Delaware
|
94-3008334
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
Page
|
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
||
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current Assets:
|
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 9,610 | $ | 5,835 | ||||
Short-term marketable securities
|
5,004 | 10,398 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net
|
12,822 | 13,555 | ||||||
Inventories
|
13,078 | 13,318 | ||||||
Other current assets
|
1,903 | 4,159 | ||||||
Total current assets
|
42,417 | 47,265 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net
|
12,965 | 12,554 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
21,412 | 21,412 | ||||||
Other acquired intangible assets, net
|
24,151 | 31,484 | ||||||
Long-term marketable securities
|
3,645 | 7,346 | ||||||
Other assets
|
1,352 | 1,910 | ||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 105,942 | $ | 121,971 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts payable
|
$ | 7,454 | $ | 8,783 | ||||
Accrued compensation and benefits
|
5,900 | 5,266 | ||||||
Accrued commissions
|
660 | 514 | ||||||
Short term note payable and capital lease obligation
|
5,810 | 6,066 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses
|
2,424 | 1,803 | ||||||
Total current liabilities
|
22,248 | 22,432 | ||||||
Long term borrowing against line of credit
|
2,000 | - | ||||||
Long term note payable and capital lease obligation
|
1,397 | 1,731 | ||||||
Total liabilities
|
25,645 | 24,163 | ||||||
Stockholders' Equity:
|
||||||||
Common stock, par value
|
45 | 45 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital
|
184,928 | 183,090 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
(127 | ) | (148 | ) | ||||
Accumulated deficit
|
(104,549 | ) | (85,179 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders' equity
|
80,297 | 97,808 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$ | 105,942 | $ | 121,971 |
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
$ | 31,076 | $ | 30,234 | $ | 89,900 | $ | 88,774 | ||||||||
Cost of revenues
|
13,537 | 12,307 | 39,056 | 37,010 | ||||||||||||
Gross margin
|
17,539 | 17,927 | 50,844 | 51,764 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
Research and development
|
11,661 | 7,605 | 38,095 | 23,392 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative
|
6,856 | 6,570 | 20,659 | 19,734 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition and restructuring related costs
|
699 | 510 | 3,805 | 510 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
|
2,445 | 648 | 7,333 | 1,945 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses
|
21,661 | 15,333 | 69,892 | 45,581 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations
|
(4,122 | ) | 2,594 | (19,048 | ) | 6,183 | ||||||||||
Interest income (expense) and other, net
|
(42 | ) | (1 | ) | (209 | ) | 108 | |||||||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes
|
(4,164 | ) | 2,593 | (19,257 | ) | 6,291 | ||||||||||
Provision for income taxes
|
62 | 1,445 | 113 | 1,948 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | (4,226 | ) | $ | 1,148 | $ | (19,370 | ) | $ | 4,343 | ||||||
Basic net income (loss) per share
|
$ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.03 | $ | (0.44 | ) | $ | 0.12 | ||||||
Shares used to compute basic per share amounts
|
44,537 | 37,098 | 44,525 | 37,068 | ||||||||||||
Diluted net income (loss) per share
|
$ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.03 | $ | (0.44 | ) | $ | 0.11 | ||||||
Shares used to compute diluted per share amounts
|
44,537 | 37,683 | 44,525 | 37,795 |
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||
September 30,
|
||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | (19,370 | ) | $ | 4,343 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities,
|
||||||||
net of assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
|
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
2,670 | 2,448 | ||||||
Share-based compensation expense
|
1,748 | 943 | ||||||
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
|
7,333 | 1,945 | ||||||
Write-downs of inventories
|
1,015 | 401 | ||||||
Other non-cash items
|
242 | 208 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts receivable
|
733 | (3,754 | ) | |||||
Inventories
|
(775 | ) | (4,825 | ) | ||||
Income tax receivable
|
901 | 84 | ||||||
Other current assets
|
1,356 | 109 | ||||||
Other assets
|
(139 | ) | 595 | |||||
Accounts payable
|
(1,329 | ) | 831 | |||||
Accrued compensation and benefits
|
633 | 1,996 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses
|
792 | 509 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
(4,190 | ) | 5,833 | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Purchases of marketable securities
|
(4,823 | ) | (26,824 | ) | ||||
Sales and maturities of marketable securities
|
13,841 | 37,298 | ||||||
Purchase of property and equipment
|
(2,487 | ) | (2,225 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
|
- | 22 | ||||||
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
6,531 | 8,271 | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Borrowings against line of credit
|
2,000 | - | ||||||
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options
|
91 | 216 | ||||||
Principal payments on capital lease obligations
|
(615 | ) | (493 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
1,476 | (277 | ) | |||||
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents
|
(42 | ) | (26 | ) | ||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
3,775 | 13,801 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
5,835 | 11,299 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 9,610 | $ | 25,100 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash paid for income taxes
|
$ | 6 | $ | 1,017 | ||||
Cash from income tax refunds
|
$ | 978 | $ | - | ||||
Cash paid for interest
|
$ | 36 | $ | 47 | ||||
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | (4,226 | ) | $ | 1,148 | $ | (19,370 | ) | $ | 4,343 | ||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities, net
|
2 | (5 | ) | 12 | (13 | ) | ||||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustments
|
(20 | ) | (4 | ) | 9 | (22 | ) | |||||||||
Comprehensive net income (loss)
|
$ | (4,244 | ) | $ | 1,139 | $ | (19,349 | ) | $ | 4,308 |
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||
Risk-free interest rate
|
0.78 | % | 1.09 | % | 1.24 | % | 1.59 | % | ||||||||
Expected volatility
|
0.61 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.62 | ||||||||||||
Expected life (years)
|
4.32 | 4.19 | 4.32 | 4.19 | ||||||||||||
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||
Cost of revenues
|
$ | 11 | $ | 8 | $ | 34 | $ | 25 | ||||||||
Research and development
|
406 | 155 | 1,145 | 464 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative
|
254 | 223 | 940 | 706 | ||||||||||||
Total share-based compensation expense
|
$ | 671 | $ | 386 | $ | 2,119 | $ | 1,195 |
Weighted Average
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Remaining
|
Aggregate
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Options Available
|
Number of
|
Weighted Average
|
Contratual Term
|
Intrinsic
|
||||||||||||||||
Options
|
for Grant
|
Shares
|
Exercise Price
|
(in years)
|
Value
|
|||||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
|
898,724 | 4,202,653 | $ | 4.34 | 5.06 | $ | 2,314,975 | |||||||||||||
Granted
|
(772,000 | ) | 772,000 | 3.73 | ||||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
- | (12,489 | ) | 1.95 | ||||||||||||||||
Cancelled
|
116,798 | (116,798 | ) | 5.52 | ||||||||||||||||
Plan Termination
|
(11 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at March 31, 2011
|
243,511 | 4,845,366 | $ | 4.22 | 5.18 | $ | 2,337,903 | |||||||||||||
Authorized
|
2,300,000 | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
Granted
|
(420,000 | ) | 420,000 | 3.35 | ||||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
- | (18,619 | ) | 1.90 | ||||||||||||||||
Cancelled
|
77,522 | (77,522 | ) | 4.30 | ||||||||||||||||
Plan Termination
|
(989 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2011
|
2,200,044 | 5,169,225 | $ | 4.15 | 5.10 | $ | 1,977,661 | |||||||||||||
Granted
|
(36,500 | ) | 36,500 | 3.28 | ||||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
- | (15,457 | ) | 2.00 | ||||||||||||||||
Cancelled
|
109,005 | (109,005 | ) | 4.77 | ||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2011
|
2,272,549 | 5,081,263 | $ | 4.14 | 4.90 | $ | 1,285,059 | |||||||||||||
Exercisable at September 30, 2011
|
2,223,929 | $ | 4.85 | 3.75 | $ | 830,390 |
Options Outstanding
|
Options Exercisable
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Remaining
|
Weighted
|
Weighted
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Term
|
Average
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Range of Exercise Prices
|
Number
|
(in years)
|
Exercise Price
|
Number
|
Exercise Price
|
||||||||||||||||
$1.50-$2.05 | 1,232,237 | 4.29 | $ | 1.97 | 797,998 | $ | 1.97 | ||||||||||||||
$2.06-$3.48 | 1,206,007 | 5.88 | 3.40 | 202,110 | 3.24 | ||||||||||||||||
$3.49-$3.87 | 1,101,220 | 5.71 | 3.76 | 213,155 | 3.83 | ||||||||||||||||
$3.88-$7.03 | 1,081,574 | 4.91 | 5.11 | 550,441 | 5.26 | ||||||||||||||||
$7.04-$16.65 | 460,225 | 1.45 | 10.52 | 460,225 | 10.52 | ||||||||||||||||
Total
|
5,081,263 | 4.85 | $ | 4.14 | 2,223,929 | $ | 4.85 |
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
Work-in-process
|
$ | 6,439 | $ | 5,016 | ||||
Finished goods
|
6,639 | 8,302 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 13,078 | $ | 13,318 |
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | (4,226 | ) | $ | 1,148 | $ | (19,370 | ) | $ | 4,343 | ||||||
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding
|
44,537 | 37,098 | 44,525 | 37,068 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) per share - basic
|
$ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.03 | $ | (0.44 | ) | $ | 0.12 | ||||||
Shares used in computing basic net income (loss) per share
|
44,537 | 37,098 | 44,525 | 37,068 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive effect of stock options
|
- | 585 | - | 727 | ||||||||||||
Shares used in computing diluted net income (loss) per share
|
44,537 | 37,683 | 44,525 | 37,795 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) per share - diluted
|
$ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.03 | $ | (0.44 | ) | $ | 0.11 |
Fair Value Measurement as Reporting Date Using
|
||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in Active Markets
|
Significant Other
|
Significant
|
||||||||||||||
for Identical Assets or Liabilities
|
Observable Inputs
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
||||||||||||||
September 30, 2011
|
(Level 1)
|
(Level 2)
|
(Level 3)
|
|||||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Money market funds
|
$ | 61 | $ | 61 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||
Certificate of deposit
|
1,494 | 1,494 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Marketable securities
|
7,653 | - | 7,653 | - | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 9,208 | $ | 1,555 | $ | 7,653 | $ | - |
Fair Value Measurement as Reporting Date Using
|
||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in Active Markets
|
Significant Other
|
Significant
|
||||||||||||||
for Identical Assets or Liabilities
|
Observable Inputs
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010
|
(Level 1)
|
(Level 2)
|
(Level 3)
|
|||||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Money market funds
|
$ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||
Certificate of deposit
|
1,494 | 1,494 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Marketable securities
|
16,997 | - | 16,997 | - | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 18,492 | $ | 1,495 | $ | 16,997 | $ | - |
September 30, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Estimated
|
|||||||||||||
Cost
|
Gain
|
Loss
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
Certificate of deposit
|
$ | 1,494 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,494 | ||||||||
Corporate bonds and notes
|
1,686 | - | - | 1,686 | ||||||||||||
Municipal bonds
|
2,322 | 2 | - | 2,324 | ||||||||||||
US treasury and government agencies securities
|
3,639 | 4 | - | 3,643 | ||||||||||||
Total bonds, notes and equity securities
|
$ | 9,141 | $ | 6 | $ | - | $ | 9,147 | ||||||||
Less amounts classified as cash equivalents
|
(498 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total short and long-term available-for-sale investments
|
$ | 8,649 | ||||||||||||||
Contractual maturity dates for investments:
|
||||||||||||||||
Less than one year:
|
5,004 | |||||||||||||||
One to two years:
|
3,645 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 8,649 | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Estimated
|
|||||||||||||
Cost
|
Gain
|
Loss
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
Certificate of deposit
|
$ | 1,494 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,494 | ||||||||
Corporate bonds and notes
|
3,879 | 2 | (1 | ) | 3,880 | |||||||||||
Municipal bonds
|
1,988 | - | (7 | ) | 1,981 | |||||||||||
US treasury and government agencies securities
|
11,136 | 11 | (11 | ) | 11,136 | |||||||||||
Total bonds, notes and equity securities
|
$ | 18,497 | $ | 13 | $ | (19 | ) | $ | 18,491 | |||||||
Less amounts classified as cash equivalents
|
(747 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total short and long-term available-for-sale investments
|
$ | 17,744 | ||||||||||||||
Contractual maturity dates for investments:
|
||||||||||||||||
Less than one year:
|
10,398 | |||||||||||||||
One to two years:
|
7,346 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 17,744 | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 Months
|
12 months or Greater
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value
|
Unrealized Loss
|
Fair Value
|
Unrealized Loss
|
Fair Value
|
Unrealized Loss
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds and notes
|
$ | 1,620 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,620 | $ | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Municipal Bonds
|
1,877 | (7 | ) | - | - | 1,877 | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
US treasury and government agencies securities
|
3,915 | (11 | ) | - | - | 3,915 | (11 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 7,412 | $ | (19 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 7,412 | $ | (19 | ) | ||||||||||
Common
|
Cash at
|
Notes
|
Bridge
|
|||||||||||||||||
Shares of PLX
|
Closing
|
A and B
|
Note
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Purchase price
|
$ | 26,406 | $ | 887 | $ | 6,386 | $ | 1,000 | $ | 34,679 | ||||||||||
Allocated to CEO bonus
|
1,048 | 35 | 264 | - | 1,347 | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 27,454 | $ | 922 | $ | 6,650 | $ | 1,000 | $ | 36,026 | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 112 | ||
Trade receivables
|
443 | |||
Inventories
|
444 | |||
Other current assets
|
360 | |||
Property, plant and equipment
|
673 | |||
Identifiable intangible assets
|
30,500 | |||
Other assets
|
42 | |||
Trade and other payable
|
(2,919 | ) | ||
Accruals and other liabilities
|
(15,021 | ) | ||
Total indentifiable net assets
|
$ | 14,634 | ||
Goodwill
|
20,045 | |||
$ | 34,679 | |||
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2010
|
|||||||
Revenue
|
$ | 30,896 | $ | 91,412 | ||||
Net loss
|
$ | (5,996 | ) | $ | (16,505 | ) |
2011 | ||||||||||||||
Gross Carrying
|
Accumulated
|
Net
|
Amortization
|
Estimated
|
||||||||||
Value
|
Amortization
|
Value
|
Method
|
Useful Life
|
||||||||||
Existing and core technology
|
||||||||||||||
Oxford USB and Serial Connectivity
|
$ | 4,600 | $ | (4,409 | ) | $ | 191 |
Accelerated
|
3 years
|
|||||
Oxford Network Attached Storage Connectivity
|
3,800 | (2,090 | ) | 1,710 |
Accelerated
|
4 years
|
||||||||
Teranetics Network PHY
|
20,100 | (3,350 | ) | 16,750 |
Straight-line
|
6 years
|
||||||||
Trade Name
|
||||||||||||||
Oxford
|
600 | (600 | ) | - |
Straight-line
|
2 years
|
||||||||
Teranetics
|
200 | (100 | ) | 100 |
Straight-line
|
2 years
|
||||||||
Customer Relationships
|
||||||||||||||
Oxford
|
56 | (56 | ) | - |
Accelerated
|
1 year
|
||||||||
Teranetics
|
10,200 | (4,800 | ) | 5,400 |
Accelerated
|
3.5 years
|
||||||||
Totals
|
$ | 39,556 | $ | (15,405 | ) | $ | 24,151 |
4.8 years
|
||||||
Remainder of 2011
|
$ | 3,265 | ||
2012
|
6,449 | |||
2013
|
4,663 | |||
2014
|
3,912 | |||
2015
|
3,350 | |||
2016
|
2,512 | |||
Total
|
$ | 24,151 |
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Taiwan
|
$ | 8,355 | $ | 5,653 | $ | 21,666 | $ | 16,521 | ||||||||
China
|
7,920 | 8,904 | 21,750 | 27,483 | ||||||||||||
United States
|
5,192 | 5,854 | 16,355 | 15,393 | ||||||||||||
Germany
|
2,514 | 2,929 | 9,765 | 7,144 | ||||||||||||
Other Asia Pacific
|
2,989 | 2,467 | 8,429 | 8,490 | ||||||||||||
Singapore
|
3,565 | 3,657 | 10,146 | 11,600 | ||||||||||||
Europe, Middle East and Africa
|
513 | 680 | 1,689 | 1,766 | ||||||||||||
The Americas - excluding United States
|
28 | 90 | 100 | 377 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 31,076 | $ | 30,234 | $ | 89,900 | $ | 88,774 |
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||
Excelpoint Systems Pte Ltd
|
24 | % | 27 | % | 23 | % | 27 | % | ||||||||
Avnet, Inc.
|
21 | % | 26 | % | 22 | % | 21 | % | ||||||||
Answer Technology, Inc.
|
20 | % | 16 | % | 20 | % | 18 | % | ||||||||
Promate Electronics Co., Ltd
|
10 | % | * | % | * | % | 10 | % |
September 30,
|
||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
Excelpoint Systems Pte Ltd
|
31 | % | 31 | % | ||||
Answer Technology, Inc.
|
22 | % | 21 | % | ||||
Avnet, Inc.
|
16 | % | 20 | % | ||||
Promate Electronics Co., Ltd
|
12 | % | * | % | ||||
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PCI Express Revenue
|
$ | 16,263 | 52.3 | % | $ | 14,434 | 47.7 | % | $ | 47,312 | 52.6 | % | $ | 41,804 | 47.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Storage Revenue
|
$ | 4,468 | 14.4 | % | $ | 3,679 | 12.2 | % | $ | 10,597 | 11.8 | % | $ | 12,759 | 14.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Network PHY Revenue
|
$ | 1,313 | 4.2 | % | $ | - | - | $ | 3,644 | 4.1 | % | $ | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Connectivity Revenue
|
$ | 9,032 | 29.1 | % | $ | 12,121 | 40.1 | % | $ | 28,347 | 31.5 | % | $ | 34,211 | 38.5 | % |
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||
Excelpoint Systems Pte Ltd
|
24 | % | 27 | % | 23 | % | 27 | % | ||||||||
Avnet, Inc.
|
21 | % | 26 | % | 22 | % | 21 | % | ||||||||
Answer Technology, Inc.
|
20 | % | 16 | % | 20 | % | 18 | % | ||||||||
Promate Electronics Co., Ltd
|
10 | % | * | % | * | % | 10 | % |
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||
in thousands
|
||||||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
$ | 17,539 | $ | 17,927 | $ | 50,844 | $ | 51,764 | ||||||||
Gross margin
|
56.4 | % | 59.3 | % | 56.6 | % | 58.3 | % | ||||||||
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||
in thousands
|
||||||||||||||||
R&D expenses
|
$ | 11,661 | $ | 7,605 | $ | 38,095 | $ | 23,392 | ||||||||
As a percentage of revenues
|
37.5 | % | 25.2 | % | 42.4 | % | 26.4 | % | ||||||||
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||
in thousands
|
||||||||||||||||
SG&A expenses
|
$ | 6,856 | $ | 6,570 | $ | 20,659 | $ | 19,734 | ||||||||
As a percentage of revenues
|
22.1 | % | 21.7 | % | 23.0 | % | 22.2 | % | ||||||||
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||
in thousands
|
||||||||||||||||
Carve-out retention bonus expense
|
$ | 491 | $ | - | $ | 2,319 | $ | - | ||||||||
Deal costs
|
- | 510 | 88 | 510 | ||||||||||||
Severance costs
|
- | - | 501 | - | ||||||||||||
Asset impairment
|
- | - | 42 | - | ||||||||||||
Lease commitment accrual
|
208 | - | 855 | - | ||||||||||||
$ | 699 | $ | 510 | $ | 3,805 | $ | 510 | |||||||||
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||
in thousands
|
||||||||||||||||
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
|
$ | 2,445 | $ | 648 | $ | 7,333 | $ | 1,945 | ||||||||
As a percentage of revenues
|
7.9 | % | 2.1 | % | 8.2 | % | 2.2 | % | ||||||||
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||
in thousands
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest income
|
$ | 15 | $ | 50 | $ | 60 | $ | 163 | ||||||||
Interest expense
|
(60 | ) | (15 | ) | (188 | ) | (50 | ) | ||||||||
Other income (expense)
|
3 | (36 | ) | (81 | ) | (5 | ) | |||||||||
$ | (42 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (209 | ) | $ | 108 | ||||||
Payments due in
|
||||||||||||||||
Less than
|
1-3 |
More than
|
||||||||||||||
Total
|
1 Year
|
Years
|
3 Years
|
|||||||||||||
Operating leases - facilities and equipment
|
$ | 729 | $ | 299 | $ | 359 | $ | 71 | ||||||||
Capital leases - IP
|
675 | 675 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Software licenses
|
6,958 | 5,183 | 1,775 | - | ||||||||||||
Teranetics acquisition notes
|
6,917 | 5,400 | 1,517 | - | ||||||||||||
Carve-out retention bonus
|
1,997 | 1,997 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Inventory purchase commitments
|
5,662 | 5,662 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Borrowing against line of credit
|
2,000 | - | 2,000 | - | ||||||||||||
Total cash obligations
|
$ | 24,938 | $ | 19,216 | $ | 5,651 | $ | 71 |
|
Other circumstances that can affect our operating results include:
|
·
|
the timing of significant orders, order cancellations and reschedulings;
|
·
|
the loss of one or more significant customers;
|
·
|
introduction of products and technologies by our competitors;
|
·
|
the availability of production capacity at the fabrication facilities that manufacture our products;
|
·
|
our significant customers could lose market share that may affect our business;
|
·
|
integration of our product functionality into our customers’ products;
|
·
|
our ability to develop, introduce and market new products and technologies on a timely basis;
|
·
|
unexpected issues that may arise with devices in production;
|
·
|
shifts in our product mix toward lower margin products;
|
·
|
changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors or suppliers, including decreases in unit average selling prices of our products;
|
·
|
the availability and cost of materials to our suppliers;
|
·
|
general macroeconomic conditions; and
|
·
|
political climate.
|
·
|
the reduction, delay or cancellation of orders from one or more of our significant customers;
|
·
|
the selection of competing products or in-house design by one or more of our current customers;
|
·
|
the loss of one or more of our current customers; or
|
·
|
a failure of one or more of our current customers to pay our invoices.
|
·
|
potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities;
|
·
|
large acquisition-related write-offs;
|
·
|
potential patent and trademark infringement claims against the acquired company;
|
·
|
the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities or amortization expenses related to other intangible assets;
|
·
|
difficulties in the assimilation of operations, personnel, technologies, products and the information systems of the acquired companies;
|
·
|
the incurrence of additional operating losses and expenses of potential companies we may acquire;
|
·
|
possible delay or failure to achieve expected synergies;
|
·
|
diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns;
|
·
|
risks of entering geographic and business markets in which we have limited or no prior experience; and
|
·
|
potential loss of key employees.
|
·
|
difficulties in managing distributors;
|
·
|
difficulties in staffing and managing foreign subsidiary and branch operations;
|
·
|
political and economic instability;
|
·
|
foreign currency exchange fluctuations;
|
·
|
difficulties in accounts receivable collections;
|
·
|
potentially adverse tax consequences;
|
·
|
timing and availability of export licenses;
|
·
|
changes in regulatory requirements, tariffs and other barriers;
|
·
|
difficulties in obtaining governmental approvals for telecommunications and other products; and
|
·
|
the burden of complying with complex foreign laws and treaties.
|
Exhibit Number
|
Description
|
|
10.1
|
Loan and Security Agreement dated September 30, 2011 by and among PLX Technology, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank.
|
|
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32.2
|
Certification of Chief Finanical Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
101.INS*
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
101.SCH*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
101.CAL*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
101.LAB*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
101.PRE*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
Exhibit Number
|
Description
|
|
10.1
|
Loan and Security Agreement dated September 30, 2011 by and among PLX Technology, Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank.
|
|
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32.2
|
Certification of Chief Finanical Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
101.INS*
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
101.SCH*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
101.CAL*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
101.LAB*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
101.PRE*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
Quarter End
|
Minimum Consolidated Quick Ratio
|
September 30, 2011
|
1.00 to 1.00
|
December 31, 2011 and each fiscal quarter end thereafter
|
1.25 to 1.00
|
Quarter End
|
Minimum Consolidated EBITDA
|
December 31, 2011
|
($100,000)
|
March 31, 2012
|
$2,400,000
|
June 30, 2012
|
$1
|
September 30, 2012
|
$900,000
|
December 31, 2012
|
$2,000,000
|
March 31, 2013 and each fiscal quarter end thereafter
|
$2,500,000
|
If to Borrower:
|
PLX Technology, Inc.
|
|
870 W. Maude Avenue
|
Sunnyvale, CA 94085
|
|
Attn: Arthur O. Whipple
|
|
Fax: (408) 774-2169
|
|
Email: awhipple@plxtech.com
|
If to Bank:
|
Silicon Valley Bank
|
|
2400 Hanover St.
|
Palo Alto, CA 94304
|
|
Attn: Ray Aguilar
|
|
Fax: (650) 320-0016
|
|
Email: raguilar@svb.com
|
By: |
/s/ Arthur O. Whipple
|
|
Name: | Arthur O. Whipple | |
Title: | CFO |
By: |
/s/ Ray Aguilar
|
|
Name: | Ray Aguilar | |
Title: | RM |
1.
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PLX Technology, Inc.;
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
4.
|
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
|
|
a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
|
b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
|
5.
|
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
|
a)
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
|
|
b)
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
|
1.
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PLX Technology, Inc.;
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
4.
|
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
|
|
a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
|
b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
|
5.
|
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
|
a)
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
|
|
b)
|
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
|
1. |
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|
2. |
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.
|
1. |
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|
2. |
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.
|
Document And Entity Information | 9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |
Document And Entity Information [Abstract] | |
Document Type | 10-Q |
Amendment Flag | false |
Document Period End Date | Sep. 30, 2011 |
Document Fiscal Period Focus | Q3 |
Document Fiscal Year Focus | 2011 |
Entity Registrant Name | PLX TECHNOLOGY INC |
Entity Central Index Key | 0000850579 |
Current Fiscal Year End Date | --12-31 |
Entity Filer Category | Accelerated Filer |
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding | 44,550,936 |
"+ text.join( "
\n" ) +"
" + text[p] + "
\n"; } } }else{ formatted = '' + raw + '
'; } html = ''+ "\n"+''+ "\n"+''+ "\n"+' formatted: '+ ( this.Default == 'raw' ? 'as Filed' : 'with Text Wrapped' ) +''+ "\n"+' | '+ "\n"+'
'+ "\n"+' | '+ "\n"+' '+ "\n"+'
'+ "\n"+' | '+ "\n"+' '+ "\n"+'
Goodwill And Intangibles | 9 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill And Intangibles [Abstract] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill And Intangibles | 8. Goodwill and Intangibles
The acquisition of Teranetics, as discussed in Note 7 above, and the 2009 acquisition Oxford included the acquisition of $30.5 million and $9.1 million, respectively, of identifiable intangible assets. All of these intangibles are subject to amortization. There is no estimated residual value on any of the intangible assets.
The following table summarizes the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization for each major intangible class and the weighted average amortization period, in total and by major intangible asset class, as of September 30, 2011 (in thousands):
The amortization expense for the three and nine months periods ended September 30, 2011 was $2.4 million and $7.3 million respectively. For the same periods in 2010 the amortization expense was $0.6 million and $1.9 million, respectively. As of the result of the divestiture of the UK design team on October 21, 2011, the Company reviewed the useful life of its storage acquired intangibles and has determined a change in the assets useful life and method of amortization was required. The Company reduced the useful life of the intangible from five years to four years and changed the amortization method from straight-line to accelerated. The change and amortization acceleration will be reflected in the fourth quarter of 2011, the period of change. Estimated future amortization expense is as follows (in thousands):
|
Income Taxes | 9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |
Income Taxes [Abstract] | |
Income Taxes | 13. Income Taxes
A provision for income tax of $0.1 million has been recorded for the nine month period ended September 30, 2011, compared to a provision of $1.9 million for the same period in 2010. Income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 is a result of applying the estimated annual effective tax rate to cumulative profit before taxes adjusted for certain discrete items which are fully recognized in the period they occur and miscellaneous state income taxes. The Company excluded from its calculation of the effective tax rate losses in the US and certain foreign jurisdiction since it cannot benefit those losses. For the same period in 2010, the income tax provision was the result of applying the estimated annual effective tax rate to cumulative profit before taxes adjusted for certain discrete items.
The Company has determined that negative evidence supports the need for a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets at this time. The Company will maintain a full valuation allowance until sufficient positive evidence exists to support a reversal of the valuation allowance.
As of September 30, 2011, the Company had unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $4.0 million of which none, if recognized, would result in a reduction of the Company's effective tax rate. There were no material changes in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Future changes in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits will have no impact on the effective tax rate as they are subject to a full valuation allowance. The Company does not believe the amount of its unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change within the next twelve months.
The Company is subject to taxation in the United States and various states and foreign jurisdictions. The tax years 1997 through 2010 remain open to examination by the federal and most state tax authorities due to certain acquired net operating loss and overall credit carryforward positions. |
Net Income (Loss) Per Share | 9 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) Per Share [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) Per Share | 4. Net Income (Loss) Per Share
The Company uses the treasury stock method to calculate the weighted average shares used in the diluted earnings per share. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (in thousands, except per share data):
As the Company incurred a net loss for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011, the effect of dilutive securities, totaling 5.1 million shares has been excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share, as its impact would be anti-dilutive. Dilutive securities are comprised of options to purchase common stock. Weighted average employee stock options to purchase approximately 2.0 million and 1.8 million for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010, respectively, were outstanding, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise price of stock options was greater than the average share price of the Company's stock and, therefore, the effect would have been anti-dilutive. |
Segments Of An Enterprise And Related Information | 9 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segments Of An Enterprise And Related Information [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segments Of An Enterprise And Related Information | 10. Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information
The Company has one operating segment, the sale of semiconductor devices. The Chief Executive Officer has been identified as the Chief Operating Decision Maker ("CODM") because he has final authority over resource allocation decisions and performance assessment. The CODM does not receive discrete financial information about individual components of the Company's business. The majority of the Company's assets are located in the United States.
Revenues by geographic region based on customer location were as follows (in thousands):
There were no direct end customers that accounted for more than 10% of net revenues. Sales to the following distributors accounted for 10% or more of net revenues:
* Less than 10%
The following distributors accounted for 10% or more of the total accounts receivable balance:
* Less than 10% |
Line Of Credit | 9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |
Line Of Credit [Abstract] | |
Line Of Credit | 11. Line of Credit
On September 30, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with Silicon Valley Bank to establish a two-year $10 million revolving loan facility. The facility provides for revolving advances based on a borrowing-base formula tied to the Company's receivables and also provides for month-end and fiscal quarter-end advances beyond the borrowing-base formula subject to certain limitations and requirements. Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at rates equal to the prime rate announced from time to time in The Wall Street Journal. As of September 30, 2011 the prime rate was 3.25%. The facility also provides for commitment, unused facility and letter-of-credit fees. The facility is secured by liens on the Company's personal property assets except for intellectual property, which is subject to a negative pledge against encumbrance. On September 30, 2011, the Company borrowed $2.0 million against the facility.
The facility is subject to certain financial covenants. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants associated with this facility as of September 30, 2011. |
Acquisition And Restructuring Costs | 9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |
Acquisition And Restructuring Costs [Abstract] | |
Acquisition And Restructuring Costs | 9. Acquisition and Restructuring Costs
Acquisition Costs
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company recorded $0.5 million and $2.3 million, respectively of carve-out retention bonus expense associated with the acquisition of Teranetics. See Note 7 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company also incurred $88,000 of third party acquisition related costs, primarily for outside legal and accounting costs. These expenses were included in operating expenses under acquisition and restructuring related costs in the Company's Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011.
Severance
In the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company recorded approximately $0.5 million of severance and benefit related costs, included in acquisition and restructuring related costs in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations, related to the termination of 14 employees worldwide as a result of the downsizing and refocus of the operations in the UK and cost control efforts as a result of the Teranetics acquisition. As of June 30, 2011, all of the $0.5 million severance and benefit related costs were paid.
Lease Terminations
In October 2010, associated with the acquisition of Teranetics, the Company assumed a building lease in San Jose, California which was vacated in March 2011. Given current lease rates and the available space in the area when the property was vacated, the Company recorded a $0.4 million liability, included in other accrued expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, for the estimated fair value of the future lease costs through June 2012, reduced by estimated sublease rental and adjusted for deferred rent. As of September 30, 2011, the Company was not able to sublease the property and as a result recoded the remaining liability of $0.2 million. The total adjusted cash payment was not materially different from the fair value. The lease accrual charge of $0.6 million was recorded in acquisition and restructuring related costs in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. The Company expects the lease liability to be fully paid by June 2012.
In connection with the downsizing of UK operations, the Company vacated the first floor of its building as of March 2011 and terminated the lease for this space. In March 2011, the Company recorded a $0.2 million liability, included in other accrued expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, for future lease costs and early termination fees. The lease accrual charge of $0.2 million was recorded in acquisition and restructuring related costs in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. The Company expects the lease liability to be fully paid by December 2011. |
Share-Based Compensation | 9 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-Based Compensation [Abstract] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-Based Compensation | 2. Share-Based Compensation
Stock Option Plans
In May 2008, the Company's stockholders approved the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan ("2008 Plan"). The 2008 Plan was then amended by the Company's stockholders in May 2010 to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan by 1,500,000 shares. In May 2011, the 2008 Plan was amended again by the Company's stockholders to increase the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan by 2,300,000 shares. Under the 2008 Plan, there is currently authorized for issuance and available for awards an aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock, plus up to an additional 2,407,369 shares that otherwise would have reverted to the share reserve of the Company's prior incentive plan, the Company's 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, subject to an overall, aggregate share reserve limit of 7,407,369 shares. Awards under the 2008 Plan may include stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, performance awards, restricted stock units and other awards, provided that with respect to full value awards, such as restricted stock or restricted stock units, no more than 300,000 shares may be issued in the form of full value awards during the term of the 2008 Plan. Awards under the 2008 Plan may be made to the Company's officers and other employees, its board members and consultants that it hires. The 2008 Plan has a term of ten years.
Share-Based Compensation Expense The fair value of share-based awards is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which requires subjective assumptions, including future stock price volatility and expected time to exercise, which greatly affect the calculated values.
The weighted-average fair value of share-based compensation to employees is based on the multiple option valuation approach. Forfeitures are estimated and it is assumed no dividends will be declared. The estimated fair value of share-based compensation awards to employees is amortized using the straight-line method over the vesting period of the options. The weighted-average fair value calculations are based on the following weighted average assumptions:
Risk-Free Interest Rate: The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the option. Expected Life: The Company's expected life represents the weighted-average period that the Company's stock options are expected to be outstanding. The expected life is based on the observed and expected time to post-vesting exercise of options by employees. The Company uses historical exercise patterns of previously granted options in relation to stock price movements to derive an employee behavioral pattern used to forecast expected exercise patterns.
Expected Volatility: The Company believes that historical volatility best represents expected volatility due to the lack of market data consistently available to calculate implied volatility. The historical volatility is based on the weekly closing prices of its common stock over a period equal to the expected term of the option and is a strong indicator of the expected future volatility.
These factors could change in the future, which would affect the share-based compensation expense in future periods.
As share-based compensation expense recognized in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The Company's estimated forfeiture rate at September 30, 2011 and 2010 of 26% was based on historical experience.
The following table shows total share-based compensation and employee stock ownership plan expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, included in the respective line items of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands):
A summary of option activity under the Company's stock equity plans during the first three quarters of 2011 is as follows:
The Black-Scholes weighted average fair values of options granted during the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were $1.57 and $1.88, respectively. The Black-Scholes weighted average fair values of options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were $1.76 and $2.40, respectively.
The following table summarizes ranges of outstanding and exercisable options as of September 30, 2011:
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $20,000 and $73,000, respectively. For the same periods in 2010, the total intrinsic value of options exercised was $14,000 and $0.3 million, respectively. The fair value of options vested during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 was approximately $0.5 million and $2.1 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2011, total unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested stock options including estimated forfeitures was $2.1 million which is expected to be recognized as expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.3 years. |
Fair Value Measurements | 9 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements | 5. Fair Value Measurements
The accounting guidance for fair value measurements provided a framework for measuring fair value and expands related disclosures. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received for an asset or the exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The guidance also established a hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs, when available. The guidance requires fair value measurement be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
Level 1: Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. The fair value of available-for-sale securities included in the level 1 category is based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active market.
Level 2: Valuations based on observable inputs (other than Level 1 prices), such as quoted prices for similar assets at the measurement date; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly. The fair value of available-for-sale securities included in the Level 2 category is based upon quoted prices in markets that are not active and incorporate available trade, bid and other market information. Level 3: Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and involve management judgment and the reporting entity's own assumptions about market participants and pricing.
The fair value of financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis is as follows (in thousands):
|
Investments | 9 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investments [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investments | 6. Investments
As of September 30, 2011, the Company's securities consisted of debt securities and were designated as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value, based on quoted market prices or prices quoted in markets that are not active, with unrealized gains and losses reported in a separate component of stockholders' equity. The amortized cost of debt securities is adjusted for the amortization of premiums and the accretion of discounts to maturity, both of which are included in interest income. Realized gains and losses are recorded on the specific identification method.
The fair value of available-for-sale investments is as follows (in thousands):
The following tables show the gross unrealized losses and fair value for investments in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2010, aggregated by investment category and the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position (in thousands):
As of September 30, 2011, the Company had an aggregate unrealized loss of less than $1,000. The Company reviews its available for sale investments for impairment at the end of each period. Investments in debt securities, which make up the majority of the Company's investments, are considered impaired when the fair value of the debt security is below its amortized cost. If an impairment exists and the Company determines it has intent to sell the debt security or if it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, an other-than-temporary impairment loss is recognized in earnings to write the debt security down to its fair value. However, even if the Company does not expect to sell the debt security, it must evaluate expected cash flows to be received and determine if a credit loss exists. In the event of a credit loss, only the amount of impairment associated with the credit loss is recognized in earnings. Amounts relating to factors other than credit losses are recognized in other comprehensive income (loss). The Company did not record any other-than-temporary write-downs in the accompanying financial statements. |
Subsequent Events | 9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |
Subsequent Events [Abstract] | |
Subsequent Events | 14. Subsequent Events
On October 5, 2011 the Company signed a definitive agreement with OCZ Technology Group, whereby OCZ will acquire the Company's UK design team and related assets. In addition, the Company entered into a license agreement with OCZ for the license of its consumer storage technology. The deal closed on October 21, 2011. The Company will continue to offer and support its current consumer storage products.
As of September 30, 2011, the assets transferred in this divestiture of $0.5 million were classified as held for use as it did not meet all the criteria to be classified as held for sale under the accounting guidance related to property, plant and equipment. The Company also reviewed the useful life of its storage acquired intangibles and has determined a change in the assets useful life was required. The Company reduced the useful life of the intangible from five years to four years. The change and amortization acceleration will be reflected in the fourth quarter of 2011, the period of change. |
Acquisition Of Teranetics Inc. | 9 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition Of Teranetics Inc. [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition Of Teranetics Inc. | 7. Acquisition of Teranetics Inc.
On October 1, 2010, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Teranetics, Inc. (Teranetics), a privately held fabless provider of high performance mixed-signal semiconductors.
Teranetics' corporate headquarters were located in San Jose, California. Founded in 2003, Teranetics provides state-of-the-art silicon solutions that enable 10 Gigabit per second rates over widely installed low-cost CAT6 and CAT6a cabling. Teranetics' products allow data centers and enterprise networks to increase scalability and improve throughput while dramatically lowering the cost of ownership for 10 Gigabit per second links.
The Company believes that this acquisition provides another leadership position into its product portfolio. There are major synergies in the design process, technology, sales, marketing, and supply chains. The company can leverage its technology and IP with PCI Express and 10 Gigabit Ethernet to bring out new architectures for the data centers. Teranetics' customers included Arista Networks, Cisco, Extreme Networks and Intel.
The total consideration paid for the transaction was $34.7 million, consisting of 7.4 million shares valued at $3.71 per share, the closing price on October 1, 2010, the date the transaction was closed, cash of $1.0 million and assessed fair value of two promissory notes in aggregate amount of approximately $6.7 million, less $1.3 million allocated to Teranetics' chief executive officer's bonus.
The following table summarizes the consideration paid for Teranetics (in thousands):
As a part of the merger agreement, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Teranetics in exchange for 7.4 million shares of common stock of PLX, cash of approximately $1.0 million and two promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $6.9 million. One note is for the principal amount of approximately $1.5 million and is due 3 years after the closing of the Merger, and the other note is for the principal amount of $5.4 million and is due 12 months after the closing of the Merger (this $5.4 million note was delivered into an escrow fund that may be used to satisfy indemnity obligations owed to PLX). The Company has delayed payment of the $5.4 million note as a result of indemnity claims it has communicated to the Teranetics stockholders representative. The parties are discussing these claims, and the Company cannot currently predict the outcome of these discussions. The stated interest rate on the promissory notes is 0.46%. In accordance with the business combinations guidance, the promissory notes were fair valued based on market interest rates and the assessed fair value of the promissory notes was approximately $6.7 million. Under a prior employment agreement between Teranetics and its chief executive officer, the chief executive officer was entitled to receive a bonus for prior services rendered based on the merger consideration amount. The agreement provided that the chief executive officer was to receive his distribution in the same manner and timing in which the shareholders of Teranetics receive their purchase consideration and did not require continuing employment after the merger. The chief executive officer's bonus of approximately $1.3 million is included in the stock, cash and promissory notes issued.
The Company extended a bridge loan to Teranetics in the amount of $1.0 million during negotiations to support the working capital needs of Teranetics and in contemplation of the Merger. Upon closing of the Merger, the $1.0 million bridge note was also considered part of the merger consideration provided as a component of the purchase price.
In addition to consideration transferred to former stockholders of Teranetics, PLX made payments at closing in the amount of $13.2 million to repay debt and other assumed liabilities. The payments consisted of $11.2 million for convertible promissory note and line of credit debt and $2.0 million of payables for legal and investment banking services performed for Teranetics prior to closing and in connection with the merger.
The Company agreed to pay the former Teranetics employees a bonus pool under the Teranetics Employee Retention Plan which required continued employment in order to be earned by individual employees. Under the final plan, a total of $5.3 million was carved out of the consideration as a bonus pool to be paid out over a period of time to participants who were employees of Teranetics at the time of a change in control, provided they fulfilled certain future service requirements for the combined entity. As of September 30, 2011, the Company has paid $3.3 million of the retention bonus. The Company also accrued the remaining $2.0 million commitment based on the required service period which ended on October 1, 2011. If any individual left prior to the completion of the required service period, any amounts forfeited by the individual was added back to the bonus pool and re-allocated to the remaining participants. Approximately $2.3 million of retention bonus expense was recorded in 2011 and included in acquisition and restructuring related costs in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed (in thousands):
The fair value of assets acquired includes trade receivables of $0.4 million. The gross amount due under sales related contracts was $0.4 million, of which none was expected to be uncollectible. The identified intangible assets consist of core technology, trade name and customer relationships. The valuation of the acquired intangibles is classified as a level 3 measurement under the fair value measurement guidance, because the valuation was based on significant unobservable inputs and involved management judgment and assumptions about market participants and pricing. In determining fair value of the acquired intangible assets, we determined the appropriate unit of measure, the exit market and the highest and best use for the assets. The fair value was estimated using an incremental income approach.
The goodwill arising from the acquisition is largely attributable to the synergies expected to be realized after the Company's acquisition and integration of Teranetics. The Company only has one operating segment, semiconductor products, so all of the goodwill was assigned to the one segment. Goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Teranetics contributed revenues and gross profit of $1.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively, to the Company for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and $3.6 million and $1.6 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The Company integrated Teranetics operations shortly after acquisition and was fully integrated as of December 31, 2010 and it is therefore not practicable to identify earnings associated with Teranetics' contribution.
The following unaudited pro forma summary presents consolidated information of the Company as if the business combination occurred at the beginning of 2009 (in thousands):
The unaudited pro forma amounts have been calculated after applying the Company's accounting policies and adjusting the results of Teranetics to reflect the acquisition carve-out retention bonus and amortization that would have been recorded assuming the acquisition occurred on January 1, 2009. |
Basis Of Presentation | 9 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basis Of Presentation [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basis Of Presentation | 1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of PLX Technology, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, "PLX" or the "Company") as of September 30, 2011 and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) that management considers necessary for a fair presentation of the Company's financial position, operating results and cash flows for the interim periods presented. Operating results and cash flows for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire year.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all of the accounts of the Company and those of its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
This financial data should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect various accounts, including but not limited to goodwill, acquired intangible assets, long-lived assets, income taxes, inventories, revenue recognition and related sales reserves, allowance for doubtful accounts, share-based compensation and warranty reserves as reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates and such differences may be material to the financial statements.
Comprehensive Net Income (Loss)
The Company's comprehensive net income (loss) for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was as follows (in thousands):
Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery or customer acceptance, where applicable, has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured.
Revenue from product sales to direct customers and distributors is recognized upon shipment and transfer of risk of loss, if the Company believes collection is reasonably assured and all other revenue recognition criteria are met. The Company assesses the probability of collection based on a number of factors, including past transaction history and the customer's creditworthiness. At the end of each reporting period, the sufficiency of allowances for doubtful accounts is assessed based on the age of the receivable and the individual customer's creditworthiness.
The Company offers pricing protection to two distributors whereby the Company supports the distributor's resale product margin on certain products held in the distributor's inventory. The Company analyzes current requests for credit in process, also known as ship and debits, and inventory at the distributor to determine the ending sales reserve required for this program. The Company also offers stock rotation rights to three distributors such that they can return up to a total of 5% of products purchased every six months in exchange for other PLX products of equal value. The Company analyzes inventory at distributors, current stock rotation requests and past experience to determine the ending sales reserve required for this program. Reserves are reduced directly from revenue and recorded as a reduction to accounts receivable. The Company evaluates revenue agreements under the accounting guidance for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. A multiple-deliverable arrangement is separated into more than one unit of accounting if (a) the delivered item(s) has value to the customer on a stand-alone basis, (b) the arrangement includes a general right of return relative to the delivered item(s) and (c) delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially in the control of the Company. If these criteria are not met, the arrangement is accounted for as a single unit of accounting which would result in revenue being recognized ratably over the contract term or being deferred until the earlier of when such criteria are met or when the last undelivered element is delivered. If these criteria are met for each, the arrangement consideration is allocated to the separate units of accounting based on each unit's relative selling price. The selling price for each element is based upon the following selling price hierarchy: vendor-specific objective evidence ("VSOE") if available, third party evidence ("TPE") if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price if neither VSOE nor TPE is available.
On occasion, the Company enters into development service arrangements in which customer payments are tied to achievements of specific milestones. The Company has elected to use the milestone method of revenue recognition for development service agreements upon the achievement of substantive milestones. When determining if a milestone is substantive, the Company assesses whether the milestone consideration (a) is commensurate with the Company's performance to achieve the milestone or the enhancement of the value of the delivered item as a result of the outcome from the Company's performance, (b) relates solely to past performance and (c) is reasonable relative to all deliverables and payments terms within the arrangement.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued a standard which revised the presentation of other comprehensive income ("OCI"). The new guidance requires entities to present net income and OCI in either a single continuous statement or in separate consecutive statements. The guidance does not change the components of net income or OCI, when OCI should be reclassified to net income, or the earnings per share calculation. This accounting guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Although adopting the guidance will not impact the Company's accounting for comprehensive income, it will affect the Company's presentation of components of comprehensive income by eliminating its practice of showing these items within the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity.
In September 2011, the FASB updated the guidance related to testing goodwill for impairment. This guidance simplifies how registrants test goodwill for impairment and permits registrants to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test included in U.S. GAAP. A registrant would not be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the registrant determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. This accounting guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements. |
Inventories | 9 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inventories [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inventories | 3. Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market (net realizable value). Inventories were as follows (in thousands):
The Company evaluates the need for potential inventory provisions by considering a combination of factors including the life of the product, sales history, obsolescence and sales forecasts. |
Contingencies | 9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Sep. 30, 2011 | |
Contingencies [Abstract] | |
Contingencies | 12. Contingencies
To date, Internet Machines LLC ("Internet Machines") has filed three separate lawsuits against the Company. The first suit was filed on February 2, 2010, which has been served on PLX, entitled Internet Machines LLC v. Alienware Corporation, et al., in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division. This first suit alleges infringement by PLX and the other defendants in the lawsuit of two patents held by Internet Machines. The complaint in the lawsuit seeks unspecified compensatory damages, treble damages and attorneys' fees, as well as injunctive relief against further infringement of Internet Machines's patents. On May 14, 2010, the Company filed its answer to the live complaint and asserted counterclaims, seeking declaratory judgments of non-infringement and invalidity of the patents-in-suit. On December 6, 2010, the Court held a case-management conference and subsequently entered a scheduling order in this matter, setting trial for February 2012.
Internet Machines's second lawsuit, which has also been served on PLX, was filed on October 17, 2010, again in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division. This suit, entitled Internet Machines LLC v. ASUS Computer International, et al., alleges infringement by PLX of another patent held by Internet Machines. The complaint also asserts infringement claims against a separate group of defendants not named in the first Internet Machines lawsuit, and accuses those defendants of infringing the two patents asserted against PLX in the first suit, as well as the additional patent listed in this second lawsuit. The complaint in the lawsuit seeks unspecified compensatory damages, treble damages and attorneys' fees, as well as injunctive relief against further infringement of Internet Machines's patents.
On December 28, 2010, the Company filed its answer to the live complaint in the second lawsuit and asserted counterclaims, seeking declaratory judgments of non-infringement and invalidity of the patents-in-suit. The Court recently issued a scheduling order, and the Court has set a trial date for this lawsuit of June 4, 2012. Because this lawsuit accuses PLX of infringing a separate patent not listed in the first suit, and because this suit involves additional parties not named as defendants in the first lawsuit, this trial date is separate from the February 2012 trial mentioned above.
On May 17, 2011, Internet Machines filed a third lawsuit entitled Internet Machines LLC v. Avnet, Inc., et al., again in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division. The third lawsuit has been served on PLX and alleges that PLX infringes a fourth patent held by Internet Machines. This lawsuit also accuses a new group of defendants of infringing each of Internet Machines's patents at issue in the first two lawsuits filed, as well as the fourth patent asserted against PLX in this third suit. The complaint in the lawsuit seeks unspecified compensatory damages, treble damages and attorneys' fees, as well as injunctive relief against further infringement of Internet Machines's patents. On September 27, 2011,the Company filed its answer to the live complaint and asserted counterclaims, seeking declaratory judgments of non-infringement and invalidity of the patents-in-suit. All parties have appeared, but the Court has not set this matter for a scheduling conference.
On March 25, 2011, a related entity, Internet Machines MC LLC, filed a lawsuit against the Company, entitled Internet Machines MC LLC v. PLX Technology, Inc., et al., in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division. Internet Machines MC LLC, however, did not serve the initial complaint on PLX. Instead, on August 26, 2011, Internet Machines MC LLC filed a first amended complaint, which has now been served on PLX, alleging infringement by PLX and the other defendants in the lawsuit of one patent held by Internet Machines MC LLC. The Company currently has a deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by Friday, November 11, 2011.
While it is not possible to determine the ultimate outcome of the above mentioned litigation, which involves various related cases, the Company believes that it has meritorious defenses with respect to the claims asserted against it and intends to vigorously defend our position. The Company is unable to estimate a range of possible loss and believes that any ultimate liability in this litigation will not have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations. |
M+JHK-L#-(#\!"J3Z!A7#+51O;*$Z%]4?(="0L3";3GU&_713+CUY`^S,ZJSG
M560O.`6<1&GM&7Z/LU(V\/DVE3EDC#M0H'%5@$A4NO.I1)C8C3S=I[CQ8TJ'
M&W7R"^_1+M>H+K@SA9N$=HM.#.$)GH,"33-?.`M#@!Z*4=6<9CH]N=XSNU[X
M@X(>=X&MO?G;:B6N`*:H>`HM@Q@1GVKH:Z*.M$X/?X***P:SH4="?E6XS,\C
M_+8L/,0=SJSN#=OS`=+.LGKL.-&X!0:D^9+BD6K/5"4#*&;J\NQ);65*[<0H
M`JA]'IO]M/FLP.^1/J:)<"IUETJY$U%;,0WEK;0N"SD;LM24F)VQBO
MX?W\R`U5(2TE4]",L8.ZL-OZC54ML3E?8`9G@@>G+%13JA6QL`O[>S&],IHA
M7L"YW,X-H0][]Q5?9YQ)W;6310YIV>!W%H=TO5JJ6C>N=5W$>%%`]V:QCZS+
M^:$E_P4O(EQ_ML'Y0B]%!TUQ94-8D08"UG1=Y300JDZA3%9^=`52Q1)K\4*M
MZK1%810D*S8.)MB3C\4E7?1_56/X>0DRD`&N*N*K"&QP:)+9P(O@NM[1,-F4
M3M&O.*7J9(2B8E&DOR,&UQS=V=$V6-EI"X_ZFS@]B+1Y15)4VPFX.L[4%0FX
M%L5+YX4SV:]^,!0.@@:\&T#.HO#FHEB7PAJ\`YXB/'FLS@6P5F7]5`T_8"<0
M`UW&<_'S/1F(C<0J'_'ACB6#`>XK1RE=NZKNF8!`::#B3)E.U7YJX
MGK'3KHG;)N0$XKKZ*@AB29*+,E#)&"P9(V6(3EB&J70HRER1J;X2U5?:4I6F
M4XG[AE1?B33Y,C3Y>.J8\BIP!]\`%0N]OB/KWI/1ODM(_<)+\)V>@8L!AP"?BV0_^4C_0W\)Q
M4C]%SU%\!4<*W,5`VWQ\3(DMOV&_+K[K2%@]AL#L`(,R]*^T0P;>6BHP"X0M
MP*T:J#G!C0.&(!2-W57QU0DS?S7ES@!=X3#@GAR""\B9&Z\]L\3OA-]YMC/E
M+HXV\67(^.`)?#EP$/U(HN[\I3:.<5:5YP$?6HT'@2/ZJGT1/J/[%W]QRH/0
MP?%0:KZ>(B5)-@!AW#!\!'.YP[KI,R$Q_>#(L9+QV`$/%=SW&7L>._88V`='
M`R-?(`)&0?*!K0D'KQZ>OIH$/6*,1OM2!$^8R0":P:&&2/IYC-[I$W=#O3
M["S1,Y\L6QE0L$JCG*Q'KS9ZN=>=^;>]-#WW7]9U0.'5'8P/S(#V#=_^'R
M+!H%Q>?-=Q(*;!/XALX/CR
M\+U/71*"]RG@?2=1V9=N>2O5U4C2$&/@I7L2=%6#"3YQ)$CZ28"XPD@7F/BF
M?M-F0)F+SO`SP$Y/Y`P=A50V%JXN3!$A`B5H.HPP`+)"-A$BA$?@JAGMP`'0
M.ASQT=\XB.2N``<2/$%-IJYI@24Q1I$SP%H6F1HY?6%::7#W26!\6*5FUV>[OWOWT>'#!X:P)1&?
M'\8!1Z@)-J*.?I7@#K0H'S"5E1[ST*@BA'$FO7@:(D=VFC=:L
M!!-JN>:-`&ZCY-Y@XBT]H%>