-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, ObPJO86d1Axov7y4ljBKPuWDtlsvyU6GojNyrYM74aJzA3PExAQba3TqbEFD7/UH XE1BeRdlkZFo9aURLlKbXg== 0000912057-02-020760.txt : 20020515 0000912057-02-020760.hdr.sgml : 20020515 20020515155416 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000912057-02-020760 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 2 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20020331 FILED AS OF DATE: 20020515 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: ROUSE COMPANY CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000085388 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: OPERATORS OF NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS [6512] IRS NUMBER: 520735512 STATE OF INCORPORATION: MD FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 001-11543 FILM NUMBER: 02652106 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 10275 LITTLE PATUXENT PKWY CITY: COLUMBIA STATE: MD ZIP: 21044-3456 BUSINESS PHONE: 4109926000 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 10275 LITTLE PATUXENT PARKWAY CITY: COLUMBIA STATE: MD ZIP: 21044 FORMER COMPANY: FORMER CONFORMED NAME: COMMUNITY RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT INC DATE OF NAME CHANGE: 19660913 10-Q 1 a2080011z10-q.htm FORM 10-Q
QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


Form 10-Q


ý

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended    March 31, 2002

OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from                          to                         

Commission File Number 0-1743


LOGO
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  52-0735512
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

10275 Little Patuxent Parkway
Columbia, Maryland

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

21044-3456
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code (410) 992-6000


        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ý                No o

        Indicate the number of shares outstanding of the issuer's common stock as of May 8, 2002:

Common Stock, $0.01 par value
Title of Class
  86,631,178
Number of Shares




Part I. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements:


THE ROUSE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
Three Months Ended March 31, 2002 and 2001
(Unaudited, in thousands, except per share amounts)

 
  Three months
ended March 31,

 
 
  2002
  2001
 
Revenues   $ 239,002   $ 246,384  
Operating expenses, exclusive of provision for bad debts, depreciation and amortization     119,289     123,637  
Interest expense     54,364     58,758  
Provision for bad debts     2,136     1,298  
Depreciation and amortization     33,284     31,418  
Other provisions and losses     9,616      
   
 
 
  Earnings before income taxes, equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate ventures, net gains (losses) on operating properties, discontinued operations, extraordinary items and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle     20,313     31,273  
Income taxes, primarily deferred     (10,320 )   (6,444 )
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate ventures     6,967     7,362  
   
 
 
  Earnings before net gains (losses) on operating properties, discontinued operations, extraordinary items and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle     16,960     32,191  
Net gains (losses) on operating properties     1,114     (401 )
   
 
 
  Earnings before discontinued operations, extraordinary items and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle     18,074     31,790  
Discontinued operations     (146 )   (119 )
Extraordinary losses     (3,225 )    
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle         (411 )
   
 
 
    Net earnings     14,703     31,260  

(continued)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

2



THE ROUSE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income, continued
Three Months Ended March 31, 2002 and 2001
(Unaudited, in thousands, except per share amounts)

 
  Three months
ended March 31,

 
 
  2002
  2001
 
Other items of comprehensive income (loss):              
    Minimum pension liability adjustment   $ (333 ) $ (500 )
    Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges     3,726      
   
 
 
  Comprehensive income   $ 18,096   $ 30,760  
   
 
 
  Net earnings applicable to common shareholders   $ 11,665   $ 28,222  
   
 
 
Earnings per share of common stock              
    Basic:              
      Earnings before discontinued operations, extraordinary items and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle   $ .18   $ .42  
      Discontinued operations          
      Extraordinary losses     (.04 )    
      Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle         (.01 )
   
 
 
        Total   $ .14   $ .41  
   
 
 
    Diluted:              
      Earnings before discontinued operations, extraordinary items and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle   $ .18   $ .41  
      Discontinued operations          
      Extraordinary losses     (.04 )    
      Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle         (.01 )
   
 
 
        Total   $ .14   $ .40  
   
 
 
  Dividends per share:              
    Common stock   $ .39   $ .355  
   
 
 
    Preferred stock   $ .75   $ .75  
   
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

3



THE ROUSE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets
March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001
(In thousands, except share data)

 
  March 31,
2002
(Unaudited)

  December 31,
2001

Assets:            
  Property:            
    Operating properties:            
      Property and deferred costs of projects   $ 4,406,298   $ 4,484,183
      Less accumulated depreciation and amortization     891,644     888,615
   
 
      3,514,654     3,595,568
    Properties in development     226,548     217,906
    Properties held for sale     68,782    
    Investment land and land held for development and sale     296,360     284,291
   
 
        Total property     4,106,344     4,097,765
  Investments in and advances to unconsolidated real estate ventures     278,004     269,573
  Prepaid expenses, receivables under finance leases and other assets     370,945     371,072
  Accounts and notes receivable     76,909     87,753
  Investments in marketable securities     22,333     22,157
  Cash and cash equivalents     286,831     32,123
   
 
        Total   $ 5,141,366   $ 4,880,443
   
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

4



THE ROUSE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets, continued
March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001
(In thousands, except share data)

 
  March 31,
2002
(Unaudited)

  December 31,
2001

 
Liabilities:              
  Debt:              
    Property debt not carrying a Parent
Company guarantee of repayment
  $ 2,638,289   $ 2,709,699  
    Parent Company debt and debt carrying a
Parent Company guarantee of repayment:
             
        Property debt     69,326     69,389  
        Other debt     627,500     709,732  
   
 
 
      696,826     779,121  
   
 
 
          Total debt     3,335,115     3,488,820  
   
 
 
  Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities     572,389     599,298  
Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of a trust holding solely Parent Company subordinated debt securities     136,965     136,965  

Shareholders' equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Series B Convertible Preferred stock with a liquidation preference of $202,500     41     41  
  Common stock of 1 cent par value per share; 250,000,000 shares authorized; 86,369,372 shares issued in 2002 and 69,354,169 shares issued in 2001     864     694  
  Additional paid-in capital     1,223,300     763,351  
  Accumulated deficit     (124,400 )   (102,425 )
  Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)     (2,908 )   (6,301 )
   
 
 
        Net shareholders' equity     1,096,897     655,360  
   
 
 
          Total   $ 5,141,366   $ 4,880,443  
   
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

5



THE ROUSE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Three Months Ended March 31, 2002 and 2001
(Unaudited, in thousands)

 
  2002
  2001
 
Cash flows from operating activities:              
  Rents and other revenues received   $ 178,783   $ 187,766  
  Proceeds from land sales and notes receivable from land sales     45,697     63,333  
  Interest received     3,133     1,796  
  Operating expenditures     (93,178 )   (110,603 )
  Land development expenditures     (31,197 )   (22,408 )
  Interest paid     (54,888 )   (51,294 )
  Operating distributions from unconsolidated real estate ventures     9,087     11,448  
   
 
 
          Net cash provided by operating activities     57,437     80,038  
   
 
 
Cash flows from investing activities:              
  Expenditures for properties in development     (27,404 )   (46,401 )
  Expenditures for improvements to existing properties     (10,350 )   (9,168 )
  Expenditures for property acquisitions     (6,365 )    
  Distributions from unconsolidated real estate ventures         7,000  
  Expenditures for investments in unconsolidated real estate ventures     (8,071 )   (9,383 )
  Expenditures for options to purchase euros     (11,298 )    
  Other     9     3,991  
   
 
 
          Net cash used by investing activities     (63,479 )   (53,961 )
   
 
 
Cash flows from financing activities:              
  Proceeds from issuance of property debt     29,129     83,502  
  Repayments of property debt:              
      Scheduled principal payments     (24,386 )   (14,933 )
      Other payments     (72,819 )   (52,330 )
  Proceeds from issuance of other debt         4,992  
  Repayments of other debt     (82,000 )   (17,400 )
  Purchases of common stock     (6,538 )   (1,968 )
  Proceeds from issuance of common stock     456,427      
  Proceeds from exercise of stock options     3,369     264  
  Dividends paid     (36,678 )   (27,402 )
  Other     (5,754 )   (557 )
   
 
 
          Net cash provided (used) by financing activities     260,750     (25,832 )
   
 
 
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents     254,708     245  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period     32,123     14,742  
   
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period   $ 286,831   $ 14,987  
   
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

6



THE ROUSE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, continued
Three Months Ended March 31, 2002 and 2001
(Unaudited, in thousands)

 
  2002
  2001
 
Reconciliation of net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:              
  Net earnings   $ 14,703   $ 31,260  
  Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:              
      Depreciation and amortization     34,113     32,433  
      Decrease in undistributed earnings of unconsolidated real estate ventures     2,120     4,086  
      Net losses (gains) on operating properties     (1,114 )   401  
      Extraordinary losses     3,225      
      Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle         411  
      Participation expense pursuant to Contingent Stock Agreement     8,725     10,216  
      Provision for bad debts     2,154     1,333  
      Deferred income taxes     7,564     5,518  
      Changes in operating assets and liabilities and other, net     (14,053 )   (5,620 )
   
 
 
  Net cash provided by operating activities   $ 57,437   $ 80,038  
   
 
 
Schedule of noncash investing and financing activities:              
  Common stock issued pursuant to Contingent Stock Agreement   $ 6,465   $ 13,205  
  Lapses of restrictions on common stock awards     396     2,212  
  Debt assumed by purchasers of land     3,629     691  
  Common stock issued in acquisition of voting interests in majority financial interest ventures         3,500  
  Debt and other liabilities assumed in acquisition of majority financial interest ventures         547,531  
  Property and other assets obtained in acquisition of majority financial interest ventures         884,572  
  Capital lease obligations incurred     831      
   
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

7



THE ROUSE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
March 31, 2002

(1)    Principles of statement presentation

        The unaudited consolidated financial statements of The Rouse Company, our subsidiaries and partnerships ("we," "Rouse" or "us") include all adjustments which are necessary, in the opinion of management, to fairly reflect our financial position and results of operations. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The statements have been prepared using the accounting policies described in the 2001 Annual Report to Shareholders.

        In October 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of," and APB Opinion No. 30, "Reporting the Results of Operations—Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions." The Statement does not change the fundamental provisions of SFAS No. 121; however, it resolves various implementation issues of SFAS No. 121 and establishes a single accounting model for long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale. It retains the requirement of Opinion No. 30 to report separately discontinued operations, but it extends that reporting for all periods presented to a component of an entity that, subsequent to or on January 1, 2002, either has been disposed of (by sale, abandonment, or in distribution to owners) or is classified as held for sale. Additionally, SFAS No. 144 requires that assets and liabilities of components held for sale, if material, be disclosed separately in the balance sheet. We adopted SFAS No. 144 effective January 1, 2002.

        Under the provisions of SFAS No. 144, we classified 12 community retail centers in Columbia, Maryland and Tampa Bay Center as properties held for sale in the first quarter of 2002. The 12 community retail centers were sold in April 2002 (see note 11) and we anticipate selling Tampa Bay Center during 2002. We decided to sell these properties as they do not meet one of our primary business strategies of owning and operating large-scale premier shopping centers. The operating results of these properties do not materially affect the reported segment results in note 5.

        Properties held for sale at March 31, 2002 are summarized as follows (in thousands):

  Operating properties, net   $ 67,769
  Properties in development     134
  Other assets     879
   
Total   $ 68,782
   

8


        Operating results of properties classified as held for sale in 2002 are included in discontinued operations for all periods presented. Operating results for these properties are summarized as follows:

 
  Three months
ended March 31,

 
 
  2002
  2001
 
  Revenues   $ 4,583   $ 5,240  
  Operating expenses, exclusive of depreciation and amortization     2,298     2,563  
  Interest expense     932     1,403  
  Depreciation and amortization     829     1,015  
  Income taxes, primarily deferred     670     378  
   
 
 
Total   $ (146 ) $ (119 )
   
 
 

        In order to conform to general industry practice, we have also reclassified certain building and land improvement costs that are recoverable from tenants from other assets to property. These costs and related accumulated depreciation were $58.7 million and $37.5 million, respectively, at March 31, 2002 and $56.7 million and $35.5 million, respectively, at December 31, 2001. In connection with this reclassification, we reclassified the depreciation of these assets from operating expenses to depreciation. Depreciation of these assets was approximately $2.0 million and $1.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

        In addition to the above reclassifications, we have reclassified certain other amounts for 2001 to conform to our current presentation.

(2)    Tax status

        We elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (REIT) pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, effective January 1, 1998. We believe that we met the qualifications for REIT status as of March 31, 2002 and intend to meet the qualifications in the future.

        A REIT is permitted to own up to 100% of the voting stock in taxable REIT subsidiaries ("TRS"). TRS are corporations that are permitted to engage in nonqualifying REIT activities. We own and operate several TRS that are principally engaged in the development and sale of land for residential, commercial and other uses, primarily in and around Columbia, Maryland and Summerlin, Nevada. The TRS also operate and/or own several retail centers and office and other properties. Except with respect to the TRS, management does not believe that we will be liable for significant income taxes at the Federal level or in most of the states in which we operate in 2002 and future years.

        In connection with our election to be taxed as a REIT, we have also elected to be subject to the "built-in gain" rules on the assets of our Qualified REIT Subsidiaries ("QRS"). Under these rules, taxes will be payable at the time and to the extent that the net unrealized gains on our assets at the date of conversion to REIT status are recognized in taxable dispositions of such assets in the ten-year period following conversion. Such net unrealized gains were approximately $2.5 billion. We believe that we will not be required to make significant payments of taxes on built-in gains throughout the ten-year period due to the availability of our net operating loss carryforward to offset built-in gains which might be recognized and the potential for us to make nontaxable dispositions, if necessary. It may be

9



necessary to recognize a liability for such taxes in the future if our plans and intentions with respect to QRS asset dispositions, or the related tax laws, change.

(3)    Unconsolidated real estate ventures

        We own interests in unconsolidated real estate ventures that own and/or develop properties. We use these ventures to limit our risk associated with individual properties and to reduce our capital requirements. These ventures are accounted for using the equity or cost method, as appropriate. At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, these ventures were primarily partnerships and corporations which own retail centers. Most of these properties are managed by our affiliates. These ventures also include joint ventures formed in connection with the contribution of our ownership interests in two development projects.

(4)    Debt

        Debt is summarized as follows (in thousands):

 
  March 31, 2002
  December 31, 2001
 
  Total
  Due in
one year

  Total
  Due in
one year

Mortgages and bonds   $ 2,646,855   $ 223,844   $ 2,717,898   $ 168,158
Medium-term notes     51,500     3,000     51,500     3,000
Credit facility borrowings     140,000         222,000    
Other loans     496,760     157,164     497,422     42,774
   
 
 
 
  Total   $ 3,335,115   $ 384,008   $ 3,488,820   $ 213,932
   
 
 
 

        The amounts due in one year reflect the terms of existing loan agreements except where refinancing commitments from outside lenders have been obtained. In these instances, maturities are determined based on the terms of the refinancing commitments.

(5)    Segment information

        We have five reportable segments: retail centers, office and other properties, community development, commercial development and corporate. The operating measure used to assess operating results for the reportable segments is Net Operating Income ("NOI"). We define NOI as net earnings (computed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America), excluding cumulative effects of changes in accounting principles, extraordinary items, net gains (losses) on operating properties, certain other provisions and losses, real estate depreciation and amortization, deferred income taxes, certain current income taxes and fixed charges. Fixed charges include interest expense, net of interest income earned on corporate investments, distributions on Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities, ground rent expense and certain preference returns to partners. Additionally, equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate ventures and minority interests are adjusted to reflect NOI on the same basis. Effective January 1, 2002, we revised our definition of NOI to exclude ground rents and depreciation attributable to building and land improvement costs that are recoverable from tenants. Accordingly, NOI for prior periods has been presented in conformity with the revised definition.

10



        We use the same accounting policies for our segment reporting as those used to prepare our consolidated financial statements, except that:

    we account for real estate ventures in which we have joint interest and control and certain other minority interest ventures ("proportionate share ventures") using the proportionate share method rather than the equity method; and

    we include our share of NOI less fixed charges of other unconsolidated minority interest ventures ("other ventures") in revenues.

        These differences affect only the reported revenues and operating expenses of the segments and have no effect on our reported net earnings.

        Operating results for the segments are summarized as follows (in thousands):

 
  Retail
Centers

  Office
and Other
Properties

  Community
Development

  Commercial
Development

  Corporate
  Total
Three months ended
March 31, 2002
                                   
Revenues (1)   $ 160,011   $ 50,234   $ 56,217   $   $   $ 266,462
Operating expenses(2)     64,991     19,349     36,508     3,365     4,179     128,392
   
 
 
 
 
 
  NOI   $ 95,020   $ 30,885   $ 19,709   $ (3,365 ) $ (4,179 ) $ 138,070
   
 
 
 
 
 

Three months ended
March 31, 2001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Revenues (1)   $ 153,333   $ 50,928   $ 68,614   $   $   $ 272,875
Operating expenses(2)     63,694     19,080     42,053     1,528     3,490     129,845
   
 
 
 
 
 
  NOI   $ 89,639   $ 31,848   $ 26,561   $ (1,528 ) $ (3,490 ) $ 143,030
   
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
Revenues exclude interest income earned on corporate investments.
(2)
Operating expenses include provisions for bad debts and certain current income taxes and exclude ground rent expense, distributions on Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities and real estate depreciation and amortization.

11


        Reconciliations of total revenues and operating expenses reported above to the related amounts in the consolidated financial statements and of NOI reported above to earnings before net gains (losses) on operating properties, discontinued operations, extraordinary items and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle in the consolidated financial statements are summarized as follows (in thousands):

 
  Three months
ended March 31,

 
 
  2002
  2001
 
Revenues:              
  Total reported above   $ 266,462   $ 272,875  
  Corporate interest income     1,219     324  
  Our share of revenues of proportionate share ventures     (21,795 )   (20,297 )
  Our share of NOI less fixed charges of other ventures     (2,796 )   (2,367 )
  Revenues of discontinued operations     (4,583 )   (5,240 )
  Other     495     1,089  
   
 
 
        Total in consolidated financial statements   $ 239,002   $ 246,384  
   
 
 
Operating expenses, exclusive of provision for bad debts, depreciation and amortization:              
  Total reported above   $ 128,392   $ 129,845  
  Distributions on Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities     3,218     3,218  
  Ground rent expense     2,147     2,200  
  Our share of operating expenses of proportionate share ventures     (7,103 )   (7,550 )
  Provision for bad debts     (2,136 )   (1,298 )
  Current income taxes     (3,426 )   (1,304 )
  Operating expenses of discontinued operations     (2,298 )   (2,563 )
  Other     495     1,089  
   
 
 
        Total in consolidated financial statements   $ 119,289   $ 123,637  
   
 
 
Operating results:              
  NOI reported above   $ 138,070   $ 143,030  
  Interest expense     (54,364 )   (58,758 )
  Ground rent expense     (2,147 )   (2,200 )
  Our share of fixed charges of proportionate share ventures     (7,685 )   (5,138 )
  Corporate interest income     1,219     324  
  Distributions on Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities     (3,218 )   (3,218 )
  Other provisions and losses     (9,616 )    
  Depreciation and amortization     (33,284 )   (31,418 )
  Deferred income tax provision     (6,894 )   (5,140 )
  NOI of discontinued operations     (2,285 )   (2,677 )
  Our share of depreciation and amortization and gains (losses) on operating properties of unconsolidated real estate ventures, net     (2,836 )   (2,614 )
   
 
 
  Earnings before net gains (losses) on operating properties, discontinued operations, extraordinary items and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle in consolidated financial statements   $ 16,960   $ 32,191  
   
 
 

12


        The assets by segment are as follows (in thousands):

 
  March 31,
2002

  December 31,
2001

Retail Centers   $ 3,478,590   $ 3,457,956
Office and Other Properties     1,031,780     1,053,840
Community Development     480,744     472,226
Commercial Development     155,758     134,503
Corporate     369,504     124,232
   
 
  Total   $ 5,516,376   $ 5,242,757
   
 

        Total segment assets exceeds total assets reported in the financial statements due to the inclusion of our share of the assets of the proportionate share ventures.

(6)    Extraordinary losses

        The extraordinary losses for the three months ended March 31, 2002 related to the extinguishment of debt prior to scheduled maturity (net of income tax benefits of $2.1 million). The sources of funds used to pay the debt and the prepayment penalties were from the refinancing of property debt and proceeds from the issuance of common stock in January/February 2002.

(7)    Other provisions and losses

        The other provisions and losses for the three months ended March 31, 2002 were attributable to a loss on options to purchase euros ($8.2 million) and our equity in an impairment provision recorded by MerchantWired ($1.4 million).

        A portion of the purchase price for the acquisition of assets from Rodamco North America N.V. ("Rodamco") (see note 11) was payable in euros. In January 2002, we acquired options to purchase 601 million euros at a weighted-average per euro price of $0.8819. These transactions were executed to reduce our exposure to movements in currency exchange rates. The contracts expire in May 2002 and had an aggregate cost of $11.3 million. At March 31, 2002, the value of the contracts was $3.1 million and we recorded a loss of $8.2 million.

13


(8)    Earnings per share

        Information relating to the calculations of earnings per share (EPS) of common stock for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001 is summarized as follows (in thousands):

 
  2002
  2001
 
 
  Basic
  Diluted
  Basic
  Diluted
 
Earnings before discontinued operations, extraordinary items and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle   $ 18,074   $ 18,074   $ 31,790   $ 31,790  
Dividends on unvested common stock awards and other     (231 )   (231 )   (172 )   (143 )
Dividends on Preferred stock     (3,038 )   (3,038 )   (3,038 )   (3,038 )
   
 
 
 
 
Adjusted earnings before discontinued operations, extraordinary items and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle used in EPS computation   $ 14,805   $ 14,805   $ 28,580   $ 28,609  
   
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average shares outstanding     81,329     81,329     68,434     68,434  
Dilutive securities                          
  Options, unvested common stock awards and other         1,258         912  
   
 
 
 
 
Adjusted weighted-average shares used in EPS computation     81,329     82,587     68,434     69,346  
   
 
 
 
 

        Effects of potentially dilutive securities are presented only in periods in which they are dilutive.

(9)    Commitments and Contingencies

        We have guaranteed the repayment of a construction loan of the unconsolidated real estate venture that is developing the Village of Merrick Park. At March 31, 2002, the outstanding balance under this loan was $80.8 million. The maximum amount that may be borrowed under the loan is $200 million. The amount of the guarantee may be reduced to a minimum of 20% upon the achievement of certain lender requirements. Additionally, venture partners have provided guarantees to us for their share (60%) of the construction loan.

        During 2001, we leased land and improvements at Fashion Show to an entity that is developing a portion of the expansion of the retail center. In connection with this lease, we have guaranteed the repayment of construction loan borrowings by the lessee. At March 31, 2002, the outstanding balance under this loan was $59.8 million. The maximum amount that may be borrowed under the loan is $111 million. The guarantee may be partially reduced upon the achievement of certain lender requirements. An affiliate of Rodamco owned a 99% interest in the lessee, and we acquired this interest in the acquisition of the assets of Rodamco described in note 11. A subsidiary of The Rouse Company Incentive Compensation Statutory Trust, an entity that we neither own nor control, owns the controlling interest in the lessee.

        We and certain of our subsidiaries are defendants in various litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which involve claims for damages that are substantial in amount. Some of these litigation matters are covered by insurance. We are also aware of claims arising from disputes in the ordinary course of business. In our opinion, adequate provision has been made for losses with respect to litigation matters and other claims, where appropriate, and the ultimate resolution of these matters is not likely to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position. Due to our fluctuating net earnings, it is not possible to predict whether the resolution of these matters is likely to have a material effect on our net earnings and it is, therefore, possible that the resolution of these matters could have such an effect in any future quarter or year.

14



(10)    Shelf registration statement

        In January and February of 2002, we issued 16.675 million shares of common stock for net proceeds of $456.4 million ($27.40 per share less issuance costs) under our effective shelf registration statement. We used the proceeds of the stock issuance to repay property and other debt and to fund a portion of the purchase price of the acquisition of the assets of Rodamco described in note 11.

        At March 31, 2002, an aggregate of $1.4 billion remained available under the shelf registration statement for the future sale (based on the public offering price) of common stock, Preferred stock and debt securities.

(11)    Subsequent events

        On April 2, 2002, we sold our interests in 12 community retail centers in Columbia for net proceeds of approximately $111 million and recorded a gain of approximately $29 million (net of income taxes) on this transaction. We used the proceeds from this transaction to fund a portion of the cash payments required to close the acquisition of assets from Rodamco North America N.V. ("Rodamco").

        In January 2002, we, Simon Property Group, Inc. and Westfield America Trust announced that affiliates of each (collectively, the "purchasers") entered into a Purchase Agreement with Rodamco to purchase substantially all of the assets of Rodamco for an aggregate purchase price of approximately 2.48 billion euros, subject to adjustment, and the assumption of substantially all of Rodamco's liabilities. In connection with the Purchase Agreement, affiliates of the purchasers entered into a Joint Purchase Agreement that specified the assets each would acquire and set forth the basis upon which the portion of the aggregate purchase price to be paid to Rodamco by each purchaser would be determined. On May 3, 2002, the purchase of the assets of Rodamco closed. We paid approximately 605 million euros (approximately $546 million based on exchange rates then in effect) to Rodamco at closing. We also paid approximately $261 million to retire certain obligations of Rodamco and to pay transaction costs. Our share of the debt secured by the operating properties in which we acquired interests is approximately $662 million and our share of subsidiary perpetual preferred stock assumed by the purchasers is approximately $24 million. The final allocation of the purchase price among the purchasers is subject to adjustment, and we expect to incur additional transaction costs.

        In the acquisition, we acquired, directly or indirectly, interests in the following operating properties:

Property

  Interest
acquired

  Location
Collin Creek (1)     70%   Plano, TX
Lakeside Mall (1)   100%   Sterling Heights, MI
North Star (1)     96%   San Antonio, TX
Oakbrook Center (2)     47%   Oakbrook, IL
Perimeter Mall (1)     50%   Atlanta, GA
The Streets at South Point     94%   Durham, NC
Water Tower Place (2)     52%   Chicago, IL
Willowbrook (1)     62%   Wayne, NJ
Notes:
(1) As a result of the acquisition, we own 100% interests in these properties.
(2) Property also contains significant office space.

15


        In addition, we acquired a 99% interest in an entity that is developing a portion of the expansion of Fashion Show on land that it leased from us. The debt of this entity was approximately $72 million at closing.

        The purchasers jointly own other assets acquired from Rodamco. Our ownership interests in these jointly held assets is approximately 27.3%. These assets include investments in real estate operating companies (South Square Mall, River Ridge, the Plaza at Saw Mill Place, Westin New York and Kravco), an investment in MerchantWired and investments in entities that hold purchase money notes arising from the sales of certain of the Rodamco assets prior to the closing. The purchasers also jointly acquired a property management business, Urban Retail Properties Co., which they intend to operate.

        In connection with the purchase, we borrowed approximately $392.5 million on our bridge loan facility from Banc of America Securities, LLC and Banc of America Mortgage Capital Corporation. The bridge loan facility provides for no additional availability and has an initial maturity of six months from the closing of the acquisition. We have the right to extend the maturity on $320 million of the borrowings for an additional six months and on $250 million for another six months. We believe we will have sufficient liquidity to repay the borrowings under the bridge facility before its extended maturity.

        As discussed above, a portion of the purchase price was payable in euros. In January 2002, we acquired options to purchase 601 million euros at a weighted-average per euro price of $0.8819. These transactions were executed to reduce our risk of movements in currency exchange rates. The contracts were scheduled to expire in May 2002 and had an aggregate cost of $11.3 million. At March 31, 2002, the value of these contracts was approximately $3.1 million and we recorded a loss of $8.2 million. In April 2002, we sold the contracts for net proceeds of approximately $10.2 million and recorded a gain of approximately $7.1 million. As a result, the net loss on these contracts was $1.1 million. We also executed and subsequently sold a euro forward contract and realized a gain of approximately $2.3 million and realized transaction gains of $3.0 million on euros we acquired and used in the closing of the purchase. As of May 15, 2002, we owned no euros or financial instruments that exposed us to risk of movements in currency exchange rates.

        Shortly before the closing of the acquisition of the Rodamco assets, we sold our interest in Franklin Park, a regional retail center in Toledo, Ohio, to an affiliate of Westfield America Trust for approximately $65.3 million, including cash proceeds of approximately $20.6 million. We recorded a gain of approximately $41 million on this transaction. We used the proceeds from this transaction to fund a portion of the cash payment required to close the acquisition of assets from Rodamco.

(12)    New financial accounting standards not yet adopted

        In April 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections." Upon adoption of SFAS No. 145, we will be required to apply the criteria in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30, "Reporting the Results of Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions," in determining the classification of gains and losses resulting from the extinguishment of debt.

        SFAS No. 145 is effective for us on January 1, 2003 with early adoption of the provisions related to the rescission of SFAS No. 4 encouraged. Upon adoption, we will reclassify our extraordinary gains and losses from extinguishment of debt to other provisions and losses, net. We expect to adopt the provisions relating to the rescission of SFAS No. 4 in the second quarter of 2002.

16



Item 2.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

THE ROUSE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

        The following discussion and analysis covers any material changes in financial condition since December 31, 2001 and any material changes in the results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2002 as compared to the same period in 2001. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in the 2001 Annual Report to Shareholders.

General:

        Through our subsidiaries and affiliates, we acquire, develop and manage a diversified portfolio of retail centers, office and industrial buildings and mixed-use and other properties located throughout the United States. We also develop and sell land for residential, commercial and other uses, primarily in and around Columbia, Maryland and Summerlin, Nevada.

        Our primary business strategies include owning and operating (1) premier properties—shopping centers and large-scale mixed-use projects in major markets across the United States and (2) geographically concentrated office and industrial buildings, principally complementing community development activities. In order to execute these strategies, we evaluate opportunities to develop or acquire properties and to expand and/or renovate properties in our portfolio. We plan to continue making substantial investments to expand and/or renovate, acquire and develop properties. For example,

    we acquired interests in eight high-quality operating properties and other assets on May 3, 2002 from Rodamco North America N.V. ("Rodamco");

    we are an investor in a joint venture that is developing the Village of Merrick Park, a large-scale mixed-use project in Coral Gables, Florida, that is expected to open in September 2002; and

    we and a lessee are currently expanding and redeveloping Fashion Show, a retail center on "the strip" in Las Vegas, Nevada, and expect to complete the first phase of this project in November 2002.

        We also assess whether particular properties are meeting or have the potential to meet our investment criteria. We have disposed of interests or transferred majority interests in more than 30 retail centers and numerous other properties since 1993 (sometimes using tax-deferred exchanges) and may dispose of selected properties that are not meeting or are not considered to have the potential to continue to meet our investment criteria. We may also dispose of interests in properties for other reasons. In March 2002, we agreed to sell our interests in 12 community retail centers in Columbia for net proceeds of approximately $111 million. The sale closed in April 2002 and we recorded a gain of $29 million (net of income taxes) on the transaction. In anticipation of this transaction, we repaid $58.1 million of debt secured by these properties in March 2002 and incurred an extraordinary loss on this repayment of $3.2 million (net of income tax benefits of $2.1 million). Also in April 2002, we sold our interest in Franklin Park, a retail center in Toledo, Ohio, for approximately $65.3 million, including cash proceeds of approximately $20.6 million, and recorded a gain of approximately $41 million. We used the net proceeds of these transactions to fund a portion of the cash payments required to close the acquisition of assets from Rodamco. Other disposition decisions and related transactions may cause us to recognize gains or losses that could have material effects on reported net earnings in future quarters or fiscal years, and, taken together with the use of sales proceeds, may have a material effect on our overall consolidated financial position.

        We also develop and manage large-scale land development projects, including the communities of Columbia and Emerson in Howard County, Maryland and Summerlin, Nevada. To leverage our

17



experience and provide further growth opportunities, we seek opportunities to acquire new and/or existing land development projects. Net cash flows from community development operations provide an additional source of funding for our other activities.

Portfolio changes:

        We believe that space in high-quality, dominant retail centers in densely populated, affluent areas will continue to be in demand by retailers and that these retail centers are better able to withstand difficult conditions in the overall economy, specifically in the real estate and retail industries. In 2001, we completed an expansion of The Mall in Columbia (May 2001) and the development of several new operating properties: Centerpointe Plaza (Summerlin Village Center—September 2001) and two office buildings in Summerlin Town Center (January and February of 2001). We also sold a building in the Hunt Valley Business Center in April 2001.

Operating results:

        As indicated in the 2001 Annual Report to Shareholders, the discussion of operating results covers each of our business segments, as management believes that a segment analysis provides the most effective means of understanding the business. It also provides information about other elements of the consolidated statement of operations that are not included in the segment results. You should refer to the consolidated statements of operations and note 5 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q when reading this discussion and analysis. We use net operating income ("NOI")to measure and assess operating results for the reportable segments. As discussed in note 5, we define NOI as net earnings (computed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America), excluding cumulative effects of changes in accounting principles, extraordinary items, net gains (losses) on operating properties, certain other provisions and losses, real estate depreciation and amortization, deferred income taxes, certain current income taxes and fixed charges. Fixed charges include interest expense, net of interest income earned on corporate investments, distributions on Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities, ground rent expense and certain preference returns to partners. Additionally, equity in earnings of certain unconsolidated real estate ventures is adjusted to reflect NOI on the same basis. Effective January 1, 2002, we revised our definition of NOI to exclude ground rents and depreciation attributable to building and land improvement costs that are recoverable from tenants. Accordingly, NOI for prior periods has been presented in conformity with the revised definition.

        As discussed in note 5, we use the same accounting policies for our segment reporting as those used to prepare our consolidated financial statements, except that:

    we account for real estate ventures in which we have joint interest and control and certain other minority interest ventures ("proportionate share ventures") using the proportionate share method rather than the equity method; and

    we include our share of NOI less fixed charges of other unconsolidated minority interest ventures ("other ventures") in revenues.

        These differences affect only the reported revenues and operating expenses of the segments and have no effect on our reported net earnings. Revenues and operating expenses reported for the segments are reconciled to the related amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements in note 5. The reasons for significant changes in revenues and expenses comprising NOI and other elements of net earnings are discussed below.

18



Operating Properties—Retail Centers:

        Operating results of retail centers are summarized as follows (in millions):

 
  Three months
ended March 31,

 
  2002
  2001
Revenues   $ 160.0   $ 153.3
Operating expenses, exclusive of ground rents and depreciation and amortization     65.0     63.7
   
 
  NOI   $ 95.0   $ 89.6
   
 

        Revenues increased $6.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002 compared to the same period in 2001. This increase was attributable primarily to the receipt of a management contract termination payment at Town & Country Center in Miami, Florida ($4.8 million) and higher rents on re-leased space at comparable properties. This increase was partially offset by lower average occupancy levels at comparable properties (91.6% in 2002 compared to 92.4% in 2001).

        Total operating expenses increased $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002, compared to the same period in 2001. This increase was attributable primarily to current Federal and state taxes related to the aforementioned management contract termination payment. Town & Country Center was managed by a taxable REIT subsidiary.

        We believe that the outlook is for continued growth in NOI from retail centers in 2002, as we believe we will benefit from the interests in properties acquired from Rodamco, properties expanded in 2001, the expected opening of the Village of Merrick Park in September 2002 and the expected opening of the first phase of the Fashion Show expansion in November 2002.

Operating Properties—Office and Other Properties:

        Operating results of office and other properties are summarized as follows (in millions):

 
  Three months
ended March 31,

 
  2002
  2001
Revenues   $ 50.2   $ 50.9
Operating expenses, exclusive of ground rents and depreciation and amortization     19.3     19.1
   
 
  NOI   $ 30.9   $ 31.8
   
 

        Office and other properties' revenues declined slightly to $50.2 million from $50.9 million in 2001's first quarter. This decrease was due primarily to lower occupancy at comparable properties (92.4% versus 93.9%). These lower occupancy levels are likely to persist for the balance of this year.

        Despite the anticipated lower occupancy levels, we expect NOI from our office and other properties segment in 2002 to exceed the 2001 results, as we believe we will benefit from the interests in properties acquired from Rodamco.

Community Development:

        Community development relates primarily to the communities of Columbia and Emerson in Howard County, Maryland and Summerlin, Nevada. Generally, revenues and NOI from land sales are affected by such factors as the availability to purchasers of construction and permanent mortgage

19



financing at acceptable interest rates, consumer and business confidence, availability of saleable land for particular uses and our decisions to sell, develop or retain land.

        Operating results of community development are summarized as follows (in millions):

 
  Three months
ended March 31,

 
  2002
  2001
Nevada Operations:            
  Revenues:            
    Summerlin   $ 33.7   $ 37.9
    Other     1.4     1.8
  Operating costs and expenses:            
    Summerlin     24.8     27.1
    Other     1.6     1.6
   
 
  NOI   $ 8.7   $ 11.0
   
 

Columbia and Other:

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Revenues   $ 21.1   $ 28.9
  Operating costs and expenses     10.1     13.3
   
 
  NOI   $ 11.0   $ 15.6
   
 

Total:

 

 

 

 

 

 
  Revenues   $ 56.2   $ 68.6
  Operating costs and expenses     36.5     42.0
   
 
  NOI   $ 19.7   $ 26.6
   
 

        Revenues from Summerlin decreased $4.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002, while related costs and expenses decreased $2.3 million, compared to the same period in 2001. Revenues from Columbia and other community development operations decreased $7.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002, while related costs and expenses decreased $3.2 million, compared to the same period in 2001.

        The decrease in revenues and operating costs and expenses at both Summerlin and Columbia and other is primarily attributable to decreases in residential sales. The decrease in residential sales is attributable to a lower supply of saleable land as we begin new development in Summerlin, Nevada and Howard County, Maryland. We have received strong interest from home builders and home buyers and anticipate the full year results of 2002 will surpass the results of 2001.

Commercial Development:

        Commercial development expenses consist primarily of preconstruction expenses, new business costs and disposition expenses. Preconstruction and new business costs relate to the costs of evaluating potential projects which may not go forward to completion, acquisition of properties and other business opportunities. Disposition expenses relate to the costs of evaluating and planning for the disposition of properties. Commercial development expenses increased by $1.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002, compared to the same period in 2001. The increase was primarily attributable to internal effort costs related to the acquisition of operating properties and other assets from Rodamco.

20



Corporate:

        Corporate operating expenses consist of general and administrative costs and our equity in the operating loss of MerchantWired, an unconsolidated joint venture with other real estate companies to provide broadband telecommunication services to tenants.

        Total corporate expenses increased $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002, compared to the same period in 2001. The increases were attributable primarily to costs incurred in evaluating various corporate structure and tax planning strategies.

Other operating information:

        Interest expense: Interest expense was $54.4 million and $58.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The decrease was attributable primarily to lower debt balances and lower average interest rates on variable rate debt.

        Depreciation and amortization: Depreciation and amortization expense was $33.3 million and $31.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The increase was attributable primarily to the portfolio changes described above and other building improvement additions in 2001 and 2002.

        Other provisions and losses: The other provisions and losses for the three months ended March 31, 2002 were attributable to a loss on options to purchase euros ($8.2 million) and our equity in an impairment provision recorded by MerchantWired ($1.4 million).

        The cash portion of the purchase price for the acquisition of assets from Rodamco was payable in euros. In January 2002, we acquired options to purchase 601 million euros at a weighted-average per euro price of $0.8819. These transactions were executed to reduce our exposure to movements in currency exchange rates. The contracts expire in May 2002 and had an aggregate cost of $11.3 million. At March 31, 2002, the value of the options was $3.1 million and we recorded a loss of $8.2 million.

        Income taxes: We own and operate several taxable REIT subsidiaries ("TRS"), which allows us to engage in certain nonqualifying REIT activities. With respect to the TRS, we are liable for income taxes at the Federal and state levels, and the current and deferred income tax provisions relate primarily to the earnings of the TRS.

        Equity in earnings of unconsolidated real estate ventures: For segment reporting purposes and in this analysis, our share of the NOI of unconsolidated real estate ventures is included in the operating results of retail centers, office and other properties and community development. Equity in earnings of the unconsolidated real estate ventures was $7.0 million and $7.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

        Extraordinary losses, net: The extraordinary loss of $3.2 million (net of deferred income tax benefits of $2.1 million) for the three months ended March 31, 2002 is the result of the extinguishment of debt prior to its scheduled maturity.

        Net earnings: The decrease in net earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2002 as compared to the same period in 2001 was attributable to the factors discussed above.

21


Financial condition, liquidity and capital resources:

        Shareholders' equity increased by $441.5 million from December 31, 2001 to March 31, 2002. The increase was primarily attributable to the sale of common stock in January and February 2002, partially offset by the payment of regular quarterly dividends on our common and Preferred stocks.

        We had cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities totaling $309.2 million at March 31, 2002, including $4.4 million of investments held for restricted uses. Approximately $284 million of this cash balance was used to fund the cash portion of the purchase price of the assets acquired from Rodamco.

        In 2000, we obtained a $375 million unsecured revolving credit facility from a group of lenders. The facility is available until December 2003, subject to a one-year renewal option. The revolving credit facility may be used for various purposes, including land and project development costs, property acquisitions, liquidity and other corporate needs. It may also be used to pay some portion of existing debt. Availability under the facility was $235 million at March 31, 2002.

        Our debt at March 31, 2002 is summarized as follows (in millions):

 
  Total
  Due in
one year

Mortgages and bonds   $ 2,646.8   $ 223.8
Medium-term notes     51.5     3.0
Credit facility borrowings     140.0    
Other loans     496.8     157.2
   
 
  Total   $ 3,335.1   $ 384.0
   
 

        As of March 31, 2002, our debt due in one year included balloon payments of $316.9 million. The balloon payments are expected to be made at or before the scheduled maturity dates of the related loans from proceeds of property refinancings (including refinancings of the maturing mortgages), credit facility borrowings and other available corporate funds. We may also obtain extensions of maturities on certain loans.

        We expect to spend more than $300 million for new developments, expansions to existing properties and investments in unconsolidated joint ventures in the remainder of 2002. These expenditures will be financed primarily by the proceeds of construction loans secured by the projects and credit facility borrowings. We are continually evaluating sources of capital, and we believe there are satisfactory sources available for all requirements without necessitating the disposition of operating properties. However, selective dispositions of interests in operating properties may provide capital resources.

        We have a shelf registration statement for the sale of up to an aggregate of approximately $2.25 billion (based on the public offering price) of common stock, Preferred stock and debt securities. In January and February of 2002, we issued 16.675 million shares of common stock for aggregate gross proceeds of $456.9 million ($27.40 per share) under the shelf registration statement. At March 31, 2002, we had issued approximately $815 million of common stock and debt securities under the shelf registration statement, with a remaining availability of approximately $1.4 billion.

        Net cash provided by operating activities was $57.4 million and $80.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The level of cash flows provided by operating activities is affected by the timing of receipts of rents, proceeds from land sales and other revenues and payment of operating and interest expenses and land development costs. The decrease in net cash provided of $22.6 million was attributable primarily to lower proceeds from land sales and higher land development expenditures. As discussed in the Community Development segment analysis, we began significant new development in Summerlin, Nevada and Howard County, Maryland in 2002.

22



        Net cash used by investing activities was $63.5 million and $54.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The increase in net cash used of $9.5 million was due primarily to expenditures for options to purchase euros, lower distributions from unconsolidated real estate ventures and expenditures to acquire remaining interests in certain community retail centers in Columbia, Maryland that we did not previously own 100%. These increases in cash used were partially offset by a decrease in expenditures for properties in development.

        Net cash provided by financing activities was $260.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002, and net cash used by financing activities was $25.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2001. The increase in net cash provided of $286.6 million was due primarily to proceeds from the issuance of common stock, partially offset by higher net repayments of property debt and other debt (credit facility borrowings) and increased dividends paid due to the sale of common stock.

        On April 2, 2002, we sold our interests in 12 community retail centers in Columbia for net proceeds of approximately $111 million. We recorded a gain of approximately $29 million (net of income taxes) on this transaction. We used the proceeds from this transaction to fund a portion of the cash payments required to close the acquisition of assets from Rodamco.

        In January 2002, we, Simon Property Group, Inc. and Westfield America Trust announced that affiliates of each (collectively, the "purchasers") entered into a Purchase Agreement with Rodamco to purchase substantially all of the assets of Rodamco for an aggregate purchase price of approximately 2.48 billion euros, subject to adjustment, and the assumption of substantially all of Rodamco's liabilities. In connection with the Purchase Agreement, affiliates of the purchasers entered into a Joint Purchase Agreement that specified the assets each would acquire and set forth the basis upon which the portion of the aggregate purchase price to be paid to Rodamco by each purchaser would be determined. On May 3, 2002, the purchase of the assets of Rodamco closed. We paid approximately 605 million euros (approximately $546 million based on exchange rates then in effect) to Rodamco at closing. We also paid approximately $261 million to retire certain obligations of Rodamco and to pay transaction costs. Our share of the debt secured by the operating properties in which we acquired interests is approximately $662 million and our share of subsidiary perpetual preferred stock assumed by the purchasers is approximately $24 million. The final allocation of the purchase price among the purchasers is subject to adjustment, and we expect to incur additional transaction costs.

        In the acquisition, we acquired, directly or indirectly, interests in the following operating properties:

Property

  Interest
acquired

  Location
Collin Creek (1)     70%   Plano, TX
Lakeside Mall (1)   100%   Sterling Heights, MI
North Star (1)     96%   San Antonio, TX
Oakbrook Center (2)     47%   Oakbrook, IL
Perimeter Mall (1)     50%   Atlanta, GA
The Streets at South Point     94%   Durham, NC
Water Tower Place (2)     52%   Chicago, IL
Willowbrook (1)     62%   Wayne, NJ

Notes:
(1)  As a result of the acquisition, we own 100% interests in these properties.
(2)  Property also contains significant office space.

        In addition, we acquired a 99% interest in an entity that is developing a portion of the expansion of Fashion Show on land that it leased from us. The debt of this entity was approximately $72 million at closing.

23



        The purchasers jointly own other assets acquired from Rodamco. Our ownership interests in these jointly held assets is approximately 27.3%. These assets include investments in real estate operating companies (South Square Mall, River Ridge, the Plaza at Saw Mill Place, Westin New York and Kravco), an investment in MerchantWired and investments in entities that hold purchase money notes arising from the sales of certain of the Rodamco assets prior to the closing. The purchasers also jointly acquired a Rodamco property management business, Urban Retail Properties Co., which they intend to operate.

        In connection with the purchase, we borrowed approximately $392.5 million on our bridge loan facility from Banc of America Securities, LLC and Banc of America Mortgage Capital Corporation. The bridge loan facility provides for no additional availability and has an initial maturity of six months from the closing of the acquisition. We have the right to extend the maturity on $320 million of the borrowings for an additional six months and on $250 million for another six months. We believe we will have sufficient liquidity to repay the borrowings under the bridge loan facility before its extended maturity. We are required to use any proceeds from sales of interests in operating properties, most property financings and/or issuances of corporate debt or equity securities to repay borrowings under the bridge loan facility.

        As discussed above, a portion of the purchase price was payable in euros. In January 2002, we acquired options to purchase 601 million euros at a weighted-average per euro price of $0.8819. These transactions were executed to reduce our risk of movements in currency exchange rates. The contracts were scheduled to expire in May 2002 and had an aggregate cost of $11.3 million. At March 31, 2002, the value of these contracts was approximately $3.1 million and we recorded a loss of $8.2 million. In April 2002, we sold the contracts for net proceeds of approximately $10.2 million and recorded a gain of approximately $7.1 million. As a result, the net loss on these contracts was $1.1 million. We also executed and subsequently sold a euro forward contract and realized a gain of approximately $2.3 million and realized transaction gains of $3.0 million on euros we acquired for use in the closing of the purchase. As of May 15, 2002, we owned no euros or financial instruments that exposed us to risk of movements in currency exchange rates.

        Shortly before the closing, we sold our interest in Franklin Park, a regional retail center in Toledo, Ohio, to an affiliate of Westfield America Trust for approximately $65.3 million, including cash proceeds of approximately $20.6 million. We realized a gain of approximately $41 million on this transaction. We used the proceeds from this transaction to fund a portion of the cash payments required to close the acquisition of assets from Rodamco.

        The sources of funds used to close the acquisition of assets from Rodamco are summarized as follows (in millions):

Sale of Columbia community retail centers   $ 111
Sale of interest in Franklin Park     20
Borrowings on bridge loan facility     392
Issuance of common stock in January/February 2002     284
   
Cash required at closing   $ 807
   

        The remaining net proceeds of approximately $172 million from the issuance of common stock in January and February 2002 were used primarily to repay property debt of the Columbia community centers and to reduce credit facility borrowings.

Unconsolidated real estate ventures:

        We have interests in unconsolidated real estate ventures that own and/or develop properties. We use these ventures to limit our risk associated with individual properties and to reduce capital

24



requirements. We may also contribute our interests in properties to unconsolidated ventures for cash distributions and interests in the ventures. In general, these ventures own retail centers managed by us for a fee and are controlled jointly by our venture partners and us.

        We have guaranteed the repayment of a construction loan of the unconsolidated real estate venture that is developing the Village of Merrick Park. At March 31, 2002, the outstanding balance under this loan was $80.8 million. The maximum amount that may be borrowed under the loan is $200 million. The amount of the guarantee may be reduced to a minimum of 20% upon the achievement of certain lender requirements. Additionally, venture partners have provided guarantees to us for their share (60%) of the construction loan.

        During 2001, we leased land and improvements at Fashion Show to an entity that is developing a portion of the expansion of the retail center. In connection with this lease, we have guaranteed the repayment of construction loan borrowings by the lessee. At March 31, 2002, the outstanding balance under this loan was $59.8 million. The maximum amount that may be borrowed under the loan is $111 million. The guarantee may be partially reduced upon the achievement of certain lender requirements. An affiliate of Rodamco owned a 99% interest in the lessee, and we acquired this interest in the acquisition of the assets of Rodamco described in note 11. A subsidiary of The Rouse Company Incentive Compensation Statutory Trust, an entity that we neither own nor control, owns the controlling interest in the lessee.

Critical accounting policies

        Critical accounting policies are those that are both important to the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations and require management's most difficult, complex or subjective judgments. Our critical accounting policies are those applicable to the evaluation of the collectibility of accounts and notes receivable, the evaluation of impairment of long-lived assets and profit recognition on land sales.

        Collectibility of accounts and notes receivable: The allowance for doubtful accounts and notes receivable is established based on quarterly analysis of the risk of loss on specific accounts. The analysis places particular emphasis on past-due accounts and considers information such as the nature and age of the receivables, the payment history of the tenants or other debtors, the financial condition of the tenants and management's assessment of their ability to meet their lease obligations, the basis for any disputes and the status of related negotiations, among other things. Our estimate of the required allowance is subject to revision as these factors change and is sensitive to the effects of economic and market conditions on tenants, particularly those at retail centers.

        Impairment of long-lived assets: If events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values of operating properties, properties in development or land held for development and sale may be impaired, a recovery analysis is performed based on the estimated undiscounted future cash flows to be generated from the property. If the analysis indicates that the carrying value of the tested asset is not recoverable from future cash flows, the property is written down to estimated fair value and an impairment loss is recognized. Fair values are determined based on estimated future cash flows using appropriate discount and capitalization rates. The estimated cash flows used for the impairment analyses and to determine estimated fair value are based on our plans for the tested asset and our views of market and economic conditions. The estimates consider matters such as current and historical rental rates, occupancies for the tested property and comparable properties and recent sales data for comparable properties. Changes in estimated future cash flows due to changes in our plans or views of market and economic conditions could result in recognition of impairment losses which, under the applicable accounting guidance, could be substantial.

        Properties held for sale, including land held for sale, are carried at the lower of their carrying values (i.e., cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairment loss recognized, where applicable)

25



or estimated fair values less costs to sell. Accordingly, decisions by us to sell certain operating properties, properties in development or land held for development and sale will result in impairment losses if carrying values of the specific properties exceed their estimated fair values less costs to sell. The estimates of fair value consider matters such as recent sales data for comparable properties and, where applicable, contracts or the results of negotiations with prospective purchasers. These estimates are subject to revision as market conditions and our assessment of them change.

        Profit recognition on land sales: Cost of land sales is determined as a specified percentage of land sales revenues recognized for each development project. These cost percentages are based on estimates of development costs and sales revenues to completion of each project and are reviewed regularly and revised periodically for changes in estimates or development plans. Significant changes in these estimates or development plans, whether due to changes in market conditions or other factors, could result in changes to the cost ratio used for a specific project.

New accounting standards not yet adopted:

        In April 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections." Upon adoption of SFAS No. 145, we will be required to apply the criteria in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30, "Reporting the Results of Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions," in determining the classification of gains and losses resulting from the extinguishment of debt.

        SFAS No. 145 is effective for us on January 1, 2003 with early adoption of the provisions related to the rescission of SFAS No. 4 encouraged. Upon adoption, we will reclassify our extraordinary gains and losses from extinguishment of debt to other provisions and losses, net. We expect to adopt the provisions relating to the rescission of SFAS No. 4 in the second quarter of 2002.

Impact of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001:

        We were largely spared direct losses caused by the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Operations were disrupted only at South Street Seaport, a retail center in lower Manhattan owned and operated by us. The center was closed for a week following the attacks for use as a staging and rest area for rescue workers. It did not sustain significant physical damage. Customer traffic, tenant sales and rents at South Street Seaport are generally affected by the level of pedestrian and other traffic and other commercial activity in lower Manhattan. While we expect a significant recovery of traffic and commercial activity in lower Manhattan, we are uncertain as to its timing and scope. Accordingly, it is difficult to predict with certainty when, if ever, customer traffic, tenant sales and rents will return to historical levels. In the first quarter of 2002, South Street Seaport experienced a significant recovery of customer traffic and tenant sales, primarily because it serves as the distribution point for tickets to the public viewing platform overlooking the World Trade Center site. The duration of this recovery is uncertain. Customer traffic at our other retail centers was lighter than usual for several days after the attacks but has generally returned to more normal levels at our suburban properties. Traffic at our urban specialty marketplaces is more dependent on tourism and continues to be lighter than usual at most of these properties. Las Vegas, where we have a substantial concentration of assets, experienced a significant decline in visitor activity in the weeks immediately following the attacks. Recent data indicate a recovery of visitor activity in Las Vegas, with the exception of international visitors. There can be no assurance that visitor activity in Las Vegas or at our urban specialty marketplaces will return to levels experienced before the attacks.

26



Information relating to forward-looking statements:

        This report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements which reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including those identified below, which could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or those anticipated. The words "believe", "expect", "anticipate" and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The following are among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or those anticipated: (1) real estate investment trust risks; (2) real estate development and investment risks; (3) liquidity of real estate investments; (4) dependence on rental income from real property; (5) effect of uninsured loss; (6) lack of geographical diversification; (7) possible environmental liabilities; (8) difficulties of compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act; (9) competition; (10) changes in the economic climate; (11) changes in tax laws or regulations; (12) cost and adequacy of insurance; and (13) risks associated with the acquisition of assets from Rodamco. Further, domestic or international incidents could affect general economic conditions and our business. For a more detailed discussion of these factors, see Exhibit 99.2 of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001.

27



Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk Information

Market risk information:

        The market risk associated with financial instruments and derivative financial and commodity instruments is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices or rates. Our market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk relating to variable rate borrowings used to maintain liquidity (e.g., credit facility advances) or to finance project development costs (e.g., construction loan advances). Our interest rate risk management objective is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows. In order to achieve this objective, we rely primarily on long-term, fixed rate nonrecourse loans from institutional lenders to finance our operating properties. We also use interest rate exchange agreements, including interest rate swaps and caps, to mitigate our interest rate risk on variable rate debt. The fair value of these and other derivative financial instruments is an asset of approximately $0.7 million at March 31, 2002. We do not enter into interest rate exchange agreements for speculative purposes.

        Our interest rate risk is monitored closely by management. The table below presents the annual maturities, weighted-average interest rates on outstanding debt at the end of each year and fair values required to evaluate expected cash flows under debt agreements and our sensitivity to interest rate changes at March 31, 2002. Information relating to debt maturities is based on expected maturity dates and is summarized as follows (dollars in millions):

 
  Remaining
2002

  2003
  2004
  2005
  2006
  Thereafter
  Total
Fixed rate debt   $ 85   $ 315   $ 287   $ 240   $ 386   $ 1,508   $ 2,821
Average interest rate     7.8%     7.7%     7.7%     7.6%     7.6%     7.6%     7.6%
Variable rate LIBOR debt   $ 101   $ 213   $ 65   $ 107   $ 20   $ 8   $ 514
Average interest rate     5.2%     5.2%     4.8%     5.1%     3.6%     3.6%     5.0%

        At March 31, 2002, approximately $44.7 million of our variable rate LIBOR debt related to borrowings under construction loans that we expect to repay with proceeds of long-term, fixed rate loans in 2002 or 2003 when the construction loans reach maturity.

        At March 31, 2002, we had interest rate cap agreements which effectively limit the interest rate on variable rate LIBOR debt as follows (dollars in millions):

Notional
Amount

  Interest
Cap

  Maturity
$ 36.0   9.0%   May 2002
$ 55.0   9.5%   March 2004
$   4.7   8.7%   January 2010

        At March 31, 2002, we also had interest rate swap agreements that effectively fix the interest rate on $300 million of the variable rate LIBOR debt at 5.6% through May 2002 and on $26.3 million of variable rate LIBOR debt at 6.8% through December 2006.

        We also had forward-starting swap agreements which effectively fix LIBOR as follows (dollars in millions):

Notional
Amount

  LIBOR
Rate

  Term
$ 400.0   2.4%   June 2002 – December 2003
$ 200.0   4.2%   January 2003 – January 2004

28


        All of our interest rate swap agreements and forward-starting swap agreements have been designated as cash flow hedges.

        As the table incorporates only those exposures that exist as of March 31, 2002, it does not consider exposures or positions which could arise after that date. As a result, our ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise after March 31, 2002, our hedging strategies during that period and interest rates.

29



Part II.    Other Information.


Item 1.    Legal Proceedings.

        None


Item 2.    Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds.

        None


Item 3.    Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

        None


Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

        None


Item 5.    Other Information.

        None


Item 6.    Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.

    (a)
    Exhibits

            None

    (b)
    Reports on Form 8-K

            None

30



Signatures

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

    on behalf of
THE ROUSE COMPANY and as

 

 

Principal Financial Officer:

Date:

May 15, 2002


By

 

/s/ Jeffrey H. Donahue

Jeffrey H. Donahue
Executive Vice President and
    Chief Financial Officer

 

 

Principal Accounting Officer:

Date:

May 15, 2002


By

 

/s/ Melanie M. Lundquist

Melanie M. Lundquist
Vice President and
    Corporate Controller

31




QuickLinks

THE ROUSE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income Three Months Ended March 31, 2002 and 2001 (Unaudited, in thousands, except per share amounts)
THE ROUSE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Balance Sheets March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001 (In thousands, except share data)
THE ROUSE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Three Months Ended March 31, 2002 and 2001 (Unaudited, in thousands)
THE ROUSE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) March 31, 2002
GRAPHIC 3 g850093.jpg G850093.JPG begin 644 g850093.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$!!`$$``#_VP!#``@&!@<&!0@'!P<)"0@*#!0-#`L+ M#!D2$P\4'1H?'AT:'!P@)"XG("(L(QP<*#JKC9Y41N98'`Q)?1 M'3);DI4A*E'`W<9'RI+TY_;K>?[KWZ(JJ3X+5QAJC/$A"BE64]04J"@?F!65 M99P=^9A67=2<[!/VB5+[2UP]3'3Z["^J>7DLI"9"-JBK&T@D=""#3TA;I8W+ M;2EW'Y`O(S[\?RJ07XH3V\0%+*4IW,J))P/R&JV)T3`_VIC_`,@_K4U,26R> MC)H=F+!CT<1*NO:4NT:A^PWK"^N8I:$M]V^DI[9;"IM:5I)BY*2",]X:K\T!4&0#T+:O MT-16S,6!/4BIW8N">HJ:7UT[JUN2NW6DI$0Q$>5L3*8=2Z@'K@@84/E[LTFI`'^D.<#Q)_^>M[M=GQ$Z4%N*DKFR'V^ MY93RO@Y)QUZ&%+P[(->MFU+!U%;%3+0XE]23M4TX=BD*\ ME#!Q6S46E/JTEVUXC$-Q9[C8=;`PDI=P#Q[%Y-+'*$'P9-KFH@YT=1J@=I3E MPU)]@-V"0F<'%-K"WTA*-N=Q)QT&*?4E1;!4D!6.0#GGWU)+`A([=[OQT2Z1 M[]J*KM*6+`Y/F/3LS`ECYQ%E&IK@K5"K$;&L.I:#Y?,A/=]V3@*SC/7C&*_8 M.HY-^D2Q98K*X<5TLJER'"E+JQ^8(2`20/,X]F:ZI4=3]ZF(:(0\Y;N[2OR) M4K'U-270VMU:')*DI]=E?0Y'BDX!X^N:JUG`@,=&4>THP#'1S MN5&+J9]S4?V#+M;D>9W"WTN=X%-.)!`!2K&3DD]0,8K*D]H3D35;>G7K*XF8 MXXE"%>D)V*"NBLXSCX5OP7[/J)^)>+?+;D*C)6A*VE=`L#*5#J/R@X..E3;5 M)0WVXVA:B$IS')).!^U2QF4`@^8M=T4$'L_J4F5<;U'9+C=C1((_8;F)"C[M MR0/K7UIJ^C4-J,WT1V(I+JV5LNGUD*2<$&OG[Q0GM0QK/%D,/NK9<==#:PHM MA.T#..F2?I6E%A,0R^6$;>_=+R_:H@9/TK4;.C-UR6R#D3HKAN]X@6*W.3[C M(2S'1P5'DD^``')/LKNJ,ZSD'5/:K;M.K6?0HSB$+1G@DC>L^_;ZM1:_!==R MM]OMKD=G0E!M=]N]^BIFPK2W%AN#K<(R]H6AUMYI M:AG8M"@H'Z$?&I(;&CN25<+H[G[>K[;M/6]4VY2$LL@X'BI1\DCJ37%"N5[N M<9,EFU,PVE\H3->/>*3X$I0"$^XG-3EV2O6/;0U%?4%P+:ZL-MX]7\/D\>.5 MX^`%66JHY!KG[2+4W=-#7$*3E<9'I+9\BCD_, M9'QI0T?=3J#1=O@3LOF+=&HRN\.=S2@=H/P)'PJK.P;AGXE'L96->?&090=* MZDCZJLB+E';4T"M2%M*()0H'H2/9@_&MJH]V=/.Z6UW=-*RB=CRB62H]5)Y2 M?\2#]*I]Z=<$#T=C/?RE!AL@X*=WYE?X4[C\*M4Y9,GN:4VEJ\MV._F*\/M' M:N6JW+!`M;KKJ7%H#RGDI00G.5="<<<5L:HU(_IBU_:+EL5)CI*0Z6G@"V3P M.".1G`S]*G>EF&V>VZY--("&V@^E"1T``2`/E3OVH`'L[NGN;_S$UFKL:V8G M8S,DL["W=K?8BZTX5!+1EI2L[20>HQX>=?NF]=6W4,UZ MW=T_"N3)4%Q9(`5QUP1P<>(ZUQ=ESB&NSJ`MQ24I"GZX5&SG.-2D735D2V:KM5A<3EV<% M$KSCN_W/?N((^%,/A4<[1;0])L<35[`<3*$CO"3P6V3CNO=C"3[UFJ?IR\(O M^GX5S;`'?M!2DC]E710^!!K1')Q.ANAV.^@+0L>(_K6#?[-#OU[;M\YO>R]; MGP2/S)/>-84#X$&I[IJ[S>S75#NGKVLFUOKW(>_93GHX/X3T4/`CV,YK`OO:8YIR MX)A7+3\AMU:0I"DR$%*@?(X\#P:;;T$/6]G.%),J.1XC_>H(K![1]*C4NFUE MAL&?$RZQ@7-8?9YK-N=I!T7!PF5:T;7> M/66C]@@>).-OO'MIMLD%R.P[+E(`G35]](X'J\82CW)3A/S/C4AN8!4RRO[@ M4J9JCI1116LWA0>E%>4A;K;*E,M=ZOP1N"<_$TB2;3G]NMY_NO?HBJ]4KM.D M=60->N:E>9@+2^XX76423G8OC`)3U''RJGEQWT;>&MC8[@_A[P>?`9J* MEVV1YE:%^IRP[,C>K8<6#VPV!F)&9CM[HRBAEL(&>\/.!5CF<0GS_P!-7Z&I MCJ#1VJKQK9G4#+,!M,=;19:;B0FTS'FEH`@LA*8_I+KC*0<[4*5D#X9Q23H+2NI]&O2P[%A28\H(W!$HI4DIS@C*<' MJ::KO)U2]#6U:;="9>6D@/2)6=GM"0GD^\U%(XH,C8D>G'"L<@C26I; M/>LJW(W*1G&.4J*3]0:]JQM*VV3:-,P($Q2526F\.J2K<"HDDG/CUK5>6M#* ME--]XL#A.[&?C70#D9,ZU)*@F1R3$CSNWY<>4TEUE9]9"AP<1\_RKMU]IM6D MUQ]4:928:VEA$E#?*2">%$'PSP1[17JC2&JT=H9U3W%O(+Y7W!DG.PIV8SMZ M[?K5'F06KQ:'H4YC#-P!3CD8R#\_/2M&E[KHR=(-D*)MHD*WK@O.;'6E> M:%G@\8'.,X'/C5D# MNH_#.*IDJX7^2PIJWV;T9]0P'ISZ.[0?/""HJ]W'OKFTGHR-IKOY;CZIETE$ MJD2W!@J).2$CP&>?;5[%-F!XFERFW"CK.3$JQJ".WF[!1P5(<`]OJH/Z"J[4 MZU/H>Z_>UK56G'V?34E*G([ZBD+(&W@^13P0<>^MV/>=4K0E#NDPT[T*S<6^ M[SY\`JQ\*BO*9!'F5I)K+*P\S0?D-1+W*E/*VLL0DJ<5Y#>H_P`C7GJ#2-FU M,UBXQ$J=`PA]'JN(]ROY'(KG?LI)/LKXM#FHK/;&(=Q@BYK:0$)D0W4@J`&!N2X4\^T$Y]E7.],-30[TPT9*Q M;9_9QVD6]B/)4['DN(2E73O6EKVE*AYC]<&MC52$+[<+0A:4J23'!"AD'E5- M9TS/ONKV-1WAAMAF"C$.`'`M94"2%+4/5')S@9Z#FL&^:.U7<]<-ZCC,V]KN M%MJ::(,2/'6&7& MG^[2$[PK:4G`X)!!Y]M;1D-"2F,5?BE!6$_P@@9^9%9IFWKN,IL[7>X_*9HV MY]^W/TK(T];=1_>F?=[[Z&A#L=+##49TJ#8"B<<@>?)\:Z<@'`'<[00#A1W^ M(W5#[DG[%[=69$H[67I*'$K/3:M&T'X*R/A5PI3UMH>+J^(VKO/1Y[`/TBE2T3 M-96QA$*ZV=NY]V`E,R)*0DK`\5)7CGVUJMQKG=9++MQ;;AQ&5AQ,5#G>+<6. MF]0X`!P=HSR!SX5<-GH3069&@<_$EUC1]W^W"1&DY2F2\\E"B.H<&]'UP*MM M*^KM&1M3MLOH?5$N<;F/+;'*2.0#YC//F*]X4_4,5A+-RL_I3Z1@OP7T;'/; MM64E)\QS6=:FLD'J8TJ:B5/662V#XI3E.?GN^5-EWTS=-92F$WE2(-G87W@A,N;W7E>:U#U4CK MP,]>M>NHK;?7F[=$L4"$S&@R6W@7G]NX-_E2`$G`/C4,I+\\=2MBEG]S&AH1 M5[6+<[:KM:=5P4$.M.)0ZH?O).Y!/O&Y/RI[M,UG4,MJZM)S%:CI[DY!]=P! M2_B!M3\55]7VT.:FTK,MTN.AAYUL]V"YO"'!RDY`Z9]G2O2QVDZ;TS#MT5E+ MKC#8"PE6W>L\J5D^TDU8(0Y/@_[+K61:6'\3O^Y-]-$?Z]+O[Y`__-.?:?\` MV=W7W-_YB:6[1H[4MN[0'M2.L0UM/NNK4RB3ZP2O/&2G!QQ\J9=<6R\ZATZY M:K?%CI,C877'W\!(!"B``#DY`YK-0?;8$=YF2*PI<$;.?W,?LVT_9[CH6"_, MMD20ZI;NY3K043A9QUIHO++34!BR04HBJG++*>Y0`&T`96K'3\HQ[U"LO0-H MO>F[,FTW*/'6VAQ2T/,O[L!7.""!X_K7[Z/JE6M!=G(4-5O1'5';8]*.]`)! M*_RXW$I`QY#K5T&$`Q+UCC4HQOHZFA6./ ME21V1W)Z!.NNEIH*7V'%.H23T(.U8_0_$U5EE0;)2G0IN&2D$C!\JTP&!!$U"APRL-2.:,U7*CA&D+TE;[H$[ M=W=AP<>Q?K`>8%6>I6UI'5C?:&=4EF!A3Q46!).>[*=FW.WKM^M5%E2UM)4X MWW:R.4YSCXU6@$9R/,KZ52O+(QLS[HHHK>=4****1"BBBD0HHHI$****1"BB MBD0HHHI$****1"BBBD0HHHI$****1"BBBD0HHHI$****1"BBBD0HHHI$**** G1"BBBD0HHHI$****1"BBBD0HHHI$****1"BBBD0HHHI$****1/_9 ` end
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----