485BPOS 1 bodycnytet.htm N1A, PSP, SAI, FINANCIALS, PART C CENTENNIAL NEW YORK TAX EXEMPT TRUST
                                                             Registration No. 33-23494
                                                             File No. 811-5584

                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, DC 20549

                                  FORM N-1A

REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES
ACT OF 1933                                                                [X]

Pre-Effective Amendment No. _____                                        [   ]


Post-Effective Amendment No. 21                                            [X]
                             --


                                    and/or

REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE INVESTMENT COMPANY
ACT OF 1940                                                                [X]


Amendment No. 23                                                           [X]
              --


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     CENTENNIAL NEW YORK TAX EXEMPT TRUST
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              6803 South Tucson Way, Centennial, Colorado 80112
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                1.303.768.3200
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Registrant's Telephone Number, including Area Code)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             Robert G. Zack, Esq.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            OppenheimerFunds, Inc.
              6803 South Tucson Way, Centennial, Colorado 80112
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   (Name and Address of Agent for Service)

It is proposed that this filing will become effective (check appropriate box):


[   ] Immediately upon filing pursuant to paragraph (b)
[X]   On August 22, 2003 pursuant to paragraph (b)
         ---------------
[   ] 60 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)
[   ] On _______________ pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)
[   ] 75 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(2)
[   ] On _______________ pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of Rule 485


If appropriate, check the following box:

[   ] This  post-effective  amendment  designates a new  effective  date for a
previously filed post-effective amendment.


Centennial New York Tax Exempt Trust

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Prospectus dated August 22, 2003

                                         Centennial New York Tax Exempt Trust
                                         is a money market mutual fund.  It
                                         seeks the maximum current income
                                         exempt from federal, New York State
                                         and New York City income taxes for
                                         individual investors as is consistent
                                         with preservation of capital. The
                                         Trust invests in short-term,
                                         high-quality "money market" securities.

                                         This Prospectus contains important
                                         information about the Trust's
                                         objective, its investment policies,
                                         strategies and risks.  It also
As with all mutual funds, the            contains important information about
Securities and Exchange Commission has   how to buy and sell shares of the
not approved or disapproved the Trust's  Trust and other account features.
securities nor has it determined that    Please read this Prospectus carefully
this Prospectus is accurate or           before you invest and keep it for
complete.  It is a criminal offense to   future reference about your account.
represent otherwise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------







2

CONTENTS

                  A B O U T  T H E  T R U S T

                  The Trust's Investment Objective and Strategies

                  Main Risks of Investing in the Trust

                  The Trust's Past Performance

                  Fees and Expenses of the Trust

                  About the Trust's Investments

                  How the Trust is Managed

                  A B O U T  Y O U R  A C C O U N T

                  How to Buy Shares
                  Automatic Purchase and Redemption Programs
                  Direct Shareholders

                  How to Sell Shares
                  Automatic Purchase and Redemption Programs
                  Direct Shareholders

                  How to Exchange Shares

                  Shareholder Account Rules and Policies


                  Dividends, Capital Gains and Taxes


                  Financial Highlights













A B O U T  T H E  T R U S T

The Trust's Investment Objective and Strategies

WHAT IS THE TRUST'S INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE?  The Trust seeks the maximum current
income exempt from federal, New York State and New York City income taxes for
individual investors as is consistent with the preservation of capital.


WHAT DOES THE TRUST MAINLY INVEST IN?  The Trust is a money market fund.  It
invests in a variety of high-quality money market instruments to seek income.
Money market instruments are short-term, U.S. dollar denominated debt instruments
issued by the U.S. and state governments, domestic and foreign corporations and
financial institutions and other entities.  They include, for example, municipal
securities, bank obligations, repurchase agreements, commercial paper, other
corporate debt obligations and government debt obligations.  To be considered
"high-quality," generally they must be rated in one of the two highest
credit-quality categories for short-term securities by nationally recognized rating
services.  If unrated, a security must be determined by the Trust's investment
manager to be of comparable quality to rated securities.


      The Trust normally attempts to invest 100% of its assets in municipal
securities and as a fundamental policy, the Trust will invest under normal
circumstances at least 80% of its net assets (plus borrowings for investment
purposes) in investments the income from which is exempt from federal, New York
State and New York City income tax for individual investors in the opinion of bond
counsel to the respective issuer.  Such investments may include obligations of the
State of New York and its political subdivisions, agencies and instrumentalities or
obligations of commonwealths or territories of the United States, or their
agencies, instrumentalities or authorities the interest from which is not subject
to New York State and New York City personal income tax in the opinion of bond
counsel to the respective issuer.  Securities that generate income that is subject
to alternative minimum taxes will not count towards that 80% threshold.


WHO IS THE TRUST DESIGNED FOR?   The Trust is designed for investors who are
seeking to earn income exempt from federal and New York State and New York City
personal income taxes at current money market rates, while preserving the value of
their investment, because the Trust tries to keep its share price stable at $1.00.
Income on money market instruments tends to be lower than income on longer term
debt securities, so the Trust's yield will likely be lower than the yield on
longer-term fixed income funds.  The Trust does not invest for the purpose of
seeking capital appreciation or gains and is not a complete investment program.


Main Risks of Investing in the Trust

      All investments carry risks to some degree.  Funds that invest in debt
obligations for income may be subject to credit risks and interest rate risks.
There are risks that any of the Trust's holdings could have its credit rating
downgraded, or the issuer could default, or that interest rates could rise sharply,
causing the value of the Trust's securities (and its share price) to fall.  As a
result, there is a risk that the Trust's shares could fall below $1.00 per share.
If there is a high redemption demand for the Trust's shares that was not
anticipated, portfolio securities might have to be sold prior to their maturity at
a loss.  Also, there is the risk that the value of your investment could be eroded
over time by the effects of inflation, and that poor security selection could cause
the Trust to underperform other funds with similar objectives.

Risks of Focusing on Investments in New York Municipal Securities.  The Trust
      generally invests a significant portion of its assets in New York municipal
      securities. Because the Trust invests primarily in the securities of New York
      issuers, its performance will be significantly affected by local, state and
      regional factors.  These may include state or local legislation or policy
      changes, erosion of the tax base of the state or one or more particular
      localities, the effects of possible terrorist acts or natural disasters, or
      other economic or credit problems affecting the state generally or any
      individual locality (which may directly or indirectly affect the state as a
      whole).


      On September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks destroyed the World Trade Center,
resulted in substantial loss of life and damaged other buildings in the vicinity.
The attack also resulted in disruption of public transportation and business and
displacement of residents in the immediate vicinity of the World Trade Center.   It
is expected that the destruction of the World Trade Center will continue to have a
substantial impact on the City and its economy.  The Statement of Additional
Information contains further information concerning special investment
considerations for New York municipal securities, including the effect of the
events of September 11, 2001 on New York City and New York State.


      Having a higher percentage of its assets invested in the securities of fewer
issuers, particularly obligations of government issuers of a single state, could
result in greater credit risk exposure to a smaller number of issuers due to
economic, regulatory or political problems in New York.  The Trust is a
"non-diversified" fund; however, it is currently subject to certain diversification
requirements under rules for money market funds under federal law.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
An investment in the Trust is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation or any other government agency.  Although the Trust seeks to
preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose
money by investing in the Trust.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Trust's Past Performance

The bar chart and table below show how the Trust's returns may vary over time, by
showing changes in the Trust's performance from year to year for the last 10
calendar years and average annual total returns for the 1-, 5- and 10- year
periods. Variability of returns is one measure of the risks of investing in a money
market fund.  The Trust's past investment performance does not predict how the
Trust will perform in the future.

Annual Total Returns (as of 12/31 each year)

[See appendix to prospectus for annual total return data for bar chart.]


For the period from 1/1/03 through 6/30/03 the cumulative total return (not
annualized) was 0.20%.
During the period shown in the bar chart, the highest return (not annualized) for a
calendar quarter was 0.87% (2nd Q ' 00) and the lowest return (not annualized) for
a calendar quarter was 0.13% (1st Q ' 02).


Average Annual Total Returns

for the periods ended December 31, 2002        1 Year      5 Years   10 Years

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               ------------          -----------

Centennial New York Tax Exempt Trust           0.59%       2.21%     2.34%
(inception 01/04/89)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The returns in the table measure the performance of a hypothetical account and
assume that all dividends have been reinvested in additional shares.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The total returns are not the Trust's current yield. The Trust's yield more closely
reflects the Trust's current earnings.  To obtain the Trust's current seven day
yield, please call the Transfer Agent toll-free at 1.800.525.9310.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fees and Expenses of the Trust


The Trust pays a variety of expenses directly for management of its assets,
administration and other services.  Those expenses are subtracted from the Trust's
assets to calculate the Trust's net asset value per share. All shareholders
therefore pay those expenses indirectly.  The following tables are meant to help
you understand the fees and expenses you may pay if you buy and hold shares of the
Trust. The numbers below are based upon the Trust's expenses during the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2003.


SHAREHOLDER FEES.  The Trust does not charge any initial sales charge to buy shares
or to reinvest dividends.  There are no exchange fees or redemption fees and no
contingent deferred sales charges (unless you buy Trust shares by exchanging Class
A shares of other eligible funds that were purchased subject to a contingent
deferred sales charge, as described in "How to Sell Shares").

Annual Trust Operating Expenses (deducted from Trust assets):
(% of average daily net assets)

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Management Fees1                             0.50%
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) Fees     0.20%
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Other Expenses2                              0.12%

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Total Annual Operating Expenses              0.82%

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. The Management fee is shown without giving effect to a voluntary expense
assumption by the Manager.  With that expense assumption the Management fee was
0.48% and the "Total Annual Operating Expenses" were 0.80%. The voluntary expense
assumption may be amended or withdrawn at any time.
2.  "Other expenses" include transfer agent fees, custodial expenses, and
accounting and legal expenses the Trust pays.  The Transfer Agent has voluntarily
undertaken to the Trust to limit the transfer agent fees to 0.35% per annum.  That
undertaking may be amended or withdrawn at any time. That fee waiver had no impact
on the Trust's "Other Expenses" or "Total Annual Operating Expenses" during its
last fiscal year.


EXAMPLE. The following example is intended to help you compare the cost of
investing in the Trust with the cost of investing in other mutual funds.  The
example assumes that you invest $10,000 in shares of the Trust for the time periods
indicated and reinvest your dividends and distributions. The example also assumes
that your investment has a 5% return each year and that the Trust's operating
expenses remain the same.  Your actual costs may be higher or lower, because
expenses will vary over time. Based on these assumptions your expenses would be as
follows, whether or not you redeem your investment at the end of each period:

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  1 year                        3 years     5 years     10 years

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  $84                           $262        $455        $1,014

  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

About the Trust's Investments

The Trust's Principal Investment Policies. The Trust invests in money market
instruments meeting quality, maturity and diversification standards established by
its Board of Trustees as well as rules that apply to money market funds under the
Investment Company Act.  The Statement of Additional Information contains more
detailed information about the Trust's investment policies and risks.


      The Trust's investment manager, Centennial Asset Management Corporation
(referred to in this Prospectus as the Manager), tries to reduce risks by
diversifying investments and by carefully researching securities before they are
purchased.  The rate of the Trust's income will vary from day to day, generally
reflecting changes in overall short-term interest rates. There is no assurance that
the Trust will achieve its investment objective.


What Does the Trust Invest In?  Money market instruments are high-quality,
      short-term debt instruments.  They may have fixed, variable or floating
      interest rates. All of the Trust's money market instruments must meet the
      special diversification, quality and maturity requirements set under the
      Investment Company Act and the special procedures set by the Board described
      briefly below. The following is a brief description of the types of money
      market instruments the Trust can invest in.

   o  Municipal Securities.  The Trust buys municipal bonds and notes, tax-exempt
      commercial paper, certificates of participation in municipal leases and other
      debt obligations. These are debt obligations issued by or on behalf of the
      State of New York, other states and the District of Columbia, their political
      subdivisions (such as cities, towns and counties), or any commonwealth or
      territory of the United States, or by their agencies, instrumentalities and
      authorities, if the interest paid on the security is not subject to federal
      individual income tax in the opinion of bond counsel to the issuer.  All of
      these types of debt obligations are referred to as "municipal securities" in
      this Prospectus.

o     Other Money Market Instruments.  Up to 20% of the Trust's assets can be
     invested in investments, the income from which may be taxable. The Trust's
     taxable investments include repurchase agreements, municipal securities issued
     to benefit a private user and certain temporary investments.  These
     investments are described below under "Other Investment Strategies" or in the
     Statement of Additional Information. Normally, the Trust will not invest more
     than 20% of its total assets in taxable investments.

      Additionally, the Trust can buy other money market instruments that the
Manager approves under procedures adopted by its Board of Trustees from time to
time.  They must be U.S. dollar-denominated short-term investments that the Manager
determines to have minimal credit risks.

What Standards Apply to the Trust's Investments?  Money market instruments are
      subject to credit risk, the risk that the issuer might not make timely
      payments of interest on the security or repay principal when it is due.  The
      Trust can buy only those instruments that meet standards set by the
      Investment Company Act for money market funds and procedures adopted by the
      Board of Trustees.  The Trust's Board of Trustees has adopted procedures to
      evaluate securities for the Trust's portfolio and the Manager has the
      responsibility to implement those procedures when selecting investments for
      the Trust.

      In general, the Trust buys only high-quality investments that the Manager
believes present minimal credit risk at the time of purchase.  "High-quality"
investments are:
o     rated in one of the two highest short-term rating categories of two national
      rating organizations, or
o     rated by one rating organization in one of its two highest rating categories
      (if only one rating organization has rated the investment), or

o     unrated investments that the Manager, determines are comparable in quality to
      the two highest rating categories.


      The procedures also limit the amount of the Trust's assets that can be
      invested in the securities of any one issuer (other than the U.S. government,
      its agencies and instrumentalities), to spread the Trust's investment risks.
      No security's maturity will exceed the maximum time permitted under Rule 2a-7
      (currently 397 days).  Finally, the Trust must maintain a dollar-weighted
      average portfolio maturity of not more than 90 days, to reduce interest rate
      risks.

Can the Trust's Investment Objective and Policies Change?  The Trust's Board of
      Trustees can change non-fundamental policies without shareholder approval,
      although significant changes will be described in amendments to this
      Prospectus. Fundamental policies cannot be changed without the approval of a
      majority of the Trust's outstanding voting shares.  The Trust's investment
      objective is a fundamental policy.  Some of the investment restrictions that
      are fundamental policies are listed in the Statement of Additional
      Information.  An investment policy is not fundamental unless this Prospectus
      or the Statement of Additional Information says that it is.

OTHER INVESTMENT STRATEGIES.  To seek its objective, the Trust can use the
investment techniques and strategies described below.  The Trust might not always
use all of them.  These techniques have risks.  The Statement of Additional
Information contains more information about some of these practices, including
limitations on their use that are designed to reduce the overall risks.

Floating Rate/Variable Rate Notes.  The Trust can purchase investments with
      floating or variable interest rates.  Variable rates are adjustable at stated
      periodic intervals.  Floating rates are adjusted automatically according to a
      specified market rate or benchmark for such investments, such as the prime
      rate of a bank.  If the maturity of an investment is greater than the maximum
      time permitted under Rule 2a-7 (currently 397 days), it can be purchased if
      it has a demand feature.  That feature must permit the Trust to recover the
      principal amount of the investment on not more than 30 days' notice at any
      time, or at specified times not exceeding the maximum time permitted under
      Rule 2a-7.

"When-Issued" and "Delayed-Delivery" Transactions.  The Trust can purchase
      municipal securities on a "when-issued" basis and can purchase or sell such
      securities on a "delayed- delivery" basis. These terms refer to securities
      that have been created and for which a market exists, but which are not
      available for immediate delivery.  The Trust does not intend to make such
      purchases for speculative purposes.  During the period between the purchase
      and settlement, no payment is made for the security and no interest accrues
      to the buyer from the investment.  There is a risk of loss to the Trust if
      the value of the security declines prior to the settlement date.

Municipal Lease Obligations. Municipal leases are used by state and local
      governments to obtain funds to acquire land, equipment or facilities.  The
      Trust can invest in certificates of participation that represent a
      proportionate interest in payments made under municipal lease obligations.
      Most municipal leases, while secured by the leased property, are not general
      obligations of the issuing municipality.  They often contain
      "non-appropriation" clauses under which the municipal government has no
      obligation to make lease or installment payments in future years unless money
      is appropriated on a yearly basis.  If the government stops making payments
      or transfers its payment obligations to a private entity, the obligation
      could lose value or become taxable.

            Some of these obligations might not have an active trading market and
      would be subject to the Trust's limits on "illiquid" securities described
      below.  From time to time the Trust can invest more than 5% of its net assets
      in municipal lease obligations that the Manager has determined to be liquid
      under guidelines set by the Trust's Board of Trustees.

Illiquid and Restricted Securities.  Investments may be illiquid because they do
      not have an active trading market, making it difficult to value them or
      dispose of them promptly at an acceptable price.  A restricted security is
      one that has a contractual limit on resale or which cannot be sold publicly
      until it is registered under federal securities laws. The Trust will not
      invest more than 10% of its net assets in illiquid or restricted securities.
      That limit does not apply to certain restricted securities that are eligible
      for resale to qualified institutional purchasers or purchases of commercial
      paper that may be sold without registration under the federal securities
      laws. The Manager monitors holdings of illiquid securities on an ongoing
      basis to determine whether to sell any holdings to maintain adequate
      liquidity.  Difficulty in selling a security may result in a loss to the
      Trust or additional costs.

Demand Features and Guarantees.  The Trust can invest a significant percentage of
      its assets in municipal securities that have demand features, guarantees or
      similar credit and liquidity enhancements.  A demand feature permits the
      holder of the security to sell the security within a specified period of time
      at a stated price and entitles the holder of the security to receive an
      amount equal to the approximate amortized cost of the security plus accrued
      interest.  A guarantee permits the holder of the security to receive, upon
      presentment to the guarantor, the principal amount of the underlying security
      plus accrued interest when due or upon default. A guarantee is the
      unconditional obligation of an entity other than the issuer of the security.
      Demand features and guarantees can effectively:
o     shorten the maturity of a variable or floating rate security,
o     enhance the security's credit quality, and
o     enhance the ability to sell the security.

      The aggregate price for a security subject to a demand feature or a guarantee
may be higher than the price that would otherwise be paid for the security without
the guarantee or the demand feature.  When the Trust purchases securities subject
to guarantees or demand features, there is an increase in the cost of the
underlying security and a corresponding reduction in its yield. Because the Trust
invests in securities backed by banks and other financial institutions, changes in
the credit quality of these institutions could cause losses to the Trust.
Therefore, an investment in the Trust may be riskier than an investment in other
types of money market funds.

Repurchase Agreements.  The Trust can enter into repurchase agreements.  In a
      repurchase transaction, the Trust buys a security and simultaneously sells it
      to the vendor for delivery at a future date.  Repurchase agreements must be
      fully collateralized.  However, if the vendor fails to pay the resale price
      on the delivery date, the Trust may incur costs in disposing of the
      collateral and may experience losses if there is any delay in its ability to
      do so. The Trust will not enter into repurchase transactions that will cause
      more than 10% of the Trust's net assets to be subject to repurchase
      agreements having a maturity beyond seven days. There is no limit on the
      amount of the Trust's net assets that can be subject to repurchase agreements
      of seven days or less.  Income earned on repurchase transactions is not tax
      exempt and accordingly, under normal market conditions, the Trust will limit
      its investments in repurchase transactions to 20% of its total assets.

Temporary Defensive and Interim Investments. In times of unstable adverse market or
      economic conditions, the Trust can invest up to 100% of its assets in
      temporary defensive or interim investments that are inconsistent with the
      Trust's principal investment objective.  These temporary investments can
      include:
o     obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or its agencies or
         instrumentalities,
o     bankers' acceptances; taxable commercial paper rated in the highest category
         by a rating organization,
o     short-term taxable debt obligations rated in one of the two highest rating
         categories of a rating organization,
o     certificates of deposit of domestic banks, and
o     repurchase agreements.

      To the extent the Trust assumes a temporary defensive position, a significant
portion of the Trust's distributions may be subject to federal and New York State
and local income taxes.

How the Trust is Managed

THE MANAGER.  The investment advisor for the Trust is the Manager, Centennial Asset
Management Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of OppenheimerFunds, Inc.  The
Manager chooses the Trust's investments and handles its day-to-day business.  The
Manager carries out its duties, subject to the policies established by the Trust's
Board of Trustees, under an investment advisory agreement that states the Manager's
responsibilities.  The agreement sets the fees the Trust pays to the Manager and
describes the expenses that the Trust is responsible to pay to conduct its
business.


      The Manager has been an investment advisor since 1978. The Manager and its
parent company and controlled affiliates managed more than $130 billion in assets
as of June 30, 2003, including other Oppenheimer funds with more than seven million
shareholder accounts.  The Manager is located at 6803 South Tucson Way, Centennial,
Colorado 80112.

Portfolio Manager.  Michael Carbuto is the portfolio manager of the Trust.  He is
      the person principally responsible for the day-to-day management of the
      Trust's portfolio.  Mr. Carbuto has had this responsibility since June 1990.
      Mr. Carbuto is a Vice President of OppenheimerFunds, Inc., a Vice President
      of the Trust, and an officer and portfolio manager of other funds for which
      the Manager or an affiliate serves as investment advisor.

Advisory Fees. Under the investment advisory agreement, the Trust pays the Manager
      an advisory fee at an annual rate that declines on additional assets as the
      Trust grows: 0.500% of the first $250 million of net assets; 0.475% of the
      next $250 million of net assets; 0.450% of the next $250 million of net
      assets; 0.425% of the next $250 million of net assets; and 0.400% of the of
      net assets in excess of $1 billion. The Manager has voluntarily undertaken to
      assume certain expenses of the Trust in any fiscal year that exceed 0.80% of
      the Trust's average annual net assets.  The Trust's management fee for the
      fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 was 0.50% of the Trust's average annual net
      assets before the expense assumption noted above and 0.48% after the expense
      assumption noted above.  Additionally, effective July 7, 2003, the Manager
      has voluntarily undertaken to waive receipt of its management fees to the
      extent necessary so that the Trust may seek to maintain a positive yield.
      The Manager reserves the right to amend or terminate either voluntary expense
      assumption at any time.


      For further information about the investment advisory agreement, including a
description of expense assumption arrangements with the Manager, see the Statement
of Additional Information.
                          -

A B O U T  Y O U R  A C C O U N T

How to Buy Shares

AT WHAT PRICE ARE SHARES SOLD?  Shares of the Trust are sold at their offering
price, which is the net asset value per share without any sales charge.  The net
asset value per share will normally remain fixed at $1.00 per share.  However,
there is no guarantee that the Trust will maintain a stable net asset value of
$1.00 per share.

      The offering price that applies to a purchase order is based on the next
calculation of the net asset value per share that is made after the Distributor
(Centennial Asset Management Corporation) or the Sub-Distributor (OppenheimerFunds
Distributor, Inc.) receives the purchase order at its offices in Colorado, or after
any agent appointed by the Sub-Distributor receives the order and sends it to the
Sub-Distributor as described below.


How is the Trust's Net Asset Value Determined?  The net asset value of shares of
      the Trust is normally determined twice each day, at 12:00 Noon and at 4:00
      P.M., on each day The New York Stock Exchange ("the Exchange") is open for
      trading (referred to in this Prospectus as a "regular business day"). All
      references to time in this Prospectus mean "Eastern time."


      The net asset value per share is determined by dividing the value of the
Trust's net assets by the number of shares that are outstanding. Under a policy
adopted by the Trust's Board of Trustees, the Trust uses the amortized cost method
to value its securities to determine net asset value.

      The shares of the Trust offered by this Prospectus are considered to be Class
A shares for the purposes of exchanging them or reinvesting distributions among
other eligible funds that offer more than one class of shares.

      If, after the close of the principal market on which a security held by the
Trust is traded, and before the time the Trust's securities are priced that day, an
event occurs that the Manager deems likely to cause a material change in the value
of such security, the Trust's Board of Trustees has authorized the Manager, subject
to the Board's review, to ascertain a fair value for such security.  A security's
valuation may differ depending on the method used for determining value.

HOW MUCH MUST YOU INVEST?  You can open an account with a minimum initial
investment described below, depending on how you buy and pay for your shares.  You
can make additional purchases at any time with as little as $25.  The minimum
investment requirements do not apply to reinvesting distributions from the Trust or
other eligible funds (a list of them appears in the Statement of Additional
Information, or you can ask your broker/dealer or call the Transfer Agent) or
reinvesting distributions from unit investment trusts that have made arrangements
with the Distributor.

HOW ARE SHARES PURCHASED? You can buy shares in one of several ways:

Buying Shares Through a Broker/Dealer's Automatic Purchase and Redemption Program.
      You can buy shares of a Trust through a broker/dealer that has a sales
      agreement with the Trust's Distributor or Sub-Distributor that allows shares
      to be purchased through the broker/dealer's Automatic Purchase and Redemption
      Program. Shares of the Trust are sold mainly to customers of participating
      broker/dealers that offer the Trust's shares under these special purchase
      programs.  If you participate in an Automatic Purchase and Redemption Program
      established by your broker/dealer, your broker/dealer buys shares of the
      Trust for your account with the broker/dealer.  Program participants should
      also read the description of the program provided by their broker/dealer.

Buying Shares Through Your Broker/Dealer.  If you do not participate in an
      Automatic Purchase and Redemption Program, you can buy shares of the Trust
      through any broker/dealer that has a sales agreement with the Distributor or
      Sub-Distributor.  Your broker/dealer will place your order with the
      Distributor on your behalf.

Buying Shares Directly Through the Sub-Distributor.  You can also purchase shares
      directly through the Trust's Sub-Distributor.  Shareholders who make
      purchases directly and hold shares in their own names are referred to as
      "direct shareholders" in this Prospectus.

      The Sub-Distributor may appoint certain servicing agents to accept purchase
(and redemption) orders, including broker/dealers that have established Automatic
Purchase and Redemption Programs.  The Distributor or Sub-Distributor, in their
sole discretion, may reject any purchase order for shares of a Trust.

AUTOMATIC PURCHASE AND REDEMPTION PROGRAM.  If you buy shares of a Trust through
your broker/dealer's Automatic Purchase and Redemption Program, your broker/dealer
will buy your shares for your Program Account and will hold your shares in your
broker/dealer's name.  These purchases will be made under the procedures described
in "Guaranteed Payment Procedures" below.  Your Automatic Purchase and Redemption
Program Account may have minimum investment requirements established by your
broker/dealer.  You should direct all questions about your Automatic Purchase and
Redemption Program to your broker/dealer, because the Trust's Transfer Agent does
not have access to information about your account under that Program.

Guaranteed Payment Procedures.  Some broker/dealers may have arrangements with the
      Distributor to enable them to place purchase orders for shares of the Trust
      and to guarantee that the Trust's custodian bank will receive Federal Funds
      to pay for the shares prior to specified times. Broker/dealers whose clients
      participate in Automatic Purchase and Redemption Programs may use these
      guaranteed payment procedures to pay for purchases of shares of the Trust.

o     If the Distributor receives a purchase order before 12:00 Noon on a regular
      business day with the broker/dealer's guarantee that the Trust's custodian
      bank will receive payment for those shares in Federal Funds by 2:00 P.M. on
      that same day, the order will be effected at the net asset value determined
      at 12:00 Noon that day. Distributions will begin to accrue on the shares on
      that day if the Federal Funds are received by the required time.

o     If the Distributor receives a purchase order after 12:00 Noon on a regular
      business day with the broker/dealer's guarantee that the Trust's custodian
      bank will receive payment for those shares in Federal Funds by 2:00 P.M. on
      that same day, the order will be effected at the net asset value determined
      at 4:00 P.M. that day.  Distributions will begin to accrue on the shares on
      that day if the Federal Funds are received by the required time.

o     If the Distributor receives a purchase order between 12:00 Noon and 4:00 P.M.
      on a regular business day with the broker/dealer's guarantee that the Trust's
      custodian bank will receive payment for those shares in Federal Funds by 4:00
      P.M. the next regular business day, the order will be effected at the net
      asset value determined at 4:00 P.M. on the day the order is received and
      distributions will begin to accrue on the shares purchased on the next
      regular business day if the Federal Funds are received by the required time.

HOW CAN DIRECT SHAREHOLDERS BUY SHARES?  Direct shareholders can buy shares of the
Trust by completing a Centennial Funds new account application and sending it to
the Sub-Distributor, OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc., P.O. Box 5143, Denver,
Colorado 80217.  Payment must be made by check or by Federal Funds wire as
described below.  If you don't list a broker/dealer on the application, the
Sub-Distributor will act as your agent in buying the shares.  However, we recommend
that you discuss your investment with a financial advisor before you make a
purchase to be sure that the Trust is appropriate for you.

      The Trust intends to be as fully invested as possible to maximize its yield.
Therefore, newly purchased shares normally will begin to accrue distributions after
the Sub-Distributor or its agent accepts your purchase order, starting on the
business day after the Trust receives Federal Funds from the purchase payment.

Payment by Check.  Direct shareholders may pay for purchases of shares of the Trust
      by check. Send your check, payable to "OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc.,"
      along with your application and other documents to the address listed above.
      For initial purchases, your check should be payable in U.S. dollars and drawn
      on a U.S. bank so that distributions will begin to accrue on the next regular
      business day after the Sub-Distributor accepts your purchase order.  If your
      check is not drawn on a U.S. bank and is not payable in U.S. dollars, the
      shares will not be purchased until the Sub-Distributor is able to convert the
      purchase payment to Federal Funds.  In that case distributions will begin to
      accrue on the purchased shares on the next regular business day after the
      purchase is made.  The minimum initial investment for direct shareholders by
      check is $500.

Payment by Federal Funds Wire.  Direct shareholders may pay for purchases of shares
      of the Trust by Federal Funds wire.  You must also forward your application
      and other documents to the address listed above. Before sending a wire, call
      the Sub-Distributor's Wire Department at 1.800.525.9310 (toll-free from
      within the U.S.) or 303.768.3200 (from outside the U.S.) to notify the
      Sub-Distributor of the wire, and to receive further instructions.

      Distributions will begin to accrue on the purchased shares on the purchase
date that is a regular business day if the Federal Funds from your wire and the
application are received by the Sub-Distributor and accepted by 12:00 Noon.  If the
Sub-Distributor receives the Federal Funds from your wire and accepts the purchase
order between 12:00 Noon and 4:00 P.M. on the purchase date, distributions will
begin to accrue on the shares on the next regular business day.  The minimum
investment by Federal Funds Wire is $2,500.

Buying Shares Through Automatic Investment Plans.  Direct shareholders can purchase
      shares of the Trust automatically each month by authorizing the Trust's
      Transfer Agent to debit your account at a U.S. domestic bank or other
      financial institution.  Details are in the Automatic Investment Plan
      Application and the Statement of Additional Information.  The minimum monthly
      purchase is $25.

Service (12b-1) Plan.  The Trust has adopted a service plan.  It reimburses the
      Distributor for a portion of its costs incurred for services provided to
      accounts that hold shares of the Trust.  Reimbursement is made quarterly, or
      monthly depending on asset size, at an annual rate of up to 0.20% of the
      average annual net assets of the Trust.  The Distributor currently uses all
      of those fees (together with significant amounts from the Manager's own
      resources) to pay dealers, brokers, banks and other financial institutions
      quarterly for providing personal services and maintenance of accounts of
      their customers that hold shares of the Trust.

How to Sell Shares

You can sell (redeem) some or all of your shares on any regular business day.  Your
shares will be sold at the next net asset value calculated after your order is
received in proper form (which means that it must comply with the procedures
described below) and is accepted by the Transfer Agent.

HOW CAN PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS SELL SHARES?  If you participate in an Automatic
Purchase and Redemption Program sponsored by your broker/dealer, you must redeem
shares held in your Program Account by contacting your broker/dealer firm, or you
can redeem shares by writing checks as described below.  You should not contact the
Trust or its Transfer Agent directly to redeem shares held in your Program
Account.  You may also arrange (but only through your broker/dealer) to have the
proceeds of redeemed Trust shares sent by Federal Funds wire, as described below in
"Sending Redemption Proceeds by Wire."


HOW CAN DIRECT SHAREHOLDERS REDEEM SHARES?  Direct shareholders can redeem their
shares by writing a letter to the Transfer Agent, by wire, by using the Trust's
checkwriting privilege, or by telephone. You can also set up Automatic Withdrawal
Plans to redeem shares on a regular basis.  If you have questions about any of
these procedures, and especially if you are redeeming shares in a special
situation, such as due to the death of the owner, please call the Transfer Agent
first, at 1.800.525.9310 for assistance.


Certain Requests Require a Signature Guarantee.  To protect you and the Trust from
      fraud, the following redemption requests for accounts of direct shareholders
      must be in writing and must include a signature guarantee (although there may
      be other situations that also require a signature guarantee):
o     You wish to redeem $100,000 or more and receive a check
o     The redemption check is not payable to all shareholders listed on the account
         statement
o     The redemption check is not sent to the address of record on your account
         statement
o     Shares are being transferred to an account with a different owner or name
o     Shares are being redeemed by someone (such as an Executor) other than the
         owners listed in the account registration.

Where Can Direct Shareholders Have Their Signatures Guaranteed?  The Transfer Agent
      will accept a guarantee of your signature by a number of financial
      institutions, including:
o     a U.S. bank, trust company, credit union or savings association,
o     a foreign bank that has a U.S. correspondent bank,
o     a U.S. registered dealer or broker in securities, municipal securities or
         government securities, or
o     a U.S. national securities exchange, a registered securities association or a
         clearing agency.

      If you are signing on behalf of a corporation, partnership or other business
or as a fiduciary, you must also include your title in the signature.

How Can Direct Shareholders Sell Shares by Mail?  Write a letter to the Transfer
      Agent that includes:
      o  Your name
      o  The Trust's name
      o  Your account number (from your account statement)
      o  The dollar amount or number of shares to be redeemed
      o  Any special payment instructions
      o  Any share certificates for the shares you are selling
      o  The signatures of all registered owners exactly as the account is
      registered, and
      o  Any special documents requested by the Transfer Agent to assure proper
         authorization of the person asking to sell the shares (such as Letters
         Testamentary of an Executor).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
Use the following address for            Send courier or express mail
---------------------------------------- requests to:
requests by mail:                        Shareholder Services, Inc.
Shareholder Services, Inc.               10200 E. Girard Avenue, Building D
P.O. Box 5143                            Denver, Colorado 80231
Denver, Colorado 80217-5143
                                         ----------------------------------------

How Can Direct Shareholders Sell Shares by Telephone?  Direct shareholders and
      their broker/dealer representative of record may also sell shares by
      telephone.  To receive the redemption price calculated on a particular
      regular business day, the Transfer Agent, or its designated agent, must
      receive the request by 4:00 P.M. on that day. You may not redeem shares held
      under a share certificate by telephone.  To redeem shares through a service
      representative, call 1.800.525.9310.  Proceeds of telephone redemptions will
      be paid by check payable to the shareholder(s) of record and will be sent to
      the address of record for the account. Up to $100,000 may be redeemed by
      telephone in any seven day period.  Telephone redemptions are not available
      within 30 days of changing the address on an account.

Sending Redemption Proceeds By Wire.  While the Transfer Agent normally sends
      direct shareholders their money by check, you can arrange to have the
      proceeds of the shares you sell sent by Federal Funds wire to a bank account
      you designate.  It must be a commercial bank that is a member of the Federal
      Reserve wire system.  The minimum redemption you can have sent by wire is
      $2,500. There is a $10 fee for each request.  To find out how to set up this
      feature on an account or to arrange a wire, direct shareholders should call
      the Transfer Agent at 1.800.525.9310.  If you hold your shares through your
      broker/dealer's Automatic Purchase and Redemption Program, you must contact
      your broker/dealer to arrange a Federal Funds wire.

Can Direct Shareholders Submit Requests by Fax?  Direct shareholders may send
      requests for certain types of account transactions to the Transfer Agent by
      fax (telecopier).  Please call 1.800.525.9310 for information about which
      transactions may be handled this way. Transaction requests submitted by fax
      are subject to the same rules and restrictions as written and telephone
      requests described in this Prospectus.

HOW DO I WRITE CHECKS AGAINST MY ACCOUNT?  Automatic Purchase and Redemption
Program participants may write checks against the account held under their Program,
but must arrange for checkwriting privileges through their broker/dealers.  Direct
shareholders may write checks against their account by requesting that privilege on
the account application or by contacting the Transfer Agent for signature cards.
They must be signed (with a signature guarantee) by all owners of the account and
returned to the Transfer Agent so that checks can be sent to you to use.
Shareholders with joint accounts can elect in writing to have checks paid over the
signature of one owner. If checkwriting is established after November 1, 2000, only
one signature is required for shareholders with joint accounts, unless you elect
otherwise.

o     Checks can be written to the order of whomever you wish, but may not be
         cashed at the bank the checks are payable through or the Trust's custodian
         bank.
o     Checkwriting privileges are not available for accounts holding shares that
         are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge.
o     Checks must be written for at least $250.
o     Checks cannot be paid if they are written for more than your account value.
o     You may not write a check that would require the Trust to redeem shares that
         were purchased by check or Automatic Investment Plan payments within the
         prior 10 days.
o     Don't use your checks if you changed your account number, until you receive
         new checks.

WILL I PAY A SALES CHARGE WHEN I SELL MY SHARES?  The Trust does not charge a fee
to redeem shares of the Trust that were bought directly or by reinvesting
distributions from that Trust or another Centennial Trust or eligible fund.
Generally, there is no fee to redeem shares of the Trust bought by exchange of
shares of another Centennial Trust or eligible fund.  However,

o     if you acquired shares of  a Trust by exchanging Class A shares of another
         eligible fund that you bought subject to the Class A contingent deferred
         sales charge, and
o     those shares are still subject to the Class A contingent deferred sales
         charge when you exchange them into the Trust, then
o     you will pay the contingent deferred sales charge if you redeem those shares
         from the Trust within 18 months of the purchase date of the shares of the
         fund you exchanged.

How to Exchange Shares

Shares of the Trust can be exchanged for shares of certain other Centennial Trusts
or other eligible funds, depending on whether you own your shares through your
broker/dealer's Automatic Purchase and Redemption Program or as a direct
shareholder.

HOW CAN PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS EXCHANGE SHARES?  If you participate in an Automatic
Purchase and Redemption Program sponsored by your broker/dealer, you may exchange
shares held in your Program Account for shares of Centennial Money Market Trust,
Centennial Government Trust, Centennial Tax Exempt Trust, Centennial California Tax
Exempt Trust and Centennial New York Tax Exempt Trust (referred to in this
Prospectus as the "Centennial Trusts"), if available for sale in your state of
residence by contacting your broker or dealer and obtaining a Prospectus of the
selected Centennial Trust.

HOW CAN DIRECT SHAREHOLDERS EXCHANGE SHARES?  Direct shareholders can exchange
shares of the Trust for Class A shares of certain eligible funds listed in the
Statement of Additional Information.  To exchange shares, you must meet several
conditions:

o     Shares of the fund selected for exchange must be available for sale in your
         state of residence.
o     The prospectuses of the Trust and the fund whose shares you want to buy must
         offer the exchange privilege.
o     You must hold the shares you buy when you establish your account for at least
         seven days before you can exchange them. After the account is open seven
         days, you can exchange shares every regular business day.
o     You must meet the minimum purchase requirements for the fund whose shares you
         purchase by exchange.
o     Before exchanging into a fund, you must obtain and read its prospectus.

      Shares of a particular class of an eligible fund may be exchanged only for
shares of the same class in other eligible funds.  For example, you can exchange
shares of the Trust only for Class A shares of another fund, and you can exchange
only Class A shares of another eligible fund for shares of the Trust.

      You may pay a sales charge when you exchange shares of the Trust.  Because
shares of the Trust are sold without sales charge, in some cases you may pay a
sales charge when you exchange shares of the Trust for shares of other eligible
funds that are sold subject to a sales charge. You will not pay a sales charge when
you exchange shares of the Trust purchased by reinvesting distributions from the
Trust or other eligible funds (except Oppenheimer Cash Reserves), or when you
exchange shares of the Trust purchased by exchange of shares of an eligible fund on
which you paid a sales charge.

      For tax purposes, exchanges of shares involve a sale of the shares of the
fund you own and a purchase of the shares of the other fund, which may result in a
capital gain or loss.  Since shares of the Trust normally maintain a $1.00 net
asset value, in most cases you should not realize a capital gain or loss when you
sell or exchange your shares.

      Direct shareholders can find a list of eligible funds currently available for
exchanges in the Statement of Additional Information or you can obtain one by
calling a service representative at 1.800.525.9310.  The list of eligible funds can
change from time to time.

How Do Direct Shareholders Submit Exchange Requests?  Direct shareholders may
      request exchanges in writing or by telephone:

o     Written Exchange Requests.  Complete an Exchange Authorization Form, signed
      by all owners of the account.  Send it to the Transfer Agent at the address
      on the back cover.

o     Telephone Exchange Requests.  Telephone exchange requests may be made by
      calling a service representative at 1.800.525.9310.  Telephone exchanges may
      be made only between accounts that are registered with the same name(s) and
      address.  Shares held under certificates may not be exchanged by telephone.

ARE THERE LIMITATIONS ON EXCHANGES?  There are certain exchange policies you should
be aware of:


o     Shares are redeemed from one fund and purchased from the other fund in the
      exchange transaction on the same regular business day on which the Transfer
      Agent receives an exchange request that conforms to the policies described
      above.  Requests for exchanges to any of the Centennial Trusts must be
      received by the Transfer Agent by 4:00 P.M. on a regular business day to be
      effected that day.  The Transfer Agent must receive requests to exchange
      shares of the Trust to funds other than the Centennial Trusts on a regular
      business day by the close of the Exchange that day.  The close is normally
      4:00 P.M. but may be earlier on some days.

   o  The interests of the Trust's long-term shareholders and its ability to manage
      its investments may be adversely affected when its shares are repeatedly
      bought and sold in response to short-term market fluctuations--also known as
      "market timing."  When large dollar amounts are involved, the Trust may have
      difficulty implementing long-term investment strategies, because it cannot
      predict how much cash it will have to invest. Market timing also may force
      the Trust to sell portfolio securities at disadvantageous times to raise the
      cash needed to buy a market timer's shares. These factors may hurt the
      Trust's performance and its shareholders. When the Manager believes frequent
      trading would have a disruptive effect on the Trust's ability to manage its
      investments, the Manager and the Trust may reject purchase orders and
      exchanges into the Trust by any person, group or account that the Manager
      believes to be a market timer.  All accounts under common ownership or
      control within the Centennial or Oppenheimer funds complex may be counted
      together for purposes of determining market timing with respect to any
      exchange involving the Trust.


o     Because excessive trading can hurt fund performance and harm shareholders,
      the Trust reserves the right to refuse any exchange request that may, in the
      opinion of the Trust, be disadvantageous, or to refuse multiple exchange
      requests submitted by a shareholder or dealer.


o     The Trust may amend, suspend or terminate the exchange privilege at any time.
      The Trust is currently not obligated to provide notice before rejecting an
      exchange offer.


o     If the Transfer Agent cannot exchange all the shares you request because of a
      restriction cited above, only the shares eligible for exchange will be
      exchanged.

Shareholder Account Rules and Policies

More information about the Trust's policies and procedures for buying, selling and
exchanging shares is contained in the Statement of Additional Information.

The offering of shares may be suspended during any period in which the
      determination of net asset value is suspended, and the offering may be
      suspended by the Board of Trustees at any time it believes it is in the
      Trust's best interest to do so.

Telephone transaction privileges for purchases, redemptions or exchanges may be
      modified, suspended or terminated by the Trust at any time.  If an account
      has more than one owner, the Trust and the Transfer Agent may rely on the
      instructions of any one owner.  Telephone privileges apply to each owner of
      the account and the broker/dealer representative of record for the account
      unless the Transfer Agent receives cancellation instructions from an owner of
      the account.  The Trust will provide you notice whenever it is required to do
      so by applicable law.

The Transfer Agent will record any telephone calls to verify data concerning
      transactions.  It has adopted other procedures to confirm that telephone
      instructions are genuine, by requiring callers to provide tax identification
      numbers and other account data and by confirming such transactions in
      writing.  The Transfer Agent and the Trust will not be liable for losses or
      expenses arising out of telephone instructions where reasonably believed to
      be genuine.

Redemption or transfer requests will not be honored until the Transfer Agent
      receives all required documents in proper form.  From time to time, the
      Transfer Agent in its discretion may waive certain of the requirements for
      redemptions stated in this Prospectus.

Payment for redeemed shares ordinarily is made in cash.  It is forwarded by check
      or by Federal Funds wire (as elected by the shareholder) within seven days
      after the Transfer Agent receives redemption instructions in proper form.
      However, under unusual circumstances determined by the Securities and
      Exchange Commission, payment may be delayed or suspended.  For accounts
      registered in the name of a broker/dealer, payment will normally be forwarded
      within three business days after redemption.


The Transfer Agent may delay processing any type of redemption payment as described
      under "How to Sell Shares" for recently purchased shares, but only until the
      purchase payment has cleared. That delay may be as much as 10 days from the
      date the shares were purchased.  That delay may be avoided if you purchase
      shares by Federal Funds wire or certified check, or arrange with your bank to
      provide telephone or written assurance to the Transfer Agent that your
      purchase payment has cleared.


Involuntary redemptions of small accounts may be made by the Trust if the account
      value has fallen below $250 for reasons other than the fact that the market
      value of shares has dropped. In some cases involuntary redemptions may be
      made to repay the Distributor or Sub-Distributor for losses from the
      cancellation of share purchase orders.


Customer Identification Program.  Federal regulations may require the Trust to
      obtain your name, your date of birth (for a natural person), your residential
      street address or principal place of business and your Social Security
      number, employer identification number or other government issued
      identification when you open an account. Additional information may be
      required in certain circumstances or to open corporate accounts.  The Trust
      or the Transfer Agent may use this information to attempt to verify your
      identity.  The Trust may not be able to establish an account if the necessary
      information is not received.  The Trust may also place limits on account
      transactions while it is in the process of attempting to verify your
      identity.  Additionally, if the Trust is unable to verify your identity after
      your account is established, the Trust may be required to redeem your shares
      and close your account.


"Backup Withholding" of federal income tax may be applied against taxable
      dividends, distributions and redemption proceeds (including exchanges) if you
      fail to furnish the Trust your correct, certified Social Security or Employer
      Identification Number when you sign your application, or if you under-report
      your income to the Internal Revenue Service.

To avoid sending duplicate copies of materials to households, the Trust will mail
      only one copy of each prospectus, annual and semi-annual report and annual
      notice of the Trust's privacy policy to shareholders having the same last
      name and address on the Trust's records. The consolidation of these mailings,
      called householding, benefits the Trust through reduced mailing expense.

      If you want to receive  multiple copies of these  materials,  you may call the
      Transfer  Agent at  1.800.525.9310.  You may also notify the Transfer Agent in
      writing.  Individual copies of prospectuses,  reports and privacy notices will
      be sent to you  commencing  within 30 days after the Transfer  Agent  receives
      your request to stop householding.


Dividends, Capital Gains and Taxes


DIVIDENDS.  The Trust intends to declare dividends from net investment income each
regular business day and to pay those dividends to shareholders monthly on a date
selected by the Board of Trustees.  To maintain a net asset value of $1.00 per
share, the Trust might withhold dividends or make distributions from capital or
capital gains.  Daily dividends will not be declared or paid on newly purchased
shares until Federal Funds are available to the Trust from the purchase payment for
such shares.

CAPITAL GAINS.  The Trust normally holds its securities to maturity and therefore
will not usually pay capital gains. Although the Trust does not seek capital gains,
the Trust could realize capital gains on the sale of its portfolio securities.  If
it does, it may make distributions out of any net short-term or long-term capital
gains in December of each year.  The Trust may make supplemental distributions of
dividends and capital gains following the end of its fiscal year.


What Choices Do I Have for Receiving Distributions?  For Automatic Purchase and
      Redemption Programs, dividends and distributions are automatically reinvested
      in additional shares of the selected Trust.  For direct shareholders, when
      you open your account, you should specify on your application how you want to
      receive your dividends and distributions.  You have four options:


o     Reinvest All Distributions in the Trust.  You can elect to reinvest all
      dividends and capital gains distributions in additional shares of the Trust.

o     Reinvest Dividends or Capital Gains.  You can elect to reinvest some
      distributions (dividends, short-term capital gains or long-term capital gains
      distributions) in the Trust while receiving other types of distributions by
      check or having them sent to your bank account.

o     Receive All Distributions in Cash.  You can elect to receive a check for all
      dividends and capital gains distributions or have them sent to your bank.
o     Reinvest Your Distributions in Another Account.  You can reinvest all
      distributions in the same class of shares of another eligible fund account
      you have established.

Under the terms of the Automatic Purchase and Redemption Program, your
broker/dealer can redeem shares to satisfy debit balances arising in your Program
Account. If that occurs, you will be entitled to dividends on those shares as
described in your Program Agreements.

TAXES. Exempt interest dividends paid from net investment income earned by the
Trust on municipal securities will be excludable from gross income for federal
income tax purposes.  A portion of a dividend that is derived from interest paid on
certain "private activity bonds" may be an item of tax preference if you are
subject to the alternative minimum tax. If the Trust earns interest on taxable
investments, any dividends derived from those earnings will be taxable as ordinary
income to shareholders.

      Dividends paid by the Trust from interest it receives from New York municipal
securities will be exempt from New York State and New York City personal income
taxes.  Dividends paid from municipal securities of other issuers normally will be
treated as taxable ordinary income subject to New York State and New York City
personal income taxes.

      Dividends and capital gains distributions may be subject to state or local
taxes. Long-term capital gains are taxable as long-term capital gains when
distributed to shareholders.  It does not matter how long you have held your
shares.  Dividends paid from short-term capital gains are taxable as ordinary
income. Whether you reinvest your distributions in additional shares or take them
in cash, the tax treatment is the same.  Every year the Trust will send you and the
IRS a statement showing the amount of any taxable distribution you received in the
previous year as well as the amount of your tax-exempt income.

Remember, There May be Taxes on Transactions.  Because the Trust seeks to maintain
      a stable $1.00 per share net asset value, it is unlikely that you will have a
      capital gain or loss when you sell or exchange your shares.  A capital gain
      or loss is the difference between the price you paid for the shares and the
      price you received when you sold them.  Any capital gain is subject to
      capital gains tax.

Returns of Capital Can Occur.  In certain cases, distributions made by the Trust
      may be considered a non-taxable return of capital to shareholders.  If that
      occurs, it will be identified in notices to shareholders.

      This information is only a summary of certain federal income tax information
about your investment. You should consult with your tax advisor about the effect of
an investment in the Trust on your particular tax situation.






Financial Highlights


The Financial Highlights Table is presented to help you understand the Trust's
financial performance for the past five fiscal years.  Certain information reflects
financial results for a single Trust share.  The total returns in the table
represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in
the Trust (assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions).  This
information has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Trust's independent
auditors, whose report, along with the Trust's financial statements, is included in
the Statement of Additional Information, which is available on request.







INFORMATION AND SERVICES

For More Information on Centennial New York Tax Exempt Trust

The following additional information about the Trust is available without charge
upon request:

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.  This document includes additional information
about the Trust's investment policies, risks, and operations.  It is incorporated
by reference into this Prospectus (which means it is legally part of this
Prospectus).

ANNUAL AND SEMI-ANNUAL REPORTS.  Additional information about the Trust's
investments and performance is available in the Trust's Annual and Semi-Annual
Reports to shareholders.  The Annual Report includes a discussion of market
conditions and investment strategies that significantly affected the Trust's
performance during its last fiscal year.

How to Get More Information

You can request the Statement of Additional Information, the Annual and Semi-Annual
Reports, the notice explaining the Trust's privacy policy and other information
about the Trust or your account:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Telephone:                            Call Shareholder Services, Inc.
                                         toll-free:
                                         1.800.525.9310
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Mail:                                 Write to:

                                         Shareholder Services, Inc.
                                         P.O. Box 5143
                                         Denver, Colorado 80217-5143

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Information about the Trust including the Statement of Additional Information can
be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C.
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by
calling the SEC at 1.202.942.8090.  Reports and other information about the Trust
are available on the EDGAR database on the SEC's Internet website at www.sec.gov.
                                                                     -----------
Copies may be obtained after payment of a duplicating fee by electronic request at
the SEC's e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing to the SEC's Public
Reference Section, Washington, D.C. 20549-0102.

No one has been authorized to provide any information about the Trust or to make
any representations about the Trust other than what is contained in this
Prospectus. This Prospectus is not an offer to sell shares of the Trust, nor a
solicitation of an offer to buy shares of the Trust, to any person in any state or
other jurisdiction where it is unlawful to make such an offer.

                                              The Trust's shares are distributed by:
The Trust's SEC File No.: 811-5584            Centennial Asset Management
Corporation

PR0780.001.0803
Printed on recycled paper







APPENDIX TO THE PROSPECTUS OF
CENTENNIAL NEW YORK TAX EXEMPT TRUST

      Graphic material included in Prospectus of Centennial New York Tax Exempt
Trust (the "Trust") under the heading:  "Annual Total Returns (as of 12/31 each
year)."


      Bar chart will be included in the Prospectus of the Trust depicting the
annual total returns of a hypothetical investment in shares of the Trust for the
past 10 full calendar years.  Set forth below are the relevant data points that
will appear on the bar chart.


--------------------------------------------------------------------
Calendar Year Ended:             Annual Total Returns
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
12/31/93                         1.62%
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
12/31/94                         2.03%
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
12/31/95                         3.14%
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
12/31/96                         2.67%
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
12/31/97                         2.88%
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
12/31/98                         2.66%
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
12/31/99                         2.49%
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
12/31/00                         3.29%
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
12/31/01                         2.04%
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------

12/31/02                         0.59%

--------------------------------------------------------------------



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Centennial New York Tax Exempt Trust
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

6803 South Tucson Way, Centennial, Colorado 80112
1.800.525.9310


Statement of Additional Information dated August 22, 2003

      This Statement of Additional Information is not a prospectus.  This
document contains additional information about the Trust and supplements
information in the Prospectus dated August 22, 2003.  It should be read
together with the Prospectus, which may be obtained by writing to the Trust's
Transfer Agent, Shareholder Services, Inc., at P.O. Box 5143, Denver,
Colorado 80217, or by calling the Transfer Agent at the toll-free number
shown above.


Contents
                                                                        Page
About the Trust

Additional Information about the Trust's Investment Policies and Risks....2
     The Trust's Investment Policies......................................2
     Other Investment Strategies..........................................9
     Investment Restrictions.............................................27
How the Trust is Managed.................................................29
     Organization and History............................................29
      Board of Trustees and Oversight Committees.........................30
     Trustees and Officers of the Trust..................................31
     The Manager.........................................................41
Service Plan.............................................................45
Performance of the Trust.................................................46


About Your Account

How To Buy Shares........................................................49
How To Sell Shares.......................................................50
How To Exchange Shares...................................................51
Dividends and Taxes......................................................53
Additional Information About the Trust...................................58


Financial Information About the Trust

Independent Auditors' Report.............................................59
Financial Statements.....................................................60


Appendix A: Description of Securities Ratings..............................A-1
Appendix B: Municipal Bond Industry Classifications........................B-1









------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ABOUT THE TRUST
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Additional Information About the Trust's Investment Policies and Risks

The investment objective and the principal investment policies of the Trust
are described in the Prospectus.  This Statement of Additional Information
contains supplemental information about those policies and the types of
securities that the Trust's investment manager, Centennial Asset Management
Corporation (referred to as the "Manager"), will select for the Trust.
Additional explanations are also provided about the strategies the Trust may
use to try to achieve its objective.

The Trust's Investment Policies. The composition of the Trust's portfolio and
the techniques and strategies that the Trust's Manager uses in selecting
portfolio securities will vary over time.  The Trust is not required to use
all of the investment techniques and strategies described below at all times
in seeking its goal.  It may use some of the special investment techniques
and strategies at some times or not at all.

      The Trust will not make investments with the objective of seeking
capital growth.  However, the value of the securities held by the Trust may
be affected by changes in general interest rates.  Because the current value
of debt securities varies inversely with changes in prevailing interest
rates, if interest rates increase after a security is purchased, that
security would normally decline in value.  Conversely, if interest rates
decrease after a security is purchased, its value would rise.  However, those
fluctuations in value will not generally result in realized gains or losses
to the Trust since the Trust does not usually intend to dispose of securities
prior to their maturity.  A debt security held to maturity is redeemable by
its issuer at full principal value plus accrued interest.

      The Trust may sell securities prior to their maturity, to attempt to
take advantage of short-term market variations, or because of a revised
credit evaluation of the issuer or other considerations. The Trust may also
do so to generate cash to satisfy redemptions of Trust shares.  In such
cases, the Trust may realize a capital gain or loss on the security.

      There are variations in the credit quality of municipal securities,
both within a particular rating classification and between classifications.
These variations depend on numerous factors. The yields of municipal
securities depend on a number of factors, including general conditions in the
municipal securities market, the size of a particular offering, the maturity
of the obligation and rating (if any) of the issue. These factors are
discussed in greater detail below.

Municipal Securities.  The types of municipal securities in which the Trust
may invest are described in the Prospectus under "About the Trust's
Investments." Municipal securities are generally classified as general
obligation bonds, revenue bonds and notes. A discussion of the general
characteristics of these principal types of municipal securities follows
below.

      |X|   Municipal Bonds.  We have classified municipal securities having
a maturity (when the security is issued) of more than one year as "municipal
bonds." The principal classifications of long-term municipal bonds are
"general obligation" and "revenue" (including "industrial development")
bonds. They may have fixed, variable or floating rates of interest, as
described below.

      Some bonds may be "callable," allowing the issuer to redeem them before
their maturity date. To protect bondholders, callable bonds may be issued
with provisions that prevent them from being called for a period of time.
Typically, that is 5 to 10 years from the issuance date.  When interest rates
decline, if the call protection on a bond has expired, it is more likely that
the issuer may call the bond.  If that occurs, the Trust might have to
reinvest the proceeds of the called bond in bonds that pay a lower rate of
return.

      General Obligation Bonds.  The basic security behind general obligation
bonds is the issuer's pledge of its full faith and credit and taxing power,
if any, for the repayment of principal and the payment of interest. Issuers
of general obligation bonds include states, counties, cities, towns, and
regional districts.  The proceeds of these obligations are used to fund a
wide range of public projects, including construction or improvement of
schools, highways and roads, and water and sewer systems.  The rate of taxes
that can be levied for the payment of debt service on these bonds may be
limited or unlimited. Additionally, there may be limits as to the rate or
amount of special assessments that can be levied to meet these obligations.

      Revenue Bonds.  The principal security for a revenue bond is generally
the net revenues derived from a particular facility, group of facilities, or,
in some cases, the proceeds of a special excise tax or other specific revenue
source.  Revenue bonds are issued to finance a wide variety of capital
projects. Examples include electric, gas, water and sewer systems; highways,
bridges, and tunnels; port and airport facilities; colleges and universities;
and hospitals.

      Although the principal security for these types of bonds may vary from
bond to bond, many provide additional security in the form of a debt service
reserve fund that may be used to make principal and interest payments on the
issuer's obligations.  Housing finance authorities have a wide range of
security, including partially or fully insured mortgages, rent subsidized
and/or collateralized mortgages, and/or the net revenues from housing or
other public projects.  Some authorities provide further security in the form
of a state's ability (without obligation) to make up deficiencies in the debt
service reserve fund.

      Industrial Development Bonds.  Industrial development bonds are
considered municipal bonds if the interest paid is exempt from federal income
tax. They are issued by or on behalf of public authorities to raise money to
finance various privately operated facilities for business and manufacturing,
housing, sports, and pollution control.  These bonds may also be used to
finance public facilities such as airports, mass transit systems, ports, and
parking.  The payment of the principal and interest on such bonds is
dependent solely on the ability of the facility's user to meet its financial
obligations and the pledge, if any, of real and personal property financed by
the bond as security for those payments.

      Private Activity Municipal Securities.  The Tax Reform Act of 1986 (the
"Tax Reform Act") reorganized, as well as amended, the rules governing tax
exemption for interest on certain types of municipal securities.  The Tax
Reform Act generally did not change the tax treatment of bonds issued in
order to finance governmental operations.  Thus, interest on general
obligation bonds issued by or on behalf of state or local governments, the
proceeds of which are used to finance the operations of such governments,
continues to be tax-exempt.  However, the Tax Reform Act limited the use of
tax-exempt bonds for non-governmental (private) purposes.  More stringent
restrictions were placed on the use of proceeds of such bonds.  Interest on
certain private activity bonds is taxable under the revised rules.  There is
an exception for "qualified" tax-exempt private activity bonds, for example,
exempt facility bonds including certain industrial development bonds,
qualified mortgage bonds, qualified Section 501(c)(3) bonds, and qualified
student loan bonds. Normally, the Trust will not invest more than 20% of its
total assets in private activity municipal securities or other taxable
investments.

      In addition, limitations as to the amount of private activity bonds
which each state may issue were revised downward by the Tax Reform Act, which
will reduce the supply of such bonds.  The value of the Trust's portfolio
could be affected if there is a reduction in the availability of such bonds.

      Interest on certain private activity bonds issued after August 7, 1986,
which continues to be tax-exempt, will be treated as a tax preference item
subject to the alternative minimum tax (discussed below) to which certain
taxpayers are subject. The Trust may hold municipal securities the interest
on which (and thus a proportionate share of the exempt-interest dividends
paid by the Trust) will be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax on
individuals and corporations.

      The federal alternative minimum tax is designed to ensure that all
persons who receive income pay some tax, even if their regular tax is zero.
This is accomplished in part by including in taxable income certain tax
preference items that are used to calculate alternative minimum taxable
income.  The Tax Reform Act made tax-exempt interest from certain private
activity bonds a tax preference item for purposes of the alternative minimum
tax on individuals and corporations.  Any exempt-interest dividend paid by a
regulated investment company will be treated as interest on a specific
private activity bond to the extent of the proportionate relationship the
interest the investment company receives on such bonds bears to all its
exempt interest dividends.

      In addition, corporate taxpayers subject to the alternative minimum tax
may, under some circumstances, have to include exempt-interest dividends in
calculating their alternative minimum taxable income. That could occur in
situations where the "adjusted current earnings" of the corporation exceeds
its alternative minimum taxable income.

      To determine whether a municipal security is treated as a taxable
private activity bond, it is subject to a test for: (a) a trade or business
use and security interest, or (b) a private loan restriction. Under the trade
or business use and security interest test, an obligation is a private
activity bond if: (i) more than 10% of the bond proceeds are used for private
business purposes and (ii) 10% or more of the payment of principal or
interest on the issue is directly or indirectly derived from such private use
or is secured by the privately used property or the payments related to the
use of the property. For certain types of uses, a 5% threshold is substituted
for this 10% threshold.

      The term "private business use" means any direct or indirect use in a
trade or business carried on by an individual or entity other than a state or
municipal governmental unit.  Under the private loan restriction, the amount
of bond proceeds that may be used to make private loans is limited to the
lesser of 5% or $5.0 million of the proceeds.  Thus, certain issues of
municipal securities could lose their tax-exempt status retroactively if the
issuer fails to meet certain requirements as to the expenditure of the
proceeds of that issue or the use of the bond-financed
facility. The Trust makes no independent investigation of the users of such
bonds or their use of proceeds of the bonds.  If the Trust should hold a bond
that loses its tax-exempt status retroactively, there might be an adjustment
to the tax-exempt income previously distributed to shareholders.

      Additionally, a private activity bond that would otherwise be a
qualified tax-exempt private activity bond will not, under Internal Revenue
Code Section 147(a), be a qualified bond for any period during which it is
held by a person who is a "substantial user" of the facilities or by a
"related person" of such a substantial user.  This "substantial user"
provision applies primarily to exempt facility bonds, including industrial
development bonds. The Trust may invest in industrial development bonds and
other private activity bonds. Therefore, the Trust may not be an appropriate
investment for entities which are "substantial users" (or persons related to
"substantial users") of such exempt facilities. Those entities and persons
should consult their tax advisers before purchasing shares of the Trust.

      A "substantial user" of such facilities is defined generally as a
"non-exempt person who regularly uses part of a facility" financed from the
proceeds of exempt facility bonds.  Generally, an individual will not be a
"related person" under the Internal Revenue Code unless such individual or
the individual's immediate family (spouse, brothers, sisters and immediate
descendants) own directly or indirectly in the aggregate more than 50% in
value of the equity of a corporation or partnership which is a "substantial
user" of a facility financed from the proceeds of exempt facility bonds.

      |X|   Municipal Notes.  Municipal securities having a maturity (when
the security is issued) of one year or less are generally known as municipal
notes. Municipal notes generally are used to provide for short-term working
capital needs. Some of the types of municipal notes the Trust can invest in
are described below.

      Tax Anticipation Notes.  These are issued to finance working capital
needs of municipalities.  Generally, they are issued in anticipation of
various seasonal tax revenue, such as income, sales, use or other business
taxes, and are payable from these specific future taxes.

      Revenue Anticipation Notes.  These are notes issued in expectation of
receipt of other types of revenue, such as federal revenues available under
federal revenue-sharing programs.

      Bond Anticipation Notes.  Bond anticipation notes are issued to provide
interim financing until long-term financing can be arranged.  The long-term
bonds that are issued typically also provide the money for the repayment of
the notes.

      Construction Loan Notes.  These are sold to provide project
construction financing until permanent financing can be secured.  After
successful completion and acceptance of the project, it may receive permanent
financing through public agencies, such as the Federal Housing Administration.
      |X|   Tax Exempt Commercial Paper.  This type of short-term obligation
(usually having a maturity of 270 days or less) is issued by a municipality
to meet current working capital needs.

      |X|   Municipal Lease Obligations.  The Trust's investments in
municipal lease obligations may be through certificates of participation that
are offered to investors by public entities. Municipal leases may take the
form of a lease or an installment purchase contract issued by a state or
local government authority to obtain funds to acquire a wide variety of
equipment and facilities.

      Some municipal lease securities may be deemed to be "illiquid"
securities. Their purchase by the Trust would be limited as described below
in "Illiquid Securities." From time to time the Trust may invest more than 5%
of its net assets in municipal lease obligations that the Manager has
determined to be liquid under guidelines set by the Board of Trustees. Those
guidelines require the Manager to evaluate:
      the frequency of trades and price quotations for such securities;
      the number of dealers or other potential buyers willing to purchase or
          sell such securities;
      the availability of market-makers; and
      the nature of the trades for such securities.

      Municipal leases have special risk considerations. Although lease
obligations do not constitute general obligations of the municipality for
which the municipality's taxing power is pledged, a lease obligation is
ordinarily backed by the municipality's covenant to budget for, appropriate
and make the payments due under the lease obligation.  However, certain lease
obligations contain "non-appropriation" clauses which provide that the
municipality has no obligation to make lease or installment purchase payments
in future years unless money is appropriated for that purpose on a yearly
basis.  While the obligation might be secured by the lease, it might be
difficult to dispose of that property in case of a default.

      Projects financed with certificates of participation generally are not
subject to state constitutional debt limitations or other statutory
requirements that may apply to other municipal securities.  Payments by the
public entity on the obligation underlying the certificates are derived from
available revenue sources. That revenue might be diverted to the funding of
other municipal service projects.  Payments of interest and/or principal with
respect to the certificates are not guaranteed and do not constitute an
obligation of a state or any of its political subdivisions.

      In addition to the risk of "non-appropriation," municipal lease
securities do not have as highly liquid a market as conventional municipal
bonds. Municipal leases, like other municipal debt obligations, are subject
to the risk of non-payment of interest or repayment of principal by the
issuer. The ability of issuers of municipal leases to make timely lease
payments may be adversely affected in general economic downturns and as
relative governmental cost burdens are reallocated among federal, state and
local governmental units.  A default in payment of income would result in a
reduction of income to the Trust. It could also result in a reduction in the
value of the municipal lease and that, as well as a default in repayment of
principal, could result in a decrease in the net asset value of the Trust.
While the Trust holds such securities, the Manager will also evaluate the
likelihood of a continuing market for these securities and their credit
quality.

Ratings of Securities - Portfolio Quality, Maturity and Diversification.
Under Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940, ("Investment Company
Act"), the Trust uses the amortized cost method to value its portfolio
securities to determine the Trust's net asset value per share.  Rule 2a-7
imposes requirements for the maturity, quality and diversification of the
securities which the Trust buys.  The Trust may purchase only those
securities that the Manager, under procedures approved by the Board of
Trustees, has determined have minimal credit risk and, as such, are "eligible
securities."

      Quality.  Eligible securities are securities that have received a
rating in one of the two highest short-term rating categories by a rating
organization.  Rating organizations are designated by the SEC.  Eligible
securities may be "first tier" or "second tier" securities.  First tier
securities are those that have received a rating in the highest category for
short term debt obligations by at least two rating organizations.  If only
one rating organization has rated the security, it must be rated in the
highest category for that rating organization.  U.S. government securities
and securities issued by a registered money market mutual fund are also first
tier securities.

      The Trust may also buy second tier "conduit securities."  These
eligible securities are securities rated by rating organizations but are not
first tier securities.  Conduit securities are municipal securities such as
industrial development or revenue bonds issued to finance non-government
projects.  The payment of the principal and interest on a conduit security is
not the obligation of the municipal issuer, but is the obligation of another
person who is ultimately responsible for the payment of principal and
interest, such as the user of the facility.  The Trust may not invest more
than 5% of its total assets in second tier conduit securities.

      The Trust may also buy unrated securities that the Manager determines
are comparable in quality to a first or second tier security by applying
certain criteria established by the Board to determine its creditworthiness.
These criteria require a high quality short term or long-term rating
(depending on the security) from a rating organization.  Unrated securities
the Trust may buy include asset backed securities and securities subject to
"demand features" or "guarantees."

      The Trust may purchase a security subject to a guarantee if the
guarantee is an eligible security or a first tier security. The trust may
also purchase a security subject to a "conditional" demand feature if the
demand feature is an eligible security and the Manager has decided that the
conditional demand feature meets the requirements imposed by Rule 2a-7.

      If a security's rating is downgraded, the Manager or the Board of
Trustees may have to reassess the security's credit risk.  If a security is
downgraded, the Manager or the Board of Trustees will promptly reassess
whether the security continues to present minimal credit risk, reassess the
status of the security as an "eligible security," and take such actions as is
appropriate. If the Trust disposes of the security within five days of the
Manager learning of the downgrade, the Manager will provide the Board of
Trustees with subsequent notice of such downgrade.  If a security is in
default, or ceases to be an eligible security, or is determined no longer to
present minimal credit risks, the Board of Trustees must determine whether it
would be in the best interests of the Trust to dispose of the security.

|X|   Diversification.  With respect to 75% of its total assets, the Trust
cannot invest more than 5% of its total assets in securities issued by one
issuer.   It cannot invest more than 5% of its total assets in securities of
one issuer unless the security is a first tier security.  The Trust also
cannot invest more than 1% of its total assets or $1.0 million, whichever is
greater, in second tier securities of one issuer.  For diversification
purposes, the Trust is considered to have purchased the security underlying a
repurchase agreement if the repurchase agreement is fully collateralized.
For a refunded security, the Trust is considered to have the U.S. government
securities underlying the refunded security.  For conduit securities, the
Trust considers the issuer to be the person ultimately responsible for
payment of the obligation.  If the Trust buys an asset backed security, the
issuer of the security is deemed to be the "special purpose" entity which
issued the security.  A special purpose entity is an entity which is
organized solely for the purpose of issuing asset backed securities.  If the
asset backed securities issued by the special purpose entity include the
obligations of another person or another special purpose entity and those
obligations amount to 10% or more of the asset backed securities the Trust
buys, that other person or entity is considered to be the issuer of a pro
rata percentage of the asset backed security.

      The Trust may buy a security subject to a demand feature or guarantee.
In this case, with respect to 75% of its total assets, the Trust may not
invest more than 10% of its total assets in securities issued by or subject
to demand features or guarantees issued by the same issuer.  If the demand
feature or guarantee is a second tier security, the Trust may not invest more
than 5% of its total assets in securities subject to demand features or
guarantees from the same issuer.  And, the Trust may not invest more than 10%
of its total assets in securities issued by or subject to demand features or
guarantees from the same issuer.  However, if the demand feature or guarantee
is issued by a person who is a non-controlled person, the Trust does not have
to limit its investments to no more than 10% of its total assets in
securities issued by or subject to demand features or guarantees from the
same issuer.

      Maturity.  The Trust must maintain a dollar-weighted average portfolio
maturity of not more than 90 days, and the maturity of any single security
must not be in excess the maximum permitted maturity under Rule 2a-7 (or any
other applicable rule) which is currently 397 days from the date of
purchase.  The Trust also may buy adjustable and floating rate securities,
enter into repurchase agreements and lend portfolio securities.  Rule 2a-7
defines how the maturities of these securities are determined.

      Demand Features and Guarantees.  Demand features and guarantees and
some of their uses are described in the Prospectus.  The Trust also uses
demand features and guarantees to satisfy the maturity, quality and
diversification requirements described above.  The Trust considers the person
which issues the demand feature as the person to whom the Trust will look for
payment.  An unconditional demand feature is considered a guarantee and the
Trust looks to the person making the guarantee for payment of the obligation
of the underlying security.

      When the Trust buys municipal securities, it may obtain a demand
feature from the seller to repurchase the securities that entitles the Trust
to achieve same day settlement from the repurchaser and to receive an
exercise price equal to the amortized cost of the underlying security plus
accrued interest, if any, at the time of exercise.  Another type of demand
feature purchased in conjunction with a Municipal Security enables the Trust
to sell the underlying security within a specified period of time at a fixed
exercise price.  The Trust may pay for demand features either separately in
cash or by paying a higher price for the securities acquired subject to the
demand features.  The Trust will enter into these transactions only with
banks and dealers which, in the Manager's opinion, present minimal credit
risks.  The Trust's purchases of demand features are subject to the
provisions of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act because the Trust
uses the amortized cost method to value its portfolio securities.

      The Trust's ability to exercise a demand feature or guarantee will
depend on the ability of the bank or dealer to pay for the securities if the
demand feature or guarantee is exercised.  If the bank or dealer should
default on its obligation, the Trust might not be able to recover all or a
portion of any loss sustained from having to sell the security elsewhere.
Demand features and guarantees are not transferable by the Trust, and
therefore terminate if the Trust sells the underlying security to a third
party.  The Trust intends to enter into these arrangements to facilitate
portfolio liquidity, although such arrangements may enable the Trust to sell
a security at a pre-arranged price which may be higher than the prevailing
market price at the time the demand feature or guarantee is exercised. Any
considerations paid by the Trust for the demand feature (which increases the
cost of the security and reduces the yield otherwise available for the
security) will be reflected on the Trust's books as unrealized depreciation
while the demand feature or guarantee is held, and a realized gain or loss
when demand feature is exercised or expires.

Other Investment Strategies

Floating Rate/Variable Rate Obligations.  The Trust may invest in instruments
with floating or variable interest rates.  The interest rate on a floating
rate obligation is based on a stated prevailing market rate, such as a bank's
prime rate, the 90-day U.S. Treasury Bill rate, the rate of return on
commercial paper or bank certificates of deposit, or some other standard.
The rate on the investment is adjusted automatically each time the market
rate is adjusted.  The interest rate on a variable rate obligation is also
based on a stated prevailing market rate but is adjusted automatically at a
specified interval.  Some variable rate or floating rate obligations in which
the Trust may invest have a demand feature entitling the holder to demand
payment of an amount approximately equal to the amortized cost of the
instrument or the principal amount of the instrument plus accrued interest at
any time, or at specified intervals not exceeding the maximum time permitted
under Rule 2a-7 (which is currently 397 days).  These notes may or may not be
backed by bank letters of credit.

      Variable rate demand notes may include master demand notes, which are
obligations that permit the Trust to invest fluctuating amounts in a note.
The amount may change daily without penalty, pursuant to direct arrangements
between the Trust, as the note purchaser, and the issuer of the note.  The
interest rates on these notes fluctuate from time to time.  The issuer of
this type of obligation normally has a corresponding right in its discretion,
after a given period, to prepay the outstanding principal amount of the
obligation plus accrued interest.  The issuer must give a specified number of
days' notice to the holders of those obligations.  Generally, the changes in
the interest rate on those securities reduce the fluctuation in their market
value.  As interest rates decrease or increase, the potential for capital
appreciation or depreciation is less than that for fixed-rate obligations
having the same maturity.
      Because these types of obligations are direct lending arrangements
between the note purchaser and issuer of the note, these instruments
generally will not be traded.  Generally, there is no established secondary
market for these types of obligations, although they are redeemable from the
issuer at face value.  Accordingly, where these obligations are not secured
by letters of credit or other credit support arrangements, the Trust's right
to redeem them is dependent on the ability of the note issuer to pay
principal and interest on demand.  These types of obligations usually are not
rated by credit rating agencies.  The Trust may invest in obligations that
are not rated only if the Manager determines at the time of investment that
they are Eligible Securities.  The Manager, on behalf of the Trust, will
monitor the creditworthiness of the issuers of the floating and variable rate
obligations in the Trust's portfolio on an ongoing basis.  There is no limit
on the amount of the Trust's assets that may be invested in floating rate and
variable rate obligations that meet the requirements of Rule 2a-7.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions.  As stated in the Prospectus,
the Trust may invest in municipal securities on a "when-issued" or "delayed
delivery" basis.  Payment for and delivery of the securities shall not exceed
120 days from the date the offer is accepted.  The purchase price and yield
are fixed at the time the buyer enters into the commitment.  During the
period between the time of commitment and settlement, no payment is made by
the Trust to the issuer and no interest accrues to the Trust from the
investment.  However, the Trust intends to be as fully invested as possible
and will not invest in when-issued securities if its income or net asset
value will be materially adversely affected.  At the time the Trust makes the
commitment to purchase a municipal security on a when-issued basis, it will
record the transaction on its books and reflect the value of the security in
determining its net asset value.  It will also identify on its books liquid
assets equal in value to the commitment for the when-issued securities.
While when-issued securities may be sold prior to settlement date, the Trust
intends to acquire the securities upon settlement unless a prior sale appears
desirable for investment reasons.  There is a risk that the yield available
in the market when delivery occurs may be higher than the yield on the
security acquired.

Loans of Portfolio Securities.  To attempt to increase its income, the Trust
may lend its portfolio securities to brokers, dealers and other financial
institutions.  These loans are limited to not more than 10% of the value of
the Trust's total assets and are subject to other conditions described below.
The Trust will not enter into any securities lending agreements having a
maturity in excess the maximum time period provided for in Rule 2a-7.  The
Trust presently does not intend to lend its portfolio securities, but if it
does, the value of securities loaned will not exceed 5% of the value of the
Trust's total assets. There are some risks in lending securities.  The Trust
could experience a delay in receiving additional collateral to secure a loan,
or a delay in recovering the loaned securities.

      The Trust must receive collateral for a loan. Any securities received
as collateral for a loan must mature in twelve months or less.  Under current
applicable regulatory requirements (which are subject to change), on each
business day the loan collateral must be at least equal to the market value
of the loaned securities.  The collateral must consist of cash, bank letters
of credit, U.S. government securities or other cash equivalents in which the
Trust is permitted to invest.  To be acceptable as collateral, letters of
credit must obligate a bank to pay amounts demanded by the Trust if the
demand meets the terms of the letter.  Such terms and the issuing bank must
be satisfactory to the Trust.

      When it lends securities, the Trust receives from the borrower an
amount equal to the interest paid or the dividends declared on the loaned
securities during the term of the loan.  It may also receive negotiated loan
fees and the interest on the collateral securities, less any finders',
custodian, administrative or other fees the Trust pays in connection with the
loan.  The Trust may share the interest it receives on the collateral
securities with the borrower as long as it realizes at least a minimum amount
of interest required by the lending guidelines established by its Board of
Trustees.

      The Trust will not lend its portfolio securities to any officer,
Trustee, employee or affiliate of the Trust or its Manager.  The terms of the
Trust's loans must meet certain tests under the Internal Revenue Code and
permit the Trust to reacquire loaned securities on five business days notice
or in time to vote on any important matter.

Repurchase Agreements.  In a repurchase transaction, the Trust acquires a
security from, and simultaneously resells it to, an approved vendor (a U.S.
commercial bank or the U.S. branch of a foreign bank having total domestic
assets of at least $1 billion or a broker-dealer with a net capital of at
least $50 million and which has been designated a primary dealer in
government securities). The resale price exceeds the purchase price by an
amount that reflects an agreed-upon interest rate effective for the period
during which the repurchase agreement is in effect.  The majority of these
transactions run from day to day, and delivery pursuant to the resale
typically will occur within one to five days of the purchase.  Repurchase
agreements are considered "loans" under the Investment Company Act
collateralized by the underlying security.  The Trust's repurchase agreements
require that at all times while the repurchase agreement is in effect, the
value of the collateral must equal or exceed the repurchase price to fully
collateralize the repayment obligation. They must meet credit requirements
set by the Manager from time to time. Additionally, the Manager will monitor
the vendor's creditworthiness to confirm that the vendor is financially sound
and will continuously monitor the collateral's value.

      Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the Securities and Exchange
Commission, the Trust, along with other affiliated entities managed by the
Manager, may transfer uninvested cash balances into one or more joint
repurchase accounts. These balances are invested in one or more repurchase
agreements, secured by U.S. government securities. Securities that are
pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements are held by a custodian bank
until the agreements mature. Each joint repurchase arrangement requires that
the market value of the collateral be sufficient to cover payments of
interest and principal; however, in the event of default by the other party
to the agreement, retention or sale of the collateral may be subject to legal
proceedings.

Bank Loan Participation Agreements.  The Fund may invest in bank loan
participation agreements, subject to the investment limitation set forth in
the Prospectus as to investments in illiquid securities.  Participation
agreements provide an undivided interest in a loan made by the bank issuing
the participation interest in the proportion that the buyer's investment
bears to the total principal amount of the loan.  Under this type of
arrangement, the issuing bank may have no obligation to the buyer other than
to pay principal and interest on the loan if and when received by the bank.
Thus, the Trust must look to the creditworthiness of the borrower, which is
obligated to make payments of principal and interest on the loan.  If the
borrower fails to pay scheduled principal or interest payments, the Trust may
experience a reduction in income.


Special Investment Considerations - New York Municipal Securities.  As
explained in the Prospectus, the Trust's investments are highly sensitive to
the fiscal stability of New York State (referred to in this section as the
"State") and its subdivisions, agencies, instrumentalities or authorities,
including New York City (the "City"), which issue the municipal securities in
which the Trust invests.  The following information on risk factors in
concentrating in New York municipal securities is only a summary, based on
the State's Annual Information Statement dated May 30, 2003, and on
publicly-available official statements relating to offerings by issuers of
New York municipal securities on or prior to June 17, 2003 with respect to
offerings of New York State, and on or prior to July 7, 2003 with respect to
offerings by the City.  No representation is made as to the accuracy of this
information.


      During the mid-1970's the State, some of its agencies,
instrumentalities and public benefit corporations (the "Authorities"), and
certain of its municipalities faced serious financial difficulties. To
address many of these financial problems, the State developed various
programs, many of which were successful in reducing the financial crisis.
Any further financial problems experienced by these Authorities or
municipalities could have a direct adverse effect on the New York municipal
securities in which the Trust invests.


      |X| Factors Affecting Investments in New York State Securities.  On May
28, 2003, the New York State Division of Budget ("DOB") issued the 2003-2004
Enacted Budget Financial Plan that reflected final action on the 2003-04
State Budget by the New York State Legislature (the "2003-04 Financial Plan"
containing the "2003-04 Enacted Budget").   The Legislature completed action
on the budget for the 2003-04 fiscal year on May 15, 2003, overriding
Governor Pataki's vetoes of $3.2 billion in tax increases and spending
additions.  DOB analysis of the 2003-04 Enacted Budget indicated that changes
since the Governor issued his Executive Budget earlier in the year would
increase General Fund (the major operating Fund of the State) spending by
$2.3 billion above the levels recommended by the Governor.  As compared to
Governor's Executive Budget, revenues were projected to increase by $1.4
billion, reflecting enacted tax and revenue increases offset by lower revenue
results for 2002-03 and the April income tax settlement.  This would leave
the General Fund with a potential imbalance of roughly $900 million in
2003-04, and increase the out year gaps by $3.7 billion in 2004-05 and $4.2
billion in 2005-06, before potential benefits provided by recently enacted
Federal aid changes and savings from a Fiscal Management Plan being
developed.  Also excluded were revenues from certain measures enacted by the
Legislature that DOB considered to be highly speculative at the time.

      Legislative changes were projected to increase revenues by $1.9 billion
in 2003-2004, $1.4 billion in 2004-05, and $605 million in 2005-06.  The out
year values of the revenue proposals decrease primarily because of "sunset"
provisions enacted for the tax increases.  In addition to these changes,
revenues were projected to decrease from the Executive Budget forecast by
$462 million in 2003-04 primarily due to the impact of 2002-03 actuals on the
current year, and the April 2003 income tax settlement.  The net 2003-04
revenue change since the Executive Budget was therefore $1.4 billion.

      General Fund spending was projected to increase from the Executive
Budget by a net $2.3 billion in 2003-04, $4.5 billion in 2004-05 and $4.2
billion in 2005-06.  This spending increase reflects net legislative
restorations and adds to the Governor's 2003-04 Executive Budget, including
the denial of the Governor's pension reform proposals included in the
Executive Budget ($434 million in 2004-05 and $197 million in 2005-06, after
deferring required 2003-04 payments with interest to 2005-06).  It also
reflects increased out year costs resulting from the May 15, 2003 school aid
database update ($184 million in 2004-05 and $60 million in 2005-06).

      In addition, the net spending changes included costs DOB projected but
which the Legislature believed might not occur.  Examples included a $200
million lump sum appropriation for member items which DOB valued at $200
million in costs and which the Legislature valued at $100 million; various
Medicaid savings DOB believed were not fully attainable; and higher costs
associated with shelter allowances for welfare recipients.

      New York is the third most populous state in the nation and has a
relatively high level of personal wealth.  The State's economy is diverse,
with a comparatively large share of the nation's financial activities,
information, education and health services employment, and a very small share
of the nation's farming and mining activity.  The State's location and its
air transport facilities and natural harbors have made it an important link
in international commerce.  Travel and tourism constitute an important part
of the economy.  Like the rest of the nation, New York has a declining
proportion of its workforce engaged in manufacturing, and an increasing
proportion engaged in service industries.

      Relative to the nation, the State has a smaller share of manufacturing
and construction and a larger share of service-related industries.  The
State's financial activities sector share, as measured by wages, is
particularly large relative to the nation.  The State has projected that it
is likely to be less affected than the nation as a whole during an economic
recession that is concentrated in manufacturing and construction, but likely
to be more affected by any economic downturn that is concentrated in the
services sector.

      The State reported that the September 11th terrorist attack had a more
severe impact on the New York economy than on any other state.  It is
therefore not surprising that the State economy is only now emerging from the
most recent recession.  State employment was projected to rise 0.3 percent in
2003, following a steep decline of 1.8 percent in 2002.  Similarly, wage
income was estimated to rise 2.0 percent in 2003, following a decline of 3.8
percent in 2002.  Both wage and total personal income growth for 2003 were
expected to be well below historical averages, due in part to further
declines in bonus payments for the first quarter of 2003 on a year-over-year
basis.  The unemployment rate for 2002 was 6.1 percent and was expected to
remain virtually unchanged for 2003

      In addition to the risks associated with the national economic
forecast, there also exist specific risks to the State economy.  Chief among
them is a more prolonged downturn in the financial sector than was projected,
producing sharper declines in both employment and compensation.  Moreover,
significant numbers of business relocations out of the State would likely
result in slower job and income growth as well.  In contrast, a stronger
national economy than expected could result in stronger equity market growth
and, in turn, a stronger demand for financial market services, fueling
stronger income growth in that sector.

      The State reported that the national economy has remained in an
adjustment phase in the wake of the bursting of the high-tech/stock market
bubble, a phase which has been prolonged by the uncertainty surrounding
national security and the conflict in Iraq.  Over 500,000 of the 2.1 million
jobs lost since the start of the 2001 recession were lost between January and
April 2003 alone.  The U.S. economy grew well below its potential growth rate
during the fourth quarter of 2002 and the first quarter of 2003.  However,
with the war ended, the nation's economic recovery was expected to gain
momentum.

      The increase in output growth projected for the second half of 2003 was
expected to be fueled by a rebound in private business investment.
Investment growth was predicted to be supported by corporate profits growth
of 12.7 percent in 2003, following a decline of 0.7 percent for 2002.
However, the increase in investment was not predicted to be accompanied by a
significant amount of job creation.  Although the increase in Federal defense
spending for the war in Iraq contributed positively to GDP growth, the impact
of the war on the labor market was clearly negative, with 220,000 reservists
having been called up for duty as of April 2003.  DOB expected no net growth
in employment for 2003, following a decline of 0.9 percent for 2002.  The
unemployment rate was projected to remain at 5.8 percent.  Consistent with a
weak labor market, wages and salaries were expected to grow only 3.6 percent
for 2003, a significant improvement over the 1.1 percent growth experienced
in 2002, but well below historical average rates.  Total personal income was
expected to grow 3.8 percent for this year, following growth of 2.8 percent
for 2002.

      In the State's opinion, the reliance on strengthening demand from
within the business sector poses a significant risk to the forecast.  If
business sector financial conditions do not improve, hiring may be delayed,
leading to an even weaker labor market, and, in turn, weaker consumption
growth.  In addition, slower global growth than expected could result in
lower than anticipated exports.  On the other hand, given the current and
lagged effects of expansionary monetary and fiscal policy, the economy could
grow faster than expected.  Better than expected financial conditions may
encourage firms to invest more and hire more workers than expected.  A lower
dollar could lead to higher exports, and therefore, higher output growth.

      Many complex political, social, and economic forces influence the
State's economy and finances, which may in turn effect the State's Financial
Plan.  These forces may affect the State unpredictably from fiscal year to
fiscal year and are influenced by governments, institutions, and events that
are not subject to the State's control.  The Financial Plan is also
necessarily based upon forecasts of national and State economic activity.
Economic forecasts have frequently failed to predict accurately the timing
and magnitude of changes in the national and State economies.  DOB expressed
its belief that its current estimates related to the performance of the State
and national economies were reasonable.  However, there can be no assurance
that actual results will not differ materially and adversely from the current
forecast.

      Based on the State's projections, the 2003-04 Financial Plan depends in
part on the implementation of a fiscal management plan to maintain budget
balance in the current fiscal year.  The plan under development by DOB was
expected to contain a range of actions that could be implemented
administratively, as well as proposals that may require legislative
approval.  The fiscal management plan was also expected to integrate savings
from the Federal aid package enacted by Congress on May 23, 2003.  DOB
estimated the Federal package would provide the State and localities a total
of $2.1 billion in fiscal relief over the next two State fiscal years,
consisting of a temporary 2.95 percent increase in the Federal matching rate
for State Medicaid expenditures (valued at $1.5 billion) and unrestricted aid
payments (valued at $645 million).  The Federal aid was expected to enhance
the State's flexibility in preparing the fiscal management plan and
maintaining a balanced budget in the 2003-04 fiscal year.

      The State reported that the Executive is reviewing legal questions
surrounding certain actions taken by the Legislature in enacting the 2003-04
budget.  The State Constitution provides that the Legislature may not alter
an appropriation bill submitted by the Governor except to strike out or
reduce items, or to add appropriations that are stated separately and
distinctly from the original appropriations.  A number of court cases have
interpreted and clarified the Legislature's powers to act on the
appropriations contained in the Executive Budget.  In light of the provisions
of the State Constitution and existing case law, the Executive believed that
the Legislature, in enacting changes to the Governor's Executive Budget for
2003-04, may have acted in a manner that violates State constitutional and
statutory requirements.

      Labor contracts between the State and most State employee unions
expired on March 31, 2003 and collective bargaining negotiations were
underway on a new round of contracts.  The Financial Plan contained no
reserves to finance potential new costs related to any new labor agreements.
DOB projected that every one percent increase in salaries for all State
employees would result in a General Fund Financial Plan cost of approximately
$80 million.

      DOB expected the State's cash flow position to experience pressure in
the first quarter of the 2004-05 fiscal year.  A number of administrative
options are available to DOB to manage General Fund cash flow needs during
any fiscal year.  The State is prohibited from issuing seasonal notes in the
public credit markets to finance cash flow needs, unless the State satisfies
certain restrictive conditions imposed under the Local Government Assistance
Corporation ("LGAC") statute and related bond covenants.

      An ongoing risk to the Financial Plan arises from the potential impact
of certain litigation and Federal disallowances now pending against the
State, which could produce adverse effects on the State's projections of
receipts and disbursements.  For example, the Federal government has issued a
draft disallowance for certain claims, and deferred the payment of other
claims, submitted by school districts related to school supportive health
services.  It is unclear what impact, if any, such disallowances may have on
the State Financial Plan in the current year or in the future.  The Financial
Plan assumes no significant Federal disallowances or other Federal actions
that could adversely affect State finances.

      In the past, the State has taken management actions to address
potential financial plan shortfalls, and DOB believed it could take similar
actions should adverse variances occur in its projections for the current
fiscal year.  To help guard against such risks, the State is maintaining a
total of $730 million in General Fund reserves, after implementation of the
fiscal management plan.

      |X| The 2003-04 Fiscal Year.  The 2003-04 Financial Plan projected that
total General Fund receipts would be $39.84 billion, an increase of $544
million from the $39.30 billion recorded in 2002-03.  This total included
$28.56 billion in tax receipts, $3.67 billion in miscellaneous receipts, and
$7.61 billion in transfers from other funds.  The increase largely reflects
the impact of revenue actions adopted with the Budget.

      General Fund receipts net of refund reserve account transactions were
estimated at $39.69 billion for 2003-04.  Adjusting for the impact of revenue
actions, General Fund tax receipts were reduced by $463 million from
estimates released with the 30-day amendments to the Executive Budget.  This
revision reflected several factors including:  the impact of
lower-than-anticipated 2002-03 receipts on the 2003-04 revenue base; a modest
net loss in personal income tax receipts due to a lower-than-expected net
settlement of 2002 income tax liability in April and May 2003; and continued
weakness in corporate tax collections.

      General Fund personal income tax receipts were projected to decrease by
$506 million from 2002-03.  This is due to economic improvement in 2003-04
and enactment of a temporary tax increase, more than offset by a lower
settlement for 2002 tax returns, a reduction in revenue reserves flowing
through the refund reserve accounts, and a higher deposit into the Revenue
Bond Tax Fund.  Overall, net of law changes, personal income tax payments
associated with the 2002 tax year were down modestly from what was
anticipated in the Executive Budget.

      The estimate for withholding tax collections increased by $1.03 billion
from the Executive Budget estimate, reflecting the enacted temporary tax
increase offset somewhat by lower wage growth than forecast with the
Executive Budget.  Estimated tax installment payments have been increased by
$300 million, again reflecting the enacted temporary tax increase.

      Additionally, reflecting results on the settlement of 2002 tax
liabilities, the estimate for payments with final returns was increased by
$100 million and the estimate for refunds was increased by $175 million.

      The estimate for delinquent collections of the personal income tax was
reduced by $50 million, reflecting the State tax amnesty program bringing
greater-than-expected receipts forward into 2002-03.

      General Fund personal income tax receipts, including refund reserve
account transactions, were expected to be $833 million higher than the 30-day
amendments to the Executive Budget adjusted for a higher net contribution
from the refund reserve account.  This increase is due to the temporary tax
increase, offset somewhat by the lower-than-anticipated income tax settlement
for 2002 tax liability, lower withholding resulting from a
weaker-than-expected economy for 2003-04, lower expected assessment
collections, and a higher STAR Fund deposit due to the Legislature's
rejection of the STAR spending limitation proposed in the Executive Budget.

      Receipts for user taxes and fees for 2003-04 were projected to total
$8.01 billion, an increase of $944 million from reported 2002-03
collections.  Included in this category are: receipts from the State sales
tax, cigarette and tobacco products taxes; alcoholic beverage taxes and fees;
and motor vehicle license and registration fees.

      The projected growth in sales tax cash receipts of 15.1 percent was
largely attributable to the enactment of a temporary increase in the overall
tax rate (to 4.25 percent) and a change in the clothing and footwear
exemption.  The Enacted Budget eliminated the exemption on items of clothing
and footwear for one year, effective June 1, 2003, and replaced it with two
temporary one-week exemptions with the same $110 thresholds - one in August
2003 and another in January 2004.  Growth in the sales tax base, after
adjusting for tax law changes and other factors, was projected at 4.3 percent.

      The decline in General Fund cigarette tax receipts was the result of a
continuation of the long-term consumption decline in cigarettes.

      User taxes and fees were expected to rise by $499 million from the
30-day amendments to the Executive Budget.  This adjustment mainly reflected
tax increases contained in the Enacted Budget.

      Receipts for business taxes for 2003-04 were projected to total $3.50
billion, an increase of $118 million from 2002-03 collections.  Business
taxes include the corporate franchise tax, corporation and utilities taxes,
the insurance franchise tax, and the bank franchise tax.  Business tax
receipts for 2003-04 were revised down by $184 million from the 30-day
amendments to the Executive Budget to reflect lower 2002-03 actuals during
closeout and anticipated enhanced refund activity.  These negatives in
2002-03 were offset by the effect of decoupling from the Federal bonus
depreciation.

      Corporate franchise tax receipts were revised down by $141 million for
the 30-day amendments to the Executive Budget.  The difference was
attributable to a closeout adjustment and enhanced refund activity.  These
reductions were offset by an increase in revenues of $58 million based on
decoupling from Federal bonus depreciation provisions.

      Corporation and utilities taxes, and insurance franchise tax receipts
remained unchanged from the 30-day Executive Budget estimate.

      Bank tax receipts were estimated to be $43 million lower than the
30-day Executive Budget estimate.  This result was primarily attributable to
continued weak earnings growth, and the decline in the 2002-03 base.

      Other tax receipts were projected to total $771 million or $28 million
above last year's amount.  Sources in this category included the estate and
gift tax, the real property gains tax and pari-mutuel taxes.  Previously
enacted legislation to repeal both the real property gains tax and the gift
tax and to reduce the estate and pari-mutuel taxes have significantly reduced
the yield from this category of receipts.

      Miscellaneous receipts, adjusted for the tobacco securitization, were
expected to reach $3.67 billion, a decrease of $322 million from 2002-03 and
an increase of $90 million from the 30-day estimate.  The annual decrease in
receipts was the result of several non-recurring actions taken in the 2002-03
Enacted Budget, including transferring available balances from various State
authorities.  The increase in receipts from the 30-day estimates was
attributed to a delay in the collection of a settlement recovery from various
Wall Street firms originally expected in 2002-03, as well as the net impact
of several legislative actions, which on balance increased receipts by an
estimated $50 million.

      Transfers from other funds were expected to total $7.61 billion, or
$282 million more than total receipts from this category during 2002-03 and
$165 million higher than the 30-day estimates.  The $910 million year-to-year
increase in transfers of personal income tax (PIT) in excess of revenue bond
debt service requirements was primarily attributable to higher dedicated PIT
receipts ($1.1 billion), including legislative tax increases, offset by
increased debt service requirements ($222 million).  The $260 million net
increase from the 30-day estimate reflected the legislative tax increases,
offset by increased debt service costs.

      The State estimated total General Trust disbursements, including
transfers to support capital projects, debt service and other purposes, to be
$40.84 billion for 2003-04, an increase of $1.32 billion or 3.4 percent from
2002-03.  The annual growth in spending was primarily attributable to the use
of non-recurring offsets in the previous fiscal year for welfare assistance
programs ($631 million), higher costs for General State Charges mostly due to
pensions and health insurance ($467 million), additional spending for member
items ($350 million), and growth in Medicaid ($318 million), offset by lower
State Operations spending ($547 million).

      Total projected spending in the 2003-04 Enacted Budget was $2.33
billion higher than the level recommended in the Governor's Executive
Budget.  Spending changes primarily reflect net legislative restorations and
adds in Medicaid ($840 million), school aid ($599 million), funding for
member items ($200 million), higher education programs ($193 million),
handicapped/all other education programs ($132 million), and welfare programs
($114 million).

      The 2003-04 Financial Plan projected a closing General Fund balance of
$730 million at the end of the 2003-04 fiscal year, unchanged from the 30-day
projection.  The closing balance represents monies on deposit in the Tax
Stabilization Reserve Fund ($710 million) and the Contingency Reserve Fund
($20 million).  The balance assumes achievement of $912 million of savings
from the Fiscal Management Plan including additional Federal aid described
earlier.

      |_|   State Governmental Funds Group.  Substantially all State
non-pension financial operations are accounted for in the State's
governmental funds group.  Governmental funds include the following four fund
types, the State's projections of receipts and disbursements in which
comprise the State's Financial Plan:


      o     the General Fund, which is the major operating fund of the State
and receives all receipts that are not required by law to be deposited in
another fund, including most State tax receipts and certain fees, transfers
from other funds and miscellaneous receipts from other sources;

      o     Special Revenue Funds, which account for the proceeds of specific
revenue sources (other than expendable trusts or major capital projects),
such as federal grants, that are legally restricted to specified purposes;

      o     Capital Projects Funds, which account for financial resources of
the State to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital
facilities (other than those financed by Special Revenue Funds, Proprietary
Funds and Fiduciary Funds); and

      o     Debt Service Funds, which account for the accumulation of
resources (including receipts from certain taxes, transfers from other funds
and miscellaneous revenues, such as dormitory room rental fees, which are
dedicated by statute for payment of lease-purchase rentals) for the payment
of general long-term debt service and related costs and payments under
lease-purchase and contractual-obligation financing arrangements.


      |_|   Local Government Assistance Corporation.  In 1990, as part of a
State fiscal reform program, legislation was enacted creating Local
Government Assistance Corporation (LGAC), a public benefit corporation
empowered to issue long-term obligations to fund payments to local
governments that had been traditionally funded through the State's annual
seasonal borrowing.  The legislation also dedicated revenues equal to one
percent of the State sales and use tax to pay debt service on these bonds.
As of June 1995, LGAC had issued bonds and notes to provide net proceeds of
$4.7 billion, completing the program.  The issuance of these long-term
obligations, which are to be amortized over no more than 30 years, was
expected to eliminate the need for continued short-term seasonal borrowing.

      The legislation also imposed a limitation on the annual seasonal
borrowing of the State except in cases where the Governor and the legislative
leaders have certified the need for additional seasonal borrowing, based on
emergency or extraordinary factors or factors unanticipated at the time of
adoption of the budget, and provided a schedule for eliminating it over
time.  Any seasonal borrowing is required by law to be eliminated by the
fourth fiscal year after the limit was first exceeded (i.e., no tax and
revenue anticipation note (TRAN) seasonal borrowing in the fifth year).  This
provision limiting the State's seasonal borrowing practices was included as a
covenant with LGAC's bondholders in the resolution authorizing such bonds.
No restrictions were placed upon the State's ability to issue deficit notes.


      The impact of the LGAC reforms, as well as other changes in revenue and
spending patterns, is that the State has been able to meet its cash flow
needs throughout the fiscal year without relying on short-term seasonal
borrowings.


      Legislation enacted with the 2003-04 Budget relating to the Local
Government Assistance Corporation (LGAC) and Municipal Assistance Corporation
for the City of New York (NYC-MAC) intended that the State assume
responsibility for debt service payments on the remaining $2.5 billion in
outstanding NYC-MAC bonds.  Thirty annual payments of $170 million from sales
tax receipts dedicated to LGAC were authorized to be pledged to a New York
City-created public benefit corporation allowing the maturity of the debt to
be extended through 2034, well beyond the original 2008 maturity of the
outstanding NYC-MAC debt.  The Executive believes that the structure may be
flawed and is continuing to evaluate the constitutional and legal issues
raised by the legislation, the implications on the State's Debt Reform Act of
2000 and the impact on LGAC bondholders.

      |X|   Authorities.  The fiscal stability of the State is related to the
fiscal stability of its public Authorities.  Authorities refer to public
benefit corporations, created pursuant to State law, other than local
authorities.  Authorities have various responsibilities, including those
which finance, construct and/or operate revenue-producing public facilities.
Authorities are not subject to the constitutional restrictions on the
incurrence of debt that apply to the State itself, and may issue bonds and
notes within the amounts and restrictions set forth in their legislative
authorization.  The State's access to the public credit markets could be
impaired and the market price of its outstanding debt may be materially and
adversely affected if any of its Authorities were to default on their
respective obligations, especially those involving State-supported or
State-related debt. As of December 31, 2002, there were 17 public authorities
that had outstanding debt of $100 million or more, and the aggregate
outstanding debt, including refunding bonds, of these State public
authorities was $104.7 billion, only a portion of which constituted
State-supported or State-related debt.


      Authorities generally pay their operating expenses and debt service
costs from revenues generated by the projects they finance or operate, such
as tolls charged for the use of highways, bridges or tunnels, charges for
public power, electric and gas utility services, rentals charged for housing
units and charges for occupancy at medical care facilities.  In addition,
State legislation authorizes several financing techniques for Authorities.
There are statutory arrangements providing for State local assistance
payments otherwise payable to localities to be made under certain
circumstances to Authorities.  Although the State has no obligation to
provide additional assistance to localities whose local assistance payments
have been paid to Authorities under these arrangements, the affected
localities could seek additional State assistance if local assistance
payments are diverted.  Some Authorities also receive moneys from State
appropriations to pay for the operating costs of certain of their programs.


      |X|   Ratings of the State's Securities.  As of June 17, 2003, Standard
& Poor's has rated the State's general obligation bonds "AA," Moody's has
rated those bonds "A2" and Fitch has rated those bonds "AA-".


      Ratings reflect only the views of the ratings organizations, and an
explanation of the significance of a rating must be obtained from the rating
agency furnishing the rating.  There is no assurance that a particular rating
will continue for any given period of time or that any such rating will not
be revised downward or withdrawn entirely if, in the judgment of the agency
originally establishing the rating, circumstances so warrant. A downward
revision or withdrawal of a rating may have an effect on the market price of
the State and municipal securities in which the Trust invests.


      |X|   The State's General Obligation Debt.  As of March 31, 2003, the
State had approximately $4.0 billion in general obligation bonds
outstanding.  Principal and interest due on general obligation bonds were
$571 million for the 2002-03 fiscal year and were estimated to be $527
million for the State's 2003-04 fiscal year.

      |X|   Pending Litigation.  The State is a defendant in numerous legal
proceedings pertaining to matters incidental to the performance of routine
governmental operations.  That litigation includes, but is not limited to,
claims asserted against the State involving State finances and programs and
arising from alleged violations of civil rights, alleged torts, alleged
breaches of contracts, real property proceedings and other alleged violations
of State and Federal laws.  These proceedings could affect adversely the
financial condition of the State in the 2003-04 fiscal year or thereafter.

      The State believes that the proposed 2003-04 Financial Plan includes
sufficient reserves for the payment of judgments that may be required during
the 2003-04 fiscal year.  There can be no assurance, however, that an adverse
decision in any of these proceedings would not exceed the amount of all
potential 2003-04 Financial Plan resources available for the payment of
judgments and, therefore, could affect the ability of the State to maintain a
balanced 2003-04 Financial Plan.

      In addition, the State is party to other claims and litigation that
either its legal counsel has advised are not probable that the State will
suffer adverse court decisions or the State has determined are not material.
Although the amounts of potential losses, if any, are not presently
determinable, it is the State's opinion that its ultimate liability in these
cases is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the State's
financial position in the 2003-04 fiscal year or thereafter.

      |X|   Other Functions.  Certain localities in addition to the City have
experienced financial problems and have requested and received additional
State assistance during the last several State fiscal years. The potential
impact on the State of any future requests by localities for additional
oversight or financial assistance is not included in the projections of the
State's receipts and disbursements for the State's 2003-04 fiscal year or
thereafter.


      |X|   Factors Affecting Investments in New York City Municipal
Securities. The City has a highly diversified economic base, with a
substantial volume of business activity in the service, wholesale and retail
trade and manufacturing industries and is the location of many securities,
banking, law, accounting, news media and advertising firms.

      The City is a major seaport and focal point for international
business.  Many of the major corporations headquartered in the City are
multinational in scope and have extensive foreign operations.  Numerous
foreign-owned companies in the United States are also headquartered in the
City.  These firms, which have increased in number substantially over the
past decade, are found in all sectors of the City's economy, but are
concentrated in trade, manufacturing sales offices, tourism and finance.  The
City is the location of the headquarters of the United Nations, and several
affiliated organizations maintain their principal offices in the City.  A
large diplomatic community exists in the City to staff the 186 missions to
the United Nations and the 96 foreign consulates.


      Economic activity in the City has experienced periods of growth and
recession and can be expected to experience periods of growth and recession
in the future. The City experienced a recession in the early 1970s through
the middle of that decade, followed by a period of expansion in the late
1970s through the late 1980s.  The City fell into recession again in the
early 1990s which was followed by an expansion that lasted until 2001.  The
City's financial plan assumes that the economic decline that began in 2001
will continue through calendar year 2003 as a result of the September 11
attack, a national economic recession, and a downturn in the securities
industry.  The City's financial plan assumes the City's economy will begin a
slow recovery in the first half of calendar year 2004.

      The City expects total expenditures for recovery, clean up and repair
efforts in the wake of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World
Trade Center to be substantial.  The Federal government has committed over
$21 billion for disaster assistance in New York, including disaster recovery
and related activities, increased security and reconstruction of
infrastructure and public facilities.  This amount includes approximately
$15.5 billion of appropriations for costs such as cleanup, economic
development, job training, transit improvements, road reconstruction and
grants to residences and businesses in lower Manhattan.  It also includes
approximately $5.5 billion for economic stimulus programs directed primarily
at businesses located in the Liberty Zone, the area surrounding the World
Trade Center site.  These programs include expanding tax credits, increasing
depreciation deductions, authorizing the issuance of tax-exempt private
activity bonds and expanding authority to advance refund some bonds issued to
finance facilities in the City.

      The City is seeking to be reimbursed by the Federal government for all
of its direct costs for response and remediation of the World Trade Center
site.  The City also expects to receive Federal funds for costs of economic
revitalization and other needs, not directly payable through the City budget,
relating to the September 11 attack.

      In addition, the State authorized the New York City Transitional
Finance Authority ("TFA") to have outstanding $2.5 billion of "Recovery
Bonds" and "Recovery Notes" to pay costs related to or arising from the
September 11 attack.  The City believes it is not possible to quantify at
present with any certainty the long-term impact of the September 11 attack on
the City and its economy, any economic benefits which may result from
recovery and rebuilding activities and the amount of additional resources
from Federal, State, City and other sources which will be required.

      For each of the 1981 through 2002 fiscal years, the City's General Fund
had an operating surplus, before discretionary and other transfers, and
achieved balanced operating results as reported in accordance with then
applicable generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") after
discretionary and other transfers.  The City has been required to close
substantial gaps between forecast revenues and forecast expenditures in order
to maintain balanced operating results. There can be no assurance that the
City will continue to maintain balanced operating results as required by
State law without tax or other revenue increases or reductions in City
services or entitlement programs, which could adversely affect the City's
economic base.

      The Mayor is responsible for preparing the City's financial plan,
including the City's financial plan for the 2003 through 2007 fiscal years
(referred to below as the "2003-2007 Financial Plan", or "Financial Plan").
The City's projections set forth in the Financial Plan are based on various
assumptions and contingencies which are uncertain and which may not
materialize.

      Implementation of the Financial Plan is dependent upon the City's
ability to market its securities successfully.  Implementation of the
Financial Plan is also dependent upon the ability to market the securities of
the TFA, which issues debt secured by personal income tax and sales revenues;
TSASC, Inc., which issues debt secured by revenues derived from the
settlement of litigation with tobacco companies, and the New York City
Municipal Water Finance Authority ("Water Authority"), which issues debt
secured by water and sewer revenues.  The TFA and TSASC were created to
assist the City in financing its capital program while keeping City
indebtedness within the forecast level of the constitutional restrictions on
the amount of debt the City is authorized to incur.

      In addition, the City issues revenue and tax anticipation notes to
finance its seasonal working capital requirements.  The success of projected
public sales of City, Water Authority, TFA, TSASC and other bonds and notes
will be subject to prevailing market conditions.  Future developments
concerning the City and public discussion of such developments, as well as
prevailing market conditions, may affect the market for outstanding City
general obligation bonds and notes.

      |X|   The City's 2003-2007 Financial Plan.  For the 2001 and 2002
fiscal years, the City's General Fund had an operating surplus of $2.949
billion and $686 million, respectively, before discretionary and other
transfers, and achieved balanced operating results in accordance with GAAP,
after discretionary and other transfers.  The 2002 fiscal year was the
twenty-second consecutive year that the City had achieved an operating
surplus, before discretionary and other transfers, and balanced operating
results, after discretionary and other transfers.

      On June 30, 2003, the City submitted the Financial Plan for the 2003
through 2007 fiscal years (the "2003-07 Financial Plan" or the "Financial
Plan"), which relates to the City and certain entities which receive funds
from the City, and which reflected changes as a result of the City's expense
and capital budgets for the 2004 fiscal year which were adopted on June 27,
2003.  The Financial Plan is a modification to the financial plan submitted
on June 26, 2002 (the "June Financial Plan"), as subsequently modified by the
financial plans submitted on November 18, 2002, January 31, 2003 and April
23, 2003 (the "April Financial Plan").  The Financial Plan projected revenues
and expenditures for the 2003 and 2004 fiscal years balanced in accordance
with GAAP, and projected gaps of $2.0 billion, $3.2 billion and $3.3 billion
for fiscal years 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.

      The Financial Plan reflected changes since the June Financial Plan
which decreased projected revenues by $821 million, $2.3 billion, $2.2
billion and $2.0 billion in fiscal years 2003 through 2006, respectively, and
increased projected net expenditures by $1.3 billion, $1.3 billion and $1.6
billion in fiscal years 2004 through 2006, respectively.  Changes in
projected revenues included a decline in projected tax revenues of $621
million, $1.6 billion, $1.8 billion and $1.9 billion in fiscal years 2003
through 2006, respectively, reflecting primarily decreases in projected
personal income, business and sales tax revenues, as well as the elimination
of previously assumed non-tax revenues.  The decline in projected tax revenue
growth reflected the September 11 attack and a continued weak economy, which
has resulted in lower wage earnings, lower corporate earnings, local job
losses exceeding 117,000 in 2002, a disruption in tourism and related
spending and the decline in financial services sector profits and employee
income.  Changes in projected expenditures since the June Financial Plan
included:  (i) increased pension costs totaling $213 million, $369 million
and $541 million for fiscal years 2004 through 2006, respectively, resulting
primarily from additional pension benefits and investment losses in fiscal
year 2002 totaling 8%, which exceeded the 3% loss assumed in the June
Financial Plan, partially offset by projected investment gains in fiscal year
2003 totaling 2%, which exceeded the previously assumed 8% loss; and (ii) the
elimination of $223 million, $296 million, $291 million and $412 million of
previously assumed labor productivity initiatives in fiscal years 2003
through 2006, respectively.  Changes in projected expenditures also included
increased agency spending, increased costs for settling claims against the
City, increased health and welfare spending primarily for Medicaid, increased
debt service costs, an increase in the labor reserve and funding for capital
expenditures.  The Financial Plan also included proposed discretionary
transfers and prepayments in fiscal year 2003 of $1.3 billion, reflecting
discretionary transfers and prepayments in fiscal year 2003 of $679 million
in debt service, subsidies and lease debt service due in fiscal year 2004 and
a miscellaneous budget grant of $624 million to the TFA in fiscal year 2003,
which increases tax revenue in fiscal year 2004 by $624 million.

      The gap-closing program included in the Financial Plan reflected:  (i)
the enacted 18.49% property tax increase, effective January 1, 2003, which
was projected to continue to generate $837 million, $1.7 billion, $1.8
billion and $1.9 billion in fiscal years 2003 through 2006, respectively, and
(ii) a gap-closing program to reduce agency expenditures (including debt
service savings reflecting a 24% reduction in capital commitments) and
increase agency revenues by $950 million in fiscal year 2003 and by between
$2.1 billion and $2.2 billion annually in subsequent fiscal years.

      The gap-closing program included in the Financial Plan also reflected:
(i) an enacted increase in the personal income tax rates (which decline after
the first year) for City residents with taxable income above specified
amounts for three years, commencing January 1, 2003, which is projected to
generate $644 million, $545 million and $315 million in fiscal years 2004
through 2006, respectively; (ii) an enacted increase in the City portion of
the sales tax by one-eighth percent for two years, commencing in June 2003,
which is proposed to generate $115 million and $111 million in fiscal years
2004 and 2005, respectively; (iii) the repeal, beginning June 1, 2003, of the
sales tax exemption on the purchase of clothing and footwear under $110 for
one year with two one-week periods of exemption which is expected to generate
$192 million in fiscal year 2004; (iv) legislation enacted by the State
Legislature pursuant to which the Local Government Assistance Corporation is
to make available to the City $170 million annually which the City intends to
assign to a newly-created financing entity for the purpose of refinancing
outstanding indebtedness of the NYC-MAC which would make available to the
City approximately $500 million annually in fiscal years 2004 through 2008 by
reducing the amount of City revenues retained by NYC-MAC for its debt
service; (v) $200 million, $583 million and $96 million in fiscal years 2004
through 2006, respectively, of back rent and renegotiated future lease
payments for the City's airports, which is subject to the settlement of the
City's claim for back rent and the renegotiation of the City's airport
leases; and (vi) additional federal assistance and additional State
assistance which requires the approval of the State government.  Additional
federal gap-closing actions in the Financial Plan included $420 million in
fiscal year 2003 (in addition to the $230 million previously provided) to
reimburse the City for costs related to the September 11 attack and increased
federal funding for Medicaid which was expected to generate approximately
$290 million for the City over the fifteen months ending June 30, 2004.  The
additional State actions proposed in the Financial Plan included a proposed
regional transportation initiative which would produce savings for the City
totaling $75 million in fiscal year 2004 and approximately $150 million
annually in each of fiscal years 2005 and 2006 by transferring responsibility
for the local private bus system to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority
("MTA").  Subsequent to the passage of the State budget by the State
Legislature, the Governor vetoed significant portions of the budget and other
legislation providing City assistance, including legislation relating to the
increase in the City personal income tax and the sales tax, the proposed $170
million annual payment that the City intended to use to refinance NYC-MAC
debt and the restorations of State education aid.  In his veto message, the
Governor raised questions as to the constitutionality of such legislation.
On May 15 and May 19, 2003, the State Legislature overrode the Governor's
vetoes.  The City believed that the legislation providing the City with
assistance was constitutional.  However, if there were to be a successful
challenge to the legislation there would be an adverse impact on the City's
budget and the Financial Plan.









      The Financial Plan does not make any provision for wage increases,
other than the pay increases for the 2000-2002 round of bargaining and pay
increases to be funded by productivity initiatives.  It is estimated that
each 1% wage increase for all City employees for subsequent contract periods
would cost approximately $200 million annually.

      The Financial Plan is based on numerous assumptions, including the
condition of the City's and the region's economies and the concomitant
receipt of economically sensitive tax revenues in the amounts projected.  The
Financial Plan is subject to various other uncertainties and contingencies
relating to, among other factors, the effects on the City economy of the
September 11 attack, the extent, if any, to which wage increases for City
employees exceed the annual wage costs assumed for the 2003 through 2007
fiscal years; realization of projected interest earnings for pension fund
assets and current assumptions with respect to wages for City employees
affecting the City's required pension fund contributions; the willingness and
ability of the State to provide the aid contemplated by the Financial Plan
and to take various other actions to assist the City; the ability of HHC and
other such entities to maintain balanced budgets; the willingness of the
federal government to provide the amount of federal aid contemplated in the
Financial Plan; the impact on City revenues and expenditures of federal and
State welfare reform and any future legislation affecting Medicare or other
entitlement programs; adoption of the City's budgets by the City Council in
substantially the forms submitted by the Mayor; the ability of the City to
implement cost reduction initiatives, and the success with which the City
controls expenditures; the impact of conditions in the real estate market on
real estate tax revenues; the ability of the City and other financing
entities to market their securities successfully in the public credit
markets; and unanticipated expenditures that may be incurred as a result of
the need to maintain the City's infrastructure.  Certain of these assumptions
have been questioned by the City Comptroller and other public officials.

      From time to time, the City Comptroller and other public officials
issue reports and make public statements regarding the City's financial
condition, commenting on, among other matters, the City's financial plans,
projected revenues and expenditures and actions by the City to eliminate
projected operating deficits.  Some of these reports and statements have
warned that the City may have underestimated certain expenditures and
overestimated certain revenues and have suggested that the City may not have
adequately provided for future contingencies.  Certain of these reports have
analyzed the City's future economic and social conditions and have questioned
whether the City has the capacity to generate sufficient revenues in the
future to meet the costs of its expenditure increases and to provide
necessary services.  It is reasonable to expect that reports and statements
will continue to be issued and to engender public comment.

      On May 27, 2003, the City Comptroller released a report on the City's
Executive Budget for fiscal year 2004.  In his report, the City Comptroller
stated that the City is in the middle of difficult economic times, with a
continuing recession, the impact of the September 11 attack and difficulties
in the nation's financial markets reflected in the City's financial
condition.  The City Comptroller's report concluded that, after accounting
for the impact of the budget enacted by the State Legislature, the City's
Executive Budget for fiscal year 2004 contains $618 million in net risks, and
identified $2.9 billion in risks for fiscal year 2005, including the $752
million gap set forth in the April Financial Plan for fiscal year 2005.

      On June 3, 2003, the staff of the Office of the State Deputy
Comptroller issued a report on the April Financial Plan.  The report
identified risks of $507 million, $2.3 billion, $2.5 billion and $3.0 billion
for fiscal years 2004 through 2007, respectively, which, when added to the
gaps projected in the April Financial Plan, would result in gaps of $507
million, $3.0 billion, $3.9 billion and $4.1 billion in fiscal years 2004
through 2007, respectively.


      Various actions proposed in the Financial Plan are uncertain.  If these
measures cannot be implemented, the City will be required to take other
actions to decrease expenditures or increase revenues to maintain a balanced
financial plan.  In addition, the economic and financial condition of the
City may be affected by various financial, social, economic and other factors
which could have a material effect on the City.


      The projections and assumptions contained in the Financial Plan are
subject to revision which may involve substantial change, and no assurance
can be given that these estimates and projections, which include actions
which the City expects will be taken but which are not within the City's
control, will be realized.

      |X|   Ratings of the City's Bonds.  As of July 7, 2003, Moody's,
Standard & Poor's and Fitch rated the City's general obligations bonds A2, A
and A+, respectively.  These ratings reflect only the views of Moody's,
Standard & Poor's and Fitch from which an explanation of the significance of
such ratings may be obtained.  There is no assurance that those ratings will
continue for any given period of time or that they will not be revised
downward or withdrawn entirely.  Any downward revision or withdrawal could
have an adverse effect on the market prices of the City's bonds.  On July 16,
1998, Standard & Poor's revised its rating of City bonds to "A-" from "BBB+."
On September 13, 2000, Standard & Poor's revised its rating of City Bonds
upward to "A."  Moody's rating of City bonds was revised in August 2000 to
"A2" from "A3."  On November 15, 2001, Moody's issued a negative outlook on
City bonds.  On March 8, 1999, Fitch revised its rating of City bonds upward
to "A" from "A-" and on September 15, 2000, Fitch revised its rating to
"A+."  On December 23, 2002, Fitch issued a negative outlook on City bonds.

      |X|   The City's Outstanding Indebtedness.  As of June 30, 2002, the
City and the Municipal Assistance Corporation for the City of New York had,
respectively, $28.539 billion and $2.311 billion of outstanding net long-term
debt.

      For its normal operations, the City depends on aid from the State both
to enable the City to balance its budget and to meet its cash requirements.
There can be no assurance that there will not be reductions in State aid to
the City from the amounts projected; that State budgets in future fiscal
years will be adopted by the April 1 statutory deadline, or interim
appropriations will be enacted; or that any such reductions or delays will
not have adverse effects on the City's cash flow or expenditures.  In
addition, the Federal budget negotiation process could result in a reduction
or a delay in the receipt of Federal grants which could have adverse effects
on the City's cash flow or revenues.  The City assumes that the costs
relating to the September 11 attack will be paid in substantial part from
Federal aid and borrowings by the TFA.

      |X|   Pending Litigation.  The City is a defendant in lawsuits
pertaining to material matters, including claims asserted that are incidental
to performing routine governmental and other functions. That litigation
includes, but is not limited to, actions commenced and claims asserted
against the City arising out of alleged constitutional violations, torts,
breaches of contract, and other violations of law and condemnation
proceedings.  While the ultimate outcome and fiscal impact, if any, on the
City of such proceedings and claims were not predictable, adverse
determinations in certain of them might have a material adverse effect upon
the City's ability to carry out the Financial Plan.  For the fiscal year
ended on June 30, 2002, the City paid $521.8 million for judgments and
claims.  The Financial Plan includes provisions for the payment of judgments
and claims of $612.7 million, $642.7 million, $676.2 million, $712.7 million
and $751.5 million for the 2003 through 2007 fiscal years, respectively.  As
of June 30, 2003, the City estimated its potential future liability for
outstanding claims against it to be approximately $4.3 billion.


Investment Restrictions

      |X|   What Are "Fundamental Policies?" Fundamental policies are those
policies that the Trust has adopted to govern its investments that can be
changed only by the vote of a "majority" of the Trust's outstanding voting
securities.  Under the Investment Company Act, a "majority" vote is defined
as the vote of the holders of the lesser of:

o     67% or more of the shares present or represented by proxy at a
         shareholder meeting, if the holders of more than 50% of the
         outstanding shares are present or represented by proxy, or
o     more than 50% of the outstanding shares.

      The Trust's investment objective is a fundamental policy. Other
policies described in the Prospectus or this Statement of Additional
Information are "fundamental" only if they are identified as such.  The
Trust's Board of Trustees can change non-fundamental policies without
shareholder approval.  However, significant changes to investment policies
will be described in supplements or updates to the Prospectus or this
Statement of Additional Information, as appropriate. The Trust's most
significant investment policies are described in the Prospectus.

|X|   Does the Trust Have Additional Fundamental Policies?  The following
investment restrictions are fundamental policies of the Trust.

o     The Trust cannot make loans, except that the Trust may purchase debt
         securities described in "Investment Objective and Policies" and
         repurchase agreements, and the Trust may lend its portfolio
         securities as described in the Statement of Additional Information;

o     The Trust cannot borrow money in excess of 10% of the value of its
         total assets or make any investment when borrowings exceed 5% of the
         value of its total assets; it may borrow only as a temporary measure
         for extraordinary or emergency purposes; no assets of the Trust may
         be pledged, mortgaged or assigned to secure a debt;

o     The Trust cannot invest in commodities or commodity contracts, or
         invest in interests in oil, gas, or other mineral exploration or
         development programs;

o     The Trust cannot invest in real estate; however, the Trust may purchase
         debt securities issued by companies which invest in real estate or
         interests therein;

o     The Trust cannot purchase securities on margin or make short sales of
         securities;

o     The Trust cannot invest in or hold securities of any issuer if those
         officers and trustees or directors of the Trust or its advisor who
         beneficially own individually more than 0.5% of the securities of
         such issuer together own more than 5% of the securities of such
         issuer;

o     The Trust cannot underwrite securities of other companies except
         insofar as the Trust may be deemed an underwriter under the
         Securities Act of 1933 in connection with the disposition of
         portfolio securities;

o     The Trust cannot purchase securities of other investment companies,
         except in connection with a merger, consolidation, acquisition or
         reorganization.

o     The Trust cannot issue "senior securities," but this does not prohibit
         certain investment activities for which assets of the Trust are
         designated as segregated, or margin, collateral or escrow
         arrangements are established, to cover the related obligations.

o     The Trust cannot invest in any debt instrument having a maturity in
         excess of the time period provided for in Rule 2a-7 of the
         Investment Company Act, or any other applicable rule, or in the case
         of a debt instrument subject to a repurchase agreement or called for
         redemption, unless purchased subject to a demand feature which may
         not exceed the time period provided for in Rule 2a-7, or any other
         applicable rule.

o     The Trust cannot invest 25% or more of its total assets in any one
         industry; however, for the purposes of this restriction, municipal
         securities and U.S. government obligations are not considered to be
         part of any single industry.

      For purposes of the investment restrictions listed above, the
identification of the "issuer" of a municipal security depends on the terms
and conditions of the security.  When the assets and revenues of an agency,
authority, instrumentality or other political subdivision are separate from
those of the government creating the subdivision and the security is backed
only by the assets and revenues of the subdivision, such subdivision would be
deemed to be the sole issuer.  Similarly, in the case of an industrial
development bond, if that bond is backed only by the assets and revenues of
the nongovernmental user, then such nongovernmental user would be deemed to
be the sole issuer.  However, if in either case the creating government or
some other entity guarantees the security, such guarantee would be considered
a separate security and would be treated as an issue of such government or
other agency.  Conduit securities are deemed to be issued by the person
ultimately responsible for payments of interest and principal on the security.







      In applying the restrictions as to the Trust's investments, the Manager
will consider a nongovernmental user of facilities financed by industrial
development bonds as being in a particular industry, despite the fact that
there is no industry concentration limitation as to municipal securities the
Trust may own.  Although this application of the restriction is not
technically a fundamental policy of the Trust, it will not be changed without
shareholder approval. Should any such change be made, the Prospectus and/or
Statement of Additional Information will be supplemented to reflect the
change.

      Unless the Prospectus or this Statement of Additional Information
states that a percentage restriction applies on an ongoing basis, it applies
only at the time the Trust makes an investment. The Trust need not sell
securities to meet the percentage limits if the value of the investment
increases in proportion to the size of the Trust.

      For purposes of the Trust's policy not to concentrate its investments
in securities of issuers, the Trust has adopted the industry classifications
set forth in Appendix B to this Statement of Additional Information.  This is
not a fundamental policy.

How the Trust is Managed

Organization and History.  The Trust is an open-end, diversified management
investment company organized as a Massachusetts business trust in 1988, with
an unlimited number of authorized shares of beneficial interest.

|X|   Classes  of  Shares.  The Trust  has a single  class of shares of stock.
While  that class has no  designation,  it is deemed to be the  equivalent  of
Class A for purposes of the shareholder  account  policies that apply to Class
A shares of the Oppenheimer funds.

      Shares of the Trust are freely transferable.  Each share has one vote
at shareholder meetings, with fractional shares voting proportionally on
matters submitted to a vote of shareholders.  There are no preemptive or
conversion rights and shares participate equally in the assets of the Trust
upon liquidation.

|X|   Meetings of Shareholders.  As a Massachusetts business trust, the Trust
is not required to hold, and does not plan to hold, regular annual meetings
of shareholders. The Trust will hold meetings when required to do so by the
Investment Company Act or other applicable law. It will also do so when a
shareholder meeting is called by the Trustees or upon proper request of the
shareholders.

      Shareholders have the right, upon the declaration in writing or vote of
two-thirds of the outstanding shares of the Trust, to remove a Trustee.  The
Trustees will call a meeting of shareholders to vote on the removal of a
Trustee upon the written request of the record holders of 10% of its
outstanding shares.  If the Trustees receive a request from at least 10
shareholders stating that they wish to communicate with other shareholders to
request a meeting to remove a Trustee, the Trustees will then either make the
Trust's shareholder list available to the applicants or mail their
communication to all other shareholders at the applicants' expense. The
shareholders making the request must have been shareholders for at least six
months and must hold shares of the Trust valued at $25,000 or more or
constituting at least 1% of the Trust's outstanding shares, whichever is
less. The Trustees may also take other action as permitted by the Investment
Company Act.

|X|   Shareholder and Trustee Liability.  The Declaration of Trust contains
an express disclaimer of shareholder or Trustee liability for the Trust's
obligations. It also provides for indemnification and reimbursement of
expenses out of the Trust's property for any shareholder held personally
liable for its obligations.  The Declaration of Trust also states that upon
request, the Trust shall assume the defense of any claim made against a
shareholder for any act or obligation of the Trust and shall satisfy any
judgment on that claim.  Massachusetts law permits a shareholder of a
business trust (such as the Trust) to be held personally liable as a
"partner" under certain circumstances. However, the risk that a Trust
shareholder will incur financial loss from being held liable as a "partner"
of the Trust is limited to the relatively remote circumstances in which the
Trust would be unable to meet its obligations.

      The Trust's contractual arrangements state that any person doing
business with the Trust (and each shareholder of the Trust) agrees under its
Declaration of Trust to look solely to the assets of the Trust for
satisfaction of any claim or demand that may arise out of any dealings with
the Trust. Additionally, the Trustees shall have no personal liability to any
such person, to the extent permitted by law.


Board of Trustees and Oversight Committees. The Trust is governed by a Board
of Trustees, which is responsible for protecting the interests of
shareholders under Massachusetts law. The Trustees meet periodically
throughout the year to oversee the Trust's activities, review its
performance, and review the actions of the Manager.  Although the Trust will
not normally hold annual meetings of its shareholders, it may hold
shareholder meetings from time to time on important matters, and shareholders
have the right to call a meeting to remove a Trustee or to take other action
described in the Declaration of Trust.

      The Board of Trustees has an Audit Committee and a Review Committee.
The members of the Audit Committee are Edward L. Cameron (Chairman), William
L. Armstrong, George C. Bowen and Robert J. Malone. The Audit Committee held
seven meetings during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003. The Audit
Committee furnishes the Board with recommendations regarding the selection of
the Trust's independent auditors. Other main functions of the Audit Committee
include, but are not limited to: (i) reviewing the scope and results of
financial statement audits and the audit fees charged; (ii) reviewing reports
from the Trust's independent auditors regarding the Trust's internal
accounting procedures and controls;  (iii) review reports from the Manager's
Internal Audit Department; (iv) maintaining a separate line of communication
between the Trust's independent auditors and its Independent Trustees; and
(v) exercise all other functions outlined in the Audit Committee Charter,
including but not limited to reviewing the independence of the Trust's
independent auditors and the pre-approval of the performance by the Trust's
independent auditors of any non-audit service, including tax service, for the
Trust that is not prohibited by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

      The Audit Committee's functions include selecting and nominating, to
the full Board, nominees for election as Trustees, and selecting and
nominating Independent Trustees for election.  The Audit Committee may, but
need not, consider the advice and recommendation of the Manager and its
affiliates in selecting nominees. The full Board elects new trustees except
for those instances when a shareholder vote is required.

      To date, the Committee has been able to identify from its own resources
an ample number of qualified candidates.  Nonetheless, shareholders may
submit names of individuals, accompanied by complete and properly supported
resumes, for the Audit Committee's consideration by mailing such information
to the Committee in care of the Trust.  The Committee may consider such
persons at such time as it meets to consider possible nominees.  The
Committee, however, reserves sole discretion to determine the candidates to
present to the Board and/or shareholders when it meets for the purpose
considering potential nominees.

      The members of the Review Committee are Jon S. Fossel (Chairman),
Robert G. Avis, Richard Grabish, Sam Freedman, Beverly Hamilton and F.
William Marshall, Jr.  The Review Committee held six meetings during the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2003. Among other functions, the Review Committee
reviews reports and makes recommendations to the Board concerning the fees
paid to the Trust's transfer agent and the services provided to the Trust by
the transfer agent.  The Review Committee also reviews the Trust's investment
performance and policies and procedures adopted by the Trust to comply with
Investment Company Act and other applicable law.


Trustees and Officers of the Trust. Except for Mr. Grabish, each of the
Trustees is an "Independent Trustee," as defined in the Investment Company
Act. Mr. Grabish is an "Interested Trustee" because he is affiliated with the
Manager by virtue of his positions with A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. and its
affiliates (as described in his biography below), which is a partial owner of
the Manager's parent company.

      The Trust's Trustees and officers and their positions held with the
Trust and length of service in such position(s) and their principal
occupations and business affiliations during the past five years are listed
in the chart below. The information for the Trustees also includes the dollar
range of shares of the Trust as well as the aggregate dollar range of shares
of the Oppenheimer/Centennial funds beneficially owned by the Trustees. All
of the Trustees are also trustees or directors of the following
Oppenheimer/Centennial funds1 (referred to as "Board II Funds"):

Oppenheimer Cash Reserves                 Oppenheimer Select Managers
Oppenheimer Champion Income Fund          Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Fund
Oppenheimer Capital Income Fund           Oppenheimer Strategic Income Fund
Oppenheimer High Yield Fund               Oppenheimer Total Return Fund, Inc.
Oppenheimer International Bond Fund       Oppenheimer Variable Account Funds
Oppenheimer Integrity Funds               Panorama Series Fund, Inc.
Oppenheimer Limited-Term Government Fund  Centennial America Fund, L. P.
                                          Centennial   California   Tax  Exempt
Oppenheimer Main Street Funds, Inc.       Trust

Oppenheimer Main Street Opportunity Fund  Centennial Government Trust
Oppenheimer Main Street Small Cap Fund    Centennial Money Market Trust
Oppenheimer Municipal Fund                Centennial New York Tax Exempt Trust
Oppenheimer Principal Protected Trust     Centennial Tax Exempt Trust
Oppenheimer Real Asset Fund


      Present or former  officers,  directors,  trustees  and  employees  (and
their immediate  family members) of the Trust, the Manager and its affiliates,
and retirement plans  established by them for their employees are permitted to
purchase  Class A shares of the Trust and the other  Oppenheimer  funds at net
asset  value  without  sales  charge.  The sales  charges on Class A shares is
waived for that group because of the  economies of sales  efforts  realized by
the Distributor.


      Messrs. Murphy, Carbuto, Masterson, Molleur, Vottiero, Wixted and Zack,
and Mses. Bechtolt, Feld, and Ives, who are officers of the Trust,
respectively hold the same offices with one or more of the other Board II
Funds as with the Trust. As of August 13, 2003, the Trustees and officers of
the Trust as a group owned of record or beneficially less than 1% of the
shares of the Trust. The foregoing statement does not reflect ownership of
shares held of record by an employee benefit plan for employees of the
Manager, other than the shares beneficially owned under that plan by the
officers of the Trust listed above. In addition, each Independent Trustee,
and his family members, do not own securities of either the Manager,
Distributor or Sub-Distributor of the Board II Funds or any person directly
or indirectly controlling, controlled by or under common control with the
Manager, Distributor or Sub-Distributor.

|X|   Affiliated Transactions and Material Business Relationships. In 2001,
Mr. Swain surrendered for cancellation 60,000 options of Oppenheimer
Acquisition Company ("OAC") (OppenheimerFunds, Inc.'s parent holding
company), to MassMutual for a cash payment of $2,700,600.

      Mr. Swain has reported that he sold a residential property to Mr.
Freedman on October 23, 2001 for $1.2 million.  An independent appraisal of
the property supported the sale price.

      The address of each Trustee in the charts below is 6803 S. Tucson Way,
Centennial, CO 80112-3924. Each Trustee serves for an indefinite term, until
his or her resignation, retirement, death or removal.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                Independent Trustees
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name,              Principal  Occupation(s)  During  Past  5   Dollar     Aggregate
                                                                           Dollar
                                                                          Range of
                                                                           Shares
                                                                         Beneficially
                                                                          Owned in
                                                              Range of   any of the

Position(s) Held   Years / Other  Trusteeships/Directorships   Shares    Oppenheimer/Centennial
with the Trust,    Held by  Trustee / Number  of  Portfolios Beneficially   Funds
Length of Service, in Fund  Complex  Currently  Overseen  by  Owned in    Overseen
Age                Trustee                                    the Trust  by Trustee

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                             As of December 31, 2002

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

James C. Swain,    Formerly, Chief Executive Officer (until      $0         Over
Chairman and       August 27, 2002) of the Board II Funds,
Trustee,           President and a director (until 1997) of
since 1989         Centennial Asset Management Corporation
Age: 69            (the "Manager") and Vice Chairman (until

                   January 2, 2002) of OppenheimerFunds,
                   Inc. (of which the Manager is a
                   wholly-owned investment advisory                       $100,000

                   subsidiary). Oversees 43 portfolios in
                   the OppenheimerFunds complex.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William L.         Chairman of the following private             $0       $50,001-

Armstrong,         mortgage banking companies: Cherry Creek
Vice-Chairman and  Mortgage Company (since 1991),
Trustee since 2001 Centennial State Mortgage Company (since
Age: 66            1994), The El Paso Mortgage Company
                   (since 1993), Transland Financial
                   Services, Inc. (since 1997); Chairman of
                   the following private companies: Great
                   Frontier Insurance (insurance agency)
                   (since 1995), Ambassador Media
                   Corporation and Broadway Ventures (since
                   1984); a director of the following
                   public companies: Helmerich & Payne,
                   Inc. (oil and gas drilling/production
                   company) (since 1992) and UNUMProvident
                   (insurance company) (since 1991). Mr.
                   Armstrong is also a Director/Trustee of
                   Campus Crusade for Christ and the
                   Bradley Foundation. Formerly a director
                   of the following: Storage Technology
                   Corporation (a publicly-held computer
                   equipment company) (1991-February 2003),
                   Frontier Real Estate, Inc. (residential                $100,000
                   real estate brokerage) (1994-1999), and
                   Frontier Title (title insurance agency)
                   (1995-June 1999); a U.S. Senator
                   (January 1979-January 1991). Oversees 43
                   portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds
                   complex.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert G. Avis,    Formerly, Director and President of A.G.
Trustee since 1990 Edwards Capital, Inc. (General Partner
Age: 72            of private equity funds) (until February

                   2001); Chairman, President and Chief
                   Executive Officer of A.G. Edwards
                   Capital, Inc. (until March 2000); Vice
                   Chairman and Director of A.G. Edwards,
                   Inc. and Vice Chairman of A.G. Edwards &
                   Sons, Inc. (its brokerage company             $0         Over
                   subsidiary) (until March 1999); Chairman               $100,000
                   of A.G. Edwards Trust Company and A.G.E.
                   Asset Management (investment advisor)
                   (until March 1999); and a Director
                   (until March 2000) of A.G. Edwards &
                   Sons and A.G. Edwards Trust Company.

                   Oversees 43 portfolios in the
                   OppenheimerFunds complex.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

George C. Bowen,   Formerly (until April 1999) Mr. Bowen
Trustee since      held the following positions: Senior
2001               Vice President (since February 1992),
Age: 66            Treasurer (since July 1991) Assistant
                   Secretary and a director (since December
                   1991) of the Manager; Senior Vice
                   President (from September 1987) and
                   Treasurer (from March 1985) of
                   OppenheimerFunds, Inc; Vice President
                   (from June 1983) and Treasurer (since
                   March 1985) of OppenheimerFunds
                   Distributor, Inc. (a subsidiary of
                   OppenheimerFunds, Inc., of which the
                   Manager is an investment advisory
                   subsidiary); Vice President (since
                   October 1989) and Treasurer (since April
                   1986) of HarbourView Asset Management
                   Corporation (an investment advisory
                   subsidiary of OppenheimerFunds, Inc.);
                   President, Treasurer and a director
                   (June 1989-January 1990) of Centennial
                   Capital Corporation (a prior investment
                   advisory subsidiary of OppenheimerFunds,
                   Inc.); Vice President and Treasurer
                   (since August 1978) and Secretary (since
                   April 1981) of Shareholder Services,

                   Inc., and Vice President, Treasurer and       $0         Over
                   Secretary (since November 1989) of                     $100,000
                   Shareholder Financial Services, Inc.
                   (both are transfer agent subsidiaries of
                   OppenheimerFunds, Inc.); Assistant
                   Treasurer (since March 1998) of
                   Oppenheimer Acquisition Corp.

                   (OppenheimerFunds, Inc.'s parent holding
                   company); Treasurer (since November
                   1989) of Oppenheimer Partnership
                   Holdings, Inc. (a holding company
                   subsidiary of OppenheimerFunds, Inc.);
                   Vice President and Treasurer (since July
                   1996) of Oppenheimer Real Asset
                   Management, Inc. (an investment advisory
                   subsidiary of OppenheimerFunds, Inc.);
                   Chief Executive Officer and director
                   (since March 1996) of MultiSource
                   Services, Inc. (a broker-dealer
                   subsidiary of OppenheimerFunds, Inc.);
                   Treasurer (since October 1997) of
                   OppenheimerFunds International Ltd. and
                   Oppenheimer Millennium Funds plc
                   (offshore fund management subsidiaries
                   of OppenheimerFunds, Inc.). Oversees 43
                   portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds
                   complex.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Edward L.          A member of The Life Guard of Mount           $0       $50,001-
Cameron, Trustee   Vernon, George Washington's home (since
since 2001         June 2000). Formerly (March 2001 - May
Age: 64            2002) Director of Genetic ID, Inc. and

                   its subsidiaries (a privately held
                   biotech company); a partner with
                   PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (from
                   1974-1999) (an accounting firm) and
                   Chairman (from 1994-1998), Price
                   Waterhouse LLP Global Investment
                   Management Industry Services Group.                    $100,000

                   Oversees 43 portfolios in the
                   OppenheimerFunds complex.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jon S. Fossel,     Chairman and Director (since 1998) of         $0         Over
Trustee since 2001 Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation (a
Age: 61            not-for-profit foundation); and a

                   director (since October 1999) of P.R.
                   Pharmaceuticals (a privately held
                   company) and UNUMProvident (an insurance
                   company) (since June 1, 2002). Formerly
                   Chairman and a director (until October
                   1996) and President and Chief Executive
                   Officer (until October 1995) of
                   OppenheimerFunds, Inc.; President, Chief
                   Executive Officer and a director of
                   Oppenheimer Acquisition Corp.,
                   Shareholder Services Inc. and                          $100,000
                   Shareholder Financial Services, Inc.

                   (until October 1995). Oversees 43
                   portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds
                   complex.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sam Freedman,      Director of Colorado Uplift (a                $0         Over
Trustee since 1996 non-profit charity) (since September
Age: 62            1984). A trustee or director of other

                   Oppenheimer funds. Formerly (until
                   October 1994) Mr. Freedman held several
                   positions in subsidiary or affiliated
                   companies of OppenheimerFunds, Inc.

                   Oversees 43 portfolios in the                          $100,000
                   OppenheimerFunds complex.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Beverly L.         Trustee (since 1996) of MassMutual            $0      $10,001-$50,000
Hamilton, Trustee  Institutional Funds and of MML Series
since 2002         Investment Fund (open-end investment
Age: 56            companies); Director of MML Services

                   (since April 1987) and America Funds
                   Emerging Markets Growth Fund (since

                   October 1991) (both are investment
                   companies), The California Endowment (a
                   philanthropy organization) (since April
                   2002), and Community Hospital of
                   Monterey Peninsula, (since February
                   2002); a trustee (since February 2000)
                   of Monterey International Studies (an
                   educational organization), and an
                   advisor to Unilever (Holland)'s pension
                   fund and to Credit Suisse First Boston's
                   Sprout venture capital unit. Mrs.
                   Hamilton also is a member of the
                   investment committees of the Rockefeller
                   Foundation, the University of Michigan
                   and Hartford Hospital. Formerly,
                   President (February 1991-April 2000)
                   ARCO Investment Management Company.
                   Oversees 44 portfolios in the
                   OppenheimerFunds complex.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert J. Malone,  Director (since 2001) of Jones                $0         Over
Trustee since 2002 Knowledge, Inc. (a privately held
Age: 58            company), U.S. Exploration, Inc., (since
                   1997), Colorado UpLIFT (a non-profit
                   organization) (since 1986) and a trustee
                   of the Gallagher Family Foundation
                   (non-profit organization) (since 2000).
                   Formerly, Chairman of U.S. Bank (a
                   subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp and formerly
                   Colorado National Bank,) (July
                   1996-April 1, 1999) and a director of                  $100,000
                   Commercial Assets, Inc. (a REIT)
                   (1993-2000). Oversees 44 portfolios in
                   the OppenheimerFunds complex.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                   Trustee (since 1996) of MassMutual
F. William         Institutional Funds and of MML Series
Marshall, Jr.,     Investment Fund (open-end investment
Trustee since 2001 companies); Chairman of the Board (since
Age: 61            2003), Trustee and Chairman of the
                   investment committee (since May 1987)
                   for the Worcester Polytech Institute;
                   President and Treasurer (since January
                   1999) of the SIS Fund (a private not for
                   profit charitable fund); Trustee (since
                   1995) of the Springfield Library and
                   Museum Association; Trustee (since 1996)
                   of the Community Music School of
                   Springfield. Formerly, member of the                     Over
                   investment committee of the Community         $0       $100,000
                   Foundation of Western Massachusetts
                   (1998 - 2003); Chairman (January
                   1999-July 1999) of SIS & Family Bank,
                   F.S.B. (formerly SIS Bank); President,
                   Chief Executive Officer and Director
                   (May 1993-December 1998) of SIS
                   Bankcorp, Inc. and SIS Bank (formerly
                   Springfield Institution for Savings) and
                   Executive Vice President (January
                   1999-July 1999) of Peoples Heritage
                   Financial Group, Inc. Oversees 43
                   portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds
                   complex.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









      The address of Mr. Grabish in the chart below is 6803 S. Tucson Way,
Centennial, CO 80112-3924. Mr. Grabish serves for an indefinite term, until
his resignation, retirement, death or removal.


                              Interested Trustee

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name,             Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5      Dollar      Aggregate
                                                                          Dollar
                                                                         Range of
                                                                        y Shares
                                                                        Beneficially
                                                                         Owned in

Position(s) Held                                             Range of   any of the
with the Trust,                                              Shares     Oppenheimer/Centennial
Length of         Years / Other Trusteeships/Directorships   Beneficiall   Funds
Service,          Held by Trustee / Number of Portfolios in  Owned in    Overseen
Age               Fund Complex Currently Overseen by Trustee the Trust  by Trustee

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               As of December 31,

                                                                      2002

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard F.        Senior Vice President, Assistant Director    $0    Over $100,000
Grabish, Trustee  of Sales and Marketing (since March
since 2001        1997), and Manager of Private Client
Age: 54           Services (since June 1985) for A.G.
                  Edwards & Sons, Inc. (broker/dealer and
                  investment firm). Chairman and Chief
                  Executive Officer (since March 2001) of
                  A.G. Edwards Trust Company; Director
                  (since March 1988) of A.G. Edwards &
                  Sons, Inc. Formerly (until March 1987)
                  President and Vice Chairman of A.G.
                  Edwards Trust Company. Oversees 6
                  portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds
                  complex.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


     The address of the officers in the chart below is as follows: Messrs.
Murphy, Molleur and Zack and Ms. Feld, 498 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY
10018, for Messrs. Carbuto, Masterson, Vottiero and Wixted and Mses. Bechtolt
and Ives, 6803 S. Tucson Way, Centennial, CO 80112-3924. Each officer serves
for an annual term or until his or her earlier resignation, death or removal.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               Officers of the Trust
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name,                            Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years
Position(s) Held with the Trust,
Length of Service,
Age

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

John V. Murphy,                  Director (since November 2001) of the Manager;
President                        Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and director
since October 2001               (since June 2001) and President (since September
Age: 54                          2000) of OppenheimerFunds, Inc.; President and a
                                 trustee or director of other Oppenheimer funds;
                                 President and a director (since July 2001) of
                                 Oppenheimer Acquisition Corp. and of Oppenheimer
                                 Partnership Holdings, Inc.; a director (since
                                 November 2001) of OppenheimerFunds Distributor,
                                 Inc.; Chairman and a director (since July 2001) of
                                 Shareholder Services, Inc. and of Shareholder
                                 Financial Services, Inc.; President and a director
                                 (since July 2001) of OppenheimerFunds Legacy
                                 Program (a charitable trust program established by
                                 OppenheimerFunds, Inc.); a director of the
                                 following investment advisory subsidiaries of
                                 OppenheimerFunds, Inc.: OFI Institutional Asset
                                 Management, Inc. (since November 2001),
                                 HarbourView Asset Management Corporation and OFI
                                 Private Investments, Inc. (since July 2002);
                                 President (since November 1, 2001) and a director
                                 (since July 2001) of Oppenheimer Real Asset
                                 Management, Inc.; a director (since November 2001)
                                 of Trinity Investment Management Corp. and Tremont
                                 Advisers, Inc. (investment advisory affiliates of
                                 OppenheimerFunds, Inc.); Executive Vice President
                                 (since February 1997) of Massachusetts Mutual Life
                                 Insurance Company (OppenheimerFunds, Inc.'s parent
                                 company); a director (since June 1995) of DLB
                                 Acquisition Corporation (a holding company that
                                 owns shares of David L. Babson & Company, Inc.);
                                 formerly Chief Operating Officer (September
                                 2000-June 2001) of OppenheimerFunds, Inc.;
                                 President and trustee (November 1999-November
                                 2001) of MML Series Investment Fund and MassMutual
                                 Institutional Funds (open-end investment
                                 companies); a director (September 1999-August
                                 2000) of C.M. Life Insurance Company; President,
                                 Chief Executive Officer and director (September
                                 1999-August 2000) of  MML Bay State Life Insurance
                                 Company; a director (June 1989-June 1998) of
                                 Emerald Isle Bancorp and Hibernia Savings Bank
                                 (wholly-owned subsidiary of Emerald Isle Bancorp).
                                 An officer of 89 portfolios in the
                                 OppenheimerFunds complex.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael A. Carbuto,              Vice President (since May 1988) of
Vice President and Portfolio     OppenheimerFunds, Inc.; an officer of 3 portfolios
Manager                          in the OppenheimerFunds complex; formerly Vice

since June 1990                  President of the Distributor (May 1988 - September
Age:  48                         1999).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian W. Wixted,                 Senior Vice President and Treasurer (since March
Treasurer since April 1999       1999) of OppenheimerFunds, Inc.; Treasurer (since
Age: 43                          March 1999) of HarbourView Asset Management

                                 Corporation, Shareholder Services, Inc.,
                                 Oppenheimer Real Asset Management Corporation,
                                 Shareholder Financial Services, Inc., Oppenheimer
                                 Partnership Holdings, Inc., OFI Private
                                 Investments, Inc. (since March 2000),
                                 OppenheimerFunds International Ltd. and
                                 Oppenheimer Millennium Funds plc (since May 2000),
                                 offshore fund management subsidiaries of
                                 OppenheimerFunds, Inc., and OFI Institutional
                                 Asset Management, Inc. (since November 2000), an
                                 investment advisory subsidiary of
                                 OppenheimerFunds, Inc.; Treasurer and Chief
                                 Financial Officer (since May 2000) of Oppenheimer
                                 Trust Company, a trust company subsidiary of
                                 OppenheimerFunds, Inc.; Assistant Treasurer (since
                                 March 1999) of Oppenheimer Acquisition Corp. and
                                 OppenheimerFunds Legacy Program (since April
                                 2000); formerly Principal and Chief Operating
                                 Officer (March 1995-March 1999), Bankers Trust
                                 Company-Mutual Fund Services Division. An officer
                                 of 89 portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds complex.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert G. Zack,                  General Counsel (since November 2001) of the
Vice President & Secretary       Manager; Senior Vice President (since May 1985)
since November 1, 2001           and General Counsel (since February 2002) of
Age: 55                          OppenheimerFunds, Inc.; General Counsel and a
                                 director (since November 2001) of OppenheimerFunds
                                 Distributor, Inc.; Senior Vice President and
                                 General Counsel (since November 2001) of
                                 HarbourView Asset Management Corporation; Vice
                                 President and a director (since November 2000) of
                                 Oppenheimer Partnership Holdings, Inc.; Senior
                                 Vice President, General Counsel and a director
                                 (since November 2001) of Shareholder Services,
                                 Inc., Shareholder Financial Services, Inc., OFI
                                 Private Investments, Inc., Oppenheimer Trust
                                 Company and OFI Institutional Asset Management,
                                 Inc.; a director (since November 2001) of
                                 Oppenheimer Real Asset Management, Inc.; Assistant
                                 Secretary and a director (since November 2001) of
                                 OppenheimerFunds International Ltd.; Vice
                                 President (since November 2001) of
                                 OppenheimerFunds Legacy Program; Secretary (since
                                 November 2001) of Oppenheimer Acquisition Corp.;
                                 formerly Acting General Counsel (November
                                 2001-February 2002) and Associate General Counsel
                                 (May 1981-October 2001) of OppenheimerFunds, Inc.;
                                 Assistant Secretary of Shareholder Services, Inc.
                                 (May 1985-November 2001), Shareholder Financial
                                 Services, Inc. (November 1989-November 2001);
                                 OppenheimerFunds International Ltd. and
                                 Oppenheimer Millennium Funds plc (October
                                 1997-November 2001). An officer of 89 portfolios
                                 in the OppenheimerFunds complex.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Philip Vottiero,                 Vice       President/Fund       Accounting       of
Assistant Treasurer              OppenheimerFunds,    Inc.   (since   March   2002);
since August 27, 2002            formerly  Vice  President/Corporate  Accounting  of
Age: 40                          OppenheimerFunds,   Inc.  (July   1999-March  2002)
                                 prior to which he was Chief  Financial  Officer  at
                                 Sovlink  Corporation  (April  1996-June  1999).  An
                                 officer of 89  portfolios  in the  OppenheimerFunds
                                 complex.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Connie Bechtolt,                 Assistant Vice President of OppenheimerFunds, Inc.
Assistant Treasurer              (since September 1998); formerly Manager/Fund
since October 22, 2002           Accounting (September 1994-September 1998) of
Age: 40                          OppenheimerFunds, Inc. An officer of 89 portfolios

                                 in the OppenheimerFunds complex.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Philip T. Masterson,             Vice President and Assistant Counsel of
Assistant Secretary              OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (since July 1998);
since August 27, 2002            formerly, an associate with Davis, Graham, &
Age: 39                          Stubbs LLP (January 1997-June 1998). An officer of
                                 89 portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds complex.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Denis R. Molleur,                Vice President and Senior Counsel of the
Assistant Secretary              OppenheimerFunds, Inc.; (since July 1999);
since November 1, 2001           formerly a Vice President and Associate Counsel of
Age: 45                          OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (September 1995-July 1999).

                                 An officer of 82 portfolios in the
                                 OppenheimerFunds complex.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Katherine P. Feld,               Director, Vice President and Assistant Secretary
Assistant Secretary              (since June 1999) of the Manager; Vice President
since November 1, 2001           and Senior Counsel (since July 1999) of
Age: 45                          OppenheimerFunds, Inc.; Vice President (since June
                                 1990) of OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc.; Vice
                                 President (since 1997) of Oppenheimer Real Asset
                                 Management, Inc.; formerly Vice President and
                                 Associate Counsel of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (June
                                 1990-July 1999). An officer of 89 portfolios in
                                 the OppenheimerFunds complex.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 Vice President and Assistant Counsel (since June
Kathleen T. Ives,                1998) of OppenheimerFunds, Inc.; Vice President
Assistant Secretary              (since 1999) of OppenheimerFunds Distributor,
since November 1, 2001           Inc.; Vice President and Assistant Secretary
Age: 37                          (since 1999) of Shareholder Services, Inc.;

                                 Assistant Secretary (since December 2001) of
                                 OppenheimerFunds Legacy Program and Shareholder
                                 Financial Services, Inc.; and formerly Assistant
                                 Vice President and Assistant Counsel of
                                 OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (August 1997-June 1998). An
                                 officer of 89 portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds
                                 complex.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


|X|   Remuneration of Trustees. The officers of the Trust are affiliated with
the Manager and receive no salary or fee from the Trust. The Trustees of the
Trust received the compensation shown below from the Trust with respect to
the Trust's fiscal year ended June 30, 2003. The compensation from all of the
Board II Funds (including the Trust) represents compensation received for
serving as a managing general partner, director or trustee and member of a
committee (if applicable) of the boards of those funds during the calendar
year 2002  (there were 41 funds at the end of 2002).


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Trustee Name and Other                Aggregate        Total Compensation
                                                         From Trust and Fund
  Position(s) (as applicable)         Compensation         Complex Paid to
                                       from Trust1        Trustee/Director*
                                                                          -

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 James C. Swain

  Chairman   of  the   Board   of         $744                $177,996
Trustees

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William L. Armstrong

  Vice Chairman of the Board of
  Trustees and                            $403                 $92,076
  Audit Committee Member

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert G. Avis                            $403                 $92,199

  Review Committee Member
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

George Bowen                              $403                 $91,124

 Audit Committee Member
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Edward L. Cameron                         $456                 $99,743

  Audit Committee Chairman
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jon. S. Fossel                            $456                 $94,590

  Review Committee Chairman
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sam Freedman                              $403                 $92,199

  Review Committee Member
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Richard F. Grabish2                      $1,056                $9,0133
   Review Committee Member

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Beverly Hamilton4                         $4035               $113,6596
   Review Committee Member

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert J. Malone4                         $4037                $58,326

   Audit Committee Member
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

F. William Marshall, Jr.                  $403                $138,1248

  Review Committee Member
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Effective  July 1,  2002,  C.  Howard.  Kast and  Robert M.  Kirchner  retired as
Trustees  from the Board II Funds.  For the  calendar  year  ended  December  31,
2002,  Mr.  Kast  received  $41,451  and  Mr.  Kirchner  received  $38,001  total
compensation from all of the Oppenheimer funds for which they served as Trustee.
1.    Aggregate   Compensation   from  Trust   includes   fees  and   deferred
   compensation, if any, for a Trustee.
2.    Mr. Grabish serves only as a Trustee for the six Centennial Trusts.
3.    Compensation  for  Mr.  Grabish  for  service  as a  Trustee  as well as
   service  on the  Review  Committee  is paid only by  Centennial  Government
   Trust,  Centennial  California  Tax Exempt Trust,  Centennial  Money Market
   Trust,  Centennial  New York Tax Exempt Trust,  Centennial Tax Exempt Trust
   and Centennial  America Fund,  L.P.  (total of six funds).  Mr. Grabish was
   appointed to the Review  Committee  beginning  February  24,  2003.  Had he
   served on the  Review  Committee  for the 2002  calendar  year,  his "Total
   Compensation From Trust and Fund Complex" would have been higher.
4.    Mrs.  Hamilton and Mr.  Malone were  elected as  Trustees,  Directors or
   Managing  General  Partners  of the Board II Funds  with the  exception  of
   Oppenheimer  Senior  Floating  Rate Fund for which  they  currently  do not
   serve as Trustees  effective June 1, 2002.  Compensation for Mrs.  Hamilton
   and Mr.  Malone was paid by all the Board II Funds,  with the  exception of
   Oppenheimer  Senior  Floating  Rate  (total of 40  Oppenheimer  funds as of
   12/31/02).
5.    Includes $403 deferred under Deferred Compensation Plan described below.
6.    Includes  $55,333  compensation  (of  which  100% was  deferred  under a
   deferred  compensation plan) paid to Mrs. Hamilton for serving as a trustee
   by two open-end investment  companies  (MassMutual  Institutional Funds and
   MML  Series  Investment  Fund)  the  investment  adviser  for  which is the
   indirect parent company of OppenheimerFunds,  Inc.  OppenheimerFunds,  Inc.
   also  serves as the  Sub-Advisor  to the  MassMutual  International  Equity
   Fund, a series of MassMutual Institutional Funds.
7.    Includes $403 deferred under Deferred Compensation Plan described below.
8.    Includes  $47,000  compensation  paid to Mr.  Marshall  for serving as a
   trustee by two  open-end  investment  companies  (MassMutual  Institutional
   Funds and MML Series  Investment Fund) the investment  adviser for which is
   the indirect  parent company of  OppenheimerFunds,  Inc.  OppenheimerFunds,
   Inc. also serves as the Sub-Advisor to the MassMutual  International Equity
   Fund, a series of MassMutual Institutional Funds.
   *For  purposes  of  this  section  only,   "Fund   Complex"   includes  the
   Oppenheimer   funds,   MassMutual   Institutional   Funds  and  MML  Series
   Investment  Fund in accordance  with the  instructions  for Form N-1A.  The
   Manager does not  consider  MassMutual  Institutional  Funds and MML Series
   Investment Fund to be part of the  OppenheimerFunds  "Fund Complex" as that
   term may be otherwise interpreted.

|X|   Deferred Compensation Plan for Trustees.  The Trustees have adopted a
Deferred Compensation Plan for disinterested Trustees that enables them to
elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of the annual fees they are
entitled to receive from the Trust.  Under the plan, the compensation
deferred by a Trustee is periodically adjusted as though an equivalent amount
had been invested in shares of one or more Oppenheimer funds selected by the
Trustee.  The amount paid to the Trustee under this plan will be determined
based upon the performance of the selected funds.


      Deferral of fees of the Trustees under this plan will not materially
affect the Trust's assets, liabilities or net income per share.  This plan
will not obligate the Trust to retain the services of any Trustee or to pay
any particular level of compensation to any Trustee.  Pursuant to an Order
issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Trust may invest in the
funds selected by any Trustee under this plan without shareholder approval
for the limited purpose of determining the value of the Trustees' deferred
fee accounts.


      |X|               Major Shareholders.  As of August 13, 2003, the only
person who owned of record or was known by the Trust to own beneficially 5%
or more of the Trust's outstanding retail shares was A.G. Edwards & Sons,
Inc. ("Edwards"), 1 North Jefferson Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103, which
owned 63,576,022.270 shares of the Trust which was 91.08% of the outstanding
shares of the Trust on that date, for accounts of its customers none of whom
individually owned more than 5% of the outstanding shares.


The Manager.  The Manager, Centennial Asset Management Corporation, is
wholly-owned by OppenheimerFunds, Inc., which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Oppenheimer Acquisition Corp., a holding company controlled by Massachusetts
Mutual Life Insurance Company.

      The portfolio manager of the Trust is principally responsible for the
day-to-day management of the Trust's investment portfolio.  Other members of
the Manager's fixed-income portfolio department, particularly security
analysts, traders and other portfolio managers, have broad experience with
fixed-income securities.  They provide the Trust's portfolio manager with
research and support in managing the Trust's investments.


|X|   Code of Ethics.  The Manager and the Distributor have a Code of
Ethics.  It is designed to detect and prevent improper personal trading by
certain employees, including portfolio managers, that would compete with or
take advantage of the Trust's portfolio transactions.  Covered persons
include persons with knowledge of the investments and investment intentions
of the Trust and other funds advised by the Manager.  The Code of Ethics does
permit personnel subject to the Code to invest in securities, including
securities that may be purchased or held by the Trust, subject to a number of
restrictions and controls.  Compliance with the Code of Ethics is carefully
monitored and enforced by the Manager.  The Trust does not have a Code of
Ethics since it is a money market fund.


      |X|               The Investment Advisory Agreement.  The Manager
provides investment advisory and management services to the Trust under an
investment advisory agreement between the Manager and the Trust.  The Manager
selects securities for the Trust's portfolio and handles its day-to-day
business.  The agreement requires the Manager, at its expense, to provide the
Trust with adequate office space, facilities and equipment.  It also requires
the Manager to provide and supervise the activities of all administrative and
clerical personnel required to provide effective administration for the
Trust.  Those responsibilities include the compilation and maintenance of
records with respect to its operations, the preparation and filing of
specified reports, and composition of proxy materials and registration
statements for continuous public sale of shares of the Trust.

      Expenses not expressly assumed by the Manager under the investment
advisory agreement are paid by the Trust.  The investment advisory agreement
lists examples of expenses paid by the Trust.  The major categories relate to
interest, taxes, fees to unaffiliated Trustees, legal and audit expenses,
custodian and transfer agent expenses, share issuance costs, certain printing
and registration costs and non-recurring expenses, including litigation
costs.  The management fees paid by the Trust to the Manager are calculated
at the rates described in the Prospectus.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Fiscal Year    Management Fee Paid to Centennial Asset Management Corporation
   ended 6/30
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      2001                                  $343,365
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      2002                                  $384,671
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      2003                                  $360,604

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


      The Manager has undertaken that the total expenses of the Trust, in any
fiscal year of the Trust, exclusive of taxes, interest, brokerage commissions
(if any) and non-recurring expenses, including litigation, shall not exceed
0.80% of the average annual net assets of the Trust.  Additionally, effective
July 7, 2003, the Manager has voluntarily undertaken to waive receipt of its
management fees to the extent necessary so that the Trust may seek to
maintain a positive yield.  The payment of the management fee at the end of
any month will be reduced so that there will not be any accrued but unpaid
liability under those expense limitations.  Any assumption of the Trust's
expenses under either arrangement lowers the Trust's overall expense ratio
and increases its yield and total return during the time such expenses are
assumed.  The Manager reserves the right to terminate or amend this
undertaking at any time. For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2001, 2002, and
2003 the management fees payable by the Trust would have been $287,819,
$357,238 and $350,265 with the Manager's voluntary expense assumption.  Those
amounts reflect the effect of the expense assumptions of $55,546, $27,433 and
$10,339 for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2001, 2002, and 2003
respectively.


    The investment advisory agreement states that in the absence of willful
misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence in the performance of its duties or
reckless disregard of its obligations and duties under the investment
advisory agreement, the Manager is not liable for any loss resulting from a
good faith error or omission on its part with respect to any of its duties
under the agreement.

         |X|      Annual Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement. Each
year, the Board of Trustees, including a majority of the Independent
Trustees, is required to approve the renewal of the investment advisory
agreement. The Investment Company Act requires that the Board request and
evaluate and the Manager provide such information as may be reasonably
necessary to evaluate the terms of the investment advisory agreement.  The
Board employs an independent consultant to prepare a report that provides
such information as the Board requests for this purpose.

      The Board also receives information about the 12b-1 distribution fees
the Trust pays.  These distribution fees are reviewed and approved at a
different time of the year.

      The Board reviewed the foregoing information in arriving at its
decision to renew the investment advisory agreement.  Among other factors,
the Board considered:
o     The nature, cost, and quality of the services provided to the Trust and
         its shareholders;
o     The profitability of the Trust to the Manager;
o     The investment performance of the Trust in comparison to regular market
         indices
o     Economies of scale that may be available to the Trust from the Manager;
o     Fees paid by other mutual funds for similar services;
o     The value and quality of any other benefits or services received by the
         Trust from its relationship with the Manager, and
o     The direct and indirect benefits the Manager received from its
         relationship with the Trust.  These included services provided by
         the Distributor and the Transfer Agent, and brokerage and soft
         dollar arrangements permissible under Section 28(e) of the
         Securities Exchange Act.

      The Board considered that the Manager must be able to pay and retain
high quality personnel at competitive rates to provide services to the
Trust.  The Board also considered that maintaining the financial viability of
the Manager is important so that the Manager will be able to continue to
provide quality services to the Trust and its shareholders in adverse times.
The Board also considered the investment performance of other mutual funds
advised by the Manager. The Board is aware that there are alternatives to the
use of the Manager.


      These matters were also considered by the Independent Trustees, meeting
separately from the full Board with experienced Counsel to the Independent
Trustees who assisted them in their deliberations.  The Independent Trustees'
Counsel is independent of the Manager within the meaning and intent of the
SEC Rules regarding the independence of counsel.









      After careful deliberation, the Board concluded that it was in the best
interest of shareholders to continue the investment advisory agreement for
another year. In arriving at a decision, the Board did not single out any one
factor or group of factors as being more important than other factors, but
considered all factors together.  The Board judged the terms and conditions
of the investment advisory agreement, including the investment advisory fee,
in light of all of the surrounding circumstances.


      |X|               The Distributor. Under its General Distributor's
agreement with the Trust, Centennial Asset Management Corporation acts as the
Trust's principal underwriter and Distributor in the continuous public
offering of the Trust's shares.  The Distributor is not obligated to sell a
specific number of shares.  The Distributor bears the expenses normally
attributable to sales, including advertising and the cost of printing and
mailing prospectuses, other than those furnished to existing shareholders.
For other distribution expenses paid by the Trust, see the section entitled
"Service Plan" below. The Trust's Sub-Distributor is OppenheimerFunds
Distributor, Inc.

Portfolio Transactions.  Portfolio decisions are based upon recommendations
and judgment of the Manager subject to the overall authority of the Board of
Trustees.  Most purchases made by the Trust are principal transactions at net
prices, so the Trust incurs little or no brokerage costs. The Trust deals
directly with the selling or purchasing principal or market maker without
incurring charges for the services of a broker on its behalf unless the
Manager determines that a better price or execution may be obtained by using
the services of a broker.  Purchases of portfolio securities from
underwriters include a commission or concession paid by the issuer to the
underwriter, and purchases from dealers include a spread between the bid and
asked prices.

      The Trust seeks to obtain prompt execution of orders at the most
favorable net price.  If broker/dealers are used for portfolio transactions,
transactions may be directed to broker/dealers for their execution and
research services.  The research services provided by a particular broker may
be useful only to one or more of the advisory accounts of the Manager and its
affiliates.  Investment research received for the commissions of those other
accounts may be useful both to the Trust and one or more of such other
accounts.  Investment research services may be supplied to the Manager by a
third party at the instance of a broker through which trades are placed.  It
may include information and analyses on particular companies and industries
as well as market or economic trends and portfolio strategy, receipt of
market quotations for portfolio evaluations, information systems, computer
hardware and similar products and services.  If a research service also
assists the Manager in a non-research capacity (such as bookkeeping or other
administrative functions), then only the percentage or component that
provides assistance to the Manager in the investment decision-making process
may be paid in commission dollars.

      The research services provided by brokers broaden the scope and
supplement the research activities of the Manager.  That research provides
additional views and comparisons for consideration, and helps the Manager
obtain market information for the valuation of securities held in the Trust's
portfolio or being considered for purchase.

      Subject to applicable rules covering the Manager's activities in this
area, sales of shares of the Trust and/or the other investment companies
managed by the Manager or distributed by the Distributor may also be
considered as a factor in the direction of transactions to dealers.  That
must be done in conformity with the price, execution and other considerations
and practices discussed above.  Those other investment companies may also
give similar consideration relating to the sale of the Trust's shares.  No
portfolio transactions will be handled by any securities dealer affiliated
with the Manager.

      The Trust may experience high portfolio turnover that may increase the
Trust's transaction costs.  However, since brokerage commissions, if any, are
small, high turnover does not have an appreciable adverse effect upon the
income of the Trust.

Service Plan

The Trust has adopted a Service Plan for the shares.  The plan has been
approved by a vote of the Board of Trustees, including a majority of the
Independent Trustees2, cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of
voting on that plan.

      Under the plan, the Manager and the Distributor may make payments to
affiliates and in their sole discretion, from time to time, may use their own
resources (at no direct cost to the Trust) to make payments to brokers,
dealers or other financial institutions for distribution and administrative
services they perform.  The Manager may use its profits from the advisory fee
it receives from the Trust.  In their sole discretion, the Distributor and
the Manager may increase or decrease the amount of payments they make from
their own resources to plan recipients.

      Unless a plan is terminated as described below, the plan continues in
effect from year to year but only if the Trust's Board of Trustees and its
Independent Trustees specifically vote annually to approve its continuance.
Approval must be by a vote cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose
of voting on continuing the plan.  A plan may be terminated at any time by
the vote of a majority of the Independent Trustees or by the vote of the
holders of a "majority" (as defined in the Investment Company Act) of the
outstanding shares of the Trust.

      The Board of Trustees and the Independent Trustees must approve all
material amendments to a plan.  An amendment to increase materially the
amount of payments to be made under a plan must be approved by shareholders.
The approval must be by a "majority" (as defined in the Investment Company
Act) of the shares.

      While the plan is in effect, the Treasurer of the Trust shall provide
separate written reports on the plan to the Board of Trustees at least
quarterly for its review.  The Reports shall detail the amount of all
payments made under the plan and the purpose for which the payments were
made. Those reports are subject to the review and approval of the Independent
Trustees.







      The plan states that while it is in effect, the selection and
nomination of those Trustees of the Trust who are not "interested persons" of
the Trust is committed to the discretion of the Independent Trustees.  This
does not prevent the involvement of others in the selection and nomination
process as long as the final decision as to selection or nomination is
approved by a majority of the Independent Trustees.

      Under the plan, no payment will be made to any recipient in any quarter
in which the aggregate net asset value of all Trust shares held by the
recipient for itself and its customers does not exceed a minimum amount, if
any, that may be set from time to time by a majority of the Independent
Trustees.  The Board of Trustees has set no minimum amount of assets to
qualify for payments under the plan.

      |X|   Service Plan Fees.  Under the service plan, the Distributor
currently uses the fees it receives from the Trust to pay brokers, dealers
and other financial institutions (they are referred to as "recipients") for
personal services and account maintenance services they provide for their
customers who hold shares.  The services include, among others, answering
customer inquiries about the Trust, assisting in establishing and maintaining
accounts in the Trust, making the Trust's investment plans available and
providing other services at the request of the Trust or the Distributor. The
service plan permits reimbursements to the Distributor at a rate of up to
0.20% of average annual net assets of the shares.  The Distributor makes
payments to plan recipients quarterly or monthly depending on asset size at
an annual rate not to exceed 0.20% of the average annual net assets
consisting of shares held in the accounts of the recipients or their
customers.


      For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 payments under the plan totaled
$143,135, all of which was paid by the Distributor to recipients.  That
included $420 paid to an affiliate of the Sub-Distributor's parent company.
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, the Manager paid, in the aggregate,
$198,926 in fees out of its own resources for distribution assistance.  Any
unreimbursed expenses the Distributor incurs with respect to the shares in
any fiscal quarter cannot be recovered in subsequent quarters.  The
Distributor may not use payments received under the plan to pay any of its
interest expenses, carrying charges, or other financial costs, or allocation
of overhead.


Performance of the Trust

Explanation of Performance Terminology.  The Trust uses a variety of terms to
illustrate its performance. These terms include "yield," "compounded
effective yield," "tax-equivalent yield" and "average annual total return."
An explanation of how yields and total returns are calculated is set forth
below.  The charts below show the Trust's performance as of the Trust's most
recent fiscal year end.  You can obtain current performance information by
calling the Trust's Transfer Agent at 1.800.525.9310.

      The Trust's illustrations of its performance data in advertisements
must comply with rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Those
rules describe the types of performance data that may be used and how it is
to be calculated.  If the Trust shows total returns in addition to its
yields, the returns must be for the 1-, 5- and 10-year periods ending as of
the most recent calendar quarter prior to the publication of the
advertisement (or its submission for publication).

      Use of standardized performance calculations enables an investor to
compare the Trust's performance to the performance of other funds for the
same periods. However, a number of factors should be considered before using
the Trust's performance information as a basis for comparisons with other
investments:

o     Yields and total returns measure the performance of a hypothetical
      account in the Trust over various periods and do not show the
      performance of each shareholder's account. Your account's performance
      will vary from the model performance data if your dividends are
      received in cash, or you buy or sell shares during the period, or you
      bought your shares at a different time than the shares used in the
      model.
o     An investment in the Trust is not insured by the FDIC or any other
      government agency.
o     The Trust's yield is not fixed or guaranteed and will fluctuate.
o     Yields and total returns for any given past period represent historical
      performance information and are not, and should not be considered, a
      prediction of future yields or returns.

        Yields.  The Trust's current yield is calculated for a seven-day
period of time as follows. First, a base period return is calculated for the
seven-day period by determining the net change in the value of a hypothetical
pre-existing account having one share at the beginning of the seven-day
period.  The change includes dividends declared on the original share and
dividends declared on any shares purchased with dividends on that share, but
such dividends are adjusted to exclude any realized or unrealized capital
gains or losses affecting the dividends declared.  Next, the base period
return is multiplied by 365/7 to obtain the current yield to the nearest
hundredth of 1%.

      The compounded effective yield for a seven-day period is calculated by
      (1) adding 1 to the base period return (obtained as described above),
      (2) raising the sum to a power equal to 365 divided by 7, and
      (3) subtracting 1 from the result.

      The yield as calculated above may vary for accounts less than
approximately $100 in value due to the effect of rounding off each daily
dividend to the nearest full cent.  The calculation of yield under either
procedure described above does not take into consideration any realized or
unrealized gains or losses on the Trust's portfolio securities which may
affect dividends.  Therefore, the return on dividends declared during a
period may not be the same on an annualized basis as the yield for that
period.

      The Trust's "tax equivalent yield" adjusts the Trust's current yield,
as calculated above, by a stated federal tax rate.  The tax equivalent yield
is computed by dividing the tax-exempt portion of the Trust's current yield
by 1 minus a stated income tax rate and adding the result to the portion (if
any) of the Trust's current yield that is not tax-exempt.  The tax equivalent
yield may be compounded as described above to provide a compounded effective
tax equivalent yield.


      The tax-equivalent yield may be used to compare the tax effects of
income derived from the Trust with income from taxable investments at the tax
rates stated. Your tax bracket is determined by your federal and state
taxable income (the net amount subject to federal and state income tax after
deductions and exemptions).  The tax-equivalent yield table assumes that the
investor is taxed at the highest bracket, regardless of whether a switch to
non-taxable investments would cause a lower bracket to apply.  For taxpayers
with income above certain levels, otherwise allowable itemized deductions are
limited.

|X|   Total Return Information.  There are different types of "total returns"
to measure the Trust's performance. Total return is the change in value of a
hypothetical investment in the Trust over a given period, assuming that all
dividends and capital gains distributions are reinvested in additional shares
and that the investment is redeemed at the end of the period.  The cumulative
total return measures the change in value over the entire period (for
example, ten years).  An average annual total return shows the average rate
of return for each year in a period that would produce the cumulative total
return over the entire period.  However, average annual total returns do not
show actual year-by-year performance.  The Trust uses standardized
calculations for its total returns as prescribed by the SEC.  The methodology
is discussed below.

o     Average Annual Total Return.  The "average annual total return" of each
class is an average annual compounded rate of return for each year in a
specified number of years.  It is the rate of return based on the change in
value of a hypothetical initial investment of $1,000 ("P" in the formula
below) held for a number of years ("n") to achieve an Ending Redeemable Value
("ERV" in the formula) of that investment, according to the following formula:

ERV    l/n - 1 = Average Annual Total
---
               Return
  P


o     Cumulative Total Return.  The "cumulative total return" calculation
measures the change in value of a hypothetical investment of $1,000 over an
entire period of years.  Its calculation uses some of the same factors as
average annual total return, but it does not average the rate of return on an
annual basis.  Cumulative total return is determined as follows:

 ERV - P   = Total Return

-----------

    P



           ----------------------------------------------------------------------

                   Tax-Equivalent Yield
           Compo(39.45% Combined State and                           Average Annual Total Returns
           EffectiFederal Tax Brackets)                                      (at 6/30/03)
           Yield
  Yield    (7
(7 days    days
ended      ended
 6/30/03)  6/30/03)

           ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                            Yield       Compounded
                           (7 days      Effective
                            ended         Yield      1-Year  5 Years 10 Years
                          6/30/03)       (7 days
                                          ended
                                         6/30/03)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  0.24%       0.24%         0.40%         0.40%      0.50%    1.97%    2.28%

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------



      |X|         Other Performance Comparisons.  Yield information may be
useful to investors in reviewing the Trust's performance.  The Trust may make
comparisons between its yield and that of other investments, by citing
various indices such as The Bank Rate Monitor National Index (provided by
Bank Rate Monitor(TM)) which measures the average rate paid on bank money market
accounts, NOW accounts and certificates of deposits by the 100 largest banks
and thrifts in the top ten metro areas.  When comparing the Trust's yield
with that of other investments, investors should understand that certain
other investment alternatives such as certificates of deposit, U.S.
government securities, money market instruments or bank accounts may provide
fixed yields and may be insured or guaranteed.


      From time to time, the Trust may include in its advertisements and
sales literature performance information about the Trust cited in other
newspapers and periodicals, such as The New York Times, which may include
performance quotations from other sources.

From time to time the Trust may include in its advertisements and sales literature
the total return performance of a hypothetical investment account that
includes shares of the Trust and other Oppenheimer funds. The combined
account may be part of an illustration of an asset allocation model or
similar presentation. The account performance may combine total return
performance of the Trust and the total return performance of other
Oppenheimer funds included in the account. Additionally, from time to time,
the Trust's advertisements and sales literature may include, for illustrative
or comparative purposes, statistical data or other information about general
or specific market and economic conditions. That may include, for example,
o     information about the performance of certain securities or commodities
            markets or segments of those markets,
o     information about the performance of the economies of particular
            countries or regions,
o     the earnings of companies included in segments of particular
            industries, sectors, securities markets, countries or
            regions,
o     the availability of different types of securities or offerings of
            securities,
o     information relating to the gross national or gross domestic product of
            the United States or other countries or regions,
o     comparisons of various market sectors or indices to demonstrate
            performance, risk, or other characteristics of the Trust.

A B O U T  Y O U R  A C C O U N T

How to Buy Shares


Determination of Net Asset Value Per Share. The net asset value per share of
the Trust is determined twice each day that the New York Stock Exchange
("Exchange") is open, at 12:00 Noon and at 4:00 P.M, on each day that the
Exchange is open, by dividing the value of the Trust's net assets by the
total number of shares outstanding. All references to time in this Statement
of Additional Information mean "Eastern time."  The Exchange's most recent
annual announcement (which is subject to change) states that it will close on
New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Jr. Day, Presidents' Day, Good Friday,
Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas
Day.  It may also close on other days.


      The Trust's Board of Trustees has adopted the amortized cost method to
value the Trust's portfolio securities.  Under the amortized cost method, a
security is valued initially at its cost and its valuation assumes a constant
amortization of any premium or accretion of any discount, regardless of the
impact of fluctuating interest rates on the market value of the security.
This method does not take into consideration any unrealized capital gains or
losses on securities.  While this method provides certainty in valuing
securities, in certain periods the value of a security determined by
amortized cost may be higher or lower than the price the Trust would receive
if it sold the security.

      The Trust's Board of Trustees has established procedures reasonably
designed to stabilize the Trust's net asset value at $1.00 per share.  Those
procedures include a review of the valuations of the Trust's portfolio
holdings by the Board of Trustees, at intervals it deems appropriate, to
determine whether the Trust's net asset value calculated by using available
market quotations deviates from $1.00 per share based on amortized cost.

      The Board of Trustees will examine the extent of any deviation between
the Trust's net asset value based upon available market quotations and
amortized cost. If the Trust's net asset value were to deviate from $1.00 by
more than 0.5%, Rule 2a-7 requires the Board of Trustees to consider what
action, if any, should be taken. If they find that the extent of the
deviation may cause a material dilution or other unfair effects on
shareholders, the Board of Trustees will take whatever steps it considers
appropriate to eliminate or reduce the dilution, including, among others,
withholding or reducing dividends, paying dividends from capital or capital
gains, selling portfolio instruments prior to maturity to realize capital
gains or losses or to shorten the average maturity of the portfolio, or
calculating net asset value per share by using available market quotations.

      During periods of declining interest rates, the daily yield on shares
of the Trust may tend to be lower (and net investment income and dividends
higher) than those of a fund holding the identical investments as the Trust
but which used a method of portfolio valuation based on market prices or
estimates of market prices. During periods of rising interest rates, the
daily yield of the Trust would tend to be higher and its aggregate value
lower than that of an identical portfolio using market price valuation.

How to Sell Shares

The information below supplements the terms and conditions for redeeming
shares set forth in the Prospectus.

Checkwriting.  When a check is presented to the Bank for clearance, the Bank
will ask the Trust to redeem a sufficient number of full and fractional
shares in the shareholder's account to cover the amount of the check.  This
enables the shareholder to continue receiving dividends on those shares until
the check is presented to the Trust.  Checks may not be presented for payment
at the offices of the Bank or the Trust's custodian.  This limitation does
not affect the use of checks for the payment of bills or to obtain cash at
other banks.  The Trust reserves the right to amend, suspend or discontinue
offering checkwriting privileges at any time.  The Trust will provide you
notice whenever it is required to do so by applicable law.


      In choosing to take advantage of the checkwriting privilege, by signing
the account application or by completing a checkwriting card, each individual
who signs:

(1)   for individual accounts, represents that they are the registered
         owner(s) of the shares of the Trust in that account;
(2)   for accounts for corporations, partnerships, trusts and other entities,
         represents that they are an officer, general partner, trustee or
         other fiduciary or agent, as applicable, duly authorized to act on
         behalf of the registered owner(s);
(3)   authorizes the Trust, its Transfer Agent and any bank through which the
         Trust's drafts (checks) are payable to pay all checks drawn on the
         Trust account of such person(s) and to redeem a sufficient amount of
         shares from that account to cover payment of each check;

      (4)               specifically acknowledges that if they choose to
         permit checks to be honored if there is a single signature on checks
         drawn against joint accounts, or accounts for corporations,
         partnerships, trusts or other entities, the signature of any one
         signatory on a check will be sufficient to authorize payment of that
         check and redemption from the account, even if that account is
         registered in the names of more than one person or more than one
         authorized signature appears on the checkwriting card or the
         application, as applicable;
(5)   understands that the checkwriting privilege may be terminated or
         amended at any time by the Trust and/or the Trust's bank; and

(6)   acknowledges and agrees that neither the Trust nor its bank shall incur
         any liability for that amendment or termination of checkwriting
         privileges or for redeeming shares to pay checks reasonably believed
         by them to be genuine, or for returning or not paying checks that
         have not been accepted for any reason.

Sending Redemption Proceeds by Federal Funds Wire.  The Federal Funds wire of
redemption proceeds may be delayed if the Trust's custodian bank is not open
for business on a day when the Trust would normally authorize the wire to be
made, which is usually the Trust's next regular business day following the
redemption.  In those circumstances, the wire will not be transmitted until
the next bank business day on which the Trust is open for business.  No
distributions will be paid on the proceeds of redeemed shares awaiting
transfer by Federal Funds wire.

How to Exchange Shares

As stated in the Prospectus, direct shareholders can exchange shares of the
Trust for Class A shares of any of the following eligible funds:


Oppenheimer AMT-Free New York Municipals  Oppenheimer Multiple Strategies Fund
Oppenheimer Bond Fund                     Oppenheimer Municipal Bond Fund
Oppenheimer California Municipal Fund     Oppenheimer New Jersey Municipal Fund
Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Fund     Oppenheimer Pennsylvania Municipal Fund
                                          Oppenheimer   Principal  Protected  Main
Oppenheimer Capital Preservation Fund     Street Fund

Oppenheimer Capital Income Fund           Oppenheimer Quest Balanced Value Fund
                                          Oppenheimer  Quest  Capital  Value Fund,
Oppenheimer Champion Income Fund          Inc.
                                          Oppenheimer  Quest  Global  Value  Fund,
Oppenheimer Convertible Securities Fund   Inc.
Oppenheimer Developing Markets Fund       Oppenheimer Quest Opportunity Value Fund
Oppenheimer Disciplined Allocation Fund   Oppenheimer Quest Value Fund, Inc.
Oppenheimer Discovery Fund                Oppenheimer Real Asset Fund
                                          Oppenheimer      Rochester      National
Oppenheimer Emerging Growth Fund          Municipals

Oppenheimer Emerging Technologies Fund    Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Fund
Oppenheimer Enterprise Fund               Oppenheimer Small Cap Value Fund
Oppenheimer Europe Fund                   Oppenheimer Strategic Income Fund
Oppenheimer Global Fund                   Oppenheimer Total Return Bond Fund
Oppenheimer Global Opportunities Fund     Oppenheimer Total Return Fund, Inc.
Oppenheimer Gold & Special Minerals Fund  Oppenheimer Trinity Core Fund
                                          Oppenheimer  Trinity  Large  Cap  Growth

Oppenheimer Growth Fund                   Fund

Oppenheimer High Yield Fund               Oppenheimer Trinity Value Fund
Oppenheimer International Bond Fund       Oppenheimer U.S. Government Trust
Oppenheimer International Growth Fund     Oppenheimer Value Fund
Oppenheimer  International  Small Company
Fund                                      Limited-Term New York Municipal Fund
Oppenheimer Limited-Term Government Fund  Rochester Fund Municipals
Oppenheimer Limited Term Municipal Fund   OSM1- Gartmore Millennium Growth Fund II
Oppenheimer Main Street Fund              OSM1 - Jennison Growth Fund
                                          OSM1 -  Mercury  Advisors  S&P 500 Index

Oppenheimer Main Street Opportunity Fund  Fund

                                          OSM1 -  Mercury  Advisors  Focus  Growth

Oppenheimer Main Street Small Cap Fund    Fund

Oppenheimer MidCap Fund                   OSM1 - QM Active Balanced Fund
                                          OSM1 - Salomon Brothers All Cap Fund
And the following money market funds:


Oppenheimer Cash Reserves                 Centennial Government Trust
Oppenheimer Money Market Fund, Inc.       Centennial Money Market Trust
Centennial America Fund, L. P.            Centennial New York Tax Exempt Trust
Centennial California Tax Exempt Trust    Centennial Tax Exempt Trust




1 - "OSM" stands for Oppenheimer Select Managers

      Shares of the Trust purchased without a sales charge may be exchanged
for shares of an eligible fund offered with a sales charge upon payment of
the sales charge.  Shares of the Trust acquired by reinvestment of dividends
or distributions from the Trust or any of the other eligible funds (other
than Oppenheimer Cash Reserves) or from any unit investment trust for which
reinvestment arrangements have been made with the Distributor may be
exchanged at net asset value for shares of any of the eligible funds.

      Limits on Multiple Exchange Orders.  The Trust reserves the right to
reject telephone or written exchange requests submitted in bulk by anyone on
behalf of more than one account. The Trust may accept requests for exchanges
of up to 50 accounts per day from representatives of authorized dealers that
qualify for this privilege.


|X|   Telephone Exchange Requests.  When exchanging shares by telephone, a
direct shareholder must have an existing account in the fund to which the
exchange is to be made.  Otherwise, the investor must obtain a prospectus of
that fund before the exchange request may be submitted. If all telephone
lines are busy (which might occur, for example, during periods of substantial
market fluctuations), shareholders might not be able to request exchanges by
telephone and would have to submit written exchange requests.

      Processing Exchange Requests.  Shares to be exchanged are redeemed on
the regular business day the Transfer Agent receives an exchange request in
proper form (the "Redemption Date").  Normally, shares of the fund to be
acquired are purchased on the Redemption Date, but such purchases may be
delayed by either fund up to five business days if it determines that it
would be disadvantaged by an immediate transfer of the redemption proceeds.
The Trust reserves the right, in its discretion, to refuse any exchange
request that may disadvantage it. For example, if the receipt of multiple
exchange requests from a dealer might require the disposition of portfolio
securities at a time or at a price that might be disadvantageous to the
Trust, the Trust may refuse the request.


      In connection with any exchange request, the number of shares exchanged
may be less than the number requested if the exchange or the number requested
would include shares subject to a restriction cited in the Prospectus or this
Statement of Additional Information or would include shares covered by a
share certificate that is not tendered with the request.  In those cases,
only the shares available for exchange without restriction will be
exchanged.

      The different eligible funds available for exchange have different
investment objectives, policies and risks.  A shareholder should assure that
the fund selected is appropriate for his or her investment and should be
aware of the tax consequences of an exchange.  For federal income tax
purposes, an exchange transaction is treated as a redemption of shares of one
fund and a purchase of shares of another.  The Trust, the Distributor, the
Sub-Distributor, and the Transfer Agent are unable to provide investment, tax
or legal advice to a shareholder in connection with an exchange request or
any other investment transaction.

      The Trust may amend, suspend or terminate the exchange privilege at any
time.  Although the Trust may impose these changes at any time, it will
provide you with notice of those changes whenever it is required to do so by
applicable law.  It may be required to provide 60 days notice prior to
materially amending or terminating the exchange privilege.  That 60-day
notice is not required in extraordinary circumstances.

Dividends and Taxes

Tax Status of the Trust's Dividends, Distributions and Redemptions of Shares.
The federal tax treatment of the Trust's distributions is briefly highlighted
in the Prospectus. The following is only a summary of certain additional tax
considerations generally affecting the Trust and its shareholders.

      The tax discussion in the Prospectus and this Statement of Additional
Information is based on tax law in effect on the date of the Prospectus and
this Statement of Additional Information. Those laws and regulations may be
changed by legislative, judicial, or administrative action, possible with
retroactive effect. State and local tax treatment of exempt-interest
dividends and potential capital gain distributions from regulated investment
companies may differ from the treatment under the Internal Revenue Code
described below. Potential purchasers of shares of the Trust are urged to
consult their tax advisers with specific reference to their own tax
circumstances as well as the consequences of federal, state and local tax
rules affecting an investment in the Trust.

|X|   Qualification as a Regulated  Investment Company.  The Trust has elected
to be  taxed as a  regulated  investment  company  under  Subchapter  M of the
Internal  Revenue  Code  of  1986,  as  amended.  As  a  regulated  investment
company,  the Trust is not subject to federal income tax on the portion of its
net  investment  income  (that  is,  taxable  interest,  dividends,  and other
taxable  ordinary  income,  net of expenses) and capital gain net income (that
is, the excess of net  long-term  capital  gains over net  short-term  capital
losses) that it distributes to shareholders.

      If the Trust qualifies as a "regulated investment company" under the
Internal Revenue Code, it will not be liable for federal income tax on
amounts it pays as dividends and other distributions. That qualification
enables the Trust to "pass through" its income and realized capital gains to
shareholders without having to pay tax on them. The Trust qualified as a
regulated investment company in its last fiscal year and intends to qualify
in future years, but reserves the right not to qualify. The Internal Revenue
Code contains a number of complex tests to determine whether the Trust
qualifies. The Trust might not meet those tests in a particular year. If it
does not qualify, the Trust will be treated for tax purposes as an ordinary
corporation and will receive no tax deduction for payments of dividends and
other distributions made to shareholders. In such an instance, all of the
Trust's dividends would be taxable to shareholders.

      To qualify as a regulated investment company, the Trust must distribute
at least 90% of its investment company taxable income (in brief, net
investment income and the excess of net short-term capital gain over net
long-term capital loss) and at least 90% of its net tax-exempt income for the
taxable year. The Trust must also satisfy certain other requirements of the
Internal Revenue Code, some of which are described below.  Distributions by
the Trust made during the taxable year or, under specified circumstances,
within twelve months after the close of the taxable year, will be considered
distributions of income and gains for the taxable year and will therefore
count toward satisfaction of the above-mentioned requirement.

      To qualify as a regulated investment company, the Trust must derive at
least 90% of its gross income from dividends, interest, certain payments with
respect to securities loans, gains from the sale or other disposition of
stock or securities or foreign currencies (to the extent such currency gains
are directly related to the regulated investment company's principal business
of investing in stock or securities) and certain other income.

      In addition to satisfying the requirements described above, the Trust
must satisfy an asset diversification test in order to qualify as a regulated
investment company.  Under that test, at the close of each quarter of the
Trust's taxable year, at least 50% of the value of the Trust's assets must
consist of cash and cash items (including receivables), U.S. government
securities, securities of other regulated investment companies, and
securities of other issuers. As to each of those issuers, the Trust must not
have invested more than 5% of the value of the Trust's total assets in
securities of each such issuer and the Trust must not hold more than 10% of
the outstanding voting securities of each such issuer. No more than 25% of
the value of its total assets may be invested in the securities of any one
issuer (other than U.S. government securities and securities of other
regulated investment companies), or in two or more issuers which the Trust
controls and which are engaged in the same or similar trades or businesses.
For purposes of this test, obligations issued or guaranteed by certain
agencies or instrumentalities of the U.S. government are treated as U.S.
government securities.

|X|   Excise Tax on Regulated Investment Companies. Under the Internal
Revenue Code, by December 31 each year, the Trust must distribute 98% of its
taxable investment income earned from January 1 through December 31 of that
year and 98% of its capital gains realized in the period from November 1 of
the prior year through October 31 of the current year. If it does not, the
Trust must pay an excise tax on the amounts not distributed. It is presently
anticipated that the Trust will meet those requirements. To meet this
requirement, in certain circumstances the Trust might be required to
liquidate portfolio investments to make sufficient distributions to avoid
excise tax liability. However, the Board of Trustees and the Manager might
determine in a particular year that it would be in the best interests of
shareholders for the Trust not to make such distributions at the required
levels and to pay the excise tax on the undistributed amounts. That would
reduce the amount of income or capital gains available for distribution to
shareholders.

|X|   Taxation of Fund Distributions. The Trust intends to qualify under the
Internal Revenue Code during each fiscal year to pay "exempt-interest
dividends" to its shareholders. To satisfy this qualification, at the end of
each quarter of its taxable year, at least 50% of the value of the Trust's
total assets consists of obligations as defined in Section 103(a) of the
Internal Revenue Code, as amended. Exempt-interest dividends that are derived
from net investment income earned by the Trust on municipal securities will
be excludable from gross income of shareholders for federal income tax
purposes. To the extent the Trust fails to qualify to pay exempt-interest
dividends in any given form, such dividends would be included in the gross
income of shareholders for federal income tax purposes.

      Net investment income includes the allocation of amounts of income from
the municipal securities in the Trust's portfolio that are free from federal
income taxes. This allocation will be made by the use of one designated
percentage applied uniformly to all income dividends paid during the Trust's
tax year. That designation will normally be made following the end of each
fiscal year as to income dividends paid in the prior year. The percentage of
income designated as tax-exempt may substantially differ from the percentage
of the Trust's income that was tax-exempt for a given period.

      A portion of the exempt-interest dividends paid by the Trust may be an
item of tax preference for shareholders subject to the federal alternative
minimum tax. The amount of any dividends attributable to tax preference items
for purposes of the alternative minimum tax will be identified when tax
information is distributed by the Trust.

      A shareholder receiving a dividend from income earned by the Trust from
one or more of the following sources must treat the dividend as ordinary
income in the computation of the shareholder's gross income, regardless of
whether the dividend is reinvested:
(1)   certain taxable temporary investments (such as certificates of deposit,
          repurchase agreements, commercial paper and obligations of the U.S.
          government, its agencies and instrumentalities);
(2)   income from securities loans;
(3)   income or gains from options or futures,
(4)   any net short-term capital gain; and
(5)   any market discount amortization on tax-exempt bonds.
      The Trust's dividends will not be eligible for the dividends-received
deduction for corporations. Shareholders receiving Social Security benefits
should be aware that exempt-interest dividends are a factor in determining
whether (and the extent to which) such benefits are subject to federal income
tax. Losses realized by shareholders on the redemption of Fund shares within
six months of purchase will be disallowed for federal income tax purposes to
the extent of exempt-interest dividends received on such shares.

      In any year in which the Trust qualifies as a regulated investment
company under the Internal Revenue Code, the Trust will also be exempt from
New York corporate income and franchise taxes. It will also be qualified
under New York law to pay exempt-interest dividends that will be exempt from
New York State and New York City personal income taxes. That exemption
applies to the extent that the Trust's distributions are attributable to
interest on New York municipal securities. Distributions from the Trust
attributable to income from sources other than New York municipal securities
and U.S. government obligations will generally be subject to New York State
and New York City personal income taxes as ordinary income.

      Distributions by the Trust from investment income and long- and
short-term capital gains will generally not be excludable from taxable net
investment income in determining New York corporate franchise tax and New
York City general corporation tax for corporate shareholders of the Trust.
Additionally, certain distributions paid to corporate shareholders of the
Trust may be includable in income subject to the New York alternative minimum
tax.

      The Trust may either retain or distribute to shareholders its net
capital gain for each taxable year.  The Trust currently intends to
distribute any such amounts.  If the net capital gain is distributed and
designated as a capital gain distribution, it will be taxable to shareholders
as a long-term capital gain and will be properly identified in reports sent
to shareholders in January of each year. Such treatment will apply no matter
how long the shareholder has held his or her shares or whether that gain was
recognized by the Trust before the shareholder acquired his or her shares.

      If the Trust elects to retain its net capital gain, the Trust will be
subject to tax on it at the 35% corporate tax rate.  If the Trust elects to
retain its net capital gain, it is expected that the Trust also will elect to
have shareholders of record on the last day of its taxable year treated as if
each received a distribution of their pro rata share of such gain. As a
result, each shareholder will be required to report his or her pro rata share
of such gain on their tax return as long-term capital gain, will receive a
refundable tax credit for his/her pro rata share of tax paid by the Trust on
the gain, and will increase the tax basis for his/her shares by an amount
equal to the deemed distribution less the tax credit.

      Distributions by the Trust will be treated in the manner described
above regardless of whether the distributions are paid in cash or reinvested
in additional shares of the Trust (or of another fund).  Shareholders
receiving a distribution in the form of additional shares will be treated as
receiving a distribution in an amount equal to the fair market value of the
shares received, determined as of the reinvestment date.


      The Trust will be required in certain cases to withhold 28% for
payments after December 31, 2003) of ordinary income dividends (not including
"exempt-interest dividends"), capital gains distributions (including
short-term and long-term) and the proceeds of the redemption of shares, paid
                        -
to any shareholder (1) who has failed to provide a correct taxpayer
                                                   -------
identification number or to properly certify that number when required, (2)
who is subject to backup withholding for failure to report the receipt of
interest or dividend income properly, or (3) who has failed to certify to the
Trust that the shareholder is not subject to backup withholding or is an
"exempt recipient" (such as a corporation). All income and any tax withheld
by the Trust is remitted by the Trust to the U.S. Treasury and is identified
in reports mailed to shareholders in January of each year.


|X|   Tax Effects of Redemptions of Shares. If a shareholder redeems all or a
portion of his/her shares, the shareholder will recognize a gain or loss on
       -
the redeemed shares in an amount equal to the difference between the proceeds
of the redeemed shares and the shareholder's adjusted tax basis in the
shares.  All or a portion of any loss recognized in that manner may be
disallowed if the shareholder purchases other shares of the Trust within 30
days before or after the redemption.

      In general, any gain or loss arising from the redemption of shares of
the Trust will be considered capital gain or loss, if the shares were held as
a capital asset. It will be long-term capital gain or loss if the shares were
held for more than one year.  However, any capital loss arising from the
redemption of shares held for six months or less will be treated as a
long-term capital loss to the extent of the amount of capital gain dividends
received on those shares. Special holding period rules under the Internal
Revenue Code apply in this case to determine the holding period of shares and
there are limits on the deductibility of capital losses in any year.

|X|   Foreign  Shareholders.  Under U.S.  tax law,  taxation of a  shareholder
who is a foreign person  (including,  but not limited to, a nonresident  alien
individual,  a foreign trust, a foreign estate,  a foreign  corporation,  or a
foreign partnership)  primarily depends on whether the foreign person's income
from the Trust is  effectively  connected  with the conduct of a U.S. trade or
business.   Typically,   ordinary   income   dividends   paid  (not  including
exempt-interest  dividends  paid by the  Trust)  from a  mutual  fund  are not
considered "effectively connected" income.

      Ordinary income dividends that are paid by the Trust (and are deemed
not "effectively connected income") to foreign persons will be subject to a
U.S. tax withheld by the Trust at a rate of 30%, provided the Trust obtains a
properly completed and signed Certificate of Foreign Status. The tax rate may
be reduced if the foreign person's country of residence has a tax treaty with
the U.S. allowing for a reduced tax rate on ordinary income dividends paid by
the Trust. All income and any tax withheld by the Trust is remitted by the
Trust to the U.S. Treasury and is identified in reports mailed to
shareholders in March of each year.

      If the ordinary income dividends from the Trust are effectively
                                                      ---
connected with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business, then the foreign
person may claim an exemption from the U.S. tax described above provided the
Trust obtains a properly completed and signed Certificate of Foreign Status.


      If the foreign person fails to provide a certification of his/her
foreign status, the Trust will be required to withhold U.S. tax at a rate of
28% on ordinary income dividends (not including "exempt-interest dividends"),
capital gains distributions (including short-term and long-term) and the
proceeds of the redemption of shares, paid to any foreign person. All income
and any tax withheld (in this situation) by the Trust is remitted by the
Trust to the U.S. Treasury and is identified in reports mailed to
shareholders in January of each year.


      The tax consequences to foreign persons entitled to claim the benefits
of an applicable tax treaty may be different from those described herein.
Foreign shareholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors or the U.S.
Internal Revenue Service with respect to the particular tax consequences to
them of an investment in the Trust, including the applicability of the U.S.
withholding taxes described above.

Dividend Reinvestment in Another Trust.  Direct shareholders of the Trust may
elect to reinvest all dividends and/or capital gains distributions in Class A
shares of any eligible fund listed above. To elect this option, the
shareholder must notify the Transfer Agent in writing and must have an
existing account in the fund selected for reinvestment.  Otherwise, the
shareholder first must obtain a prospectus for that fund and an application
from the Distributor to establish an account.  The investment will be made at
the close of business on the payable date of the dividend or distribution.

Additional Information About the Trust

The Distributor.  The Trust's shares are sold through dealers, brokers and
other financial institutions that have a sales agreement with the
Sub-Distributor.  The Distributor and the Sub-Distributor also distribute
shares of the other funds managed by the Manager or an affiliate.


The Transfer Agent.  Shareholder Services, Inc., the Trust's Transfer Agent,
is responsible for maintaining the Trust's shareholder registry and
shareholder accounting records, and for paying dividends and distributions to
shareholders of the Trust.  It also handles shareholder servicing and
administrative functions.  It serves as the Transfer Agent for an annual per
account fee.

The Custodian.  Citibank, N.A. is the custodian of the Trust's assets.  The
custodian's responsibilities include safeguarding and controlling the Trust's
portfolio securities and handling the delivery of such securities to and from
the Trust.  It is the practice of the Trust to deal with the custodian in a
manner uninfluenced by any banking relationship the custodian may have with
the Manager and its affiliates.  The Trust's cash balances with the custodian
in excess of $100,000 are not protected by federal deposit insurance.  Those
uninsured balances at times may be substantial.


Independent Auditors.  Deloitte & Touche LLP are the independent auditors of
the Trust.  They audit the Trust's financial statements and perform other
related audit services.  They also act as auditors for the Manager and OFI
and for certain other funds advised by the Manager and its affiliates.







                                    A-4

                                  Appendix A

                      Description of Securities Ratings

Below is a description of the two highest rating categories for Short Term
Debt and Long Term Debt by the "Nationally-Recognized Statistical Rating
Organizations" which the Manager evaluates in purchasing securities on behalf
of the Trust.  The ratings descriptions are based on information supplied by
the ratings organizations to subscribers.

SHORT TERM DEBT RATINGS.

Moody's Investors Service, Inc.  ("Moody's")

The following rating designations for commercial paper (defined by Moody's as
promissory obligations not having original maturity in excess of nine
months), are judged by Moody's to be investment grade, and indicate the
relative repayment capacity of rated issuers:

Prime-1: Superior capacity for repayment.  Capacity will normally be
evidenced by the following characteristics: (a) leading market positions in
well-established industries; (b) high rates of return on funds employed; (c)
conservative capitalization structure with moderate reliance on debt and
ample asset protection; (d) broad margins in earning coverage of fixed
financial charges and high internal cash generation; and (e) well-established
access to a range of financial markets and assured sources of alternate
liquidity.

Prime-2: Strong capacity for repayment.  This will normally be evidenced by
many of the characteristics cited above but to a lesser degree.  Earnings
trends and coverage ratios, while sound, will be more subject to variation.
Capitalization characteristics, while still appropriate, may be more affected
by external conditions.  Ample alternate liquidity is maintained.

      Moody's ratings for state and municipal short-term obligations are
designated "Moody's Investment Grade" ("MIG"). Short-term notes which have
demand features may also be designated as "VMIG."  These rating categories
are as follows:

MIG 1/VMIG 1: Denotes superior credit quality. Excellent protection is
afforded by established cash flows, highly reliable liquidity support or
demonstrated broad-based access to the market for refinancing.

MIG 2/VMIG 2: Denotes strong credit quality. Margins of protection are ample
although not as large as in the preceding group.

Standard & Poor's Ratings Services, a division of The McGraw-Hill  Companies,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inc. ("Standard and Poor's")
----------------------------

The following ratings by Standard and Poor's for commercial paper (defined by
Standard and Poor's as debt having an original maturity of no more than 365
days) assess the likelihood of payment:
A-1: Obligation is rated in the highest category. The obligor's capacity to
meet its financial commitment on the obligation is strong. Within this
category, a plus (+) sign designation indicates the obligor's capacity to
meet its financial obligation is extremely strong.

A-2: Obligation is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of
changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher
rating categories. However, the obligor's capacity to meet its financial
commitment on the obligation is satisfactory.

Standard and Poor's ratings for Municipal Notes due in 3 years or less:
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SP-1: Strong capacity to pay principal and interest. An issue determined to
possess a very strong capacity to pay debt service is given a (+) designation.

SP-2: Satisfactory capacity to pay principal and interest, with some
vulnerability to adverse financial and economic changes over the term of the
notes.

Standard and Poor's assigns "dual ratings" to all municipal debt issues that
have a demand or double feature as part of their provisions.  The first
rating addresses the likelihood of repayment of principal and interest as
due, and the second rating addresses only the demand feature.  With
short-term demand debt, Standard and Poor's note rating symbols are used with
the commercial paper symbols (for example, "SP-1+/A-1+").


Fitch, Inc. ("Fitch")
---------------------

Fitch assigns the following short-term ratings to debt obligations that are
payable on demand or have original maturities of generally up to three years,
including commercial paper, certificates of deposit, medium-term notes, and
municipal and investment notes:

F1: Highest credit quality. Strongest capacity for timely payment of
financial commitments. May have an added "+" to denote any exceptionally
strong credit feature.

F2: Good credit quality. A satisfactory capacity for timely payment of
financial commitments, but the margin of safety is not as great as in the
case of higher ratings.


Dominion Bond Rating Service Limited ("DBRS")

------------------------------------------------------------------------------


R-1: Short term debt rated "R-1 (high)" is of the highest credit quality,  and
indicates  an entity which  possesses  unquestioned  ability to repay  current
liabilities  as they  fall  due.  Entities  rated  in this  category  normally
maintain   strong   liquidity   positions,   conservative   debt   levels  and
profitability  which is both stable and above average.  Companies achieving an
"R-1  (high)"  rating are  normally  leaders in  structurally  sound  industry
segments with proven track records,  sustainable  positive  future results and
no  substantial   qualifying  negative  factors.  Given  the  extremely  tough
definition  which DBRS has established  for an "R-1 (high)",  few entities are
strong enough to achieve this rating.  Short term debt rated "R-1 (middle)" is
of  superior  credit  quality  and, in most  cases,  ratings in this  category
differ from "R-1 (high)"  credits to only a small degree.  Given the extremely
tough  definition  which  DBRS has for the "R-1  (high)"  category  (which few
companies  are  able to  achieve),  entities  rated  "R-1  (middle)"  are also
considered strong credits which typically  exemplify above average strength in
key areas of  consideration  for debt  protection.  Short term debt rated "R-1
(low)" is of  satisfactory  credit quality.  The overall  strength and outlook
for key liquidity,  debt and profitability ratios is not normally as favorable
as  with  higher  rating  categories,   but  these  considerations  are  still
respectable.  Any  qualifying  negative  factors  which  exist are  considered
manageable,  and the  entity  is  normally  of  sufficient  size to have  some
influence in its industry.

R-2:  Short term debt rated  "R-2" is of  adequate  credit  quality and within
the three subset grades  (high,  middle,  low),  debt  protection  ranges from
having reasonable  ability for timely repayment to a level which is considered
only just  adequate.  The  liquidity  and debt ratios of entities in the "R-2"
classification are not as strong as those in the "R-1" category,  and the past
and future  trend may suggest  some risk of  maintaining  the  strength of key
ratios  in  these  areas.   Alternative   sources  of  liquidity  support  are
considered  satisfactory;  however,  even the strongest liquidity support will
not improve the commercial paper rating of the issuer.  The size of the entity
may restrict  its  flexibility,  and its relative  position in the industry is
not typically as strong as the "R-1 credit".  Profitability  trends,  past and
future,  may be less  favorable,  earnings not as stable,  and there are often
negative  qualifying  factors  present  which  could also make the entity more
vulnerable to adverse changes in financial and economic conditions.


LONG TERM DEBT RATINGS.

These ratings are relevant for securities purchased by the Trust with a
remaining maturity of 397 days or less, or for rating issuers of short-term
obligations.


Moody's
-------

Bonds (including municipal bonds) are rated as follows:

Aaa: Judged to be the best quality. They carry the smallest degree of
investment risk and are generally referred to as "gilt edged."  Interest
payments are protected by a large or by an exceptionally stable margin and
principal is secure.  While the various protective elements are likely to
change, the changes that can be expected are most unlikely to impair the
fundamentally strong position of such issues.

Aa: Judged to be of high quality by all standards. Together with the "Aaa"
group, they comprise what are generally known as high-grade bonds.  They are
rated lower than the best bonds because margins of protection may not be as
large as with "Aaa" securities or fluctuation of protective elements may be
of greater amplitude or there may be other elements present which make the
long-term risk appear somewhat larger than that of "Aaa" securities.

      Moody's applies numerical modifiers "1", "2" and "3" in its "Aa" rating
classification. The modifier "1" indicates that the obligation ranks in the
higher end of its generic rating category; the modifier "2" indicates a
mid-range ranking; and the modifier "3" indicates a ranking in the lower end
of that generic rating category.


Standard and Poor's
-------------------

Bonds (including municipal bonds maturing beyond 3 years) are rated as
follows:

AAA: Bonds rated "AAA" have the highest rating assigned by Standard & Poor's.
The obligor's capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is
extremely strong.

AA: Bonds rated "AA" differ from the highest rated obligations only in small
degree. A strong capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation
is very strong.


Fitch
-----

AAA: Highest Credit Quality. "AAA" ratings denote the lowest expectation of
credit risk. They are assigned only in the case of exceptionally strong
capacity for timely payment of financial commitments. This capacity is highly
unlikely to be adversely affected by foreseeable events.

AA: Very High Credit Quality. "AA" ratings denote a very low expectation of
credit risk. They indicate a very strong capacity for timely payment of
financial commitments. This capacity is not significantly vulnerable to
foreseeable events.

      Because bonds rated in the "AAA" and "AA" categories are not
significantly vulnerable to foreseeable future developments, short-term debt
of these issuers is generally rated "F-1+."








                                    B-1

                                  Appendix B

                   Municipal Bond Industry Classifications

Adult Living Facilities
Airlines
Bond Anticipation Notes
Education
Electric Utilities
Gas Utilities
General Obligation
Higher Education
Highways/Railways
Hospital/Healthcare
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Manufacturing, Durable Goods
Manufacturing, Non Durable Goods
Marine/Aviation Facilities
Multi-Family Housing
Municipal Leases
Non Profit Organization
Paper, Containers & Packaging
Parking Fee Revenue
Pollution Control
Resource Recovery
Revenue Anticipation Notes
Sales Tax Revenue
Sewer Utilities
Single Family Housing
Special Assessment
Special Tax
Sports Facility Revenue
Student Loans
Tax Anticipation Notes
Tax & Revenue Anticipation Notes
Telephone Utilities
Tobacco
Water Utilities














------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Centennial New York Tax Exempt Trust
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Investment Advisor and Distributor
Centennial Asset Management Corporation
6803 South Tucson Way
Centennial, Colorado 80112

Sub-Distributor

OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc.
P.O. Box 5254
Denver, Colorado 80217-5254


Transfer Agent

Shareholder Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 5143
Denver, Colorado 80217-5143

1.800.525.9310

Custodian of Portfolio Securities

Citibank, N.A.
111 Wall Street
New York, New York 10005


Independent Auditors
Deloitte & Touche LLP
555 Seventeenth Street
Denver, Colorado 80202


Counsel to the Trust

Myer, Swanson, Adams & Wolf, P.C.
1600 Broadway
Denver, Colorado 80202

Counsel to the Independent Trustees

Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, LLP
1675 Broadway
New York, New York 10019


PX0780.001.0803


--------

1 Mr. Grabish is a Trustee of Centennial Government Trust, Centennial
California Tax Exempt Trust, Centennial Money Market Trust, Centennial New
York Tax Exempt Trust and Centennial Tax Exempt Trust and is a Managing
General Partner of Centennial America Fund, L.P. Mrs. Hamilton and Mr. Malone
are not Trustees of Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Fund.
2. In  accordance  with Rule 12b-1 of the  Investment  Company  Act,  the term
"Independent  Trustees" in this Statement of Additional  Information refers to
those  Trustees who are not  "interested  persons" of the Trust and who do not
have any direct or indirect  financial  interest in the  operation of the plan
or any agreement under the plan.

                     CENTENNIAL NEW YORK TAX EXEMPT TRUST

                                  FORM N-1A

                                    PART C

                              OTHER INFORMATION


Item 23.  Exhibits
------------------

(a)   (i)  Amended  Declaration  of Trust dated  February 1, 1990:  Previously
filed  with  Post-Effective  Amendment  No.  3  (1/30/90),  and  refiled  with
Registrant's  Post-Effective  Amendment No. 9 (11/1/94),  pursuant to Item 102
of Regulation S-T, and incorporated herein by reference.

      (ii)  Amendment  to the  Declaration  of Trust dated  February 23, 2001:
Previously   filed  with   Registrant's   Post  Effective   Amendment  No.  19
(10/25/01), and incorporated herein by reference.


      (iii)  Amendment No 2 to the Amended  Declaration  of Trust dated August
27, 2002:  Previously filed with Registrant's Post Effective  Amendment No. 20
(10/18/02), and incorporated herein by reference.


(b)   By-Laws,  as amended and restated  through October 24, 2000:  Previously
filed with  Registrant's  Post  Effective  Amendment  No. 19  (10/25/01),  and
incorporated herein by reference.

(c)   Specimen Share Certificate:   Previously  filed with  Registrant's  Post
Effective Amendment No. 19 (10/25/01), and incorporated herein by reference.

(d)   Investment  Advisory Agreement dated October 22, 1990:  Previously filed
with  Registrant's  Post-Effective  Amendment No. 5  (10/29/90),  refiled with
Registrant's  Post-Effective  Amendment No. 9 (11/1/94),  pursuant to Item 102
of Regulation S-T and incorporated herein by reference.

(e)   (i)   General   Distributor's   Agreement  Centennial  Asset  Management
      Corporation  dated October 13, 1992:  Previously filed with Registrant's
      Post-Effective  Amendment No. 8 (10/28/93),  and incorporated  herein by
      reference.

      (ii)  Sub-Distributor's  Agreement  between  Centennial Asset Management
      Corporation and OppenheimerFunds  Distributor,  Inc. dated May 28, 1993:
      Previously  filed  with  Registrant's  Post-Effective  Amendment  No.  8
      (10/28/93), and incorporated herein by reference.

      (iii) Form  of  Dealer   Agreement  of   Centennial   Asset   Management
      Corporation  (formerly  Centennial  Capital   Corporation):   Previously
      filed  with  Post-Effective  Amendment  No. 6 of  Centennial  Government
      Trust  (Reg.  No.  2-75912),  (10/26/84),  and  incorporated  herein  by
      reference.

(f)   Form of Deferred Compensation Agreement for Disinterested
Trustees/Directors:  Filed with Post-Effective Amendment No. 40 to the
Registration Statement of Oppenheimer High Yield Fund (Reg. No. 2-62076),
(10/27/98), and incorporated herein by reference.

(g)   Global   Custodial   Services   Agreement  dated  May  3,  2001  between
Registrant  and  Citibank,   N.A.:   Previously   filed  with   Post-Effective
Amendment  No. 33 to the  Registration  Statement of  Centennial  Money Market
Trust  (Reg.  No.  2-65245),  October 25,  2001,  and  incorporated  herein by
reference.

(h)   Not applicable.

(i)   Opinion and Consent of Counsel  dated  September  22,  1987:  Previously
filed with  Registrant's  Pre-Effective  Amendment No. 1  (11/28/88),  refiled
with Registrant's  Post-Effective Amendment No. 9 (11/1/94),  pursuant to Item
102 of Regulation S-T and incorporated herein by reference.

(j)   Independent Auditors' Consent: Filed herewith.

(k)   Not applicable.

(l)   Investment letter from Oppenheimer  Management Corporation to Registrant
dated  December  5, 1988:  Previously  filed with  Registrant's  Pre-Effective
Amendment  No. 1  (11/28/88),  and refiled  with  Registrant's  Post-Effective
Amendment  No.  9,  (11/1/94)  pursuant  to  Item  102 of  Regulation  S-T and
incorporated herein by reference.

(m)   Service Plan and  Agreement  between  Registrant  and  Centennial  Asset
Management  Corporation  under Rule 12b-1 dated  August 24,  1993:  Previously
filed  with  Registrant's  Post-Effective  Amendment  No. 8,  (10/28/93),  and
incorporated herein by reference.


(n)   Oppenheimer  Funds Multiple Class Plan under Rule 18f-3 updated  through
10/22/02:  Previously  filed  with  Post-Effective  Amendment  No.  22 to  the
Registration  Statement of  Oppenheimer  Global Growth & Income Fund (Reg. No.
33-33799), 11/20/02, and incorporated herein by reference.


(o)       Powers of Attorney for all Trustees and Officers except for Mr.
Armstrong, Mr. Bowen, Mr. Cameron, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Malone, Mr.
Grabish and Mrs. Hamilton: Previously filed with Pre-Effective Amendment No.
2 to the Registration Statement of Oppenheimer Select Managers (Reg. No.
333-49774), (2/8/01), and incorporated herein by reference.

Powers of Attorney for Mr. Armstrong, Mr. Bowen, Mr. Cameron, Mr. Marshall
and Mr. Grabish: Previously filed with Registrant's Post-Effective Amendment
No. 18 (08/24/01), and incorporated herein by reference.

Power of Attorney for Mr. Murphy: Previously filed with Registrant's Post
Effective Amendment No. 19 (10/25/01), and incorporated herein by reference.

Powers of Attorney for Beverly L.  Hamilton  and Robert J. Malone:  Previously
filed with  Post-Effective  Amendment No. 46 to the Registration  Statement of
Oppenheimer  High Yield Fund (Reg. No. 2-62076),  and  incorporated  herein by
reference.


(p)   Amended and Restated Code of Ethics of the  Oppenheimer  Funds dated May
15, 2002 under Rule 17j-1 of the  Investment  Company Act of 1940:  Previously
filed with  Post-Effective  Amendment No. 29 to the Registration  Statement of
Oppenheimer  Discovery  Fund (Reg. No.  33-371),  11/21/02,  and  incorporated
herein by reference.



Item 24.  Persons Controlled by or Under Common Control with the Fund
---------------------------------------------------------------------

None.

Item 25.  Indemnification
-------------------------

Reference is made to the provisions of Article Seven of Registrant's Amended
and Restated Declaration of Trust filed as Exhibit 23(a) to this Registration
Statement, and incorporated herein by reference.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
of 1933 may be permitted to trustees, officers and controlling persons of
Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions or otherwise, Registrant has
been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission
such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities
Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for
indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by
Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a trustee, officer or controlling
person of Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or
proceeding) is asserted by such trustee, officer or controlling person,
Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been
settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against
public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and will be governed
by the final adjudication of such issue.

Item 26.  Business and Other Connections of Investment Adviser
--------  ----------------------------------------------------

(a)   Centennial Asset Management Corporation is the investment adviser of
the Registrant; it and certain subsidiaries and affiliates act in the same
capacity to other registered investment companies as described in Parts A and
B hereof and listed in Item 26(b) below.

(b)   There is set forth below information as to any other business,
profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature in which each
officer and director of Centennial Asset Management Corporation is, or at any
time during the past two fiscal years has been, engaged for his/her own
account or in the capacity of director, officer, employee, partner or trustee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name and Current Position
with Centennial Asset
Management Corporation       Other Business and Connections During the Past Two
                             Years
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert Agan,                 Vice President of OppenheimerFunds Distributor,
Vice President               Inc., Shareholder Services, Inc. and OFI Private
                             Investments, Inc.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Janette Aprilante,           As of January 2002: Vice President and Secretary
Secretary                    of OppenheimerFunds, Inc.; Secretary of

                             OppenheimerFunds, Distributor, Inc., Oppenheimer
                             Partnership Holdings, Inc., Oppenheimer Real Asset
                             Management, Inc., Shareholder Financial Services,
                             Inc., Shareholder Services, Inc.; Assistant
                             Secretary of HarbourView Asset Management
                             Corporation, OFI Private Investments, Inc.,
                             Oppenheimer Trust Company and OFI Institutional
                             Asset Management, Inc.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Katherine P. Feld,           Vice President of OppenheimerFunds, Inc.,
Director, Vice President &   OppenheimerFunds, Distributor, Inc. and
Assistant Secretary          Oppenheimer Real Asset Management, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Murphy,                 Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director                     Director of OppenheimerFunds, Inc.; Director of

                             OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc., President of
                             HarbourView Asset Management Corporation, Trinity
                             Investments Management Corporation, OFI Private
                             Investments, Inc., OFI Institutional Asset
                             Management, Inc. and Tremont Advisers, Inc.;
                             President and Director of Oppenheimer Acquisition
                             Corp., Oppenheimer Partnership Holdings, Inc.,
                             Oppenheimer Real Asset Management, Inc.; Chairman
                             and Director of Shareholder Financial Services,
                             Inc. and Shareholder Services, Inc.; Executive
                             Vice President of MassMutual Life Insurance
                             Company; director of DLB Acquisition Corp.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Raymond C. Olson,            Assistant Vice President of OppenheimerFunds,
Treasurer                    Inc.; Assistant Vice President and Treasurer of
                             OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
James H. Ruff,               Executive Vice President of OppenheimerFunds, Inc.
President & Director         and OFI Private Investments, Inc.; President and
                             director of OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark S. Vandehey,            Vice President of OppenheimerFunds, Inc.,
Vice President               OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. and Shareholder
                             Services, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert G. Zack               General Counsel and Director of OppenheimerFunds
General Counsel,             Distributor, Inc.; Senior Vice President and

                             General Counsel of HarbourView Asset Management
                             Corporation and OFI Institutional Asset
                             Management, Inc.; Senior Vice President, General
                             Counsel and Director of Shareholder Financial
                             Services, Inc., Shareholder Services, Inc., OFI
                             Private Investments, Inc. and Oppenheimer Trust
                             Company; Vice President and Director of
                             Oppenheimer Partnership Holdings, Inc.; Secretary
                             of OAC Acquisition Corp.; Director and Assistant
                             Secretary of OppenheimerFunds International Ltd.;
                             Director of Oppenheimer Real Asset Management,
                             Inc.; Senior Vice President and General Counsel of
                             OppenheimerFunds, Inc.; Vice President of
                             OppenheimerFunds Legacy Program.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Oppenheimer Funds include the following:

Centennial America Fund, L.P.
Centennial California Tax Exempt Trust
Centennial Government Trust
Centennial Money Market Trust
Centennial New York Tax Exempt Trust
Centennial Tax Exempt Trust

Limited Term New York Municipal Fund (Rochester Portfolio Series)
Oppenheimer AMT-Free New York Municipals
Oppenheimer Bond Fund (a series of Oppenheimer Integrity Funds)
Oppenheimer California Municipal Fund
Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Fund
Oppenheimer Capital Income Fund
Oppenheimer Capital Preservation Fund
Oppenheimer Cash Reserves
Oppenheimer Champion Income Fund
Oppenheimer Convertible Securities Fund (Bond Fund Series)
Oppenheimer Developing Markets Fund
Oppenheimer Discovery Fund
Oppenheimer Emerging Growth Fund
Oppenheimer Emerging Technologies Fund
Oppenheimer Enterprise Fund
Oppenheimer Europe Fund
Oppenheimer Global Fund
Oppenheimer Global Opportunities Fund
Oppenheimer Gold & Special Minerals Fund
Oppenheimer Growth Fund
Oppenheimer High Yield Fund
Oppenheimer International Bond Fund
Oppenheimer International Growth Fund
Oppenheimer International Small Company Fund
Oppenheimer Limited-Term Government Fund
Oppenheimer  Limited Term Municipal  Fund (a series of  Oppenheimer  Municipal
Fund)
Oppenheimer Main Street Fund (a series of Oppenheimer Main Street Funds, Inc.)
Oppenheimer Main Street Opportunity Fund
Oppenheimer Main Street Small Cap Fund
Oppenheimer MidCap Fund
Oppenheimer Money Market Fund, Inc.
Oppenheimer Multi Cap Value Fund
Oppenheimer Multiple Strategies Fund
Oppenheimer Multi-Sector Income Trust
Oppenheimer Multi-State Municipal Trust (3 series):

     Oppenheimer New Jersey Municipal Fund
     Oppenheimer Pennsylvania Municipal Fund
     Oppenheimer Rochester National Municipals

Oppenheimer Municipal Bond Fund
Oppenheimer Principal Protected Trust (1 series)
      Oppenheimer Prinicipal Protected Main Street Fund
Oppenheimer Quest Capital Value Fund, Inc.
Oppenheimer Quest For Value Funds (3 series)

     Oppenheimer Quest Balanced Value Fund
     Oppenheimer Quest Opportunity Value Fund
     Oppenheimer Small Cap Value Fund
Oppenheimer Quest Global Value Fund, Inc.
Oppenheimer Quest Value Fund, Inc.
Oppenheimer Real Asset Fund
Oppenheimer Real Estate Fund
Oppenheimer Select Managers (6 series):
     Gartmore Millennium Growth Fund II
     Jennison Growth Fund
     Mercury Advisors Focus Growth Fund
     Mercury Advisors S&P 500 Index Fund
     QM Active Balanced Fund
     Salomon Brothers All Cap Fund
Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Fund
Oppenheimer Series Fund, Inc. (2 series):
     Oppenheimer Disciplined Allocation Fund
     Oppenheimer Value Fund

Oppenheimer Strategic Income Fund
Oppenheimer Total Return Bond Fund
Oppenheimer Total Return Fund, Inc.
Oppenheimer Tremont Market Neutral Fund LLC
Oppenheimer Tremont Opportunity Fund LLC
Oppenheimer Trinity Core Fund
Oppenheimer Trinity Large Cap Growth Fund
Oppenheimer Trinity Value Fund
Oppenheimer U.S. Government Trust
Oppenheimer Variable Account Funds (11 series):
     Oppenheimer Aggressive Growth Fund/VA
     Oppenheimer Bond Fund/VA
     Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Fund/VA
     Oppenheimer Global Securities Fund/VA
     Oppenheimer High Income Fund/VA
     Oppenheimer Main Street Fund/VA
     Oppenheimer Main Street Small Cap Fund/VA
     Oppenheimer Money Fund/VA
     Oppenheimer Multiple Strategies Fund/VA
     Oppenheimer Strategic Bond Fund/VA
     Oppenheimer Value Fund/VA
Panorama Series Fund, Inc. (4 series):
     Growth Portfolio
     Government Securities Portfolio
     Oppenheimer International Growth Fund/VA
     Total Return Portfolio

Rochester Fund Municipals


The address of the  Oppenheimer  funds  listed  above,  Shareholder  Financial
Services,  Inc.,  Shareholder  Services,  Inc.,   OppenheimerFunds   Services,
Centennial   Asset   Management   Corporation,   Centennial   Capital   Corp.,
Oppenheimer Real Asset Management,  Inc. and  OppenheimerFunds  Legacy Program
is 6803 South Tucson Way, Centennial, Colorado 80112-3924.

The address of OppenheimerFunds,  Inc.,  OppenheimerFunds  Distributor,  Inc.,
HarbourView Asset Management  Corporation,  Oppenheimer  Partnership Holdings,
Inc.,  Oppenheimer  Acquisition  Corp.,  OFI Private  Investments,  Inc.,  OFI
Institutional  Asset  Management,  Inc. and  Oppenheimer  Trust Company is 498
Seventh Avenue, New York, New York 10018.


The address of Tremont  Advisers,  Inc. is 555 Theodore  Fremd  Avenue,  Suite
206-C, Rye, New York 10580.

The  address  of  OppenheimerFunds  International  Ltd.  is Bloc C, Irish Life
Center, Lower Abbey Street, Dublin 1, Ireland.

The address of Trinity Investment  Management  Corporation is 301 North Spring
Street, Bellefonte, Pennsylvania 16823.

Item 27.  Principal Underwriter
-------   ---------------------

(a)   Centennial Asset Management Corporation is the Distributor of
Registrant's shares. It is also the Distributor of each of the other
registered open-end investment companies for which Centennial Asset
Management Corporation is the investment adviser, as described in Part A and
B of this Registration Statement and listed in Item 26(b) above.

(b)   The directors and officers of the Registrant's principal underwriter
are:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name & Principal                                          Position(s) and
Business Address     Position(s) & Office(s) with         Office(s)
                     Underwriter                          with Registrant
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Agan(1)       Vice President                       None
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Janette Aprilante(1) Secretary                            None
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Katherine P. Feld(1) Director, Vice President &           Assistant Secretary
                     Assistant Secretary
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John V. Murphy(1)    Director                             President
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Raymond C. Olson(2)  Treasurer                            None
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
James H. Ruff(1)     President & Director                 None
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Vandehey(2)     Vice President                       None
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert G. Zack(1)    General Counsel                      Vice President &
                                                          Secretary
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


(1)498 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10018
(2)6803 South Tucson Way, Centennial, CO 80112-3924


(c)   Not applicable.

Item 28. Location of Accounts and Records
-----------------------------------------


The  accounts,  books  and  other  documents  required  to  be  maintained  by
Registrant  pursuant to Section  31(a) of the  Investment  Company Act of 1940
and rules  promulgated  thereunder are in the possession of  OppenheimerFunds,
Inc. at its offices at 6803 South Tucson Way, Centennial, Colorado 80112-3924.


Item 29. Management Services
----------------------------

Not applicable

Item 30. Undertakings
---------------------

Not applicable.








                                  SIGNATURES


Pursuant  to  the  requirements  of the  Securities  Act of  1933  and/or  the
Investment  Company Act of 1940,  the  Registrant  certifies that it meets all
the requirements for effectiveness of this Registration  Statement pursuant to
Rule  485(b)  under  the  Securities  Act of 1933  and has  duly  caused  this
Registration  Statement  to be  signed  on  its  behalf  by  the  undersigned,
thereunto  duly  authorized,  in the City of New York and State of New York on
the on the 21st day of August, 2003.


                                          CENTENNIAL NEW YORK TAX EXEMPT TRUST


                                                      By:  /s/ John V. Murphy*
                                 ---------------------------------------------
                                                  John V. Murphy, President, &
                                                   Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration
Statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities on
the dates indicated:

Signatures                    Title                         Date
----------                    -----                         ----

/s/ James C. Swain*           Chairman,

----------------------------------                          & Trustee
August 21, 2003
James C. Swain


/s/ John V. Murphy*           President & Principal

----------------------------------                          Executive Officer
August 21, 2003
John V. Murphy


/s/ Brian W. Wixted*          Treasurer & Principal         August 21, 2003
----------------------------------                          Financial and
Brian W. Wixted               Accounting Officer

/s/ William L. Armstrong *    Vice Chairman & Trustee       August 21, 2003

----------------------------------
William L. Armstrong


/s/ Robert G. Avis*           Trustee                       August 21, 2003

----------------------------------
Robert G. Avis


/s/ George Bowen*             Trustee                       August 21, 2003

----------------------------------
George Bowen


s/ Edward L. Cameron *        Trustee                       August 21, 2003

----------------------------------
Edward L. Cameron


/s/ Jon S. Fossel*            Trustee                       August 21, 2003

----------------------------------
Jon S. Fossel


/s/ Sam Freedman*             Trustee                       August 21, 2003

----------------------------------
Sam Freedman


/s/Richard F. Grabish*        Trustee                       August 21, 2003

----------------------------------
Richard F. Grabish


/s/ Beverly L. Hamilton*      Trustee                       August 21, 2003

----------------------------------
Beverly L. Hamilton


/s/ Robert J. Malone*         Trustee                       August 21, 2003

----------------------------------
Robert J. Malone


/s/ F. William Marshall, Jr.  Trustee                       August 21, 2003

----------------------------------
F. William Marshall, Jr.


*By: /s/ Robert G. Zack
-----------------------------------------
Robert G. Zack, Attorney-in-Fact






                     CENTENNIAL NEW YORK TAX EXEMPT TRUST

                     Registration Statement No. 33-23494


                       Post-Effective Amendment No. 21


                                EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit No.                  Description
-----------                  -----------


23(j)                    Independent Auditors' Consent
















Centennial/780/2003/780ptc_03(b).doc