EX-99.77Q1 OTHR EXHB

SEI LIQUID ASSET TRUST
SEI TAX EXEMPT TRUST
SEI DAILY INCOME TRUST
SEI INSTITUTIONAL MANAGED TRUST
SEI INSTITUTIONAL INTERNATIONAL TRUST
SEI ASSET ALLOCATION TRUST
SEI INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENTS TRUST
ADVISER MANAGED TRUST
NEW COVENANT FUNDS
SEI INSURANCE PRODUCTS TRUST

Financial Officer Code of Ethics
1.	Introduction
The reputation and integrity of SEI Liquid
Asset Trust, SEI Tax Exempt Trust, SEI Daily
Income Trust, SEI Institutional Managed Trust,
SEI Institutional International Trust, SEI
Asset Allocation Trust, SEI Institutional
Investments Trust, Adviser Managed Trust, New
Covenant Funds and SEI Insurance Products
Trust (each a Trust and, collectively, the
Trusts) are valuable assets that are vital to
the each Trusts success.  The Trusts senior
financial officers (SFOs) are responsible for
conducting the Trusts business in a manner
that demonstrates a commitment to the highest
standards of integrity. The Trusts SFOs
include the principal executive officer, the
principal financial officer, comptroller or
principal accounting officer, and any person
who performs a similar function.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Act)
effected sweeping corporate disclosure and
financial reporting reform on public
companies, including mutual funds, to address
corporate malfeasance and assure investors
that the companies in which they invest are
accurately and completely disclosing financial
information.  Under the Act, all public
companies (including the Trusts) must either
have a code of ethics for their SFOs, or
disclose why they do not.  The Act was
intended to foster corporate environments
which encourage employees to question and
report unethical and potentially illegal
business practices.  Each Trust has chosen to
adopt this Financial Officer Code of Ethics
(the Code) to encourage its SFOs to act in a
manner consistent with the highest principles
of ethical conduct.
2.	Purposes of the Code
The purposes of this Code are:
To promote honest and ethical conduct
by each Trusts SFOs, including the
ethical handling of actual or
apparent conflicts of interest
between personal and professional
relationships;
To assist each Trusts SFOs in
recognizing and avoiding conflicts of
interest, including disclosing to an
appropriate person any material
transaction or relationship that
reasonably could be expected to give
rise to such a conflict;
To promote full, fair, accurate,
timely, and understandable disclosure
in reports and documents that the
Trusts file with, or submit to, the
SEC and in other public
communications made by the Trusts;
To promote compliance with applicable
laws, rules and regulations;
To encourage the prompt internal
reporting to an appropriate person of
violations of this Code; and
To establish accountability for
adherence to this Code.
3.	Questions about this Code
Each Trusts compliance officer designated to
oversee compliance with the Trusts Code of
Ethics adopted pursuant to Rule 17j-1 shall
serve as Compliance Officer for the
implementation and administration of this
Code.  You should direct your questions about
this Code to the Compliance Officer.
4.	Conduct Guidelines
Each Trust has adopted the following
guidelines under which the Trusts SFOs must
perform their official duties and conduct the
business affairs of the Trust.
a)	Ethical and honest conduct is of
paramount importance.  Each Trusts SFOs
must act with honesty and integrity and
avoid violations of this Code, including
the avoidance of actual or apparent
conflicts of interest with the Trust in
personal and professional relationships.
b)	SFOs must disclose material transactions
or relationships. Each Trusts SFOs must
disclose to the Compliance Officer any
actual or apparent conflicts of interest
the SFO may have with the Trust that
reasonably could be expected to give
rise to any violations of this Code.
Such conflicts of interest may arise as
a result of material transactions or
business or personal relationships to
which the SFO may be a party.  If it is
not possible to disclose the matter to
the Compliance Officer, it should be
disclosed to the Trusts Chief Financial
Officer, Chief Executive Officer or
another appropriate person.  In addition
to disclosing any actual or apparent
conflicts of interest in which an SFO is
personally involved, the Trusts SFOs
have an obligation to report any other
actual or apparent conflicts which they
discover or of which they otherwise
become aware.  If you are unsure whether
a particular fact pattern gives rise to
a conflict of interest, or whether a
particular transaction or relationship
is material, you should bring the matter
to the attention of the Compliance
Officer.
c)	Standards for quality of information
shared with service providers of the
Trusts.  Each Trusts SFOs must at all
times seek to provide information to the
Trusts service providers (adviser,
administrator, outside auditor, outside
counsel, custodian, etc.) that is
accurate, complete, objective, relevant,
timely, and understandable.
d)	Standards for quality of information
included in periodic reports. Each
Trusts SFOs must at all times endeavor
to ensure full, fair, timely, accurate,
and understandable disclosure in the
Trusts periodic reports.
e)	Compliance with laws.  Each Trusts SFOs
must comply with the federal securities
laws and other laws and rules applicable
to the Trusts, such as the Internal
Revenue Code.
f)	Standard of care.  Each Trusts SFOs must
at all times act in good faith and with
due care, competence and diligence,
without misrepresenting material facts
or allowing your independent judgment to
be subordinated. Each Trusts SFOs must
conduct the affairs of the Trust in a
responsible manner, consistent with this
Code.
g)	Confidentiality of information. Each
Trusts SFOs must respect and protect the
confidentiality of information acquired
in the course of their professional
duties, except when authorized by the
Trust to disclose it or where disclosure
is otherwise legally mandated.  You may
not use confidential information
acquired in the course of your work for
personal advantage.
h)	Sharing of information and educational
standards.  Each Trusts SFOs should
share information with relevant parties
to keep them informed of the business
affairs of the Trust, as appropriate,
and maintain skills important and
relevant to the Trusts needs.
i)	Promote ethical conduct. Each Trusts
SFOs should at all times proactively
promote ethical behavior among peers in
your work environment.
j)	Standards for recordkeeping.  Each
Trusts SFOs must at all times endeavor
to ensure that the Trusts financial
books and records are thoroughly and
accurately maintained to the best of
their knowledge in a manner consistent
with applicable laws and this Code.
5.	Waivers of this Code
You may request a waiver of a provision of
this Code by submitting your request in
writing to the Compliance Officer for
appropriate review.  For example, if a family
member works for a service provider that
prepares a Trusts financial statements, you
may have a potential conflict of interest in
reviewing those statements and should seek a
waiver of this Code to review the work.  An
executive officer of each Trust, or another
appropriate person (such as a designated Board
or Audit Committee member), will decide
whether to grant a waiver.  All waivers of
this code must be disclosed to the applicable
Trusts shareholders to the extent required by
SEC rules.
6.	Affirmation of the Code
Upon adoption of the Code, each Trusts SFOs
must affirm in writing that they have
received, read and understand the Code, and
annually thereafter must affirm that they have
complied with the requirements of the Code. To
the extent necessary, each Trusts Compliance
Officer will provide guidance on the conduct
required by this Code and the manner in which
violations or suspected violations must be
reported and waivers must be requested.
7.	Reporting Violations
In the event that an SFO discovers or, in good
faith, suspects a violation of this Code, the
SFO must immediately report the violation or
suspected violation to the Compliance Officer.
The Compliance Officer may, in his discretion,
consult with another member of the Trusts
senior management or the Board in determining
how to address the suspected violation.  For
example, a Code violation may occur when a
periodic report or financial statement of a
Trust omits a material fact, or is technically
accurate but, in the view of the SFO, is
written in a way that obscures its meaning.
SFOs who report violations or suspected
violations in good faith will not be subject
to retaliation of any kind.  Reported
violations will be investigated and addressed
promptly and will be treated as confidential
to the extent possible.
8.	Violations of the Code
Dishonest or unethical conduct or conduct that
is illegal will constitute a violation of this
Code, regardless of whether this Code
specifically refers to such particular
conduct.  A violation of this Code may result
in disciplinary action, up to and including
removal as an SFO of the Trust.  A variety of
laws apply to the Trusts and their operations,
including the Securities Act of 1933, the
Investment Company Act of 1940, state laws
relating to duties owed by Trust officers, and
criminal laws. The Trusts will report any
suspected criminal violations to the
appropriate authorities, and will investigate,
address and report, as appropriate, non-
criminal violations.

EX-99.77B ACCT LTTR

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm

To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders
SEI Institutional International Trust:

In planning and performing our audits of the
financial statements of SEI Institutional
International Trust, comprised of the International
Equity Fund, Emerging Markets Equity Fund,
International Fixed Income Fund, and the Emerging
Markets Debt Fund (collectively, the Funds), as of
and for the year ended September 30, 2015, in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), we
considered the Funds internal control over financial
reporting, including controls over safeguarding
securities, as a basis for designing our auditing
procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion
on the financial statements and to comply with the
requirements of Form N-SAR, but not for the purpose
of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Funds internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Management of the Funds is responsible for
establishing and maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting. In fulfilling this
responsibility, estimates and judgments by
management are required to assess the expected
benefits and related costs of controls. A companys
internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. A companys internal control
over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of
records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of
the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection
of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of
the companys assets that could have a material
effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal
control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.

A deficiency in internal control over financial
reporting exists when the design or operation of a
control does not allow management or employees, in
the normal course of performing their assigned
functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a
timely basis.  A material weakness is a deficiency,
or a combination of deficiencies, in internal
control over financial reporting, such that there is
a reasonable possibility that a material
misstatement of the Funds annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or
detected on a timely basis.
Our consideration of the Funds internal control over
financial reporting was for the limited purpose
described in the first paragraph and would not
necessarily disclose all deficiencies in internal
control that might be material weaknesses under
standards established by the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
However, we noted no deficiencies in the Funds
internal control over financial reporting and its
operation, including controls over safeguarding
securities that we consider to be a material
weakness as defined above as of September 30, 2015.

This report is intended solely for the information
and use of management and the Board of Trustees of
SEI Institutional International Trust and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not
intended to be and should not be used by anyone
other than these specified parties.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
November 30, 2015

EX-99.77E LEGAL

A lawsuit entitled Steven Curd and Rebel Curd v. SEI
Investments Management Corporation was initially
filed against SIMC in the U.S. District Court for
the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (the Court) on
December 11, 2013. On August 28, 2014, the Court
granted SIMCs motion to dismiss the initial
complaint in the lawsuit, but also granted
plaintiffs leave to amend the complaint. On October
2, 2014, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. In
the amended complaint, SEI Investments Global Funds
Services (SGFS) was added as a defendant. On July
13, 2015, the Court denied SIMCs motion to dismiss
the amended complaint and granted the motion to
dismiss with respect to SGFS. On September 18, 2015,
a second amended complaint was filed that seeks to
remedy a technical deficiency in the amended
complaint. The plaintiffs bring the case as a
shareholder derivative action against SIMC and SGFS
on behalf of certain SEI funds. The claims were
based on Section 36(b) of the 1940 Act, which allows
shareholders of a mutual fund to sue the investment
adviser of the fund or its affiliates for an alleged
breach of fiduciary duty with respect to
compensation received by the adviser or its
affiliates. The plaintiffs bring the suit against
SIMC and SGFS with respect to five specific SEI
Funds: the International Equity Fund, which is a
series of the SEI Institutional International Trust,
the High Yield Bond, Tax-Managed Large Cap, and Tax-
Managed Small/Mid Cap Funds, each of which is a
series of the SEI Institutional Managed Trust, and
the Intermediate-Term Municipal Fund, which is a
series of the SEI Tax Exempt Trust. The plaintiffs
seek: (1) damages for the funds in the amount of the
alleged excessive fees earned by SIMC and SGFS
beginning from the one year period prior to the
filing of the lawsuit, plus interest, costs, and
fees; (2) orders declaring that SIMC and SGFS
allegedly violated Section 36(b) and enjoining SIMC
and SGFS from further alleged violations; and (3)
rescission of SIMCs and SGFSs contracts with the
funds, and restitution of all allegedly excessive
fees paid beginning from the one year period prior
to the filing of the lawsuit, plus interest, costs,
and fees. SIMC continues to dispute the claims and
intends to continue to vigorously defend the matter.