XML 38 R26.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.21.2
Fair value measurement
6 Months Ended
Jul. 31, 2021
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair value measurement Fair value measurement
The estimated fair value of Signet’s financial instruments held or issued to finance Signet’s operations is summarized below. Certain estimates and judgments were required to develop the fair value amounts. The fair value amounts shown below are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that Signet would realize upon disposition nor do they indicate Signet’s intent or ability to dispose of the financial instrument. Assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value are required to be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
Level 1—quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities
Level 2—observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data
Level 3—unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data
Signet determines fair value based upon quoted prices when available or through the use of alternative approaches, such as discounting the expected cash flows using market interest rates commensurate with the credit quality and duration of the investment. The methods Signet uses to determine fair value on an instrument-specific basis are detailed below:
July 31, 2021January 30, 2021August 1, 2020
(in millions)Carrying ValueLevel 1Level 2Carrying ValueLevel 1Level 2Carrying ValueLevel 1Level 2
Assets:
US Treasury securities
$5.1 $5.1 $ $5.7 $5.7 $— $6.4 $6.4 $— 
Foreign currency contracts
0.9  0.9 0.1 — 0.1 2.3 — 2.3 
US government agency securities
2.0  2.0 3.2 — 3.2 3.7 — 3.7 
Corporate bonds and notes
6.2  6.2 6.5 — 6.5 7.6 — 7.6 
Total assets
$14.2 $5.1 $9.1 $15.5 $5.7 $9.8 $20.0 $6.4 $13.6 
Liabilities:
Foreign currency contracts
$(0.2)$ $(0.2)$(0.3)$— $(0.3)$— $— $— 
Commodity contracts
   (0.1)— (0.1)— — — 
Total liabilities$(0.2)$ $(0.2)$(0.4)$— $(0.4)$— $— $— 

Investments in US Treasury securities are based on quoted market prices for identical instruments in active markets, and therefore were classified as Level 1 measurements in the fair value hierarchy. Investments in US government agency securities and corporate bonds and notes are based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, and therefore were classified as Level 2 measurements in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of derivative financial instruments has been determined based on market value equivalents at the balance sheet date, taking into account the current interest rate environment, foreign currency forward rates or commodity forward rates, and therefore were classified as Level 2 measurements in the fair value hierarchy. See Note 17 for additional information related to the Company’s derivatives.
During the second quarter of Fiscal 2019, the Company completed the sale of all eligible non-prime in-house accounts receivable. Upon closing, 5% of the purchase price was deferred until the second anniversary of the closing date. Final payment of the deferred purchase price was contingent upon the non-prime portfolio achieving a pre-defined yield. The Company recorded an asset at the transaction date related to this deferred payment at fair value. This estimated fair value was derived from a discounted cash flow model using unobservable Level 3 inputs, including estimated yields derived from historic performance, loss rates, payment rates and discount rates to estimate the fair value associated with the accounts receivable. The measurement period was completed in June 2020 and the Company received the full deferred payment of $23.5 million during the second quarter of Fiscal 2022, as further described in Note 11.
During the 13 weeks ended May 2, 2020, the Company performed an interim impairment test for goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets and long-lived assets. The fair value was calculated using the income approach for the reporting units and the relief from royalty method for the indefinite-lived intangible assets, respectively. The fair value is a Level 3 valuation based on certain unobservable inputs, including estimated future cash flows and discount rates aligned with market-based assumptions, that would be utilized by market participants in valuing these assets or prices of similar assets. For long-lived assets, the Company utilizes primarily the replacement cost method (a level 3 valuation method) for the fair value of its property and equipment, and the income method to estimate the fair value of its ROU assets, which incorporates Level 3 inputs such as historical store level sales, internal business plans, real estate market capitalization and rental rates, and discount rates. See Note 14 and Note 16 for additional information.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities, and income taxes approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of these amounts.
The fair values of long-term debt instruments, excluding revolving credit facilities, were determined using quoted market prices in inactive markets based upon current observable market interest rates and therefore were classified as Level 2 measurements in the fair value hierarchy. The carrying value of the ABL Revolving Facility (as defined in Note 19) approximates fair value based on the nature of the instrument and variable interest rate, which are primarily Level 2 inputs. The following table provides a summary of the carrying amount and fair value of outstanding debt:
July 31, 2021January 30, 2021August 1, 2020
(in millions) Carrying
Value
Fair ValueCarrying
Value
Fair ValueCarrying
Value
Fair Value
Long-term debt:
Senior notes (Level 2)
$146.9 $152.7 $146.7 $145.1 $146.6 $107.2 
Term loans (Level 2)
  — — 99.5 100.0 
Total
$146.9 $152.7 $146.7 $145.1 $246.1 $207.2