UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-35006
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 93-0979187 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
11500 South Eastern Avenue, Suite 240 Henderson, Nevada |
89052 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(702) 835-6300
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer | x | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of November 14, 2013, 63,879,714 shares of the registrants common stock were outstanding.
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013
Page | ||||||
PART I | FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |||||
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) | |||||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (Restated) |
3 | |||||
4 | ||||||
5 | ||||||
6 | ||||||
7 | ||||||
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
32 | ||||
ITEM 3. | 40 | |||||
ITEM 4. | 40 | |||||
PART II | ||||||
ITEM 1. | 42 | |||||
ITEM 1A. | 43 | |||||
ITEM 6. | 44 | |||||
45 |
Item 2 through 5 of Part II have been omitted because they are not applicable with respect to the current reporting period.
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share and par value amounts)
(Unaudited)
September 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 (Restated see Note 2) |
|||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current Assets: |
||||||||
Cash and equivalents |
$ | 71,974 | $ | 139,698 | ||||
Marketable securities |
3,312 | 3,310 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $254 and $228, respectively |
54,923 | 92,169 | ||||||
Inventories, net |
14,642 | 14,478 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
4,852 | 2,745 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset |
3,824 | 12,473 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
153,527 | 264,873 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
1,741 | 2,548 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
236,626 | 200,234 | ||||||
Goodwill |
7,900 | 7,279 | ||||||
Other assets |
8,614 | 6,745 | ||||||
Deferred tax asset |
45,325 | 23,276 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 453,733 | $ | 504,955 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable and other accrued obligations |
$ | 71,320 | $ | 93,811 | ||||
Accrued compensation and related expenses |
7,771 | 4,835 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
1,068 | 12,300 | ||||||
Deferred development costs |
3,251 | 856 | ||||||
Accrued drug development costs |
10,580 | 11,441 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
93,990 | 123,243 | ||||||
Deferred revenueless current portion |
4,140 | 2,937 | ||||||
Deferred development costs, less current portion |
15,400 | 11,377 | ||||||
Deferred payment contingency |
| 2,287 | ||||||
Other long-term obligations |
12,839 | 1,430 | ||||||
Revolving line of credit |
25,000 | 75,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
151,369 | 216,274 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized: |
||||||||
Series B junior participating preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 1,500,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Series E convertible voting preferred stock, $0.001 par value and $10,000 stated value; 2,000 shares authorized; 20 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively (aggregate liquidation value of $240) |
123 | 123 | ||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 175,000,000 shares authorized; 63,825,102 and 60,026,675 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively |
64 | 60 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
499,783 | 463,710 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
635 | 273 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(198,241 | ) | (175,485 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total stockholders equity |
302,364 | 288,681 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 453,733 | $ | 504,955 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 (Restated see Note 2) |
2013 | 2012 (Restated see Note 2) |
|||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Product sales, net |
$ | 41,439 | $ | 65,871 | $ | 102,998 | $ | 188,282 | ||||||||
License fees |
1,000 | 3,171 | 11,340 | 9,321 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 42,439 | $ | 69,042 | $ | 114,338 | $ | 197,603 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of product sales (excludes amortization and impairment of intangible assets) |
8,221 | 11,155 | 22,271 | 31,402 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
29,003 | 22,925 | 73,601 | 64,230 | ||||||||||||
Research and development |
13,567 | 10,019 | 35,910 | 27,838 | ||||||||||||
Amortization and impairment of intangible assets |
4,935 | 1,834 | 14,829 | 4,400 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating expenses |
55,726 | 45,933 | 146,611 | 127,870 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
(Loss) income from operations |
(13,287 | ) | 23,109 | (32,273 | ) | 69,733 | ||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
742 | 293 | (738 | ) | (1,076 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
(Loss) income before income taxes |
(12,545 | ) | 23,402 | (33,011 | ) | 68,657 | ||||||||||
Benefit (provision) for income taxes |
4,733 | (1,878 | ) | 10,249 | 18,054 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (7,812 | ) | $ | 21,524 | $ | (22,762 | ) | $ | 86,711 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net (loss) income per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.13 | ) | $ | 0.37 | $ | (0.38 | ) | $ | 1.48 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.13 | ) | $ | 0.33 | $ | (0.38 | ) | $ | 1.34 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
61,903,242 | 58,912,031 | 60,013,842 | 58,564,176 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted |
61,903,242 | 65,139,606 | 60,013,842 | 64,880,786 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 (Restated see Note 2) |
2013 | 2012 (Restated see Note 2) |
|||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (7,812 | ) | $ | 21,524 | $ | (22,762 | ) | $ | 86,711 | ||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax: |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities |
(293 | ) | 1,267 | 674 | 966 | |||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
(122 | ) | (60 | ) | 49 | (57 | ) | |||||||||
Income tax |
| | (361 | ) | | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net |
(415 | ) | 1,207 | (362 | ) | 909 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total comprehensive (loss) income |
$ | (8,227 | ) | $ | 22,731 | $ | (23,124 | ) | $ | 87,620 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
2013 | 2012 (Restated see Note 2) |
|||||||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (22,762 | ) | $ | 86,711 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Amortization of deferred revenue |
(11,300 | ) | (9,225 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
16,249 | 6,714 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
8,662 | 9,424 | ||||||
Change in fair value of common stock warrants |
202 | | ||||||
Deferred income tax benefit |
(10,016 | ) | (33,298 | ) | ||||
Provision (recovery) for bad debt |
59 | (72 | ) | |||||
Provision for inventory obsolescence |
1,871 | 522 | ||||||
Loss on disposal of assets |
| 115 | ||||||
Change in fair value of deferred development costs and deferred payment contingency |
(2,869 | ) | | |||||
Impairment of intangible assets |
1,023 | | ||||||
Foreign currency remeasurement loss |
675 | 847 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
| (3,752 | ) | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
| |||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
37,187 | (32,334 | ) | |||||
Inventories, net |
(1,424 | ) | (492 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
(3,193 | ) | 9,977 | |||||
Accounts payable and other accrued obligations |
(26,104 | ) | 26,618 | |||||
Accrued compensation and related expenses |
1,324 | 496 | ||||||
Accrued drug development costs |
(861 | ) | 746 | |||||
Deferred revenue and other credits |
1,271 | 865 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
(10,006 | ) | 63,862 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
||||||||
Sales and maturities of marketable securities |
| 71,400 | ||||||
Purchases of marketable securities |
| (26,386 | ) | |||||
Acquisition of Melphalan license |
(3,000 | ) | | |||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(127 | ) | (304 | ) | ||||
Purchases of available-for-sale securities |
| (1,712 | ) | |||||
Acquisition of ZEVALIN Rights |
| (25,435 | ) | |||||
Acquisition of Talon Therapeutics, Inc., net of cash acquired |
(11,189 | ) | | |||||
Acquisition of Allos Therapeutics, Inc., net of cash acquired |
| (133,264 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(14,316 | ) | (115,701 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock from stock option exercises |
2,970 | 4,592 | ||||||
Proceeds from contributions to ESPP |
197 | 372 | ||||||
Payments to acquire treasury stock |
(1,652 | ) | (8,948 | ) | ||||
Repurchase of shares to satisfy minimum tax withholding for restricted stock vesting |
(612 | ) | (492 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from Munidpharma collaboration amendment |
7,000 | | ||||||
Proceeds from revolving line of credit |
100,000 | 75,000 | ||||||
Repayment of revolving line of credit |
(150,000 | ) | | |||||
Repayment of capital leases |
| (9 | ) | |||||
Payment of debt issuance costs |
| (475 | ) | |||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
| 3,752 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(42,097 | ) | 73,792 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Effect of exchange rates on cash |
(1,305 | ) | 128 | |||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(67,724 | ) | 22,081 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalentsbeginning of period |
139,698 | 121,202 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalentsend of period |
$ | 71,974 | $ | 143,283 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |
||||||||
Melphalan license included in intangible assets and other long term obligations |
$ | 4,700 | $ | | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Inventory liability assumed in acquisition |
$ | | $ | 580 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Retirement of treasury shares |
$ | 1,652 | $ | 11,874 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
1. | Description of Business, Basis of Presentation, and Operating Segment |
(a) Description of Business
Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (Spectrum, the Company, we, our, or us), is a biotechnology company with fully integrated commercial and drug development operations, with a primary focus in oncology and hematology. Our strategy is comprised of acquiring, developing, and marketing a diverse pipeline of late-stage clinical and commercial products.
We currently market four drugs:
| FUSILEV® injection for patients in the U.S. with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer and to counteract certain effects of methotrexate therapy; |
| ZEVALIN® injection for patients in the U.S. and various international markets with follicular non-Hodgkins lymphoma; |
| FOLOTYN® injection for patients in the U.S. with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma; and |
| Marqibo® injection for patients in the U.S. with Philadelphia chromosomenegative acute lymphoblastic leukemia. |
We also have a diversified pipeline of product candidates in advanced-stage Phase 2 and Phase 3 studies. We have assembled an integrated in-house scientific team, including formulation development, clinical development, medical research, regulatory affairs, biostatistics and data management, and have established a commercial infrastructure for the marketing of our drug products. We also leverage the expertise of our worldwide partners to assist in the execution of our business strategies.
(b) Basis of Presentation
The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP) and the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). These financial statements include the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the Company, including its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
We own fifty-percent of our Canadian affiliate, Spectrum Pharma Canada (SPC). We fund all of the expenses of this entity, and since we are deemed to be its primary beneficiary (as defined under applicable GAAP), SPC is reported in our financial statements as if it were a wholly-owned subsidiary.
On April 1, 2012, we acquired the licensing rights outside of the U.S. to market ZEVALIN (the ZEVALIN Rights); on September 5, 2012, we acquired Allos Therapeutics, Inc. (Allos); and on July 17, 2013, we acquired Talon Therapeutics, Inc. (Talon). Our financial statements include the assets acquired, liabilities assumed, operating results and cash flows of these acquisitions, beginning with the respective acquisition date for each.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments which are of a normal recurring nature (except for the correction of certain prior period immaterial errors, as discussed in Note 2). In the opinion of management, these adjustments are necessary to fairly state our financial position as of September 30, 2013, and the results of our operations and cash flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.
The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2013, or for any other periods. The unaudited financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q do not include all disclosures required by GAAP for annual periods and should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(c) Operating Segment
We have one reportable operating segment that is focused exclusively on developing and commercializing oncology and hematology drug products. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, all of our revenue and related expenses were solely attributable to these activities. Substantially all of our long-lived assets are located in the U.S.
7
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
2. | Correction of Immaterial Errors Within Previously Issued Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
Overview
In connection with the preparation of our accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, we determined that our June 30, 2013 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, included within our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013, presented a $7.7 million overstatement within accounts payable and other accrued obligations and accrued drug development costs. However, this error had no resulting impact to our September 30, 2013 cash balance.
The components of the accounts payable and other accrued obligations and accrued drug development costs overstatement include (a) $6.7 million of excess accruals that correspond with our research and development and sales and marketing activities which accumulated from January 1, 2007 through June 30, 2013, and (b) $1.0 million of excess liabilities that were recorded as part of our business combination accounting for our 2009 acquisition of RIT Oncology, LLC. As with the $6.7 million of excess accruals, this $1.0 million did not require settlement, and was not timely identified as such.
Materiality Assessment
Our management evaluated the materiality of these errors from a qualitative and quantitative perspective, as required by applicable SEC and GAAP guidance. Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that these errors were not material to any of our previously reported quarterly or annual periods, and therefore, the amendment of previously filed reports with the SEC are not required for this matter. However, the correction of these accumulated errors would be material if corrected in full (i.e., the entire $7.7 million) within the current reporting periods Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Therefore, we have revised within this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our previously reported financial information as of December 31, 2012, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 for those errors specific to each period.
In addition, our accompanying December 31, 2012 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet has been restated to reflect the correction of certain additional errors related to our conclusion that the indefinite-lived intangible asset acquired and recognized as part of our acquisition of Allos Therapeutics, Inc. in September 2012, as in-process research & development (IPR&D), should instead be recognized at the acquisition date as a definite-lived intangible asset. This matter is further discussed in our Form 10-Q/A, Note 1A Restatement of Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013.
Financial Statement Presentation Current and Future Periods
Our accompanying December 31, 2012 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet reflects the correction of the cumulative error of $7.2 million that existed through that date, as an adjustment to accumulated deficit, and the correction of the corresponding accounts of deferred tax assets, accounts payable and other accrued obligations, and accrued drug development costs. The remaining $0.5 million correction is reflected as a reduction of selling general and administrative and research and development expenses within the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. This correction reduced operating expenses by $0.1 million and $0.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively.
The prior period financial statements included within this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, within the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, and Condensed Consolidated Cash Flows reflect reductions of selling general and administrative and research and development expenses for the errors that correspond to each period.
8
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
The impact of this aggregate $7.7 million error to our previously reported 2012 annual period, and our previously reported 2013 and 2012 quarterly periods is summarized below. These amounts will be reported within our future Form 10-Q and 10-K filings, and any other SEC filing that includes financial information covering the impacted periods on this as restated basis:
Consolidated Balance Sheet for Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
||||||||
As Reported | As Restated | |||||||
Intangible assets, net |
$ | 202,311 | $ | 200,234 | ||||
Goodwill |
28,973 | 7,279 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets |
12,473 | 23,276 | ||||||
Other assets |
7,569 | 6,745 | ||||||
Total assets |
506,274 | 504,955 | ||||||
Accounts payable and other accrued obligations |
95,297 | 93,811 | ||||||
Accrued drug development costs |
15,109 | 11,441 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
128,397 | 123,243 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
221,428 | 216,274 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(179,320 | ) | (175,485 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
284,846 | 288,681 |
Condensed Consolidated Results of Operations | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 (As Reported) |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 (As Restated) |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 (As Reported) |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 (As Restated) |
|||||||||||||
Research and development |
$ | 10,183 | $ | 10,019 | $ | 28,657 | $ | 27,838 | ||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
23,114 | 22,925 | 64,723 | 64,230 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
46,286 | 45,933 | 129,182 | 127,870 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations |
22,756 | 23,109 | 68,421 | 69,733 | ||||||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
23,049 | 23,402 | 67,345 | 68,657 | ||||||||||||
(Provision) benefit for income taxes |
(1,737 | ) | (1,878 | ) | 18,579 | 18,054 | ||||||||||
Net income |
21,312 | 21,524 | 85,924 | 86,711 | ||||||||||||
Net income per share, basic |
$ | 0.36 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 1.47 | $ | 1.48 | ||||||||
Net income per share, diluted |
$ | 0.33 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 1.32 | $ | 1.34 |
9
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows | ||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 (As Reported) |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 (As Restated) |
|||||||
Net income |
$ | 85,924 | $ | 86,711 | ||||
Changes in operating expenses and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable and other accrued obligations |
26,586 | 26,618 | ||||||
Accrued drug development costs |
1,565 | 746 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
63,862 | 63,862 |
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows were impacted by the adjustments to net income (loss) discussed above. However, its effect on the annual cash flows for these periods was limited to an increase to net income and a corresponding and equal change to deferred income tax benefit, accounts payable and other accrued obligations, and accrued drug development costs, with no resulting net impact to cash provided by operating activities.
10
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
3. | Use of Estimates and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent liabilities. On an on-going basis, our management evaluates its estimates, including those related to (i) revenue adjustments; (ii) the collectability of customer accounts; (iii) whether the cost of inventories can be recovered; (iv) the value of goodwill and intangible assets; (v) the realization of tax assets and estimates of tax liabilities; (vi) the likelihood of payment and value of contingent liabilities; and (vii) the potential outcome of litigation.
Such estimates are based on our managements judgment which takes into account historical experience and various assumptions. Nonetheless, actual results may materially differ from managements estimates. In our judgment, the accounting policies, estimates, and assumptions described below have the greatest potential impact on our preparation of the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements:
(i) Revenue Recognition
Product Sales: We sell our products to wholesalers and distributors. Our wholesalers and distributors purchase our products and sell the products directly to end-users, such as clinics, hospitals, and private oncology-based practices. Revenue from product sales is recognized upon shipment of product when title and risk of loss have transferred to our customer, and the following additional criteria are met:
(1) | appropriate evidence of a binding arrangement exists with our customer; |
(2) | price is substantially fixed and determinable; |
(3) | collection from our customer is reasonably assured; |
(4) | our customers obligation to pay us is not contingent on resale of the product; |
(5) | we do not have significant obligations for future performance to directly bring about the resale of our product; and |
(6) | we have a reasonable basis to estimate future returns. |
We calculate a provision for estimated product returns, sales discounts, rebates, government chargebacks, and distribution and data fees (collectively, gross-to-net estimates) the nature of which is discussed within Note 2 to our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our gross revenue is reduced by our gross-to-net estimates. We defer revenue recognition in full if/when these estimates are not reasonably determinable at the time of sale.
License Fees: We recognize license fees based on the terms of each contractual agreement. In general, this results in periodic revenue recognition as the third-party licensee has sales for which we are entitled to a royalty, or in certain cases, a lump-sum license fee in which revenue is recognized in that period.
(ii) Accounts Receivable
Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, and do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts is managements best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in existing accounts receivable. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after appropriate collection efforts are exhausted.
(iii) Inventories
We value inventory at the lower of the actual cost to purchase or manufacture the inventory, or the market value for such inventory. Cost is determined on the first-in, first-out method (FIFO). We regularly review inventory quantities in process and on hand, and when appropriate, record a provision for obsolete and excess inventory. The provision is based on actual loss experience and a forecast of product demand compared to its remaining shelf life.
(iv) Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of the net assets of the acquired businesses. Goodwill has an indefinite useful life and is not amortized, but instead tested for impairment annually unless there are interim impairment indicators. We perform our annual evaluation as of October 1 each year.
11
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
We evaluate the recoverability of indefinite and definite lived intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an intangible assets carrying amount may not be recoverable. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to the following:
(a) | a significant decrease in the market value of an asset; |
(b) | a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used; or |
(c) | an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition of an asset. |
(v) Foreign Currency Translation
We translate the assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries stated in local functional currencies to U.S. dollars at the rates of exchange in effect at the end of the period. Revenues and expenses are translated using rates of exchange in effect during the period. Gains and losses from the translation of financial statements denominated in foreign currencies are included as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the statement of comprehensive income (loss).
We record foreign currency transactions at the exchange rate prevailing at the date of the transaction with resultant gains and losses being included in results of operations. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses have not been significant for any period presented.
(vi) Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is calculated in accordance with authoritative guidance which requires the disclosure of all components of comprehensive income, including net income (loss) and changes in equity during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances generated from non-owner sources. Our accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively consisted primarily of foreign currency translation adjustments and net unrealized gains/losses on investments in marketable securities as of each date.
(vii) Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) per Share
We calculate basic and diluted net income (loss) per share using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods presented, and adjust the amount of net income (loss) used in this calculation for preferred stock dividends (if any) declared during the period. In periods of a net loss position, basic and diluted loss per share are the same. For the diluted earnings per share calculation, we adjust the weighted average number of common shares outstanding to include dilutive stock options, warrants and other common stock equivalents outstanding during the period.
(viii) Income Taxes
We record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and amounts reported in the financial statements, as well as operating losses and tax credit carry forwards. We have recorded a valuation allowance to reduce our net deferred tax assets, because we believe that, based upon a weighting of positive and negative factors, it is more likely than not that these deferred tax assets will not be realized. If we were to determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the valuation allowance of our deferred tax assets would increase net income in the period such determination was made. In the event that we were assessed interest and/or penalties from taxing authorities, such amounts would be included in income tax expense within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) in the period the notice was received.
(ix) Research and Development Costs
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
12
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
(x) Fair Value Measurements
We measure fair value based on the prices that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible. Fair value measurements are based on a three-tier hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. These tiers include the following:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.
Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data. These inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted market prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.
Cash and equivalents within our accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of bank deposits and certificates of deposit. Certificates of deposit are valued at cost, which approximates fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. Marketable securities consist of U.S. Government treasury bills, U.S. treasury-backed securities, and corporate deposits, which are stated at fair value (utilizing Level 1 inputs).
The fair value of our deferred development cost liability and our deferred payment contingency within our accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets was valued using a model commonly referred to as the discounted income approach model. The unobservable inputs (i.e., Level 3 inputs) in this valuation model that have the most significant effect on these liabilities include (i) internal estimates of research and development personnel costs needed to perform the research and development services, (ii) estimates of expected cash outflows to third parties for services and supplies over the expected period that the services will be performed, and (iii) an appropriate discount rate for these expenditures. These inputs are reviewed for reasonableness by management on at least on a quarterly basis.
Other long-term obligations within our accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets represent future amounts we may be required to pay in conjunction with various business combinations (i.e., contingent consideration) see Note 8(a) for a discussion of CVRs granted as part of our acquisition of Talon). The fair value of the liability associated with FDA approval of Captisol-enabled® melphalan (see Note 8(b)) is also included within other long-term obligations. These liabilities within our accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are valued using Level 3 inputs which include probabilities and assumptions related to the timing and likelihood of achievement of regulatory and sales milestones and other contractual performance conditions. These inputs are reviewed for reasonableness by management on at least a quarterly basis.
4. | Balance Sheet Account Detail |
(a) Cash and Marketable Securities
As of September 30, 2013, we held substantially all of our cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities at major financial institutions.
Our investment policy requires that investments in marketable securities be in only highly-rated instruments, which are primarily U.S. treasury bills or U.S. treasury-backed securities, with limitations on investing in securities of any single issuer. We maintain cash balances in excess of federally insured limits with reputable financial institutions. To a limited degree, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and third parties insure these investments. However, these investments are not insured against the possibility of a complete loss of earnings or principal and are inherently subject to the credit risk related to the continued credit worthiness of the underlying issuer and general credit market risks. We manage such risks on our portfolio by investing in highly liquid, highly rated instruments, and limit investing in long-term maturity instruments.
13
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
Cash, equivalents and marketable securities, including long term bank certificates of deposits, and investments totaled $78.4 million and $145.5 million as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Long term bank certificates of deposit include a $0.3 million restricted certificate of deposit that collateralizes tenant improvement obligations to the lessor of our principal offices. The following is a summary of such investments:
Amortized Cost |
Gross Unrealized Gains |
Gross Unrealized Losses |
Estimated fair Value |
Cash | Marketable Security | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Current | Long Term |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and equivalents |
$ | 71,974 | $ | | $ | | $ | 71,974 | $ | 71,974 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Bank CDs (including restricted certificate of deposit of $250) |
252 | | | 252 | | 252 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Money market currency funds |
3,060 | | | 3,060 | | 3,060 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other securities (included in other assets) |
1,747 | 1,407 | | 3,154 | | | 3,154 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total investments |
$ | 77,033 | $ | 1,407 | $ | | $ | 78,440 | $ | 71,974 | $ | 3,312 | $ | 3,154 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
December 31, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and equivalents |
$ | 139,698 | $ | | $ | | $ | 139,698 | $ | 139,698 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Bank CDs (including restricted certificate of deposit of $250) |
987 | | | 987 | | 987 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Money market currency funds |
2,323 | | | 2,323 | | 2,323 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other securities (included in other assets) |
1,747 | 733 | | 2,480 | | | 2,480 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total investments |
$ | 144,755 | $ | 733 | $ | | $ | 145,488 | $ | 139,698 | $ | 3,310 | $ | 2,480 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2013, none of the securities had been in a continuous unrealized loss position longer than one year.
(b) Inventories
Inventories, net of allowances consisted of the following:
September 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 2,622 | $ | 887 | ||||
Work-in-process |
3,174 | 7,302 | ||||||
Finished goods |
8,846 | 6,289 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 14,642 | $ | 14,478 | |||||
|
|
|
|
14
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
(c) Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Intangible assets consist of the following:
September 30, 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Foreign Currency Translation |
Impairment | Net Amount |
Amortization Period (years) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Marqibo IPR&D |
$ | 17,600 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 17,600 | n/a | |||||||||||||
Marqibo developed technology |
26,900 | (508 | ) | | | 26,392 | 13 | |||||||||||||||||
ZEVALIN marketing rightsU.S. |
41,900 | (22,525 | ) | | | 19,375 | 10 | |||||||||||||||||
ZEVALIN marketing rightsEx. U.S. |
23,490 | (4,501 | ) | 263 | | 19,252 | 10 | |||||||||||||||||
FUSILEV developed technology |
16,778 | (4,459 | ) | | | 12,319 | 9 | |||||||||||||||||
FOLOTYN distribution rights* |
27,900 | (2,981 | ) | | (1,023 | ) | 23,896 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||
FOLOTYN developed technology. |
118,400 | (8,308 | ) | | | 110,092 | 14 | |||||||||||||||||
Melphalan IPR&D |
7,700 | | | | 7,700 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total intangible assets |
$ | 280,668 | $ | (43,282 | ) | $ | 263 | $ | (1,023 | ) | $ | 236,626 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | On May 29, 2013, we amended our collaboration agreement Mundipharma in order to modify the scope of their licensed territories and the respective development obligations. As a result of the amendment, Europe and Turkey were excluded from Mundipharmas commercialization territory, and royalty and milestone rates were modified. The modification of our associated royalty and milestone rights constituted a change in the contractual provisions under which we measured our original acquired intangible asset (i.e., the FOLOTYN distribution rights). We determined that an impairment of the FOLOTYN distribution rights of $1.0 million resulted from the amendment and is recorded in the amortization and impairment of intangible assets in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. |
Goodwill includes the following:
September 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 (As Restated) |
|||||||
Acquisition of Zevalin Rights |
2,525 | 2,525 | ||||||
Acquisition of Allos |
5,346 | 4,791 | ||||||
Foreign exchange translation effects |
29 | (37 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 7,900 | $ | 7,279 |
(d) Accounts payable and accrued obligations
Accounts payable and other accrued obligations consisted of the following:
September 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 (As restated) |
|||||||
Trade payables |
$ | 22,958 | $ | 30,814 | ||||
Allowance for rebates |
25,395 | 11,023 | ||||||
Accrued product royalty |
9,019 | 12,275 | ||||||
Allowance for returns |
2,636 | 5,056 | ||||||
Accrued data and distribution fees |
2,995 | 8,449 | ||||||
Accrued GPO administrative fees |
2,196 | 2,650 | ||||||
Inventory management fee |
784 | 3,050 | ||||||
Accrued income taxes |
| 2,522 | ||||||
Allowance for chargebacks |
4,559 | 15,153 | ||||||
Other accrued obligations |
778 | 2,819 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 71,320 | $ | 93,811 | |||||
|
|
|
|
15
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
5. | Gross-to Net Product Sales |
The below table presents a gross-to-net product sales reconciliation for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
Gross product sales |
$ | 61,256 | $ | 91,805 | $ | 161,750 | $ | 279,075 | ||||||||
Government rebates and chargebacks |
(15,136 | ) | (16,368 | ) | (46,219 | ) | (65,641 | ) | ||||||||
Data, distribution and GPO fees |
(4,631 | ) | (7,898 | ) | (14,677 | ) | (21,369 | ) | ||||||||
Prompt pay discount |
(50 | ) | (1,078 | ) | (155 | ) | (3,684 | ) | ||||||||
Product returns allowance |
| (590 | ) | 2,299 | (99 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net product sales |
$ | 41,439 | $ | 65,871 | $ | 102,998 | $ | 188,282 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. | Net Income (Loss) Per Share |
Net Loss | Weighted- Average Shares Outstanding (Denominator) |
Net Loss Per Share |
||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 |
||||||||||||
Basic and diluted loss per share: |
$ | (7,812 | ) | 61,903,242 | $ | (0.13 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the number of shares excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share, as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive:
September 30, 2013 |
||||
Preferred shares |
40,000 | |||
Options |
2,881,993 | |||
Incremental shares assumed issued on exercise of in the money warrants |
132,565 | |||
Unvested restricted stock |
1,044,904 | |||
|
|
|||
4,099,288 | ||||
|
|
16
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
Net Income | Weighted- Average Shares Outstanding (Denominator) |
Net Income Per Share |
||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 As restated |
||||||||||||
Basic net income per share: |
$ | 21,524 | 58,912,031 | $ | 0.37 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share: |
||||||||||||
Dilutive preferred shares |
40,000 | |||||||||||
Dilutive options |
4,863,932 | |||||||||||
Incremental shares assumed issued on exercise of in the money warrants |
279,518 | |||||||||||
Unvested restricted stock |
1,044,125 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 21,524 | 65,139,606 | $ | 0.33 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Potentially dilutive securities not included above since they were antidilutive: |
||||||||||||
Antidilutive options excluded from the calculation |
696,500 | |||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Net Loss | Weighted- Average Shares Outstanding (Denominator) |
Net Loss Per Share |
||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 |
||||||||||||
Basic net loss per share: |
$ | (22,762 | ) | 60,013,842 | $ | (0.38 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the number of shares excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share, as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive:
September 30, 2013 |
||||
Preferred shares |
40,000 | |||
Options |
3,247,710 | |||
Incremental shares assumed issued on exercise of in the money warrants |
160,486 | |||
Unvested restricted stock |
1,044,904 | |||
|
|
|||
4,493,100 | ||||
|
|
Net Income | Weighted- Average Shares Outstanding (Denominator) |
Net Income Per Share |
||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 As restated |
||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share: |
$ | 86,711 | 58,564,176 | $ | 1.48 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share: |
||||||||||||
Dilutive preferred shares |
40,000 | |||||||||||
Dilutive options |
4,959,558 | |||||||||||
Incremental shares assumed issued on exercise of in the money warrants |
272,927 | |||||||||||
Unvested restricted stock |
1,044,125 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 86,711 | 64,880,786 | $ | 1.34 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Potentially dilutive securities not included above since they were antidilutive: |
||||||||||||
Antidilutive options excluded from the calculation |
737,230 | |||||||||||
|
|
17
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
7. | Fair Value Measurements |
The below table summarizes certain asset and liability fair values that are included within our accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, and their designations among three fair value measurement categories (as described within Note 3(x)):
Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
September 30, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and equivalents |
$ | 71,974 | $ | | $ | | $ | 71,974 | ||||||||
Bank CDs (including restricted certificate of deposit of $250) |
| 252 | | 252 | ||||||||||||
Money market currency funds |
| 3,060 | | 3,060 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cash and equivalents, and marketable securities and investments |
71,974 | 3,312 | | 75,286 | ||||||||||||
Deferred compensation investments, including life insurance cash surrender value |
| 4,757 | | 4,757 | ||||||||||||
Other securities |
3,154 | | | 3,154 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 75,128 | $ | 8,069 | $ | | $ | 83,197 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Deferred executive compensation liability |
| 3,721 | | 3,721 | ||||||||||||
Deferred development costs |
| | 18,651 | 18,651 | ||||||||||||
Melphalan license contingent consideration |
| | 4,700 | 4,700 | ||||||||||||
Contingent value right |
| | 6,500 | 6,500 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | | $ | 3,721 | $ | 29,851 | $ | 33,572 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following summarizes the activity of Level 3 inputs measured on a recurring basis:
Fair Value Measurements of Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
||||
Balance at December 31, 2011 |
$ | | ||
Transfers in / (out) of Level 3: |
||||
Deferred development costs |
12,233 | |||
Deferred payment contingency |
2,287 | |||
|
|
|||
Balance at December 31, 2012 |
14,520 | |||
Transfers in / (out) of Level 3: |
||||
Other long term liabilities |
4,700 | |||
Deferred development costs |
6,418 | |||
Deferred payment contingency |
(2,287 | ) | ||
Contingent Value Right |
6,500 | |||
|
|
|||
Balance at September 30, 2013 |
$ | 29,851 | ||
|
|
18
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
8. | Business Combinations |
(a) Acquisition of Talon Therapeutics, Inc.
Talon Acquisition Overview
On July 16, 2013, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Talon Therapeutics, Inc. (Talon), whereby, on July 17, 2013, we purchased all of its then outstanding shares of common stock. Through the acquisition of Talon, we gained worldwide rights to Marqibo, an FDA-approved drug that we believe complements our other hematology and oncology products.
The purchase consideration comprised of (i) an aggregate upfront cash amount of $11.3 million, (ii) issuance of 3.0 million shares of our common stock, then equivalent to $26.3 million (based on a closing price of $8.77 per share on July 17, 2013), and (iii) the issuance of contingent value rights (CVR) valued by us of $6.5 million.
The CVR was valued using a valuation model that probability-weights expected outcomes (ranging from 0% to 100%) and discounts those amounts to their present value, using a discount rate of 25% (these represent Level 3 inputs see Note 3(x)). The CVR has a maximum payout of $195.0 million if all sales and regulatory approval milestones are achieved, as summarized below:
| $5.0 million upon the achievement of net sales of Marqibo in excess of $30.0 million in any calendar year |
| $10.0 million upon the achievement of net sales of Marqibo in excess of $60.0 million in any calendar year |
| $25.0 million upon the achievement of net sales of Marqibo in excess of $100.0 million in any calendar year |
| $50.0 million upon the achievement of net sales of Marqibo in excess of $200.0 million in any calendar year |
| $100.0 million upon the achievement of net sales of Marqibo in excess of $400.0 million in any calendar year |
| $5.0 million upon receipt of marketing authorization from the FDA regarding Menadione Topical Lotion |
Since July 17, 2013, the results of operations of the former Talon business have been included in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013. From July 17, 2013 through September 30, 2013, our revenue derived from the former Talon business was approximately $0.1 million. We had nominal earnings from the Talon business during this period.
Direct Costs of the Talon Acquisition
Our direct costs of the Talon acquisition included employee severance, banker, legal, and accounting fees which aggregated to $5.7 million. This amount is included in selling and general expenses within the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
Consideration Transferred
The Talon acquisition purchase price was allocated to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the acquisition date. The following table summarizes the purchase price:
Cash consideration |
$ | 11,300 | ||
Contingent value right |
6,500 | |||
Spectrum shares of common stock |
26,300 | |||
|
|
|||
Total purchase consideration |
$ | 44,100 | ||
|
|
19
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
Fair Value Estimate of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed
Under the purchase method of accounting, the total purchase consideration is allocated to Talon net tangible and intangible assets based on the estimated fair values as of the closing date. The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired as of July 17, 2013:
Cash and equivalents |
$ | 131 | ||
Inventory |
611 | |||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
109 | |||
Property and equipment |
30 | |||
Deferred tax asset |
3,950 | |||
Identifiable intangible assets |
44,500 | |||
|
|
|||
Total assets acquired |
49,331 | |||
Accounts payable & accrued liabilities |
5,231 | |||
|
|
|||
Total liabilities assumed |
5,231 | |||
|
|
|||
Net assets acquired |
$ | 44,100 | ||
|
|
The acquired intangible assets consisted of developed technology and in-process research and development (IPR&D) for Marqibo treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and Marqibo treatment of non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) as follows in the table below:
Value of Intangible Assets Acquired |
Amortization Period |
|||||||
Developed technology Marqibo for ALL |
$ | 26,900 | 13 years | |||||
IPR&D Marqibo for NHL |
17,600 | (1) | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total identifiable intangible assets |
$ | 44,500 | ||||||
|
|
(1) | IPR&D is an intangible asset classified as an indefinite-lived until the completion or abandonment of the associated research and development effort, and will be amortized over an estimated useful life to be determined at the date the project is completed. IPR&D is not amortized during this period, but rather tested for impairment. |
The fair value of the acquired in-process research and developed technology assets was estimated using the income approach. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount (discounted). Our measurement is based on the value indicated by current market expectations about those future amounts.
The deferred tax liability reflects future book-to-tax differences that are associated with the acquired IPR&D assets.
We believe that the fair values assigned to the Talon assets acquired and liabilities assumed were based upon reasonable assumptions, and we expect to complete our valuation of the deferred tax liability by December 31, 2013, which would have a corresponding impact on goodwill, if adjusted. Our allocations of the purchase price are largely dependent on discounted cash flow analyses of projects and products of Talon. There can be no assurance that the underlying assumptions we used to forecast the cash flows or the regulatory approvals will occur as we have estimated, if at all.
Supplemental Pro Forma Financial Information
The following unaudited pro forma financial information is presented to reflect the results of the Companys consolidated operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, as if the acquisition of Talon had occurred on January 1, 2012. To reflect the combined businesses, adjustments have been made to exclude one-time transaction costs and employee severance costs that were directly associated with the Talon acquisition. These pro forma results have been prepared for informational purposes only and may not be indicative of what operating results would have been, had the acquisition actually taken place on January 1, 2012, and may not be indicative of future operating results.
20
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
Pro Forma Total revenues |
$ | 42,439 | $ | 69,042 | $ | 114,338 | $ | 197,603 | ||||||||
Pro Forma Cost of product sales |
8,221 | 11,155 | 22,271 | 31,402 | ||||||||||||
Pro Forma Total operating expenses |
53,026 | 51,633 | 140,911 | 133,570 | ||||||||||||
Pro Forma Net income (loss) |
(5,112 | ) | 15,824 | (17,062 | ) | 81,011 | ||||||||||
Pro Forma Net income (loss) per share basic |
$ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.27 | $ | (0.29 | ) | $ | 1.38 | ||||||
Pro Forma Net income (loss) per share diluted |
$ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.24 | $ | (0.29 | ) | $ | 1.24 |
(b) Acquisition of Rights to Captisol-Enabled® Melphalan
Overview of Acquisition of Rights to Captisol-Enabled® Melphalan
On March 8, 2013, we completed the acquisition of exclusive global development and commercialization rights to Captisol-enabled®, propylene glycol-free melphalan from CyDex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (Ligand). The Captisol-enabled melphalan product candidate is currently in a pivotal trial being conducted by Ligand for use as a conditioning treatment prior to autologous stem cell transplant for patients with multiple myeloma. We assumed full responsibility for its ongoing clinical and regulatory development program. Under the agreement, we paid Ligand a license fee of $3.0 million on April 1, 2013. We are required to pay Ligand additional amounts upon achievement of certain regulatory milestones and net sales thresholds, and royalties on net sales of licensed products in all territories.
We accounted for the acquisition of these rights as a business combination, using the acquisition method of accounting. This requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at their fair values as of the purchase date and be recorded on the balance sheet. The process for estimating the fair values of identifiable intangible assets involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including estimating future cash flows and developing appropriate discount rates. Aggregate transaction costs of $15,000 are included in selling and general expenses within the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
Consideration Transferred
The acquisition-date fair value of the consideration transferred consisted of the following items:
Cash consideration |
$ | 3,000 | ||
Contingent consideration |
4,700 | |||
|
|
|||
Total purchase consideration |
$ | 7,700 | ||
|
|
Fair Value Estimate of Asset Acquired and Liability Assumed
The total purchase consideration is allocated to the acquisition of the net tangible and intangible assets based on their estimated fair values as of the closing date. The allocation of the total purchase price to the net assets acquired is as follows:
IPR&DCaptisol-enabled®, propylene glycol-free melphalan rights |
$ | 7,700 | ||
|
|
Acquired IPR&D is an intangible asset that is classified as indefinite-lived until the completion or abandonment of the associated R&D effort, and is subject to impairment testing. The Captisol-enabled®, propylene glycol-free melphalan rights IPR&D will amortized over an estimated useful life to be determined at the date the project is complete.
We estimated the fair value of the in-process research and development using the income approach. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount (discounted). Our measurement is based on the value indicated by current market expectations about those future amounts. The fair value estimate took into
21
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
account our estimates of future incremental earnings that may be achieved upon regulatory approval, promotion, and distribution associated with the rights, and included estimated cash flows of approximately 10 years and a discount rate of approximately 25%.
The fair value of the contingent consideration liability assumed was determined using the probability of success and the discounted cash flow method of the income approach, which assumes that FDA approval of Captisol-enabled® melphalan will occur on or about December 31, 2015. Upon receipt of FDA approval, we will be obligated to make a milestone payment to Ligand.
We do not consider this acquisition to represent a material business combination; accordingly, we have not presented pro forma results of our combined operations that are otherwise required.
(c) Allos Acquisition
We acquired Allos Therapeutics, Inc. (Allos) on September 5, 2012, as discussed in Note 3 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
9. | Revolving Line of Credit |
In connection with the Allos acquisition, we entered into a credit agreement on September 5, 2012 with Bank of America, N.A, as the administrative agent and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A, as an initial lender, as amended July 16, 2013 (the Credit Agreement). The Credit Agreement provides us with a committed $50.0 million revolving line of credit facility (the Credit Facility). The Credit Facility expires on September 5, 2014.
The Credit Facility bears interest, at our election, at a rate equal to the London Interbank Offer Rate, or LIBOR rate, or the base rate, plus an applicable margin (2.75% to 4.25%, dependent on a defined liquidity ratio).
We incurred $1.0 million in related loan costs and fees, which were deferred and will be amortized using the effective interest method over 24 months, the term of the Credit Facility. Amortization expense included in interest expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations was $0.5 million and $40,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
An unused line fee is payable quarterly in an amount ranging from 0.375% to 0.625% of the sum of the average daily unused portion of the facilities during any quarter based upon consolidated leverage ratio as at the last test date. A customary fee is also payable to the administrative agent on an annual basis in advance. Related interest expense for the unused line fee was $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
Our direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries guaranty our obligations under the Credit Facility. The Credit Agreement includes the following quarterly financial covenants:
| We may not permit the our consolidated interest coverage ratio as of the end of any fiscal quarter to be less than 3.00 to 1.00; |
| We may not permit the consolidated leverage ratio at any time set forth below to be greater than the ratio set forth below opposite such period: |
Measurement Period Ending |
Maximum Consolidated Leverage Ratio |
|||
Closing Date through September 30, 2012 |
2.00 to 1.00 | |||
December 31, 2012 and each fiscal quarter thereafter |
1.50 to 1.00 |
| We may not permit the ratio of (i) the sum of (a) our unencumbered cash and cash equivalents on a consolidated basis, plus (b) our net accounts receivable on a consolidated basis, to (ii) consolidated funded indebtedness as of the end of any fiscal quarter to be less than 2.00 to 1.00. |
In addition, the Credit Agreement includes certain negative covenants that, subject to exceptions, limit our ability to, among other things incur additional indebtedness, engage in future mergers, consolidations, liquidations and dissolutions, sell assets, pay dividends and distributions on or repurchase capital stock, and enter into or amend other material agreements. At September 30, 2013, we were in compliance with all financial covenants.
22
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
10. | Mundipharma Agreement |
As the result of Allos becoming our wholly-owned subsidiary, effective September 5, 2012, we assumed obligations under a strategic collaboration agreement with Mundipharma (the Mundipharma Collaboration Agreement). Under the Mundipharma Collaboration Agreement, we retained full commercialization rights for FOLOTYN in the U.S. and Canada, with Mundipharma having exclusive rights to commercialize FOLOTYN in all other countries in the world (the Mundipharma Territories).
On May 29, 2013, the Mundipharma Collaboration Agreement was amended and restated (the Amended Munipharma Collaboration Agreement), in order to modify the scope of the licensed territory and the respective development obligations. As a result, Europe and Turkey were excluded from Mundipharmas commercialization territory, and royalty and milestone rates were modified. We may now also receive potential regulatory milestone payments of up to $16.0 million and commercial progress and sales-dependent milestone payments of up to $107.0 million. We will also receive tiered double- digit royalties based on net sales of FOLOTYN within Mundipharmas licensed territories consistent with the terms of the original Munidpharma Collaboration Agreement.
In connection with the Amended Munipharma Collaboration Agreement, we received a one-time $7.0 million payment from Mundipharma for certain research and development activities to be performed by us. As part of the original Mundipharma Collaboration Agreement, we were obligated to perform research and development services related to jointly agreed-upon clinical development activities through approximately 2022. We recorded the fair value of the related deferred development cost obligation of $12.3 million as of September 5, 2012, using the discounted cash flow method of the income approach. This development cost liability was determined to be $18.7 million as of September 30, 2013 (inclusive of the $7.0 million payment from Mundipharma), which includes assumptions about our estimates of personnel needed to perform these research and development services, and expected third party costs for services and supplies for our projected clinical trial enrollment and patient treatment-related follow up time periods through approximately 2031. We will assess this liability at each subsequent reporting date and record its change within research and development expense in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Under the original Mundipharma Collaboration Agreement, Mundipharma was initially responsible for 40% of the joint development costs incurred by the parties, which increased to 50% upon the later of (i) the calendar quarter of the first approval of FOLOTYN in the EU for relapsed or refractory PTCL, and (ii) the first calendar quarter in which the development cost differential equals or exceeds $15.0 million. The development cost differential was defined as the cumulative amount of joint development costs that Mundipharma would have incurred if it was responsible for 50% of the joint development costs rather than its initial 40% share. To the extent that this development cost differential did not meet or exceed $15.0 million by December 31, 2019, then we were obligated to pay Mundipharma the difference between $15.0 million and the amount of the development cost differential as of December 31, 2019.
Research and development for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 included $-0- and $0.6 million, respectively, related to the 40% joint development cost reimbursement under the original Mundipharma Collaboration Agreement. The Amended Mundipharma Collaboration Agreement eliminated the development cost differential computation requirement. Prospectively, we and Mundipharma will bear our own development costs.
As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, deferred amounts related to the Mundipharma Agreements consisted of:
September 30, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||
Deferred development cost liability |
$ | 3,251 | $ | 856 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Deferred development cost liability, less current portion |
15,400 | 11,377 | ||||||
Deferred payment contingency |
| 2,287 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 18,651 | $ | 14,520 | |||||
|
|
|
|
23
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
11. | Commitments and Contingencies |
(a) Facility Lease
We sublease our principal executive office in Henderson, Nevada under a non-cancelable operating lease expiring April 30, 2014. We also lease our research and development facility in Irvine, California under a non-cancelable operating lease expiring June 30, 2016. Each lease agreement contains certain scheduled rent increases which are accounted for on a straight-line basis.
As part of our Irvine facility lease renewal in 2009, the landlord agreed to contribute up to approximately $1.5 million toward the cost of tenant improvements. The tenant improvements were completed in 2010 at an aggregate cost of approximately $1.4 million. This landlord contribution is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease as a reduction to rent expense. We also lease small administrative offices in Colorado, New Jersey, Westlake Village (California), Tokyo, and Mumbai.
(b) Licensing Agreements, Co-Development Agreements, and Milestone Payments
We are developing almost all of our drug candidates pursuant to license agreements that provide us with rights in certain territories, among other things, to develop, sublicense, manufacture and sell the drugs. We are generally required to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop the drugs, and are generally responsible for all development, patent filing and maintenance, sales and marketing and liability insurance costs, and are generally contingently obligated to make milestone payments to the licensors if we successfully reach development and regulatory milestones specified in the license agreements. In addition, we are obligated to pay royalties and, in some cases, milestone payments based on net sales, if any, after marketing approval is obtained from regulatory authorities.
The potential contingent development and regulatory milestone obligations under all of our licensing agreements are generally tied to progress through the various regulatory authorities approval process, which approval significantly depends on positive clinical trial results. The following items are typical of such milestone events: conclusion of Phase 2 or commencement of Phase 3 clinical trials; filing of new drug applications in each of the U.S., Europe and Japan; and approvals from each of the regulatory agencies in those jurisdictions.
(i) ZEVALIN licensing and development in the United States
In December 2008, we acquired rights to commercialize and develop ZEVALIN in the United States as the result of a transaction with Cell Therapeutics, Inc. (CTI). Pursuant to the transfer of the ZEVALIN assets from CTI to a joint venture, RIT Oncology LLC (RIT), in December 2008, RIT assumed certain agreements with various third parties related to ZEVALIN intellectual property. These currently effective agreements relate to the manufacture, use and sale of ZEVALIN in the United States and include (i) a license from Biogen, Idec, Inc. (Biogen) (ii) a license-back to Biogen for limited uses including fulfillment of a supply obligation to CTI, (iii) a sublicense from Biogen to certain ZEVALIN patents held by Genentech, Inc., (iv) a sublicense from Biogen to certain ZEVALIN patents held by GlaxoSmithKline and Glaxo Group Limited, and (v) a sublicense from Biogen to certain ZEVALIN patents held by Corixa Corporation, Coulter Pharmaceutical, Inc., The Regents of the University of Michigan and GlaxoSmithKline.
In accordance with the terms of such agreements, RIT is required to meet specified payment obligations including a commercial milestone payment to Corixa Corporation of $5.0 million based on ZEVALIN sales in the United States, which has not been met as of September 30, 2013, as well as U.S. net sales-based royalties of low to mid-single digits to Genentech, Inc. and mid-single digits to Corixa Corporation. Such agreements generally continue until the last to expire of the licensed patents unless earlier terminated in accordance with the terms of the agreement. The patents that are subject to the agreements expire between 2014 and 2019.
(ii) Asset Purchase Agreement between CTI and Biogen, ZEVALIN U.S.
In connection with the joint venture arrangement with CTI, we entered into an amendment to the original asset purchase agreement between CTI and Biogen, referred to as the CTI/Biogen Agreement, modifying future milestone payments. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, as amended, (i) upon the achievement of the specified FDA approval milestone, which was achieved in 2009, RIT (as successor to CTI) paid Biogen an additional amount of $5.5 million, (ii) RIT may be required to make an additional $10.0 million milestone payment upon the achievement of an additional FDA
24
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
approval milestone, and (iii) RIT is required to make yearly royalty payments determined as a mid-single to mid-teen digits percentage of yearly net sales for the preceding year, increasing with the passage of time. The agreement has an indefinite term and is no longer subject to termination; provided, however, that the royalty obligations automatically terminate upon the latest to occur of expiration of the subject patents, the sale by a third party of a biosimilar product in the U.S. or December 31, 2015. CTIs rights and obligations, including its payment obligations to Biogen for royalties on net sales of ZEVALIN and an additional regulatory milestone payment, under both the CTI/Biogen Agreement and the amendment were assigned to and assumed by RIT in connection with the closing of the joint venture transaction.
(iii) License and Asset Purchase Agreement with Bayer Pharma, ZEVALIN Ex-U.S.
On April 1, 2012, through a subsidiary, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Cayman, L.P., we completed the acquisition of licensing rights to market ZEVALIN outside of the U.S., referred to as the ZEVALIN Ex-US Rights, from Bayer Pharma AG, or Bayer. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Spectrum acquired all rights including marketing, selling, intellectual property and access to existing inventory of ZEVALIN from Bayer. We currently market ZEVALIN in the U.S. and this agreement expands our commercial efforts to the rest of the world. ZEVALIN is currently approved in more than 40 countries outside the U.S. for the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including countries in Europe, Latin America and Asia. In consideration for the rights granted under the agreement, concurrent with the closing, Spectrum paid Bayer a one-time fee of Euro 19 million or approximately $25.4 million, and will pay Bayer royalties based on a mid-teen digits percentage of net sales of the licensed products in all territories worldwide except the U.S., with specific rates subject to confidential treatment pursuant to an order by the SEC. Under the agreement, we also acquired access to existing inventory of ZEVALIN and concurrent with the closing, entered into certain ancillary agreements including but not limited to a transition services agreement to transition the business. Unless earlier terminated, the term of the agreement continues until the expiration of our royalty payment obligations which, in turn, run until the last-to-expire patent covering the sale of a licensed product in the relevant country or fifteen (15) years from the date of first commercial sale of the licensed product in such country, whichever is longer. This agreement may be terminated in the event of a material default, which is defined to include: (i) our failure to timely pay royalty payments under this agreement or payments under certain related agreements; (ii) our insolvency; and (iii) our breach and the resulting termination of an Amended and Restated License Agreement between Biogen and Bayer, dated as of January 16, 2012.
(iv) Amended and Restated License Agreement with Merck & Cie AG, FUSILEV
In May 2006, we amended and restated a license agreement with Merck & Cie AG, a Swiss corporation, which we assumed in connection with the acquisition of the assets of Targent. Pursuant to the license agreement with Merck & Cie, we obtained the exclusive license to use regulatory filings related to FUSILEV and a non-exclusive license under certain patents and know-how related to FUSILEV to develop, make, and have made, use, sell and have sold FUSILEV in the field of oncology in North America. In addition, we have the right of first opportunity to negotiate an exclusive license to manufacture, have manufactured, use and sell FUSILEV products outside the field of oncology in North America. Also, under the terms of the license agreement, we paid Merck & Cie $100,000 for the achievement of FDA approval of an injectable form of FUSILEV. Merck & Cie is also eligible to receive a $200,000 payment upon achievement of FDA approval of an oral form of FUSILEV, in addition to royalties in the mid-single digits based on a percentage of net sales. The term of the license agreement is determined on a product-by-product and country-by-country basis until royalties are no longer owed under the license agreement. The license agreement expires in its entirety after the date that we no longer owe any royalties to Merck & Cie. We have the unilateral right to terminate the license agreement, in its entirety or on a product-by-product or country-by-country basis, at any time for any reason and either party may terminate the license agreement due to material breach of the terms of the license agreement by or insolvency of the other party.
(v) Asset Purchase Agreement with Targent, Inc., FUSILEV
In March 2006, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Targent, Inc. (Targent). As part of the consideration for the purchase of certain assets, we agreed to pay milestone payments to Targent upon the achievement of certain regulatory events as well as for certain sales levels for FUSILEV within a calendar year. In connection with the achievement of the FDA approval milestone in April 2011, we issued an aggregate of 0.7 million shares of common stock to certain of Targents stockholders, as directed by Targent. We capitalized $6.3 million associated with this milestone as an intangible asset during 2011, which is being amortized over the estimated useful life of 8.7 years.
25
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
In addition, in connection with the achievement of the first sales milestone of $40.0 million in May 2011 we issued 0.6 million shares of common stock to certain of Targents stockholders (which was equivalent value to approximately $5.0 million in cash), as directed by Targent. In September 2011, we achieved the second and final sales milestone of $100.0 million and paid $5.0 million in cash for an aggregate with the first sales milestone of $10.0 million. We capitalized the $10.0 million associated with these milestones as intangible assets. These intangible assets are being amortized over the estimated useful life of 8.6 years. As of December 2011, we have met all of the contractual milestones related to FUSILEV.
(vi) License Agreement with Sloan-Kettering Institute, SRI International and Southern Research Institute, FOLOTYN
In December 2002, Allos entered into the FOLOTYN License Agreement with Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, SRI International and Southern Research Institute. As a result of Allos becoming our wholly owned subsidiary effective September 5, 2012, on a consolidated basis we are bound by the FOLOTYN License Agreement under which we obtained exclusive worldwide rights to a portfolio of patents and patent applications related to FOLOTYN and its uses. Under the terms of the FOLOTYN License Agreement, we are required to fund all development programs and will have sole responsibility for all commercialization activities. In addition, we pay the licensors royalties based on worldwide graduated annual levels of net sales of FOLOTYN, net of actual rebates, chargebacks and returns, or distributor sales, which may be different than our net product revenue recognized in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, or sublicense revenues arising from sublicensing the product, if and when such sales or sublicenses occur. For purposes of the FOLOTYN License Agreement, annual worldwide sales consists of our distributor sales and annual net sales of FOLOTYN in the Mundipharma Territories, as reported to us under the Mundipharma Collaboration Agreement, if and when such sales occur in the Mundipharma Territories. Royalties are 8% of annual worldwide sales up to $150.0 million; 9% of annual worldwide sales of $150.0 million through $300.0 million; and 11% of annual worldwide sales in excess of $300.0 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, our royalties were 8% of our net distributor sales. As of September 30, 2013, accrued royalties were $0.9 million and are included in accounts payable and accrued obligations on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(vii) License Agreement with Cydex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Captisol-enabled, Propyleneglycol-free Melphalan
See Note 8(b) above.
(viii) Exclusive Development and Commercialization Collaboration Agreement with Allergan, Apaziquone
In October 2008, we signed an exclusive development and commercialization collaboration agreement with Allergan for Apaziquone. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Allergan paid us an up-front non-refundable $41.5 million at closing and is obligated to make additional payments based on the achievement of certain development, regulatory and commercialization milestones. Under the terms of the original agreement, we were entitled to payment of $57.5 million and $245.0 million upon achievement of certain regulatory and commercialization milestones, respectively, of which $1.5 million has been achieved following completion of enrollment in clinical trials, per the terms of the license, development, supply and distribution agreement. Also, Allergan agreed to pay us tiered royalties starting in the mid-teens based on a percentage of net sales of Apaziquone outside of the U.S. and Asia, which specific rates are subject to confidential treatment pursuant to an order by the SEC.
On January 29, 2013, we entered into a second amendment to the license, development, supply and distribution agreement with Allergan to amend the agreement and reacquire the rights originally licensed to Allergan in the U.S., Europe, and other territories in exchange for a tiered single-digit royalty on certain products containing Apaziquone, and relieved Allergan of its obligations for development, commercialization and other activities. As a result of the second amendment to the agreement with Allergan, Allergan has no remaining obligations to us, and we have no remaining performance obligations to them. However, we are obligated to pay Allergan a tiered single-digit royalty not to exceed mid-single digits based upon the net sales, when and if earned, of certain products containing Apaziquone in specified territories. Additionally, we are obligated to pay any royalties or other payments due to certain licensors of underlying intellectual property, as well as to provide indemnification of Allergan for claims arising from the manufacture, development, or commercialization of pharmaceutical products containing Apaziquone by us.
26
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
(ix) Collaboration Agreement with Nippon Kayaku Co. LTD., Apaziquone
In November 2009, we entered into a collaboration agreement with Nippon Kayaku Co., LTD. (Nippon Kayaku) for the development and commercialization of Apaziquone in Asia, except North and South Korea (the Nippon Kayaku Territory). In addition, Nippon Kayaku received exclusive rights to Apaziquone for the treatment of non muscle invasive bladder cancer in Asia (other than North and South Korea), including Japan and China. Nippon Kayaku will conduct apaziquone clinical trials in the Nippon Kayaku Territory pursuant to a development plan. Further, Nippon Kayaku will be responsible for all expenses relating to the development and commercialization of Apaziquone in the Nippon Kayaku Territory.
Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, Nippon Kayaku paid Spectrum an upfront fee of $15.0 million and is obligated to make additional payments based on the achievement of certain development, regulatory and commercialization milestones. Under the terms of the agreement, we are entitled to payment of $10.0 million and $126.0 million upon achievement of certain regulatory and commercialization milestones, respectively. Also, Nippon Kayaku has agreed to pay us royalties based on a percentage of net sales of the subject products in the defined territory in the mid-teen digits. The agreement will remain in effect, on a country-by-country basis, until the expiration of the obligation of Nippon Kayaku to pay royalties on sales of the subject products in such country.
Our license agreement with Nippon Kayaku provides for payments to us upon the achievement of development milestones, such as the completion of clinical trials or regulatory submissions, approvals by health authorities, and commercial launches of drug candidates. Given the challenges inherent in developing and obtaining approval for drug products and in achieving commercial launches, there was substantial uncertainty whether any such milestones would be achieved at the time of execution of such license agreement. In addition, we continue to evaluate whether the development milestones, none of which have been achieved to date, meet the remaining criteria to be considered substantive. As a result of our analysis, we consider our development milestones under the Nippon Kayaku license agreement to be substantive and, accordingly, we expect to recognize as revenue future payments received from such milestones only if and as each milestone is achieved.
(x) Licensing and Collaboration Agreement with TopoTarget, belinostat
In February 2010, we entered into a licensing and collaboration agreement with TopoTarget A/S (TopoTarget), for the development and commercialization of belinostat, pursuant to which we agreed to collaboration for the development and commercialization of belinostat. The agreement provides that we have the exclusive right to make, develop and commercialize belinostat in North America and India, with an option for China. The agreement also grants TopoTarget a co-promote option if and only if we do not maintain a minimum number (subject to adjustment for certain events outside of our control) of field personnel (as defined in the agreement) for a certain number of years post-approval of the PTCL indication.
Under the terms of the agreement, all development, including studies, will be conducted under a joint development plan and in accordance with a mutually agreed upon target product profile provided that we have final decision-making authority for all developmental activities in North America and India (and China upon exercise of the option for China) and TopoTarget has final decision-making authority for all developmental activities in all other jurisdictions. We have agreed to assume all responsibility for and future costs of the ongoing registrational PTCL trial. We and TopoTarget will conduct future planned clinical trials pursuant to the joint development plan, of which we will fund 70% of the development costs and TopoTarget will fund 30% of the development costs. We and TopoTarget will each pay 50% of the costs for chemical, pharmaceutical and other process development related to the manufacturing of the product that are incurred with a mutually agreed upon budget in the joint development plan. TopoTarget is responsible for supplying us with both clinical and commercial product.
Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, we paid TopoTarget an upfront fee of $30.0 million. In addition, on the successful achievement of certain development, regulatory and sales milestones, none of which have been achieved to date, we are obligated to issue 1.0 million shares of our common stock (subject to certain resale conditions) and pay TopoTarget up to $313.0 million. Also, we will pay TopoTarget royalties in the mid-teen digits based on net sales of the subject product in the defined territory. None of such royalties have been earned or paid since inception of the agreement.
The agreement will continue until the expiration of the last royalty payment period in the last country in the defined territory with certain provisions surviving, unless earlier terminated in accordance with its terms. We may terminate this agreement with 180 days notice to TopoTarget. We may also terminate immediately upon a prohibition on the use of the subject product or clinical hold by the FDA. TopoTarget may also terminate immediately in the event of a challenge (without TopoTargets consent) by us of the patents that cover the product.
27
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
(xi) Co-Development and Commercialization Agreement with Hanmi Pharmaceutical Company, SPI-2012
In late January 2012, we entered into a co-development and commercialization agreement with Hanmi Pharmaceutical Company, (Hanmi), for SPI-2012, formerly known as LAPS-GCSF, a drug for the treatment of chemotherapy induced neutropenia based on Hanmis proprietary LAPSCOVERY Technology. In consideration for the rights granted to us under the co-development and commercialization agreement with Hanmi, we paid Hanmi a fee which is included in research and development expense in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations because the technology has not yet achieved regulatory approval. Under the terms of the agreement, we will share the costs and expenses of the study with Hanmi, although we will have primary responsibility for them. If SPI-2012 is ultimately commercialized by us, we will have worldwide rights except for Korea, China and Japan upon payment of fees and milestone payments related to further development, regulatory approvals and sales targets.
(c) Service Agreements
In connection with the research and development of our drug products, we have entered into contracts with numerous third party service providers, such as radio-pharmacies, distributors, clinical trial centers, clinical research organizations, data monitoring centers, and with drug formulation, development and testing laboratories. The financial terms of these agreements are varied and generally obligate us to pay in stages, depending on achievement of certain events specified in the agreements, such as contract execution, reservation of service or production capacity, actual performance of service, or the successful accrual and dosing of patients.
At each period end, we accrue for all costs of goods and services received, with such accruals based on factors such as estimates of work performed, patient enrollment, completion of patient studies and other events. We are in a position to accelerate, slow-down or discontinue any or all of the projects that we are working on at any given point in time. Should we decide to discontinue and/or slow-down the work on any project, the associated costs for those projects would be limited to the extent of the work completed. Generally, we are able to terminate these contracts due to the discontinuance of the related project(s) and thus avoid paying for the services that have not yet been rendered and our future purchase obligations would reduce accordingly.
(d) Supply Agreements
In connection with our joint venture arrangement with CTI (see (b)(i) above), we entered into an amendment to the original supply agreement between Biogen and CTI, referred to as the CTI/Biogen Supply Agreement, modifying certain of the pricing and manufacturing technology transfer terms contained in the CTI/Biogen Supply Agreement and also providing that the term of the agreement may be shortened in some instances in the event of a mid-term manufacturing technology transfer. There are no milestone or royalty payments required pursuant to this agreement. The term of the agreement is until the manufacturing technology transfer is complete.
(e) Employment Agreement
We have entered into an employment agreement with Dr. Rajesh C. Shrotriya, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, which expires January 2, 2014. The employment agreement automatically renews for subsequent one-year calendar terms unless either party gives written notice of such partys intent not to renew the agreement at least 90 days prior to the commencement of the new term. Payment and benefits would become payable to Dr. Shrotriya in the event of termination by us for any reason other than cause, upon a change in control of the Company, or by Dr. Shrotriya for good reason.
(f) Deferred Compensation Plan
On September 2, 2011, the Board of Directors approved the Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the Plan). The Plan is intended to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the board of directors, or a designee or
28
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
designees of the Compensation Committee. The Plan is intended to be an unfunded plan which is maintained primarily to provide deferred compensation benefits for a select group of our employees including management, as selected by the Plan administrator (the Participants). Under the Plan, we provide the Participants with the opportunity to make annual elections to defer up to a specified amount or percentage of their eligible cash compensation, as established by the Plan administrator, and we have the option to make discretionary contributions. At September 30, 2013, deferrals and contributions totaling $3.7 million are included in other accrued obligations in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
(g) Litigation
We make provisions for liabilities when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Such provisions are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impact of any settlement negotiations, judicial and administrative rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular case. Litigation is inherently unpredictable. Although the ultimate resolution of these various matters cannot be determined at this time, we do not believe that such matters, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our condensed consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
We are presently responding to certain shareholder suits that purportedly stem from our March 12, 2013 press release, in which we announced anticipated changes in customer ordering patterns of FUSILEV. These complaints allege that, as a result of the March 12, 2013 press release, our stock price declined. The complaints further allege that during the putative class period certain defendants made misleadingly optimistic statements about FUSILEV sales, which inflated the trading price of our stock. The lawsuits seek relief in the form of monetary damages, costs and fees, and any other equitable or injunctive relief that the court deems appropriate.
We from time-to-time are involved in other claims and legal proceedings of a nature considered normal and incidental to our business. These matters may include product liability, intellectual property, employment, and other general claims.
Shareholder Litigation
Mark J. Sherwin v. Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Filed September 3, 2013 in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware; Case Number 8858). The complaint seeks inspection of Spectrums books and records under Delaware Code section 220. Specifically, the complaint seeks inspection of books and records concerning whether Spectrums officers and directors breached their fiduciary duties by causing the Company to make false statements concerning the performance of FUSILEV. The complaint also seeks fees and costs.
29
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
(h) SEC Subpoena
On April 1, 2013, we received a subpoena from the SEC for documents pursuant to a formal order of investigation. The subpoena followed our March 12, 2013 announcement that we anticipated a change in customer ordering patterns of FUSILEV. We continue to cooperate with this SEC investigation, though we cannot predict its outcome, or the timing of resolution.
12. | Stock-based Compensation |
We record share-based employee compensation expense for all equity-based programs, including stock options, restricted stock grants, 401(k) plan matching, and our employee stock purchase plan. Total expense recorded for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 is summarized below:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||
Research and development |
$ | 283 | $ | 528 | $ | 1,152 | $ | 1,316 | ||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
2,708 | 2,800 | 7,510 | 8,108 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total share-based compensation expense |
$ | 2,991 | $ | 3,328 | $ | 8,662 | $ | 9,424 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(all tabular amounts presented in thousands, except share and per share, and number of years)
(Unaudited)
13. | Income Taxes |
We apply an estimated annual effective tax rate (ETR) approach for calculating a tax provision for interim periods, as required under GAAP. We recorded a benefit (provision) for income taxes of $4.7 million and $10.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. Our ETR was 39% and 31% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. Our ETR differs from the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35% primarily as a result of nondeductible expenses, state income taxes, foreign income taxes, and the impact of a valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets.
Our provision for income taxes is computed using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for the expected future tax benefit to be derived from tax loss and credit carryforwards.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined using the enacted tax rates in effect for the years in which those tax assets are expected to be realized. A valuation allowance is established when it is more likely than not the future realization of all or some of the deferred tax assets will not be achieved. The evaluation of the need for a valuation allowance is performed on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis, and includes a review of all available positive and negative evidence.
Based on the weight of both positive and negative evidence, we concluded that it is more likely than not that the domestic net deferred tax assets would be realized, and therefore, we released our domestic valuation allowance during the quarter ended March 31, 2012. We released $23.0 million as part of the projected annual effective tax rate and released the remaining $24.0 million of the domestic valuation allowance as a discrete item in the quarter ended March 31, 2012. We maintain a valuation allowance against our foreign net deferred tax assets as we continue to conclude it not more likely than not that the foreign net deferred tax assets will be realized.
We recognize excess tax benefits associated with share-based compensation to stockholders equity only when realized. When assessing whether excess tax benefits relating to share-based compensation have been realized, we follow the with-and-without approach, excluding any indirect effects of the excess tax deductions. Under this approach, excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation are not deemed to be realized until after the utilization of all other tax benefits available to us.
We recognize the impact of a tax position in our financial statements only if that position is more likely than not of being sustained upon examination by taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. Any interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions will be reflected in income tax expense.
14. | Subsequent Event |
On October 3, 2013, we entered into an amendment (the Topotarget Amendment) to the License and Collaboration Agreement, dated February 2, 2010, as amended, by and between us and Topotarget. Under the Topotarget Amendment, among other things, we agreed to restructure the agreement to provide us with the right and the responsibility to manufacture (either through itself or one or more contract manufacturers) clinical, commercial and named patient supplies of Belinostat world-wide for an initial period from the amendment effective date through the date that is five years from the new drug application approval date and Topotarget being relieved of its existing responsibility regarding the same. Additionally, we agreed that Topotarget will purchase its requirements from us based on periodic forecasts and at cost plus percentage for such supplies. After the initial period, absent notices of termination, the supply arrangement shall continue for renewable periods.
31
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, in reliance upon the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements regarding our future product development activities and costs, the revenue potential (licensing, royalty and sales) of our products and product candidates, the success, safety and efficacy of our drug products, revenues, development timelines, product acquisitions, liquidity and capital resources and trends, and other statements containing forward-looking words, such as, believes, may, could, will, expects, intends, estimates, anticipates, plans, seeks, continues, or the negative thereof or variation thereon or similar terminology (although not all forward-looking statements contain these words). Such forward-looking statements are based on the reasonable beliefs of our management as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to our management. Readers should not put undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified; therefore, our actual results may differ materially from those described in any forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed in our periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, as well as those discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and the following factors:
| our ability to successfully develop, obtain regulatory approval for and market our products; |
| our ability to continue to grow sales revenue of our marketed products; |
| risks associated with doing business internationally; |
| our ability to generate and maintain sufficient cash resources to fund our business; |
| our ability to enter into strategic alliances with partners for manufacturing, development and commercialization; |
| efforts of our development partners; |
| the ability of our manufacturing partners to meet our timelines; |
| the ability to timely deliver product supplies to our customers; |
| our ability to identify new product candidates and to successfully integrate those product candidates into our operations; |
| the timing and/or results of pending or future clinical trials, and our reliance on contract research organizations; |
| our ability to protect our intellectual property rights; |
| competition in the marketplace for our drugs; |
| delay in approval of our products or new indications for our products by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA; |
| actions by the FDA and other regulatory agencies, including international agencies; |
| securing positive reimbursement for our products; |
| the impact of any product liability, or other litigation to which we are, or may become a party; |
| the impact of legislative or regulatory reform of the healthcare industry and the impact of recently enacted healthcare reform legislation; |
| the availability and price of acceptable raw materials and components from third-party suppliers, and their ability to meet our demands; |
| our ability, and that of our suppliers, development partners, and manufacturing partners, to comply with laws, regulations and standards, and the application and interpretation of those laws, regulations and standards, that govern or affect the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, the non-compliance with which may delay or prevent the development, manufacturing, regulatory approvals and sale of our products; |
| defending against claims relating to improper handling, storage or disposal of hazardous chemical, radioactive or biological materials which could be time consuming and expensive; |
| our ability to maintain the services of our key executives and technical and sales and marketing personnel; |
| the difficulty in predicting the timing or outcome of product development efforts and regulatory approvals; and |
| demand and market acceptance for our approved products. |
32
We do not plan to update any such forward-looking statements and expressly disclaim any duty to update the information contained in this report except as required by law.
You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of our operations in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes to those financial statements included in Part 1 of Item I of this Quarterly Report and our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes for the year ended December 31, 2012 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.
Business Outlook
We are a biotechnology company with fully integrated commercial and drug development operations, with a primary focus in oncology and hematology. Our strategy is comprised of acquiring, developing, and marketing a diverse pipeline of late-stage clinical and commercial products. We currently market four drugs:
| FUSILEV® injection for patients in the U.S. with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer and to counteract certain effects of methotrexate therapy; |
| ZEVALIN® injection for patients in the U.S. and various international markets with follicular non-Hodgkins lymphoma; |
| FOLOTYN® injection for patients in the U.S. with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma; and |
| Marqibo® injection for patients in the U.S. with Philadelphia chromosomenegative acute lymphoblastic leukemia. |
We also have a diversified pipeline of product candidates in advanced-stage Phase 2 and Phase 3 studies. We have assembled an integrated in-house scientific team, including formulation development, clinical development, medical research, regulatory affairs, biostatistics and data management, and have established a commercial infrastructure for the marketing of our drug products. We also leverage the expertise of our worldwide partners to assist in the execution of our business strategies.
Our business strategy is comprised of the following initiatives:
| Maximizing the growth potential of our marketed drugs. |
| Optimizing our development portfolio and maximizing the asset values of its components. |
| Expanding our pipeline of development stage and commercial drugs through business development activities. |
| Managing our financial resources effectively. |
| Further enhancing the organizational structure to meet our corporate objectives. |
Financial Condition
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We are dependent upon revenues from our four commercialized drugs to fund our operations. As of September 30, 2013, we had an aggregate $75.3 million in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities. We believe that we have adequate liquidity to fund our essential operations for at least the next twelve months. However, we may seek to obtain additional capital through the sale of debt or equity securities, especially in conjunction with opportunistic acquisitions or licensing arrangements. Nonetheless, we may be unable to obtain such additional capital when needed, or on terms favorable to us or our stockholders, if at all.
If we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, the percentage ownership of each of our stockholders will be reduced. In addition, these equity securities could provide for rights, preferences, or privileges senior to those of the holders of our common stock. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of debt securities, the terms of such securities may place restrictions on our ability to operate our business.
On September 5, 2012, we entered into a credit agreement with Bank of America and Wells Fargo Bank for a $75.0 million revolving line of credit, which was reduced to $50.0 million on July 16, 2013 in connection with our acquisition of Talon. As of September 30, 2013, $25.0 million has been drawn down on the revolving line of credit and we were in compliance with all financial covenants.
33
Net Cash (Used In) Provided by Operating Activities
Cash used in operating activities was $(9.5) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, as compared to cash provided by operating activities of $63.9 million in the prior year period. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities during the current period, as compared to the prior year period is primarily a function of the working capital drivers of (i) decreased revenue and related collections and (ii) increased payments to reduce trade payables between these periods.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, our cash collections from customers totaled $174.5 million and $228.0 million, respectively, representing 153% and 115% of reported revenue for the same periods.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, our cash payments to our employees, and our vendors for product and services, totaled $191.4 million and $159.4 million, respectively.
Net Cash (Used In) Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities of $(14.3) million in the first nine months of 2013 was due to the acquisition of Talon for $11.2 million (Note 8(a)), a $3.0 million payment for the Melphalan license (Note 8(b)), and the $0.1 million purchase of property and equipment.
Net Cash (Used In) Provided By Financing Activities
Net cash (used in) financing activities of $(42.1) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, primarily relates to the $50.0 million net repayment of our line of credit, $1.7 million purchase of treasury stock which was subsequently retired, the $0.6 million repurchase of shares to satisfy minimum tax withholding for the vesting of restricted stock which was partially offset by $7.0 million in proceeds as a result of the Munidpharma contract amendment and $3.0 million in proceeds from the issuance of common stock as a result of the exercise of employee stock options.
Results of Operations
Three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012
Total Revenues. A summary of our total revenues is as follows:
Three months ended September 30, | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Product sales, net: |
||||||||||||||||
FUSILEV |
$ | 23.1 | $ | 52.0 | $ | (28.9 | ) | (56.0 | )% | |||||||
FOLOTYN |
10.5 | 6.0 | 4.5 | 75.0 | % | |||||||||||
ZEVALIN |
7.7 | 7.9 | (0.2 | ) | (2.5 | )% | ||||||||||
Marqibo |
0.1 | | 0.1 | >100.0 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 41.4 | $ | 65.9 | $ | (24.5 | ) | (37.2 | )% | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
License fees |
1.0 | 3.1 | (2.1 | ) | (67.7 | )% | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 42.4 | $ | 69.0 | $ | (26.6 | ) | (38.6 | )% | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We calculate a provision for estimated product returns, sales discounts, rebates, government chargebacks, and distribution and data fees (collectively, gross-to-net estimates) the nature of which is discussed within Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and Assumptions in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. Our gross revenue for three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 is reduced by these estimates to derive our product sales, net as summarized in Note 5 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
We defer revenue recognition in full if/when these estimates are not reasonably determinable at the time of sale. Product sales, net, may vary from quarter-to-quarter based on customer mix, and in particular, whether our customers are entitled to government mandated pricing.
FUSILEV revenue decrease is primarily due to a change in buying patterns of wholesalers, a lower average net sales price, and a decrease in underlying demand from end-users, as the shortage in generic leucovorin abated in late 2012. In addition, government rebates and chargebacks as a percentage of gross sales increased by 10% as compared to the same period in 2012; this was driven primarily by customer mix between the periods.
34
FOLOTYN revenue increase is due to a full quarter of recognition of product sales in 2013, as compared to the prior year period. We acquired this drug through the acquisition of Allos on September 5, 2012 see Note 8(c).
ZEVALIN revenue decrease is due to a slight decrease in product demand for U.S. sales, which did not fully offset a slight increase in our average net sales price per unit. Beginning in the second quarter of 2013, we terminated our ZEVALIN services agreement with Bayer, and transitioned to a sales distribution model in Europe. This transition has had a favorable impact on our 2013 unit sales in Europe.
Marqibo revenue derived in 2013 is a result of our acquisition of Talon in July 2013, as discussed in Note 8(a).
License fees: License revenue decreased due to certain affects resulting from our amendment of the Allergan agreement for Apaziquone, and the reacquisition of associated licensing rights, as described in Note 11(b) (viii).
Operating Costs and Expenses
Our operating costs and expenses are summarized in the following table:
Three months ended September 30, | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 (Restated See Note 2) |
|||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of product sales (excludes amortization of purchased intangibles) |
$ | 8.2 | $ | 11.2 | $ | (3.0 | ) | (26.8 | )% | |||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
29.0 | 22.9 | 6.1 | 26.6 | % | |||||||||||
Research and development |
13.6 | 10.0 | 3.6 | 36.0 | % | |||||||||||
Amortization of purchased intangible assets |
4.9 | 1.8 | 3.1 | >100.0 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses |
$ | 55.7 | $ | 45.9 | $ | 9.8 | 21.4 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
$ | 0.7 | $ | 0.3 | $ | 0.4 | >100 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Product Sales. The overall decrease in total cost of product sales relates primarily to a decrease in product revenues which was partially offset by an increase of $0.7 million for inventory reserves.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased primarily due to:
| $2.4 million increase in legal and professional fees related to the Talon acquisition. |
| $2.0 million increase in severance costs of Talon employees. |
| $1.7 million increase in legal and professional fees related to the shareholder lawsuit and patent litigation. |
| $1.7 million increase in professional fees which include legal fees for patents and trademarks, audit and tax services. |
| $1.2 million increase in compensation, consulting and associated benefits. |
| $0.9 million increase in marketing expenses which include the promotion of FOLOTYN and ZEVALIN outside the U.S. |
These increases were partially offset by:
| $2.2 million reduction in legal and professional fees related to the Allos tender offer and the Bayer agreement licensing rights to market ZEVALIN outside the U.S. |
| $1.6 million reduction in Allos severance costs. |
Research and Development. Research and development expense increase is primarily due to:
| $1.3 million increase in clinical trial outsourcing. |
| $0.7 million increase in severance costs of Talon employees. |
| $0.6 million increase in consulting, compensation and associated benefits. |
| $0.7 million increase in grants and other expenses. |
These increases were partially offset by:
| $0.8 million decrease in the reimbursement of expenses compared to the same period in 2012 primarily due to the amendment of the Allergan agreement in the first quarter of 2013. |
| $0.5 million reduction in Allos severance costs. |
Amortization and Impairment of Intangible Assets. The non-cash amortization and impairment of intangible assets increased $3.1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to the amortization of intangibles from the acquisitions of ZEVALIN Ex. U.S. Rights, Allos and Talon.
35
Other Income (Expense), net. Other income (expense), net increased primarily due to foreign currency gains partially offset by a $0.7 million increase in interest expense in connection with the revolving line of credit. In the current economic environment, our principal investment objective is preservation of capital. Accordingly, for the foreseeable future we expect to earn minimal interest yields on our investments, until such time as the credit markets recover.
Three months ended September 30, | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 (Restated See Note 2) |
|||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Benefit (provision) for income taxes |
$ | 4.7 | $ | (1.9 | ) | $ | 6.6 | >100.0 | % | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit (Provision) for Income Taxes. As a result of our year-to-date operating loss, we recorded a benefit for income taxes of $4.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, we recorded a provision of $1.9 million primarily as a result of generating $23.4 million in operating profits. The release of the valuation allowance in 2012 was due to a change in judgment regarding the expected realization of our domestic deferred tax assets after considering positive and negative evidence.
Nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012
Total Revenues. A summary of our total revenues is as follows:
Nine months ended September 30, | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 (Restated See Note 2) |
|||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Product sales, net: |
||||||||||||||||
FUSILEV |
$ | 47.8 | $ | 159.8 | $ | (112.0 | ) | (70 | )% | |||||||
FOLOTYN |
33.0 | 6.0 | 27.0 | >100 | % | |||||||||||
ZEVALIN |
22.1 | 22.5 | (0.4 | ) | (2 | )% | ||||||||||
Marqibo |
0.1 | | 0.1 | >100 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 103.0 | $ | 188.3 | $ | (85.3 | ) | (45.3 | )% | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
License and contract revenue |
11.3 | 9.3 | 2.0 | 22 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 114.3 | $ | 197.6 | $ | (83.3 | ) | (42.2 | )% | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We calculate a provision for estimated product returns, sales discounts, rebates, government chargebacks, and distribution and data fees (collectively, gross-to-net estimates) the nature of which is discussed within Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and Assumptions in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. Our gross revenue for nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 is reduced by these estimates to derive our product sales, net as summarized in Note 5 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
We defer revenue recognition in full if/when these estimates are not reasonably determinable at the time of sale. Product sales, net, may vary from quarter-to-quarter based on customer mix, and in particular, whether our customers are entitled to government mandated pricing.
FUSILEV revenue decrease is primarily due to a change in buying patterns of wholesalers, a lower average net sales price, and a decrease in underlying demand by end-users, as the shortage in generic leucovorin abated in late 2012. In addition, government rebates and chargebacks as a percentage of gross sales increased by 17% as compared to the same period in 2012. This was driven primarily by a change in customer mix, and to a lesser extent, a refinement to our methodology to estimate rebate claims remaining in channel inventory.
36
FOLOTYN revenue increase is due to nine months of recognition of product sales in 2013, as compared to the prior year period. We acquired this drug through the acquisition of Allos on September 5, 2012 see Note 8(c).
ZEVALIN revenue was relatively flat between the 2013 and 2012 periods. The slight decrease is attributable to less U.S. product demand and a minor decrease in our average net sales price per unit, which was not fully offset by an increase in European product demand. Beginning in the second quarter of 2013, we terminated our ZEVALIN services agreement with Bayer, and transitioned to a sales distribution model in Europe. This transition has had a favorable impact on 2013 unit sales in Europe.
Marqibo revenue derived in 2013 is a result of our acquisition of Talon in July 2013, as discussed in Note 8(a).
License fees: During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, we recognized $11.3 million and $9.3 million, respectively, of licensing revenues from the amortization of a $41.5 million upfront payment we received from Allergan in 2008, and $16.0 million upfront payment we received from Nippon Kayaku and Handok in the first quarter of 2010. Of the $11.3 million recognized in 2013, $8.3 million relates to licensing fees received from Allergan.
Operating Costs and Expenses
Our operating costs and expenses are summarized in the following table:
Nine months ended September 30, | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 (Restated See Note 2) |
|||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of product sales (excludes amortization of purchased intangibles) |
$ | 22.3 | $ | 31.4 | $ | (9.1 | ) | (29.0 | )% | |||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
73.6 | 64.2 | 9.4 | 14.6 | % | |||||||||||
Research and development |
35.9 | 27.8 | 8.1 | 29.1 | % | |||||||||||
Amortization and impairment of purchased intangible assets |
14.8 | 4.4 | 10.4 | >100.0 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses |
$ | 146.6 | $ | 127.9 | $ | 18.8 | 14.7 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
$ | (0.7 | ) | (1.1 | ) | 0.4 | 36.4 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Product Sales. The overall decrease in total cost of sales relates primarily to a decrease in product revenues which was partially offset by an increase of $1.6 million for excess inventory.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased as a result of the inclusion of Allos in the financial statements and is primarily due to:
| $2.2 million increase in professional fees which include legal for patents and trademarks, audit and tax services. |
| $3.0 million increase in legal and professional fees related to the Talon acquisition. |
| $1.7 million increase in marketing expenses and commercial costs related to FOLOTYN and sales of ZEVALIN outside the U.S. |
| $2.0 million increase in severance costs of Talon employees. |
| $4.0 million increase in legal and professional fees related to the shareholder lawsuit and patent litigation. |
| $2.9 million increase in compensation and associated benefits, which is mainly attributable to general and administrative expenses as a result of the addition of higher level management and the inclusion of personnel for Allos and personnel in Japan and Netherlands, and also includes a $0.4 million increase in recruitment fees. |
| $0.6 million increase in other expenses consisting of computer software and services as well as rent and utilities for new facilities in Japan, Colorado and the Netherlands. |
37
These increases were partially offset by:
| $5.5 million reduction in legal and professional fees related to the Allos tender offer and the Bayer agreement licensing rights to market ZEVALIN outside the U.S. |
| $1.6 million reduction in Allos severance costs. |
Research and Development. Research and development expenses increased as a result of the inclusion of Allos in the financial statements and is primarily due to:
| $3.1 million increase in clinical study expenses. |
| $1.1 million increase in continuing medical education grants. |
| $1.1 million increase in consulting, compensation and associated benefits. |
These increases were partially offset by:
| $5.7 million decrease in the reimbursement of expenses compared to the same period in 2012 primarily due to the amendment of the Allergan agreement in the first quarter of 2013. |
| $2.4 million write off of deferred payment contingency as a result of the amendment to the Mundipharma agreement. |
| $0.5 million reduction in Allos severance costs. |
Amortization and Impairment of Intangible Assets. The amortization and impairment of intangible assets increased $10.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, of which $1.0 million is due to the impairment of our FOLOTYN distribution rights as a result of the Mundipharma contract amendment in May 2013. The remaining amount is due to the amortization of intangibles assets from the acquisitions of ZEVALIN Ex. U.S. Rights, Allos and Talon.
Other Income (Expense), net. Other income (expense), net decreased $0.4 million primarily due to foreign currency gains partially offset by an increase in interest expense in connection with the revolving line of credit. In the current economic environment, our principal investment objective is preservation of capital. Accordingly, for the foreseeable future we expect to earn minimal interest yields on our investments, until such time as the credit markets recover.
Nine months ended September 30, | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 (Restated See Note 2) |
|||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Benefit for income taxes |
$ | 10.2 | $ | 18.1 | $ | (7.9 | ) | (43.6 | %) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit for Income Taxes. As a result of our year-to-date operating loss, we recorded a benefit for income taxes of $10.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we recorded a tax benefit of $18.1 million primarily as a result of the releasing $26.0 million of valuation allowance on domestic deferred tax assets as of January 1, 2012 as a discrete tax adjustment.
The release of the valuation allowance in 2012 was due to a change in judgment regarding the expected realization of our domestic deferred tax assets after considering positive and negative evidence which existed as of March 31, 2012. We maintain a valuation allowance against our foreign net deferred tax assets as we continue to conclude it is not more likely than not that the foreign net deferred tax assets will be realized.
The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 was enacted on January 2, 2013 and retroactively reinstated the U.S. R&D tax credit to January 1, 2012. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 we recognized $0.4 million as a discrete tax benefit due to the retroactive reinstatement of the U.S. R&D tax credit for 2012.
38
Roll-forward of Gross Revenue to Net Revenue
Provisions for government rebates, commercial rebates, chargebacks, data and distribution product returns, sales discounts and rebates and estimates for chargebacks are established as a reduction of product sales revenue at the time revenues are recognized. We consider various factors in determining such provisions. Such estimated amounts are deducted from our gross sales to determine our net revenues. Provisions for rebates, chargebacks, data and distribution fees, GPO fees, prompt pay discount and returns are classified as part of our accrued obligations. Changes in our estimates, if any, are recorded in the statements of operations in the period the change is determined. If we materially over or under estimate the amount, there could be a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the following is a roll-forward of the reductions to revenue:
Rebates and Chargebacks |
Data and Distribution, GPO Fees, and Inventory Management Fees |
Prompt Pay Discount |
Returns | Total | ||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Period ended September 30, 2013: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at beginning of the period |
$ | 26,176 | $ | 14,149 | $ | 1,451 | $ | 5,056 | $ | 46,832 | ||||||||||
Add: provisions (recovery): |
46,232 | 14,680 | 139 | (2,299 | ) | 58,753 | ||||||||||||||
Less: Credits or actual allowances: |
(42,453 | ) | (22,854 | ) | (1,251 | ) | (121 | ) | (66,680 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Balances at the close of the period |
$ | 29,955 | $ | 5,975 | $ | 339 | $ | 2,636 | $ | 38,905 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Period ended September 30, 2012: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at beginning of period |
$ | 9,064 | $ | 9,808 | $ | 992 | $ | 4,000 | $ | 23,864 | ||||||||||
Add: provisions (recovery): |
68,012 | 21,551 | 3,684 | 1,040 | 94,287 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Credits or actual allowances: |
(52,695 | ) | (19,763 | ) | (3,317 | ) | (33 | ) | (75,808 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Balances at the close of the period |
$ | 24,381 | $ | 11,596 | $ | 1,359 | $ | 5,007 | $ | 42,343 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recorded as reductions to revenue on our accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for 2013 and 2012 are reflected in the table above. The basis and methods of estimating these reductions, used by management, are more fully described in Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and Assumptions in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Since inception, we have not engaged in material off-balance sheet activities, including the use of structured finance, special purpose entities or variable interest entities.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. These accounting principles require us to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments and assumptions upon which we rely are reasonable based upon information available to us at the time that these estimates, judgments and assumptions are made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. To the extent there are material differences between these estimates, judgments or assumptions and actual results, our financial statements will be affected.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, there were no significant changes in our critical accounting policies and estimates. Please refer to Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 for a more complete discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates.
39
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
In the normal course of business, our operations are exposed to risks associated with fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.
The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve capital, while at the same time maximizing yields without significantly increasing risk. We do not utilize hedging contracts or similar instruments.
We are exposed to certain market risks. Our primary exposures relate to (1) interest rate risk on our investment portfolio, (2) credit risk of the companies bonds in which we invest, (3) interest rate risk on borrowings under the Credit Facility, (4) general credit market risks as have existed since late 2007 and (5) the financial viability of the institutions which hold our capital and through which we have invested our funds. We manage such risks on our investment portfolio by investing in highly liquid, highly rated instruments and not investing in long-term maturity instruments.
Our investments, as of September 30, 2013 and 2012, were primarily in money market accounts, short-term corporate bonds, certificates of deposit, U.S. Treasury bills and U.S. Treasury-backed securities. We believe the financial institutions through which we have invested our funds are strong and well capitalized and our instruments are held in accounts segregated from the assets of the institutions. Because of our ability to generally redeem these investments at par on short notice and without penalty, we believe that changes in interest rates would have an immaterial effect on the fair value of these investments. If a 10% change in interest rates were to have occurred on September 30, 2013 or 2012, any decline in the fair value of our investments or increase in our obligations under our credit agreement (described below) would not be material in the context of our condensed consolidated financial statements. In addition, we are exposed to certain market risks associated with credit ratings of corporations whose corporate bonds we may purchase from time to time. If these companies were to experience a significant detrimental change in their credit ratings, the fair market value of such corporate bonds may significantly decrease. If these companies were to default on these corporate bonds, we may lose part or all of our principal. We believe that we effectively manage this market risk by diversifying our investments and investing in highly rated securities.
In addition, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations relating to payments we make to vendors, suppliers and license partners using foreign currencies.
In connection with our acquisition of Allos Therapeutics, Inc. in September 2012, we entered into a credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A. as the administrative agent and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as an initial lender for a $75.0 million revolving line of credit. This line of credit was reduced to $50.0 million on July 16, 2013 in connection with our acquisition of Talon Therapeutics. Inc. and can be increased to $100.0 million, subject to meeting certain customary conditions and obtaining commitments for such increase from our lenders. The credit agreement contains certain financial covenants and expires on September 5, 2014.
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer (CEO) and chief financial officer (CFO), evaluated the design and the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2013. The term disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the companys management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
At the time that our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 was filed on February 28, 2013, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2012. At the time that our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 was filed on May 9, 2013, and at the time that our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 was filed on August 9, 2013, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013. Subsequent to these evaluations, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2012, March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013, and continue to not be effective as of September 30, 2013 because of a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, as described below.
40
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
While preparing our financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, we determined that our June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (Condensed) Consolidated Balance Sheets, included within our respective Form 10-Q and Form 10-K filings presented an aggregate $7.7 million and $7.2 million overstatement, respectively, within accounts payable and other accrued obligations and accrued drug development costs.
The components of the accounts payable and other accrued obligations and accrued drug development costs overstatement comprise excess accruals that correspond with (i) research and development and sales and marketing activities that accumulated over multiple reporting periods from January 1, 2007 to June 30, 2013, and (ii) excess liabilities that were recorded as part of our business combination accounting for the 2009 acquisition of RIT Oncology, LLC that did not require settlement, and were not identified as such within a timely manner.
We have concluded that, when aggregated as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, these deficiencies represent a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting, and accordingly, our internal control over financial reporting was ineffective at both September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal controls over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a companys annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. We have developed, and are currently implementing, a remediation plan for this material weakness. We will continue to execute our remediation plan, which includes, among other things, hiring additional experienced accounting personnel and expanding training for our accounting personnel. The successful remediation of this material weakness will require review and evidence of the effectiveness of the related internal controls as part of our next annual assessment of our internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013.
As we continue to evaluate and work to enhance internal control over financial reporting, we may determine that additional measures should be taken to address these or other control deficiencies, and/or that we should modify the remediation plan described above.
Notwithstanding our material weakness, we have concluded that the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, fairly present in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows as of, and for, the periods presented.
Except as disclosed above, no change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations of the Effectiveness of Internal Controls
A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the internal control system are met. Because of inherent limitations in any control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within a company have been detected. We are continuously seeking to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of our operations and of our internal controls.
41
ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
We are involved with various legal matters arising in the ordinary course of business. We make provisions for liabilities when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Such provisions are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impact of any settlement negotiations, judicial and administrative rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular case. Litigation is inherently unpredictable. Although the ultimate resolution of these various matters cannot be determined at this time, we do not believe that such matters, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our condensed consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
Certain of the legal proceedings in which we are involved are discussed in Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies, to our accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, and are hereby incorporated by reference.
42
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
The risks described in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. These risk factors do not identify all of the risks that we face. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could also be affected by factors that are not presently known to us or that we currently consider to be immaterial. Except for the below, there have been no material changes to the Risk Factors section included in our 2012 Annual Report:
We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting which existed as of December 31, 2012, and has not been adequately remediated as of March 31, 2013, June 30, 2013, and September 30, 2013. If we fail to properly remediate this or any future weaknesses or deficiencies or maintain proper and effective internal controls, our ability to produce accurate and timely financial statements could be impaired and investors views of us could be harmed.
While preparing our financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, we have determined that we have a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting which also existed as of December 31, 2012. The financial misstatements resulting from our material weakness resulted in a restatement of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained herein. See Item 4, Controls and Procedures for a complete discussion of this material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting.
Although we are undertaking steps to address this material weakness, the existence of a material weakness is an indication that there is more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of our financial statements will not be prevented or detected in the current or any future period. There can be no assurance that we will be able to fully implement our plans and controls, as described in Item 4, to address this material weakness, or that the plans and controls, if implemented, will be successful in fully remediating this material weakness. In addition, we may in the future identify further material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting that we have not discovered to date. If we fail to successfully remediate the identified material weakness, or we identify further material weaknesses in our internal controls, the markets confidence in our financial statements could decline and the market price of our common stock could be adversely impacted.
43
ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS |
Exhibit |
Description | |
2.1 | Securities Purchase Agreement, dated July 16, 2013, by and among Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eagle Acquisition Merger Sub, Inc., certain entities affiliated with Warburg Pincus & Co. and certain entities affiliated with Deerfield Management, LLC. (Filed as Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 19, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.) | |
2.2 | Stock Purchase Agreement, dated July 16, 2013, by and among Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eagle Acquisition Merger Sub, Inc. and Talon Therapeutics, Inc. (Filed as Exhibit 2.2 to Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 19, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.) | |
2.3 | Contingent Value Rights Agreement, dated July 16, 2013, by and among Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Talon Therapeutics, Inc. and Corporate Stock Transfer Inc. as rights agent. (Filed as Exhibit 2.3 to Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 19, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.) | |
2.4 | Exchange Agreement, dated July 16, 2013, by and among Talon Therapeutics, Inc. and certain entities affiliated with Deerfield Management, LLC, including the Registration Rights Agreement by and among Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and certain entities affiliated with Deerfield Management, LLC, as Exhibit A thereto. (Filed as Exhibit 2.4 to Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 19, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.) | |
10.1 |
Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement, dated July 16, 2013, by and among Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bank of America, N.A., in its capacity as administrative agent for the lenders, and other parties signatory thereto. (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 19, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.) | |
31.1+ | Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
31.2+ | Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
32.1* | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. | |
32.2* | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. | |
101.INS+ | XBRL Instance Document. | |
101.SCH+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | |
101.CAL+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. | |
101.DEF+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. | |
101.LAB+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. | |
101.PRE+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
+ | Filed herewith. |
* | Furnished herewith. |
44
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. | ||||||
Date: November 18, 2013 | By: | /s/ Kurt A. Gustafson | ||||
Kurt A. Gustafson | ||||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||||
(Authorized Signatory and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
45
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit |
Description | |
2.1 | Securities Purchase Agreement, dated July 16, 2013, by and among Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eagle Acquisition Merger Sub, Inc., certain entities affiliated with Warburg Pincus & Co. and certain entities affiliated with Deerfield Management, LLC. (Filed as Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 19, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.) | |
2.2 | Stock Purchase Agreement, dated July 16, 2013, by and among Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eagle Acquisition Merger Sub, Inc. and Talon Therapeutics, Inc. (Filed as Exhibit 2.2 to Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 19, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.) | |
2.3 | Contingent Value Rights Agreement, dated July 16, 2013, by and among Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Talon Therapeutics, Inc. and Corporate Stock Transfer Inc. as rights agent. (Filed as Exhibit 2.3 to Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 19, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.) | |
2.4 | Exchange Agreement, dated July 16, 2013, by and among Talon Therapeutics, Inc. and certain entities affiliated with Deerfield Management, LLC, including the Registration Rights Agreement by and among Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and certain entities affiliated with Deerfield Management, LLC, as Exhibit A thereto. (Filed as Exhibit 2.4 to Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 19, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.) | |
10.1 | Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement, dated July 16, 2013, by and among Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bank of America, N.A., in its capacity as administrative agent for the lenders, and other parties signatory thereto. (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 19, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.) | |
31.1+ | Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
31.2+ | Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
32.1* | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. | |
32.2* | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. | |
101.INS+ | XBRL Instance Document. | |
101.SCH+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | |
101.CAL+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. | |
101.DEF+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. | |
101.LAB+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. | |
101.PRE+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
+ | Filed herewith. |
* | Furnished herewith. |
46
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Rajesh C. Shrotriya, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: November 18, 2013 | /s/ Rajesh C. Shrotriya | |||||
Rajesh C. Shrotriya, MD | ||||||
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President |
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
I, Kurt A. Gustafson, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
November 18, 2013 | /s/ Kurt A. Gustafson | |||||
Kurt A. Gustafson | ||||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Rajesh C. Shrotriya, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Date: November 18, 2013 | By: | /s/ Rajesh C. Shrotriya | ||||
Name: | Rajesh C. Shrotriya, MD | |||||
Title: | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President |
This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, or, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporated by reference.
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
I, Kurt A. Gustafson, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Date: November 18, 2013 | By: | /s/ Kurt A. Gustafson | ||||
Name: | Kurt Gustafson | |||||
Title: | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, or, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporated by reference.
Commitments and Contingencies
|
9 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
|||
Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] | |||
Commitments and Contingencies |
(a) Facility Lease We sublease our principal executive office in Henderson, Nevada under a non-cancelable operating lease expiring April 30, 2014. We also lease our research and development facility in Irvine, California under a non-cancelable operating lease expiring June 30, 2016. Each lease agreement contains certain scheduled rent increases which are accounted for on a straight-line basis. As part of our Irvine facility lease renewal in 2009, the landlord agreed to contribute up to approximately $1.5 million toward the cost of tenant improvements. The tenant improvements were completed in 2010 at an aggregate cost of approximately $1.4 million. This landlord contribution is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease as a reduction to rent expense. We also lease small administrative offices in Colorado, New Jersey, Westlake Village (California), Tokyo, and Mumbai. (b) Licensing Agreements, Co-Development Agreements, and Milestone Payments We are developing almost all of our drug candidates pursuant to license agreements that provide us with rights in certain territories, among other things, to develop, sublicense, manufacture and sell the drugs. We are generally required to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop the drugs, and are generally responsible for all development, patent filing and maintenance, sales and marketing and liability insurance costs, and are generally contingently obligated to make milestone payments to the licensors if we successfully reach development and regulatory milestones specified in the license agreements. In addition, we are obligated to pay royalties and, in some cases, milestone payments based on net sales, if any, after marketing approval is obtained from regulatory authorities. The potential contingent development and regulatory milestone obligations under all of our licensing agreements are generally tied to progress through the various regulatory authorities’ approval process, which approval significantly depends on positive clinical trial results. The following items are typical of such milestone events: conclusion of Phase 2 or commencement of Phase 3 clinical trials; filing of new drug applications in each of the U.S., Europe and Japan; and approvals from each of the regulatory agencies in those jurisdictions. (i) ZEVALIN licensing and development in the United States In December 2008, we acquired rights to commercialize and develop ZEVALIN in the United States as the result of a transaction with Cell Therapeutics, Inc. (“CTI”). Pursuant to the transfer of the ZEVALIN assets from CTI to a joint venture, RIT Oncology LLC (“RIT”), in December 2008, RIT assumed certain agreements with various third parties related to ZEVALIN intellectual property. These currently effective agreements relate to the manufacture, use and sale of ZEVALIN in the United States and include (i) a license from Biogen, Idec, Inc. (“Biogen”) (ii) a license-back to Biogen for limited uses including fulfillment of a supply obligation to CTI, (iii) a sublicense from Biogen to certain ZEVALIN patents held by Genentech, Inc., (iv) a sublicense from Biogen to certain ZEVALIN patents held by GlaxoSmithKline and Glaxo Group Limited, and (v) a sublicense from Biogen to certain ZEVALIN patents held by Corixa Corporation, Coulter Pharmaceutical, Inc., The Regents of the University of Michigan and GlaxoSmithKline. In accordance with the terms of such agreements, RIT is required to meet specified payment obligations including a commercial milestone payment to Corixa Corporation of $5.0 million based on ZEVALIN sales in the United States, which has not been met as of September 30, 2013, as well as U.S. net sales-based royalties of low to mid-single digits to Genentech, Inc. and mid-single digits to Corixa Corporation. Such agreements generally continue until the last to expire of the licensed patents unless earlier terminated in accordance with the terms of the agreement. The patents that are subject to the agreements expire between 2014 and 2019. (ii) Asset Purchase Agreement between CTI and Biogen, ZEVALIN U.S. In connection with the joint venture arrangement with CTI, we entered into an amendment to the original asset purchase agreement between CTI and Biogen, referred to as the CTI/Biogen Agreement, modifying future milestone payments. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, as amended, (i) upon the achievement of the specified FDA approval milestone, which was achieved in 2009, RIT (as successor to CTI) paid Biogen an additional amount of $5.5 million, (ii) RIT may be required to make an additional $10.0 million milestone payment upon the achievement of an additional FDA approval milestone, and (iii) RIT is required to make yearly royalty payments determined as a mid-single to mid-teen digits percentage of yearly net sales for the preceding year, increasing with the passage of time. The agreement has an indefinite term and is no longer subject to termination; provided, however, that the royalty obligations automatically terminate upon the latest to occur of expiration of the subject patents, the sale by a third party of a biosimilar product in the U.S. or December 31, 2015. CTI’s rights and obligations, including its payment obligations to Biogen for royalties on net sales of ZEVALIN and an additional regulatory milestone payment, under both the CTI/Biogen Agreement and the amendment were assigned to and assumed by RIT in connection with the closing of the joint venture transaction. (iii) License and Asset Purchase Agreement with Bayer Pharma, ZEVALIN Ex-U.S. On April 1, 2012, through a subsidiary, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Cayman, L.P., we completed the acquisition of licensing rights to market ZEVALIN outside of the U.S., referred to as the ZEVALIN Ex-US Rights, from Bayer Pharma AG, or Bayer. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Spectrum acquired all rights including marketing, selling, intellectual property and access to existing inventory of ZEVALIN from Bayer. We currently market ZEVALIN in the U.S. and this agreement expands our commercial efforts to the rest of the world. ZEVALIN is currently approved in more than 40 countries outside the U.S. for the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including countries in Europe, Latin America and Asia. In consideration for the rights granted under the agreement, concurrent with the closing, Spectrum paid Bayer a one-time fee of Euro 19 million or approximately $25.4 million, and will pay Bayer royalties based on a mid-teen digits percentage of net sales of the licensed products in all territories worldwide except the U.S., with specific rates subject to confidential treatment pursuant to an order by the SEC. Under the agreement, we also acquired access to existing inventory of ZEVALIN and concurrent with the closing, entered into certain ancillary agreements including but not limited to a transition services agreement to transition the business. Unless earlier terminated, the term of the agreement continues until the expiration of our royalty payment obligations which, in turn, run until the last-to-expire patent covering the sale of a licensed product in the relevant country or fifteen (15) years from the date of first commercial sale of the licensed product in such country, whichever is longer. This agreement may be terminated in the event of a material default, which is defined to include: (i) our failure to timely pay royalty payments under this agreement or payments under certain related agreements; (ii) our insolvency; and (iii) our breach and the resulting termination of an Amended and Restated License Agreement between Biogen and Bayer, dated as of January 16, 2012. (iv) Amended and Restated License Agreement with Merck & Cie AG, FUSILEV In May 2006, we amended and restated a license agreement with Merck & Cie AG, a Swiss corporation, which we assumed in connection with the acquisition of the assets of Targent. Pursuant to the license agreement with Merck & Cie, we obtained the exclusive license to use regulatory filings related to FUSILEV and a non-exclusive license under certain patents and know-how related to FUSILEV to develop, make, and have made, use, sell and have sold FUSILEV in the field of oncology in North America. In addition, we have the right of first opportunity to negotiate an exclusive license to manufacture, have manufactured, use and sell FUSILEV products outside the field of oncology in North America. Also, under the terms of the license agreement, we paid Merck & Cie $100,000 for the achievement of FDA approval of an injectable form of FUSILEV. Merck & Cie is also eligible to receive a $200,000 payment upon achievement of FDA approval of an oral form of FUSILEV, in addition to royalties in the mid-single digits based on a percentage of net sales. The term of the license agreement is determined on a product-by-product and country-by-country basis until royalties are no longer owed under the license agreement. The license agreement expires in its entirety after the date that we no longer owe any royalties to Merck & Cie. We have the unilateral right to terminate the license agreement, in its entirety or on a product-by-product or country-by-country basis, at any time for any reason and either party may terminate the license agreement due to material breach of the terms of the license agreement by or insolvency of the other party. (v) Asset Purchase Agreement with Targent, Inc., FUSILEV In March 2006, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Targent, Inc. (“Targent”). As part of the consideration for the purchase of certain assets, we agreed to pay milestone payments to Targent upon the achievement of certain regulatory events as well as for certain sales levels for FUSILEV within a calendar year. In connection with the achievement of the FDA approval milestone in April 2011, we issued an aggregate of 0.7 million shares of common stock to certain of Targent’s stockholders, as directed by Targent. We capitalized $6.3 million associated with this milestone as an intangible asset during 2011, which is being amortized over the estimated useful life of 8.7 years.
In addition, in connection with the achievement of the first sales milestone of $40.0 million in May 2011 we issued 0.6 million shares of common stock to certain of Targent’s stockholders (which was equivalent value to approximately $5.0 million in cash), as directed by Targent. In September 2011, we achieved the second and final sales milestone of $100.0 million and paid $5.0 million in cash for an aggregate with the first sales milestone of $10.0 million. We capitalized the $10.0 million associated with these milestones as intangible assets. These intangible assets are being amortized over the estimated useful life of 8.6 years. As of December 2011, we have met all of the contractual milestones related to FUSILEV. (vi) License Agreement with Sloan-Kettering Institute, SRI International and Southern Research Institute, FOLOTYN In December 2002, Allos entered into the FOLOTYN License Agreement with Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, SRI International and Southern Research Institute. As a result of Allos becoming our wholly owned subsidiary effective September 5, 2012, on a consolidated basis we are bound by the FOLOTYN License Agreement under which we obtained exclusive worldwide rights to a portfolio of patents and patent applications related to FOLOTYN and its uses. Under the terms of the FOLOTYN License Agreement, we are required to fund all development programs and will have sole responsibility for all commercialization activities. In addition, we pay the licensors royalties based on worldwide graduated annual levels of net sales of FOLOTYN, net of actual rebates, chargebacks and returns, or distributor sales, which may be different than our net product revenue recognized in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, or sublicense revenues arising from sublicensing the product, if and when such sales or sublicenses occur. For purposes of the FOLOTYN License Agreement, annual worldwide sales consists of our distributor sales and annual net sales of FOLOTYN in the Mundipharma Territories, as reported to us under the Mundipharma Collaboration Agreement, if and when such sales occur in the Mundipharma Territories. Royalties are 8% of annual worldwide sales up to $150.0 million; 9% of annual worldwide sales of $150.0 million through $300.0 million; and 11% of annual worldwide sales in excess of $300.0 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, our royalties were 8% of our net distributor sales. As of September 30, 2013, accrued royalties were $0.9 million and are included in “accounts payable and accrued obligations” on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. (vii) License Agreement with Cydex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Captisol-enabled, Propyleneglycol-free Melphalan See Note 8(b) above. (viii) Exclusive Development and Commercialization Collaboration Agreement with Allergan, Apaziquone In October 2008, we signed an exclusive development and commercialization collaboration agreement with Allergan for Apaziquone. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Allergan paid us an up-front non-refundable $41.5 million at closing and is obligated to make additional payments based on the achievement of certain development, regulatory and commercialization milestones. Under the terms of the original agreement, we were entitled to payment of $57.5 million and $245.0 million upon achievement of certain regulatory and commercialization milestones, respectively, of which $1.5 million has been achieved following completion of enrollment in clinical trials, per the terms of the license, development, supply and distribution agreement. Also, Allergan agreed to pay us tiered royalties starting in the mid-teens based on a percentage of net sales of Apaziquone outside of the U.S. and Asia, which specific rates are subject to confidential treatment pursuant to an order by the SEC. On January 29, 2013, we entered into a second amendment to the license, development, supply and distribution agreement with Allergan to amend the agreement and reacquire the rights originally licensed to Allergan in the U.S., Europe, and other territories in exchange for a tiered single-digit royalty on certain products containing Apaziquone, and relieved Allergan of its obligations for development, commercialization and other activities. As a result of the second amendment to the agreement with Allergan, Allergan has no remaining obligations to us, and we have no remaining performance obligations to them. However, we are obligated to pay Allergan a tiered single-digit royalty not to exceed mid-single digits based upon the net sales, when and if earned, of certain products containing Apaziquone in specified territories. Additionally, we are obligated to pay any royalties or other payments due to certain licensors of underlying intellectual property, as well as to provide indemnification of Allergan for claims arising from the manufacture, development, or commercialization of pharmaceutical products containing Apaziquone by us.
(ix) Collaboration Agreement with Nippon Kayaku Co. LTD., Apaziquone In November 2009, we entered into a collaboration agreement with Nippon Kayaku Co., LTD. (“Nippon Kayaku”) for the development and commercialization of Apaziquone in Asia, except North and South Korea (the “Nippon Kayaku Territory”). In addition, Nippon Kayaku received exclusive rights to Apaziquone for the treatment of non muscle invasive bladder cancer in Asia (other than North and South Korea), including Japan and China. Nippon Kayaku will conduct apaziquone clinical trials in the Nippon Kayaku Territory pursuant to a development plan. Further, Nippon Kayaku will be responsible for all expenses relating to the development and commercialization of Apaziquone in the Nippon Kayaku Territory. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, Nippon Kayaku paid Spectrum an upfront fee of $15.0 million and is obligated to make additional payments based on the achievement of certain development, regulatory and commercialization milestones. Under the terms of the agreement, we are entitled to payment of $10.0 million and $126.0 million upon achievement of certain regulatory and commercialization milestones, respectively. Also, Nippon Kayaku has agreed to pay us royalties based on a percentage of net sales of the subject products in the defined territory in the mid-teen digits. The agreement will remain in effect, on a country-by-country basis, until the expiration of the obligation of Nippon Kayaku to pay royalties on sales of the subject products in such country. Our license agreement with Nippon Kayaku provides for payments to us upon the achievement of development milestones, such as the completion of clinical trials or regulatory submissions, approvals by health authorities, and commercial launches of drug candidates. Given the challenges inherent in developing and obtaining approval for drug products and in achieving commercial launches, there was substantial uncertainty whether any such milestones would be achieved at the time of execution of such license agreement. In addition, we continue to evaluate whether the development milestones, none of which have been achieved to date, meet the remaining criteria to be considered substantive. As a result of our analysis, we consider our development milestones under the Nippon Kayaku license agreement to be substantive and, accordingly, we expect to recognize as revenue future payments received from such milestones only if and as each milestone is achieved. (x) Licensing and Collaboration Agreement with TopoTarget, belinostat In February 2010, we entered into a licensing and collaboration agreement with TopoTarget A/S (“TopoTarget”), for the development and commercialization of belinostat, pursuant to which we agreed to collaboration for the development and commercialization of belinostat. The agreement provides that we have the exclusive right to make, develop and commercialize belinostat in North America and India, with an option for China. The agreement also grants TopoTarget a co-promote option if and only if we do not maintain a minimum number (subject to adjustment for certain events outside of our control) of field personnel (as defined in the agreement) for a certain number of years post-approval of the PTCL indication. Under the terms of the agreement, all development, including studies, will be conducted under a joint development plan and in accordance with a mutually agreed upon target product profile provided that we have final decision-making authority for all developmental activities in North America and India (and China upon exercise of the option for China) and TopoTarget has final decision-making authority for all developmental activities in all other jurisdictions. We have agreed to assume all responsibility for and future costs of the ongoing registrational PTCL trial. We and TopoTarget will conduct future planned clinical trials pursuant to the joint development plan, of which we will fund 70% of the development costs and TopoTarget will fund 30% of the development costs. We and TopoTarget will each pay 50% of the costs for chemical, pharmaceutical and other process development related to the manufacturing of the product that are incurred with a mutually agreed upon budget in the joint development plan. TopoTarget is responsible for supplying us with both clinical and commercial product. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, we paid TopoTarget an upfront fee of $30.0 million. In addition, on the successful achievement of certain development, regulatory and sales milestones, none of which have been achieved to date, we are obligated to issue 1.0 million shares of our common stock (subject to certain resale conditions) and pay TopoTarget up to $313.0 million. Also, we will pay TopoTarget royalties in the mid-teen digits based on net sales of the subject product in the defined territory. None of such royalties have been earned or paid since inception of the agreement. The agreement will continue until the expiration of the last royalty payment period in the last country in the defined territory with certain provisions surviving, unless earlier terminated in accordance with its terms. We may terminate this agreement with 180 days notice to TopoTarget. We may also terminate immediately upon a prohibition on the use of the subject product or clinical hold by the FDA. TopoTarget may also terminate immediately in the event of a challenge (without TopoTarget’s consent) by us of the patents that cover the product.
(xi) Co-Development and Commercialization Agreement with Hanmi Pharmaceutical Company, SPI-2012 In late January 2012, we entered into a co-development and commercialization agreement with Hanmi Pharmaceutical Company, (“Hanmi”), for SPI-2012, formerly known as “LAPS-GCSF”, a drug for the treatment of chemotherapy induced neutropenia based on Hanmi’s proprietary LAPSCOVERY™ Technology. In consideration for the rights granted to us under the co-development and commercialization agreement with Hanmi, we paid Hanmi a fee which is included in “research and development expense” in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations because the technology has not yet achieved regulatory approval. Under the terms of the agreement, we will share the costs and expenses of the study with Hanmi, although we will have primary responsibility for them. If SPI-2012 is ultimately commercialized by us, we will have worldwide rights except for Korea, China and Japan upon payment of fees and milestone payments related to further development, regulatory approvals and sales targets. (c) Service Agreements In connection with the research and development of our drug products, we have entered into contracts with numerous third party service providers, such as radio-pharmacies, distributors, clinical trial centers, clinical research organizations, data monitoring centers, and with drug formulation, development and testing laboratories. The financial terms of these agreements are varied and generally obligate us to pay in stages, depending on achievement of certain events specified in the agreements, such as contract execution, reservation of service or production capacity, actual performance of service, or the successful accrual and dosing of patients. At each period end, we accrue for all costs of goods and services received, with such accruals based on factors such as estimates of work performed, patient enrollment, completion of patient studies and other events. We are in a position to accelerate, slow-down or discontinue any or all of the projects that we are working on at any given point in time. Should we decide to discontinue and/or slow-down the work on any project, the associated costs for those projects would be limited to the extent of the work completed. Generally, we are able to terminate these contracts due to the discontinuance of the related project(s) and thus avoid paying for the services that have not yet been rendered and our future purchase obligations would reduce accordingly. (d) Supply Agreements In connection with our joint venture arrangement with CTI (see (b)(i) above), we entered into an amendment to the original supply agreement between Biogen and CTI, referred to as the CTI/Biogen Supply Agreement, modifying certain of the pricing and manufacturing technology transfer terms contained in the CTI/Biogen Supply Agreement and also providing that the term of the agreement may be shortened in some instances in the event of a mid-term manufacturing technology transfer. There are no milestone or royalty payments required pursuant to this agreement. The term of the agreement is until the manufacturing technology transfer is complete. (e) Employment Agreement We have entered into an employment agreement with Dr. Rajesh C. Shrotriya, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, which expires January 2, 2014. The employment agreement automatically renews for subsequent one-year calendar terms unless either party gives written notice of such party’s intent not to renew the agreement at least 90 days prior to the commencement of the new term. Payment and benefits would become payable to Dr. Shrotriya in the event of termination by us for any reason other than cause, upon a change in control of the Company, or by Dr. Shrotriya for good reason. (f) Deferred Compensation Plan On September 2, 2011, the Board of Directors approved the Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan is intended to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the board of directors, or a designee or designees of the Compensation Committee. The Plan is intended to be an unfunded plan which is maintained primarily to provide deferred compensation benefits for a select group of our employees including management, as selected by the Plan administrator (the “Participants”). Under the Plan, we provide the Participants with the opportunity to make annual elections to defer up to a specified amount or percentage of their eligible cash compensation, as established by the Plan administrator, and we have the option to make discretionary contributions. At September 30, 2013, deferrals and contributions totaling $3.7 million are included in “other accrued obligations” in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. (g) Litigation We make provisions for liabilities when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Such provisions are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted to reflect the impact of any settlement negotiations, judicial and administrative rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other information and events pertaining to a particular case. Litigation is inherently unpredictable. Although the ultimate resolution of these various matters cannot be determined at this time, we do not believe that such matters, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our condensed consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. We are presently responding to certain shareholder suits that purportedly stem from our March 12, 2013 press release, in which we announced anticipated changes in customer ordering patterns of FUSILEV. These complaints allege that, as a result of the March 12, 2013 press release, our stock price declined. The complaints further allege that during the putative class period certain defendants made misleadingly optimistic statements about FUSILEV sales, which inflated the trading price of our stock. The lawsuits seek relief in the form of monetary damages, costs and fees, and any other equitable or injunctive relief that the court deems appropriate. We from time-to-time are involved in other claims and legal proceedings of a nature considered normal and incidental to our business. These matters may include product liability, intellectual property, employment, and other general claims. Shareholder Litigation Mark J. Sherwin v. Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Filed September 3, 2013 in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware; Case Number 8858). The complaint seeks inspection of Spectrum’s books and records under Delaware Code section 220. Specifically, the complaint seeks inspection of books and records concerning whether Spectrum’s officers and directors breached their fiduciary duties by causing the Company to make false statements concerning the performance of FUSILEV. The complaint also seeks fees and costs.
(h) SEC Subpoena On April 1, 2013, we received a subpoena from the SEC for documents pursuant to a formal order of investigation. The subpoena followed our March 12, 2013 announcement that we anticipated a change in customer ordering patterns of FUSILEV. We continue to cooperate with this SEC investigation, though we cannot predict its outcome, or the timing of resolution. |
Business Combinations - Supplemental Pro Forma Financial Information (Detail) (USD $)
In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
|
Business Combinations [Abstract] | ||||
Pro Forma Total revenues | $ 42,439 | $ 69,042 | $ 114,338 | $ 197,603 |
Pro Forma Cost of product sales | 8,221 | 11,155 | 22,271 | 31,402 |
Pro Forma Total operating expenses | 53,026 | 51,633 | 140,911 | 133,570 |
Pro Forma Net income (loss) | $ (5,112) | $ 15,824 | $ (17,062) | $ 81,011 |
Pro Forma Net income (loss) per share - basic | $ (0.09) | $ 0.27 | $ (0.29) | $ 1.38 |
Pro Forma Net income (loss) per share - diluted | $ (0.09) | $ 0.24 | $ (0.29) | $ 1.24 |
'QC%YRFO^5/Q-:^?RDLS.Q4'F-SE/`&KJ/%Q
M47S35M?N<'JH7'/+M?C_!8;P$/52[G`!^JJGU]HQ](O3TH_/`_````__\#
M`%!+`P04``8`"````"$`,X3/D:`#```Q"P``&0```'AL+W=O &UL
ME)5=;]HP%(;O)^T_6+YOG"\(182J4'6KM$G3M(]KDSC$(HDCVY3VW^_8AI0`
MS>@-Q.0];Y[S'N/,[E[J"CTSJ;AH4AQX/D:LR43.FW6*?_]ZO)E@I#1M PNZ)%OD;U^=';0
MBB;GG7:K\K5>0)*M;^P[(X^P%%/!'U:R=:T)<^GZ.0'+Z8JHE9PU];4+\WN>
MP2]NUWI(+0A &%]_)18Z5`.$4_4;$^QZR9922\L6$8SF_>\0K`%`:=3Q"A^M+O&S2Q#IN!
M@L*-&Y"5LB$Y^O2#'E/N$LHKK>`RQKD\2QK5G<]2*SU')8X_2*.V@L^Z06T(T:F\;5>G?0=M:+KF+C?<*6C(EJMX!"--3)LLU&E%J,Y)CBCH
M.Z+^&P0-W
2!=(.SB"QLD.VF#2I*QIT]9)6RW;K"^XT\WYGC"VENPL
M_CZGL?/FS&7GY.)%&CNUL&-K.[;2U.#9DRD*0Y/L(&,<8[Z4%3]F\=%]0.
M?#:8,25-,,&G*H&AAQZ8/(#DMQS-TJV_````__\#`%!+`P04``8`"````"$`
M:"0@<-4+```7:P``#0```'AL+W-T>6QE
_$'8D'(T3&+4,2(40^]['H_V2G^"L"/H0X\
MNX9@GB1TFX^YUR#S?4/,->+#B2Z-B`<1C=#JI,/LQ1%^X/M!]2'O&IN#R&-%
MS(HENSPQU\%0L\R%*8$?Z;887.E7&$&P+PLV?E2'OYF/*O1G.(RWRA-:.'C4
M4B.:*G161S!?\'VB+OJS>TC2UHRX.!`UQ7+<`>]L?7'_Z>93,LF$[F1Q%2&/
MNV!1/48`1@7/J,9-_HRS)$+`$B5_\8XS'#3<+'X]_B`?79D*H6_;TDMT\4@5
M54)7DD*5?P);8'&M-YG4IEK??)HS/Z/585F9'[DIJ`K%FH/-^UG7E9$RVBGR
M7K