10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011

or

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                              to                   

Commission File Number 1-10346

EMRISE CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	77-0226211
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

2530 Meridian Parkway

Durham, North Carolina 27713

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(408) 200-3040

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer o	Accelerated Filer o
Non-Accelerated Filer o	Smaller Reporting Company x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes o No x

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s common stock, $0.0033 par value, as of August 9, 2011 was 10,667,337.

EMRISE CORPORATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2011

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 (unaudited) and December 31, 2010		1
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)		2
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 (unaudited)		3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)		4
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)		5
ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	17
ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	32
ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	32
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS	35
SIGNATURES		36

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

EMRISE CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	June 30,			December 31,
	2011			2010
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,795		$	3,742
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $113 at June 30, 2011 and $152 at December 31, 2010	4,954			5,573
Inventories	8,713			7,568
Current deferred tax assets	41			36
Prepaid and other current assets	697			1,336
Total current assets	17,200			18,255
Property, plant and equipment, net	864			863
Goodwill	5,115			4,931
Intangible assets other than goodwill, net	905			973
Deferred tax assets	263			259
Other assets	192			208
Total assets	$	24,539		$	25,489
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	3,449		$	3,168
Accrued expenses	4,034			3,777
Lines of credit	789			411
Current portion of long-term debt	166			172
Income taxes payable	47			82
Other current liabilities	260			752
Total current liabilities	8,745			8,362
Long-term debt	4,065			4,092
Deferred income taxes	141			141
Other liabilities	816			874
Total liabilities	13,767			13,469
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 10,000,000 shares no shares issued and oustanding	—			—
Common stock, $0.0033 par value. Authorized 75,000,000 shares; 10,667,337 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010	128			128
Additional paid-in capital	44,133			44,068
Accumulated deficit	(31,845		)	(30,007		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(1,644		)	(2,169		)
Total stockholders’ equity	10,772			12,020
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	24,539		$	25,489

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

1

EMRISE CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net sales	$	6,950		$	6,474		$	14,989		$	13,566
Cost of sales	5,173			4,533			10,953			9,674
Gross profit	1,777			1,941			4,036			3,892
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative	2,490			2,566			5,163			5,099
Engineering and product development	439			402			872			925
Total operating expenses	2,929			2,968			6,035			6,024
Loss from operations	(1,152		)	(1,027		)	(1,999		)	(2,132		)
Other income (expense):
Interest income	12			32			24			47
Interest expense	(83		)	(746		)	(169		)	(1,570		)
Other, net	(4		)	147			(57		)	291
Total other expense, net	(75		)	(567		)	(202		)	(1,232		)
Loss before income taxes	(1,227		)	(1,594		)	(2,201		)	(3,364		)
Income tax benefit	(43		)	(303		)	(58		)	(439		)
Loss from continuing operations	(1,184		)	(1,291		)	(2,143		)	(2,925		)
Discontinued operations:
Income from discontinued operations	416			975			416			1,887
Tax provision on discontinued operations	111			479			111			709
Income from discontinued operations	305			496			305			1,178
Net loss	$	(879	)	$	(795	)	$	(1,838	)	$	(1,747	)
Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic	10,667			10,213			10,667			10,213
Diluted	10,667			10,213			10,667			10,213
Loss (earnings) per share:
Basic
Continuing operations	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.29	)
Discontinued operations	$	0.03		$	0.05		$	0.03		$	0.12
Net loss	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.17	)	$	(0.17	)
Diluted
Continuing operations	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.29	)
Discontinued operations	$	0.03		$	0.05		$	0.03		$	0.12
Net loss	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.17	)	$	(0.17	)

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

2

EMRISE CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(Unaudited)
(in thousands)

									Accumulated
				Additional					Other
	Common Stock			Paid-in		Accumulated			Comprehensive
	Shares	Amount		Capital		Deficit			Loss			Total
Balance at December 31, 2010	10,667	$	128	$	44,068	$	(30,007	)	$	(2,169	)	$	12,020
Stock-based compensation	—	—		65		—			—			65
Net loss and comprehensive loss	—	—		—		(1,838		)	525			(1,313		)
Balance at June 30, 2011	10,667	$	128	$	44,133	$	(31,845	)	$	(1,644	)	$	10,772

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

3

EMRISE CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)
(in thousands)

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2011			2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(1,838	)	$	(1,747	)
Adjustments to arrive at net loss from continuing operations	(305		)	(1,178		)
Net loss from continuing operations	(2,143		)	(2,925		)
Reconciliation to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	205			227
Provision for doubtful accounts	21			11
Provision for warranty reserve	61			32
Deferred taxes	—			20
Loss on sale of assets	—			14
Amortization of deferred issuance costs	—			316
Amortization of debt (premium) discount	(37		)	290
Stock-based expense	65			74
Change in fair value of common stock warrant	—			(75		)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	587			1,837
Inventories	(1,266		)	829
Prepaid and other assets	655			(197		)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	(101		)	(599		)
Operating cash flow used in continuing operations	(1,953		)	(146		)
Operating cash flow provided by discontinued operations	305			815
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	(1,648		)	669
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment	(31		)	(33		)
Investing cash flow used in continuing operations	(31		)	(33		)
Investing cash flow provided by discontinued operations including proceeds from sale of subsidiary operations, net of cash	—			830
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	(31		)	797
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Borrowings from lines of credit	9,670			22,070
Repayments of lines of credit	(9,330		)	(23,670		)
Repayments of long-term debt	(101		)	(874		)
Payments of notes to stockholders	—			(169		)
Financing cash flow provided by (used in) continuing operations	239			(2,643		)
Financing cash flow used in discontinued operations	—			(80		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	239			(2,723		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	493			(751		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(947		)	(2,008		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	3,742			3,995
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	2,795		$	1,987
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisition of equipment through capital lease	$	112		$	—

 The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

4

EMRISE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization and Business

EMRISE Corporation (the “Company”) designs, manufactures and markets proprietary electronic devices and communications equipment for aerospace, defense, industrial, and communications applications. The Company has operations in the United States (the “U.S.”), England and France.  The Company conducts its business through two operating segments: electronic devices and communications equipment. The subsidiaries within the electronic devices segment design, develop, manufacture and market electronic devices for defense, aerospace and industrial markets and operate out of facilities located in England.  The subsidiaries within the communications equipment segment design, develop, manufacture and market network access equipment, including network timing and synchronization products and operate out of facilities located in the U.S. and France.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and therefore do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”).  The year-end balance sheet was derived from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.  The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do, however, reflect all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to state fairly the financial position as of June 30, 2011 and the results of operations and cash flows for the related interim periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. However, these results are not necessarily indicative of results for any other interim period or for the year. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the SEC.

In March of 2010, EMRISE completed the sale of substantially all of the assets of EEC’s subsidiary, RO Associates, to Massachusetts based Astrodyne Corporation.  In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we refer to the businesses of RO Associates as the “RO Operations” or “RO,” and we refer to the sale of the RO Associates’ assets as the “RO Transaction.”  The accompanying financial statements include the RO Operations as a discontinued operation for all periods presented.

On August 31, 2010, EMRISE completed the sale of all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of EEC’s subsidiary, Advanced Control Components, Inc. (“ACC”) and all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Custom Components, Inc. (“CCI”) (collectively the “ACC Operations”).  The accompanying financial statements include the ACC Operations as a discontinued operation for all periods presented.

5

EMRISE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Comprehensive Loss

Comprehensive loss includes all changes in equity during a period except those that resulted from investments by or distributions to the Company’s stockholders.  Other comprehensive income (loss) refers to revenues, expenses, gains and losses that, under GAAP, are included in comprehensive loss, but excluded from net loss, as these amounts are recorded directly as an adjustment to stockholders’ equity.  The Company’s other comprehensive income (loss) consists of foreign currency translation adjustments.  The following table reflects the components of comprehensive loss (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net loss	$	(879	)	$	(795	)	$	(1,838	)	$	(1,747	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment	113			(32		)	525			(1,031		)
Comprehensive loss	$	(766	)	$	(827	)	$	(1,313	)	$	(2,778	)

Revenue Recognition

The Company derives revenues from sales of electronic devices and communications equipment products and services.  The Company’s sales are based upon written agreements or purchase orders that identify the type and quantity of the item and/or services being purchased and the purchase price.  The Company recognizes revenues when shipment of products has occurred or services have been rendered, no significant obligations remain on the part of the Company, and collectability is reasonably assured based on the Company’s credit and collections practices and policies.

The Company recognizes revenues from its U.S. communications equipment business unit at the point of shipment of those products.  An estimate of warranty cost is recorded at the time the revenue is recognized.  Product returns are infrequent and require prior authorization because sales are final and the Company tests its products for quality prior to shipment to ensure products meet the specifications of the binding purchase orders under which those products are shipped. Normally, when a customer requests and receives authorization to return a product, the request is accompanied by a purchase order for a repair or for a replacement product.

Revenue recognition for products and services provided by the Company’s subsidiaries in England depends upon the type of contract involved.  Engineering/design services contracts generally entail design and production of a prototype over a term of up to several years, with revenue deferred until each milestone defined in the contract is reached.  Production contracts provide for a specific quantity of products to be produced over a specific period of time.  Customers issue binding purchase orders or enter into binding agreements for the products to be produced.  The Company recognizes revenues on these orders as the products are shipped.  Returns are infrequent and permitted only with prior authorization because these products are custom made to order based on binding purchase orders and are quality tested prior to shipment.  An estimate of warranty cost is recorded at the time revenue is recognized.  The Company offers extended warranty contracts for an additional cost to its customers, which are recognized ratably over the term of the extended warranty contract.

The Company recognizes revenues for products sold by its subsidiary in France at the point of shipment.  Customer discounts are included in the product price list provided to the customer.

6

EMRISE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Returns are infrequent and permitted only with prior authorization because these products are shipped based on binding purchase orders and are quality tested prior to shipment.  An estimate of warranty cost is recorded at the time revenue is recognized.

Revenues from services such as repairs and modifications are recognized when the service is completed and invoiced.  For repairs that involve shipment of a repaired product, the Company recognizes repair revenues when the product is shipped back to the customer. Service revenues contribute less than 5% of total revenue and, therefore, are considered to be immaterial to overall financial results.

Loss Per Share from Continuing Operations

Basic loss per share from continuing operations is computed by dividing net loss from continuing operations by the weighted average common shares outstanding during a period.  Diluted loss per share from continuing operations is based on the treasury stock method and includes the dilutive effect of stock options and warrants outstanding during the period.  Common share equivalents have been excluded where their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.  As a result of the losses from continuing operations incurred by the Company for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the potentially dilutive common shares have been excluded from the loss per share computation because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.  The following table illustrates the computation of basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
NUMERATOR:
Net loss	$	(879	)	$	(795	)	$	(1,838	)	$	(1,747	)
Less: income from discontinued operations	305			496			305			1,178
Net loss from continuing operations	$	(1,184	)	$	(1,291	)	$	(2,143	)	$	(2,925	)
DENOMINATOR:
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding	10,667			10,213			10,667			10,213
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding	10,667			10,213			10,667			10,213
Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.29	)

The following table shows the common stock equivalents that were outstanding as of June 30, 2011 and 2010, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ or warrants’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect would have been anti-dilutive:

		Range of
	Number of	Exercise Price
	Shares	Per Share
Anti-dilutive common stock options:
As of June 30, 2011	586,000	$1.31 – $7.50
As of June 30, 2010	674,000	$1.31 – $7.50
Anti-dilutive common stock warrants:
As of June 30, 2011	8,000	$4.31
As of June 30, 2010	784,000	$1.80 – $4.31

7

EMRISE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Adopted

Revenue Recognition.  In October 2009, the FASB issued an update to existing guidance on revenue recognition for arrangements with multiple deliverables.  This update will allow companies to allocate consideration received for qualified separate deliverables using estimated selling prices for both delivered and undelivered items when vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence is unavailable.  Additional disclosures discussing the nature of multiple element arrangements, the types of deliverables under the arrangements, the general timing of their delivery, and significant factors and estimates used to determine estimated selling prices are required.  The Company adopted this update for new revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified beginning January 1, 2011.  The adoption of this new revenue recognition guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition.  In April 2010, the FASB issued an update to existing guidance on revenue recognition, which establishes a revenue recognition model for contingent consideration that is payable upon the achievement of an uncertain future event, referred to as a milestone.  The scope of the guidance is limited to research or development arrangements and requires an entity to record the milestone payment in its entirety in the period received if the milestone meets all the necessary criteria to be considered substantive.  However, entities would not be precluded from making an accounting policy election to apply another appropriate accounting policy that results in the deferral of some portion of the arrangement consideration.  The guidance was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company adopted this update and the guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

Issued, but not adopted

Fair Value Measurements.  In May 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to existing guidance on fair value measurements and related disclosures.  This update clarifies the existing guidance and amends the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements.  This update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with prospective application required.  The Company does not expect this update to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Comprehensive Income.  In June 2011, the FASB issued an update to existing guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income.  This update requires entities to present items of net income and other comprehensive income either in one continuous statement, referred to as the statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate, but consecutive, statements of net income and other comprehensive income.  This update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with retrospective application required.

NOTE 2 — LIQUIDITY

The Company reported a net loss from continuing operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 of approximately $1.2 million and $2.1 million, respectively, and a loss from continuing operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 of approximately $1.3 million and $2.9 million, respectively.  The Company reported working capital of $8.5 million at June 30, 2011.  In combination with forecasted cash flows from operations and existing financing arrangements, the Company believes it has sufficient funding to support its working capital requirements during the next 12 months and beyond.

8

EMRISE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The ability of the Company to support its business plan is dependent upon its ability to achieve profitable operations, manage costs and satisfy long-term debt service obligations, which will begin in the first quarter of 2012. Management believes the Company is positioned to achieve profitability in the near future, manage costs through active and ongoing cost management processes and satisfy its debt service obligations.  However, if it is unable to do so, the Company may be required to sell additional assets or stock, complete a recapitalization, or consummate a merger transaction in order to continue operations.

To address these potential financing needs, the Company may need to explore a revised debt structure with its existing lenders; additional or new financing with another lender or lenders; expedite the sale of additional assets to generate cash; complete a recapitalization of the Company, or consummate a merger or other transaction.  Successfully executing these strategies is uncertain and there are many short term and long term risks associated with attempting to execute each of these initiatives.   Failure to meet the Company’s financing requirements, if and when needed, would have an adverse effect on the Company’s operations and/or ability to do business after that date or could restrict its growth, limit the development of new products, hinder its ability to fulfill existing or future orders or negatively affect its ability to secure new customers or product orders.

NOTE 3 — DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

RO Associates

On March 22, 2010, EEC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into and consummated the closing under an asset purchase agreement by and among Astrodyne Corporation (“Astrodyne”), RO, and EEC dated March 22, 2010 (the “RO Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which Astrodyne purchased substantially all of the assets, properties, and business as a going concern of RO.  Such sale and transfer of assets pursuant to the RO Purchase Agreement was deemed to be a disposition of an insignificant amount of assets by the Company and EEC.  RO retained certain rights, as fully described in the RO Purchase Agreement, including certain records, rights to benefits plans and insurance policies and proceeds, and certain assets.

As part of the transactions contemplated by the RO Purchase Agreement, Astrodyne assumed certain specified liabilities of RO pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption Agreement by and between Astrodyne and RO (the “Assignment and Assumption Agreement”).  Pursuant to the RO Purchase Agreement, EEC also agreed to guarantee the full, complete, and timely compliance with and performance of all agreements, covenants and obligations of RO in connection with the RO Transaction.

Astrodyne paid RO an aggregate purchase price for the RO Transaction of $1,000,000, plus the assumption of certain liabilities pursuant to the Assignment and Assumption Agreement, subject to a purchase price adjustment.  As additional consideration for Astrodyne’s entry into the RO Purchase Agreement and consummation of the contemplated transactions under such agreement, EEC and RO agreed that, for a certain period immediately following the closing date, they would not compete with the Business, perform services for any person in competition with the Business or solicit certain specified customers of the Business, or hire any employees of Astrodyne or its affiliates.

In connection with the Company’s divestiture of RO, which comprised a portion of the Company’s electronic devices segment, the Company incurred approximately $0.4 million in charges relating to legal, accounting and investment banking fees.  The Company does not expect to incur any additional costs associated with this transaction.  The Company incurred a loss on the sale of the RO assets of approximately $0.5 million.

The Company has classified RO, which is a component of its electronic devices segment, as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.

9

EMRISE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

ACC Operations

On June 7, 2010, EEC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement by and among Aeroflex Incorporated, as buyer, and EEC, as seller, relating to the sale of all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of ACC and all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of CCI (the “ACC Purchase Agreement”), which was subsequently assigned by Aeroflex Incorporated to its subsidiary, Aeroflex/KDI, Inc. (“Aeroflex”).

On August 31, 2010, EEC completed its previously announced sale to Aeroflex of all of the issued and outstanding shares of ACC and all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of CCI (the “ACC Transaction”) pursuant to the Purchase Agreement.

The ACC Transaction consisted of an aggregate purchase price of $20 million in cash (the “Purchase Price”).  An amount equal to $0.8 million was placed in a 12-month escrow account pursuant to an agreement between Aeroflex and EEC to satisfy any indemnification claims.  Following the 12-month escrow period, any unused funds in the account will be returned to the Company and will be recorded as a purchase price adjustment and a gain from the sale of discontinued operations.  In addition, the following amounts were satisfied out of the Purchase Price:  (i) $10.6 million to the Company’s senior lender, GVEC Resource IV Inc., an affiliate of Private Equity Management Group (“PEM”), representing the aggregate amount of the indebtedness owed by EEC to PEM, which was satisfied by payment of $9.6 million in cash and by delivering a two-year, interest bearing note in the amount of $1 million described herein, and (ii) $3.1 million in cash and a $2.8 million, three-year, interest bearing note, both in satisfaction of the deferred purchase price and contingent payments owed by EEC to certain of ACC’s previous shareholders, Charles S. Brand, Thomas P.M. Couse, Joanne Couse and Michael Gaffney (collectively, the “Former Shareholders”), as further described in Note 10.  The Purchase Price was also adjusted by $0.8 million based on the estimated level of adjusted net working capital of ACC at the closing of the Transaction, subject to final determination pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Purchase Agreement.

In April 2011, the Company negotiated a settlement associated with the level of adjusted net working capital of the ACC Operations as of the closing date of the ACC Transaction.  At December 31, 2010, the estimated additional net working capital adjustment was $0.4 million, which was accrued and recorded as an additional purchase price adjustment.   The Company and Aeroflex agreed that the Company would satisfy the net working capital obligation through the release of $0.6 million of funds held in escrow from the date of the ACC Transaction.  As a result of the settlement associated with the level of adjusted net working capital of the ACC Operations and the release of funds held in escrow, the Company recorded an additional gain on the sale of ACC of $0.3 million (net of $0.1 million of income taxes), which is included in discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated condensed statement of operations.

In connection with the ACC Transaction, the Company incurred approximately $1.4 million in closing costs, including legal, accounting and investment advisory fees.  The Company does not expect to incur any additional costs associated with this transaction, except for any potential claim on the remaining escrow before the indemnification period ends on September 30, 2011.  The Company recognized a gain on the ACC Transaction of approximately $0.9 million.

The Company has classified the ACC Operations, which was a component of its electronic devices segment, as discontinued operations in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.

The following table summarizes those components of the statements of operations, which have been classified as discontinued operations and are associated with the electronic devices segment, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

10

EMRISE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended									Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2010									June 30, 2010
	RO			ACC						RO			ACC
	Operations			Operations			Total			Operations			Operations			Total
Net Sales	$	—		$	5,488		$	5,488		$	442		$	10,698		$	11,140
Income (loss) from operations	$	(29	)	$	1,108		$	1,079		$	182		$	2,366		$	2,548
Other income (expense)	1			(104		)	(103		)	1			(212		)	(211		)
Loss on sale	(1		)	—			(1		)	(451		)	—			(451		)
Provision for income taxes	—			479			479			—			709			709
Net (loss) income	$	(29	)	$	525		$	496		$	(268	)	$	1,445		$	1,177
(Loss) earnings per share:
Basic	$	(0.00	)	$	0.05		$	0.05		$	(0.03	)	$	0.14		$	0.12
Diluted	$	(0.00	)	$	0.05		$	0.05		$	(0.03	)	$	0.14		$	0.12
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic	10,213			10,213			10,213			10,213			10,213			10,213
Diluted	10,213			10,213			10,213			10,213			10,213			10,213

NOTE 4 — STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company has the following five stock option plans, which are described more fully in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010:

·Employee Stock and Stock Option Plan, effective July 1, 1994;

·1993 Stock Option Plan;

·1997 Stock Incentive Plan;

·Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan; and

·2007 Stock Incentive Plan.

The Company’s board of directors does not intend to issue any additional options under the Employee Stock and Stock Option Plan, 1993 Stock Option Plan, 1997 Stock Incentive Plan or Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan.

Total stock-based compensation expense included in wages, salaries and related costs was $33,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and $38,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010.  Total stock-based compensation expense included in wages, salaries and related costs was $65,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and $74,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.  These compensation expenses were charged to selling, general and administrative expenses. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had $30,000 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to stock option grants, which will be recognized over the remaining weighted average period of one year.

11

EMRISE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 5 — INVENTORIES

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market (net realizable value) and consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 30,		December 31,
	2011		2010
Raw materials	$	4,028	$	4,683
Work-in-process	1,979		1,499
Finished goods	2,706		1,386
Total inventories	$	8,713	$	7,568

NOTE 6 — OPERATING SEGMENTS

The Company has two reportable operating segments: electronic devices and communications equipment. The electronic devices segment manufactures and markets electronic power supplies, RF and microwave devices and subsystem assemblies. The electronic devices segment consists of the Company’s two electronic device subsidiaries located in England, both of which offer the same or similar products to the same or similar customers.  The communications equipment segment designs, manufactures and distributes network access products and timing and synchronization products.  The communications equipment segment consists of operating entities CXR Larus Corporation (“CXR Larus”), which is located in the U.S., and CXR Anderson Jacobson (“CXR AJ”), which is located in France, both of which offer the same or similar products to similar customers.  Both segments operate primarily in the U.S. and European markets, but they have distinctly different customers, design and manufacturing processes and marketing strategies.  Each segment has discrete financial information and a separate management structure.

The Company evaluates performance based upon contribution margin of the segments and also upon profit or loss from operations before income taxes exclusive of nonrecurring gains and losses. The Company accounts for intersegment sales at pre-determined prices negotiated between the individual segments.

During the first quarter of 2010, the Company sold its RO Operations and during the third quarter of 2010, the Company sold its ACC Operations (see Note 3), all of which were part of its electronic devices segment.  These transactions resulted in differences in the basis of segmentation from the amounts disclosed in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.  In this report, the RO Operations and ACC Operations are reported as discontinued operations and are excluded from the electronics devices segment.

12

EMRISE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Selected financial data for each of the Company’s operating segments reconciled to the consolidated totals is shown below (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net sales
Electronic devices	$	4,705		$	3,958		$	9,327		$	8,396
Communications equipment	2,245			2,516			5,662			5,170
Total net sales	$	6,950		$	6,474		$	14,989		$	13,566
Operating income (loss)
Electronic devices	$	294		$	211		$	486		$	688
Communications equipment	(549		)	(213		)	(570		)	(692		)
Corporate and other	(897		)	(1,025		)	(1,915		)	(2,128		)
Total operating loss	$	(1,152	)	$	(1,027	)	$	(1,999	)	$	(2,132	)

	June 30,		December 31,
	2011		2010
Total assets
Electronic devices	$	15,411	$	13,848
Communications equipment	7,818		8,781
Corporate and other	1,310		2,860
Total assets	$	24,539	$	25,489

NOTE 7 — GOODWILL

The following table reflects changes in our goodwill balances for the six months ended June 30, 2011 (in thousands):

	Electronic
	Devices
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	4,931
Foreign currency translation	184
Balance at June 30, 2011	$	5,115

13

EMRISE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 8 — INCOME TAXES

The effective tax rate for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 was different than the 34% U.S. statutory rate primarily because the Company’s foreign entities generate a tax obligation and related tax expense as a result of their net income, which cannot be offset by U.S. tax loss carry forwards.

The Company’s business is subject to regulation under a wide variety of U.S. federal, state and foreign tax laws, regulations and policies.  The majority of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries have earnings and profits that are reinvested indefinitely.  However, under the Credit Agreement described in Notes 9 and 10, the foreign subsidiaries have issued guarantees on the Credit Agreement and, as a result, under IRC §956, have been deemed to have distributed these earnings to fund U.S. operations.  This has resulted in U.S. federal taxable income and an increase in U.S. tax liability, which has been reduced through utilization of available net operating loss carryforwards and foreign tax credits.  However, the Company has exhausted a significant portion of its net operating losses available to be carried forward into future periods and, as a result, any income from operations and/or gain on sales of assets could result in tax obligations.

As of June 30, 2011, the Company had not recorded any net unrecognized tax benefits.  The Company currently has no open matters with tax authorities nor is it engaged in an examination by any tax authority.  The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in interest expense and selling, general and administrative expense, respectively, in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. No interest or penalties were recognized during the first six months of 2011. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had nothing accrued for interest and penalties.

The Company files income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdiction, the United Kingdom and France, and in the state jurisdictions of California, Texas, Pennsylvania and New Jersey. The Company is no longer subject to United States federal and state tax examinations for years before 2007 and 2006, respectively, and is no longer subject to tax examinations for the United Kingdom for years prior to 2009, and for France for years prior to 2007.

NOTE 9 — FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

On August 31, 2010, two of the Company’s UK subsidiaries, Pascall Electronics Limited (“Pascall”) and XCEL Power Systems, Ltd. (“XCEL”), each entered into a Receivables Finance Agreement with Lloyds TSB Commercial Finance (“Lloyds”) (each, a “Receivables Finance Agreement” and, collectively, the “Receivables Finance Agreements”), pursuant to which Lloyds agreed to provide Pascall and XCEL a credit facility to support their UK operations in the aggregate principal amount of £2,75 million ($4.3 million based on the exchange rate on September 30, 2010), in each case at an advance rate of 88%, a discount charge of 2.5% above the base rate, and a service fee of 0.2%.  The Receivables Finance Agreement between Pascall and Lloyds is secured by the All Assets Debenture, dated August 31, 2010, Given by Pascall Electronics Limited in favor of Lloyds TSB Commercial Finance Limited (the “Pascall Debenture”) and the Receivables Finance Agreement between XCEL and Lloyds is secured by the All Assets Debenture, dated August 31, 2010, Given by XCEL Power Systems Limited in favor of Lloyds TSB Commercial Finance Limited (the “XCEL Debenture”).  The Receivables Finance Agreements bear interest at the base rate plus 2.5% on the outstanding balance and is paid monthly.  As of June 30, 2011, outstanding borrowings under the Receivable Finance Agreements were $0.6 million.

On September 20, 2010, the Company’s French subsidiary, CXR AJ entered into an accounts receivable financing arrangement with FACTOCIC S.A., a subsidiary of CIC Group (“CIC”) (the “CIC Agreement”), pursuant to which CIC agreed to provide CXR AJ a financing arrangement to support its French operations in the aggregate principal amount of €1.35 million ($1.8 million based on the exchange rate on September 30, 2010) at an advance rate of 90% of presented receivables.

14

EMRISE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The CIC Agreement bears interest at the three month EURIBOR plus 1.4%.  As of June 30, 2011, CXR AJ had $0.2 million of outstanding borrowings under the CIC Agreement.

On November 15, 2010, CXR Larus and Bridge Bank, National Association (“Bridge Bank”) executed a Business Financing Agreement dated as of October 22, 2010 (the “Business Financing Agreement”) pursuant to which Bridge Bank agreed to provide to CXR Larus up to $800,000 of advance on trade accounts receivable at an advance rate of 80% with interest at the Prime Rate plus 3.25%.  To secure Bridge Bank’s obligations, CXR Larus granted Bridge Bank a continuing security interest in certain collateral.  The Company has guaranteed the obligations of CXR Larus under the Business Financing Agreement pursuant to a Guaranty dated as of October 22, 2010, effective November 15, 2010.  As of June 30, 2011, CXR Larus had no outstanding borrowings under the Business Financing Agreement.

NOTE 10 — FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

FASB guidance for fair value measurements defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants and also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.  The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between three levels of inputs that may be utilized when measuring fair value as follows:

Level 1 — Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities available at the measurement date.

Level 2 — Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, and inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 — Inputs that are unobservable inputs which reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions on what assumptions the market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best available information.

Cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses reflected in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets are a reasonable estimate of their fair value due to the short term nature of these instruments.  The carrying value of the Company’s borrowings is a reasonable estimate of its fair value as borrowings under the Company’s financing arrangements have variable rates that reflect currently available terms and conditions for similar debt.  As of June 30, 2011, the Company did not have any financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis that would be subject to the disclosure provisions of FASB guidance noted above.

15

EMRISE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 11 — CASUALTY LOSS

On September 27, 2010, the Company’s French subsidiary, CXR AJ, sustained significant damage to a portion of the building comprising its Abondant, France facility as a result of a fire.  The portion of the building damaged, which was fully depreciated at the time of the fire, was primarily used for component parts storage.  Virtually all of the component parts that were on-site were destroyed in the fire.  CXR AJ’s main operating facility, which includes administration, finance, sales and engineering, was not damaged by the fire.  Immediately after the fire, CXR AJ’s insurer was on-site evaluating the damage.  CXR AJ maintains adequate insurance coverage for such events and it anticipates that any business interruption impact will be recoverable under the insurance policy.

Subsequent to the fire, the Company recorded an impairment for the component parts inventory destroyed by the fire of €0.8 million (approximately $1.1 million).  As the CXR AJ insurance policy covers this inventory amount and the insurance company has confirmed that this inventory is covered under at least net value, the Company recorded a receivable for the same amount as the impairment loss.  The insurance company provided an advance of funds in December 2010 for €0.5 million (approximately $0.7 million using the average December 2010 exchange rate) and an additional advance of funds in April 2011 for €0.4 million, both of which were applied towards replacement of the component parts that were destroyed by the fire.  The advances received from the insurance company in December 2010 and April 2011 were applied to the receivable.  We continue to work with our local insurance company to finalize valuation and settlement of our claims related to inventory replacement, business interruption and building construction.

NOTE 12 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

CXR AJ Short-term Financing

In July 2011, CXR AJ negotiated a short-term financing arrangement with CIC Bank West (“Order Financing”) allowing for the advancement of funds in the maximum amount of €750,000 on a certain pre-approved customer order in order to facilitate the production and subsequent shipment of such orders.  This financing arrangement has a term of no less than 10 days and no more than 93 days and is collateralized by the accounts receivable associated with that specific order.  Interest is calculated based upon the 3 month Euribor rate plus 2.694% and is due at the end of the term along with the full principal.  The Order Financing will be effective once CXR AJ makes its request for advance on the arrangement.

Lloyds TSB Bank Term Loan

On August 2, 2011, EMRISE Electronics Limited (“EEL”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of EMRISE Corporation, entered into a term loan with Lloyds TSB Bank plc (“Lloyds Bank”) in the amount of £750,000 (“Lloyds Term Loan”).  The Lloyds Term Loan bears interest at a fixed rate of the aggregate of 4.75% per annum and the rate quoted by the Lloyds Bank Wholesale Markets division at or about the time of borrowing.  Principal and interest are payable monthly over 60 months commencing 1 month after the date of borrowing.  The loan is subject to a financial covenant requiring a minimum net worth at EEL from and after December 31, 2011 of not less than £4,200,000 and shall increase annually by not less than £200,000.  The Lloyds Term Loan is characterized as a refinancing of existing indebtedness to cover a cash account overdraft existing at EEL.

16

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Cautionary Statement

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto contained in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The information contained in this report is not a complete description of our business or the risks associated with an investment in our common stock. We urge you to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our other reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and Current Reports on Form 8-K, which discuss our business in greater detail.  This report and the following discussion contain forward-looking statements, which generally include the plans, objectives and expectations of management for future operations, including plans, objectives and expectations relating to our future economic performance and our current beliefs regarding revenues we might generate and profits we might earn if we are successful in implementing our business and growth strategies. The forward-looking statements and associated risks may include, relate to or be qualified by other important factors, including, without limitation:

·our ability to continue to borrow funds under the financing arrangements currently in place (see “ — Liquidity and Capital Resources”) or to secure additional financing in the future;

·exposure to and impacts of various international risks including legal, business, political and economic risks associated with our international operations, also including the impact of foreign currency translation (see “-Foreign Currency Translation”);

·the projected growth or contraction in the electronic devices and communications equipment markets in which we operate, including military and defense spending across the globe;

·our strategies for expanding, maintaining or contracting our presence in these markets;

·anticipated trends in our financial condition and results of operations;

·our ability to meet our working capital and other financing needs;

·our ability to distinguish ourselves from our current and future competitors;

·our ability to secure long term purchase orders;

·our ability to deliver against our existing or future book of shippable orders (backlog);

·technical or quality issues experienced by us, our suppliers and/or our customers;

·failure to comply with existing or future government or industry standards and regulations;

·our ability to successfully locate, acquire and integrate any possible future acquisitions;

·our ability to successfully support the working capital needs of our company;

·the impact of current and/or future economic conditions, including but not limited to the overall condition of the stock market, the overall credit market, the global recession, political, economic and/or other constraints which are or may negatively impact the industries in which we participate and/or the ability for us to market the products which we sell; and

·our ability to successfully compete against competitors that in many cases are larger than us, have access to significantly more working capital than we do and have significant resources in comparison to us.

We do not undertake to update, revise or correct any forward-looking statements.

Any of the factors described above or in the “Risk Factors” sections contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as amended, could cause our financial results, including our net income or loss or growth in net income or loss to differ materially from prior results, which in turn could, among other things, cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially.

17

Business Description

We design, manufacture and market proprietary electronic devices and communications equipment for aerospace, defense, industrial, and communications applications. We have operations in the U.S., England, and France.  We organize our business in two operating segments: electronic devices and communications equipment. In the first six months of 2011, our electronic devices segment contributed approximately 62% of overall net sales while the communications segment contributed approximately 38% of overall net sales. Our subsidiaries within our electronic devices segment design, develop, manufacture and market power supplies, radio frequency, or RF, and microwave devices for defense, aerospace and industrial markets.  Our subsidiaries within our communications equipment segment design develop, manufacture and market network access equipment, including network timing and synchronization products, for communications applications in public and private networks, defense and industrial markets, including utilities and transportation.

Within our electronic devices segment, we produce a range of power systems and RF and microwave devices.  This segment is primarily “project” driven, with the majority of revenues being derived from custom products with long life cycles and high barriers to entry.  The majority of manufacturing and testing is performed in-house or through sub-contract manufacturers.  Our electronic devices are used in a wide range of military airborne, seaborne and land-based systems, and in-flight entertainment systems, including next generation in-flight entertainment and connectivity, or IFE&C, systems, such as applications for mobile phone, e-mail and internet communications and real time, on-board satellite and broadcast TV, which are being installed in new commercial aircraft as well as being retrofitted into existing commercial aircraft.

Within our communications equipment segment, we produce a range of network access equipment, including network timing and synchronization products, for public and private communications networks.  This segment is “end-user product” based with a traditional cycle of internally funded development and marketing prior to selling via direct and indirect sales channels.  Manufacturing is primarily outsourced.  Our communications equipment is used in a broad range of network applications primarily for private communications networks, public communications carriers, and also for utility companies and military applications, including homeland security.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of net sales and expenses for each period. The following represents a summary of our critical accounting policies, defined as those policies that we believe are the most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain.

Revenue Recognition

We derive revenues from sales of electronic devices and communications equipment products and services and extended warranty contracts.  Our sales are based upon written agreements or purchase orders that identify the type and quantity of the item and/or services being purchased and the purchase price.  We recognize revenues when shipment of products has occurred or services have been rendered, no significant obligations remain on our part, and collectability is reasonably assured based on our credit and collections practices and policies.

We recognize revenues from domestic sales at the point of shipment of those products.  An estimate of warranty cost is recorded at the time the revenue is recognized.  Product returns are infrequent and require prior authorization because our sales are final and we quality test our products prior to shipment to ensure the products

18

meet the specifications of the binding purchase orders under which those products are shipped. Normally, when a customer requests and receives authorization to return a product, the request is accompanied by a purchase order for a repair or for a replacement product.

Revenue recognition for products and services provided by our subsidiaries in England depends upon the type of contract involved.  Engineering/design services contracts generally entail design and production of a prototype over a term of up to several years, with revenue deferred until each milestone defined in the contract is reached.  Production contracts provide for a specific quantity of products to be produced over a specific period of time.  Customers issue binding purchase orders or enter into binding agreements for the products to be produced.  We recognize revenues on these orders as the products are shipped.  Returns are infrequent and permitted only with prior authorization because these products are custom made to order based on binding purchase orders and are quality tested prior to shipment.  An estimate of warranty cost is recorded at the time revenue is recognized.  We offer extended warranty contracts for an additional cost to our customers, which we recognize ratably over the term of the extended warranty contract under either the milestone method or percentage of completion method, whichever is most appropriate under GAAP.

We recognize revenues for products sold by our subsidiary in France at the point of shipment.  Customer discounts are included in the product price list provided to the customer.  Returns are infrequent and permitted only with prior authorization because these products are shipped based on binding purchase orders and are quality tested prior to shipment.  An estimate of warranty cost is recorded at the time revenue is recognized.

Revenues from services such as repairs and modifications are recognized when the service is completed and invoiced.  For repairs that involve shipment of a repaired product, we recognize repair revenues when the product is shipped back to the customer. Service revenues contribute less than 5% of total revenue and, therefore, are considered to be immaterial to overall financial results.

Product Warranty Liabilities

Generally, our products carry a standard one-year, limited parts and labor warranty.  In certain circumstances, we provide a two-year limited parts and labor warranty.  We offer extended warranties beyond two years for an additional cost to our customers.  Products returned under warranty typically are tested and repaired or replaced at our option.  Historically, we have not experienced significant warranty costs or returns.

We record a liability for estimated costs that we expect to incur under our basic limited warranties when product revenue is recognized.  Factors affecting our warranty liability include the number of units sold, the types of products involved, historical and anticipated rates of claim and historical and anticipated costs per claim.  We periodically assess the adequacy of our warranty liability accrual based on changes in these factors.

Inventory Valuation

Our finished goods electronic devices inventories generally are built to order.  Our communications equipment inventories generally are built to forecast, which requires us to produce a larger amount of finished goods in our communications equipment business so that our customers can be served promptly.  Our products consist of numerous electronic and other materials, which necessitate that we exercise detailed inventory management.  We value our inventory at the lower of the actual cost to purchase or manufacture the inventory (first-in, first-out) or the current estimated market value of the inventory (net realizable value). We perform cycle counts of inventories using an ABC inventory methodology, which groups inventory items into prioritized cycle counting categories, or we conduct physical inventories at least once a year.  We regularly review inventory quantities on hand and record a provision for excess and obsolete inventory based primarily on our estimated forecast of product demand and production requirements for the next 12 to 24 months. Additionally, to determine inventory write-down provisions, we review product line inventory levels and individual items as necessary and periodically review assumptions about forecasted demand and market conditions.  Any inventory that we determine to be obsolete, either in connection with the physical count or at other times of observation, is specifically reserved for and subsequently written-off.

19

The electronic devices and communications equipment industries are characterized by rapid technological change, frequent new product development, and rapid product obsolescence that could result in an increase in the amount of obsolete inventory quantities on hand. Also, our estimates of future product demand may prove to be inaccurate, in which case we may have understated or overstated the provision required for excess and obsolete inventory. Although we make every effort to ensure the accuracy of our forecasts of future product demand, any significant unanticipated changes in demand or technological developments could have a significant impact on the value of our inventory and our reported operating results.

Foreign Currency Translation

We have foreign subsidiaries that together accounted for approximately 86.0% of our net revenues, 78.7% of our total assets and 61.1% of our total liabilities as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2011.  In preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to translate the financial statements of our foreign subsidiaries from the functional currencies in which they keep their accounting records into U.S. dollars. This process results in exchange gains and losses which, under relevant accounting guidance, are included either within our statement of operations under the caption “other income (expense)” or as a separate part of our net equity under the caption “accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).”  We evaluate the impact of currency fluctuations on a periodic basis and may, in the future, participate in currency hedging activities if the need arises.

Under relevant accounting guidance, the treatment of these translation gains or losses depends upon management’s determination of the functional currency of each subsidiary. This determination involves consideration of relevant economic facts and circumstances affecting the subsidiary. Generally, the currency in which the subsidiary transacts a majority of its transactions, including billings, financing, payroll and other expenditures, would be considered the functional currency. However, management must also consider any dependency of the subsidiary upon the parent and the nature of the subsidiary’s operations.

If management deems any subsidiary’s functional currency to be its local currency, then any gain or loss associated with the translation of that subsidiary’s financial statements is included as a separate component of stockholders’ equity in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).  However, if management deems the functional currency to be U.S. dollars, then any gain or loss associated with the translation of these financial statements would be included in other income (expense) within our statement of operations.

If we dispose of any of our subsidiaries, any cumulative translation gains or losses would be realized into our statement of operations. If we determine that there has been a change in the functional currency of a subsidiary to U.S. dollars, then any translation gains or losses arising after the date of the change would be included within our statement of operations.

Based on our assessment of the factors discussed above, we consider the functional currency of each of our international subsidiaries to be each subsidiary’s local currency. Accordingly, we had cumulative translation losses of $1.6 million that were included as part of accumulated other comprehensive loss within our balance sheet at June 30, 2011. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we included translation gains of $0.1 million and $0.5 million, respectively, under accumulated other comprehensive income.

The magnitude of these gains or losses depends upon movements in the exchange rates of the foreign currencies in which we transact business as compared to the value of the U.S. dollar. During the first half of 2011, these currencies included the euro and the British pound sterling. Any future translation gains or losses could be significantly higher or lower than those we recorded for this period.

Intangibles, Including Goodwill

We periodically evaluate our intangibles, including goodwill, for potential impairment. Our judgments regarding the existence of impairment are based on many factors including market conditions and operational performance of our acquired businesses.  In assessing potential impairment of goodwill, we consider these factors as well as forecasted financial performance of the acquired businesses.

20

If forecasts are not met, we may have to record additional impairment charges not previously recognized. In assessing the recoverability of our goodwill and other intangibles, we must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of those respective assets. If these estimates or their related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for these assets that were not previously recorded.  If that were the case, we would have to record an expense in order to reduce the carrying value of our goodwill.  Under the Codification guidance for Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, we are required to analyze our goodwill for impairment issues at least annually or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.  We performed our annual impairment test for goodwill at our electronic devices reporting unit as of December 31, 2010.  In performing the valuation, we used cash flows that reflected management’s forecasts and discount rates that reflected the risks associated with the current market.  We considered the results of an income approach and a market approach in determining the fair value of the reporting units.  For the income approach we assumed growth at 4.0% as a result of expected shipments on existing contracts and future opportunities.  We discounted the projected cash flows at 15% to determine the fair value for the electronic devices reporting unit.  For the market approach, we used the guideline public company method, under which the fair value of a business is estimated by comparing the subject company to similar companies with publicly traded ownership interests. From these “guideline” companies, valuation multiples are derived and then applied to the appropriate operating statistics of the subject company to arrive at indications of value.

At June 30, 2011, our reported goodwill totaled $5.1 million, all of which belonged to the electronic devices reporting unit.

Results of Operations

Overview

A significant portion of our products are customized to the unique specifications of our customers and are subject to variable timing of delivery, which makes comparability of our revenues and gross profit from period to period difficult.  Shipments of products can be accelerated or delayed due to many reasons including, but not limited to, exceeding or not meeting customer contract requirements, a change in customer timing or specifications, technology related issues, delays in acquiring component parts, and other production related issues.

Overall net sales from continuing operations increased 7% in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010 and 10% in the first half of 2011 compared to the first half of 2010.  We began 2011 with a significant backlog.  For a significant portion of our business, customers issue binding purchase orders or enter into binding agreements for the products to be produced and shipped over time in the future.  Our “backlog” represents these orders and provides a partial view into potential shipments and revenues.  The strength of our backlog supported the increase in 2011 compared to 2010, which was the result of higher sales volumes of electronic devices during the second quarter and higher sales volumes of communication equipment from our French subsidiary in the first quarter of 2011.

Overall gross profit, as a percentage of sales (“gross margin”), decreased to 25.6% in the second quarter of 2011 from 30.0% in the second quarter of 2010.  Gross margin decreased to 26.9% in the first half of 2011 from 28.7% in the first half of 2010.  The majority of the decrease is the result of fluctuations in product mix and lower overhead absorption levels due to lower sales at one of our electronic devices business units and our U.S. communications equipment business unit.

While we experienced year-over-year improvements on the sales line, we incurred a larger loss in the second quarter of 2011 than initial expectations, primarily driven by lower gross margins.  Selling, general and administrative expenses are in-line with our expectations.  As a result of the loss of a large order during the second quarter of 2011, the majority of which was expected to ship in the third quarter of 2011, we expect to experience a loss in the third quarter of 2011, but expect profitability during the fourth quarter of 2011 as we ship a large portion of our existing book of orders in our electronic devices segment.

21

The following is a detailed discussion of our results of operations by business segment.  As a result of the sale of the RO Operations in March of 2010 and the sale of the ACC Operations in August of 2010, for purposes of the following discussion and analysis, the RO and ACC Operations have been removed from the prior period comparisons and are reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010

Net Sales

	Three Months Ended						Variance
	June 30,						Favorable (Unfavorable)
(in thousands)	2011			2010			Dollar			Percent
Electronic devices	$	4,705		$	3,958		$	747		18.9	%
as % of net sales from continuing operations	67.7		%	61.1		%
Communications equipment	2,245			2,516			(271		)	(10.8	)%
as % of net sales from continuing operations	32.3		%	38.9		%
Total net sales from continuing operations	6,950			6,474			476			7.4	%

Electronic Devices Segment

The increase in net sales within our electronic devices segment is the result of higher volumes of sales for aerospace power supplies and, to a lesser extent, RF devices. A significant portion of our business at our electronic devices subsidiaries is transacted in U.S. dollars and was positively impacted by exchange rate fluctuations as the subsidiary’s local currency is the British pound sterling.  The translation impact of exchange rates remains an uncertainty and could negatively or positively impact our overall results in future periods.

Third quarter 2011 sales are expected to be lower than estimated as a result of a recently announced cancellation of a two-part, $1.2 million order for products to be used in an international military program, $1.0 million of which was to be shipped in the third quarter of 2011.  However, despite this cancellation, we expect third quarter 2011 sales to be significantly higher than both second quarter 2011 and third quarter 2010 as we begin shipping larger orders currently in our existing backlog.

Communications Equipment Segment

The decrease in net sales within our communications equipment segment in the second quarter of 2011 compared to 2010 was due to lower sales volumes at both communications equipment subsidiaries.  The lower sales volumes were partially due to timing of the receipt of orders, the political climate in North Africa and a decline in infrastructure spending in the U.S. These lower sales levels were partially offset by the positive impact of exchange rate fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and the euro.

We expect sales volumes in the third quarter to be higher than those in the second quarter of 2011 as a result of the planned shipment of a large order received in the second quarter at our French subsidiary.  However, the translation impact of exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the euro remain an uncertainty, particularly in light of the current European Union climate, and could negatively impact our overall results in future periods.

22

Gross Profit

Electronic Devices Segment

	Three Months Ended						Variance
	June 30,						Favorable (Unfavorable)
(in thousands)	2011			2010			Dollar			Percent
Electronic devices	$	1,071		$	978		$	93		9.5	%
as % of net sales from continuing operations	22.8		%	24.7		%
Communications equipment	706			963			(257		)	(26.7	)%
as % of net sales from continuing operations	31.4		%	38.3		%
Total gross profit from continuing operations	1,777			1,941			(164		)	(8.4	)%
Total gross margin from continuing operations	25.6		%	30.0		%

The decrease in gross margin, for our electronic devices segment from 24.7% in the second quarter of 2010 to 22.8% in the second quarter of 2011 is primarily due to poor absorption of fixed costs at one of our business units due to the low sales volumes, together with variations in product mix to a lower ratio of military sales and higher ratio of sales to commercial markets.

Third quarter gross margin is expected to be lower than originally estimated as a result of the $1.2 million in sales order cancellation previously discussed, which will reduce the overhead absorption rate from our previous estimates.  However, we expect gross margin to improve slightly in the fourth quarter of 2011 as we begin shipping larger orders currently in our existing backlog.

Communications Equipment Segment

The decrease in gross profit, as a percentage of sales, for our communications equipment segment from 38.3% in the second quarter of 2010 to 31.4% in the second quarter of 2011 is primarily due to lower sales volumes resulting in a large under absorption of fixed overhead costs.

We expect that gross profit, as a percentage of sales, for the third quarter of 2011 will be higher than the second quarter of 2011 as a result of an expected increase in sales volumes and the resulting positive impact that will have on fixed overhead costs.

23

Operating Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses

	Three Months Ended						Variance
	June 30,						Favorable (Unfavorable)
(in thousands)	2011			2010			Dollar			Percent
Selling, general and administrative	$	2,490		$	2,566		$	76		3.0	%
as % of net sales from continuing operations	35.8		%	39.6		%
Engineering and product development	439			402			(37		)	(9.2	)%
as % of net sales from continuing operations	6.3		%	6.2		%
Total operating expenses from continuing operations	2,929			2,968			39			1.3	%

Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses for the second quarter of 2011 remained relatively consistent with those of the same period in 2010.  SG&A, as a percentage of sales, improved slightly as a result of a headcount reduction in one of our UK operations.  We expect SG&A expenses, as a percentage of sales, in each 2011 subsequent quarter to remain at lower levels than the corresponding previous year period, contributing to the expected profitability in the fourth quarter of 2011.

Engineering and product development

Engineering and product development costs remained relatively consistent in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010.

We expect quarterly engineering and product development costs for the remaining quarters of 2011 to remain consistent with those experienced in the second quarter of 2011.

Interest expense

Interest expense was $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $0.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 due to significantly lower outstanding loan balances and the absence of debt discount and deferred financing costs amortization in the second quarter of 2011.  We expect quarterly interest expense for the last half of 2011 to be comparable with the prior year period, as a result of the repayment of debt from the proceeds of the ACC Transaction and lower interest rates on new financing arrangements, which took place in the third quarter of 2010.

Other income and expense

We recorded other expense of $4,000 in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $0.1 million of other income in the second quarter of 2010.  Other expense in the second quarter of 2011 consists primarily of short-term exchange rate gains and losses associated with the volatility of the U.S. dollar to the British pound sterling and euro on the current portion of certain assets and liabilities.  Other income in the 2010 period consisted primarily of (i) fair value adjustments on outstanding warrants held by our former primary lender and (ii) short-term exchange rate gains and losses.  In August 2010, we repurchased the outstanding warrants from our former primary lender associated with the fair value adjustment and, therefore, there will be no further fair value adjustments associated with these warrants.

24

Income tax benefit

Income tax benefit amounted to $0.1 million for the second quarter of 2011 compared to income tax benefit of $0.3 million for the second quarter of 2010.  The income tax benefit in the second quarter of 2011 and 2010 was related to the losses from continuing operations that we incurred during the quarter.

Loss from continuing operations

Loss from continuing operations was $1.2 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $1.3 million in the second quarter of 2010.  The improvement in loss from continuing operations in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010 was primarily related to significantly reduced interest expense of $0.7 million, of which approximately $0.3 million amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount associated with our former credit facility.  The significant decrease in interest expense was partially offset by the absence of $0.3 million in positive fair value adjustments on outstanding warrants held by our previous lender (as described above) and a lower tax benefit in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010.

Income from discontinued operations

We reported income from discontinued operations of $0.3 million (net of tax of $0.1 million) during the second quarter of 2011 and income from discontinued operations of $0.5 million (net of tax of $0.5 million) during the second quarter of 2010.  In April 2011, we negotiated a settlement associated with the level of adjusted net working capital of the ACC Operations as of the closing date of the ACC Transaction.  At December 31, 2010, the estimated additional net working capital adjustment was $0.4 million, which was accrued and recorded as an additional purchase price adjustment.   The Company and Aeroflex agreed that we would satisfy the net working capital obligation through the release of $0.6 million of funds held in escrow from the date of the ACC Transaction.  As a result of the settlement associated with the level of adjusted net working capital of the ACC Operations and the release of funds held in escrow, we recorded an additional gain on the sale of ACC of $0.3 million (net of $0.1 million of income taxes), which is included in discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated condensed statement of operations.  The income from discontinued operations in the second quarter of 2010 related to income earned from the ACC Operations.

Net loss

We reported a net loss of $0.9 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $0.8 million in the second quarter of 2010.  Contributing to the net loss in the second quarter of 2011 were lower gross profit levels and the absence of gains of $0.3 million from the valuation of warrants that were present in the second quarter of 2010, but were not present in the second quarter of 2011 as a result of the repurchase of those warrants, substantially offset by a significant reduction of interest expense.  We expect to experience a loss in the third quarter of 2011, albeit, smaller than losses experienced in previous periods and the prior year third quarter.

25

Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010

Net Sales

	Six Months Ended						Variance
	June 30,						Favorable (Unfavorable)
(in thousands)	2011			2010			Dollar		Percent
Electronic devices	$	9,327		$	8,396		$	931	11.1	%
as % of net sales from continuing operations	62.2		%	61.9		%
Communications equipment	5,662			5,170			492		9.5	%
as % of net sales from continuing operations	37.8		%	38.1		%
Total net sales from continuing operations	14,989			13,566			1,423		10.5	%

Electronic Devices Segment

The increase in net sales within our electronic devices segment for the first half of 2011 compared to the first half of 2010 is the result of higher sales volumes in the second quarter as we have begun to ship orders from our existing book of shippable orders (backlog).  Additionally, a significant portion of our business at our electronic devices subsidiaries is transacted in U.S. dollars and was positively impacted by exchange rate fluctuations as the subsidiary’s local currency is the British pound sterling.  The translation impact of exchange rates remains an uncertainty and could negatively or positively impact our overall results in future periods.

Communications Equipment Segment

The increase in net sales within our communications equipment segment in the first half of 2011 compared to 2010 was due to increased sales at our French subsidiary, as they shipped a large portion of their backlog during the first quarter of 2011.  This increase was partially offset by a slight decrease in sales volumes at our U.S. subsidiary.

Gross Profit

	Six Months Ended						Variance
	June 30,						Favorable (Unfavorable)
(in thousands)	2011			2010			Dollar		Percent
Electronic devices	$	2,086		$	2,081		$	5	0.2	%
as % of net sales from continuing operations	22.4		%	24.8		%
Communications equipment	1,950			1,811			139		7.7	%
as % of net sales from continuing operations	34.4		%	35.0		%
Total gross profit from continuing operations	4,036			3,892			144		3.7	%
Total gross margin from continuing operations	26.9		%	28.7		%

Electronic Devices Segment

The decrease in gross margin, for our electronic devices segment from 24.8% in the first half of 2010 to 22.4% in the first half of 2011 is primarily due to poor absorption of fixed costs at one of our business units due to low sales volumes and variations in product mix to a lower ratio of military sales and higher ratio of sales to commercial markets with slightly higher levels of lower margin In-Flight Entertainment & Connectivity (IFE&C) products than in the first half of 2011.

26

Communications Equipment Segment

The slight decrease in gross margin for our communications equipment segment from 35.0% in the second quarter of 2010 to 34.4% in the second quarter of 2011 is primarily due to lower sales volumes resulting in under absorption of fixed overhead costs, which was partially offset by higher levels of third-party inventory purchased by our French subsidiary in U.S. dollars in the first quarter of 2011, resulting in a favorable exchange rate impact as the local currency is the euro.

Operating Expenses

	Six Months Ended						Variance
	June 30,						Favorable (Unfavorable)
(in thousands)	2011			2010			Dollar			Percent
Selling, general and administrative	$	5,163		$	5,099		$	(64	)	(1.3	)%
as % of net sales from continuing operations	34.4		%	37.6		%
Engineering and product development	872			925			53			5.7	%
as % of net sales from continuing operations	5.8		%	6.8		%
Total operating expenses from continuing operations	6,035			6,024			(11		)	(0.2	)%

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses for the first half of 2011 remained relatively consistent with those of the same period in 2010.  The increase was primarily associated with sales commissions within our communications equipment business related to the increased sales in the first quarter of 2011.  SG&A, as a percentage of sales, improved from 37.6% in the first half of 2010 to 34.4% in the first half of 2011 as we continue to focus on containing costs in proportion to our operational needs.

Engineering and product development

The decrease in engineering and product development costs is primarily due to a shift in our U.S. communications equipment subsidiary engineering projects from general product development to customer specific engineering, which is accounted for as a cost of the product.

Interest expense

Interest expense was $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 due to significantly lower outstanding loan balances and the absence of debt discount and deferred financing costs amortization in the first half of 2011 as a result of the repayment of debt.

Other income and expense

We recorded other expense of $57,000 in the first half of 2011 compared to $0.3 million of other income in the first half of 2010.  Other expense in the first half of 2011 consists primarily of short-term exchange rate gains and losses associated with the volatility of the U.S. dollar to the British pound sterling and euro on the current portion of certain assets and liabilities.  Other income in the 2010 period consisted primarily of (i) fair value adjustments on outstanding warrants to our previous lender and (ii) short-term exchange rate gains and losses.  In August 2010, we repurchased the outstanding warrants from our former primary lender associated with the fair value adjustment and, therefore, there will be no further fair value adjustments associated with these warrants.

27

Income tax benefit

Income tax benefit amounted to $0.1 million in the first half of 2011 compared to income tax benefit of $0.4 million in the first half of 2010.  The income tax benefit in both periods is primarily related to the losses from continuing operations that we incurred during the periods.

Loss from continuing operations

Loss from continuing operations was $2.1 million in the first half of 2011 compared to $2.9 million in the first half of 2010.  The improvement in loss from continuing operations in the first half of 2011 compared to the first half of 2010 was primarily related to significantly reduced interest expense and improved sales and gross profit.

Income from discontinued operations

We reported income from discontinued operations of $0.3 million (net of tax of $0.1 million) during the second quarter of 2011.  In April 2011, we negotiated a settlement associated with the level of adjusted net working capital of the ACC Operations as of the closing date of the ACC Transaction.  At December 31, 2010, the estimated additional net working capital adjustment was $0.4 million, which was accrued and recorded as an additional purchase price adjustment.   The Company and Aeroflex agreed that we would satisfy the net working capital obligation through the release of $0.6 million of funds held in escrow from the date of the ACC Transaction.  As a result of the settlement associated with the level of adjusted net working capital of the ACC Operations and the release of funds held in escrow, we recorded an additional gain on the sale of ACC of $0.3 million (net of $0.1 million of income taxes), which is included in discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated condensed statement of operations..  We reported income from discontinued operations of $1.2 million (net of tax of $0.7 million) during the first half of 2010.  The income from discontinued operations in the first half of 2010 related to income earned from the RO Operations and the ACC Operations (offset by a loss on the sale of the RO Operations of $0.5 million).

Net loss

We reported a net loss of $1.8 million in the first half of 2011 and a net loss of $1.7 million in the first half of 2010.  Contributing to the net loss in the first half of 2011 were higher levels of general and administrative expenses associated with the timing of year-end audit activities and financial reporting requirements than are typically incurred during the remainder of the year.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

In making an assessment of our liquidity, we believe that the items in our financial statements that are most relevant to our ongoing operations are working capital, cash generated from operating activities and cash available from financing activities.  We also have a variety of financing arrangements to support working capital and other short and long-term debt.

Working Capital

We fund our daily cash flow requirements through funds provided by operations and through borrowings under our various financing arrangements.  Working capital was $8.5 million at June 30, 2011 as compared to $9.9 million at December 31, 2010.  The decrease in working capital was the result of higher levels of accounts payable and accrued expenses primarily related to increased inventory levels as we prepare for higher shipments of products in the second half of 2011.  At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had accumulated deficits of $31.8 million and $30.0 million, respectively, and cash and cash equivalents of $2.8 million and $3.7 million, respectively.  The following is a discussion of the change in our cash and cash equivalents for the first half of 2011.

28

Net cash used in operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2011 totaled $1.6 million.  The primary non-cash adjustment to our net loss for the first half of 2011 was $0.2 million of depreciation and amortization expense.  The primary uses of cash associated with operating activities during the first half of 2011 was an increase in inventories of $1.3 million in preparation for shipments of products in the second half of 2011.  The primary sources of cash associated with operating activities included a decrease in accounts receivable of $0.6 million due to collections on fourth quarter 2010 sales and a decrease in prepaid and other assets of $0.7 million due to collection of insurance proceeds associated with a 2010 fire at our French subsidiary.

Cash used in our investing activities during the second quarter of 2011 totaled $31,000.

Cash provided by financing activities during the second quarter of 2011 totaled $0.2 million and was primarily associated with changes in borrowings within our financing arrangements.

Backlog

Our backlog was $31.0 million as of June 30, 2011 as compared to $27.1 million as of December 31, 2010. The amount of backlog orders represents revenue that we anticipate recognizing in the future, as evidenced by purchase orders and other purchase commitments received from customers, but on which work has not yet been initiated or with respect to which work is currently in progress. As of June 30, 2011, approximately 90% of our backlog related to our electronic devices business, which tends to provide us with long lead-times for our manufacturing processes due to the custom nature of the products.  Approximately 10% of this backlog related to our communications equipment business, which tends to deliver standard or modified standard products from stock as orders are received. We believe that a significant portion of our current backlog will be shipped within the next 12 months.  However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in fulfilling such orders and commitments in a timely manner or that we will ultimately recognize as revenue the amounts reflected as backlog.

Debt and Financing Arrangements

At June 30, 2011, we had total debt obligations of $5.0 million.  Total debt includes $0.8 million outstanding related to subsidiary financing arrangements, a term loan to our former senior lender of $1.0 million (maturing August 31, 2012), capital lease obligations of $0.4 million and notes payable to the former ACC Shareholders (the “Former Shareholders”) of $2.8 million (maturing August 31, 2013), the current portion of which loans and obligations totaled $1.0 million.

Financing Arrangements

On August 31, 2010, two of our subsidiaries in England, Pascall Electronics Limited (“Pascall”) and XCEL Power Systems, Ltd. (“XCEL”), entered into a Receivables Finance Agreement with Lloyds TSB Commercial Finance (“Lloyds”) (each, a “Receivables Finance Agreement” and, collectively, the “Receivables Finance Agreements”), pursuant to which Lloyds agreed to provide Pascall and XCEL a credit facility to support their operations in the aggregate principal amount of £2,75 million ($4.4 million based on the exchange rate on June 30, 2011), in each case at an advance rate of 88%, a discount charge of 2.5% above the base rate, and a service fee of 0.2%.  The Receivables Finance Agreements bear interest at the base rate plus 2.5% on the outstanding balance and is paid monthly.  As of June 30, 2011, outstanding borrowings under the Receivables Finance Agreements were $0.6 million (based on the exchange rate on June 30, 2011).

On September 20, 2010, our French subsidiary, CXR Anderson Jacobson (“CXR AJ”) entered into a Factoring Agreement with FACTOCIC S.A., a subsidiary of CIC Group (“CIC”) (the “CIC Agreement”), pursuant to which CIC agreed to provide CXR AJ a financing arrangement to support its French operations in the aggregate principal amount of €1.35 million ($1.9 million based on the exchange rate on June 30, 2011) at an advance rate of 90% of presented trade receivables.

29

The CIC Agreement bears interest at the three month EURIBOR plus 1.4%.  As of June 30, 2011, CXR AJ had outstanding borrowings under the CIC Agreement of $0.2 million (based on the exchange rate on June 30, 2011).

In July 2011, CXR AJ negotiated a short-term financing arrangement with CIC Bank West (“Order Financing”) allowing for the advancement of funds in the maximum amount of €750,000 on a certain pre-approved customer order in order to facilitate the production and subsequent shipment of such orders.  This financing arrangement has a term of no less than 10 days and no more than 93 days and is collateralized by the accounts receivable associated with that specific order.  Interest is calculated based on the 3 month Euribor rate plus 2.694% and is due at the end of the term along with the full principal.  The Order Financing will be effective once CXR AJ makes its request for advance on the arrangement.

On November 15, 2010, CXR Larus Corporation (“CXR Larus”) and Bridge Bank, National Association (“Bridge Bank”) executed a Business Financing Agreement dated as of October 22, 2010 (the “Business Financing Agreement”) pursuant to which Bridge Bank agreed to provide to CXR Larus up to $800,000 of advance on trade accounts receivable at an advance rate of 80% with interest at the Prime Rate plus 3.25%.  As of June 30, 2011, CXR Larus had no outstanding borrowings under the Business Financing Agreement.

PEM Credit Agreement

EMRISE (including each of its direct subsidiaries), is a party to a Credit Agreement (“PEM Credit Agreement”), initially entered into in November 2007 and subsequently amended, with GVEC Resources IV, Inc., an affiliate of Private Equity Management Group (“PEM”), providing for a credit facility in the aggregate amount of $26 million.  As of June 30, 2011, we owed a total of $1.0 million under the terms of the PEM Credit Agreement.  All references to the PEM Credit Agreement herein refer to the PEM Credit Agreement as amended.

The Amended and Restated Term Loan A Note, dated August 31, 2010, is a two-year interest bearing secured note in the principal amount of $1.0 million (the “PEM Note”).  The PEM Note will be payable interest only on a monthly basis for the first 18 months, with equal monthly payments of principal plus interest due thereafter through maturity.  The PEM Note will be payable at a rate of 12.5% per annum during the first 12 months and 15.5% per annum thereafter until paid in full, plus any applicable default rate or late fees.

Former Shareholder Debt

The Former Shareholders’ subordinated secured contingent promissory notes, which EEC issued in May 2008 in connection with the acquisition of the ACC Operations and which were subsequently amended in November 2009, were amended by Amendment No. 2, effective August 31, 2010 (the “Amended Subordinated Contingent Notes”).  The Former Shareholders are individuals who owned ACC stock in 2008.  The Amended Subordinated Contingent Notes bear interest at the prime rate as reported in The Wall Street Journal plus 1% and mature on August 31, 2013 (the “Maturity Date”).  Interest is payable quarterly beginning October 1, 2010 through the Maturity Date.  No principal payments are due until October 1, 2012, when quarterly principal payments in the amount of $0.2 million will be paid with the outstanding principal balance due at the Maturity Date.  As of June 30, 2011, the Company had $2.8 million outstanding principal balance under the Amended Subordinated Contingent Notes.

Lloyds TSB Bank Term Loan

On August 2, 2011, EMRISE Electronics Limited (“EEL”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of EMRISE Corporation, entered into a term loan with Lloyds TSB Bank plc (“Lloyds Bank”) in the amount of £750,000 (“Lloyds Term Loan”).  The Lloyds Term Loan bears interest at a fixed rate of the aggregate of 4.75% per annum and the rate quoted by the Lloyds Bank Wholesale Markets division at or about the time of borrowing.  Principal and interest are payable monthly over 60 months commencing 1 month after the date of borrowing.  The loan is subject to a financial covenant requiring a minimum net worth at EEL from and after December 31, 2011 of not less than £4,200,000 and shall increase annually by not less than £200,000.  The Lloyds Term Loan is characterized as a refinancing of existing indebtedness to cover a cash account overdraft existing at EEL.

30

Liquidity

In combination with forecasted cash flows from operations and existing financing arrangements, we believe we have sufficient funding to support our working capital requirements during the next 12 months and beyond.

Our ability to support our business plan is dependent upon our ability to achieve profitable operations, manage costs and satisfy long-term debt service obligations, which will begin in the second quarter of 2012. Management believes we are positioned to achieve profitability in the near future, manage costs through active and ongoing cost management processes and satisfy our debt service obligations.  However, if we are unable to do so, we may be required to sell additional assets or stock, complete a recapitalization, or consummate a merger transaction in order to continue operations.

To address these potential financing needs, we may need to explore a revised debt structure with our existing lenders; additional or new financing with another lender or lenders; expedite the sale of additional assets to generate cash; complete a recapitalization, or consummate a merger or other transaction.  Successfully executing these strategies is uncertain and there are many short term and long term risks associated with attempting to execute each of these initiatives.   Failure to meet our financing requirements, if and when needed, would have an adverse effect on our operations and/or ability to do business after that date or could restrict our growth, limit the development of new products, hinder our ability to fulfill existing or future orders or negatively affect our ability to secure new customers or product orders.

Effects of Inflation

The impact of inflation and changing prices has not been significant on the financial condition or results of operations of either the Company or our operating subsidiaries.

Impacts of New Accounting Pronouncements

Revenue Recognition.  In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an update to existing guidance on revenue recognition for arrangements with multiple deliverables.  This update will allow companies to allocate consideration received for qualified separate deliverables using estimated selling prices for both delivered and undelivered items when vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence is unavailable.  Additional disclosures discussing the nature of multiple element arrangements, the types of deliverables under the arrangements, the general timing of their delivery, and significant factors and estimates used to determine estimated selling prices are required.  We adopted this update for new revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified beginning January 1, 2011.  The adoption of this new revenue recognition guidance had no material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition.  In April 2010, the FASB issued an update to existing guidance on revenue recognition, which establishes a revenue recognition model for contingent consideration that is payable upon the achievement of an uncertain future event, referred to as a milestone.  The scope of the guidance is limited to research or development arrangements and requires an entity to record the milestone payment in its entirety in the period received if the milestone meets all the necessary criteria to be considered substantive.  However, entities would not be precluded from making an accounting policy election to apply another appropriate accounting policy that results in the deferral of some portion of the arrangement consideration.  The guidance was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010.  We adopted this update and the guidance did not have a material effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Fair Value Measurements.  In May 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to existing guidance on fair value measurements and related disclosures.  This update clarifies the existing guidance and amends the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information

31

about fair value measurements.  This update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with prospective application required.  We do not expect this update to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Comprehensive Income.  In June 2011, the FASB issued an update to existing guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income.  This update requires entities to present items of net income and other comprehensive income either in one continuous statement, referred to as the statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate, but consecutive, statements of net income and other comprehensive income.  This update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with retrospective application required.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not applicable for smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Based on an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures required by paragraph (b) of Rule 13a-15 or Rule 15d-15 of the Exchange Act, as of June 30, 2011, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective, because of the three material weaknesses set forth below that were identified as part of our evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting at December 31, 2010.

Summary of Material Weaknesses

Through the efforts of management, external consultants and our Audit Committee, we are currently in the process of executing specific action plans to remediate the material weaknesses identified and discussed more fully below.  We expect to complete these various action plans during 2011.  If we are able to complete these actions in a timely manner, we anticipate that all control deficiencies and material weaknesses will be remediated by December 31, 2011.

Set forth below is a summary of the various significant deficiencies which caused management to conclude that we had three material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.

(1)We did not effectively implement comprehensive entity-level internal controls, as evidenced by the following control deficiencies:

·Entity Level Internal Control Evaluation.  We did not formally consider entity-wide controls that are pervasive across the Company when considering whether control activities are sufficient to address identified risks.

32

·Fraud Considerations.  We did not conduct regular formalized assessments to consider risk factors that influence the likelihood of someone committing a fraud and the impact of a fraud on our financial reporting.

·Assessment of Information Technology.  We did not formally evaluate the extent of the needed information technology controls in relation to our assessment of processes and systems supporting financial reporting.

·Ongoing and Separate Evaluations.  We did not effectively create and maintain effective evaluations on the progress of our remediation efforts nor the constant evaluations of the operating effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

(2)We did not formally evaluate the effectiveness controls over changes to critical financial reporting applications and over access to these applications and related data.  As a result, certain of our personnel could have unrestricted access to various financial application programs and data beyond the requirements of their individual job responsibilities. This control deficiency, if existing, could result in a material misstatement of significant accounts or disclosures, including those described above, that could result in a material misstatement of our interim or annual consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.

(3)We did not formally evaluate the sufficiency of information technology personnel to execute general computing controls over our information technology structure, which include the implementation and assessment of information technology policies and procedures. This control deficiency, if existing, did not result in an adjustment to our 2010 interim or annual consolidated financial statements, but could result in a material misstatement of significant accounts or disclosures, which would not have been prevented or detected.

Remediation of Internal Control Deficiencies and Expenditures

It is reasonably possible that, if not remediated, one or more of the material weaknesses described above could result in a material misstatement in our reported financial statements that might result in a material misstatement in a future annual or interim period.

We have experienced complex domestic and international tax and financial reporting issues over the past several years.  During the past two years, we have completed several transactions, including the sale of the Digitran Operations, RO Operations and ACC Operations and the extinguishment of a complex debt facility, all resulting in a much smaller and less complex organization going forward.  Also, during the second quarter of 2010, we engaged a third party firm to prepare our tax provisions, provide guidance on complex tax matters and interface with our independent registered public accounting firm on tax matters.  Finally, in the third quarter of 2010, we restructured our accounting and finance group to allocate responsibilities to those individuals most qualified to perform such tasks and more effectively utilize the worldwide accounting and finance organization.  In executing this remediation plan, we were able to eliminate the material weakness previously reported that related to a lack of quality financial accounting staff, particularly in the area of taxation.

We have developed specific action plans for each of the remaining material weaknesses discussed above.  We believe the experience and knowledge of the existing staff will allow us to execute the plan effectively.  During 2011, our internal controls compliance team will prepare appropriate documentation and test plans for our information technology structure and applications data and will test and remediate that area.  The Audit Committee is working directly with management and our other board members, as necessary, to ensure that entity level deficiencies are addressed. We are uncertain at this time of the costs to remediate all of the above listed material weaknesses, however, we anticipate the cost to be approximately $50,000, most of which we expect to incur during the second half of 2011.  We cannot guarantee that the actual costs to remediate these deficiencies will not exceed this amount or will not be incurred after 2011.

33

Through these steps, we believe that we are addressing the deficiencies that affected our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 and management is committing the necessary time and resources to successfully complete our action plans for full compliance by December 31, 2011. However, because the remedial actions require relying extensively on manual review and approval, the successful operation of these controls for several quarters may be required before management may be able to conclude that the material weaknesses have been remediated.  We intend to continue to evaluate and strengthen our internal control over financial reporting systems. These efforts require significant time and resources.  If we are unable to establish adequate internal control over financial reporting systems, we may encounter difficulties in the audit or review of our financial statements by our independent registered public accounting firm, which in turn may have a material adverse effect on our ability to prepare financial statements in accordance with GAAP and to comply with our SEC reporting obligations.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

34

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6.EXHIBITS.

Number		Description
31.	1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
31.	2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
32.	1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
32.	2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
101		The following financial information from EMRISE Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2011; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; and (v) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.* (1)

* Filed herewith.

(1)  Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the interactive data files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

35

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	EMRISE CORPORATION
Dated: August 15, 2011	By:	/s/ CARMINE T. OLIVA
		Carmine T. Oliva,
		Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Dated: August 15, 2011	By:	/s/ BRANDI L. FESTA
		Brandi L. Festa,
		Director of Finance and Administration, Secretary and Treasurer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

36

INDEX TO EXHIBITS ATTACHED TO THIS REPORT

Number		Description
31.	1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.	2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.	1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.	2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101		The following financial information from EMRISE Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2011; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; and (v) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. (1)

(1)  Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the interactive data files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

37

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(a) OR 15D-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Carmine T. Oliva, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EMRISE Corporation;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 15, 2011

/s/ CARMINE T. OLIVA

Carmine T. Oliva

Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(a) OR 15D-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brandi L. Festa, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EMRISE Corporation;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 15, 2011

/s/ BRANDI L. FESTA

Brandi L. Festa

Director of Finance and Administration, Secretary and Treasurer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with EMRISE Corporation’s (the “Company”) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on his knowledge:

1.             the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.             the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 15, 2011	By:	/s/ CARMINE T. OLIVA
		Carmine T. Oliva
		Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EX-32.2

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with EMRISE Corporation’s (the “Company”) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies in her capacity as Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on her knowledge:

1.             the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.             the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 15, 2011	By:	/s/ BRANDI L. FESTA
		Brandi L. Festa
		Director of Finance and Administration, Secretary and Treasurer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

XML



Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
Net sales	$ 6,950	$ 6,474	$ 14,989	$ 13,566
Cost of sales	5,173	4,533	10,953	9,674
Gross profit	1,777	1,941	4,036	3,892
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative	2,490	2,566	5,163	5,099
Engineering and product development	439	402	872	925
Total operating expenses	2,929	2,968	6,035	6,024
Loss from operations	(1,152)	(1,027)	(1,999)	(2,132)
Other income (expense):
Interest income	12	32	24	47
Interest expense	(83)	(746)	(169)	(1,570)
Other, net	(4)	147	(57)	291
Total other expense, net	(75)	(567)	(202)	(1,232)
Loss before income taxes	(1,227)	(1,594)	(2,201)	(3,364)
Income tax benefit	(43)	(303)	(58)	(439)
Loss from continuing operations	(1,184)	(1,291)	(2,143)	(2,925)
Discontinued operations:
Income from discontinued operations	416	975	416	1,887
Tax provision on discontinued operations	111	479	111	709
Income from discontinued operations	305	496	305	1,178
Net loss	$ (879)	$ (795)	$ (1,838)	$ (1,747)
Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic (in shares)	10,667	10,213	10,667	10,213
Diluted (in shares)	10,667	10,213	10,667	10,213
Basic
Continuing operations (in dollars per share)	$ (0.11)	$ (0.13)	$ (0.20)	$ (0.29)
Discontinued operations (in dollars per share)	$ 0.03	$ 0.05	$ 0.03	$ 0.12
Net loss (in dollars per share)	$ (0.08)	$ (0.08)	$ (0.17)	$ (0.17)
Diluted
Continuing operations (in dollars per share)	$ (0.11)	$ (0.13)	$ (0.20)	$ (0.29)
Discontinued operations (in dollars per share)	$ 0.03	$ 0.05	$ 0.03	$ 0.12
Net loss (in dollars per share)	$ (0.08)	$ (0.08)	$ (0.17)	$ (0.17)

XML



Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (USD $) In Thousands	Total	Common Stock	Additional Paid-in Capital	Accumulated Deficit	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Balance at Dec. 31, 2010	$ 12,020	$ 128	$ 44,068	$ (30,007)	$ (2,169)
Balance (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2010		10,667
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity
Stock-based compensation	65	0	65
Net loss and comprehensive loss	(1,313)			(1,838)	525
Balance at Jun. 30, 2011	$ 10,772	$ 128	$ 44,133	$ (31,845)	$ (1,644)
Balance (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2011		10,667

XML



Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $) In Thousands	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 2,795	$ 3,742
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $113 at June 30, 2011 and $152 at December 31, 2010	4,954	5,573
Inventories	8,713	7,568
Current deferred tax assets	41	36
Prepaid and other current assets	697	1,336
Total current assets	17,200	18,255
Property, plant and equipment, net	864	863
Goodwill	5,115	4,931
Intangible assets other than goodwill, net	905	973
Deferred tax assets	263	259
Other assets	192	208
Total assets	24,539	25,489
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	3,449	3,168
Accrued expenses	4,034	3,777
Lines of credit	789	411
Current portion of long-term debt	166	172
Income taxes payable	47	82
Other current liabilities	260	752
Total current liabilities	8,745	8,362
Long-term debt	4,065	4,092
Deferred income taxes	141	141
Other liabilities	816	874
Total liabilities	13,767	13,469
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock,$0.01 par value. Authorized 10,000,000 shares no shares issued and oustanding
Common stock,$0.0033 par value. Authorized 75,000,000 shares; 10,667,337 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010	128	128
Additional paid-in capital	44,133	44,068
Accumulated deficit	(31,845)	(30,007)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(1,644)	(2,169)
Total stockholders' equity	10,772	12,020
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$ 24,539	$ 25,489

XML



GOODWILL

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

GOODWILL

GOODWILL

NOTE 7 — GOODWILL

The following table reflects changes in our goodwill balances for the six months ended June 30, 2011 (in thousands):

	Electronic
	Devices
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	4,931
Foreign currency translation	184
Balance at June 30, 2011	$	5,115

XML



SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

NOTE 12 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

CXR AJ Short-term Financing

In July 2011, CXR AJ negotiated a short-term financing arrangement with CIC Bank West (“Order Financing”) allowing for the advancement of funds in the maximum amount of €750,000 on a certain pre-approved customer order in order to facilitate the production and subsequent shipment of such orders.  This financing arrangement has a term of no less than 10 days and no more than 93 days and is collateralized by the accounts receivable associated with that specific order.  Interest is calculated based upon the 3 month Euribor rate plus 2.694% and is due at the end of the term along with the full principal.  The Order Financing will be effective once CXR AJ makes its request for advance on the arrangement.

Lloyds TSB Bank Term Loan

On August 2, 2011, EMRISE Electronics Limited (“EEL”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of EMRISE Corporation, entered into a term loan with Lloyds TSB Bank plc (“Lloyds Bank”) in the amount of £750,000 (“Lloyds Term Loan”).  The Lloyds Term Loan bears interest at a fixed rate of the aggregate of 4.75% per annum and the rate quoted by the Lloyds Bank Wholesale Markets division at or about the time of borrowing.  Principal and interest are payable monthly over 60 months commencing 1 month after the date of borrowing.  The loan is subject to a financial covenant requiring a minimum net worth at EEL from and after December 31, 2011 of not less than £4,200,000 and shall increase annually by not less than £200,000.  The Lloyds Term Loan is characterized as a refinancing of existing indebtedness to cover a cash account overdraft existing at EEL.

XML



DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

NOTE 3 — DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

RO Associates

On March 22, 2010, EEC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into and consummated the closing under an asset purchase agreement by and among Astrodyne Corporation (“Astrodyne”), RO, and EEC dated March 22, 2010 (the “RO Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which Astrodyne purchased substantially all of the assets, properties, and business as a going concern of RO.  Such sale and transfer of assets pursuant to the RO Purchase Agreement was deemed to be a disposition of an insignificant amount of assets by the Company and EEC.  RO retained certain rights, as fully described in the RO Purchase Agreement, including certain records, rights to benefits plans and insurance policies and proceeds, and certain assets.

As part of the transactions contemplated by the RO Purchase Agreement, Astrodyne assumed certain specified liabilities of RO pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption Agreement by and between Astrodyne and RO (the “Assignment and Assumption Agreement”).  Pursuant to the RO Purchase Agreement, EEC also agreed to guarantee the full, complete, and timely compliance with and performance of all agreements, covenants and obligations of RO in connection with the RO Transaction.

Astrodyne paid RO an aggregate purchase price for the RO Transaction of $1,000,000, plus the assumption of certain liabilities pursuant to the Assignment and Assumption Agreement, subject to a purchase price adjustment.  As additional consideration for Astrodyne’s entry into the RO Purchase Agreement and consummation of the contemplated transactions under such agreement, EEC and RO agreed that, for a certain period immediately following the closing date, they would not compete with the Business, perform services for any person in competition with the Business or solicit certain specified customers of the Business, or hire any employees of Astrodyne or its affiliates.

In connection with the Company’s divestiture of RO, which comprised a portion of the Company’s electronic devices segment, the Company incurred approximately $0.4 million in charges relating to legal, accounting and investment banking fees.  The Company does not expect to incur any additional costs associated with this transaction.  The Company incurred a loss on the sale of the RO assets of approximately $0.5 million.

The Company has classified RO, which is a component of its electronic devices segment, as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.

ACC Operations

On June 7, 2010, EEC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement by and among Aeroflex Incorporated, as buyer, and EEC, as seller, relating to the sale of all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of ACC and all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of CCI (the “ACC Purchase Agreement”), which was subsequently assigned by Aeroflex Incorporated to its subsidiary, Aeroflex/KDI, Inc. (“Aeroflex”).

On August 31, 2010, EEC completed its previously announced sale to Aeroflex of all of the issued and outstanding shares of ACC and all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of CCI (the “ACC Transaction”) pursuant to the Purchase Agreement.

The ACC Transaction consisted of an aggregate purchase price of $20 million in cash (the “Purchase Price”).  An amount equal to $0.8 million was placed in a 12-month escrow account pursuant to an agreement between Aeroflex and EEC to satisfy any indemnification claims.  Following the 12-month escrow period, any unused funds in the account will be returned to the Company and will be recorded as a purchase price adjustment and a gain from the sale of discontinued operations.  In addition, the following amounts were satisfied out of the Purchase Price:  (i) $10.6 million to the Company’s senior lender, GVEC Resource IV Inc., an affiliate of Private Equity Management Group (“PEM”), representing the aggregate amount of the indebtedness owed by EEC to PEM, which was satisfied by payment of $9.6 million in cash and by delivering a two-year, interest bearing note in the amount of $1 million described herein, and (ii) $3.1 million in cash and a $2.8 million, three-year, interest bearing note, both in satisfaction of the deferred purchase price and contingent payments owed by EEC to certain of ACC’s previous shareholders, Charles S. Brand, Thomas P.M. Couse, Joanne Couse and Michael Gaffney (collectively, the “Former Shareholders”), as further described in Note 10.  The Purchase Price was also adjusted by $0.8 million based on the estimated level of adjusted net working capital of ACC at the closing of the Transaction, subject to final determination pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Purchase Agreement.

In April 2011, the Company negotiated a settlement associated with the level of adjusted net working capital of the ACC Operations as of the closing date of the ACC Transaction.  At December 31, 2010, the estimated additional net working capital adjustment was $0.4 million, which was accrued and recorded as an additional purchase price adjustment.   The Company and Aeroflex agreed that the Company would satisfy the net working capital obligation through the release of $0.6 million of funds held in escrow from the date of the ACC Transaction.  As a result of the settlement associated with the level of adjusted net working capital of the ACC Operations and the release of funds held in escrow, the Company recorded an additional gain on the sale of ACC of $0.3 million (net of $0.1 million of income taxes), which is included in discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated condensed statement of operations.

In connection with the ACC Transaction, the Company incurred approximately $1.4 million in closing costs, including legal, accounting and investment advisory fees.  The Company does not expect to incur any additional costs associated with this transaction, except for any potential claim on the remaining escrow before the indemnification period ends on September 30, 2011.  The Company recognized a gain on the ACC Transaction of approximately $0.9 million.

The Company has classified the ACC Operations, which was a component of its electronic devices segment, as discontinued operations in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.

The following table summarizes those components of the statements of operations, which have been classified as discontinued operations and are associated with the electronic devices segment, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Three Months Ended									Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2010									June 30, 2010
	RO			ACC						RO			ACC
	Operations			Operations			Total			Operations			Operations			Total
Net Sales	$	—		$	5,488		$	5,488		$	442		$	10,698		$	11,140
Income (loss) from operations	$	(29	)	$	1,108		$	1,079		$	182		$	2,366		$	2,548
Other income (expense)	1			(104		)	(103		)	1			(212		)	(211		)
Loss on sale	(1		)	—			(1		)	(451		)	—			(451		)
Provision for income taxes	—			479			479			—			709			709
Net (loss) income	$	(29	)	$	525		$	496		$	(268	)	$	1,445		$	1,177
(Loss) earnings per share:
Basic	$	(0.00	)	$	0.05		$	0.05		$	(0.03	)	$	0.14		$	0.12
Diluted	$	(0.00	)	$	0.05		$	0.05		$	(0.03	)	$	0.14		$	0.12
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic	10,213			10,213			10,213			10,213			10,213			10,213
Diluted	10,213			10,213			10,213			10,213			10,213			10,213

XML



FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

NOTE 9 — FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

On August 31, 2010, two of the Company’s UK subsidiaries, Pascall Electronics Limited (“Pascall”) and XCEL Power Systems, Ltd. (“XCEL”), each entered into a Receivables Finance Agreement with Lloyds TSB Commercial Finance (“Lloyds”) (each, a “Receivables Finance Agreement” and, collectively, the “Receivables Finance Agreements”), pursuant to which Lloyds agreed to provide Pascall and XCEL a credit facility to support their UK operations in the aggregate principal amount of £2,75 million ($4.3 million based on the exchange rate on September 30, 2010), in each case at an advance rate of 88%, a discount charge of 2.5% above the base rate, and a service fee of 0.2%.  The Receivables Finance Agreement between Pascall and Lloyds is secured by the All Assets Debenture, dated August 31, 2010, Given by Pascall Electronics Limited in favor of Lloyds TSB Commercial Finance Limited (the “Pascall Debenture”) and the Receivables Finance Agreement between XCEL and Lloyds is secured by the All Assets Debenture, dated August 31, 2010, Given by XCEL Power Systems Limited in favor of Lloyds TSB Commercial Finance Limited (the “XCEL Debenture”).  The Receivables Finance Agreements bear interest at the base rate plus 2.5% on the outstanding balance and is paid monthly.  As of June 30, 2011, outstanding borrowings under the Receivable Finance Agreements were $0.6 million.

On September 20, 2010, the Company’s French subsidiary, CXR AJ entered into an accounts receivable financing arrangement with FACTOCIC S.A., a subsidiary of CIC Group (“CIC”) (the “CIC Agreement”), pursuant to which CIC agreed to provide CXR AJ a financing arrangement to support its French operations in the aggregate principal amount of €1.35 million ($1.8 million based on the exchange rate on September 30, 2010) at an advance rate of 90% of presented receivables.

The CIC Agreement bears interest at the three month EURIBOR plus 1.4%.  As of June 30, 2011, CXR AJ had $0.2 million of outstanding borrowings under the CIC Agreement.

On November 15, 2010, CXR Larus and Bridge Bank, National Association (“Bridge Bank”) executed a Business Financing Agreement dated as of October 22, 2010 (the “Business Financing Agreement”) pursuant to which Bridge Bank agreed to provide to CXR Larus up to $800,000 of advance on trade accounts receivable at an advance rate of 80% with interest at the Prime Rate plus 3.25%.  To secure Bridge Bank’s obligations, CXR Larus granted Bridge Bank a continuing security interest in certain collateral.  The Company has guaranteed the obligations of CXR Larus under the Business Financing Agreement pursuant to a Guaranty dated as of October 22, 2010, effective November 15, 2010.  As of June 30, 2011, CXR Larus had no outstanding borrowings under the Business Financing Agreement.

XML



FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

NOTE 10 — FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

FASB guidance for fair value measurements defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants and also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.  The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between three levels of inputs that may be utilized when measuring fair value as follows:

Level 1 — Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities available at the measurement date.

Level 2 — Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, and inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 — Inputs that are unobservable inputs which reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions on what assumptions the market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best available information.

Cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses reflected in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets are a reasonable estimate of their fair value due to the short term nature of these instruments.  The carrying value of the Company’s borrowings is a reasonable estimate of its fair value as borrowings under the Company’s financing arrangements have variable rates that reflect currently available terms and conditions for similar debt.  As of June 30, 2011, the Company did not have any financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis that would be subject to the disclosure provisions of FASB guidance noted above.

XML



INCOME TAXES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

INCOME TAXES

INCOME TAXES

NOTE 8 — INCOME TAXES

The effective tax rate for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 was different than the 34% U.S. statutory rate primarily because the Company’s foreign entities generate a tax obligation and related tax expense as a result of their net income, which cannot be offset by U.S. tax loss carry forwards.

The Company’s business is subject to regulation under a wide variety of U.S. federal, state and foreign tax laws, regulations and policies.  The majority of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries have earnings and profits that are reinvested indefinitely.  However, under the Credit Agreement described in Notes 9 and 10, the foreign subsidiaries have issued guarantees on the Credit Agreement and, as a result, under IRC §956, have been deemed to have distributed these earnings to fund U.S. operations.  This has resulted in U.S. federal taxable income and an increase in U.S. tax liability, which has been reduced through utilization of available net operating loss carryforwards and foreign tax credits.  However, the Company has exhausted a significant portion of its net operating losses available to be carried forward into future periods and, as a result, any income from operations and/or gain on sales of assets could result in tax obligations.

As of June 30, 2011, the Company had not recorded any net unrecognized tax benefits.  The Company currently has no open matters with tax authorities nor is it engaged in an examination by any tax authority.  The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in interest expense and selling, general and administrative expense, respectively, in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. No interest or penalties were recognized during the first six months of 2011. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had nothing accrued for interest and penalties.

The Company files income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdiction, the United Kingdom and France, and in the state jurisdictions of California, Texas, Pennsylvania and New Jersey. The Company is no longer subject to United States federal and state tax examinations for years before 2007 and 2006, respectively, and is no longer subject to tax examinations for the United Kingdom for years prior to 2009, and for France for years prior to 2007.

XML



SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

NOTE 1 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization and Business

EMRISE Corporation (the “Company”) designs, manufactures and markets proprietary electronic devices and communications equipment for aerospace, defense, industrial, and communications applications. The Company has operations in the United States (the “U.S.”), England and France.  The Company conducts its business through two operating segments: electronic devices and communications equipment. The subsidiaries within the electronic devices segment design, develop, manufacture and market electronic devices for defense, aerospace and industrial markets and operate out of facilities located in England.  The subsidiaries within the communications equipment segment design, develop, manufacture and market network access equipment, including network timing and synchronization products and operate out of facilities located in the U.S. and France.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and therefore do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”).  The year-end balance sheet was derived from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.  The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do, however, reflect all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to state fairly the financial position as of June 30, 2011 and the results of operations and cash flows for the related interim periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. However, these results are not necessarily indicative of results for any other interim period or for the year. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the SEC.

In March of 2010, EMRISE completed the sale of substantially all of the assets of EEC’s subsidiary, RO Associates, to Massachusetts based Astrodyne Corporation.  In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we refer to the businesses of RO Associates as the “RO Operations” or “RO,” and we refer to the sale of the RO Associates’ assets as the “RO Transaction.”  The accompanying financial statements include the RO Operations as a discontinued operation for all periods presented.

On August 31, 2010, EMRISE completed the sale of all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of EEC’s subsidiary, Advanced Control Components, Inc. (“ACC”) and all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Custom Components, Inc. (“CCI”) (collectively the “ACC Operations”).  The accompanying financial statements include the ACC Operations as a discontinued operation for all periods presented.

Comprehensive Loss

Comprehensive loss includes all changes in equity during a period except those that resulted from investments by or distributions to the Company’s stockholders.  Other comprehensive income (loss) refers to revenues, expenses, gains and losses that, under GAAP, are included in comprehensive loss, but excluded from net loss, as these amounts are recorded directly as an adjustment to stockholders’ equity.  The Company’s other comprehensive income (loss) consists of foreign currency translation adjustments.  The following table reflects the components of comprehensive loss (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net loss	$	(879	)	$	(795	)	$	(1,838	)	$	(1,747	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment	113			(32		)	525			(1,031		)
Comprehensive loss	$	(766	)	$	(827	)	$	(1,313	)	$	(2,778	)

Revenue Recognition

The Company derives revenues from sales of electronic devices and communications equipment products and services.  The Company’s sales are based upon written agreements or purchase orders that identify the type and quantity of the item and/or services being purchased and the purchase price.  The Company recognizes revenues when shipment of products has occurred or services have been rendered, no significant obligations remain on the part of the Company, and collectability is reasonably assured based on the Company’s credit and collections practices and policies.

The Company recognizes revenues from its U.S. communications equipment business unit at the point of shipment of those products.  An estimate of warranty cost is recorded at the time the revenue is recognized.  Product returns are infrequent and require prior authorization because sales are final and the Company tests its products for quality prior to shipment to ensure products meet the specifications of the binding purchase orders under which those products are shipped. Normally, when a customer requests and receives authorization to return a product, the request is accompanied by a purchase order for a repair or for a replacement product.

Revenue recognition for products and services provided by the Company’s subsidiaries in England depends upon the type of contract involved.  Engineering/design services contracts generally entail design and production of a prototype over a term of up to several years, with revenue deferred until each milestone defined in the contract is reached.  Production contracts provide for a specific quantity of products to be produced over a specific period of time.  Customers issue binding purchase orders or enter into binding agreements for the products to be produced.  The Company recognizes revenues on these orders as the products are shipped.  Returns are infrequent and permitted only with prior authorization because these products are custom made to order based on binding purchase orders and are quality tested prior to shipment.  An estimate of warranty cost is recorded at the time revenue is recognized.  The Company offers extended warranty contracts for an additional cost to its customers, which are recognized ratably over the term of the extended warranty contract.

The Company recognizes revenues for products sold by its subsidiary in France at the point of shipment.  Customer discounts are included in the product price list provided to the customer. Returns are infrequent and permitted only with prior authorization because these products are shipped based on binding purchase orders and are quality tested prior to shipment.  An estimate of warranty cost is recorded at the time revenue is recognized.

Revenues from services such as repairs and modifications are recognized when the service is completed and invoiced.  For repairs that involve shipment of a repaired product, the Company recognizes repair revenues when the product is shipped back to the customer. Service revenues contribute less than 5% of total revenue and, therefore, are considered to be immaterial to overall financial results.

Loss Per Share from Continuing Operations

Basic loss per share from continuing operations is computed by dividing net loss from continuing operations by the weighted average common shares outstanding during a period.  Diluted loss per share from continuing operations is based on the treasury stock method and includes the dilutive effect of stock options and warrants outstanding during the period.  Common share equivalents have been excluded where their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.  As a result of the losses from continuing operations incurred by the Company for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the potentially dilutive common shares have been excluded from the loss per share computation because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.  The following table illustrates the computation of basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
NUMERATOR:
Net loss	$	(879	)	$	(795	)	$	(1,838	)	$	(1,747	)
Less: income from discontinued operations	305			496			305			1,178
Net loss from continuing operations	$	(1,184	)	$	(1,291	)	$	(2,143	)	$	(2,925	)
DENOMINATOR:
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding	10,667			10,213			10,667			10,213
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding	10,667			10,213			10,667			10,213
Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.29	)

The following table shows the common stock equivalents that were outstanding as of June 30, 2011 and 2010, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ or warrants’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect would have been anti-dilutive:

		Range of
	Number of	Exercise Price
	Shares	Per Share
Anti-dilutive common stock options:
As of June 30, 2011	586,000	$1.31 – $7.50
As of June 30, 2010	674,000	$1.31 – $7.50
Anti-dilutive common stock warrants:
As of June 30, 2011	8,000	$4.31
As of June 30, 2010	784,000	$1.80 – $4.31

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Adopted

Revenue Recognition.  In October 2009, the FASB issued an update to existing guidance on revenue recognition for arrangements with multiple deliverables.  This update will allow companies to allocate consideration received for qualified separate deliverables using estimated selling prices for both delivered and undelivered items when vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence is unavailable.  Additional disclosures discussing the nature of multiple element arrangements, the types of deliverables under the arrangements, the general timing of their delivery, and significant factors and estimates used to determine estimated selling prices are required.  The Company adopted this update for new revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified beginning January 1, 2011.  The adoption of this new revenue recognition guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition.  In April 2010, the FASB issued an update to existing guidance on revenue recognition, which establishes a revenue recognition model for contingent consideration that is payable upon the achievement of an uncertain future event, referred to as a milestone.  The scope of the guidance is limited to research or development arrangements and requires an entity to record the milestone payment in its entirety in the period received if the milestone meets all the necessary criteria to be considered substantive.  However, entities would not be precluded from making an accounting policy election to apply another appropriate accounting policy that results in the deferral of some portion of the arrangement consideration.  The guidance was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company adopted this update and the guidance did not have a material effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

Issued, but not adopted

Fair Value Measurements.  In May 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to existing guidance on fair value measurements and related disclosures.  This update clarifies the existing guidance and amends the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements.  This update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with prospective application required.  The Company does not expect this update to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Comprehensive Income.  In June 2011, the FASB issued an update to existing guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income.  This update requires entities to present items of net income and other comprehensive income either in one continuous statement, referred to as the statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate, but consecutive, statements of net income and other comprehensive income.  This update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with retrospective application required.

XML



STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

NOTE 4 — STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company has the following five stock option plans, which are described more fully in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010:

· Employee Stock and Stock Option Plan, effective July 1, 1994;

· 1993 Stock Option Plan;

· 1997 Stock Incentive Plan;

· Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan; and

· 2007 Stock Incentive Plan.

The Company’s board of directors does not intend to issue any additional options under the Employee Stock and Stock Option Plan, 1993 Stock Option Plan, 1997 Stock Incentive Plan or Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option Plan.

Total stock-based compensation expense included in wages, salaries and related costs was $33,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and $38,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010.  Total stock-based compensation expense included in wages, salaries and related costs was $65,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and $74,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.  These compensation expenses were charged to selling, general and administrative expenses. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had $30,000 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to stock option grants, which will be recognized over the remaining weighted average period of one year.

XML



INVENTORIES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

INVENTORIES

INVENTORIES

NOTE 5 — INVENTORIES

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market (net realizable value) and consisted of the following (in thousands):

	June 30,		December 31,
	2011		2010
Raw materials	$	4,028	$	4,683
Work-in-process	1,979		1,499
Finished goods	2,706		1,386
Total inventories	$	8,713	$	7,568

XML



Document and Entity Information	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Aug. 09, 2011
Document and Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	Emrise CORP
Entity Central Index Key	0000854852
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Jun. 30, 2011
Amendment Flag	false
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		10,667,337
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2011
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q2

XML



OPERATING SEGMENTS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

OPERATING SEGMENTS

OPERATING SEGMENTS

NOTE 6 — OPERATING SEGMENTS

The Company has two reportable operating segments: electronic devices and communications equipment. The electronic devices segment manufactures and markets electronic power supplies, RF and microwave devices and subsystem assemblies. The electronic devices segment consists of the Company’s two electronic device subsidiaries located in England, both of which offer the same or similar products to the same or similar customers.  The communications equipment segment designs, manufactures and distributes network access products and timing and synchronization products.  The communications equipment segment consists of operating entities CXR Larus Corporation (“CXR Larus”), which is located in the U.S., and CXR Anderson Jacobson (“CXR AJ”), which is located in France, both of which offer the same or similar products to similar customers.  Both segments operate primarily in the U.S. and European markets, but they have distinctly different customers, design and manufacturing processes and marketing strategies.  Each segment has discrete financial information and a separate management structure.

The Company evaluates performance based upon contribution margin of the segments and also upon profit or loss from operations before income taxes exclusive of nonrecurring gains and losses. The Company accounts for intersegment sales at pre-determined prices negotiated between the individual segments.

During the first quarter of 2010, the Company sold its RO Operations and during the third quarter of 2010, the Company sold its ACC Operations (see Note 3), all of which were part of its electronic devices segment.  These transactions resulted in differences in the basis of segmentation from the amounts disclosed in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.  In this report, the RO Operations and ACC Operations are reported as discontinued operations and are excluded from the electronics devices segment.

Selected financial data for each of the Company’s operating segments reconciled to the consolidated totals is shown below (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Net sales
Electronic devices	$	4,705		$	3,958		$	9,327		$	8,396
Communications equipment	2,245			2,516			5,662			5,170
Total net sales	$	6,950		$	6,474		$	14,989		$	13,566
Operating income (loss)
Electronic devices	$	294		$	211		$	486		$	688
Communications equipment	(549		)	(213		)	(570		)	(692		)
Corporate and other	(897		)	(1,025		)	(1,915		)	(2,128		)
Total operating loss	$	(1,152	)	$	(1,027	)	$	(1,999	)	$	(2,132	)

	June 30,		December 31,
	2011		2010
Total assets
Electronic devices	$	15,411	$	13,848
Communications equipment	7,818		8,781
Corporate and other	1,310		2,860
Total assets	$	24,539	$	25,489

XML



Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $) In Thousands	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$ (1,838)	$ (1,747)
Adjustments to arrive at net loss from continuing operations	(305)	(1,178)
Net loss from continuing operations	(2,143)	(2,925)
Reconciliation to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	205	227
Provision for doubtful accounts	21	11
Provision for warranty reserve	61	32
Deferred taxes		20
Loss on sale of assets		14
Amortization of deferred issuance costs		316
Amortization of debt (premium) discount	(37)	290
Stock-based expense	65	74
Change in fair value of common stock warrant		(75)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	587	1,837
Inventories	(1,266)	829
Prepaid and other assets	655	(197)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	(101)	(599)
Operating cash flow used in continuing operations	(1,953)	(146)
Operating cash flow provided by discontinued operations	305	815
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	(1,648)	669
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment	(31)	(33)
Investing cash flow used in continuing operations	(31)	(33)
Investing cash flow provided by discontinued operations including proceeds from sale of subsidiary operations, net of cash		830
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	(31)	797
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Borrowings from lines of credit	9,670	22,070
Repayments of lines of credit	(9,330)	(23,670)
Repayments of long-term debt	(101)	(874)
Payments of notes to stockholders		(169)
Financing cash flow provided by (used in) continuing operations	239	(2,643)
Financing cash flow used in discontinued operations		(80)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	239	(2,723)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	493	(751)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(947)	(2,008)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	3,742	3,995
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	2,795	1,987
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisition of equipment through capital lease	$ (112)

XML



LIQUIDITY

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

LIQUIDITY

LIQUIDITY

NOTE 2 — LIQUIDITY

The Company reported a net loss from continuing operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 of approximately $1.2 million and $2.1 million, respectively, and a loss from continuing operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 of approximately $1.3 million and $2.9 million, respectively.  The Company reported working capital of $8.5 million at June 30, 2011.  In combination with forecasted cash flows from operations and existing financing arrangements, the Company believes it has sufficient funding to support its working capital requirements during the next 12 months and beyond.

The ability of the Company to support its business plan is dependent upon its ability to achieve profitable operations, manage costs and satisfy long-term debt service obligations, which will begin in the first quarter of 2012. Management believes the Company is positioned to achieve profitability in the near future, manage costs through active and ongoing cost management processes and satisfy its debt service obligations.  However, if it is unable to do so, the Company may be required to sell additional assets or stock, complete a recapitalization, or consummate a merger transaction in order to continue operations.

To address these potential financing needs, the Company may need to explore a revised debt structure with its existing lenders; additional or new financing with another lender or lenders; expedite the sale of additional assets to generate cash; complete a recapitalization of the Company, or consummate a merger or other transaction.  Successfully executing these strategies is uncertain and there are many short term and long term risks associated with attempting to execute each of these initiatives.   Failure to meet the Company’s financing requirements, if and when needed, would have an adverse effect on the Company’s operations and/or ability to do business after that date or could restrict its growth, limit the development of new products, hinder its ability to fulfill existing or future orders or negatively affect its ability to secure new customers or product orders.

XML



CASUALTY LOSS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

CASUALTY LOSS

CASUALTY LOSS

NOTE 11 — CASUALTY LOSS

On September 27, 2010, the Company’s French subsidiary, CXR AJ, sustained significant damage to a portion of the building comprising its Abondant, France facility as a result of a fire.  The portion of the building damaged, which was fully depreciated at the time of the fire, was primarily used for component parts storage.  Virtually all of the component parts that were on-site were destroyed in the fire.  CXR AJ’s main operating facility, which includes administration, finance, sales and engineering, was not damaged by the fire.  Immediately after the fire, CXR AJ’s insurer was on-site evaluating the damage.  CXR AJ maintains adequate insurance coverage for such events and it anticipates that any business interruption impact will be recoverable under the insurance policy.

Subsequent to the fire, the Company recorded an impairment for the component parts inventory destroyed by the fire of €0.8 million (approximately $1.1 million).  As the CXR AJ insurance policy covers this inventory amount and the insurance company has confirmed that this inventory is covered under at least net value, the Company recorded a receivable for the same amount as the impairment loss.  The insurance company provided an advance of funds in December 2010 for €0.5 million (approximately $0.7 million using the average December 2010 exchange rate) and an additional advance of funds in April 2011 for €0.4 million, both of which were applied towards replacement of the component parts that were destroyed by the fire.  The advances received from the insurance company in December 2010 and April 2011 were applied to the receivable.  We continue to work with our local insurance company to finalize valuation and settlement of our claims related to inventory replacement, business interruption and building construction.

XML



Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
Accounts receivable, allowances for doubtful accounts (in dollars)	$ 113	$ 152
Preferred stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Preferred stock, Authorized shares	10,000,000	10,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued	0	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	0	0
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.0033	$ 0.0033
Common stock, Authorized shares	75,000,000	75,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	10,667,337	10,667,337
Common stock, shares outstanding	10,667,337	10,667,337