UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 29, 2013
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 000-17297
BTU INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE | 04-2781248 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) | |
23 Esquire Road, North Billerica, Massachusetts |
01862-2596 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (978) 667-4111
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every interactive data file required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period than the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Large Accelerated Filer | ¨ | Accelerated Filer | ¨ | |||
Non-Accelerated Filer | ¨ | Smaller Reporting Company | x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of the Registrants Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, as of the latest practicable date: As of November 4, 2013: 9,544,864 shares.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||||||
Item 1. | ||||||
3 | ||||||
4 | ||||||
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss |
5 | |||||
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity |
5 | |||||
6 | ||||||
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
7-11 | |||||
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
12-16 | ||||
Item 3. | 16 | |||||
Item 4. | 17 | |||||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | ||||||
Item 1. | 18 | |||||
Item 1A. | 18 | |||||
Item 6. | 18 | |||||
19 |
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
September 29, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 16,672 | $ | 20,218 | ||||
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $1,378 and $1,583 at September 29, 2013 and December 31, 2012 |
9,168 | 9,623 | ||||||
Inventories |
10,260 | 9,547 | ||||||
Other current assets |
2,067 | 4,131 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
38,167 | 43,519 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
3,604 | 4,669 | ||||||
Other assets, net |
491 | 481 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 42,262 | $ | 48,669 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
$ | 363 | $ | 400 | ||||
Accounts payable |
6,416 | 5,185 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
263 | 893 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
5,691 | 5,147 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
12,733 | 11,625 | ||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion |
7,307 | 7,564 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
620 | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
20,660 | 19,189 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value - 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value - 25,000,000 shares authorized; 10,912,831 shares issued and 9,544,864 shares outstanding at September 29, 2013 and 10,898,939 shares issued and 9,530,972 shares outstanding at December 31, 2012 |
109 | 109 | ||||||
Additional paid in capital |
52,039 | 51,545 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(27,845 | ) | (19,385 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,367,967 shares at September 29, 2013 and December 31, 2012 |
(4,990 | ) | (4,990 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
2,289 | 2,201 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total stockholders equity |
21,602 | 29,480 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 42,262 | $ | 48,669 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 29, 2013 | September 30, 2012 | September 29, 2013 | September 30, 2012 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 12,014 | $ | 14,137 | $ | 36,761 | $ | 45,007 | ||||||||
Costs of goods sold |
8,480 | 10,018 | 25,103 | 30,983 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gross profit |
3,534 | 4,119 | 11,658 | 14,024 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
6,228 | 4,925 | 15,237 | 15,674 | ||||||||||||
Research, development and engineering |
1,276 | 1,333 | 3,427 | 4,121 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating loss |
(3,970 | ) | (2,139 | ) | (7,006 | ) | (5,771 | ) | ||||||||
Interest income |
13 | 10 | 36 | 47 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(103 | ) | (114 | ) | (323 | ) | (346 | ) | ||||||||
Foreign exchange loss |
(33 | ) | (3 | ) | (147 | ) | (56 | ) | ||||||||
Other income |
17 | 1 | 63 | 2 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Loss before provision for income taxes |
(4,076 | ) | (2,245 | ) | (7,377 | ) | (6,124 | ) | ||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
998 | 153 | 1,083 | 430 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (5,074 | ) | $ | (2,398 | ) | $ | (8,460 | ) | $ | (6,554 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Loss per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.53 | ) | $ | (0.25 | ) | $ | (0.89 | ) | $ | (0.69 | ) | ||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.53 | ) | $ | (0.25 | ) | $ | (0.89 | ) | $ | (0.69 | ) | ||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic shares |
9,544,864 | 9,515,967 | 9,536,010 | 9,506,926 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive options |
| | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted shares |
9,544,864 | 9,515,967 | 9,536,010 | 9,506,926 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 29, 2013 |
September 30, 2012 |
September 29, 2013 |
September 30, 2012 |
|||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss is calculated as follows: |
||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (5,074 | ) | $ | (2,398 | ) | $ | (8,460 | ) | $ | (6,554 | ) | ||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
23 | 47 | 88 | 49 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive loss |
$ | (5,051 | ) | $ | (2,351 | ) | $ | (8,372 | ) | $ | (6,505 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 29, 2013
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
Common Stock | Additional Paid-In |
Accumulated | Treasury Stock |
Accumulated Comprehensive |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
shares | $ | Capital | Deficit | shares | $ | Income | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2012 |
10,899 | $ | 109 | $ | 51,545 | $ | (19,385 | ) | 1,368 | $ | (4,990 | ) | $ | 2,201 | $ | 29,480 | ||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | (8,460 | ) | | | | (8,460 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock |
14 | | 17 | | | | | 17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | 477 | | | | | 477 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Translation adjustment |
| | | | | | 88 | 88 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 29, 2013 |
10,913 | $ | 109 | $ | 52,039 | $ | (27,845 | ) | 1,368 | $ | (4,990 | ) | $ | 2,289 | $ | 21,602 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 29, 2013 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
($ in thousands)
(unaudited)
September 29, 2013 |
September 30, 2012 |
|||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (8,460 | ) | $ | (6,554 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,307 | 1,255 | ||||||
Provision (recovery) for bad debts |
(181 | ) | 339 | |||||
Provision for inventory obsolescence |
1,706 | 2,718 | ||||||
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment |
(51 | ) | | |||||
Stock-based compensation |
477 | 698 | ||||||
Deferred taxes |
825 | (143 | ) | |||||
Net change in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
692 | 1,659 | ||||||
Inventories |
(2,327 | ) | 651 | |||||
Other current assets |
1,409 | (1,579 | ) | |||||
Deferred revenue |
(629 | ) | 743 | |||||
Other assets |
(154 | ) | | |||||
Other long-term liabilities |
620 | | ||||||
Accounts payable |
1,142 | 3,212 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
486 | (566 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
(3,138 | ) | 2,433 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
57 | | ||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
(208 | ) | (198 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(151 | ) | (198 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Principal payments under loan and capital lease agreements |
(294 | ) | (277 | ) | ||||
Issuance of common stock |
17 | 29 | ||||||
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options |
| 9 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(277 | ) | (239 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Effects of exchange rates on cash |
20 | 85 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(3,546 | ) | 2,081 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
20,218 | 18,948 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 16,672 | $ | 21,029 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid during the periods for: |
||||||||
Interest |
$ | 293 | $ | 299 | ||||
Income taxes |
484 | 230 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(1) Basis of Presentation
The condensed consolidated balance sheet, financial information and related disclosures as of December 31, 2012 have been derived from our consolidated financial statements, which have been audited as of that date. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 29, 2013 and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2013 and September 30, 2012 are unaudited. The condensed consolidated statement of stockholders equity and consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 29, 2013 and September 30, 2012 are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of such financial statements have been included. Such adjustments consisted only of normal recurring items. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for any other period or for the full year. These financial statements do not include all disclosures associated with annual financial statements and, accordingly, should be read in conjunction with the footnotes contained in the Companys consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012, together with the auditors report, included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accounting policies underlying the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are those set forth in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the SEC.
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, that requires entities to disclose items reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI) and into net income in their entirety, the effect of the reclassification on each affected net income line item and for AOCI reclassification items that are not reclassified in their entirety into net income, a cross reference to other required U.S. GAAP disclosures. This consolidated standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2012 and interim periods within those years. The application of this standard did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Subsequent Events - The Company evaluated subsequent events through the time of issuance of these condensed consolidated financial statements. On October 4, 2013, the Company settled previously disclosed litigation regarding allegations made by one of its overseas customers that furnaces such customer had purchased from the Company in 2006 had not functioned properly. The settlement constitutes a full and final settlement and release of all rights and obligations of each party. The $1.5 million payable as a result of the settlement has been recognized in the Companys consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended September 29, 2013.
We are not aware of any other events that occurred subsequent to the balance sheet date, but prior to the filing of this report that would have a material impact on the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
(3) Inventories
September 29, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||
Raw materials and manufactured components |
$ | 5,684 | $ | 4,772 | ||||
Work-in-process |
2,918 | 1,905 | ||||||
Finished goods |
1,658 | 2,870 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total inventory |
$ | 10,260 | $ | 9,547 | ||||
|
|
|
|
7
BTU INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(4) Accrued Expenses
September 29, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
( $ in thousands) | ||||||||
Accrued commissions |
$ | 1,014 | $ | 935 | ||||
Accrued warranty |
385 | 393 | ||||||
Accrued taxes |
1,791 | 1,817 | ||||||
Accrued audit |
378 | 388 | ||||||
Accrued legal |
1,261 | 240 | ||||||
Accrued bonus |
15 | 87 | ||||||
Payroll and payroll taxes |
479 | 793 | ||||||
Accrued cost of sales |
246 | 300 | ||||||
Accrued restructuring costs |
3 | 111 | ||||||
Other |
119 | 83 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 5,691 | $ | 5,147 | |||||
|
|
|
|
Warranty
The Company provides standard warranty coverage for labor for 12 months and special extended material-only coverage on certain products. The Company estimates and records an accrual for anticipated warranty claims based on sales. The accrual for warranty claims covers the estimated costs of material, labor and travel. Actual warranty claims incurred are charged to the accrual. Factors that affect the Companys product warranty accrual include the number of installed units, the anticipated cost of warranty repairs and historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims.
The following table reflects changes in the Companys accrued warranty account during the nine months ended September 29, 2013 (in thousands):
Nine Months Ended September 29, 2013 |
||||
Beginning balance, December 31, 2012 |
$ | 393 | ||
Plus: accruals related to new sales |
300 | |||
Less: warranty claims incurred and reserve adjustment |
(308 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Ending balance, September 29, 2013 |
$ | 385 | ||
|
|
Restructuring
In April 2013, the Company eliminated 12 positions. Accordingly, the Company recorded a restructuring charge of $176,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2013. The decision to eliminate 12 positions was taken due to the continued slowdown in the solar industry. The Company eliminated 31 positions and recorded restructuring charges of $424,000 in the year ended December 31, 2012.
8
The following table reflects changes in the reserves for restructuring charges for the nine months ended September 29, 2013 (in thousands):
Nine Months Ended September 29, 2013 |
||||
Beginning balance, December 31, 2012 |
$ | 111 | ||
Plus: charges to costs and expenses |
176 | |||
Less: reduction of accrual |
(71 | ) | ||
Less: cash payments |
(213 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Ending balance, September 29, 2013 |
$ | 3 | ||
|
|
(5) Debt
Long-term debt consisted of:
September 29, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||
Mortgage note payable, interest rate of 4.43% and 5.50% at September 29, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively |
$ | 7,670 | $ | 7,964 | ||||
Less - current portion of long-term debt |
363 | 400 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Long-Term debt, less current portion |
$ | 7,307 | $ | 7,564 | ||||
|
|
|
|
On March 30, 2006, the Company entered into a $10 million mortgage note secured by its real property in Billerica, Massachusetts, which had an initial maturity date of December 23, 2015. On September 9, 2010, the Company signed a First Loan Modification Agreement relating to the mortgage note, which reduced the annual interest rate from 6.84% to 5.50% and the monthly payment from $76,280 to $69,000.
On September 26, 2013, the Company signed a Second Loan Modification Agreement relating to the mortgage note, which extended the maturity date from December 23, 2015 to September 26, 2023. The modification also reduced the annual interest rate from 5.50% to 4.43% through September 26, 2018, at which time the interest rate will be adjusted to a per annum fixed rate equal to the aggregate of the FHLB Five Year Classic Advance Rate plus two hundred forty basis points. The current monthly payment was reduced from $69,000 to $57,997. All outstanding principal and accrued and unpaid interest will be due and payable on the maturity date.
On August 31, 2009, the Company entered into a pledge and assignment agreement with a bank. The bank agrees, at the Companys request, to issue letters of credit in the banks name and the Company agrees to cash collateralize letters of credit via restricted cash deposits at the bank. As of September 29, 2013, the value of the outstanding letters of credit issued by the bank for the Company and cash collateralized by the Company was $252,566. This restricted cash value is included in the Companys balance sheet in other current assets.
(6) Net Loss Per Share
Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period, using the treasury stock method. Potentially dilutive securities include outstanding stock options and unvested restricted stock units. Due to their anti-dilutive effect, approximately 1,315,670 and 1,291,326 options to purchase common stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share for the nine months ended September 29, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively. However, these potentially dilutive securities could become dilutive in future periods.
(7) Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
Stock Options
The Companys stock option compensation expense was $140,027 and $436,984 for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2013, respectively, and $180,321 and $678,577 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. These amounts do not include expense related to restricted stock awards or the employee stock purchase plan.
The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model incorporates certain assumptions for inputs including a risk-free market interest rate, expected dividend yield of the underlying common stock, expected option life and expected volatility in the market value of the underlying common stock. The Company is also required to estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Historical data is used to estimate pre- vesting forfeitures and record stock-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest. Accordingly, awards ultimately expected to vest have been reduced by an annualized estimated forfeiture rate of 4%.
9
Calculation of Fair Value - Assumptions Used:
Nine months ended | ||||||||
September 29, 2013 | September 30, 2012 | |||||||
Expected Volatility |
66.84 | % | 66.85 | % | ||||
Expected Life (in years) |
4.21 | 4.21 | ||||||
Risk-Free Interest Rate |
0.79 | % | 0.59 | % | ||||
Expected Dividend Yield |
| |
Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the Companys common stock. The Company used significant historical data to help evaluate the expected lives of options in developing its assumption. The risk-free interest rate is based upon quoted market yields for United States Treasury debt securities with a term approximating the expected life of the options. The expected dividend yield is based upon the Companys long-standing history of not issuing dividends and managements current expectation of the same.
The following table summarizes the stock option activity during the nine months ended September 29, 2013:
Shares | Weighted- Average Exercise Price |
Average Remaining Contractual Term |
Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
|||||||||||||
Options |
||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2012 |
1,353,141 | $ | 6.20 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
112,933 | $ | 2.35 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited/Cancelled |
(150,404 | ) | $ | 9.69 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding at September 29, 2013 |
1,315,670 | $ | 5.47 | 3.59 | $ | 212,109 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at September 29, 2013 |
862,852 | $ | 6.29 | 2.70 | $ | 5,543 |
The weighted-average grant date fair values of options granted during the nine-month periods ended September 29, 2013 and September 30, 2012 were $1.21 and $1.54, respectively. The aggregate fair values of options exercised during the nine-month periods ended September 29, 2013 and September 30, 2012 were $0 and $6,179, respectively.
As of September 29, 2013, there was $622,685 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested options granted under the Companys option plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.43 years. The total fair value of options vested during the nine-month period ended September 29, 2013 was $326,401.
Restricted Stock Units
In June 2013, the Company granted 20,250 restricted stock units to various employees. The fair value of the restricted stock units at the date of the grant was $2.35. These stock units vest over a two-year term. The Company has recorded compensation expense of $27,913 and $4,633 during the nine-month period ended September 29, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively, related to restricted stock units. As of September 29, 2013, there was $60,610 of unrecognized compensation costs related to these grants. These grants have a remaining life of 1.38 years.
(8) Revenue Recognition
For the three and nine months ended September 29, 2013, there was no revenue recognized using the percentage of completion method. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, there was $794,990 and $1,173,427, respectively, of revenue recognized using the percentage of completion method.
(9) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
In accordance with the requirements of the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC), the Company groups its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:
| Level 1 - Valuation is based upon quoted market price for identical instruments traded in active markets. |
10
| Level 2 - Valuation is based on quoted market prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market. |
| Level 3 - Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. Valuation techniques include use of discounted cash flow models and similar techniques. |
In accordance with the requirements of the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the FASB ASC, it is the Companys policy to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when developing fair value measurements. When available, the Company uses quoted market prices to measure fair value. If market prices are not available, the fair value measurement is based on models that use primarily market based parameters including interest rate yield curves, option volatilities and currency rates. In certain cases, where market rate assumptions are not available, the Company is required to make judgments about assumptions market participants would use to estimate the fair value of a financial instrument. Changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows, could significantly affect the results of current or future values.
The carrying amounts of the Companys cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair value due to their short-term nature. Long-term debt is also reported at carrying value and approximates fair value as the interest rate on the mortgage note payable of 4.43% approximates the current market interest rate.
(10) Segment Reporting
Segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision-maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company operates as a single business segment called Thermal Processing Capital Equipment.
The Thermal Processing Capital Equipment segment consists of the designing, manufacturing, selling and servicing of thermal processing equipment and related process controls for use in the electronics, alternative energy, automotive and other industries. This business segment includes the supply of solder reflow systems used for surface mount applications in printed circuit board assembly. Thermal processing equipment is used in low temperature curing/encapsulation, hybrid integrated circuit manufacturing, integrated circuit packaging and sealing, and processing multi-chip modules. In addition, the thermal process equipment is used for solar cell processing, sintering nuclear fuel for commercial power generation, as well as brazing and the sintering of ceramics and powdered metals, and the deposition of precise thin film coatings. The business segments customers are multinational original equipment manufacturers and contract manufacturing companies.
Tangible long-lived assets by geographic location are as follows:
September 29, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||
United States |
$ | 3,071 | $ | 3,936 | ||||
Asia Pacific |
533 | 733 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 3,604 | $ | 4,669 | |||||
|
|
|
|
11
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
BTU International, Inc. (BTU or the Company), which was founded in 1950, incorporated as a Delaware corporation in 1981 and is headquartered in North Billerica, Massachusetts, is a global supplier of, and technology leader with respect to, advanced thermal processing equipment and processes to the electronic manufacturing and alternative energy markets. BTU equipment is used in the production of printed circuit board assemblies and semiconductor packaging as well as in solar cell, nuclear fuel and fuel cell manufacturing.
Our customers require high throughput, high yield and highly reliable thermal processing systems with tightly controlled temperature and atmospheric parameters. In electronics assembly, our convection solder reflow systems are used to attach electronic components to the printed circuit boards, primarily in the advanced, high-density, surface mount segments of this market. In the semiconductor market, we participate in both wafer level and die level packaging, where our thermal processing systems are used to connect and seal integrated circuits into a package. In the solar market, BTU offers processing equipment for both silicon and thin film photovoltaics. Also in alternative energy, our customers use our thermal systems for the processing of nuclear fuel.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three months ended September 29, 2013 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, selected items in our condensed consolidated statements of operations expressed as a percentage of net sales.
Summary Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
September 29, 2013 | September 30, 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||
( $ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
% of Net Sales |
% of Net Sales |
Percent Change |
||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 12,014 | 100.0 | % | $ | 14,137 | 100.0 | % | (15.0 | )% | ||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
8,480 | 70.6 | % | 10,018 | 70.9 | % | (15.4 | )% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
3,534 | 29.4 | % | 4,119 | 29.1 | % | (14.2 | )% | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
6,228 | 51.8 | % | 4,925 | 34.8 | % | 26.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Research, development and engineering expenses |
1,276 | 10.6 | % | 1,333 | 9.4 | % | (4.3 | )% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Operating loss |
(3,970 | ) | (33.0 | )% | (2,139 | ) | (15.1 | )% | 85.6 | % | ||||||||||
Loss before provision for income taxes |
(4,076 | ) | (33.9 | )% | (2,245 | ) | (15.9 | )% | 81.6 | % | ||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
998 | 8.3 | % | 153 | 1.1 | % | 552.3 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (5,074 | ) | (42.2 | )% | $ | (2,398 | ) | (17.0 | )% | 111.6 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
Net Sales. Net sales for the third quarter of 2013 were $12.0 million representing a decrease of $2.1 million, or 15.0%, as compared to the same period in the prior year. Net sales of electronic market systems decreased by $0.8 million, or 7.6%, as compared to the same period in the prior year. Net sales of alternative energy systems decreased by $1.1 million, or 48.6%, as compared to the same period in the prior year. Net sales for the Companys other market systems, parts and service sales decreased by $0.3 million, or 14.5%, as compared to the same period in the prior year. The electronic market systems decrease represents a decrease in demand for Semi-Packaging systems and high-end Surface Mount Technology systems, particularly in Asia. The decrease in alternative energy sales is mainly due to lower nuclear product sales. The Companys alternative energy sales continue to be low due to the continued weakness of the worldwide solar industry which started in the second quarter of 2011. The decrease in sales in the other market systems, parts and service is due to the cyclical nature of the parts and service business.
12
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, revenues from sales into select geographies expressed as a percentage of total revenues. The values shown represent the amount sold into each of the listed geographical areas.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 29, 2013 | September 30, 2012 | |||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
$ | % of Revenues |
$ | % of Revenues |
|||||||||||||
United States |
$ | 2,357 | 19.6 | % | $ | 1,377 | 9.8 | % | ||||||||
Europe, Near East |
2,007 | 16.7 | % | 3,355 | 23.7 | % | ||||||||||
Asia Pacific |
6,118 | 50.9 | % | 9,107 | 64.4 | % | ||||||||||
Other Americas |
1,532 | 12.8 | % | 298 | 2.1 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Revenue |
$ | 12,014 | $ | 14,137 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit. In the third quarter of 2013, gross profit was $3.5 million, a decrease of $0.6 million, compared to the third quarter of 2012 due primarily to the 15.0% decrease in net sales. In the third quarter of 2013, gross profit as a percentage of sales remained relatively flat at 29.4% as compared to 29.1% in the same period in 2012.
Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A). SG&A third quarter 2013 expenses of $6.2 million increased by $1.3 million compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase is primarily due to the $1.5 million payable as a result of the legal settlement as disclosed below in Part II, Item 1 - Legal Proceedings.
Research, Development and Engineering (RD&E). RD&E third quarter 2013 expenses of $1.3 million remained relatively flat as compared to the same period in the prior year.
Interest Income (Expense). In the third quarter of 2013, net interest expense remained relatively flat at $0.1 million as compared to the same period in 2012.
Foreign Exchange Loss. The foreign exchange loss in the third quarter of 2013 was $33,000 as compared to a loss of $3,000 in the same period in the prior year. The net exchange loss is primarily the result of foreign currency transactions in the Companys foreign operations for the applicable period.
Income Taxes. For the three months ended September 29, 2013, the Company recorded an income tax provision of $1.0 million as compared to an income tax provision of $0.2 million for the same period in 2012. The income tax provision recorded for the three months ended September 29, 2013 is primarily due to establishing a $1.1 million valuation allowance on all deferred tax assets related to the China manufacturing subsidiary. Accounting Standards require that a valuation allowance be established when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of deferred tax assets will not be realized. A review of all available positive and negative evidence needs to be considered, including a companys performance, the market environment in which the company operates and the length of carryback and carryforward periods. According to those standards, a valuation allowance may be needed when the negative evidence includes cumulative losses in recent years. Therefore, cumulative losses weigh heavily in the overall assessment. As a result of the review as of September 29, 2013, the Company concluded that it was appropriate to establish a full valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets in the China manufacturing subsidiary, where cumulative losses have been incurred during recent periods. The significant fluctuations in the Companys quarterly tax rate, exclusive of the fluctuation related to the establishment of the valuation allowance, as a percent of consolidated pre-tax income or loss, are the result of the different statutory tax rates in each of the Companys non-U.S. locations and the fluctuations of pre-tax income (loss) generated in these jurisdictions. A portion of the consolidated annual tax provision relates to Chinese withholding taxes which are not directly related to pre-tax income in China. China withholding taxes primarily result from corporate royalty charges based on the China manufacturing subsidiary net sales. U.S. taxes have had no impact to the rate fluctuation as the U.S. Company operates at a loss.
13
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Nine months ended September 29, 2013 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, selected items in our condensed consolidated statements of operations expressed as a percentage of net sales.
Summary Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
September 29, 2013 | September 30, 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||
( $ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
% of net sales |
% of net sales |
Percent change |
||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 36,761 | 100.0 | % | $ | 45,007 | 100.0 | % | (18.3 | )% | ||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
25,103 | 68.3 | % | 30,983 | 68.8 | % | (19.0 | )% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
11,658 | 31.7 | % | 14,024 | 31.2 | % | (16.9 | )% | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
15,237 | 41.4 | % | 15,674 | 34.8 | % | (2.8 | )% | ||||||||||||
Research, development and engineering expenses |
3,427 | 9.3 | % | 4,121 | 9.2 | % | (16.8 | )% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Operating loss |
(7,006 | ) | (19.1 | )% | (5,771 | ) | (12.8 | )% | 21.4 | % | ||||||||||
Loss before provision for income taxes |
(7,377 | ) | (20.1 | )% | (6,124 | ) | (13.6 | )% | 20.5 | % | ||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
1,083 | 2.9 | % | 430 | 1.0 | % | 151.9 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (8,460 | ) | (23.0 | )% | $ | (6,554 | ) | (14.6 | )% | 29.1 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
Net Sales. Net sales for the first nine months of 2013 were $36.8 million, representing a decrease of $8.2 million, or 18.3%, as compared to the same period in the prior year. Net sales of electronic market systems decreased by $2.1 million, or 6.6%, and net sales of alternative energy systems decreased by $4.5 million, or 74.5%, each as compared to the same period in the prior year. Net sales for the Companys other market systems, parts and service sales decreased by $1.6 million, or 24.9%, as compared to the same period in the prior year. The electronic market systems decrease represents a decrease in demand for Surface Mount Technology systems, particularly in Asia. The alternative energy systems sales decrease for the nine months of 2013 as compared to the same period in the prior year is due to the continued weakness of the worldwide solar industry which started in the second quarter of 2011. The decrease is due to lower sales of both solar and nuclear products. The decrease in sales in the other market systems, parts and service is due to the cyclical nature of the parts and service business.
14
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, revenues from sales into select geographies expressed as a percentage of total revenues. The values shown represent the amount sold into each of the listed geographical areas.
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 29, 2013 | September 30, 2012 | |||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
$ | % of revenues |
$ | % of revenues |
|||||||||||||
United States |
$ | 6,333 | 17.2 | % | $ | 6,008 | 13.3 | % | ||||||||
Europe, Near East |
4,695 | 12.8 | % | 6,673 | 14.8 | % | ||||||||||
Asia Pacific |
22,567 | 61.4 | % | 31,133 | 69.2 | % | ||||||||||
Other Americas |
3,166 | 8.6 | % | 1,193 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Revenue |
$ | 36,761 | $ | 45,007 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit. The first nine months of 2013 gross profit of $11.7 million decreased by $2.4 million compared to the first nine months of 2012 due primarily to the 18.3% decrease in net sales. In the first nine months of 2013, gross profit as a percentage of sales remained relatively flat at 31.7% as compared to 31.2% in the same period in 2012.
Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A). SG&A first nine months of 2013 expenses of $15.2 million decreased by $0.4 million compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease is primarily due to the lower commission expense on reduced sales and cost reductions taken in the Companys service, marketing and administrative functions as well as a reduction of bad debt reserves of approximately $277,000. In the second quarter of 2013, management determined that certain accounts receivable balances that had been reserved for in prior quarters were deemed collectible, as the amounts were subsequently collected from customers. Offsetting these decreases is the $1.5 million payable as a result of the legal settlement as disclosed below in Part II, Item 1 - Legal Proceedings.
Research, Development and Engineering (RD&E). RD&E first nine months of 2013 expenses of $3.4 million decreased by $0.7 million, or 16.8%, from the same period in the prior year as a result of headcount reductions and expense reductions in the Companys RD&E functions.
Interest Income (Expense). In the first nine months of 2013, net interest expense remained relatively flat at $0.3 million as compared to the same period in 2012.
Foreign Exchange Loss. The foreign exchange loss in the first nine months of 2013 was $147,000 as compared to a loss of $56,000 in the same period in the prior year. The net exchange loss is primarily the result of foreign currency transactions in the Companys foreign operations in the applicable period.
Income Taxes. For the nine months ended September 29, 2013, the Company recorded an income tax provision of $1.1 million compared to a provision of $0.4 million in the same period in the prior year. The income tax provision recorded for the nine months ended September 29, 2013 is primarily due to establishing a $1.1 million valuation allowance on all deferred tax assets related to the China manufacturing subsidiary. Accounting Standards require that a valuation allowance be established when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of deferred tax assets will not be realized. A review of all available positive and negative evidence needs to be considered, including a companys performance, the market environment in which the company operates and the length of carryback and carryforward periods. According to those standards, a valuation allowance may be needed when the negative evidence includes cumulative losses in recent years. Therefore, cumulative losses weigh heavily in the overall assessment. As a result of the review as of September 29, 2013, the Company concluded that it was appropriate to establish a full valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets in the China manufacturing subsidiary, where cumulative losses have been incurred during recent periods. The significant fluctuations in the Companys quarterly tax rate, exclusive of the fluctuation related to the establishment of the valuation allowance, as a percent of consolidated pre-tax income or loss, are the result of the different statutory tax rates in each of the Companys non-U.S. locations and the fluctuations of pre-tax income (loss) generated in these jurisdictions. A portion of the consolidated annual tax provision relates to Chinese withholding taxes which are not directly related to pre-tax income in China. China withholding taxes primarily result from corporate royalty charges based on the China manufacturing subsidiary net sales. U.S. taxes have had no impact to the rate fluctuation as the U.S. Company operates at a loss.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of September 29, 2013, we had $16.7 million in cash and cash equivalents, a decrease of $3.5 million, compared to $20.2 million at December 31, 2012.
During the nine months ended September 29, 2013, the Company used net cash of approximately $3.1 million for operating activities. This use of cash was primarily the result of a net loss of $8.5 million and an increase in inventory of $2.3 million, offset by a decrease in accounts receivable of $0.7 million, an increase in accounts payable of $1.1 million, a decrease in other current assets of $1.4 million and the adding back of non-cash expenses for depreciation and amortization of $1.3 million, stock-based compensation of $0.5 million, deferred taxes of $0.8 million and inventory provisions of $1.7 million.
15
On August 31, 2009, the Company entered into a pledge and assignment agreement with a bank. The bank agrees, at the Companys request, to issue letters of credit in the banks name and the Company agrees to cash collateralize the letters of credit via restricted cash deposits at the bank. As of September 29, 2013, the value of the outstanding letters of credit issued by the bank for the Company and cash collateralized by the Company was $252,566. This restricted cash value is included in the Companys balance sheet in other current assets.
On March 30, 2006, the Company entered into a $10 million mortgage note secured by its real property in Billerica, Massachusetts, which had an initial maturity date of December 23, 2015. On September 9, 2010, the Company signed a First Loan Modification Agreement relating to the mortgage note, which reduced the annual interest rate from 6.84% to 5.50% and the monthly payment from $76,280 to $69,000.
On September 26, 2013, the Company signed a Second Loan Modification Agreement relating to the mortgage note, which extended the maturity date from December 23, 2015 to September 26, 2023. The modification also reduced the annual interest rate from 5.50% to 4.43% through September 26, 2018, at which time the interest rate will be adjusted to a per annum fixed rate equal to the aggregate of the FHLB Five Year Classic Advance Rate plus two hundred forty basis points. The current monthly payment was reduced from $69,000 to $57,997. The mortgage note had an outstanding balance on September 29, 2013 of approximately $7.7 million. All outstanding principal and accrued and unpaid interest will be due and payable on the maturity date.
As of September 29, 2013, the Company has no material commitments relating to capital expenditures. There were no significant changes in the Companys commitments from those that were outlined in the Contractual Obligations section of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.
The Companys business forecasts project that our cash position and cash flow will be sufficient to meet our corporate, operating and capital requirements for the next twelve months.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND SIGNIFICANT ESTIMATES
During the nine months ended September 29, 2013, there have been no significant changes to the items that we disclosed as our critical accounting policies and estimates in the Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Estimates section of Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.
RISK FACTORS
During the nine months ended September 29, 2013, there have been no significant changes to the items that we disclosed as risk factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains forward-looking statements, including without limitation statements about our expectation for minimal revenue from solar equipment in 2013 and the sufficiency of our cash position and cash flows. The words or phrases will likely result, are expected to, will continue, is anticipated, may, intends, believes, estimate, project or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are neither promises nor guarantees but rather are subject to risks and uncertainties described in this report and other reports we have filed with the SEC, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Such statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions established by the federal securities laws, and are based on the assumptions and expectations of our management at the time such statements are made. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ include, but are not limited to, the condition of the world economy, the timely availability and acceptance of new products in the electronics, semiconductor and alternative energy generation industries, manufacturing problems with our foreign operations in China, the impact of competitive products and pricing, particularly from companies in Asia, and other risks detailed under the section entitled Risk Factors in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Actual results may vary materially. Unless otherwise required by law, we disclaim any obligation to revise or update this information in order to reflect future events or developments, whether or not anticipated. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
We have international subsidiaries in China, the United Kingdom, Singapore, and Malaysia. These subsidiaries transact business in their functional or local currency. Therefore, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange risks and fluctuations in foreign currencies, along with economic and political instability in the foreign countries in which we operate, all of which could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.
As of September 29, 2013 and December 31, 2012, all of our long-term debt obligations are fixed rate financial instruments. However, on September 26, 2018, the interest rate related to the mortgage note will be adjusted to a per annum fixed rate, to be applicable until the maturity date of September 26, 2023, equal to the aggregate of the FHLB Five Year Classic Advance Rate plus two hundred forty basis points.
16
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Operating Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Operating Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Operating Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
17
Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined by Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act), that occurred during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
On October 4, 2013, the Company settled previously disclosed litigation regarding allegations made by one of its overseas customers that furnaces such customer had purchased from the Company in 2006 had not functioned properly. The settlement constitutes a full and final settlement and release of all rights and obligations of each party. The $1.5 million payable as a result of the settlement has been recognized in the Companys consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended September 29, 2013.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
During the nine months ended September 29, 2013, there have been no material changes to the items that we disclosed as risk factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.
Item 6. | Exhibits |
(a) | Exhibits |
Exhibit 10.1 - | Second Modification Agreement between the Company and Salem Five Cents Savings Bank, dated September 26, 2013, incorporated by reference from the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 2, 2013 | |
Exhibit 10.2 - | Second Amended and Restated Commercial Real Estate Promissory Note by the Company in favor of Salem Five Cents Savings Bank, dated September 26, 2013, incorporated by reference from the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on October 2, 2013 | |
Exhibit 31.1 - | Section 302 Certification | |
Exhibit 31.2 - | Section 302 Certification | |
Exhibit 32.1 - | Section 906 Certification | |
Exhibit 32.2 - | Section 906 Certification |
Exhibit 101.INS - XBRL Instance Document.
Exhibit 101.SCH - XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
Exhibit 101.CAL - XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.
Exhibit 101.DEF - XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
Exhibit 101.LAB - XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.
Exhibit 101.PRE - XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.
18
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
BTU INTERNATIONAL, INC. | ||||||
DATE: November 8, 2013 | BY: | /S/ PAUL J. VAN DER WANSEM | ||||
Paul J. van der Wansem | ||||||
President, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chairman of the Board of Directors | ||||||
DATE: November 8, 2013 | BY: | /S/ PETER J. TALLIAN | ||||
Peter J. Tallian | ||||||
Chief Operating Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) |
19
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Paul J. van der Wansem, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BTU International, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 8, 2013
/s/ Paul J. van der Wansem |
Paul J. van der Wansem |
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors (principal executive officer) |
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Peter J. Tallian, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BTU International, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 8, 2013
/s/ Peter J. Tallian |
Peter J. Tallian |
Chief Operating Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) |
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as President and Chief Executive Officer of BTU International, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to his knowledge:
1. | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 29, 2013 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods covered by the Report. |
/s/ Paul J. van der Wansem |
Paul J. van der Wansem |
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors (principal executive officer) |
Dated: November 8, 2013
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Operating Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of BTU International, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to his knowledge:
1. | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 29, 2013 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods covered by the Report. |
/s/ Peter J. Tallian |
Peter J. Tallian |
Chief Operating Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) |
Dated: November 8, 2013
Segment Reporting
|
9 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 29, 2013
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment Reporting [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment Reporting | (10) Segment Reporting Segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision-maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company operates as a single business segment called Thermal Processing Capital Equipment. The Thermal Processing Capital Equipment segment consists of the designing, manufacturing, selling and servicing of thermal processing equipment and related process controls for use in the electronics, alternative energy, automotive and other industries. This business segment includes the supply of solder reflow systems used for surface mount applications in printed circuit board assembly. Thermal processing equipment is used in low temperature curing/encapsulation, hybrid integrated circuit manufacturing, integrated circuit packaging and sealing, and processing multi-chip modules. In addition, the thermal process equipment is used for solar cell processing, sintering nuclear fuel for commercial power generation, as well as brazing and the sintering of ceramics and powdered metals, and the deposition of precise thin film coatings. The business segment’s customers are multinational original equipment manufacturers and contract manufacturing companies. Tangible long-lived assets by geographic location are as follows:
|
8!)U8QD
M#$QG8V/XD'4_G*"'U..58"H>Q==Q7+F=OF#@[S4'YC*Q)8F`)$*2B$@B)HF$
M)%(5(?D-WH[]5@]Q#F]TR/*KAXZ#7/0%L^SF2?@-,&TT'6TE8&DZ-AIGP1AP
M'6^U1*$,QX"W6,X7Z!61`,"#:SM1*V.22,8OL1 ("KZ0PVNK2
M18ACP>AES#,V8TA:+@J)$?BT$P-E3F^3^?J:LN6BS\]/"3M[]$QLK7>?C"R^
MR!8PV5@F7X"-UD]>^E#X+3S,+D[?]P7X:D@!)=\V[IO>?099U0ZK/<*`?%SS
MXO4.K,"$(B9*1YXD=(,&\)