UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act File Number: 811-05833

T. Rowe Price Institutional International Funds, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202

(Address of principal executive offices)

David Oestreicher

100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202

(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (410) 345-2000

Date of fiscal year end: December 31

Date of reporting period: December 31, 2016

The views and opinions in this report were current as of December 31, 2016. They are not guarantees of performance or investment results and should not be taken as investment advice. Investment decisions reflect a variety of factors, and the managers reserve the right to change their views about individual stocks, sectors, and the markets at any time. As a result, the views expressed should not be relied upon as a forecast of the fund’s future investment intent. The report is certified under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires mutual funds and other public companies to affirm that, to the best of their knowledge, the information in their financial reports is fairly and accurately stated in all material respects.

Developed markets international bonds generated modestly positive returns in U.S. dollar terms. While yields decreased to record lows and many non-U.S. currencies gained against the dollar early in the year, yields later began to increase as economic data improved and investors began to anticipate another interest rate increase from the Federal Reserve. The U.S. dollar resumed its strengthening trend near the end of the year, further weighing on non-U.S. developed markets bond returns in U.S. dollar terms.

The Institutional International Bond Fund returned 2.33% for the 12 months ended December 31, 2016. The fund outperformed the benchmark Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex USD Bond Index.

U.S. economic growth was slow but positive in the first half of the year before picking up later in 2016. The sluggish growth early in the year helped convince the Fed to delay until December its second interest rate increase since the global financial crisis. The UK voted in late June to leave the European Union. In an effort to offset the negative economic effects of Brexit, the Bank of England (BoE) cut interest rates for the first time since 2009 and resumed purchases of government and corporate bonds. The eurozone economy continued to be anemic, leading the European Central Bank (ECB) to expand its quantitative easing program early in the year. The ECB also announced that it would begin to buy euro-denominated investment-grade bonds from nonfinancial corporate issuers. Japan’s economy grew at a sub 1% annual rate in the first half of the year before accelerating slightly to 1.1% in the third quarter. Amid concerns about a dwindling amount of Japanese sovereign debt available for trading, the Bank of Japan (BoJ) changed its government bond purchase program to target a 0.0% yield on the 10-year note instead of buying a set amount of bonds per month.

Interest rates on high-quality developed markets government debt plummeted to ultralow or negative levels following the Brexit vote as investors became convinced that the Fed would wait even longer before raising rates again and that other central banks would expand their aggressive economic stimulus measures. The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield hit a record low of 1.36% in early July in the flight to quality in the immediate aftermath of the Brexit vote. U.S. Treasury yields began increasing as economic data improved over the summer and moved sharply higher after the U.S. presidential election as investors surmised that Donald Trump would cut taxes and increase infrastructure spending. The yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note finished the year at 2.45%. In the eurozone, the German 10-year bund yield dipped well into negative territory in early July, when the market consensus seemed to be that global central banks would maintain or even expand their accommodative policies. However, by the end of the reporting period, speculation that the ECB would begin tapering its asset purchases had pushed the bund yield above 0.20%. The yield on the Japanese 10-year sovereign note followed a similar trajectory, hitting a record low of -0.30% in July before increasing after the BoJ announced in September that it would target its yield at around 0%.

Oil prices sharply rebounded from their early-year lows near $26 per barrel for global benchmark Brent crude to just over $50 by June. The Brent crude price hovered in the $40 to $50 range in the second half of the year before ending 2016 just below $55. The rebound and subsequent stability in oil supported a rally in the noninvestment-grade bond market, where bonds from issuers in the metals and mining industry and other commodity-related businesses performed particularly well. Investment-grade corporate bonds posted solid gains but significantly lagged their high yield cousins. The ECB’s purchases of corporate bonds from nonfinancial issuers supported the investment-grade corporate segment on both sides of the Atlantic. Sovereign and corporate bonds from emerging markets recorded solid gains, primarily in the first half of the year as the rebound in oil prices boosted sentiment toward riskier asset classes. Donald Trump’s victory in the U.S. presidential election trimmed gains for emerging markets debt, however, as investors feared that the new administration would implement protectionist trade policies that would harm Mexico and China in particular.

The U.S. dollar’s strength in 2014 and 2015 paused in the first half of 2016 before resuming in the later months of the year as investors began to anticipate another interest rate increase from the Fed. This resulted in mixed performances against the dollar for other currencies. The British pound sterling plummeted over 16% for the year after hitting a record low after the Brexit vote, while the euro lost almost 3%. The Japanese yen, on the other hand, gained nearly 3% versus the green-back. In emerging markets, the Brazilian real climbed more than 21% against the dollar as the government of President Michel Temer started to implement fiscal reforms, and the Russian ruble gained over 19% amid hopes that the incoming Trump administration would improve relations with Russia and possibly remove sanctions against the country. On the negative side, the Mexican peso dropped more than 16% versus the U.S. dollar as a result of worries about the new U.S. president’s potentially protectionist trade policies.

The fund’s sector selection made a significant positive contribution to relative performance in 2016. In particular, our allocation to European high yield corporate bonds, which are not included in the benchmark, boosted relative returns as riskier assets outperformed for much of the year. European high yield corporates indirectly benefited from the ECB’s purchases of investment-grade corporate debt. We also had an allocation to Japanese inflation-linked government bonds that appeared to be mispriced relative to expectations for inflation in Japan, but their performance lagged and weighed on relative returns for the year.

Currency positioning also contributed to the portfolio’s relative returns. Early in the year we established an underweight in the British pound sterling against overweights in a group of other developed markets currencies as a hedge against the possibility that the UK would vote to leave the EU in its late-June referendum. This positioning benefited performance as the surprising “leave” vote sent the pound to its lowest level against the U.S. dollar in 30 years. Near the end of 2016, we shifted overall currency exposure to be long the greenback against shorts in the yen and the euro, which benefited relative returns as the U.S. dollar strengthened.

The fund’s exposure to emerging markets currencies broadly favored countries that have the willingness and ability to implement meaningful structural reforms, such as India and Mexico. Our allocation to the Mexican peso varied as we actively traded the currency, taking advantage of its liquidity. We bought the Mexican currency prior to the U.S. presidential election, anticipating that the peso would bounce back from its low levels if Hillary Clinton won the election. However, it plunged further following the election. Our exposure to the peso weighed on relative returns for the year. By the end of 2016, most of our long positions in emerging markets currencies were funded with shorts in the currencies of other emerging countries. We favored the Indian rupee, the Indonesian rupiah, and the Brazilian real, for example.

The fund’s country allocation and exposure to interest rate changes made a modestly positive contribution to relative performance. At the beginning of 2016, the portfolio’s overall duration was slightly shorter than the duration of the benchmark. Over the course of the year, we extended overall duration so that it was more than one year longer than the benchmark’s duration by the end of 2016. In developed markets, we favor exposure to countries that have a very steep yield curve, including Sweden, Australia, and Israel. Our overweight position in Sweden’s government bonds benefited relative returns for the year. On the other hand, our underweight in Japanese government bonds in the first half of the year weighed on returns as the BoJ unexpectedly cut interest rates into negative territory. Later in the year, we added to the fund’s exposure to Japanese government debt, making positioning neutral relative to the benchmark.

The majority of the fund’s relatively long duration positioning late in the year stemmed from exposure to emerging markets debt, where we continue to favor local currency sovereign bonds issued by nations making progress toward implementing structural, fiscal, and economic reforms, such as Brazil and Mexico. The portfolio also had significant exposure to countries that can continue to cut interest rates, including Russia, and emerging markets such as Romania and Malaysia that offer a steep yield curve. Our allocation to Brazilian bonds contributed to relative returns, but our exposure to Mexican sovereign debt was a negative relative performance factor for 2016. The fund also had a small allocation to emerging markets corporate bonds.

The fund maintains material holdings of various types of derivatives, primarily for hedging risk or gaining exposure to certain sectors or currencies. The fund’s overall exposure to derivatives contributed to absolute performance during the reporting period. Currency forward contracts were the principal contributors.

While the late-year increase in developed markets sovereign bond yields gave the impression that inflation risks are surging, core inflation has yet to actually move higher in many countries. On the other hand, moderate economic growth should begin to put upward pressure on inflation over the next couple of years, particularly in the U.S. and central and Eastern Europe. As a result, we expect global yields to gradually climb as actual core inflation ticks upward, but the trend is unlikely to be smooth. We anticipate that the ECB will continue to taper its purchases of government and corporate bonds over the next 18 months, although actual interest rate hikes are unlikely before 2019.

Just as it was 12 months ago, there is a risk that China will not be able to manage its slowdown, leading to an economic “hard landing” that would disrupt global growth. With the added element of potentially heightened political tensions between China and the Trump administration in the U.S., the Chinese government’s task of navigating the transition to an economy driven by domestic consumption rather than exports will be even more difficult. In Europe, we expect to see more ramifications of Brexit as the BoE struggles with a weaker pound and strong domestic consumption. Brexit also set the stage for 2017 presidential elections in France and Germany that could result in anti-euro candidates coming to power, leading to more concerns about a breakup of the eurozone in the longer term as well as some potential buying opportunities in eurozone assets.

The uncertainty and volatility dominating the market environment should provide a tailwind for our strategy as we try to find sectors and individual securities that are mispriced as a result of temporary market dislocations. In this environment, we believe that the extended reach of T. Rowe Price’s global sovereign, credit, and equity research platforms, combined with our emphasis on collaboration across those platforms, gives us a critical edge in analyzing risks and opportunities in both developed and emerging fixed income markets.

Arif Husain
President of the International Fixed Income Division, and co-portfolio manager and cochairman of the fund’s Investment Advisory Committee

Kenneth Orchard
Co-portfolio manager and cochairman of the fund’s Investment Advisory Committee

The committee chairmen have day-to-day responsibility for the portfolio and work with committee members in developing and executing the fund’s investment program.

Funds that invest overseas generally carry more risk than funds that invest strictly in U.S. assets, including unpredictable changes in currency values. Investments in emerging markets are subject to abrupt and severe price declines and should be regarded as speculative. The economic and political structures of developing nations, in most cases, do not compare favorably with the U.S. or other developed countries in terms of wealth and stability, and their financial markets often lack liquidity. Some countries also have legacies of hyperinflation, currency devaluations, and governmental interference in markets.

International investments are subject to currency risk, a decline in the value of a foreign currency versus the U.S. dollar, which reduces the dollar value of securities denominated in that currency. The overall impact on a fund’s holdings can be significant and long-lasting depending on the currencies represented in the portfolio, how each one appreciates or depreciates in relation to the U.S. dollar, and whether currency positions are hedged. Further, exchange rate movements are unpredictable and it is not possible to effectively hedge the currency risks of many developing countries.

Bonds are also subject to interest rate risk, the decline in bond prices that usually accompanies a rise in interest rates, and credit risk, the chance that any fund holding could have its credit rating downgraded or that a bond issuer will default (fail to make timely payments of interest or principal), potentially reducing the fund’s income level and share price.

Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex USD Bond Index: An unmanaged index that tracks an international basket of bonds that contains government, corporate, agency, and mortgage-related bonds.

Credit spread: Measures the additional yield that investors demand as compensation for holding a bond with credit risk versus a similar-maturity Treasury security or other type of low-risk bond.

Duration: A measure of a bond’s or bond fund’s sensitivity to changes in interest rates. For example, a fund with a duration of six years would fall about 6% in response to a one-percentage-point rise in rates, and vice versa.

J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global: Tracks U.S. dollar government bonds of 31 foreign countries.

Quasi-sovereign debt: Debt issued by a corporation and backed by the respective government, typically offering the higher yields of corporate debt with the added benefit of government support.

Weighted average maturity: A measure of a fund’s sensitivity to interest rates. In general, the longer the average maturity, the greater the fund’s sensitivity to interest rate changes. The weighted average maturity may take into account the interest rate readjustment dates for certain securities. Money funds must maintain a weighted average maturity of less than 60 days.

Yield curve: A graphic depiction of the relationship between yields and maturity dates for a set of similar securities. A security with a longer maturity usually has a higher yield. If a short-term security offers a higher yield, then the curve is said to be “inverted.” If short- and long-term bonds are offering equivalent yields, then the curve is said to be “flat.”

Performance and Expenses
T. Rowe Price Institutional International Bond Fund

This chart shows the value of a hypothetical $1 million investment in the fund over the past 10 fiscal year periods or since inception (for funds lacking 10-year records). The result is compared with benchmarks, which may include a broad-based market index and a peer group average or index. Market indexes do not include expenses, which are deducted from fund returns as well as mutual fund averages and indexes.

As a mutual fund shareholder, you may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees, and other fund expenses. The following example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the most recent six-month period and held for the entire period.

Actual Expenses
The first line of the following table (Actual) provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information on this line, together with your account balance, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number on the first line under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The information on the second line of the table (Hypothetical) is based on hypothetical account values and expenses derived from the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed 5% per year rate of return before expenses (not the fund’s actual return). You may compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund with other funds by contrasting this 5% hypothetical example and the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.

You should also be aware that the expenses shown in the table highlight only your ongoing costs and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. To the extent a fund charges transaction costs, however, the total cost of owning that fund is higher.

Portfolio of Investments^‡T. Rowe Price Institutional International Bond Fund
December 31, 2016

Statement of Assets and Liabilities
T. Rowe Price Institutional International Bond Fund
December 31, 2016
($000s, except shares and per share amounts)

Statement of Operations
T. Rowe Price Institutional International Bond Fund
($000s)

Statement of Changes in Net Assets
T. Rowe Price Institutional International Bond Fund
($000s)

Notes to Financial Statements
T. Rowe Price Institutional International Bond Fund
December 31, 2016

T. Rowe Price Institutional International Funds, Inc. (the corporation), is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). The Institutional International Bond Fund (the fund) is a nondiversified, open-end management investment company established by the corporation. The fund seeks to provide high current income and capital appreciation.

Basis of Preparation The fund is an investment company and follows accounting and reporting guidance in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 (ASC 946). The accompanying financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), including, but not limited to, ASC 946. GAAP requires the use of estimates made by management. Management believes that estimates and valuations are appropriate; however, actual results may differ from those estimates, and the valuations reflected in the accompanying financial statements may differ from the value ultimately realized upon sale or maturity.

Investment Transactions, Investment Income, and Distributions Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis. Premiums and discounts on debt securities are amortized for financial reporting purposes. Inflation adjustments to the principal amount of inflation-indexed bonds are reflected as interest income. Dividends received from mutual fund investments are reflected as dividend income; capital gain distributions are reflected as realized gain/loss. Dividend income and capital gain distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income tax-related interest and penalties, if incurred, would be recorded as income tax expense. Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Realized gains and losses are reported on the identified cost basis. Income distributions are declared daily and paid monthly. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Capital gain distributions are generally declared and paid by the fund annually.

Currency Translation Assets, including investments, and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar values each day at the prevailing exchange rate, using the mean of the bid and asked prices of such currencies against U.S. dollars as quoted by a major bank. Purchases and sales of securities, income, and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at the prevailing exchange rate on the date of the transaction. The effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on realized and unrealized security gains and losses is reflected as a component of security gains and losses.

Redemption Fees A 2% fee is assessed on redemptions of fund shares held for 90 days or less to deter short-term trading and to protect the interests of long-term shareholders. Redemption fees are withheld from proceeds that shareholders receive from the sale or exchange of fund shares. The fees are paid to the fund and are recorded as an increase to paid-in capital. The fees may cause the redemption price per share to differ from the net asset value per share.

New Accounting Guidance In October 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a new rule, Investment Company Reporting Modernization, which, among other provisions, amends Regulation S-X to require standardized, enhanced disclosures, particularly related to derivatives, in investment company financial statements. Compliance with the guidance is effective for financial statements filed with the SEC on or after August 1, 2017; adoption will have no effect on the fund’s net assets or results of operations.

The fund’s financial instruments are valued and its net asset value (NAV) per share is computed at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), normally 4 p.m. ET, each day the NYSE is open for business. However, the NAV per share may be calculated at a time other than the normal close of the NYSE if trading on the NYSE is restricted, if the NYSE closes earlier, or as may be permitted by the SEC.

Fair Value The fund’s financial instruments are reported at fair value, which GAAP defines as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The T. Rowe Price Valuation Committee (the Valuation Committee) is an internal committee that has been delegated certain responsibilities by the fund’s Board of Directors (the Board) to ensure that financial instruments are appropriately priced at fair value in accordance with GAAP and the 1940 Act. Subject to oversight by the Board, the Valuation Committee develops and oversees pricing-related policies and procedures and approves all fair value determinations. Specifically, the Valuation Committee establishes procedures to value securities; determines pricing techniques, sources, and persons eligible to effect fair value pricing actions; oversees the selection, services, and performance of pricing vendors; oversees valuation-related business continuity practices; and provides guidance on internal controls and valuation-related matters. The Valuation Committee reports to the Board and has representation from legal, portfolio management and trading, operations, risk management, and the fund’s treasurer.

Various valuation techniques and inputs are used to determine the fair value of financial instruments. GAAP establishes the following fair value hierarchy that categorizes the inputs used to measure fair value:

Level 1 – quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical financial instruments that the fund can access at the reporting date

Level 2 – inputs other than Level 1 quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly (including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar financial instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar financial instruments in inactive markets, interest rates and yield curves, implied volatilities, and credit spreads)

Observable inputs are developed using market data, such as publicly available information about actual events or transactions, and reflect the assumptions that market participants would use to price the financial instrument. Unobservable inputs are those for which market data are not available and are developed using the best information available about the assumptions that market participants would use to price the financial instrument. GAAP requires valuation techniques to maximize the use of relevant observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. When multiple inputs are used to derive fair value, the financial instrument is assigned to the level within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest-level input that is significant to the fair value of the financial instrument. Input levels are not necessarily an indication of the risk or liquidity associated with financial instruments at that level but rather the degree of judgment used in determining those values.

Valuation Techniques Debt securities generally are traded in the over-the-counter (OTC) market. Securities with remaining maturities of one year or more at the time of acquisition are valued at prices furnished by dealers who make markets in such securities or by an independent pricing service, which considers the yield or price of bonds of comparable quality, coupon, maturity, and type, as well as prices quoted by dealers who make markets in such securities. Securities with remaining maturities of less than one year at the time of acquisition generally use amortized cost in local currency to approximate fair value. However, if amortized cost is deemed not to reflect fair value or the fund holds a significant amount of such securities with remaining maturities of more than 60 days, the securities are valued at prices furnished by dealers who make markets in such securities or by an independent pricing service. Generally, debt securities are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; however, to the extent the valuations include significant unobservable inputs, the securities would be categorized in Level 3.

Investments in mutual funds are valued at the mutual fund’s closing NAV per share on the day of valuation and are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Financial futures contracts are valued at closing settlement prices and are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Forward currency exchange contracts are valued using the prevailing forward exchange rate and are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Swaps are valued at prices furnished by independent swap dealers or by an independent pricing service and generally are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; however, if unobservable inputs are significant to the valuation, the swap would be categorized in Level 3. Assets and liabilities other than financial instruments, including short-term receivables and payables, are carried at cost, or estimated realizable value, if less, which approximates fair value.

Thinly traded financial instruments and those for which the above valuation procedures are inappropriate or are deemed not to reflect fair value are stated at fair value as determined in good faith by the Valuation Committee. The objective of any fair value pricing determination is to arrive at a price that could reasonably be expected from a current sale. Financial instruments fair valued by the Valuation Committee are primarily private placements, restricted securities, warrants, rights, and other securities that are not publicly traded.

Subject to oversight by the Board, the Valuation Committee regularly makes good faith judgments to establish and adjust the fair valuations of certain securities as events occur and circumstances warrant. For instance, in determining the fair value of troubled or thinly traded debt instruments, the Valuation Committee considers a variety of factors, which may include, but are not limited to, the issuer’s business prospects, its financial standing and performance, recent investment transactions in the issuer, strategic events affecting the company, market liquidity for the issuer, and general economic conditions and events. In consultation with the investment and pricing teams, the Valuation Committee will determine an appropriate valuation technique based on available information, which may include both observable and unobservable inputs. The Valuation Committee typically will afford greatest weight to actual prices in arm’s length transactions, to the extent they represent orderly transactions between market participants, transaction information can be reliably obtained, and prices are deemed representative of fair value. However, the Valuation Committee may also consider other valuation methods such as a discount or premium from market value of a similar, freely traded security of the same issuer; discounted cash flows; yield to maturity; or some combination. Fair value determinations are reviewed on a regular basis and updated as information becomes available, including actual purchase and sale transactions of the issue. Because any fair value determination involves a significant amount of judgment, there is a degree of subjectivity inherent in such pricing decisions, and fair value prices determined by the Valuation Committee could differ from those of other market participants. Depending on the relative significance of unobservable inputs, including the valuation technique(s) used, fair valued securities may be categorized in Level 2 or 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Valuation Inputs The following table summarizes the fund’s financial instruments, based on the inputs used to determine their fair values on December 31, 2016:

There were no material transfers between Levels 1 and 2 during the year ended December 31, 2016.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the fund invested in derivative instruments. As defined by GAAP, a derivative is a financial instrument whose value is derived from an underlying security price, foreign exchange rate, interest rate, index of prices or rates, or other variable; it requires little or no initial investment and permits or requires net settlement. The fund invests in derivatives only if the expected risks and rewards are consistent with its investment objectives, policies, and overall risk profile, as described in its prospectus and Statement of Additional Information. The fund may use derivatives for a variety of purposes, such as seeking to hedge against declines in principal value, increase yield, invest in an asset with greater efficiency and at a lower cost than is possible through direct investment, or to adjust portfolio duration and credit exposure. The risks associated with the use of derivatives are different from, and potentially much greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in the instruments on which the derivatives are based. The fund at all times maintains sufficient cash reserves, liquid assets, or other SEC-permitted asset types to cover its settlement obligations under open derivative contracts.

The fund values its derivatives at fair value and recognizes changes in fair value currently in its results of operations. Accordingly, the fund does not follow hedge accounting, even for derivatives employed as economic hedges. Generally, the fund accounts for its derivatives on a gross basis. It does not offset the fair value of derivative liabilities against the fair value of derivative assets on its financial statements, nor does it offset the fair value of derivative instruments against the right to reclaim or obligation to return collateral.

The following table summarizes the fair value of the fund’s derivative instruments held as of December 31, 2016, and the related location on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities, presented by primary underlying risk exposure:

Additionally, the amount of gains and losses on derivative instruments recognized in fund earnings during the year ended December 31, 2016, and the related location on the accompanying Statement of Operations is summarized in the following table by primary underlying risk exposure:

Counterparty Risk and Collateral The fund invests in derivatives in various markets, which expose it to differing levels of counterparty risk. Counterparty risk on exchange-traded and centrally cleared derivative contracts, such as futures, exchange-traded options, and centrally cleared swaps, is minimal because the clearinghouse provides protection against counterparty defaults. For futures and centrally cleared swaps, the fund is required to deposit collateral in an amount specified by the clearinghouse and the clearing firm (margin requirement), and the margin requirement must be maintained over the life of the contract. Each clearinghouse and clearing firm, in its sole discretion, may adjust the margin requirements applicable to the fund.

Derivatives, such as bilateral swaps, forward currency exchange contracts, and OTC options, that are transacted and settle directly with a counterparty (bilateral derivatives) expose the fund to greater counterparty risk. To mitigate this risk, the fund has entered into master netting arrangements (MNAs) with certain counterparties that permit net settlement under specified conditions and, for certain counterparties, also require the exchange of collateral to cover mark-to-market exposure. MNAs may be in the form of International Swaps and Derivatives Association master agreements (ISDAs) or foreign exchange letter agreements (FX letters).

MNAs provide the ability to offset amounts the fund owes a counterparty against amounts the counterparty owes the fund (net settlement). Both ISDAs and FX letters generally allow termination of transactions and net settlement upon the occurrence of contractually specified events, such as failure to pay or bankruptcy. In addition, ISDAs specify other events, the occurrence of which would allow one of the parties to terminate. For example, a downgrade in credit rating of a counterparty would allow the fund to terminate while a decline in the fund’s net assets of more than a specified percentage would allow the counterparty to terminate. Upon termination, all transactions with that counterparty would be liquidated and a net termination amount settled. ISDAs include collateral agreements whereas FX letters do not. Collateral requirements are determined daily based on the net aggregate unrealized gain or loss on all bilateral derivatives with a counterparty, subject to minimum transfer amounts that typically range from $100,000 to $250,000. Any additional collateral required due to changes in security values is transferred the next business day.

The following table summarizes the fund’s derivatives at the reporting date by loss exposure to each counterparty or clearinghouse after consideration of collateral, if any. Exchange-traded and centrally cleared derivatives that settle variation margin daily are presented at the variation margin receivable or payable on the reporting date, and exchange-traded options are presented at value.

Collateral may be in the form of cash or debt securities issued by the U.S. government or related agencies. Cash and currencies posted by the fund are reflected as cash deposits in the accompanying financial statements and generally are restricted from withdrawal by the fund; securities posted by the fund are so noted in the accompanying Portfolio of Investments; both remain in the fund’s assets. Collateral pledged by counterparties is not included in the fund’s assets because the fund does not obtain effective control over those assets. For bilateral derivatives, collateral posted by the fund is held in a segregated account by the fund’s custodian.

Forward Currency Exchange Contracts The fund is subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. It uses forward currency exchange contracts (forwards) primarily to protect its non-U.S. dollar-denominated securities from adverse currency movements and to gain exposure to currencies for the purposes of risk management or enhanced return. A forward involves an obligation to purchase or sell a fixed amount of a specific currency on a future date at a price set at the time of the contract. Although certain forwards may be settled by exchanging only the net gain or loss on the contract, most forwards are settled with the exchange of the underlying currencies in accordance with the specified terms. Forwards are valued at the unrealized gain or loss on the contract, which reflects the net amount the fund either is entitled to receive or obligated to deliver, as measured by the difference between the forward exchange rates at the date of entry into the contract and the forward rates at the reporting date. Appreciated forwards are reflected as assets and depreciated forwards are reflected as liabilities on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Risks related to the use of forwards include the possible failure of counterparties to meet the terms of the agreements; that anticipated currency movements will not occur, thereby reducing the fund’s total return; and the potential for losses in excess of the fund’s initial investment. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the volume of the fund’s activity in forwards, based on underlying notional amounts, was generally between 37% and 60% of net assets.

Futures Contracts The fund is subject to interest rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives and uses futures contracts to help manage such risk. The fund may enter into futures contracts to manage exposure to interest rate and yield curve movements, security prices, foreign currencies, credit quality, and mortgage prepayments; as an efficient means of adjusting exposure to all or part of a target market; to enhance income; as a cash management tool; or to adjust portfolio duration and credit exposure. A futures contract provides for the future sale by one party and purchase by another of a specified amount of a specific underlying financial instrument at an agreed-upon price, date, time, and place. The fund currently invests only in exchange-traded futures, which generally are standardized as to maturity date, underlying financial instrument, and other contract terms. Payments are made or received by the fund each day to settle daily fluctuations in the value of the contract (variation margin), which reflect changes in the value of the underlying financial instrument. Variation margin is recorded as unrealized gain or loss until the contract is closed. The value of a futures contract included in net assets is the amount of unsettled variation margin; net variation margin receivable is reflected as an asset, and net variation margin payable is reflected as a liability on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Risks related to the use of futures contracts include possible illiquidity of the futures markets, contract prices that can be highly volatile and imperfectly correlated to movements in hedged security values and/or interest rates, and potential losses in excess of the fund’s initial investment. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the volume of the fund’s activity in futures, based on underlying notional amounts, was generally between 15% and 31% of net assets

Options The fund is subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk and/or credit risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives and uses options to help manage such risks. The fund may use options to manage exposure to security prices, interest rates, foreign currencies, and credit quality; as an efficient means of adjusting exposure to all or a part of a target market; to enhance income; as a cash management tool; or to adjust credit exposure. Options are included in net assets at fair value, purchased options are included in Investments in Securities, and written options are separately reflected as a liability on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Premiums on unexercised, expired options are recorded as realized gains or losses; premiums on exercised options are recorded as an adjustment to the proceeds from the sale or cost of the purchase. The difference between the premium and the amount received or paid in a closing transaction is also treated as realized gain or loss. In return for a premium paid, currency options give the holder the right, but not the obligation, to buy and sell currency at a specified exchange rate. Risks related to the use of options include possible illiquidity of the options markets; trading restrictions imposed by an exchange or counterparty; movements in the underlying asset values and/or currency values; and, for written options, potential losses in excess of the fund’s initial investment. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the volume of the fund’s activity in options, based on underlying notional amounts, was generally between 0% and 25% of net assets. Transactions in written options and related premiums received during the year ended December 31, 2016, were as follows:

Swaps The fund is subject to interest rate risk and/or credit risk, in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives and uses swap contracts to help manage such risks. The fund may use swaps in an effort to manage exposure to changes in interest rates, inflation rates, and credit quality; to adjust overall exposure to certain markets; to enhance total return or protect the value of portfolio securities; to serve as a cash management tool; or to adjust portfolio duration and credit exposure. Swap agreements can be settled either directly with the counterparty (bilateral swap) or through a central clearinghouse (centrally cleared swap). Fluctuations in the fair value of a contract are reflected in unrealized gain or loss and are reclassified to realized gain or loss upon contract termination or cash settlement. Net periodic receipts or payments required by a contract increase or decrease, respectively, the value of the contract until the contractual payment date, at which time such amounts are reclassified from unrealized to realized gain or loss. For bilateral swaps, cash payments are made or received by the fund on a periodic basis in accordance with contract terms; unrealized gain on contracts and premiums paid are reflected as assets and unrealized loss on contracts and premiums received are reflected as liabilities on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities. For bilateral swaps, premiums paid or received are amortized over the life of the swap and are recognized as realized gain or loss in the Statement of Operations. For centrally cleared swaps, payments are made or received by the fund each day to settle the daily fluctuation in the value of the contract (variation margin). Accordingly, the value of a centrally cleared swap included in net assets is the unsettled variation margin; net variation margin receivable is reflected as an asset and net variation margin payable is reflected as a liability on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities.

Interest rate swaps are agreements to exchange cash flows based on the difference between specified interest rates applied to a notional principal amount for a specified period of time. Risks related to the use of interest rate swaps include the potential for unanticipated movements in interest or currency rates, the possible failure of a counterparty to perform in accordance with the terms of the swap agreements, potential government regulation that could adversely affect the fund’s swap investments, and potential losses in excess of the fund’s initial investment.

Credit default swaps are agreements where one party (the protection buyer) agrees to make periodic payments to another party (the protection seller) in exchange for protection against specified credit events, such as certain defaults and bankruptcies related to an underlying credit instrument, or issuer or index of such instruments. Upon occurrence of a specified credit event, the protection seller is required to pay the buyer the difference between the notional amount of the swap and the value of the underlying credit, either in the form of a net cash settlement or by paying the gross notional amount and accepting delivery of the relevant underlying credit. For credit default swaps where the underlying credit is an index, a specified credit event may affect all or individual underlying securities included in the index and will be settled based upon the relative weighting of the affected underlying security(ies) within the index. Generally, the payment risk for the seller of protection is inversely related to the current market price or credit rating of the underlying credit or the market value of the contract relative to the notional amount, which are indicators of the markets’ valuation of credit quality. As of December 31, 2016, the notional amount of protection sold by the fund totaled $8,914,000 (2.9% of net assets), which reflects the maximum potential amount the fund could be required to pay under such contracts. Risks related to the use of credit default swaps include the possible inability of the fund to accurately assess the current and future creditworthiness of underlying issuers, the possible failure of a counterparty to perform in accordance with the terms of the swap agreements, potential government regulation that could adversely affect the fund’s swap investments, and potential losses in excess of the fund’s initial investment.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the volume of the fund’s activity in swaps, based on underlying notional amounts, was generally between 4% and 25% of net assets.

Consistent with its investment objective, the fund engages in the following practices to manage exposure to certain risks and/or to enhance performance. The investment objective, policies, program, and risk factors of the fund are described more fully in the fund’s prospectus and Statement of Additional Information.

Emerging and Frontier Markets The fund may invest, either directly or through investments in T. Rowe Price institutional funds, in securities of companies located in, issued by governments of, or denominated in or linked to the currencies of emerging and frontier market countries; at period-end, approximately 36% of the fund’s net assets were invested in emerging markets and 9% in frontier markets. Emerging markets, and to a greater extent frontier markets, generally have economic structures that are less diverse and mature, and political systems that are less stable, than developed countries. These markets may be subject to greater political, economic, and social uncertainty and differing regulatory environments that may potentially impact the fund’s ability to buy or sell certain securities or repatriate proceeds to U.S. dollars. Such securities are often subject to greater price volatility, less liquidity, and higher rates of inflation than U.S. securities. Investing in frontier markets is significantly riskier than investing in other countries, including emerging markets.

Noninvestment-Grade Debt At December 31, 2016, approximately 12% of the fund’s net assets were invested, either directly or through its investment in T. Rowe Price institutional funds, in noninvestment-grade debt, including “high yield” or “junk” bonds or leveraged loans. The noninvestment-grade debt market may experience sudden and sharp price swings due to a variety of factors, including changes in economic forecasts, stock market activity, large sustained sales by major investors, a high-profile default, or a change in market sentiment. These events may decrease the ability of issuers to make principal and interest payments and adversely affect the liquidity or value, or both, of such securities.Investments in noninvestment-grade holdings may be considered speculative.

Restricted Securities The fund may invest in securities that are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. Prompt sale of such securities at an acceptable price may be difficult and may involve substantial delays and additional costs.

Other Purchases and sales of portfolio securities other than short-term securities aggregated $251,143,000 and $283,376,000, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2016.

No provision for federal income taxes is required since the fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code and distribute to shareholders all of its taxable income and gains. Distributions determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations may differ in amount or character from net investment income and realized gains for financial reporting purposes. Financial reporting records are adjusted for permanent book/tax differences to reflect tax character but are not adjusted for temporary differences.

The fund files U.S. federal, state, and local tax returns as required. The fund’s tax returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities until expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, which is generally three years after the filing of the tax return but which can be extended to six years in certain circumstances. Tax returns for open years have incorporated no uncertain tax positions that require a provision for income taxes.

Reclassifications between income and gain relate primarily to the character of net currency losses. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the following reclassifications were recorded to reflect tax character (there was no impact on results of operations or net assets):

Distributions during the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, were characterized for tax purposes as follows:

At December 31, 2016, the tax-basis cost of investments and components of net assets were as follows:

The difference between book-basis and tax-basis net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable to the deferral of losses from certain derivative contracts, and the realization of gains/losses on certain open derivative contracts for tax purposes. The fund intends to retain realized gains to the extent of available capital loss carryforwards. Net realized capital losses may be carried forward indefinitely to offset future realized capital gains. All or a portion of the capital loss carryforwards may be from losses realized between November 1 and the fund’s fiscal year-end, which are deferred for tax purposes until the subsequent year but recognized for financial reporting purposes in the year realized. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the fund utilized $493,000 of capital loss carryforwards. In accordance with federal tax laws applicable to investment companies, specified net losses realized between November 1 and December 31 are not recognized for tax purposes until the subsequent year (late-year ordinary loss deferrals); however, such losses are recognized for financial reporting purposes in the year realized.

The fund is managed by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Price Associates), a wholly owned subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (Price Group). Price Associates has entered into a sub-advisory agreement(s) with one or more of its wholly owned subsidiaries, to provide investment advisory services to the fund. The investment management and administrative agreement between the fund and Price Associates provides for an all-inclusive annual fee equal to 0.55% of the fund’s average daily net assets. The fee is computed daily and paid monthly. The all-inclusive fee covers investment management, shareholder servicing, transfer agency, accounting, and custody services provided to the fund, as well as fund directors’ fees and expenses. Interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, and other non-recurring expenses permitted by the investment management agreement are paid directly by the fund.

Mutual funds, trusts, and other accounts managed by Price Associates or its affiliates (collectively, Price funds and accounts) may invest in the fund. No Price fund or account may invest for the purpose of exercising management or control over the fund. At December 31, 2016, approximately 55% of the fund’s outstanding shares were held by Price funds and accounts.

The fund may invest in the T. Rowe Price Government Reserve Fund, the T. Rowe Price Treasury Reserve Fund, or the T. Rowe Price Short-Term Fund (collectively, the Price Reserve Funds), open-end management investment companies managed by Price Associates and considered affiliates of the fund. The Price Reserve Funds are offered as short-term investment options to mutual funds, trusts, and other accounts managed by Price Associates or its affiliates and are not available for direct purchase by members of the public. The Price Reserve Funds pay no investment management fees.

The fund may participate in securities purchase and sale transactions with other funds or accounts advised by Price Associates (cross trades), in accordance with procedures adopted by the fund’s Board and Securities and Exchange Commission rules, which require, among other things, that such purchase and sale cross trades be effected at the independent current market price of the security. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the fund had no purchases or sales cross trades with other funds or accounts advised by Price Associates.

To the Board of Directors of T. Rowe Price Institutional International Funds, Inc. and
Shareholders of T. Rowe Price Institutional International Bond Fund

In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of T. Rowe Price Institutional International Bond Fund (one of the portfolios constituting T. Rowe Price Institutional International Funds, Inc., hereafter referred to as the “Fund”) as of December 31, 2016, the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated therein, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as “financial statements”) are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities as of December 31, 2016 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, and confirmation of the underlying fund by correspondence with the transfer agent, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

We are providing this information as required by the Internal Revenue Code]. The amounts shown may differ from those elsewhere in this report because of differences between tax and financial reporting requirements.

The fund’s distributions to shareholders included $661,000 from short-term capital gains.

The fund will pass through foreign source income of $62,000 and foreign taxes paid of $62,000.

A description of the policies and procedures used by T. Rowe Price funds and portfolios to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available in each fund’s Statement of Additional Information. You may request this document by calling 1-800-225-5132 or by accessing the SEC’s website, sec.gov.

The description of our proxy voting policies and procedures is also available on our corporate website. To access it, please visit the following Web page:

Scroll down to the section near the bottom of the page that says, “Proxy Voting Policies.” Click on the Proxy Voting Policies link in the shaded box.

Each fund’s most recent annual proxy voting record is available on our website and through the SEC’s website. To access it through T. Rowe Price, visit the website location shown above, and scroll down to the section near the bottom of the page that says, “Proxy Voting Records.” Click on the Proxy Voting Records link in the shaded box.

The fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q is available electronically on the SEC’s website (sec. gov); hard copies may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room, 100 F St. N.E., Washington, DC 20549. For more information on the Public Reference Room, call 1-800-SEC-0330.

Your fund is overseen by a Board of Directors (Board) that meets regularly to review a wide variety of matters affecting or potentially affecting the fund, including performance, investment programs, compliance matters, advisory fees and expenses, service providers, and business and regulatory affairs. The Board elects the fund’s officers, who are listed in the final table. At least 75% of the Board’s members are independent of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (T. Rowe Price), and its affiliates; “inside” or “interested” directors are employees or officers of T. Rowe Price. The business address of each director and officer is 100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202. The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the fund directors and is available without charge by calling a T. Rowe Price representative at 1-800-638-5660.

The registrant has adopted a code of ethics, as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR, applicable to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. A copy of this code of ethics is filed as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR. No substantive amendments were approved or waivers were granted to this code of ethics during the period covered by this report.

The registrant’s Board of Directors/Trustees has determined that Mr. Bruce W. Duncan qualifies as an audit committee financial expert, as defined in Item 3 of Form N-CSR. Mr. Duncan is considered independent for purposes of Item 3 of Form N-CSR.

(a) – (d) Aggregate fees billed for the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered to, or on behalf of, the registrant by the registrant’s principal accountant were as follows:

Audit fees include amounts related to the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements and services normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings. Audit-related fees include amounts reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrant’s financial statements and specifically include the issuance of a report on internal controls and, if applicable, agreed-upon procedures related to fund acquisitions. Tax fees include amounts related to services for tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice. The nature of these services specifically includes the review of distribution calculations and the preparation of Federal, state, and excise tax returns. All other fees include the registrant’s pro-rata share of amounts for agreed-upon procedures in conjunction with service contract approvals by the registrant’s Board of Directors/Trustees.

(e)(1) The registrant’s audit committee has adopted a policy whereby audit and non-audit services performed by the registrant’s principal accountant for the registrant, its investment adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant require pre-approval in advance at regularly scheduled audit committee meetings. If such a service is required between regularly scheduled audit committee meetings, pre-approval may be authorized by one audit committee member with ratification at the next scheduled audit committee meeting. Waiver of pre-approval for audit or non-audit services requiring fees of a de minimis amount is not permitted.

(2) No services included in (b) – (d) above were approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

(f) Less than 50 percent of the hours expended on the principal accountant’s engagement to audit the registrant’s financial statements for the most recent fiscal year were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees.

(g) The aggregate fees billed for the most recent fiscal year and the preceding fiscal year by the registrant’s principal accountant for non-audit services rendered to the registrant, its investment adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant were $2,146,000 and $2,158,000, respectively.

(h) All non-audit services rendered in (g) above were pre-approved by the registrant’s audit committee. Accordingly, these services were considered by the registrant’s audit committee in maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.

(a) Not applicable. The complete schedule of investments is included in Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.

Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.

(a) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of this filing and have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of that date, in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported timely.

(b) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer are aware of no change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s second fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

(a)(1) The registrant’s code of ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is attached.

(2) Separate certifications by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, are attached.

(3) Written solicitation to repurchase securities issued by closed-end companies: not applicable.

(b) A certification by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, is attached.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

T. Rowe Price Institutional International Funds, Inc.

	By	/s/ Edward C. Bernard
		Edward C. Bernard
		Principal Executive Officer

Date February 16, 2017

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

	By	/s/ Edward C. Bernard
		Edward C. Bernard
		Principal Executive Officer

Date February 16, 2017


	By	/s/ Catherine D. Mathews
		Catherine D. Mathews
		Principal Financial Officer

Date February 16, 2017

●	Developed markets international bonds generated modestly positive returns in U.S. dollar terms as increasing yields and a strengthening U.S. dollar toward the end of the year nearly offset a strong first half of 2016.

●	The Institutional International Bond Fund returned 2.33% for the 12-month period, outperforming the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex USD Bond Index.

●	Political uncertainty in some developed markets could lead to fixed income volatility and opportunities to buy mispriced bonds and currencies.

●	Effective security selection is critical as the international bond market grows in size, complexity, and maturity, highlighting the importance of T. Rowe Price’s global sovereign, credit, and equity research platforms.

Name (Year of Birth) Year Elected* [Number of T. Rowe Price Portfolios Overseen]		Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships of Public Companies and Other Investment Companies During the Past Five Years

William R. Brody, M.D., Ph.D. (1944) 2009 [187]		President and Trustee, Salk Institute for Biological Studies (2009 to present); Director, BioMed Realty Trust (2013 to 2016); Chairman of the Board, Mesa Biotech, a molecular diagnostic company (March 2016 to present); Director, Radiology Partners, an integrated radiology practice management company (June 2016 to present); Director, Novartis, Inc. (2009 to 2014); Director, IBM (2007 to present)

Anthony W. Deering (1945) 1991 [187]		Chairman, Exeter Capital, LLC, a private investment firm (2004 to present); Director, Brixmor Real Estate Investment Trust (2012 to present); Director and Advisory Board Member, Deutsche Bank North America (2004 to present); Director, Under Armour (2008 to present); Director, Vornado Real Estate Investment Trust (2004 to 2012)

Bruce W. Duncan (1951) 2013 [187]		Chief Executive Officer and Director (2009 to present), Chairman of the Board (January 2016 to present), and President (2009 to September 2016), First Industrial Realty Trust, an owner and operator of industrial properties; Chairman of the Board (2005 to May 2016) and Director (1999 to May 2016), Starwood Hotels & Resorts, a hotel and leisure company; Director, Boston Properties (May 2016 to present)

Robert J. Gerrard, Jr. (1952) 2012 [187]		Advisory Board Member, Pipeline Crisis/Winning Strategies, a collaborative working to improve opportunities for young African Americans (1997 to present)

Paul F. McBride (1956) 2013 [187]		Advisory Board Member, Vizzia Technologies (2015 to present)

Cecilia E. Rouse, Ph.D. (1963) 2012 [187]		Dean, Woodrow Wilson School (2012 to present); Professor and Researcher, Princeton University (1992 to present); Director, MDRC, a nonprofit education and social policy research organization (2011 to present); Member of National Academy of Education (2010 to present); Research Associate of Labor Program (2011 to present) and Board Member (2015 to present), National Bureau of Economic Research (2011 to present); Chair of Committee on the Status of Minority Groups in the Economic Profession (2012 to present) and Vice President (2015 to present), American Economic Association

John G. Schreiber (1946) 2001 [187]		Owner/President, Centaur Capital Partners, Inc., a real estate investment company (1991 to present); Cofounder, Partner, and Cochairman of the Investment Committee, Blackstone Real Estate Advisors, L.P. (1992 to 2015); Director, General Growth Properties, Inc. (2010 to 2013); Director, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, a real estate finance company (2012 to 2016); Director and Chairman of the Board, Brixmor Property Group, Inc. (2013 to present); Director, Hilton Worldwide (2013 to present); Director, Hudson Pacific Properties (2014 to 2016)

Mark R. Tercek (1957) 2009 [187]		President and Chief Executive Officer, The Nature Conservancy (2008 to present)

*Each independent director serves until retirement, resignation, or election of a successor.

Name (Year of Birth) Year Elected* [Number of T. Rowe Price Portfolios Overseen]		Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships of Public Companies and Other Investment Companies During the Past Five Years

Edward C. Bernard (1956) 2006 [187]		Director and Vice President, T. Rowe Price; Vice Chairman of the Board, Director, and Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, Director, and President, T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc.; Chairman of the Board and Director, T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, Director, and President, T. Rowe Price International and T. Rowe Price Trust Company; Chairman of the Board, all funds

Brian C. Rogers, CFA, CIC (1955) 2006 [131]		Chief Investment Officer, Director, and Vice President, T. Rowe Price; Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer, Director, and Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Vice President, T. Rowe Price Trust Company; Director, United Technologies (January 2016 to present)

*Each inside director serves until retirement, resignation, or election of a successor.

Name (Year of Birth) Position Held With Institutional International Funds		Principal Occupation(s)

Ulle Adamson, CFA (1979) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Roy H. Adkins (1970) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Christopher D. Alderson (1962) President		Company’s Representative and Vice President, Price Hong Kong; Vice President, Price Singapore; Director and Vice President, T. Rowe Price International; Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

Paulina Amieva (1981) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

Malik S. Asif (1981) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International; formerly, student, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business (to 2012)

Harishankar Balkrishna (1983) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Sheena L. Barbosa (1983) Vice President		Vice President, Price Hong Kong and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

Peter J. Bates, CFA (1974) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

Oliver D.M. Bell (1969) Executive Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

R. Scott Berg, CFA (1972) Executive Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

Steven E. Boothe, CFA (1977) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

Peter I. Botoucharov (1965) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International; formerly, Director, EMEA Macroeconomic Research and Strategy (to 2012)

Tala Boulos (1984) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International; formerly, Vice President, CEEMEA Corporate Credit Research, Deutsche Bank (to 2013)

Darrell N. Braman (1963) Vice President and Secretary		Vice President, Price Hong Kong, Price Singapore, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price International, T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.

Carolyn Hoi Che Chu (1974) Vice President		Vice President, Price Hong Kong and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

Archibald Ciganer Albeniz, CFA (1976) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Richard N. Clattenburg, CFA (1979) Executive Vice President		Vice President, Price Singapore, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Michael J. Conelius, CFA (1964) Executive Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price International, and T. Rowe Price Trust Company

Richard de los Reyes (1975) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company

Michael Della Vedova (1969) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Shawn T. Driscoll (1975) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company

Bridget A. Ebner (1970) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

David J. Eiswert, CFA (1972) Executive Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Mark S. Finn, CFA, CPA (1963) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company

Quentin S. Fitzsimmons (1968) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International; formerly, Portfolio Manager, Royal Bank of Scotland Group (to 2015); Executive Director, Threadneedle Investment, Ltd. (to 2012)

John R. Gilner (1961) Chief Compliance Officer		Chief Compliance Officer and Vice President, T. Rowe Price; Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc.

Paul D. Greene II (1978) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

Benjamin Griffiths, CFA (1977) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Amanda B. Hall, CFA (1985) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price International; formerly, Investment Analyst, Bill Gates Investments (to 2012); student, Stanford Graduate School of Business (to 2014)

Richard L. Hall (1979) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; formerly, Financial Attaché, U.S. Department of Treasury, International Affairs Division (to 2012)

Nabil Hanano, CFA (1984) Vice President		Employee, T. Rowe Price; formerly, Senior Equity Research Associate, Raymond James (to 2012)

Steven C. Huber, CFA, FSA (1958) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Stefan Hubrich, Ph.D., CFA (1974) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

Arif Husain, CFA (1972) Executive Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International; formerly, Director/Head of UK and Euro Fixed Income, AllianceBernstein (to 2013)

Randal S. Jenneke (1971) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Nina P. Jones, CPA (1980) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

Yoichiro Kai (1973) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Jai Kapadia (1982) Vice President		Vice President, Price Hong Kong and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

Andrew J. Keirle (1974) Executive Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Paul J. Krug, CPA (1964) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company

Christopher J. Kushlis, CFA (1976) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Mark J. Lawrence (1970) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Anh Lu (1968) Vice President		Vice President, Price Hong Kong and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

Sebastien Mallet (1974) Executive Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Catherine D. Mathews (1963) Treasurer and Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company

Jonathan H.W. Matthews, CFA (1975) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Raymond A. Mills, Ph.D., CFA (1960) Executive Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price International, and T. Rowe Price Trust Company

Eric C. Moffett (1974) Vice President		Vice President, Price Hong Kong and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

Tobias F. Mueller (1980) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Sudhir Nanda, Ph.D., CFA (1959) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

Joshua Nelson (1977) Executive Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Sridhar Nishtala (1975) Vice President		Vice President, Price Singapore and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

Jason Nogueira, CFA (1974) Executive Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

David Oestreicher (1967) Vice President		Director, Vice President, and Secretary, T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Services, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company; Chief Legal Officer, Vice President, and Secretary, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Vice President and Secretary, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price International; Vice President, Price Hong Kong and Price Singapore

Michael D. Oh, CFA (1974) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

Kenneth A. Orchard (1975) Executive Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Oluwaseun A. Oyegunle, CFA (1984) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International; formerly, student, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania (to 2013); Summer Investment Analyst, T. Rowe Price International (2012); Analyst, Asset & Resource Management Limited (to 2012)

Gonzalo Pángaro, CFA (1968) Executive Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

John W. Ratzesberger (1975) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company; formerly, North American Head of Listed Derivatives Operation, Morgan Stanley (to 2013)

Shannon H. Rauser (1987) Assistant Secretary		Employee, T. Rowe Price

Federico Santilli, CFA (1974) Executive Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Sebastian Schrott (1977) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Deborah D. Seidel (1962) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.

Robert W. Sharps, CFA, CPA (1971) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company

John C.A. Sherman (1969) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Robert W. Smith (1961) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company

Gabriel Solomon (1977) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

Joshua K. Spencer, CFA (1973) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

David A. Stanley (1963) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Taymour R. Tamaddon, CFA (1976) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

Ju Yen Tan (1972) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Dean Tenerelli (1964) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Eric L. Veiel, CFA (1972) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company

Verena Wachnitz, CFA (1978) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Dai Wang (1989) Vice President		Employee, T. Rowe Price; formerly, student Harvard Business School (to 2014); Analyst, Goldman Sachs (to 2012)

Christopher S. Whitehouse (1972) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

J. Howard Woodward, CFA (1974) Vice President		Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International

Ernest C. Yeung, CFA (1979) Vice President		Director, Responsible Officer, and Vice President, Price Hong Kong; Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

Unless otherwise noted, officers have been employees of T. Rowe Price or T. Rowe Price International for at least 5 years.