-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, CC85Xv8khq38NptyMwsVvRG5gpkq8k6GWDpwDvX4IrIqLoYBLDKfqEYkdYAzqRcy P1ujRcHp2PUY+669o9Oh8A== 0000918905-98-000006.txt : 19980522 0000918905-98-000006.hdr.sgml : 19980522 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000918905-98-000006 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: DEFS14A PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 1 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19980618 FILED AS OF DATE: 19980521 SROS: AMEX FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: MATEC CORP/DE/ CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000085608 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: STEEL WORKS, BLAST FURNACES & ROLLING & FINISHING MILLS [3310] IRS NUMBER: 060737363 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: DEFS14A SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-04184 FILM NUMBER: 98629815 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 75 SOUTH ST CITY: HOPKINTON STATE: MA ZIP: 01748 BUSINESS PHONE: 5084359039 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 75 SOUTH STREET CITY: HOPKINTON STATE: MA ZIP: 01748 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: RSC INDUSTRIES INC DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19840515 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: REEVES INDUSTRIES INC DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19710520 DEFS14A 1 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. ) Filed by the Registrant { X } Filed by the Party other than the Registrant { } Check the appropriate box: { } Preliminary Proxy Statement { } Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as Permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) { X } Definitive Proxy Statement { } Definitive Additional Materials { } Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11(c) or Section 240.14a-12 MATEC CORPORATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) --------------------------------------------------------------------- (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): { X } No fee required. { } Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11. 1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: ----------------------------------------------------- 2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: ----------------------------------------------------- 3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11. (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): ----------------------------------------------------- 4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: ----------------------------------------------------- 5) Total fee paid: ----------------------------------------------------- { } Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. { } Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. 1) Amount Previously Paid: ------------------------------------------------------ 2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No: ------------------------------------------------------ 3) Filing Party: ------------------------------------------------------ 4) Date Filed: ------------------------------------------------------ MATEC CORPORATION (A DELAWARE CORPORATION) __________ NOTICE OF SPECIAL IN LIEU OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS JUNE 18, 1998 __________ TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF MATEC CORPORATION The Special In Lieu Of Annual Meeting of Stockholders of MATEC Corporation will be held at the offices of the Company, 75 South Street, Hopkinton, Massachusetts 01748, on June 18, 1998, at 10:00 A.M. to consider and vote on the following matters described under the corresponding numbers in the attached Proxy Statement. (1) The election of six directors; (2) Consideration and vote upon a proposal to reincorporate the Company in Maryland and cash out certain stockholders; and (3) Such other matters as may properly come before the meeting. The Board of Directors has fixed May 18, 1998, at the close of business, as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting, and only holders of shares of Common Stock of record at the close of business on that day will be entitled to vote. The list of such stockholders will be available for inspection by stockholders during the ten days prior to the meeting in accordance with Section 219 of the Delaware General Corporation Law at the offices of the Company, 75 South Street, Hopkinton, Massachusetts 01748. Stockholders may make arrangements for such inspection by contacting the Secretary of MATEC Corporation, 75 South Street, Hopkinton, Massachusetts 01748. The stock transfer books of the Company will not be closed. WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO BE PRESENT, PLEASE FILL IN, SIGN AND MAIL THE ENCLOSED PROXY, WHICH IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. THE PROXY IS REVOCABLE AND WILL NOT AFFECT YOUR RIGHT TO VOTE IN THE EVENT YOU ATTEND THE MEETING. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS JOHN J. MCARDLE III Secretary May 11, 1998 REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THE PROXY MATERIAL SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO SECRETARY, MATEC CORPORATION, 75 SOUTH STREET, HOPKINTON, MASSACHUSETTS 01748. MATEC CORPORATION 75 SOUTH STREET HOPKINTON, MASSACHUSETTS 01748 ____________ PROXY STATEMENT ____________ SPECIAL IN LIEU OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS JUNE 18, 1998 ____________ The enclosed Proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of MATEC Corporation (the "Company") in connection with the Special in Lieu of Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 18, 1998. The Board of Directors has fixed May 18, 1998, at the close of business, as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting. Any Proxy received by the Board of Directors may be revoked, either in writing or in person, by the record holder of the shares covered thereby, if such revocation is received by the Company at any time prior to said Proxy being exercised. It is anticipated that this Proxy Statement and the enclosed Notice and Proxy first will be mailed to stockholders of record on or about May 21, 1998. All Proxies will be voted in accordance with the instructions contained therein and if no choice is specified will be voted in favor of the election as directors of the persons named herein and for approval of the proposal to reincorporate the Company in Maryland and cash out certain stockholders. The Company knows of no reason why any of the nominees named herein would be unable to serve. In the event, however, that any such nominee should prior to the election become unable to serve as a director, the Proxy will be voted for such substitute nominee, if any, as the Board of Directors shall propose. A stockholder who abstains from a vote by registering an abstention vote will be deemed present at the meeting for quorum purposes but will not be deemed to have voted on the particular matter. Similarly, in the event a nominee holding shares for beneficial owners votes on certain matters pursuant to discretionary authority or instructions from beneficial owners, but with respect to one or more other matters does not receive instructions from beneficial owners and does not exercise discretionary authority (a so-called "non-vote"), the shares held by the nominee will be deemed present at the meeting for quorum purposes but will not be deemed to have voted on such other matters. Thus, on the vote for the proposal to elect directors, where the outcome depends on the votes cast, abstentions and non-votes will have no effect. The proposal to reincorporate in Maryland requires the approval of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company. Abstentions as to such proposal will have the same effect as votes against such proposal. Broker non-votes will be treated as unvoted for purposes of determining approval of such proposals and will not be counted as votes for or against such proposals. The Annual Report to Stockholders of the Company, including financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1997, is enclosed herewith. COMMON STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT All the voting power of the Company is vested in its Common Stock. As of the close of business on May 11, 1998, 2,758,253 shares of Common Stock, par value $.05 per share (exclusive of 1,070,642 shares held by the Company as treasury shares) were outstanding. Each share of Common Stock (other than the treasury shares) is entitled to one vote. It is not presently anticipated that the number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock will significantly change between May 11, 1998 and the record date. Set forth in the table below is information concerning the ownership as of May 11, 1998 of the Common Stock of the Company by persons who, to the knowledge of the Board of Directors, own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Company. The table also shows information concerning beneficial ownership by all other directors, by each nominee for director, by each of the executive officers of the Company and by all directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, the beneficial owners have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned. Name and Address Amount Beneficially Percentage of Beneficial Owner Owned of Class - ------------------- ------------------- ---------- Dimensional Fund 149,000(1) 5.4% Advisors Inc. 1299 Ocean Avenue 11th Floor Santa Monica, CA 90401 John J. McArdle III 187,962(2)(3) 6.8% MetroWest Bank 15 Park Street Framingham, MA 01701 Mary R. and 207,400 7.5% Emile Vaccari 508 40th Street Union City, NJ 07087 Robert W. Valpey 204,403(2)(4) 7.4% Route 25 Box 249 Center Harbor, NH 03226 Ted Valpey,Jr. 727,935(5) 26.4% P.O. Box 4100 Portsmouth, NH 03801 Other Directors and Executive Officers - ------------------- Eli Fleisher 87,000(6) 3.2% Robert B. Gill 121,300(7) 4.4% Lawrence Holsborg 114,267 4.1% Robert W. Muir, Jr. 8,000 less than 1% Joseph W. Tiberio 25,000 less than 1% Michael J. Kroll 15,300(8) less than 1% Directors and Executive 1,286,764(2)(3)(5)-(8) 46.7% Officers as a Group (consisting of 8 individuals) ______________________________ (1) Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc., a registered investment advisor, is deemed to have beneficial ownership of 149,000 shares of Common Stock of the Corporation as of December 31, 1997, all of which shares are held in portfolios of DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc., a registered open-end investment company, or in series of the DFA Investment Trust Company, a Delaware business trust, or the DFA Group Trust and DFA Participating Group Trust, investment vehicles for qualified employee benefit plans, all of which Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc. serves as investment manager. Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc. disclaims beneficial ownership of all such shares. (2) Includes 100,000 shares, as to which each of Mr. Robert Valpey and Mr. McArdle disclaims beneficial ownership, held by a trust of which each is one of two trustees. (3) Includes 25,750 shares owned by Mr. McArdle's wife as to which he disclaims beneficial ownership. (4) Includes 2,900 shares owned by Mr. Robert Valpey's wife as to which he disclaims beneficial ownership and 1,000 shares jointly owned by Mr. Valpey's wife. (5) 300,000 of such shares are pledged as collateral to a bank to secure certain indebtedness of Mr. Ted Valpey, Jr. (6) Includes 1,500 shares owned by Mr. Fleisher's wife as to which he disclaims beneficial ownership. (7) Includes 64,300 shares jointly owned by Mr. Gill's wife and deposited as collateral by Mr. & Mrs. Gill in a joint margin account maintained by them with a registered broker-dealer. (8) Includes 8,700 shares jointly owned by Mr. Kroll's wife. (1) ELECTION OF DIRECTORS NOMINEES The Board of Directors has amended the By-Laws of the Company, effective the date of the 1998 Special In Lieu of Annual Meeting to decrease the number of directors from seven to six. Six directors are to be elected at the Annual Meeting, each to hold office until the next annual meeting and until his successor is elected and qualified. Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast. The following table sets forth certain information furnished to the Company regarding the persons who are nominees for election as directors of the Company: Year First Principal Occupation Elected Name of Nominee for Past Five Years Director Age - --------------- -------------------- -------- --- Eli Fleisher(d) Investor since 1977 70 prior to 1993. Lawrence Holsborg(b)(c)(d) Investor since 1986 64 prior to 1993. John J. McArdle III(a)(b)(c) Employee of Prime 1992 48 Capital Group (financial consultants) since prior to 1993; President of RSC Realty Corporation (a subsidiary of the Company) since prior to 1993 and Secretary of the Company since prior to 1993; Chief Executive Officer of MetroWest Bank since January 1993; and President of MetroWest Bank since January 1993 to April 1998. Robert W. Muir, Jr.(a)(d) Vice President Corporate 1996 49 Development, Thomas & Betts Electrical Supply since October 1997; CEO and President of Diamond Communication Products Inc. (manufacturer of poleline hardware) from prior to 1993 to July 1997. Joseph W. Tiberio(a)(b) President, Century 1986 76 Manufacturing Co., Inc. (metal stamping) since prior to 1993; President Ty-Wood Corporation (metal fabrication) since prior to 1993. Ted Valpey, Jr. (a)(c) Investor; Chairman of 1980 65 the Company since prior to 1993 and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from prior to 1993 to December 21, 1993 and since April 28, 1997. _______________________ (a) Member of the Executive Committee (b) Member of the Audit Committee (c) Member of the Nominating Committee (d) Member of the Stock Option-Compensation Committee. Each of the above nominees was elected a director at the last Annual Meeting of Stockholders and has served continuously since the year he was first elected. Mr. Robert B. Gill, a director who is not standing for reelection, is a member of the Executive Committee. The Board of Directors held six meetings during the last fiscal year. During the last fiscal year Robert B. Gill attended less than 75% of the meetings of the Board of Directors and committees of which he is a member. The Stock Option-Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors recommends to the Board of Directors the Compensation for the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), approves the compensation recommendations of the CEO for corporate and executive officers, and subsidiary presidents and controllers, administers and approves option grants pursuant to the Company's 1992 Stock Option Plan, and approves the Company's contributions and 401(k) match under the Company's profit sharing 401(k) plan. The Stock Option-Compensation Committee held three meetings during 1997. The Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors performs such functions as the selection and recommendation to the Board of Directors of potential candidates for nomination as directors. The Nominating committee held one meeting during 1997. In recommending to the Board the nominees for election as directors, the Committee will consider stockholders' recommendations for director sent to the Nominating Committee, c/o Secretary, MATEC Corporation, 75 South Street, Hopkinton, Massachusetts 01748. Stockholders must submit the names of potential future nominees in writing with a statement of their qualifications and an indication of the potential nominee's willingness to serve as a director if nominated and elected. The Executive Committee of the Board of Directors is authorized to exercise all of the authority of the Board of Directors except that which by law cannot be delegated by the Board of Directors. The Executive Committee did not meet during 1997. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors performs the customary functions of such a committee including recommendation to the directors of the engagement of independent auditors, the review of the plan and results of the yearly audit by the independent auditors, the review of the Company's system of internal controls and procedures and the investigation, where necessary, into matters relating to the audit functions. The Audit Committee held two meetings during 1997. Except as set forth below none of the directors or nominees is a director of any company (other than the Company) which is subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or which is a registered investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Name of Director Director of -------- ----------- John J. McArdle III MetroWest Bank Ted Valpey, Jr. MetroWest Bank DIRECTORS COMPENSATION Each outside director is paid an annual director's fee of $2,500 plus $750 for each meeting of the Board of Directors attended. Each outside director who is a member of a Committee is paid $750 for each Committee meeting attended and not held on the same day as a meeting of the Board of Directors. For Committee meetings held on the same day as meetings of the Board of Directors, each outside director is paid for attendance at the rate of $350 per Committee meeting. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The Summary Compensation Table below sets forth compensation information for each of the Company's last three fiscal years for the CEO and the other executive officers whose total annual salary for such fiscal year exceeded $100,000. SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE Annual Compensation(1)(2) ------------------------- Name and Principal All Other Position Year Salary Bonus Compensation(3) - --------- ---- ------ ----- --------------- Ted Valpey, Jr. 1997 $80,000 $25,000 $2,531 (CEO and 1996 80,000 -- 2,446 President since 1995 80,000 -- 2,438 April 28, 1997, and Chairman)(4) Robert B. Gill 1997 132,980 -- 130,656 (CEO and 1996 200,000 -- 4,500 President until 1995 200,000 25,000 4,500 April 28, 1997) Michael J. Kroll 1997 111,500 15,000 3,741 (Vice President 1996 111,500 -- 3,532 and Treasurer) 1995 111,500 -- 3,532 _____________________________ (1) For 1996 and 1995 the Company maintained a Management Incentive Plan (the "Incentive Plan") which provides cash payments to key managers of the Company based on the achievement of defined profit objectives by various operating units and other transaction and performance-oriented goals. The Company paid no amounts to any of the named officers pursuant to the Incentive Plan in 1996 or 1995. (2) The above table does not include any amounts for personal benefits because, in any individual case, such amounts do not exceed the lesser of $50,000 or 10% of such individual's cash compensation. (3) Represents amounts allocated under the Company's Profit Sharing and Savings Plan. (4) Mr. Valpey was elected CEO on April 28, 1997. He served as Chairman of the Company for 1995, 1996 and 1997. The amounts set forth in the table with respect to 1997 includes all amounts paid to Mr. Valpey as compensation in 1997. The Company has reimbursed Mr. Valpey since prior to January 1, 1995 at the rate of $4,000 per month for office, secretarial and other business expenses. Effective in April 1998 such reimbursement for office, secretarial and other business expenses was increased to $5,000 per month. (5) Mr. Gill ceased to be CEO on April 28, 1997. The amount set forth in the table under the heading "All Other Compensation" includes payments in 1997 of $66,667 in connection with Mr. Gill's termination of employment, of $60,000 paid in cancellation of options to purchase 120,000 shares of Common Stock, and of $3,989 allocated under the Company's Profit Sharing and Savings Plan. See "CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS". OPTION TABLE The following table sets forth the fiscal year- end option values with respect to the named officers. No stock options were exercised by or granted to the named officers during 1997. December 31, 1997 ----------------- Option Values(1) ------------- Number of Securities Values of Unexercised Underlying Unexercised In-the-Money Options at Options at 12/31/97 12/31/97(1) ---------------------- ----------------------- Exercisable Unexercisable Exercisable Unexercisable ----------- ------------- ----------- ------------- Ted Valpey, Jr. -- -- $-- -- Robert B. Gill -- -- $-- -- Michael J. Kroll 1,500 1,000 $ -0- -0- ____________________ (1) The fair market value of the Company's Common Stock at December 31, 1997 was $4.125 per share. The exercise price of all exercisable and unexercisable options to purchase shares held by Mr. Kroll were equal to or in excess of such fair market value. CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS Robert B. Gill, a director of the Company who is not standing for reelection, ceased to be President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company on April 28, 1997. For the period April 28, 1997 until August 5, 1997 he was President of the Company's wholly owned subsidiary Bergen Cable Technologies, Inc. Pursuant to a Separation Agreement between the Company and Mr. Gill, Mr. Gill's employment by the Company terminated on August 5, 1997. In connection with such termination, the Company paid Mr. Gill $100,000 in six equal monthly installments. All such termination payments paid in 1997 are included in the Summary Compensation Table. In addition, the Company paid Mr. Gill $60,000 for cancellation of options to purchase 120,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company. On April 15, 1998, the Company sold substantially all the assets excluding real property and plant of its wholly owned subsidiary, Bergen Cable Technologies, Inc. to a newly created corporation of which Robert W. Muir, Jr., a director of the Company, owns 27.12% of the outstanding capital stock. The real property and plant was sold to a New Jersey limited liability company of which Mr. Muir owns a 27.12% membership interest. The purchase price received consisted of $7,500,000, a subordinated promissory note in the principal amount of $1,250,000, a 10% stock and membership interest in the acquiring entities and assumption of certain liabilities including trade payables. Because of Mr. Muir's interest in the transaction the Company retained the firm of O'Conor, Wright Wyman, Inc. to evaluate the fairness of the transaction to the stockholders of the Company from a financial point of view. O'Conor, Wright Wyman, Inc. gave their opinion that the consideration received was fair to the stockholders of the Company from a financial point of view. The transaction was unanimously approved by all directors of the Company except Mr. Muir who did not vote on approval of the transaction. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT OF THE STOCK OPTION-COMPENSATION COMMITTEE ------------------------------------ The Stock-Option Compensation Committee (the "Committee") of the Board of Directors consists of three non-employee directors, Eli Fleisher, Lawrence Holsborg and Robert W. Muir, Jr. The Committee recommends to the Board of Directors the compensation for the Chairman and the CEO, approves the compensation recommendations of the CEO for corporate and executive officers, and subsidiary presidents and controllers, administers and approves option grants pursuant to the Company's 1992 Stock Option Plan, and approves the Company's contributions and 401(k) match under the Company's profit sharing 401(k) plan. COMPENSATION POLICY FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS The Committee's policy is that the Company's executive officers should be paid a salary commensurate with their responsibilities, should receive short-term incentive compensation in the form of a bonus, and should receive long-term incentive compensation in the form of stock options. The policy with respect to salaries of the executive officers, other than the CEO, is that it should be in an amount recommended by the CEO, and the current salary of such executive officer is in the amount so recommended. The considerations entering into the determination by the CEO of the salary for the named executive which he recommended to the Committee in 1997 were his subjective evaluation of the ability and past performance of the executive and his judgment of his potential for enhancing the profitability of the Company. The CEO advised the Committee that, in his subjective judgment based on his experience and knowledge of the marketplace, such salary was reasonable and proper in light of the duties and responsibilities of the executive. On the recommendation of the Committee, the Board has adopted the Company's Management Incentive Plan (the "Plan"). However, for 1997, the Committee recommended that corporate management, including the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table, not be eligible to participate in the Plan. The Committee did however recommend payment of bonuses aggregating $15,000 to Mr. Kroll. The Committee's policy generally is to grant options to executives and other key employees under the Company's 1992 Stock Option Plan (the "Option Plan") and in amounts not exceeding the amounts recommended by the Chairman and the CEO. The recommendations of the Chairman and the CEO for option grants reflect the subjective judgment of such officers of the performance of employees and the potential benefit to the Company from the grant of this form of incentive compensation. In recommending option grants the Chairman and CEO, among other things, consider the amount and terms of options granted in the past. No options were granted under the Option Plan to executive officers in the 1997 fiscal year. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, enacted in 1993, generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies for compensation over $1,000,000 paid to the CEO and other named executive officer. Because of the range of compensation paid to its executive officers, the Committee has not established any policy regarding annual compensation to such executive officers in excess of $1,000,000. COMPENSATION OF THE CEO IN 1997 On April 28, 1997 Mr. Gill ceased to be CEO and Mr. Valpey was elected CEO. At the time of his election by the Board of Directors, the Board determined to continue to pay Mr. Valpey $80,000 per annum, the amount he had been receiving as Chairman. On March 4, 1998, the Board of Directors approved a bonus of $25,000 for the increased responsibilities Mr. Valpey assumed as CEO during 1997 which amount is included in the Summary Compensation Table. Eli Fleisher Lawrence Holsborg Robert W. Muir, Jr. Stock Option-Compensation Committee COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION Ted Valpey, Jr. serves on the Compensation Committee of MetroWest Bank, of which Mr. McArdle is Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Holsborg was President of Matec Fiberoptics Inc., a subsidiary of the Corporation, prior to 1989. Robert W. Muir, Jr. owns 27.12% of entities which on April 15, 1998 acquired substantially all the assets of the Company's subsidiary Bergen Cable Technologies, Inc. for a purchase price consisting of $7,500,000 cash, a subordinated promissory note in the principal amount of $1,250,000, a 10% stock and membership interest in the acquiring entities and assumption of certain liabilities including trade payables. The Company received an opinion from O'Conor, Wright Wyman, Inc. that the consideration received by the Company's subsidiary was fair to the stockholders of the Company from a financial point of view. See "CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS". PERFORMANCE GRAPH The graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on the Company's Common Stock with the cumulative total return of the American Stock Exchange Index and a weighted index made up 40% of companies in the electronic components manufacturing business, 40% of companies in the fabricated metal products business and 20% of companies in the laboratory analytical instruments business, for the five years beginning December 31, 1992 and ending December 31, 1997 (assuming the investment of $100 on December 31, 1992, and the reinvestment of all dividends). The Company selected the weighted index because the companies included therein are engaged in operations similar to those of the Company's three segments with the percentages being approximately the same as the revenues of the segments are of total revenues during the period since December 31, 1992. TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN [Graph] Base Period Dec.92 Dec.93 Dec.94 Dec.95 Dec.96 Dec.97 MATEC CORPORATION 100 110.71 128.57 114.29 96.43 117.86 AMERICAN STOCK EXCHANGE IND 100 119.52 108.63 137.32 146.10 171.48 WEIGHTED PEER INDEX 100 107.85 109.21 141.49 156.66 194.81 (2) REINCORPORATION OF THE COMPANY IN MARYLAND AND CASH-OUT OF CERTAIN STOCKHOLDERS GENERAL The Board of Directors has approved a proposal (the "Reincorporation") to change the Company's state of incorporation from Delaware to Maryland. The Reincorporation would be accomplished by merging the Company (the "Merger") into a newly formed Maryland subsidiary named MATEC Corporation (the "Maryland Company"), pursuant to an Agreement of Merger and Recapitalization (the "Merger Agreement") substantially in the form attached as Exhibit A to this Proxy Statement. The Maryland Company was incorporated in Maryland on May 6, 1998, specifically for purposes of the Reincorporation and has conducted no business and has no material assets or liabilities. The Maryland Company's principal executive offices will continue to be located at 75 South Street, Hopkinton, Massachusetts 01748. The Reincorporation will not result in any change in the Company's business, management, policies, assets or liabilities, or result in any changes in ownership of the Common Stock of the Company ("Common Stock"), except that holders of less than 100 shares will be cashed out, as described below. PURPOSES OF THE REINCORPORATION There are two purposes of the Reincorporation. First, in connection with it approximately 1,700 Stockholders who each own less than 100 shares of the Common Stock will cease to be Stockholders and will receive cash in lieu of fractional shares in the Maryland Company. At March 19, 1998, such stockholders owned an aggregate of 35,948 shares, representing 1.3% of the shares outstanding. This will result in savings in administering stockholder accounts estimated at $11,500 per year. Second, the Company will be able to avoid Delaware's annual franchise tax which for the year ended December 31, 1997, totaled $11,200. The Company anticipates having to pay the same amount in franchise taxes for future years if it continues as a Delaware corporation. As a Maryland corporation, the Company would not be subject to such annual taxes other than the property tax filing fee of $100, provided that Maryland does not alter its current laws. In addition to cashing out its holders of less than 100 shares and avoiding the annual Delaware franchise tax, a number of changes will be effected as a result of the Reincorporation. Such changes are described below under the headings "Certain Consequences of the Reincorporation" and "Comparison of Rights of Stockholders of the Company and Stockholders of the Maryland Company." In the event this proposal is not adopted, the Company will continue to operate as a Delaware corporation, the Company will remain subject to Delaware's annual franchise tax and the holders of less than 100 shares will continue as Stockholders of the Company. CONVERSION OF COMMON STOCK AND CASH PAYMENT TO HOLDERS OF LESS THAN 100 SHARES - ------------------------------- In the Merger, each outstanding share of Common Stock of the Company will automatically be converted into 1/100th of a share of the Common Stock of the Maryland Company. Holders of less than 100 shares will receive cash for their shares based on the market value of the Company's Common Stock at the time of the Reincorporation. THE SHARE OWNERSHIP OF HOLDERS OF 100 SHARES OR MORE WILL NOT BE AFFECTED BY THE MERGER. The reason is that one hour after the effectiveness of the Merger, shares of the Common Stock of the Maryland Corporation (the "Maryland Common Stock") will be split 100 for 1, so that each holder of 100 shares or more of the Company's Common Stock will hold the same number of shares of the Maryland Common Stock. As to such holders, other than changes due to the differences between Delaware and Maryland law and certain differences between the charters of the Company and the Maryland Company, there will be no changes in the rights, preferences and privileges of holders of the Common Stock as a result of the Reincorporation (see "Comparison of Rights of Stockholders of the Company and Stockholders of the Maryland Company"). The Maryland Common Stock will be listed on the American Stock Exchange, Inc. (the "AMEX") under the same symbol as the Company's Common Stock, MXC. DESCRIPTION OF THE REINCORPORATION EFFECTIVE TIME. The Merger will take effect at 6:00 P.M. Eastern Time on June 19, 1998 (the "Effective Time") or such later time as the Board of Directors may determine. At the Effective Time, the separate corporate existence of the Company will cease, and the Maryland Company will possess all of the rights, property and assets of the Company and will assume all of its debts, liabilities and obligations. EFFECT ON CAPITAL STOCK. 1. Each stockholder who owns of record less than 100 shares of Common Stock immediately prior to the Effective Time will have only the right to receive cash in lieu of receiving a fraction of a share, as hereinafter described. The interest of each such stockholder in the Company will terminate, and each such stockholder will have no right to vote as a stockholder or share in the Company's assets, earnings or profits following the Reincorporation. 2. Each stockholder who owns of record 100 or more shares of Common Stock immediately prior to the Effective Time will become stockholders of the Maryland Company owning 1/100th of the number of shares so owned in the Company. Effective one hour after the Merger each such share and fractional share will be split 100 for 1 (the "Split"). ANY HOLDER OF RECORD OF LESS THAN 100 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK WHO DESIRES TO RETAIN AN EQUITY INTEREST IN THE COMPANY AFTER THE MERGER MAY DO SO BY PURCHASING, PRIOR TO THE MERGER, A SUFFICIENT NUMBER OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK SUCH THAT THE TOTAL NUMBER OF SHARES HELD OF RECORD IN HIS NAME IS EQUAL TO AT LEAST 100. ANY BENEFICIAL OWNER OF LESS THAN 100 SHARES WHO IS NOT A HOLDER OF RECORD AND WHO DESIRES TO HAVE HIS SHARES EXCHANGED FOR CASH SHOULD INSTRUCT HIS BROKER TO TRANSFER HIS SHARES INTO HIS NAME IN A TIMELY MANNER SUCH THAT SUCH BENEFICIAL OWNER WILL BE A HOLDER OF RECORD AT THE EFFECTIVE TIME. CASH PAYMENT IN LIEU OF FRACTIONAL SHARES. The average daily closing price per share of the Common Stock on the AMEX for the ten trading days immediately preceding the date on which the Merger takes effect is hereinafter called the "Purchase Price." Each stockholder who holds less than 100 shares of record at the Effective Time will receive, in lieu of fractional shares, cash in the amount of the Purchase Price multiplied by the number of shares of Common Stock held by such stockholder at the Effective Time (the "Cash Out"). All amounts payable to stockholders will be subject to applicable state laws relating to abandoned property. No service charges or brokerage commissions will be payable by stockholders in connection with the Cash Out. The Company will pay no interest on cash sums due any such stockholder pursuant to the Cash Out. As soon as practical after the Merger, the Company will mail a letter of transmittal to each such holder of less than 100 shares of Common Stock for use in transmitting stock certificates to the Company's Exchange Agent. The letter of transmittal will contain instructions for the surrender of such certificate or certificates to the Exchange Agent in exchange for such stockholder's cash payment. No cash payment will be made to any such stockholder until he has surrendered his outstanding certificate(s), together with the letter of transmittal, to the Exchange Agent. The Exchange Agent is State Street Bank and Trust Company, P.O. Box 644, Mail Stop 45-02-64, Boston, MA 02102-0644, Telephone No. 800-426-5523. After the Merger and until surrendered, each outstanding certificate held by a stockholder of record who held less than 100 shares at the close of business at the Effective Time will represent only the right to receive the amount of cash to which the holder is entitled. CONTINUING STOCKHOLDERS. After the Merger and the Split, stockholders who immediately prior to the Effective Time owned 100 shares or more of the Common Stock of the Company will be stockholders of the Maryland Company owning the same number of shares until they acquire or dispose of shares. The stock will be identified by a new CUSIP number, which will appear on all certificates issued after the Merger. After the Merger and the Split, each certificate which immediately prior to the Merger represented at least 100 shares of Common Stock, until surrendered and exchanged for a new certificate will be deemed for all purposes to evidence ownership of the same number of shares of the Maryland Company. Any stockholder desiring to receive a new certificate bearing the new CUSIP number can do so at any time by contacting the Exchange Agent at the address set forth above for instructions for surrendering his old certificates. EFFECT OF CASH OUT. As of March 19, 1998, approximately 1,700 record holders of Common Stock, or approximately 59% of the total number of record holders, owned less than 100 shares of Common Stock. Such stockholders owned in the aggregate 35,948 shares, being approximately 1.3% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. Assuming a Purchase Price of $4.00 per share, the cash payments to such holders will total $143,792. The cost of administering each stockholder's account and the amount of time spent by management of the Company in responding to stockholder requests is the same regardless of the number of shares held in the account. Accordingly, the cost to the Company of maintaining many small accounts is disproportionately high when compared with the total number of shares involved. Management of the Company believes that it would be beneficial to the Company and its stockholders as a whole to eliminate the administrative burden and costs associated with the accounts containing less than 100 shares of Common Stock. It is expected that the direct costs of administering stockholder accounts will be reduced by approximately $11,500 per year if the Reincorporation is effected. Since the Company is unable to locate a significant number of its stockholders with small holdings, it believes it would be unable to acquire the shares of such stock- holders by making a tender offer to acquire the shares. Accordingly, if it is to acquire these shares, the Company believes it must do so by means of the Reincorporation. Funds otherwise payable to a stockholder who cannot be located will be held by the Company until proper claim therefor is made, subject to applicable escheat laws. Further, the Reincorporation will enable holders of record of less than 100 shares to dispose of their investment at market value and avoid brokerage fees on the transaction. Stockholders owning a small number of shares would, if they chose to sell their shares otherwise, likely incur brokerage fees disproportionately high relative to the market value of the shares. In some cases, stockholders might encounter difficulty in finding a broker willing to handle such small transactions. CERTAIN CONSEQUENCES OF THE REINCORPORATION In the discussion below, where the context so requires the term "Company" shall mean the Maryland Company and the term "Board of Directors" shall mean the Board of Directors of the Maryland Company. MANAGEMENT AFTER THE REINCORPORATION. Immediately after the Reincorporation, the Board of Directors of the Maryland Company (the "Maryland Board of Directors") will be composed of the persons who are Directors of the Company at the time of the Merger. Each will serve as director of the Maryland Company until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until his successor is elected and qualified. STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS. Certain differences in Stockholder rights exist under Delaware General Corporation Law ("Delaware law") and Maryland General Corporation law ("Maryland law"). These are discussed below under the caption "Comparison of Rights of Stockholders of the Company and Stockholders of the Maryland Company". NUMBER OF SHARES OF STOCK AUTHORIZED AND OUTSTANDING. The Company's charter authorizes the Company to issue ten million shares of Common Stock and one million shares of preferred stock, and the charter of the Maryland Company also authorizes the issuance of ten million shares of Common Stock and one million shares of preferred stock. The number of outstanding shares of Maryland Common Stock following the Reincorporation and Split will equal the number of shares of Common Stock of the Company outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time less the approximately 36,000 shares held by holders of less than 100 shares. No shares of preferred stock are outstanding. SECURITIES LAWS. The Common Stock is registered under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and, as a result, the Company is subject to the periodic reporting and other requirements of the Exchange Act. The Common Stock of the Maryland Company will be registered under the Exchange Act. The Company has no current intention of terminating such registration to become a "private" company, and after the Reincorporation the Maryland Company will be a publicly held company. It will file with the SEC and provide to its stockholders the same type of information that the Company has previously filed and provided. Continuing shareholders whose stock in the Company is freely tradable will have freely tradable shares of the Maryland Company. Shareholders holding restricted securities will be subject to the same restrictions on transfer as those to which their present shares of stock in the Company are subject. FRANCHISE TAX. The Company is subject to Delaware's annual franchise tax and for the year ended December 31, 1997, the amount of such tax was $11,200. The Company anticipates having to pay approximately the same amount of franchise tax each year in the future if it continues as a Delaware corporation. As a Maryland corporation, the Maryland Company would not be subject to any such annual taxes other than the Maryland personal property tax filing fee of $100, provided that Maryland does not alter its current laws. OPTION PLAN. The Company's 1992 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") will be continued by the Maryland Company following the Reincorporation. Approval of the proposed Reincorporation will constitute approval of the adoption and assumption of the Plan by the Maryland Company. OUTSTANDING OPTIONS. All outstanding options and other rights to acquire shares of Common Stock of the Company will be converted into options or rights to acquire shares of the Maryland Company. CERTAIN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES. CONSEQUENCES TO THE COMPANY. The Reincorporation is intended to be tax free under the Internal Revenue Code and no gain or loss will be recognized by the Company or the Maryland Company as a result of it. CONSEQUENCES TO STOCKHOLDERS WHO RECEIVE NO CASH AND CONTINUE TO HOLD COMMON STOCK IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REINCORPORATION. A stockholder who continues to hold Common Stock immediately after the effectiveness of the Reincorporation and who receives no cash pursuant to the Reincorporation (i) will not recognize any gain or loss in the Reincorporation and (ii) will have the same adjusted tax basis and holding period in the Common Stock as he had in the Common Stock immediately prior to the Reincorporation. CONSEQUENCES TO STOCKHOLDERS WHO RECEIVE CASH OF PURSUANT TO THE REINCORPORATION. A stockholder who receives cash in lieu of fractional shares in the Reincorporation generally will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the cash received in the Reincorporation and his aggregate adjusted tax basis in the shares of Common Stock disposed of. If a stockholder who receives cash continues to own shares beneficially, but not of record, or is treated under the Internal Revenue Code as constructively owning shares owned by certain related persons or entities, then under some circumstances the full amount of the cash received may be treated as capital gain or ordinary income. MAXIMUM TAX RATES APPLICABLE TO CAPITAL GAIN. Under the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997, net capital gain (i.e., generally, capital gain in excess of capital loss) recognized by an individual upon the sale of a capital asset that has been held for more than 18 months will generally be subject to tax at a rate not to exceed 20%. Net capital gain recognized by an individual from the sale of a capital asset that has been held for more than 12 months but not for more than 18 months will continue to be subject to tax at a rate not to exceed 28%, and capital gain recognized from the sale of a capital asset that has been held for 12 months or less will continue to be subject to tax at ordinary income tax rates. In addition, capital gain recognized by a corporate taxpayer will continue to be subject to tax at the ordinary income tax rates applicable to corporations. The foregoing is only a summary of certain Federal income tax consequences, and each stockholder is urged to consult his tax advisor as to the particular Federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences to him. ACCOUNTING TREATMENT OF THE MERGER Upon the effectiveness of the Merger, the financial accounts of the Maryland Company will become those of the Company as they were immediately before effectiveness, except that they as a result of the Cash Out the Common Stock account will be charged with the portion of the Cash Out payment equal to the total par value of the eliminated Common Stock and the balance allocated to the capital surplus and retained earnings accounts. APPRAISAL RIGHTS Delaware law provides that shareholders of a corporation do not have appraisal rights when a corporation whose shares are listed on a national securities exchange merges with a foreign corporation. Consequently, because the Common Stock is listed on the AMEX, appraisal rights are not available to shareholders of the Company with respect to the Reincorporation. APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR REINCORPORATION The affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding Common Stock entitled to vote on the proposal is required for approval of the Reincorporation. The Reincorporation may be abandoned or the Merger Agreement may be amended (with certain exceptions), either before or after Stockholder approval has been obtained, if in the opinion of the Board of Directors circumstances arise that make such action advisable. No federal or state regulatory requirements must be complied with or approval must be obtained in connection with the proposed transaction. COMPARISON OF RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS OF THE COMPANY AND STOCKHOLDERS OF THE MARYLAND COMPANY GENERAL. The Company is organized as a corporation under the laws of the State of Delaware and the Maryland Company is organized as a corporation under the laws of the State of Maryland. As a Delaware corporation, the Company is subject to Delaware law and, as a Maryland corporation, the Maryland Company is subject to Maryland law. The Company also is governed by its Certificate of Incorporation (the "Delaware Certificate") and Bylaws. As a Maryland corporation, the Maryland Company is governed by Maryland law and by its Articles of Incorporation (the "Maryland Articles") and Bylaws. A number of differences between Delaware law and Maryland law and between these documents are summarized below. The discussion of the comparative rights of the shareholders of the Company and the stockholders of the Maryland Company as set forth below does not purport to be complete and is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to Delaware law, Maryland law, the Maryland Articles and the Delaware Certificate. The Maryland Articles will be substantially in the form attached to this Proxy Statement. The Delaware Certificate may be obtained from the Company, without charge, by contacting Michael J. Kroll, Vice President, MATEC Corporation, 75 South Street, Hopkinton, Massachusetts 01748. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. Pursuant to Delaware law and the Delaware Certificate, the liability of directors of the Company to the Company or to any shareholder of the Company for money damages for breach of fiduciary duty has been eliminated, except for (i) breach of the directors' duty of loyalty to the Company or its shareholders, (ii) acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) unlawful dividends or redemptions or purchases of stock, or (iv) any transaction from which the directors derived an improper personal benefit. In general, the liability of officers may not be eliminated or limited under Delaware law. Pursuant to Maryland law and the Maryland Articles, the liability of directors and officers of the Maryland Company to the Maryland Company or to any shareholder of the Maryland Company for money damages has been eliminated except for (i) actual receipt of an improper personal benefit in money, property or service and (ii) active and deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment as being material to the cause of action. As a result of the Reincorporation, both directors and officers of the Company may not be liable under Maryland law for certain actions for which they would have otherwise been liable under Delaware law; therefore, the likelihood of payments by the Company pursuant to its indemnification obligations (which are described below) may be reduced. There is no pending or, to the Company's knowledge, threatened litigation to which any of its directors or officers is or would be a party in which the rights of the Company or its shareholders would be affected if the Company already were subject to the provisions of Maryland law rather than Delaware law. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS. The Delaware Certificate requires the Company, to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, to indemnify every person who is or was a party or is or was threatened to be made a party to any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer or employee of the Company or, while a director, officer or employee of the Company, is or was serving at the request of the Company as a director, officer, employee, agent or trustee of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise, against all expense, liability and loss (including attorneys' fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement) reasonably incurred by him in connection with such action, suit or proceeding. The Maryland Articles require the Maryland Company to indemnify its directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted from time to time by the laws of Maryland. Maryland law permits a corporation to indemnify its present and former directors and officers, among others, against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in connection with any proceeding to which they may be made a party by reason of their service in those or other capacities unless it is established that (a) the act or omission of the director or officer was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and was committed in bad faith or was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty, (b) the director or officer actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services, or (c) in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful. In addition, Maryland law requires the Company, as conditions to advancing expenses, to obtain (i) a written affirmation by the director or officer of his or her good faith belief that he or she has met the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification by the Company as authorized by the bylaws, and (ii) a written statement by or on his or her behalf to repay the amount paid or reimbursed by the Company if it shall ultimately be determined that the standard of conduct was not met. Under Maryland law, rights to indemnification and expenses are non-exclusive, in that they need not be limited to those expressly provided by statute. Unlike the Delaware Certificate, which specifically sets forth most of the conditions and requirements of indemnification for the Delaware Company without referring to Delaware law, the Maryland Articles define most of the conditions and requirements of indemnification for the Maryland Company by referring to applicable Maryland law; therefore, the Maryland Company's indemnification obligations may be modified by future changes in law without stockholder action. To protect the Maryland Company's officers and directors, the Maryland Articles provide that amendment or repeal of the indemnification provision of the Maryland Articles would be effective on a prospective basis only and neither repeal nor modification of such provision would adversely affect rights to indemnification in effect at the time of any act or omission that is the subject of a proceeding against an indemnified person. The indemnification provisions of the Maryland Articles are intended to apply to proceedings arising from acts or omissions occurring before or after their respective adoption or execution. There is presently no pending or already completed litigation nor, to the best knowledge of the Company, is there any threatened litigation to which the expanded nature of the coverage under the indemnity provision of the Maryland Articles would apply. Under Delaware law, the termination of any proceeding by conviction or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, shall not, of itself, create a presumption that such person is prohibited from being indemnified. Under Maryland law, such a termination creates a rebuttable presumption that such person is not entitled to indemnification. In addition, Delaware law requires court approval before there may be any indemnification where the person seeking indemnification has been found liable to the corporation. However, indemnification is prohibited under Maryland law if the person seeking indemnification has been found liable to the corporation in a proceeding brought by or in the right of the corporation. In addition, Maryland law provides that a person adjudged liable on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received may not be indemnified by the corporation. Thus, under these circumstances, Maryland law provides indemnification rights that are narrower than under Delaware law. ACTIONS BY WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHAREHOLDERS. Under both Delaware law and Maryland law, shareholders may act by written consent in lieu of a shareholder meeting. Delaware law provides that, unless otherwise provided in the certificate of incorporation, any action that may be taken at a shareholder meeting may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote, upon the written consent of the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a shareholder meeting at which all shares entitled to vote were present and voted. Maryland law provides that any action that may be taken at a stockholder meeting may be taken without a meeting only if, among other things, a unanimous written consent setting forth the matter is signed by each stockholder entitled to vote on the matter. Because Maryland law requires the consent of all stockholders entitled to vote for actions to be taken by written consent, it will be extremely unlikely that stockholders of the Maryland Company will be able to take action by written consent. INSPECTION OF BOOKS AND RECORDS. Under Delaware law, any shareholder of the Company may examine the list of shareholders and any shareholder making a written demand may inspect any other corporate books and records for any purpose reasonably related to the shareholder's interest as a shareholder. Maryland law provides an absolute right of stockholder inspection for any purpose to individuals who have been stockholders for more than six (6) months and, individually or as a group, own at least five percent (5%) or more of a Maryland corporation's outstanding voting shares. In addition, any stockholder of a Maryland corporation has the right to request the corporation to provide a sworn statement showing all stock and securities issued and all consideration received by the corporation within the preceding twelve (12) months. Thus, stockholders of less than five percent (5%) of the Company's Common Stock will generally not be able to make written demand to inspect the books and records of the Company if the Reincorporation is approved. AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS. Under Delaware law, the shareholders may never be divested of the power to adopt, amend or repeal the bylaws. Such power may also be conferred upon the board of directors. As permitted by Maryland law, the power to amend the bylaws of the Maryland Company is vested exclusively with the board of directors. FILLING VACANCIES ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. Pursuant to Maryland law, unless the charter or bylaws provide otherwise or a classified board system is employed, a majority of the remaining directors, whether or not sufficient to constitute a quorum, may appoint a director to fill a vacancy which results from any cause except an increase in the number of directors, and any vacancy resulting from an increase in the number of directors shall be filled only by a majority vote of the entire board. If the vacancy is caused by removal of a director by the stockholders, the successor director may be elected by the stockholders at the same meeting at which such removal occurs. Pursuant to Delaware law, vacancies and newly created directorships may be filled by a majority of the directors then in office or a sole remaining director (even though less than a quorum) unless otherwise provided in the certificate of incorporation or bylaws. However, Delaware law also provides that if the directors then in office constitute less than a majority of the corporation's board of directors, then, upon application by shareholders representing at least ten (10%) of outstanding shares entitled to vote for such directors, the Court of Chancery may order a shareholder election of directors to be held. DIVIDENDS AND OTHER DISTRIBUTIONS. Under Delaware law, dividends may be paid out of the surplus of the corporation or, if there is no surplus, out of net profits for the year in which the dividend is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year. Maryland law allows the payment of dividends and redemption of stock unless (i) the corporation would not be able to pay indebtedness that became due in the ordinary course of business or (ii) the corporation's total assets would be less than the sum of the corporation's liabilities plus, unless the charter would provide otherwise, the amount that would be needed upon dissolution to satisfy the preferential rights of those shareholders whose preferential rights upon dissolution are superior to those receiving the distribution. LAWS REGULATING BUSINESS COMBINATIONS. Delaware law requires that a merger, consolidation, share exchange, or, in certain circumstances, an asset transfer, or issuance or reclassification of equity securities (a "business combination") between a corporation and any person who owns fifteen percent (15%) or more of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation may not occur for three (3) years following the date such person became such an interested shareholder unless (i) approved by the board of directors and holders of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding voting stock (other than shares controlled by the interested shareholder), (ii) the board of directors approved the acquisition of voting stock pursuant to which such person became an interested shareholder, or (iii) an exemption is available. Under Maryland law, business combinations between a Maryland corporation and any person who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of ten percent (10%) or more of the voting power of the then-outstanding voting stock of the corporation (an "Interested Maryland Stockholder") are prohibited for five (5) years after the most recent date on which the Interested Maryland Stockholder became an Interested Maryland Stockholder. Thereafter, unless an exemption is available, Maryland law provides that any such business combination must be recommended by the board of directors of such corporation and approved by the affirmative vote of at least (a) eighty percent (80%) of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of outstanding voting shares of the corporation and (b) sixty-six percent (66%) of the votes entitled to be cast by outstanding voting shares of the corporation other than shares held by the Interested Maryland Stockholder with whom the business combination is to be effected. Ted Valpey, Jr. owns, and for more than five (5) years has owned, more than 10% of the Company's Common Stock and thus will become an Interested Maryland Stockholder after the Reincorporation. However, the Articles of Incorporation of the Maryland Company exempt him from the provisions of this business combination statute. The Maryland business combination statue could have the effect of discouraging offers to acquire the Maryland Company and of increasing the difficulty of consummating any such offers. DISSENTERS' RIGHTS. Under Maryland law, stockholders have the right to demand and to receive payment of the fair value of their stock in the event of: (a) a merger or consolidation, (b) a share exchange, (c) certain sales of all or substantially all of the assets, (d) a charter amendment altering contract rights of outstanding stock, as expressly set forth in the charter, and substantially adversely affecting the stockholders rights, unless the right to do so is reserved in the charter, or (e) certain business combinations with interested stockholders which are subject to or exempted from Maryland's business combination statute and in connection with the approval of voting rights of certain stockholders under Maryland's control share acquisition statute. However, the right to demand and receive payment of fair value does not apply to stock listed on a national securities exchange. See "Appraisal Rights" above concerning rights of appraisal in connection with the Reincorporation. NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF CAPITAL STOCK. The Delaware Certificate authorizes the issuance of 10,000,000 shares of Common Stock and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The Maryland Articles also authorize the issuance of 10,000,000 shares of Common Stock and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock. CLASSIFICATION & RECLASSIFICATION OF UNISSUED STOCK. Maryland law expressly permits a Maryland corporation's charter to authorize so-called "blank check" stock which permits the Board both to classify and/or reclassify the preferences, conversion rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends, rights regarding redemption and liquidation, and other rights of any shares of unissued stock. If the Board of Directors exercises this power, Articles Supplementary must be filed with SDAT prior to the issuance of such securities. This power can be used not only to classify or initially set the preferences and other terms of preferred stock as under Delaware law, but also to change the terms of unissued common stock or to reclassify unissued common stock as preferred stock, or vice versa. Delaware law provides for a similar right for a Delaware corporation, but only with respect to classifying (but not reclassifying) the terms of any class or series of authorized but unissued stock. Because Maryland law affords greater flexibility in either classifying or reclassifying the terms of any unissued stock than does Delaware law, "blank check" stock of a Maryland corporation can be used as a anti-takeover defense since it enables the corporation to issue additional shares with supervoting or other enhanced rights. VALIDITY OF THE MARYLAND COMPANY STOCK. The validity of the Maryland Company Stock will be passed upon for the Maryland Company by Whiteford, Taylor & Preston L.L.P., Seven Saint Paul Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202-1626. POSSIBLE DISADVANTAGES. Despite the belief of the Company's Board of Directors that the Reincorporation Proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, shareholders should be aware that Maryland law has generally not received the same extent of scrutiny and interpretation by the courts as has Delaware law. Although the corporate law of other states such as Maryland's has been updated in a number of significant respects recently to make it an attractive alternative site for incorporation, Delaware law is still widely regarded as the most extensive and well-defined body of corporate law in the United States. Because of Delaware's prominence as a state of incorporation for many major corporations, both the legislature and courts in Delaware have demonstrated an ability and willingness to act quickly and effectively to meet changing business needs. Furthermore Delaware corporations are often guided by the extensive body of court decisions interpreting Delaware's corporate law. Maryland law is a modern corporation statute, which was significantly updated in 1975, and has been further amended in a number of significant respects to date. The Company's Board of Directors believes that Maryland law, as supplemented by its legislative history, will provide MATEC Corporation with a comprehensive and flexible legal structure under which to operate. Furthermore, Maryland courts have referred to the analysis of the Delaware courts in addressing issues raised by similar provisions of Maryland law and Delaware law. RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. The Board believes that the Reincorporation proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its Stockholders and therefore recommends Stockholders vote FOR approval of the proposal. A vote FOR the Reincorporation will constitute approval of (i) the change in the Company's state of incorporation through a merger of the Company into the Maryland Company, (ii) the Maryland Articles and (iii) all other aspects of the Reincorporation. OTHER MATTERS The Board of Directors knows of no matters to be presented at the meeting other than those set forth in the foregoing Notice of Annual Meeting. If other matters properly come before the meeting, the persons named on the accompanying form of proxy intend to vote the shares subject to such proxies in accordance with their best judgment. AUDIT AND RELATED MATTERS The Board of Directors has selected Deloitte & Touche, independent certified public accountants, as auditors of the Company for 1998. The consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries included in the Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 were examined by Deloitte & Touche. Representatives of Deloitte & Touche are expected to attend the meeting with the opportunity to make a statement if they desire. It is expected that such representatives will be available to respond to appropriate questions from stockholders. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The cost of solicitation of Proxies will be borne by the Company. If necessary to insure satisfactory representation at this meeting, Proxies may be solicited to a limited extent by telephone or personal interview by officers and employees of the Company. Such solicitation will be without cost to the Company, except for actual out- of-pocket communication charges. Brokerage houses, banks, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries are being requested to forward the proxy material to beneficial owners and their reasonable expenses therefor will be reimbursed by the Company. STOCKHOLDER'S PROPOSALS From time to time, stockholders present proposals which may be proper subjects for inclusion in the Proxy Statement and for consideration at the annual meeting. To be considered, proposals must be submitted on a timely basis. Proposals for the 1999 annual meeting must be received by the Company no later than January 21, 1999. JOHN J. MCARDLE III SECRETARY MAY 11, 1998 UPON THE WRITTEN REQUEST OF ANY STOCKHOLDER OF THE COMPANY, THE COMPANY WILL PROVIDE TO SUCH STOCKHOLDER A COPY OF THE CORPORATION'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR 1997, INCLUDING THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE SCHEDULES THERETO, FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. ANY SUCH REQUEST SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO SECRETARY, MATEC CORPORATION, 75 SOUTH STREET, HOPKINTON, MASSACHUSETTS 01748. THERE WILL BE NO CHARGE FOR SUCH REPORT UNLESS ONE OR MORE EXHIBITS THERETO ARE REQUESTED, IN WHICH CASE THE CORPORATION'S REASONABLE EXPENSES OF FURNISHING SUCH EXHIBITS MAY BE CHARGED. ALL STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO FILL IN, SIGN AND MAIL THE ENCLOSED PROXY PROMPTLY WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE MEETING. IF YOU ARE MAILING YOUR PROXY, KINDLY DO SO SUFFICIENTLY IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING DATE SO THAT IT WILL BE RECEIVED IN TIME TO BE COUNTED AT THE MEETING. EXHIBIT A AGREEMENT OF MERGER AND RECAPITALIZATION THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement"), dated as of June 18, 1998, is by and between MATEC Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and MATEC Corporation, a Maryland corporation (the "Maryland Company"). RECITALS WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company and the Board of Directors of the Maryland Company each has determined that it is in the best interest of their respective shareholders to effect the merger provided for herein and thereafter to effect the recapitalization of the Maryland Company provided for herein, all upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, and of the representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto adopt the plan of reorganization encompassed by this Agreement and agree as follows: ARTICLE I THE MERGER; CLOSING; EFFECTIVE TIME 1.1 The Merger. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, at the Effective Time (as defined in Section 1.2), the Company shall be merged with and into the Maryland Company and the separate corporate existence of the Company shall thereupon cease (the "Merger"). To the extent the Merger constitutes a transaction for federal income tax purposes, the parties intend that the Merger qualify as a reorganization described in Section 368(a)(1)(F) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Maryland Company (sometimes hereinafter referred to as the "Surviving Entity") shall be the surviving entity in the Merger and shall continue to be governed by the laws of the State of Maryland, and its separate existence with all its rights, privileges, immunities, powers and franchises shall continue unaffected by the Merger. The Merger shall have the effects specified in the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "DGCL") and the Maryland General Corporation Law (the "MGCL"). 1.2 Effective Time. Promptly after the conditions set forth in Section 6.1 shall be fulfilled, and provided that this Agreement has not been terminated or abandoned pursuant to Article VII, the Company and the Maryland Company shall cause a Certificate of Merger (the "Certificate of Merger") to be executed and filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware as provided in Section 251 of the DGCL and Articles of Merger (the "Articles of Merger") to be executed and filed with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland (the "SDAT") as provided in Section 3-107 of the MGCL. The Merger shall become effective at 6:00 P.M. Eastern Time on June 19, 1998 (the "Effective Time"), but only if prior to that date such Certificate of Merger and Articles of Merger have been so filed. ARTICLE II ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS OF THE SURVIVING CORPORATION 2.1 Articles of Incorporation. The Articles of Incorporation of the Maryland Company in effect at the Effective Time, as amended by this Agreement, shall be the Articles of Incorporation of the Surviving Entity, until duly amended in accordance with the MGCL. 2.2 The Bylaws. The Bylaws of the Maryland Company in effect at the Effective Time shall be the Bylaws of the Surviving Entity, until duly amended in accordance with the terms thereof and the MGCL. ARTICLE III DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF THE SURVIVING CORPORATION Directors and Officers. The directors and officers of the Company at the Effective Time shall, from and after the Effective Time, be the directors and officers, respectively, of the Surviving Entity until their successors have been duly elected or appointed and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal in accordance with the Surviving Entity's Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. ARTICLE IV EFFECT OF THE MERGER ON CAPITAL STOCK 4.1 Effect on Capital Stock. At the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of any holder of capital stock of the Company: (a) Except as provided in (b) below, each share of the common stock, par value $0.05 per share, of the Company ("Company Stock") issued prior to the Effective Time and not theretofore retired (other than shares held by the Company) shall be converted into 1/100th of one validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable share of common stock, par value $0.05 per share, of the Maryland Company ("Maryland Company Stock"), and each share of Company Stock held by the Company shall be retired. (b) Stockholders holding less than 100 shares of Company Stock of record immediately prior to the Effective Time ("Fractional Holders") shall not receive or be entitled to any fractional shares of Maryland Company Stock and, except as set forth in the immediately following sentence, shall not have any rights as a stockholder of the Surviving Entity. In lieu of all other rights, Fractional Holders shall be entitled to receive, upon surrender of the certificate or certificates evidencing their shares of Company Stock, the cash value of such shares based on the average daily closing price per share of the Company Stock on the American Stock Exchange (the "AMEX") for the 10 trading days immediately preceding the Effective Time, without interest. (c) Each issued certificate which immediately prior to the Effective Time represented at least 100 shares of Company Stock shall, from and after the Effective Time and the effectiveness of the amendment of the Articles of Incorporation of the Maryland Company referred to in Section 6.1(c) (the "Split"), be deemed for all purposes to evidence ownership of and represent the number of shares of Maryland Company Stock which the shares of Company Stock represented by such certificates have become as a result of the Merger and the Split, and shall be so registered on the books and records of the Maryland Company and its transfer agent. (d) Each option or other right to purchase or otherwise acquire shares of Company Stock outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall, by virtue of the Merger and the Split and without any action on the part of the holder of such option or right, be converted into and become an option or right to purchase or otherwise acquire the same number of shares of Maryland Company Stock at the same price per share and upon the same terms and subject to the same conditions as applicable to such options or other rights immediately prior to the Effective Time. (e) Each share of the Maryland Company Stock outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be canceled and retired, without payment of any consideration therefor, and resume the status of an authorized and unissued share of Maryland Company Stock. ARTICLE V COVENANTS 5.1 Stock Exchange Listing. The Maryland Company shall use its best efforts to cause the Maryland Company Stock to be issued in the Merger and Split to be approved for listing on the AMEX prior to the Effective Time subject to official notice of issuance. ARTICLE VI CONDITIONS 6.1 Conditions to Each Party's Obligation to Effect the Merger. The respective obligations of the Maryland Company and the Company to consummate the Merger are subject to the fulfillment of each of the following conditions: (a) Shareholder Approval. This Agreement shall have been duly approved by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Company Stock. (b) AMEX Listing. The Maryland Company Stock issuable pursuant to this Agreement shall have been approved for listing on AMEX upon official notice of issuance. (c) The Articles of Incorporation of the Maryland Company shall have been amended by adding to Article FOURTH thereof a Paragraph (c) providing as follows: "(c) Effective one hour after the merger of MATEC Corporation (a Delaware corporation) with and into this Corporation shall become effective, each issued share of the common stock, par value five cents ($0.05) per share, of this Corporation and each fraction thereof is reclassified and converted into multiple shares on the basis of 100 shares for each one share." ARTICLE VII TERMINATION 7.1 Termination by Mutual Consent. This Agreement may be terminated and the Merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time, before or after the approval by holders of the Company Stock, by the mutual consent of the Board of Directors of the Company and the Board of Directors of the Maryland Company 7.2 Effect of Termination and Abandonment. In the event of termination of this Agreement and abandonment of the Merger pursuant to this Article VII, no party hereto (or any of its directors or officers) shall have any liability or further obligation to any other party to this Agreement. ARTICLE VIII MISCELLANEOUS AND GENERAL 8.1 Modification or Amendment. Subject to the applicable provisions of the DGCL and the MGCL, at any time prior to the Effective Time, the parties hereto may modify or amend this Agreement, by written agreement executed and delivered by duly authorized officers of the respective parties. 8.2 Waiver of Conditions. The conditions to each of the parties' obligations to consummate the Merger are for the sole benefit of such party and may be waived by such party in whole or in part to the extent permitted by applicable law. 8.3 Counterparts. For the convenience of the parties hereto, this Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each such counterpart being deemed to be an original instrument, and all such counterparts shall together constitute the same agreement. 8.4 Headings. The Article, Section and paragraph headings herein are for convenience of reference only, do not constitute a part of this Agreement and shall not be deemed to limit or otherwise affect any of the provisions hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the duly authorized officers of the parties hereto on the date first hereinabove written. MATEC CORPORATION ATTEST: _________________________ By: _________________________ JOHN J. McARDLE III, TED VALPEY, JR., Secretary President MATEC ATTEST: _________________________ By: _________________________ JOHN J. McARDLE III, TED VALPEY, JR., Secretary President EXHIBIT B ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF MATEC CORPORATION THE UNDERSIGNED, Joan Dacey-Seib, whose mailing address is c/o Jacobs Persinger & Parker, 77 Water Street, 17th Floor, New York, New York 10005, being at least eighteen years of age, acting as incorporator, does hereby form a corporation under the General Laws of the State of Maryland. FIRST: The name of the corporation (the "Corporation") is MATEC Corporation. SECOND: The purpose of the Corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized under the Maryland General Corporation Law ("MGCL") as now or hereafter in force. THIRD: The address of the Corporation's principal office is 75 South Street, Hopkinton, Massachusetts 01748. The address of the Corporation's principal office and registered office in the State of Maryland is National Corporate Research, Ltd. c/o Harbor City Research, Inc., 201 East Baltimore Street, Suite 630, Baltimore, Maryland 21202. The name of its registered agent at that office is National Corporate Research, Ltd. FOURTH: (a) The total number of shares of capital stock which the Corporation has authority to issue is Eleven Million (11,000,000) shares, consisting of ten million (10,000,000) shares of common stock, par value five cents ($.05) per share, and One Million (1,000,000) shares of series preferred stock, par value ten cents ($.10) per share. The aggregate par value of all authorized shares having a par value is Six Hundred Thousand dollars ($600,000). (b) The following is a description of each class of stock of the Corporation, including any preferences, conversion and other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends and other distributions, qualifications and terms and conditions of redemption: 1. Common Stock. Subject to the rights of holders of any series of preferred stock established pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article FOURTH, each share of common stock shall entitle the holder to one (1) vote per share on all matters upon which stockholders are entitled to vote, to receive dividends and other distributions as authorized by the Board of Directors in accordance with the MGCL and to all rights of a stockholder pursuant to the MGCL. The common stock shall have no preferences or preemptive, conversion or exchange rights. The Board of Directors may classify or reclassify any unissued shares of common stock from time to time by setting or changing the designations, preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends and other distributions, qualifications or terms or conditions of redemption. 2. Series Preferred Stock. The Board of Directors shall have the power from time to time to classify or reclassify, in one (1) or more series, any unissued shares of series preferred stock by setting or changing the number of shares constituting such series and the designation, preferences, conversion and other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends and other distributions, qualifications and terms and conditions of redemption of such shares and, in such event, the Corporation shall file for record with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland ("SDAT") Articles Supplementary in substance and form as prescribed from time to time by the MGCL. FIFTH: No holder of shares of capital stock of the Corporation shall, as such holder, have any preemptive or other right to purchase or subscribe for any shares of common stock or any class of capital stock of the Corporation that the Corporation may issue or sell; provided, however, that the Board of Directors may, in authorizing the issuance of stock of any class or series, confer any preemptive right the Board of Directors may deem advisable in connection with such issuance, and set the price and any other terms the Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, may fix. SIXTH: The number of directors that will constitute the entire Board of Directors shall be fixed by, or in the manner provided in, the Bylaws but shall in no event be less than three (3) nor more than fifteen (15). The names of the directors who will serve until the first annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualify are Eli Fleisher, Lawrence Holsborg, John J. McArdle III, Robert W. Muir, Jr., Joseph W. Tiberio and Ted Valpey, Jr. SEVENTH: The Board of Directors of the Corporation is hereby empowered to authorize the issuance from time to time of shares of its stock of any class, whether now or hereafter authorized, or securities convertible into shares of its stock of any class or classes, whether now or hereafter authorized. EIGHTH: The liability of the directors and officers of the Corporation to the Corporation and its stockholders for money damages is hereby limited to the fullest extent permitted by the laws of the State of Maryland now or hereafter in force. No amendment of these Articles of Incorporation or repeal of any of its provisions shall limit or eliminate the benefits provided to directors and officers under this provision with respect to any act or omission that occurred prior to such amendment or repeal. NINTH: The Corporation shall indemnify its directors, officers, agents and employees as follows: (a) the Corporation shall indemnify its directors and officers, whether serving the Corporation, any predecessor of the Corporation, or at the Corporation's request any other entity, to the fullest extent required or permitted by the laws of the State of Maryland now or hereafter in force, and (b) the Corporation shall indemnify other employees and agents, whether serving the Corporation, any predecessor of the Corporation, or at the Corporation's request any other entity, to such extent as shall be authorized by the Board of Directors or the Corporation's Bylaws and be permitted by law. The foregoing rights of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other rights to which those seeking indemnification may be entitled and shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director, officer, agent or employee and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors and administrators of such a person. The Board of Directors may take such action as is necessary to carry out these indemnification provisions and is expressly empowered to adopt, approve and amend from time to time such Bylaws, resolutions or contracts implementing such provisions or such further indemnification arrangements as may be permitted by law. No amendment of these Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation shall limit or eliminate the right to indemnification provided hereunder with respect to acts or omissions occurring prior to such amendment or repeal. TENTH: Notwithstanding any provision of the General Laws of the State of Maryland requiring action to be taken or authorized by the affirmative vote of the holders of a designated proportion greater than a majority of the shares of capital stock of the Corporation outstanding and entitled to vote thereupon, such action shall, except as otherwise provided in these Articles of Incorporation, be valid and effective if taken or authorized by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the total number of shares of capital stock of the Corporation outstanding and entitled to vote thereupon voting together as a single class. ELEVENTH: Pursuant to the express grant of authority contained in MGCL Sections 3-702(b) and 2-104(b), the control share acquisition provisions of Title 3, Subtitle 7 of the MGCL shall not apply with respect to the voting or any other rights of any shares of the Corporation's capital stock of every nature, kind and description whatsoever acquired or otherwise held by any entity, individual or any other person at anytime whatsoever and the acquisition of said shares by any such person or entity, as aforesaid, is hereby generally approved in all respects; provided that, this election shall be effective only for so long as the provisions of this Article ELEVENTH remain in full force and effect and the Corporation expressly reserves the right to amend, repeal or otherwise alter the same at anytime, in whole or in part, in accordance with the MGCL and the Corporation's Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, as the same may be amended, supplemented and in effect from time to time. TWELFTH: Pursuant to the authority contained in MGCL Sections 2-104(b) and 3.603(e)(1)(iii), the Corporation expressly elects that the special voting requirements of Section 3.602 of the MGCL shall not apply with respect to any person who became an "interested stockholder" (as that term is defined in MGCL Section 3- 601(j)) of a corporation which merges with or into this Corporation more than five (5) years prior to the date of such merger. THIRTEENTH: The Corporation reserves the right to amend, alter or repeal any provision contained in these Articles of Incorporation in any manner permitted by The General Laws of the State of Maryland, including any amendment changing the terms or contract rights, as expressly set forth in its Charter, of any of its outstanding stock by classification, reclassification or otherwise, upon the vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of capital stock of the Corporation outstanding and entitled to vote thereon voting together as a single class. FOURTEENTH: The duration of the Corporation shall be perpetual. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned incorporator of the Corporation who executed the foregoing Articles of Incorporation hereby acknowledges the same to be her act and further acknowledges that, to the best of her knowledge the matters and facts set forth therein are true in all material respects under the penalties of perjury. Dated the 1st day of May, 1998. /s/ Joan Dacey-Seib -------------------- JOAN DACEY-SEIB MATEC CORPORATION Proxy Solicited by the Board Of Directors for Special in Lieu of Annual Meeting on June 18, 1998 The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints TED VALPEY, JR. and MICHAEL J. KROLL, either one of whom is authorized to act singly, attorneys and proxies with full power of substitution according to the number of shares of Common Stock of MATEC Corporation (the "Company") which the undersigned may be entitled to vote and with all powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present at the Special In Lieu of Annual Meeting of its stockholders to be held on June 18, 1998, at the offices of the Company, 75 South Street, Hopkinton, Massachusetts 01748, and at any adjournment thereof, on matters properly coming before the Meeting. Without otherwise limiting the general authorization hereby given, said attorneys and proxies are instructed to vote as follows on the proposals set forth on the reverse side and described in the Proxy Statement dated May 11, 1998. The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Special In Lieu of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement, each dated May 11, 1998. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN THE SPACE PROVIDED, THE UNDERSIGNED'S VOTE IS TO BE CAST "FOR" THE ELECTION AS DIRECTORS OF THE PERSONS NAMED IN THE PROXY STATEMENT DATED MAY 11, 1998 AND "FOR" THE PROPOSAL TO REINCORPORATE IN MARYLAND AND CASH OUT CERTAIN STOCKHOLDERS. PLEASE VOTE, DATE AND SIGN ON REVERSE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. IMPORTANT: In signing this Proxy, please sign your name or names on the signature lines on the reverse side in the exact form appearing on this Proxy. When signing as an attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give your full title as such. EACH JOINT TENANT MUST SIGN. HAS YOUR ADDRESS CHANGED? DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS? _________________________________ __________________________________ _________________________________ __________________________________ _________________________________ __________________________________ (X) PLEASE MARK VOTES AS IN THIS EXAMPLE MATEC CORPORATION RECORD DATE SHARES: A vote "FOR" Items 1 and 2 is recommended by the Board of Directors. 1. The election of six Directors. Eli Fleisher Robert W. Muir, Jr. For All With- For All Lawrence Holsborg Joseph W. Tiberio Nominees hold Except John J. McArdle III Ted Valpey, Jr. ( ) ( ) ( ) NOTE: If you do not wish your shares voted "For" a particular nominee, mark the "For All Except" box and strike a line through the name(s) of the nominee(s). Your shares will be voted for the remaining nomineee(s). 2. Proposal to reincorporate the Company in Maryland and cash out certain stockholders as described in the Proxy Statement dated May 11, 1998. For Against Abstain ( ) ( ) ( ) Mark box at right if an address change or comment has been noted ( ) on the reverse side of this card. Please be sure to sign and date this Proxy. Date: _____________________ _____________________ Stockholder sign here Co-owner sign here -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----