XML 102 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Impairment and Other Charges
12 Months Ended
Jan. 28, 2012
Impairment and Other Charges

3.  Impairment and Other Charges

     
  2011   2010   2009
     (in millions)
Impairment of intangible assets   $   5     $   10     $   —  
Impairment of assets                 36  
Reorganization costs                 5  
Total impairment and other charges   $ 5     $ 10     $ 41  

Impairment of Intangible Assets

Intangible assets that are determined to have finite lives are amortized over their useful lives and are measured for impairment only when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be impaired. Intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested for impairment if impairment indicators arise and, at a minimum, annually. During the fourth quarters of 2011 and 2010, the Company determined that triggering events had occurred related to its CCS intangible assets, which is part of the Direct-to-Customers segment, reflecting decreases in projected revenues. Accordingly, a charge of $5 million and $10 million was recorded to write-down the CCS tradename for 2011 and 2010, respectively. The fair value was determined using an income approach using the relief-from-royalty method.

Impairment of Assets

No impairment charges related to long-lived assets were recorded during 2011 or 2010. During 2009, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges totaling $36 million; $32 million was recorded to write-down long-lived assets at its Lady Foot Locker, Kids Foot Locker, Footaction, and Champs Sports divisions, and a $4 million charge was recorded to write off certain software development costs for the Direct-to-Customers segment as a result of management’s decision to terminate the project.

Reorganization Costs

In 2009, the Company consolidated the management team of the Lady Foot Locker business with the team that managed the Foot Locker U.S., Kids Foot Locker, and Footaction businesses. As a result of this divisional reorganization, as well as certain corporate staff reductions taken to improve corporate efficiency, the Company recorded a charge of $5 million. This charge was comprised primarily of severance costs to eliminate approximately 120 positions.