XML 29 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Note 12. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Certain of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or the price paid to transfer a liability (the exit price) in the principal and most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Assets and liabilities carried at fair value are classified using the following three-tier hierarchy:
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and
Level 3: Fair value measurements derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.
The following table summarizes the valuation of the Company’s foreign currency forward contracts (see Note 13) that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis by the above pricing levels at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):
 
Fair
Value
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
September 30, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency forward contracts—asset position
$
1,408

 
$

 
$
1,408

 
$

Foreign currency forward contracts—liability position
(5,132
)
 

 
(5,132
)
 

 
$
(3,724
)
 
$

 
$
(3,724
)
 
$

December 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency forward contracts—asset position
$
680

 
$

 
$
680

 
$

Foreign currency forward contracts—liability position
(342
)
 

 
(342
)
 

 
$
338

 
$

 
$
338

 
$


The fair value of the Company’s foreign currency forward contracts is based on observable inputs that are corroborated by market data. Observable inputs include broker quotes, daily market foreign currency rates and forward pricing curves. Remeasurement gains and losses on foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income, and in other income (expense) for non-designated foreign currency forward contracts (see Note 12) .
Disclosures about the Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are categorized within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy due to the short-term nature of these balances. The table below illustrates information about fair value relating to the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, as well as the fair value of contingent contracts that represent financial instruments (in thousands).
 
September 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair 
Value
Money market funds(1)
$
73,229

 
$
73,229

 
$

 
$

Japan ABL Facility(2)
$

 
$

 
$
14,969

 
$
14,969

Standby letters of credit(3)
$
933

 
$
933

 
$
1,030

 
$
1,030

 

(1)
The carrying value of the money market funds approximates fair value as the funds are highly liquid and short-term in nature. The funds seek to maintain a stable net asset value of $1.00 per share, and the market value per share of these funds are available in active markets. As such, they are categorized within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. The money market funds accrue dividends, which are reinvested and reflected in the carrying value as of September 30, 2016.
(2)
The carrying value of the amount outstanding under the Japan ABL Facility approximates the fair value due to the short-term nature of this obligation. The fair value of this debt is categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 2 for information on the Company's credit facilities, including certain risks and uncertainties related thereto.
(3)
The carrying value of the Company's standby letters of credit approximates the fair value as they represent the Company’s contingent obligation to perform in accordance with the underlying contracts. There were no amounts outstanding under these letters of credit as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. The fair value of this contingent obligation is categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements
The Company measures certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at least annually or when certain indicators are present. These assets include long-lived assets, goodwill and non-amortizing intangible assets that are written down to fair value when they are held for sale or determined to be impaired. During each of the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company did not have any significant assets or liabilities that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in periods subsequent to initial recognition.