Exhibit 1.02

Lindsay Corporation

Conflict Minerals Report

For the Calendar Year Ended December 31, 2013

This is the Conflict Minerals Report of Lindsay Corporation (the “Company”, “Lindsay”, “we”, “us” or “our”) for calendar year 2013 in accordance with Rule 13p-1 (the “Rule”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Rule was adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to implement reporting and disclosure requirements related to conflict minerals as directed by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act). The Rule imposes certain reporting obligations on SEC registrants whose manufactured products contain conflict minerals which are necessary to the functionality or production of their products. “Conflict minerals” are defined as cassiterite, columbite-tantalite, gold, wolframite, and their derivatives, which are limited to tin, tantalum and tungsten (together with gold, referred to as “3TG”) for the purposes of this assessment. These requirements apply to registrants whatever the geographic origin of the conflict minerals and whether or not they fund armed conflict.

If a registrant can establish that the conflict minerals originated from sources other than the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) or an adjoining country, or from recycled and scrap sources, they must submit a Form SD which describes the Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry completed. If a registrant has reason to believe that any of the conflict minerals in their supply chain may have originated in the DRC or an adjoining country, or if they are unable to determine the country of origin of those conflict minerals, then the registrant must exercise due diligence on the conflict minerals’ source and chain of custody and submit a Conflict Minerals Report to the SEC that includes a brief description of those due diligence measures.

In accordance with the instructions to Form SD, this Conflict Minerals Report has not been audited by an independent private sector auditor.

For terms not otherwise defined herein, please refer to Rule 13p-1 and SEC Release No. 34-67716 for such definitions.

1. Company Overview

Lindsay, along with its subsidiaries, is a global leader in providing a variety of proprietary water management and road infrastructure products and services. Lindsay’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol LNN. For more information regarding Lindsay, please visit our website at http://www.lindsay.com.

2. Products Overview

Lindsay has operations which are categorized into two major reporting segments; irrigation and infrastructure.

Irrigation Segment – Our irrigation segment includes the manufacture and marketing of center pivot, lateral move, and hose reel irrigation systems which are used principally in the agricultural industry to increase or stabilize crop production while conserving water, energy and labor. We also manufacture and market repair and replacement parts for our irrigation systems and controls, design and manufacture water pumping stations and controls for the agriculture, golf, landscape and municipal markets, and manufacture and distribute separators and filtration solutions for groundwater, agriculture, industrial and heat transfer markets.

Infrastructure Segment – Our infrastructure segment includes the manufacture and marketing of moveable barriers, specialty barriers, crash cushions and end terminals, road marking and road safety equipment, large diameter steel tubing, railroad signals and structures, and outsourced manufacturing services.

We determined that during the 2013 calendar year, we manufactured and sub-contracted to manufacture products containing 3TG and that the use of these minerals is necessary to the functionality or production of these products.

3. Supply Chain Overview

We rely upon our direct suppliers to provide information regarding the origin of conflict minerals contained in components and materials supplied to us. Generally, there are multiple tiers of suppliers between us and the mines from which the conflict minerals were mined. Accordingly, most of our suppliers must similarly conduct due diligence up the supply chain. We do not make purchases of raw ore or unrefined conflict minerals directly from mines, smelters or refiners. The methods we used to try to determine the origin of conflict minerals in our products included:

• sending letters to our direct suppliers, explaining the rule and referring the suppliers to online training materials and instructions;

• soliciting information from relevant suppliers of components and materials utilized in our products, using the standard Conflict Minerals Reporting Template designed by the Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition (EICC) and the Global e-Sustainability Initiative (GeSI);

• reviewing responses that we received from our suppliers and following up on information that appeared to be incomplete, incorrect or not trustworthy; and

• sending reminders to suppliers who did not respond to our requests for information.

4. Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry (RCOI) and RCOI conclusion

We conducted an analysis of our products and found that 3TG can be found in some of our products and are necessary to the functionality or production of those products. Therefore, we are subject to the reporting obligations of Rule 13p-1.

We conducted a survey of our suppliers using the EICC/GeSI Conflict Minerals Reporting Template. The template was developed to facilitate disclosure and communication of information regarding smelters that provide material to a company’s supply chain. It includes questions regarding a company’s conflict-free policy, engagement with its direct suppliers, and a listing of the smelters the company and its suppliers use. In addition, the template contains questions about the origin of conflict minerals included in their products, as well as supplier due diligence. This template is being widely adopted by many companies in their due diligence processes related to conflict minerals.

Despite having conducted a good faith reasonable country of origin inquiry and due diligence process, we have been unable to reliably determine the origin of the 3TG within our products. Due to the complexity of our products and supply chain, it will take time for many of our suppliers to verify the origin of all of the minerals. Using our supply chain due diligence processes, we hope to further develop transparency into our supply chain.

5. Conflict Minerals Status Analysis and Conflict Status Conclusion

We have concluded that our supply chain remains “DRC conflict undeterminable.” We reached this conclusion because we have been unable to determine the origin of the 3TG used in our products.

6. Due Diligence Program

6.1. Conflict Minerals Policy

Our policy with respect to the sourcing of conflict minerals may be found publicly on our internet website at http://www.lindsayir.com/Conflict Minerals.

6.2. Due Diligence Process

Our due diligence processes and efforts have been developed in conjunction with Annex I of the second edition of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (OECD Guidance) and the related supplements for gold and for tin, tantalum and tungsten. As described above, our efforts include utilization of the EICC/GeSI Conflict Minerals Reporting Template as part of our supply chain diligence process.

Our conflict minerals due diligence process includes: the development of a Conflict Minerals Policy, establishment of governance structures with cross functional team members and senior executives, communication with suppliers, due diligence compliance process and measurement, record keeping and escalation procedures. Senior management is briefed about the results of our due diligence efforts on a regular basis.

6.3. Steps to Be Taken to Mitigate Risk and Maturing Due Diligence Program

As we move towards developing our due diligence program, we intend to enhance our supplier communication and to improve our due diligence data accuracy in order to mitigate the risk that the necessary 3TG contained in our products could benefit armed groups in the DRC or adjoining countries.

7. Identify and Assess Risk in the Supply Chain

Because of our size, the breadth and complexity of our products, and the constant evolution of our supply chain, it is difficult to identify parties upstream from our direct suppliers. Our direct suppliers are similarly reliant upon information provided by their suppliers.

At the outset of our reasonable country of origin inquiry, we elected to survey a broad group of direct suppliers for our products. This included sending letters to approximately 1,200 suppliers. A majority of the responses stated that their materials did not contain 3TG, the supplier was unable to determine whether the products they sold to us contained 3TG, or the supplier was still in the process of evaluating the source of the 3TG in their products. While some suppliers provided company-level information regarding 3TG smelters and refiners, this information does not identify the smelters or refiners used for a particular part, component or business customer. Therefore, we are unable to reliably determine the facilities used to process the 3TG used in our products or their country of origin.

8. Audit of Supply Chain Due Diligence

We do not have a direct relationship with 3TG smelters and refiners, nor do we perform direct audits of the other entities in our supply chain. However, we do rely upon industry efforts to influence smelters and refineries to participate in the EICC/GeSI Conflict-Free Smelter Program.

9. Continuous Improvement Efforts to Mitigate Risk

The due diligence process discussed above is an ongoing process. As we continue to conduct due diligence on our products, we will continue to refine our procedures to meet the goals set forth above. We intend to undertake the following next steps to improve the due diligence process and to gather additional information which will assist us to determine whether the 3TG we utilize benefit armed groups contributing to human rights violations:

• continue to work with suppliers who provided incomplete or insufficient information in an effort to obtain complete and accurate information in future years;

• continue to conduct and report annually on supply chain due diligence for the applicable conflict minerals;

• examine the possibility of including a conflict minerals clause in our supplier contracts and purchase order terms and conditions; and

• attempt to validate supplier responses using information collected via independent conflict free smelter validation programs such as the EICC/GeSI Conflict Free Smelter Program.

This Conflict Minerals Report was not subjected to an independent private sector audit as it is not required by paragraph (c)(1)(iv) of the instructions to Item 1.01.