Financing Liability for Construction in Progress	9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Financing Liability for Construction in Progress [Abstract]
FINANCING LIABILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS	NOTE 9: FINANCING LIABILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS The lease for the buildings at the Company’s Sunnyvale, California location ended in September 2010. In December 2009, the Company entered into a lease for a building in San Jose, California, which was intended to become the Company’s new headquarters. In January 2010, the Company began a build-out of this facility and during the construction incurred approximately $18.9 million in structural leasehold improvements. Under the terms of the lease, the landlord reimbursed $18.8 million of the construction costs. Because certain improvements constructed by the Company were considered structural in nature and the Company was responsible for any cost overruns, the Company was considered to be the owner of the construction project for accounting purposes under applicable accounting guidance on the effect of lessee involvement in asset construction. As a result, in December 2009 the Company capitalized the fair value of the building of $6.9 million with a corresponding credit to financing liability. The fair value was determined as of December 31, 2009, using a combination of the revenue comparison approach and the income capitalization approach. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the liability increased by $18.9 million due to additional structural leasehold improvements, by $0.2 million due to land lease expense and by $0.2 million due to capitalized interest expense. Construction was completed in September 2010, at which time the Company relocated to the new building. Upon completion of construction in September 2010, the Company concluded that it qualified for sale-leaseback accounting under applicable accounting guidance because the Company has no form of continuing involvement other than under its lease. Accordingly, the Company removed from its books the carrying value of the building, the structural leasehold improvements and the financing liability.

Financing Liability for Construction in Progress

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Financing Liability for Construction in Progress [Abstract]

FINANCING LIABILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS

NOTE 9: FINANCING LIABILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS

The lease for the buildings at the Company’s Sunnyvale, California location ended in September 2010. In December 2009, the Company entered into a lease for a building in San Jose, California, which was intended to become the Company’s new headquarters. In January 2010, the Company began a build-out of this facility and during the construction incurred approximately $18.9 million in structural leasehold improvements. Under the terms of the lease, the landlord reimbursed $18.8 million of the construction costs.

Because certain improvements constructed by the Company were considered structural in nature and the Company was responsible for any cost overruns, the Company was considered to be the owner of the construction project for accounting purposes under applicable accounting guidance on the effect of lessee involvement in asset construction.

As a result, in December 2009 the Company capitalized the fair value of the building of $6.9 million with a corresponding credit to financing liability. The fair value was determined as of December 31, 2009, using a combination of the revenue comparison approach and the income capitalization approach. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the liability increased by $18.9 million due to additional structural leasehold improvements, by $0.2 million due to land lease expense and by $0.2 million due to capitalized interest expense.

Construction was completed in September 2010, at which time the Company relocated to the new building. Upon completion of construction in September 2010, the Company concluded that it qualified for sale-leaseback accounting under applicable accounting guidance because the Company has no form of continuing involvement other than under its lease. Accordingly, the Company removed from its books the carrying value of the building, the structural leasehold improvements and the financing liability.