-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, JF5DXAsvgLDnurYga9wYJgrBttM6gSCBhDGew34jA/mhW62HV6dbhm8TQYykCmmU tuV6GgUKU8habKjIyj6uFQ== 0000950149-98-000603.txt : 19980401 0000950149-98-000603.hdr.sgml : 19980401 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000950149-98-000603 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 6 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19971231 FILED AS OF DATE: 19980331 SROS: NONE FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: IEA INCOME FUND IX L P CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000836972 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SERVICES-EQUIPMENT RENTAL & LEASING, NEC [7359] IRS NUMBER: 943069954 STATE OF INCORPORATION: CA FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-18169 FILM NUMBER: 98581596 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 444 MARKET ST 15TH FLR STREET 2: C/O INTERMODAL EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATE CITY: SAN FRANCISCO STATE: CA ZIP: 94111 BUSINESS PHONE: 4156778990 10-K 1 IEA INCOME FUND IX, L.P. 1 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED, EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 7, 1996]. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 ----------------- OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED] For the transition period from ________ to ________. Commission file number 0-18169 IEA INCOME FUND IX, L.P. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) California 94-3069954 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) incorporation or organization) 444 Market Street, 15th Floor, San Francisco, California 94111 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code (415) 677-8990 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Name of each exchange on Title of each class which registered ------------------- ---------------- Not Applicable --------------------------- ---------------------------- Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: UNITS OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS (Title of Class) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X . No . ----- ----- Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X] The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant is not applicable. Documents incorporated by Reference PART I Item 1 - Business Prospectus of IEA Income Fund IX, L.P. dated September 12, 1988 included as part of Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-23321) Certificate of Limited Partnership of IEA Income Fund IX, L.P., filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-23321) PART II Item 9 - Changes in and Dis- Current Report on Form 8-K of IEA Income Fund IX, agreements with L.P., filed February 7, 1997 and April 14, 1997, Accountants on respectively, and Amendment No. 1 to Current Accounting and Report on Form 8-K filed February 26, 1997. Financial Disclosure 2 PART I Item 1. Business (a) General Development of Business The Registrant is a California limited partnership formed on June 8, 1988 to engage in the business of leasing marine dry cargo containers to unaffiliated third-party lessees. The Registrant was initially capitalized with $100, and commenced offering its limited partnership interests to the public during the week of September 12, 1988, pursuant to its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-23321). The offering terminated on August 31, 1989. The Registrant raised $16,996,100 in subscription proceeds. The following table sets forth the use of said subscription proceeds:
Percentage of Amount Gross Proceeds ----------- -------------- Gross Subscription Proceeds $16,996,100 100.0% Public Offering Expenses: Underwriting Commissions $ 1,699,600 10.0% Offering and Organization Expenses $ 434,497 2.6% ----------- ----- Total Public Offering Expenses $ 2,134,097 12.6% ----------- ----- Net Proceeds $14,862,003 87.4% Acquisition Fees $ 145,536 0.8% Working Capital Reserve $ 162,897 1.0% ----------- ----- Gross Proceeds Invested in Equipment $14,553,570 85.6% =========== =====
2 3 The general partner of the Registrant is Cronos Capital Corp. ("CCC"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cronos Holdings/Investments (U.S.), Inc., a Delaware corporation. Cronos Holdings/Investments (U.S.), Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Cronos Group, a Luxembourg company. These and other affiliated companies are ultimately wholly-owned by The Cronos Group, a holding company registered in Luxembourg ("the Holding Company") and are collectively referred to as the "Group". The activities of the container division of the Group are managed through the Group's subsidiary in the United Kingdom, Cronos Containers Limited ("the Leasing Company"). The Leasing Company manages the leasing operations of all equipment owned or managed by the Group on its own behalf or on behalf of other third-party container owners, including all other programs organized by CCC. Pursuant to the Limited Partnership Agreement of the Registrant, all authority to administer the business of the Registrant is vested in CCC. CCC has entered into a Leasing Agent Agreement, whereby the Leasing Company has assumed the responsibility for the container leasing activities of CCC's managed programs. For information concerning the containers acquired by the Registrant, see Item 2, "Properties." As reported in the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K and Amendment No. 1 to Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on February 7, 1997 and February 26, 1997, respectively, Arthur Andersen, London, England, resigned as auditors of The Cronos Group, a Luxembourg Corporation headquartered in Orchard Lea, England (the "Parent Company"), on February 3, 1997. The Parent Company is the indirect corporate parent of CCC, the General Partner of the Partnership. In its letter of resignation to the Parent Company, Arthur Andersen stated that it resigned as auditors of the Parent Company and all other entities affiliated with the Parent Company. While its letter of resignation was not addressed to CCC, Arthur Andersen confirmed to CCC that its resignation as auditors of the entities referred to in its letter of resignation included its resignation as auditors of CCC and the Registrant. CCC does not believe, based upon the information currently available to it, that Arthur Andersen's resignation was triggered by any concern over the accounting policies and procedures followed by the Registrant. Arthur Andersen's report on the financial statements of CCC and the Registrant, for years preceding 1996, has not contained an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, nor was any such report qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles. During the Registrant's 1995 fiscal year and the subsequent interim period preceding Arthur Andersen's resignation, there have been no disagreements between CCC or the Registrant and Arthur Andersen on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure. The Registrant retained a new auditor, Moore Stephens, P.C. on April 10, 1997, as reported in its Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 14, 1997. In connection with its resignation, Arthur Andersen also prepared a report pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(b)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for filing by the Parent Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Following the report of Arthur Andersen, the SEC, on February 10, 1997, commenced a private investigation of the Parent Company for the purpose of investigating the matters discussed in such report and related matters. The Registrant does not believe that the focus of the SEC's investigation is upon the Registrant or CCC. CCC is unable to predict the outcome of the SEC's ongoing private investigation of the Parent Company. In 1993, the Parent Company negotiated a credit facility (hereinafter, the "Credit Facility") with several banks for the use of the Parent Company and its affiliates, including CCC. At December 31, 1996, approximately $73,500,000 in principal indebtedness was outstanding under the Credit Facility. As a party to the Credit Facility, CCC is jointly and severally liable for the repayment of all principal and interest owed under the Credit Facility. The obligations of CCC, and the five other subsidiaries of the Parent Company that are borrowers under the Credit Facility, are guaranteed by the Parent Company. 3 4 Following negotiations in 1997 with the banks providing the Credit Facility, an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement was executed in June 1997, subject to various actions being taken by the Parent Company and its subsidiaries, primarily relating to the provision of additional collateral. This Agreement was further amended in July 1997 and the provisions of the Agreement and its Amendment converted the facility to a term loan, payable in installments, with a final maturity date of May 31, 1998. At December 31, 1997, approximately $37,600,000 was outstanding under the Credit Facility. The terms of the Agreement and its Amendment also provide for additional security over shares in the subsidiary of the Parent Company that owns the head office of the Parent Company's container leasing operations. They also provided for the loans to Stefan M. Palatin, the Chairman of the Parent Company (the "Chairman") and its Chief Executive Officer (and a Director of CCC), of approximately $5,990,000 and $3,700,000 (totaling approximately $9,690,000) to be restructured as obligations of the Chairman to another subsidiary of the Parent Company. These obligations have been collaterally assigned to the lending banks, together with the pledge of 1,000,000 shares of the Parent Company's Common Stock owned by the Chairman. These 1,000,000 shares represent 11% of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Parent Company as of December 31, 1997. The shares of the Parent Company are traded on NASDAQ (CRNSF). (The Chairman, including the 1,000,000 shares pledged to the banks, owns approximately 55% of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Parent Company as of December 31, 1997). Additionally, CCC granted the lending banks a security interest in the fees to which it is entitled for the services it renders to the container leasing partnerships of which it acts as general partner, including its fee income payable by the Partnership. The lending banks have indicated that they will not renew the Credit Facility, and the Parent Company has yet to secure a source for repayment of the balance due under the Credit Facility at May 31, 1998. CCC is currently in discussions with the management of the Parent Company to provide assurance that the management of the container leasing partnerships managed by CCC, including the Registrant, is not disrupted pending a refinancing or reorganization of the indebtedness of the Parent Company and its affiliates. The Registrant is not a borrower under the Credit Facility, and neither the containers nor the other assets of the Registrant have been pledged as collateral under the Credit Facility. The Registrant is unable to determine the impact, if any, these concerns may have on the future operating results and financial condition of the Registrant or CCC and the Leasing Company's ability to manage the Registrant's fleet in subsequent periods. (b) Financial Information About Industry Segments Inapplicable. (c) Narrative Description of Business (c)(1)(i) A marine cargo container is a reusable metal container designed for the efficient carriage of cargo with a minimum of exposure to loss from damage or theft. Containers are manufactured to conform to worldwide standards of container dimensions and container ship fittings adopted by the International Standards Organization ("ISO") in 1968. The standard container is either 20' long x 8' wide x 8'6" high (one twenty-foot equivalent unit ("TEU"), the standard unit of physical measurement in the container industry) or 40' long x 8' wide x 8'6" high (two TEU). Standardization of the construction, maintenance and handling of containers allows containers to be picked up, dropped off, stored and repaired effectively throughout the world. This standardization is the foundation on which the container industry has developed. Standard dry cargo containers are rectangular boxes with no moving parts, other than doors, and are typically made of steel. They are constructed to carry a wide variety of cargos ranging from heavy industrial raw materials to light-weight finished goods. Specialized containers include, among others, refrigerated containers for the transport of temperature-sensitive goods and tank containers for the carriage of liquid cargo. 4 5 One of the primary benefits of containerization has been the ability of the shipping industry to effectively lower freight rates due to the efficiencies created by standardized intermodal containers. Containers can be handled much more efficiently than loose cargo and are typically shipped via several modes of transportation, including truck, railway and ship. Containers require loading and unloading only once and remain sealed until arrival at the final destination, significantly reducing transport time, labor and handling costs and losses due to damage and theft. Efficient movement of containerized cargo between ship and shore reduces the amount of time that a ship must spend in port and reduces the transit time of freight moves. The logistical advantages and reduced freight rates brought about by containerization have been a major catalyst for world trade growth during the last twenty-five years, which in turn has generated increased demand for containerization. The rapid growth of containerization began with the standardization of equipment sizes by international agreement in the late 1960's. Initially confined to the highly competitive trade routes among the industrialized nations, containerization expanded into substantially all free-world trade routes by the early 1970's. Throughout the decade of the 1970's, conversion from break bulk shipping methods to containers gained momentum in an environment of generally robust growth in world trade (except during the 1975-76 world-wide recession). Both shipping lines and container leasing companies responded to this growing market demand with major container purchases, while container manufacturers substantially boosted production capacity. During the early and mid-1980's, the container industry encountered alternating periods of slow trade growth, creating excess container capacity, followed by periods of economic recovery. From the late 1980s to 1991, the container industry generally experienced a balance in supply and demand for equipment. In 1992, companies embarked on ambitious container production programs encouraged by positive economic forecasts and the profitability of the industry in previous years. This produced an oversupply of containers as some of the major world economies slipped into recession and ocean carriers and leasing companies built up large container inventories. During 1993, container purchasing declined, generally helping to reduce the oversupply of containers. During 1994 and 1995, the world's major industrialized nations emerged from a global economic recession. Consequently, excess equipment inventories that had resulted from the sluggish growth in world trade during 1992 and 1993, as well as increased production capacity, were absorbed. However, since 1995, the growth of the industry's fleet, as well as containership tonnage, outpaced increases in world containerized trade and resulted in a steady decline in container prices to levels not seen in a decade. Consequently, ocean carriers reduced their holding of leased container equipment and increased the number of containers purchased for their own account. Additionally, ocean carriers, through the efforts of strategic shipping alliances, were able to increase the efficiency of utilizing owned containers, further reducing their reliance on leased containers. As a result, the container leasing industry has, since mid - 1995, experienced a decline in container utilization and per-diem rental rates. The Registrant believes that the favorable growth of containerization has been and will be impacted in subsequent years for the following reasons: o Lower freight rates resulting from containerization are generating new cargos that previously were not economical to export. Containerization provides inexpensive, timely and secure transport to manufacturers allowing them to take advantage of regional opportunities in technology or labor, and to move products to different locations at various stages of production; o Intermodal traffic is expected to continue to grow, and industrialized countries are continuing to improve intermodal infrastructure (i.e., railways, roads and ports); o Shippers continue to demand transportation of cargo by containers rather than break-bulk; o Countries with rapidly-growing economies in emerging markets are continuing to build new container port facilities that accommodate an increased flow of containerized trade; and o Trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement ("NAFTA") and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade ("GATT"), should further stimulate world trade, and, therefore containerized trade. 5 6 The container leasing industry has been a significant contributor to the growth of containerization. To an ocean carrier, the primary benefits of leasing rather than owning containers are as follows: o Reduced Capital Expenditures. Leasing is an attractive option to ocean carriers because ownership of containers requires significant capital expenditures. Carriers constantly evaluate their investment strategy, with container purchasing competing directly with other expenditure requirements, such as ship purchases, ship conversions and terminal improvements. Container leasing allows ocean carriers to invest capital in assets that are more central to their business. o Improved Asset Management. Trade flow imbalances and seasonal demands frequently leave ocean carriers with regional surpluses or shortages of containers, requiring costly repositioning of empty containers. Leasing companies help ocean carriers manage these trade imbalances by providing the inventory to service demand, reducing the costs of maintaining local inventories and minimizing repositioning expenses. By matching different carriers' container needs, leasing companies can reduce their own risks of container inventory imbalances and seasonality through a portfolio of lessees as well as variations in lease terms. o Increased Container Fleet Flexibility. Ocean carriers benefit from the variety of lease types offered by leasing companies such as the master lease, long-term and short-term lease and direct financing lease. These various leases give ocean carriers flexibility in sizing their fleets while minimizing capital costs. For example, master lease agreements give ocean carriers the option of adjusting the size of their fleets, with the flexibility to pick-up and drop-off containers at various locations around the world. Dry cargo containers are the most-commonly used type of container in the shipping industry. The Registrant's dry cargo container fleet is constructed of all Corten(R) steel (Corten(R) roofs, walls, doors and undercarriage), a high-tensile steel yielding greater damage and corrosion resistance than mild steel. The Registrant's containers are leased primarily to ocean-going steamship companies operating in major trade routes (see Item 1(d)). Most if not all of the Registrant's marine dry cargo containers are leased pursuant to operating leases, primarily master leases, where the containers are leased to the ocean carrier on a daily basis for any desired length of time, with the flexibility of picking up and dropping off containers at various agreed upon locations around the world and, secondarily, term leases (1-5 years) and one-way or round-trip leases. Master lease agreements. A master lease is designed to provide greater flexibility by allowing customers to pick-up and drop-off containers where and when needed, subject to restrictions and availability, on pre-agreed terms. The commercial terms of master leases are generally negotiated annually. Master leases also define the number of containers that may be returned within each calendar month and the return locations and applicable drop-off charges. Because of the increased flexibility they offer, master leases usually command higher per-diem rates and generate more ancillary fees (including pick-up, drop-off, handling and off-hire fees) than term leases. Term lease agreements. Term lease agreements include short-term and long-term leases. Long-term lease agreements define the number of containers to be leased, the pick-up and drop-off locations, the applicable per-diem rental rate for the duration of the lease and the early termination penalties that may apply in the event of early redelivery. Ocean carriers use long-term leases when they have a need for identified containers for a specified term. Long-term leases usually are not terminated early by the customer and provide the Registrant with stable and relatively predictable sources of revenue, although per-diem rates and ancillary charges are lower under long-term leases than under master lease agreements. Short-term lease agreements have a duration of less than one year and include one-way, repositioning and round-trip leases. They differ from master leases in that they define the number and the term of containers to be leased. Ocean carriers use one-way leases to manage trade imbalances (where more containerized cargo moves in one direction than another) by picking up a container in one port and dropping it off at another after one or more legs of a voyage. Except for direct financing leases, lease rates typically are highest for short-term leases. 6 7 Under these leases, customers are responsible for paying all taxes and service charges arising from container use, maintaining the containers in good and safe operating condition while on lease and paying for repairs upon redelivery, other than ordinary wear and tear. Some leases provide for a "damage protection plan" whereby lessees, for an additional payment (which may be in the form of a higher per-diem rate), are relieved of the responsibility of paying some of the repair costs upon redelivery of the containers. The Leasing Company has historically provided this service on a limited basis to selected customers. Repairs provided under such plans are carried out by the same depots, under the same procedures, as are repairs to containers not covered by such plans. Customers also are required to insure leased containers against physical damage and loss, and against third party liability for loss, damage, bodily injury or death. All containers are inspected and repaired when redelivered by a customer, and customers are obligated to pay for all damage repair, excluding wear and tear, according to standardized industry guidelines. Depots in major port areas perform repair and maintenance which is verified by independent surveyors or the Leasing Company's technical and operations staff. Before any repair or refurbishment is authorized on older containers in the Registrant's fleet, the Leasing Company's technical and operations staff reviews the age, condition and type of container and its suitability for continued leasing. The Leasing Company compares the cost of such repair or refurbishment with the prevailing market resale price that might be obtained for that container and makes the appropriate decision whether to repair or sell the container. The non-cancelable terms of the operating leases of the Registrant's containers will not be sufficient to return to the Registrant as lessor the purchase price of the equipment. In order to recover the original investment in the equipment and achieve an adequate return thereon, it is necessary to renew the lease, lease the equipment to another lessee at the end of the initial lease term, or sell the equipment. The Registrant estimates that a dry cargo container may be used as a leased marine cargo container for a period ranging from 10 to 15 years. The Registrant disposes of used containers in a worldwide market for used containers in which buyers include wholesalers, mini-storage operators, construction companies and others. As the Registrant's fleet ages, a larger proportion of its revenue will be derived from selling its containers. Of the 2,116 twenty-foot, 717 forty-foot and 1,386 forty-foot high-cube dry cargo containers owned by the Registrant as of December 31, 1997, 1,665 twenty-foot (or 79% thereof), 598 forty-foot (or 83% thereof) and 1,215 forty-foot high-cube dry cargo containers (or 88% thereof) were on lease. The following table sets forth the information on the lease terms with respect to the containers on lease:
Number of Containers ---------- 20-Foot Dry Cargo Containers: Term Leases 164 Master Leases 1,501 40-Foot Dry Cargo Containers: Term Leases 54 Master Leases 544 40-Foot High-Cube Dry Cargo Containers: Term Leases 160 Master Leases 1,055
The Leasing Company will make payments to the Registrant based upon rentals collected from ocean carriers after deducting certain operating expenses associated with the containers, such as the base management fee payable to CCC, certain expense reimbursements to CCC, the costs of maintenance and repairs not performed by lessees, independent agent fees and expenses, depot expenses for handling, inspection and storage, and additional insurance. 7 8 The Registrant's sales and marketing operations are conducted through the Leasing Company, in the United Kingdom, with support provided by area offices and dedicated agents located in San Francisco, California; Iselin, New Jersey; Windsor, England; Hamburg; Antwerp; Auckland; Genoa; Singapore; Hong Kong; Sydney; Tokyo; Taipei; Seoul; Rio de Janeiro; and Shanghai. Each of the Leasing Company's area offices and dedicated agents is staffed with local people familiar with the customers and language of the region. The Leasing Company's marketing directors have been employed in the container industry in their respective regions for an average of 12 years, building direct personal relationships with the local ocean carriers and locally-based representatives of other ocean carriers. The Leasing Company also maintains agency relationships with over 45 independent agents around the world, who are generally paid a commission based upon the amount of revenues they generate in the region or the number of containers that are leased from their area on behalf of the Registrant. They are located in jurisdictions where the volume of the Leasing Company's business necessitates a presence in the area but is not sufficient to justify a fully-functioning Leasing Company office or dedicated agent. These agents provide marketing support to the area offices covering the region, together with limited operational support. In addition, the Leasing Company relies on the services of over 350 independently-owned and operated depots around the world to inspect, repair, maintain and store containers while off-hire. The Leasing Company's area offices authorize all container movements into and out of the depot and supervise all repair and maintenance performed by the depot. The Leasing Company's technical staff sets the standards for repair of its owned and managed fleet throughout the world and monitors the quality of depot repair work. The depots provide a vital link to the Leasing Company's operations, as the redelivery of a container into a depot is the point at which the container is off-hired from one customer and repaired in preparation for re-leasing to the next, and the point when the Leasing Company's area offices report the container's movements onto the Leasing Company's equipment tracking system. The Leasing Company's computer system has the capability to accommodate future developments, such as allowing depots access to record directly on the system the on-hire and off-hire activity of containers delivered into the depot. It also has the capability of verifying the terms of redelivery authorized by the area offices. These functions are currently being performed by the Leasing Company's area offices. The Registrant relies upon the financial and operational systems provided by the Leasing Company and its affiliates, as well as the systems provided by other independent third parties. The Registrant has received assurances from the Leasing Company and independent third parties, indicating that plans have been developed and implemented to address issues related to the impact year 2000 will have on these systems. The financial impact of making these required system changes is not expected to be material to the Registrant's financial position, results of operations or cash flows. (c)(1)(ii) Inapplicable. (c)(1)(iii) Inapplicable. (c)(1)(iv) Inapplicable. (c)(1)(v) The Registrant's containers are leased globally, therefore, seasonal fluctuations are minimal. Other economic and business factors to which the transportation industry in general and the container leasing industry in particular are subject, include inflation and fluctuations in general business conditions and fluctuations in supply and demand for equipment resulting from, among other things, obsolescence, changes in the methods or economics of a particular mode of transportation or changes in governmental regulations or safety standards. (c)(1)(vi) The Registrant established an initial working capital reserve of approximately $163,000 (approximately 1% of subscription proceeds raised). In addition, the Registrant may reserve additional amounts from anticipated cash distributions to the partners to meet working capital requirements. Amounts due under master leases are calculated at the end of each month and billed approximately six to eight days thereafter. Amounts due under short-term and long-term leases are set forth in the respective lease agreements and are generally payable monthly. However, payment is normally received within 45-100 days of receipt. Past due penalties are not customarily collected from lessees, and accordingly are not generally levied by the Leasing Company against lessees of the Registrant's containers. 8 9 (c)(1)(vii) For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, no single lessee accounted for 10% or more of the Registrant's rental income. The Registrant does not believe that its ongoing business is dependent upon a single customer, although the loss of one or more of its largest customers could have an adverse effect upon its business. (c)(1)(viii) Inapplicable. (c)(1)(ix) Inapplicable. (c)(1)(x) Competition among container leasing companies is based upon several factors, including the location and availability of inventory, lease rates, the type, quality and condition of the containers, the quality and flexibility of the service offered and the confidence in and professional relationship with the lessor. Other factors include the speed with which a leasing company can prepare its containers for lease and the ease with which a lessee believes it can do business with a lessor or its local area office. The Leasing Company believes that it, on behalf of the Registrant, competes favorably on all of these factors. The Leasing Company, on behalf of the Registrant, competes with various container leasing companies in the markets in which it conducts business, including Transamerica Leasing, GE-Seaco, Florens Container Corp., Textainer Group, Triton Container International, Interpool Inc., Xtra Group, Container Applications Inc. and others. During 1996 and 1997, two of the container leasing industry's largest mergers transpired. The acquisition of Trans Ocean Ltd by Transamerica Leasing in 1996, and the 1997 merger between the fleets of Genstar Container Corp. and Sea Containers to form GE-Seaco, resulted in the creation of the two largest leasing organizations in the container leasing industry. It is estimated that, at the end of 1997, these two organizations controlled approximately 45% of the worldwide leased container fleet. These and other competitors of the Leasing Company may have greater financial resources and may be capable of offering lower per-diem rates. Since 1996, the container leasing industry has also experienced the formation of new leasing companies, which have been able to compete at lower per-diem rates as a result of the decline in container prices and cost of capital. In the Leasing Company's experience, however, ocean carriers will generally lease containers from more than one leasing company in order to minimize dependence on a single supplier. In addition, not all container leasing companies compete in the same market, as some supply only dry cargo containers and not specialized containers, while others offer only long-term leasing. (c)(1)(xi) Inapplicable. (c)(1)(xii) Inapplicable. (c)(1)(xiii) The Registrant, as a limited partnership, is managed by CCC, the general partner, and accordingly does not itself have any employees. CCC has 19 employees, consisting of 4 officers, 4 other managers and 11 clerical and staff personnel. (d) Financial Information About Foreign and Domestic Operations and Export Sales The Registrant's business is not divided between foreign or domestic operations. The Registrant's business is the leasing of containers worldwide to ocean-going steamship companies. To this extent, the Registrant's operations are subject to the fluctuations of worldwide economic and political conditions that may affect the pattern and levels of world trade. Rental income from leases to foreign customers exceeded 90% of the Registrant's total rental income for the years 1997, 1996 and 1995. The Registrant believes that the profitability of, and risks associated with, leases to foreign customers is generally the same as those of leases to domestic customers. The Registrant's leases generally require all payments to be made in United States currency. 9 10 Item 2. Properties As of December 31, 1997, the Registrant owned 2,116 twenty-foot, 717 forty-foot and 1,386 forty-foot high-cube marine dry cargo containers suitable for transporting cargo by rail, sea or highway. All but 200 twenty-foot and 400 forty-foot high-cube dry cargo containers were originally acquired from container manufacturers located in Korea, India and Taiwan. Pursuant to undertakings made in its Registration Statement No. 33-23321, Section 4.3 and 7.2(j) of the Partnership Agreement in the Registration Statement No. 33-23321, the Registrant purchased 200 used twenty-foot and 400 used forty-foot high-cube marine dry cargo containers from the general partner in 1989. These containers were originally purchased by the general partner during the fourth quarter of 1988 from a Korean manufacturer. The average useful life and manufacturers' invoice cost of the Registrant's fleet as of December 31, 1997 were as follows:
Estimated Useful Life Average Age Average Cost ----------- ----------- ------------ 20-Foot Dry Cargo Containers 10-15 years 8 years $2,875 40-Foot Dry Cargo Containers 10-15 years 8 years $4,331 40-Foot High-Cube Dry Cargo Containers 10-15 years 9 years $4,709
Utilization by lessees of the Registrant's containers fluctuates over time depending on the supply of and demand for containers in the Registrant's inventory locations. During 1997, utilization of the Registrant's containers averaged 81%. During 1997, the Registrant disposed of 57 twenty-foot, 31 forty-foot and 124 forty-foot high-cube marine dry cargo containers at an average book loss of $486 per container. Item 3. Legal Proceedings As reported in the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K and Amendment No. 1 to Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on February 7, 1997 and February 26, 1997, respectively, Arthur Andersen, London, England, resigned as auditors of The Cronos Group, a Luxembourg Corporation headquartered in Orchard Lea, England (the "Parent Company"), on February 3, 1997. The Parent Company is the indirect corporate parent of CCC, the General Partner of the Partnership. In its letter of resignation to the Parent Company, Arthur Andersen stated that it resigned as auditors of the Parent Company and all other entities affiliated with the Parent Company. While its letter of resignation was not addressed to CCC, Arthur Andersen confirmed to CCC that its resignation as auditors of the entities referred to in its letter of resignation included its resignation as auditors of CCC and the Registrant. CCC does not believe, based upon the information currently available to it, that Arthur Andersen's resignation was triggered by any concern over the accounting policies and procedures followed by the Registrant. Arthur Andersen's report on the financial statements of CCC and the Registrant, for years preceding 1996, has not contained an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, nor was any such report qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles. During the Registrant's 1995 fiscal year and the subsequent interim period preceding Arthur Andersen's resignation, there have been no disagreements between CCC or the Registrant and Arthur Andersen on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure. 10 11 The Registrant retained a new auditor, Moore Stephens, P.C. on April 10, 1997, as reported in its Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 14, 1997. In connection with its resignation, Arthur Andersen also prepared a report pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(b)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for filing by the Parent Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Following the report of Arthur Andersen, the SEC, on February 10, 1997, commenced a private investigation of the Parent Company for the purpose of investigating the matters discussed in such report and related matters. The Registrant does not believe that the focus of the SEC's investigation is upon the Registrant or CCC. CCC is unable to predict the outcome of the SEC's ongoing private investigation of the Parent Company. In 1993, the Parent Company negotiated a credit facility (hereinafter, the "Credit Facility") with several banks for the use of the Parent Company and its affiliates, including CCC. At December 31, 1996, approximately $73,500,000 in principal indebtedness was outstanding under the Credit Facility. As a party to the Credit Facility, CCC is jointly and severally liable for the repayment of all principal and interest owed under the Credit Facility. The obligations of CCC, and the five other subsidiaries of the Parent Company that are borrowers under the Credit Facility, are guaranteed by the Parent Company. Following negotiations in 1997 with the banks providing the Credit Facility, an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement was executed in June 1997, subject to various actions being taken by the Parent Company and its subsidiaries, primarily relating to the provision of additional collateral. This Agreement was further amended in July 1997 and the provisions of the Agreement and its Amendment converted the facility to a term loan, payable in installments, with a final maturity date of May 31, 1998. At December 31, 1997, approximately $37,600,000 was outstanding under the Credit Facility. The terms of the Agreement and its Amendment also provide for additional security over shares in the subsidiary of the Parent Company that owns the head office of the Parent Company's container leasing operations. They also provided for the loans to Stefan M. Palatin, the Chairman of the Parent Company (the "Chairman") and its Chief Executive Officer (and a Director of CCC), of approximately $5,990,000 and $3,700,000 (totaling approximately $9,690,000) to be restructured as obligations of the Chairman to another subsidiary of the Parent Company. These obligations have been collaterally assigned to the lending banks, together with the pledge of 1,000,000 shares of the Parent Company's Common Stock owned by the Chairman. These 1,000,000 shares represent 11% of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Parent Company as of December 31, 1997. The shares of the Parent Company are traded on NASDAQ (CRNSF). (The Chairman, including the 1,000,000 shares pledged to the banks, owns approximately 55% of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Parent Company as of December 31, 1997). Additionally, CCC granted the lending banks a security interest in the fees to which it is entitled for the services it renders to the container leasing partnerships of which it acts as general partner, including its fee income payable by the Partnership. The lending banks have indicated that they will not renew the Credit Facility, and the Parent Company has yet to secure a source for repayment of the balance due under the Credit Facility at May 31, 1998. CCC is currently in discussions with the management of the Parent Company to provide assurance that the management of the container leasing partnerships managed by CCC, including the Registrant, is not disrupted pending a refinancing or reorganization of the indebtedness of the Parent Company and its affiliates. The Registrant is not a borrower under the Credit Facility, and neither the containers nor the other assets of the Registrant have been pledged as collateral under the Credit Facility. The Registrant is unable to determine the impact, if any, these concerns may have on the future operating results and financial condition of the Registrant or CCC and the Leasing Company's ability to manage the Registrant's fleet in subsequent periods. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders Inapplicable. 11 12 PART II Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters (a) Market Information (a)(1)(i) The Registrant's outstanding units of limited partnership interests are not traded on any market nor does an established public trading market exist for such purposes. (a)(1)(ii) Inapplicable. (a)(1)(iii) Inapplicable. (a)(1)(iv) Inapplicable. (a)(1)(v) Inapplicable. (a)(2) Inapplicable. (b) Holders
Number of Unit Holders (b)(1) Title of Class as of December 31, 1997 -------------- ----------------------- Units of limited partnership interests 1,736
(c) Dividends Inapplicable. For the distributions made by the Registrant to its limited partners, see Item 6 below, "Selected Financial Data." 12 13 Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Year Ended December 31, --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Net lease revenue $ 1,765,903 $ 2,036,698 $ 2,599,513 $ 2,566,074 $ 2,550,709 Net earnings $ 715,508 $ 1,084,193 $ 1,657,599 $ 1,563,483 $ 1,484,601 Net earnings per unit of limited partnership interest $ 18.58 $ 28.61 $ 44.39 $ 42.64 $ 39.43 Cash distributions per unit of limited partnership interest $ 61.88 $ 72.19 $ 80.63 $ 71.25 $ 65.00 At year-end: Total assets $ 9,702,375 $11,189,085 $12,693,635 $13,938,924 $14,947,181 Long-term obligations $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 17,981 $ 41,426 Partners' capital $ 9,702,375 $11,189,085 $12,675,654 $13,897,497 $14,879,816
- ---------------------- Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources The Registrant's primary objective is to generate cash from operations for distribution to its limited partners. Aside from the initial working capital reserve retained from gross subscription proceeds (equal to approximately 1% of such proceeds), the Registrant relies primarily on container rental receipts to meet this objective as well as to finance current operating needs. No credit lines are maintained to finance working capital. At December 31, 1997, the Registrant had $999,900 in cash and cash equivalents, an increase of $63,819 and a decrease of $109,778 from the December 31, 1996 and 1995 balances, respectively. The Registrant's allowance for doubtful accounts declined from $124,324 at December 31, 1996 to $41,626 at December 31, 1997. This decrease was a direct result of the Leasing Company's decision, after exhausting all other alternatives, to write-off $119,597 of outstanding receivable balances that were specifically reserved for in prior years and considered to be uncollectable. Cash distributions from operations are allocated 5% to the general partner and 95% to the limited partners. Distributions of sale proceeds are allocated 1% to the general partner and 99% to the limited partners. This sharing arrangement will remain in place until the limited partners receive aggregate distributions in an amount equal to their capital contributions, plus a 10% cumulative, compounded (daily), annual return on their adjusted capital contributions. Thereafter, all distributions will be allocated 15% to the general partner and 85% to the limited partners, pursuant to Section 6.1(b) of the Partnership Agreement. Cash distribution from operations to the general partner in excess of 5% of distributable cash will be considered an incentive fee and compensation to the general partner. From inception through February 28, 1998, the Registrant has distributed $18,181,099 in cash from operations and $987,896 in cash from sales proceeds to its limited partners. This represents total distributions of $19,168,995, or approximately 113% of the Registrant's original limited partners' investment. Distributions to partners are determined and paid quarterly, based primarily on each quarter's cash flow from operations and cash generated from container sales. Quarterly distributions are also affected by periodic increases or decreases to working capital reserves, as deemed appropriate by the general partner. Additional container disposals, combined with current leasing market conditions, may contribute to lower operating results and consequently, lower distributions from operations to its partners in subsequent periods. However, sales proceeds distributed to its partners may fluctuate in subsequent periods, reflecting the level of container disposals. 13 14 Market conditions that existed during 1996 persisted throughout 1997. Low container prices, favorable interest rates and the abundance of available capital continued to discourage ocean carriers and other transport companies from leasing containers at levels comparable to previous years. During the first half of 1997, increasing cargo volumes and continuing equipment imbalances within the container fleets of shipping lines and transport companies contributed to a modest recovery in utilization rates. However, by the end of 1997, the volatility of the Hong Kong and other Asian financial markets began to negatively impact trade, shipping and container leasing. Per-diem rental rates continued to remain under pressure as a result of the following factors: start-up leasing companies offering new containers and low rental rates in an effort to break into the leasing market; established leasing companies reducing rates to very low levels; and a continuing oversupply of containers. These leasing market conditions, as well as the Registrant's declining fleet size, may impact the Registrant's financial condition and operating performance during 1998. Additionally, see the discussion regarding The Cronos Group under Item 7., Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations hereof. Results of Operations 1997 - 1996 During 1997, the container leasing industry continued to experience a decline in the demand for its containers, as conditions existing since 1996 continued to adversely impact world trade, shipping and container leasing. These conditions include, but are not limited to, declining container prices, favorable interest rates and an abundance of capital which resulted in ocean carriers and transport companies purchasing a larger share of containers for their own account. The addition of new, larger container ships also contributed to the growth in container ship capacity. As capacity exceeded the growth rate of world containerized trade, ocean carriers attempted to reduce operating costs, further reducing the demand for leased containers. As the leasing industry's equipment remained in surplus, ocean carriers and transport companies continued to be selective about the age and condition of containers taken on-hire. Many have adopted a policy of only leasing containers of a certain age or less. It has been the Registrant's experience that in periods of weak demand, many lessees insist on equipment three to five years of age. Such criteria currently serves as a barrier to older equipment being taken on-hire, including those within the Registrant's fleet and contributed to the decline in the Registrant's results of operations. The primary component of the Registrant's results of operations is net lease revenue. Net lease revenue is determined by deducting direct operating expenses, management fees and reimbursed administrative expenses, from rental revenues billed by the Leasing Company from the leasing of the Registrant's containers. Net lease revenue is directly related to the size, utilization and per-diem rental rates of the Registrant's fleet. Accordingly, net lease revenue declined by approximately 13% when compared to 1996. The Registrant expects net lease revenue to decline in subsequent periods as current container leasing market conditions continue and its fleet size declines. Despite the aforementioned market conditions, the Registrant's utilization rate averaged 81% during 1997, consistent with the prior year. The Registrant's average fleet size (as measured in twenty-foot equivalent units ("TEU")) declined from 6,785 TEU in 1996 to 6,543 TEU in 1997. This decline, combined with a 11% reduction in average per-diem rental rates, contributed to a 15% decline in gross rental revenue (a component of net lease revenue). 14 15 At December 31, 1997, 88% of the original equipment remained in the Registrant's fleet, and was comprised of the following:
40-Foot 20-Foot 40-Foot High-Cube ------- ------- --------- Containers on lease: Term leases 164 54 160 Master lease 1,501 544 1,055 ----- --- ----- Subtotal 1,665 598 1,215 Containers off lease 451 119 171 ----- --- ----- Total container fleet 2,116 717 1,386 ===== === =====
40-Foot 20-Foot 40-Foot High-Cube ------------ ----------- ------------ Units % Units % Units % ----- --- ---- --- ----- --- Total purchases 2,327 100% 799 100% 1,653 100% Less disposals 211 9% 82 10% 267 16% ----- --- --- --- ----- --- Remaining fleet at December 31, 1997 2,116 91% 717 90% 1,386 84% ===== === === === ===== ===
Rental equipment operating expenses, when measured as a percentage of rental revenue, were approximately 21% during 1997, as compared to 23% during 1996. Lower repair and maintenance expenses, as well as, a decline in the provision for doubtful accounts, contributed to this decline. Other general and administrative expenses increased $13,320, or approximately 39% during 1997. Contributing to this change was an increase of approximately $6,072 associated with the cost of the Registrant's annual audit, as well as an increase of approximately $12,000 associated with the cost of preparing and processing the Registrant's regulatory filings. The Registrant's declining fleet size contributed to a 4% decline in depreciation expense during 1997. Base management fees, based on the operating performance of the fleet, declined $24,715, or approximately 12% during 1997. Base management fees are expected to decline in subsequent periods as the Registrant's fleet size declines. The Registrant disposed of 57 twenty-foot, 31 forty-foot and 124 forty-foot high-cube marine dry cargo containers during 1997, as compared to 53 twenty-foot, 17 forty-foot and 70 forty-foot high-cube marine dry cargo containers during 1996. These disposals resulted in a loss of $103,031 for 1997, as compared to a gain of $9,835 for 1996. The Registrant does not believe that the carrying amount of its containers has been permanently impaired or that events or changes in circumstances have indicated that the carrying amount of its containers may not be fully recoverable. The Registrant believes that the 1997 loss on container disposals was a result of various factors including the age, condition, suitability for continued leasing, as well as the geographical location of the containers when disposed. These factors will continue to influence the amount of sales proceeds received and the related gain on container disposals, which may fluctuate in subsequent periods. 1996 - 1995 The primary component of the Registrant's results of operations is net lease revenue. Net lease revenue is determined by deducting direct operating expenses, management fees and reimbursed administrative expenses, from rental revenues billed by the Leasing Company from the leasing of the Registrant's containers and is directly related to the size, utilization and per-diem rental rates of the Registrant's fleet. Accordingly, net lease revenue declined by approximately 22% when compared to 1995. During 1996, utilization averaged 81%, as compared with 89% in the prior year, while the Registrant's average fleet size (as measured in twenty-foot equivalent units ("TEU")) declined from 6,963 TEU in 1995 to 6,785 TEU in 1996. These declines, combined with a 4% reduction in average per-diem rental rates, contributed to a 17% decline in gross rental revenue (a component of net lease revenue). 15 16 At December 31, 1996, 93% of the original equipment remained in the Registrant's fleet, and was comprised of the following:
40-Foot 20-Foot 40-Foot High-Cube ------- ------- --------- Containers on lease: Term leases 144 54 83 Master lease 1,424 500 1,216 ----- --- ----- Subtotal 1,568 554 1,299 Containers off lease 605 194 211 ----- --- ----- Total container fleet 2,173 748 1,510 ===== === =====
40-Foot 20-Foot 40-Foot High-Cube ------------ ----------- ------------ Units % Units % Units % ----- --- ----- --- ----- --- Total purchases 2,327 100% 799 100% 1,653 100% Less disposals 154 7% 51 6% 143 9% ----- --- --- --- ----- --- Remaining fleet at December 31, 1996 2,173 93% 748 94% 1,510 91% ===== === === === ===== ===
Rental equipment operating expenses, when measured as a percentage of rental revenue, were approximately 23% during 1996, as compared to 18% during 1995. This increase was a result of higher storage and handling costs associated with lower equipment utilization and increased repositioning costs. The Registrant's slightly smaller fleet size contributed to a 3% decline in depreciation expense during 1996. Base management fees declined by $40,219, or approximately 16% during 1996. The Registrant disposed of 53 twenty-foot, 17 forty-foot and 70 forty-foot high-cube marine dry cargo containers during 1996, as compared to 48 twenty-foot, 10 forty-foot and 14 forty-foot high-cube marine dry cargo containers during 1995. Approximately 1% of the Registrant's net earnings for 1996 were from gain on disposal of equipment, as compared to 2% for 1995. The decision to repair or dispose of a container is made when it is returned by a lessee. This decision is influenced by various factors including the age, condition, suitability for continued leasing as well as the geographical location of the container when disposed. These factors also influence the amount of sales proceeds received and the related gain on container disposals. The Cronos Group As reported in the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K and Amendment No. 1 to Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on February 7, 1997 and February 26, 1997, respectively, Arthur Andersen, London, England, resigned as auditors of The Cronos Group, a Luxembourg Corporation headquartered in Orchard Lea, England (the "Parent Company"), on February 3, 1997. The Parent Company is the indirect corporate parent of CCC, the General Partner of the Partnership. In its letter of resignation to the Parent Company, Arthur Andersen stated that it resigned as auditors of the Parent Company and all other entities affiliated with the Parent Company. While its letter of resignation was not addressed to CCC, Arthur Andersen confirmed to CCC that its resignation as auditors of the entities referred to in its letter of resignation included its resignation as auditors of CCC and the Registrant. CCC does not believe, based upon the information currently available to it, that Arthur Andersen's resignation was triggered by any concern over the accounting policies and procedures followed by the Registrant. 16 17 Arthur Andersen's report on the financial statements of CCC and the Registrant, for years preceding 1996, has not contained an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, nor was any such report qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles. During the Registrant's 1995 fiscal year and the subsequent interim period preceding Arthur Andersen's resignation, there have been no disagreements between CCC or the Registrant and Arthur Andersen on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure. The Registrant retained a new auditor, Moore Stephens, P.C. on April 10, 1997, as reported in its Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 14, 1997. In connection with its resignation, Arthur Andersen also prepared a report pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(b)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for filing by the Parent Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Following the report of Arthur Andersen, the SEC, on February 10, 1997, commenced a private investigation of the Parent Company for the purpose of investigating the matters discussed in such report and related matters. The Registrant does not believe that the focus of the SEC's investigation is upon the Registrant or CCC. CCC is unable to predict the outcome of the SEC's ongoing private investigation of the Parent Company. In 1993, the Parent Company negotiated a credit facility (hereinafter, the "Credit Facility") with several banks for the use of the Parent Company and its affiliates, including CCC. At December 31, 1996, approximately $73,500,000 in principal indebtedness was outstanding under the Credit Facility. As a party to the Credit Facility, CCC is jointly and severally liable for the repayment of all principal and interest owed under the Credit Facility. The obligations of CCC, and the five other subsidiaries of the Parent Company that are borrowers under the Credit Facility, are guaranteed by the Parent Company. Following negotiations in 1997 with the banks providing the Credit Facility, an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement was executed in June 1997, subject to various actions being taken by the Parent Company and its subsidiaries, primarily relating to the provision of additional collateral. This Agreement was further amended in July 1997 and the provisions of the Agreement and its Amendment converted the facility to a term loan, payable in installments, with a final maturity date of May 31, 1998. At December 31, 1997, approximately $37,600,000 was outstanding under the Credit Facility. The terms of the Agreement and its Amendment also provide for additional security over shares in the subsidiary of the Parent Company that owns the head office of the Parent Company's container leasing operations. They also provided for the loans to Stefan M. Palatin, the Chairman of the Parent Company (the "Chairman") and its Chief Executive Officer (and a Director of CCC), of approximately $5,990,000 and $3,700,000 (totaling approximately $9,690,000) to be restructured as obligations of the Chairman to another subsidiary of the Parent Company. These obligations have been collaterally assigned to the lending banks, together with the pledge of 1,000,000 shares of the Parent Company's Common Stock owned by the Chairman. These 1,000,000 shares represent 11% of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Parent Company as of December 31, 1997. The shares of the Parent Company are traded on NASDAQ (CRNSF). (The Chairman, including the 1,000,000 shares pledged to the banks, owns approximately 55% of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Parent Company as of December 31, 1997). Additionally, CCC granted the lending banks a security interest in the fees to which it is entitled for the services it renders to the container leasing partnerships of which it acts as general partner, including its fee income payable by the Partnership. The lending banks have indicated that they will not renew the Credit Facility, and the Parent Company has yet to secure a source for repayment of the balance due under the Credit Facility at May 31, 1998. CCC is currently in discussions with the management of the Parent Company to provide assurance that the management of the container leasing partnerships managed by CCC, including the Registrant, is not disrupted pending a refinancing or reorganization of the indebtedness of the Parent Company and its affiliates. The Registrant is not a borrower under the Credit Facility, and neither the containers nor the other assets of the Registrant have been pledged as collateral under the Credit Facility. 17 18 The Partnership is unable to determine the impact, if any, these concerns may have on the future operating results and financial condition of the Partnership or CCC and the Leasing Company's ability to manage the Partnership's fleet in subsequent periods. Year 2000 The Registrant relies upon the financial and operational systems provided by the Leasing Company and its affiliates, as well as the systems provided by other independent third parties to service the three primary areas of its business: investor processing/maintenance; container leasing/asset tracking; and accounting finance. The Registrant has received confirmation from its third-party investor processing/maintenance vendor that their system is Year 2000 compliant. The Registrant does not expect a material increase in its vendor servicing fee to reimburse Year 2000 costs. Container leasing/asset tracking and accounting/finance services are provided to the Registrant by CCC and its affiliate, Cronos Containers Limited (the "Leasing Company"), pursuant to the respective Limited Partnership Agreement and Leasing Agent Agreement. In 1998, CCC and the Leasing Company will initiate a program to prepare their systems and applications for the Year 2000. Preliminary studies indicate that testing, conversion and upgrading of system applications is expected to cost CCC and the Leasing Company less than $500,000. The Registrant may reimburse CCC and the Leasing Company for certain data processing expenses as outlined in the Limited Partnership Agreement. The Registrant's reimbursement of data processing costs associated with Year 2000 compliance are not expected to be material. The financial impact of making these required system changes is not expected to be material to the Registrant's financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Cautionary Statement This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains statements relating to future results of the Registrant, including certain projections and business trends, that are "forward-looking statements" as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially from those projected as a result of certain risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to changes in: economic conditions; trade policies; demand for and market acceptance of leased marine cargo containers; competitive utilization and per-diem rental rate pressures; as well as other risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those described above in the discussion of the marine container leasing business under Item 7., Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations; and those detailed from time to time in the filings of the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 18 19 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS The Partners IEA Income Fund IX, L.P.: We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of IEA Income Fund IX, L.P., as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of IEA Income Fund IX, L.P. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. As further discussed in Note 10 to the financial statements, The Cronos Group, which is the indirect corporate parent of Cronos Capital Corp., the general partner of the Partnership, is subject to an investigation, commenced on February 10, 1997, by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Furthermore, Cronos Capital Corp. and five other subsidiaries of The Cronos Group are borrowers under a credit facility with several banks. The credit facility is guaranteed by The Cronos Group and the entire loan balance is due on May 31, 1998. The lending banks have indicated that they will not renew the credit facility, and as of the date of our report, The Cronos Group has yet to secure a source for repayment of the balance due. Our audits were conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplementary information included in Schedule 1, for the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. Moore Stephens, P.C. Certified Public Accountants New York, New York, February 20, 1998 19 20 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS The Partners IEA Income Fund IX, L.P.: We have audited the accompanying statement of operations of IEA Income Fund IX, L.P. as of December 31, 1995, and the related statements of partners' capital and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1995. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations of IEA Income Fund IX, L.P. as of December 31, 1995, and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1995, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplementary information included in Schedule 1 is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. This information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in our audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. Arthur Andersen LLP San Francisco, California, March 15, 1996 20 21 IEA INCOME FUND IX, L.P. BALANCE SHEETS DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996
Assets 1997 1996 ------ ---- ---- Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents, includes $999,700 in 1997 and $935,733 in 1996 in interest-bearing accounts (note 2) $ 999,900 $ 936,081 Net lease receivables due from Leasing Company (notes 1 and 3) 385,314 543,250 ------------ ------------ Total current assets 1,385,214 1,479,331 ------------ ------------ Container rental equipment, at cost 15,717,692 16,577,611 Less accumulated depreciation 7,400,531 6,867,857 ------------ ------------ Net container rental equipment 8,317,161 9,709,754 ------------ ------------ $ 9,702,375 $ 11,189,085 ============ ============ Liabilities and Partners' Capital Partners' capital (deficit): General partner (19,830) (4,963) Limited partners (note 7) 9,722,205 11,194,048 ------------ ------------ Total partners' capital 9,702,375 11,189,085 ------------ ------------ $ 9,702,375 $ 11,189,085 ============ ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 21 22 IEA INCOME FUND IX, L.P. STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
1997 1996 1995 ---- ---- ---- Net lease revenue (note 5) $ 1,765,903 $ 2,036,698 $ 2,599,513 Other operating expenses: Depreciation (note 1) 944,458 980,495 1,005,274 Other general and administrative expenses 47,327 34,007 40,832 ----------- ----------- ----------- 991,785 1,014,502 1,046,106 ----------- ----------- ----------- Earnings from operations 774,118 1,022,196 1,553,407 Other income (expenses): Interest income 44,421 52,162 65,224 Gain (loss) on disposal of equipment (103,031) 9,835 38,968 ----------- ----------- ----------- (58,610) 61,997 104,192 ----------- ----------- ----------- Net earnings $ 715,508 $ 1,084,193 $ 1,657,599 =========== =========== =========== Allocation of net earnings: General partner $ 84,083 $ 111,821 $ 148,765 Limited partners 631,425 972,372 1,508,834 ----------- ----------- ----------- $ 715,508 $ 1,084,193 $ 1,657,599 =========== =========== =========== Limited partners' per unit share of net earnings $ 18.58 $ 28.61 $ 44.39 =========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 22 23 IEA INCOME FUND IX, L.P. STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
Limited Partners General (Note 7) Partner Total ------------ ------------ ------------ Balances at December 31, 1994 $ 13,907,275 $ (9,778) $ 13,897,497 Net earnings 1,508,834 148,765 1,657,599 Cash distributions (2,740,621) (138,821) (2,879,442) ------------ ------------ ------------ Balances at December 31, 1995 12,675,488 166 12,675,654 Net earnings 972,372 111,821 1,084,193 Cash distributions (2,453,812) (116,950) (2,570,762) ------------ ------------ ------------ Balances at December 31, 1996 11,194,048 (4,963) 11,189,085 Net earnings 631,425 84,083 715,508 Cash distributions (2,103,268) (98,950) (2,202,218) ------------ ------------ ------------ Balances at December 31, 1997 $ 9,722,205 $ (19,830) $ 9,702,375 ============ ============ ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 23 24 IEA INCOME FUND IX, L.P. STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
1997 1996 1995 ---- ---- ---- Cash flows from operating activities: Net earnings $ 715,508 $ 1,084,193 $ 1,657,599 Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation 944,458 980,495 1,005,274 Net loss (gain) on disposal of equipment 103,031 (9,835) (38,968) Decrease in net lease receivables due from Leasing Company 125,741 49,241 246,076 ----------- ----------- ----------- Total adjustments 1,173,230 1,019,901 1,212,382 ----------- ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by operating activities 1,888,738 2,104,094 2,869,981 ----------- ----------- ----------- Cash flows from (used in) investing activities: Proceeds from sale of container rental equipment 377,648 310,703 116,999 Acquisition fees paid to general partner (349) (17,632) (23,446) ----------- ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by investing activities 377,299 293,071 93,553 ----------- ----------- ----------- Cash flows used in financing activities: Distributions to partners (2,202,218) (2,570,762) (2,879,442) ----------- ----------- ----------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 63,819 (173,597) 84,092 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 936,081 1,109,678 1,025,586 ----------- ----------- ----------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 999,900 $ 936,081 $ 1,109,678 =========== =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 24 25 IEA INCOME FUND IX, L.P. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995 (1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (a) Nature of Operations IEA Income Fund IX, L.P. (the "Partnership") is a limited partnership organized under the laws of the State of California on June 8, 1988 for the purpose of owning and leasing marine cargo containers. Cronos Capital Corp. ("CCC") is the general partner and, with its affiliate Cronos Containers Limited (the "Leasing Company"), manages the business of the Partnership. The Partnership shall continue until December 31, 2009, unless sooner terminated upon the occurrence of certain events. The Partnership commenced operations on December 5, 1988, when the minimum subscription proceeds of $1,000,000 were obtained. The Partnership offered 40,000 units of limited partnership interest at $500 per unit, or $20,000,000. The offering terminated on September 11, 1989, at which time 33,992 limited partnership units had been purchased. As of December 31, 1997, the Partnership operated 2,116 twenty-foot, 717 forty-foot and 1,386 forty-foot high-cube marine dry cargo containers. (b) Leasing Company and Leasing Agent Agreement Pursuant to the Limited Partnership Agreement of the Partnership, all authority to administer the business of the Partnership is vested in CCC. CCC has entered into a Leasing Agent Agreement whereby the Leasing Company has the responsibility to manage the leasing operations of all equipment owned by the Partnership. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Leasing Company is responsible for leasing, managing and re-leasing the Partnership's containers to ocean carriers and has full discretion over which ocean carriers and suppliers of goods and services it may deal with. The Leasing Agent Agreement permits the Leasing Company to use the containers owned by the Partnership, together with other containers owned or managed by the Leasing Company and its affiliates, as part of a single fleet operated without regard to ownership. Since the Leasing Agent Agreement meets the definition of an operating lease in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 13, it is accounted for as a lease under which the Partnership is lessor and the Leasing Company is lessee. The Leasing Agent Agreement generally provides that the Leasing Company will make payments to the Partnership based upon rentals collected from ocean carriers after deducting direct operating expenses and management fees to CCC. The Leasing Company leases containers to ocean carriers, generally under operating leases which are either master leases or term leases (mostly one to five years). Master leases do not specify the exact number of containers to be leased or the term that each container will remain on hire but allow the ocean carrier to pick up and drop off containers at various locations; rentals are based upon the number of containers used and the applicable per-diem rate. Accordingly, rentals under master leases are all variable and contingent upon the number of containers used. Most containers are leased to ocean carriers under master leases; leasing agreements with fixed payment terms are not material to the financial statements. Since there are no material minimum lease rentals, no disclosure of minimum lease rentals is provided in these financial statements. See footnote 10 for further discussion regarding CCC and the Leasing Company. 25 26 IEA INCOME FUND IX, L.P. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (c) Concentrations of Credit Risk The Partnership's financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and net lease receivables due from the Leasing Company. See note 2 for further discussion regarding the credit risk associated with cash and cash equivalents. Net lease receivables due from the Leasing Company (see notes 1(b) and 3 for discussion regarding net lease receivables) subject the Partnership to a significant concentration of credit risk. These net lease receivables, representing rentals collected from ocean carriers after deducting direct operating expenses and management fees to CCC and the Leasing Company, are remitted by the Leasing Company to the Partnership three to four times per month. The Partnership has historically never incurred a loss associated with the collectability of unremitted net lease receivables due from the Leasing Company. However, CCC and the Partnership are unable to predict the outcome of the events discussed in note 10 and their potential impact on the credit risk associated with these net lease receivables. (d) Basis of Accounting The Partnership utilizes the accrual method of accounting. Net lease revenue is recorded by the Partnership in each period based upon its leasing agent agreement with the Leasing Company. Net lease revenue is generally dependent upon operating lease rentals from operating lease agreements between the Leasing Company and its various lessees, less direct operating expenses and management fees due in respect of the containers specified in each operating lease agreement. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires the Partnership to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. (e) Allocation of Net Earnings and Partnership Distributions Net earnings have been allocated between general and limited partners in accordance with the Partnership Agreement. Actual cash distributions differ from the allocations of net earnings between the general and limited partners as presented in these financial statements. Partnership distributions are based on "distributable cash" and are paid to the general and limited partners on a quarterly basis, in accordance with the provisions of the Partnership Agreement. Partnership distributions from operations are allocated 95% to the limited partners and 5% to the general partner. Sales proceeds are allocated 99% to the limited partners and 1% to the general partner. These allocations remain in effect until such time as the limited partners have received from the Partnership aggregate distributions in an amount equal to their capital contributions plus a 10% cumulative, compounded (daily), annual return on their adjusted capital contributions. Thereafter, all Partnership distributions will be allocated 85% to the limited partners and 15% to the general partner. Cash distribution from operations to the general partner in excess of 5% of distributable cash will be considered an incentive fee and compensation to the general partner. 26 27 IEA INCOME FUND IX, L.P. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (f) Acquisition Fees Pursuant to Article IV Section 4.2 of the Partnership Agreement, acquisition fees paid to the general partner are based on 5% of the equipment purchase price. These fees are capitalized and included in the cost of the rental equipment. The fees are payable in five equal annual installments commencing in the year of purchase. (g) Container Rental Equipment In March 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of." The Statement requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles to be held and used by an entity be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be fully recoverable. The Partnership adopted SFAS No. 121 during 1996. Container rental equipment is considered to be impaired if the carrying value of the asset exceeds the expected future cash flows from related operations (undiscounted and without interest charges). If impairment is deemed to exist, the assets are written down to fair value. Depreciation policies are also evaluated to determine whether subsequent events and circumstances warrant revised estimates of useful lives. There were no reductions to the carrying value of container rental equipment during 1997 and 1996. Container rental equipment is depreciated over a twelve-year life on a straight line basis to its salvage value, estimated to be 30%. (h) Income Taxes The Partnership is not subject to income taxes, consequently no provision for income taxes has been made. The Partnership files an annual information tax return, prepared on the accrual basis of accounting. (i) Foreign Operations The Partnership's business is not divided between foreign or domestic operations. The Partnership's business is the leasing of containers worldwide to ocean-going steamship companies and does not fit the definition of reportable foreign operations within Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 14 "Financial Reporting for Segments of a Business Enterprise." Any attempt to separate "foreign" operations from "domestic" operations would be dependent on definitions and assumptions that are so subjective as to render the information meaningless and potentially misleading. 27 28 IEA INCOME FUND IX, L.P. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (j) New Pronouncements In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income". SFAS No. 130 establishes standards for reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in the financial statements. SFAS No. 130 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1997. Reclassification of financial statements for earlier periods for comparative purposes is required. The Partnership is in the process of determining its preferred format. The adoption of SFAS No. 130 will have no impact on the Partnership's results of operations, financial position or cash flows. The FASB issued SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information", in June 1997. SFAS No. 131 establishes standards for the way that public business enterprises report information about operating segments in annual financial statements and requires that those enterprises report selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports issued to shareholders. It also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. SFAS No. 131 is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1997. Financial statement disclosures for prior years are required to be restated. The Partnership is in the process of evaluating the disclosure requirements. The adoption of SFAS No. 131 will have no impact on the Partnership's financial position, results of operations or cash flows. (k) Financial Statement Presentation The Partnership has determined that, for accounting purposes, the Leasing Agent Agreement is a lease, and the receivables, payables, gross revenues and operating expenses attributable to the containers managed by the Leasing Company are, for accounting purposes, those of the Leasing Company and not of the Partnership. Consequently, the Partnership's balance sheets and statements of operations display the payments to be received by the Partnership from the Leasing Company as the Partnership's receivables and revenues. (2) Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less on their acquisition date. Cash equivalents are carried at cost which approximates fair value. The Partnership maintains its cash and cash equivalents in accounts which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Partnership has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk. The Partnership places its cash equivalents in investment grade, short term debt instruments and limits the amount of credit exposure to any one commercial issuer. 28 29 IEA INCOME FUND IX, L.P. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (3) Net Lease Receivables Due from Leasing Company Net lease receivables due from the Leasing Company are determined by deducting direct operating payables and accrued expenses, base management fees payable, and reimbursed administrative expenses payable to CCC and its affiliates from the rental billings payable by the Leasing Company to the Partnership under operating leases to ocean carriers for the containers owned by the Partnership. Net lease receivables at December 31, 1997 and December 31, 1996 were as follows:
December 31, December 31, 1997 1996 -------- -------- Lease receivables, net of doubtful accounts of $41,626 in 1997 and $124,324 in 1996 $666,274 $767,166 Less: Direct operating payables and accrued expenses 153,087 79,541 Damage protection reserve (note 4) 60,973 73,502 Base management fees 55,062 57,795 Reimbursed administrative expenses 11,838 13,078 -------- -------- $385,314 $543,250 ======== ========
(4) Damage Protection Plan The Leasing Company offers a repair service to several lessees of the Partnership's containers, whereby the lessee pays an additional rental fee for the convenience of having the Partnership incur the repair expense for containers damaged while on lease. This fee is recorded as revenue when earned according to the terms of the rental contract. A reserve has been established to provide for the estimated costs incurred by this service. This reserve is a component of net lease receivables due from the Leasing Company (see note 3). The Partnership is not responsible in the event repair costs exceed predetermined limits, or for repairs that are required for damages not defined by the damage protection plan agreement. (5) Net Lease Revenue Net lease revenue is determined by deducting direct operating expenses, base management fees and reimbursed administrative expenses to CCC from the rental revenue billed by the Leasing Company under operating leases to ocean carriers for the containers owned by the Partnership. Net lease revenue for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, was as follows:
1997 1996 1995 ---- ---- ---- Rental revenue (note 9) $2,632,866 $3,102,611 $3,716,863 Less: Rental equipment operating expenses 554,279 698,393 675,813 Base management fees (note 6) 182,826 207,541 247,760 Reimbursed administrative expenses (note 6) 129,858 159,979 193,777 ---------- ---------- ---------- $1,765,903 $2,036,698 $2,599,513 ========== ========== ==========
29 30 IEA INCOME FUND IX, L.P. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (6) Compensation to General Partner Base management fees are equal to 7% of gross lease revenues attributable to operating leases pursuant to Section 4.4 of the Partnership Agreement. Reimbursed administrative expenses are equal to the costs expended by CCC and its affiliates for services necessary to the prudent operation of the Partnership pursuant to Section 4.5 of the Partnership Agreement. The following compensation was paid or will be paid by the Partnership to CCC:
1997 1996 1995 ---- ---- ---- Base management fees $182,826 $207,541 $247,760 Reimbursed administrative expenses 129,858 159,979 193,777 -------- -------- -------- $312,684 $367,520 $441,537 ======== ======== ========
(7) Limited Partners' Capital The limited partners' per unit share of capital at December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 was $286, $329 and $373, respectively. This is calculated by dividing the limited partners' capital at the end of the year by 33,992, the total number of limited partnership units. (8) Income Taxes The reconciliation of net earnings as reported in the statement of operations and as would be reported for federal tax purposes for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995 are as follows:
1997 1996 1995 ---- ---- ---- Net earnings per statement of operations $ 715,508 $ 1,084,193 $ 1,657,599 Depreciation for income tax purposes less than (in excess of) depreciation for financial statement purposes 597,995 554,906 (682,650) Gain on disposition of assets for tax purposes in excess of gain on disposition for financial statement purposes 445,461 298,218 115,699 Bad debt expense for tax purposes less than (in excess of) bad debt expense for financial statement purposes (82,698) (13,742) 38,670 ----------- ----------- ----------- Net earnings for federal tax purposes $ 1,676,266 $ 1,923,575 $ 1,129,318 =========== =========== ===========
At December 31, 1997, the tax basis of total partners' capital was $3,714,484. (9) Major Lessees No single lessee contributed more than 10% of the rental revenue earned during 1997, 1996 and 1995. The Partnership believes that the profitability of, and risks associated with, leases to foreign customers is generally the same as those of leases to domestic customers. The operating lease agreements generally require all payments to be made in United States currency. The Partnership's operations are subject to the fluctuations of worldwide economic and political conditions that may affect the pattern and levels of world trade. 30 31 IEA INCOME FUND IX, L.P. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (10) The Cronos Group As reported in the Partnership's Current Report on Form 8-K and Amendment No. 1 to Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on February 7, 1997 and February 26, 1997, respectively, Arthur Andersen, London, England, resigned as auditors of The Cronos Group (the "Parent Company") on February 3, 1997. The Parent Company is the indirect corporate parent of CCC, the General Partner of the Partnership. In its letter of resignation to The Parent Company, Arthur Andersen stated that it resigned as auditors of The Parent Company and all other entities affiliated with The Parent Company. While its letter of resignation was not addressed to CCC, Arthur Andersen confirmed to CCC that its resignation as auditors of the entities referred to in its letter of resignation included its resignation as auditors of CCC and the Partnership. CCC does not believe, based upon the information currently available to it, that Arthur Andersen's resignation was triggered by any concern over the accounting policies and procedures followed by the Partnership. Arthur Andersen's report on the financial statements of CCC and the Partnership, for years preceding 1996, has not contained an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, nor was any such report qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles. During the Partnership's 1995 fiscal year and the subsequent interim period preceding Arthur Andersen's resignation, there have been no disagreements between CCC or the Partnership and Arthur Andersen on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure. The Partnership retained a new auditor, Moore Stephens, P.C., on April 10, 1997, as reported in its current report on Form 8-K, filed April 14, 1997. In connection with its resignation, Arthur Andersen also prepared a report pursuant to the provisions of Section 10A(b)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for filing by the Parent Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Following the report of Arthur Andersen, the SEC, on February 10, 1997, commenced a private investigation of the Parent Company for the purpose of investigating the matters discussed in such report and related matters. The Partnership does not believe that the focus of the SEC's investigation is upon the Partnership or CCC. CCC is unable to predict the outcome of the SEC's ongoing private investigation of the Parent Company. In 1993, the Parent Company negotiated a credit facility (hereinafter, the "Credit Facility") with several banks for the use of the Parent Company and its affiliates, including CCC. At December 31, 1996, approximately $73,500,000 in principal indebtedness was outstanding under the Credit Facility. As a party to the Credit Facility, CCC is jointly and severally liable for the repayment of all principal and interest owed under the Credit Facility. The obligations of CCC, and the five other subsidiaries of the Parent Company that are borrowers under the Credit Facility, are guaranteed by the Parent Company. Following negotiations in 1997 with the banks providing the Credit Facility, an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement was executed in June 1997, subject to various actions being taken by the Parent Company and its subsidiaries, primarily relating to the provision of additional collateral. This Agreement was further amended in July 1997 and the provisions of the Agreement and its Amendment converted the facility to a term loan, payable in installments, with a final maturity date of May 31, 1998. At December 31, 1997, approximately $37,600,000 was outstanding under the Credit Facility. 31 32 IEA INCOME FUND IX, L.P. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (10) The Cronos Group - (Continued) The terms of the Agreement and its Amendment also provide for additional security over shares in the subsidiary of the Parent Company that owns the head office of the Parent Company's container leasing operations. They also provided for the loans to Stefan M. Palatin, the Chairman of the Parent Company (the "Chairman") and its Chief Executive Officer (and a Director of CCC), of approximately $5,990,000 and $3,700,000 (totaling approximately $9,690,000) to be restructured as obligations of the Chairman to another subsidiary of the Parent Company. These obligations have been collaterally assigned to the lending banks, together with the pledge of 1,000,000 shares of the Parent Company's Common Stock owned by the Chairman. These 1,000,000 shares represent 11% of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Parent Company as of December 31, 1997. The shares of the Parent Company are traded on NASDAQ (CRNSF). (The Chairman, including the 1,000,000 shares pledged to the banks, owns approximately 55% of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Parent Company as of December 31, 1997). Additionally, CCC granted the lending banks a security interest in the fees to which it is entitled for the services it renders to the container leasing partnerships of which it acts as general partner, including its fee income payable by the Partnership. The lending banks have indicated that they will not renew the Credit Facility, and the Parent Company has yet to secure a source for repayment of the balance due under the Credit Facility at May 31, 1998. CCC is currently in discussions with the management of the Parent Company to provide assurance that the management of the container leasing partnerships managed by CCC, including the Partnership, is not disrupted pending a refinancing or reorganization of the indebtedness of the Parent Company and its affiliates. The Partnership is not a borrower under the Credit Facility, and neither the containers nor the other assets of the Partnership have been pledged as collateral under the Credit Facility. The Partnership is unable to determine the impact, if any, these concerns may have on the future operating results and financial condition of the Partnership or CCC and the Leasing Company's ability to manage the Partnership's fleet in subsequent periods. 32 33 Schedule 1 IEA INCOME FUND IX, L.P. SCHEDULE OF REIMBURSED ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES PURSUANT TO ARTICLE IV SECTION 4.5 OF THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1996 AND 1995
1997 1996 1995 ---- ---- ---- Salaries $ 59,934 $ 76,293 $ 98,542 Other payroll related expenses 11,036 13,223 15,221 General and administrative expenses 58,888 70,463 80,014 -------- -------- -------- Total reimbursed administrative expenses $129,858 $159,979 $193,777 ======== ======== ========
See report of independent public accountants 33 34 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure The Registrant's discussion regarding the resignation of its certifying accountant is included in the Registrant's Report on Form 8-K, dated February 3, 1997 and filed February 7, 1997 and Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant's Report on Form 8-K, dated February 3, 1997 and filed February 26, 1997, incorporated herein by reference. The Registrant retained a new auditor, Moore Stephens, P.C., on April 10, 1997, as reported in its Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 14, 1997. 34 35 PART III Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant The Registrant, as such, has no officers or directors, but is managed by CCC, the general partner. The officers and directors of CCC at March 18, 1998, are as follows:
Name Office ----------------- ------------------------------------------------ Dennis J. Tietz President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director Elinor Wexler Vice President/Administration and Secretary, and Director John P. McDonald Vice President/Sales, and Director Stefan M. Palatin Director Peter J. Younger Director
DENNIS J. TIETZ Mr. Tietz, 45, as President and Chief Executive Officer, is responsible for the general management of CCC. From 1986 until August 1992, Mr. Tietz was responsible for the organization, marketing and after-market support of CCC's investment programs. Mr. Tietz is also President and a director of Cronos Securities Corp. Mr. Tietz was a regional manager for CCC, responsible for various container leasing activities in the U.S. and Europe from 1981 to 1986. Prior to joining CCC in December 1981, Mr. Tietz was employed by Trans Ocean Leasing Corporation as Regional Manager based in Houston, with responsibility for all leasing and operational activities in the U.S. Gulf. Mr. Tietz holds a B.S. degree in Business Administration from San Jose State University and is a Registered Securities Principal with the NASD. ELINOR A. WEXLER Ms. Wexler, 49, was elected Vice President - Administration and Secretary of CCC in August 1992. Ms. Wexler has been employed by the General Partner since 1987, and is responsible for investor services, compliance and securities registration. From 1983 to 1987, Ms. Wexler was Manager of Investor Services for The Robert A. McNeil Corporation, a real estate syndication company, in San Mateo, California. From 1971 to 1983, Ms. Wexler held various positions, including securities trader and international research editor, with Nikko Securities Co., International, based in San Francisco. Ms. Wexler attended the University of Oregon, Portland State University and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel. Ms. Wexler is also Vice President and Secretary of Cronos Securities Corp. and a Registered Principal with the NASD. JOHN P. MCDONALD Mr. McDonald, 36, was elected Vice President - National Sales Manager of CCC in August 1992, with responsibility for marketing CCC's investment programs. Since 1988, Mr. McDonald had been Regional Marketing Manager for the Southwestern U.S. From 1983 to 1988, Mr. McDonald held a number of container leasing positions with CCC, the most recent of which was as Area Manager for Belgium and the Netherlands, based in Antwerp. Mr. McDonald holds a B.S. degree in Business Administration from Bryant College, Rhode Island. Mr. McDonald is also a Vice President of Cronos Securities Corp. STEFAN M. PALATIN Mr. Palatin, 44, joined the Board of Directors of CCC in January 1993. Mr. Palatin is Chairman and CEO of The Cronos Group, and was a founder of LPI in 1983. From 1980 to 1991, Mr. Palatin was an executive director of the Contrin Group, which has provided financing to the container leasing industry, as well as other business ventures, and has sponsored limited partnerships organized in Austria. From 1977 to 1980, Mr. Palatin was a consultant to a number of companies in Austria, including Contrin. From 1973 to 1977, Mr. Palatin was a sales manager for Generali AG, the largest insurance group in Austria. Mr. Palatin, who is based in Austria, holds a Doctorate in Business Administration from the University of Economics and World Trade in Vienna. Mr. Palatin is also a director of The Cronos Group. 35 36 PETER J. YOUNGER Mr. Younger, 41, joined the Board of Directors of CCC in June 1997. See key management personnel of the Leasing Company for further information. JOHN KALLAS Mr. Kallas, 35, was elected Vice President/Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of CCC in December 1993 and was directly responsible for CCC's accounting operations and reporting activities. Mr. Kallas resigned from Cronos Capital Corp. on March 18, 1998. The key management personnel of the Leasing Company at March 18, 1998, were as follows:
Name Title ---------------- -------------------------------------- Steve Brocato President Peter J. Younger Vice President/Chief Financial Officer John M. Foy Vice President/Americas Nico Sciacovelli Vice President/Europe, Middle East and Africa Harris H. T. Ho Vice President/Asia Pacific David Heather Vice President/Technical Services John C. Kirby Vice President/Operations J. Gordon Steel Vice President/Tank Container Division
STEVE BROCATO Mr. Brocato, 45, was elected President of the Leasing Company's container division in June 1997, and is based in the United Kingdom. Mr. Brocato has held various positions since joining Cronos including, Vice President - Corporate Affairs and Director of Marketing - Refrigerated Containers for Cronos in North and South America. Prior to joining Cronos, Mr. Brocato was a Vice President for ICCU Containers from 1983 to 1985 and was responsible for dry cargo container marketing and operations for the Americas. From 1981 to 1983, he was Regional Manager for Trans Ocean Leasing Ltd. PETER J. YOUNGER Mr. Younger, 41, was elected Chief Financial Officer of The Cronos Group in March, 1997, and is based in the United Kingdom. Mr. Younger was appointed Vice President and Controller of Cronos in 1991. He joined IEA in 1987 and served as Director of Accounting and the Vice President and Controller, based in San Francisco. Prior to 1987, Mr. Younger was a certified public accountant and a principal with the accounting firm of Johnson, Glaze and Co. in Salem, Oregon. Mr. Younger holds a B.S. degree in Business Administration from Western Baptist College. JOHN M. FOY Mr. Foy, 52, is directly responsible for the Leasing Company's lease marketing and operations in North America, Central America, and South America, and is based in San Francisco. From 1985 to 1993, Mr. Foy was Vice President/Pacific with responsibility for dry cargo container lease marketing and operations in the Pacific Basin. From 1977 to 1985 Mr. Foy was Vice President of Marketing for Nautilus Leasing Services in San Francisco with responsibility for worldwide leasing activities. From 1974 to 1977, Mr. Foy was Regional Manager for Flexi-Van Leasing, a container lessor, with responsibility for container leasing activities in the Western United States. Mr. Foy holds a B.A. degree in Political Science from University of the Pacific, and a Bachelor of Foreign Trade from Thunderbird Graduate School of International Management. NICO SCIACOVELLI Mr. Sciacovelli, 48, was elected Vice President - Europe, Middle East and Africa in June 1997. Mr. Sciacovelli is directly responsible for the Leasing Company's lease marketing and operations in Europe, the Middle East and Africa and is based in Italy. Since joining Cronos in 1983, Mr. Sciacovelli served as Area Director and Area Manager for Southern Europe. Prior to joining Cronos, Mr. Sciacovelli was a Sales Manager at Interpool Ltd. HARRIS H. T. HO Mr. Ho, 39, was elected Vice President - Asia Pacific in June 1997. Mr. Ho is directly responsible for the Leasing Company's lease marketing and operations in Asia, Australia and the Indian sub-continent and is based in Hong Kong. Since joining Cronos in 1990, Mr. Ho served as Area Director, Hong Kong and China. Prior to joining Cronos, Mr. Ho was a Manager at Sea Containers Pacific Ltd and Sea Containers Hong Kong Limited from 1981 to 1990, responsible for container marketing within Asia. From 1978 to 1981, Mr. Ho was Senior Equipment Controller for Hong Kong Container Line. Mr. Ho holds a Diploma of Management Studies in Marketing from The Hong Kong Polytechnic and The Hong Kong Management Association. 36 37 DAVID HEATHER Mr. Heather, 50, is responsible for all technical and engineering activities of the fleet managed by the Leasing Company. Mr. Heather was Technical Director for LPI, based in the United Kingdom, from 1986 to 1991. From 1980 to 1986, Mr. Heather was employed by ABC Containerline NV as Technical Manager with technical responsibility for the shipping line's fleet of dry cargo, refrigerated and other specialized container equipment. From 1974 to 1980, Mr. Heather was Technical Supervisor for ACT Services Ltd., a shipping line, with responsibility for technical activities related to refrigerated containers. Mr. Heather holds a Marine Engineering Certificate from Riversdale Marine Technical College in England. JOHN C. KIRBY Mr. Kirby, 44, is responsible for container purchasing, contract and billing administration, container repairs and leasing-related systems, and is based in the United Kingdom. Mr. Kirby joined CCC in 1985 as European Technical Manager and advanced to Director of European Operations in 1986, a position he held with CCC, and later the Leasing Company, until his promotion to Vice President/Operations of the Leasing Company in 1992. From 1982 to 1985, Mr. Kirby was employed by CLOU Containers, a container leasing company, as Technical Manager based in Hamburg, Germany. Mr. Kirby acquired a professional engineering qualification from the Mid-Essex Technical College in England. J. GORDON STEEL Mr. Steel, 65, is directly responsible for the overall lease marketing activity for the Leasing Company's Tank Container Division. From 1990 to 1992, Mr. Steel held the position of Director/General Manager for Tiphook Container's Tank Division. From 1977 to 1990, Mr. Steel held various managerial positions, involving manufacturing and transportation of hazardous materials, with Laporte Industries and ICI, major chemical distribution companies. Mr. Steel is a qualified Chemical Engineer and attended the Associate Royal Technical College in Scotland. 37 38 Item 11. Executive Compensation The Registrant pays a management fee and will reimburse the general partner for various administrative expenses. The Registrant also makes quarterly distributions to its partners (general and limited) from distributable cash from operations (allocated 95% to the limited partners and 5% to the general partner). Sales proceeds are allocated 99% to the limited partners and 1% to the general partner. These allocations remain in effect until such time as the limited partners have received from the Registrant aggregate distributions in an amount equal to their capital contributions plus a 10% cumulative, compounded (daily), annual return on their adjusted capital contributions. Thereafter, all Partnership distributions will be allocated 85% to the limited partners and 15% to the general partner. The Registrant does not pay or reimburse CCC or its affiliates for any remuneration payable by them to their executive officers, directors or any other controlling persons. However, the Registrant does reimburse the general partner for certain services pursuant to Section 4.5 of the Partnership Agreement. These services include but are not limited to (i) salaries and related salary expenses for services which could be performed directly for the Registrant by independent parties, such as legal, accounting, transfer agent, data processing, operations, communications, duplicating and other such services; and, (ii) performing administrative services necessary to the prudent operations of the Registrant. The following table sets forth the fees the Registrant paid (on a cash basis) to CCC for the year ended December 31, 1997.
Cash Fees and Name Description Distributions ---- ----------- ------------- 1) CCC Acquisition fee - equal to 5% of the purchase $ 349 price of containers acquired by the Registrant pursuant to Section 4.2 of the Limited Partnership Agreement 2) CCC Base management fees - equal to 7% of gross $185,559 lease revenues attributable to operating leases pursuant to Section 4.4 of the Limited Partnership Agreement 3) CCC Reimbursed administrative expenses - equal to $131,099 the costs expended by CCC and its affiliates for services necessary to the prudent operation of the Registrant pursuant to Section 4.5 of the Limited Partnership Agreement 4) CCC Interest in Fund - 5% of distributions of $ 98,950 distributable cash for any quarter pursuant to Section 6.1 of the Limited Partnership Agreement
38 39 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management (a) Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners There is no person or "group" of persons known to the management of CCC to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the outstanding units of limited partnership interests of the Registrant. (b) Security Ownership of Management The Registrant has no directors or officers. It is managed by CCC. CCC owns 163.2 units, representing 0.48% of the total amount of units outstanding. (c) Changes in Control Inapplicable. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions (a) Transactions with Management and Others The Registrant's only transactions with management and other related parties during 1997 were limited to those fees paid or amounts committed to be paid (on an annual basis) to CCC, the general partner. See Item 11, "Executive Compensation," herein. (b) Certain Business Relationships Inapplicable. (c) Indebtedness of Management Inapplicable. (d) Transactions with Promoters Inapplicable. 39 40 PART IV Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K (a)1. Financial Statements The following financial statements of the Registrant are included in Part II, Item 8:
Page ---- Reports of Independent Public Accountants............................ 19, 20 Balance sheets - December 31, 1997 and 1996.......................... 21 Statements of operations - for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995.................................. 22 Statements of partners' capital - for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995.................................. 23 Statements of cash flows - for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995.................................. 24 Notes to financial statements........................................ 25 Schedule of Reimbursed Administrative Expenses....................... 33
All other schedules are omitted as the information is not required or the information is included in the financial statements or notes thereto. 40 41 (a)3. Exhibits
Exhibit No. Description Method of Filing ------ ----------- ---------------- 3(a) Limited Partnership Agreement of the Registrant, * amended and restated as of September 12, 1988 3(b) Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Registrant ** 27 Financial Data Schedule Filed with this document
(b) Reports on Form 8-K The Registrant filed a Report on Form 8-K, February 7, 1997 and Amendment No. 1 to Report on Form 8-K, February 26, 1997, reporting the resignation of the Registrant's certifying accountant. The Registrant filed a Report on Form 8-K, April 14, 1997, reporting the appointment of the Registrant's successor certifying accountant. - ------------- * Incorporated by reference to Exhibit "A" to the Prospectus of the Registrant dated September 12, 1988, included as part of Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-23321) ** Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-23321) 41 42 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. IEA INCOME FUND IX, L.P. By Cronos Capital Corp. The General Partner By /s/ Dennis J. Tietz ------------------------------------ Dennis J. Tietz President and Director of Cronos Capital Corp. ("CCC") Principal Executive Officer of CCC Date: March 31, 1998 Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Cronos Capital Corp., the general partner of the Registrant, in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
Signature Title Date --------- ----- ---- /s/ Dennis J. Tietz President and Director of - ---------------------------- Cronos Capital Corp. March 31, 1998 Dennis J. Tietz ("CCC") (Principal Executive Officer of CCC) /s/ John McDonald National Sales Manager - ---------------------------- and Director of March 31, 1998 John McDonald Cronos Capital Corp. /s/ Peter Younger Director of - ---------------------------- Cronos Capital Corp. March 31, 1998 Peter Younger
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION The Registrant's annual report will be furnished to its limited partners on or about April 30, 1998. Copies of the annual report will be concurrently furnished to the Commission for information purposes only, and shall not be deemed to be filed with the Commission. 43 EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. Description Method of Filing ------ ----------- ---------------- 3(a) Limited Partnership Agreement of the Registrant, * amended and restated as of September 12, 1988 3(b) Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Registrant ** 27 Financial Data Schedule Filed with this document
- ------------- * Incorporated by reference to Exhibit "A" to the Prospectus of the Registrant dated September 12, 1988, included as part of Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-23321) ** Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-23321) EX-27.1 2 FDS-YEAR END 1997
5 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD DECEMBER 31, 1997 12-MOS DEC-31-1997 JAN-01-1997 DEC-31-1997 999,900 0 385,314 0 0 1,385,214 15,717,692 7,400,531 9,702,375 0 0 0 0 0 9,702,375 9,702,375 0 1,765,903 0 991,785 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 715,508 0 0
EX-27.2 3 FDS-YEAR END 1996
5 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD DECEMBER 31, 1996 12-MOS DEC-31-1996 JAN-01-1996 DEC-31-1996 936,081 0 543,250 0 0 1,479,331 16,577,611 6,867,857 11,189,085 0 0 0 0 0 11,189,085 11,189,085 0 2,036,698 0 1,014,502 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,084,193 0 0
EX-27.3 4 FDS-YEAR END 1995
5 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND THE STAEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVBE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 12-MOS DEC-31-1995 JAN-01-1995 DEC-31-1995 1,109,678 0 589,878 0 0 1,699,556 17,104,812 6,110,733 12,693,635 17,981 0 0 0 0 12,675,654 12,693,635 0 2,703,705 0 1,046,106 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,657,599 0 0
EX-27.4 5 FDS-1997 Q'S
5 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE SHEETS AT MARCH 31, 1997, JUNE 30, 1997 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997, JUNE 30, 1997 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE RESPECTIVE PERIODS THEN ENDED 3-MOS 6-MOS 9-MOS DEC-31-1997 DEC-31-1997 DEC-31-1997 JAN-01-1997 JAN-01-1997 JAN-01-1997 MAR-31-1997 JUN-30-1997 SEP-30-1997 896,964 859,457 949,776 0 0 0 527,711 484,355 466,547 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,424,675 1,343,812 1,416,323 16,481,361 16,365,883 16,014,882 7,066,754 7,249,431 7,312,924 10,839,282 10,460,264 10,188,281 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,839,282 10,460,264 110,118,281 10,839,282 10,460,264 110,118,281 0 0 0 452,207 885,170 1,322,701 0 0 0 250,729 503,561 742,795 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 207,473 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 207,473 373,192 543,757 0 0 0 0 0 0
EX-27.5 6 FDS-1996 Q'S
5 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE SHEETS AT MARCH 31, 1996, JUNE 30, 1996 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1996, JUNE 30, 1996 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE RESPECTIVE PERIODS THEN ENDED 3-MOS 6-MOS 9-MOS DEC-31-1996 DEC-31-1996 DEC-31-1996 JAN-01-1996 JAN-01-1996 JAN-01-1996 MAR-31-1996 JUN-30-1996 SEP-30-1996 1,006,105 970,731 1,055,315 0 0 0 637,746 632,869 533,907 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,643,851 1,603,600 1,589,222 17,009,569 16,727,244 16,658,916 6,322,307 6,447,308 6,663,538 12,331,113 11,880,536 11,584,600 17,981 7,783 4,743 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,313,132 11,873,153 11,579,857 12,331,113 11,880,536 11,584,600 0 0 0 567,612 1,008,642 1,523,822 0 0 0 257,385 512,217 766,403 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 340,567 514,223 799,662 0 0 0 0 0 0
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----