-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, CNUELJYaeNATQaCWkKL745z5VwCcpjzVuY33NqGK1XcpPlsKIuW3F0fZ+fSva/8Y canNwjVSjJ8bkAde43X9hA== 0001047469-99-031853.txt : 19990816 0001047469-99-031853.hdr.sgml : 19990816 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001047469-99-031853 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 2 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19990630 FILED AS OF DATE: 19990813 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V C LTD PARTNERSHIP CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000847559 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SERVICES-EQUIPMENT RENTAL & LEASING, NEC [7359] IRS NUMBER: 043077437 STATE OF INCORPORATION: MA FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-19134 FILM NUMBER: 99688289 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 98 NORTH WASHINGTON ST. CITY: BOSTON STATE: MA ZIP: 02114 BUSINESS PHONE: 6175421200 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 98 N WASHINGTON STREET CITY: BOSTON STATE: MA ZIP: 02114 10-Q 1 FORM 10-Q UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q (Mark One) [XX] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended JUNE 30, 1999 ----------------------------------------------- OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from __________________ to _________________________ __________________ For Quarter Ended June 30, 1999 Commission File No. 0-19134 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) MASSACHUSETTS 04-3077437 - ------------------------------- ------------------------------- (State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 88 BROAD STREET, BOSTON, MA 02110 - --------------------------------------- ------------------------------- (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code (617) 854-5800 ---------------------------- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No_____ APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13, or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes_____ No______ AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FORM 10-Q INDEX
Page ----- PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: Item 1. Financial Statements Statement of Financial Position at June 30, 1999 and December 31, 1998 3 Statement of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 1999 and 1998 4 Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 1999 and 1998 5 Notes to the Financial Statements 6-10 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 11-16 PART II. OTHER INFORMATION: Items 1 - 6 17
2 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION June 30, 1999 and December 31, 1998 (Unaudited)
June 30, December 31, 1999 1998 ----------- ------------ ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents $ 3,296,738 $ 2,913,800 Rents receivable 11,699 17,052 Accounts receivable - affiliate 131,385 260,794 Equipment at cost, net of accumulated depreciation of $4,936,168 and $6,710,529 at June 30, 1999 and December 31, 1998, respectively 39,354 52,472 ----------- ------------ Total assets $ 3,479,176 $ 3,244,118 ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------ LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL Accrued liabilities $ 214,318 $ 270,940 Accrued liabilities - affiliate 48,199 8,236 Deferred rental income 18,000 2,470 Other liabilities -- 201,000 Cash distributions payable to partners 82,643 82,643 ----------- ------------ Total liabilities 363,160 565,289 ----------- ------------ Partners' capital (deficit): General Partner (875,709) (897,569) Limited Partnership Interests (930,443 Units; initial purchase price of $25 each) 3,991,725 3,576,398 ----------- ------------ Total partners' capital 3,116,016 2,678,829 ----------- ------------ Total liabilities and partners' capital $ 3,479,176 $ 3,244,118 ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 3 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS for the three and six months ended June 30, 1999 and 1998 (Unaudited)
Three Months Six Months Ended June 30, Ended June 30, 1999 1998 1999 1998 -------- -------- -------- -------- Income: Lease revenue $118,189 $170,449 $259,530 $347,255 Interest income 42,616 24,521 78,229 50,395 Gain on sale of equipment 425,825 495,995 425,825 505,995 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total income 586,630 690,965 763,584 903,645 -------- -------- -------- -------- Expenses: Depreciation 6,559 18,455 13,118 70,533 Equipment management fees - affiliate 5,672 8,285 12,502 16,888 Operating expenses - affiliate 82,626 374,586 135,491 408,809 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total expenses 94,857 401,326 161,111 496,230 -------- -------- -------- -------- Net income $491,773 $289,639 $602,473 $407,415 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Net income per limited partnership unit $ 0.50 $ 0.30 $ 0.62 $ 0.42 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- Cash distributions declared per limited partnership unit $ 0.08 $ 0.08 $ 0.17 $ 0.17 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 4 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS for the six months ended June 30, 1999 and 1998 (Unaudited)
1999 1998 ----------- ----------- Cash flows from (used in) operating activities: Net income $ 602,473 $ 407,415 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from (used in) operating activities: Depreciation 13,118 70,533 Gain on sale of equipment (425,825) (505,995) Changes in assets and liabilities Decrease (increase) in: Rents receivable 5,353 11,373 Accounts receivable - affiliate 129,409 (597,408) Increase (decrease) in: Accrued liabilities (56,622) 277,919 Accrued liabilities - affiliate 39,963 (12,884) Deferred rental income 15,530 -- Other liabilities (201,000) -- ----------- ----------- Net cash from (used in) operating activities 122,399 (349,047) ----------- ----------- Cash flows from investing activities: Proceeds from equipment sales 425,825 686,895 ----------- ----------- Net cash from investing activities 425,825 686,895 ----------- ----------- Cash flows used in financing activities: Distributions paid (165,286) (165,286) ----------- ----------- Net cash used in financing activities (165,286) (165,286) ----------- ----------- Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 382,938 172,562 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 2,913,800 1,880,014 ----------- ----------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 3,296,738 $ 2,052,576 ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
5 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Notes to the Financial Statements June 30, 1999 (Unaudited) NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION The financial statements presented herein are prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and the instructions for preparing Form 10-Q under Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission and are unaudited. As such, these financial statements do not include all information and footnote disclosures required under generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements and, accordingly, the accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the footnotes presented in the 1998 Annual Report. Except as disclosed herein, there has been no material change to the information presented in the footnotes to the 1998 Annual Report. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal and recurring adjustments) considered necessary to present fairly the financial position at June 30, 1999 and December 31, 1998 and results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 1999 and 1998 have been made and are reflected. NOTE 2 - CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS At June 30, 1999, the Partnership had $3,182,593 invested in federal agency discount notes, repurchase agreements secured by U.S. Treasury Bills or interests in U.S. Government securities, or other highly liquid overnight investments. NOTE 3 - REVENUE RECOGNITION Rents are payable to the Partnership monthly or quarterly and no significant amounts are calculated on factors other than the passage of time. The leases are accounted for as operating leases and are noncancellable. Rents received prior to their due dates are deferred. Future minimum rents of $181,384 are due as follows: For the year ending June 30, 2000 $ 157,648 2001 23,736 --------- Total $ 181,384 --------- ---------
NOTE 4 - EQUIPMENT The following is a summary of equipment owned by the Partnership at June 30, 1999. Remaining Lease Term (Months), as used below, represents the number of months remaining from June 30, 1999 under contracted lease terms and is presented as a range when more than one lease agreement is contained in the stated equipment category. A Remaining Lease Term equal to zero reflects equipment either held for sale or re-lease or being leased on a month-to-month basis. In the opinion of EFG, the acquisition cost of the equipment did not exceed its fair market value. 6 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Notes to the Financial Statements (Continued)
Remaining Lease Term Equipment Equipment Type (Months) At Cost - ----------------------- ---------- ----------- Construction and mining 1-18 $2,345,427 Communications 0 1,278,350 Retail store fixtures 0 589,255 Materials handling 0 550,472 Motor vehicles 0 212,018 ----------- Total equipment cost 4,975,522 Accumulated depreciation (4,936,168) ----------- Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation $ 39,354 ----------- -----------
At June 30, 1999, the Partnership was not holding any equipment not subject to a lease and no equipment was held for sale or re-lease. The summary above includes equipment being leased on a month-to-month basis. NOTE 5 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS All operating expenses incurred by the Partnership are paid by EFG on behalf of the Partnership and EFG is reimbursed at its actual cost for such expenditures. Fees and other costs incurred during each of the six month periods ended June 30, 1999 and 1998, which were paid or accrued by the Partnership to EFG or its Affiliates, are as follows:
1999 1998 ------------- ------------ Equipment management fees $ 12,502 $ 16,888 Administrative charges 51,460 27,846 Reimbursable operating expenses due to third parties 84,031 380,963 ------------- ------------ Total $ 147,993 $ 425,697 ------------- ------------ ------------- ------------
All rents and proceeds from the sale of equipment are paid directly to either EFG or to a lender. EFG temporarily deposits collected funds in a separate interest-bearing escrow account prior to remittance to the Partnership. At June 30, 1999, the Partnership was owed $131,385 by EFG for such funds and the interest thereon. These funds were remitted to the Partnership in July 1999. Administrative charges represent amounts owed to EFG, pursuant to Section 10.4 of the Amended and Restated Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership (the "Restated Agreement, as amended"), for persons employed by EFG who are engaged in providing administrative services to the Partnership. Administrative charges and reimbursable operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 1999 include adjustments for 1998 actual costs of approximately $16,000 and $11,000, respectively. 7 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Notes to the Financial Statements (Continued) NOTE 6 - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS In January 1998, certain plaintiffs (the "Plaintiffs") filed a class and derivative action, captioned LEONARD ROSENBLUM, ET AL. V. EQUIS FINANCIAL GROUP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (the "Court") on behalf of a proposed class of investors in 28 equipment leasing programs sponsored by EFG, including the Partnership (collectively, the "Nominal Defendants"), against EFG and a number of its affiliates, including the General Partner, as defendants (collectively, the "Defendants"). Certain of the Plaintiffs, on or about June 24, 1997, had filed an earlier derivative action, captioned LEONARD ROSENBLUM, ET AL. V. EQUIS FINANCIAL GROUP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., in the Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on behalf of the Nominal Defendants against the Defendants. Both actions are referred to herein collectively as the "Class Action Lawsuit". The Plaintiffs have asserted, among other things, claims against the Defendants on behalf of the Nominal Defendants for violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, common law fraud, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and violations of the partnership or trust agreements that govern each of the Nominal Defendants. The Defendants have denied, and continue to deny, that any of them have committed or threatened to commit any violations of law or breached any fiduciary duties to the Plaintiffs or the Nominal Defendants. On July 16, 1998, counsel for the Defendants and the Plaintiffs executed a Stipulation of Settlement setting forth terms pursuant to which a settlement of the Class Action Lawsuit is intended to be achieved and which, among other things, is expected to reduce the burdens and expenses attendant to continuing litigation. The Stipulation of Settlement was preliminarily approved by the Court on August 20, 1998 when the Court issued its "Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement, Conditionally Certifying Settlement Class and Providing for Notice of, and Hearing on, the Proposed Settlement" (the "August 20 Order"). On March 12, 1999, counsel for the Plaintiffs and the Defendants entered into an amended stipulation of settlement (the "Amended Stipulation") which was filed with the Court on March 12, 1999. The Amended Stipulation was preliminarily approved by the Court by its "Modified Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement, Conditionally Certifying Settlement Class and Providing For Notice of, and Hearing On, the Proposed Settlement" dated March 22, 1999 (the "March 22 Order"). The Amended Stipulation, among other things, divides the Class Action Lawsuit into two separate sub-classes that can be settled individually. On May 26, 1999, the Court issued an Order and Final Judgment approving settlement of one of the sub-classes. Settlement of the second sub-class, involving the Partnership and 10 affiliated partnerships (collectively referred to as the "Exchange Partnerships"), is expected to remain pending for a longer period due, in part, to the complexity of the proposed settlement pertaining to this class. Prior to issuing a final order approving the settlement of the second sub-class involving the Partnership, the Court will hold a fairness hearing that will be open to all interested parties and permit any party to object to the settlement. The investors of the Partnership and all other plaintiff sub-class members will receive a Notice of Settlement and other information pertinent to the settlement of their claims that will be mailed to them in advance of the fairness hearing. The settlement of the second sub-class is premised on the consolidation of the Exchange Partnerships' net assets (the "Consolidation"), subject to certain conditions, into a single successor company ("Newco"). Under the proposed Consolidation, the partners of the Exchange Partnerships would receive both common stock in Newco and a cash distribution; and thereupon the Exchange Partnerships would be dissolved. In addition, EFG would contribute certain management contracts, operations personnel, and business opportunities to Newco and cancel its current management contracts with all of the Exchange Partnerships. Newco would operate as a finance company specializing in the acquisition, financing and servicing of equipment leases for its own account and for the account of others on a contract basis. Newco also would use its best efforts to list its shares on the NASDAQ National Market or another national exchange or market as soon after the Consolidation as Newco deems that market conditions and its business operations are suitable for listing its shares and Newco has satisfied all necessary regulatory and listing requirements. The potential benefits and risks of the Consolidation will be presented in a Solicitation Statement that will be mailed to all of the partners of the Exchange Partnerships as 8 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Notes to the Financial Statements (Continued) soon as the associated regulatory review process is completed and at least 60 days prior to the fairness hearing. A preliminary Solicitation Statement was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 24, 1998 and remains pending. Class members will be notified of the actual fairness hearing date when it is confirmed. One of the principal objectives of the Consolidation is to create a company that would have the potential to generate more value for the benefit of existing limited partners than other alternatives, including continuing the Partnership's customary business operations until all of its assets are disposed in the ordinary course of business. To facilitate the realization of this objective, the Amended Stipulation provides, among other things, that commencing March 22, 1999, the Exchange Partnerships may collectively invest up to 40% of the total aggregate net asset values of all of the Exchange Partnerships in any investment, including additional equipment and other business activities that the general partners of the Exchange Partnerships and EFG reasonably believe to be consistent with the anticipated business interests and objectives of Newco, subject to certain limitations, including that the Exchange Partnerships retain sufficient cash balances to pay their respective shares of the cash distribution referenced above in connection with the proposed Consolidation. In the absence of the Court's authorization to enter into such activities, the Partnership's Restated Agreement, as amended, would not permit new investment activities without the approval of limited partners owning a majority of the Partnership's outstanding Units. Accordingly, to the extent that the Partnership invests in new equipment, the Manager (being EFG) will (i) defer, until the earlier of the effective date of the Consolidation or December 31, 1999, any acquisition fees resulting therefrom and (ii) limit its management fees on all such assets to 2% of rental income. In the event that the Consolidation is consummated, all such acquisition and management fees will be paid to Newco. To the extent that the Partnership invests in other business activities not consisting of equipment acquisitions, the Manager will forego any acquisition fees and management fees related to such investments. In the event that the Partnership has acquired new investments, but the Partnership does not participate in the Consolidation, Newco will acquire such new investments for an amount equal to the Partnership's net equity investment plus an annualized return thereon of 7.5%. Finally, in the event that the Partnership has acquired new investments and the Consolidation is not effected, the General Partner will use its best efforts to divest all such new investments in an orderly and timely fashion and the Manager will cancel or return to the Partnership any acquisition or management fees resulting from such new investments. To date, the General Partner has not authorized new investment activities involving the Partnership. The Amended Stipulation and previous Stipulation of Settlement prescribe certain conditions necessary to effecting a final settlement, including providing the partners of the Exchange Partnerships with the opportunity to object to the participation of their partnership in the Consolidation. Assuming the proposed settlement is effected according to present terms, the Partnership's share of legal fees and expenses related to the Class Action Lawsuit is estimated to be approximately $63,000 all of which was accrued and expensed by the Partnership in 1998. In addition, the Partnership's share of fees and expenses related to the proposed Consolidation is estimated to be approximately $224,000, all of which also was accrued and expensed by the Partnership in 1998. While the Court's August 20 Order enjoined certain class members, including all of the partners of the Partnership, from transferring, selling, assigning, giving, pledging, hypothecating, or otherwise disposing of any Units pending the Court's final determination of whether the settlement should be approved, the March 22 Order permits the partners to transfer Units to family members or as a result of the divorce, disability or death of the partner. No other transfers are permitted pending the Court's final determination of whether the settlement should be approved. The provision of the August 20 Order which enjoined the General Partners of the Exchange Partnerships from, among other things, recording any transfers not in accordance with the Court's order remains effective. There can be no assurance that settlement of the sub-class involving the Exchange Partnerships will receive final Court approval and be effected. There also can be no assurance that all or any of the Exchange Partnerships will participate in the Consolidation because if limited partners owning more than one-third of the outstanding Units of a partnership object to the Consolidation, then that partnership will be excluded from the 9 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Notes to the Financial Statements (Continued) Consolidation. The General Partner and its affiliates, in consultation with counsel, concur that there is a reasonable basis to believe that a final settlement of the sub-class involving the Exchange Partnerships will be achieved. However, in the absence of a final settlement approved by the Court, the Defendants intend to defend vigorously against the claims asserted in the Class Action Lawsuit. Neither the General Partner nor its affiliates can predict with any degree of certainty the cost of continuing litigation to the Partnership or the ultimate outcome. In addition to the foregoing, the Partnership is a party to other lawsuits that have arisen out of the conduct of its business, principally involving disputes or disagreements with lessees over lease terms and conditions. Refer to the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 for a description of these matters. The following are updates to the Partnership's prior disclosures on Form 10-K for 1998: ACTION INVOLVING TRANSMERIDIAN AIRLINES On November 9, 1998, First Security Bank, N.A., as trustee of the Partnership and certain affiliated investment programs (collectively, the "Plaintiffs), filed an action in Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in Suffolk County against Prime Air, Inc. d/b/a Transmeridian Airlines ("Transmeridian"), Atkinson & Mullen Travel, Inc., and Apple Vacations, West, Inc., both d/b/a Apple Vacations, asserting various causes of action for declaratory judgment and breach of contract. The action subsequently was removed to United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Transmeridian filed counterclaims for breach of contract, quantum meruit, conversion, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and violation of M.G.L. c. 93A. The Plaintiffs subsequently filed an Amended Complaint asserting claims for breaches of contract and covenant of good faith and fair dealing against Transmeridian and breach of guaranty against Apple Vacations. The Plaintiffs are seeking damages for, among other things, breach of contract arising out of Transmeridian's refusal to repair or replace burned engine blades found in one engine during a pre-return inspection of an aircraft leased by Transmeridian from the Plaintiffs, a Boeing 727-251 ADV aircraft (the "Aircraft"). The estimated cost to repair the engine and lease a substitute engine during the repair period was approximately $488,000. Repairs were completed in June 1999. The Plaintiffs intend to enforce written guarantees issued by Apple Vacations that absolutely and unconditionally guarantee Transmeridian's performance under the lease agreement and are seeking recovery of all costs, lost revenue and monetary damages in connection with this matter. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Plaintiffs were required to advance the cost of repairing the engine and leasing a substitute engine and cannot be certain whether the guarantees will be enforced. Therefore, the Partnership accrued and expensed its share of these costs, or approximately $23,000 in 1998 and $7,000 in 1999. Discovery is ongoing and a trial date has been tentatively scheduled for April 17, 2000. The General Partner plans to vigorously pursue this action; however, it is too early to predict the Plaintiffs' likelihood of success. This aircraft was sold in June 1999. ACTION INVOLVING NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC. On September 22, 1995, Investors Asset Holding Corp. and First Security Bank, N.A., trustees of the Partnership and certain affiliated investment programs (collectively, the "Plaintiffs"), filed an action in United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts against a lessee of the Partnership, Northwest Airlines, Inc. ("Northwest"). The Complaint alleges that Northwest did not fulfill its maintenance obligations under its Lease Agreements with the Plaintiffs and seeks declaratory judgment concerning Northwest's obligations and monetary damages. Northwest filed an Answer to the Plaintiffs' Complaint and a motion to transfer the venue of this proceeding to Minnesota. The Court denied Northwest's motion. On June 29, 1998, a United States Magistrate Judge recommended entry of partial summary judgment in favor of the Plaintiffs. Northwest appealed this decision. On April 15, 1999, the United States District Court Judge adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation and entered partial summary judgment in favor of the Plaintiffs. The General Partner believes that the Plaintiff's claims ultimately will prevail and that the Partnership's financial position will not be adversely affected by the outcome of this action. 10 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FORM 10-Q PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. Certain statements in this quarterly report of American Income Partner's V-C Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") that are not historical fact constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties. There are a number of factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made herein. These factors include, but are not limited to, the outcome of the Class Action Lawsuit described in Note 6 to the accompanying financial statements and the remarketing of the Partnership's equipment. YEAR 2000 ISSUE The Year 2000 Issue generally refers to the capacity of computer programming logic to correctly identify the calendar year. Many companies utilize computer programs or hardware with date sensitive software or embedded chips that could interpret dates ending in "00" as the year 1900 rather than the year 2000. In certain cases, such errors could result in system failures or miscalculations that disrupt the operations of the affected businesses. The Partnership uses information systems provided by Equis Financial Group Limited Partnership (formerly American Finance Group) ("EFG") and has no information systems of its own. EFG has adopted a plan to address the Year 2000 Issue that consists of four phases: assessment, remediation, testing, and implementation and has elected to utilize principally internal resources to perform all phases. EFG has completed substantially all of its Year 2000 project at an aggregate cost of less than $50,000 and at a di minimus cost to the Partnership. All costs incurred in connection with EFG's Year 2000 project have been expensed as incurred. EFG's primary information software was coded by a third party at the point of original design to use a four-digit field to identify calendar year. All of the Partnership's lease billings, cash receipts and equipment remarketing processes are performed using this proprietary software. In addition, EFG has gathered information about the Year 2000 readiness of significant vendors and third party servicers and continues to monitor developments in this area. All of EFG's peripheral computer technologies, such as its network operating system and third-party software applications, including payroll, depreciation processing, and electronic banking, have been evaluated for potential programming changes and have required only minor modifications to function properly with respect to dates in the year 2000 and thereafter. EFG understands that each of its and the Partnership's significant vendors and third-party servicers are in the process, or have completed the process, of making their systems Year 2000 compliant. Substantially all parties queried indicated that their systems would be Year 2000 compliant by the end of 1998. Presently, EFG is not aware of any outside customer with a Year 2000 Issue that would have a material effect on the Partnership's results of operations, liquidity, or financial position. The Partnership's equipment leases were structured as triple net leases, meaning that the lessees are responsible for, among other things, (i) maintaining and servicing all equipment during the lease term, (ii) ensuring that all equipment functions properly and is returned in good condition, normal wear and tear excepted, and (iii) insuring the assets against casualty and other events of loss. Non-compliance with lease terms on the part of a lessee, including failure to address Year 2000 Issues could result in lost revenues and impairment of residual values of the Partnership's equipment assets under a worst-case scenario. EFG believes that its Year 2000 compliance plan will be effective in resolving all material Year 2000 risks in a timely manner and that the Year 2000 Issue will not pose significant operational problems with respect to its computer systems or result in a system failure or disruption of its or the Partnership's business operations. However, EFG has no means of ensuring that all customers, vendors and third-party servicers will conform ultimately to Year 2000 standards. The effect of this risk to the Partnership is not determinable. 11 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FORM 10-Q PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 COMPARED TO THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998: The Partnership was organized in 1989 as a direct-participation equipment leasing program to acquire a diversified portfolio of capital equipment subject to lease agreements with third parties. Presently, the Partnership is a Nominal Defendant in a Class Action Lawsuit, the outcome of which could significantly alter the nature of the Partnership's organization and its future business operations. See Note 6 to the accompanying financial statements. Pursuant to the Restated Agreement, as amended, the Partnership is scheduled to be dissolved by December 31, 2001. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS For the three and six months ended June 30, 1999, the Partnership recognized lease revenue of $118,189 and $259,530 compared to $170,449 and $347,255 for the same periods in 1998. The decrease in lease revenue from 1998 to 1999 resulted principally from renewal lease term expirations and the sale of equipment. The Partnership also earns interest income from temporary investments of rental receipts and equipment sales proceeds in short-term instruments. The Partnership's equipment portfolio (until the second quarter of 1999) included certain assets in which the Partnership held a proportionate ownership interest. In such cases, the remaining interests were owned by an affiliated equipment leasing program sponsored by EFG. Proportionate equipment ownership enabled the Partnership to further diversify its equipment portfolio at inception by participating in the ownership of selected assets, thereby reducing the general levels of risk which could have resulted from a concentration in any single equipment type, industry or lessee. The Partnership and each affiliate individually report, in proportion to their respective ownership interests, their respective shares of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses associated with the equipment. For the three and six months ended June 30, 1999, the Partnership sold equipment that had been fully depreciated to existing lessees and third parties. These sales resulted in a net gain, for financial statement purposes, of $425,825, all of which occurred during the three months ended June 30, 1999. For the three and six months ended June 30, 1998, the Partnership sold equipment having a net book value of $180,900 which resulted in net gains of $495,995 and $505,995, respectively. The net gain in 1999 includes $408,000 related to the sale of the Partnership's interests in two aircraft (see further discussion below). It cannot be determined whether future sales of equipment will result in a net gain or a net loss to the Partnership, as such transactions will be dependent upon the condition and type of equipment being sold and its marketability at the time of sale. In addition, the amount of gain or loss reported for financial statement purposes is partly a function of the amount of accumulated depreciation associated with the equipment being sold. The ultimate realization of residual value for any type of equipment is dependent upon many factors, including EFG's ability to sell and re-lease equipment. Changing market conditions, industry trends, technological advances, and many other events can converge to enhance or detract from asset values at any given time. EFG attempts to monitor these changes in order to identify opportunities which may be advantageous to the Partnership and which will maximize total cash returns for each asset. The total economic value realized for each asset is comprised of all primary lease term revenue generated from that asset, together with its residual value. The latter consists of cash proceeds realized upon the asset's sale in addition to all other cash receipts obtained from renting the asset on a re-lease, renewal or month-to-month basis. The Partnership classifies such residual rental payments as lease revenue. Consequently, the amount of gain or loss reported in the financial statements is not necessarily indicative of the total residual value the Partnership achieved from leasing the equipment. 12 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FORM 10-Q PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Depreciation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 1999 was $6,559 and $13,118, respectively, compared to $18,455 and $70,533 for the same periods in 1998. For financial reporting purposes, to the extent that an asset is held on primary lease term, the Partnership depreciates the difference between (i) the cost of the asset and (ii) the estimated residual value of the asset on a straight-line basis over such term. For purposes of this policy, estimated residual values represent estimates of equipment values at the date of primary lease expiration. To the extent that an asset is held beyond its primary lease term, the Partnership continues to depreciate the remaining net book value of the asset on a straight-line basis over the asset's remaining economic life. Management fees were approximately 4.8% of lease revenue for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 1999 compared to 4.9% for each of the same periods in 1998. Management fees are based on 5% of gross lease revenue generated by operating leases and 2% of gross lease revenue generated by full payout leases. Operating expenses were $82,626 and $135,491 for the three and six months ended June 30, 1999, respectively, compared to $374,586 and $408,809 for the same periods in 1998. Operating expenses in 1999 include approximately $7,000 related to the refurbishment of an aircraft engine (see discussion below) and an adjustment for 1998 actual administrative charges and third party costs of approximately $27,000. During the six months ended June 30, 1998, the Partnership incurred or accrued $285,000 for certain legal and Consolidation expenses related to the Class Action Lawsuit described in Note 6 to the financial statements. Other operating expenses consist principally of professional service costs, such as audit and legal fees, as well as printing, distribution and other remarketing expenses. In certain cases, equipment storage or repairs and maintenance costs may be incurred in connection with equipment being remarketed. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES AND DISCUSSION OF CASH FLOWS The Partnership by its nature is a limited life entity. As an equipment leasing program, the Partnership's principal operating activities derive from asset rental transactions. Accordingly, the Partnership's principal source of cash from operations is generally provided by the collection of periodic rents. These cash inflows are used to pay management fees and operating costs. Operating activities generated a net cash inflow of $122,399 and a net cash outflow of $349,047 for the six months ended June 30, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Future renewal, re-lease and equipment sale activities will cause a decline in the Partnership's lease revenue and corresponding sources of operating cash. Overall, expenses associated with rental activities, such as management fees, and net cash flow from operating activities also will decline as the Partnership experiences a higher frequency of remarketing events. Cash realized from asset disposal transactions is reported under investing activities on the accompanying Statement of Cash Flows. During the six months ended June 30, 1999 and 1998, the Partnership realized $425,825 and $686,895 in equipment sale proceeds. Sale proceeds in 1999 include $408,000 related to the Partnership's interests in two Boeing 727-251 ADV jet aircraft discussed below. Future inflows of cash from asset disposals will vary in timing and amount and will be influenced by many factors including, but not limited to, the frequency and timing of lease expirations, the type of equipment being sold, its condition and age, and future market conditions. In January 1999, upon expiration of the lease term, the Partnership and certain affiliated investment programs (collectively, the "Programs") entered into an agreement to sell a Boeing 727-251 ADV jet aircraft to the lessee for $2,450,000. The sale agreement permitted the lessee to return the aircraft to the Programs, subject to certain conditions, on or before April 10, 1999. During the first quarter of 1999, the Partnership received $86,941, representing a portion of the Partnership's total sale proceeds with the remainder of the sale proceeds being received in the second quarter of 1999, subsequent to the expiration of the lessee's option to return the aircraft. In aggregate, the Partnership received 13 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FORM 10-Q PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION $147,000 for its interest in this aircraft. Due to the contingent nature of the sale, the Partnership deferred recognition of the sale until expiration of the return option on April 10, 1999. The Partnership's interest in the aircraft had a cost of $583,038 and was fully depreciated, resulting in a net gain, for financial statement purposes, of $147,000. In November 1998, the Programs entered into a separate agreement to sell their ownership interests in a different Boeing 727-251 ADV jet aircraft and three engines (collectively the "Aircraft") to a third party (the "Purchaser") for $4,350,000. In December 1998, the Purchaser remitted $3,350,000 for the Aircraft, excluding one of three engines which had been damaged while the Aircraft was leased to Transmeridian Airlines ("Transmeridian"). (See Note 6 to the accompanying financial statements regarding legal action undertaken by the Programs related to Transmeridian and the damaged engine). The Purchaser also deposited $1,000,000 into a third-party escrow account (the "Escrow") pending repair of the damaged engine and re-installation of the refurbished engine on the Aircraft. Upon installation, the escrow agent was obligated to transfer the Escrow amount plus interest thereon to the Programs. The engine was refurbished at the expense of the Programs. The associated cost was approximately $374,000, of which the Partnership's share was approximately $23,000. The Partnership accrued $16,000 of these costs in 1998 and the balance was incurred during the six months ended June 30, 1999. The Programs also were required to reimburse the Purchaser for its cost to lease a substitute engine during the period that the damaged engine was being repaired. This cost was approximately $114,000, of which the Partnership's share was approximately $7,000, all of which was accrued in 1998 in connection with the litigation referenced above. In addition, the purchase and sale agreement permitted the Purchaser to return the Aircraft to the Programs, subject to a number of conditions, for $4,350,000, reduced by an amount equivalent to $450 multiplied by the number of flight hours since the Aircraft's most recent C Check. Among the conditions precedent to the Purchaser's returning the Aircraft, the Purchaser must have completed its intended installation of hush-kitting on the Aircraft to conform to Stage 3 noise regulations. This work was completed in January 1999. The Purchaser's return option was to expire on May 15, 1999. Due to the contingent nature of the sale, the Partnership deferred recognition of the sale and a resulting gain until expiration of the Purchaser's return option on May 15, 1999. The Partnership's share of the December proceeds was $201,000, which amount was deposited into EFG's customary escrow account and transferred to the Partnership, together with the Partnership's other December rental receipts, in January 1999. Upon the installation of the refurbished engine on the Aircraft, the remainder of the sale consideration, or $1,000,000 and the interest thereon, was released from the escrow account to the Programs. The Partnership's share of this payment was $60,950, including interest of $950. In aggregate, the Partnership received sales proceeds of $261,000 for its interest in the Aircraft. The Partnership's interest in the Aircraft had a cost of $648,738 and was fully depreciated, resulting in a net gain, for financial statement purposes, of $261,000. At June 30, 1999, the Partnership was due aggregate future minimum lease payments of $181,384 from contractual lease agreements (see Note 3 to the financial statements). At the expiration of the individual renewal lease terms underlying the Partnership's future minimum lease payments, the Partnership will sell the equipment or enter re-lease or renewal agreements when considered advantageous by the General Partner and EFG. Such future remarketing activities will result in the realization of additional cash inflows in the form of equipment sale proceeds or rents from renewals and re-leases, the timing and extent of which cannot be predicted with certainty. This is because the timing and extent of remarketing events often is dependent upon the needs and interests of the existing lessees. Some lessees may choose to renew their lease contracts, while others may elect to return the equipment. In the latter instances, the equipment could be re-leased to another lessee or sold to a third-party. Accordingly, as the terms of the currently existing contractual lease agreements expire, the cash flows of the Partnership will become less predictable. In addition, the Partnership will need cash outflows to pay management fees and operating expenses. 14 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FORM 10-Q PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION There are no formal restrictions under the Restated Agreement, as amended, that materially limit the Partnership's ability to pay cash distributions, except that the General Partner may suspend or limit cash distributions to ensure that the Partnership maintains sufficient working capital reserves to cover, among other things, operating costs and potential expenditures, such as refurbishment costs to remarket equipment upon lease expiration. Liquidity is especially important as the Partnership matures and sells equipment, because the remaining equipment base consists of fewer revenue-producing assets that are available to cover prospective cash disbursements. Insufficient liquidity could inhibit the Partnership's ability to sustain its operations or maximize the realization of proceeds from remarketing its remaining assets. Cash distributions to the General Partner and Recognized Owners are declared and generally paid within fifteen days following the end of each calendar quarter. The payment of such distributions is presented as a component of financing activities. For the six months ended June 30, 1999, the Partnership declared total cash distributions of Distributable Cash From Operations and Distributable Cash From Sales and Refinancing of $165,286. In accordance with the Restated Agreement, as amended, the Recognized Owners were allocated 95% of these distributions, or $157,022, and the General Partner was allocated 5%, or $8,264. The second quarter 1999 cash distribution was paid on July 15, 1999. Cash distributions paid to the Recognized Owners consist of both a return of and a return on capital. Cash distributions do not represent and are not indicative of yield on investment. Actual yield on investment cannot be determined with any certainty until conclusion of the Partnership and will be dependent upon the collection of all future contracted rents, the generation of renewal and/or re-lease rents, and the residual value realized for each asset at its disposal date. The Partnership's capital account balances for federal income tax and for financial reporting purposes are different primarily due to differing treatments of income and expense items for income tax purposes in comparison to financial reporting purposes (generally referred to as permanent or timing differences; see Note 6 to the financial statements presented in the Partnership's 1998 Annual Report). For instance, selling commissions, organization and offering costs pertaining to syndication of the Partnership's limited partnership units are not deductible for federal income tax purposes, but are recorded as a reduction of partners' capital for financial reporting purposes. Therefore, such differences are permanent differences between capital accounts for financial reporting and federal income tax purposes. Other differences between the bases of capital accounts for federal income tax and financial reporting purposes occur due to timing differences. Such items consist of the cumulative difference between income or loss for tax purposes and financial statement income or loss and the difference between distributions (declared vs. paid) for income tax and financial reporting purposes. The principal component of the cumulative difference between financial statement income or loss and tax income or loss results from different depreciation policies for book and tax purposes. For financial reporting purposes, the General Partner has accumulated a capital deficit at June 30, 1999. This is the result of aggregate cash distributions to the General Partner being in excess of its capital contribution of $1,000 and its allocation of financial statement net income or loss. Ultimately, the existence of a capital deficit for the General Partner for financial reporting purposes is not indicative of any further capital obligations to the Partnership by the General Partner. The Restated Agreement, as amended, requires that upon the dissolution of the Partnership, the General Partner will be required to contribute to the Partnership an amount equal to any negative balance which may exist in the General Partner's tax capital account. At December 31, 1998, the General Partner had a positive tax capital account balance. The outcome of the Class Action Lawsuit described in Note 6 to the accompanying financial statements will be the principal factor in determining the future of the Partnership's operations. A preliminary court order has allowed the Partnership to invest in new equipment or other activities, subject to certain limitations, effective March 22, 1999. Until the Class Action Lawsuit is adjudicated, the General Partner does not expect that the level of future quarterly cash distributions paid by the Partnership will be increased above amounts paid in the second 15 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FORM 10-Q PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION quarter of 1999. The proposed settlement, if effected, will materially change the future organizational structure and business interests of the Partnership, as well as its cash distribution policies. 16 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FORM 10-Q PART II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings Response: Refer to Note 6 to the financial statements herein. Item 2. Changes in Securities Response: None Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities Response: None Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders Response: None Item 5. Other Information Response: None Item 6(a). Exhibits Response: None Item 6(b). Reports on Form 8-K Response: None 17 SIGNATURE PAGE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on behalf of the registrant and in the capacity and on the date indicated. AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-C LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: AFG Leasing IV Incorporated, a Massachusetts corporation and the General Partner of the Registrant. By: /s/ Michael J. Butterfield ------------------------------------------- Michael J. Butterfield Treasurer of AFG Leasing IV Incorporated (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) Date: August 13, 1999 ------------------------------------------- By: /s/ Gary Romano ------------------------------------------- Gary M. Romano Clerk of AFG Leasing IV Incorporated (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer) Date: August 13, 1999 ------------------------------------------- 18 EX-27 2 EXHIBIT 27
5 6-MOS DEC-31-1999 JAN-01-1999 JUN-30-1999 3,296,738 0 143,084 0 0 3,439,822 4,975,522 (4,936,168) 3,479,176 363,160 0 0 0 0 3,116,016 3,479,176 0 763,584 0 161,111 0 0 0 602,473 0 602,473 0 0 0 602,473 0 0
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----