XML 67 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2012
Fair Value of Financial Instruments  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Note 13—Fair Value of Financial Instruments

        Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A three level hierarchy has been established for valuing assets and liabilities based on how transparent (observable) the inputs are that are used to determine fair value, with the inputs considered most observable categorized as Level 1 and those that are the least observable categorized as Level 3. Hierarchy levels are defined as follows:

Level 1:   Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities;

Level 2:

 

Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and

Level 3:

 

Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market data which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

        The following table presents information about the Company's assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 and indicate the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized to determine such values. For some assets, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. When this is the case, the asset is categorized based on the level of the most significant input to the fair value measurement. The Company's assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and considers factors specific to the assets being valued.

 
  September 30, 2012  
 
  Fair Value Measurements Using    
 
 
  Total Fair
Value
 
(in thousands)
  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3  

Assets:

                         

Interest rate cap

  $   $ 22   $   $ 22  
                   

Total assets

  $   $ 22   $   $ 22  
                   

Liabilities:

                         

Interest rate swaps

  $   $ 7,419   $   $ 7,419  
                   

Total liabilities

  $   $ 7,419   $   $ 7,419  
                   

 

 
  December 31, 2011  
 
  Fair Value Measurements Using    
 
 
  Total Fair
Value
 
(in thousands)
  Level 1   Level 2   Level 3  

Assets:

                         

Equity securities, trading

  $ 12,369   $   $   $ 12,369  

Equity securities, available-for-sale

    12,099             12,099  

Interest rate cap

        432         432  

Natural gas hedge

        4,050         4,050  
                   

Total assets

  $ 24,468   $ 4,482   $   $ 28,950  
                   

Liabilities:

                         

Interest rate swaps

  $   $ 5,683   $   $ 5,683  
                   

Total liabilities

  $   $ 5,683   $   $ 5,683  
                   

        Below is a summary of the Company's valuation techniques for Level 1 and Level 2 financial assets and liabilities:

        Equity securities—Changes in the fair value of trading securities are recorded in other income (loss) and determined using observable market prices. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, a loss of $12.4 million was recorded related to trading securities held at the reporting date. Realized losses of $1.6 million on the sale of available-for-sale securities were recorded in other income (loss) during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and determined using the specific identification method.

        Interest rate cap—The fair value of the interest rate cap was determined using quoted dealer prices for similar contracts in active over-the-counter markets.

        Natural gas hedge—The fair value of the natural gas hedge was determined using quoted dealer prices for similar contracts in active over-the-counter markets.

        Interest rate swaps—The fair value of interest rate swaps were determined using quoted dealer prices for similar contracts in active over-the-counter markets.

        The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value for which the fair value option was not elected:

        Cash and cash equivalents, receivables and accounts payable—The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet approximate fair value.

        Debt—Debt associated with the Company's 2011 term loan A and term loan B in the amount of $854.7 million and $1.273 billion, respectively, at September 30, 2012 and $894.8 million and $1.333 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2011 is carried at cost. Debt associated with the Company's revolving credit facility in the amount of $158.6 million at September 30, 2012 and $10.0 million at December 31, 2011 is carried at cost. The estimated fair value of the Company's term loan A, term loan B and Revolver was $848.0 million, $1.267 billion and $147.5 million at September 30, 2012, respectively, and $880.6 million, $1.319 billion and $9.7 million at December 31, 2011, respectively, based on similar transactions and yields in an active market for similarly rated debt (Level 2).