10-K 1 a2066423z10-k.htm 10-K Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION
QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K

(Mark One)


/x/

Annual report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001.
/ / Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from                to               .

Commission file number 0-19655


TETRA TECH, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  95-4148514
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

670 N. Rosemead Blvd.
Pasadena, California

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

91107
(Zip Code)

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

 

(626) 351-4664

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

(Title of each class)
None

 

(Name of each exchange on which registered)
None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

(Title of Class)
Common Stock, $.01 par value

    Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes /x/ No / /

    Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. / /

    The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on December 11, 2001 was $941,155,063.

    The number of shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value, outstanding (the only class of common stock of the registrant outstanding) was 52,381,602 on December 11, 2001.

    Portions of registrant's Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001 are incorporated by reference in Part II of this report. Portions of registrant's Proxy Statement for its 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this report.





PART I


Item 1.  Business.

    Tetra Tech, Inc. is a leading provider of specialized management consulting and technical services in three principal business areas: resource management, infrastructure and communications. As a specialized management consultant, we assist our clients in defining problems and developing innovative and cost-effective solutions. Our management consulting services are complemented by our technical services. These technical services, which implement solutions, include research and development, applied science, engineering and architectural design, construction management, and operations and maintenance. Our clients include a diverse base of public and private organizations located in the United States and internationally.

    Since our initial public offering in December 1991, we have increased the size and scope of our business and have expanded our service offerings through a series of strategic acquisitions and internal growth. As of the end of our last fiscal year, we had more than 7,400 employees worldwide, primarily located in North America in more than 300 locations. In addition, we have established a presence in Asia, South America and Europe.

Industry Overview

    Due to increased competition, changing regulatory environments and rapid technological advancement, many organizations face new and complex challenges. Increasingly, these organizations are turning to professional services firms to assist them with addressing these challenges. Since each industry presents its own unique set of challenges, organizations often seek professional service firms with industry-specific expertise to analyze their problems and develop appropriate solutions. These solutions are then implemented by firms possessing the required engineering and technical service capabilities. Each of the following three business areas faces its own unique set of problems:

    Resource Management.  The world's natural resources, including water, air and soil, are interdependent, creating a delicate balance. Factors such as agricultural and residential development, commercial construction and industrialization often upset this balance. Public concern over environmental issues, especially water quality and availability, has been a driving force behind numerous laws and regulations that are designed to prevent environmental degradation and mandate restorative measures. To comply with environmental laws and regulations, respond to public pressure and attain operating efficiencies, public and private organizations are increasing their focus on resource management. Two areas particularly affected by these trends are water management and waste management.

    Water Management. Insufficient water supplies, concern over the cost, quality and availability of water and the need in many parts of the world to replace aging infrastructure used to capture, safeguard and distribute water are critical social and economic concerns. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), contamination of groundwater and surface water resulting from agricultural, residential, commercial and industrial development is one of the most serious environmental problems facing the United States. To alleviate these social and economic concerns, public and private organizations seek water management advice.

    Waste Management. In the past, many waste disposal practices caused significant environmental damage. Since the 1970s, more stringent controls on municipal and industrial waste have been established by governments around the world to protect the environment. Organizations seek waste management advice to comply with complex and evolving environmental regulations, to minimize the economic impact of waste generation and disposal, and to realize significant cost savings through increased operating efficiencies.

2


    Infrastructure.  Continued population and economic growth place significant strain on an overburdened infrastructure, thereby requiring additional development. This development includes water and wastewater treatment plants, roads, pipelines, communication and power networks, and educational, recreational and correctional facilities. Additionally, as existing facilities age, they require upgrading or replacement. Further, the trend toward privatization of infrastructure is causing public and private organizations that develop and maintain these facilities to evaluate their cost structures and establish more efficient systems. These factors drive the need for development and planning services that are often provided by consulting firms.

    Communications.  Technological change and government deregulation have spurred sweeping changes in the communications industry. Local and long-distance telephone companies, cable operators and wireless service providers are penetrating each other's markets and trying to establish a foothold in new markets created by new technologies. For example, traditional cable operators are installing advanced capabilities such as digital cable, cable modem, cable telephony and other high-speed data transmission services at the same time as wireless communications providers are seeking access to the Internet. At the same time, various service providers are consolidating in order to offer their subscribers a comprehensive set of services and to maintain dominance in their markets. As these trends continue, network service providers will increasingly turn to professional service firms for advice and assistance in planning, deploying and maintaining their communications networks.

    Increased pricing competition is forcing service providers to outsource their network development activities, which we provide. In addition, organizations within each of the above business areas face unique problems but often lack the internal resources and experience necessary to identify issues and evaluate possible solutions. As a result, many of these organizations rely on advice from outside management consultants. Most consulting companies provide limited front-end problem assessment and solution design and require clients to engage other engineering and technical services companies to implement recommended solutions. A significant opportunity exists for consulting companies that not only develop, but also implement, solutions. These professional service firms are often in the best position to help clients respond to the challenges they face.

The Tetra Tech Solution

    Tetra Tech provides the specialized management consulting services that assist clients in identifying industry-specific problems and defining appropriate solutions. We also provide the technical services required to implement these solutions. We believe that we are a leader in this market and that the following factors distinguish us from our competitors:

    Understanding Client Needs.  The ability to identify client needs is essential to strategic planning and execution. Even before the proposal process begins, we assist our clients by helping them define their business objectives and strategies and identify issues that are critical to their success. We strive to develop numerous contacts at various levels within our clients' organizations to help us identify the key issues from a variety of perspectives. We believe that our long history and exposure to a broad client base increase our awareness of the issues being confronted by organizations and thereby help us identify and solve our clients' problems.

    Capitalizing on Our Extensive Technical Experience.  Since our inception in 1966, we have provided innovative consulting and engineering services, historically focusing on cost-effective solutions to water resource management and environmental problems. We have been successful in leveraging this foundation of scientific and engineering capabilities into other areas, including infrastructure and communications. Our services are provided by a wide range of professionals including: archaeologists, biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, computer scientists, economists, electrical engineers, environmental engineers, environmental scientists, geologists, hydrogeologists, mechanical engineers, oceanographers and toxicologists. Because of the experience that we have gained from

3


thousands of completed projects, we often are able to apply proven solutions to client problems without the time-consuming process of developing new approaches.

    Offering a Full Range of Services.  Our depth of consulting and technical skills allows us to respond to client needs at every phase of a project, including initial planning, research and development, applied science, engineering and architectural design, and construction management. Once a particular project is completed, we are able to offer our clients additional value-added services such as operations and maintenance. Our expertise across industries and our broad service offerings enable us to be a single source provider to our clients.

    Providing Broad Geographic Coverage and Local Expertise.  We believe that proximity to our clients is instrumental to understanding their needs and delivering comprehensive services. We have significantly broadened our geographic presence in recent years through strategic acquisitions and internal growth. Our historical geographic base was primarily in the western portion of the United States. However, we currently have operations in more than 40 states. We have also increased our international presence, and we now have operations in Canada, Taiwan, Japan, India, Spain, Switzerland, Poland, the Czech Republic, the Philippines, Argentina, Chile, Brazil, Germany, France and Puerto Rico.

Company Strategy

    Our objective is to become the leading provider of specialized management consulting and technical services in our chosen business areas. To achieve this objective, we plan to continue the following primary strategies that we believe have been integral to our success:

    Identify and Expand Into New Business Areas.  We use our management consulting services and certain of our technical services as an entry point to evaluate and to enter new business areas. After our consulting practice is established in a new business area, we can expand our operations by offering additional technical services. For example, based on our provision of site acquisition services to communications industry participants, we identified infrastructure services within the communications industry as an appropriate area into which we could expand our operations.

    Expand Service Offerings and Geographic Presence Through Acquisitions.  We believe that acquisition opportunities exist that will allow us to continue our growth in selected business areas, broaden our service offerings and extend our geographic presence. We intend to make acquisitions that will enable us to consolidate our position in certain key business areas, such as communications, or further strengthen our position in our more established service offerings. We believe that our reputation and public company status make us an attractive partner and provide us with an advantage in pursuing acquisitions.

    Focus on Government Projects.  We intend to continue marketing to government organizations and bidding for government projects to stay on the leading edge of policy development. This experience helps us identify market opportunities and enhances our ability to serve other public and private clients. Additionally, government contracts provide more predictable revenues than private sector contracts.

    Manage Internal Financial Controls.  We take a disciplined approach to monitoring, managing and improving our return on investment in each of our business areas through the prompt billing and collection of accounts receivables, the negotiation of favorable contract terms and the management of our contract performance to prevent cost overruns. We believe that this approach to managing our financial affairs enables us to improve our cash position and thereby fund acquisitions and internal growth.

    Leverage Existing Client Base.  Some of our clients engage us to provide limited services. We believe that we can increase our revenue by selling additional services to our existing client base. For

4


example, we may be able to secure an operations and maintenance contract after working with a client on the design and construction phases of a facility. In addition, we believe that our ability to offer a full spectrum of services will allow us to grow our business and compete more effectively for larger projects.

Services

    We provide our clients with management consulting and technical services that focus on our clients' industry-specific needs. We offer these services individually or as part of our full service approach to problem solving. We are currently performing services under contracts ranging from small site investigations to large, complex infrastructure projects. Our service offerings include:

    Management consulting to assist clients in identifying and addressing operational and competitive problems they face within their industries;

    Research and development to formulate solutions to complex problems and develop advanced computer simulation techniques for modeling problems, ranging from microscopic to global;

    Applied science to assess all aspects of problems and develop practical and cost-effective solutions through the application of new technology and data interpretation;

    Engineering and architectural design to provide services from concept development and initial planning and design through project completion;

    Contract management to provide experienced and specialized construction managers to assist clients in minimizing the risk of cost overruns, delays and contractual conflicts; and

    Operations and maintenance to allow clients to outsource routine functions, permitting them to streamline contractor relationships and reduce operating costs.

Business Areas

    We provide our services in the following three principal business areas: resource management, infrastructure and communications.

Resource Management

    One of our major concentrations is water resource management, where we have a leadership position in understanding the interrelationships of water quality and human activities. We support high priority government programs for water quality improvement, environmental restoration, productive reuse of defense facilities and strategic environmental resource planning. We provide comprehensive services, including management consulting, research and development, applied science, engineering and architectural design, construction management, and operations and maintenance. Our service offerings in the resource management business area are focused on the following project areas:

        Surface Water Projects:  Public concern with the quality of rivers, lakes and streams, as well as coastal and marine waters and the ensuing legislative and regulatory response, are driving demand for our services. Over the past 34 years, we have developed a specialized set of technical skills that positions us to compete effectively for surface water and watershed management projects. We provide water resource services to government clients such as the EPA, the Department of Defense (DOD) and the Department of Energy (DOE), and to a broad base of private sector clients including those in the chemical, pharmaceutical, utility, aerospace and petroleum industries. We also provide surface water services to state and local agencies, particularly in the area of watershed management.

5


        Groundwater Projects:  Groundwater is the source of drinking water for approximately 50% of the U.S. population and accounts for approximately 25% of all water consumed for residential, industrial and agricultural purposes. Our activities in the groundwater field are diverse and typically include projects such as investigating and identifying sources of chemical contamination, examining the extent of contamination, analyzing the speed and direction of contamination migration, and designing and evaluating remedial alternatives. In addition, we conduct monitoring studies to assess the effectiveness of groundwater treatment and extraction wells.

        Waste Management Projects:  We currently provide a wide range of engineering and consulting services for hazardous waste contamination and remediation projects, from initial site assessment through design and implementation phases of remedial solutions. In addition, we perform risk assessments to determine the probability of adverse health effects that may result from exposure to toxic substances. We also provide waste minimization and pollution prevention services, and evaluate the effectiveness of innovative technologies and novel solutions to environmental problems.

        Regulatory Compliance Projects:  Our regulatory compliance services include advising our clients on the full spectrum of regulatory requirements under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, the National Environmental Policy Act and other environmental laws. Although we provide services to both public and private clients, our current emphasis is on providing regulatory compliance services to the Army, Navy and Air Force.

Infrastructure

    In the infrastructure area, we focus on the development of water resource projects, institutional facilities, commercial, recreational and leisure facilities and transportation projects. These facilities are an essential part of everyday life and also sustain economic activity and the quality of life. Our engineers, architects and planners work in partnership with our clients to provide adequate infrastructure development within their financial constraints. We assist clients with infrastructure projects by providing management consulting, engineering and architectural design, construction management, and operations and maintenance. Our service offerings in the infrastructure business area are focused on the following project areas:

        Water Resource Projects:  Our technical services are applied to all aspects of water quantity and quality management ranging from stormwater management through drainage and flood control projects to major water and wastewater treatment plants. Our experience includes planning, design and construction services for drinking water projects, the design of water treatment facilities and reservoirs, and the design of distribution systems including pipelines and pump stations. Our capabilities are also applied to specialized technical challenges associated with the design and construction of fisheries and hatcheries worldwide.

        Institutional Facilities Projects:  We provide architectural engineering and construction services for projects including site planning for land development, complete architectural design, interior design, civil/structural engineering and mechanical/electrical engineering of educational, healthcare and research facilities. We have completed engineering and construction projects for a wide range of clients with specialized needs such as security systems, training and audiovisual facilities, clean rooms, laboratories, medical facilities and emergency preparedness facilities.

        Commercial, Recreational and Leisure Facilities Projects:  We specialize in the planning and design of water-related entertainment and leisure facilities from theme park attractions to large marine aquariums. Our projects also include high-rise office buildings, museums, hotels, parks, visitor centers and marinas. We have designed complex aquatic life support systems and provided structural, civil and mechanical engineering and design of interpretive exhibits for a series of large

6


    aquarium projects worldwide. We have also designed integrated interior building systems for heat, light, security, and communications to improve building energy efficiency and cost effectiveness.

        Transportation Projects:  We provide architectural, engineering and construction services for transportation projects to improve public safety and mobility. Our projects include roadway improvements, commuter railway stations and expansion of airports. We have also completed numerous transportation projects including bridges, major highways, and repair, replacement and upgrading of older transportation facilities.

Communications

    In the communications area, we focus on the delivery of technical solutions necessary to build and manage communications infrastructure projects. Our capabilities support a wide range of technologies for rapid information transport including broadband and wireless communications. Our communications clients seek management consulting, applied science, engineering and architectural design, and construction management services. Our service offerings in the communications business area are focused on the following project areas:

        Network Feasibility Projects:  We apply our technical services to all aspects of assessing the feasibility of network systems development, expansion and upgrades for our clients. Our experience includes feasibility and remote site selection studies, cost-benefit modeling and market assessments. We also assist network service providers with technical requirements definition, sensitivity/risk analysis and key economic projections.

        Network Planning Projects:  We specialize in network planning, including short- and long-term network configuration and development planning. We develop outside plant designs, civil engineering and regulatory compliance assessment and support efforts. In addition, our projects have included employment analysis, staffing, logistics, planning, and materials provisioning and management.

        Network Engineering Projects:  We provide a full range of onsite and offsite premises engineering and support services for projects ranging from developing computer aided design workprints to field surveys. Our experience includes digital evaluation and terrain modeling, right-of-way permitting and site acquisition for wireless and broadband networks. Capabilities include radio frequency engineering for wireless networks and for fiber optic, coaxial cable, and hybrid coaxial fiber networks. Our engineers design each system to the specifications of the customer's transmission requirements including subscriber density, traffic demand, coverage area and cost-benefit decisions. In addition, we have performed outside and inside plant design projects for twisted pair, coaxial fiber optic and copper cable networks, and wireless networks.

        Network Development Projects:  We have performed both inside and outside plant projects for major network service providers and building owners using both broadband and wireless technologies. Our construction projects include urban and long-haul underground cable installation. We have also applied our capabilities to wireless cell site construction and aerial cable placement.

        The following table presents brief examples of specific current and recent projects in our three primary business areas:

Business Area

  Representative Projects
Resource Management     Currently providing engineering services for Bureau of Reclamation projects throughout the southwestern U.S. Providing water quality modeling, watershed management, public consensus building, and engineering solutions for water supplies.

7



 

 


 

Assisting the EPA Office of Wastewater Management in conducting the Clean Water Needs Survey to assess financial needs for constructing wastewater treatment plants and other clean water related infrastructure.

 

 


 

Currently providing relicensing services for nuclear power plants to extend the operational lifespans of these facilities.

 

 


 

Currently supporting environmental activities at Air Force installations worldwide to assist the Air Force in its environmental mission in the areas of restoration, pollution prevention, compliance, and conservation.

 

 


 

Currently providing program management and technical support for the Comprehensive Long-term Environmental Action Navy (CLEAN) program under several ten-year contracts. Activities include installation, restoration, base realignment and closure, and underground storage tank programs.

 

 


 

Currently serving as prime contractor for environmental operations and maintenance services at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California. Also providing operations and maintenance services for a wastewater treatment plant and a hazardous waste collection plant, and air monitoring and other services.

 

 


 

Currently serving as prime contractor for environmental and natural resource planning at U.S. Navy facilities in four western states. Conducted air emissions modeling, noise impact studies and biological resource surveys.

Infrastructure

 


 

Currently implementing production process engineering efficiencies. Upgraded information management systems and implemented ISO 14000-compliant environmental management systems for several Fortune 50 industrial customers.

 

 


 

Provided engineering design of building mechanical systems including air, power, and data distribution systems, for the world headquarters of a major corporation in Ohio.

 

 


 

Provided complex mechanical, electrical, and other building systems for the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao, Spain.

 

 


 

Provided multi-modal transportation planning and design for Boston, Massachusetts' first citywide transportation plan since the 1960s.

 

 


 

Completed the development and analysis of alternative flood control measures for the Los Angeles River.

 

 


 

Provided design and program management for Taiwan's National Museum of Marine Biology/Aquarium. Responsible for civil, structural and mechanical engineering and for aquatic life support systems. Designed water, wastewater and parking facilities.

 

 


 

Currently providing information technology, mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire protection engineering for Time Warner Center, a mixed-use project in New York City, New York.

 

 


 

Provided project management for upgrading residuals management facilities at four drinking water treatment plants in the Detroit, Michigan area that are among the largest such plants in the U.S.

8



 

 


 

Provided design for sections of a major six-lane toll road in Southern California that included new bridges, a tunnel and numerous large regional drainage facilities.

Communications

 


 

Currently supporting the upgrade of a wireless data network to enhance data transmission capabilities in the western U.S. markets.

 

 


 

Currently providing integrated voice, video, and data networks inside buildings for large corporations, colleges, and health care facilities nationwide.

 

 


 

Currently assisting a leading provider of broadband services with deployment of a high capacity broadband fiber optic network to provide high speed Internet connections, digital cable television, and broadband telephony in several western U.S. markets.

 

 


 

Provided turnkey network development services for broadband wireless networks in several European countries. Services included overall project management, site acquisition, radio frequency engineering, network deployment, and startup verification.

 

 


 

Provided site acquisition, obtained entitlements, supervised construction and installation of equipment, and provided program management services for a Canadian corporation.

 

 


 

Provided services to install over 730 miles of cable to provide telephony and expanded channel capacity to approximately 135,000 homes in the Seattle, Washington area.

 

 


 

Provided turnkey services including site selection and optimization, architectural and engineering design, site construction, and electronics installation and optimization for cell site development in the Los Angeles, California area for a major cellular communications carrier.

 

 


 

Providing network planning through network deployment services for approximately 1,200 sites for a wireless communications firm serving the western U.S. markets.

Clients

    We have developed a diverse client base of hundreds of clients both in the public and private sectors. During fiscal 2001, the DOD, EPA and DOE accounted for approximately 12.3%, 8.6% and 1.1%, respectively, of our net revenue. Although agencies of the Federal government are among our most significant clients, we often support multiple programs within a single Federal agency. Our private sector clients include companies in the chemical, mining, pharmaceutical, aerospace, automotive, petroleum, communications and utility industries. No private sector client accounted for more than 10% of our net revenue in fiscal 2001.

9


    The following table presents a list of representative clients in our three primary business areas:

 
  Representative Clients
Business Area

  Federal Government
  State, County and Local
  Private
Resource Management   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; U.S. Air Force; U.S. Navy; U.S. Army; U.S. Coast Guard; U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Department of Energy; U.S. Agency for International Development; Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; U.S. Postal Service   California Department of Health Services; Washington Department of Ecology; Prince Georges County, Maryland; Clarmont County, Ohio; City of San Jose, California; Salton Sea Authority   Lockheed Martin Corporation; Merck & Co.; General Electric Company; Exelon Corporation; Hewlett-Packard Corporation; Unocal Corporation

Infrastructure

 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; U.S. Bureau of Reclamation; U.S. Navy; Federal Emergency Management Agency; U.S. Department of the Interior

 

City of Tucson, Arizona; City of Breckenridge, Colorado; Washington Department of Transportation; City of Detroit, Michigan; City of Portland, Oregon; Texas Parks and Wildlife Department; King County, Washington; Delaware Department of Transportation; Delaware Department of Corrections; Boston Water and Sewer Commission

 

Boeing Corporation; E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company; Ford Motor Company; DaimlerChrysler Corporation AG; Disney Imagineering; Lowe's Company; Marriott Corporation; AOL-Time Warner, Inc.

Communications

 

 

 

 

 

AT&T Wireless Services; AT&T Broadband Services; Nextel Communications, Inc.; Verizon Communications; Motorola, Inc.; Sprint Communications Company; Lucent Technologies, Inc.; Ericsson

10


Contracts

    We enter into various types of contracts with our clients, including fixed-price, fixed-rate time and materials, cost-reimbursement plus fixed fee and cost-reimbursement plus fixed and award fee contracts. In fiscal 2001, 44.6%, 33.8% and 21.6% of our net revenue was derived from fixed-price, fixed-rate time and materials, and cost-reimbursement plus fixed fee and award fee contracts, respectively. Under a fixed-price contract, the client agrees to pay a specified price for our performance of the entire contract. Fixed-price contracts carry certain inherent risks, including risks of losses from underestimating costs, delays in project completion, problems with new technologies and economic and other changes that may occur over the contract period. Consequently, the profitability of fixed-price contracts may vary substantially. The amount of the fee received for a cost-reimbursement and award fee contract partially depends upon the government's discretionary periodic assessment of our performance on that contract. Our various clients determine which type of contract we enter into for a particular engagement.

    Some contracts made with the Federal government are subject to annual approval of funding. Federal government agencies may impose spending restrictions that limit the continued funding of our existing contracts with the Federal government and may limit our ability to obtain additional contracts. These limitations, if significant, could have a material adverse effect on us. To date, spending limitations have not had a significant effect on us. All contracts made with the Federal government may be terminated by the government at any time, with or without cause.

    Federal government agencies have formal policies against continuing or awarding contracts that would create actual or potential conflicts of interest with other activities of a contractor. These policies may prevent us in certain cases from bidding for or performing contracts resulting from or relating to certain work we have performed for the government. In addition, services performed for a private client may create conflicts of interest that preclude or limit our ability to obtain work for another private organization. We attempt to identify actual or potential conflicts of interest and to minimize the possibility that such conflicts would affect our work under current contracts or our ability to compete for future contracts. We have, on occasion, declined to bid on a project because of an existing potential conflict of interest. However, we have not experienced disqualification during a bidding or award negotiation process by any government or private client as a result of a conflict of interest.

    Our contracts with the Federal government are subject to audit by the government, primarily by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA). The DCAA generally seeks to (1) identify and evaluate all activities which either contribute to, or have an impact on, proposed or incurred costs of government contracts; (2) evaluate the contractor's policies, procedures, controls and performance; and (3) prevent or avoid wasteful, careless and inefficient production or service. To accomplish this, the DCAA examines our internal control systems, management policies and financial capability, evaluates the accuracy, reliability and reasonableness of our cost representations and records, and assesses compliance by us with Cost Accounting Standards and defective-pricing clauses found within the Federal Acquisition Regulations. The DCAA also performs the annual review of our overhead rates and assists in the establishment of our final rates. This review focuses on the allowability of cost items and the applicability of Cost Accounting Standards. The DCAA also audits cost-based contracts, including the close-out of those contracts.

    The DCAA also reviews all types of Federal proposals, including those of award, administration, modification and repricing. Factors considered are our cost accounting system, estimating methods and procedures, and specific proposal requirements. Operational audits are also performed by the DCAA. A review of our operations at every major organizational level that has a significant effect on the performance of future government contracts is also conducted during the proposal review period.

    During the course of its audit, the DCAA may disallow costs if it determines that we accounted for such costs in a manner inconsistent with Cost Accounting Standards. Under a government contract,

11


only those costs that are reasonable, allocable and allowable are recoverable. A disallowance of costs by the DCAA could have a material adverse effect on us.

    Due to the severity of the legal remedies available to the government, including the required payment of damages and/or penalties, criminal and civil sanctions, and debarment, we maintain controls to avoid the occurrence of fraud and other unlawful activity. In addition, we maintain preventative audit programs to ensure appropriate control systems and mitigate control weaknesses.

    We provide our services under contracts, purchase orders or retainer letters. Our policy provides that, where possible, all contracts will be in writing. We bill all of our clients periodically based on costs incurred, on either an hourly-fee basis or on a percentage of completion basis, as the project progresses. Generally, our contracts do not require that we provide performance bonds. A performance bond, issued by a surety company, guarantees the contractor's performance under the contract. If the contractor defaults under the contract, the surety will, in its discretion, step in to finish the job or pay the client the amount of the bond. If the contractor does not have a performance bond and defaults in the performance of a contract, the contractor is responsible for all damages resulting from the breach of contract. These damages include the cost of completion, together with possible consequential damages such as lost profits. To date, we have not incurred material damages beyond the coverage of any performance bond.

    Most of our agreements permit termination without cause by the clients upon payment of fees and expenses through the date of the termination.

Marketing

    We utilize both a centralized corporate marketing department and local marketing groups within each of our operating units. Our corporate marketing department assists management in establishing our business plan, our target markets and an overall marketing strategy. The corporate marketing department also identifies and tracks the development of large Federal programs, positions us for new business areas, selects appropriate partners, if any, for new projects and assists in the bid process for new projects. We market throughout the organizations we target, focusing primarily on senior representatives in government organizations and senior management in private companies. In addition, the corporate marketing department supports marketing activities firm-wide by coordinating corporate promotional and professional activities, including appearances at trade shows, direct mailings, telemarketing and public relations.

    Most marketing activities are performed through our local offices. We believe that these offices have a greater understanding of local issues, laws and regulations and, therefore, can better target their marketing activities. These marketing activities are coordinated by full time marketing staff located in certain of our offices. These activities include meetings with potential clients and state, county and municipal regulators, presentations to civic and professional organizations and seminars on current technical topics.

Competition

    The market for our services is highly competitive. We compete with many other firms, ranging from small local firms to large national firms that may have greater financial and marketing resources. We perform a broad spectrum of engineering and consulting services across the resource management, infrastructure and communications business areas. Services within these business areas are provided to a client base which includes Federal agencies, such as the DOD, the DOE, the Department of the Interior, the EPA and the U.S. Postal Service, state and local agencies, and the private sector. Our competition varies and is a function of the business areas in which, and client sectors for which, we perform our services. The range of competitors for any one procurement can vary from one to 100 firms, depending upon the relative value of the project, the financial terms and risks associated with the

12


work, and any restrictions placed upon competition by the client. Historically, clients have chosen among competing firms based primarily on the quality and timeliness of the firm's service. However, we believe that price has become an increasingly important competitive factor. We believe that if this trend continues it could have a material adverse effect on our operating margins and profitability.

    We believe that our principal competitors include, in alphabetical order, Black & Veatch LLP; Brown & Caldwell; Camp, Dresser & McKee Inc.; Castle Tower Corporation; CH2M Hill Companies Ltd.; Earth Tech, Inc.; IT Group, Inc.; Mastec, Inc.; Montgomery Watson Harza; o2Wireless Solutions, Inc.; Quanta Services, Inc.; Roy F. Weston, Inc.; Science Applications International Corporation; URS Corporation and Wireless Facilities, Inc.

Backlog

    At September 30, 2001, our gross revenue backlog was approximately $634.7 million, compared to $632.9 million at October 1, 2000. We include in gross revenue backlog only those contracts for which funding has been provided and work authorizations have been received. We estimate that approximately $536.5 million of the gross revenue backlog at September 30, 2001 will be recognized during fiscal 2002. No assurance can be given that all amounts included in backlog will ultimately be realized, even if evidenced by written contracts. For example, certain of our contracts with the Federal government and other clients are terminable at will. If any of these clients terminate their contracts prior to completion, we may not be able to recognize that revenue.

Environmental Legislation

    Our clients have become subject to an increasing number of frequently overlapping Federal, state and local laws concerned with the protection of the environment, as well as regulations promulgated by administrative agencies pursuant to these laws. We provide services with respect to Federal environmental laws and regulations including: the Clean Water Act; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA); the National Environmental Policy Act; the Safe Drinking Water Act; and other laws.

Potential Liability and Insurance

    Our business activities could expose us to potential liability under various environmental laws such as CERCLA, or under workplace health and safety regulations. In addition, we occasionally contractually assume liability under indemnification agreements. We cannot predict the magnitude of such potential liabilities.

    We currently maintain comprehensive general liability, umbrella and professional and pollution liability insurance policies. The professional and pollution liability policies are "claims made" policies. This means that only claims made during the term of the policy are covered. If we terminate our professional and pollution liability policies and do not obtain retroactive coverage, we would be uninsured for claims made after termination even if based on events or acts that occurred during the term of the policy.

    We obtain insurance coverage through a broker who is experienced in the professional liability field. The broker, together with our risk manager, periodically review the adequacy of our insurance programs. However, because there are various exclusions and retentions under our insurance policies, there can be no assurance that all potential liabilities will be covered by our insurance. Further, in the event we expand our services into new markets, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain the types of insurance coverages for such activities or, if insurance is obtained, the dollar amount of any liabilities incurred could exceed our insurance coverage limits.

13


    We evaluate the risk associated with uninsured claims. If we determine that an uninsured claim has potential liability, we establish an appropriate reserve. A reserve is not established if we determine that the claim has no merit. Our historic levels of insurance coverage and reserves have been adequate. However, a partially or completely uninsured claim, if successful and of significant magnitude, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Employees

    At September 30, 2001, we had approximately 7,400 total employees or approximately 6,820 full-time equivalent employees. Our professional staff includes archaeologists, biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, computer scientists, economists, electrical engineers, environmental engineers, environmental scientists, geologists, hydrogeologists, mechanical engineers, oceanographers, toxicologists and project managers. Our ability to retain and expand our staff of qualified professionals will be an important factor in determining our future growth and success. We currently have 208 employees represented by seven labor organizations. Management considers its relations with our employees to be good.

    In addition, we supplement our consultants on certain engagements with independent contractors. We believe that the practice of retaining independent contractors on a per engagement basis provides us with significant flexibility in adjusting professional personnel levels in response to changes in demand for our services.

14



RISK FACTORS

    Some of the information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. You can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as "may," "will," "expect," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate" and "continue" or similar words. You should read statements that contain these words carefully because they: (1) discuss our future expectations; (2) contain projections of our future operating results or of our future financial condition; or (3) state other "forward-looking" information. We believe it is important to communicate our expectations to our investors. There may be events in the future, however, that we are not accurately able to predict or over which we have no control. The risk factors listed in this section, as well as any cautionary language in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, provide examples of risks, uncertainties and events that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations we describe in our forward-looking statements. You should be aware that the occurrence of any of the events described in these risk factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and that upon the occurrence of any of these events, the trading price of our common stock could decline.

There are risks associated with our acquisition strategy that could adversely impact our business and operating results

    A significant part of our growth strategy is to acquire other companies that complement our lines of business or that broaden our geographic presence. During fiscal 2001, we purchased 11 companies in ten separate transactions. We expect to continue to acquire companies as an element of our growth strategy. Acquisitions involve certain risks that could cause our actual growth or operating results to differ from our expectations or the expectations of securities analysts. For example:

    We may not be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates or to acquire additional companies on favorable terms;

    We compete with others to acquire companies. Competition may increase and may result in decreased availability of or increased price for suitable acquisition candidates;

    We may not be able to obtain the necessary financing, on favorable terms or at all, to finance any of our potential acquisitions;

    We may ultimately fail to consummate an acquisition even if we announce that we plan to acquire a company;

    We may not be able to retain key employees of an acquired company which could negatively impact these companies' future performance;

    We may fail to successfully integrate or manage these acquired companies due to differences in business backgrounds or corporate cultures;

    These acquired companies may not perform as we expect;

    We may find it difficult to provide a consistent quality of service across our geographically diverse operations; and

    If we fail to successfully integrate any acquired company, our reputation could be damaged. This could make it more difficult to market our services or to acquire additional companies in the future.

In addition, our acquisition strategy may divert management's attention away from our primary service offerings, result in the loss of key clients or personnel and expose us to unanticipated liabilities.

    Finally, acquired companies that derive a significant portion of their revenues from the Federal government and that do not follow the same cost accounting policies and billing procedures as we do

15


may be subject to larger cost disallowances for greater periods than we typically encounter. If we fail to determine the existence of unallowable costs and establish appropriate reserves in advance of an acquisition, we may be exposed to material unanticipated liabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly, which could have a negative effect on the price of our common stock

    Our quarterly revenues, expenses and operating results may fluctuate significantly because of a number of factors, including:

    The seasonality of the spending cycle of our public sector clients and the spending patterns of our private sector clients;

    Employee hiring and utilization rates;

    The number and significance of client engagements commenced and completed during a quarter;

    Credit worthiness and solvency of clients;

    The ability of our clients to terminate engagements without penalties;

    Delays incurred in connection with an engagement;

    The size and scope of engagements;

    The timing of expenses incurred for corporate initiatives;

    The timing and size of the return on investment capital; and

    General economic or political conditions.

    Variations in any of these factors could cause significant fluctuations in our operating results from quarter to quarter and could result in net losses.

The value of our common stock could continue to be volatile

    The trading price of our common stock has fluctuated widely. In addition, in recent years the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. The overall market and the price of our common stock may continue to fluctuate greatly. The trading price of our common stock may be significantly affected by various factors, including:

    Quarter to quarter variations in our operating results;

    Changes in environmental legislation;

    Changes in investors' and analysts' perception of the business risks and conditions of our business;

    Investors' and analysts' assessment of third party reports or conclusions;

    Broader market fluctuations; and

    General economic or political conditions.

If we are not able to successfully manage our growth strategy, our business and results of operations may be adversely affected

    We are growing rapidly. Our growth presents numerous managerial, administrative, operational and other challenges. Our ability to manage the growth of our operations will require us to continue to improve our operational, financial and human resource management information systems and our other

16


internal systems and controls. In addition, our growth will increase our need to attract, develop, motivate and retain both our management and professional employees. The inability of our management to manage our growth effectively or the inability of our employees to achieve anticipated performance or utilization levels could have a material adverse effect on our business.

The loss of key personnel or our inability to attract and retain qualified personnel could significantly disrupt our business

    We depend upon the efforts and skills of our executive officers, senior managers and consultants. With limited exceptions, we do not have employment agreements with any of these individuals. The loss of the services of any of these key personnel could adversely affect our business. Although we have obtained non-compete agreements from certain principals and stockholders of companies we have acquired, we generally do not have non-compete or employment agreements with key employees who were not once equity holders of these companies. We do not maintain key-man life insurance policies on any of our executive officers or senior managers.

    Our future growth and success depends on our ability to attract and retain qualified scientists and engineers. The market for these professionals is competitive and we may not be able to attract and retain such professionals.

Changes in existing laws and regulations could reduce the demand for our services

    A significant amount of our resource management business is generated either directly or indirectly as a result of existing Federal and state governmental laws, regulations and programs. Any changes in these laws or regulations that reduce funding or affect the sponsorship of these programs could reduce the demand for our services and could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our revenue from agencies of the Federal government is concentrated, and a reduction in spending by these agencies could adversely affect our business and operating results

    Agencies of the Federal government are among our most significant clients. During fiscal 2001, approximately 24.5% of our net revenue was derived from Federal agencies, of which 12.3% was derived from the Department of Defense (DOD), 8.6% from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1.1% from the Department of Energy (DOE) and 2.5% from various other Federal agencies. Some contracts with Federal government agencies require annual funding approval and may be terminated at their discretion. A reduction in spending by Federal government agencies could limit the continued funding of our existing contracts with them and could limit our ability to obtain additional contracts. These limitations, if significant, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our revenue from commercial clients is significant, and the credit risks associated with certain of these clients could adversely affect our operating results

    During fiscal 2001, approximately 54.2% of our net revenue was derived from commercial clients. We rely upon the financial stability and credit worthiness of these clients. To the extent the credit quality of these clients deteriorates or these clients seek bankruptcy protection, our ability to collect our receivables, and ultimately our operating results, may be adversely affected.

    On July 2, 2001, our client, Metricom, Inc. ("Metricom"), filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. At the time of filing, we had outstanding accounts receivable with Metricom in the aggregate amount of $38.3 million. In the third quarter of fiscal 2001, we took a charge in that amount to provide a reserve for Metricom.

17


Our contracts with governmental agencies are subject to audit, which could result in the disallowance of certain costs

    Contracts with the Federal government and other governmental agencies are subject to audit. Most of these audits are conducted by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), which reviews our overhead rates, operating systems and cost proposals. The DCAA may disallow costs if it determines that we accounted for these costs incorrectly or in a manner inconsistent with Cost Accounting Standards. A disallowance of costs by the DCAA, or other governmental auditors, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our business and operating results could be adversely affected by losses under fixed-price contracts or termination of contracts at the client's discretion

    We contract with Federal and state governments as well as with the commercial sector. These contracts are often subject to termination at the discretion of the client with or without cause. Additionally, we enter into various types of contracts with our clients, including fixed-price contracts. During fiscal 2001, approximately 44.6% of our net revenue was derived from fixed-price contracts. Fixed-price contracts protect clients and expose us to a number of risks. These risks include underestimation of costs, problems with new technologies, unforeseen costs or difficulties, delays beyond our control and economic and other changes that may occur during the contract period. Losses under fixed-price contracts or termination of contracts at the discretion of the client could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our inability to find qualified subcontractors could adversely affect the quality of our service and our ability to perform under certain contracts

    Under some of our contracts, we depend on the efforts and skills of subcontractors for the performance of certain tasks. Reliance on subcontractors varies from project to project. During fiscal 2001, subcontractor costs comprised 25.0% of our gross revenue. The absence of qualified subcontractors with whom we have a satisfactory relationship could adversely affect the quality of our service and our ability to perform under some of our contracts.

Our industry is highly competitive and we may be unable to compete effectively

    We provide specialized management consulting and technical services to a broad range of public and private sector clients. The market for our services is highly competitive and we compete with many other firms. These firms range from small regional firms to large national firms which have greater financial and marketing resources than ours.

    We focus primarily on the resource management, infrastructure and communications business areas. We provide services to our clients which include Federal, state and local agencies, and organizations in the private sector.

    We compete for projects and engagements with a number of competitors which can vary from one to 100 firms. Historically, clients have chosen among competing firms based on the quality and timeliness of the firm's service. We believe, however, that price has become an increasingly important factor.

    We believe that our principal competitors include, in alphabetical order, Black & Veatch LLP; Brown & Caldwell; Camp, Dresser & McKee Inc.; Castle Tower Corporation; CH2M Hill Companies Ltd.; Earth Tech, Inc.; IT Group, Inc.; Mastec, Inc.; Montgomery Watson Harza; o2 Wireless Solutions, Inc.; Quanta Services, Inc.; Roy F. Weston, Inc.; Science Applications International Corporation; URS Corporation and Wireless Facilities, Inc.

18


Our services expose us to significant risks of liability and our insurance policies may not provide adequate coverage

    Our services involve significant risks of professional and other liabilities which may substantially exceed the fees we derive from our services. Our business activities could expose us to potential liability under various environmental laws such as the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). In addition, we sometimes contractually assume liability under indemnification agreements. We cannot predict the magnitude of such potential liabilities.

    We currently maintain comprehensive general liability, umbrella professional and pollution liability insurance policies. We believe that our insurance policies are adequate for our business operations. The professional and pollution liability policies are "claims made" policies. Only claims made during the term of the policy are covered. Should we terminate our professional and pollution liability policies and fail to obtain retroactive coverage, we would be uninsured for claims made after termination even if the claims were based on events or acts that occurred during the term of the policy. Additionally, our insurance policies may not protect us against potential liability due to various exclusions and retentions. In addition, if we expand into new markets, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain insurance coverage for the new activities or, if insurance is obtained, the dollar amount of any liabilities incurred could exceed our insurance coverage limits. Partially or completely uninsured claims, if successful and of significant magnitude, could have a material adverse affect on our business.

We may be precluded from providing certain services due to conflict of interest issues

    Many of our clients are concerned about potential or actual conflicts of interest in retaining management consultants. Federal government agencies have formal policies against continuing or awarding contracts that would create actual or potential conflicts of interest with other activities of a contractor. These policies, among other things, may prevent us from bidding for or performing contracts resulting from or relating to certain work we have performed for the government. In addition, services performed for a private client may create a conflict of interest that precludes or limits our ability to obtain work from other public or private organizations. We have, on occasion, declined to bid on projects because of these conflicts of interest issues.

Our international operations expose us to risks such as foreign currency fluctuations

    During fiscal 2001, approximately 3.2% of our net revenue was derived from the international marketplace. Some contracts with our international clients are denominated in foreign currencies. As such, these contracts contain inherent risks including foreign currency exchange risk and the risk associated with expatriating funds from foreign countries. If our international revenue increases, our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations may also increase. We periodically enter into forward exchange contracts to address foreign currency fluctuations.


Item 2.  Properties.

    Our corporate headquarters facilities are located in Pasadena, California. These facilities contain approximately 47,600 square feet of office space. In addition, we lease office space in approximately 310 locations in the United States. In total, our facilities contain approximately 1.8 million square feet of office space and are subject to leases which expire beyond the year 2002. We also rent additional office space on a month-to-month basis.

    We believe that our existing facilities are adequate to meet current requirements and that suitable additional or substitute space will be available as needed to accommodate any expansion of operations and for additional offices.

19



Item 3.  Legal Proceedings.

    We are subject to certain claims and lawsuits typically filed against the engineering and consulting professions, primarily alleging professional errors or omissions. We carry professional liability insurance, subject to certain deductibles and policy limits against such claims. Management is of the opinion that the resolution of these claims will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations. See "Item 1. Business—Potential Liability and Insurance."


Item 4.  Submissions of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

    In June 2001, we distributed a Consent Solicitation Statement to our stockholders of record on May 25, 2001 in connection with the solicitation of stockholder consents by our board of directors, in lieu of a meeting of stockholders, with respect to the approval of our 2001 Stock Plan. In August 2001, we were advised by our transfer agent, U.S. Stock Transfer Corporation, that 13,048,779 shares of common stock had been voted to approve the plan, 18,778,485 shares had been voted against the plan and 126,383 shares had abstained. As a result, the plan was not approved and terminated by its terms.

20



PART II

    The information required by Items 5 through 8 of this report is set forth on pages 19 through 42 of our Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001. Such information is incorporated in this report and made a part hereof by reference. Item 9 is not applicable.


PART III

    The information required by Items 10 through 13 of this report is set forth in the sections entitled "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management," "Election of Directors," and "Executive Compensation" in our Proxy Statement for our 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Such information is incorporated in this report and made a part hereof by reference.


PART IV

Item 14.  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K.

(a)   1. and 2.   Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules.
        The Financial Statements filed as part of this report are listed in the accompanying index at page 25.
    3.   Exhibits.
    3.1   Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 1995).
    3.2   Bylaws of the Company as amended to date (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 33-43723).
    3.3   Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 4, 1998).
    3.4   Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as amended for the fiscal quarter ended April 1, 2001).
    10.1   Credit Agreement dated as of March 17, 2000 among the Company and the financial institutions named therein (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 2, 2000).
    10.2   First Amendment dated as of April 9, 2001 to the Credit Agreement dated as of March 17, 2000 among the Company and the financial institutions named therein (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 1, 2001).
    10.3   Second Amendment dated as of August 13, 2001 to the Credit Agreement dated as of March 17, 2000 among the Company and the financial institutions named therein.
    10.4   Note Purchase Agreement dated as of May 15, 2001 among the Company and the purchasers named therein (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 1, 2001).
    10.5   First Amendment dated as of September 30, 2001 to the Note Purchase Agreement dated as of May 15, 2001 among the Company and the purchasers named therein.

21


    10.6   1989 Stock Option Plan dated as of February 1, 1989 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 33-43723).
    10.7   Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement executed by the Company and certain individuals in connection with the Company's 1989 Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 33-43723).
    10.8   Executive Medical Reimbursement Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 33-43723).
    10.9   1992 Incentive Stock Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 3, 1993).
    10.10   Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement used by the Company in connection with the Company's 1992 Incentive Stock Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 3, 1993).
    10.11   1992 Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 3, 1993).
    10.12   Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement used by the Company in connection with the Company's 1992 Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 3, 1993).
    10.13   1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 1994).
    10.14   Form of Stock Purchase Agreement used by the Company in connection with the Company's 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 1994).
    10.15   2002 Stock Option Plan.
    10.16   Form of Incentive Option Agreement used by the Company in connection with the 2002 Stock Option Plan.
    10.17   Registration Rights Agreement dated as of March 31, 2000 among the Company and the parties listed on Schedule A attached thereto (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2000).
    10.18   Registration Rights Agreement dated as of May 3, 2000 among the Company and the parties listed on Schedule A attached thereto (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2000).
    10.19   Registration Rights Agreement dated as of May 17, 2000 among the Company and the parties listed on Schedule A attached thereto (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2000).

22


    10.20   Registration Rights Agreement dated as of May 24, 2000 among the Company and the parties listed on Schedule A attached thereto (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2000).
    10.21   Registration Rights Agreement dated as of December 21, 2000 among the Company and the parties listed on Schedule A attached thereto (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2000).
    10.22   Registration Rights Agreement dated as of March 2, 2001 among the Company and the parties listed on Schedule A attached thereto (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as amended for fiscal quarter ended April 1, 2001).
    10.23   Registration Rights Agreement dated as of March 30, 2001 among the Company and the parties listed on Schedule A attached thereto (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as amended for fiscal quarter ended April 1, 2001).
    10.24   Registration Rights Agreement dated as of May 21, 2001 among the Company and the parties listed on Schedule A attached thereto (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for fiscal quarter ended July 1, 2001).
    10.25   Registration Rights Agreement dated as of May 25, 2001 among the Company and the parties listed on Schedule A attached thereto (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for fiscal quarter ended July 1, 2001).
    10.26   Registration Rights Agreement dated as of June 1, 2001 among the Company and the parties listed on Schedule A attached thereto (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for fiscal quarter ended July 1, 2001).
    10.27   Registration Rights Agreement dated as of September 26, 2001 among the Company and the parties listed on Schedule A attached thereto.
    10.28   Registration Rights Agreement dated as of September 26, 2001 among the Company and the parties listed on Schedule A attached thereto.
    13.   Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001, portions of which are incorporated by reference in this report as set forth in Part II hereof. With the exception of these portions, such Annual Report is not deemed filed as part of this report.
    21.   Subsidiaries of the Company.
    23.   Independent Auditors' Consent.
(b)
Reports on Form 8-K

    On July 6, 2001, we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a Current Report on Form 8-K. The items reported in the Form 8-K were Item 5 (Other Events) and Item 7 (Financial Statements and Exhibits), which related to the press release dated July 2, 2001, titled "Tetra Tech Updates Guidance for Third Quarter Based on Charge for Metricom Work." The date of the Form 8-K was July 2, 2001.

    On July 19, 2001, we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a Current Report on Form 8-K. The items reported in the Form 8-K were Item 5 (Other Events) and Item 7 (Financial Statements and Exhibits), which related to the press release dated July 18, 2001, titled "Tetra Tech Reports Third Quarter 2001 Results." The date of the Form 8-K was July 18, 2001.

23



SIGNATURES

    Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

    TETRA TECH, INC.

Date: December 28, 2001

 

By:

 

/s/ 
LI-SAN HWANG   
Li-San Hwang, Chairman of the Board of
Directors and Chief Executive Officer

    Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature
  Title
  Date

 

 

 

 

 
/s/ LI-SAN HWANG   
Li-San Hwang
  Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
  December 28, 2001

/s/ 
JAMES M. JASKA   
James M. Jaska

 

President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

December 28, 2001

/s/ 
DANIEL A. WHALEN   
Daniel A. Whalen

 

Director

 

December 27, 2001

/s/ 
J. CHRISTOPHER LEWIS   
J. Christopher Lewis

 

Director

 

December 27, 2001

/s/ 
PATRICK C. HADEN   
Patrick C. Haden

 

Director

 

December 27, 2001

/s/ 
JAMES J. SHELTON   
James J. Shelton

 

Director

 

December 27, 2001

24



INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    The consolidated financial statements, together with the Notes thereto and report thereon of Deloitte & Touche LLP dated November 14, 2001, appearing on pages 28 through 43 of the accompanying 2001 Annual Report to Stockholders, are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. With the exception of the aforementioned information and Part II information set forth on pages 19 through 27, the 2001 Annual Report to Stockholders is not to be deemed filed as part of this report.

Financial Statements Schedules

 
  Page No.
Independent Auditors' Report   26

Financial Statement Schedule

 

 
Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves   27

25



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

Tetra Tech, Inc.:

    We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Tetra Tech, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of September 30, 2001 and October 1, 2000, and for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2001, and have issued our report thereon dated November 14, 2001; such financial statements and report are included in your 2001 Annual Report to Stockholders and are incorporated herein by reference. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Tetra Tech, Inc. and its subsidiaries, listed in Item 14. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Los Angeles, California
November 14, 2001

26



TETRA TECH, INC.

SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES

For the Fiscal Years Ended
October 3, 1999, October 1, 2000 and September 30, 2001

 
  Balance at
Beginning of
Period

  Additions
through
Acquisitions

  Charges to
Costs and
Earnings

  Deductions,
Net of
Recoveries

  Balance at
End of Period

Fiscal year ended October 3, 1999                              
Allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable   $ 12,685,000   $ 747,000   $ (667,000 ) $ (4,236,000 ) $ 8,529,000

Fiscal year ended October 1, 2000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable   $ 8,529,000   $ 391,000   $ 3,056,000   $ (4,903,000 ) $ 7,073,000

Fiscal year ended September 30, 2001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable   $ 7,073,000   $ 1,442,000   $ 44,025,000   $ (6,643,000 ) $ 45,897,000

27




QuickLinks

PART I
RISK FACTORS
PART II
PART III
PART IV
SIGNATURES
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
TETRA TECH, INC. SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES For the Fiscal Years Ended October 3, 1999, October 1, 2000 and September 30, 2001