-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, FDJIO2Nxa1ZWeLGCKQQSHP8TdeypEprDGdEy8ZDo4y9xkxPgmak139zwvLqhmIPi pD+ZC+TBXvl5qcMOekxA7w== 0001047469-99-020219.txt : 19990517 0001047469-99-020219.hdr.sgml : 19990517 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001047469-99-020219 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 2 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19990331 FILED AS OF DATE: 19990514 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V A LTD PARTNERSHIP CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000847557 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SERVICES-EQUIPMENT RENTAL & LEASING, NEC [7359] IRS NUMBER: 043057303 STATE OF INCORPORATION: MA FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-18365 FILM NUMBER: 99621235 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 98 NORTH WASHINGTON ST. CITY: BOSTON STATE: MA ZIP: 02114 BUSINESS PHONE: 6178545800 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 98 NORTH WASHINGTON STREET CITY: BOSTON STATE: MA ZIP: 02114 10-Q 1 FORM 10-Q UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q (Mark One) [X X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 1999 ------------------------------------------------ OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to ------------------- ------------------------- For Quarter Ended March 31, 1999 Commission File No. 0-18364 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) MASSACHUSETTS 04-3057303 - ---------------------------------- ----------------------- (State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 88 BROAD STREET, BOSTON, MA 02110 - ---------------------------------- ----------------------- (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code (617) 854-5800 ----------------------------- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ---- ---- APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13, or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ---- ---- AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FORM 10-Q INDEX
Page ---- PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: Item 1. Financial Statements Statement of Financial Position at March 31, 1999 and December 31, 1998 3 Statement of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 1998 4 Statement of Changes in Partners' Capital for the three months ended March 31, 1999 5 Statement of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 1998 6 Notes to the Financial Statements 7-13 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 14-19 PART II. OTHER INFORMATION: Items 1 - 6 20
2 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION March 31, 1999 and December 31, 1998 (Unaudited)
March 31, December 31, 1999 1998 ----------- ----------- ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents $ 3,369,244 $ 2,448,960 Rents receivable 3,594 6,643 Accounts receivable - affiliates 26,854 787,967 Note receivable - affiliate 771,450 771,450 Investment securities - affiliate 123,772 140,844 Equipment at cost, net of accumulated depreciation of $5,486,899 and $5,498,839 at March 31, 1999 and December 31, 1998, respectively -- -- ----------- ----------- Total assets $ 4,294,914 $ 4,155,864 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL Accrued liabilities $ 316,276 $ 350,276 Accrued liabilities - affiliate 13,681 6,864 Deferred rental income -- 9,219 Other liabilities 1,074,981 750,400 Cash distributions payable to partners 136,250 136,250 ----------- ----------- Total liabilities 1,541,188 1,253,009 ----------- ----------- Partners' capital (deficit): General Partner (1,393,285) (1,385,829) Limited Partnership Interests (1,380,661 Units; initial purchase price of $25 each) 4,147,011 4,288,684 ----------- ----------- Total partners' capital 2,753,726 2,902,855 ----------- ----------- Total liabilities and partners' capital $ 4,294,914 $ 4,155,864 ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 3 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS for the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 1998 (Unaudited)
1999 1998 -------- -------- Income: Lease revenue $ 31,593 $117,616 Interest income 38,509 33,315 Interest income - affiliate 19,022 19,286 Gain on sale of equipment 1,000 -- -------- -------- Total income 90,124 170,217 -------- -------- Expenses: Depreciation -- 80,952 Equipment management fees - affiliate 1,580 5,881 Operating expenses - affiliate 84,351 39,750 -------- -------- Total expenses 85,931 126,583 -------- -------- Net income $ 4,193 $ 43,634 -------- -------- -------- -------- Net income per limited partnership unit $ -- $ 0.03 -------- -------- -------- -------- Cash distribution declared per limited partnership unit $ 0.09 $ 0.09 -------- -------- -------- --------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 4 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL for the three months ended March 31, 1999 (Unaudited)
General Recognized Owners Partner ---------------------------------- Amount Units Amount Total ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Balance at December 31, 1998 $(1,385,829) 1,380,661 $ 4,288,684 $ 2,902,855 Net income 210 -- 3,983 4,193 Unrealized loss on investment securities - affiliate (854) -- (16,218) (17,072) ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Comprehensive loss (644) -- (12,235) (12,879) ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Cash distribution declared (6,812) -- (129,438) (136,250) ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- Balance at March 31, 1999 $(1,393,285) 1,380,661 $ 4,147,011 $ 2,753,726 ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 5 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS for the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 1998 (Unaudited)
1999 1998 ----------- ----------- Cash flows from (used in) operating activities: Net income $ 4,193 $ 43,634 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities: Depreciation -- 80,952 Gain on sale of equipment (1,000) -- Changes in assets and liabilities Decrease in: Rents receivable 3,049 1,272 Accounts receivable - affiliates 761,113 13,932 Increase (decrease) in: Accrued liabilities (34,000) 1,462 Accrued liabilities - affiliate 6,817 (6,157) Deferred rental income (9,219) 14,020 Other liabilities 324,581 -- ----------- ----------- Net cash from operating activities 1,055,534 149,115 ----------- ----------- Cash flows from investing activities: Proceeds from equipment sales 1,000 -- ----------- ----------- Net cash from investing activities 1,000 -- ----------- ----------- Cash flows used in financing activities: Distributions paid (136,250) (136,250) ----------- ----------- Net cash used in financing activities (136,250) (136,250) ----------- ----------- Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 920,284 12,865 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 2,448,960 2,614,272 ----------- ----------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 3,369,244 $ 2,627,137 ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity: See Note 5 to the financial statements regarding the reduction of the Partnership's carrying value of its investment securities - affiliate during the three months ended March 31, 1999. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 6 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Notes to the Financial Statements March 31, 1999 (Unaudited) NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION The financial statements presented herein are prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and the instructions for preparing Form 10-Q under Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission and are unaudited. As such, these financial statements do not include all information and footnote disclosures required under generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements and, accordingly, the accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the footnotes presented in the 1998 Annual Report. Except as disclosed herein, there has been no material change to the information presented in the footnotes to the 1998 Annual Report. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal and recurring adjustments) considered necessary to present fairly the financial position at March 31, 1999 and December 31, 1998 and results of operations for the three month periods ended March 31, 1999 and 1998 have been made and are reflected. NOTE 2 - CASH At March 31, 1999, the Partnership had $3,256,604 invested in federal agency discount notes and reverse repurchase agreements secured by U.S. Treasury Bills or interests in U.S. Government securities. NOTE 3 - REVENUE RECOGNITION Rents are payable to the Partnership monthly or quarterly and no significant amounts are calculated on factors other than the passage of time. The leases are accounted for as operating leases and are noncancellable. Rents received prior to their due dates are deferred. Future minimum rents of $7,806 are due as follows:
For the year ending March 31, 2000 $7,277 2001 529 ------ Total $7,806 ------ ------
NOTE 4 - EQUIPMENT The following is a summary of equipment owned by the Partnership at March 31, 1999. Remaining Lease Term (Months), as used below, represents the number of months remaining from March 31, 1999 under contracted lease terms and is presented as a range when more than one lease agreement is contained in the stated equipment category. A Remaining Lease Term equal to zero reflects equipment either held for sale or re-lease or being leased on a month-to-month basis. In the opinion of EFG, the acquisition cost of the equipment did not exceed its fair market value. 7 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Notes to the Financial Statements (Continued)
REMAINING LEASE TERM EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT TYPE (MONTHS) AT COST - --------------------- ---------- ------------ Aircraft 0 $ 4,596,188 Materials handling 0-14 849,719 Communications 0 40,992 ------------ Total equipment cost 5,486,899 Accumulated depreciation (5,486,899) ------------ Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation $ -- ------------ ------------
At March 31, 1999, the Partnership's equipment portfolio included equipment having a proportionate original cost of $4,596,188 representing approximately 84% of total equipment cost. At March 31, 1999, the Partnership had fully-depreciated equipment held for sale with a cost of approximately $4,596,000. This equipment represents the Partnership's proportionate interests in two Boeing 727-251 ADV aircraft. See below for discussion related to the Partnership's interests in these aircraft. The summary above also includes equipment being leased on a month to month basis. DEFERRED SALES The Partnership and certain affiliated investment programs (collectively, the "Programs") own a Boeing 727-251 ADV jet aircraft that was leased to Sunworld International Airlines, Inc. ("Sunworld"). In January 1999, upon expiration of the lease term, the Programs entered into an agreement to sell the aircraft to Sunworld for $2,450,000. The sale agreement permits Sunworld to return the aircraft to the Programs, subject to certain conditions, on or before April 10, 1999. At March 31, 1999, the Partnership had received $324,581, representing a portion of the Partnership's total sale proceeds which is classified as a component of other liabilities on the accompanying Statement of Financial Position at March 31, 1999. The Partnership received the remainder of the sale proceeds in April 1999; see Note 8 - Subsequent Event. Due to the contingent nature of the sale, the Partnership has deferred recognition of the sale until expiration of the return option on April 10, 1999. The Partnership's interest in the aircraft had a cost of $2,175,454 and was fully depreciated at March 31, 1999. In November 1998, the Programs entered into an agreement to sell their ownership interests in a Boeing 727-251 ADV aircraft and three engines (collectively the "Aircraft") to a third party (the "Purchaser"). The Programs will receive gross sale proceeds of $4,350,000. Previously, the Aircraft had been leased to Transmeridian Airlines ("Transmeridian"). In December 1998, the Purchaser remitted $3,350,000 for the Aircraft, excluding one of three engines which had been damaged while the Aircraft was leased to Transmeridian. (See Note 7 to the financial statements presented in the Partnership's 1998 Annual Report regarding legal action undertaken by the Programs related to Transmeridian and the damaged engine). The Purchaser also deposited $1,000,000 into a third-party escrow account (the "Escrow") pending repair of the damaged engine and re-installation of the refurbished engine on the Aircraft. Upon installation, the escrow agent will transfer the Escrow amount plus interest thereon to the Programs. Currently, the engine is being refurbished at the expense of the Programs. The associated cost is estimated to be approximately $336,000, of which the Partnership's share is approximately $75,000. The Partnership accrued $58,000 of these costs in 1998 and the balance was incurred in the three months ended March 31, 1999. 8 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Notes to the Financial Statements (Continued) The Programs also are required to reimburse the Purchaser for its cost to lease a substitute engine during the period that the damaged engine is being repaired. This cost is expected to be approximately $114,000, of which the Partnership's share is approximately $26,000, all of which was accrued in 1998 in connection with the litigation referenced above. Upon completion of the engine repair and re-installation, the Escrow plus all interest thereon will be transferred to the Programs. In addition, the purchase and sale agreement permits the Purchaser to return the Aircraft to the Programs, subject to a number of conditions, for $4,350,000, reduced by an amount equivalent to $450 multiplied by the number of flight hours since the Aircraft's most recent C Check. Among the conditions precedent to the Purchaser's returning the Aircraft, the Purchaser must have completed its intended installation of hush-kitting on the Aircraft to conform to Stage 3 noise regulations. This work was completed in January 1999. The Purchaser's return option expires on May 15, 1999. Due to the contingent nature of the sale, the Partnership has deferred recognition of the sale and a resulting gain at March 31, 1999 until expiration of the Purchaser's return option on May 15, 1999. The Partnership's share of the December proceeds was $750,400, which amount was deposited into EFG's customary escrow account and transferred to the Partnership, together with the Partnership's other December rental receipts, in January 1999. At March 31, 1999, such amount was reflected as a component of other liabilities on the accompanying Statement of Financial Position. The remainder of the sale consideration, or $1,000,000, will be paid to the Programs upon release of the Escrow discussed above. The Partnership's share of this payment will be $224,000. The Partnership's interest in the Aircraft had a cost of $2,420,734 and was fully depreciated at March 31, 1999. NOTE 5 - INVESTMENT SECURITIES - AFFILIATE / NOTE RECEIVABLE - AFFILIATE As a result of an exchange transaction in 1997, the Partnership owns 34,144 shares of Semele Group, Inc. ("Semele") common stock and holds a beneficial interest in a note from Semele (the "Semele Note") of $771,450. The Semele Note bears an annual interest rate of 10% and will be amortized over three years with mandatory principal reductions, if and to the extent that net proceeds are received by Semele from the sale or refinancing of its principal real estate asset consisting of an undeveloped 274-acre parcel of land near Malibu, California ("Rancho Malibu"). The Partnership recognized interest income of $19,022 related to the Semele Note during the three months ended March 31, 1999. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, marketable equity securities classified as available-for-sale are carried at fair value. During the three months ended March 31, 1999, the Partnership decreased the carrying value of its investment in Semele common stock to $3.625 per share (the quoted price of the Semele stock on NASDAQ SmallCap Market at March 31, 1999) resulting in an unrealized loss of $17,072. This loss was reported as a component of comprehensive loss, included in partners' capital. NOTE 6 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS All operating expenses incurred by the Partnership are paid by EFG on behalf of the Partnership and EFG is reimbursed at its actual cost for such expenditures. Fees and other costs incurred during each of the three month periods ended March 31, 1999 and 1998, which were paid or accrued by the Partnership to EFG or its Affiliates, are as follows: 9 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Notes to the Financial Statements (Continued)
1999 1998 -------- ------- Equipment management fees $ 1,580 $ 5,881 Administrative charges 14,709 14,709 Reimbursable operating expenses due to third parties 69,642 25,041 ------- ------- Total $85,931 $45,631 ------- ------- ------- -------
All rents and proceeds from the sale of equipment are paid directly to either EFG or to a lender. EFG temporarily deposits collected funds in a separate interest-bearing escrow account prior to remittance to the Partnership. At March 31, 1999, the Partnership was owed $7,832 by EFG for such funds and the interest thereon. These funds were remitted to the Partnership in April 1999. NOTE 7 - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS In January 1998, certain plaintiffs (the "Plaintiffs") filed a class and derivative action, captioned LEONARD ROSENBLUM, ET AL. V. EQUIS FINANCIAL GROUP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (the "Court") on behalf of a proposed class of investors in 28 equipment leasing programs sponsored by EFG, including the Partnership (collectively, the "Nominal Defendants"), against EFG and a number of its affiliates, including the General Partner, as defendants (collectively, the "Defendants"). Certain of the Plaintiffs, on or about June 24, 1997, had filed an earlier derivative action, captioned LEONARD ROSENBLUM, ET AL. V. EQUIS FINANCIAL GROUP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., in the Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on behalf of the Nominal Defendants against the Defendants. Both actions are referred to herein collectively as the "Class Action Lawsuit". The Plaintiffs have asserted, among other things, claims against the Defendants on behalf of the Nominal Defendants for violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, common law fraud, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and violations of the partnership or trust agreements that govern each of the Nominal Defendants. The Defendants have denied, and continue to deny, that any of them have committed or threatened to commit any violations of law or breached any fiduciary duties to the Plaintiffs or the Nominal Defendants. On July 16, 1998, counsel for the Defendants and the Plaintiffs executed a Stipulation of Settlement setting forth terms pursuant to which a settlement of the Class Action Lawsuit is intended to be achieved and which, among other things, is expected to reduce the burdens and expenses attendant to continuing litigation. The Stipulation of Settlement was based upon and superseded a Memorandum of Understanding between the parties dated March 9, 1998 which outlined the terms of a possible settlement. The Stipulation of Settlement was filed with the Court on July 23, 1998 and was preliminarily approved by the Court on August 20, 1998 when the Court issued its "Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement, Conditionally Certifying Settlement Class and Providing for Notice of, and Hearing on, the Proposed Settlement" (the "August 20 Order"). Prior to issuing a final order, the Court will hold a fairness hearing that will be open to all interested parties and permit any party to object to the settlement. The investors of the Partnership and all other plaintiff class members in the Class Action Lawsuit will receive a Notice of Settlement and other information pertinent to the settlement of their claims that will be mailed to them in advance of the fairness hearing. Since first executing the Stipulation of Settlement, the Court has scheduled two fairness hearings, the first on December 11, 1998 and the second on March 19, 1999, each of which was postponed because of delays in finalizing certain information materials that are subject to regulatory review prior to being distributed to investors. 10 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Notes to the Financial Statements (Continued) On March 15, 1999, counsel for the Plaintiffs and the Defendants entered into an amended stipulation of settlement (the "Amended Stipulation") which was filed with the Court on March 15, 1999. The Amended Stipulation was preliminarily approved by the Court by its "Modified Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement, Conditionally Certifying Settlement Class and Providing For Notice of, and Hearing On, the Proposed Settlement" dated March 22, 1999 (the "March 22 Order"). The Amended Stipulation, among other things, divides the Class Action Lawsuit into two separate sub-classes that can be settled individually. This revision is expected to expedite the settlement of one sub-class by the middle of 1999. However, the second sub-class, involving the Partnership and 10 affiliated partnerships (collectively referred to as the "Exchange Partnerships"), is expected to remain pending for a longer period due, in part, to the complexity of the proposed settlement pertaining to this class. Specifically, the settlement of the second sub-class is premised on the consolidation of the Exchange Partnerships' net assets (the "Consolidation"), subject to certain conditions, into a single successor company ("Newco"). Under the proposed Consolidation, the partners of the Exchange Partnerships would receive both common stock in Newco and a cash distribution; and thereupon the Exchange Partnerships would be dissolved. In addition, EFG would contribute certain management contracts, operations personnel, and business opportunities to Newco and cancel its current management contracts with all of the Exchange Partnerships. Newco would operate as a finance company specializing in the acquisition, financing and servicing of equipment leases for its own account and for the account of others on a contract basis. Newco also would use its best efforts to list its shares on the NASDAQ National Market or another national exchange or market as soon after the Consolidation as Newco deems that market conditions and its business operations are suitable for listing its shares and Newco has satisfied all necessary regulatory and listing requirements. The potential benefits and risks of the Consolidation will be presented in a Solicitation Statement that will be mailed to all of the partners of the Exchange Partnerships as soon as the associated regulatory review process is completed and at least 60 days prior to the fairness hearing. A preliminary Solicitation Statement was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 24, 1998 and remains pending. Class members will be notified of the actual fairness hearing date when it is confirmed. One of the principal objectives of the Consolidation is to create a company that would have the potential to generate more value for the benefit of existing limited partners than other alternatives, including continuing the Partnership's customary business operations until all of its assets are disposed in the ordinary course of business. To facilitate the realization of this objective, the Amended Stipulation provides, among other things, that commencing March 22, 1999, the Exchange Partnerships may collectively invest up to 40% of the total aggregate net asset values of all of the Exchange Partnerships in any investment, including additional equipment and other business activities that the general partners of the Exchange Partnerships and EFG reasonably believe to be consistent with the anticipated business interests and objectives of Newco, subject to certain limitations, including that the Exchange Partnerships retain sufficient cash balances to pay their respective shares of the cash distribution referenced above in connection with the proposed Consolidation. In the absence of the Court's authorization to enter into such activities, the Partnership's Restated Agreement, as amended, would not permit new investment activities without the approval of limited partners owning a majority of the Partnership's outstanding Units. Accordingly, to the extent that the Partnership invests in new equipment, the Manager (being EFG) will (i) defer, until the earlier of the effective date of the Consolidation or December 31, 1999, any acquisition fees resulting therefrom and (ii) limit its management fees on all such assets to 2% of rental income. In the event that the Consolidation is consummated, all such acquisition and management fees will be paid to Newco. To the extent that the Partnership invests in other business activities not consisting of equipment acquisitions, the Manager will forego any acquisition fees and management fees related to such investments. In the event that the Partnership has acquired new investments, but the Partnership does not participate in the Consolidation, Newco will acquire such new investments for an amount equal to the Partnership's net equity investment plus an annualized return thereon of 7.5%. Finally, in the event that the Partnership has acquired new investments and the Consolidation is not effected, the General Partner will use its 11 best efforts to divest all such new investments in an orderly and timely fashion and the Manager will cancel or return to the Partnership any acquisition or management fees resulting from such new investments. The Amended Stipulation and previous Stipulation of Settlement prescribe certain conditions necessary to effecting final settlements, including providing the partners of the Exchange Partnerships with the opportunity to object to the participation of their partnership in the Consolidation. Assuming the proposed settlement is effected according to present terms, the Partnership's share of legal fees and expenses related to the Class Action Lawsuit is estimated to be approximately $78,000 all of which was accrued and expensed by the Partnership in 1998. In addition, the Partnership's share of fees and expenses related to the proposed Consolidation is estimated to be approximately $227,000, all of which was accrued and expensed by the Partnership in 1998. While the Court's August 20 Order enjoined certain class members, including all of the partners of the Partnership, from transferring, selling, assigning, giving, pledging, hypothecating, or otherwise disposing of any Units pending the Court's final determination of whether the settlement should be approved, the March 22 Order permits the partners to transfer Units to family members or as a result of the divorce, disability or death of the partner. No other transfers are permitted pending the Court's final determination of whether the settlement should be approved. The provision of the August 20 Order which enjoined the General Partners of the Exchange Partnerships from, among other things, recording any transfers not in accordance with the Court's order remains effective. There can be no assurance that settlement of either sub-class of the Class Action Lawsuit will receive final Court approval and be effected. There also can be no assurance that all or any of the Exchange Partnerships will participate in the Consolidation because if limited partners owning more than one-third of the outstanding Units of a partnership object to the Consolidation, then that partnership will be excluded from the Consolidation. The General Partner and its affiliates, in consultation with counsel, concur that there is a reasonable basis to believe that final settlements of each sub-class will be achieved. However, in the absence of final settlements approved by the Court, the Defendants intend to defend vigorously against the claims asserted in the Class Action Lawsuit. Neither the General Partner nor its affiliates can predict with any degree of certainty the cost of continuing litigation to the Partnership or the ultimate outcome. In addition to the foregoing, the Partnership is a party to other lawsuits that have arisen out of the conduct of its business, principally involving disputes or disagreements with lessees over lease terms and conditions. Refer to the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 for a description of these matters. The following is an update to the Partnership's prior disclosure on Form 10-K for 1998: ACTION INVOLVING NATIONAL STEEL CORPORATION EFG, on behalf of the Partnership and certain affiliated investment programs (collectively, the "Plaintiffs"), filed an action in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Superior Court, Department of the Trial Court in and for the County of Suffolk on July 27, 1995, for damages and declaratory relief against a lessee of the Partnership, National Steel Corporation ("National Steel"). The Complaint seeks reimbursement from National Steel of certain sales and/or use taxes paid to the State of Illinois in connection with equipment leased by National Steel from the Plaintiffs and other remedies provided under the Master Lease Agreement ("MLA"). On August 30, 1995, National Steel filed a Notice of Removal, which removed the case to United States District Court, District of Massachusetts. On September 7, 1995, National Steel filed its Answer to the Plaintiff's Complaint along with Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims and sought declaratory relief, alleging breach of contract, implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and specific performance. The Plaintiffs filed an Answer to National Steel's Counterclaims on September 29, 1995. The parties discussed settlement with respect to this matter for some time; however, the negotiations were unsuccessful. The Plaintiffs filed an Amended and Supplemental Complaint alleging further default under the MLA and filed a motion for Summary Judgment on all claims and Counterclaims. The Court held a hearing on the Plaintiff's motion in December 1997 and later entered a decision 12 dismissing certain of National Steel's Counterclaims, finding in favor of the Plaintiffs on certain issues and in favor of National Steel on other issues. In March 1999, the Plaintiffs obtained payment for certain of the disputed items and, on May 11, 1999, the parties executed a comprehensive settlement agreement to resolve remaining issues. The General Partner does not expect the outcome of this action to have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's financial position or results of operations. ACTION INVOLVING NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC. On September 22, 1995, Investors Asset Holding Corp. and First Security Bank, N.A., trustees of the Partnership and certain affiliated investment programs (collectively, the "Plaintiffs"), filed an action in United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts against a lessee of the Partnership, Northwest Airlines, Inc. ("Northwest"). The Complaint alleges that Northwest did not fulfill its maintenance obligations under its Lease Agreements with the Plaintiffs and seeks declaratory judgment concerning Northwest's obligations and monetary damages. Northwest filed an Answer to the Plaintiffs' Complaint and a motion to transfer the venue of this proceeding to Minnesota. The Court denied Northwest's motion. On June 29, 1998, a United States Magistrate Judge recommended entry of partial summary judgment in favor of the Plaintiffs. Northwest appealed this decision. On April 15, 1999, the United States District Court Judge adopted the Magistrate Judge's recommendation and entered partial summary judgment in favor of the Plaintiffs. The General Partner believes that the Plaintiff's claims ultimately will prevail and that the Partnership's financial position will not be adversely affected by the outcome of this action. NOTE 8 - SUBSEQUENT EVENT On April 10, 1999, Sunworld's option to return a Boeing 727-251 ADV aircraft that it had purchased from the Partnership and certain affiliated investment programs in January 1999 expired. Subsequently, the Partnership received the balance of its share of the sale proceeds for this asset. In aggregate, the Partnership received total sale proceeds of $548,800. The aircraft was fully depreciated at the date of its disposal. See also Note 4. 13 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Form 10-Q PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. Certain statements in this quarterly report of American Income Partners V-A Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") that are not historical fact constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties. There are a number of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made herein. These factors include, but are not limited to, the outcome of the Class Action Lawsuit described in Note 7 to the accompanying financial statements, the collection of all rents due under the Partnership's lease agreements and the remarketing of the Partnership's equipment. YEAR 2000 ISSUE The Year 2000 Issue generally refers to the capacity of computer programming logic to correctly identify the calendar year. Many companies utilize computer programs or hardware with date sensitive software or embedded chips that could interpret dates ending in "00" as the year 1900 rather than the year 2000. In certain cases, such errors could result in system failures or miscalculations that disrupt the operations of the affected businesses. The Partnership uses information systems provided by Equis Financial Group Limited Partnership (formerly American Finance Group) ("EFG") and has no information systems of its own. EFG has adopted a plan to address the Year 2000 Issue that consists of four phases: assessment, remediation, testing, and implementation and has elected to utilize principally internal resources to perform all phases. EFG has completed substantially all of its Year 2000 project at an aggregate cost of less than $50,000 and at a di minimus cost to the Partnership. All costs incurred in connection with EFG's Year 2000 project have been expensed as incurred. EFG's primary information software was coded by IBM at the point of original design to use a four digit field to identify calendar year. All of the Partnership's lease billings, cash receipts and equipment remarketing processes are performed using this proprietary software. In addition, EFG has gathered information about the Year 2000 readiness of significant vendors and third party servicers and continues to monitor developments in this area. All of EFG's peripheral computer technologies, such as its network operating system and third-party software applications, including payroll, depreciation processing, and electronic banking, have been evaluated for potential programming changes and have required only minor modifications to function properly with respect to dates in the year 2000 and thereafter. EFG understands that each of its and the Partnership's significant vendors and third-party servicers are in the process, or have completed the process, of making their systems Year 2000 compliant. Substantially all parties queried have indicated that their systems would be Year 2000 compliant by the end of 1998. Presently, EFG is not aware of any outside customer with a Year 2000 Issue that would have a material effect on the Partnership's results of operations, liquidity, or financial position. The Partnership's equipment leases were structured as triple net leases, meaning that the lessees are responsible for, among other things, (i) maintaining and servicing all equipment during the lease term, (ii) ensuring that all equipment functions properly and is returned in good condition, normal wear and tear excepted, and (iii) insuring the assets against casualty and other events of loss. Non-compliance with lease terms on the part of a lessee, including failure to address Year 2000 Issues, could result in lost revenues and impairment of residual values of the Partnership's equipment assets under a worst-case scenario. EFG believes that its Year 2000 compliance plan will be effective in resolving all material Year 2000 risks in a timely manner and that the Year 2000 Issue will not pose significant operational problems with respect to its computer systems or result in a system failure or disruption of its or the Partnership's business operations. However, EFG has no means of ensuring that all customers, vendors and third-party servicers will conform ultimately to Year 2000 standards. The effect of this risk to the Partnership is not determinable. 14 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Form 10-Q PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 COMPARED TO THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998: The Partnership was organized in 1989 as a direct-participation equipment leasing program to acquire a diversified portfolio of capital equipment subject to lease agreements with third parties. Presently, the Partnership is a Nominal Defendant in a Class Action Lawsuit, the outcome of which could significantly alter the nature of the Partnership's organization and its future business operations. See Note 7 to the accompanying financial statements. Pursuant to the Restated Agreement, as amended, the Partnership is scheduled to be dissolved by December 31, 2000. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS For the three months ended March 31, 1999, the Partnership recognized lease revenue of $31,593 compared to $117,616 for the same period in 1998. The decrease in lease revenue between 1998 and 1999 resulted principally from renewal lease term expirations and the sale of equipment. In the future, lease revenue will continue to decline due to lease term expirations and the sale of equipment. Interest income for the three months ended March 31, 1999 was $57,531 compared to $52,601 for the same period in 1998. Interest income is typically generated from temporary investment of rental receipts and equipment sale proceeds in short-term instruments. Interest income in 1999 and 1998 included $19,022 and $19,286, respectively, earned on a note receivable from Semele Group, Inc. ("Semele") (see Note 5 to the financial statements herein). The amount of future interest income is expected to fluctuate in relation to prevailing interest rates, the collection of lease revenue and the proceeds from equipment sales. The Partnership's equipment portfolio includes certain assets in which the Partnership holds a proportionate ownership interest. In such cases, the remaining interests are owned by an affiliated equipment leasing program sponsored by EFG. Proportionate equipment ownership enabled the Partnership to further diversify its equipment portfolio at inception by participating in the ownership of selected assets, thereby reducing the general levels of risk which could have resulted from a concentration in any single equipment type, industry or lessee. The Partnership and each affiliate individually report, in proportion to their respective ownership interests, their respective shares of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses associated with the equipment. For the three months ended March 31, 1999, the Partnership sold equipment which had been fully depreciated to existing lessees and third parties. These sales resulted in a net gain, for financial statement purposes, of $1,000. There were no equipment sales during the three months ended March 31, 1998. The results of future sales of equipment will be dependent upon the condition and type of equipment being sold and its marketability at the time of sale. The ultimate realization of residual value for any type of equipment is dependent upon many factors, including EFG's ability to sell and re-lease equipment. Changing market conditions, industry trends, technological advances, and many other events can converge to enhance or detract from asset values at any given time. EFG attempts to monitor these changes in order to identify opportunities which may be advantageous to the Partnership and which will maximize total cash returns for each asset. The total economic value realized upon final disposition of each asset is comprised of all primary lease term revenue generated from that asset, together with its residual value. The latter consists of cash proceeds realized upon the asset's sale in addition to all other cash receipts obtained from renting the asset on a re-lease, renewal or month-to-month basis. The Partnership classifies such residual rental payments as lease revenue. Consequently, the amount of gain or loss reported in the financial statements is not necessarily indicative of the total residual value the Partnership achieved from leasing the equipment. 15 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Form 10-Q PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Depreciation expense was $80,952 for the three months ending March 31, 1998. The Partnership's equipment was fully depreciated at March 31, 1998. Management fees were 5% of lease revenue for the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 1998. Management fees are based on 5% of gross lease revenue generated by operating leases and 2% of gross lease revenue generated by full payout leases. Operating expenses were $84,351 for the three months ended March 31, 1999, compared to $39,750 for the same period in 1998. In 1999, operating expenses included approximately $17,000 related to the refurbishment of an aircraft engine (see Note 4 to the financial statements). Other operating expenses consist principally of administrative charges, professional service costs, such as audit and legal fees, as well as printing, distribution and other remarketing expenses. In certain cases, equipment storage or repairs and maintenance costs may be incurred in connection with equipment being remarketed. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES AND DISCUSSION OF CASH FLOWS The Partnership by its nature is a limited life entity. As an equipment leasing program, the Partnership's principal operating activities derive from asset rental transactions. Accordingly, the Partnership's principal source of cash from operations is generally provided by the collection of periodic rents. These cash inflows are used to pay management fees and operating costs. Operating activities generated a net cash outflow of $19,447 (excluding the receipt of proceeds of $1,074,981 related to the deferred aircraft sales, discussed below) and a net cash inflow of $149,115 for the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Future renewal, re-lease and equipment sale activities will cause a decline in the Partnership's lease revenue and corresponding sources of operating cash. Overall, expenses associated with rental activities, such as management fees, and net cash flow from operating activities will also decline as the Partnership experiences a higher frequency of remarketing events. Cash realized from asset disposal transactions is reported under investing activities on the accompanying Statement of Cash Flows. During the three months ended March 31, 1999, the Partnership realized $1,000 in equipment sale proceeds. There were no equipment sales during the three months ending March 31, 1998. Future inflows of cash from asset disposals will vary in timing and amount and will be influenced by many factors including, but not limited to, the frequency and timing of lease expirations, the type of equipment being sold, its condition and age, and future market conditions. The Partnership and certain affiliated investment programs (collectively, the "Programs") own a Boeing 727-251 ADV jet aircraft that was leased to Sunworld International Airlines, Inc. ("Sunworld"). In January 1999, upon expiration of the lease term, the Programs entered into an agreement to sell the aircraft to Sunworld for $2,450,000. The sale agreement permits Sunworld to return the aircraft to the Programs, subject to certain conditions, on or before April 10, 1999. At March 31, 1999, the Partnership had received $324,581, representing a portion of the Partnership's total sale proceeds which is classified as a component of other liabilities on the accompanying Statement of Financial Position at March 31, 1999. The Partnership received the remainder of the sale proceeds in April 1999; see Note 8 - Subsequent Event to the financial statements. Due to the contingent nature of the sale, the Partnership has deferred recognition of the sale until expiration of the return option on April 10, 1999. The Partnership's interest in the aircraft had a cost of $2,175,454 and was fully depreciated at March 31, 1999. In November 1998, the Programs entered into an agreement to sell their ownership interests in a Boeing 727-251 ADV aircraft and three engines (collectively the "Aircraft") to a third party (the "Purchaser"). The Programs will receive gross sale proceeds of $4,350,000. Previously, the Aircraft had been leased to Transmeridian Airlines ("Transmeridian"). In December 1998, the Purchaser remitted $3,350,000 for the Aircraft, excluding one of three engines which had been damaged while the Aircraft was leased to Transmeridian. (See Note 7 to the financial 16 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Form 10-Q PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION statements presented in the Partnership's 1998 Annual Report regarding legal action undertaken by the Programs related to Transmeridian and the damaged engine). The Purchaser also deposited $1,000,000 into a third-party escrow account (the "Escrow") pending repair of the damaged engine and re-installation of the refurbished engine on the Aircraft. Upon installation, the escrow agent will transfer the Escrow amount plus interest thereon to the Programs. Currently, the engine is being refurbished at the expense of the Programs. The associated cost is estimated to be approximately $336,000, of which the Partnership's share is approximately $75,000. The Partnership accrued $58,000 of these costs in 1998 and the balance was incurred in the three months ended March 31, 1999. The Programs also are required to reimburse the Purchaser for its cost to lease a substitute engine during the period that the damaged engine is being repaired. This cost is expected to be approximately $114,000, of which the Partnership's share is approximately $26,000, all of which was accrued in 1998 in connection with the litigation referenced above. Upon completion of the engine repair and re-installation, the Escrow plus all interest thereon will be transferred to the Programs. In addition, the purchase and sale agreement permits the Purchaser to return the Aircraft to the Programs, subject to a number of conditions, for $4,350,000, reduced by an amount equivalent to $450 multiplied by the number of flight hours since the Aircraft's most recent C Check. Among the conditions precedent to the Purchaser's returning the Aircraft, the Purchaser must have completed its intended installation of hush-kitting on the Aircraft to conform to Stage 3 noise regulations. This work was completed in January 1999. The Purchaser's return option expires on May 15, 1999. Due to the contingent nature of the sale, the Partnership has deferred recognition of the sale and a resulting gain at March 31, 1999 until expiration of the Purchaser's return option on May 15, 1999. The Partnership's share of the December proceeds was $750,400, which amount was deposited into EFG's customary escrow account and transferred to the Partnership, together with the Partnership's other December rental receipts, in January 1999. At March 31, 1999, such amount was reflected as a component of other liabilities on the accompanying Statement of Financial Position. The remainder of the sale consideration, or $1,000,000, will be paid to the Programs upon release of the Escrow discussed above. The Partnership's share of this payment will be $224,000. The Partnership's interest in the Aircraft had a cost of $2,420,734 and was fully depreciated at March 31, 1999. At March 31, 1999, the Partnership was due aggregate future minimum lease payments of $7,806 from contractual lease agreements (see Note 3 to the financial statements). At the expiration of the individual renewal lease terms underlying the Partnership's future minimum lease payments, the Partnership will sell the equipment or enter re-lease or renewal agreements when considered advantageous by the General Partner and EFG. Such future remarketing activities will result in the realization of additional cash inflows in the form of equipment sale proceeds or rents from renewals and re-leases, the timing and extent of which cannot be predicted with certainty. This is because the timing and extent of remarketing events often is dependent upon the needs and interests of the existing lessees. Some lessees may choose to renew their lease contracts, while others may elect to return the equipment. In the latter instances, the equipment could be re-leased to another lessee or sold to a third-party. Accordingly, as the terms of the currently existing contractual lease agreements expire, the cash flows of the Partnership will become less predictable. In addition, the Partnership will need cash outflows to pay management fees and operating expenses. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, marketable equity securities classified as available-for-sale are carried at fair value. During the three months ended March 31, 1999, the Partnership decreased the carrying value of its investment in Semele common stock to $3.625 per share (the quoted price of the Semele stock on NASDAQ SmallCap Market at March 31, 1999) resulting in an unrealized loss of $17,072 compared to an unrealized gain of $42,680 for the same period in 1998. The loss and gain were each reported as a component of comprehensive loss and income 17 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Form 10-Q PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION included in partners' capital during the respective periods. The General Partner believes that the underlying tangible assets of Semele, particularly the Rancho Malibu property, can be sold or developed on a tax free basis due to Semele's net operating loss carryforwards and can provide an attractive economic return to the Partnership. There are no formal restrictions under the Restated Agreement, as amended, that materially limit the Partnership's ability to pay cash distributions, except that the General Partner may suspend or limit cash distributions to ensure that the Partnership maintains sufficient working capital reserves to cover, among other things, operating costs and potential expenditures, such as refurbishment costs to remarket equipment upon lease expiration. Liquidity is especially important as the Partnership matures and sells equipment, because the remaining equipment base consists of fewer revenue-producing assets that are available to cover prospective cash disbursements. Insufficient liquidity could inhibit the Partnership's ability to sustain its operations or maximize the realization of proceeds from remarketing its remaining assets. In particular, the Partnership's ownership interests in commercial aircraft involve unique risks resulting from the specialized nature of these assets and the potential for the Partnership to incur significant remarketing costs at lease expiration. Accordingly, the General Partner has maintained significant cash reserves within the Partnership in order to minimize the risk of a liquidity shortage primarily in connection with the Partnership's aircraft. At March 31, 1999, the Partnership owned interests in two Boeing 727 aircraft, both of which were under contract to be sold to third-party buyers subject to the buyers' right to return the aircraft on or before April 10, 1999 and May 15, 1999, respectively (see discussion above). In addition, the Partnership is a Nominal Defendant in a Class Action Lawsuit described in Note 7 to the accompanying financial statements. A preliminary court order has allowed the Partnership to invest in new equipment or other activities, subject to certain limitations, effective March 22, 1999. To the extent that the Partnership has exposure to aircraft investments that could require capital reserves, the General Partner does not anticipate that the Partnership will invest in new assets, regardless of its authority to do so. Until the Class Action Lawsuit is adjudicated, the General Partner does not expect that the level of future quarterly cash distributions paid by the Partnership will be increased above amounts paid in the first quarter of 1999. In addition, the proposed settlement, if effected, will materially change the future organizational structure and business interests of the Partnership, as well as its cash distribution policies. See Note 7 to the accompanying financial statements. Cash distributions to the General Partner and Recognized Owners are declared and generally paid within fifteen days following the end of each calendar quarter. The payment of such distributions is presented as a component of financing activities. For the three months ended March 31, 1999, the Partnership declared total cash distributions of Distributable Cash From Operations and Distributable Cash From Sales and Refinancings of $136,250. In accordance with the Amended and Restated Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership, the Recognized Owners were allocated 95% of these distributions, or $129,438, and the General Partner was allocated 5%, or $6,812. The first quarter 1999 cash distribution was paid on April 15, 1999. Cash distributions paid to the Recognized Owners consist of both a return of and a return on capital. Cash distributions do not represent and are not indicative of yield on investment. Actual yield on investment cannot be determined with any certainty until conclusion of the Partnership and will be dependent upon the collection of all future contracted rents, the generation of renewal and/or re-lease rents, and the residual value realized for each asset at its disposal date. The Partnership's future cash distributions will be adversely affected by the bankruptcy of a former lessee of the Partnership, Midway Airlines, Inc. ("Midway"). In 1993, the Partnership's interests in two DC-9-30 aircraft leased by Midway were transferred to a designee of the lender in lieu of foreclosure. Although this bankruptcy had no immediate adverse effect on the Partnership's cash flow, as the Partnership had almost fully leveraged its ownership interest in the underlying aircraft, this event resulted in the Partnership's loss of any future interest in the residual value of the aircraft. Notwithstanding such adverse impact, the overall investment results to be 18 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Form 10-Q PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION achieved by the Partnership will be dependent upon the collective performance results of all of the Partnership's equipment leases. The Partnership's capital account balances for federal income tax and for financial reporting purposes are different primarily due to differing treatments of income and expense items for income tax purposes in comparison to financial reporting purposes (generally referred to as permanent or timing differences; see Note 6 to the financial statements presented in the Partnership's 1998 Annual Report). For instance, selling commissions, organization and offering costs pertaining to syndication of the Partnership's limited partnership units are not deductible for federal income tax purposes, but are recorded as a reduction of partners' capital for financial reporting purposes. Therefore, such differences are permanent differences between capital accounts for financial reporting and federal income tax purposes. Other differences between the bases of capital accounts for federal income tax and financial reporting purposes occur due to timing differences. Such items consist of the cumulative difference between income or loss for tax purposes and financial statement income or loss, the difference between distributions (declared vs. paid) for income tax and financial reporting purposes, and the treatment of unrealized gains or losses on investment securities, if any, for book and tax purposes. The principal component of the cumulative difference between financial statement income or loss and tax income or loss results from different depreciation policies for book and tax purposes. For financial reporting purposes, the General Partner has accumulated a capital deficit at March 31, 1999. This is the result of aggregate cash distributions to the General Partner being in excess of its capital contribution of $1,000 and its allocation of financial statement net income or loss. Ultimately, the existence of a capital deficit for the General Partner for financial reporting purposes is not indicative of any further capital obligations to the Partnership by the General Partner. The Amended and Restated Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership, requires that upon the dissolution of the Partnership, the General Partner will be required to contribute to the partnership an amount equal to any negative balance which may exist in the General Partner's tax capital account. At December 31, 1998, the General Partner had a positive tax capital account balance. The future liquidity of the Partnership will be influenced by, among other factors, prospective market conditions, technological changes, the ability of EFG to manage and remarket the Partnership's assets, and many other events and circumstances, that could enhance or detract from individual asset yields and the collective performance of the Partnership's equipment portfolio. However, the outcome of the Class Action Lawsuit described in Note 7 to the accompanying financial statements will be the principal factor in determining the future of the Partnership's operations. 19 AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FORM 10-Q PART II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings Response: Refer to Note 7 to the financial statements herein. Item 2. Changes in Securities Response: None Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities Response: None Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders Response: None Item 5. Other Information Response: None Item 6(a). Exhibits Response: None Item 6(b). Reports on Form 8-K Response: None 20 SIGNATURE PAGE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on behalf of the registrant and in the capacity and on the date indicated. AMERICAN INCOME PARTNERS V-A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: AFG Leasing IV Incorporated, a Massachusetts corporation and the General Partner of the Registrant. By: /s/ MICHAEL J. BUTTERFIELD ------------------------------------------------- Michael J. Butterfield Treasurer of AFG Leasing IV Incorporated (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) Date: MAY 14, 1999 ------------------------------------------------- By: /s/ GARY ROMANO ------------------------------------------------- Gary M. Romano Clerk of AFG Leasing IV Incorporated (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer) Date: MAY 14, 1999 ------------------------------------------------- 21 EX-27 2 EXHIBIT 27
5 3-MOS DEC-31-1999 JAN-01-1999 MAR-31-1999 3,369,244 123,772 801,898 0 0 4,294,914 5,486,899 (5,486,899) 4,294,914 1,541,188 0 0 0 0 2,753,726 4,294,914 0 90,124 0 0 85,931 0 0 4,193 0 4,193 0 0 0 4,193 0 0
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----