XML 81 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements
Under FASB guidance, fair value is defined as the price expected to be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in a transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, the Company uses various valuation approaches, including quoted market prices and discounted cash flows. The FASB guidance also establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that the market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from independent sources. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect a company’s judgment concerning the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available at that time. The fair value hierarchy is broken down into the following three levels based on the reliability of inputs:
Level 1 – Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments that the Company is able to access. Since valuations are based on quoted prices which are readily and regularly available in an active market, valuation of these products can be done without a significant degree of judgment.
Level 2 – Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for instruments that are similar, or quoted prices in markets that are not active for identical or similar instruments and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drives are observable in active markets.
Level 3 – Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. These values are generally determined using pricing models for which the assumptions utilize management’s estimates of market participant assumptions.
As of March 31, 2015 and September 30, 2014, all of the Company’s financial assets utilized Level 1 inputs.
As of March 31, 2015, the Company did not have any liabilities or non-financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
 

Available-for-sale marketable securities consisted of the following:
 
March 31, 2015
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
 
 
 
(In thousands)
 
 
Available-for-sale
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Level 1:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market instruments
 
$
9,326

 
$

 
$

 
$
9,326

Certificates of deposit
 
20,075

 

 

 
20,075

Total
 
29,401

 

 

 
29,401

Less: Amounts included in cash and cash
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
          equivalents
 
(27,970
)
 

 

 
(27,970
)
 
 
$
1,431

 
$

 
$

 
$
1,431

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
September 30, 2014
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Gains
 
Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Losses
 
Fair
Value
 
 
 
 
(In thousands)
 
 
Available-for-sale

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Level 1:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market instruments
 
$
22,519

 
$

 
$

 
$
22,519

Certificates of deposit
 
20,679

 

 

 
20,679

Total
 
43,198

 

 

 
43,198

Less: Amounts included in cash, cash
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
          equivalents and restricted cash
 
(41,721
)
 

 

 
(41,721
)
 
 
$
1,477

 
$

 
$

 
$
1,477


There were no transfers in or out of Level 1 assets during the three months ended March 31, 2015.
As of March 31, 2015 and September 30, 2014, the Company had cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and short-term investments in foreign financial institutions of $75.9 million ($1.0 million of which was in China and subject to exchange control regulations) and $71.9 million, respectively.