XML 43 R27.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.1.900
FAIR VALUE
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE
NOTE 19 - FAIR VALUE
In analyzing the fair value of its assets and liabilities accounted for on a fair value basis, the Company follows the fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Assets and liabilities are categorized into one of three levels based on the assumptions (inputs) used in valuing the asset or liability. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, while Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three levels are defined as follows:
Level 1 − Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. 
Level 2 − Observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets.
Level 3 − Unobservable inputs that reflect the entity's own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in the pricing of the asset or liability and that are, consequently, not based on market activity, but upon particular valuation techniques.
There were no transfers between any of the levels within the fair value hierarchy for any of the periods presented.
The following is a discussion of the assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis, as well as the valuation techniques applied to each fair value measurement and the estimates and assumptions used by the Company in those measurements.
Investment securities − equity securities. The Company uses quoted market prices (Level 1) to value its investments in DIF, CIF, TBBK and RSO common stock.
The fair value of the Company's investments in CLO and CDO securities are based on internally-generated expected cash flow models that require significant management judgments and estimate due to the lack of market activity and unobservable pricing inputs.
The fair value of the Company's investments in CLO and CDO securities are based on internally- generated expected cash flow models that require significant management judgments and estimates due to the lack of market activity and unobservable pricing inputs. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement include the constant prepayment rate ("CPR"), a probability of default ("CDR"), severity rate, reinvestment price on underlying collateral and the discount rate. Significant increases (decreases) in the default or discount rates in isolation would result in significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement, whereas significant increases (decreases) in the recovery rate, prepayment rate or reinvestment price in isolation would result in significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. Generally a change in the assumption used for the probability of default is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the assumption used for the discount rate and a directionally opposite change in the assumption used for prepayment rates, recovery rates and reinvestment prices on underlying collateral.
As of December 31, 2015, the Company held six securities of value within its trading portfolio, five of which were debt/equity in externally managed CDO issuers and one of which was a term loan (Level 3). 
Investment in Apidos-CVC preferred stock and contractual commitment. The Company's obligation to a third party in connection with its preferred interest in Apidos-CVC was initially valued at $589,000 based on the present value of the underlying discounted projected cash flows of the legacy Apidos incentive management fees (Level 3).
The fair values of the Company’s assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows (in thousands): 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Assets - Investment securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment securities
$
11,062

 
$

 
$
9,898

 
$
20,960

Pelium securities

 

 
24,712

 
24,712

December 31, 2015
$
11,062

 
$

 
$
34,610

 
$
45,672

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment securities
$
14,734

 
$
741

 
$
8,489

 
$
23,964

Pelium securities
53

 

 
17,366

 
17,419

December 31, 2014
$
14,787

 
$
741

 
$
25,855

 
$
41,383

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities - Apidos contractual commitment:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2015
$

 
$

 
$
615

 
$
615

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2014
$

 
$

 
$
745

 
$
745


The following table presents additional information about assets which were measured at fair value on a recurring basis for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value during 2015 (in thousands):
 
Investment Securities
 
Pelium Securities
 
Total
Balance, beginning of year
$
8,489

 
$
17,366

 
$
25,855

Purchases
2,524

 
27,630

 
30,154

Income accreted
1,238

 

 
1,238

Payments and distributions received
(1,913
)
 
(2,874
)
 
(4,787
)
Sales
(174
)
 
(16,012
)
 
(16,186
)
Impairment
(331
)
 

 
(331
)
Gains (losses) on sales of trading securities
(14
)
 
1,415

 
1,401

Unrealized holding gains on trading securities
269

 
(2,813
)
 
(2,544
)
Change in unrealized gains included in accumulated other comprehensive loss
(190
)
 

 
(190
)
Balance, end of year
$
9,898

 
$
24,712

 
$
34,610

The following table presents additional information about assets which were measured at fair value on a recurring basis for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value during 2014 (in thousands):
 
Investment Securities
 
Pelium Securities
 
Total
Balance, beginning of year
$
7,407

 
$

 
$
7,407

Purchases
15,063

 
20,029

 
35,092

Income accreted
(3,753
)
 

 
(3,753
)
Payments and distributions received
(200
)
 
(1,655
)
 
(1,855
)
Sales
(13,177
)
 
(1,368
)
 
(14,545
)
Impairment recognized in earnings
370

 

 
370

Gain on sales of trading securities
995

 
450

 
1,445

Unrealized holding gains on trading securities
1,850

 
(90
)
 
1,760

Change in unrealized losses included in accumulated other comprehensive loss
(66
)
 

 
(66
)
Balance, end of year
$
8,489

 
$
17,366

 
$
25,855


The following table presents the Company's quantitative inputs and assumptions used in determining the fair value of items categorized in Level 3 (in thousands, except percentages):
 
Fair value at December 31, 2015
 
Valuation Technique
 
Unobservable Inputs
 
Assumptions
(weighted average)
CLO securities
$
8,447

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Constant default rate
 
1% - 2%
 
 
 
 
 
Loss severity rate
 
25%
 
 
 
 
 
Constant prepayment rate
 
25%
 
 
 
 
 
Reinvestment spread
 
0% - 4.50%
 
 
 
 
 
Reinvestment price on collateral
 
99%
 
 
 
 
 
Discount rates
 
14%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trading securities
$
1,451

 
Net asset value
 
Value of underlying assets
 
variable
 
 
 
Discounted cash flow
 
Constant default rate
 
5%
 
 
 
 
 
Loss severity rate
 
30%
 
 
 
 
 
Constant prepayment rate
 
30%

In accordance with guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures, the Company is not required to disclose quantitative information with respect to unobservable inputs contained in fair value measurements that are not developed by the Company. As a consequence, the Company has not disclosed such information associated with fair values obtained from third-party pricing sources.        
The fair value of financial instruments required to be disclosed at fair value, excluding instruments valued on a recurring basis, is as follows (in thousands):
 
December 31, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Estimated Fair Value
Borrowings:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Real estate debt
$
9,877

 
$
10,618

 
$
10,088

 
$
11,197

Senior Notes
10,000

 
12,202

 
10,000

 
12,820

Other debt
870

 
870

 
324

 
324

 
$
20,747

 
$
23,690

 
$
20,412

 
$
24,341


For cash, receivables and payables, the carrying amounts approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.
The Company estimated the fair value of the real estate debt using current interest rates for similar loans. The Company estimated the fair value of the Senior Notes by applying the percentage appreciation in a high-yield fund with approximately similar quality and risk attributes as the Senior Notes. The carrying value of the Company's other debt was estimated using current interest rates for similar loans at December 31, 2015 and 2014.