CORRESP 1 filename1.htm Correspondence

SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP

525 UNIVERSITY AVENUE

PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA 94301

 

 

 

  

TEL: (650) 470-4500

FAX: (650) 470-4570

www.skadden.com

  

FIRM/AFFILIATE

OFFICES

      BOSTON
      CHICAGO
      HOUSTON
      LOS ANGELES
      NEW YORK
      WASHINGTON, D.C.
      WILMINGTON
     

BEIJING

BRUSSELS

FRANKFURT

HONG KONG

LONDON

MOSCOW

MUNICH

PARIS

SÃO PAULO

SHANGHAI

SINGAPORE

SYDNEY

TOKYO

TORONTO

VIENNA

     
     
   January 20, 2017   
     
     
     
     
     
     
VIA EDGAR   
  

Heather Percival, Senior Attorney

Office of Electronics and Machinery

Division of Corporation Finance

  
  
  
  
United States Securities and Exchange Commission   
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549

 

  Re: Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
       Amendment No. 1 to Preliminary Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A
       (the “Amended Preliminary Proxy Statement”)
       Filed December 28, 2016
       File No. 000-18032

Dear Ms. Percival:

Set forth below are the responses of Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (the “Company,” “we” or “us”) to the comments of the staff (the “Staff”) of the Division of Corporation Finance of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission received by letter, dated January 9, 2017, concerning the Amended Preliminary Proxy Statement and the merger contemplated therein. For your convenience, each response of ours immediately follows the text of the corresponding comment of the Staff. The Staff’s comments have been indicated in bold italics. In addition to the responses below, we have filed today a revised version of the Amended Preliminary Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (the “Revised Proxy Statement”) to address the Staff’s comments and update certain additional information. For the convenience of the Staff, we are delivering paper copies of this letter and copies of the Revised Proxy Statement marked to show changes from the Amended Preliminary Proxy Statement. All references in this letter to page numbers and captions correspond to the page numbers and captions in the Revised Proxy Statement, unless otherwise noted.


Ms. Heather Percival

January 20, 2017

Page 2 of 2

 

Financing of the Merger, page 84

 

1. Your revisions added in response to prior comment 1 imply that CVC, the large Chinese investment fund, is the source of funds for the transaction. If that is correct, please revise for clarity. If that is not correct, please revise to clarify the source of funds.

In response to the Staff’s comment, we have complied and revised our disclosure on page 84 of the Revised Proxy Statement under the heading “Financing of the Merger” to clarify the source of the funds for the proposed transaction.

Regulatory Approvals Required for the Merger, page 93

 

2. Please expand your revisions in response to prior comment 2 to clarify why CFIUS may prevent or limit approval of the transaction. For example, we note your added disclosure regarding CFIUS determining the presence or absence of national security concerns. However, it is unclear from your disclosure why national security concerns are or are not present.

In response to the Staff’s comment, we have complied and revised the disclosure on page 93 of the Revised Proxy Statement under the heading “Regulatory Approvals Required for the Merger” to explain how potential national security concerns may relate to the proposed transaction.

***

Please contact the undersigned at (650) 470-4522 should you require further information.

 

Very truly yours,

/s/ Thomas J. Ivey

Thomas J. Ivey, Esq.

 

cc: Securities and Exchange Commission
     Geoff Kruczek
     Amanda Ravitz

 

cc: Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
     Darin G. Billerberck
     Byron W. Milstead