Note 2 - Fair Value Measurement

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2020

Notes to Financial Statements

Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

2. Fair Value Measurement

In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” (“ASC Topic 820”), the Company measures its cash and cash equivalents and investments at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company also measures certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a non-recurring basis when applying acquisition accounting. ASC Topic 820 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, ASC Topic 820 establishes a three-tier value fair hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

Level 1 – Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 – Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the related assets or liabilities.

Level 3 – Unobservable data points for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.

For the investment in iVexSol convertible debt that was converted to Series A-1 preferred stock in November 2020, the significant Level 3 inputs were the expected term of the instrument, the underlying credit worthiness of iVexSol and the valuation of various embedded features in the note, which were based on future financings of iVexSol. We considered a range of probability-weighted financing or payoff settlements between 5% and 50% with outcomes occurring over a range of 1 to 2 years. The estimated market interest rate of approximately 8.0% was based on an average of indexes of below investment grade debt. The market rate was calibrated to the rate implied in the original issuance in September 2019 and adjusted for changes in market rates quarterly. Certain assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the convertible debt were uncertain by nature. Actual results may differ materially from estimates.

The fair value of the Astero contingent consideration liability was initially valued based on unobservable inputs using a Black-Scholes valuation model. These inputs included the estimated amount and timing of projected future revenue, a discount rate of 17.5%, risk-free rates between 2.29% and 2.41% and revenue volatility of 56%. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. Generally, changes used in the assumptions for projected future revenue and revenue volatility would be accompanied by a directionally similar change in the fair value measurement. Conversely, changes in the discount rate would be accompanied by a directionally opposite change in the related fair value measurement. However, due to the contingent consideration having a maximum payout amount, changes in these assumptions would not affect the fair value of the contingent consideration if they increase (decrease) beyond certain amounts. Subsequent to the acquisition date, at each reporting period, the contingent consideration liability is re-measured to fair value with changes recorded in the change in fair value of contingent consideration in the consolidated statements of operations. During the most recent re-measurement of the contingent consideration liability as of December 31, 2020, the Company used a discount rate of 11.0%, a risk-free rate of 0.11% and revenue volatility of 76.6%. This contingent consideration liability is presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2020 and 2019 in the amount of $81,000 and $1.1 million, respectively. Certain assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the contingent consideration are uncertain by nature. Actual results may differ materially from estimates.

The fair value of the CBS contingent consideration liability was initially valued based on unobservable inputs using a Monte Carlo simulation. These inputs included the estimated amount and timing of projected future revenue, a discount rate of 26.0%, a risk-free rate of approximately 1.74% and revenue volatility of 70%. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. Generally, changes used in the assumptions for projected future revenue and revenue volatility would be accompanied by a directionally similar change in the fair value measurement. Conversely, changes in the discount rate would be accompanied by a directionally opposite change in the related fair value measurement. However, due to the contingent consideration having a maximum payout amount, changes in these assumptions would not affect the fair value of the contingent consideration if they increase (decrease) beyond certain amounts. Subsequent to the acquisition date, at each reporting period, the contingent consideration liability is re-measured to fair value with changes recorded in the change in fair value of contingent consideration in the consolidated statements of operations. During the most recent re-measurement of the contingent consideration liability as of December 31, 2020, the Company used a discount rate of 21.0%, a risk-free rate of 0.23% and revenue volatility of 63%. This contingent consideration liability is presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2020 and 2019 in the amount of $140,000 and $856,000, respectively. Certain assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the contingent consideration are uncertain by nature. Actual results may differ materially from estimates.

The fair value of the SciSafe contingent consideration liability was initially valued based on unobservable inputs using a Monte Carlo simulation. These inputs included the estimated amount and timing of projected future revenue, a discount rate of 4.5%, a risk-free rate of approximately 0.20%, asset volatility of 60%, and revenue volatility of 15%. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. Generally, changes used in the assumptions for projected future revenue and revenue volatility would be accompanied by a directionally similar change in the fair value measurement. Conversely, changes in the discount rate would be accompanied by a directionally opposite change in the related fair value measurement. However, due to the contingent consideration having a maximum payout amount, changes in these assumptions would not affect the fair value of the contingent consideration if they increase (decrease) beyond certain amounts. At the acquisition date, the contingent consideration was determined to have a fair value of $3.7 million. Subsequent to the acquisition date, the contingent consideration liability was re-measured to fair value with changes recorded in the change in fair value of contingent consideration in the consolidated statements of operations. During the most recent re-measurement of the contingent consideration liability as of December 31, 2020, the Company used a discount rate of 4.5%, a risk-free rate of approximately 0.22%, asset volatility of 61%, and revenue volatility of 15%. This contingent consideration liability is presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2020 in the amount of $6.9 million. The change in fair value of contingent consideration of $3.3 million associated with this liability is presented within the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020. Certain assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the contingent consideration are uncertain by nature. Actual results may differ materially from estimates.

For the warrant liability, the significant Level 3 inputs include the contractual remaining term of the warrants and the volatility of the Company’s common stock. For the estimated term of the warrants, we used the actual terms of the warrants, which are all currently less than one year. For the volatility off the Company’s stock we used historical volatility for the remaining term of each warrant. These amounts ranged from 56.8% to 84.6% during the year ended December 31, 2020. We did not make any adjustments to the historical volatility. Certain assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the warrants are uncertain by nature. Actual results may differ materially from estimates.

There were no remeasurements to fair value during the year ended December 31, 2020 of financial assets and liabilities that are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

The following tables set forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, based on the three-tier fair value hierarchy:

(In thousands)

As of December 31, 2020	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Money market accounts	$	90,403	$	-	$	-	$	90,403
Total		90,403		-		-		90,403
Liabilities:
Contingent consideration - business combinations		-		-		7,152		7,152
Warrant liability		-		-		2,780		2,780
Total	$	-	$	-	$	9,932	$	9,932

As of December 31, 2019	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Money market accounts	$	6,448	$	-	$	-	$	6,448
Convertible debt held at fair value		-		-		1,000		1,000
Total		6,448		-		1,000		7,448
Liabilities:
Contingent consideration - business combinations		-		-		1,914		1,914
Warrant liability		-		-		39,602		39,602
Total	$	-	$	-	$	41,516	$	41,516

The fair values of money market funds classified as Level 1 were derived from quoted market prices as active markets for these instruments exist. The fair values of investments and contingent consideration classified as Level 3 were derived from management assumptions (see Note 1 – “Organization and Significant Accounting Policies.”) There have been no transfers of assets or liabilities between the fair value measurement levels.

The following table presents the changes in fair value of convertible debt investments which are measured using Level 3 inputs at December 31, 2020 and 2019:

(In thousands)	2020			2019
Beginning balance	$	1,000		$	-
Purchases		-			1,000
Change in fair value recognized in net income		1,319			-
Recognition of accrued interest in fair value upon conversion		58			-
Conversion of convertible debt to preferred stock		(2,377	)		-
Total	$	-		$	1,000

The following table presents the changes in fair value of contingent consideration liabilities which are measured using Level 3 inputs at December 31, 2020 and 2019:

(In thousands)	2020		2019
Beginning balance	$	1,914	$	-
Additions		3,663		2,347
Change in fair value recognized in net income		1,575		50
Payments earned, reclassified to accrued liabilities		-		(483	)
Total	$	7,152	$	1,914

The following table presents the changes in fair value of warrant liabilities which are measured using Level 3 inputs at December 31, 2020 and 2019:

(In thousands)	2020			2019
Beginning balance	$	39,602		$	28,516
Exercised warrants		(33,221	)		(1,749	)
Change in fair value recognized in net income		(3,601	)		12,835
Total	$	2,780		$	39,602