Note 17: Derivatives and Hedging Activities: Agreements with Derivative Counterparties Policy (Policies)	12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Policies
Agreements with Derivative Counterparties Policy	The Company has agreements with its derivative counterparties. If the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness, including a default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations. If the Bank fails to maintain its status as a well-capitalized institution, then the counterparty could terminate the derivative positions and the Company would be required to settle its obligations under the agreements. Similarly, the Company could be required to settle its obligations under certain of its agreements if certain regulatory events occurred, such as the issuance of a formal directive, or if the Company’s credit rating is downgraded below a specified level. As of December 31, 2014, the termination value of derivatives in a net liability position, which included accrued interest but excluded any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was $2.1 million. The Company has minimum collateral posting thresholds with its derivative counterparties. At December 31, 2014, the Company’s activity with its derivative counterparties had met the level at which the minimum collateral posting thresholds take effect and the Company had posted $3.1 million of collateral to satisfy the agreement. As of December 31, 2013, the termination value of derivatives in a net liability position, which included accrued interest but excluded any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was $480,000. At December 31, 2013, the Company’s activity with its derivative counterparties had met the level at which the minimum collateral posting thresholds take effect and the Company had posted $778,000 of collateral to satisfy the agreement. If the Company had breached any of these provisions at December 31, 2014 and 2013, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at the termination value.

Note 17: Derivatives and Hedging Activities: Agreements with Derivative Counterparties Policy (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2014

Agreements with Derivative Counterparties Policy

The Company has agreements with its derivative counterparties. If the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness, including a default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations. If the Bank fails to maintain its status as a well-capitalized institution, then the counterparty could terminate the derivative positions and the Company would be required to settle its obligations under the agreements. Similarly, the Company could be required to settle its obligations under certain of its agreements if certain regulatory events occurred, such as the issuance of a formal directive, or if the Company’s credit rating is downgraded below a specified level.

As of December 31, 2014, the termination value of derivatives in a net liability position, which included accrued interest but excluded any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was $2.1 million. The Company has minimum collateral posting thresholds with its derivative counterparties. At December 31, 2014, the Company’s activity with its derivative counterparties had met the level at which the minimum collateral posting thresholds take effect and the Company had posted $3.1 million of collateral to satisfy the agreement. As of December 31, 2013, the termination value of derivatives in a net liability position, which included accrued interest but excluded any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was $480,000. At December 31, 2013, the Company’s activity with its derivative counterparties had met the level at which the minimum collateral posting thresholds take effect and the Company had posted $778,000 of collateral to satisfy the agreement. If the Company had breached any of these provisions at December 31, 2014 and 2013, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at the termination value.