UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF
REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-05833
T. Rowe Price Institutional International Funds, Inc. |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) |
100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
David Oestreicher |
100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 |
(Name and address of agent for service) |
Registrants telephone number, including
area code: (410) 345-2000
Date of fiscal year end:
October 31
Date of reporting period: October 31, 2012
Item 1. Report to Shareholders
Institutional International Core Equity Fund |
October
31, 2012 |
Highlights |
The views and opinions in this report were current as of October 31, 2012. They are not guarantees of performance or investment results and should not be taken as investment advice. Investment decisions reflect a variety of factors, and the managers reserve the right to change their views about individual stocks, sectors, and the markets at any time. As a result, the views expressed should not be relied upon as a forecast of the funds future investment intent. The report is certified under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires mutual funds and other public companies to affirm that, to the best of their knowledge, the information in their financial reports is fairly and accurately stated in all material respects.
Managers Letter
T. Rowe Price Institutional International Core Equity
Fund
Dear Investor
Non-U.S. stock markets finished with solid gains for the year ended October 31, 2012. Volatility was high, however, amid political and economic troubles in Europe, a sluggish recovery in the U.S., and decelerating growth in China and other key emerging markets. Investor sentiment was buoyed by resilient corporate earnings and central bank actions around the world designed to stimulate asset prices and economic growth. The Institutional International Core Equity Fund performed well in this turbulent environment, outpacing the MSCI EAFE Index and its Lipper peer group average for the 12-month period.
As shown in the Performance Comparison table, the Institutional International Core Equity Fund gained 2.20% and 7.78% for the 6- and 12-month periods ended October 31, 2012, respectively. The portfolio lagged the MSCI EAFE Index for the six-month period but outperformed for the full year. The portfolio outpaced its Lipper peer group average over both periods. Our health care holdings generated exceptional absolute gains for the year and outpaced the broader market by a wide margin, while allocations to the consumer discretionary and financials sectors also produced strong returns. Information technology was modestly negative, but materials and telecommunication services weighed more heavily on performance. Stock selection provided a significant boost to performance versus the benchmark MSCI index, led by consumer discretionary and health care.
Market Environment
Non-U.S. equities gained moderately in the past year, but volatility was high as investors vacillated between optimism about economically supportive central bank actions and resilient corporate earnings and concerns about a muted U.S. economic recovery, recession in Europe, and slowing growth in key emerging markets. European stocks were solidly positive despite the regions economic and fiscal uncertainty, with Germany, Switzerland, and Nordic markets registering the largest gains. Singapore and Hong Kong turned in the best results among developed Asian markets, but Japan continued to struggle and declined for the period. Performance among emerging markets was mixed. Emerging Asian markets generated decent gains, but Latin American markets fell overall.
The U.S. economy grew at a modest pace despite an anemic employment market and a contentious election cycle that forestalled substantive action on the governments profound fiscal challenges. Corporations held off on hiring and capital expenditures as they awaited greater clarity on the direction of government fiscal and regulatory policies. Corporate fundamentals remained strong, however, with ample cash on balance sheets and healthy earnings, despite signs of a modest slowdown toward the end of the period. The Federal Reserve maintained its highly accommodative monetary policy, initiating a third round of quantitative easingknown as QE3and announcing its intent to keep interest rates very low until at least mid-2015.
Much of Europe slipped into recession, but supportive central bank actions appeared to stabilize the Continents long-running debt problems. The European Central Bank announced a pair of long-term refinancing operations, the first of which provides European banks with inexpensive, three-year loans to help them purchase sovereign debt. This was followed by a conditional offer for the ECB itself to purchase short-term sovereign debt to keep bond yields in countries such as Spain and Italy from rising to unsustainable levels. Although the ECB rationalized this action as necessary for effective policy transmission within its mandate, it comes closer to outright sovereign debt monetization in the eyes of many observers.
China remained a key focus for investors amid concerns about slowing domestic consumer demand and a high-profile leadership transition. However, the government is continuing to take steps to revive the economy, and although there will likely be periods of disruption, we are optimistic that it can achieve sustained growth at lower levels given its considerable financial resources. We continue to have a positive view of the long-term structural growth story in emerging markets.
Portfolio Highlights and Positioning
Our health care shares were the portfolios strongest performers by a wide margin over the past 12 months, and stock selection provided a significant boost to returns versus the MSCI benchmark. Pharmaceutical firms were particularly strong, with Sanofi, Bayer, and Astellas Pharma among the portfolios top overall performers. Sanofi is an example of how in-depth fundamental analysis can uncover a stock poised for outperformance. Patent expirations and a gloomy European economic environment weighed on Sanofis valuation. However, our internal analysis found a management team focused on cutting costs and rationalizing the companys product portfolio to emphasize growth, and the stock surged as patent issues receded. Bayer benefited from a solid product pipeline in its core pharmaceutical business (particularly in emerging markets) and its growing, high value-added agricultural business. Astellas Pharma is a top player in Japans prescription drug market, and the stock performed well as a result of increasing expectations for the companys oncology pipeline. Australian biotechnology company CSL was another solid contributor based on the strength of its global plasma extraction business. We eliminated our position in Terumo, a Japanese medical device maker, on strength and initiated a position in Takeda Pharmaceutical, Japans largest pharmaceutical company. (Please refer to the funds portfolio of investments for a complete list of holdings and the amount each represents in the portfolio.)
Our consumer discretionary holdings also performed well. Stock selection made a strong contribution even as the sector underperformed the broader market. UK homebuilder Persimmon was particularly strong. The company excels at buying real estate at depressed valuations, resulting in a very attractive portfolio of land for development. Management made good on a pledge to return capital to shareholders and paid out special dividends, providing a further boost to shares. Media firm WPP was a solid contributor as the company continues to manage costs effectively while it expands into digital media and emerging markets. Shares of German automaker Volkswagen rose, with the company holding its own in core European markets and growing its share in key emerging markets, including China. Japanese automaker Toyota Motor performed well as it continued to regain its global reputation for efficiency and quality, but Nissan Motor lost ground as Chinese consumers shunned Japanese cars amid heightened tensions over ownership of an uninhabited island chain near Taiwan. Brazilian company PDG Realty suffered from significant cost overruns and an ill-timed acquisition. In addition, the company raised new capitala disappointing development given its depressed valuations and modest need for additional funding.
Financials stocks were strong contributors, with commercial banks among our top performers. Australia & New Zealand Banking shares rose on strength in its core Australian market and growth in other Asian markets. Swedens Swedbank benefited from its skilled management team and the relative health of the Nordic economies. The UKs Barclays was able to shake off concerns over the LIBOR scandal (several European financial institutions were accused of manipulating the London Interbank Offered Rate, a leading measure of short-term interest rates) and bounced back from depressed valuations earlier in the year. Insurance companies also performed well, led by Munich Re, Allianz, and AIA Group. Banco Santander Brasil weighed on returns as nonperforming loans were higher than expected. Government efforts to help consumers through lower loan rates also pressured margins. We eliminated positions in French banks BNP Paribas and Societe Generale due to their anemic growth prospects and potential exposure to the LIBOR scandal.
Our consumer staples shares were up for the year, although stock selection and an underweight allocation detracted from results relative to the benchmark. Swiss food company Nestle and Anglo-Dutch consumer goods company Unilever were among our better performers in the sector. Nestle continues to expand margins by cutting costs and growing its business in emerging markets, which now account for approximately 30% of revenues. Unilever also benefited from its significant presence in higher-growth emerging markets, while management continues to control costs and rationalize the companys product line. We initiated a position in French beverage maker Danone. Although growth in its core European markets is pressured by the regions recession, Danone should benefit from growing exposure to consumers in developing markets and ample room for management to trim costs. Shares of UK retailer Tesco fell for the year. The company has struggled to increase sales and market share in the UK, but we are reasonably optimistic that management will successfully regain positive growth momentum.
Our industrials and business services stocks eked out a modest overall gain. SembCorp Industries, whose SembCorp Marine subsidiary builds offshore oil-drilling platforms, was a bright spot in the sector amid robust demand in Asia and the Middle East. Philips Electronics also performed well as a new management team focused on cutting costs, rationalizing business lines, and promoting innovation. Airplane engine maker Rolls-Royce Holdings has been a very good stock, benefiting from order strength in its commercial aviation business and favorable results from its contract service model. French construction and engineering company Bouygues was among our biggest detractors, due largely to fierce competition in Frances wireless telecommunications industry. Carillion, a high-end construction services and building maintenance provider, suffered from concerns over decreased government spending.
The portfolios information technology holdings declined slightly overall, but stock selection boosted results relative to the benchmark. Samsung Electronics was among our best overall performers. The company is firing on all cylinders as it transitions from production of low-margin, commodity-type products to higher-margin goods such as smartphones and tablet computers. ASML, which builds equipment that other companies use to manufacture semiconductors, was another good performer. Shares of communication equipment maker Alcatel-Lucent fell due to balance sheet weakness and commoditization in some of its core businesses. We are optimistic that the company will benefit over the long term from its exceptional patent portfolio, inherited in part from the old Bell Laboratories. We initiated positions in Tencent Holdings and Baidu. Tencent is the largest online community in China with over 80% penetration among Chinese Internet users and enjoys strong growth in its core social platform, including online entertainment and gaming. Slower economic growth in China has dampened revenues for Baidu, but we believe this is more of a short-term cyclical challenge than a structural problem. Baidu remains the dominant Web search company in a Chinese market with huge growth potential.
In terms of geographic positioning, European stocks continue to account for the bulk of the portfolio, in large part due to the high number of well-established, large-cap companies in the region. Although we remain underweight Europe versus the benchmark MSCI EAFE Index amid heightened political and economic uncertainty, the risk-averse atmosphere has resulted in opportunities to purchase some high-quality companies selling at compelling valuations. We are particularly interested in European companies looking outside their home markets for opportunities to grow revenues, especially in faster-growing emerging markets. Our portfolio has relatively more exposure to the UK, Germany, Norway, and Sweden than to the troubled economies of southern Europe.
Japan is our second-largest geographic allocation, but we remain underweight relative to the index. Japanese manufacturers are struggling with weaker global demand and the strength of the yen, which makes their products less competitive on world markets. In addition, a dispute with China over an uninhabited island chain has resulted in sharp declines in sales of Japanese goods in China and a decline in travel to Japan by Chinese tourists. Japans exports to Europe have continued to decline, and only exports to the U.S. have shown any real growth. Japans debt ratios are now among the highest in the world, and although most debt is domestically owned (unlike the U.S.), it calls into question the sustainability of stimulus policies.
The Pacific ex Japan region is our third-largest allocation, and we have a modest overweight versus the benchmark. Growth has slowed somewhat, but the regions economies continue to expand, driven by positive long-term trends toward increased urbanization, industrialization, and domestic consumption. We have significant exposure to Australia, which should continue to benefit from growing trade with China and Southeast Asia. Adding to their attraction, Australian companies typically have strong corporate governance and shareholder-friendly policies.
Among emerging markets, we maintain a modest allocation to Latin America. Although economic growth is slowing, particularly in Brazil, it remains strong in comparison with much of the developed world. High debt levels are not an issue in many of these economies, employment levels are healthy, wages are on the rise, and the wealth effect has the potential to create robust consumer demand for years to come.
Investment Outlook
We expect continued market volatility in the face of ongoing uncertainties in developed and emerging markets alike. In the U.S., we are hopeful that the Obama administration and congressional Republicans will set aside a divisive election cycle and work together to confront, if not resolve, the nations profound fiscal challenges. Corporations are likely to remain hesitant to spend money on hiring and capital expenditures unless and until they see policies that are both fiscally prudent and supportive of economic growth.
European policymakers appear to have stabilized the patient, but a cure remains elusive as we await substantive progress on the long-term debt problems plaguing the eurozone. The political, social, and economic turmoil roiling the region has only highlighted the stark contrast between the stronger economies of northern Europe and their weaker counterparts in the south. Policymakers are struggling to keep the eurozone intact as they try to simultaneously implement much-needed fiscal discipline and structural reforms without strangling economic growth.
Although China has averted a hard economic landing, there are a number of significant structural challenges hanging over the economy and markets. We are optimistic that the countrys new leadership will continue to promote sustainable growth rates and spur increased domestic consumption. How long an increasingly wealthy and educated populace will tolerate the limitations of one-party rule remains an open question, however, especially if economic growth is less robust.
The muted economic environment is certainly challenging, but we continue to find companies doing a good job of controlling costs and growing profits. Although valuations are not as attractive as they were a year ago, they remain reasonable. We will continue to leverage our independent global research platform to uncover compelling investment opportunities, focusing on companies that are able to grow earnings through sound business models regardless of short-term economic uncertainty.
Respectfully submitted,
Raymond A. Mills
Chairman of the funds Investment Advisory
Committee
November 14, 2012
The committee chairman has day-to-day responsibility for managing the portfolio and works with committee members in developing and executing the funds investment program.
Risks of International Investing |
Funds that invest overseas generally carry more risk than funds that invest strictly in U.S. assets. Funds investing in a single country or in a limited geographic region tend to be riskier than more diversified funds. Risks can result from varying stages of economic and political development; differing regulatory environments, trading days, and accounting standards; and higher transaction costs of non-U.S. markets. Non-U.S. investments are also subject to currency risk, or a decline in the value of a foreign currency versus the U.S. dollar, which reduces the dollar value of securities denominated in that currency.
Glossary |
Lipper averages: The averages of available mutual fund performance returns for specified time periods in categories defined by Lipper Inc.
MSCI EAFE Index: An index that measures equity market performance of developed countries in the Europe, Australasia, and Far East regions.
Portfolio Highlights
Performance and
Expenses
T. Rowe Price Institutional
International Core Equity Fund
Performance Comparison |
This chart shows the value of a hypothetical $1 million investment in the fund over the past 10 fiscal year periods or since inception (for funds lacking 10-year records). The result is compared with benchmarks, which may include a broad-based market index and a peer group average or index. Market indexes do not include expenses, which are deducted from fund returns as well as mutual fund averages and indexes.
Fund Expense Example
As a mutual fund shareholder, you may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees, and other fund expenses. The following example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the most recent six-month period and held for the entire period.
Actual
Expenses
The first line of the
following table (Actual) provides information about actual account values and
actual expenses. You may use the information on this line, together with your
account balance, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply
divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value
divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number on the first
line under the heading Expenses Paid During Period to estimate the expenses
you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for
Comparison Purposes
The information
on the second line of the table (Hypothetical) is based on hypothetical account
values and expenses derived from the funds actual expense ratio and an assumed
5% per year rate of return before expenses (not the funds actual return). You
may compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund with other funds by
contrasting this 5% hypothetical example and the 5% hypothetical examples that
appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. The hypothetical account
values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account
balance or expenses you paid for the period.
You should also be aware that the expenses shown in the table highlight only your ongoing costs and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. To the extent a fund charges transaction costs, however, the total cost of owning that fund is higher.
Financial Highlights
T. Rowe Price Institutional International Core Equity
Fund
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Portfolio of
Investments
T. Rowe Price Institutional International Core Equity
Fund
October 31, 2012
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Statement of Assets and
Liabilities
T. Rowe Price
Institutional International Core Equity Fund
October 31, 2012
($000s, except shares and per share
amounts)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Statement of
Operations
T. Rowe Price
Institutional International Core Equity Fund
($000s)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Statement of Changes in Net
Assets
T. Rowe Price Institutional
International Core Equity Fund
($000s)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Notes to Financial
Statements
T. Rowe Price
Institutional International Core Equity Fund
October 31, 2012
T. Rowe Price Institutional International Funds, Inc. (the corporation), is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). The Institutional International Core Equity Fund (the fund) is a diversified, open-end management investment company established by the corporation. The fund commenced operations on October 27, 2010. The fund seeks long-term growth of capital through investments in the common stocks of non-U.S. companies.
NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Preparation The accompanying financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), which require the use of estimates made by management. Management believes that estimates and valuations are appropriate; however, actual results may differ from those estimates, and the valuations reflected in the accompanying financial statements may differ from the value ultimately realized upon sale or maturity.
Investment Transactions, Investment Income, and Distributions Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis. Dividends received from mutual fund investments are reflected as dividend income; capital gain distributions are reflected as realized gain/loss. Dividend income and capital gain distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income tax-related interest and penalties, if incurred, would be recorded as income tax expense. Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Realized gains and losses are reported on the identified cost basis. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income distributions are declared and paid annually. Capital gain distributions, if any, are generally declared and paid by the fund annually.
Currency Translation Assets, including investments, and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar values each day at the prevailing exchange rate, using the mean of the bid and asked prices of such currencies against U.S. dollars as quoted by a major bank. Purchases and sales of securities, income, and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at the prevailing exchange rate on the date of the transaction. The effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on realized and unrealized security gains and losses is reflected as a component of security gains and losses.
Credits The fund earns credits on temporarily uninvested cash balances held at the custodian, which reduce the funds custody charges. Custody expense in the accompanying financial statements is presented before reduction for credits.
Redemption Fees A 2% fee is assessed on redemptions of fund shares held for 90 days or less to deter short-term trading and to protect the interests of long-term shareholders. Redemption fees are withheld from proceeds that shareholders receive from the sale or exchange of fund shares. The fees are paid to the fund and are recorded as an increase to paid-in capital. The fees may cause the redemption price per share to differ from the net asset value per share.
New Accounting Pronouncements In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued amended guidance to align fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP with International Financial Reporting Standards. The guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. Adoption had no effect on net assets or results of operations.
In December 2011, the FASB issued amended guidance to enhance disclosure for offsetting assets and liabilities. The guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. Adoption will have no effect on the funds net assets or results of operations.
NOTE 2 - VALUATION
The funds financial instruments are reported at fair value as defined by GAAP. The fund determines the values of its assets and liabilities and computes its net asset value per share at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), normally 4 p.m. ET, each day that the NYSE is open for business.
Valuation Methods Equity securities listed or regularly traded on a securities exchange or in the over-the-counter (OTC) market are valued at the last quoted sale price or, for certain markets, the official closing price at the time the valuations are made, except for OTC Bulletin Board securities, which are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices. A security that is listed or traded on more than one exchange is valued at the quotation on the exchange determined to be the primary market for such security. Listed securities not traded on a particular day are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices for domestic securities and the last quoted sale price for international securities.
Investments in mutual funds are valued at the mutual funds closing net asset value per share on the day of valuation.
Other investments, including restricted securities and private placements, and those financial instruments for which the above valuation procedures are inappropriate or are deemed not to reflect fair value, are stated at fair value as determined in good faith by the T. Rowe Price Valuation Committee, established by the funds Board of Directors (the Board). Subject to oversight by the Board, the Valuation Committee develops pricing-related policies and procedures and approves all fair-value determinations. The Valuation Committee regularly makes good faith judgments, using a wide variety of sources and information, to establish and adjust valuations of certain securities as events occur and circumstances warrant. For instance, in determining the fair value of private-equity instruments, the Valuation Committee considers a variety of factors, including the companys business prospects, its financial performance, strategic events impacting the company, relevant valuations of similar companies, new rounds of financing, and any negotiated transactions of significant size between other investors in the company. Because any fair-value determination involves a significant amount of judgment, there is a degree of subjectivity inherent in such pricing decisions.
For valuation purposes, the last quoted prices of non-U.S. equity securities may be adjusted under the circumstances described below. If the fund determines that developments between the close of a foreign market and the close of the NYSE will, in its judgment, materially affect the value of some or all of its portfolio securities, the fund will adjust the previous closing prices to reflect what it believes to be the fair value of the securities as of the close of the NYSE. In deciding whether it is necessary to adjust closing prices to reflect fair value, the fund reviews a variety of factors, including developments in foreign markets, the performance of U.S. securities markets, and the performance of instruments trading in U.S. markets that represent foreign securities and baskets of foreign securities. A fund may also fair value securities in other situations, such as when a particular foreign market is closed but the fund is open. The fund uses outside pricing services to provide it with closing prices and information to evaluate and/or adjust those prices. The fund cannot predict how often it will use closing prices and how often it will determine it necessary to adjust those prices to reflect fair value. As a means of evaluating its security valuation process, the fund routinely compares closing prices, the next days opening prices in the same markets, and adjusted prices. Additionally, trading in the underlying securities of the fund may take place in various foreign markets on certain days when the fund is not open for business and does not calculate a net asset value. As a result, net asset values may be significantly affected on days when shareholders cannot make transactions.
Valuation Inputs Various inputs are used to determine the value of the funds financial instruments. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
Level 1 quoted prices in active markets for identical financial instruments
Level 2 observable inputs other than Level 1 quoted prices (including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar financial instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, and credit risk)
Level 3 unobservable inputs
Observable inputs are those based on market data obtained from sources independent of the fund, and unobservable inputs reflect the funds own assumptions based on the best information available. The input levels are not necessarily an indication of the risk or liquidity associated with financial instruments at that level. For example, non-U.S. equity securities actively traded in foreign markets generally are reflected in Level 2 despite the availability of closing prices because the fund evaluates and determines whether those closing prices reflect fair value at the close of the NYSE or require adjustment, as described above. The following table summarizes the funds financial instruments, based on the inputs used to determine their values on October 31, 2012:
NOTE 3 - OTHER INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS
Purchases and sales of portfolio securities other than short-term and U.S. government securities aggregated $11,531,000 and $13,822,000, respectively, for the year ended October 31, 2012.
NOTE 4 - FEDERAL INCOME TAXES
No provision for federal income taxes is required since the fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code and distribute to shareholders all of its taxable income and gains. Distributions determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations may differ in amount or character from net investment income and realized gains for financial reporting purposes. Financial reporting records are adjusted for permanent book/tax differences to reflect tax character but are not adjusted for temporary differences.
The fund files U.S. federal, state, and local tax returns as required. The funds tax returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities until expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, which is generally three years after the filing of the tax return but which can be extended to six years in certain circumstances. Tax returns for open years have incorporated no uncertain tax positions that require a provision for income taxes.
Distributions during the years ended October 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011, totaled $1,793,000 and $8,000, respectively, and were characterized as ordinary income for tax purposes. At October 31, 2012, the tax-basis cost of investments and components of net assets were as follows:
The difference between book-basis and tax-basis net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable to the realization of gains/losses on passive foreign investment companies for tax purposes. The fund intends to retain realized gains to the extent of available capital loss carryforwards. As a result of the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010, net capital losses realized on or after November 1, 2011 (effective date) may be carried forward indefinitely to offset future realized capital gains; however, post-effective losses must be used before pre-effective capital loss carryforwards with expiration dates. Accordingly, it is possible that all or a portion of the funds pre-effective capital loss carryforwards could expire unused. The funds available capital loss carryforwards as of October 31, 2012, expire as follows: $134,000 in fiscal 2019; $2,856,000 have no expiration.
NOTE 5 - FOREIGN TAXES
The fund is subject to foreign income taxes imposed by certain countries in which it invests. Acquisition of certain foreign currencies related to security transactions are also subject to tax. Additionally, capital gains realized by the fund upon disposition of securities issued in or by certain foreign countries are subject to capital gains tax imposed by those countries. All taxes are computed in accordance with the applicable foreign tax law, and, to the extent permitted, capital losses are used to offset capital gains. Taxes attributable to income are accrued by the fund as a reduction of income. Taxes incurred on the purchase of foreign currencies are recorded as realized loss on foreign currency transactions. Current and deferred tax expense attributable to net capital gains is reflected as a component of realized and/or change in unrealized gain/loss on securities in the accompanying financial statements. At October 31, 2012, the fund had no deferred tax liability attributable to foreign securities and no foreign capital loss carryforwards.
NOTE 6 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The fund is managed by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Price Associates), a wholly owned subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (Price Group). The investment management agreement between the fund and Price Associates provides for an annual investment management fee equal to 0.65% of the funds average daily net assets. The fee is computed daily and paid monthly.
The fund is also subject to a contractual expense limitation through February 28, 2013. During the limitation period, Price Associates is required to waive its management fee and reimburse the fund for any expenses, excluding interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, and extraordinary expenses, that would otherwise cause the funds ratio of annualized total expenses to average net assets (expense ratio) to exceed its expense limitation of 0.75%. For a period of three years after the date of any reimbursement or waiver, the fund is required to repay Price Associates for expenses previously reimbursed and management fees waived to the extent its net assets have grown or expenses have declined sufficiently to allow repayment without causing the funds expense ratio to exceed its expense limitation. Pursuant to this agreement, management fees in the amount of $212,000 were waived during the year ended October 31, 2012. Including these amounts, management fees waived and expenses previously reimbursed by Price Associates in the amount of $423,000 remain subject to repayment at October 31, 2012.
In addition, the fund has entered into service agreements with Price Associates and a wholly owned subsidiary of Price Associates (collectively, Price). Price Associates computes the daily share price and provides certain other administrative services to the fund. T. Rowe Price Services, Inc., provides shareholder and administrative services in its capacity as the funds transfer and dividend disbursing agent. For the year ended October 31, 2012, expenses incurred pursuant to these service agreements were $122,000 for Price Associates and less than $1,000 for T. Rowe Price Services, Inc. The total amount payable at period-end pursuant to these service agreements is reflected as Due to Affiliates in the accompanying financial statements.
The fund may invest in the T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Fund and the T. Rowe Price Government Reserve Investment Fund (collectively, the T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Funds), open-end management investment companies managed by Price Associates and considered affiliates of the fund. The T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Funds are offered as cash management options to mutual funds, trusts, and other accounts managed by Price Associates and/or its affiliates and are not available for direct purchase by members of the public. The T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Funds pay no investment management fees.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors of
T. Rowe Price Institutional International Funds, Inc. and
Shareholders of
T. Rowe Price Institutional International Core Equity Fund
In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of T. Rowe Price Institutional International Core Equity Fund (one of the portfolios comprising T. Rowe Price Institutional International Funds, Inc., hereafter referred to as the Fund) at October 31, 2012, and the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated therein, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as financial statements) are the responsibility of the Funds management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities at October 31, 2012 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, and confirmation of the underlying funds by correspondence with the transfer agent, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
December 14, 2012
Tax Information (Unaudited) for the Tax Year Ended 10/31/12 |
We are providing this information as required by the Internal Revenue Code. The amounts shown may differ from those elsewhere in this report because of differences between tax and financial reporting requirements.
For taxable non-corporate shareholders, $1,863,000 of the funds income represents qualified dividend income subject to the 15% rate category.
For corporate shareholders, $5,000 of the funds income qualifies for the dividends-received deduction.
The fund will pass through foreign source income of $1,851,000 and foreign taxes paid of $163,000.
Information on Proxy Voting Policies, Procedures, and Records |
A description of the policies and procedures used by T. Rowe Price funds and portfolios to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available in each funds Statement of Additional Information, which you may request by calling 1-800-225-5132 or by accessing the SECs website, sec.gov. The description of our proxy voting policies and procedures is also available on our website, troweprice.com. To access it, click on the words Our Company at the top of our corporate homepage. Then, when the next page appears, click on the words Proxy Voting Policies on the left side of the page.
Each funds most recent annual proxy voting record is available on our website and through the SECs website. To access it through our website, follow the directions above, then click on the words Proxy Voting Records on the right side of the Proxy Voting Policies page.
How to Obtain Quarterly Portfolio Holdings |
The fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The funds Form N-Q is available electronically on the SECs website (sec.gov); hard copies may be reviewed and copied at the SECs Public Reference Room, 100 F St. N.E., Washington, DC 20549. For more information on the Public Reference Room, call 1-800-SEC-0330.
About the Funds Directors and Officers |
Your fund is overseen by a Board of Directors (Board) that meets regularly to review a wide variety of matters affecting the fund, including performance, investment programs, compliance matters, advisory fees and expenses, service providers, and other business affairs. The Board elects the funds officers, who are listed in the final table. At least 75% of the Boards members are independent of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (T. Rowe Price), and its affiliates; inside or interested directors are employees or officers of T. Rowe Price. The business address of each director and officer is 100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202. The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the fund directors and is available without charge by calling a T. Rowe Price representative at 1-800-638-5660.
Independent Directors | ||
Name (Year of
Birth) Year Elected* [Number of T. Rowe Price Portfolios Overseen] |
Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships of Public Companies and Other Investment Companies During the Past Five Years | |
William R. Brody (1944) 2009 [138] |
President and Trustee, Salk Institute for Biological Studies (2009 to present); Director, Novartis, Inc. (2009 to present); Director, IBM (2007 to present); President and Trustee, Johns Hopkins University (1996 to 2009); Chairman of Executive Committee and Trustee, Johns Hopkins Health System (1996 to 2009) | |
Jeremiah E. Casey (1940) 2006 [138] |
Retired | |
Anthony W.
Deering (1945) 1991 [138] |
Chairman, Exeter Capital, LLC, a private investment firm (2004 to present); Director, Under Armour (2008 to present); Director, Vornado Real Estate Investment Trust (2004 to present); Director and Member of the Advisory Board, Deutsche Bank North America (2004 to present); Director, Mercantile Bankshares (2002 to 2007) | |
Donald W. Dick, Jr. (1943) 1989 [138] |
Principal, EuroCapital Partners, LLC, an acquisition and management advisory firm (1995 to present) | |
Robert J. Gerrard, Jr. (1952) 2012 [90] |
Chairman of Compensation Committee and Director, Syniverse Holdings, Inc. (2008 to 2011); Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Scripps Networks, LLC (1997 to 2009); Advisory Board Member, Pipeline Crisis/Winning Strategies (1997 to present) | |
Karen N. Horn (1943) 2003 [138] |
Senior Managing Director, Brock Capital Group, an advisory and investment banking firm (2004 to present); Director, Eli Lilly and Company (1987 to present); Director, Simon Property Group (2004 to present); Director, Norfolk Southern (2008 to present); Director, Fannie Mae (2006 to 2008) | |
Theo C. Rodgers (1941) 2006 [138] |
President, A&R Development Corporation (1977 to present) | |
Cecilia E. Rouse, Ph.D. (1963) 2012 [90] |
Professor and Researcher, Princeton University (1992 to present); Director, MDRC (2011 to present); Member, National Academy of Education (2010 to present); Research Associate, National Bureau of Economic Researchs Labor Studies Program (1998 to 2009 and 2011 to present); Member, Presidents Council of Economic Advisors (2009 to 2011); Member, The MacArthur Foundation Network on the Transition to Adulthood and Public Policy (2000 to 2008); Member, National Advisory Committee for the Robert Wood Johnson Foundations Scholars in Health Policy Research Program (2008); Director and Member, National Economic Association (2006 to 2008); Member, Association of Public Policy Analysis and Management Policy Council (2006 to 2008); Member, Hamilton Projects Advisory Board at The Brookings Institute (2006 to 2008); Chair of Committee on the Status of Minority Groups in the Economic Profession, American Economic Association (2006 to 2008) | |
John G. Schreiber (1946) 2001 [138] |
Owner/President, Centaur Capital Partners, Inc., a real estate investment company (1991 to present); Cofounder and Partner, Blackstone Real Estate Advisors, L.P. (1992 to present); Director, General Growth Properties, Inc. (2010 to present) | |
Mark R. Tercek (1957) 2009 [138] |
President and Chief Executive Officer, The Nature Conservancy (2008 to present); Managing Director, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (1984 to 2008) | |
*Each independent director serves until retirement, resignation, or election of a successor. | ||
Inside Directors | ||
Name
(Year of Birth) Year Elected* [Number of T. Rowe Price Portfolios Overseen] |
Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships of Public Companies and Other Investment Companies During the Past Five Years | |
Edward C. Bernard (1956) |
Director and Vice President, T. Rowe Price; Vice Chairman of the Board, Director, and Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, Director, and President, T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc.; Chairman of the Board and Director, T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Savings Bank, and T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, and Director, T. Rowe Price International; Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board, Director, and President, T. Rowe Price Trust Company; Chairman of the Board, all funds | |
Brian C. Rogers, CFA, CIC
(1955) |
Chief Investment Officer, Director, and Vice President, T. Rowe Price; Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer, Director, and Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Vice President, T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
*Each inside director serves until retirement, resignation, or election of a successor. |
Officers | ||
Name (Year of Birth) Position Held With Institutional International Funds |
Principal Occupation(s) | |
Ulle Adamson, CFA
(1979) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International, Inc. | |
Roy H. Adkins (1970) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; formerly employee, African Development Bank (to 2008) | |
Christopher D. Alderson
(1962) |
Director and PresidentInternational Equity, T. Rowe Price International; Companys Representative, Director, and Vice President, Price Hong Kong; Director and Vice President, Price Singapore; Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | |
Paulina Amieva (1981) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International; formerly student, Harvard Business School (to 2008) | |
Oliver D.M. Bell, IMC
(1969) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International; formerly Head of Global Emerging Markets Research, Pictet Asset Management Ltd. (to 2011), and Portfolio Manager of Africa and Middle East portfolios and other emerging markets strategies, Pictet Asset Management Ltd. (to 2009) | |
R. Scott Berg, CFA
(1972) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | |
Carolyn Hoi Che Chu
(1974) |
Vice President, Price Hong Kong and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; formerly Director, Bank of America Merrill Lynch and Co-head of credit and convertibles research team in Hong Kong (to 2010) | |
Archibald Ciganer Albeniz, CFA
(1976) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
Richard N. Clattenburg, CFA
(1979) |
Vice President, Price Singapore, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
Michael J. Conelius, CFA
(1964) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price International, and T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
Jose Costa Buck (1972) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
Richard de los Reyes
(1975) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | |
Michael Della Vedova (1969) Vice President |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International; formerly Cofounder and Partner, Four Quarter Capital (to 2009) | |
Bridget A. Ebner (1970) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | |
Mark J.T. Edwards (1957)
|
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
David J. Eiswert, CFA
(1972) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
Roger L. Fiery III, CPA
(1959) |
Vice President, Price Hong Kong, Price Singapore, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price International, and T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
Mark S. Finn, CFA, CPA
(1963) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
Robert N. Gensler
(1957) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
John R. Gilner (1961) |
Chief Compliance Officer and Vice President, T. Rowe Price; Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc. | |
Gregory S. Golczewski
(1966) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
M. Campbell Gunn (1956) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
Gregory K. Hinkle, CPA
(1958) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
Leigh Innes, CFA (1976) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
Randal S. Jenneke
(1971) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International; formerly Senior Portfolio Manager, Australian Equities (to 2010) | |
Kris H. Jenner, M.D., D.Phil.
(1962) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
Yoichiro Kai (1973) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International; formerly Japanese Financial/Real Estate Sector Analyst/Portfolio Manager, Citadel Investment Group, Asia Limited (to 2009) | |
Andrew J. Keirle
(1974) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
Ian D. Kelson
(1956) |
PresidentInternational Fixed Income, T. Rowe Price International; Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | |
Christopher J. Kushlis, CFA
(1976) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
Mark J. Lawrence (1970) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International; formerly Equity Fund Manager, Citi (London) (to 2008) | |
David M. Lee, CFA
(1962) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | |
Patricia B. Lippert (1953)
|
Assistant Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc. | |
Christopher C. Loop, CFA (1966) Vice President |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
Anh Lu (1968) |
Vice President, Price Hong Kong and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | |
Sebastien Mallet
(1974) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
Daniel Martino, CFA
(1974) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | |
Jonathan H.W. Matthews, CFA
(1975) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International; formerly Analyst, Pioneer Investments (to 2008) | |
Susanta Mazumdar (1968) |
Vice President, Price Singapore and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | |
Raymond A. Mills, Ph.D., CFA
(1960) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price International, and T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
Sudhir Nanda, Ph.D., CFA
(1959) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | |
Joshua Nelson
(1977) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | |
Jason Nogueira, CFA
(1974) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | |
David Oestreicher
(1967) |
Director, Vice President, and Secretary, T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Services, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company; Vice President and Secretary, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International; Vice President, Price Hong Kong and Price Singapore | |
Michael D. Oh, CFA
(1974) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | |
Kenneth A. Orchard
(1975) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International; formerly Vice President, Moodys Investors Service (to 2010) | |
Gonzalo Pángaro, CFA
(1968) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
Timothy E. Parker, CFA
(1974) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | |
Craig J. Pennington, CFA
(1971) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International; formerly Global Energy Analyst, Insight Investment (to 2010); Senior Trader, Brevan Howard (to 2008) | |
Frederick A. Rizzo
(1969) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
Christopher J. Rothery
(1963) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
Federico Santilli, CFA
(1974) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
Sebastian Schrott
(1977) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
Deborah D. Seidel (1962) Vice President |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Services, Inc. | |
Robert W. Sharps, CFA, CPA
(1971) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
Robert W. Smith
(1961) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
Joshua K. Spencer, CFA
(1973) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | |
David A. Stanley (1963) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
Jonty Starbuck, Ph.D.
(1975) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
Ju Yen Tan (1972) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
Dean Tenerelli (1964) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
Eric L. Veiel, CFA
(1972) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | |
Julie L. Waples (1970) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price | |
Christopher S. Whitehouse
(1972) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
J. Howard Woodward, CFA
(1974) |
Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International | |
Ernest C. Yeung
(1979) |
Vice President, Price Hong Kong and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | |
Unless otherwise noted, officers have been employees of T. Rowe Price or T. Rowe Price International for at least 5 years. |
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
The registrant has adopted a code of ethics, as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR, applicable to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. A copy of this code of ethics is filed as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR. No substantive amendments were approved or waivers were granted to this code of ethics during the period covered by this report.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
The registrants Board of Directors/Trustees has determined that Mr. Anthony W. Deering qualifies as an audit committee financial expert, as defined in Item 3 of Form N-CSR. Mr. Deering is considered independent for purposes of Item 3 of Form N-CSR.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
(a) (d) Aggregate fees billed to the registrant for the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the registrants principal accountant were as follows:
Audit fees include amounts related to the audit of the registrants annual financial statements and services normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings. Audit-related fees include amounts reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrants financial statements and specifically include the issuance of a report on internal controls and, if applicable, agreed-upon procedures related to fund acquisitions. Tax fees include amounts related to services for tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice. The nature of these services specifically includes the review of distribution calculations and the preparation of Federal, state, and excise tax returns. All other fees include the registrants pro-rata share of amounts for agreed-upon procedures in conjunction with service contract approvals by the registrants Board of Directors/Trustees.
(e)(1) The registrants audit committee has adopted a policy whereby audit and non-audit services performed by the registrants principal accountant for the registrant, its investment adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant require pre-approval in advance at regularly scheduled audit committee meetings. If such a service is required between regularly scheduled audit committee meetings, pre-approval may be authorized by one audit committee member with ratification at the next scheduled audit committee meeting. Waiver of pre-approval for audit or non-audit services requiring fees of a de minimis amount is not permitted.
(2) No services included in (b) (d) above were approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
(f) Less than 50 percent of the hours expended on the principal accountants engagement to audit the registrants financial statements for the most recent fiscal year were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountants full-time, permanent employees.
(g) The aggregate fees billed for the most recent fiscal year and the preceding fiscal year by the registrants principal accountant for non-audit services rendered to the registrant, its investment adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant were $1,333,000 and $1,632,000, respectively.
(h) All non-audit services rendered in (g) above were pre-approved by the registrants audit committee. Accordingly, these services were considered by the registrants audit committee in maintaining the principal accountants independence.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable.
Item 6. Investments.
(a) Not applicable. The complete schedule of investments is included in Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not applicable.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the registrants disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of this filing and have concluded that the registrants disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of that date, in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported timely.
(b) The registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer are aware of no change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants second fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits.
(a)(1) The registrants code of ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is attached.
(b) A certification by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, is attached.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
T. Rowe Price Institutional International Funds, Inc.
By | /s/ Edward C. Bernard | |
Edward C. Bernard | ||
Principal Executive Officer | ||
Date December 14, 2012 |
Pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company
Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on
behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By | /s/ Edward C. Bernard | |
Edward C. Bernard | ||
Principal Executive Officer | ||
Date December 14, 2012 | ||
By | /s/ Gregory K. Hinkle | |
Gregory K. Hinkle | ||
Principal Financial Officer | ||
Date December 14, 2012 |
Item 12(a)(2).
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Edward C. Bernard, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of T. Rowe Price Institutional International Core Equity Fund; | |||
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; | |||
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; | |||
4. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have: | |||
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |||
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |||
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and | |||
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and | |||
5. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |||
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and | |||
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: December 14, 2012 | /s/ Edward C. Bernard | |
Edward C. Bernard | ||
Principal Executive Officer |
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Gregory K. Hinkle, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of T. Rowe Price Institutional International Core Equity Fund; | |||
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; | |||
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; | |||
4. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have: | |||
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |||
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; | |||
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and | |||
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and | |||
5. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): | |||
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and | |||
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: December 14, 2012 | /s/ Gregory K. Hinkle | |
Gregory K. Hinkle | ||
Principal Financial Officer |
Item 12(b).
CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 | ||
Name of Issuer: T. Rowe Price Institutional International Core Equity Fund | ||
In connection with the Report on Form N-CSR for the above named Issuer, the undersigned hereby | ||
certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that: | ||
1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities | |
Exchange Act of 1934; | ||
2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial | |
condition and results of operations of the Issuer. |
Date: December 14, 2012 | /s/ Edward C. Bernard | |
Edward C. Bernard | ||
Principal Executive Officer | ||
Date: December 14, 2012 | /s/ Gregory K. Hinkle | |
Gregory K. Hinkle | ||
Principal Financial Officer |
CODE OF ETHICS FOR PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
AND SENIOR FINANCIAL
OFFICERS OF THE PRICE FUNDS
UNDER THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I. General Statement. This Code of Ethics (the Price Funds S-O Code) has been designed to bring the Price Funds into compliance with the applicable requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Act) rules promulgated by The Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder (Regulations). The Price Funds S-O Code applies solely to the Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer or Controller of, or persons performing similar functions for, a Price Fund (whether such persons are employed by a Price Fund or third party) (Covered Officers). The Price Funds shall include each mutual fund that is managed, sponsored and distributed by affiliates of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (Group). The investment managers to the Price Funds will be referred to as the Price Fund Advisers. A list of Covered Officers is attached as Exhibit A.
The Price Fund Advisers have, along with their parent, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (Group) also maintained a comprehensive Code of Ethics and Conduct (the Group Code) since 1972, which applies to all officers, directors and employees of the Price Funds, Group and its affiliates.
As mandated by the Act, Group has adopted a Code (the Group S-O Code), similar to the Price Funds S-O Code, which applies solely to its principal executive and senior financial officers. The Group S-O Code and the Price Funds S-O Code will be referred to collectively as the S-O Codes.
The Price Funds S-O Code has been adopted by the Price Funds in accordance with the Act and Regulations thereunder and will be administered in conformity with the disclosure requirements of Item 2 of Form N-CSR. The S-O Codes are attachments to the Group Code. In many respects the S-O Codes are supplementary to the Group Code, but the Group Code is administered separately from the S-O Codes, as the S-O Codes are from each other.
II. Purpose of the Price Funds S-O Code. The purpose of the Price Funds S-O Code, as mandated by the Act and the Regulations, is to establish standards that are reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:
Ethical Conduct. Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships.
Disclosure. Full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Price Funds file with, or submit to, the SEC and in other public communications made by the Price Funds.
Compliance. Compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations.
Reporting of Violations. The prompt internal reporting of violations of the Price Funds S-O Code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Price Funds S-O Code.
Accountability. Accountability for adherence to the Price Funds S-O Code.
III. Covered Officers Should Handle Ethically Actual and Apparent Conflicts of Interest.
Overview. Each Covered Officer owes a duty to the Price Funds to adhere to a high standard of honesty and business ethics and should be sensitive to situations that may give rise to actual as well as apparent conflicts of interest.
A conflict of interest occurs when a Covered Officers private interest interferes with the interests of, or his or her service to, the Price Funds. For example, a conflict of interest would arise if a Covered Officer, or a member of his or her family, receives improper personal benefits as a result of his or her position with a Price Fund.
Certain conflicts of interest covered by the Price Funds S-O Code arise out of the relationships between Covered Officers and the Price Funds and may already be subject to provisions regulating conflicts of interest in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (Investment Company Act), the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (Investment Advisers Act) and the Group Code. For example, Covered Officers may not individually engage in certain transactions (such as the purchase or sale of securities or other property) with a Price Fund because of their status as affiliated persons of a Price Fund. The compliance programs and procedures of the Price Funds and Price Fund Advisers are designed to prevent, or identify and correct, violations of these provisions.
Although typically not presenting an opportunity for improper personal benefit, conflicts arise from, or as a result of, the contractual relationship between a Price Fund and its Price Fund Adviser (and its affiliates) of which the Covered Officers may also be officers or employees. As a result, the Price Funds S-O Code recognizes that the Covered Officers will, in the normal course of their duties (whether formally for the Price Funds or for the Price Fund Advisers, or for both), be involved in establishing policies and implementing decisions which will have different effects on these entities. The participation of the Covered Officers in such activities is inherent in the contractual relationship between each Price Fund and its respective Price Fund Adviser. Such participation is also consistent with the performance by the Covered Officers of their duties as officers of the Price Funds and, if consistent with the provisions of the Investment Company Act and the Investment Advisers Act, it will be deemed to have been handled ethically.
Other conflicts of interest are covered by the Price Funds S-O Code, even if these conflicts of interest are not addressed by or subject to provisions in the Investment Company Act and the Investment Advisers Act.
Whenever a Covered Officer is confronted with a conflict of interest situation where he or she is uncertain as to the appropriate action to be taken, he or she should discuss the matter with the Chairperson of Groups Ethics Committee or another member of the Committee.
Handling of Specific Types of Conflicts. Each Covered Officer (and close family members) must not:
Entertainment. Accept entertainment from any company with which any Price Fund or any Price Fund Adviser has current or prospective business dealings, including portfolio companies, unless such entertainment is in full compliance with the policy on entertainment as set forth in the Group Code.
Gifts. Accept any gifts, except as permitted by the Group Code.
Improper Personal Influence. Use his or her personal influence or personal relationships improperly to influence investment decisions, brokerage allocations or financial reporting by the Price Funds to the detriment of any one or more of the Price Funds.
Taking Action at the Expense of a Price Fund. Cause a Price Fund to take action, or fail to take action, for the personal benefit of the Covered Officer rather than for the benefit of one or more of the Price Funds.
Misuse of Price Funds Transaction Information. Use knowledge of portfolio transactions made or contemplated for a Price Fund or any other clients of the Price Fund Advisers to trade personally or cause others to trade in order to take advantage of or avoid the market impact of such portfolio transactions.
Outside Business Activities. Engage in any outside business activity that detracts from a Covered Officers ability to devote appropriate time and attention to his or her responsibilities to a Price Fund.
Service Providers. Excluding Group and its affiliates, have any ownership interest in, or any consulting or employment relationship with, any of the Price Funds service providers, except that an ownership interest in public companies is permitted
Receipt of Payments. Have a direct or indirect financial interest in commissions, transaction charges, spreads or other payments paid by a Price Fund for effecting portfolio transactions or for selling or redeeming shares other than an interest (such as compensation or equity ownership) arising from the Covered Officers employment by Group or any of its affiliates.
Service as a Director or Trustee. Serve as a director, trustee or officer of any public or private company or a non-profit organization that issues securities eligible for purchase by any of the Price Funds, unless approval is obtained as required by the Group Code.
IV. Covered Officers Specific Obligations and Accountabilities.
A. Disclosure Requirements and Controls. Each Covered Officer must familiarize himself or herself with the disclosure requirements (Form N-1A registration statement, proxy (Schedule 14A), shareholder reports, Forms N-SAR, N-CSR, etc.) applicable to the Price Funds and the disclosure controls and procedures of the Price Fund and the Price Fund Advisers.
B. Compliance with Applicable Law. It is the responsibility of each Covered Officer to promote compliance with all laws, rules and regulations applicable to the Price Funds and the Price Fund Advisers. Each Covered Officer should, to the extent appropriate within his or her area of responsibility, consult with other officers and employees of the Price Funds and the Price Fund Advisers and take other appropriate steps with the goal of promoting full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in the reports and documents the Price Funds file with, or submit to, the SEC, and in other public communications made by the Price Funds.
C. Fair Disclosure. Each Covered Officer must not knowingly misrepresent, or cause others to misrepresent, facts about a Price Fund to others, whether within or outside the Price organization, including to the Price Funds directors and auditors, and to governmental regulators and self-regulatory organizations.
D. Initial and Annual Affirmations. Each Covered Officer must:
1. Upon adoption of the Price Funds S-O Code (or thereafter, as applicable, upon becoming a Covered Officer), affirm in writing that he or she has received, read, and understands the Price Funds S-O Code.
2. Annually affirm that he or she has complied with the requirements of the Price Funds S-O Code.
E. Reporting of Material Violations of the Price Funds S-O Code. If a Covered Officer becomes aware of any material violation of the Price Funds S-O Code or laws and governmental rules and regulations applicable to the operations of the Price Funds, he or she must promptly report the violation (Report) to the Chief Legal Counsel of the Price Funds (CLC). Failure to report a material violation will be considered itself a violation of the Price Funds S-O Code. The CLC is identified in the attached Exhibit B.
It is the Price Funds policy that no retaliation or other adverse action will be taken against any Covered Officer or other employee of a Price Fund, a Price Fund Adviser or their affiliates based upon any lawful actions of the Covered Officer or employee with respect to a Report made in good faith.
F. Annual Disclosures. Each Covered Officer must report, at least annually, all affiliations or other relationships as called for in the Annual Questionnaire for Executive Officers and/or Employee Directors/Trustees of Group and the Price Funds.
V. Administration of the Price Funds S-O Code. The Ethics Committee is responsible for administering the Price Funds S-O Code and applying its provisions to specific situations in which questions are presented.
A. Waivers and Interpretations. The Chairperson of the Ethics Committee has the authority to interpret the Price Funds S-O Code in any particular situation and to grant waivers where justified, subject to the approval of the Joint Audit Committee of the Price Funds. All material interpretations concerning Covered Officers will be reported to the Joint Audit Committee of the Price Funds at its next meeting. Waivers, including implicit waivers, to Covered Officers will be publicly disclosed as required in the Instructions to N-CSR. Pursuant to the definition in the Regulations, an implicit waiver means a Price Funds failure to take action within a reasonable period of time regarding a material departure from a provision of the Price Funds S-O Code that has been made known to an executive officer (as defined in Rule 3b-7 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of a Price Fund. An executive officer of a Price Fund includes its president and any vice-president in charge of a principal business unit, division or function.
B. Violations/Investigations. The following procedures will be followed in investigating and enforcing the Price Funds S-O Code:
1. The CLC will take or cause to be taken appropriate action to investigate any potential or actual violation reported to him or her.
2. The CLC, after consultation if deemed appropriate with Outside Counsel to the Price Funds, will make a recommendation to the appropriate Price Funds Board regarding the action to be taken with regard to each material violation. Such action could include any of the following: a letter of censure or suspension, a fine, a suspension of trading privileges or termination of officership or employment. In addition, the violator may be required to surrender any profit realized (or loss avoided) from any activity that is in violation of the Price Funds S-O Code.
VI. Amendments to the Price Funds S-O Code. Except as to the contents of Exhibit A and Exhibit B, the Price Funds S-O Code may not be materially amended except in written form, which is specifically approved or ratified by a majority vote of each Price Fund Board, including a majority of the independent directors on each Board.
VII. Confidentiality. All reports and records prepared or maintained pursuant to the Price Funds S-O Code will be considered confidential and shall be maintained and protected accordingly. Except as otherwise required by law, the Price Funds S-O Code or as necessary in connection with regulations under the Price Funds S-O Code, such matters shall not be disclosed to anyone other than the directors of the appropriate Price Fund Board, Outside Counsel to the Price Funds, members of the Ethics Committee and the CLC and authorized persons on his or her staff.
Preparation Date: 9/30/03
Adoption Date: 10/22/03
Exhibit A
Persons Covered by the Price Funds S-O Code of
Ethics
Edward C. Bernard, Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
Gregory K. Hinkle, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer
Exhibit B
David Oestreicher, Chief Legal Counsel to the Price Funds
VN(=(LO)?\`@E;X/^/?[-7_``2W_9X^$_QI_9M^
M)7A'XX?LV_`ZR^'VL?!BW\8_L^>)/%7Q&U[P!X?5K7_A6_BKPW\;=4^$?V3Q
MQ=`:5X4G^(GQ)^'@M=1#OXR'A/2`FKR0_P#!&3X:?'KX'_L%?#CX'_M(?`7Q
MG\`?B=\,_%_QBAO]"\6>,/@KXXL_$FF>//C#X\^*FA^(?"^M_!3XI_%#3&TJ
M/2/'-EH6HV_B:;PQK]OXETC7(H-$N]`31_$.M`'ZJ5QW@3XB?#_XH^'_`/A+
M/AGXZ\'?$7PM_:_B'P__`,)+X$\3:)XN\/\`]O\`A'7=1\+>*]#_`+9\/WVH
M:=_:_ACQ-I&K>'?$.F_:?MNBZ[I>HZ1J4%MJ%E
XN@ND1QL+?^DY+[0W<6[7P!]+:8G]W]Y3;8UQ@3/.H(_*$E/__2
M[<9F8'VL/4+'/-K?38,,PUI]S:/Y=EV[^>W[$']HY+\<"GJY?<\%S;FX#W5D
M/?553Z;6_2V^_P#P_P#AO6_1U5+6'7>C%P;]NH#G.-;0;&B7MG=4-Q_G/;_-
M_346_6#H+A(ZCC"`20;6`M#?I[VN=NKV?G[_`*"2FSBUY5;7C)N%[G/ XN@ND1QL+?^DY+[0W<6[7P!]+:8G]W]Y3;8UQ@3/.H(_*$E/__2
M[<9F8'VL/4+'/-K?38,,PUI]S:/Y=EV[^>W[$']HY+\<"GJY?<\%S;FX#W5D
M/?553Z;6_2V^_P#P_P#AO6_1U5+6'7>C%P;]NH#G.-;0;&B7MG=4-Q_G/;_-
M_346_6#H+A(ZCC"`20;6`M#?I[VN=NKV?G[_`*"2FSBUY5;7C)N%[G/3<)&T,V_F?O.L:_^PH-SLAS7>RICP_9L]5KM0P6.W$?G
M?SGL_P!%^F_X-)3&S"R+&V!P82]\DD2'-@-][/4;[O3WU_35E[+2YFP/`!]\
MNF6P?;_.?2W;5&C,WSZSJ6'3:&6!_.[R9^Y9_P!M/5GG4)*:.3B77$^QKF&`
M6VR^1^3<)&T,V_F?O.L:_^PH-SLAS7>RICP_9L]5KM0P6.W$?G
M?SGL_P!%^F_X-)3&S"R+&V!P82]\DD2'-@-][/4;[O3WU_35E[+2YFP/`!]\
MNF6P?;_.?2W;5&C,WSZSJ6'3:&6!_.[R9^Y9_P!M/5GG4)*:.3B77$^QKF&`
M6VR^1^7RE<*K;U13>Z]U;M\@]G[A^>WP)ZZR_1./QVTL[V
M%6?";Y8=9[4[F&>Z\I!'U+WGT1\M,'UKV)/A-L;SW#US6;CQW7RX"NJH<)EY
M\%4U33?85AIS32>Z]U#HNA_DN?F'W[\CZ[;71E/MOMWX*=#?'K$8"D[DW_69
MS%=L=/;[^4G85<]-J=G;1R>Z-K[/VJVUI.O]U;MSFW\_P!BYK?&%&TL3NJAVYD]W09$
M38:"NCI,@U'[KW2'Z`[,[&W+_,W^6.S=PX?N?KS9D/PJ^%79F,ZD[3WYM[=F
M)PN^-W]S?-O9>ZMZ[,P>RNS^T]D;/I]T[=ZRP=#64]!4T)J*G#-42TNN3[BH
M]U[H8/EA\]>N/B?M_N?-Y#KGM;NFJ^.W3NW^_N\=M=,OU&-P=:=1;KS.]\/M
MW>F?7N'MOJ##3T&5'5VZ:M(J*LJJF.CVY622QIJI5J?=>Z=LC\VME8#MOK3I
MO=?5W<^U<_VEOV3IO;^X,YM_:5'LUN]:?X_9+Y-5?45)DI-[KF=UUM+U9A:U
MY-TX#'Y;K],Q1SXA\^N4ADI%]U[H`=B_S*L+/L+X]Y?+=/\`?_8NZ/DM\C_F
M+\<-@8K9NP^G-M97&]E_%W=_RB7(;`W9A*WY*;CQ&.>7;WQGS&/HMQTV:J\'
MD)H(