviewing the allegations and intend to defend this litigation. Additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations may be filed in the future. The potential impact of these lawsuits, all of which seek unquantified damages, attorneys' fees and expenses, and future potential similar suits is uncertain. Although we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Funds, there can be no assurance that these suits, the ongoing adverse publicity and/or other developments resulting from the regulatory investigations will not result in increased Fund redemptions, reduced sales of Fund shares, or other adverse consequences for the Funds.

8. CHANGE IN INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM (UNAUDITED)

On August 18, 2006, the Fund's Board of Trustees ("Trustees"), upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee and completion of the audit for July 31, 2006, appointed KPMG LLP (KPMG) as the Fund's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007. The Fund's previous independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP (D&T) declined to stand for re-election. The reports issued by D&T on the Fund's financial statements for the fiscal years ended 2005, and 2006, contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During the Fund's fiscal years ended 2005, and 2006: (i) there were no disagreements with D&T on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of D&T, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its reports on the financial statements for such years; and (ii) there were no reportable events of the kind described in Item 304(a) (1) (v) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

As indicated above, the Fund has appointed KPMG as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Fund's financial statements for the fiscal year ending 2007. During the Fund's fiscal years ended 2005, and 2006, and the interim period commencing August 1, 2006 and ending September 22, 2006, neither the Fund nor anyone on its behalf has consulted KPMG on items which: (i) concerned the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Fund's financial statements; or (ii) concerned the subject of a disagreement (as defined in paragraph (a) (1) (iv) of Item 304 of Regulations S-K) or reportable events (as described in paragraph (a) (1) (v) of said Item 304).

9. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2006, 100% of dividends paid by the Fund are interest-related dividends, as provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONEY MARKET OBLIGATIONS TRUST AND SHAREHOLDERS OF PRIME OBLIGATIONS FUND FOR THE INSTITUTIONAL SHARES:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments, of Prime Obligations Fund (the "Fund") (a portfolio of the Money Market Obligations Trust) as of July 31, 2006, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of July 31, 2006, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. When replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of July 31, 2006, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets, and its financial highlights for the respective stated periods, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
September 22, 2006

Board of Trustees and Trust Officers

The Board is responsible for managing the Trust's business affairs and for exercising all the Trust's powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Board member and the senior officers of the Funds. Where required, the tables separately list Board members who are "interested persons" of the Fund (i.e., "Interested" Board members) and those who are not (i.e., "Independent" Board members). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is Federated Investors Tower, 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA. As of December 31, 2005, the Trust comprised 41 portfolios, and the Federated Fund Complex consisted of 43 investment companies (comprising 136 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Board member oversees all portfolios in the Federated Fund Complex and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund's Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trust Trustees and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John F. Donahue*
Birth Date: July 28, 1924
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex's Executive Committee.

Previous Positions
: Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex; Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Chairman and Director, Federated Investment Counseling.



J. Christopher Donahue*
Birth Date: April 11, 1949
PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 1989
Principal Occupations : Principal Executive Officer and President of the Federated Fund Complex; Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company; Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman, Passport Research, Ltd. (Investment advisory subsidiary of Federated); Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director, Federated Services Company.

Previous Positions
: President, Federated Investment Counseling; President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D.*
Birth Date: October 11, 1932
3471 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1111
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Medical Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Downtown; Hematologist, Oncologist and Internist, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Other Directorships Held
: Member, National Board of Trustees, Leukemia Society of America.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, University of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.



* Family relationships and reasons for "interested" status: John F. Donahue is the father of J. Christopher Donahue; both are "interested" due to the positions they hold with Federated Investors, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D. is "interested" because his son-in-law is employed by the Fund's principal underwriter, Federated Securities Corp.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES BACKGROUND




Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Thomas G. Bigley
Birth Date: February 3, 1934
15 Old Timber Trail
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: November 1994
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Member of Executive Committee, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh.

Previous Position
: Senior Partner, Ernst & Young LLP.



John T. Conroy, Jr.
Birth Date: June 23, 1937
Investment Properties Corporation
3838 North Tamiami Trail
Suite 402
Naples, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman of the Board, Investment Properties Corporation; Partner or Trustee in private real estate ventures in Southwest Florida.

Previous Positions
: President, Investment Properties Corporation; Senior Vice President, John R. Wood and Associates, Inc., Realtors; President, Naples Property Management, Inc. and Northgate Village Development Corporation.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

Nicholas P. Constantakis
Birth Date: September 3, 1939
175 Woodshire Drive
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Michael Baker Corporation (engineering and energy services worldwide).

Previous Position
: Partner, Andersen Worldwide SC.



John F. Cunningham
Birth Date: March 5, 1943
353 El Brillo Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Director, WinsorTech.

Other Directorships Held
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cunningham & Co., Inc. (strategic business consulting); Trustee Associate, Boston College.

Previous Positions
: Director, Redgate Communications and EMC Corporation (computer storage systems); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Computer Consoles, Inc.; President and Chief Operating Officer, Wang Laboratories; Director, First National Bank of Boston; Director, Apollo Computer, Inc.



Peter E. Madden
Birth Date: March 16, 1942
One Royal Palm Way
100 Royal Palm Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991
Principal Occupation : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held
: Board of Overseers, Babson College.

Previous Positions
: Representative, Commonwealth of Massachusetts General Court; President, State Street Bank and Trust Company and State Street Corporation (retired); Director, VISA USA and VISA International; Chairman and Director, Massachusetts Bankers Association; Director, Depository Trust Corporation; Director, The Boston Stock Exchange.



Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.
Birth Date: April 10, 1945
80 South Road
Westhampton Beach, NY
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Management Consultant.

Previous Positions
: Chief Executive Officer, PBTC International Bank; Partner, Arthur Young & Company (now Ernst & Young LLP); Chief Financial Officer of Retail Banking Sector, Chase Manhattan Bank; Senior Vice President, HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank); Vice President, Citibank; Assistant Professor of Banking and Finance, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University; Executive Vice President, DVC Group, Inc.






Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)

John E. Murray, Jr., J.D., S.J.D.
Birth Date: December 20, 1932
Chancellor, Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1995
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee, and Chairman of the Board of Directors or Trustees, of the Federated Fund Complex; Chancellor and Law Professor, Duquesne University; Partner, Murray, Hogue & Lannis.

Other Directorships Held
: Director, Michael Baker Corp. (engineering, construction, operations and technical services).

Previous Positions
: President, Duquesne University; Dean and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Dean and Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law.



Marjorie P. Smuts
Birth Date: June 21, 1935
4905 Bayard Street
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Public Relations/Marketing Consultant/Conference Coordinator.

Previous Positions
: National Spokesperson, Aluminum Company of America; television producer; President, Marj Palmer Assoc.; Owner, Scandia Bord.



John S. Walsh
Birth Date: November 28, 1957
2604 William Drive
Valparaiso, IN
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer of construction temporary heaters); President and Director, Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers Products, Inc.

Previous Position
: Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc.



James F. Will
Birth Date: October 12, 1938
Saint Vincent College
Latrobe, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 2006
Principal Occupations : Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chancellor and President, Saint Vincent College.

Other Directorships Held
: Alleghany Corporation.

Previous Positions
: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Armco, Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer, Cyclops Industries; President and Chief Operating Officer, Kaiser Steel Corporation.



OFFICERS




Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
John W. McGonigle
Birth Date: October 26, 1938
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND SECRETARY
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Federated Investment Counseling; Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Services Company and Federated Securities Corp.



Richard A. Novak
Birth Date: December 25, 1963
TREASURER
Began serving: January 2006
Principal Occupations : Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Federated Fund Complex; Senior Vice President, Federated Administrative Services; Financial and Operations Principal for Federated Securities Corp., Edgewood Services, Inc. and Southpointe Distribution Services, Inc.

Previous Positions
: Vice President, Finance of Federated Services Company; Controller of Federated Investors, Inc.; held various financial management positions within The Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh; Auditor, Arthur Andersen & Co.



Richard B. Fisher
Birth Date: May 17, 1923
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: October 1988
Principal Occupations : Vice Chairman or Vice President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman, Federated Securities Corp.

Previous Positions
: President and Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Executive Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc. and Director and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Securities Corp.



Brian P. Bouda
Birth Date: February 28, 1947
CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER
AND SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: August 2004
Principal Occupations : Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of Federated Investors, Inc.; and Chief Compliance Officer of its subsidiaries. Mr. Bouda joined Federated in 1999 and is a member of the American Bar Association and the State Bar Association of Wisconsin.



Deborah A. Cunningham
Birth Date: September 15, 1959
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Deborah A. Cunningham has been the Fund's portfolio manager since July 1991. She was named Chief Investment Officer of money market products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1981 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1997. Ms. Cunningham is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.S.B.A. in Finance from Robert Morris College.






Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   
Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years and Previous Position(s)
Mary Jo Ochson
Birth Date: September 12, 1953
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Mary Jo Ochson was named Chief Investment Officer of tax-exempt, fixed-income products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1982 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Pittsburgh.



Susan R. Hill
Birth Date: June 20, 1963
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Susan R. Hill is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Hill joined Federated in 1990 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 2003 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 2005. Ms. Hill was a Portfolio Manager from 1994 until 2003, and served as Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1997 until 2004 and an Assistant Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1994 until 1997. Ms. Hill is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received an M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University.



Jeff A. Kozemchak
Birth Date: January 15, 1960
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004
Principal Occupations : Jeff A. Kozemchak is Vice President of the Trust. Mr. Kozemchak joined Federated in 1987 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 1996 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund's Adviser since 1999. He was a Portfolio Manager until 1996 and a Vice President of the Fund's Adviser from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Kozemchak is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received his M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University in 1987.



Paige M. Wilhelm
Birth Date: May 28, 1962
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: August 2006
Principal Occupations : Paige M. Wilhelm is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Wilhelm joined Federated in 1985 and has been a Senior Vice President and a Senior Portfolio Manager. She is responsible for portfolio management and research in the fixed-income area concentrating on taxable money market instruments. Previous associations include Senior Credit Analyst, Federated Investors; Performance Analysis Supervisor; Performance Analyst, Federated Investment Counseling. Ms. Wilhelm is a member of the CFA Society of Pittsburgh and received her B.S. from Indiana University and her M.B.A. from Duquesne University.



Evaluation and Approval of Advisory Contract

PRIME OBLIGATIONS FUND (THE "FUND")

The Fund's Board reviewed the Fund's investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board's decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser's fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser's cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize "economies of scale" as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser's relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser's services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund's advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer's evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board's formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board's consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer's evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser's investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund's short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or "peer group" funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund's investment objectives; the Fund's expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund's portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund's relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated's responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board's evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund's performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund's investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund's ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund's investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser's investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated's fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds ( e.g. , institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's performance was above the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated's subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds' administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated's profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer's evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of "economies of scale" as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with "breakpoints" that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated's fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund's investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was below the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund's advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund's operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser's industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board's approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board's decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated's performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies, if any, relating to securities held in the Fund's portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on "Form N-PX" of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Federated's website. Go to FederatedInvestors.com, select "Products," select the "Prospectuses and Regulatory Reports" link, then select the Fund to access the link to Form N-PX. This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

The Fund files with the SEC a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on "Form N-Q." These filings are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.) You may also access this information from the "Products" section of Federated's website at FederatedInvestors.com by clicking on "Portfolio Holdings" and selecting the name of the Fund, or by selecting the name of the Fund and clicking on "Portfolio Holdings." You must register on the website the first time you wish to access this information.

Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board, or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal. Although money market funds seek to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share, there is no assurance that they will be able to do so.

This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the Fund's prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses, and other information.

Federated
World-Class Investment Manager

Prime Obligations Fund
Federated Investors Funds
5800 Corporate Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15237-7000
Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.

Federated Securities Corp., Distributor

Cusip 60934N203

33506 (9/06)

Federated is a registered mark of Federated Investors, Inc. 2006 (c)Federated Investors, Inc.

Federated Investors
World-Class Investment Manager

Federated Investors 50 Years of Growth & Innovation

Trust for U.S. Treasury Obligations

A Portfolio of Money Market Obligations Trust

ANNUAL SHAREHOLDER REPORT

July 31, 2006

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
SHAREHOLDER EXPENSE EXAMPLE
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS SUMMARY TABLES
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND TRUST OFFICERS
EVALUATION AND APPROVAL OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
BOARD REVIEW OF ADVISORY CONTRACT
VOTING PROXIES ON FUND PORTFOLIO SECURITIES
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULE

Not FDIC Insured * May Lose Value * No Bank Guarantee

Financial Highlights

(For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period)

Year Ended July 31

    

2006

 

    

2005

 

    

2004

 

    

2003

 

    

2002

 


Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period

 

$1.00

 

 

$1.00

 

 

$1.00

 

 

$1.00

 

 

$1.00

 


                             

Income From Investment Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


                             

Net investment income

 

0.039

 

 

0.018

 

 

0.006

 

 

0.009

 

 

0.018

 


                             

Net realized gain on investments

 

--

 

 

--

 

 

0.000

1

 

0.001

 

 

0.001

 


TOTAL FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS

 

0.039

 

 

0.018

 

 

0.006

 

 

0.010

 

 

0.019

 


Less Distributions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


                             

Distributions from net investment income

 

(0.039

)

 

(0.018

)

 

(0.006

)

 

(0.009

)

 

(0.018

)


                             

Distributions from net realized gain on investments

 

--

 

 

--

 

 

(0.000

)1

 

(0.001

)

 

(0.001

)


TOTAL DISTRIBUTIONS

 

(0.039

)

 

(0.018

)

 

(0.006

)

 

(0.010

)

 

(0.019

)


Net Asset Value, End of Period

 

$1.00

 

 

$1.00

 

 

$1.00

 

 

$1.00

 

 

$1.00

 


Total Return2

 

3.93

%

 

1.86

%

 

0.62

%

 

1.02

%

 

1.95

%


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ratios to Average Net Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Net expenses

 

0.45

%

 

0.45

%

 

0.45

%

 

0.45

%

 

0.45

%


Net investment income

 

3.83

%

 

1.82

%

 

0.60

%

 

0.97

%

 

1.85

%


Supplemental Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Net assets, end of period (000 omitted)

 

$524,802

 

$520,178

 

$651,852

 

$863,363

 

$845,889

 


1 Represents less than $0.001.

2 Based on net asset value. Total returns for periods of less than one year, if any, are not annualized.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees; to the extent applicable, distribution (12b-1) fees and/or shareholder services fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you to understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. It is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from February 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006.

ACTUAL EXPENSES

The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you incurred over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses attributable to your investment during this period.

HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE FOR COMPARISON PURPOSES

The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. Thus, you should not use the hypothetical account values and expenses to estimate the actual ending account balance or your expenses for the period. Rather, these figures are required to be provided to enable you to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund with other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only. Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.

   

Beginning
Account Value
2/1/2006

   

Ending
Account Value
7/31/2006

   

Expenses Paid
During Period

1


Actual:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Fund

 

$1,000

 

$1,021.60

 

$2.26

 


Hypothetical (assuming a 5% return
before expenses):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Fund

 

$1,000

 

$1,022.56

 

$2.26

 


1 Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized net expense ratio of 0.45%, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).

Portfolio of Investments Summary Tables

At July 31, 2006, the Fund’s portfolio composition1 was as follows:

 

    

Percentage of
Total Net Assets

 


Repurchase Agreements

 

97.4

%


U.S. Treasury Securities

 

2.8

%


Other Assets and Liabilities Net2

 

(0.2

)%


TOTAL

100.0

%


At July 31, 2006, the Fund’s effective maturity3 schedule was as follows:

Securities With an
Effective Maturity of:

    

Percentage of
Total Net Assets


1-7 Days

 

96.5

%


8-30 Days

 

0.0

%


31-90 Days

 

0.0

%


91-180 Days

 

2.9

%


181 Days or more

 

0.8

%


Other Assets and Liabilities Net2

 

(0.2

)%


TOTAL

100.0

%


1 See the Fund’s Prospectus for a description of the principal types of securities in which the Fund invests.

2 Assets, other than investments in securities, less liabilities. See Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

3 Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, which regulates money market mutual funds.

Portfolio of Investments

July 31, 2006

Principal
Amount

    

 

    

 

Value

 


 

 

 

U.S. TREASURY OBLIGATIONS--2.8%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury Notes--2.8%

 

 

 

 

$

3,500,000

 

United States Treasury Notes, 2.500%, 10/31/2006

 

$

3,485,622

 

 

7,000,000

 

United States Treasury Notes, 2.875%, 11/30/2006

 

 

6,963,403

 

 

4,250,000

 

United States Treasury Notes, 3.125%, 1/31/2007

 

 

4,219,722

 


 

 

 

TOTAL U.S. TREASURY OBLIGATIONS

 

 

14,668,747

 


 

 

 

REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--97.4%

 

 

 

 

 

107,288,000

 

Interest in $2,323,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006, under which BNP Paribas Securities Corp. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2036 for $2,323,338,771 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $2,369,460,967.

 

 

107,288,000

 

 

103,000,000

 

Interest in $1,500,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.26%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Bear Stearns & Co., Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 5/15/2016 for $1,500,219,167 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,557,996,728.

 

 

103,000,000

 

 

103,000,000

 

Interest in $1,350,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006, under which J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2036 for $1,350,196,875 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,377,001,350.

 

 

103,000,000

 

 

103,000,000

 

Interest in $850,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006, under which Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. will repurchase a U.S. Treasury security maturing on 1/15/2011 for $850,123,958 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying security at the end of the period was $868,259,653.

 

 

103,000,000

 

 

5,000,000

1

Interest in $244,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.20%, dated 6/1/2006, under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 2/15/2015 for $250,344,000 on 11/29/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $251,133,204.

 

 

5,000,000

 

 

 

 

REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS--continued

 

 

 

 

$

90,000,000

Interest in $1,850,000,000 joint repurchase agreement 5.25%, dated 7/31/2006, under which UBS Securities LLC will repurchase U.S. Treasury securities with various maturities to 5/15/2021 for $1,850,269,792 on 8/1/2006. The market value of the underlying securities at the end of the period was $1,887,004,311.

 

$

90,000,000

 


 

 

 

TOTAL REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS

 

 

511,288,000

 


 

 

 

TOTAL INVESTMENTS--100.2% (AT AMORTIZED COST)2

 

 

525,956,747

 


 

 

 

OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES--NET--(0.2)%

 

 

(1,154,834

)


 

 

 

TOTAL NET ASSETS--100%

 

$

524,801,913

 


1 Although the repurchase date is more than seven days after the date of purchase, the Fund has the right to terminate the repurchase agreement at any time with seven-days’ notice.

2 Also represents cost for federal tax purposes.

Note: The categories of investments are shown as a percentage of total net assets at July 31, 2006.

See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

July 31, 2006

Assets:

    

 

 

    

 

 

 


             

Investments in repurchase agreements

 

$

511,288,000

 

 

 

 


             

Investments in securities

 

 

14,668,747

 

 

 

 


Total investments in securities, at amortized cost and value

 

 

 

 

$

525,956,747

 


             

Income receivable

 

 

 

 

 

173,761

 


             

Receivable for shares sold

 

 

 

 

 

28,534

 


TOTAL ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

526,159,042

 


Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


             

Payable for shares redeemed

 

 

219,159

 

 

 

 


             

Income distribution payable

 

 

1,100,590

 

 

 

 


             

Payable to bank

 

 

2,248

 

 

 

 


             

Payable for Directors’/Trustees’ fees

 

 

50

 

 

 

 


             

Accrued expenses

 

 

35,082

 

 

 

 


TOTAL LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

 

1,357,129

 


Net assets for 524,799,689 shares outstanding

 

 

 

 

$

524,801,913

 


Net Assets Consist of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


             

Paid-in capital

 

 

 

 

$

524,799,689

 


             

Undistributed net investment income

 

 

 

 

 

2,224

 


TOTAL NET ASSETS

 

 

 

 

$

524,801,913

 


Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Proceeds per Share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


             

$524,801,913 ÷ 524,799,689 shares outstanding, no par value, unlimited shares authorized

 

 

 

 

 

$1.00

 


See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Operations

Year Ended July 31, 2006

Investment Income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


                     

Interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

21,613,745


Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


                     

Investment adviser fee (Note 5)

 

 

 

 

 

$

2,018,872

 

 

 

 


                     

Administrative personnel and services fee (Note 5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

401,918

 

 

 

 


                     

Custodian fees

 

 

 

 

 

 

28,831

 

 

 

 


                     

Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees and expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

29,629

 

 

 

 


                     

Directors’/Trustees’ fees

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,824

 

 

 

 


                     

Auditing fees

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,537

 

 

 

 


                     

Legal fees

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,951

 

 

 

 


                     

Portfolio accounting fees

 

 

 

 

 

 

96,659

 

 

 

 


                     

Shareholder services fee (Note 5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

981,357

 

 

 

 


                     

Share registration costs

 

 

 

 

 

 

32,249

 

 

 

 


                     

Printing and postage

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,171

 

 

 

 


                     

Insurance premiums

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,168

 

 

 

 


                     

Miscellaneous

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,256

 

 

 

 


TOTAL EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,656,422

 

 

 

 


Waivers (Note 5):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


                     

Waiver of investment adviser fee

 

$

(354,351

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


                     

Waiver of administrative personnel and services fee

 

 

(17,323

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


                     

Waiver of shareholder services fee

 

 

(981,357

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


TOTAL WAIVERS

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,353,031

)

 

 

 


Net expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,303,391


Net investment income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

19,310,354


See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Statement of Changes in Net Assets

Year Ended July 31

   

2006

   

2005


Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


               

Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


               

Net investment income

 

$

19,310,354

 

 

$

10,515,749

 


Distributions to Shareholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


               

Distributions from net investment income

 

 

(19,306,837

)

 

 

(10,521,748

)


Share Transactions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


               

Proceeds from sale of shares

 

 

2,493,828,282

 

 

 

2,699,869,630

 


               

Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared

 

 

5,038,704

 

 

 

2,546,155

 


               

Cost of shares redeemed

 

 

(2,494,246,324

)

 

 

(2,834,084,138

)


CHANGE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

 

 

4,620,662

 

 

 

(131,668,353

)


Change in net assets

 

 

4,624,179

 

 

 

(131,674,352

)


Net Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


               

Beginning of period

 

 

520,177,734

 

 

 

651,852,086

 


End of period (including undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income of $2,224 and $(1,293), respectively)

 

$

524,801,913

 

 

$

520,177,734

 


See Notes which are an integral part of the Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

July 31, 2006

1. ORGANIZATION

Money Market Obligations Trust (the “Trust”) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust consists of 41 portfolios. The financial statements included herein are only those of Trust for U.S. Treasury Obligations (the “Fund”). The financial statements of the other portfolios are presented separately. The assets of each portfolio are segregated and a shareholder’s interest is limited to the portfolio in which shares are held. The investment objective of the Fund is stability of principal and current income consistent with stability of principal.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America.

Investment Valuation

The Fund uses the amortized cost method to value its portfolio securities in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act.

Repurchase Agreements

It is the policy of the Fund to require the other party to a repurchase agreement to transfer to the Fund’s custodian or sub-custodian eligible securities or cash with a market value (after transaction costs) at least equal to the repurchase price to be paid under the repurchase agreement. The eligible securities are transferred to accounts with the custodian or sub-custodian in which the Fund holds a “securities entitlement” and exercises “control” as those terms are defined in the Uniform Commercial Code. The Fund has established procedures for monitoring the market value of the transferred securities and requiring the transfer of additional eligible securities if necessary to equal at least the repurchase price. These procedures also allow the other party to require securities to be transferred from the account to the extent that their market value exceeds the repurchase price or in exchange for other eligible securities of equivalent market value.

With respect to agreements to repurchase U.S. government securities and cash items, the Fund treats the repurchase agreement as an investment in the underlying securities and not as an obligation of the other party to the repurchase agreement. Other repurchase agreements are treated as obligations of the other party secured by the underlying securities. Nevertheless, the insolvency of the other party or other failure to repurchase the securities may delay the disposition of the underlying securities or cause the Fund to receive less than the full repurchase price. Under the terms of the repurchase agreement, any amounts received by the Fund in excess of the repurchase price and related transaction costs must be remitted to the other party.

The Fund may enter into repurchase agreements in which eligible securities are transferred into joint trading accounts maintained by the custodian or sub-custodian for investment companies and other clients advised by the Fund’s adviser and its affiliates. The Fund will participate on a pro rata basis with the other investment companies and clients in its share of the securities transferred under such repurchase agreements and in its share of proceeds from any repurchase or other disposition of such securities.

Investment Income, Expenses and Distributions

Interest income and expenses are accrued daily. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions of net investment income are declared daily and paid monthly.

Premium and Discount Amortization

All premiums and discounts are amortized/accreted.

Federal Taxes

It is the Fund’s policy to comply with the Subchapter M provision of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its income. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary.

On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released FASB Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. FIN 48 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken in the course of preparing the fund’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax benefits of positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax expense in the current year. Adoption of FIN 48 is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the effective date. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FIN 48 and its impact in the financial statements has not yet been determined.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions

The Fund may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Fund records when-issued securities on the trade date and maintains security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimated.

Other

Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis.

3. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST

The following table summarizes share activity:

Year Ended July 31

   

2006

 

    

2005

 


Shares sold

 

2,493,828,282

 

 

2,699,869,630

 

Shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared

 

5,038,704

 

 

2,546,155

 

Shares redeemed

 

(2,494,246,324

)

 

(2,834,084,138

)


NET CHANGE RESULTING FROM SHARE TRANSACTIONS

 

4,620,662

 

 

(131,668,353

)


4. FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION

The tax character of distributions as reported on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the years ended July 31, 2006 and 2005 was as follows:

 

    

2006

   

2005


Ordinary income1

 

$19,306,837

 

$10,521,748


1 For tax purposes short-term capital gain distributions are considered ordinary income distributions.

As of July 31, 2006, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:

Undistributed ordinary income

    

$

1,102,814

 


Dividends payable

    

$

(1,100,590

)


5. INVESTMENT ADVISER FEE AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

Investment Adviser Fee

Federated Investment Management Company, the Fund’s investment adviser (the “Adviser”), receives for its services an annual investment adviser fee equal to 0.40% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The Adviser will waive, to the extent of its adviser fee, the amount, if any, by which the Fund’s aggregate annual operating expenses (excluding interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, expenses of registering or qualifying the Fund and its shares under federal and state law and regulations, expenses of withholding taxes and extraordinary expenses) exceed 0.45% of the average daily net assets of the Fund. In addition, the Adviser may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. The Adviser can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the Adviser waived $354,351 of its fee.

Administrative Fee

Federated Administrative Services (FAS), under the Administrative Services Agreement, provides the Fund with administrative personnel and services. The fee paid to FAS is based on the average aggregate daily net assets of certain Federated funds as specified below:

Maximum
Administrative Fee

    

Average Aggregate Daily Net Assets
of the Federated Funds


0.150%

 

on the first $5 billion


0.125%

 

on the next $5 billion


0.100%

 

on the next $10 billion


0.075%

 

on assets in excess of $20 billion


The administrative fee received during any fiscal year shall be at least $150,000 per portfolio and $40,000 per each additional class of Shares. FAS may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of its fee. FAS can modify or terminate this voluntary waiver at any time at its sole discretion. For the year ended July 31, 2006, the net fee paid to FAS was 0.076% of average aggregate daily net assets of the Fund.

Shareholder Services Fee

The Fund may pay fees (Service Fees) up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Fund’s Shares to financial intermediaries or to Federated Shareholder Services Company (FSSC) for providing services to shareholders and maintaining shareholder accounts. FSSC or these financial intermediaries may voluntarily choose to waive any portion of their fee. In addition, FSSC may voluntarily reimburse the Fund for shareholder services fees. This voluntary waiver and/or reimbursement can be modified or terminated at any time. For the year ended July 31, 2006, FSSC voluntarily waived $981,357 of its fee.

General

Certain of the Officers and Trustees of the Fund are Officers and Directors or Trustees of the above companies.

6. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning in October 2003, Federated Investors, Inc. and various subsidiaries thereof (including the advisers and distributor for various investment companies, collectively, “Federated”), along with various investment companies sponsored by Federated (“Funds”) were named as defendants in several class action lawsuits now pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The lawsuits were purportedly filed on behalf of people who purchased, owned and/or redeemed shares of Federated-sponsored mutual funds during specified periods beginning November 1, 1998. The suits are generally similar in alleging that Federated engaged in illegal and improper trading practices including market timing and late trading in concert with certain institutional traders, which allegedly caused financial injury to the mutual fund shareholders. These lawsuits began to be filed shortly after Federated’s first public announcement that it had received requests for information on shareholder trading activities in the Funds from the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Office of the New York State Attorney General (“NYAG”), and other authorities. In that regard, on November 28, 2005, Federated announced that it had reached final settlements with the SEC and the NYAG with respect to those matters. As Federated previously reported in 2004, it has already paid approximately $8.0 million to certain funds as determined by an independent consultant. As part of these settlements, Federated agreed to pay for the benefit of fund shareholders additional disgorgement and a civil money penalty in the aggregate amount of an additional $72 million. Federated and various Funds have also been named as defendants in several additional lawsuits, the majority of which are now pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleging, among other things, excessive advisory and Rule 12b-1 fees. The Board of the Funds has retained the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro LLP to represent the Funds in these lawsuits. Federated and the Funds, and their respective counsel, are reviewing the allegations and intend to defend this litigation. Additional lawsuits based upon similar allegations may be filed in the future. The potential impact of these lawsuits, all of which seek unquantified damages, attorneys’ fees and expenses, and future potential similar suits is uncertain. Although we do not believe that these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the Funds, there can be no assurance that these suits, the ongoing adverse publicity and/or other developments resulting from the regulatory investigations will not result in increased Fund redemptions, reduced sales of Fund shares, or other adverse consequences for the Funds.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MONEY MARKET OBLIGATIONS TRUST AND SHAREHOLDERS OF TRUST FOR U.S. TREASURY OBLIGATIONS:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Trust for U.S. Treasury Obligations (the “Fund”) (one of the portfolios constituting Money Market Obligations Trust), including the portfolio of investments, as of July 31, 2006, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statement of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of July 31, 2006, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Trust for U.S. Treasury Obligations, a portfolio of the Money Market Obligations Trust, at July 31, 2006, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ Ernst & Young

Boston, Massachusetts
September 12, 2006

Board of Trustees and Trust Officers

The Board is responsible for managing the Trust’s business affairs and for exercising all the Trust’s powers except those reserved for the shareholders. The following tables give information about each Board member and the senior officers of the Fund. Where required, the tables separately list Board members who are “interested persons” of the Fund (i.e., “Interested” Board members) and those who are not (i.e., “Independent” Board members). Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person listed is Federated Investors Tower, 1001 Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA. As of December 31, 2005, the Trust comprised 41 portfolios, and the Federated Fund Complex consisted of 43 investment companies (comprising 136 portfolios). Unless otherwise noted, each Officer is elected annually. Unless otherwise noted, each Board member oversees all portfolios in the Federated Fund Complex and serves for an indefinite term. The Fund’s Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trust Trustees and is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400.

INTERESTED TRUSTEES BACKGROUND

 

 

 


Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   

Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)


John F. Donahue*
Birth Date: July 28, 1924
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988

 

Principal Occupations: Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex’s Executive Committee.

Previous Positions: Chairman of the Federated Fund Complex; Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Chairman and Director, Federated Investment Counseling.

 

 

 


J. Christopher Donahue*
Birth Date: April 11, 1949
PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1999

 

Principal Occupations: Principal Executive Officer and President of the Federated Fund Complex; Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman and Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company; Trustee, Federated Investment Counseling; Chairman and Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp.; Chairman, Federated Equity Management Company of Pennsylvania and Passport Research, Ltd. (Investment advisory subsidiary of Federated); Trustee, Federated Shareholder Services Company; Director, Federated Services Company.

Previous Positions: President, Federated Investment Counseling; President and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Investment Management Company, Federated Global Investment Management Corp. and Passport Research, Ltd.

 

 

 


Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D.*
Birth Date: October 11, 1932
3471 Fifth Avenue
Suite 1111
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988

 

Principal Occupations: Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh; Medical Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Downtown; Hematologist, Oncologist and Internist, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Other Directorships Held: Member, National Board of Trustees, Leukemia Society of America.

Previous Positions: Trustee, University of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

 

 

 


* Family relationships and reasons for interested status: John F. Donahue is the father of J. Christopher Donahue; both are interested due to the positions they hold with Federated Investors, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Lawrence D. Ellis, M.D. is interested because his son-in-law is employed by the Funds principal underwriter, Federated Securities Corp.

INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES BACKGROUND


Name
Birth Date
Address
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

   

Principal Occupation(s) for Past Five Years,
Other Directorships Held and Previous Position(s)


Thomas G. Bigley
Birth Date: February 3, 1934
15 Old Timber Trail
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: November 1994

 

Principal Occupation: Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held: Director, Member of Executive Committee, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh; Director, University of Pittsburgh.

Previous Position: Senior Partner, Ernst & Young LLP.

 

 

 


John T. Conroy, Jr.
Birth Date: June 23, 1937
Investment Properties Corporation
3838 North Tamiami Trail
Suite 402
Naples, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991

 

Principal Occupations: Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Chairman of the Board, Investment Properties Corporation; Partner or Trustee in private real estate ventures in Southwest Florida.

Previous Positions: President, Investment Properties Corporation; Senior Vice President, John R. Wood and Associates, Inc., Realtors; President, Naples Property Management, Inc. and Northgate Village Development Corporation.

 

 

 


Nicholas P. Constantakis
Birth Date: September 3, 1939
175 Woodshire Drive
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1999

 

Principal Occupation: Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held: Director and Member of the Audit Committee, Michael Baker Corporation (engineering and energy services worldwide).

Previous Position: Partner, Andersen Worldwide SC.

 

 

 


John F. Cunningham
Birth Date: March 5, 1943
353 El Brillo Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999

 

Principal Occupation: Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Director, WinsorTech.

Other Directorships Held: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Cunningham & Co., Inc. (strategic business consulting); Trustee Associate, Boston College.

Previous Positions: Director, Redgate Communications and EMC Corporation (computer storage systems); Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Computer Consoles, Inc.; President and Chief Operating Officer, Wang Laboratories; Director, First National Bank of Boston; Director, Apollo Computer, Inc.

 

 

 


Peter E. Madden
Birth Date: March 16, 1942
One Royal Palm Way
100 Royal Palm Way
Palm Beach, FL
TRUSTEE
Began serving: August 1991

 

Principal Occupation: Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex.

Other Directorships Held: Board of Overseers, Babson College.

Previous Positions: Representative, Commonwealth of Massachusetts General Court; President, State Street Bank and Trust Company and State Street Corporation (retired); Director, VISA USA and VISA International; Chairman and Director, Massachusetts Bankers Association; Director, Depository Trust Corporation; Director, The Boston Stock Exchange.

 

 

 


Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.
Birth Date: April 10, 1945
80 South Road
Westhampton Beach, NY
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999

 

Principal Occupations: Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Management Consultant.

Previous Positions: Chief Executive Officer, PBTC International Bank; Partner, Arthur Young & Company (now Ernst & Young LLP); Chief Financial Officer of Retail Banking Sector, Chase Manhattan Bank; Senior Vice President, HSBC Bank USA (formerly, Marine Midland Bank); Vice President, Citibank; Assistant Professor of Banking and Finance, Frank G. Zarb School of Business, Hofstra University; Executive Vice President DVC Group, Inc.

 

 

 


John E. Murray, Jr., J.D., S.J.D.
Birth Date: December 20, 1932
Chancellor, Duquesne University
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: February 1995

 

Principal Occupations: Director or Trustee, and Chairman of the Board of Directors or Trustees, of the Federated Fund Complex; Chancellor and Law Professor, Duquesne University; Partner, Murray, Hogue & Lannis.

Other Directorships Held: Director, Michael Baker Corp. (engineering, construction, operations and technical services).

Previous Positions: President, Duquesne University; Dean and Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law; Dean and Professor of Law, Villanova University School of Law.

 

 

 


Marjorie P. Smuts
Birth Date: June 21, 1935
4905 Bayard Street
Pittsburgh, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: October 1988

 

Principal Occupations: Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Public Relations/Marketing Consultant/Conference Coordinator.

Previous Positions: National Spokesperson, Aluminum Company of America; television producer; President, Marj Palmer Assoc.; Owner, Scandia Bord.

 

 

 


John S. Walsh
Birth Date: November 28, 1957
2604 William Drive
Valparaiso, IN
TRUSTEE
Began serving: January 1999

 

Principal Occupations: Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; President and Director, Heat Wagon, Inc. (manufacturer of construction temporary heaters); President and Director, Manufacturers Products, Inc. (distributor of portable construction heaters); President, Portable Heater Parts, a division of Manufacturers Products, Inc.

Previous Position: Vice President, Walsh & Kelly, Inc.

 

 

 


James F. Will
Birth Date: October 12, 1938
Saint Vincent College
Latrobe, PA
TRUSTEE
Began serving: April 2006

 

Principal Occupations: Director or Trustee of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chancellor and President, Saint Vincent College.

Other Directorships Held: Alleghany Corporation.

Previous Positions: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Armco, Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer, Cyclops Industries; President and Chief Operating Officer, Kaiser Steel Corporation.

 

 

 


OFFICERS

 

 

 


Name
Birth Date
Positions Held with Trust
Date Service Began

    

Principal Occupation(s) and Previous Position(s)


John W. McGonigle
Birth Date: October 26, 1938
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND SECRETARY
Began serving: October 1988

 

Principal Occupations: Executive Vice President and Secretary of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Director, Federated Investors, Inc.

Previous Positions: Trustee, Federated Investment Management Company and Federated Investment Counseling; Director, Federated Global Investment Management Corp., Federated Services Company and Federated Securities Corp.

 

 

 


Richard A. Novak
Birth Date: December 25, 1963
TREASURER
Began serving: January 2006

 

Principal Occupations: Principal Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Federated Fund Complex; Senior Vice President, Federated Administrative Services; Financial and Operations Principal for Federated Securities Corp., Edgewood Services, Inc. and Southpointe Distribution Services, Inc.

Previous Positions: Vice President, Finance of Federated Services Company; Controller of Federated Investors, Inc.; held various financial management positions within The Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh; Auditor, Arthur Andersen & Co.

 

 

 


Richard B. Fisher
Birth Date: May 17, 1923
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: October 1988

 

Principal Occupations: Vice Chairman or Vice President of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Vice Chairman, Federated Investors, Inc.; Chairman, Federated Securities Corp.

Previous Positions: President and Director or Trustee of some of the Funds in the Federated Fund Complex; Executive Vice President, Federated Investors, Inc. and Director and Chief Executive Officer, Federated Securities Corp.

 

 

 


Brian P. Bouda
Birth Date: February 28, 1947
CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER Began serving: August 2004

 

Principal Occupations: Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of the Federated Fund Complex; Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of Federated Investors, Inc.; and Chief Compliance Officer of its subsidiaries. Mr. Bouda joined Federated in 1999 and is a member of the American Bar Association and the State Bar Association of Wisconsin.

 

 

 


Deborah A. Cunningham
Birth Date: September 15, 1959
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: May 2004

 

Principal Occupations: Deborah A. Cunningham was named Chief Investment Officer of money market products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1981 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund’s Adviser since 1997. Ms. Cunningham is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.S.B.A. in Finance from Robert Morris College.

 

 

 


Mary Jo Ochson
Birth Date: September 12, 1953
CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER
Began serving: November 1998

 

Principal Occupations: Mary Jo Ochson was named Chief Investment Officer of tax-exempt fixed income products in 2004. She joined Federated in 1982 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager and a Senior Vice President of the Fund’s Adviser since 1996. Ms. Ochson is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received her M.B.A. in Finance from the University of Pittsburgh.

 

 

 


Susan R. Hill
Birth Date: June 20, 1963
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004

 

Susan R. Hill has been the Fund’s Portfolio Manager since January 1994. She is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Hill joined Federated in 1990 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 2003 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund’s Adviser since 2005. Ms. Hill was a Portfolio Manager from 1994 until 2003, and served as Vice President of the Fund’s Adviser from 1997 until 2004 and an Assistant Vice President of the Fund’s Adviser from 1994 until 1997. Ms. Hill is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received an M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University.

 

 

 


Jeff A. Kozemchak
Birth Date: January 15, 1960
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: May 2004

 

Jeff A. Kozemchak is Vice President of the Trust. Mr. Kozemchak joined Federated in 1987 and has been a Senior Portfolio Manager since 1996 and a Senior Vice President of the Fund’s Adviser since 1999. He was a Portfolio Manager until 1996 and a Vice President of the Fund’s Adviser from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Kozemchak is a Chartered Financial Analyst and received his M.S. in Industrial Administration from Carnegie Mellon University in 1987.

 

 

 


Paige M. Wilhelm
Birth Date: May 28, 1962
VICE PRESIDENT
Began serving: August 2006

 

Paige M. Wilhelm is Vice President of the Trust. Ms. Wilhelm joined Federated in 1985 and has been a Senior Vice President and a Senior Portfolio Manager. She is responsible for portfolio management and research in the fixed income area concentrating on taxable money market instruments. Previous associations include Senior Credit Analyst, Federated Investors; Performance Analysis Supervisor; Performance Analyst, Federated Investment Counseling. Ms. Wilhelm is a member of the CFA Society of Pittsburgh and received her B.S. from Indiana University and her M.B.A. from Duquesne University.

 

 

 


** Officers do not receive any compensation from the Fund.

Evaluation and Approval of Advisory Contract

TRUST FOR U.S. TREASURY OBLIGATIONS (THE “FUND”)

The Fund’s Board reviewed the Fund’s investment advisory contract at meetings held in May 2006. The Board’s decision regarding the contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to continue the existing arrangements.

Prior to the meeting, the Adviser had recommended that the Federated Funds appoint a Senior Officer, whose duties include specified responsibilities relating to the process by which advisory fees are to be charged to a Federated Fund. The Senior Officer appointed by the Funds has the authority to retain consultants, experts, or staff as may be reasonably necessary to assist in the performance of his duties, reports directly to the Board, and may be terminated only with the approval of a majority of the independent members of the Board. The Senior Officer prepared and furnished to the Board an independent written evaluation that covered topics discussed below, which the Board considered, along with other information, in deciding to approve the advisory contract.

During its review of the contract, the Board considered compensation and benefits received by the Adviser. This included the fees received for services provided to the Fund by other entities in the Federated organization and research services received by the Adviser from brokers that execute Federated fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board is also familiar with judicial decisions concerning allegedly excessive investment advisory fees which have indicated that the following factors may be relevant to an Adviser’s fiduciary duty with respect to its receipt of compensation from a fund: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, including the performance of the Fund; the Adviser’s cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Adviser may realize “economies of scale” as the Fund grows larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser’s relationship with the Fund; performance and expenses of comparable funds; and the extent to which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts the Board deems relevant bearing on the Adviser’s services and fees. The Board further considered management fees (including any components thereof) charged to institutional and other clients of the Adviser for like services and costs to the Adviser and its affiliates of supplying services pursuant to the management fee agreements, excluding any intra-corporate profit and profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying such services. The Board was aware of these considerations and was guided by them in its review of the Fund’s advisory contract to the extent they are appropriate and relevant, as discussed further below.

The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its substantial accumulated experience in governing the Fund and working with Federated on matters relating to the Federated funds, and was assisted in its deliberations by the advice of independent legal counsel. Throughout the year, the Board has requested and received substantial and detailed information about the Fund and the Federated organization that was in addition to the extensive materials that comprise the Senior Officer’s evaluation. Federated provided much of this information at each regular meeting of the Board, and furnished additional reports in connection with the particular meeting at which the Board’s formal review of the advisory contract occurred. Between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board has received information on particular matters as the need arose. Thus, the Board’s consideration of the advisory contract included review of the Senior Officer’s evaluation, accompanying data and additional reports covering such matters as: the Adviser’s investment philosophy, revenue, profitability, personnel and processes; investment and operating strategies; the Fund’s short- and long-term performance (in absolute terms, both on a gross basis and net of expenses, as well as in relationship to its particular investment program and certain competitor or “peer group” funds and/or other benchmarks, as appropriate), and comments on the reasons for performance; the Fund’s investment objectives; the Fund’s expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Fund, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the use and allocation of brokerage commissions derived from trading the Fund’s portfolio securities (if any); the nature, quality and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry and market practices; the range of comparable fees for similar funds in the mutual fund industry; the Fund’s relationship to the Federated family of funds which include a comprehensive array of funds with different investment objectives, policies and strategies which are available for exchange without the incurrence of additional sales charges; compliance and audit reports concerning the Federated funds and the Federated companies that service them (including communications from regulatory agencies), as well as Federated’s responses to any issues raised therein; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Federated funds and/or Federated are responding to them. The Board’s evaluation process is evolutionary. The criteria considered and the emphasis placed on relevant criteria change in recognition of changing circumstances in the mutual fund marketplace.

With respect to the Fund’s performance and expenses in particular, the Board has found the use of comparisons to other mutual funds with comparable investment programs to be particularly useful, given the high degree of competition in the mutual fund business. The Board focused on comparisons with other similar mutual funds more heavily than non-mutual fund products or services because, simply put, they are more relevant. For example, other mutual funds are the products most like the Fund, they are readily available to Fund shareholders as alternative investment vehicles, and they are the type of investment vehicle in fact chosen and maintained by the Fund’s investors. The range of their fees and expenses therefore appears to be a generally reliable indication of what consumers have found to be reasonable in the precise marketplace in which the Fund competes. The Fund’s ability to deliver competitive performance when compared to its peer group was a useful indicator of how the Adviser is executing the Fund’s investment program, which in turn assisted the Board in reaching a conclusion that the nature, extent, and quality of the Adviser’s investment management services were such as to warrant continuation of the advisory contract. In this regard, the Senior Officer has reviewed Federated’s fees for providing advisory services to products outside the Federated family of funds (e.g., institutional and separate accounts). He concluded that mutual funds and institutional accounts are inherently different products. Those differences included, but are not limited to targeting different investors, being subject to different laws and regulations, different legal structure, distribution costs, average account size and portfolio management techniques made necessary by different cash flows. The Senior Officer did not consider these fee schedules to be significant in determining the appropriateness of mutual fund advisory contracts.

The Senior Officer reviewed reports compiled by Federated, and directed the preparation of independent reports, regarding the performance of, and fees charged by, other mutual funds, noting his view that comparisons to fund peer groups is of significance in judging the reasonableness of proposed fees.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund’s performance was above the median of the relevant peer group.

The Board also received financial information about Federated, including reports on the compensation and benefits Federated derived from its relationships with the Federated funds. These reports covered not only the fees under the advisory contracts, but also fees received by Federated’s subsidiaries for providing other services to the Federated funds under separate contracts (e.g., for serving as the Federated funds’ administrator). The reports also discussed any indirect benefit Federated may derive from its receipt of research services from brokers who execute Federated fund trades as well as waivers of fees and/or reimbursements of expenses. In order for a fund to be competitive in the marketplace, Federated and its affiliates frequently waived fees and/or reimbursed expenses and have indicated to the Board their intention to do so in the future, where appropriate.

Federated furnished reports, requested by the Senior Officer, that reported revenues on a fund by fund basis and made estimates of the allocation of expenses on a fund by fund basis, using allocation methodologies specified by the Senior Officer. The Senior Officer noted that, although they may apply consistent allocation processes, the inherent difficulties in allocating costs and the lack of consensus on how to allocate those costs causes such allocation reports to be of questionable value. The allocation reports were considered in the analysis by the Board but were determined to be of limited use.

The Board also reviewed profitability information for Federated and other publicly held fund management companies, provided by the Senior Officer, who noted the limited availability of such information, and concluded that Federated’s profit margins did not appear to be excessive.

The Senior Officer’s evaluation also discussed the notion of possible realization of “economies of scale” as a fund grows larger. The Board considered in this regard that the Adviser has made significant additional investments in the portfolio management and distribution efforts supporting all of the Federated funds and that the benefits of any economies, should they exist, were likely to be enjoyed by the fund complex as a whole. Finally, the Board also noted the absence of any applicable regulatory or industry guidelines on this subject, which is compounded by the lack of any common industry practice or general pattern with respect to structuring fund advisory fees with “breakpoints” that serve to reduce the fee as the fund attains a certain size. The Senior Officer did not recommend institution of breakpoints in pricing Federated’s fund advisory services at this time.

During the year ending December 31, 2005, the Fund’s investment advisory fee after waivers and expense reimbursements, if any, was above the median of the relevant peer group. The Board reviewed the fees and other expenses of the Fund with the Adviser and was satisfied that the overall expense structure of the Fund remained competitive. The Board will continue to monitor advisory fees and other expenses borne by the Fund.

No changes were recommended to, and no objection was raised to the continuation of the Fund’s advisory contract, and the Senior Officer noted that Federated appeared to provide appropriate administrative services to the Fund for the fees paid. For 2005, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and scope of services provided the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates was satisfactory.

In its decision to continue an existing investment advisory contract, the Board was mindful of the potential disruptions of the Fund’s operations and various risks, uncertainties and other effects that could occur as a result of a decision to terminate or not renew an advisory contract. In particular, the Board recognized that most shareholders have invested in the Fund on the strength of the Adviser’s industry standing and reputation and in the expectation that the Adviser will have a continuing role in providing advisory services to the Fund. Thus, the Board’s approval of the advisory contract reflected the fact that it is the shareholders who have effectively selected the Adviser by virtue of having invested in the Fund.

The Board based its decision to approve the advisory contract on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations identified above were relevant to every Federated fund, nor did the Board consider any one of them to be determinative. With respect to the factors that were relevant, the Board’s decision to approve the contract reflects its determination that Federated’s performance and actions provided a satisfactory basis to support the decision to continue the existing arrangements.

The Senior Officer also made recommendations relating to the organization and availability of data and verification of processes for purposes of implementing future evaluations which the Adviser has agreed to implement.

Voting Proxies on Fund Portfolio Securities

A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies, if any, relating to securities held in the Fund’s portfolio is available, without charge and upon request, by calling 1-800-341-7400. A report on “Form N-PX” of how the Fund voted any such proxies during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available through Federated’s website. Go to FederatedInvestors.com, select “Products,” select the “Prospectuses and Regulatory Reports” link, then select the Fund to access the link to Form N-PX. This information is also available from the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Quarterly Portfolio Schedule

The Fund files with the SEC a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings, as of the close of the first and third quarters of its fiscal year, on “Form N-Q.” These filings are available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. (Call 1-800-SEC-0330 for information on the operation of the Public Reference Room.) You may also access this information from the “Products” section of the Federated’s website at FederatedInvestors.com by clicking on “Portfolio Holdings” and selecting the name of the Fund, or by selecting the name of the Fund and clicking on “Portfolio Holdings.” You must register on the website the first time you wish to access this information.

Mutual funds are not bank deposits or obligations, are not guaranteed by any bank, and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve Board, or any other government agency. Investment in mutual funds involves investment risk, including the possible loss of principal. Although money market funds seek to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share, there is no assurance that they will be able to do so.

This report is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by the Fund’s prospectus, which contains facts concerning its objective and policies, management fees, expenses, and other information.

Federated Investors
World-Class Investment Manager

Trust for U.S. Treasury Obligations
Federated Investors Funds
5800 Corporate Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15237-7000

Contact us at FederatedInvestors.com
or call 1-800-341-7400.

Federated Securities Corp., Distributor

Cusip 60934N799

28731 (9/06)

Federated is a registered mark of Federated Investors, Inc.
2006 ©Federated Investors, Inc.

ITEM 2.     CODE OF ETHICS

(a) As of the end of the period covered by this report, the registrant has
adopted a code of ethics (the "Section 406 Standards for Investment Companies -
Ethical Standards for Principal Executive and Financial Officers") that applies
to the registrant's Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer;
the registrant's Principal Financial Officer also serves as the Principal
Accounting Officer.

(c) Not Applicable

(d) Not Applicable

(e) Not Applicable

(f)(3) The registrant hereby undertakes to provide any person, without charge,
upon request, a copy of the code of ethics.  To request a copy of the code of
ethics, contact the registrant at 1-800-341-7400, and ask for a copy of the
Section 406 Standards for Investment Companies - Ethical Standards for Principal
Executive and Financial Officers.


ITEM 3.     AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

The registrant's Board has determined that each member of the Board's Audit
Committee is an "audit committee financial expert," and that each such member is
"independent," for purposes of this Item.  The Audit Committee consists of the
following Board members:  Thomas G. Bigley, John T. Conroy, Jr., Nicholas P.
Constantakis and Charles F. Mansfield, Jr.


ITEM 4.     PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

(a)     Audit Fees billed to the registrant for the two most recent fiscal years:
                Fiscal year ended 2006 - $706,795
                Fiscal year ended 2005 - $661,534
(b)     Audit-Related Fees billed to the registrant for the two most recent
fiscal  years:
                Fiscal year ended 2006 - $2,016
                Fiscal year ended 2005 - $17,850

     Fiscal year ended 2006 - Transfer Agent  Services  Auditor  report.  Fiscal
     year ended 2005 - Transfer Agent Services Auditor report.  Amount requiring
     approval  of  the  registrant's   audit  committee  pursuant  to  paragraph
     (c)(7)(ii)   of  Rule  2-01  of   Regulation   S-X,   $3,131  and  $161,097
     respectively.  Fiscal  year  ended  2006 - Audit  consents  issued for N-14
     business  combinations.  Fiscal year ended 2005 - Sarbanes  Oxley sec.  302
     procedures and Transfer Agent Service Auditors report.

(c)  Tax Fees billed to the registrant for the two most recent fiscal years:
        Fiscal year ended 2006 - $0
        Fiscal year ended 2005 - $0
     Amount requiring approval of the registrant's audit committee pursuant to
     paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X, $0 and
     $0 respectively.

(d)  All Other Fees billed to the registrant for the two most recent fiscal
years:
        Fiscal year ended 2006 - $0
        Fiscal year ended 2005 - $0
     Amount requiring  approval of the registrant's  audit committee pursuant to
     paragraph  (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation  S-X,  $22,593 and $22,187
     respectively.  Fiscal  year ended 2006 - Executive  compensation  analysis.
     Fiscal year ended 2005 - Discussions  with auditor related to market timing
     and late trading activities and executive compensation analysis.

(e)(1) Audit Committee Policies regarding Pre-approval of Services.
     The Audit Committee is required to pre-approve audit and non-audit services
performed by the  independent  auditor in order to assure that the  provision of
such services do not impair the auditor's independence. Unless a type of service
to be provided by the independent auditor has received general pre-approval,  it
will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. Any proposed services
exceeding  pre-approved  cost levels will require  specific  pre-approval by the
Audit Committee.
     Certain services have the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee.  The
term of the general  pre-approval  is 12 months  from the date of  pre-approval,
unless the Audit Committee  specifically  provides for a different  period.  The
Audit  Committee  will annually  review the services that may be provided by the
independent  auditor  without  obtaining  specific  pre-approval  from the Audit
Committee  and may  grant  general  pre-approval  for such  services.  The Audit
Committee  will revise the list of general  pre-approved  services  from time to
time, based on subsequent determinations.  The Audit Committee will not delegate
its  responsibilities  to  pre-approve  services  performed  by the  independent
auditor to management.
     The Audit Committee has delegated  pre-approval  authority to its Chairman.
The Chairman will report any  pre-approval  decisions to the Audit  Committee at
its next scheduled  meeting.  The Committee  will designate  another member with
such pre-approval authority when the Chairman is unavailable.

AUDIT SERVICES
     The annual Audit services  engagement terms and fees will be subject to the
specific  pre-approval of the Audit Committee.  The Audit Committee must approve
any changes in terms, conditions and fees resulting from changes in audit scope,
registered  investment company (RIC) structure or other matters.  In addition to
the  annual  Audit  services  engagement  specifically  approved  by  the  Audit
Committee,  the Audit Committee may grant general  pre-approval  for other Audit
Services,  which are those services that only the independent auditor reasonably
can provide.  The Audit Committee has pre-approved  certain Audit services,  all
other Audit services must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
AUDIT-RELATED SERVICES
     Audit-related   services  are  assurance  and  related  services  that  are
reasonably  related to the  performance  of the audit or review of the Company's
financial  statements  or that are  traditionally  performed by the  independent
auditor.  The Audit  Committee  believes  that the  provision  of  Audit-related
services does not impair the  independence of the auditor,  and has pre-approved
certain  Audit-related  services,  all  other  Audit-related  services  must  be
specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

TAX SERVICES
     The Audit Committee  believes that the independent  auditor can provide Tax
services to the Company  such as tax  compliance,  tax  planning  and tax advice
without impairing the auditor's independence.  However, the Audit Committee will
not  permit the  retention  of the  independent  auditor  in  connection  with a
transaction  initially  recommended by the independent  auditor,  the purpose of
which may be tax  avoidance  and the tax treatment of which may not be supported
in the Internal  Revenue Code and related  regulations.  The Audit Committee has
pre-approved certain Tax services,  all Tax services involving large and complex
transactions must be specifically pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

ALL OTHER SERVICES
     With  respect to the  provision  of services  other than  audit,  review or
attest services the pre-approval requirement is waived if:
     (1)  The aggregate amount of all such services provided constitutes no more
          than  five  percent  of the  total  amount  of  revenues  paid  by the
          registrant,  the  registrant's  adviser (not including any sub-adviser
          whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with
          or  overseen   by  another   investment   adviser),   and  any  entity
          controlling,   controlled   by,  or  under  common  control  with  the
          investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant to
          its  accountant  during  the  fiscal  year in which the  services  are
          provided;
     (2)  Such services were not recognized by the registrant,  the registrant's
          adviser  (not  including  any  sub-adviser  whose  role  is  primarily
          portfolio  management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another
          investment  adviser),  and any entity  controlling,  controlled by, or
          under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing
          services  to the  registrant  at the  time  of  the  engagement  to be
          non-audit services; and
     (3)  Such  services  are  promptly  brought to the  attention  of the Audit
          Committee of the issuer and approved  prior to the  completion  of the
          audit by the Audit  Committee  or by one or more  members of the Audit
          Committee who are members of the board of directors to whom  authority
          to grant such approvals has been delegated by the Audit Committee.

     The Audit  Committee may grant general  pre-approval  to those  permissible
non-audit services classified as All Other services that it believes are routine
and recurring services, and would not impair the independence of the auditor.

     The SEC's rules and relevant  guidance should be consulted to determine the
precise  definitions of prohibited  non-audit  services and the applicability of
exceptions to certain of the prohibitions.

PRE-APPROVAL FEE LEVELS
     Pre-approval  fee levels for all services to be provided by the independent
auditor  will be  established  annually  by the Audit  Committee.  Any  proposed
services exceeding these levels will require specific  pre-approval by the Audit
Committee.

PROCEDURES
     Requests or applications to provide services that require specific approval
by the Audit  Committee  will be  submitted  to the Audit  Committee by both the
independent  auditor  and  the  Principal  Accounting  Officer  and/or  Internal
Auditor,  and must include a joint  statement as to whether,  in their view, the
request  or  application   is  consistent   with  the  SEC's  rules  on  auditor
independence.

(e)(2)   Percentage of services identified in items 4(b) through 4(d) that were
approved by the registrants audit committee pursuant to paragraph
(c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X:

                4(b)
                Fiscal year ended 2006 - 0%
                Fiscal year ended 2005 - 0%
                Percentage of services provided to the registrants investment
                adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under
                common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing
                services to the registrant that were approved by the registrants
                audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01
                of Regulation S-X, 0% and 0% respectively.

                4(c)
                Fiscal year ended 2006 - 0%
                Fiscal year ended 2005 - 0%
                Percentage of services provided to the registrants investment
                adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under
                common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing
                services to the registrant that were approved by the registrants
                audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01
                of Regulation S-X, 0% and 0% respectively.

                4(d)
                Fiscal year ended 2006 - 0%
                Fiscal year ended 2005 - 0%
                Percentage of services provided to the registrants investment
                adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under
                common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing
                services to the registrant that were approved by the registrants
                audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01
                of Regulation S-X, 0% and 0% respectively.

(f) NA

(g)     Non-Audit Fees billed to the registrant, the registrant's  investment
        adviser, and certain entities controlling, controlled by or under common
        control with the investment adviser:
                Fiscal year ended 2006 - $228,759
                Fiscal year ended 2005 - $333,628

(h)     The registrant's Audit Committee has considered that the provision of
non-audit services that were rendered to the registrant's adviser (not
including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is
subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity
controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment
adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not
pre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X
is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant's independence.


ITEM 5.     AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS

            Not Applicable

ITEM 6.     SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

            Not Applicable

ITEM 7.     DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END
            MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

            Not Applicable

ITEM 8.     PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

            Not Applicable

ITEM 9.     PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT
            COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

            Not Applicable

ITEM 10.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

            Not Applicable

ITEM 11.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) The registrant's President and Treasurer have concluded that the
registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-3(c)
under the Act) are effective in design and operation and are sufficient
to form the basis of the certifications required by Rule 30a-(2) under the Act,
based on their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures within 90
days of the filing date of this report on Form N-CSR.

(b) There were no changes in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) during the last fiscal
quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 12.    EXHIBITS













SIGNATURES

PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND THE
INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940, THE REGISTRANT HAS DULY CAUSED THIS REPORT TO BE
SIGNED ON ITS BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED.

REGISTRANT  MONEY MARKET OBLIGATIONS TRUST

BY          /S/ RICHARD A. NOVAK
                RICHARD A. NOVAK, PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                             (INSERT NAME AND TITLE)

DATE        September 20, 2006


PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND THE
INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940, THIS REPORT HAS BEEN SIGNED BELOW BY THE
FOLLOWING PERSONS ON BEHALF OF THE REGISTRANT AND IN THE CAPACITIES AND ON THE
DATES INDICATED.


BY          /S/ J. CHRISTOPHER DONAHUE
                J. CHRISTOPHER DONAHUE, PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


DATE        September 20, 2006


BY          /S/ RICHARD A. NOVAK
                RICHARD A. NOVAK, PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


DATE        September 20, 2006