10-Q 1 dfff2.txt DFF2 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q [X] Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 or [ ] Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from to__________________ Commission File Number 0-17446 DEAN WITTER DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND II L.P. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 13-3490286 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) Demeter Management Corporation 330 Madison Avenue, 8th Floor New York, NY 10017 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant?s telephone number, including area code (212) 905-2700 (Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) Indicate by check-mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No___________ Indicate by check-mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No X DEAN WITTER DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND II L.P. INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q June 30, 2005
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements Statements of Financial Condition as of June 30, 2005 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2004..........................2 Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)...................3 Statements of Changes in Partners? Capital for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)........4 Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)...................5 Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)...............6-11 Item 2. Management?s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.......12-26 Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.........................................27-39 Item 4. Controls and Procedures.............................39-40 PART II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 5. Other Information......................................41 Item 6. Exhibits............................................41-42
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements DEAN WITTER DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND II L.P. STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
June 30, December 31, 2005 2004 $ $ (Unaudited) ASSETS Equity in futures interests trading accounts: Cash 4,720,865 5,838,647 Net unrealized gain on open contracts (MS&Co.) 408,528 506,726 Net unrealized gain (loss) on open contracts (MSIL) (10,086) 10,406 Total net unrealized gain on open contracts 398,442 517,132 Total Trading Equity 5,119,307 6,355,779 Interest receivable (Morgan Stanley DW) 9,930 8,989 Total Assets 5,129,237 6,364,768 LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS? CAPITAL Liabilities Redemptions payable 113,601 164,684 Accrued management fees (VK Capital) 12,823 15,912 Total Liabilities 126,424 180,596 Partners? Capital Limited Partners (1,670.911 and 1,735.637 Units, respectively) 4,810,360 5,954,816 General Partner (66.850 Units) 192,453 229,356 Total Partners? Capital 5,002,813 6,184,172 Total Liabilities and Partners? Capital 5,129,237 6,364,768 NET ASSET VALUE PER UNIT 2,878.88 3,430.91 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
DEAN WITTER DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND II L.P. STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
For the Three Months For the Six Months Ended June 30, Ended June 30, 2005 2004 2005 2004 $ $ $ $ INVESTMENT INCOME Interest income (Morgan Stanley DW) 28,680 14,220 57,377 27,453 EXPENSES Brokerage commissions (Morgan Stanley DW) 61,809 92,807 128,318 168,670 Management fees (VK Capital) 37,411 46,906 78,874 102,214 Transaction fees and costs 3,539 4,359 6,995 7,755 Total Expenses 102,759 144,072 214,187 278,639 NET INVESTMENT LOSS (74,079) (129,852) (156,810) (251,186) TRADING RESULTS Trading profit (loss): Realized (682,511) (502,838) (718,038) (59,008) Net change in unrealized 652,334 (808,755) (118,690) (823,969) Total Trading Results (30,177) (1,311,593) (836,728) (882,977) NET LOSS (104,256) (1,441,445) (993,538) (1,134,163) NET LOSS ALLOCATION Limited Partners (100,334) (1,392,555) (956,635) (1,095,569) General Partner (3,922) (48,890) (36,903) (38,594) NET LOSS PER UNIT Limited Partners (58.67) (731.34) (552.03) (577.33) General Partner (58.67) (731.34) (552.03) (577.33) The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
DEAN WITTER DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND II L.P. STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS? CAPITAL For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)
Units of Partnership Limited General Interest Partners Partner Total $ $ $ Partners? Capital, December 31, 2003 1,995.258 6,794,754 235,546 7,030,300 Net Loss ? (1,095,569) (38,594) (1,134,163) Redemptions (63.553) (205,010) ? (205,010) Partners? Capital, June 30, 2004 1,931.705 5,494,175 196,952 5,691,127 Partners? Capital, December 31, 2004 1,802.487 5,954,816 229,356 6,184,172 Net Loss ? (956,635) (36,903) (993,538) Redemptions (64.726) (187,821) ? (187,821) Partners? Capital, June 30, 2005 1,737.761 4,810,360 192,453 5,002,813 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
DEAN WITTER DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND II L.P. STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 2004 $ $ CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net loss (993,538) (1,134,163) Noncash item included in net loss: Net change in unrealized 118,690 823,969 Increase in operating assets: Interest receivable (Morgan Stanley DW) (941) (1,057) Decrease in operating liabilities: Accrued management fees (VK Capital) (3,089) (3,808) Net cash used for operating activities (878,878) (315,059) CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES Cash paid from redemptions of Units (238,904) (384,926) Cash used for financing activities (238,904) (384,926) Net decrease in cash (1,117,782) (699,985) Balance at beginning of period 5,838,647 6,963,743 Balance at end of period 4,720,865 6,263,758 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
DEAN WITTER DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND II L.P. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 2005 (Unaudited) The unaudited financial statements contained herein include, in the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations and financial condition of Dean Witter Diversified Futures Fund II L.P. (the "Partnership"). The financial statements and condensed notes herein should be read in conjunction with the Partnership?s December 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year?s financial statements to conform to the current year presentation. Such reclassifications have no impact on the Partnership?s reported net income (loss). 1. Organization Dean Witter Diversified Futures Fund II L.P. is a Delaware limited partnership organized in 1988 to engage primarily in the speculative trading of futures and forward contracts on physical commodities, and other commodity interests, including, but not limited to, foreign currencies, financial instruments, metals, energy, and agricultural products. The Partnership?s general partner is Demeter Management Corporation (?Demeter?). The non-clearing commodity broker is DEAN WITTER DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND II L.P. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) Morgan Stanley DW Inc. (?Morgan Stanley DW?). The clearing commodity brokers are Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated (?MS & Co.?) and Morgan Stanley & Co. International Limited (?MSIL?). The trading manager is VK Capital Inc. (?VK Capital? or the ?Trading Manager?). Demeter, Morgan Stanley DW, MS & Co., MSIL, and VK Capital are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Morgan Stanley. Effective April 28, 2005, Morgan Stanley Futures & Currency Management Inc. changed its name to VK Capital Inc. 2. Related Party Transactions The Partnership?s cash is on deposit with Morgan Stanley DW, MS & Co., and MSIL in futures and forwards trading accounts to meet margin requirements as needed. Monthly, Morgan Stanley DW pays the Partnership interest income equal to 80% of its average daily Net Assets for the month at a rate equal to the average yield on 13- week U.S. Treasury bills. The Partnership pays brokerage commissions to Morgan Stanley DW. Management fees and incentive fees (if any) incurred by the Partnership are paid to VK Capital. 3. Financial Instruments The Partnership trades futures and forward contracts on physical commodities and other commodity interests, including, but not limited to, foreign currencies, financial instruments, metals, DEAN WITTER DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND II L.P. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) energy, and agricultural products. Futures and forwards represent contracts for delayed delivery of an instrument at a specified date and price. Risk arises from changes in the value of these contracts and the potential inability of counterparties to perform under the terms of the contracts. There are numerous factors which may significantly influence the market value of these contracts, including interest rate volatility. The market value of exchange-traded contracts is based on the settlement price quoted by the exchange on the day with respect to which market value is being determined. If an exchange-traded contract could not have been liquidated on such day due to the operation of daily limits or other rules of the exchange, the settlement price shall be the settlement price on the first subsequent day on which the contract could be liquidated. The market value of off-exchange-traded contracts is based on the fair market value quoted by the counterparty. The Partnership?s contracts are accounted for on a trade-date basis and marked to market on a daily basis. The Partnership accounts for its derivative investments in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, ?Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities? (?SFAS No. 133?). SFAS No. 133 defines a derivative DEAN WITTER DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND II L.P. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) as a financial instrument or other contract that has all three of the following characteristics: 1) One or more underlying notional amounts or payment provisions; 2) Requires no initial net investment or a smaller initial net investment than would be required relative to changes in market factors; 3) Terms require or permit net settlement. Generally, derivatives include futures, forwards, swaps or options contracts, and other financial instruments with similar characteristics such as caps, floors, and collars. The net unrealized gains on open contracts, reported as a component of ?Equity in futures interests trading accounts? on the Statements of Financial Condition, and their longest contract maturities were as follows: Net Unrealized Gains on Open Contracts Longest Maturities Exchange- Off-Exchange- Exchange- Off-Exchange- Date Traded Traded Total Traded Traded $ $ $ Jun. 30, 2005 212,088 186,354 398,442 Mar. 2007 Sep. 2005 Dec. 31, 2004 323,480 193,652 517,132 Sep. 2005 Mar. 2005 DEAN WITTER DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND II L.P. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) The Partnership has credit risk associated with counterparty non- performance. The credit risk associated with the instruments in which the Partnership trades is limited to the amounts reflected in the Partnership?s Statements of Financial Condition. The Partnership also has credit risk because Morgan Stanley DW, MS & Co., and MSIL act as the futures commission merchants or the counterparties, with respect to most of the Partnership?s assets. Exchange-traded futures and forward contracts are marked to market on a daily basis, with variations in value settled on a daily basis. Morgan Stanley DW, MS & Co., and MSIL, each as a futures commission merchant for the Partnership?s exchange-traded futures and forward contracts, are required, pursuant to regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (?CFTC?), to segregate from their own assets, and for the sole benefit of their commodity customers, all funds held by them with respect to exchange-traded futures and forward contracts, including an amount equal to the net unrealized gains (losses) on all open futures and forward contracts, which funds, in the aggregate, totaled $4,932,953 and $6,162,127 at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. With respect to the Partnership?s off-exchange-traded forward currency contracts, there are no daily exchange-required settlements of variation in value, nor is there any requirement that an amount equal to the net unrealized gains (losses) on open forward contracts be segregated. However, the DEAN WITTER DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND II NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONCLUDED) Partnership is required to meet margin requirements equal to the net unrealized loss on open contracts in the Partnership accounts with the counterparty, which is accomplished by daily maintenance of the cash balance in a custody account held at Morgan Stanley DW for the benefit of MS & Co. With respect to those off-exchange- traded forward currency contracts, the Partnership is at risk to the ability of MS & Co., the sole counterparty on all such contracts, to perform. The Partnership has a netting agreement with MS & Co. This agreement, which seeks to reduce both the Partnership?s and MS & Co.?s exposure on off-exchange-traded forward currency contracts, should materially decrease the Partnership?s credit risk in the event of MS & Co.?s bankruptcy or insolvency. Item 2. MANAGEMENT?S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Liquidity. The Partnership deposits its assets with Morgan Stanley DW as non-clearing broker, and MS & Co. and MSIL as clearing brokers in separate futures and forwards trading accounts established for the Trading Manager. Such assets are used as margin to engage in trading and may be used as margin solely for the Partnership?s trading. The assets are held in either non- interest bearing bank accounts or in securities and instruments permitted by the CFTC for investment of customer segregated or secured funds. Since the Partnership?s sole purpose is to trade in futures and forwards, it is expected that the Partnership will continue to own such liquid assets for margin purposes. The Partnership?s investment in futures and forwards may, from time to time, be illiquid. Most U.S. futures exchanges limit fluctuations in prices during a single day by regulations referred to as ?daily price fluctuations limits? or ?daily limits?. Trades may not be executed at prices beyond the daily limit. If the price for a particular futures contract has increased or decreased by an amount equal to the daily limit, positions in that futures contract can neither be taken nor liquidated unless traders are willing to effect trades at or within the limit. Futures prices have occasionally moved the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading. These market conditions could prevent the Partnership from promptly liquidating its futures contracts and result in restrictions on redemptions. There is no limitation on daily price moves in trading forward contracts on foreign currencies. The markets for some world currencies have low trading volume and are illiquid, which may prevent the Partnership from trading in potentially profitable markets or prevent the Partnership from promptly liquidating unfavorable positions in such markets, subjecting it to substantial losses. Either of these market conditions could result in restrictions on redemptions. For the periods covered by this report, illiquidity has not materially affected the Partnership?s assets. There are no known material trends, demands, commitments, events, or uncertainties at the present time that are reasonably likely to result in the Partnership?s liquidity increasing or decreasing in any material way. Capital Resources. The Partnership does not have, nor expects to have, any capital assets. Redemptions of units of limited partnership interest (?Unit(s)?) in the future will affect the amount of funds available for investments in futures and forwards in subsequent periods. It is not possible to estimate the amount, and therefore the impact, of future outflows of Units. There are no known material trends, favorable or unfavorable, that would affect, nor any expected material changes to, the Partnership?s capital resource arrangements at the present time. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations. The Partnership does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, nor does it have contractual obligations or commercial commitments to make future payments that would affect its liquidity or capital resources. Results of Operations General. The Partnership?s results depend on the Trading Manager and the ability of the Trading Manager?s trading programs to take advantage of price movements in the futures and forwards markets. The following presents a summary of the Partnership?s operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, and a general discussion of its trading activities during each period. It is important to note, however, that the Trading Manager trades in various markets at different times and that prior activity in a particular market does not mean that such market will be actively traded by the Trading Manager or will be profitable in the future. Consequently, the results of operations of the Partnership are difficult to discuss other than in the context of the Trading Manager?s trading activities on behalf of the Partnership during the period in question. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The Partnership?s results of operations set forth in the financial statements on pages 2 through 11 of this report are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require the use of certain accounting policies that affect the amounts reported in these financial statements, including the following: The contracts the Partnership trades are accounted for on a trade- date basis and marked to market on a daily basis. The difference between their cost and market value is recorded on the Statements of Operations as ?Net change in unrealized trading profit (loss)? for open (unrealized) contracts, and recorded as ?Realized trading profit (loss)? when open positions are closed out. The sum of these amounts constitutes the Partnership?s trading results. The market value of a futures contract is the settlement price on the exchange on which that futures contract is traded on a particular day. The value of foreign currency forward contracts is based on the spot rate as of the close of business. Interest income, as well as management fees, incentive fees, and brokerage commission expenses of the Partnership are recorded on an accrual basis. Demeter believes that, based on the nature of the operations of the Partnership, no assumptions relating to the application of critical accounting policies other than those presently used could reasonably affect reported amounts. For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 The Partnership recorded total trading results including interest income totaling $(1,497) and expenses totaling $102,759, resulting in a net loss of $104,256 for the three months ended June 30, 2005. The Partnership?s net asset value per Unit decreased from $2,937.55 at March 31, 2005 to $2,878.88 at June 30, 2005. The most significant trading losses of approximately 6.3% were recorded within the energy markets during April from long positions in crude oil as prices reversed sharply lower after U.S. government data pointed to greater refinery production and rising supplies. Prices were also pressured lower by the release of slower demand growth forecasts. Elsewhere in the energy complex, losses resulted from long positions in natural gas as prices dropped throughout the month in tandem with crude oil prices. Additional losses in the energy markets were experienced during June from short positions in natural gas futures as prices reversed higher on supply worries after a tropical storm entered the Gulf of Mexico. Smaller losses were experienced from short positions in crude oil futures early in the month as prices increased due to reports of weak supply. In the agricultural markets, losses of approximately 2.6% were recorded from both long and short positions in corn as prices moved without consistent direction throughout the quarter due to conflicting news regarding supply and demand. Elsewhere in the agricultural complex, losses were incurred from long positions in cotton futures during May as prices declined on news of weak demand in China and technically-based selling. Further losses were experienced during June from short positions in cotton as prices finished higher. Smaller losses of approximately 1.4% were recorded in the metals markets, primarily during June from positions in copper futures as prices moved in a choppy manner amid conflicting news regarding supply and demand. Further losses were experienced from both long and short positions in gold futures due to significant volatility in prices resulting in trendless markets. A portion of the Partnership?s overall losses for the quarter was offset by gains of approximately 5.3% in the global interest rate futures markets during April from long positions in Japanese interest rate futures as prices increased due to weak economic data and geopolitical concerns over an intensifying rift between China and Japan. Additional gains were recorded from long positions in European bond futures as prices increased amid a steady stream of weak economic data from the major countries of the European Union. During May, gains were recorded from long positions in European interest rate futures as prices trended higher early in the month as investors sought the safe-haven of fixed-income investments due to speculation that several hedge funds may have experienced significant losses. Prices then continued to strengthen after European Central Bank representatives publicly rejected calls for increases in European interest rates and after French voters rejected the European Union constitution. Finally in June, gains were recorded from long positions in European and Japanese interest rate futures as prices trended higher throughout the month due to European Central Bank officials? decision to keep key interest rates unchanged and the release of weak economic data from Japan. Later in the month, long positions in European interest rate futures experienced further gains as prices continued to move higher after the Swedish Central Bank made a sharper cut in interest rates than had been expected. In the currency markets, gains of approximately 2.0% were recorded during May and June from short positions in the Swedish krona, euro, Swiss franc, and Japanese yen as the value of the U.S. dollar moved steadily higher after China downplayed rumors of a move toward a flexible exchange rate, the rejection of the European Union constitution by French voters, data indicating a slowing in the euro-zone and Japanese economies, and the ninth consecutive quarter-point interest rate hike by the U.S. Federal Reserve. Additional gains of approximately 1.9% were experienced in the global stock index futures markets during May and June from long positions in European equity index futures as prices finished higher on strong U.S. inflation data, strength in the technology sector, and weakness in the euro. The Partnership recorded total trading results including interest income totaling $(779,351) and expenses totaling $214,187, resulting in a net loss of $993,538 for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The Partnership?s net asset value per Unit decreased from $3,430.91 at December 31, 2004 to $2,878.88 at June 30, 2005. The most significant trading losses of approximately 13.6% were recorded in the currency markets from positions in the euro relative to the British pound and the U.S. dollar. During January long positions in the euro versus the British pound and the U.S. dollar incurred losses as the value of the euro reversed sharply lower in what many analysts described as a ?corrective? move after its strong upward trend during the fourth quarter of 2004. This decline in the value of the euro was attributed to weak economic data out of the European Union and a rebound in the value of its main rival, the U.S. dollar. Additional losses were recorded during February and March from both long and short positions in the euro against these currencies as the value of the euro moved without consistent direction amid conflicting economic data out of Germany, the European Union?s largest economy. Elsewhere in the currency markets, losses resulted from positions in the Singapore dollar, Swedish krona, South African rand, and Swiss franc relative to the U.S dollar, primarily during February and March, as the value of the U.S. dollar moved in a trendless range amid speculation that China would revalue its currency, negative comments by the U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan about the considerable U.S. Current-Account deficit and the U.S. Federal Reserve's announcement of a quarter-point increase in the federal funds rate. Additional losses of approximately 3.8% were incurred within the energy markets during January from short positions in crude oil as prices moved higher amid speculation that OPEC would move to cut production. Prices were also strengthened by forecasts for cold winter weather in the Northeastern U.S. Then in April, long positions in crude oil resulted in additional losses as prices reversed sharply lower after U.S. government data pointed to greater refinery production and rising supplies. Prices were also pressured lower by the release of slower demand growth forecasts by the International Energy Agency. Elsewhere in the energy complex, losses resulted from long positions in natural gas as prices dropped throughout the month in tandem with crude oil prices. Additional losses in the energy markets were experienced during June from short positions in natural gas futures as prices reversed higher on supply worries after a tropical storm entered the Gulf of Mexico. Smaller losses were experienced from short positions in crude oil futures early in the month as prices increased due to reports of weak supply. Within the agricultural complex, losses of approximately 2.5% were recorded from both long and short positions in corn during March, April, May, and June as prices moved without consistent direction throughout most of the year due to conflicting news regarding supply and demand. Elsewhere in the agricultural markets, losses were experienced from short positions in cotton futures during January as prices moved higher early in the month due to speculative buying and news of a decrease in supply. Further losses were incurred from long positions in cotton futures during May as prices declined on news of weak demand in China and technically-based selling. Smaller losses of approximately 1.1% were recorded in the metals markets, primarily during June from positions in copper futures as prices moved without consistent direction amid conflicting news regarding supply and demand. Further losses were experienced during April and June from both long and short positions in gold futures due to significant volatility in prices. A portion of these losses for the first six months of the year was offset by gains of approximately 3.5% recorded in the global interest rate futures markets. During January, gains were recorded from long positions in Japanese and European bond futures as prices continued to trend higher due to conflicting economic data out of Japan and the European Union and uncertainty in the equity markets. Further gains were experienced during April from long positions in Japanese interest rate futures as prices increased due to uncertainty regarding the direction of the Japanese economy and geopolitical concerns over an intensifying rift between China and Japan. Also in April, gains were recorded from long positions in European bond futures as prices increased amid a steady stream of weak economic data from the major countries of the European Union. During May, gains were recorded from long positions in European interest rate futures as prices increased early in the month as investors sought the safe-haven of fixed-income investments due to speculation that several hedge funds may have experienced significant losses. Prices then continued to strengthen after European Central Bank representatives publicly rejected calls for increases in European interest rates and French voters rejected the European Union constitution. Finally in June, gains were recorded from long positions in European and Japanese interest rate futures as prices trended higher throughout the month due to European Central Bank officials? decision to keep key interest rates unchanged and the release of weak economic data from Japan. Later in the month, long positions in European interest rate futures experienced further gains as prices continued to move higher after the Swedish Central Bank made a sharper cut in interest rates than had been expected. Additional gains of approximately 1.7% were experienced in the global stock index futures markets during May and June from long positions in European equity index futures as prices finished higher on strong U.S. inflation data, strength in the technology sector, and weakness in the euro. For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 The Partnership recorded total trading results including interest income totaling $(1,297,373) and expenses totaling $144,072, resulting in a net loss of $1,441,445 for the three months ended June 30, 2004. The Partnership?s net asset value per Unit decreased from $3,677.51 at March 31, 2004 to $2,946.17 at June 30, 2004. The most significant trading losses of approximately 8.9% were generated in the currency markets from positions in the Japanese yen and Singapore dollar versus the U.S. dollar. These losses were experienced throughout the quarter from both long and short positions in the Japanese yen relative to the U.S. dollar as the value of the yen experienced significant short-term price volatility due to conflicting economic data regarding a Japanese economic recovery, uncertainty regarding a currency market intervention by the Bank of Japan, geopolitical concerns stemming from terror warnings and instability in Iraq, and uncertainty regarding the direction of U.S. and Japanese interest rates. Losses were also recorded from positions in the Singapore dollar against the U.S. dollar as the value of the Singapore dollar experienced significant ?whipsawing? throughout the quarter in tandem with the Japanese yen. Elsewhere in the currency markets, losses were recorded primarily during May and June from positions in the euro relative to the British pound. During May, losses were recorded from long positions in the euro versus the pound as the value of the euro moved lower against the pound following the Bank of England?s decision to raise interest rates. Further losses were recorded during June as the value of the euro experienced short-term volatile price movements against most major currencies. In the global interest rate futures markets, losses of approximately 5.5% were recorded during April from long European, Japanese, and Australian interest rate futures positions as prices tumbled following the release of stronger-than-expected U.S. jobs data. Losses continued in May from short positions in Japanese interest rate futures as prices were pushed higher by the Bank of Japan?s decision to maintain current interest rate levels and strong results from an auction of Japanese Government bonds. Smaller losses were experienced during June from short positions in European interest rate futures as prices increased due to weaker-than-expected economic reports and diminished expectations for the U.S. Federal Reserve to maintain an aggressive policy towards tightening interest rates. In the metals markets, losses of approximately 2.6% were recorded during April from long futures positions in gold and copper as both precious and base metals prices weakened due to the strength in the U.S. dollar. Smaller losses were incurred during May from short positions in aluminum futures as prices increased due to a weaker U.S. dollar and news of strong demand from Asia. Within the energy markets, losses of approximately 2.1% were recorded during April and June from long positions in natural gas futures as prices reversed sharply lower due to news of increased supply. In the agricultural sector, losses of approximately 1.0% were incurred, primarily during May, from short positions in coffee futures as prices strengthened due to technically-based buying and reports of cold temperatures in the growing regions of Brazil. Additional losses were incurred from newly established long coffee positions during June as prices reversed lower due to larger crop expectations. The Partnership recorded total trading results including interest income totaling $(855,524) and expenses totaling $278,639, resulting in a net loss of $1,134,163 for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The Partnership?s net asset value per Unit decreased from $3,523.50 at December 31, 2003 to $2,946.17 at June 30, 2004. The most significant trading losses of approximately 14.2% were recorded in the currency markets from positions in the Japanese yen and Singapore dollar versus the U.S. dollar. These losses were experienced throughout the year from both long and short positions in the Japanese yen relative to the U.S. dollar as the value of the yen experienced significant short-term price volatility due to conflicting economic data regarding a Japanese economic recovery, uncertainty regarding an intervention by the Bank of Japan in the currency markets, geopolitical concerns stemming from terror warnings and instability in Iraq, and uncertainty regarding the direction of U.S. and Japanese interest rates. Losses were also recorded from positions in the Singapore dollar against the U.S. dollar as the value of the Singapore dollar experienced significant ?whipsawing? throughout the year in tandem with the Japanese yen. This price volatility in the Japanese yen also resulted in losses from cross-rate positions in the euro versus the Japanese yen as the yen experienced volatile price movements against most major currencies for the aforementioned reasons. Elsewhere in the currency markets, losses were experienced during May and June from positions in the euro versus the British pound. During May, losses were recorded from long positions in the euro versus the British pound as the value of the euro moved lower against the pound following the Bank of England?s decision to raise interest rates. Further losses were recorded during June as the value of the euro experienced short-term volatile price movements against most major currencies. Within the energy markets, losses of approximately 1.6% were recorded during April and June from long positions in natural gas futures as prices reversed sharply lower due to news of increased supply. Additional losses of approximately 0.7% were incurred in the metals markets, primarily during April, from long futures positions in gold as precious metals prices weakened due to the strength in the U.S. dollar. Within the global interest rate futures markets, losses of approximately 0.6% were incurred from long positions in Japanese and Australian interest rate futures during April as global bond prices reversed lower following the release of stronger-than-expected U.S. jobs data. Additional losses were recorded during May from newly established short positions in Japanese interest rate futures as prices were pushed higher by the Bank of Japan?s decision to maintain current interest rate levels and strong results from an auction of Japanese Government bonds. Within the metals markets, losses of approximately 0.7% were experienced, primarily during April, from long futures positions in gold as precious metals prices weakened due to the strength in the U.S. dollar. A portion of the Partnership?s overall losses was offset by gains of approximately 2.0% recorded in the agricultural markets from long futures positions in corn as growing U.S. exports and heightened demand from Asia pushed prices higher during January and March. Elsewhere in the agricultural markets, gains were experienced from short cotton futures positions, primarily during March, as prices trended lower due to rising supply and technically-based selling. Item 3.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Introduction The Partnership is a commodity pool engaged primarily in the speculative trading of futures and forwards. The market-sensitive instruments held by the Partnership are acquired for speculative trading purposes only and, as a result, all or substantially all of the Partnership?s assets are at risk of trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market-sensitive instruments is inherent to the primary business activity of the Partnership. The futures and forwards traded by the Partnership involve varying degrees of related market risk. Market risk is often dependent upon changes in the level or volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, and prices of financial instruments and commodities, factors that result in frequent changes in the fair value of the Partnership?s open positions, and consequently in its earnings, whether realized or unrealized, and cash flow. Gains and losses on open positions of exchange-traded futures and forward contracts are settled daily through variation margin. Gains and losses on off-exchange-traded forward currency contracts are settled upon termination of the contract, however, the Partnership is required to meet margin requirements equal to the net unrealized loss on open contracts in the Partnership accounts with the counterparty, which is accomplished by daily maintenance of the cash balance in a custody account held at Morgan Stanley DW for the benefit of MS & Co. The Partnership?s total market risk may increase or decrease as it is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the diversification among the Partnership?s open positions, the volatility present within the markets, and the liquidity of the markets. The face value of the market sector instruments held by the Partnership is typically many times the applicable margin requirements. Margin requirements generally range between 2% and 15% of contract face value. Additionally, the use of leverage causes the face value of the market sector instruments held by the Partnership to typically be many times the total capitalization of the Partnership. The Partnership?s past performance is no guarantee of its future results. Any attempt to numerically quantify the Partnership?s market risk is limited by the uncertainty of its speculative trading. The Partnership?s speculative trading and use of leverage may cause future losses and volatility (i.e., ?risk of ruin?) that far exceed the Partnership?s experience to date under the ?Partnership?s Value at Risk in Different Market Sectors? section and significantly exceed the Value at Risk (?VaR?) tables disclosed. Limited partners will not be liable for losses exceeding the current net asset value of their investment. Quantifying the Partnership?s Trading Value at Risk The following quantitative disclosures regarding the Partnership?s market risk exposures contain ?forward-looking statements? within the meaning of the safe harbor from civil liability provided for such statements by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). All quantitative disclosures in this section are deemed to be forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor, except for statements of historical fact. The Partnership accounts for open positions on the basis of mark to market accounting principles. Any loss in the market value of the Partnership?s open positions is directly reflected in the Partnership?s earnings and cash flow. The Partnership?s risk exposure in the market sectors traded by the Trading Manager is estimated below in terms of VaR. The Partnership estimates VaR using a model based upon historical simulation (with a confidence level of 99%) which involves constructing a distribution of hypothetical daily changes in the value of a trading portfolio. The VaR model takes into account linear exposures to risk including equity and commodity prices, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and correlation among these variables. The hypothetical changes in portfolio value are based on daily percentage changes observed in key market indices or other market factors (?market risk factors?) to which the portfolio is sensitive. The one-day 99% confidence level of the Partnership?s VaR corresponds to the negative change in portfolio value that, based on observed market risk factors, would have been exceeded once in 100 trading days, or one day in 100. VaR typically does not represent the worst case outcome. Demeter uses approximately four years of daily market data (1,000 observations) and revalues its portfolio (using delta-gamma approximations) for each of the historical market moves that occurred over this time period. This generates a probability distribution of daily ?simulated profit and loss? outcomes. The VaR is the appropriate percentile of this distribution. For example, the 99% one-day VaR would represent the 10th worst outcome from Demeter?s simulated profit and loss series. The Partnership?s VaR computations are based on the risk representation of the underlying benchmark for each instrument or contract and do not distinguish between exchange and non-exchange dealer-based instruments. They are also not based on exchange and/or dealer-based maintenance margin requirements. VaR models, including the Partnership?s, are continually evolving as trading portfolios become more diverse and modeling techniques and systems capabilities improve. Please note that the VaR model is used to numerically quantify market risk for historic reporting purposes only and is not utilized by either Demeter or the Trading Manager in their daily risk management activities. Please further note that VaR as described above may not be comparable to similarly-titled measures used by other entities. The Partnership?s Value at Risk in Different Market Sectors The following table indicates the VaR associated with the Partnership?s open positions as a percentage of total Net Assets by primary market risk category at June 30, 2005 and 2004. At June 30, 2005 and 2004, the Partnership?s total capitalization was approximately $5 million and $6 million, respectively. Primary Market June 30, 2005 June 30, 2004 Risk Category Value at Risk Value at Risk Interest Rate (1.74)% (2.04)% Currency (1.25) (1.28) Equity (0.55) - Commodity (0.40) (0.59) Aggregate Value at Risk (1.72)% (2.32)% The VaR for a market category represents the one-day downside risk for the aggregate exposures associated with this market category. The Aggregate Value at Risk listed above represents the VaR of the Partnership?s open positions across all the market categories, and is less than the sum of the VaRs for all such market categories due to the diversification benefit across asset classes. Because the business of the Partnership is the speculative trading of futures and forwards, the composition of its trading portfolio can change significantly over any given time period, or even within a single trading day, which could positively or negatively materially impact market risk as measured by VaR. The table below supplements the quarter-end VaR set forth above by presenting the Partnership?s high, low, and average VaR, as a percentage of total Net Assets for the four quarter-end reporting periods from July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2005. Primary Market Risk Category High Low Average Interest Rate (1.74)% (0.60)% (1.42)% Currency (2.31) (1.01) (1.43) Equity (2.52) - (1.26) Commodity (4.09) (0.22) (1.77) Aggregate Value at Risk (6.04)% (1.72)% (3.57)% Limitations on Value at Risk as an Assessment of Market Risk VaR models permit estimation of a portfolio?s aggregate market risk exposure, incorporating a range of varied market risks; reflect risk reduction due to portfolio diversification or hedging activities; and can cover a wide range of portfolio assets. However, VaR risk measures should be viewed in light of the methodology?s limitations, which include, but may not be limited to the following: * past changes in market risk factors will not always result in accurate predictions of the distributions and correlations of future market movements; * changes in portfolio value caused by market movements may differ from those of the VaR model; * VaR results reflect past market fluctuations applied to current trading positions while future risk depends on future positions; * VaR using a one-day time horizon does not fully capture the market risk of positions that cannot be liquidated or hedged within one day; and * the historical market risk factor data used for VaR estimation may provide only limited insight into losses that could be incurred under certain unusual market movements. In addition, the VaR tables above, as well as the past performance of the Partnership, give no indication of the Partnership?s potential ?risk of ruin?. The VaR tables provided present the results of the Partnership?s VaR for each of the Partnership?s market risk exposures and on an aggregate basis at June 30, 2005, and for the four quarter- end reporting periods from July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2005. VaR is not necessarily representative of the Partnership?s historic risk, nor should it be used to predict the Partnership?s future financial performance or its ability to manage or monitor risk. There can be no assurance that the Partnership?s actual losses on a particular day will not exceed the VaR amounts indicated above or that such losses will not occur more than once in 100 trading days. Non-Trading Risk The Partnership has non-trading market risk on its foreign cash balances. These balances and any market risk they may represent are immaterial. The Partnership also maintains a substantial portion (approximately 93% as of June 30, 2005) of its available assets in cash at Morgan Stanley DW. A decline in short-term interest rates would result in a decline in the Partnership?s cash management income. This cash flow risk is not considered to be material. Materiality, as used throughout this section, is based on an assessment of reasonably possible market movements and any associated potential losses, taking into account the leverage, optionality, and multiplier features of the Partnership?s market- sensitive instruments, in relation to the Partnership?s Net Assets. Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Primary Trading Risk Exposures The following qualitative disclosures regarding the Partnership?s market risk exposures ? except for (A) those disclosures that are statements of historical fact and (B) the descriptions of how the Partnership manages its primary market risk exposures ? constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act. The Partnership?s primary market risk exposures, as well as the strategies used and to be used by Demeter and the Trading Manager for managing such exposures, are subject to numerous uncertainties, contingencies, and risks, any one of which could cause the actual results of the Partnership?s risk controls to differ materially from the objectives of such strategies. Government interventions, defaults and expropriations, illiquid markets, the emergence of dominant fundamental factors, political upheavals, changes in historical price relationships, an influx of new market participants, increased regulation, and many other factors could result in material losses, as well as in material changes to the risk exposures and the risk management strategies of the Partnership. Investors must be prepared to lose all or substantially all of their investment in the Partnership. The following were the primary trading risk exposures of the Partnership at June 30, 2005, by market sector. It may be anticipated, however, that these market exposures will vary materially over time. Interest Rate. The primary market exposure of the Partnership at June 30, 2005 was to the global interest rate sector. Exposure was primarily spread across the Japanese, European, U.S., and Australian interest rate sectors. Interest rate movements directly affect the price of the sovereign bond futures positions held by the Partnership and indirectly affect the value of its stock index and currency positions. Interest rate movements in one country, as well as relative interest rate movements between countries, materially impact the Partnership?s profitability. The Partnership?s primary interest rate exposure is generally to interest rate fluctuations in the U.S. and the other G-7 countries. The G-7 countries consist of France, the U.S., Britain, Germany, Japan, Italy, and Canada. However, the Partnership also takes futures positions in the government debt of smaller countries ? e.g., Australia. Demeter anticipates that the G-7 countries interest rates will remain the primary interest rate exposure of the Partnership for the foreseeable future. The speculative futures positions held by the Partnership may range from short to long-term instruments. Consequently, changes in short, medium, or long-term interest rates may have an effect on the Partnership. Currency. The second largest market exposure of the Partnership at June 30, 2005 was to the currency sector. The Partnership?s currency exposure is to exchange rate fluctuations, primarily fluctuations which disrupt the historical pricing relationships between different currencies and currency pairs. Interest rate changes, as well as political and general economic conditions influence these fluctuations. The Partnership trades a number of currencies, including cross-rates - i.e., positions between two currencies other than the U.S. dollar. At June 30, 2005, the Partnership?s major exposures were to the euro and Japanese yen currency crosses, as well as to outright U.S. dollar positions. Outright positions consist of the U.S. dollar vs. other currencies. These other currencies include major and minor currencies. Demeter does not anticipate that the risk associated with the Partnership?s currency trades will change significantly in the future. Equity. The third largest market exposure of the Partnership at June 30, 2005 was to equity price risk in the G-7 countries. The stock index futures traded by the Partnership are by law limited to futures on broadly-based indices. At June 30, 2005, the Partnership?s primary exposure was to the Hang Seng (China) stock index. The Partnership is exposed to the risk of adverse price trends or static markets in the Chinese stock index. Static markets would not cause major market changes, but would make it difficult for the Partnership to avoid trendless price movements, resulting in numerous small losses. Commodity. Metals. At June 30, 2005, the Partnership had market exposure in the metals sector. The Partnership's metals exposure was to fluctuations in the price of base metals, such as nickel, aluminum, copper, and zinc. The Partnership also had exposure to precious metals, such as gold. Economic forces, supply and demand inequalities, geopolitical factors, and market expectations influence price movements in these markets. The Trading Manager utilizes the trading system(s) to take positions when market opportunities develop, and Demeter anticipates that the Partnership will continue to do so. Soft Commodities and Agriculturals. At June 30, 2005, the Partnership had market exposure to the markets that comprise these sectors. Most of the exposure was to the corn, coffee, and cocoa markets. Supply and demand inequalities, severe weather disruptions, and market expectations affect price movements in these markets. Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Non-Trading Risk Exposure The following was the only non-trading risk exposure of the Partnership at June 30, 2005: Foreign Currency Balances. The Partnership?s primary foreign currency balance at June 30, 2005 was in Hong Kong dollars. The Partnership controls the non-trading risk of foreign currency balances by regularly converting them back into U.S. dollars upon liquidation of their respective positions. Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Means of Managing Risk Exposure The Partnership and the Trading Manager, separately, attempt to manage the risk of the Partnership?s open positions in essentially the same manner in all market categories traded. Demeter attempts to manage market exposure by diversifying the Partnership?s assets among different market sectors and trading approaches, and by monitoring the performance of the Trading Manager daily. In addition, the Trading Manager establishes diversification guidelines, often set in terms of the maximum margin to be committed to positions in any one market sector or market-sensitive instrument. Demeter monitors and controls the risk of the Partnership?s non- trading instrument, cash. Cash is the only Partnership investment directed by Demeter, rather than the Trading Manager. Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES (a) As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, the President and Chief Financial Officer of Demeter, the general partner of the Partnership, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership?s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a?15(e) and 15d?15(e) of the Exchange Act), and have judged such controls and procedures to be effective. (b) There have been no material changes during the period covered by this quarterly report in the Partnership?s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation. PART II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION Management. The following changes have been made to the Board of Directors and Officers of Demeter: Mr. Harry Handler and Ms. Shelley Hanan were approved as Directors of Demeter by the National Futures Association as of May 12, 2005 and June 30, 2005, respectively. Item 6. EXHIBITS 3.01 Limited Partnership Agreement of the Partnership, dated as of October 28, 1988, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 and Exhibit 3.02 of the Partnership?s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-24662). 10.01 Management Agreement among the Partnership, Demeter Management Corporation and VK Capital Inc. (formerly known as Morgan Stanley Futures & Currency Management Inc.), dated as of October 28, 1988, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.02 of the Partnership?s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-24662). 10.02 Amended and Restated Customer Agreement between the Partnership and Morgan Stanley DW Inc., dated as of May 19, 2000, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.01 of the Partnership?s Form 8-K (File No. 0-17446) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2001. 10.03 Commodity Futures Customer Agreement between Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and the Partnership, and acknowledged and agreed to by Morgan Stanley DW Inc., dated as of May 1, 2000, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.02 of the Partnership?s Form 8-K (File No. 0- 17446) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2001. 10.04 Customer Agreement between the Partnership and Morgan Stanley & Co. International Limited, dated as of May 1, 2000, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.04 of the Partnership?s Form 8-K (File No. 0-17446) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2001. 10.05 Foreign Exchange and Options Master Agreement between Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and the Partnership, dated as of April 30, 2000, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.05 of the Partnership?s Form 8-K (File No. 0-17446) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2001. 10.06 Securities Account Control Agreement among the Partnership, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, and Morgan Stanley DW Inc., dated as of May 1, 2000, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.03 of the Partnership?s Form 8- K (File No. 0-17446) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2001. 31.01 Certification of President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 31.02 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.01 Certification of President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.02 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. Dean Witter Diversified Futures Fund II L.P. (Registrant) By: Demeter Management Corporation (General Partner) August 15, 2005 By:/s/Kevin Perry Kevin Perry Chief Financial Officer The General Partner which signed the above is the only party authorized to act for the Registrant. The Registrant has no principal executive officer, principal financial officer, controller, or principal accounting officer and has no Board of Directors. DEAN WITTER DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND II L.P. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONCLUDED)