UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF
REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-05833
T. Rowe Price Institutional International Funds, Inc. |
|
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) |
100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 |
|
(Address of principal executive offices) |
David Oestreicher |
100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 |
|
(Name and address of agent for service) |
Registrants telephone number, including area
code: (410) 345-2000
Date of fiscal year end: December 31
Date of reporting period: June 30,
2016
Item 1. Report to Shareholders
![]() |
Institutional Emerging Markets Bond Fund |
June 30, 2016 |
Highlights |
● | Emerging markets debt generated strong total
returns in the six-month reporting period. |
● | The Institutional Emerging Markets Bond Fund
returned 11.07%, outperforming the J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global Diversified. |
● | The funds overweight allocations to Brazil and
Venezuela, as well as security selection within those countries, were the
major factors behind its relative
outperformance. |
● | The fundamental economic and fiscal condition of many emerging markets remains sound, with strong balance sheets and higher rates of economic growth than developed countries. While we expect Chinas economy to avoid a hard landing, the countrys management of its transition to domestically oriented growth presents a meaningful risk for emerging markets bonds going forward if policymakers are unable to implement needed reforms. |
The views and opinions in this report were current as of June 30, 2016. They are not guarantees of performance or investment results and should not be taken as investment advice. Investment decisions reflect a variety of factors, and the managers reserve the right to change their views about individual stocks, sectors, and the markets at any time. As a result, the views expressed should not be relied upon as a forecast of the funds future investment intent. The report is certified under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires mutual funds and other public companies to affirm that, to the best of their knowledge, the information in their financial reports is fairly and accurately stated in all material respects.
Managers Letter
T. Rowe Price Institutional Emerging Markets Bond
Fund
Dear Investor
Emerging markets bonds generated strong total returns in the first half of 2016. The asset class benefited from improving sentiment as perceptions of the Federal Reserve turned increasingly dovish as well as from a sharp rebound in oil prices. Emerging markets government bonds denominated in local currencies outperformed their dollar-denominated cousins. Corporate bonds issued by companies in emerging markets lagged dollar-denominated sovereign bonds from the same countries but still posted healthy returns.
As seen in the Performance Comparison table, the Institutional Emerging Markets Bond Fund returned 11.07% for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The fund outperformed its benchmark, the J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global Diversified. The funds overweight allocations to strong-performing Brazil and Venezuela, as well as security selection within those countries, were the major factors accounting for its relative outperformance.
Market Environment
Emerging markets sovereign bonds denominated in U.S. dollars generated strong total returns in the first half of 2016. The asset class benefited from improving sentiment as investors perceptions of the Federal Reserves policy outlook turned increasingly dovish as well as from a sharp rebound in oil prices. Brent crude oil (the global benchmark) traded at just over $50 a barrel in June after rebounding from its January lows near $26. The performance of individual countries varied widely, but Brazilian bonds returned more than 21% amid investor expectations that interim President Michel Temer would be able to implement structural reforms to improve the countrys fiscal situation. Argentinas debt also rallied, gaining nearly 16% for the six-month period, as newly elected President Mauricio Macri enacted investor-friendly policies. In April, Argentina sold $16.5 billion of new sovereign bonds in the largest-ever issue of emerging markets debt.
Argentina had not issued bonds in almost 15 years and had spent much of that time battling holdout creditors following its default on over $80 billion in debt in 2001. The UKs Brexit vote in late June caused a brief sell-off in emerging markets debt as well as other riskier segments of the markets, but the asset class quickly rebounded.
Emerging markets government debt denominated in local currencies produced even stronger returns for the six-month reporting period, with J.P. Morgans local currency debt index gaining over 14%. Brazils local currency bonds produced an astounding 47% total return in U.S. dollar terms as a result of higher bond prices as well as the Brazilian reals 23% gain against the dollar. However, the performance disparity among individual countries in locally denominated government bonds was stark. Mexicos sovereign debt denominated in pesos declined 2% in terms of the U.S. dollar as a result of the currencys loss of more than 7% versus the dollar. The Mexican peso is one of the more liquid emerging markets currencies and tends to trade as proxy for risk in the segment.
Corporate bonds issued by companies in emerging marketswhich are denominated in hard currencies such as U.S. dollarslagged emerging markets sovereign bonds but still managed to post strong returns. According to J.P. Morgan data, emerging markets corporates broadly gained almost 8% in the six-month period. Noninvestment-grade corporate bonds from developing countries performed particularly well in the second quarter of 2016 as their compelling yields attracted investors. Debt from issuers in the metals and mining sector tended to outperform as a result of the strong rally in commodity prices, while oil and gas bonds also posted strong returns.
Portfolio Review and Positioning
The portfolios overweight allocation to Brazil and its security selection in the country made some of the most significant contributions to relative returns. Brazilian bonds rallied as investors gained confidence in acting President Temers government, which introduced legislation to cap government spending and help regain control of the countrys mounting debt. Our holdings of longer-maturity sovereign bonds from Brazil performed particularly well, as did our allocation to bonds from Petrobras, Brazils partially state-owned oil company. Petrobras debt benefited from rising oil prices, new sources of financing, and its announcement that it would sell some assets. We meaningfully increased the funds exposure to Brazilian bondslocally and dollar-denominated sovereigns as well as corporate bondsover the course of the six-month reporting period. (Please refer to the funds portfolio of investments for a complete list of holdings and the amount each represents in the portfolio.)
Similarly, our overweight to Venezuela and bond selection within the country contributed to relative performance. Our position in short-maturity debt from Petroleos de Venezuela, the state-owned oil company known as PDVSA, continued to advance as oil prices climbed above their early-year lows. As a result of the meaningful long-term economic problems that Venezuela faces, our exposure to the country consists primarily of short-term bonds with low dollar prices.
The portfolio was also overweight Serbia and Croatia, which weighed on relative returns as the late-June Brexit vote dragged the prices of many Eastern European securities lower. However, the fundamentals of both countries are improving, and we maintain our long-term conviction in their debt. Another positive factor for Serbia and Croatia is that they are more insulated from Brexits potential negative impact on growth than their regional neighbors Poland and Hungary, which are more integrated with the economies of developed European countries.
In fact, we made a significant reduction in our exposure to Poland and Hungary prior to the Brexit referendum as the trade-off between risk and reward in the countries deteriorated. We also meaningfully reduced the portfolios allocation to bonds from another Eastern European country, Turkey, over the course of the reporting period. This positioning adjustment was in response to long-term political risks in Turkey that we believed were not appropriately reflected in the prices of its debt. Shortly after the reporting period ended, Turkey experienced a failed military coup.
We reduced the funds out-of-benchmark allocation to emerging markets corporate bonds during the first half of 2016. While we maintain a positive outlook for emerging markets corporate debt in general, we found more attractive opportunities in sovereign bonds. Emerging markets corporate bonds are also less liquid than government debt from the same developing countries.
The fund holds select locally denominated sovereign bonds where the relative value appears compelling versus debt denominated in U.S. dollars. Our allocation to locally denominated bonds increased as benign inflation, attractive inflation-adjusted yields, and expectations for supportive central bank policies made select local markets such as Brazil, Indonesia, and Russia somewhat more attractive. Depending upon our outlook for a particular currency and the costs involved, we may fully or partially hedge the currency exposure to reduce risk, or opt not to hedge if a currency appears to be poised to gain against the dollar. During the reporting period, we hedged most of the portfolios foreign exchange exposure or utilized non-U.S. dollar funding currencies. The funds nondollar currency exposure focused on the Brazilian real and the Argentine peso.
Market liquidity is a key variable that we are closely monitoring as the Fed slowly raises interest rates because it can limit our ability to buy and sell emerging markets bonds at efficient prices. Emerging markets debt, as one of the riskier and less traded fixed income asset classes, tends to have lower liquidity than high-quality government debt such as U.S. Treasuries. As markets adapt to the Feds first tightening cycle since 2006, temporary dislocations may result in limited liquidity for some bonds from developing countries. As a result, we actively consider market depth and liquidity when evaluating bonds for purchase or sale, and we have been upgrading the liquidity of our portfolio holdings.
Outlook
The fundamental economic and fiscal condition of many emerging markets remains sound, with stronger balance sheets and higher rates of economic growth than developed countries. Some developing countries are making noteworthy progress toward implementing economic, political, and fiscal reforms that will further boost the quality of their sovereign debt. These supportive fundamental factors suggest that an increasing number of investors will gradually address their underinvestment to emerging markets bonds by building their allocations to the asset class, providing further support. Rather than presenting a systemic risk to developing countries, we believe that Brexit will serve to highlight the advantages of investing in emerging markets debt over developed markets bonds.
However, significant risks for the asset class remain, and Chinas struggle to manage its transition from an export-oriented economy to one focused on domestic consumption without inducing an abrupt slowdown is chief among them. The Chinese government has been willing to support growth through accommodative fiscal and monetary policies, but future stimulus measures are likely to become less effective. This could lead to erratic Chinese economic data reports that create market volatility. Over the longer term, we expect China to be able to successfully navigate its economic transition while still growing at a faster pace than most other countries. Political risks in developed markets, including the U.S. presidential election in November and potential ongoing Brexit fallout in Europe, could contribute to elevated volatility later in 2016. We are also mindful of the risks associated with a potential retreat in commodity prices.
The diverse background of country-specific developments in emerging markets drives the importance of country selection and maintaining a long-term investment view. We believe that the extended reach of T. Rowe Prices global credit, sovereign, and equity research platforms, combined with our emphasis on collaboration across those platforms, gives us a critical edge in the analysis of individual countries and bonds in emerging fixed income markets.
Respectfully submitted,
Michael J.
Conelius
Lead portfolio manager of the fund
and chairman of its Investment Advisory Committee.
July 26, 2016
The committee chairman has day-to-day responsibility for managing the portfolio and works with committee members in developing and executing the funds investment program.
Risk of International Bond Investing |
Funds that invest overseas generally carry more risk than funds that invest strictly in U.S. assets, including unpredictable changes in currency values. Investments in emerging markets are subject to abrupt and severe price declines and should be regarded as speculative. The economic and political structures of developing nations, in most cases, do not compare favorably with the U.S. or other developed countries in terms of wealth and stability, and their financial markets often lack liquidity. Some countries also have legacies of hyperinflation, currency devaluations, and governmental interference in markets.
International investments are subject to currency risk, a decline in the value of a foreign currency versus the U.S. dollar, which reduces the dollar value of securities denominated in that currency. The overall impact on a funds holdings can be significant and long-lasting depending on the currencies represented in the portfolio, how each one appreciates or depreciates in relation to the U.S. dollar, and whether currency positions are hedged. Further, exchange rate movements are unpredictable, and it is not possible to effectively hedge the currency risks of many developing countries.
Bonds are also subject to interest rate risk, the decline in bond prices that usually accompanies a rise in interest rates, and credit risk, the chance that any fund holding could have its credit rating downgraded or that a bond issuer will default (fail to make timely payments of interest or principal), potentially reducing the funds income level and share price.
Glossary |
Duration: A measure of a bonds or bond funds sensitivity to changes in interest rates. For example, a fund with a duration of six years would fall about 6% in response to a one-percentage-point rise in rates, and vice versa.
J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global Diversified: Tracks U.S. dollar government bonds of 31 foreign countries.
Lipper averages: The averages of available mutual fund performance returns for specified time periods in categories defined by Lipper Inc.
Weighted average maturity: A measure of a funds sensitivity to interest rates. In general, the longer the average maturity, the greater the funds sensitivity to interest rate changes. The weighted average maturity may take into account the interest rate readjustment dates for certain securities. Money funds must maintain a weighted average maturity of less than 60 days.
Portfolio Highlights
Performance and Expenses
T. Rowe Price Institutional Emerging Markets Bond
Fund
Growth of $1 Million |
This chart shows the value of a hypothetical $1 million investment in the fund over the past 10 fiscal year periods or since inception (for funds lacking 10-year records). The result is compared with benchmarks, which may include a broad-based market index and a peer group average or index. Market indexes do not include expenses, which are deducted from fund returns as well as mutual fund averages and indexes.
Fund Expense Example
As a mutual fund shareholder, you may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees, and other fund expenses. The following example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the most recent six-month period and held for the entire period.
Actual Expenses
The first line of the following table (Actual) provides
information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the
information on this line, together with your account balance, to estimate the
expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by
$1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then
multiply the result by the number on the first line under the heading Expenses
Paid During Period to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during
this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison
Purposes
The information on the second
line of the table (Hypothetical) is based on hypothetical account values and
expenses derived from the funds actual expense ratio and an assumed 5% per year
rate of return before expenses (not the funds actual return). You may compare
the ongoing costs of investing in the fund with other funds by contrasting this
5% hypothetical example and the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the
shareholder reports of the other funds. The hypothetical account values and
expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or
expenses you paid for the period.
You should also be aware that the expenses shown in the table highlight only your ongoing costs and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. To the extent a fund charges transaction costs, however, the total cost of owning that fund is higher.
Financial Highlights
T. Rowe Price Institutional Emerging Markets Bond Fund
(Unaudited)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Portfolio of Investments
T. Rowe Price
Institutional Emerging Markets Bond Fund
June 30, 2016
(Unaudited)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Statement of Assets and
Liabilities
T. Rowe Price Institutional
Emerging Markets Bond Fund
June 30, 2016 (Unaudited)
($000s, except shares and per share amounts)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Statement of Operations
T. Rowe Price Institutional Emerging Markets Bond Fund
(Unaudited)
($000s)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Statement of Changes in Net
Assets
T. Rowe Price Institutional
Emerging Markets Bond Fund
(Unaudited)
($000s)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Notes to Financial
Statements
T. Rowe Price Institutional
Emerging Markets Bond Fund
June 30, 2016 (Unaudited)
T. Rowe Price Institutional International Funds, Inc. (the corporation), is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). The Institutional Emerging Markets Bond Fund (the fund) is a nondiversified, open-end management investment company established by the corporation. The fund incepted on November 30, 2006. The fund seeks to provide high income and capital appreciation.
NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Preparation The fund is an investment company and follows accounting and reporting guidance in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 (ASC 946). The accompanying financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), including, but not limited to, ASC 946. GAAP requires the use of estimates made by management. Management believes that estimates and valuations are appropriate; however, actual results may differ from those estimates, and the valuations reflected in the accompanying financial statements may differ from the value ultimately realized upon sale or maturity.
Investment Transactions, Investment Income, and Distributions Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis. Premiums and discounts on debt securities are amortized for financial reporting purposes. Inflation adjustments to the principal amount of inflation-indexed bonds are reflected as interest income. Dividends received from mutual fund investments are reflected as dividend income; capital gain distributions, if any, are reflected as realized gain/loss. Dividend income and capital gain distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income tax-related interest and penalties, if incurred, would be recorded as income tax expense. Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Realized gains and losses are reported on the identified cost basis. Income distributions are declared daily and paid monthly. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Capital gain distributions, if any, are generally declared and paid by the fund annually.
Currency Translation Assets, including investments, and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar values each day at the prevailing exchange rate, using the mean of the bid and asked prices of such currencies against U.S. dollars as quoted by a major bank. Purchases and sales of securities, income, and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at the prevailing exchange rate on the date of the transaction. The effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on realized and unrealized security gains and losses is reflected as a component of security gains and losses.
Redemption Fees A 2% fee is assessed on redemptions of fund shares held for 90 days or less to deter short-term trading and to protect the interests of long-term shareholders. Redemption fees are withheld from proceeds that shareholders receive from the sale or exchange of fund shares. The fees are paid to the fund and are recorded as an increase to paid-in capital. The fees may cause the redemption price per share to differ from the net asset value per share.
NOTE 2 - VALUATION
The funds financial instruments are valued and its net asset value (NAV) per share is computed at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), normally 4 p.m. ET, each day the NYSE is open for business.
Fair Value The funds financial instruments are reported at fair value, which GAAP defines as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The T. Rowe Price Valuation Committee (the Valuation Committee) has been established by the funds Board of Directors (the Board) to ensure that financial instruments are appropriately priced at fair value in accordance with GAAP and the 1940 Act. Subject to oversight by the Board, the Valuation Committee develops and oversees pricing-related policies and procedures and approves all fair value determinations. Specifically, the Valuation Committee establishes procedures to value securities; determines pricing techniques, sources, and persons eligible to effect fair value pricing actions; oversees the selection, services, and performance of pricing vendors; oversees valuation-related business continuity practices; and provides guidance on internal controls and valuation-related matters. The Valuation Committee reports to the Board and has representation from legal, portfolio management and trading, operations, risk management, and the funds treasurer.
Various valuation techniques and inputs are used to determine the fair value of financial instruments. GAAP establishes the following fair value hierarchy that categorizes the inputs used to measure fair value:
Level 1 quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical financial instruments that the fund can access at the reporting date
Level 2 inputs other than Level 1 quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly (including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar financial instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar financial instruments in inactive markets, interest rates and yield curves, implied volatilities, and credit spreads)
Level 3 unobservable inputs
Observable inputs are developed using market data, such as publicly available information about actual events or transactions, and reflect the assumptions that market participants would use to price the financial instrument. Unobservable inputs are those for which market data are not available and are developed using the best information available about the assumptions that market participants would use to price the financial instrument. GAAP requires valuation techniques to maximize the use of relevant observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. When multiple inputs are used to derive fair value, the financial instrument is assigned to the level within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest-level input that is significant to the fair value of the financial instrument. Input levels are not necessarily an indication of the risk or liquidity associated with financial instruments at that level but rather the degree of judgment used in determining those values.
Valuation Techniques Debt securities generally are traded in the over-the-counter (OTC) market. Securities with remaining maturities of one year or more at the time of acquisition are valued at prices furnished by dealers who make markets in such securities or by an independent pricing service, which considers the yield or price of bonds of comparable quality, coupon, maturity, and type, as well as prices quoted by dealers who make markets in such securities. Securities with remaining maturities of less than one year at the time of acquisition generally use amortized cost in local currency to approximate fair value. However, if amortized cost is deemed not to reflect fair value or the fund holds a significant amount of such securities with remaining maturities of more than 60 days, the securities are valued at prices furnished by dealers who make markets in such securities or by an independent pricing service. Generally, debt securities are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; however, to the extent the valuations include significant unobservable inputs, the securities would be categorized in Level 3.
Investments in mutual funds are valued at the mutual funds closing NAV per share on the day of valuation and are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Listed options, and OTC options with a listed equivalent, are valued at the mean of the closing bid and asked prices and generally are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Financial futures contracts are valued at closing settlement prices and are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Forward currency exchange contracts are valued using the prevailing forward exchange rate and are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Swaps are valued at prices furnished by independent swap dealers or by an independent pricing service and generally are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; however, if unobservable inputs are significant to the valuation, the swap would be categorized in Level 3. Assets and liabilities other than financial instruments, including short-term receivables and payables, are carried at cost, or estimated realizable value, if less, which approximates fair value.
Thinly traded financial instruments and those for which the above valuation procedures are inappropriate or are deemed not to reflect fair value are stated at fair value as determined in good faith by the Valuation Committee. The objective of any fair value pricing determination is to arrive at a price that could reasonably be expected from a current sale. Financial instruments fair valued by the Valuation Committee are primarily private placements, restricted securities, warrants, rights, and other securities that are not publicly traded.
Subject to oversight by the Board, the Valuation Committee regularly makes good faith judgments to establish and adjust the fair valuations of certain securities as events occur and circumstances warrant. For instance, in determining the fair value of troubled or thinly traded debt instruments, the Valuation Committee considers a variety of factors, which may include, but are not limited to, the issuers business prospects, its financial standing and performance, recent investment transactions in the issuer, strategic events affecting the company, market liquidity for the issuer, and general economic conditions and events. In consultation with the investment and pricing teams, the Valuation Committee will determine an appropriate valuation technique based on available information, which may include both observable and unobservable inputs. The Valuation Committee typically will afford greatest weight to actual prices in arms length transactions, to the extent they represent orderly transactions between market participants, transaction information can be reliably obtained, and prices are deemed representative of fair value. However, the Valuation Committee may also consider other valuation methods such as a discount or premium from market value of a similar, freely traded security of the same issuer; discounted cash flows; yield to maturity; or some combination. Fair value determinations are reviewed on a regular basis and updated as information becomes available, including actual purchase and sale transactions of the issue. Because any fair value determination involves a significant amount of judgment, there is a degree of subjectivity inherent in such pricing decisions, and fair value prices determined by the Valuation Committee could differ from those of other market participants. Depending on the relative significance of unobservable inputs, including the valuation technique(s) used, fair valued securities may be categorized in Level 2 or 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Valuation Inputs The following table summarizes the funds financial instruments, based on the inputs used to determine their fair values on June 30, 2016:
There were no material transfers between Levels 1 and 2 during the six months ended June 30, 2016.
NOTE 3 - DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the fund invested in derivative instruments. As defined by GAAP, a derivative is a financial instrument whose value is derived from an underlying security price, foreign exchange rate, interest rate, index of prices or rates, or other variable; it requires little or no initial investment and permits or requires net settlement. The fund invests in derivatives only if the expected risks and rewards are consistent with its investment objectives, policies, and overall risk profile, as described in its prospectus and Statement of Additional Information. The fund may use derivatives for a variety of purposes, such as seeking to hedge against declines in principal value, increase yield, invest in an asset with greater efficiency and at a lower cost than is possible through direct investment, or to adjust portfolio duration and credit exposure. The risks associated with the use of derivatives are different from, and potentially much greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in the instruments on which the derivatives are based. The fund at all times maintains sufficient cash reserves, liquid assets, or other SEC-permitted asset types to cover its settlement obligations under open derivative contracts.
The fund values its derivatives at fair value and recognizes changes in fair value currently in its results of operations. Accordingly, the fund does not follow hedge accounting, even for derivatives employed as economic hedges. Generally, the fund accounts for its derivatives on a gross basis. It does not offset the fair value of derivative liabilities against the fair value of derivative assets on its financial statements, nor does it offset the fair value of derivative instruments against the right to reclaim or obligation to return collateral.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the funds derivative instruments held as of June 30, 2016, and the related location on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities, presented by primary underlying risk exposure:
Additionally, the amount of gains and losses on derivative instruments recognized in fund earnings during the six months ended June 30, 2016, and the related location on the accompanying Statement of Operations is summarized in the following table by primary underlying risk exposure:
Counterparty Risk and Collateral The fund invests in derivatives in various markets, which expose it to differing levels of counterparty risk. Counterparty risk on exchange-traded and centrally cleared derivative contracts, such as futures, exchange-traded options, and centrally cleared swaps, is minimal because the clearinghouse provides protection against counterparty defaults. For futures and centrally cleared swaps, the fund is required to deposit collateral in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the contract value (margin requirement), and the margin requirement must be maintained over the life of the contract. Each clearing broker, in its sole discretion, may adjust the margin requirements applicable to the fund.
Derivatives, such as bilateral swaps, forward currency exchange contracts, and OTC options, that are transacted and settle directly with a counterparty (bilateral derivatives) expose the fund to greater counterparty risk. To mitigate this risk, the fund has entered into master netting arrangements (MNAs) with certain counterparties that permit net settlement under specified conditions and, for certain counterparties, also provide collateral agreements. MNAs may be in the form of International Swaps and Derivatives Association master agreements (ISDAs) or foreign exchange letter agreements (FX letters).
MNAs govern the ability to offset amounts the fund owes a counterparty against amounts the counterparty owes the fund (net settlement). Both ISDAs and FX letters generally allow net settlement in the event of contract termination and permit termination by either party prior to maturity upon the occurrence of certain stated events, such as failure to pay or bankruptcy. In addition, ISDAs specify other events, the occurrence of which would allow one of the parties to terminate. For example, a downgrade in credit rating of a counterparty would allow the fund to terminate while a decline in the funds net assets of more than a certain percentage would allow the counterparty to terminate. Upon termination, all bilateral derivatives with that counterparty would be liquidated and a net amount settled. ISDAs typically include collateral agreements whereas FX letters do not. Collateral requirements are determined based on the net aggregate unrealized gain or loss on all bilateral derivatives with each counterparty, subject to minimum transfer amounts that typically range from $100,000 to $250,000. Any additional collateral required due to changes in security values is transferred the next business day.
Collateral may be in the form of cash or debt securities issued by the U.S. government or related agencies. Cash and currencies posted by the fund are reflected as cash deposits in the accompanying financial statements and generally are restricted from withdrawal by the fund; securities posted by the fund are so noted in the accompanying Portfolio of Investments; both remain in the funds assets. Collateral pledged by counterparties is not included in the funds assets because the fund does not obtain effective control over those assets. For bilateral derivatives, collateral posted or received by the fund is held in a segregated account by the funds custodian. As of June 30, 2016, securities valued at $575,000 had been posted by the fund to counterparties for bilateral derivatives. As of June 30, 2016, no collateral was pledged by counterparties to the fund for bilateral derivatives. As of June 30, 2016, cash of $25,000 had been posted by the fund for exchange-traded and/or centrally cleared derivatives.
Forward Currency Exchange Contracts The fund is subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. It uses forward currency exchange contracts (forwards) primarily to protect its non-U.S. dollar-denominated securities from adverse currency movements and to gain exposure to currencies for the purposes of risk management or enhanced return. A forward involves an obligation to purchase or sell a fixed amount of a specific currency on a future date at a price set at the time of the contract. Although certain forwards may be settled by exchanging only the net gain or loss on the contract, most forwards are settled with the exchange of the underlying currencies in accordance with the specified terms. Forwards are valued at the unrealized gain or loss on the contract, which reflects the net amount the fund either is entitled to receive or obligated to deliver, as measured by the difference between the forward exchange rates at the date of entry into the contract and the forward rates at the reporting date. Appreciated forwards are reflected as assets and depreciated forwards are reflected as liabilities on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Risks related to the use of forwards include the possible failure of counterparties to meet the terms of the agreements; that anticipated currency movements will not occur, thereby reducing the funds total return; and the potential for losses in excess of the funds initial investment. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the volume of the funds activity in forwards, based on underlying notional amounts, was generally between 8% and 10% of net assets.
Futures Contracts The fund is subject to interest rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives and uses futures contracts to help manage such risk. The fund may enter into futures contracts to manage exposure to interest rate and yield curve movements, security prices, foreign currencies, credit quality, and mortgage prepayments; as an efficient means of adjusting exposure to all or part of a target market; to enhance income; as a cash management tool; or to adjust portfolio duration and credit exposure. A futures contract provides for the future sale by one party and purchase by another of a specified amount of a specific underlying financial instrument at an agreed-upon price, date, time, and place. The fund currently invests only in exchange-traded futures, which generally are standardized as to maturity date, underlying financial instrument, and other contract terms. Payments are made or received by the fund each day to settle daily fluctuations in the value of the contract (variation margin), which reflect changes in the value of the underlying financial instrument. Variation margin is recorded as unrealized gain or loss until the contract is closed. The value of a futures contract included in net assets is the amount of unsettled variation margin; net variation margin receivable is reflected as an asset, and net variation margin payable is reflected as a liability on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Risks related to the use of futures contracts include possible illiquidity of the futures markets, contract prices that can be highly volatile and imperfectly correlated to movements in hedged security values and/or interest rates, and potential losses in excess of the funds initial investment. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the volume of the funds activity in futures, based on underlying notional amounts, was generally less than 1% of net assets.
Options The fund is subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives and uses options to help manage such risk. The fund may use options to manage exposure to security prices, interest rates, foreign currencies, and credit quality; as an efficient means of adjusting exposure to all or a part of a target market; to enhance income; as a cash management tool; or to adjust credit exposure. Options are included in net assets at fair value, purchased options are included in Investments in Securities, and written options are separately reflected as a liability on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Premiums on unexercised, expired options are recorded as realized gains or losses; premiums on exercised options are recorded as an adjustment to the proceeds from the sale or cost of the purchase. The difference between the premium and the amount received or paid in a closing transaction is also treated as realized gain or loss. In return for a premium paid, currency options give the holder the right, but not the obligation, to buy and sell currency at a specified exchange rate. Risks related to the use of options include possible illiquidity of the options markets; trading restrictions imposed by an exchange or counterparty; movements in the underlying asset values and/or currency values; and, for written options, potential losses in excess of the funds initial investment. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the volume of the funds activity in options, based on underlying notional amounts, was generally less than 1% of net assets.
Swaps The fund is subject to interest rate risk and credit risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives and uses swap contracts to help manage such risks. The fund may use swaps in an effort to manage exposure to changes in interest rates, inflation rates, and credit quality; to adjust overall exposure to certain markets; to enhance total return or protect the value of portfolio securities; to serve as a cash management tool; or to adjust portfolio duration and credit exposure. Swap agreements can be settled either directly with the counterparty (bilateral swap) or through a central clearinghouse (centrally cleared swap). Fluctuations in the fair value of a contract are reflected in unrealized gain or loss and are reclassified to realized gain or loss upon contract termination or cash settlement. Net periodic receipts or payments required by a contract increase or decrease, respectively, the value of the contract until the contractual payment date, at which time such amounts are reclassified from unrealized to realized gain or loss. For bilateral swaps, cash payments are made or received by the fund on a periodic basis in accordance with contract terms; unrealized gain on contracts and premiums paid are reflected as assets and unrealized loss on contracts and premiums received are reflected as liabilities on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities. For centrally cleared swaps, payments are made or received by the fund each day to settle the daily fluctuation in the value of the contract (variation margin). Accordingly, the value of a centrally cleared swap included in net assets is the unsettled variation margin; net variation margin receivable is reflected as an asset and net variation margin payable is reflected as a liability on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
Interest rate swaps are agreements to exchange cash flows based on the difference between specified interest rates applied to a notional principal amount for a specified period of time. Risks related to the use of interest rate swaps include the potential for unanticipated movements in interest or currency rates, the possible failure of a counterparty to perform in accordance with the terms of the swap agreements, potential government regulation that could adversely affect the funds swap investments, and potential losses in excess of the funds initial investment.
Credit default swaps are agreements where one party (the protection buyer) agrees to make periodic payments to another party (the protection seller) in exchange for protection against specified credit events, such as certain defaults and bankruptcies related to an underlying credit instrument, or issuer or index of such instruments. Upon occurrence of a specified credit event, the protection seller is required to pay the buyer the difference between the notional amount of the swap and the value of the underlying credit, either in the form of a net cash settlement or by paying the gross notional amount and accepting delivery of the relevant underlying credit. For credit default swaps where the underlying credit is an index, a specified credit event may affect all or individual underlying securities included in the index and will be settled based upon the relative weighting of the affected underlying security(ies) within the index. Generally, the payment risk for the seller of protection is inversely related to the current market price or credit rating of the underlying credit or the market value of the contract relative to the notional amount, which are indicators of the markets valuation of credit quality. As of June 30, 2016, the notional amount of protection sold by the fund totaled $1,050,000 (0.4% of net assets), which reflects the maximum potential amount the fund could be required to pay under such contracts. Risks related to the use of credit default swaps include the possible inability of the fund to accurately assess the current and future creditworthiness of underlying issuers, the possible failure of a counterparty to perform in accordance with the terms of the swap agreements, potential government regulation that could adversely affect the funds swap investments, and potential losses in excess of the funds initial investment.
During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the volume of the funds activity in swaps, based on underlying notional amounts, was generally between 0% and 2% of net assets.
NOTE 4 - OTHER INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS
Consistent with its investment objective, the fund engages in the following practices to manage exposure to certain risks and/or to enhance performance. The investment objective, policies, program, and risk factors of the fund are described more fully in the funds prospectus and Statement of Additional Information.
Emerging and Frontier Markets The fund may invest, either directly or through investments in T. Rowe Price institutional funds, in securities of companies located in, issued by governments of, or denominated in or linked to the currencies of emerging and frontier market countries; at period-end, approximately 57% of the funds net assets were invested in emerging markets and 35% in frontier markets. Emerging markets, and to a greater extent frontier markets, generally have economic structures that are less diverse and mature, and political systems that are less stable, than developed countries. These markets may be subject to greater political, economic, and social uncertainty and differing regulatory environments that may potentially impact the funds ability to buy or sell certain securities or repatriate proceeds to U.S. dollars. Such securities are often subject to greater price volatility, less liquidity, and higher rates of inflation than U.S. securities. Investing in frontier markets is significantly riskier than investing in other countries, including emerging markets.
In response to political and military actions undertaken by Russia, the U.S., European Union, and other jurisdictions have instituted various sanctions against Russia. These sanctions and additional sanctions, if issued, could have adverse consequences for the Russian economy, including a weakening or devaluation of the ruble, a downgrade in the countrys credit rating, and a significant decline in the value and liquidity of securities issued by Russian companies or the Russian government. Sanctions could impair a funds ability to invest in accordance with its investment program, to determine the overall value of its net assets, and to sell holdings as needed to meet shareholder redemptions. At June 30, 2016, approximately 5% of the funds net assets were invested in Russian securities; on that date, none of the funds investments were in securities issued by entities subject to sanctions.
Noninvestment-Grade Debt At June 30, 2016, approximately 61% of the funds net assets were invested, either directly or through its investment in T. Rowe Price institutional funds, in noninvestment-grade debt, including high yield or junk bonds or leveraged loans. The noninvestment-grade debt market may experience sudden and sharp price swings due to a variety of factors, including changes in economic forecasts, stock market activity, large sustained sales by major investors, a high-profile default, or a change in market sentiment. These events may decrease the ability of issuers to make principal and interest payments and adversely affect the liquidity or value, or both, of such securities.
Restricted Securities The fund may invest in securities that are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. Prompt sale of such securities at an acceptable price may be difficult and may involve substantial delays and additional costs.
Other Purchases and sales of portfolio securities other than short-term securities aggregated $115,750,000 and $156,135,000, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2016.
NOTE 5 - FEDERAL INCOME TAXES
No provision for federal income taxes required since the fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code and distribute to shareholders all of its taxable income and gains. Distributions determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations may differ in amount or character from net investment income and realized gains for financial reporting purposes. Financial reporting records are adjusted for permanent book/tax differences to reflect tax character but are not adjusted for temporary differences. The amount and character of tax-basis distributions and composition of net assets are finalized at fiscal year-end; accordingly, tax-basis balances have not been determined as of the date of this report.
The fund intends to retain realized gains to the extent of available capital loss carryforwards. Net realized capital losses may be carried forward indefinitely to offset future realized capital gains. As of December 31, 2015, the fund had $5,259,000 of available capital loss carryforwards.
At June 30, 2016, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was $291,195,000. Net unrealized gain aggregated $3,168,000 at period-end, of which $12,999,000 related to appreciated investments and $9,831,000 related to depreciated investments.
NOTE 6 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The fund is managed by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Price Associates), a wholly owned subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (Price Group). The investment management and administrative agreement between the fund and Price Associates provides for an all-inclusive annual fee equal to 0.70% of the funds average daily net assets. The fee is computed daily and paid monthly. The all-inclusive fee covers investment management, shareholder servicing, transfer agency, accounting, and custody services provided to the fund, as well as fund directors fees and expenses. Interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, and extraordinary expenses are paid directly by the fund.
Mutual funds, trusts, and other accounts managed by Price Associates or its affiliates (collectively, Price funds and accounts) may invest in the fund; however, no Price fund or account may invest for the purpose of exercising management or control over the fund. At June 30, 2016, approximately 78% of the funds outstanding shares were held by Price funds and accounts.
The fund may invest in the T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Fund, the T. Rowe Price Government Reserve Investment Fund, or the T. Rowe Price Short-Term Reserve Fund (collectively, the Price Reserve Investment Funds), open-end management investment companies managed by Price Associates and considered affiliates of the fund. The Price Reserve Investment Funds are offered as short-term investment options to mutual funds, trusts, and other accounts managed by Price Associates or its affiliates and are not available for direct purchase by members of the public. The Price Reserve Investment Funds pay no investment management fees.
The fund may participate in securities purchase and sale transactions with other funds or accounts advised by Price Associates (cross trades), in accordance with procedures adopted by the funds Board and Securities and Exchange Commission rules, which require, among other things, that such purchase and sale cross trades be effected at the independent current market price of the security. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the fund had no purchases or sales cross trades with other funds or accounts advised by Price Associates.
Information on Proxy Voting Policies, Procedures, and Records |
A description of the policies and procedures used by T. Rowe Price funds and portfolios to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available in each funds Statement of Additional Information. You may request this document by calling 1-800-225-5132 or by accessing the SECs website, sec.gov.
The description of our proxy voting policies and procedures is also available on our corporate website. To access it, please visit the following Web page
https://www3.troweprice.com/usis/corporate/en/utility/policies.html
and scroll down to the section near the bottom of the page that says, Proxy Voting Policies. Click on the Proxy Voting Policies link in the shaded box.
Each funds most recent annual proxy voting record is available on our website and through the SECs website. To access it through T. Rowe Price, visit the website location shown above, and scroll down to the section near the bottom of the page that says, Proxy Voting Records. Click on the Proxy Voting Records link in the shaded box.
How to Obtain Quarterly Portfolio Holdings |
The fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The funds Form N-Q is available electronically on the SECs website (sec.gov); hard copies may be reviewed and copied at the SECs Public Reference Room, 100 F St. N.E., Washington, DC 20549. For more information on the Public Reference Room, call 1-800-SEC-0330.
Approval of Investment Management Agreement |
On March 11, 2016, the funds Board of Directors (Board), including a majority of the funds independent directors, approved the continuation of the investment management agreement (Advisory Contract) between the fund and its investment advisor, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Advisor). In connection with its deliberations, the Board requested, and the Advisor provided, such information as the Board (with advice from independent legal counsel) deemed reasonably necessary. The Board considered a variety of factors in connection with its review of the Advisory Contract, also taking into account information provided by the Advisor during the course of the year, as discussed below:
Services Provided by the
Advisor
The Board considered the nature,
quality, and extent of the services provided to the fund by the Advisor. These
services included, but were not limited to, directing the funds investments in
accordance with its investment program and the overall management of the funds
portfolio, as well as a variety of related activities such as financial,
investment operations, and administrative services; compliance; maintaining the
funds records and registrations; and shareholder communications. The Board also
reviewed the background and experience of the Advisors senior management team
and investment personnel involved in the management of the fund, as well as the
Advisors compliance record. The Board concluded that it was satisfied with the
nature, quality, and extent of the services provided by the Advisor.
Investment Performance of the Fund
The Board reviewed the funds
three-month, one-year, and year-by-year returns, as well as the funds average
annualized total returns over the three-year, five-year, and since-inception
periods, and compared these returns with a wide variety of comparable
performance measures and market data, including those supplied by Lipper and
Morningstar, which are independent providers of mutual fund data.
On the basis of this evaluation and the Boards ongoing review of investment results, and factoring in the relative market conditions during certain of the performance periods, the Board concluded that the funds performance was satisfactory.
Costs, Benefits, Profits, and Economies
of Scale
The Board reviewed detailed
information regarding the revenues received by the Advisor under the Advisory
Contract and other benefits that the Advisor (and its affiliates) may have
realized from its relationship with the fund, including any research received
under soft dollar agreements and commission-sharing arrangements with
broker-dealers. The Board considered that the Advisor may receive some benefit
from soft-dollar arrangements pursuant to which research is received from
broker-dealers that execute the applicable funds portfolio transactions. The
Board received information on the estimated costs incurred and profits realized
by the Advisor from managing T. Rowe Price mutual funds. The Board also reviewed
estimates of the profits realized from managing the fund in particular, and the
Board concluded that the Advisors profits were reasonable in light of the
services provided to the fund.
The Board also considered whether the fund benefits under the fee levels set forth in the Advisory Contract from any economies of scale realized by the Advisor. The Board noted that, under the Advisory Contract, the fund pays the Advisor a single fee, or all-inclusive management fee, which is based on the funds average daily net assets. The all-inclusive management fee includes investment management services and provides for the Advisor to pay all of the funds ordinary, recurring operating expenses except for interest, taxes, portfolio transaction fees, and any nonrecurring extraordinary expenses that may arise. The Board concluded that, based on the profitability data it reviewed and consistent with this all-inclusive management fee structure, the Advisory Contract provided for a reasonable sharing of any benefits from economies of scale with the fund.
Fees
The Board was provided with information regarding industry trends in
management fees and expenses, and the Board reviewed the funds management fee
rate and total expense ratio in comparison with fees and expenses of other
comparable funds based on information and data supplied by Lipper. For these
purposes, the Board assumed that the funds management fee rate was equal to the
all-inclusive management fee rate less the funds actual operating expenses and
the total expense ratio was equal to the all-inclusive management fee rate. The
information provided to the Board indicated that the funds management fee rate
was above the median for comparable funds and the funds total expense ratio was
below the median for comparable funds.
The Board also reviewed the fee schedules for institutional accounts (including subadvised mutual funds) and private accounts with similar mandates that are advised or subadvised by the Advisor and its affiliates. Management provided the Board with information about the Advisors responsibilities and services provided to subadvisory and other institutional account clients, including information about how the requirements and economics of the institutional business differ from those of the Advisors proprietary mutual fund business. The Board considered information showing that the Advisors proprietary mutual fund business is generally more complex from a business and compliance perspective than its institutional account business and considered various other relevant factors, including the broader scope of operations and oversight, more extensive shareholder communication infrastructure, greater asset flows, heightened business risks, and differences in applicable laws and regulations associated with the Advisors proprietary mutual fund business. In assessing the reasonableness of the funds management fee rate, the Board considered the differences in the nature of the services required for the Advisor to manage its proprietary mutual fund business versus managing a discrete pool of assets as a subadvisor to another institutions mutual fund or for another institutional account, and the degree to which the Advisor performs significant additional services and assumes greater risk in managing the fund and other T. Rowe Price mutual funds than it does for institutional account clients.
On the basis of the information provided and the factors considered, the Board concluded that the fees paid by the fund under the Advisory Contract are reasonable.
Approval of the Advisory Contract
As noted, the Board approved the
continuation of the Advisory Contract. No single factor was considered in
isolation or to be determinative to the decision. Rather, the Board concluded,
in light of a weighting and balancing of all factors considered, that it was in
the best interests of the fund and its shareholders for the Board to approve the
continuation of the Advisory Contract (including the fees to be charged for
services thereunder). The independent directors were advised throughout the
process by independent legal counsel.
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
A code of ethics, as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR, applicable to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions is filed as an exhibit to the registrants annual Form N-CSR. No substantive amendments were approved or waivers were granted to this code of ethics during the registrants most recent fiscal half-year.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Disclosure required in registrants annual Form N-CSR.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Disclosure required in registrants annual Form N-CSR.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable.
Item 6. Investments.
(a) Not applicable. The complete schedule of investments is included in Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not applicable.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the registrants disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of this filing and have concluded that the registrants disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of that date, in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported timely.
(b) The registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer are aware of no change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants second fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits.
(a)(1) The registrants code of ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is filed with the registrants annual Form N-CSR.
(2) Separate certifications by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, are attached.
(3) Written solicitation to repurchase securities issued by closed-end companies: not applicable.
(b) A certification by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, is attached.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
T. Rowe Price Institutional International
Funds, Inc.
By | /s/ Edward C. Bernard | |
Edward C. Bernard | ||
Principal Executive Officer | ||
Date August 17, 2016 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By | /s/ Edward C. Bernard | |
Edward C. Bernard | ||
Principal Executive Officer | ||
Date August 17, 2016 | ||
By | /s/ Catherine D. Mathews | |
Catherine D. Mathews | ||
Principal Financial Officer | ||
Date August 17, 2016 |
Item 12(a)(2).
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Edward C. Bernard, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of T. Rowe Price Institutional Emerging Markets Bond Fund; | |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; | |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; | |
4. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have: | |
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and | |
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and | |
5. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and | |
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. | |
Date: August 17, 2016 | /s/ Edward C. Bernard | |
Edward C. Bernard | ||
Principal Executive Officer |
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Catherine D. Mathews, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of T. Rowe Price Institutional Emerging Markets Bond Fund; | |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; | |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; | |
4. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have: | |
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and | |
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and | |
5. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and | |
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. | |
Date: August 17, 2016 | /s/ Catherine D. Mathews | |
Catherine D. Mathews | ||
Principal Financial Officer |
Item 12(b).
CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 | ||
Name of Issuer: T. Rowe Price Institutional Emerging Markets Bond Fund | ||
In connection with the Report on Form N-CSR for the above named Issuer, the undersigned hereby | ||
certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that: | ||
1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities | |
Exchange Act of 1934; | ||
2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial | |
condition and results of operations of the Issuer. |
Date: August 17, 2016 | /s/ Edward C. Bernard | |
Edward C. Bernard | ||
Principal Executive Officer | ||
Date: August 17, 2016 | /s/ Catherine D. Mathews | |
Catherine D. Mathews | ||
Principal Financial Officer |
,]^- R9+L84S#^K;+B3%V!WE*-2J4;((7+]Q@,"Z '(&+VB&$FOGQR"
MT1,# $ D)#@O9D#29
M6QT' (Z66]-X$ 0=]N08$68: 'XD8XU$ "@;,%'7,.5B%JA"A-0EF9YEFAY
MEC^0 ^MD$#_# R"P!1M "93P UN8EN@H UD!1D? "G_P!WT@ $^0 W>)EY2
M"/66#GBYF(PY 4@ !BXAB*HHE@K1E=QP=P"0;9N8%4[)#=H0E!U7
O$V\P&V]0CBW+'EA!"&E"#5K@"-I#0 H50_Q2&4GB#=Y#0"S#0 87)
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M '[M5W_MUWWMUS,LA7_E5STM6'F(R H!UBH@/\G.U>,
MW39;#8R_W-*L%,(,A4 O!0G
-D!0(&$
MS896B-D=<("9C=EF) &=A=DO@%F>)
G^D0VLS\RG)S>EYN6,'& S
M '@ ,0 $ 0 !4@ *$
M 0 0 0
M &YU;&P " !F)O=6YD G^D0VLS\RG)S>EYN6,'& !-4I$:JQ8=5@:B,JL>D!'47VB/-W>0@Q8M_W3/MDTUR;=;)E
MCF/B7ITF,YZ"!*P;1Z1"0@EB26 S(PV=K)GY,Q!%&W-NKH+4F8R!%N5TC3)X
MR6QVKC@F-IDM1JK((A>Q;M5G?Y5"IW*>3-@-;:.XY>XHJ[EH=+"K'30DG2N?
MJS"AO#C7ARQJUT/\/&%XEX> Z' ?_]?]#W:S7B1O2QWB,, A_-L973L_F:DQZ)BNW[L=I]4
M'U&^K9!)W[=NGLV>M9Z6S^8_P?\ @T?I3?L_3,7'M+664TLK S '@ ,@ $ 0 !4P
M 0 0 0 0
M &YU;&P " !F)O=6YD A_-L973L_F:DQZ)B
MNW[L=I]4'U&^K9!)W[=NGLV>M9Z6S^8_P?\ @T?I3?L_3,7'M+664TLK &-"YKCY4!\CM)29<:9]G,Q;1523W=HG10
MVL))7+8++Z.VA7XS8(@=H7B\NQ3L)/R[:,B)Q57CDT/H-&H.,-S .@D85K;T
M(:@9@8D-I:#S#Y.F1EXF*9"DQ94R 617O452E%K)0&L[&&0M I #6EMGA.T]
M!1G(D5R1XZ'%D9"1'(1FE'HNBX]3I0J48QIJ"^TA/:75CK"$]NTAT&UT#0-
MT#0- T#0- T&JY1R&/QW!RLS)C/DQ805;("-MU918TZD5*--0UZ?\UV@] 7!E96YU;0 I%4VQI8V54>7!E $EM9R &8F]U
M;F1S3V)J8P $ !28W0Q ! !4;W @;&]N9P
M3&5F=&QO;F< $)T;VUL;VYG FP !29VAT;&]N9P 5(
M #=7)L5$585 $ !N=6QL5$585 $ !-(6TW5VN ]22*WLM='L_D)(?_0[#(;6S,R'UY^-3OM?OK.2&V#
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M M5:2G.RVXC\O,S,7J.)3?<:Q38VYC7[-M=>4VRWTWN8Y[*_P!#_2:Z_P"=
M]'U4[[9M?8WJN.=YM!!RH]KG[L85;6_J_I,]]FS^<]+T?YJS]#<'7_4Q^H95
M+&NKPLRBW](
MDIMGIU!))@[G-<997KM!:QO\U^:P[$&FOIP+?3NKW9)=6 &U!UGIC9;3'IM=
M9Z7I^]GYBJGZOW[_ %&9FQT0(8Z "W)#JJV^O[,??DT_HO\ 18M=?J_S%N-*
MWH-MF!7ALR6U%AR3O966@?:&Y#&>DUMVZK[/]I_TO^#_ ,$DIM68F&'4TW/:
M7.#JJ6/95JW;+JF?HOH[&;_3:B-Z?2U[;6F+&[MM@96'#=N+O=Z7[UECO[:S
MK?J]>_098#6N>ZO]&[ (6TW5VN ]22*WLM='L_D)(?_0[#(;6S,R'UY^-3OM?OK.
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M\*S_ M5:2G.RVXC\O,S,7J.)3?<:Q38VYC7[-M=>4VRWTWN8Y[*_P!#_2:Z
M_P"=]'U4[[9M?8WJN.=YM!!RH]KG[L85;6_J_I,]]FS^<]+T?YJS]#<'7_4Q
M^H95+&NKPLR
MBW](DIMGIU!))@[G-<997KM!:QO\U^:P[$&FOIP+?3NKW9)=6 &U!UGIC9;3
M'IM=9Z7I^]GYBJGZOW[_ %&9FQT0(8Z "W)#JJV^O[,??DT_HO\ 18M=?J_S
M%N-*WH-MF!7ALR6U%AR3O966@?:&Y#&>DUMVZK[/]I_TO^#_ ,$DIM68F&'4
MTW/:7.#JJ6/95JW;+JF?HOH[&;_3:B-Z?2U[;6F+&[MM@96'#=N+O=Z7[UEC
MO[:SK?J]>_098#6N>ZO]&[ 1CORYLS+YKI8QF27Y#*O5?[\>UMU?H^O_HOY_P#1(PZ3UAC1CORYLS+YKI8QF27Y#*O5?[\>UMU?H^O_HOY_P#1(PZ3
MUACEU1615H/6O\ 3H)9#F?FIC9-8N1SN1X/
ZG5<,A,K6 )W"-WA\7N]
M!7!9_-XS%\=5/7WJLW.?%BRFR*%(7&,7R81,M%@/*L9(BT]ZZ[XGBT'H_P S
MB1 2Z3#BPWLFSH!LES#3!!D!]45NETCG:3JTN2+$K\(L\?@\89E.>L/D2\&,
M:(J36B>JI4RJ7-HU0MJ<,-DURU+OL(P<)7+=[OP#>&LIYB3<=PW[:?"H[:+)
MG(*5, !ZP9;5["F @:M
3'?5IC1K;6(W!?01! W,M)+OUU=C'MN97Z'^#]3U:UH)*:?[5PO&S_ +:M_P#2:7[5
MPO&S_MJW_P!)JXDDII_M7"\;/^VK?_2:Q+M^QC:JZG.KR[LICWMO!;OL-]&Q
MS,3>W<]_ZTQKV>I_,^ILO>NG224\M;BT!EC,VQE_P!JO>W&
M_1V[O6=_VH]6RS_M/_A#.;2^YEMA]0V/R'Y/LO88M9Z%%=3F4;O93732]_Z+
M^;];Z:Z-))3D=*R!P:\4EP#"\M:RFW:UKG.L94'>DUUGI,=Z?K/_27?SMG
MO5O]JX7C9_VU;_Z35Q))3GY/4<:W'MJJMMILL8YK+13:2QQ&UM@'I_F?26(<
M6M^-=39M>UU?HXM;Z[[!0QX:
OZEGZS7]H^RV6?H5J+#S#DSZC+FG)-6/4U];MP;>RPNN9:UG
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M;(BMYGU/2],, ;NL1=DWY%
M-=9=>_!H8USRUWIWVMV>_P#F_3ML_P )CU)J>FYSL!UMG6'LR'UX-[-V5D5U
MTU9KFM;9F/>PUV>VQG\U>ST?^&725_XL^NTEAI^L=E?IAXKV5VMVBT^ID!FW
M.]GKV#U+O]+9^D>FK_Q8=9J(-7U@=60VM@+*K&D-IUQF>W-^AC?]IV?X'_!I
M*>?_ &9?CFL9?5M%QO\5.51E47.ZM6X
M4VUV[1C$$^F]MNV?M3OW4E/_T.Q%/V?.LNJL-3GYA?>*Z[!OI!W;'6,QG;W^
MNW<_^<]2O]'7E4UV*-)RV Y=FYU;0^PC(