XML 46 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
9 Months Ended
Sep. 27, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair Value of Financial Instruments (in thousands):

 
Fair value measurements as of
September 27, 2014
 
Fair value measurements as of
 December 28, 2013
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Short-term marketable securities
$
134,131

 
$
134,131

 
$

 
$

 
$
101,505

 
$
101,505

 
$

 
$

Long-term marketable securities

 

 

 

 
5,241

 

 

 
5,241

Foreign currency forward exchange contracts
150

 

 
150

 

 
48

 

 
48

 

Total fair value of financial instruments
$
134,281

 
$
134,131

 
$
150

 
$

 
$
106,794

 
$
101,505

 
$
48

 
$
5,241



We invest in various financial instruments including corporate and government bonds and notes, and commercial paper. In the past we have also invested in auction rate securities. In addition, we enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to mitigate our foreign currency exchange rate exposure. We carry these instruments at their fair value in accordance with ASC 820. The framework under the provisions of ASC 820 establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Each level of input has different levels of subjectivity and difficulty involved in determining fair value.

Level 1 instruments generally represent quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Therefore, determining fair value for Level 1 instruments generally does not require significant management judgment, and the estimation is not difficult. Our Level 1 instruments consist of federal agency, corporate notes and bonds, and commercial paper that are traded in active markets and are classified as Short-term marketable securities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Level 2 instruments include inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices for identical instruments in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 instruments include unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Our auction rate securities were classified as Level 3 instruments. Management used a combination of the market and income approach to derive the fair value of auction rate securities, which included third party valuation results, investment broker provided market information and available information on the credit quality of the underlying collateral. As a result, the determination of fair value for Level 3 instruments requires significant management judgment and subjectivity.

There were no transfers between any of the levels during the first nine months of fiscal 2014 or 2013. During the first nine months of fiscal 2014 we sold our Level 3 instruments, which consisted entirely of auction rate securities.

During the nine months ended September 27, 2014 and September 28, 2013, the following changes occurred in our Level 3 instruments (in thousands):

 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 27,
2014
 
September 28,
2013
Beginning fair value of Long-term marketable securities
$
5,241

 
$
4,717

Fair value of securities sold
(5,488
)
 

Realized gain from increase in fair value
247

 

Ending fair value of Long-term marketable securities
$

 
$
4,717



In accordance with ASC 320, “Investments-Debt and Equity Securities,” we recorded an unrealized loss of less than $0.2 million during each of the nine months ended September 27, 2014 and September 28, 2013 on certain Short-term marketable securities (Level 1 instruments), which has been recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss. Future fluctuations in fair value related to these instruments that the Company deems to be temporary, including any recoveries of previous write-downs, would be recorded to Accumulated other comprehensive loss. If we were to determine in the future that any further decline in fair value is other-than-temporary, we would record an impairment charge, which could have a materially detrimental impact on our operating results. If we were to liquidate our position in these securities, it is likely that the amount of any future realized gain or loss would be different from the unrealized gain or loss reported in Accumulated other comprehensive loss.