10-Q 1 a4454325.txt ROGERS CORPORATION 10-Q SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q (Mark One) [X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 29, 2003 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to ----------------- --------------- Commission file number 1-4347 ROGERS CORPORATION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) Massachusetts 06-0513860 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) P.O. Box 188, One Technology Drive, Rogers, Connecticut 06263-0188 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code (860) 774-9605 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No -------- --------- Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes X No -------- --------- The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant's classes of common stock as of July 27, 2003: Capital Stock, $1 Par Value - 16,131,687 shares 1 ROGERS CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES FORM 10-Q June 29, 2003 INDEX
Page No. -------- PART I--FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited): Condensed Statements of Income 3 Condensed Statements of Financial Position 4-5 Condensed Statements of Cash Flows 6 Supplementary Notes 7-13 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 13-16 Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 16 Item 4. Controls and Procedures 16-17 PART II--OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings 18 Item 6. Reports on Form 8-K 19 Signatures 19 Certifications Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 20-25
2
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM I. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ROGERS CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Dollars in Thousands Except for Per Share Amounts) Three Months Ended: Six Months Ended: ------------------- ---------------- (Unaudited) (Unaudited) ----------- --------- June 29, June 30, June 29, June 30, 2003 2002 2003 2002 ---- ---- ---- ---- Net Sales $49,159 $57,330 $101,037 $111,888 Cost of Sales 34,433 39,634 69,823 77,949 Selling and Administrative Expenses 9,115 10,099 18,816 20,208 Research and Development Expenses 2,810 3,640 5,648 7,105 ----- ------ ----- ------- Total Costs and Expenses 46,358 53,373 94,287 105,262 ------ ------ ------ ------- Operating Income 2,801 3,957 6,750 6,626 Other Income less Other Charges 4,092 2,173 7,720 4,780 Interest Income (Expense), Net 56 (89) 131 (186) ----- ------- ------ ------- Income Before Income Taxes 6,949 6,041 14,601 11,220 Income Taxes 1,737 1,510 3,650 2,805 ----- ----- ----- ----- Net Income $5,212 $4,531 $ 10,951 $ 8,415 ====== ====== ======== ======= Net Income Per Share: Basic $ 0.33 $ 0.29 $ 0.70 $ 0.54 ====== ====== ====== ====== Diluted $ 0.32 $ 0.28 $ 0.68 $ 0.52 ====== ====== ====== ====== The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed financial statements.
3
ROGERS CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION ASSETS (Dollars in Thousands) (Unaudited) June 29, December 29, -------- ------------ 2003 2002 Current Assets: ---- ---- Cash and Cash Equivalents $32,640 $22,300 Short-term Investments -- 6,628 Accounts Receivable, Net 33,385 32,959 Accounts Receivable, Joint Ventures 1,184 1,414 Note Receivable, Current 2,100 -- Inventories: Raw Materials 4,902 5,525 In-Process and Finished 12,982 12,544 ------ ------ Total Inventories 17,884 18,069 Current Deferred Income Taxes 4,985 4,985 Other Current Assets 1,482 1,320 ----- ----- Total Current Assets 93,660 87,675 Note Receivable, Long-Term 9,900 12,000 Property, Plant and Equipment, Net of Accumulated Depreciation of $98,633 and $90,285 103,292 99,883 Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures 24,004 21,860 Pension Asset 8,951 8,951 Goodwill and Other Intangibles, Net 22,201 22,204 Other Assets 5,400 5,128 ----- ----- Total Assets $ 267,408 $257,701 ========= ======== The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed financial statements.
4
ROGERS CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION - CONTINUED LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (Dollars in Thousands) (Unaudited) June 29, December 29, ------- ----------- 2003 2002 Current Liabilities: ---- ---- Accounts Payable $ 8,436 $ 10,125 Accrued Employee Benefits and Compensation 8,838 10,414 Accrued Income Taxes Payable 11,533 8,249 Taxes, Other than Federal and Foreign Income 913 542 Other Accrued Liabilities 5,520 5,450 ----- ----- Total Current Liabilities 35,240 34,780 Noncurrent Deferred Income Taxes 8,529 8,308 Noncurrent Pension Liability 17,119 22,658 Noncurrent Retiree Health Care and Life Insurance Benefits 6,197 6,197 Other Long-Term Liabilities 2,073 2,720 Commitments and Contingencies -- -- Shareholders' Equity: Capital Stock, $1 Par Value: Authorized Shares 50,000,000; Issued Shares 16,075,478 and 15,856,748 16,075 15,857 Additional Paid-In Capital 37,975 36,600 Retained Earnings 159,003 148,045 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (2,369) (4,693) Treasury Stock (346,836 and 360,487 shares, at cost) (12,434) (12,771) -------- -------- Total Shareholders' Equity 198,250 183,038 ------- ------- Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity $267,408 $ 257,701 ======== ========= The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed financial statements.
5
ROGERS CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Dollars in Thousands) Six Months Ended: ----------------- (Unaudited) ----------- June 29, June 30, OPERATING ACTIVITIES: 2003 2002 -------------------- ---- ---- Net Income $10,951 $8,415 Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities: Depreciation and Amortization 7,027 7,175 Equity in Undistributed Income of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures, Net (3,815) (3,755) Loss on Disposition of Assets 250 -- Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities: Accounts Receivable (3,688) (4,914) Accounts Receivable, Joint Ventures 215 3,282 Inventories 659 1,293 Other Current Assets (95) (423) Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses (69) 4,987 Noncurrent Pension and Postretirement Benefits (5,538) (3,026) Other, Net (749) (841) ----- ----- Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities 5,147 12,193 INVESTING ACTIVITIES: --------------------- Capital Expenditures (8,266) (6,604) Acquisition of Business -- (8,000) Divestiture of Business 3,268 -- Short-term Investments 6,628 -- Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures and Affiliates 1,633 2,962 ------ ----- Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities 3,263 (11,642) FINANCING ACTIVITIES: --------------------- Proceeds from Short - and Long-Term Borrowings 10 3,966 Repayments of Debt Principal -- (2,105) Repayment of Life Insurance Debt -- (3,081) Proceeds from Disposition of Treasury Stock 258 214 Proceeds from Sale of Capital Stock, Net 1,492 524 ----- ----- Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities 1,760 (482) Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash 170 (43) ----- ----- Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents 10,340 26 Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year 22,300 20,891 ------ ------ Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Quarter $ 32,640 $ 20,917 ======== ======== The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed financial statements.
6 ROGERS CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES (Unaudited) A. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. For further information regarding Rogers' accounting policies, refer to the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2002. B. Rogers effective tax rate was 25% for the first six months of 2003 and 2002. The effective tax rate continues to be lower than the statutory rate due to significant tax benefits including nontaxable foreign sales income and foreign tax and research and development credits. Income taxes paid were $498,000 and $374,000 in the first six months of 2003 and 2002, respectively. C. Comprehensive income, net of related tax, for the three and six-month periods ended June 29, 2003 and June 30, 2002 are as follows:
Three Months Six Months Ended: Ended: ------------------------------ -------------------------------- (Dollars In Thousands) June 29, June 30, June 29, June 30, 2003 2002 2003 2002 ------------------------------ -------------------------------- Net income $ 5,212 $ 4,531 $ 10,951 $ 8,415 Foreign currency translation adjustments 1,477 (336) 2,324 2,303 ------------------------------ -------------------------------- Comprehensive Income $ 6,689 $ 4,195 $ 13,275 $ 10,718 ============================== ================================
Accumulated balances related to each component of Other Comprehensive Loss were as follows:
June 29, December 29, 2003 2002 ----------------------- ----------------------- Foreign currency translation adjustments $ 5,369 $ 3,045 Minimum pension liability (7,738) (7,738) ------- ------- Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss $ (2,369) $ (4,693) ========= =========
7 D. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share in conformity with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 128, "Earnings per Share" for the three and six month periods ended:
Three Months Ended: Six Months Ended: ------------------------------- ------------------------------ (In Thousands, Except Per Share June 29, June 30, June 29, June 30, Amounts) 2003 2002 2003 2002 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ Numerator: Net income $ 5,212 $ 4,531 $ 10,951 $ 8,415 Denominator: Denominator for basic earnings per share - weighted average shares 15,742 15,487 15,647 15,445 Effect of stock options 563 614 515 631 ------------------------------ ------------------------------- Denominator for diluted earnings per share - adjusted weighted average shares and assumed conversions 16,305 16,101 16,162 16,076 =============================== =============================== Basic earnings per share $ 0.33 $ 0.29 $ 0.70 $ 0.54 =============================== =============================== Diluted earnings per share $ 0.32 $ 0.28 $ 0.68 $ 0.52 =============================== ===============================
E. Under various plans, the Company may grant stock and stock options to directors, officers, and other key employees. Stock-based compensation awards are accounted for using the intrinsic value method prescribed in APB 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and related interpretations. Stock-based compensation costs for stock options are generally not reflected in net income as each option granted under the plans had an exercise price equal to market value of the underlying common stock on the date of the grant. Stock-based compensation costs for stock awards are reflected in net income over the awards' vesting period. The Company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized in the financial statements for the stock option plans. Had compensation cost for the Company's stock option plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for awards in the three and six months ended, consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, the Company's net earnings and earnings per share for the three and six month periods ended would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below. 8
Three Months Ended: Six Months Ended: --------------------------------- -------------------------------- (In Thousands, Except Per Share June 29, June 30, June 29, June 30, Amounts) 2003 2002 2003 2002 ---------------------------------- ------------------------------- Net income, as reported $5,212 $4,531 $10,951 $8,415 Less: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under Black- Scholes option pricing model, net of related tax effect 1,281 1,156 636 567 Pro Forma net income 4,576 3,964 9,670 7,259 Basic earnings per share: As Reported $ 0.33 $ 0.29 $ 0.70 $ 0.54 Pro Forma 0.29 0.26 0.62 0.47 Diluted earnings per share: As Reported $ 0.32 $ 0.28 $ 0.68 $ 0.52 Pro Forma 0.28 0.25 0.60 0.45
The effects on pro forma net income and earnings per share of expensing the estimated fair value of stock options are not necessarily representative of the effects on reported net income for future years, due to such things as the vesting period of the stock options, and the potential for issuance of additional stock options in future years. F. The table below conveys information about the Company's operating segments in conformity with SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information":
High Printed Polymer (Dollars in Millions) Performance Circuit Materials & Total Foams Materials Components -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Three months ended June 29, 2003 Net Sales $17.1 $22.0 $10.1 $49.2 Operating Income (Loss) 2.5 0.9 (0.6) 2.8 Three months ended June 30, 2002 Net Sales $17.8 $20.0 $19.5 $57.3 Operating Income 2.7 0.3 1.0 4.0 Six months ended June 29, 2003 Net Sales $34.3 $46.2 $20.5 $101.0 Operating Income (Loss) 4.6 3.5 (1.3) 6.8 Six months ended June 30, 2002 Net Sales $33.5 $39.5 $38.9 $111.9 Operating Income 4.3 0.6 1.7 6.6
Inter-segment sales, which are generally priced with reference to costs or prevailing market prices, have been eliminated from the sales data in the previous table. 9 G. The Company has four joint ventures, each 50% owned, which are accounted for by the equity method. Equity income of $3,950,000 and $3,870,000 for the first six months ended in 2003 and 2002, respectively, is included in other income less other charges on the condensed statements of income. Each of the joint ventures is described below:
Joint Venture Location Business Segment Durel Corporation U.S. Polymer Materials and Components Rogers Inoac Corporation Japan High Performance Foams Polyimide Laminate U.S. Printed Circuit Materials Systems, LLC Rogers Chang Chun Taiwan Printed Circuit Materials Technology Co., Ltd.
The summarized financial information for these joint ventures is included in the following table for the first six months ended of each year shown. Note that there is a difference between the Company's investment in unconsolidated joint ventures and its one-half interest in the underlying shareholders' equity of the joint ventures due primarily to three factors. First, the Company's major initial contribution to two joint ventures was technology that was valued differently by the joint ventures than it was on the Company's books. Secondly, one of the joint ventures had a negative retained earnings balance for a period of time. Lastly, the translation of foreign currency at current rates differs from that at historical rates. Correspondingly, there is a difference between the Company's recorded income from unconsolidated joint ventures and a 50% share of the income of those joint ventures.
2003 2002 ---------------------- ------------------------ Net Sales $61,070,000 $59,946,000 Gross Profit 22,157,000 21,366,000 Net Income 7,461,000 7,625,000
Sales made to unconsolidated joint ventures by the Company were immaterial in all periods presented above. H. The following table sets forth the significant components of other income less other charges for the first three and six months ended of 2003 and 2002.
Three Months Six Months Ended: Ended: ------------------------------ ------------------------------- (Dollars In Thousands) June 29, June 30, June 29, June 30, 2003 2002 2003 2002 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ Joint venture equity income $ 2,385 $ 2,810 $ 5,713 $ 5,394 Royalties 1,512 197 2,442 584 Other income/(expense) 195 (834) (435) (1,198) ---------- ----------- ------------- ----------- Total other income $ 4,092 $ 2,173 $ 7,720 $ 4,780
10 I. The Company is subject to federal, state, and local laws and regulations concerning the environment and is currently engaged in proceedings related to such matters. The Company is currently involved as a potentially responsible party ("PRP") in three active cases involving waste disposal sites. These proceedings are at a stage where it is still not possible to estimate the cost of remediation, the timing and extent of remedial action that may be required by governmental authorities, and the amount of liability, if any, of the Company alone or in relation to that of any other PRPs. Where it has been possible to make a reasonable estimate of the Company's liability, a provision has been established. Insurance proceeds have only been taken into account when they have been confirmed by or received from the insurance company. Actual costs to be incurred in future periods may vary from these estimates. Based on facts presently known to it, the Company does not believe that the outcome of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on its financial position. In addition to the above proceedings, the Company worked with the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection ("CT DEP") related to certain polychlorinated biphenyl ("PCB") contamination in the soil beneath a section of cement flooring at its Woodstock, Connecticut facility. The Company completed clean-up efforts in 2000, monitored the site in 2001 and 2002, and will continue to monitor the site for the next three years. On the basis of estimates prepared by environmental engineers and consultants, the Company had recorded a provision of $2,600,000 in prior years. Prior to 2003, $2,300,000 was charged against this provision. In the first six months of 2003, expenses of $125,000 have been charged against the provision. The remaining reserve is primarily for testing, monitoring, sampling and minor residual treatment activity. Management believes, based on facts currently available, that the balance of this provision is adequate to complete the project. In this same matter the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") alleged that the Company improperly disposed of PCBs. An administrative law judge found the Company liable for this alleged disposal and assessed a penalty of approximately $300,000. The Company reflected this fine in expense in 1998 but disputed the EPA allegations and appealed the administrative law judge's findings and penalty assessment. The original findings were upheld internally by the EPA's Environmental Appeals Board, and the Company placed that decision on appeal with the District of Columbia Federal Court of Appeals in 2000. In early January of 2002, the Company was informed that the Court of Appeals reversed the decision. As a result of this favorable decision, the $300,000 reserve for the fine was taken into income in 2001. However, subsequent to the favorable decision by the Court of Appeals, the EPA continued to pursue this issue and settlement discussions with the EPA were more protracted and difficult than originally anticipated. As such, the Company recorded $325,000 for legal and other costs associated with this matter in 2002. On January 16, 2003, a settlement agreement was signed with the EPA. The costs associated with the settlement will not exceed the provision recorded, which included a cash settlement payment to the government of $45,000 plus a commitment to undertake some energy-related environmental improvements at its facilities, as well as assistance to a local Woodstock, Connecticut Fire Department for emergency preparedness. Management believes, based on facts currently available, that the provision recorded is adequate to cover the requirements of the settlement. On February 7, 2001, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to purchase the Advanced Dielectric Division ("ADD") of Tonoga, Inc. (commonly known as Taconic), which operates facilities in Petersburgh, 11 New York and Mullingar, Ireland. On May 11, 2001, the Company announced that active discussions with Taconic to acquire the ADD business had been suspended and it was not anticipated that the acquisition would occur. Accordingly, $1,500,000 in costs associated with this potential acquisition were written off during the second quarter of 2001. On October 23, 2001, the Company terminated the acquisition agreement. On October 24, 2001, Taconic filed a breach of contract lawsuit against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut seeking damages in the amount of $25,000,000 or more, as well as specific performance and attorneys' fees. In September 2002, a confidential settlement agreement concerning all matters raised in this litigation was negotiated and entered into. The settlement had no material impact on the 2002 results. There recently has been a significant increase in certain U.S. states in asbestos-related product liability claims against numerous industrial companies. The Company has been named, along with hundreds of other industrial companies, as a defendant in some of these cases. The Company strongly believes it has valid defenses to these claims and intends to defend itself vigorously. In addition, the Company believes that it has sufficient insurance to cover all costs associated with these claims. Based upon past claims experience and available insurance coverage, management believes these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company. In addition to the above issues, the nature and scope of the Company's business bring it in regular contact with the general public and a variety of businesses and government agencies. Such activities inherently subject the Company to the possibility of litigation, including environmental and product liability matters that are defended and handled in the ordinary course of business. The Company has established accruals for matters for which management considers a loss to be probable and reasonably estimable. It is the opinion of management that facts known at the present time do not indicate that such litigation, after taking into account insurance coverage and the aforementioned accruals, will have a material adverse effect on the financial position of the Company. J. In 2002, the Company incurred restructuring charges of $2,150,000. These charges were associated solely with the severance benefits for 62 employees of which 48 had been terminated prior to the 2002 year-end. The remaining employees were notified prior to year-end. The separation date of these residual employees occurred on varied dates in the first half of 2003. These workforce reductions were initiated in order to appropriately align resources with the Company's business requirements, given varied ongoing operational initiatives, including non-strategic business unit consolidations, plant rationalizations, outsourcing low value production and/or moving it to lower production cost environments, and support function reorganizations to streamline administrative activities. As of June 29, 2003, the balance in the accrual for these charges was $1,000,000. Management believes, based on current estimates, the residual provision will be adequate to cover the future costs of these restructuring activities. The following table summarizes activities related to the provision for the first six months ended. Balance in Provision at December 29, 2002 $1,600,000 Less Payments made for Severance Benefits (600,000) Adjustments/Additional Provisions -- Balance in Provision at June 29, 2003 $ 1,000,000 =========== 12 K. As of December 31, 2001 (fiscal year 2002), the Company acquired certain assets of the high performance foam business of Cellect LLC ("Cellect") for approximately $10,000,000 in cash, plus a potential earn-out in five years based upon performance. While there is no contractual limitation on the earn-out, the actual earn-out will be determined and affected by the sales and profitability growth through 2006 as compared to the base year of 2001. The assets acquired included intellectual property rights and machinery and equipment for portions of the Cellect plastomeric and elastomeric high performance polyolefin foam business. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase pursuant to SFAS No.141, "Business Combinations". As such, the purchase price was allocated to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets based on their respective fair values at the date of acquisition. On November 18, 2002, the Company completed the divestiture of its Moldable Composites Division ("MCD"), located in Manchester, Connecticut. MCD, which was included in the Company's Polymer Materials and Components segment, was sold to Vyncolit North America Inc., a subsidiary of the Perstorp group, Sweden. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company will receive a total of approximately $21,000,000 for the business assets (excluding the intellectual property) and a five-year royalty stream from the intellectual property license. Half of the $21,000,000 was paid in cash upon consummation of the transaction. A Note, which bears interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 1%, was provided for the remainder of the sales price, which will be paid over a five-year period. There was no material gain or loss on the transaction. L. In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin ("ARB") No. 51," ("FIN 46"). FIN 46 clarifies the application of ARB No. 51, "Consolidated Financial Statements," to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. The consolidation requirements of FIN 46 apply immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003, and to existing variable interest entities in the interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company is in the final stages of reviewing the new accounting standard and its own operations and joint ventures to determine the impact, if any, and the appropriate reporting. In accordance with the standard, any required reporting and disclosure changes will be addressed in the third quarter of 2003. ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS -------------------------- Statements in this report that are not strictly historical may be deemed to be "forward-looking" statements which should be considered as subject to the many uncertainties that exist in the Company's operations and environment. These uncertainties, which include economic conditions, market demand and pricing, competitive and cost factors, rapid technological change, new product introductions, legal proceedings, and the like, are discussed in greater detail in Rogers' 2002 Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated by reference. Such factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. 13 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND SEGMENT ANALYSIS ------------------------------------------ Net sales of $49.2 million and $101.0 million in the second quarter and first half of 2003 were down 14% and 10%, respectively compared to $57.3 million and $111.9 million in the same periods of 2002. These decreases are primarily attributable to the MCD divestiture in November of 2002. The Company's 50% owned, unconsolidated joint ventures had total revenues in the second quarter and first half of 2003 of $27.0 million and $61.0 million, respectively. Adding 50% of these joint venture sales to the Company's net sales, which the Company defines as Combined Sales, were $62.7 million for the second quarter of 2003 compared to $73.1 million reported in the second quarter of 2002 (see the non-GAAP measure reconciliation below for combined sales). Combined Sales decreased compared to the second quarter of 2002 because of the divestiture of MCD, along with a decline in sales at Durel Corporation, the largest of Rogers' joint ventures. However, on a year-to-date basis, revenues across most of the Company's product lines and joint ventures improved from the prior year with strong sales into key market niches.
(Dollars in Thousands) Second Quarter First Six Months ---------------------------------------------------- 2003 2002 2003 2002 ------------------------- --------------------------- Net Sales, as reported in this report and in $49.2 $57.3 $101.0 $111.9 accordance with generally acceptable accounting principles 50% of Rogers' Joint Venture Sales 13.5 15.8 30.5 29.6 ---- ---- ---- ---- Combined Sales $62.7 $73.1 $131.5 $141.8 ===== ===== ====== ======
Sales of Printed Circuit Materials for the second quarter and first half totaled $22.0 million and $46.2 million, respectively, an increase of 10% and 17% respectively compared to similar periods in 2002. Revenue growth was driven by strong sales of high frequency laminates into the satellite television and cellular base station infrastructure markets as well as flexible laminates for disk drive applications and increased penetration into cellular telephone handsets. High Performance Foam sales were $17.1 million and $34.3 million for this year's second quarter and first half, down about 4% and up about 3% respectively from comparable periods in 2002. High performance urethane materials used in cell phones were strong as the Company continues to gain design wins in more models; however, weakness on the consumer side of the business, as well as in aerospace and chip packaging, caused a slight decline in total revenues. Sales of Polymer Materials and Components totaled $10.1 million and $20.5 million, respectively for the second quarter and first half of 2003, a decrease of 48% and 47% respectively as compared to the prior year comparable periods. Sales of power distribution components grew over last year driven in part by a European application in DSL, a system that moves network data over phone lines at high speeds. This increase, however, was more than offset by a significant decline in the office equipment roller business and by the impact of the MCD divestiture. Second quarter 2003 net income was $5.2 million and diluted earnings per share were $.32, as compared to $4.5 million in net income and $.28 in diluted earnings per share earned in last year's second quarter. The increase was due 14 mostly to revenue growth in Rogers' higher margin businesses, increased royalties, and strong focus on cost management. Manufacturing profit as a percentage of sales was 30% and 31% in the second quarter and first half of 2003, respectively, as compared to 31% and 30% in comparable periods of 2002. The impact of higher revenues in Rogers' higher margin businesses coupled with productivity improvements continues to drive stronger manufacturing margins; however, the gains have been reduced by the start up costs associated with plant openings in China, Belgium, and Carol Stream, Illinois, particularly in the second quarter of 2003. These start up costs will most likely continue at varying levels through the balance of the year. Selling and administrative expenses for the second quarter and first half of 2003 were down in total dollars as compared to similar periods in 2002, but fairly consistent as a percentage of sales. The decrease in total expenses was a result of continued cost management and reduction in overhead commensurate with the MCD divestiture. Research and development expenses for the second quarter and first half were also lower than the comparable periods in 2002. This decrease is due to timing of developmental projects and the divestiture of MCD; however, as a percentage of sales, they are comparable with the prior year and generally in line with the Company's annual investment target. Other income was up substantially for the second quarter and the first half, as compared to 2002. The increase is due primarily to increased royalties, principally associated with the intellectual property license entered into in connection with the divestiture of MCD. Rogers' four joint ventures in total had a favorable first six months; however, the total revenues attributable to Rogers' joint ventures decreased by 14% compared to last year's second quarter. Durel's revenues were lower in the second quarter due to the continuing shift to color displays for cellular telephones, which cannot utilize electroluminescence for backlighting. However, Durel anticipates that its sales should remain relatively level over the next twelve months. Polyimide Laminate Systems sales were essentially unchanged compared to last year's second quarter. Rogers Inoac Corporation realized double digit growth over the previous year's second quarter as it continues to win new designs for its urethane foam materials used as seals and shock absorbing components in mobile phones. Rogers Chang Chun Technologies continued to make progress in the second quarter with two new major design wins. The effective tax rate used in the second quarter and first half of 2003 and 2002 was 25%. The tax rate has continued to benefit from foreign tax credits, research and development credits, nontaxable foreign sales income, and most recently a reduction in the statutory tax rate in Belgium. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES ------------------------------- Cash and short-term investments increased during the first half of 2003 by approximately $3.7. The strong cash flow from operations was partially offset by $5.5 million of voluntary pension contributions made by the Company. Trade receivables were up from the 2002 year-end balance due to the increased revenues in the first half of 2003, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2002. Inventories and current liabilities were relatively comparable with the 2002 year-end levels. 15 Net cash provided by operating activities in the first half of 2003 totaled $5.1 million. This compares with $12.2 million provided by operations for the comparable 2002 period. Cash provided by operations was lower in the current year due primarily to higher levels of voluntary pension contributions in 2003 and the repayment in 2002 of working capital advances from the Company's joint ventures. In 2003, investments in capital expenditures totaled $8.2 million in the first half and are expected to approach $25.0 million for the year; primarily associated with the plant expansion in Carol Stream and in China. In 2002, capital expenditures in the first half were $6.6 million and finished at $22.3 million for the year. Management believes that cash on hand, and internally generated funds will be sufficient to meet the near term, regular needs of the business. In addition, the Company has an unsecured multi-currency revolving credit agreement with two domestic banks and can borrow up to $50.0 million, or the equivalent in certain other foreign currencies. There were no borrowings at June 29, 2003 under this agreement. In addition to the revolving credit agreement above, Rogers N.V., a Belgian subsidiary of the Company, has an unsecured revolving credit agreement with a European bank. Under this arrangement Rogers N.V. can borrow up to 6.2 million Euro. There were no borrowings at June 29, 2003 under this agreement. RESTRUCTURINGS -------------- In 2002, the Company incurred restructuring charges of $2,150,000. These charges were associated solely with the severance benefits for 62 employees of which 48 had been terminated prior to the 2002 year-end. The remaining employees were notified prior to year-end. The separation date of these residual employees occurred on varied dates in the first half of 2003. These workforce reductions were initiated in order to appropriately align resources with the Company's business requirements, given varied ongoing operational initiatives, including non-strategic business unit consolidations, plant rationalizations, outsourcing low value production and/or moving it to lower production cost environments, and support function reorganizations to streamline administrative activities. As of June 29, 2003, the balance in the accrual for these charges was $1,000,000. Management believes, based on current estimates, the residual provision will be adequate to cover the future costs of these restructuring activities. The following table summarizes activities related to the provision for the first six months ended.
Balance in Provision at December 29, 2002 $1,600,000 Less Payments made for Severance Benefits (600,000) Adjustments/Additional Provisions -- ---------- Balance in Provision at June 29, 2003 $1,000,000 ==========
CONTINGENCIES ------------- During the first half of 2003, there were no material developments relative to environmental matters or other contingencies (Refer to Note H for ongoing environmental and contingency matters). The Company has not had any material recurring costs and capital expenditures relating to environmental matters, except as specifically described in the preceding statements. 16 ITEM. 3 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. The Company does not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The Company monitors foreign exchange and interest rate risks and manages such risks on specific transactions. The risk management process primarily uses analytical techniques and sensitivity analysis. The Company has various borrowing facilities where the interest rates, although not fixed, are relatively low. Currently, an increase in the associated interest rates would not significantly impact interest expense on these facilities as the Company has paid them off in full, thus the Company has no debt. The fair value of the Company's investment portfolio or the related interest income would not be significantly impacted by either a 100.0 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates due mainly to the size and short-term nature of the Company's investment portfolio and the relative insignificance of interest income to consolidated pretax income. The Company's largest foreign currency exposure is against the Euro, primarily because of its investments in its ongoing operations in Belgium. In addition to the Euro exposure, commensurate with the Company's growth and expansion in Asia, particularly China, the Company is experiencing an escalation of foreign currency exposure against the currencies in countries such as China, Japan, Taiwan, Korea, and Singapore. Exposure to variability in currency exchange rates is mitigated, when possible, through the use of natural hedges, whereby purchases and sales in the same foreign currency and with similar maturity dates offset one another. The Company can initiate hedging activities by entering into foreign exchange forward contracts with third parties when the use of natural hedges is not possible or desirable. ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES a. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"). Based on such evaluation, such officers have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in alerting our management on a timely basis to material information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act. b. There have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect such controls since the Evaluation Date. 17 PART II - OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings The Company is currently involved as a potentially responsible party ("PRP") in three active cases involving waste disposal sites. These proceedings are at a stage where it is still not possible to estimate the cost of remediation, the timing and extent of remedial action that may be required by governmental authorities, and the amount of liability, if any, of the Company alone or in relation to that of any other PRPs. Where it has been possible to make a reasonable estimate of the Company's liability, a provision has been established. Insurance proceeds have only been taken into account when they have been confirmed by or received from the insurance company. Actual costs to be incurred in future periods may vary from these estimates. Based on facts presently known to it, the Company does not believe that the outcome of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on its financial position. In addition to the above proceedings, the Company worked with the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection ("CT DEP") related to certain polychlorinated biphenyl ("PCB") contamination in the soil beneath a section of cement flooring at its Woodstock, Connecticut facility. The Company completed clean-up efforts in 2000, monitored the site in 2001 and 2002, and will continue to monitor the site for the next three years. On the basis of estimates prepared by environmental engineers and consultants, the Company had recorded a provision of $2,600,000 in prior years. Prior to 2003, $2,300,000 was charged against this provision. In the first six months of 2003, expenses of $125,000 have been charged against the provision. The remaining reserve is primarily for testing, monitoring, sampling and minor residual treatment activity. Management believes, based on facts currently available, that the balance of this provision is adequate to complete the project. There recently has been a significant increase in certain U.S. states in asbestos-related product liability claims against numerous industrial companies. The Company has been named, along with hundreds of other industrial companies, as a defendant in some of these cases. The Company strongly believes it has valid defenses to these claims and intends to defend itself vigorously. In addition, the Company believes that it has sufficient insurance to cover all costs associated with these claims. Based upon past claims experience and available insurance coverage, management believes these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company. In addition to the above issues, the nature and scope of the Company's business bring it in regular contact with the general public and a variety of businesses and government agencies. Such activities inherently subject the Company to the possibility of litigation, including environmental and product liability matters that are defended and handled in the ordinary course of business. The Company has established accruals for matters for which management considers a loss to be probable and reasonably estimable. It is the opinion of management that facts known at the present time do not indicate that such litigation, after taking into account insurance coverage and the aforementioned accruals, will have a material adverse effect on the financial position of the Company. 18 Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K (a) List of Exhibits: Exhibit 99.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Exhibit 99.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (b) Reports on Form 8-K filed for the three months ended June 29, 2003 A form 8-K was filed on July 16, 2003 with respect to the Company's Second Quarter Earnings Release SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. ROGERS CORPORATION (Registrant) /s/ James M. Rutledge --------------------- James M. Rutledge Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer Dated: August 13, 2003 19 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ROGERS CORPORATION CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 CERTIFICATION I, Walter E. Boomer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Rogers Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and 20 6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. /s/ Walter E. Boomer -------------------- Walter E. Boomer Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer August 13, 2003 21 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFICATION I, James M. Rutledge, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Rogers Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and 22 6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. /s/ James M. Rutledge --------------------- James M. Rutledge Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer August 13, 2003 23 Exhibit 99.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rogers Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Walter E. Boomer, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Walter E. Boomer ------------------- Walter E. Boomer Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer August 13, 2003 24 Exhibit 99.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rogers Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James M. Rutledge, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ James M. Rutledge --------------------- James M. Rutledge Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer August 13, 2003 25