XML 25 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
RESTRUCTURING / IMPAIRMENT CHARGES
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
RESTRUCTURING / IMPAIRMENT CHARGES
NOTE 16 - RESTRUCTURING / IMPAIRMENT CHARGES

The following table summarizes the restructuring and impairment charges recorded in income from continuing operations for each of the fiscal years in the three year period ended December 31, 2011:

(Dollars in thousands)
                 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2009
 
Inventory charges (1)
                 
Printed Circuit Materials
  $ -     $ -     $ 380  
Other
    -       -       430  
 
    -       -       810  
Property, plant and equipment charges (2)
                       
High Performance Foams
    441       -       559  
Printed Circuit Materials
    -       -       800  
Other
    -       -       16,382  
 
    441       -       17,741  
                         
Severance (3)
    -       -       4,920  
Total charges
  $ 441     $ -     $ 23,471  
 
 
(1)
These amounts were included in cost of sales on our consolidated statements of operations.
 
(2)
These amounts are included in restructuring and impairment charges on our consolidated statements of operations.
 
(3)
These amounts have been included in restructuring and impairment charges on our consolidated statements of operations.

2011

In the first quarter of 2012, we signed an agreement to sell our facility in Richmond, Virginia for $1.5 million.  We acquired this facility as part of the acquisition of MTI Global Inc. and subsequently moved operations from Richmond to our High Performance Foams manufacturing facility in Carol Stream, Illinois, so the facility has been vacant and classified as held for sale since 2009.  This facility had a book value of approximately $1.8 million prior to the signing of the agreement, and we recorded an impairment charge of approximately $0.4 million as of December 31, 2011, which represents the write down to the selling price less approximately $0.1 million of estimated selling costs.  We expect the transaction to close in the second quarter of 2012.
 
2009

During 2009, we recorded approximately $23.5 million in restructuring and impairment charges (of which $0.8 million was recorded in “Cost of Sales” on our consolidated statements of operations).  The restructuring and impairment charges were comprised of the following:

 
·
$17.7 million in charges related to the impairment of certain long-lived assets in the following operating segments: Other, for the business of Flexible Circuit Materials ($7.7 million) and the business of Custom Electrical Components ($8.6 million), High Performance Foams ($0.6 million) and Printed Circuit Materials ($0.8 million); and
 
·
$4.9 million in severance related to a global workforce reduction; and
 
·
$0.8 million in charges related to additional inventory reserves related to the restructuring of our Custom Electrical Components and Flexible Circuit Materials operating segments, which was recorded in “Cost of sales” on our consolidated statements of operations.

These charges are discussed in greater detail below.

·
Flexible Circuit Materials

In the second quarter of 2009 as part of our strategic planning process, our management team determined that we would exit the flexible circuit materials market and effectively discontinue any new product development or research in this area.  Over the previous several years, the flexible circuit materials market had experienced increased commoditization of its products, resulting in increased competition and extreme pricing pressures.  In 2008, we had taken certain initial actions to streamline our flexible circuit materials business, including shifting production of certain products to our joint venture in Taiwan, and retaining only certain, higher margin products.  However, in 2009, we determined that the future markets for these products were very limited and did not fit with the strategic direction of the Company.  Therefore, we determined that we would immediately stop production of certain remaining flexible circuit materials products and continue to support only select customers for a limited time period going forward, ultimately resulting in the abandonment of our wholly-owned flexible circuit materials business.

As a result of these management decisions, we determined it appropriate to evaluate the assets related to this business for potential impairment.  This analysis resulted in an impairment charge related to specific equipment located in our Belgian facility.  This equipment was to be used primarily for the development of certain flexible circuit materials-related products; however, based on the decision to abandon the business, this equipment was no longer of use to us.  We recognized an impairment charge of approximately $6.0 million related to this equipment and wrote it down to an estimated salvage value of approximately $2.0 million.  This charge was reported in the “Restructuring and impairment” line item in our consolidated statements of operations.

We also recorded an impairment charge on a building located in Suzhou, China that was built to support our flexible circuit materials business in the Asian marketplace.  The impairment charge was reported in the “Restructuring and impairment” line item in our consolidated statements of operations.  In the first quarter of 2011 we sold this building.

Further, as part of the decision to exit the flexible circuit materials business, we recorded additional reserves on certain inventory that will no longer be sold, of approximately $0.4 million.  This charge was reported as part of “Cost of sales” in our consolidated statements of operations.

Lastly, we also recorded an impairment charge in 2009 on certain other assets pertaining to the flexible circuit materials business in Asia of approximately $0.1 million, which was reported in the “Restructuring and impairment” line item in our consolidated statements of operations.

These charges were reported in our Other reportable segment.
 
·
Custom Electrical Components

Over the past few years, our Custom Electrical Components (CEC) electroluminescent (EL) lamp business has steadily declined as new technologies have emerged to replace these lamps in cell phone and other related applications.  In the second quarter of 2007, we took initial steps to restructure the CEC business for this decline, as we shifted the majority of manufacturing to our China facility and recorded impairment charges on certain U.S. based assets.  Since that time, we have continued to produce EL lamps out of our China facility at gradually declining volumes and our management team has initiated efforts to develop new product applications using our screen printing technology.  Our initial forecasts indicated the potential for new applications to go to market in the second half of 2009; however, we had not successfully developed any new applications that would generate material cash flows in the future.  We concluded that this situation, plus the fact that our EL lamp production was primarily limited to automotive applications as there were no longer material sales into the handheld market as of the second quarter of 2009, was an indicator of impairment.   The resulting analysis concluded that these assets should be treated as “abandoned”, as they are not in use and we did not anticipate the assets being placed in use in the near future.  As such, these assets were written down to their current fair value, which in this case approximates salvage value as there is not a readily available market for these assets since the technology is becoming obsolete.  Therefore, we recorded an impairment charge of approximately $4.6 million related to these assets, resulting in a remaining book value of approximately $0.7 million.  This charge is reported in the “Restructuring and impairment” line item in our consolidated statement of operations.

Further, as a result of reaching end of life on certain handheld applications, we recorded additional inventory reserves of approximately $0.4 million, as this inventory no longer had any value or future use.  This charge was reported as part of “Cost of sales” in our consolidated statements of operations.

During the fourth quarter of 2009, as a result of the continued decline in the CEC business, as described above, we made the decision to market for sale the CEC facility located in Chandler, Arizona.  As a result of this decision, the fair value of the building was appraised at approximately $7.1 million, resulting in an impairment charge of $4.0 million.  This charge was reported in the “Restructuring and impairment” line item in our consolidated statement of operations.  The building does not meet the definition of an asset-held-for-sale, per the relevant accounting guidance, and therefore it will continue to be classified as “Property, plant and equipment” on our consolidated statement of financial position at December 31, 2011 and 2010.

These charges were reported in our Other reportable segment.

·
High Performance Foams

During the fourth quarter of 2009, we recorded an impairment charge of $0.6 million on our manufacturing facility located in Richmond, Virginia which was acquired as part of the acquisition of certain assets of MTI Global Inc.  The building was classified as an “asset held for sale” when acquired in the second quarter of 2009.  Market conditions at the time resulted in the 2009 fourth quarter impairment charge.

This charge was recorded in our High Performance Foams operating segment.

·
Printed Circuit Materials

Early in 2008, management determined based on forecasts at that time, that we would need additional capacity for our high frequency products later that year.  Management had already undertaken initiatives to build additional capacity through a new facility on our China campus, but needed a solution to fill interim capacity needs.  Therefore, we initiated efforts to move idle equipment from our Belgian facility to our Arizona facility and incurred costs of approximately $0.8 million due to these efforts.  At the end of 2008, our overall business began to decline due in part to the global recession, and management determined that we would not need this equipment at that time but that we would still need certain capacity later in 2009 prior to the China capacity coming on line.  However, in 2009, business did not recover as quickly as anticipated and we believed that we would not need this equipment as we had sufficient capacity to meet our current needs and the China facility would be available in time to satisfy any increase in demand.  Therefore, we determined that the costs incurred related to the relocation of this equipment should be impaired and equipment purchased or refurbished as part of the relocation should be written down to an estimated salvage value, resulting in a charge of approximately $0.8 million, which is reflected in the “Restructuring and impairment” line item on our consolidated statements of operations.

These charges were reported in our Printed Circuit Materials operating segment.
 
·
Severance

In the first half of 2009, we announced certain cost reduction initiatives that included a workforce reduction and a significant reduction in our operating and overhead expenses in an effort to better align our cost structure with the lower sales volumes experienced at the end of 2008 and in 2009.  As a result, we recognized approximately $4.7 million in severance charges in 2009, and paid out approximately $3.8 million in severance during 2009.

A summary of the activity in the severance accrual as of December 31, 2010 is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)
     
Balance at December 31, 2010
  $ 1,088  
Provisions
    -  
Payments
    (1,088 )
Balance at December 31, 2011
  $ -  

These charges were included in the “Restructuring and impairment charges” line item on our consolidated statements of operations and were reported across all segments.