form10q_iliac-093008

				Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
				2008		2007		2008		2007
Revenues:
	Net investment income		$	263.9	$	264.0	$	800.3	$	785.4
	Fee income			154.8		184.4		496.5		571.2
	Premiums			16.3		9.5		31.4		39.9
	Broker-dealer commission revenue			152.2		140.9		502.7		365.6
	Net realized capital losses			(124.7)		(4.7)		(277.6)		(6.4)
	Other income			6.8		7.3		14.8		19.7
Total revenue				469.3		601.4		1,568.1		1,775.4
Benefits and expenses:
	Interest credited and other benefits
		to contractowners		500.5		176.2		827.1		530.3
	Operating expenses			209.3		157.3		544.2		467.8
	Broker-dealer commission expense			152.2		140.9		502.7		365.6
	Net amortization of deferred policy acquisition
		costs and value of business acquired		(1.8)		39.3		157.5		104.4
	Interest expense			0.4		1.9		1.2		5.0
Total benefits and expenses				860.6		515.6		2,032.7		1,473.1
(Loss) income before income taxes				(391.3)		85.8		(464.6)		302.3
Income tax (benefit) expense				(25.1)		22.3		(77.0)		84.4
Net (loss) income			$	(366.2)	$	63.5	$	(387.6)	$	217.9

				As of		As of
				September 30,		December 31,
				2008		2007
				(Unaudited)
Assets
Investments:
	Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, at fair value
		(amortized cost of $13,576.2 at 2008 and $13,374.7 at 2007)	$	12,474.6	$	13,316.3
	Equity securities, available-for-sale, at fair value
		(cost of $358.7 at 2008 and $440.1 at 2007)		317.5		446.4
	Short-term investments			57.6		167.9
	Mortgage loans on real estate			2,090.8		2,089.4
	Policy loans			263.8		273.4
	Limited partnerships/corporations			703.6		636.1
	Other investments			67.9		34.8
	Securities pledged (amortized cost of $1,287.0 at 2008
		and $940.2 at 2007)		1,268.1		934.1
Total investments				17,243.9		17,898.4
Cash and cash equivalents				399.5		252.3
Short-term investments under securities loan agreement,
	including collateral delivered			663.5		202.7
Accrued investment income				207.4		168.3
Receivable for securities sold				180.5		5.6
Reinsurance recoverable				2,520.4		2,594.4
Deferred policy acquisition costs				812.3		728.6
Value of business acquired				1,667.1		1,253.2
Notes receivable from affiliate				175.0		175.0
Loan to affiliate				481.4		-
Due from affiliates				33.9		10.6
Current income tax recoverable				11.2		-
Property and equipment				118.9		147.4
Other assets				92.6		112.1
Assets held in separate accounts				41,024.8		48,091.2
Total assets			$	65,632.4	$	71,639.8

				As of		As of
				September 30,		December 31,
				2008		2007
				(Unaudited)
Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity
Future policy benefits and claims reserves			$	20,198.1	$	18,569.1
Payable for securities purchased				143.4		0.2
Payables under securities loan agreement				602.2		183.9
Notes payable				9.9		9.9
Borrowed money				655.2		738.4
Due to affiliates				132.3		130.7
Current income taxes				-		56.8
Deferred income taxes				41.1		275.9
Other liabilities				571.7		542.7
Liabilities related to separate accounts				41,024.8		48,091.2
Total liabilities				63,378.7		68,598.8

Shareholder's equity:
	Common stock (100,000 shares authorized, 55,000
		issued and outstanding; $50 per share value)		2.8		2.8
	Additional paid-in capital			4,160.7		4,159.3
	Accumulated other comprehensive loss			(434.9)		(33.8)
	Retained earnings (deficit)			(1,474.9)		(1,087.3)
Total shareholder's equity				2,253.7		3,041.0
Total liabilities and shareholder's equity			$	65,632.4	$	71,639.8

									Accumulated
							Additional		Other		Retained		Total
					Common		Paid-In		Comprehensive		Earnings		Shareholder's
					Stock		Capital		Loss		(Deficit)		Equity

Balance at December 31, 2006					$	2.8	$	4,299.5	$	(14.0)	$	(1,274.6)	$	3,013.7
	Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles					-		-		-		(31.1)		(31.1)
Balance at January 1, 2007						2.8		4,299.5		(14.0)		(1,305.7)		2,982.6
	Comprehensive income:
		Net income				-		-		-		217.9		217.9
		Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
			Change in net unrealized capital gains
				(losses) on securities ($(39.4) pretax)
				including tax valuation allowance of $(51.2)		-		-		(76.8)		-		(76.8)
			Pension liability ($(0.9) pretax)			-		-		(0.6)		-		(0.6)
	Total comprehensive income													140.5
	Employee share-based payments					-		4.3		-		-		4.3
Balance at September 30, 2007 (Restated)					$	2.8	$	4,303.8	$	(91.4)	$	(1,087.8)	$	3,127.4

Balance at December 31, 2007					$	2.8	$	4,159.3	$	(33.8)	$	(1,087.3)	$	3,041.0
	Comprehensive loss:
		Net loss				-		-		-		(387.6)		(387.6)
		Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
			Change in net unrealized capital gains (losses)
				on securities ($(626.3) pretax), including
				tax valuation allowance of $6.4		-		-		(400.7)		-		(400.7)
			Pension liability ($(0.6) pretax)			-		-		(0.4)		-		(0.4)
	Total comprehensive loss													(788.7)
	Employee share-based payments					-		1.4		-		-		1.4
Balance at September 30, 2008					$	2.8	$	4,160.7	$	(434.9)	$	(1,474.9)	$	2,253.7

				Nine Months Ended September 30,
				2008		2007

Net cash provided by operating activities			$	638.4	$	698.0

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
	Proceeds from the sale, maturity, disposal or redemption of:
		Fixed maturities, available-for-sale		7,244.9		8,110.4
		Equity securities, available-for-sale		360.4		98.6
		Mortgage loans on real estate		110.8		165.8
		Limited partnerships/corporations		66.0		23.1
		Derivatives		27.5		2.0
	Acquisition of:
		Fixed maturities, available-for-sale		(8,331.8)		(6,702.2)
		Equity securities, available-for-sale		(315.5)		(208.4)
		Mortgage loans on real estate		(115.5)		(370.4)
		Limited partnerships/corporations		(141.0)		(215.9)
		Derivatives		(15.8)		(12.9)
	Policy loans, net			9.6		(5.8)
	Short-term investments, net			110.8		(163.3)
	Collateral delivered			(42.5)		(8.8)
	Other investments, net			0.1		(1.8)
	Purchases of fixed assets, net			(23.2)		(73.7)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities				(1,055.2)		636.7

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
	Deposits received for investment contracts			2,785.2		1,160.9
	Maturities and withdrawals from investment contracts			(1,656.6)		(2,620.4)
	Short-term loans (to) from affiliates			(481.4)		45.0
	Short-term repayments			(83.2)		(66.8)
	Notes payable			-		9.9
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities				564.0		(1,471.4)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents				147.2		(136.7)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period				252.3		311.2
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period			$	399.5	$	174.5

ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company (“ILIAC”) is a stock life insurance company domiciled in the state of Connecticut. ILIAC and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) are providers of financial products and services in the United States. ILIAC is authorized to conduct its insurance business in all states and in the District of Columbia.

The condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, include ILIAC and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, ING Financial Advisers, LLC (“IFA”) and Directed Services LLC (“DSL”). For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, ILIAC’s wholly-owned subsidiaries also included Northfield Windsor LLC (“NWL”). ILIAC is a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc. (“Lion” or “Parent”), which is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of ING Groep N.V. (“ING”). ING is a global financial services holding company based in The Netherlands, with American Depository Shares listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ING.”

On May 11, 2006, ILIAC organized NWL as a wholly-owned subsidiary for the purpose of purchasing, constructing, developing, leasing, and managing a new corporate office facility to be located at One Orange Way, Windsor, Connecticut, that would serve as the principal executive office of ILIAC and as corporate offices for other Hartford based operations of the Company and its affiliates (the “Windsor Property”). Effective October 1, 2007, the principal executive office of ILIAC was changed to One Orange Way, Windsor, Connecticut.

On October 31, 2007, ILIAC’s subsidiary, NWL merged with and into ILIAC. As of the merger date, NWL ceased to exist, and ILIAC became the surviving corporation. The merger did not have an impact on ILIAC’s condensed consolidated results of operations and financial position, as NWL was a wholly-owned subsidiary and already included in the condensed consolidated financial statements for all periods presented since its formation.

The condensed consolidated financial statements and notes as of September 30, 2008, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("US GAAP") and are unaudited.

The condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal, recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of the consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows, for the interim periods. These condensed consolidated financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes as presented in the Company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of operations for the interim periods may not be considered indicative of results to be expected for the full year.

The Company offers qualified and nonqualified annuity contracts that include a variety of funding and payout options for individuals and employer-sponsored retirement plans qualified under Internal Revenue Code Sections 401, 403, 408, and 457, as well as nonqualified deferred compensation plans. The Company’s products are offered primarily to individuals, pension plans, small businesses, and employer-sponsored groups in the health care, government, and education markets (collectively “not-for-profit” organizations) and corporate markets. The Company’s products are generally distributed through pension professionals, independent agents and brokers, third party administrators, banks, dedicated career agents, and financial planners.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from reported results using those estimates.

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year financial information to conform to the current year classifications.

For a description of significant accounting policies, see the Organization and Significant Accounting Policies footnote to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have been no material changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies since the filing of the Company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K, except as noted in the Recently Adopted Accounting Standards footnote.

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“FAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“FAS 157”). FAS 157 provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. FAS 157 does not expand the use of fair value to any new circumstances.

Under FAS 157, the FASB clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. In support of this principle, FAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop such assumptions. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data. FAS 157 also requires separate disclosure of fair value measurements by level within the hierarchy and expanded disclosure of the effect on earnings for items measured using unobservable data.

FAS 157 was adopted by the Company on January 1, 2008. As a result of implementing FAS 157, the Company recognized $1.7, before tax, as an increase to Net income on the date of adoption related to the fair value measurements of the reserves for product guarantees. The impact of implementation was included in Interest credited and other benefits to contractholders on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

In October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS No. 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active” (“FSP FAS 157-3”), which provides clarifying guidance on the application of FAS 157 to financial assets in a market that is not active and was effective upon issuance. FSP FAS 157-3 had no effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows upon adoption, as its guidance is consistent with that applied by the Company upon adoption of FAS 157.

The Company recognized no other adjustments to its financial statements related to the adoption of FAS 157, and new disclosures are included in the Financial Instruments footnote.

In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“FAS 159”), which allows a company to make an irrevocable election, on specific election dates, to measure eligible items at fair value with unrealized gains and losses recognized in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The election to measure an item at fair value may be determined on an instrument by instrument basis, with certain exceptions. If the fair value option is elected, any upfront costs and fees related to the item will be recognized in earnings as incurred. Items eligible for the fair value option include:

FAS 159 was adopted by the Company on January 1, 2008. In implementing FAS 159, the Company elected not to take the fair value option for any eligible assets or liabilities in existence on January 1, 2008, or in existence at the date of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

On April 30, 2007, the FASB issued a FSP on FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 39, “Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts” (“FSP FIN 39-1”), which permits a reporting entity to offset fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim or the obligation to return cash collateral against fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments under master netting arrangements. FSP FIN 39-1 had no effect on the financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows upon adoption by the Company on January 1, 2008, as it is the Company’s accounting policy not to offset such fair value amounts.

In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”), which creates a single model to address the accounting for the uncertainty in income tax positions recognized in a company’s financial statements. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement criteria that must be satisfied to recognize a financial statement benefit of tax positions taken, or expected to be taken, on an income tax return. Additionally, FIN 48 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.

FIN 48 was adopted by the Company on January 1, 2007. As a result of implementing FIN 48, the Company recognized a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of $2.9 as a reduction to January 1, 2007 Retained earnings (deficit).

Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred Acquisition Costs in Connection with Modifications or Exchanges of Insurance Contracts

In September 2005, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants ("AICPA") issued Statement of Position ("SOP") 05-1, “Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred Acquisition Costs in Connection with Modifications or Exchanges of Insurance Contracts” (“SOP 05-1”), which states that when an internal replacement transaction results in a substantially changed contract, the unamortized deferred acquisition costs, unearned revenue liabilities, and deferred sales inducement assets, related to the replaced contract should not be deferred in connection with the new contract. Contract modifications that meet various conditions defined by SOP 05-1 and result in a new contract that is substantially unchanged from the replaced contract, however, should be accounted for as a continuation of the replaced contract.

SOP 05-1 defines an internal replacement as a modification in product benefits, features, rights, or coverage that occurs by the exchange of a contract for a new contract, by amendment, endorsement, or rider, to a contract, or by the election of a feature or coverage within a contract. SOP 05-1 applies to internal replacements made primarily to contracts defined by FAS No. 60, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises” (“FAS 60”), as short-duration and long-duration insurance contracts, and by FAS No. 97, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Long-Duration Contracts and for Realized Gains and Losses from the Sale of Investments” (“FAS 97”), as investment contracts.

SOP 05-1 was adopted by the Company on January 1, 2007, and is effective for internal replacements occurring on or after that date. As a result of implementing SOP 05-1, the Company recognized a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of $43.4, before tax, or $28.2, net of $15.2 of income taxes, as a reduction to January 1, 2007 Retained earnings (deficit). In addition, the Company revised its accounting policy on the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs ("DAC") and value of business acquired ("VOBA") to include internal replacements.

In September 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 133-1 and FIN No. 45-4, “Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and Clarification of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161” (“FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4” or “the FSP”), which does the following:

The provisions of FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4 that amend FAS 133 and FIN 45 are effective for reporting periods ending after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Company is currently in the process of determining the impact of adoption of the FSP on its disclosures; however, as the pronouncement only pertains to additional disclosure, the Company has determined that the adoption of the FSP will have no financial statement impact.

The clarification in the FSP of the effective date of FAS 161 is consistent with the guidance in FAS 161 and the Company’s disclosure provided herein.

In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS 161, which requires enhanced disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements, including:

The provisions of FAS 161 are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Company is currently in the process of determining the impact of adoption of FAS 161 on its disclosures; however, as the pronouncement only pertains to additional disclosures, the Company has determined that the adoption of FAS 161 will have no financial statement impact. In addition, the Company’s derivatives are generally not accounted for using hedge accounting treatment under FAS 133, as the Company has not historically sought hedge accounting treatment.

In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“FAS 141R”), which replaces FAS No. 141, “Business Combinations,” as issued in 2001. FAS 141R requires most identifiable assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interest, and goodwill, acquired in a business combination to be recorded at full fair value as of the acquisition date, even for acquisitions achieved in stages. In addition, the statement requires:

The provisions of FAS 141R are effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008 for all business combinations occurring on or after that date. As such, this standard will impact any Company acquisitions that occur on or after January 1, 2009. Also, the Company will consider transition costs related to any acquisitions that may occur prior to January 1, 2009.

FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value, and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements.

The Company has categorized its financial instruments into a three level hierarchy based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). If the inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the category level is based on the lowest priority level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

Financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are categorized as follows:

The following table presents the Company’s hierarchy for its assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2008.

				Level 1		Level 2		Level 3⁽¹⁾		Total
Assets:
	Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, including
		securities pledged	$	229.9	$	10,753.9	$	2,758.9	$	13,742.7
	Equity securities, available-for-sale			317.5		-		-		317.5
	Other investments (primarily derivatives)			-		67.9		-		67.9
	Cash and cash equivalents, short-term
		investments, and short-term investments
		under securities loan agreement		1,120.6		-		-		1,120.6
	Assets held in separate accounts			35,365.8		5,659.0		-		41,024.8
Total			$	37,033.8	$	16,480.8	$	2,758.9	$	56,273.5

Liabilities:
	Product guarantees		$	-	$	-	$	201.7	$	201.7
	Other liabilities (primarily derivatives)			-		277.4		-		277.4
Total			$	-	$	277.4	$	201.7	$	479.1

⁽¹⁾	Level 3 net assets and liabilities accounted for 4.6% of total net assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
	basis. Excluding separate accounts assets for which the policyholder bears the risk, the Level 3 net assets and liabilities
	in relation to total net assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis totaled 17.3%.

The Company utilizes a number of valuation methodologies to determine the fair values of its financial assets and liabilities in conformity with the concepts of “exit price” and the fair value hierarchy as prescribed in FAS 157. Valuations are obtained from third party commercial pricing services, brokers and industry-standard, vendor-provided software that models the value based on market observable inputs. The valuations obtained from the brokers are non-binding. The valuations are reviewed and validated monthly through comparisons to internal pricing models, back testing to recent trades, and monitoring of trading volumes.

All valuation methods and assumptions are validated at least quarterly to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the fair values. No material changes to the valuation methods or assumptions used to determine fair values were made during the third quarter.

The following valuation methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of the following financial instruments:

Fixed maturities, available-for-sale: The fair values for the actively traded marketable bonds are determined based upon the quoted market prices or dealer quotes and are

classified as Level 1 assets. The fair values for marketable bonds without an active market, excluding subprime and Alt-A mortgage-backed securities, are obtained through several commercial pricing services, which provide the estimated fair values, and are classified as Level 2 assets. These services incorporate a variety of market observable information in their valuation techniques, including benchmark yields, broker-dealer quotes, credit quality, issuer spreads, bids, offers and other reference data. Valuations obtained from third party commercial pricing services are non-binding and are validated monthly through comparisons to internal pricing models, back testing to recent trades, and monitoring of trading volumes.

Fair values of privately placed bonds are determined using a matrix-based pricing model and are classified as Level 3 assets. The model considers the current level of risk-free interest rates, current corporate spreads, the credit quality of the issuer, and cash flow characteristics of the security. Also considered are factors such as the net worth of the borrower, the value of collateral, the capital structure of the borrower, the presence of guarantees, and the Company’s evaluation of the borrower’s ability to compete in their relevant market. Using this data, the model generates estimated market values, which the Company considers reflective of the fair value of each privately placed bond.

Trading activity for the Company’s Residential Mortgage-backed Securities (“RMBS”), particularly subprime and Alt-A mortgage-backed securities, has been declining during 2008 as a result of the dislocation of the credit markets. During the third quarter of 2008, the Company continued to obtain pricing information from commercial pricing services and brokers. However, the pricing for subprime and Alt-A mortgage-backed securities did not represent regularly occurring market transactions since the trading activity declined significantly in the third quarter. As a result, the Company concluded that the market for subprime and Alt-A mortgage-backed securities was inactive. The Company did not change its valuation procedures as a result of determining that the market was inactive. However, the Company determined that the classification within the valuation hierarchy should be transferred to Level 3 due to market inactivity.

At September 30, 2008, the fixed maturities valued using unadjusted broker quotes totaled $8,648.6.

Equity securities, available-for-sale: Fair values of these securities are based upon quoted market price and are classified as Level 1 assets.

Cash and cash equivalents, Short-term investments, and Short-term investments under securities loan agreement: The carrying amounts for cash reflect the assets’ fair values. The fair values for cash equivalents and short-term investments are determined based on quoted market prices. These assets are classified as Level 1.

Assets held in separate accounts: Assets held in separate accounts are reported at the quoted fair values of the underlying investments in the separate accounts. Mutual funds, short-term investments and cash are based upon a quoted market price and are included in Level 1. Bond valuations are obtained from third party commercial pricing services and brokers and are included in Level 2. The valuations obtained from brokers are non-binding. Valuations are validated monthly through comparisons to internal pricing models, back testing to recent trades, and monitoring of trading volumes.

Other financial instruments reported as assets and liabilities: The carrying amounts for these financial instruments (primarily derivatives) reflect the fair value of the assets and liabilities. Derivatives are carried at fair value (on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets), which is determined using the Company’s derivative accounting system in conjunction with observable key financial data from third party sources or through values established by third party brokers. Counterparty credit risk is considered and incorporated in the Company’s valuation process through counterparty credit rating requirements and monitoring of overall exposure. It is the Company’s policy to deal only with investment grade counterparties with a credit rating of A- or better. These assets and liabilities are classified as Level 2.

Product guarantees: The Company records reserves for product guarantees, which can be either assets or liabilities, for annuity contracts containing guaranteed credited rates in accordance with FAS 133. The guarantee is treated as an embedded derivative or a stand-alone derivative (depending on the underlying product) and is required to be reported at fair value. The fair value of the obligation is calculated based on the income approach as described in FAS 157. The income associated with the contracts is projected using relevant actuarial and capital market assumptions, including benefits and related contract charges, over the anticipated life of the related contracts. The cash flow estimates are produced by using stochastic techniques under a variety of risk neutral scenarios and other best estimate assumptions. Explicit risk margins in the actuarial assumptions underlying valuations are included, as well as an explicit recognition of all nonperformance risks as required by FAS 157. Nonperformance risk for product guarantees contains adjustments to the fair values of these contract liabilities related to the current credit standing of ING and the Company based on publicly-traded securities with similar term to maturity and priority of payment. The ING bond spread is applied to the discount factors for product guarantees in the Company’s valuation model in order to incorporate credit risk into the fair values of these product guarantees. As of September 30, 2008, the credit ratings of ING and the Company remained relatively stable in relation to prior periods, which resulted in a minimal impact on the valuation of the reserves for product guarantees. See also Note 13 for a discussion of a calculation error associated with reserves for such product guarantees, which was identified in the Company’s previously issued unaudited interim financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2008, and resulted in a restatement of such prior period interim financial statements.

The fair values of certain assets and liabilities are determined using prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement (i.e., Level 3 as defined by FAS 157). These valuations, whether derived internally or obtained from a third party, use critical assumptions that are not widely available to estimate market participant expectations in valuing the asset or liability. In light of the methodologies employed to obtain the fair value of financial assets and liabilities classified as Level 3, additional information is presented below, with particular attention addressed to the reserves for product guarantees due to the impact on the Company’s results of operations.

The following tables summarize the changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 assets and liabilities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008.

				Fixed			Product
				Maturities			Guarantees
Balance at June 30, 2008			$	1,608.6		$	(72.7)
	Capital gains (losses):
		Net realized capital gains (losses)		-	⁽¹⁾		(128.0)	⁽³⁾
		Net unrealized capital (losses) gains⁽²⁾		(49.1)			-
	Total net realized and unrealized capital (losses) gains			(49.1)			(128.0)

		Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements, net		(21.8)			(1.0)
		Transfer in (out) of Level 3		1,221.2			-
Balance at September 30, 2008			$	2,758.9		$	(201.7)

Balance at January 1, 2008			$	1,737.6		$	(76.4)
	Capital gains (losses):
		Net realized capital gains (losses)		0.3	⁽¹⁾		(122.3)	⁽³⁾
		Net unrealized capital (losses) gains⁽²⁾		(93.8)			-
	Total net realized and unrealized capital losses			(93.5)			(122.3)

		Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements, net		(106.4)			(3.0)
		Transfer in (out) of Level 3		1,221.2			-
Balance at September 30, 2008			$	2,758.9		$	(201.7)

⁽¹⁾	This amount is included in Net realized capital gains (losses) on the Condensed Statements of Operations.
⁽²⁾	The amounts in this line are included in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the Condensed Balance Sheets.
⁽³⁾	This amount is included in Interest credited and other benefits to contractowners on the Condensed Statements of
	Operations. All gains and losses on Level 3 liabilities are classified as realized gains (losses) for the purpose of this
	disclosure because it is impracticable to track realized and unrealized gains (losses) separately on a contract-by-contract basis.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the value of the liability increased due to increased credit spreads, increased interest rate volatility and decreased interest rates. As of September 30, 2008, the net realized gains attributable to credit risk were $28.1. The unrealized capital losses on fixed maturities were driven by the widening of credit spreads.

At September 30, 2008, the Company determined that the classification within the valuation hierarchy related to the subprime and Alt-A mortgage-backed securities within the RMBS portfolio should be changed due to market inactivity. This change is presented as transfers into Level 3 in the table above and discussed in more detail in the previous disclosure regarding RMBS.

The following tables identify the Company’s other-than-temporary impairments by type for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.

		Three Months Ended September 30,
		2008			2007
			No. of			No. of
		Impairment	Securities		Impairment	Securities
U.S. corporate	$	161.2	91	$	5.9	25
Foreign⁽¹⁾		42.3	29		5.3	16
Residential mortgage-backed		32.2	16		1.0	3
Other asset-backed		24.3	12		0.2	1
Limited partnerships		1.2	2		-	-
Equity securities		13.2	4		-	-
Mortgage loans on real estate		1.4	1		-	-
Total	$	275.8	155	$	12.4	45
⁽¹⁾ Primarily U.S. dollar denominated.

		Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2008			2007
			No. of			No. of
		Impairment	Securities		Impairment	Securities
U.S. corporate	$	197.7	166	$	15.4	55
Foreign⁽¹⁾		57.5	56		16.4	51
Residential mortgage-backed		65.6	37		3.3	19
Other asset-backed		45.2	34		1.3	4
Limited partnerships		2.3	3		-	-
Equity securities		16.9	6		-	-
Mortgage loans on real estate		3.8	1		-	-
Total	$	389.0	303	$	36.4	129
⁽¹⁾ Primarily U.S. dollar denominated.

The above schedules include $82.2 and $126.9 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and $2.6 and $5.5 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, in other-than-temporary write-downs related to the analysis of credit risk and the possibility of significant prepayment risk. The remaining write-downs are related to investments that the Company does not have the intent to retain for a period of time sufficient to allow for recovery in fair value.

The following tables summarize these write-downs by type for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.

The remaining fair value of fixed maturities with other-than-temporary impairments as of September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $1,479.2 and $1,084.1, respectively.

The Company may sell securities during the period in which fair value has declined below amortized cost for fixed maturities or cost for equity securities. In certain situations, new factors, including changes in the business environment, can change the Company’s previous intent to continue holding a security.

Activity within DAC was as follows for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.

				2008		2007
Balance at January 1			$	728.6	$	622.6
	Deferrals of commissions and expenses			133.0		106.7
	Amortization:
		Amortization		(100.1)		(61.8)
		Interest accrued at 5% to 7%		37.4		32.9
	Net amortization included in Condensed Consolidated
		Statements of Operations		(62.7)		(28.9)
	Change in unrealized capital (gains) losses on
		available-for-sale securities		13.4		0.9
	Implementation of SOP 05-1			-		(6.0)
Balance at September 30			$	812.3	$	695.3

Activity within VOBA was as follows for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.

				2008		2007
Balance at January 1			$	1,253.2	$	1,340.2
	Deferrals of commissions and expenses			25.3		30.0
	Amortization:
		Amortization		(153.6)		(139.1)
		Interest accrued at 6% to 7%		58.8		63.6
	Net amortization included in Condensed Consolidated
		Statements of Operations		(94.8)		(75.5)
	Change in unrealized capital (gains) losses on
		available-for-sale securities		483.4		2.8
	Implementation of SOP 05-1			-		(37.4)
Balance at September 30			$	1,667.1	$	1,260.1

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recognized an increase in amortization of DAC and VOBA of $36.9 due to the unlocking resulting from the revisions of certain assumptions used in the estimation of gross profits and unfavorable equity market performance. No material unlocking occurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, ILIAC did not receive any capital contributions from its Parent.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, ILIAC did not pay any dividends on its common stock to its Parent.

The Company’s effective tax rates for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were 6.4% and 26.0%, respectively. The effective tax rates for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were 16.6% and 27.9%, respectively. The effective rates differ from the expected rate primarily due to the following items:

Valuation allowances are provided when it is considered unlikely that deferred tax assets will be realized. At September 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company had a tax valuation allowance of $118.4 and $0, respectively, related to realized capital losses, which is included in Net (loss) income. As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had a valuation allowance of $0 and $6.4, respectively, related to unrealized capital losses on investments, which is included in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

In first quarter 2008, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) finalized the audit of tax years 2002 and 2003. The IRS is currently examining tax years 2004, 2005 and 2006. In addition, the Company and the IRS have agreed to enter the Compliance Assurance Program (“CAP”) for tax year 2008. In the third quarter 2008, the Company also finalized the audit by New York for years 1995 through 2000.

A reconciliation of the change in unrecognized income tax benefits for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 is as follows:

The Company had $22.2 of unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2008 and $42.6 of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2007 that would affect the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized.

The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in Current income taxes and Income tax expense on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations, respectively. The Company had accrued interest of $3.3 as of September 30, 2008 and $16.9 as of December 31, 2007. The decrease in accrued interest primarily relates to the settlement of the IRS and the State of New York audits.

On July 1, 2008, Lion acquired 100% of CitiStreet LLC (“CitiStreet”), a leading retirement plan and benefit service and administration company in the U.S. defined contribution marketplace. Due to expected synergies, Company management endeavored to integrate the CitiStreet retirement services businesses with those of the Company and its other ING affiliates. During the third quarter, integration initiatives, which provided significant operational and information technology efficiencies to ING’s U.S. retirement services businesses, including the Company, resulted in the recognition of integration costs of $46.5.

ILIAC maintains a reciprocal loan agreement with ING America Insurance Holdings, Inc. (“ING AIH”), an affiliate, to facilitate the handling of unanticipated short-term cash requirements that arise in the ordinary course of business. Under this agreement, which became effective in June 2001 and expires on April 1, 2011, either party can borrow from the other up to 3% of ILIAC’s statutory admitted assets as of the preceding December 31. Interest on any ILIAC borrowing is charged at the rate of ING AIH’s cost of funds for the interest period, plus 0.15%. Interest on any ING AIH borrowings is charged at a rate based on the prevailing interest rate of U.S. commercial paper available for purchase with a similar duration.

Under this agreement, ILIAC incurred an immaterial amount of interest expense for the three months and $0.2 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and $1.5 and $3.9 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. The Company earned interest income of $1.2 and $2.3 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, and $0.2 and $0.5 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively. Interest expense and income are included in Interest expense and Net investment income, respectively, on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of September 30, 2008, the Company had a $481.4 receivable from ING AIH under this agreement, and no amounts outstanding as of December 31, 2007.

For information on the Company’s additional financing agreements, see the Financing Agreements footnote to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Through the normal course of investment operations, the Company commits to either purchase or sell securities, commercial mortgage loans, or money market instruments, at a specified future date and at a specified price or yield. The inability of counterparties to honor these commitments may result in either a higher or lower replacement cost. Also, there is likely to be a change in the value of the securities underlying the commitments.

At September 30, 2008, the Company had off-balance sheet commitments to purchase investments equal to their fair value of $470.7, $258.4 of which was with related parties. At December 31, 2007, the Company had off-balance sheet commitments to purchase investments equal to their fair value of $357.8, $226.6 of which was with related parties. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, $20.4 and $64.4, respectively, were funded to related parties under these commitments.

The Company owns a 3-year credit-linked note arrangement, whereby the Company will reimburse the guaranteed party upon payment default of the referenced obligation. Upon such default, the Company reimburses the guaranteed party for the loss under the reference obligation, and the Company receives that reference obligation in settlement. The Company can then seek recovery of any losses under the agreement by sale or collection of the received reference obligation. As of September 30, 2008, the maximum liability of the Company under the guarantee was $30.0.

Under the terms of the Company’s Over-The-Counter Derivative International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. Agreements (“ISDA Agreements”), the Company may receive from, or deliver to, counterparties, collateral to assure that all terms of the ISDA Agreements will be met with regard to the Credit Support Annex (“CSA”). The terms of the CSA call for the Company to pay interest on any cash received equal to the Federal Funds rate. As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company delivered $61.3 and $18.8, respectively, of cash collateral, which was included in Short-term investments under securities loan agreement, including collateral delivered, on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Company is involved in threatened or pending lawsuits/arbitrations arising from the normal conduct of business. Due to the climate in insurance and business litigation/arbitrations, suits against the Company sometimes include claims for substantial compensatory, consequential, or punitive damages, and other types of relief. Moreover, certain claims are asserted as class actions, purporting to represent a group of similarly situated individuals. While it is not possible to forecast the outcome of such lawsuits/arbitrations, in light of existing insurance, reinsurance, and established reserves, it is the opinion of management that the disposition of such lawsuits/arbitrations will not have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s operations or financial position.

As with many financial services companies, the Company and its affiliates have received informal and formal requests for information from various state and federal governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations in connection with inquiries and investigations of the products and practices of the financial services industry. In each case, the Company and its affiliates have been and are providing full cooperation. For information on the focus of such regulatory inquiries and the actions undertaken by ING in connection therewith, see the Other Regulatory Matters section of the Commitments and Contingent Liabilities footnote to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Shareholder’s equity included the following components of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of September 30, 2008 and 2007.

			2008		2007
Net unrealized capital gains (losses):
	Fixed maturities, available-for-sale	$	(1,120.5)	$	(157.6)
	Equity securities, available-for-sale		(41.2)		12.4
	DAC/VOBA adjustment on available-for-sale securities		504.6		7.7
	Sales inducements adjustment on available-for-sale securities		(3.5)		0.2
	Premium deficiency reserve adjustment		-		(13.2)
	Other investments		(0.2)		(1.1)
	Less: allocation to experience-rated contracts		-		(105.5)
Unrealized capital losses, before tax			(660.8)		(46.1)
Deferred income tax asset			231.3		16.1
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance			-		(51.2)
Net unrealized capital losses			(429.5)		(81.2)
Pension liability, net of tax			(5.4)		(10.2)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		$	(434.9)	$	(91.4)

During the third quarter of 2008, as a result of the current market conditions, the Company included $808.2 of net unrealized capital losses allocated to experience-rated contracts in Shareholder’s equity on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets rather than Future policy benefits and claims reserves. As of September 30, 2007, the Company had $105.5 of net unrealized capital losses allocated to experience-rated contracts that were reflected on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets in Future policy benefits and claims reserves and were not included in Shareholder’s equity.

Changes in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of DAC, VOBA, and tax (excluding the tax valuation allowance), related to changes in unrealized capital gains (losses) on securities, including securities pledged and excluding those related to experience-rated contracts for 2007, were as follows for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.

			Previously
			Reported		Adjustment		Restated

Interest credited and other benefits
	to contractowners	$	195.9	$	39.4	$	235.3
Net amortization of deferred policy acquisition
	costs and value of business acquired		94.9		(10.4)		84.5
Total benefits and expenses			629.8		29.0		658.8
(Loss) income before income taxes			(69.4)		(29.0)		(98.4)
Income tax (benefit) expense			(43.7)		(10.1)		(53.8)
Net (loss) income			(25.7)		(18.9)		(44.6)

		Previously
		Reported		Adjustment		Restated

Deferred policy acquisition costs	$	747.6	$	3.5	$	751.1
Value of business acquired		1,199.2		6.9		1,206.1
Total assets		69,173.0		10.4		69,183.4
Future policy benefits and claims reserves		18,830.9		39.4		18,870.3
Deferred income taxes		182.0		(10.1)		171.9
Total liabilities		66,253.4		29.3		66,282.7
Retained earnings (deficit)		(1,113.0)		(18.9)		(1,131.9)
Total shareholder's equity		2,919.6		(18.9)		2,900.7
Total liabilities and shareholder's equity		69,173.0		10.4		69,183.4

In the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company identified $43.1 in unreconciled net liabilities before taxes. While the correction of this error was not material to the prior period financial statements, correction of the error through the income statement would have been material to the 2007 Statement of Operations. In accordance with the guidance provided in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) Topic IN, “Financial Statements - Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (“SAB 108”), the Company restated the prior period financial statements to correct this error by adjusting January 1, 2005 Retained earnings. The effect of the restatement on the interim prior period financial statements is as follows:

The following narrative analysis presents a review of the consolidated results of operations of ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company (“ILIAC”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, and financial condition as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007. This item should be read in its entirety and in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes, which can be found under Part I, Item 1. contained herein, as well as the “Management’s Narrative Analysis of the Results of Operations and Financial Condition” section contained in the Company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In connection with the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Company cautions readers regarding certain forward-looking statements contained in this report and in any other statements made by, or on behalf of, the Company, whether or not in future filings with the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Forward-looking statements are statements not based on historical information and which relate to future operations, strategies, financial results, or other developments. Statements using verbs such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” or words of similar import, generally involve forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, forward-looking statements include statements that represent the Company’s beliefs concerning future levels of sales and redemptions of the Company’s products, investment spreads and yields, or the earnings and profitability of the Company’s activities.

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based on estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to significant business, economic, and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond the Company’s control and many of which are subject to change. These uncertainties and contingencies could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, the Company. Whether or not actual results differ materially from forward-looking statements may depend on numerous foreseeable and unforeseeable developments, including, but not limited to the following:

Investors are also directed to consider the risks and uncertainties discussed in this Item 2. and in Item 1A. of Part II contained herein, as well as in other documents filed by the Company with the SEC. Except as may be required by the federal securities laws, the Company disclaims any obligation to update forward-looking information.

ILIAC is a stock insurance company domiciled in the state of Connecticut. ILIAC and its wholly-owned subsidiaries are providers of financial products and services in the United States. ILIAC is authorized to conduct its insurance business in all states and in the District of Columbia.

ILIAC is a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc. (“Lion” or “Parent”), which is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of ING Groep N.V. (“ING”). ING is a global financial services holding company based in The Netherlands, with American Depository Shares listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ING”.

There have been no material changes to the Company’s critical accounting policies since the filing of the Company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Products offered by the Company include qualified and nonqualified annuity contracts that include a variety of funding and payout options for individuals and employer-sponsored retirement plans qualified under Internal Revenue Code Sections 401, 403, 408, and 457, as well as nonqualified deferred compensation plans.

The Company derives its revenue mainly from (a) fee income generated from separate account assets supporting variable options under variable annuity contract investments, as designated by contractowners, (b) investment income earned on assets supporting fixed assets under management (“AUM”), mainly generated from annuity products with fixed investment options, and (c) certain other fees. The Company’s benefits and expenses primarily consist of (a) interest credited and other benefits to contractowners, (b) amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs (“DAC”) and value of business acquired (“VOBA”), (c) expenses related to the selling and servicing of the various products offered by the Company, and (d) other general business expenses. In addition, the Company collects broker-dealer commissions through its subsidiary Directed Services LLC (“DSL”), which are, in turn, paid to broker-dealers and expensed.

The financial market crisis of 2008 presents challenges for the Company and the insurance industry. The Company’s sales and financial results continue to be affected by economic trends.

The credit and liquidity crisis caused turmoil in the financial markets in the third quarter of 2008 impacting short-term, LIBOR and U.S. Treasury rates. Although U.S. Treasury market rates declined in the third quarter, the unrealized and realized losses on fixed maturities increased due to the continued widening of credit spreads that is driven by the higher perceived risk related to investment grade securities.

LIBOR rates rose during the third quarter of 2008 with most of the increase occurring during September. As a result, any favorable effects of the increase on floating rate investments will be felt primarily in the fourth quarter of 2008.

In the third quarter of 2008, short-term Treasury rates fell more than long-term rates. The rate declines were driven by investor “flight to quality”, which is the trend of investors selecting U.S. Treasuries as opposed to higher yielding, potentially riskier investments.

The credit crisis also negatively impacted equity markets, as investor confidence in the economy diminished. The Company’s fee revenue from variable AUM is generally affected by equity market performance. In addition, variable product demand often mirrors consumer demand for equity market investments. Poor equity market performance during 2008 unfavorably impacted AUM related to variable annuity products. In addition, the Company experienced higher realized and unrealized losses on equity securities.

The Company’s results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, and changes therein, were impacted by higher realized capital losses and unfavorable product experience driven by poor equity market performance and lower variable AUM.

				Three Months Ended September 30,				$ Increase	% Increase
				2008		2007		(Decrease)	(Decrease)
Revenues:
	Net investment income		$	263.9	$	264.0	$	(0.1)	-
	Fee income			154.8		184.4		(29.6)	(16.1)%
	Premiums			16.3		9.5		6.8	71.6%
	Broker-dealer commission revenue			152.2		140.9		11.3	8.0%
	Net realized capital losses			(124.7)		(4.7)		(120.0)	NM
	Other income			6.8		7.3		(0.5)	(6.8)%
Total revenue				469.3		601.4		(132.1)	(22.0)%
Benefits and expenses:
	Interest credited and other
		benefits to contractowners		500.5		176.2		324.3	NM
	Operating expenses			209.3		157.3		52.0	33.1%
	Broker-dealer commission expense			152.2		140.9		11.3	8.0%
	Net amortization of deferred policy
		acquisition costs and value
		of business acquired		(1.8)		39.3		(41.1)	NM
	Interest expense			0.4		1.9		(1.5)	(78.9)%
Total benefits and expenses				860.6		515.6		345.0	66.9%
(Loss) income before income taxes				(391.3)		85.8		(477.1)	NM
Income tax (benefit) expense				(25.1)		22.3		(47.4)	NM
Net (loss) income			$	(366.2)	$	63.5	$	(429.7)	NM
Effective tax rate				6.4%		26.0%
NM - Not meaningful.

				Nine Months Ended September 30,				$ Increase	% Increase
				2008		2007		(Decrease)	(Decrease)
Revenues:
	Net investment income		$	800.3	$	785.4	$	14.9	1.9%
	Fee income			496.5		571.2		(74.7)	(13.1)%
	Premiums			31.4		39.9		(8.5)	(21.3)%
	Broker-dealer commission revenue			502.7		365.6		137.1	37.5%
	Net realized capital losses			(277.6)		(6.4)		(271.2)	NM
	Other income			14.8		19.7		(4.9)	(24.9)%
Total revenue				1,568.1		1,775.4		(207.3)	(11.7)%
Benefits and expenses:
	Interest credited and other
		benefits to contractowners		827.1		530.3		296.8	56.0%
	Operating expenses			544.2		467.8		76.4	16.3%
	Broker-dealer commission expense			502.7		365.6		137.1	37.5%
	Net amortization of deferred policy
		acquisition costs and value
		of business acquired		157.5		104.4		53.1	50.9%
	Interest expense			1.2		5.0		(3.8)	(76.0)%
Total benefits and expenses				2,032.7		1,473.1		559.6	38.0%
Income (loss) before income taxes				(464.6)		302.3		(766.9)	NM
Income tax (benefit) expense				(77.0)		84.4		(161.4)	NM
Net (loss) income			$	(387.6)	$	217.9	$	(605.5)	NM
Effective tax rate				16.6%		27.9%
NM - Not meaningful.

Total revenue decreased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily reflecting higher Net realized capital losses and decreases in Fee income.

The increase in Net realized capital losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, was primarily due to higher credit related impairments of fixed maturities driven by the widening of credit spreads. In addition, the Company experienced losses on equity securities due to poor equity market performance in 2008. The 2008 third quarter losses were partially offset by gains on forward contracts driven by the decline of interest rates and the adjustment of certain credit default swaps to recoverable value.

Fee income decreased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, as average variable AUM decreased, driven by lower equity markets.

Total benefits and expenses increased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily due to increases in Interest credited and other benefits to contractowners, Net amortization of DAC and VOBA, and Operating expenses.

Interest credited and other benefits to contractowners increased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, reflecting the amortization of realized losses associated with experience-rated contracts. In addition, the Company experienced an increase in product guarantee reserves driven by an increase in credit spreads during 2008.

The Net amortization of DAC and VOBA increased for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, reflecting $36.9 of unlocking resulting from unfavorable equity market performance and the revisions of certain assumptions used in the estimation of gross profits. The unfavorable unlocking was partially offset by the decrease in amortization due to higher realized losses. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Company experienced a decrease due to lower actual gross profits driven by the amortization of realized losses associated with experience-rated contracts.

Operating expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, increased mainly due to integration costs related to the acquisition of CitiStreet LLC by the Company’s Parent on July 1, 2008. In addition, the Company experienced higher marketing and commission expenses related to higher sales of individual retirement products.

Income tax expense decreased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily due to the audit settlement with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) during the first quarter of 2008 and higher losses before taxes, partially offset by the tax valuation allowance related to realized capital losses.

The Company’s investment strategy focuses on diversification by asset class. The Company seeks to achieve economic diversification, while reducing overall credit risk and liquidity risks. In addition, the Company seeks to mitigate the impact of cash flow variability from embedded options within certain investment products, such as prepayment options, interest rate options embedded in collateralized mortgage obligations, and call options embedded in corporate bonds. The investment management function is centralized under ING Investment Management LLC, an affiliate, pursuant to an investment advisory agreement. Separate portfolios are established for groups of products with similar liability characteristics within the Company.

The following table presents the investment portfolio at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

			2008			2007
			Carrying Value	%		Carrying Value	%
Fixed maturities, available-for-sale,
	including securities pledged	$	13,742.7	79.7%	$	14,250.4	79.6%
Equity securities, available-for-sale			317.5	1.9%		446.4	2.5%
Mortgage loans on real estate			2,090.8	12.1%		2,089.4	11.7%
Policy loans			263.8	1.5%		273.4	1.5%
Other investments			829.1	4.8%		838.8	4.7%
Total investments		$	17,243.9	100.0%	$	17,898.4	100.0%

						Gross		Gross
						Unrealized		Unrealized
				Amortized		Capital		Capital		Fair
				Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
Fixed maturities:
	U.S. Treasuries		$	228.5	$	1.6	$	0.3	$	229.8
	U.S. government agencies and authorities			267.5		3.9		0.2		271.2
	State, municipalities, and political subdivisions			79.1		-		9.1		70.0

	U.S. corporate securities:
		Public utilities		1,076.6		1.7		72.6		1,005.7
		Other corporate securities		4,187.5		15.6		307.7		3,895.4
	Total U.S. corporate securities			5,264.1		17.3		380.3		4,901.1

	Foreign securities⁽¹⁾:
		Government		429.8		4.6		33.3		401.1
		Other		2,226.5		13.1		171.8		2,067.8
	Total foreign securities			2,656.3		17.7		205.1		2,468.9

	Residential mortgage-backed securities			3,671.7		129.7		321.6		3,479.8
	Commercial mortgage-backed securities			1,830.3		0.2		269.5		1,561.0
	Other asset-backed securities			865.7		5.1		109.9		760.9

	Total fixed maturities, including securities pledged			14,863.2		175.5		1,296.0		13,742.7
	Less: securities pledged			1,287.0		9.3		28.2		1,268.1
Total fixed maturities			$	13,576.2	$	166.2	$	1,267.8	$	12,474.6
⁽¹⁾	Primarily U.S. dollar denominated.

						Gross		Gross
						Unrealized		Unrealized
				Amortized		Capital		Capital		Fair
				Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
Fixed maturities:
	U.S. Treasuries		$	11.2	$	0.7	$	-	$	11.9
	U.S. government agencies and authorities			0.6		-		-		0.6
	State, municipalities, and political subdivisions			66.1		0.1		2.2		64.0

	U.S. corporate securities:
		Public utilities		1,049.1		10.8		15.6		1,044.3
		Other corporate securities		3,855.1		46.1		65.2		3,836.0
	Total U.S. corporate securities			4,904.2		56.9		80.8		4,880.3

	Foreign securities⁽¹⁾:
		Government		379.3		17.1		6.6		389.8
		Other		1,955.8		29.9		40.3		1,945.4
	Total foreign securities			2,335.1		47.0		46.9		2,335.2

	Residential mortgage-backed securities			4,146.1		101.8		63.5		4,184.4
	Commercial mortgage-backed securities			1,927.3		10.7		52.3		1,885.7
	Other asset-backed securities			924.3		5.5		41.5		888.3

	Total fixed maturities, including securities pledged			14,314.9		222.7		287.2		14,250.4
	Less: securities pledged			940.2		8.0		14.1		934.1
Total fixed maturities			$	13,374.7	$	214.7	$	273.1	$	13,316.3
⁽¹⁾ Primarily U.S. dollar denominated.

It is management’s objective that the portfolio of fixed maturities be of high quality and be well diversified by market sector. The fixed maturities in the Company’s portfolio are generally rated by external rating agencies and, if not externally rated, are rated by the Company on a basis believed to be similar to that used by the rating agencies. The average quality rating of the Company’s fixed maturities portfolio was A+ as of September 30, 2008 and AA- as of December 31, 2007. Ratings are calculated using a rating hierarchy that considers Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”), Moody’s Investor’s Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”), and internal ratings.

Total fixed maturities, including securities pledged to creditors, by quality rating category were as follows as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

		2008			2007
		Fair	% of		Fair	% of
		Value	Total		Value	Total
AAA	$	5,820.3	42.2%	$	6,446.7	45.3%
AA		972.2	7.1%		956.4	6.7%
A		2,413.7	17.6%		2,114.4	14.8%
BBB		3,870.2	28.2%		3,932.9	27.6%
BB		477.1	3.5%		591.0	4.1%
B and below		189.2	1.4%		209.0	1.5%
Total	$	13,742.7	100.0%	$	14,250.4	100.0%

95.1% and 94.4% of fixed maturities were invested in securities rated BBB and above (Investment Grade) as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.

Fixed maturities rated BB and below (Below Investment Grade) may have speculative characteristics, and changes in economic conditions or other circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the issuer to make principal and interest payments than is the case with higher rated fixed maturities.

Total fixed maturities by market sector, including securities pledged to creditors, were as follows at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

		2008			2007
		Fair	% of		Fair	% of
		Value	Total		Value	Total
U.S. Treasuries	$	229.8	1.7%	$	11.9	0.1%
U.S. government agencies and authorities		271.2	2.0%		0.6	0.0%
U.S. corporate, states, and municipalities		4,971.1	36.1%		4,944.3	34.7%
Foreign		2,468.9	18.0%		2,335.2	16.4%
Residential mortgage-backed		3,479.8	25.3%		4,184.4	29.4%
Commercial mortgage-backed		1,561.0	11.4%		1,885.7	13.2%
Other asset-backed		760.9	5.5%		888.3	6.2%
Total	$	13,742.7	100.0%	$	14,250.4	100.0%

The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturities, excluding securities pledged, as of September 30, 2008, are shown below by contractual maturity. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities as securities may be restructured, called, or prepaid.

Since the third quarter of 2007, credit markets have become more turbulent amid concerns about subprime and Alt-A mortgages and collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”). This in turn has resulted in a general widening of credit spreads, reduced price transparency, reduced liquidity, increased rating agency downgrades and increased volatility across certain markets.

The Company does not originate or purchase subprime or Alt-A whole-loan mortgages. Subprime lending is the origination of loans to customers with weaker credit profiles. The Company defines Alt-A Loans to include residential mortgage loans to customers who have strong credit profiles but lack some element(s), such as documentation to substantiate income. Commencing in the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company expanded its definition of Alt-A loans to include residential mortgage loans to borrowers that would otherwise be classified as prime but whose loan structure provides repayment options to the borrower that increase the risk of default. Further, during the fourth quarter of 2007, the industry coalesced around classifying any securities backed by residential mortgage collateral not clearly identifiable as prime or subprime into the Alt-A category, and the Company is following that lead. The following summarizes the Company’s exposure to subprime and Alt-A mortgages as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

backed securities was inactive. The Company did not change its valuation procedures as a result of determining that the market was inactive.

The Company’s exposure to subprime mortgages was primarily in the form of asset-backed securities (“ABS”) structures collateralized by subprime residential mortgages, and the majority of these holdings were included in other asset-backed securities in the fixed maturities by market sector table above. As of September 30, 2008, the fair value and gross unrealized losses related to the Company’s exposure to subprime mortgages were $301.8 and $70.6, respectively, representing 2.2% of total fixed maturities. As of December 31, 2007, the fair value and gross unrealized losses related to the Company’s exposure to subprime mortgages were $410.2 and $32.9, respectively, representing 2.9% of total fixed maturities.

The following tables summarize the Company’s exposure to subprime mortgage-backed holdings by credit quality and vintage year as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:

2008				2007
% of Total Subprime				% of Total Subprime
Mortgage-backed				Mortgage-backed
Securities		Vintage		Securities		Vintage

AAA	61.8%	2007	24.5%	AAA	68.9%	2007	35.7%
AA	30.9%	2006	24.1%	AA	26.6%	2006	14.8%
A	2.9%	2005 and prior	51.4%	A	4.2%	2005 and prior	49.5%
BBB	3.4%		100.0%	BBB	0.2%		100.0%
BB and below	1.0%			BB and below	0.1%
	100.0%				100.0%

The Company’s exposure to Alt-A mortgages was included in residential mortgage-backed securities in the fixed maturities by market sector table above. As of September 30, 2008, the fair value and gross unrealized losses aggregated to $919.4 and $173.6, respectively, representing 6.7% of total fixed maturities. As of December 31, 2007, the fair value and gross unrealized losses related to the Company’s exposure to Alt-A mortgages were $1.3 billion and $38.1, respectively, representing 8.9% of total fixed maturities.

The following tables summarize the Company’s exposure to Alt-A mortgage-backed holdings by credit quality and vintage year as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:

2008				2007
% of Total Alt-A				% of Total Alt-A
Mortgage-backed				Mortgage-backed
Securities		Vintage		Securities		Vintage

AAA	96.4%	2007	11.2%	AAA	99.9%	2007	28.4%
AA	1.3%	2006	29.6%	AA	0.1%	2006	12.9%
A	1.6%	2005 and prior	59.2%		100.0%	2005 and prior	58.7%
BBB	0.2%		100.0%				100.0%
BB and below	0.5%
	100.0%

While the delinquency rates on commercial mortgages have been stable in recent years, commercial real estate rents and property values have recently become more volatile. In addition, there are growing concerns with consumer loans as a result of the current economic environment, which includes lower family income and higher unemployment rates.

As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the fair value of the Company’s commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) totaled $1.6 billion and $1.9 billion, respectively, and other ABS, excluding subprime exposure, totaled $463.6 and $512.8, respectively. CMBS investments represent pools of commercial mortgages that are broadly diversified across property types and geographical areas.

As of September 30, 2008, the other ABS was also broadly diversified both by type and issuer with credit card receivables, automobile receivables, public utility, and collateralized loan obligations comprising 34.8%, 16.6%, 22.6% and 11.8%, respectively, of total other ABS, excluding subprime exposure. As of December 31, 2007, the other ABS was broadly diversified by both type and issuer with credit card receivables, automobile receivables, public utility, and collateralized loan obligations comprising 34.5%, 18.8%, 17.6%, and 13.3%, respectively, of total other ABS, excluding subprime exposure.

The following tables summarize the Company’s exposure to CMBS holdings, excluding subprime exposure, by credit quality and vintage year as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:

The following tables summarize the Company’s exposure to Other ABS holdings by credit quality and vintage year as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:

Mortgage loans on real estate, primarily commercial mortgage loans, totaled $2,090.8 and $2,089.4 as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. These loans are reported at amortized cost, less impairment write-downs. If the value of any mortgage loan is determined to be impaired (i.e., when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect on all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement), the carrying value of the mortgage loan is reduced to either the present value of expected cash flows from the loan, discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or fair value of the collateral. If the loan is in foreclosure, the carrying value is reduced to the fair value of the underlying collateral, net of estimated costs to obtain and sell. As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had no allowance for mortgage loan credit losses. The properties collateralizing mortgage loans are geographically dispersed throughout the United States, with the largest concentration of 16.5% and 16.8% of properties in California as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.

Unrealized capital losses in fixed maturities, including securities pledged to creditors, for Investment Grade (“IG”) and Below Investment Grade (“BIG”) securities by duration were as follows as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

			2008						2007
				% of IG			% of IG			% of IG			% of IG
			IG	and BIG		BIG	and BIG		IG	and BIG	BIG		and BIG
Less than six months
	below amortized cost	$	241.6	18.6%	$	28.3	2.2%	$	44.8	15.7%	$	4.1	1.4%
More than six months
	and less than twelve
	months below
	amortized cost		348.4	26.9%		13.2	1.0%		119.5	41.6%		11.8	4.1%
More than twelve months
	below amortized cost		636.5	49.1%		28.0	2.2%		102.0	35.5%		5.0	1.7%
Total unrealized capital loss		$	1,226.5	94.6%	$	69.5	5.4%	$	266.3	92.8%	$	20.9	7.2%

Unrealized capital losses in fixed maturities as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, were primarily related to the effects of interest rate movement or spread widening on mortgage and other asset-backed securities. Mortgage and other asset-backed securities include U.S. government-backed securities, principal protected securities, and structured securities, which did not have an adverse change in cash flows. The following tables summarize the unrealized capital losses by duration and reason, along with the fair value of fixed maturities, including securities pledged to creditors, in unrealized capital loss positions as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

					More Than
			Less Than		Six Months		More Than
			Six Months		and less than		Twelve Months
			Below		Twelve Months		Below
			Amortized		Below		Amortized
2008			Cost		Amortized Cost		Cost		Total
Interest rate or spread widening		$	218.4	$	160.2	$	216.4	$	595.0
Mortgage and other asset-backed
	securities		51.5		201.4		448.1		701.0
Total unrealized capital loss		$	269.9	$	361.6	$	664.5	$	1,296.0
Fair value		$	4,341.8	$	3,049.1	$	3,044.8	$	10,435.7

2007
Interest rate or spread widening		$	18.8	$	62.3	$	48.8	$	129.9
Mortgage and other asset-backed
	securities		30.1		69.0		58.2		157.3
Total unrealized capital loss		$	48.9	$	131.3	$	107.0	$	287.2
Fair value		$	2,256.2	$	2,217.7	$	3,612.1	$	8,086.0

Unrealized capital losses in fixed maturities, including securities pledged to creditors, by market sector and duration were as follows as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

				More Than
		Less Than		Six Months		More Than
		Six Months		and Less Than		Twelve Months		Total
		Below		Twelve Months		Below		Unrealized
		Amortized		Below		Amortized		Capital
		Cost		Amortized Cost		Cost		Loss
2008
U.S. Treasuries	$	0.3	$	-	$	-	$	0.3
U.S. government agencies and authorities		0.2		-		-		0.2
U.S. corporate, state, and municipalities		140.6		111.3		137.5		389.4
Foreign		77.3		48.9		78.9		205.1
Residential mortgage-backed		28.1		86.1		207.4		321.6
Commercial mortgage-backed		19.2		90.5		159.8		269.5
Other asset-backed		4.2		24.8		80.9		109.9
Total unrealized capital loss	$	269.9	$	361.6	$	664.5	$	1,296.0

2007
U.S. corporate, state, and municipalities	$	10.7	$	40.7	$	31.6	$	83.0
Foreign		8.1		21.6		17.2		46.9
Residential mortgage-backed		17.3		18.2		28.0		63.5
Commercial mortgage-backed		4.2		33.4		14.7		52.3
Other asset-backed		8.6		17.4		15.5		41.5
Total unrealized capital loss	$	48.9	$	131.3	$	107.0	$	287.2

Of the unrealized capital losses aged more than twelve months, the average market value of the related fixed maturities was 82.8% of the average book value as of September 30, 2008. In addition, this category includes 594 securities, which have an average quality rating of AA-. No other-than-temporary impairment loss was considered necessary for these fixed maturities as of September 30, 2008.

The Company analyzes the general account investments to determine whether there has been an other-than-temporary decline in fair value below the amortized cost basis. Management considers the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost, the issuer’s financial condition and near-term prospects, future economic conditions and market forecasts, interest rate changes, and the Company’s intent to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for recovery in fair value. If it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of an investment will not be collected, an other-than-temporary impairment is considered to have occurred.

In addition, the Company invests in asset-backed securities. Determination of the required impairment is based on the analysis discussed in the preceding paragraph, as well as credit risk and the possibility of significant prepayment risk that restricts the Company’s ability to recover the investment. An impairment is recognized if the fair value of the security is less than book value and there has been an adverse change in cash flow since the last remeasurement date.

When a decline in fair value is determined to be other-than-temporary, the individual security is written down to fair value, and the loss is recorded in Net realized capital gains (losses).

The following tables identify the Company’s other-than-temporary impairments by type for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.

		Three Months Ended September 30,
		2008			2007
			No. of			No. of
		Impairment	Securities		Impairment	Securities
U.S. corporate	$	161.2	91	$	5.9	25
Foreign⁽¹⁾		42.3	29		5.3	16
Residential mortgage-backed		32.2	16		1.0	3
Other asset-backed		24.3	12		0.2	1
Limited partnerships		1.2	2		-	-
Equity securities		13.2	4		-	-
Mortgage loans on real estate		1.4	1		-	-
Total	$	275.8	155	$	12.4	45
⁽¹⁾Primarily U.S. dollar denominated.

		Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2008			2007
			No. of			No. of
		Impairment	Securities		Impairment	Securities
U.S. corporate	$	197.7	166	$	15.4	55
Foreign⁽¹⁾		57.5	56		16.4	51
Residential mortgage-backed		65.6	37		3.3	19
Other asset-backed		45.2	34		1.3	4
Limited partnerships		2.3	3		-	-
Equity securities		16.9	6		-	-
Mortgage loans on real estate		3.8	1		-	-
Total	$	389.0	303	$	36.4	129
⁽¹⁾Primarily U.S. dollar denominated.

The Company may sell securities during the period in which fair value has declined below amortized cost for fixed maturities or cost for equity securities. In certain situations new factors, including changes in the business environment, can change the Company’s previous intent to continue holding a security.

Net realized capital gains (losses) are comprised of the difference between the amortized cost of investments and proceeds from sale and redemption, as well as losses incurred due to other-than-temporary impairment of investments and changes in fair value of derivatives. The cost of the investments on disposal is determined based on specific identification of securities. Net realized capital gains (losses) on investments were as follows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.

Net realized capital losses allocated to experience-rated contracts were deducted from Net realized capital losses and an offsetting amount was reflected in Future policy benefits and claim reserves on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. At September 30, 2008, the Company fully amortized $213.5 of net unamortized realized capital losses allocated to experience-rated contractowners. At December 31, 2007, net unamortized realized capital (losses) gains allocated to experience-rated contractowners were $53.8.

Liquidity is the ability of the Company to generate sufficient cash flows to meet the cash requirements of operating, investing, and financing activities.

The Company’s principal sources of liquidity are product charges, investment income, proceeds from the maturity and sale of investments, and capital contributions. Primary uses of these funds are payments of commissions and operating expenses, interest credits, investment purchases, and contract maturities, withdrawals, and surrenders.

The Company’s liquidity position is managed by maintaining adequate levels of liquid assets, such as cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments. Asset/liability management is integrated into many aspects of the Company’s operations, including investment decisions, product development, and determination of crediting rates. As part of the risk management process, different economic scenarios are modeled, including cash flow testing required for insurance regulatory purposes, to determine that existing assets are adequate to meet projected liability cash flows. Key variables in the modeling process include interest rates, anticipated contractowner behavior, and variable separate account performance. Contractowners bear the investment risk related to variable annuity products, subject, in limited cases, to certain minimum guaranteed rates.

The fixed account liabilities are supported by a general account portfolio, principally composed of fixed rate investments with matching duration characteristics that can generate predictable, steady rates of return. The portfolio management strategy for the fixed account considers the assets available-for-sale. This strategy enables the Company to respond to changes in market interest rates, prepayment risk, relative values of asset sectors and individual securities and loans, credit quality outlook, and other relevant factors. The objective of portfolio management is to maximize returns, taking into account interest rate and credit risk, as well as other risks. The Company’s asset/liability management discipline includes strategies to minimize exposure to loss as interest rates and economic and market conditions change. In executing this strategy, the Company uses derivative instruments to manage these risks. The Company’s derivative counterparties are of high credit quality. As of September 30, 2008, the Company held net derivative liabilities with a fair value of $209.5.

Additional sources of liquidity include borrowing facilities to meet short-term cash requirements that arise in the ordinary course of business. ILIAC maintains the following agreements:

Management believes that these sources of liquidity are adequate to meet the Company’s short-term cash obligations.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, ILIAC did not receive any capital contributions from its Parent.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, ILIAC did not pay any dividends on its common stock to its Parent.

ING reached an agreement with the Dutch government to strengthen its capital position. On November 12, 2008, ING issued to the Dutch State non-voting Tier 1 securities for a total consideration of Euro 10 billion. $1.1 billion will be contributed to the various ING U.S. insurance companies and is comprised of the proceeds from the investment by the Dutch government and the redistribution of currently existing capital within ING. The portion to be contributed to the Company, if any, has not yet been determined.

On August 23, 2005, S&P reaffirmed its AA (Very Strong) counterparty credit and financial strength rating of ING’s primary U.S. insurance operating companies (“ING U.S.”), including the Company. S&P also, on that date, affirmed the stable outlook on the core insurance operating companies. There has been no change in S&P’s rating of ING U.S., including the Company, since that date.

On July 25, 2007, Moody’s affirmed the financial strength rating of the Company, of Aa3 (Excellent) with a stable outlook. On February 12, 2008, Moody’s assigned a short-term financial strength rating of Prime-1 (P-1) and reaffirmed the long-term financial strength rating of Aa3. On October 21, 2008, Moody's placed the Aa3 insurance financial strength rating on review for possible downgrade.

On June 18, 2008, A.M. Best Company, Inc. (“A.M. Best”) reaffirmed the financial strength rating of A+ (Superior) of ING U.S., including the Company, with a stable outlook. A.M. Best assigned an issuer credit rating of AA- to ILIAC at that time.

Income tax obligations consist of the allowance on uncertain tax benefits related to IRS tax audits and state tax exams that have not been completed. The timing of the payment of the allowance on uncertain tax benefits of $23.1 cannot be reliably estimated.

(See the Recently Adopted Accounting Standards and New Accounting Pronouncements footnotes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.)

Legislative proposals, which have been or may, in the future, be considered by Congress, include repealing/modifying the estate tax, reducing the taxation on annuity benefits, changing the tax treatment of insurance products relative to other financial products, and changing life insurance company taxation. Some of these proposals, if enacted, could have a material adverse effect on life insurance, annuity, and other retirement savings product sales, while others could have a material beneficial effect. It is unlikely that Congress will enact tax changes that will adversely affect the Company’s products in 2008. The Department of Labor and the SEC have several regulatory initiatives underway to improve fee disclosures in defined contribution plans and mutual funds. Regulatory action to change fee disclosure requirements could adversely impact the market for certain of the Company’s defined contribution retirement services products, but the content of such changes as well as the timetable for implementation are uncertain at this time. The IRS and the Treasury have published final regulations, effective in 2009, that update and consolidate the rules applicable to 403(b) tax deferred annuity arrangements. The final regulations impose broad written plan document and operational compliance requirements on all 403(b) programs and contain new restrictions on annuity exchanges. The final regulations have the potential to change the marketplace for 403(b) service providers in a fundamental way and could have a material beneficial effect on providers that position themselves to assist 403(b) sponsors with plan document and operational compliance or otherwise assist with streamlining overall plan administration.

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s current disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that material information relating to the Company required to be disclosed in the Company’s periodic SEC filings is made known to them in a timely manner.

In the course of determining the required fair value of the reserves for product guarantees for annuity contracts containing guaranteed credited rates for the three months ended March 31, 2008, an error was made in the calculation of the fair value of reserves for such product guarantees. This error had no impact on customer accounts. However, this error resulted, for the three months ended March 31, 2008, in the understatement of Interest credited and other benefits to contractowners by $39.4, overstatement of net amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired by $10.4 and understatement of net loss of $(18.9). The error was identified by the Company in the course of a review by the Company of its product guarantee reserves valuation methodology undertaken during the preparation of the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. Restated unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company reflecting the correction of this first quarter 2008 error were included in Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008. See also Note 13 for a further discussion of the calculation error associated with the reserves for product guarantees, which was identified in the Company’s previously issued unaudited interim financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2008, and resulted in a restatement of such prior period interim financial statements.

The Company believes that the error was attributable to a material weakness in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting. Specifically, the Company implemented a new model in 2008 for the calculation of the fair value of the reserves for product guarantees. This model, which was performed using an end-user computing tool, contained an error in the discount rate conversion process. Such discount rates are used in the determination of the fair value of the reserves for product guarantees. In addition, the secondary review of the results did not identify that incorrect discount rates were used.

The Company has implemented enhancements to its internal controls over financial reporting to provide reasonable assurance that errors of this type will not recur. These steps include correction of the identified model errors, the implementation of additional monitoring controls to be performed on a quarterly basis, additional in-depth internal review of assumptions, and full implementation of the Company’s existing policies related to end-user computing tools. In addition, the Company has implemented definitive standards for detailed documentation supporting the product guarantee reserves valuation methodology. This includes the implementation of a formalized change control process and logic inspection to be completed for each change of the model, and additional in-depth internal review on the converted rates. The Company completed these enhancements by September 30, 2008.

As discussed above, management has implemented improvements to the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting to address the material weakness described above. Except for such changes, no changes in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2008 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal controls over financial reporting.

ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company (“ILIAC”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) are involved in threatened or pending lawsuits/arbitrations arising from the normal conduct of business. Due to the climate in insurance and business litigation/arbitrations, suits against the Company sometimes include claims for substantial compensatory, consequential, or punitive damages, and other types of relief. Moreover, certain claims are asserted as class actions, purporting to represent a group of similarly situated individuals. While it is not possible to forecast the outcome of such lawsuits/arbitrations, in light of existing insurance, reinsurance, and established reserves, it is the opinion of management that the disposition of such lawsuits/arbitrations will not have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s operations or financial position.

As with many financial services companies, the Company and its affiliates have received informal and formal requests for information from various state and federal governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations in connection with inquiries and investigations of the products and practices of the financial services industry. In each case, the Company and its affiliates have been and are providing full cooperation. For information on the focus of such regulatory inquiries and the actions undertaken by ING in connection therewith, see the “Other Regulatory Matters” section of “Management’s Narrative Analysis of the Results of Operations and Financial Condition” included in the Company’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2008 (SEC File No. 033-23376).

In addition to the normal risks of business, the Company is subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including those which are described below.

The current financial crisis has reached unprecedented levels of market volatility and may materially adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations

Markets in the United States and elsewhere have been experiencing extreme volatility and disruption, due in part to the financial stresses affecting the liquidity of the banking system and the financial markets generally. In recent weeks, this volatility and disruption have reached unprecedented levels. These circumstances have also exerted downward pressure on stock prices and the availability of credit. These market conditions may continue to affect the Company’s results of operations and investment portfolio since the Company is exposed to significant financial and capital markets risk, including changes in interest rates, credit spreads and equity prices.

The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to the market price and cash flow variability associated with changes in interest rates. A rise in interest rates will increase the net unrealized loss position of the Company’s investment portfolio and, if long-term interest rates rise dramatically within a six to twelve month time period, certain contractowners may surrender their contracts, requiring the Company to liquidate assets in an unrealized loss position. Due to the long-term nature of the liabilities associated with certain of the Company’s products, sustained declines in long term interest rates may subject us to reinvestment risks. In other situations, declines in interest rates or changes in credit spreads may result in reducing the duration of certain liabilities, creating asset liability duration mismatches and possibly lowering spread income due to minimum guaranteed interest rates on certain general account liabilities.

With the recent widening of credit spreads, the net unrealized loss position of the Company’s investment portfolio has increased, as have other than temporary impairments. If issuer credit spreads continue to widen or increase significantly over an extended period of time, it would likely exacerbate these effects, resulting in greater and additional other-than-temporary impairments.

One important primary exposure to equity risk relates to the potential for lower earnings associated with variable annuities where fee income is earned based upon the fair value of the assets under management. During the course of 2008, the declines in equity markets have negatively impacted assets under management. As a result, fee income earned on the value of those assets under management has also been negatively impacted.

In addition, certain of the Company’s products offer guaranteed benefits which increase the potential benefit exposure should equity markets decline. Due to declines in equity markets during 2008, the liability for these guaranteed benefits has increased.

Regulatory initiatives intended to alleviate the current financial crisis that have been adopted may not be effective and, in any event, may be accompanied by other initiatives, including new capital requirements or other regulations, that could materially affect the Company’s results of operations, financial condition and liquidity

In response to the financial crisis affecting the banking system and financial markets, on October 3, 2008, President Bush signed the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the “EESA”) into law. Pursuant to the EESA, the U.S. Treasury has the authority to, among other things, make equity investments in certain financial institutions and purchase mortgage-backed and other securities from financial institutions, for an aggregate amount of up to $700 billion, for the purpose of stabilizing the financial markets. The U.S. federal government, the Federal Reserve Board and comparable authorities in other countries have taken or are considering taking other actions to address the financial crisis that could further impact our business. The Company cannot predict with any certainty the effect these actions will have on the financial markets or on the Company’s business, results of operations, cash flows

and financial condition. This legislation and other proposals or actions may also have other consequences, including material effects on interest rates and foreign exchange rates, which could materially affect the Company’s investments, results of operations and liquidity in ways that are not predictable. The failure to effectively implement this legislation and related proposals or actions could also result in material adverse effects, notably increased constraints on the liquidity available in the banking system and financial markets and increased pressure on stock prices, any of which could materially and adversely affect the Company’s results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. In the event of future material deterioration in business conditions, the Company may need to raise additional capital or consider other transactions to manage our capital position or our liquidity.

In addition, the Company is subject to extensive laws and regulations that are administered and/or enforced by a number of different governmental authorities and non-governmental self-regulatory bodies, including state insurance regulators, state securities administrators, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”), the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), Financial Accounting Standards Board, and state attorneys general. In light of the current financial crisis, some of these authorities are or may in the future consider enhanced or new requirements intended to prevent future crises or otherwise assure the stability of institutions under their supervision. These authorities may also seek to exercise their supervisory or enforcement authority in new or more robust ways. All of these possibilities, if they occurred, could affect the way The Company conducts its business and manages capital, and may require the Company to satisfy increased capital requirements, any of which in turn could materially affect the Company’s results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

Continuing adverse financial market conditions may significantly affect the Company’s ability to meet liquidity needs, access to capital and cost of capital

Adverse capital market conditions may affect the availability and cost of borrowed funds, including commercial paper, thereby ultimately impacting profitability and ability to support or grow the businesses. While the Company has various sources of liquidity available, adverse market conditions could impact the cost and availability of these borrowing sources. Without sufficient liquidity, the Company could be forced to curtail certain operations, and the business could suffer.

The amount of statutory capital that the Company must hold to maintain its financial strength and credit ratings can vary significantly from time to time and is sensitive to a number of factors outside of the Company’s control

The NAIC has established regulations that provide minimum capitalization requirements based on risk-based capital (“RBC”) formulas for insurance companies. The RBC formula for life insurance companies establishes capital requirements relating to insurance, business, asset and interest rate risks, including equity, interest rate and expense recovery risks associated with variable annuities and group annuities that contain death benefits or certain living benefits.

In any particular year, statutory surplus amounts and RBC ratios may increase or decrease depending on a variety of factors – the amount of statutory income or losses generated by the Company (which itself is sensitive to equity market and credit market conditions), the amount of additional capital the Company must hold to support business growth, changes in equity market levels, the value of certain fixed-income and equity securities in its investment portfolio, the value of certain derivative instruments that do not receive hedge accounting, changes in interest rates, as well as changes to the NAIC RBC formulas. Most of these factors are outside of the Company’s control. The Company’s financial strength and credit ratings are significantly influenced by its statutory surplus amounts and RBC. In addition, rating agencies may implement changes to internal models that have the effect of increasing or decreasing the amount of statutory capital the Company must hold in order to maintain our current ratings. In addition, in extreme scenarios of equity market declines, the amount of additional statutory reserves that the Company is required to hold for variable annuity guarantees increases at a greater than linear rate. This reduces the statutory surplus used in calculating the Company’s RBC ratios. To the extent that the Company’s statutory capital resources are deemed to be insufficient to maintain a particular rating by one or more rating agencies, the Company may seek to raise additional capital. Alternatively, if the Company were unable to raise additional capital in such a scenario, the Company’s financial strength and credit ratings might be downgraded by one or more rating agencies.

Equity market volatility could negatively impact profitability and financial condition

The decline of the United States and international equity markets over an extended period of time may reduce the profitability and negatively affect the financial condition of the Company due to the following:

Changes in interest rates could have a negative impact on profitability and financial condition

Changes in interest rates may be caused by either changes in the underlying risk free rates or changes in the credit spreads required for various levels of risk within the market. Changes in interest rates may negatively affect the Company’s attempts to maintain profitable margins between the amounts earned on its general account investments and the amounts paid under its annuity contracts.

As interest rates rise, fixed annuity contract surrenders and withdrawals may increase as contractowners seek higher returns. To raise the cash necessary to fund such surrenders and withdrawals, the Company may need to sell assets at capital losses. An increase in contract surrenders and withdrawals may also require the Company to accelerate amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired, as applicable, relating to such contracts, further reducing profits. In addition, rising interest rates increase unrealized losses for fixed maturities and certain derivatives where the Company assumes credit exposure. Significant or sustained increases in interest rates may result in increased other-than-temporary impairments.

As interest rates decline, borrowers may prepay or redeem mortgages and bonds with embedded call options that are owned as investments by the Company. This may force the Company to reinvest the proceeds at lower interest rates.

All of the Company’s fixed annuity products, and the fixed account options included in some of the Company’s annuity products, contain minimum interest rate guarantees that limit the Company’s ability to lower interest rates credited to contractowners in response to lower investment returns. A decrease in the difference between earned investment income and the interest credited to contractowners further reduces profits. This decrease in profits may also require the Company to accelerate amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired, as applicable.

The Company’s investment portfolio is subject to risks that may reduce the value of invested assets and adversely affect sales, profitability, and investment returns credited to contractowners

The Company’s investment portfolio is subject to several risks, including the following:

Changes in underwriting and actual experience could materially affect profitability

The Company prices its products based on long-term assumptions regarding investment returns, mortality, persistency, and operating costs. Management establishes target returns for each product based upon these factors and the average amount of regulatory and rating agency capital that the Company must hold to support in-force contracts. The Company monitors and manages pricing and sales mix to achieve target returns. Profitability from a new business emerges over a period of years, depending on the nature and life of the product, and is subject to variability as actual results may differ from pricing assumptions.

A downgrade in the Company’s ratings may negatively affect profitability and financial condition

Ratings are an important factor in establishing the competitive position of insurance companies. A downgrade, or the potential for a downgrade, of any of the Company’s ratings may lead to lower margins and fee income due to lower assets under management, resulting from:

The Company cannot predict what actions rating organizations may take, or what actions the Company may be required to take in response to the actions of rating organizations, which could adversely affect the Company. Rating organizations assign ratings based upon several factors, including the following:

On September 18, September 29, October 2, 2008 and October 10, 2008, A.M. Best Company, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd., Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) and Standard & Poor’s, respectively, each revised its outlook for the U.S. life insurance sector to negative from stable, citing, among other things, the significant deterioration and volatility in the credit and equity markets, economic and political uncertainty, and the expected impact of realized and unrealized investment losses on life insurers’ capital levels and profitability.

In view of the difficulties experienced recently by many financial institutions, including insurance companies, it is possible that rating organizations will heighten the level of scrutiny that they apply to such institutions, will increase the frequency and scope of their credit reviews, will request additional information from the companies that they rate, and may adjust upward the capital and other requirements employed in the rating organization models for maintenance of certain ratings levels. It is possible that the outcome of such reviews of the Company will have adverse ratings consequences, which could have a material adverse effect on results of operation and financial condition.

A loss of key product distribution relationships could materially affect sales

The Company distributes certain products under agreements with other members of the financial services industry that are not affiliated with the Company. Termination of one or more of these agreements due to, for example, a change in control of one of the distributors, could reduce sales.

Competition could negatively affect the ability to maintain or increase profitability

The insurance industry is intensely competitive. The Company competes based on factors including the following:

The Company’s competitors include insurers, broker-dealers, financial advisors, asset managers, and other financial institutions, which may, for example, have greater market share, offer a broader range of products, or have higher claims-paying or credit ratings than the Company.

In recent years, there has been substantial consolidation among companies in the financial services industry resulting in increased competition from large, well-capitalized financial services firms. Many of these firms also have been able to increase their distribution systems through mergers or contractual arrangements. Furthermore, larger competitors may lower operating costs and have an ability to absorb greater risk, while maintaining financial strength ratings, allowing them to price products more competitively. While the Company cannot predict the future level of consolidation, the Company expects consolidation to continue and perhaps accelerate in the future, increasing competitive pressure.

Changes in federal income tax law or interpretations of existing tax law could affect profitability and financial condition by making some products less attractive to contractowners and increasing tax costs of contractowners or the Company

Annuity products that the Company sells currently benefit from one or more forms of tax favored status under current federal tax law. The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 and the Jobs Act and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 contain provisions that will, over time, significantly lower individual tax rates. This decrease will reduce the benefits of deferral on the build-up of value of annuities. Many of these provisions expire in 2008 and 2010. The Bush Administration, however, has proposed that many of the rate reductions and tax-favored savings initiatives be made permanent. Although the Company cannot predict the overall effect on product sales, some of these tax law changes could hinder sales and result in the increased surrender of annuity contracts.

Additionally, the Company is subject to federal corporation income tax, and benefits from certain federal tax provisions, including but not limited to, dividends received deductions, various tax credits, and insurance reserve deductions. There is risk that changes to federal tax law or in Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) interpretation of existing tax law may be enacted or adopted, and could result in materially higher corporate taxes than would be incurred under existing tax law or interpretation and adversely impact profitability.

The Company is, and may be in the future, subject to legal actions in the ordinary course of insurance, investment management, and other business operations. These legal actions may include proceedings relating to aspects of businesses and operations that are specific to the Company and proceedings that are typical of the businesses in which the Company operates. Some of these proceedings may be brought on behalf of a class. Plaintiffs may seek large or indeterminate amounts of damage, including compensatory, liquidated, treble, and/or punitive damages. Given the large or indeterminate amounts sometimes sought, and the inherent unpredictability of litigation, it is possible that an adverse outcome could, from time to time, have an adverse effect on the Company’s reputation, results of operations, or cash flows, in particular quarterly or annual periods.

Changes in regulation in the United States and recent regulatory investigations may reduce profitability

The Company’s insurance and securities business is subject to comprehensive state and federal regulation and supervision throughout the United States. The primary purpose of state regulation is to protect contractowners, and not necessarily to protect creditors and investors. State insurance and securities regulators, state attorneys general, the NAIC, the SEC, FINRA, the Department of Labor (“DOL”) and the IRS continually reexamine existing laws and regulations and may impose changes in the future. Changes in legislation and administrative policies, or new interpretations of existing laws, in areas such as employee benefit plan regulation, financial services regulation, and federal taxation, could lessen the competitive advantages of certain of the Company’s products, result in the surrender of existing contracts and policies, increase costs, reduce new product sales, or result in higher taxes affecting the Company, thus reducing the Company’s profitability.

Since 2002, the insurance industry has become the focus of increased regulatory scrutiny as various state and federal governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations conduct inquiries and investigations into the products and practices of the financial services industries. These initiatives currently focus on areas such as:

It is likely that the scope of these industry investigations will become broader before they conclude.

In some cases, this regulatory scrutiny has led to new proposed legislation and regulation that could significantly affect the financial services industry, including businesses in which the Company is engaged, or has resulted in regulatory penalties, settlements, and litigation. At this time, the Company does not believe that any of this regulatory scrutiny will have a material adverse affect on it. The Company cannot guarantee, however, that new laws, regulations, and other regulatory actions aimed at the business practices under scrutiny would not adversely affect its business. The adoption of new laws and regulations, enforcement actions, or litigation, whether or not involving the Company, could influence the manner in which the Company distributes its products, result in negative coverage of the industry by the media, cause significant harm to the Company’s reputation, and adversely impact profitability.

The Company’s products are subject to extensive regulation and failure to meet any of the complex product requirements may reduce profitability

The Company’s insurance and annuity products are subject to a complex and extensive array of state and federal tax, securities, insurance, and employee benefit plan laws, and regulations, which are administered and enforced by a number of different governmental and self-regulatory authorities, including state insurance regulators, state securities administrators, the SEC, the FINRA, the DOL, and the IRS.

For example, U.S. federal income tax law imposes requirements relating to insurance and annuity product design, administration, and investments that are conditions for beneficial tax treatment of such products under the Internal Revenue Code. Failure to administer certain contract features (for example, contractual annuity start dates in nonqualified annuities) could affect such beneficial tax treatment. Additionally, state and federal securities and insurance laws impose requirements relating to insurance and annuity product design, offering and distribution, and administration. Failure to meet any of these complex tax, securities, or insurance requirements could subject the Company to administrative penalties imposed by a particular governmental or self-regulatory authority, unanticipated costs associated with remedying such failure or other claims, harm to the Company's reputation, interruption of the Company's operations, or adversely impact profitability.

A failure of the Company’s operating systems or a compromise of security with respect to operating systems or portable electronic devices could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition

The Company is highly dependent on automated systems to record and process Company and contractowner transactions. The Company may experience a failure of

its operating systems or a compromise of its security due to technical system flaws, clerical or record-keeping errors, or tampering or manipulation of those systems by employees or unauthorized third parties. Information security risks also exist with respect to the use of portable electronic devices, such as laptops, which are particularly vulnerable to loss and theft. The Company may also be subject to disruptions of its operating systems arising from events that are wholly or partially beyond its control (for example, natural disasters, acts of terrorism, epidemics, computer viruses, and electrical/telecommunications outages). All of these risks are also applicable where the Company relies on outside vendors to provide services to it and its contractowners. Operating system failures or disruptions or the compromise of security with respect to operating systems or portable electronic devices could subject the Company to regulatory sanctions, or other claims, harm the Company’s reputation, interrupt the Company’s operations, and adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations, or financial condition.

The occurrence of natural or man-made disasters may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition

The Company is exposed to various risks arising from natural disasters, including hurricanes, global warming, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, and pandemic disease, caused by a virus such as H5N1 (the “Avian flu” virus), as well as man-made disasters, including acts of terrorism and military actions, which may adversely affect assets under management, results of operations and financial condition, as follows:

While the Company has a business continuation and crisis management plan, there can be no assurance that the Company’s plan and insurance coverages would be effective in mitigating any negative effects on operations or profitability in the event of a disaster.

The occurrence of unidentified or unanticipated risks could negatively affect the Company’s business or result in losses

The Company has developed risk management policies and procedures and expects to continue to do so in the future. Nonetheless, the Company’s policies and procedures to identify, monitor, and manage risks may not be fully effective. Many of the Company’s methods of managing risk and exposures are based upon observed historical market behavior or statistics based on historical models. As a result, these methods may not predict future exposures, which could be significantly greater than historical measures indicate. Other risk management methods depend on the evaluation of information regarding markets, clients, catastrophe occurrence, or other

matters, that is publicly available or otherwise accessible to the Company. This information may not always be accurate, complete, up-to-date or properly evaluated. Management of operational, legal, and regulatory risks requires, among other things, policies and procedures to record and verify large numbers of transactions and events. These policies and procedures may not be fully effective.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


4.13	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-75974), as filed on February 28, 1997.

4.14	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-75962), as filed on April 17, 1996.

4.15	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 14 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-75962), as filed on April 17, 1998.

4.16	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-75982), as filed on April 22, 1996.

4.17	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-75980), as filed on August 19, 1997.

4.18	Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-56297), as filed on June 8, 1998.

4.19	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-79122), as filed on August 16, 1995.

4.20	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 32 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-34370), as filed on December 16, 1997.

4.21	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 30 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-34370), as filed on September 29, 1997.

4.22	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 26 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-34370), as filed on February 21, 1997.

4.23	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 35 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-34370), as filed on April 17, 1998.

4.24	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-87932), as filed on September 19, 1995.

4.25	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-79122), as filed on April 17, 1998.

4.26	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-79122), as filed on April 22, 1997.

4.27	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 21 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-75996), as filed on February 16, 2000.

4.28	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 13 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-01107), as filed on April 7, 1999.

4.29	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 37 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-34370), as filed on April 9, 1999.

4.30	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-87305), as filed on December 13, 1999.

4.31	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 18 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-56297), as filed on August 30, 2000.

4.32	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No.17 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-75996), as filed on April 7, 1999.

4.33	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 19 to Registration Statement on From N-4 (File No. 333-01107), as filed on February 16, 2000.

4.34	Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-2 (File No. 33- 64331), as filed on November 16, 1995.

4.35	Incorporated by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-2 (File No. 33-64331), as filed on January 17, 1996.

4.36	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 30 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-75988), as filed on December 30, 2003.

4.37	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 18 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-75980), as filed on April 16, 2003.

4.38	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 30 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-01107), as filed on April 10, 2002.

4.39	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 24 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-81216), as filed on April 11, 2003.

4.40	Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-109860), as filed on October 21, 2003.

4.41	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 39 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-75962), as filed on December 17, 2004.

4.42	Incorporated by reference to Initial Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-130822), as filed on January 3, 2006.

4.43	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-87131), as filed on December 15, 1999.

4.44	Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-59749), as filed on June 1, 1995.


UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 _______________________

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)
x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 OR
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ___________________ to ____________________
Commission File Number: 333-150147, 333-133157, 333-133158, 333-130833, 333-130827
ING LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY COMPANY (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Connecticut (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) One Orange Way Windsor, Connecticut (Address of principal executive offices)		71-0294708 (IRS Employer Identification No.) 06095-4774 (Zip Code)
(860) 580-4646 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 55,000 shares of Common Stock, $50 par value, as of November 12, 2008, are issued and outstanding, all of which were directly owned by Lion Connecticut Holdings Inc.

NOTE: WHEREAS ING LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY COMPANY MEETS THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN GENERAL INSTRUCTION H(1)(a) AND (b) OF FORM 10-Q, THIS FORM IS BEING FILED WITH THE REDUCED DISCLOSURE FORMAT PURSUANT TO GENERAL INSTRUCTION H(2).

	INDEX

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)	PAGE

Item 1.	Financial Statements:
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations	3
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholder's Equity	6
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	7
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	8

Item 2.	Management’s Narrative Analysis of the Results of Operations and Financial Condition	31

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	53


PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	55

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	55

Item 6.	Exhibits	66

Signature		67

Exhibit Index		68

	Three months ended September 30,		Nine months ended September 30,
	2008	2007	2008	2007
Statutory rate	35.0%	35.0%	35.0%	35.0%
Dividend received deduction	(0.6)%	(9.4)%	2.6%	(7.9)%
Audit Settlement	4.9%	-	6.3%	-
State taxes	(1.7)%	-	(1.5)%	-
Valuation allowance	(30.0)%	-	(25.3)%	-
Other	(1.2)%	0.4%	(0.5)%	0.8%
Effective rate at September 30	6.4%	26.0%	16.6%	27.9%

			2008		2007
Net unrealized capital holding gains (losses) arising
	during the period⁽¹⁾	$	(644.6)	$	(57.0)
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) and other
	items included in Net income (loss)⁽²⁾		(237.5)		(31.4)
Net change in unrealized capital gains (losses) on securities		$	(407.1)	$	(25.6)

Balance at December 31, 2007	$	47.4
Additions for tax positions related to current year		1.6
Additions for tax positions related to prior year		2.1
Reductions for tax positions related to prior years		(20.6)
Reductions for settlement with taxing authorities		(9.2)
Balance at September 30, 2008	$	21.3

2008				2007
% of Total CMBS		Vintage		% of Total CMBS		Vintage

AAA	88.4%	2008	0.3%	AAA	84.1%	2007	25.4%
AA	7.3%	2007	22.1%	AA	9.3%	2006	11.5%
A	4.1%	2006	20.3%	A	6.4%	2005 and prior	63.1%
BBB	0.2%	2005 and prior	57.3%	BBB	0.2%		100.0%
	100.0%		100.0%		100.0%

2008				2007
% of Total Other ABS		Vintage		% of Total Other ABS		Vintage
AAA	56.1%	2008	4.2%	AAA	60.1%	2007	26.2%
AA	18.0%	2007	16.4%	AA	5.8%	2006	12.9%
A	10.5%	2006	24.0%	A	16.8%	2005 and prior	60.9%
BBB	15.0%	2005 and prior	55.4%	BBB	16.7%		100.0%
BB and below	0.4%		100.0%	BB and below	0.6%
	100.0%				100.0%

	Exhibit Index

Exhibit Number	Description of Exhibit
3.1	Certificate of Incorporation as amended and restated October 1, 2007, incorporated by reference to the ILIAC Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on March 31, 2008 (File No. 33-23376).

3.2	Amended and Restated ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company By-Laws, effective October 1, 2007, incorporated by reference to the ILIAC Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on March 31, 2008 (File No. 33-23376).

4.1	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 14 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-75964), as filed on July 29, 1997.

4.2	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-75980), as filed on February 12, 1997.

4.3	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 12 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-75964), as filed on February 11, 1997.

4.4	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-75986), as filed on April 12, 1996.

4.5	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 12 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-01107), as filed on February 4, 1999.

4.6	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-75988), as filed on April 15, 1996.

4.7	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-81216), as filed on April 17, 1996.

4.8	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-91846), as filed on April 15, 1996.

4.9	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-91846), as filed on August 6, 1996.

4.10	Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-01107), as filed on February 21, 1996.

4.11	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 12 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-75982), as filed on February 20, 1997.

4.12	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-75992), as filed on February 13, 1997.

4.45	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-59749), as filed on April 16, 1997.

4.46	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 9 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-80750), as filed on April 17, 1998.

4.47	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-80750), as filed on April 23, 1997.

4.48	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-59749), as filed on November 26, 1997.

4.49	Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form S-2 (File No. 33-63657), as filed on October 25, 1995.

4.50	Incorporated by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on Form S-2 (File No. 33-63657), as filed on January 17, 1996.

4.51	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on Form S-2 (File No. 33-63657), as filed on November 24, 1997.

4.52	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on Form S-2 (File No. 33-64331), as filed on November 24, 1997.

4.53	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-59749), as filed on November 26, 1997.

4.54	Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-59749), as filed on June 1, 1995.

4.55	Incorporated by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 33-59749), as filed on April 16, 1997.

31.1⁺	Certificate of David A. Wheat pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2⁺	Certificate of Richard T. Mason pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1⁺	Certificate of David A. Wheat pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2⁺	Certificate of Richard T. Mason pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

⁺ Filed herewith.