XML 43 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A three-level hierarchy has been established for valuing assets and liabilities based on how transparent (observable) the inputs are that are used to determine fair value, with the inputs considered most observable categorized as Level 1 and those that are the least observable categorized as Level 3. Hierarchy levels are defined as follows:
Level 1:
 
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities;
Level 2:
 
Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and
Level 3:
 
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market data which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The Company had no assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2015 or December 31, 2014. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value for which the fair value option was not elected:
Cash and cash equivalents, receivables and accounts payable—The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet approximate fair value. Cash equivalents represent highly-liquid instruments and constitute Level 1 fair value measurements.
Debt—All of the Company's outstanding debt is carried at cost. There were no borrowings outstanding under the revolver at March 31, 2015 or December 31, 2014. The estimated fair value of the Company's debt is based on observable market data (Level 2). The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company's debt (excluding capital lease obligations, equipment financing agreements and debt discount and debt issuance costs on the revolver of $1.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively, as of March 31, 2015 and $1.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2014) are presented below (in thousands):

 
March 31, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair Value
2011 term loan B (1)
$
953,405

 
$
591,798

 
$
951,583

 
$
755,936

9.50% senior secured notes (2)
$
950,318

 
$
579,575

 
$
949,537

 
$
759,025

11.0%/12.0% senior secured PIK toggle notes (3)
$
342,891

 
$
33,250

 
$
342,631

 
$
113,750

9.875% senior notes (4)
$
378,951

 
$
22,310

 
$
378,664

 
$
77,600

8.50% senior notes (5)
$
377,062

 
$
22,038

 
$
442,481

 
$
85,500

_______________________________________________________________________________

(1)
Net of debt discount and debt issuance costs of $11.1 million and $13.7 million, respectively, as of March 31, 2015 and $11.9 million and $14.7 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2014.
(2)
Net of debt discount and debt issuance costs of $2.6 million and $17.1 million, respectively, as of March 31, 2015 and $2.7 million and $17.8 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2014.
(3)
Net of debt issuance costs of $7.1 million and $7.4 million as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
(4)
Net of debt discount and debt issuance costs of $2.1 million and $6.9 million, respectively, as of March 31, 2015 and $2.2 million and $7.1 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2014.
(5)
Net of debt issuance costs of $6.2 million and $7.5 million as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.