New Accounting Pronouncements	9 Months Ended
New Accounting Pronouncements	Sep. 30, 2011
New Accounting Pronouncements [Abstract]
New Accounting Pronouncements	2. New Accounting Pronouncements In October 2009, the FASB issued amendments to the accounting and disclosure for revenue recognition. These amendments, effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, modify the criteria for recognizing revenue in multiple element arrangements and the scope of what constitutes a non-software deliverable. The guidance relates to the determination of when the individual deliverables included in a multiple-element arrangement may be treated as separate units of accounting and modifies the manner in which the transaction consideration is allocated across the individual deliverables. Also, the guidance expands the disclosure requirements for revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. This guidance removes tangible products from the scope of the software revenue guidance if the products contain both software and non-software components that function together to deliver a product’s essential functionality and provides guidance on determining whether software deliverables in an arrangement that includes a tangible product are within the scope of the software revenue guidance. The guidance must be applied as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2010, and may be applied retrospectively for all periods presented or prospectively to arrangements entered into or materially modified after the adoption date. Effective January 1, 2011 the Company adopted on a prospective basis for all new or materially modified arrangements entered into on or after January 1, 2011, the new accounting guidance for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements and the new guidance related to the scope of existing software revenue recognition guidance. The guidance does not generally change the units of accounting for the Company’s revenue transactions. Most of the Company’s products and services qualify as separate units of accounting. The new guidance changes the level of evidence of stand-alone selling price required to separate deliverables in a multiple deliverable revenue arrangement by allowing a company to make its best estimate of the selling price of deliverables when more objective evidence of selling price is not available and eliminates the use of the residual method. The guidance applies to multiple deliverable revenue arrangements that are not accounted for under other accounting pronouncements and retains the use of vendor specific objective evidence of selling price if available and third-party evidence of selling price, when vendor specific objective evidence is unavailable. Under the new guidance, the Company uses the margin approach to determine the best estimate of selling price. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts . ASU 2010-28 addresses how to apply Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test when a reporting unit has a zero or negative carrying amount. ASU 2010-28 requires for those reporting units with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform Step 2 of the impairment test if qualitative factors indicate that it is more likely than not that goodwill impairment exists. ASU 2010-28 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations. ASU 2010-29 requires public entities to disclose certain pro forma information about the revenue and earnings of the combined entity within the notes to the financial statements when a material business combination occurs. The pro forma revenue and earnings of the combined entity must be presented as though the business combination had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. ASU 2010-29 also requires that this disclosure include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the pro forma revenue and earnings. This adoption did not affect our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as we did not deem our August 15, 2011 acquisition of Information Systems Consulting Group, Inc (“InSysCo”) to be material to our financial statements. In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income which changes the manner in which comprehensive income is presented in the financial statements. The guidance in ASU 2011-05 removes the current option to report other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and its components in the statement of changes in equity and requires entities to report this information in one of two options. The first option is to present this information in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income starting with the components of net income and total net income followed by the components of OCI, total OCI, and total comprehensive income. The second option is to report two consecutive statements; the first statement would report the components of net income and total net income in a statement of income followed by a statement of OCI that includes the components of OCI, total OCI and total comprehensive income. The statement of OCI would begin with net income. The ASU does not change what is required to be reported in other comprehensive income or impact the computation of earnings per share. ASU 2011-05 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011 with the application of the ASU applied retrospectively for all periods presented in the financial statements. The Company has no items of other comprehensive income in any period presented. Therefore, net income as presented in the Company’s Statement of Operations equals comprehensive income. In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08, or ASU 2011-08, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment, to allow entities to use a qualitative approach to test goodwill for impairment. ASU 2011-08 permits an entity to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If it is concluded that this is the case, it is necessary to perform the currently prescribed two-step goodwill impairment test. Otherwise, the two-step goodwill impairment test is not required. ASU 2011-08 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption of this update is permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

The entire disclosure for reporting accounting changes and error corrections. It includes the conveyance of information necessary for a user of the Company's financial information to understand all aspects and required disclosure information concerning all changes and error corrections reported in the Company's financial statements for the period.