XML 30 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.21.1
Lease Termination and Impairment Charges
12 Months Ended
Feb. 27, 2021
Lease Termination and Impairment Charges  
Lease Termination and Impairment Charges

6. Lease Termination and Impairment Charges

Impairment Charges

The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset group has a carrying value that may not be recoverable. The individual operating store is the lowest level for which cash flows are identifiable. As such, the Company evaluates individual stores for recoverability of assets. To determine if a store needs to be tested for recoverability, the Company considers items such as decreases in market prices, changes in the manner in which the store is being used or physical condition, changes in legal factors or business

climate, an accumulation of losses significantly in excess of budget, a current period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection of continuing losses, or an expectation that the store will be closed or sold.

The Company monitors new and recently relocated stores against operational projections and other strategic factors such as regional economics, new competitive entries and other local market considerations to determine if an impairment evaluation is required. For other stores, it performs a recoverability analysis if it has experienced current-period and historical cash flow losses.

In performing the recoverability test, the Company compares the expected future cash flows of a store to the carrying amount of its assets. Significant judgment is used to estimate future cash flows. Major assumptions that contribute to its future cash flow projections include expected sales, gross profit and distribution expenses; expected costs such as payroll, occupancy costs and advertising expenses; and estimates for other significant selling, and general and administrative expenses. Many long-term macro-economic and industry factors are considered, both quantitatively and qualitatively, in the future cash flow assumptions. In addition to current and expected economic conditions such as inflation, interest and unemployment rates that affect customer shopping patterns, the Company considers that it operates in a highly competitive industry which includes the actions of other national and regional drugstore chains, independently owned drugstores, supermarkets, mass merchandisers, dollar stores and internet pharmacies. Additionally, the Company takes into consideration that certain operating stores are executing specific improvement plans which are monitored quarterly to recoup recent capital investments, such as an acquisition of an independent pharmacy, which it has made to respond to specific competitive or local market conditions, or have specific programs tailored towards a specific geography or market.

The Company recorded impairment charges of $46,287 in fiscal 2021, $39,875 in fiscal 2020 and $63,492 in fiscal 2019. The Company’s methodology for recording impairment charges has been consistently applied in the periods presented.

At February 27, 2021, $850.5 million of the Company’s long-lived assets, including intangible assets, were associated with 2,510 active operating stores. Additionally, in connection with the adoption of ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), we have approximately $2.8 billion of operating lease right-of-use assets associated with the active stores.

If an operating store’s estimated future undiscounted cash flows are not sufficient to cover its carrying value, its carrying value is reduced to fair value. Fair value is its estimated future discounted cash flows. The discount rate is commensurate with the risks associated with the recovery of a similar asset. Beginning in fiscal year 2020, operating lease right-of-use assets are included within the stores’ asset groups. The Company obtains fair values of these right-of-use assets based on real estate market data.

An impairment charge is recorded in the period that the store does not meet its original return on investment and/or has an operating loss for the last two years and its projected cash flows do not exceed its current asset carrying value. The amount of the impairment charge is the entire difference between the current asset carrying value and its fair value which is the estimated future discounted cash flows.

The Company recorded impairment charges for active stores of $29,745 in fiscal 2021, $34,825 in fiscal 2020 and $46,419 in fiscal 2019.

The Company reviews key performance results for active stores on a quarterly basis and approves certain stores for closure. Impairment for closed stores, if any (many stores are closed on lease expiration), are recorded in the quarter the closure decision is approved. Closure decisions are made on an individual store or regional basis considering all of the macro-economic, industry and other factors, in addition to, the active store’s individual operating results. The Company recorded impairment charges for closed facilities of $16,542 in fiscal 2021, $5,050 in fiscal 2020 and $2,788 in fiscal 2019.

The following table summarizes the impairment charges and number of locations, segregated by closed facilities and active stores that have been recorded in fiscal 2021, 2020 and 2019:

February 27, 2021

February 29, 2020

March 2, 2019

(in thousands, except number of stores)

Number

    

Charge

    

Number

    

Charge

    

Number

    

Charge

Active stores:

Stores previously impaired(1)

174

$

21,372

274

$

11,449

288

$

17,939

New, relocated and remodeled stores(2)

2

 

1,519

8

 

11,228

22

 

10,595

Remaining stores not meeting the recoverability test(3)

19

 

6,854

38

 

12,148

74

 

17,885

Total impairment charges—active stores

195

 

29,745

320

 

34,825

384

 

46,419

Total impairment charges—closed facilities

33

16,542

30

5,050

62

2,788

Total impairment charges—other(4)

14,285

Total impairment charges—all locations

228

$

46,287

350

$

39,875

446

$

63,492

(1)These charges are related to stores that were impaired for the first time in prior periods. In an effort to improve the operating results or to meet geographical competition, the Company will often make additional capital additions in stores that were impaired in prior periods. These additions will be impaired in future periods if they are deemed to be unrecoverable. In connection with our March 3, 2019 adoption of ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), under the alternative transition method, and the recording of our corresponding right-of-use asset (“ROU”), the Company includes the ROU in its recoverability assessment. The fiscal 2021 impairment charge includes $15,459 of impairment relating to the ROU and $5,913 of capital additions. The fiscal 2020 impairment charge includes $6,594 of impairment relating to the ROU and $4,855 of capital additions.
(2)These charges are related to new stores (open at least three years) and relocated stores (relocated in the last two years) and significant strategic remodels (remodeled in the last year) that did not meet their recoverability test during the current period. These stores have not met their original return on investment projections and have a historical loss of at least two years. Their future cash flow projections do not recover their current carrying value. The fiscal 2021 impairment charge includes $347 of impairment relating to the ROU and $1,172 of capital assets. The fiscal 2020 impairment charge includes $5,625 of impairment relating to the ROU and $5,603 of capital assets.
(3)These charges are related to the remaining active stores that did not meet the recoverability test during the current period. These stores have a historical loss of at least 2 years. Their future cash flow projections do not recover their current carrying value. The fiscal 2021 impairment charge includes $3,177 of impairment relating to the ROU and $3,677 of capital assets. The fiscal 2020 impairment charge includes $2,228 of impairment relating to the ROU and $9,920 of capital assets.
(4)These fiscal 2019 charges were due to the impairment of assets related to the termination of a project to replace the point of sale software used in the Company’s stores.

The primary drivers of its impairment charges are each store’s current and historical operating performance and the assumptions that the Company makes about each store’s operating performance in future periods. Projected cash flows are updated based on the next year’s operating budget which includes the qualitative factors noted above. The Company utilizes the three-level valuation hierarchy for the recognition and disclosure of fair value measurements. The categorization of assets and liabilities within this hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the measurement of fair value. The three levels of the hierarchy consist of the following:

Level 1—Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2—Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices in markets that are not active or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the instrument.
Level 3—Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable inputs based upon management’s best estimate of inputs market participants could use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date, including assumptions about risk.

Long-lived non-financial assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis for purposes of calculating impairment using Level 2 and Level 3 inputs as defined in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of long-lived assets using Level 2 inputs is determined by evaluating the current economic conditions in the geographic area for similar use assets. The fair value of long-lived assets using Level 3 inputs is determined by estimating the amount and timing of net future cash flows (which are unobservable inputs) and discounting them using a risk-adjusted rate of interest (which is Level 1). The Company estimates future cash flows based on its experience and knowledge of the market in which the store is located. Significant increases or decreases in actual cash flows may result in valuation changes.

The table below sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the long-lived assets, which include right-of-use assets, as of the impairment measurement date for which an impairment assessment was performed and total losses as of February 27, 2021 and February 29, 2020:

Fair Values

Total

as of

Charges

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

    

Impairment Date

    

February 27, 2021

Long-lived assets held for use

$

$

74,448

$

1,071

$

75,519

$

(43,185)

Long-lived assets held for sale

$

$

5,229

$

$

5,229

$

(3,102)

Total

$

$

79,677

$

1,071

$

80,748

$

(46,287)

Fair Values

Total

as of

Charges

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

    

Impairment Date

    

February 29, 2020

Long-lived assets held for use

$

$

113,510

$

278

$

113,788

$

(38,878)

Long-lived assets held for sale

$

$

2,689

$

$

2,689

$

(997)

Total

$

$

116,199

$

278

$

116,477

$

(39,875)

The above assets reflected in the caption Long-lived assets held for sale are separate and apart from the Assets to be Sold and due to their immateriality, have not been reclassified to assets held for sale.

Lease Termination and Facility Exit Charges

Upon adoption of ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), the Company recorded a future lease liability for every real estate lease and therefore, no longer records a lease termination charge. Post adoption, the Company records ancillary costs in connection with store closings. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-02, charges to close a store, which principally consist of continuing lease obligations associated with ancillary costs, are recorded at the time the store is closed and all inventory is liquidated, pursuant to the guidance set forth in ASC 420, “Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations.” The Company calculates the liability for closed stores on a store-by-store basis. The calculation for stores where the remaining lease term exceeds one year, includes the ancillary costs from the date of closure to the end of the remaining lease term. The Company evaluates these assumptions each quarter and adjusts the liability accordingly.

In fiscal 2021, 2020 and 2019, the Company recorded lease termination charges of $12,116, $2,968 and $44,502, respectively.

As part of the Company's ongoing business activities, the Company assesses stores and distribution centers for potential closure or relocation. Decisions to close or relocate stores or distribution centers in future periods would result in lease exit costs and inventory liquidation charges, as well as impairment of assets at these locations. When a store or distribution center is closed, the Company records an expense for unrecoverable costs and accrues a liability equal to the present value at current credit adjusted risk-free interest rates of any anticipated executory costs which are not included within the store or distribution center's respective lease liability under Topic 842. Other store or distribution center closing and liquidation costs are expensed when incurred.

The following table reflects the closed store and distribution center charges that relate to new closures, changes in assumptions and interest accretion:

Year Ended

February 27,

February 29,

March 2,

2021

2020

2019

    

(52 Weeks)

    

(52 Weeks)

    

(52 Weeks)

Balance—beginning of period

$

2,253

$

124,046

$

133,290

Existing Topic 420 liabilities eliminated by recording a reduction to the ROU asset

(112,288)

Provision for present value of executory costs for closed stores

 

1,643

 

 

35,190

Changes in assumptions about future sublease income

(73)

737

Interest accretion

 

27

 

 

9,741

Cash payments, net of sublease income

 

(407)

 

(9,505)

 

(54,912)

Balance—end of period

$

3,443

$

2,253

$

124,046

The Company’s revenues and income before income taxes for fiscal 2021, 2020 and 2019 included results from stores that have been closed or are approved for closure as of February 27, 2021. The revenue, operating expenses and income before income taxes of these stores for the periods are presented as follows:

Year Ended

February 27,

February 29,

March 2,

    

2021

    

2020

    

2019

Revenues

$

23,643

$

69,352

$

243,317

Operating expenses

 

25,000

 

72,259

 

264,590

Gain from sale of assets

 

(7,993)

 

(2,547)

 

(38,109)

Other expenses

 

2,646

1,782

 

2,647

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

3,990

 

(2,142)

 

14,189

Included in these stores’ loss before income taxes are:

Depreciation and amortization

 

191

 

934

 

1,634

Inventory liquidation charges

 

(1,528)

 

(505)

 

(5,536)

The above results are not necessarily indicative of the impact that these closures will have on revenues and operating results of the Company in the future, as the Company often transfers the business of a closed store to another Company store, thereby retaining a portion of these revenues and operating expenses.