UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-16393
BMC Software, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 74-2126120 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) | |
2101 CityWest Boulevard Houston, Texas |
77042-2827 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(713) 918-8800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | x | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of October 29, 2012, there were 154,938,817 outstanding shares of Common Stock, par value $.01, of the registrant.
BMC SOFTWARE, INC.
QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
2
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
BMC SOFTWARE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except par value data)
September 30, | March 31, | |||||||
2012 | 2012 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 1,311.2 | $ | 1,496.9 | ||||
Short-term investments |
128.2 | 86.1 | ||||||
Trade accounts receivable, net |
216.9 | 296.7 | ||||||
Trade finance receivables, net |
68.5 | 108.0 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets |
74.6 | 71.0 | ||||||
Other current assets |
105.3 | 122.2 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
1,904.7 | 2,180.9 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
92.3 | 87.8 | ||||||
Software development costs, net |
262.4 | 244.7 | ||||||
Long-term investments |
45.9 | 52.6 | ||||||
Long-term trade finance receivables, net |
56.2 | 80.1 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
229.7 | 257.5 | ||||||
Goodwill |
1,708.3 | 1,720.6 | ||||||
Other long-term assets |
236.2 | 240.2 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 4,535.7 | $ | 4,864.4 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Trade accounts payable |
$ | 44.5 | $ | 31.5 | ||||
Finance payables |
7.7 | 1.2 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities |
249.0 | 321.4 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
1,004.7 | 1,059.5 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
1,305.9 | 1,413.6 | ||||||
Long-term deferred revenue |
837.3 | 934.4 | ||||||
Long-term borrowings |
824.8 | 821.6 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
246.3 | 249.0 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
3,214.3 | 3,418.6 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 1.0 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value, 600.0 shares authorized, 249.1 shares issued |
2.5 | 2.5 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
1,237.5 | 1,179.5 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
3,397.4 | 3,245.3 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
7.4 | 31.9 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
4,644.8 | 4,459.2 | |||||||
Treasury stock, at cost (93.5 and 87.4 shares) |
(3,323.4 | ) | (3,013.4 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total stockholders equity |
1,321.4 | 1,445.8 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 4,535.7 | $ | 4,864.4 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
BMC SOFTWARE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In millions, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Quarter Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
License |
$ | 209.2 | $ | 229.7 | $ | 380.8 | $ | 419.2 | ||||||||
Maintenance |
285.4 | 270.5 | 564.2 | 535.1 | ||||||||||||
Professional services |
53.6 | 56.5 | 107.6 | 104.8 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenue |
548.2 | 556.7 | 1,052.6 | 1,059.1 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of license revenue |
40.5 | 39.3 | 79.8 | 77.6 | ||||||||||||
Cost of maintenance revenue |
53.0 | 49.5 | 103.9 | 93.3 | ||||||||||||
Cost of professional services revenue |
54.5 | 53.2 | 112.2 | 100.6 | ||||||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses |
163.1 | 153.5 | 327.8 | 298.2 | ||||||||||||
Research and development expenses |
32.3 | 38.3 | 74.6 | 83.0 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
55.9 | 51.0 | 118.9 | 109.6 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
10.9 | 10.9 | 23.5 | 20.7 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating expenses |
410.2 | 395.7 | 840.7 | 783.0 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income |
138.0 | 161.0 | 211.9 | 276.1 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other income (loss), net: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income, net |
3.5 | 2.6 | 5.8 | 6.4 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(10.6 | ) | (5.2 | ) | (20.8 | ) | (10.7 | ) | ||||||||
Gain (loss) on investments, net |
0.7 | (2.2 | ) | 0.3 | (2.1 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total other loss, net |
(6.4 | ) | (4.8 | ) | (14.7 | ) | (6.4 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Earnings before income taxes |
131.6 | 156.2 | 197.2 | 269.7 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
33.8 | 41.5 | 45.2 | 59.3 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 97.8 | $ | 114.7 | $ | 152.0 | $ | 210.4 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.62 | $ | 0.66 | $ | 0.96 | $ | 1.20 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.61 | $ | 0.65 | $ | 0.94 | $ | 1.18 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Shares used in computing basic earnings per share |
157.5 | 173.0 | 158.9 | 174.7 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Shares used in computing diluted earnings per share |
160.3 | 176.0 | 162.1 | 178.3 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 97.8 | $ | 114.7 | $ | 152.0 | $ | 210.4 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax provision (benefit) of $1.0, $(0.8), $2.6 and $(0.4), respectively |
5.1 | (41.5 | ) | (24.1 | ) | (33.3 | ) | |||||||||
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities, net of tax provision (benefit) of $0, $(0.3), $(0.3) and $(0.3), respectively |
| (0.7 | ) | (0.4 | ) | (0.8 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total other comprehensive income (loss) |
5.1 | (42.2 | ) | (24.5 | ) | (34.1 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
$ | 102.9 | $ | 72.5 | $ | 127.5 | $ | 176.3 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
BMC SOFTWARE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 152.0 | $ | 210.4 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
115.9 | 111.4 | ||||||
Deferred income tax benefit |
(3.8 | ) | (3.5 | ) | ||||
Share-based compensation expense |
74.5 | 61.6 | ||||||
Loss on investments, net and other |
0.8 | 3.9 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: |
||||||||
Trade accounts receivable |
79.0 | 65.7 | ||||||
Trade finance receivables |
64.5 | 109.7 | ||||||
Prepaid and other current assets |
10.3 | 0.7 | ||||||
Other long-term assets |
5.2 | 12.7 | ||||||
Accrued and other current liabilities |
(57.9 | ) | (63.7 | ) | ||||
Deferred revenue |
(149.0 | ) | (64.5 | ) | ||||
Other long-term liabilities |
(2.0 | ) | (9.0 | ) | ||||
Other operating assets and liabilities |
(3.4 | ) | (12.3 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
286.1 | 423.1 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from maturities of investments |
34.0 | 15.5 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of investments |
9.6 | 3.3 | ||||||
Purchases of investments |
(79.4 | ) | (18.9 | ) | ||||
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired, and other investments |
(19.4 | ) | (148.9 | ) | ||||
Capitalization of software development costs |
(63.3 | ) | (62.8 | ) | ||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(13.3 | ) | (10.0 | ) | ||||
Other investing activities |
1.9 | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(129.9 | ) | (221.8 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Treasury stock acquired |
(350.0 | ) | (405.5 | ) | ||||
Repurchases of stock to satisfy employee tax withholding obligations |
(20.0 | ) | (23.0 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from stock options exercised and other |
38.9 | 37.1 | ||||||
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation expense |
3.4 | 12.6 | ||||||
Repayments of borrowings and capital lease obligations |
(5.6 | ) | (4.7 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(333.3 | ) | (383.5 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
(8.6 | ) | (19.0 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
(185.7 | ) | (201.2 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
1,496.9 | 1,660.9 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 1,311.2 | $ | 1,459.7 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 22.2 | $ | 11.6 | ||||
Cash paid for income taxes, net of amounts refunded |
$ | 48.6 | $ | 13.5 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
BMC SOFTWARE, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(1) Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of BMC Software, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, we, us, our or BMC). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. These financial statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments necessary to fairly present our financial position and results of operations as of and for the periods presented herein. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods financial statements to conform to the current periods presentation.
Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. Our results reflect the seasonality of our business and generally tend to be stronger in the third and fourth quarters of our fiscal year, as compared to the first and second quarters of our fiscal year; however, general economic conditions also have an impact on our business and financial results. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with our annual audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the SEC on Form 10-K.
(2) Business Combinations
During the six months ended September 30, 2012, we completed three business combinations for combined purchase consideration of $19.5 million. The purchase consideration was allocated to acquired assets and assumed liabilities consisting primarily of $19.5 million of acquired technology, with weighted average economic lives of approximately three years, in addition to other tangible assets and liabilities. These acquisitions resulted in a preliminary allocation of $2.7 million to goodwill assigned to our Enterprise Service Management segment. We are in the process of finalizing our assessment of the fair value of acquired assets and assumed liabilities and will adjust the purchase price allocations when they are finalized.
(3) Financial Instruments
We measure certain financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis using the following valuation techniques:
(A) Market approach Uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.
(B) Income approach Uses valuation techniques to convert future estimated cash flows to a single present amount based on current market expectations about those future amounts, using present value techniques.
6
The fair values of our financial instruments were determined using the following input levels and valuation techniques:
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using | ||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2012 |
Total | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
Valuation Technique | |||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents |
||||||||||||||||||
Money-market funds |
$ | 182.4 | $ | 182.4 | $ | | $ | | A | |||||||||
United States Treasury securities |
200.0 | 200.0 | | | A | |||||||||||||
Short-term and long-term investments |
||||||||||||||||||
United States Treasury securities |
134.8 | 134.8 | | | A | |||||||||||||
Auction rate securities |
18.6 | | | 18.6 | B | |||||||||||||
Mutual funds |
20.7 | 20.7 | | | A | |||||||||||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
5.5 | | 5.5 | | A | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | 562.0 | $ | 537.9 | $ | 5.5 | $ | 18.6 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
$ | 4.1 | $ | | $ | 4.1 | $ | | A | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | 4.1 | $ | | $ | 4.1 | $ | | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 classification is applied to any asset or liability that has a readily available quoted market price from an active market where there is significant transparency in the executed/quoted price.
Level 2 classification is applied to assets and liabilities that have evaluated prices where the data inputs to these valuations are observable either directly or indirectly, but do not represent quoted market prices from an active market.
Level 3 classification is applied to assets and liabilities when prices are not derived from existing market data and requires us to develop our own assumptions about how market participants would value the asset or liability.
The following table summarizes the activity in our Level 3 financial instruments (auction rate securities) for the quarters and six months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively:
Quarter
Ended September 30, |
Six Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at the beginning of the period |
$ | 18.7 | $ | 26.8 | $ | 26.9 | $ | 27.2 | ||||||||
Redemption and sales of auction rate securities |
| (0.2 | ) | (7.6 | ) | (0.4 | ) | |||||||||
Change in unrealized gain (loss) included in other comprehensive income |
(0.1 | ) | (1.0 | ) | (0.7 | ) | (1.2 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance at the end of the period |
$ | 18.6 | $ | 25.6 | $ | 18.6 | $ | 25.6 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
Investments
Our cash, cash equivalents and investments were comprised of the following:
September 30, 2012 | March 31, 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
Short-term Investments |
Long-term Investments |
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
Short-term Investments |
Long-term Investments |
|||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Measured at fair value: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States Treasury securities |
$ | 200.0 | $ | 128.2 | $ | 6.6 | $ | 49.9 | $ | 86.1 | $ | 6.1 | ||||||||||||
Auction rate securities |
| | 18.6 | | | 26.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Trading |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mutual funds |
| | 20.7 | | | 19.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total debt and equity investments measured at fair value |
200.0 | 128.2 | 45.9 | 49.9 | 86.1 | 52.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Cash on hand |
878.5 | | | 632.6 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
50.3 | | | 45.1 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Money-market funds |
182.4 | | | 769.3 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total cash, cash equivalents and investments |
$ | 1,311.2 | $ | 128.2 | $ | 45.9 | $ | 1,496.9 | $ | 86.1 | $ | 52.6 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive income from available-for-sale securities (pre-tax): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized losses* |
$ | | $ | | $ | 3.1 | $ | | $ | | $ | 2.4 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | The unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities at September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012 relate to the auction rate securities. |
The following summarizes the underlying contractual maturities of our available-for-sale investments in debt securities at September 30, 2012:
Cost | Fair Value |
|||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 328.2 | $ | 328.2 | ||||
Due between one and two years |
6.6 | 6.6 | ||||||
Due after ten years |
21.7 | 18.6 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 356.5 | $ | 353.4 | ||||
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, we held auction rate securities with a par value of $21.7 million and $29.3 million, respectively, which were classified as available-for-sale. The total estimated fair value of our auction rate securities was $18.6 million and $26.9 million at September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, respectively. Our auction rate securities consist entirely of bonds issued by public agencies that are backed by student loans with at least a 97% guarantee by the federal government under the United States Department of Educations Federal Family Education Loan Program. All of these bonds are currently rated investment grade by Moodys or Standard and Poors. Auctions for these securities began failing in early 2008 and have continued to fail, resulting in our continuing to hold such securities and the issuers paying interest at the maximum contractual rates. We do not believe that any of the underlying issuers of these auction rate securities are presently at risk of default or that the underlying credit quality of the assets backing the auction rate security investments has been impacted by the reduced liquidity of these investments. Due to the illiquidity in the auction rate securities market caused by failed auctions, we estimated the fair value of these securities using internally developed models of the expected cash flows of the securities on a discounted basis. These models incorporate assumptions about the expected cash flows of the underlying student loans discounted at an estimate of the rate of return required by investors, which includes an adjustment to reflect a lack of liquidity in the market for these securities. The range of and weighted average discount rates used in our valuation models at September 30, 2012 were 3.7% to 4.1%, and 3.9%, respectively. Significant increases (decreases) in the discount rate used in the valuation would result in decreases (increases) in the fair value of the auction rate securities. Periodically, the issuers of certain of our auction rate securities have redeemed portions of our holdings at par value plus accrued interest. There were no redemptions during the quarter ended September 30, 2012. During the six months ended September 30, 2012, issuers redeemed available-for-sale holdings of $7.6 million par value. During the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, issuers redeemed available-for-sale holdings of $0.2 million and $0.4 million par value, respectively.
8
The unrealized loss on our available-for-sale auction rate securities, which have a fair value of $18.6 million at September 30, 2012, was $3.1 million and was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as we believe the decline in fair value of these auction rate securities is temporary. In making this determination, we primarily considered the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuers, the probability scheduled cash flows will continue to be made and the likelihood we would be required to sell the investments before recovery of our cost basis. These available-for-sale auction rate securities have been in an unrealized loss position for greater than twelve months. Because of the uncertainty related to the timing of liquidity associated with these auction rate securities, these securities are classified as long-term investments at September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012.
Derivative Financial Instruments
We operate globally and transact business in various foreign currencies. Our foreign currency exposures relate primarily to certain foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities, primarily non-U.S. dollar denominated accounts receivable, cash and intercompany balances held by U.S. dollar functional currency entities. To minimize the risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, we have established a program that utilizes foreign currency forward contracts to offset the risks associated with the effects of certain foreign currency exposures. Gains or losses on our foreign currency exposures are offset by gains or losses on the foreign currency forward contracts entered into under this program. These foreign currency forward contracts generally have terms of one month or less and are generally entered into at the prevailing market exchange rate at the end of each month. We do not use foreign currency forward contracts for speculative purposes. While these foreign currency forward contracts are utilized to hedge foreign currency exposures, they are not formally designated as hedges for accounting purposes, and therefore, the changes in the fair values of these contracts are recognized currently in earnings. We record these foreign currency forward contracts at fair value as either assets or liabilities depending on their net settlement position with each respective counterparty at the balance sheet date.
The fair value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts that closed in a gain position at September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012 was $5.5 million and $8.1 million, respectively, and was recorded within other current assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts that closed in a loss position at September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012 was $4.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively, and was recorded within accrued liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. The notional amounts at contract exchange rates of our foreign currency forward contracts outstanding were:
Notional Amount |
||||||||
September 30, 2012 |
March 31, 2012 |
|||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
Foreign Currency Forward Contracts (receive United States dollar/pay foreign currency) |
||||||||
Euro |
$ | 90.4 | $ | 214.2 | ||||
Australian dollar |
19.8 | 29.9 | ||||||
Chinese yuan renminbi |
13.9 | 11.7 | ||||||
Swiss franc |
7.5 | 6.8 | ||||||
Singapore dollar |
5.6 | 3.8 | ||||||
New Zealand dollar |
5.0 | 3.4 | ||||||
Canadian dollar |
3.8 | | ||||||
South Korean won |
2.9 | 2.6 | ||||||
Danish krone |
2.7 | 3.9 | ||||||
Brazilian real |
2.1 | 8.7 | ||||||
British pound |
| 19.2 | ||||||
Swedish krona |
| 8.2 | ||||||
Mexican peso |
| 3.2 | ||||||
Other |
5.0 | 6.4 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 158.7 | $ | 322.0 | ||||
|
|
|
|
9
Notional Amount | ||||||||
September 30, | March 31, | |||||||
2012 | 2012 | |||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
Foreign Currency Forward Contracts (pay United States dollar/receive foreign currency) |
||||||||
Israeli shekel |
$ | 146.5 | $ | 158.2 | ||||
Indian rupee |
11.0 | 15.0 | ||||||
British pound |
6.3 | | ||||||
Other |
0.5 | 4.8 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 164.3 | $ | 178.0 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Our use of foreign currency forward contracts is intended to principally offset gains and losses associated with foreign currency exposures. Therefore, the notional amounts and currencies underlying our foreign currency forward contracts will fluctuate period to period as they are principally dependent on the balances and currency denomination of monetary assets and liabilities maintained by our global entities. The effect of the foreign currency forward contracts for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, was a loss of $1.9 million and a gain of $4.5 million, respectively, which, after including gains and losses on our foreign currency exposures, resulted in net gains of $1.0 million and $0.6 million, respectively, recorded in interest and other income, net. The effect of the foreign currency forward contracts for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, was losses of $2.3 million and $6.0 million, respectively, which, after including gains and losses on our foreign currency exposures, resulted in net losses of $0.9 million and $1.9 million, respectively, recorded in interest and other income, net.
We are exposed to credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties to derivative financial instruments, but we do not expect any counterparties to fail to meet their obligations given their high credit ratings. In addition, we diversify this risk across several counterparties and utilize netting agreements to mitigate the counterparty credit risk.
Trade Finance Receivables
A substantial portion of our trade finance receivables is transferred to financial institutions on a non-recourse basis. We utilize wholly-owned finance subsidiaries in these finance receivables transfers. These entities are consolidated into our financial position and results of operations. We account for such transfers as sales in accordance with applicable accounting rules pertaining to the transfer of financial assets and the sale of future revenue when we have surrendered control of such receivables (including determining that such assets have been isolated beyond our reach and the reach of our creditors) and when we do not have significant continuing involvement in the generation of cash flows due the financial institutions. During the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, we transferred $39.0 million and $111.8 million, respectively, of such receivables through these programs. During the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, we transferred $147.8 million and $159.0 million, respectively, of such receivables through these programs. Finance receivables are typically transferred within several months after origination and the outstanding principal balance at the time of transfer typically approximates fair value.
For those finance receivables not transferred, we evaluate the credit risk of finance receivables in our portfolio based on regional characteristics specific to the risk climate in each of our geographic operations as well as based on internal credit quality indicators for individual receivables. We evaluate the credit risk of finance receivables using an internal credit rating system based on whether an individual receivable meets specific internal criteria including counterparty credit rating and receivable maturity date and assign an internal credit rating of 1, 2 or 3, with a credit rating of 1 representing the best credit quality.
For all regions and credit categories, a finance receivable will be specifically reserved once deemed uncollectible. As of September 30, 2012, we held $124.7 million of finance receivables, net of $0.3 million of specific receivables which have been fully reserved.
10
At September 30, 2012, our finance receivables balance, net of allowance, by region and by class of internal credit rating was as follows:
North America | EMEA | Asia Pacific | Latin America | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Class 1 |
$ | 61.9 | $ | 29.4 | $ | 4.6 | $ | 1.2 | $ | 97.1 | ||||||||||
Class 2 |
7.8 | 12.8 | 1.8 | 3.9 | 26.3 | |||||||||||||||
Class 3 |
0.1 | | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.3 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Balance at the end of the period |
$ | 69.8 | $ | 42.2 | $ | 6.6 | $ | 6.1 | $ | 124.7 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Instruments
The fair value of our senior unsecured notes due 2018 at September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, based on market prices (Level 2), was $372.4 million and $368.4 million, respectively, compared to the carrying value of $299.0 million and $298.9 million, respectively.
The fair value of our senior unsecured notes due 2022 at September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, based on market prices (Level 2), was $531.6 million and $506.6 million, respectively, compared to the carrying value of $497.5 million and $497.4 million, respectively.
The carrying values of all other financial instruments, consisting primarily of trade and finance receivables, accounts payable and other borrowings, approximate their respective fair values.
(4) Long-Term Borrowings
Long-term borrowings at September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012 consisted of:
September 30, | March 31, | |||||||
2012 | 2012 | |||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
Senior unsecured notes due 2018 (net of $1.0 million and $1.1 million of unamortized discount at September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, respectively) |
$ | 299.0 | $ | 298.9 | ||||
Senior unsecured notes due 2022 (net of $2.5 million and $2.6 million of unamortized discount at September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, respectively) |
497.5 | 497.4 | ||||||
Capital leases and other obligations |
52.4 | 46.3 | ||||||
Total |
848.9 | 842.6 | ||||||
Less current maturities of capital leases and other obligations (included in accrued liabilities) |
(24.1 | ) | (21.0 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Long-term borrowings |
$ | 824.8 | $ | 821.6 | ||||
|
|
|
|
In February 2012, we issued $500.0 million of senior unsecured notes due 2022. Net proceeds to us after original issuance discount and issuance costs amounted to $493.3 million. These senior notes were issued at an original issuance discount of $2.7 million. These senior notes bear interest at a rate of 4.25% per annum, payable semi-annually in February and August of each year. These senior notes are redeemable at our option at any time in whole or, from time to time, in part at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) 100% of the principal amount of these senior notes to be redeemed, or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest discounted at the applicable United States Treasury rate plus 35 basis points, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
In November 2010, we entered into a credit agreement with certain institutional lenders providing for an unsecured revolving credit facility in an amount up to $400.0 million which is scheduled to expire on November 30, 2014 (the Credit Facility). Subject to certain conditions, at any time prior to maturity, we may invite existing and new lenders to increase the size of the Credit Facility up to a maximum of $600.0 million. The Credit Facility includes provisions for swing line loans of up to $25.0 million and standby letters of credit of up to $50.0 million. Revolving loans under the Credit Facility bear interest, at the Companys option, at a rate equal to either (i) the base rate (as defined) plus a margin based on the credit ratings of BMC's senior unsecured notes due 2018, or (ii) the LIBOR rate (as defined) plus a margin based on the credit ratings of BMC's senior notes due 2018, for interest periods of one, two, three or six months. As of September 30, 2012 and through October 31, 2012, we have not borrowed any funds under the Credit Facility.
11
In June 2008, we issued $300.0 million of senior unsecured notes due 2018. Net proceeds to us after original issuance discount and issuance costs amounted to $295.6 million. These senior notes were issued at an original issuance discount of $1.8 million. These senior notes bear interest at a rate of 7.25% per annum, payable semi-annually in June and December of each year. These senior notes are redeemable at our option at any time in whole or, from time to time, in part at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) 100% of the principal amount of these senior notes to be redeemed, or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest discounted at the applicable United States Treasury rate plus 50 basis points, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
The above credit facilities are subject to covenants limiting, among other things, the creation of liens securing indebtedness and sale-leaseback transactions. At September 30, 2012, we were in compliance with all debt covenants.
(5) Income Taxes
Income tax expense was $33.8 million and $45.2 million for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, resulting in effective tax rates of 25.7% and 22.9%, respectively. Income tax expense was $41.5 million and $59.3 million for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, resulting in effective tax rates of 26.6% and 22.0%, respectively. Our effective tax rate generally differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% due to favorable tax rates associated with earnings from lower tax rate jurisdictions throughout the world and our policy of indefinitely reinvesting earnings from certain jurisdictions (primarily in Europe), as well as due to additional accruals, changes in estimates, releases and settlements with taxing authorities related to our uncertain tax positions and benefits associated with income attributable to both domestic production activities and the extraterritorial income exclusion. During the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, the overall favorable effects of foreign tax rates on our effective tax rate were 7.2% and 9.3% of pre-tax earnings, respectively. During the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, the overall favorable effects of foreign tax rates on our effective tax rate were 6.7% and 8.9% of pre-tax earnings, respectively. During the six months ended September 30, 2011, we also recorded discrete net tax benefits of $6.2 million associated with tax authority settlements related to prior years tax matters which favorably impacted our effective tax rate by 2.3% of pre-tax earnings. Our effective tax rate could fluctuate on a quarterly basis and could be adversely affected to the extent forecasted earnings for the year are lower than anticipated in countries with lower statutory rates and higher than anticipated in countries with higher statutory rates.
We file a federal income tax return in the United States as well as income tax returns in various local, state and foreign jurisdictions. Our tax years are closed with the United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS) through the tax year ended March 31, 2007, except for one issue related to the year ended March 31, 2006. We received a Notice of Deficiency from the IRS related to this issue and in July 2011 filed a petition for hearing with the U.S. Tax Court. A trial was held in May 2012 and post-trial briefs have been submitted. We are currently awaiting the Tax Courts ruling. The IRS is in the final stages of an examination of our federal income tax return for the years ended March 31, 2009 and 2010 and there are no unagreed issues. In addition, certain tax years related to local, state, and foreign jurisdictions remain subject to examination. To provide for potential tax exposures, we maintain a liability for unrecognized tax benefits which we believe is adequate.
(6) Share-Based Compensation
During the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, we granted 0.2 million and 2.0 million nonvested stock units, respectively, at a weighted average grant date fair value of $40.20 and $43.58, respectively, consisting of both time-based and market-based awards, to our executive officers, non-executive employees and non-employee board members. Time-based nonvested stock units primarily vest in annual increments over one or three years. Market-based nonvested stock units vest in 50% increments over two- and three-year periods upon achievement of certain targets related to our relative shareholder return as compared to the NASDAQ-100 Index over each performance period.
During the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, we issued 0.4 million and 1.0 million shares, respectively, of common stock related to exercises of stock options, and 0.3 million and 1.5 million shares, respectively, of common stock related to vesting of nonvested stock units.
At September 30, 2012, we had approximately $229.2 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to share-based awards that are expected to be recognized as expense over a remaining weighted-average period of two years.
12
Share-based compensation expense as recorded in our condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income is summarized as follows:
Quarter Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of license revenue |
$ | 1.8 | $ | 1.2 | $ | 3.3 | $ | 2.3 | ||||||||
Cost of maintenance revenue |
4.2 | 3.8 | 8.7 | 7.3 | ||||||||||||
Cost of professional services revenue |
1.5 | 1.2 | 3.1 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses |
14.0 | 10.0 | 27.9 | 19.1 | ||||||||||||
Research and development expenses |
3.1 | 3.6 | 6.4 | 6.5 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
12.3 | 11.0 | 25.1 | 23.9 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total share-based compensation expense |
$ | 36.9 | $ | 30.8 | $ | 74.5 | $ | 61.6 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7) Stockholders Equity
Earnings Per Share
The two-class method is utilized for the computation of earnings per share (EPS). The two-class method requires a portion of net income to be allocated to participating securities, which are unvested awards of share-based payments with non-forfeitable rights to receive dividends or dividend equivalents, if declared. Income allocated to these participating securities is excluded from net earnings allocated to common shares and was insignificant for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011. There were no participating securities outstanding during the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012.
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income allocated to common shares by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income allocated to common shares by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, plus the dilutive effect of outstanding share-based awards and other dilutive securities using the treasury stock method.
The following table summarizes our basic and diluted EPS computations for the quarters and six months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
Quarter Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(In millions, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Net earnings allocated to common shares |
$ | 97.8 | $ | 114.7 | $ | 152.0 | $ | 210.4 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
157.5 | 173.0 | 158.9 | 174.7 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.62 | $ | 0.66 | $ | 0.96 | $ | 1.20 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Net earnings allocated to common shares |
$ | 97.8 | $ | 114.7 | $ | 152.0 | $ | 210.4 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
157.5 | 173.0 | 158.9 | 174.7 | ||||||||||||
Incremental shares from assumed conversions of share-based awards |
2.8 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 3.6 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Adjusted weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
160.3 | 176.0 | 162.1 | 178.3 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.61 | $ | 0.65 | $ | 0.94 | $ | 1.18 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, 0.9 million and 0.9 million weighted average potential common shares, respectively, have been excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS as they were anti-dilutive. For the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, 1.5 million and 0.9 million weighted average potential common shares, respectively, have been excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS as they were anti-dilutive.
13
Treasury Stock
Our Board of Directors has previously authorized a total of $5.0 billion to repurchase common stock. During the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, we repurchased 4.8 million and 8.3 million shares, respectively, for $200.0 million and $350.0 million, respectively, under these authorizations. At September 30, 2012, approximately $500.3 million remains authorized in the stock repurchase program, which does not have an expiration date. In October 2012, our Board of Directors approved a new $1 billion stock repurchase program. We expect $750 million of the repurchase to be executed via an accelerated share repurchase agreement to be entered into during the quarter ending December 31, 2012.
During the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, we repurchased 0.1 million and 0.5 million shares, respectively, for $3.1 million and $20.0 million, to satisfy employee tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of share-based awards.
Shareholder Rights Agreement
On May 12, 2012, our Board of Directors authorized and declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right (a Right) for each outstanding common share through a shareholder rights agreement (the Rights Agreement). Each Right, once exercisable, represents the right to purchase one one-thousandth of a series B junior participating preferred share, par value $0.01, for $180, or an equivalent value of common shares determined at 50% of the then-current market price of BMCs common stock, provided sufficient common shares are then unissued. The Rights become exercisable in the event any individual person or entity (including the ownership of their related affiliates) acquires 10% or more of the outstanding share capital of the Company without the approval of BMCs Board of Directors, and until such time are inseparable from and trade with BMCs common stock. The Rights have a de minimus fair value and are accounted for as a component of stockholders equity. The Rights Agreement expires May 11, 2013.
(8) Guarantees and Contingencies
Guarantees
Under our standard software license agreements, we agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless our licensees from and against certain losses, damages and costs arising from claims alleging the licensees use of our software infringes the intellectual property rights of a third party. Also, under these standard license agreements, we represent and warrant to licensees that our software products operate substantially in accordance with published specifications.
Other guarantees include promises to indemnify, defend and hold harmless each of our executive officers, non-employee directors and certain key employees from and against losses, damages and costs incurred by each such individual in administrative, legal or investigative proceedings arising from alleged wrongdoing by the individual while acting in good faith within the scope of his or her job duties on our behalf.
We also had outstanding letters of credit, performance bonds and similar instruments at September 30, 2012 of approximately $46.1 million primarily in support of performance obligations to various customers, but also related to facilities and other obligations.
Historically, we have not incurred significant costs related to such indemnifications, warranties and guarantees. As such, and based on other factors, no provision or accrual for these items has been made.
Contingencies
We are party to various labor claims brought by certain former international employees alleging that amounts are due to such employees for unpaid commissions and other compensation. The claims are in various stages and are not expected to be fully resolved in the near future; however, we intend to vigorously contest all of the claims. Taking into account accruals recorded by us, we believe the likelihood of a material adverse effect on our financial statements resulting from these claims is remote. However, we cannot predict the timing or ultimate outcome of these matters.
We are currently litigating a matter in Brazilian courts as to whether a tax applies to the remittance of software payments from our Brazilian operations. In February 2007, a law was enacted that clarified that this particular tax did not apply to the remittance of software payments, retroactive to January 1, 2006. We continue to pursue a favorable resolution on this matter for years prior to January 1, 2006. While we believe we will ultimately prevail based on the merits of our position, if we do not, we could incur a charge of up to approximately $10 million based on current exchange rates; however, we cannot predict the timing or ultimate outcome of this matter.
We are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, which arise in the ordinary course of business. Taking into account accruals recorded by us, we believe the likelihood of a material adverse effect on our financial statements resulting from any of these matters is remote.
14
(9) Segment Reporting
We are organized into two primary business units, Enterprise Service Management (ESM) and Mainframe Service Management (MSM). ESM derives its revenue from our performance management, automation, IT service management, and Atrium solution suites (collectively, ESM-Solutions), along with professional services revenue derived from consulting, implementation, integration and educational services related principally to the delivery of our ESM solutions (ESM-Services). MSM derives its revenue from solution suites for mainframe data and performance management and enterprise workload automation. Beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2013, we expanded our ESM segment reporting to include separate financial information for both ESM-Solutions and ESM-Services, consistent with the manner in which business segment performance is being assessed internally for evaluating performance and making resource allocation decisions.
Segment performance is measured based on internal segment operating income. Segment operating income for ESM-Solutions and MSM reflects segment revenue less direct and allocated indirect segment operating expenses. Direct segment operating expenses primarily include cost of revenue, selling and marketing, research and development and general and administrative expenses that can be specifically identified to a particular segment and are directly controllable by segment management, while allocated indirect segment operating expenses primarily include indirect costs within these operating expense categories that are not specifically identified to a particular segment or controllable by segment management. Indirect operating expenses are allocated to ESM-Solutions and MSM based on budgeted bookings, revenue and other allocation methods that management believes to be reasonable. Segment operating income for ESM-Services reflects professional services revenue less direct segment operating expenses consisting primarily of cost of professional services revenue and direct selling and marketing costs. The Company has reclassified all periods presented to conform to the current period presentation.
Our measure of segment operating income does not include the effect of share-based compensation expenses, amortization of acquired technology and other intangible assets, the costs associated with severance, exit costs and related charges or proxy contest costs, which are collectively included in unallocated operating expenses below. Assets and liabilities are reviewed by management at the consolidated level only.
15
The following tables summarize segment performance for the quarters and six months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
Enterprise Service Management |
Mainframe Service Management |
Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended September 30, 2012 |
Solutions | Services | Total | |||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||
License |
$ | 129.0 | $ | | $ | 129.0 | $ | 80.2 | $ | 209.2 | ||||||||||
Maintenance |
161.9 | | 161.9 | 123.5 | 285.4 | |||||||||||||||
Professional services |
| 53.6 | 53.6 | | 53.6 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total revenue |
290.9 | 53.6 | 344.5 | 203.7 | 548.2 | |||||||||||||||
Direct and allocated indirect segment operating expenses: |
213.9 | 58.7 | 272.6 | 77.2 | 349.8 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Segment operating income (loss) |
77.0 | (5.1 | ) | 71.9 | 126.5 | 198.4 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Unallocated operating expenses |
(60.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Other loss, net |
(6.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Earnings before income taxes |
$ | 131.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Enterprise Service Management |
Mainframe Service Management |
Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended September 30, 2011 |
Solutions | Services | Total | |||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||
License |
$ | 146.0 | $ | | $ | 146.0 | $ | 83.7 | $ | 229.7 | ||||||||||
Maintenance |
145.6 | | 145.6 | 124.9 | 270.5 | |||||||||||||||
Professional services |
| 56.5 | 56.5 | | 56.5 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total revenue |
291.6 | 56.5 | 348.1 | 208.6 | 556.7 | |||||||||||||||
Direct and allocated indirect segment operating expenses: |
200.9 | 58.2 | 259.1 | 81.2 | 340.3 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Segment operating income (loss) |
90.7 | (1.7 | ) | 89.0 | 127.4 | 216.4 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Unallocated operating expenses |
(55.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Other loss, net |
(4.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Earnings before income taxes |
$ | 156.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
16
Enterprise Service Management |
Mainframe Service Management |
Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended September 30, 2012 |
Solutions | Services | Total | |||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||
License |
$ | 226.1 | $ | | $ | 226.1 | $ | 154.7 | $ | 380.8 | ||||||||||
Maintenance |
318.4 | | 318.4 | 245.8 | 564.2 | |||||||||||||||
Professional services |
| 107.6 | 107.6 | | 107.6 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total revenue |
544.5 | 107.6 | 652.1 | 400.5 | 1,052.6 | |||||||||||||||
Direct and allocated indirect segment operating expenses: |
428.2 | 120.4 | 548.6 | 157.6 | 706.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Segment operating income (loss) |
116.3 | (12.8 | ) | 103.5 | 242.9 | 346.4 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Unallocated operating expenses |
(134.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Other loss, net |
(14.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Earnings before income taxes |
$ | 197.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Enterprise Service Management |
Mainframe Service Management |
Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended September 30, 2011 |
Solutions | Services | Total | |||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||
License |
$ | 264.5 | $ | | $ | 264.5 | $ | 154.7 | $ | 419.2 | ||||||||||
Maintenance |
286.8 | | 286.8 | 248.3 | 535.1 | |||||||||||||||
Professional services |
| 104.8 | 104.8 | | 104.8 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total revenue |
551.3 | 104.8 | 656.1 | 403.0 | 1,059.1 | |||||||||||||||
Direct and allocated indirect segment operating expenses: |
398.8 | 108.9 | 507.7 | 164.5 | 672.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Segment operating income (loss) |
152.5 | (4.1 | ) | 148.4 | 238.5 | 386.9 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Unallocated operating expenses |
(110.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Other loss, net |
(6.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Earnings before income taxes |
$ | 269.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
(10) New Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance requiring new disclosures regarding balance sheet offsetting. This guidance requires entities to disclose the gross amounts of certain recognized financial assets and liabilities, to reconcile these amounts to the net positions recognized in the balance sheet and to provide qualitative disclosures about the rights of offset relating to these financial assets and liabilities. This new disclosure guidance is effective for us beginning with our first quarter of fiscal 2014.
17
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
It is important that this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) be read in conjunction with: (i) the attached unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, (ii) the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012, and (iii) our discussion of risks and uncertainties included within the section entitled Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012.
This MD&A contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), which are identified by the use of the words believe, expect, anticipate, estimate, will, contemplate, would and similar expressions that contemplate future events. Such forward-looking statements are based on managements reasonable current assumptions and expectations. Numerous important factors, risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those summarized under Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012, affect our operating results and could cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievement to differ materially from the results expressed or implied by these or any other forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. There can be no assurance that future results will meet expectations.
BMC, BMC Software and the BMC Software logo are the exclusive properties of BMC Software, Inc., are registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and may be registered or pending registration in other countries. All other BMC trademarks, service marks and logos may be registered or pending registration in the U.S. or in other countries. All other trademarks or registered trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
Unless indicated otherwise, results of operations data in this MD&A are presented in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Additionally, in an effort to provide investors with additional information regarding our results of operations, certain non-GAAP financial measures including non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP net earnings and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share are provided in this MD&A. See Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Reconciliations below for an explanation of our use of non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations to their corresponding measures calculated in accordance with GAAP.
18
Overview
A summary of select operating metrics for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012 is as follows:
| Total bookings, which represent the contract value of new transactions that we closed and recorded, were $430.4 million for the quarter, representing an increase of $48.0 million, or 12.6%, over the prior year quarter, and for the first half of fiscal 2013 were $900.7 million, representing a decrease of $97.1 million, or 9.7%, from the prior year period. Within the first half of the prior fiscal year, one large transaction generated total bookings of over $100 million, principally related to our MSM business. |
| Total license bookings were $187.8 million for the quarter, representing an increase of $0.3 million, or 0.1%, over the prior year quarter, and for the first half of fiscal 2013 were $315.7 million, representing a decrease of $64.3 million, or 16.9%, from the prior year period. During the quarter, we closed 34 transactions with license bookings over $1 million (with total license bookings of $93.3 million) compared to 37 transactions with license bookings over $1 million (with total license bookings of $96.4 million) in the prior year quarter. During the first half of fiscal 2013, we closed 55 transactions with license bookings over $1 million (with total license bookings of $147.1 million) compared to 68 transactions with license bookings over $1 million (with total license bookings of $218.5 million) in the prior year period. |
| Within our ESM-Solutions segment, where we evaluate performance on the basis of license bookings, total license bookings for the quarter increased by $2.6 million, or 2.1%, over the prior year quarter, and for the first half of fiscal 2013 decreased by $9.1 million, or 4.0%, from the prior year period. We attribute this first half decrease primarily to the impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes, a weakening global economic environment and internal sales-related factors. We estimate that foreign currency exchange rate changes for the quarter had a minimal impact on ESM license bookings as compared to the prior year quarter and for the first half of fiscal 2013 contributed to an approximate $5 million, or 2%, reduction in ESM license bookings as compared to the prior year period, on a constant currency basis. We also saw evidence of the weakening economic environment in certain areas. Lastly, while sales force capacity has reached planned levels, we believe that overall productivity for the first half of fiscal 2013 was negatively impacted by lower sales force tenure and experience levels, particularly in certain regions. |
| Within our MSM segment, where we evaluate performance based on total and annualized bookings, total bookings for the trailing twelve months ended September 30, 2012 decreased by $146.9 million, or 15.6%, and on an annualized basis, after normalizing for contract length, decreased by $22.9 million, or 7.9%, as compared to the prior year period. These trailing twelve month decreases were attributable primarily to the large prior year transaction referred to above as well as the timing of other transaction renewal cycles. Over the trailing 36 months ended September 30, 2012, total MSM bookings increased by $54.9 million, or 2.3%, and on an annualized basis, after normalizing for contract length, increased by $18.3 million, or 2.3%, as compared to the prior year period. |
| Total revenue for the quarter was $548.2 million, representing a decrease of $8.5 million, or 1.5%, from the prior year quarter, and for the first half of fiscal 2013 was $1,052.6 million, representing a decrease of $6.5 million, or 0.6%, from the prior year period. The decrease for the quarter was reflective of decreases of $20.5 million, or 8.9%, and $2.9 million, or 5.1%, in license and professional services revenue, respectively, partially offset by a maintenance revenue increase of $14.9 million, or 5.5%. The decrease for the first half of fiscal 2013 was reflective of a decrease of $38.4 million, or 9.2%, in license revenue, partially offset by increases of $29.1 million, or 5.4%, and $2.8 million, or 2.7%, in maintenance and professional services revenue, respectively. On a segment basis, ESM-Solutions revenue for the quarter decreased by $0.7 million, or 0.2%, ESM-Services revenue decreased by $2.9 million, or 5.1%, and MSM revenue decreased by $4.9 million, or 2.3%, as compared to the prior year quarter. For the first half of fiscal 2013, ESM-Solutions revenue decreased by $6.8 million, or 1.2%, ESM-Services revenue decreased by $2.8 million, or 2.7%, and MSM revenue decreased by $2.5 million, or 0.6%, from the prior year period. We estimate that foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations contributed to an approximate $7 million, or 1%, decrease in revenue for the quarter, and an approximate $17 million, or 2%, decrease in revenue for the first half of fiscal 2013, as compared to the respective prior year periods, on a constant currency basis. |
19
| Operating income for the quarter was $138.0 million, representing a decrease of $23.0 million, or 14.3%, from the prior year quarter, and for the first half of fiscal 2013 was $211.9 million, representing a decrease of $64.2 million, or 23.3%, from the prior year period. Non-GAAP operating income for the quarter was $198.4 million, representing a decrease of $18.0 million, or 8.3%, from the prior year quarter, and for the first half of fiscal 2013 was $346.4 million, representing a decrease of $40.5 million, or 10.5%, from the prior year period. |
| Net earnings for the quarter were $97.8 million, representing a decrease of $16.9 million, or 14.7%, from the prior year quarter, and for the first half of fiscal 2013 were $152.0 million, representing a decrease of $58.4 million, or 27.8%, from the prior year period. Non-GAAP net earnings for the quarter were $140.8 million, representing a decrease of $12.6 million, or 8.2%, from the prior year quarter, and for the first half of fiscal 2013 were $246.7 million, representing a decrease of $36.0 million, or 12.7%, from the prior year period. |
| Diluted earnings per share for the quarter was $0.61, representing a decrease of $0.04 per share, or 6.2%, from the prior year quarter, and for the first half of fiscal 2013 was $0.94, representing a decrease of $0.24 per share, or 20.3%, from the prior year period. Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share was $0.88, representing an increase of $0.01 per share, or 1.1%, over the prior year quarter, and for the first half of fiscal 2013 was $1.52, representing a decrease of $0.07 per share, or 4.4%, from the prior year period. |
| Cash flows from operations for the six months ended September 30, 2012 were $286.1 million, representing a decrease of $137.0 million, or 32.4%, from the prior year period. We closed out the quarter with a strong balance sheet at September 30, 2012, including $1.5 billion in cash, cash equivalents and investments and $1.8 billion in deferred revenue. |
We continue to invest in our technology leadership, including in the areas of cloud computing and software-as-a-service (SaaS). In addition to our ongoing product development efforts, we consummated three strategic acquisitions in our ESM segment during the six months ended September 30, 2012, acquiring Abydos Limited, a provider of workflow management solutions, VaraLogix, Inc., an application release automation provider, and my-eService, Inc., a provider of self-service IT support solutions.
We also continue to enhance shareholder value by returning cash to shareholders through our stock repurchase program. During the six months ended September 30, 2012, we repurchased 8.3 million shares for a total value of $350.0 million. In October 2012, our Board of Directors approved a new $1 billion stock repurchase program. We expect $750 million of the repurchase to be executed via an accelerated share repurchase agreement to be entered into during the quarter ending December 31, 2012.
Our earnings are subject to volatility as a significant portion of our operating expenses is fixed in the short-term and we plan a portion of our expense run-rate based on our expectations of future revenue. In addition, a significant amount of our license transactions are completed during the final weeks and days of each quarter and, therefore, we generally do not know whether revenue has met our expectations until after the end of the quarter. If a shortfall in revenue were to occur in any given quarter, there would be an immediate, and possibly significant, impact to our overall earnings and, most likely, our stock price.
Because our software solutions are designed for and marketed to companies looking to improve the management of their IT infrastructure and processes, demand for our products, and therefore our financial results, are dependent upon customers continuing to value such solutions and to invest in such technology. There are a number of trends that have historically influenced demand for IT management software, including, among others, business demands placed on IT, computing capacity within IT departments, complexity of IT systems and IT operational costs. Our financial results are also influenced by many economic and industry conditions, including, but not limited to, general economic and market conditions in the United States and other economies in which we market products, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, general levels of customer spending, IT budgets, the competitiveness of the IT management software and solutions industry, the adoption rate for Business Service Management and the stability of the mainframe market.
20
Results of Operations and Financial Condition
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentages that selected items in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income represent of total revenue. These financial results are not necessarily indicative of future results.
Percentage of Total Revenue | ||||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended September 30, |
Six Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
License |
38.2 | % | 41.3 | % | 36.2 | % | 39.6 | % | ||||||||
Maintenance |
52.1 | % | 48.6 | % | 53.6 | % | 50.5 | % | ||||||||
Professional services |
9.8 | % | 10.1 | % | 10.2 | % | 9.9 | % | ||||||||
Total revenue |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of license revenue |
7.4 | % | 7.1 | % | 7.6 | % | 7.3 | % | ||||||||
Cost of maintenance revenue |
9.7 | % | 8.9 | % | 9.9 | % | 8.8 | % | ||||||||
Cost of professional services revenue |
9.9 | % | 9.6 | % | 10.7 | % | 9.5 | % | ||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses |
29.8 | % | 27.6 | % | 31.1 | % | 28.2 | % | ||||||||
Research and development expenses |
5.9 | % | 6.9 | % | 7.1 | % | 7.8 | % | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
10.2 | % | 9.2 | % | 11.3 | % | 10.3 | % | ||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
2.0 | % | 2.0 | % | 2.2 | % | 2.0 | % | ||||||||
Total operating expenses |
74.8 | % | 71.1 | % | 79.9 | % | 73.9 | % | ||||||||
Operating income |
25.2 | % | 28.9 | % | 20.1 | % | 26.1 | % | ||||||||
Other loss, net |
(1.2 | )% | (0.9 | )% | (1.4 | )% | (0.6 | )% | ||||||||
Earnings before income taxes |
24.0 | % | 28.1 | % | 18.7 | % | 25.5 | % | ||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
6.2 | % | 7.5 | % | 4.3 | % | 5.6 | % | ||||||||
Net earnings |
17.8 | % | 20.6 | % | 14.4 | % | 19.9 | % |
21
Revenue
The following tables provide information regarding software license and software maintenance revenue for the quarters and six months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
Quarter Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Software License Revenue |
2012 | 2011 | % Change | 2012 | 2011 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | (In millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Enterprise Service Management |
$ | 129.0 | $ | 146.0 | (11.6 | )% | $ | 226.1 | $ | 264.5 | (14.5 | )% | ||||||||||||
Mainframe Service Management |
80.2 | 83.7 | (4.2 | )% | 154.7 | 154.7 | | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total software license revenue |
$ | 209.2 | $ | 229.7 | (8.9 | )% | $ | 380.8 | $ | 419.2 | (9.2 | )% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Software Maintenance Revenue |
2012 | 2011 | % Change | 2012 | 2011 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | (In millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Enterprise Service Management |
$ | 161.9 | $ | 145.6 | 11.2 | % | $ | 318.4 | $ | 286.8 | 11.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Mainframe Service Management |
123.5 | 124.9 | (1.1 | )% | 245.8 | 248.3 | (1.0 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total software maintenance revenue |
$ | 285.4 | $ | 270.5 | 5.5 | % | $ | 564.2 | $ | 535.1 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Software Revenue |
2012 | 2011 | % Change | 2012 | 2011 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | (In millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Enterprise Service Management |
$ | 290.9 | $ | 291.6 | (0.2 | )% | $ | 544.5 | $ | 551.3 | (1.2 | )% | ||||||||||||
Mainframe Service Management |
203.7 | 208.6 | (2.3 | )% | 400.5 | 403.0 | (0.6 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total software revenue |
$ | 494.6 | $ | 500.2 | (1.1 | )% | $ | 945.0 | $ | 954.3 | (1.0 | )% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software License Revenue
License revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 was $209.2 million, a decrease of $20.5 million, or 8.9%, from the prior year quarter. This decrease was attributable to decreases in ESM and MSM license revenue, as further discussed below. Recognition of license revenue that was deferred in prior periods decreased $8.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 as compared to the prior year quarter. Of the license revenue transactions recorded, the percentage of license revenue recognized upfront was 60% in the current quarter as compared to 64% in the prior year quarter.
License revenue for the six months ended September 30, 2012 was $380.8 million, a decrease of $38.4 million, or 9.2%, from the prior year period. This decrease was attributable to a decrease in ESM license revenue, as further discussed below, while MSM license revenue remained relatively flat as compared to the prior year period. Recognition of license revenue that was deferred in prior periods decreased $18.5 million for the six months ended September 30, 2012 as compared to the prior year period. Of the license revenue transactions recorded, the percentage of license revenue recognized upfront was 59% in the current six month period as compared to 54% in the prior year period.
ESM license revenue was $129.0 million, or 61.7%, and $226.1 million, or 59.4%, of our total license revenue for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, and $146.0 million, or 63.6%, and $264.5 million, or 63.1%, of our total license revenue for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. ESM license revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 decreased by $17.0 million, or 11.6%, from the prior year quarter, due to a $9.9 million decrease in the recognition of previously deferred license revenue and a $7.1 million reduction in upfront license revenue recognized in connection with new transactions. The decrease in upfront license revenue recognized in the quarter ended September 30, 2012 was attributable to a lower percentage of license transaction bookings that were recognized as revenue upfront rather than ratably over the underlying contractual maintenance terms, partially offset by an increase in license bookings. ESM license revenue for the six months ended September 30, 2012 decreased by $38.4 million, or 14.5%, from the prior year period, due to a $22.2 million decrease in the recognition of previously deferred license revenue and a $16.2 million reduction in upfront license revenue in connection with new transactions. The decrease in upfront license revenue recognized in the six months ended September 30, 2012 was attributable to a decrease in license transaction bookings along with a lower percentage of such bookings that were recognized as revenue upfront rather than ratably over the underlying contractual maintenance terms.
22
MSM license revenue was $80.2 million, or 38.3%, and $154.7 million, or 40.6%, of our total license revenue for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, and $83.7 million, or 36.4%, and $154.7 million, or 36.9%, of our total license revenue for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011. MSM license revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 decreased by $3.5 million, or 4.2%, from the prior year quarter. This decrease was due to a $4.7 million decrease in the amount of upfront license revenue recognized in connection with new transactions, partially offset by a $1.2 million increase in the recognition of previously deferred license revenue. The decrease in upfront license revenue recognized in the quarter ended September 30, 2012 was attributable to a decrease in license bookings along with a slight decrease in the percentage of license transaction bookings that were recognized as revenue upfront rather than ratably over the underlying contractual maintenance terms. MSM license revenue for the six months ended September 30, 2012 remained flat as compared to the prior year period.
Deferred License Revenue
For the quarters ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, our recognized license revenue was impacted by the changes in our deferred license revenue balance as follows:
Quarter Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Deferrals of license revenue |
$ | 75.6 | $ | 67.9 | $ | 129.1 | $ | 174.0 | ||||||||
Recognition from deferred license revenue |
(98.2 | ) | (106.9 | ) | (192.7 | ) | (211.2 | ) | ||||||||
Impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes |
1.2 | (3.2 | ) | (1.5 | ) | (2.0 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net decrease in deferred license revenue |
$ | (21.4 | ) | $ | (42.2 | ) | $ | (65.1 | ) | $ | (39.2 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Deferred license revenue balance at end of period |
$ | 625.6 | $ | 646.9 | $ | 625.6 | $ | 646.9 |
The primary reasons for license revenue deferrals include, but are not limited to, customer transactions that include products for which the maintenance pricing is based on a combination of undiscounted license list prices, net license fees or discounted license list prices, certain arrangements that include unlimited licensing rights, time-based licenses that are recognized over the term of the arrangement, customer transactions that include products with differing maintenance periods and other transactions for which we do not have or are not able to determine vendor-specific objective evidence of the fair value of the maintenance and/or professional services. The contract terms and conditions that result in deferral of revenue recognition for a given transaction result from arms length negotiations between us and our customers. We anticipate our transactions will continue to include such contract terms that result in deferral of the related license revenue as we expand our offerings to meet customers product, pricing and licensing needs.
Once it is determined that license revenue for a particular contract must be deferred, based on the contractual terms and application of revenue recognition policies to those terms, we recognize such license revenue either ratably over the term of the contract or when the revenue recognition criteria are met. Because of this, we generally know the timing of the subsequent recognition of license revenue at the time of deferral. Therefore, the amount of license revenue to be recognized from the deferred revenue balance in each future quarter is generally predictable. At September 30, 2012, the deferred license revenue balance was $625.6 million. Estimated future recognition from deferred license revenue at September 30, 2012 is (in millions):
Remainder of fiscal 2013 |
$ | 179.6 | ||
Fiscal 2014 |
225.8 | |||
Fiscal 2015 and thereafter |
220.2 | |||
|
|
|||
$ | 625.6 | |||
|
|
Software Maintenance Revenue
Maintenance revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 was $285.4 million, an increase of $14.9 million, or 5.5%, over the prior year quarter, due to an increase in ESM maintenance revenue, partially offset by a decrease in MSM maintenance revenue, as discussed below. Maintenance revenue for the six months ended September 30, 2012 was $564.2 million, an increase of $29.1 million, or 5.4%, over the prior year period, due to an increase in ESM maintenance revenue, partially offset by a decrease in MSM maintenance revenue, as discussed below. Maintenance revenue included revenue from our SaaS offerings, which is included in our ESM segment, of $6.3 million and $2.4 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $11.9 million and $3.5 million for the six months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
23
ESM maintenance revenue was $161.9 million, or 56.7%, and $318.4 million, or 56.4%, of our total maintenance revenue for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, and $145.6 million, or 53.8%, and $286.8 million, or 53.6%, of our total maintenance revenue for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. ESM maintenance revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 increased by $16.3 million, or 11.2%, over the prior year quarter. ESM maintenance revenue for the six months ended September 30, 2012 increased by $31.6 million, or 11.0%, over the prior year period. These increases were attributable primarily to an expanded installed ESM customer license base and increases in SaaS subscription revenue.
MSM maintenance revenue was $123.5 million, or 43.3%, and $245.8 million, or 43.6%, of our total maintenance revenue for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, and $124.9 million, or 46.2%, and $248.3 million, or 46.4%, of our total maintenance revenue for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. MSM maintenance revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 decreased by $1.4 million, or 1.1%, from the prior year quarter. MSM maintenance revenue for the six months ended September 30, 2012 decreased by $2.5 million, or 1.0%, from the prior year period.
Deferred Maintenance Revenue
At September 30, 2012, the deferred maintenance revenue balance was $1.2 billion. Estimated future recognition from deferred maintenance revenue at September 30, 2012 is (in millions):
Remainder of fiscal 2013 |
$ | 414.3 | ||
Fiscal 2014 |
417.3 | |||
Fiscal 2015 and thereafter |
344.7 | |||
|
|
|||
$ | 1,176.3 | |||
|
|
Domestic vs. International Revenue
Quarter Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | % Change | 2012 | 2011 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | (In millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
License: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Domestic |
$ | 104.0 | $ | 122.2 | (14.9 | )% | $ | 181.7 | $ | 207.5 | (12.4 | )% | ||||||||||||
International |
105.2 | 107.5 | (2.1 | )% | 199.1 | 211.7 | (6.0 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total license revenue |
209.2 | 229.7 | (8.9 | )% | 380.8 | 419.2 | (9.2 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Maintenance: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Domestic |
158.4 | 146.3 | 8.3 | % | 312.8 | 287.9 | 8.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
International |
127.0 | 124.2 | 2.3 | % | 251.4 | 247.2 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total maintenance revenue |
285.4 | 270.5 | 5.5 | % | 564.2 | 535.1 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Professional services: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Domestic |
26.6 | 29.6 | (10.1 | )% | 51.0 | 51.4 | (0.8 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
International |
27.0 | 26.9 | 0.4 | % | 56.6 | 53.4 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total professional services revenue |
53.6 | 56.5 | (5.1 | )% | 107.6 | 104.8 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total domestic revenue |
289.0 | 298.1 | (3.1 | )% | 545.5 | 546.8 | (0.2 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
Total international revenue |
259.2 | 258.6 | 0.2 | % | 507.1 | 512.3 | (1.0 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total revenue |
$ | 548.2 | $ | 556.7 | (1.5 | )% | $ | 1,052.6 | $ | 1,059.1 | (0.6 | )% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We estimate that foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations contributed to an approximate $7 million and $17 million decrease in our international revenue for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, as compared to the respective prior year periods, on a constant currency basis.
Domestic License Revenue
Domestic license revenue was $104.0 million, or 49.7%, and $181.7 million, or 47.7%, of our total license revenue for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, and $122.2 million, or 53.2%, and $207.5 million, or 49.5%, of our total license revenue for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Domestic license revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 decreased by $18.2 million, or 14.9%, from the prior year quarter, due to a $13.4 million decrease in ESM license revenue and a $4.8 million decrease in MSM license revenue. Domestic license revenue for the six months ended September 30, 2012 decreased by $25.8 million, or 12.4%, from the prior year period, due to a $23.1 million decrease in ESM license revenue and a $2.7 million decrease in MSM license revenue.
24
International License Revenue
International license revenue was $105.2 million, or 50.3%, and $199.1 million, or 52.3%, of our total license revenue for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, and $107.5 million or 46.8%, and $211.7 million, or 50.5%, of our total license revenue for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.
International license revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 decreased by $2.3 million, or 2.1%, from the prior year quarter, due to a $3.6 million decrease in ESM license revenue, offset by a $1.3 million increase in MSM license revenue. The ESM license revenue decrease was attributable primarily to decreases of $2.6 million and $1.6 million in our Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) and Canada markets, respectively, partially offset by a $1.3 million increase in our Latin America market. The MSM license revenue increase was attributable to increases of $1.5 million and $1.3 million in our Latin America and Asia Pacific markets, respectively, partially offset by a combined net decrease of $1.5 million in our other international markets.
International license revenue for the six months ended September 30, 2012 decreased by $12.6 million, or 6.0%, from the prior year period, due to a $15.3 million decrease in ESM license revenue, partially offset by a $2.7 million increase in MSM license revenue. The ESM license revenue decrease was attributable to decreases of $9.0 million, $3.4 million, $1.7 million and $1.2 million in our EMEA, Asia Pacific, Latin America and Canada markets, respectively. The MSM license revenue increase was attributable primarily to increases of $3.3 million and $2.5 million in our Asia Pacific and Latin America markets, respectively, partially offset by a $2.5 million decrease in our EMEA market.
Domestic Maintenance Revenue
Domestic maintenance revenue was $158.4 million, or 55.5%, and $312.8 million, or 55.4%, of our total maintenance revenue for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, and $146.3 million, or 54.1%, and $287.9 million, or 53.8%, of our total maintenance revenue for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Domestic maintenance revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 increased by $12.1 million, or 8.3%, over the prior year quarter, due to an $11.5 million increase in ESM maintenance revenue and a $0.6 million increase in MSM maintenance revenue. Domestic maintenance revenue for the six months ended September 30, 2012 increased by $24.9 million, or 8.6%, over the prior year period, due to a $23.0 million increase in ESM maintenance revenue and a $1.9 million increase in MSM maintenance revenue.
International Maintenance Revenue
International maintenance revenue was $127.0 million, or 44.5%, and $251.4 million, or 44.6%, of our total maintenance revenue for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, and $124.2 million or 45.9%, and $247.2 million, or 46.2%, of our total maintenance revenue for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.
International maintenance revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 increased by $2.8 million, or 2.3%, over the prior year quarter, due to a $4.7 million increase in ESM maintenance revenue, partially offset by a $1.9 million decrease in MSM maintenance revenue. The ESM maintenance revenue increase was attributable primarily to increases of $2.9 million and $1.4 million in our EMEA and Asia Pacific markets, respectively. The MSM maintenance revenue decrease was attributable primarily to a decrease of $1.5 million in our Latin America market.
International maintenance revenue for the six months ended September 30, 2012 increased by $4.2 million, or 1.7%, over the prior year period, due to an $8.6 million increase in ESM maintenance revenue, partially offset by a $4.4 million decrease in MSM maintenance revenue. The ESM maintenance revenue increase was attributable to increases of $4.8 million, $3.2 million and $1.7 million in our EMEA, Asia Pacific and Canada markets, respectively, partially offset by a decrease of $1.1 million in our Latin America market. The MSM maintenance revenue decrease was attributable to decreases of $3.1 million and $1.3 million in our Latin America and EMEA markets, respectively.
Professional Services Revenue
Professional services revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 decreased by $2.9 million, or 5.1%, from the prior year quarter, which is reflective of a $3.0 million, or 10.1%, decrease in domestic professional services revenue, partially offset by a $0.1 million, or 0.4%, increase in international professional services revenue. Professional services revenue for the six months ended September 30, 2012 increased by $2.8 million, or 2.7%, over the prior year period, which is reflective of a $3.2 million, or 6.0%, increase in international professional services revenue, partially offset by a $0.4 million, or 0.8%, decrease in domestic professional services revenue.
25
Operating Expenses
Quarter Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | % Change | 2012 | 2011 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | (In millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of license revenue |
$ | 40.5 | $ | 39.3 | 3.1 | % | $ | 79.8 | $ | 77.6 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Cost of maintenance revenue |
53.0 | 49.5 | 7.1 | % | 103.9 | 93.3 | 11.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of professional services revenue |
54.5 | 53.2 | 2.4 | % | 112.2 | 100.6 | 11.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Selling and marketing expenses |
163.1 | 153.5 | 6.3 | % | 327.8 | 298.2 | 9.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Research and development expenses |
32.3 | 38.3 | (15.7 | )% | 74.6 | 83.0 | (10.1 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
55.9 | 51.0 | 9.6 | % | 118.9 | 109.6 | 8.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
10.9 | 10.9 | | 23.5 | 20.7 | 13.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
$ | 410.2 | $ | 395.7 | 3.7 | % | $ | 840.7 | $ | 783.0 | 7.4 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We estimate that foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations contributed to an approximate $10 million and $23 million decrease in our international operating expenses for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, as compared to the respective prior year periods, on a constant currency basis.
Cost of License Revenue
Cost of license revenue consists primarily of the amortization of capitalized software costs for internally developed products, the amortization of acquired technology for products acquired through business combinations, license-based royalties to third parties and production and distribution costs for initial product licenses. For the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, cost of license revenue was $40.5 million, or 7.4%, and $79.8 million, or 7.6%, of total revenue, respectively, and 19.4% and 21.0% of license revenue, respectively. For the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, cost of license revenue was $39.3 million, or 7.1%, and $77.6 million, or 7.3%, of total revenue, respectively, and 17.1% and 18.5% of license revenue, respectively.
Cost of license revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 increased by $1.2 million, or 3.1%, over the prior year quarter. This increase was attributable primarily to a $3.9 million increase in the amortization of capitalized software development costs, partially offset by a $2.2 million decrease in the amortization of acquired technology. Cost of license revenue for the six months ended September 30, 2012 increased by $2.2 million, or 2.8%, over the prior year period. This increase was attributable primarily to a $5.4 million increase in the amortization of capitalized software development costs, partially offset by a $2.5 million decrease in the amortization of acquired technology. The increases in the amortization of capitalized software development costs are related to increases in the amount of costs capitalized in prior periods related to development activities and represented an increased investment in software development. The decreases in amortization of acquired technology were attributable to a reduction in amortization associated with intangible assets acquired in connection with past acquisitions that became fully amortized, partially offset by an increase in amortization associated with intangible assets acquired in connection with our fiscal 2012 and 2013 acquisitions.
Cost of Maintenance Revenue
Cost of maintenance revenue consists primarily of the costs associated with customer support and research and development personnel that provide maintenance, enhancement and support services to our customers, as well as internal and third party infrastructure hosting and support costs associated with our SaaS offerings. For the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, cost of maintenance revenue was $53.0 million, or 9.7%, and $103.9 million, or 9.9%, of total revenue, respectively, and 18.6% and 18.4% of maintenance revenue, respectively. For the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, cost of maintenance revenue was $49.5 million, or 8.9%, and $93.3 million, or 8.8%, of total revenue, respectively, and 18.3% and 17.4% of maintenance revenue, respectively.
Cost of maintenance revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 increased by $3.5 million, or 7.1%, over the prior year quarter. This increase was attributable primarily to a $2.7 million increase in personnel costs and a $1.2 million increase in third party SaaS hosting and support costs.
Cost of maintenance revenue for the six months ended September 30, 2012 increased by $10.6 million, or 11.4%, over the prior year period. This increase was attributable primarily to a $4.7 million increase in personnel costs, a $2.7 million increase in third party SaaS hosting and support costs, a $1.3 million increase in third party maintenance outsourcing costs and a $1.4 million increase in share-based compensation expense.
26
Cost of Professional Services Revenue
Cost of professional services revenue consists primarily of salaries, related personnel costs and third party subcontracting fees associated with implementation, consulting and education services that we provide to our customers and the related infrastructure to support this business. For the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, cost of professional services revenue was $54.5 million, or 9.9%, and $112.2 million, or 10.7%, of total revenue, respectively, and 101.7% and 104.3% of professional services revenue, respectively. For the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, cost of professional services revenue was $53.2 million, or 9.6%, and $100.6 million, or 9.5%, of total revenue, respectively, and 94.2% and 96.0% of professional services revenue, respectively.
Cost of professional services revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 increased by $1.3 million, or 2.4%, over the prior year quarter. This increase was attributable primarily to a $3.6 million increase in personnel and related costs, due principally to an increase in professional services headcount, partially offset by a $3.0 million decrease in third party subcontracting fees.
Cost of professional services revenue for the six months ended September 30, 2012 increased by $11.6 million, or 11.5%, over the prior year period. This increase was attributable to an $11.6 million increase in personnel and related costs, due principally to an increase in professional services headcount, and a $1.6 million net increase in other expenses, partially offset by a $1.6 million decrease in third party subcontracting fees.
Selling and Marketing Expenses
Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, related personnel costs, sales commissions and costs associated with advertising, marketing, industry trade shows and sales seminars. For the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, selling and marketing expenses were $163.1 million, or 29.8%, and $327.8 million, or 31.1%, of total revenue, respectively. For the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, selling and marketing expenses were $153.5 million, or 27.6%, and $298.2 million, or 28.2%, of total revenue, respectively.
Selling and marketing expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 increased by $9.6 million, or 6.3%, over the prior year quarter. This increase was attributable primarily to a $4.2 million increase in sales personnel and related costs, a $4.0 million increase in share-based compensation expense, both principally due to an increase in sales personnel headcount as well as sales retention efforts, and a $1.0 million increase in marketing campaign expenditures.
Selling and marketing expenses for the six months ended September 30, 2012 increased by $29.6 million, or 9.9%, over the prior year period. This increase was attributable to a $15.7 million increase in sales personnel and related costs, an $8.8 million increase in share-based compensation expense, both principally due to an increase in sales personnel headcount as well as sales retention efforts, a $2.2 million increase in third party consulting fees, a $1.5 million increase in marketing campaign expenditures and a $1.4 million net increase in other expenses.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and personnel costs and third party subcontracting fees related to software developers and development support personnel, including product management, software programmers, testing and quality assurance personnel and writers of technical documentation, such as product manuals and installation guides. These expenses also include computer hardware and software costs, telecommunications costs and personnel costs associated with our development and production labs. For the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, research and development expenses were $32.3 million, or 5.9%, and $74.6 million, or 7.1%, of total revenue, respectively. For the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, research and development expenses were $38.3 million, or 6.9%, and $83.0 million, or 7.8%, of total revenue, respectively.
Research and development expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 decreased by $6.0 million, or 15.7%, from the prior year quarter. This decrease was attributable primarily to a $7.7 million decrease in personnel expenses, partially offset by a $1.9 million increase in third-party subcontracting fees.
Research and development expenses for the six months ended September 30, 2012 decreased by $8.4 million, or 10.1%, from the prior year period. This decrease was attributable primarily to an $11.4 million decrease in personnel expenses, partially offset by a $3.1 million increase in third-party subcontracting fees.
27
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related personnel costs of executive management, finance and accounting, facilities management, legal and human resources. Other costs included in general and administrative expenses include fees paid for outside accounting and legal services, consulting projects and insurance. For the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, general and administrative expenses were $55.9 million, or 10.2%, and $118.9 million, or 11.3%, of total revenue, respectively. For the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, general and administrative expenses were $51.0 million, or 9.2%, and $109.6 million, or 10.3%, of total revenue, respectively.
General and administrative expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 increased by $4.9 million, or 9.6%, over the prior year quarter. This increase was attributable to a $2.5 million increase in professional fees, a $2.2 million increase in personnel expense and a $1.3 million increase in share-based compensation expense, partially offset by a $1.1 million net decrease in other expenses.
General and administrative expenses for the six months ended September 30, 2012 increased by $9.3 million, or 8.5%, over the prior year period. This increase was attributable primarily to a $6.2 million increase in proxy contest costs, a $2.0 million increase in personnel expenses and a $1.2 million increase in share-based compensation expense.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Amortization of intangible assets consists of the amortization of customer relationships and other intangible assets recorded in connection with our business combinations. For the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, amortization of intangible assets was $10.9 million and $23.5 million, respectively. For the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, amortization of intangible assets was $10.9 million and $20.7 million, respectively.
Amortization of intangible assets for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 was flat as compared to the prior year quarter.
Amortization of intangible assets for the six months ended September 30, 2012 increased by $2.8 million, or 13.5%, over the prior year period. This increase was attributable primarily to amortization associated with intangible assets acquired in connection with our fiscal 2012 acquisitions, partially offset by a reduction in amortization associated with intangible assets acquired in connection with past acquisitions that became fully amortized.
Other Income (Loss), Net
Other income (loss), net, consists primarily of interest earned, realized gains and losses on investments and interest expense on our senior unsecured notes due 2018 and 2022 and capital leases. Other income (loss), net, for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, was a loss of $6.4 million and $14.7 million, respectively. Other income (loss), net, for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, was a loss of $4.8 million and $6.4 million, respectively.
The change in other income (loss), net for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 was attributable primarily to a $5.4 million increase in interest expense, primarily due to the issuance of our senior unsecured notes due 2022, partially offset by a change in net gains on investments of $2.9 million.
The change in other income (loss), net for the six months ended September 30, 2012 was attributable primarily to a $10.1 million increase in interest expense, primarily due to the issuance of our senior unsecured notes due 2022, partially offset by a change in net gains on investments of $2.4 million.
28
Income Taxes
Income tax expense was $33.8 million and $45.2 million for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, resulting in effective tax rates of 25.7% and 22.9%, respectively. Income tax expense was $41.5 million and $59.3 million for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, resulting in effective tax rates of 26.6% and 22.0%, respectively. Our effective tax rate generally differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% due to favorable tax rates associated with earnings from lower tax rate jurisdictions throughout the world and our policy of indefinitely reinvesting earnings from certain jurisdictions (primarily in Europe), as well as due to additional accruals, changes in estimates, releases and settlements with taxing authorities related to our uncertain tax positions and benefits associated with income attributable to both domestic production activities and the extraterritorial income exclusion. During the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, the overall favorable effect of foreign tax rates on our effective tax rate was 7.2% and 9.3% of pre-tax earnings, respectively. During the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, the overall favorable effect of foreign tax rates on our effective tax rate was 6.7% and 8.9% of pre-tax earnings, respectively. During the six months ended September 30, 2011, we also recorded discrete net tax benefits of $6.2 million associated with tax authority settlements related to prior years tax matters which favorably impacted our effective tax rate by 2.3% of pre-tax earnings. Our effective tax rate could fluctuate on a quarterly basis and could be adversely affected to the extent forecasted earnings for the year are lower than anticipated in countries with lower statutory rates and higher than anticipated in countries with higher statutory rates.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Reconciliations
In an effort to provide investors with additional information regarding our results as determined by GAAP, we disclose various non-GAAP financial measures in our quarterly earnings press releases and other public disclosures. The primary non-GAAP financial measures we focus on are: (i) non-GAAP operating income, (ii) non-GAAP net earnings, and (iii) non-GAAP diluted earnings per share. Each of these financial measures excludes the impact of certain items and therefore has not been calculated in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures exclude share-based compensation expense; the amortization of intangible assets; severance, exit costs and related charges; proxy contest costs; as well as the related tax impacts of these items; and certain discrete tax items. Each of the non-GAAP adjustments is described in more detail below. A reconciliation of each of these non-GAAP financial measures to its most comparable GAAP financial measure is also included below.
We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures provide meaningful supplemental information regarding our operating results because they exclude amounts that BMC management and the Board of Directors do not consider part of core operating results when assessing the performance of the organization. In addition, we have historically reported similar non-GAAP financial measures and we believe that inclusion of these non-GAAP financial measures provides consistency and comparability with past reports of financial results. Accordingly, we believe these non-GAAP financial measures are useful to investors in allowing for greater transparency of supplemental information used by management.
While we believe that these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful supplemental information, there are limitations associated with the use of these non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with GAAP, do not reflect a comprehensive system of accounting and may not be completely comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies due to potential differences in the exact method of calculation between companies. Items such as share-based compensation expense; the amortization of intangible assets; severance, exit costs and related charges; proxy contest costs; as well as the related tax impacts of these items; and certain discrete tax items that are excluded from our non-GAAP financial measures can have a material impact on net earnings. As a result, these non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, net earnings, cash flow from operations or other measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. We compensate for these limitations by using these non-GAAP financial measures as supplements to GAAP financial measures and by reconciling the non-GAAP financial measures to their most comparable GAAP financial measure. Investors are encouraged to review the reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to their most comparable GAAP financial measures below.
For a detailed explanation of the adjustments made to comparable GAAP financial measures, the reasons why management uses these measures and the usefulness of these measures, see items (1) (6) below.
29
Quarter Ended | Six Months Ended |
|||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Operating income: |
||||||||||||||||
GAAP operating income |
$ | 138.0 | $ | 161.0 | $ | 211.9 | $ | 276.1 | ||||||||
Share-based compensation expense (1) |
36.9 | 30.8 | 74.5 | 61.6 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets (2) |
22.0 | 24.1 | 46.9 | 46.6 | ||||||||||||
Severance, exit costs and related charges (3) |
1.5 | 0.5 | 6.9 | 2.6 | ||||||||||||
Proxy contest costs (4) |
| | 6.2 | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Non-GAAP operating income |
$ | 198.4 | $ | 216.4 | $ | 346.4 | $ | 386.9 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Quarter Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Net earnings: |
||||||||||||||||
GAAP net earnings |
$ | 97.8 | $ | 114.7 | $ | 152.0 | $ | 210.4 | ||||||||
Share-based compensation expense (1) |
36.9 | 30.8 | 74.5 | 61.6 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets (2) |
22.0 | 24.1 | 46.9 | 46.6 | ||||||||||||
Severance, exit costs and related charges (3) |
1.5 | 0.5 | 6.9 | 2.6 | ||||||||||||
Proxy contest costs (4) |
| | 6.2 | | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes on above pre-tax non-GAAP adjustments (5) |
(17.4 | ) | (16.7 | ) | (39.8 | ) | (32.3 | ) | ||||||||
Certain discrete tax items (6) |
| | | (6.2 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Non-GAAP net earnings |
$ | 140.8 | $ | 153.4 | $ | 246.7 | $ | 282.7 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Quarter Ended | Six Months Ended |
|||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share*: |
||||||||||||||||
GAAP diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.61 | $ | 0.65 | $ | 0.94 | $ | 1.18 | ||||||||
Share-based compensation expense (1) |
0.23 | 0.18 | 0.46 | 0.35 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets (2) |
0.14 | 0.14 | 0.29 | 0.26 | ||||||||||||
Severance, exit costs and related charges (3) |
0.01 | | 0.04 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||
Proxy contest costs (4) |
| | 0.04 | | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes on above pre-tax non-GAAP adjustments (5) |
(0.11 | ) | (0.09 | ) | (0.25 | ) | (0.18 | ) | ||||||||
Certain discrete tax items (6) |
| | | (0.03 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share* |
$ | 0.88 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 1.52 | $ | 1.59 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share is computed independently for each period presented. The sum of GAAP diluted earnings per share and non-GAAP adjustments per share may not equal non-GAAP diluted earnings per share due to rounding differences. |
(1) | Share-based compensation expense. Our non-GAAP financial measures exclude the compensation expenses required to be recorded by GAAP for equity awards to employees and directors. Management and the Board of Directors believe it is useful in evaluating corporate performance during a particular time period to review the supplemental non-GAAP financial measures, excluding expenses related to share-based compensation, because these costs are generally fixed at the time an award is granted, are then expensed over several years and generally cannot be changed or influenced by management once granted. |
(2) | Amortization of intangible assets. Our non-GAAP financial measures exclude costs associated with the amortization of intangible assets, which are included in cost of license revenue and amortization of intangible assets in our condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Management and the Board of Directors believe it is useful in evaluating corporate performance during a particular time period to review the supplemental non-GAAP financial measures, excluding amortization of intangible assets, because these costs are fixed at the time of an acquisition, are then amortized over a period of several years after the acquisition and generally cannot be changed or influenced by management after the acquisition. |
(3) | Severance, exit costs and related charges. Our non-GAAP financial measures exclude severance, exit costs and related charges, and any subsequent changes in estimates, as they relate to our corporate restructuring and exit activities. Management and the Board of Directors believe it is useful in evaluating corporate performance during a particular time period to review the supplemental non-GAAP financial measures, excluding severance, exit costs and related charges, in order to provide comparability and consistency with historical operating results. |
30
(4) | Proxy contest costs. During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company became engaged in a proxy contest initiated by a shareholder of the Company. The Company incurred approximately $6.2 million in unplanned proxy contest expenses during the first quarter of fiscal 2013, consisting primarily of outside financial advisory, legal, solicitation and consulting fees. Management and the Board of Directors believe it is useful in evaluating corporate performance during a particular time period to review the supplemental non-GAAP financial measures, excluding such costs, in order to provide comparability and consistency with historical operating results. |
(5) | Provision for income taxes on above pre-tax non-GAAP adjustments. Our non-GAAP financial measures exclude the tax impact of the above pre-tax non-GAAP adjustments. This amount is calculated using the tax rates of each country to which these pre-tax non-GAAP adjustments relate. Management excludes the non-GAAP adjustments on a net-of-tax basis in evaluating our performance. Therefore, we exclude the tax impact of these charges when presenting non-GAAP financial measures. |
(6) | Certain discrete tax items. Our non-GAAP financial measures exclude net tax benefits of $6.2 million for the six months ended September 30, 2011 associated with tax authority settlements related to prior years tax matters. Management excludes the impact of these items in evaluating our performance. Therefore, we exclude these items when presenting non-GAAP financial measures. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At September 30, 2012, we had $1.5 billion in cash, cash equivalents and investments, approximately 67% of which was held by our international subsidiaries and was largely generated from our international operations. Our international operations have generated $671.4 million of earnings that we have determined will be invested indefinitely in those operations. If such earnings were to be repatriated, we would incur a United States federal income tax liability that is not currently accrued in our financial statements. We also had outstanding letters of credit, performance bonds and similar instruments at September 30, 2012 of approximately $46.1 million primarily in support of performance obligations to various customers, but also related to facilities and other obligations.
At September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, we held auction rate securities with a par value of $21.7 million and $29.3 million, respectively, which were classified as available-for-sale. The total estimated fair value of our auction rate securities was $18.6 million and $26.9 million at September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, respectively. Our auction rate securities consist entirely of bonds issued by public agencies that are backed by student loans with at least a 97% guarantee by the federal government under the United States Department of Educations Federal Family Education Loan Program. All of these bonds are currently rated investment grade by Moodys or Standard and Poors. Auctions for these securities began failing in early 2008 and have continued to fail, resulting in our continuing to hold such securities and the issuers paying interest at the maximum contractual rates. We do not believe that any of the underlying issuers of these auction rate securities are presently at risk of default or that the underlying credit quality of the assets backing the auction rate security investments has been impacted by the reduced liquidity of these investments. Due to the illiquidity in the auction rate securities market caused by failed auctions, we estimated the fair value of these securities using internally developed models of the expected cash flows of the securities on a discounted basis. These models incorporate assumptions about the expected cash flows of the underlying student loans discounted at an estimate of the rate of return required by investors, which includes an adjustment to reflect a lack of liquidity in the market for these securities. Periodically, the issuers of certain of our auction rate securities have redeemed portions of our holdings at par value plus accrued interest. There were no redemptions during the quarter ended September 30, 2012. During the six months ended September 30, 2012, issuers redeemed available-for-sale holdings of $7.6 million par value. During the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, issuers redeemed available-for-sale holdings of $0.2 million and $0.4 million par value, respectively.
In February 2012, we issued $500.0 million of senior unsecured notes due 2022. Net proceeds to us after original issuance discount and issuance costs amounted to $493.3 million. These senior notes were issued at an original issuance discount of $2.7 million. These senior notes bear interest at a rate of 4.25% per annum, payable semi-annually in February and August of each year. These senior notes are redeemable at our option at any time in whole or, from time to time, in part at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) 100% of the principal amount of these senior notes to be redeemed, or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest discounted at the applicable United States Treasury rate plus 35 basis points, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
31
In November 2010, we entered into a credit agreement with certain institutional lenders providing for an unsecured revolving credit facility in an amount up to $400.0 million which is scheduled to expire on November 30, 2014 (the Credit Facility). Subject to certain conditions, at any time prior to maturity, we may invite existing and new lenders to increase the size of the Credit Facility up to a maximum of $600.0 million. The Credit Facility includes provisions for swing line loans of up to $25.0 million and standby letters of credit of up to $50.0 million. Revolving loans under the Credit Facility bear interest, at the Companys option, at a rate equal to either (i) the base rate (as defined) plus a margin based on the credit ratings of BMC's senior unsecured notes due 2018, or (ii) the LIBOR rate (as defined) plus a margin based on the credit ratings of BMC's senior notes due 2018, for interest periods of one, two, three or six months. As of September 30, 2012 and through October 31, 2012, we have not borrowed any funds under the Credit Facility.
In June 2008, we issued $300.0 million of senior unsecured notes due 2018. Net proceeds to us after original issuance discount and issuance costs amounted to $295.6 million. These senior notes were issued at an original issuance discount of $1.8 million. These senior notes bear interest at a rate of 7.25% per annum, payable semi-annually in June and December of each year. These senior notes are redeemable at our option at any time in whole or, from time to time, in part at a redemption price equal to the greater of: (i) 100% of the principal amount of these senior notes to be redeemed, or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest discounted at the applicable United States Treasury rate plus 50 basis points, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
These credit facilities are subject to covenants limiting, among other things, the creation of liens securing indebtedness and sale-leaseback transactions.
We believe that our existing cash and investment balances, funds generated from operating activities and available credit under the Credit Facility will be sufficient to meet our working and other capital requirements for the foreseeable future. In the normal course of business, we evaluate the merits of acquiring technology or businesses, or establishing strategic relationships with or investing in these businesses. We may elect to use available cash and investments to fund such activities in the future. In the event additional needs for cash arise, we might find it advantageous to utilize third party financing sources based on factors such as our then available cash and its source (i.e., cash held in the United States versus international locations), the cost of financing and our internal cost of capital.
We may from time to time seek to repurchase or retire securities, including outstanding borrowings and equity securities, in open market repurchases, unsolicited or solicited privately negotiated transactions or in such other manner as will comply with the provisions of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements and contractual restrictions, if applicable. The amount of repurchases, which is subject to management discretion, may be material and may change from period to period.
Our cash flows for the quarters ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 were:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 286.1 | $ | 423.1 | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(129.9 | ) | (221.8 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(333.3 | ) | (383.5 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
(8.6 | ) | (19.0 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | (185.7 | ) | $ | (201.2 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Our primary method for funding operations and growth has been through cash flows generated from operating activities. Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended September 30, 2012 decreased by $137.0 million from the prior year period, attributable primarily to a decrease in net income and the net impact of working capital changes.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended September 30, 2012 decreased by $91.9 million from the prior year period. This decrease was attributable primarily to a decrease in cash paid for acquisitions and an increase in proceeds from maturities of investments, partially offset by an increase in purchases of investments.
32
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended September 30, 2012 decreased by $50.2 million from the prior year period, attributable primarily to a decrease in treasury stock acquired.
Treasury Stock Purchases
Our Board of Directors has previously authorized a total of $5.0 billion to repurchase common stock. During the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, we purchased 4.8 million and 8.3 million shares, respectively, for $200.0 million and $350.0 million, respectively. From the inception of the stock repurchase authorization through September 30, 2012, we have purchased 160.3 million shares for $4.5 billion. At September 30, 2012, there was $500.3 million remaining in the stock repurchase program, which does not have an expiration date. In October 2012, our Board of Directors approved a new $1 billion stock repurchase program. We expect $750 million of the repurchase to be executed via an accelerated share repurchase agreement to be entered into during the quarter ending December 31, 2012.
During the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, we repurchased 0.1 million and 0.5 million shares, respectively, for $3.1 million and $20.0 million, respectively, to satisfy employee tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of share-based awards.
The repurchase of stock will continue to be funded primarily with cash generated from domestic operations and, therefore, affects our overall domestic versus international liquidity balances. See PART II. Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds below for a monthly detail of treasury stock purchases for the quarter ended September 30, 2012.
Shareholder Rights Agreement
On May 12, 2012, our Board of Directors authorized and declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right (a Right) for each outstanding common share through a shareholder rights agreement (the Rights Agreement). Each Right, once exercisable, represents the right to purchase one one-thousandth of a series B junior participating preferred share, par value $0.01, for $180, or an equivalent value of common shares determined at 50% of the then-current market price of BMCs common stock, provided sufficient common shares are then unissued. The Rights become exercisable in the event any individual person or entity (including the ownership of their related affiliates) acquires 10% or more of the outstanding share capital of the Company without the approval of BMCs Board of Directors, and until such time are inseparable from and trade with BMCs common stock. The Rights have a de minimus fair value and are accounted for as a component of stockholders equity. The Rights Agreement expires May 11, 2013.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. On an on-going basis, we make and evaluate estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, capitalized software development costs, share-based compensation, goodwill and intangible assets, valuation of investments and accounting for income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances; the results of which form the basis for making judgments about amounts and timing of revenue and expenses, the carrying values of assets and the recorded amounts of liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates and such estimates may change if the underlying conditions or assumptions change. We have discussed the development and selection of the critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors, and the Audit Committee has reviewed our related disclosures. The critical accounting policies related to the estimates and judgments are discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012 under Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. There have been no changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates during the six months ended September 30, 2012.
New Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance requiring new disclosures regarding balance sheet offsetting. This guidance requires entities to disclose the gross amounts of certain recognized financial assets and liabilities, to reconcile these amounts to the net positions recognized in the balance sheet and to provide qualitative disclosures about the rights of offset relating to these financial assets and liabilities. This new disclosure guidance is effective for us beginning with our first quarter of fiscal 2014.
33
Available Information
Our internet website address is http://www.bmc.com. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available through the investor relations page of our internet website free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Our internet website and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not intended to be incorporated into this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
We are exposed to a variety of risks, including foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, the impact of changes in interest rates on our investments and long-term borrowings and changes in market prices of our debt and equity securities. In the normal course of business, we employ established policies and procedures to manage these risks including the use of derivative instruments. There have been no material changes in our foreign currency exchange rate risk management strategy or our portfolio management strategy subsequent to March 31, 2012; therefore, the risk profile of our market risk sensitive instruments remains substantially unchanged from the description in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012.
34
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Based on managements evaluation (with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO)), as of the end of the period covered by this report, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) are effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change to our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 and Rule 15d-15 under the Exchange Act that occurred during our second fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
35
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
There are no items that require disclosure under this item.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
There have been no material changes to the risk factors as presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Total Dollar Value | Approximate Dollar | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Number of Shares | of Shares Purchased | Value of Shares that | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Average Price | Purchased as Part of a | as Part of a | may yet be | ||||||||||||||||
Shares | Paid per | Publicly Announced | Publicly Announced | Purchased Under | ||||||||||||||||
Period |
Purchased (1) | Share | Program (2) | Program (2) | the Program (2) | |||||||||||||||
July 131, 2012 |
596,785 | $ | 40.19 | 559,675 | $ | 22,491,157 | $ | 677,759,715 | ||||||||||||
August 131, 2012 |
3,763,819 | $ | 41.22 | 3,729,369 | 153,741,671 | $ | 524,018,044 | |||||||||||||
September 130, 2012 |
565,128 | $ | 42.57 | 558,027 | 23,757,932 | $ | 500,260,112 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total |
4,925,732 | $ | 41.26 | 4,847,071 | $ | 199,990,760 | $ | 500,260,112 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes 78,661 shares of our common stock withheld by us to satisfy employee tax withholding obligations. |
(2) | Our Board of Directors has previously authorized a total of $5.0 billion to repurchase common stock. At September 30, 2012, approximately $500.3 million remains authorized in this stock repurchase program and the program does not have an expiration date. In October 2012, our Board of Directors approved a new $1 billion stock repurchase program. We expect $750 million of the repurchase to be executed via an accelerated share repurchase agreement to be entered into during the quarter ending December 31, 2012. |
36
(a) Exhibits.
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer of BMC Software, Inc. pursuant to Section 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer of BMC Software, Inc. pursuant to Section 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer of BMC Software, Inc. pursuant to Section 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer of BMC Software, Inc. pursuant to Section 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document. | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
37
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
BMC SOFTWARE, INC. | ||||||
October 31, 2012 | By: | /s/ ROBERT E. BEAUCHAMP | ||||
Robert E. Beauchamp | ||||||
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||||
October 31, 2012 | By: | /s/ STEPHEN B. SOLCHER | ||||
Stephen B. Solcher | ||||||
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
38
Exhibits
INDEX
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer of BMC Software, Inc. pursuant to Section 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer of BMC Software, Inc. pursuant to Section 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer of BMC Software, Inc. pursuant to Section 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer of BMC Software, Inc. pursuant to Section 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document. | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
39
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF BMC SOFTWARE, INC.
I, Robert E. Beauchamp, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BMC Software, Inc. (the registrant); |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: October 31, 2012
By: | /s/ ROBERT E. BEAUCHAMP | |
Robert E. Beauchamp (Chief Executive Officer) |
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF BMC SOFTWARE, INC.
I, Stephen B. Solcher, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BMC Software, Inc. (the registrant); |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: October 31, 2012
By: | /s/ STEPHEN B. SOLCHER | |
Stephen B. Solcher (Chief Financial Officer) |
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF BMC SOFTWARE, INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350
Based on my knowledge, I, Robert E. Beauchamp, Chief Executive Officer of BMC Software, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2012 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Company fully complies with the requirements of that section.
Based on my knowledge, I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ ROBERT E. BEAUCHAMP |
Robert E. Beauchamp |
October 31, 2012 |
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF BMC SOFTWARE, INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350
Based on my knowledge, I, Stephen B. Solcher, Chief Financial Officer of BMC Software, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2012 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Report) by the Company fully complies with the requirements of that section.
Based on my knowledge, I further certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ STEPHEN B. SOLCHER |
Stephen B. Solcher |
October 31, 2012 |
Guarantees And Contingencies (Narrative) (Detail) (USD $)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified |
Sep. 30, 2012
|
---|---|
Contingencies And Commitments [Line Items] | |
Outstanding letters of credit, performance bonds and similar instruments | $ 46.1 |
Maximum estimated charge from litigation of foreign tax dispute | $ 10 |
Long-Term Borrowings (Narrative) (Detail) (USD $)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified |
1 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | 1 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | 1 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov. 30, 2010
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Feb. 29, 2012
Senior Unsecured Notes Due 2022 [Member]
|
Sep. 30, 2012
Senior Unsecured Notes Due 2022 [Member]
|
Jun. 30, 2008
Senior Unsecured Notes Due 2018 [Member]
|
Sep. 30, 2012
Senior Unsecured Notes Due 2018 [Member]
|
|
Debt Instrument [Line Items] | ||||||
Issuance of senior notes | $ 500.0 | $ 300.0 | ||||
Net proceeds after original issuance discount and issuance costs | 493.3 | 295.6 | ||||
Original issuance discount | 2.7 | 1.8 | ||||
Interest rate on senior unsecured notes | 4.25% | 7.25% | ||||
Redemption options of senior notes | The greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of these senior notes to be redeemed, or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest discounted at the applicable United States Treasury rate plus 35 basis points, plus accrued and unpaid interest | The greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of these senior notes to be redeemed, or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest discounted at the applicable United States Treasury rate plus 50 basis points, plus accrued and unpaid interest | ||||
Percentage of principal amount of senior notes to be redeemed | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||||
Number of basis points to be added to the discounted present value of remaining scheduled payments | 35 basis points | 50 basis points | ||||
Maximum amount of credit facility | 600.0 | |||||
Expiration date of credit facility | Nov. 30, 2014 | |||||
Amount of unsecured revolving credit facility | 400.0 | |||||
Provisions for swing line loans (maximum) | 25.0 | |||||
Provision for standby letters of credit (maximum) | $ 50 | |||||
Interest periods for revolving loans under the credit facility | One, two, three or six months |
Financial Instruments (Summary Of Activity In Level 3 Financial Instruments) (Detail) (USD $)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Sep. 30, 2011
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Sep. 30, 2011
|
|
Fair Value, Assets Measured on Recurring Basis, Unobservable Input Reconciliation [Line Items] | ||||
Balance at the beginning of the period | $ 18.7 | $ 26.8 | $ 26.9 | $ 27.2 |
Redemption and sales of auction rate securities | (0.2) | (7.6) | (0.4) | |
Change in unrealized gain (loss) included in other comprehensive income | (0.1) | (1.0) | (0.7) | (1.2) |
Balance at the end of the period | $ 18.6 | $ 25.6 | $ 18.6 | $ 25.6 |
Stockholders' Equity (Computation Of Basic And Diluted EPS) (Detail) (USD $)
In Millions, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Sep. 30, 2011
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Sep. 30, 2011
|
|
Basic earnings per share: | ||||
Net earnings allocated to common shares | $ 97.8 | $ 114.7 | $ 152.0 | $ 210.4 |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding | 157.5 | 173.0 | 158.9 | 174.7 |
Basic earnings per share | $ 0.62 | $ 0.66 | $ 0.96 | $ 1.20 |
Diluted earnings per share: | ||||
Net earnings allocated to common shares | $ 97.8 | $ 114.7 | $ 152.0 | $ 210.4 |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding | 157.5 | 173.0 | 158.9 | 174.7 |
Incremental shares from assumed conversions of share-based awards | 2.8 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 3.6 |
Adjusted weighted average number of common shares outstanding | 160.3 | 176.0 | 162.1 | 178.3 |
Diluted earnings per share | $ 0.61 | $ 0.65 | $ 0.94 | $ 1.18 |
Financial Instruments
|
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial Instruments | (3) Financial Instruments We measure certain financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis using the following valuation techniques: (A) Market approach — Uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. (B) Income approach — Uses valuation techniques to convert future estimated cash flows to a single present amount based on current market expectations about those future amounts, using present value techniques. The fair values of our financial instruments were determined using the following input levels and valuation techniques:
Level 1 classification is applied to any asset or liability that has a readily available quoted market price from an active market where there is significant transparency in the executed/quoted price. Level 2 classification is applied to assets and liabilities that have evaluated prices where the data inputs to these valuations are observable either directly or indirectly, but do not represent quoted market prices from an active market. Level 3 classification is applied to assets and liabilities when prices are not derived from existing market data and requires us to develop our own assumptions about how market participants would value the asset or liability. The following table summarizes the activity in our Level 3 financial instruments (auction rate securities) for the quarters and six months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively:
Investments Our cash, cash equivalents and investments were comprised of the following:
The following summarizes the underlying contractual maturities of our available-for-sale investments in debt securities at September 30, 2012:
At September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, we held auction rate securities with a par value of $21.7 million and $29.3 million, respectively, which were classified as available-for-sale. The total estimated fair value of our auction rate securities was $18.6 million and $26.9 million at September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, respectively. Our auction rate securities consist entirely of bonds issued by public agencies that are backed by student loans with at least a 97% guarantee by the federal government under the United States Department of Education’s Federal Family Education Loan Program. All of these bonds are currently rated investment grade by Moody’s or Standard and Poor’s. Auctions for these securities began failing in early 2008 and have continued to fail, resulting in our continuing to hold such securities and the issuers paying interest at the maximum contractual rates. We do not believe that any of the underlying issuers of these auction rate securities are presently at risk of default or that the underlying credit quality of the assets backing the auction rate security investments has been impacted by the reduced liquidity of these investments. Due to the illiquidity in the auction rate securities market caused by failed auctions, we estimated the fair value of these securities using internally developed models of the expected cash flows of the securities on a discounted basis. These models incorporate assumptions about the expected cash flows of the underlying student loans discounted at an estimate of the rate of return required by investors, which includes an adjustment to reflect a lack of liquidity in the market for these securities. The range of and weighted average discount rates used in our valuation models at September 30, 2012 were 3.7% to 4.1%, and 3.9%, respectively. Significant increases (decreases) in the discount rate used in the valuation would result in decreases (increases) in the fair value of the auction rate securities. Periodically, the issuers of certain of our auction rate securities have redeemed portions of our holdings at par value plus accrued interest. There were no redemptions during the quarter ended September 30, 2012. During the six months ended September 30, 2012, issuers redeemed available-for-sale holdings of $7.6 million par value. During the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, issuers redeemed available-for-sale holdings of $0.2 million and $0.4 million par value, respectively.
The unrealized loss on our available-for-sale auction rate securities, which have a fair value of $18.6 million at September 30, 2012, was $3.1 million and was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as we believe the decline in fair value of these auction rate securities is temporary. In making this determination, we primarily considered the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuers, the probability scheduled cash flows will continue to be made and the likelihood we would be required to sell the investments before recovery of our cost basis. These available-for-sale auction rate securities have been in an unrealized loss position for greater than twelve months. Because of the uncertainty related to the timing of liquidity associated with these auction rate securities, these securities are classified as long-term investments at September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012. Derivative Financial Instruments We operate globally and transact business in various foreign currencies. Our foreign currency exposures relate primarily to certain foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities, primarily non-U.S. dollar denominated accounts receivable, cash and intercompany balances held by U.S. dollar functional currency entities. To minimize the risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, we have established a program that utilizes foreign currency forward contracts to offset the risks associated with the effects of certain foreign currency exposures. Gains or losses on our foreign currency exposures are offset by gains or losses on the foreign currency forward contracts entered into under this program. These foreign currency forward contracts generally have terms of one month or less and are generally entered into at the prevailing market exchange rate at the end of each month. We do not use foreign currency forward contracts for speculative purposes. While these foreign currency forward contracts are utilized to hedge foreign currency exposures, they are not formally designated as hedges for accounting purposes, and therefore, the changes in the fair values of these contracts are recognized currently in earnings. We record these foreign currency forward contracts at fair value as either assets or liabilities depending on their net settlement position with each respective counterparty at the balance sheet date. The fair value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts that closed in a gain position at September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012 was $5.5 million and $8.1 million, respectively, and was recorded within other current assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts that closed in a loss position at September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012 was $4.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively, and was recorded within accrued liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. The notional amounts at contract exchange rates of our foreign currency forward contracts outstanding were:
Our use of foreign currency forward contracts is intended to principally offset gains and losses associated with foreign currency exposures. Therefore, the notional amounts and currencies underlying our foreign currency forward contracts will fluctuate period to period as they are principally dependent on the balances and currency denomination of monetary assets and liabilities maintained by our global entities. The effect of the foreign currency forward contracts for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, was a loss of $1.9 million and a gain of $4.5 million, respectively, which, after including gains and losses on our foreign currency exposures, resulted in net gains of $1.0 million and $0.6 million, respectively, recorded in interest and other income, net. The effect of the foreign currency forward contracts for the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, was losses of $2.3 million and $6.0 million, respectively, which, after including gains and losses on our foreign currency exposures, resulted in net losses of $0.9 million and $1.9 million, respectively, recorded in interest and other income, net. We are exposed to credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties to derivative financial instruments, but we do not expect any counterparties to fail to meet their obligations given their high credit ratings. In addition, we diversify this risk across several counterparties and utilize netting agreements to mitigate the counterparty credit risk. Trade Finance Receivables A substantial portion of our trade finance receivables is transferred to financial institutions on a non-recourse basis. We utilize wholly-owned finance subsidiaries in these finance receivables transfers. These entities are consolidated into our financial position and results of operations. We account for such transfers as sales in accordance with applicable accounting rules pertaining to the transfer of financial assets and the sale of future revenue when we have surrendered control of such receivables (including determining that such assets have been isolated beyond our reach and the reach of our creditors) and when we do not have significant continuing involvement in the generation of cash flows due the financial institutions. During the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2012, we transferred $39.0 million and $111.8 million, respectively, of such receivables through these programs. During the quarter and six months ended September 30, 2011, we transferred $147.8 million and $159.0 million, respectively, of such receivables through these programs. Finance receivables are typically transferred within several months after origination and the outstanding principal balance at the time of transfer typically approximates fair value. For those finance receivables not transferred, we evaluate the credit risk of finance receivables in our portfolio based on regional characteristics specific to the risk climate in each of our geographic operations as well as based on internal credit quality indicators for individual receivables. We evaluate the credit risk of finance receivables using an internal credit rating system based on whether an individual receivable meets specific internal criteria including counterparty credit rating and receivable maturity date and assign an internal credit rating of 1, 2 or 3, with a credit rating of 1 representing the best credit quality. For all regions and credit categories, a finance receivable will be specifically reserved once deemed uncollectible. As of September 30, 2012, we held $124.7 million of finance receivables, net of $0.3 million of specific receivables which have been fully reserved. At September 30, 2012, our finance receivables balance, net of allowance, by region and by class of internal credit rating was as follows:
Other Financial Instruments The fair value of our senior unsecured notes due 2018 at September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, based on market prices (Level 2), was $372.4 million and $368.4 million, respectively, compared to the carrying value of $299.0 million and $298.9 million, respectively. The fair value of our senior unsecured notes due 2022 at September 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, based on market prices (Level 2), was $531.6 million and $506.6 million, respectively, compared to the carrying value of $497.5 million and $497.4 million, respectively. The carrying values of all other financial instruments, consisting primarily of trade and finance receivables, accounts payable and other borrowings, approximate their respective fair values. |