XML 72 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Note 17. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Certain of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or the price paid to transfer a liability (the exit price) in the principal and most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Assets and liabilities carried at fair value are classified using the following three-tier hierarchy:
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and
Level 3: Fair value measurements derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.
The following table summarizes the valuation of the Company’s foreign currency exchange contracts (see Note 18) that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis by the above pricing levels at December 31, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands):
 
Fair
Value
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency derivative instruments—asset position
$
40

 
$

 
$
40

 
$

Foreign currency derivative instruments—liability position
(246
)
 

 
(246
)
 

 
$
(206
)
 
$

 
$
(206
)
 
$

2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency derivative instruments—asset position
$
557

 
$

 
$
557

 
$

Foreign currency derivative instruments—liability position
(823
)
 

 
(823
)
 

 
$
(266
)
 
$

 
$
(266
)
 
$


The fair value of the Company’s foreign currency exchange contracts is based on observable inputs that are corroborated by market data. Foreign currency derivatives on the balance sheet are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in the statement of operations.
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements
The Company measures certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at least annually or when certain indicators are present. These assets include long-lived assets, goodwill and non-amortizing intangible assets that are written down to fair value when they are held for sale or determined to be impaired. As the implied fair value for the items discussed below was based on significant, unobservable inputs, the fair value measurements are classified as Level 3.
During 2012, in connection with the Cost Reduction Initiatives (see Note 3), the Company reached an agreement to sell its golf ball manufacturing facility in Chicopee, Massachusetts and, in connection with this agreement, during the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company designated this building as assets available for sale, and recorded a pre-tax charge of $7,939,000 to write the building down to its estimated selling price, net of estimated commissions and fees (see Note 7). In addition, in connection with the same initiatives, the Company transitioned its integrated device business to a third-party based model and, as a result, the Company performed an impairment analysis that was based on a discounted cash flow model on the net realizable value of its uPro assets. This analysis resulted in impairment charges of $5,156,000 to write-off amortizing intangibles and goodwill (see Note 8), and $4,345,000 to write-off property, plant and equipment associated with uPro devices (see Note 3).
Also in connection with the Cost Reduction Initiatives, during the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company determined that the sum of the future cash flows expected to result from the use of its Top-Flite patents was less than their carrying amount and, as a result, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $4,572,000 to write-off the net book value of these patents (see Note 8).
Disclosures about the Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2014 and 2013 are reasonable estimates of fair value due to the short-term nature of these balances and are therefore classified as Level 1. The table below illustrates information about fair value relating to the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are recognized on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, as well as the fair value of contingent contracts that represent financial instruments (in thousands):
 
December 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair Value
Convertible notes(1)
$
108,574

 
$
126,222

 
$
107,835

 
$
138,668

ABL Facility(2)
$
15,235

 
$
15,235

 
$
25,660

 
$
25,660

Standby letters of credit(3)
$
1,142

 
$
1,142

 
$
1,297

 
$
1,297

 
(1) The carrying value of the convertible notes at December 31, 2014 and 2013 is net of the unamortized discount of $3,926,000 and $4,665,000, respectively (see Note 4). The fair value of the convertible notes was determined based on secondary quoted market prices, and as such is classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
(2) The carrying value of amounts outstanding under the Company's ABL Facility approximates the fair value due to the short term nature of this obligation. The fair value of this debt is categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 4 for information on the ABL Facility, including certain risks and uncertainties.
(3) The carrying value of the Company's standby letters of credit approximates the fair value as they represent the Company’s contingent obligation to perform in accordance with the underlying contracts. There were no amounts outstanding under these letters of credit at December 31, 2014 or 2013. The fair value of this contingent obligation is categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.