EX-99

Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust
10/31/13 Annual report

77L

New accounting pronouncement

In January 2013, ASU 2013-01, Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures
about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, amended ASU No. 2011-11,
Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The ASUs
create new disclosure requirements requiring entities to disclose
both gross and net information for derivatives and other
financial instruments that are either off set in the Statement of
assets and liabilities or subject to an enforceable master
netting arrangement or similar agreement. The disclosure
requirements are effective for annual reporting periods beginning
on or after January 1, 2013 and interim periods within those
annual periods. Putnam Management is currently evaluating the
application of ASUs 2013-01 and 2011-11 and their impact, if any,
on the funds financial statements.

EX-99

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Trustees and Shareholders
Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust (the Fund) as of and for
the year ended October 31, 2013, in accordance with the standards
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
we considered the Funds internal control over financial
reporting, including controls over safeguarding securities, as a
basis for designing our auditing procedures for the purpose of
expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to comply
with the requirements of Form N-SAR, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Funds internal
control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no
such opinion.
Management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting.
In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments by
management are required to assess the expected benefits and
related costs of controls.  A companys internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
A companys internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance
with authorizations of management and trustees of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or
timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition
of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A deficiency in internal control over financial reporting exists
when the design or operation of a control does not allow
management or employees, in the normal course of performing their
assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a
timely basis.  A material weakness is a deficiency, or a
combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial
reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of a Funds annual or interim financial
statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Our consideration of the Funds internal control over financial
reporting was for the limited purpose described in the first
paragraph and would not necessarily disclose all deficiencies in
internal control that might be material weaknesses under
standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States).  However, we noted no deficiencies in the
Funds internal control over financial reporting and its
operation, including controls over safeguarding securities, that
we consider to be a material weakness as defined above as of
October 31, 2013.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Trustees of Putnam Managed Municipal
Income Trust and the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than
these specified parties.


      /s/ KPMG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
December 13, 2013

EX-99

Item 85B

Additional Information About Errors and Omissions Policy

While no claims with respect to the Registrant/Series were filed
under such policy during the period, requests under such policy
for reimbursement of legal expenses and costs arising out of
claims of market timing activity in the Putnam Funds have been
submitted by the investment manager of the Registrant/Series.

EX-99

Shareholder Meeting Results
(Unaudited)

September 19, 2013 annual meeting

At the meeting, a proposal to fix the number of Trustees at 14
was approved as follows:

Votes for             Votes against             Abstentions

48,947,570            2,150,880                 1,102,894

Additionally each of the nominees for Trustees was elected, as
follows:

Votes for
Votes withheld
Liaquat Ahamed
49,604,181
2,597,172
Ravi Akhoury
49,597,153
2,604,200
Barbara M. Baumann
49,796,554
2,404,799
Jameson A. Baxter
49,747,455
2,453,898
Charles B. Curtis
49,784,106
2,417,247
Robert J. Darretta
49,642,451
2,558,901
Katinka Domotorffy
49,687,636
2,513,717
Paul L. Joskow
49,805,536
2,395,817
Kenneth R. Leibler
49,792,685
2,408,668
George Putnam, III
49,671,117
2,530,236
Robert L. Reynolds
49,733,947
2,467,406
W. Thomas Stephens
49,508,836
2,692,517





A quorum was not present with respect to the matter of electing
two Trustees to be voted on by the preferred shareholders voting
as a separate class. As a result, in accordance with the funds
Declaration of Trust and Bylaws, independent fund Trustees John
A. Hill and Robert E. Patterson remain in office and continue to
serve as Trustees.

All tabulations are rounded to the nearest whole number.